Rachel just did the fancy solve to avoid embarrassing the comedians with the simple version: (100/25)x(75-3)+1 Rachel's fancy sum uses (100-3)x3-2 with the second 3 provided by 75=3x25 while the 2 is provided by 50=2x25. So it is: [(100-3)x(3x25)-(2x25)]/25
Rachel Riley And Susie Dent Share SMUTTY Stories | Best Of Cats Does Countdown Series 26 | Channel 4 1825pm 25.8.24 i like the words section of the show. it's like flags of the world but with.............. errr words. more of this. james whale started all this off with his great cunts.....
@@Aye-McHunt 26.8.24 1714pm terribel joking aside... the serious side to this was: messrs master and bates went bust trying to convince the populace that their warehouse project was worth investing in...
@@johnmanning5568 yes it's mathematics. math. it's not mathsematics. Just like most things british people argue about, word wise, math was first, then math's. All in a vain attempt to try to prove themselves smarter than American's.
@@Drianikaben unfortunately your English is atrocious. You cannot even spell the simple plural word “Americans”. Why put an apostrophe in the word? To pluralise an English word in the vast majority of cases then simply add a letter “s”. Thus, one American, two Americans. An apostrophe isn’t used to make a singular noun into a plural noun. Hopefully your maths is better than your English!
We all know British television comedy has been light-years ahead of us for decades. Also, Tom Allen is a quick-witted genius. But Sarah Millican is their national treasure.
Here in the states we don't get this style of humor on tv due to our censors. Granted this would be aired late nite but it's actually good humor. Better than foul mouthed comics who rely on cursing vs actual humor.
Susie Dent .. As apart of the commonwealth I want to thank you for years of entertainment and fun.. From Canada with love thank you for .. give’r The slang word give’r, or any number of other variant spellings, is used in Canada to mean to give it all you’ve got or to try as hard as possible at something.
It's just an algebraic manipulation (specifically, the distributive property) that enables you to effectively use a number twice without actually using it twice. Start with 3 * 100 = 300, and note that you'd like to reduce this by 11. Taking off 3 * 3 = 9 would help, and you can make another 3 with 75/25, but you've already used the first 3. But the distributive property tells us that 100*3 - 3*3 is equal to (100-3) * 3 Take a 3 off the 100 _before_ multiplying by 3, and you've effectively used the first 3 twice. So we're at (100-3) * 75/25 That's 291. Now, can you make a 2 to take away to get to 289? Well, 50/25 = 2, but you've already used the 25. Algebra to the rescue! What we want is (100-3) * 75/25 - 50/25 That can be rearranged as ((100-3) * 75) / 25 - 50/25 and then, with the distributive property, that's equal to ((100-3) * 75 - 50) / 25 which is exactly what Rachel did. The reason she asked for a calculator to verify is because she hadn't done those steps in that order yet, so didn't yet know that the intermediate calculations would give a 7275 and 7225, and she wanted to make sure it was right. TL;DR: Rachel effectively did 3 * 100 = 300 75 / 25 = 3 3 * 3 = 9 300 - 9 = 291 50 / 25 = 2 291 - 2 = 289 but just did a couple of algebraic manipulations to avoid actually using the 3 and the 25 twice.
If all you’re looking for is verbal pornography and smut then yes! The Brit’s are funnier. My idea of funny is someone who can make you laugh without resorting filthy content.
![Big Fat Quiz Of The Year Marathon | 2014 & 2015 Full Episode [4K] | Absolute Jokes](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rPpjNLna04g/mqdefault.jpg)
I love Richard getting increasingly frustrated at everyone doubting he was in Paddington 2 haha
I had to look it up also. I wasn't sure he was in it either. Lol 'I don't remember...' 🤔
"Why would I lie about something so banal." Good point. I believed him then.
That solve by Rachel at 28:14 was amazing. Only improvement would be to multiply by one to use all the numbers!
Rachel just did the fancy solve to avoid embarrassing the comedians with the simple version: (100/25)x(75-3)+1
Rachel's fancy sum uses (100-3)x3-2 with the second 3 provided by 75=3x25 while the 2 is provided by 50=2x25.
So it is: [(100-3)x(3x25)-(2x25)]/25
That was like Einstein level
There is a quicker way to do it, its simple maths if you know the formula 😝
I love Richard saying he wishes he could get that enthusiasm back.
" Staines " LOL
Rachel Riley And Susie Dent Share SMUTTY Stories | Best Of Cats Does Countdown Series 26 | Channel 4 1825pm 25.8.24 i like the words section of the show. it's like flags of the world but with.............. errr words. more of this. james whale started all this off with his great cunts.....
Always knew Susie Dent was pure filth! 🤣
Siemens were going to build a warehouse there until someone pointed out that it would become known as the Siemens' Staines Warehouse.
@@Aye-McHunt 26.8.24 1714pm terribel joking aside... the serious side to this was: messrs master and bates went bust trying to convince the populace that their warehouse project was worth investing in...
Ahhh...this American didn't get the joke. Thank you.
As an American, it’s so sad to admit that the British comedians are so much more funny than the Americans.
She’s Canadian. Lol
But Conan O'Brien is American and he is extremely funny? Conan O'Brien Must Go is a hoot! 🙂
You should get used to that feeling dude, American isn’t the top in everything
Americans have Amy Schumer, the funniest woman in the world.
@@Okurka. Not sure if satire or serious, lol...
Fabio is the only person of whom I can honestly quip "Didn't recognize you with clothes on".
Rachel's math at 28:10 omfg......what a badass
*Rachel’s maths. The word is mathematics not mathematic.
@@johnmanning5568
Nit?
@@null6634 I was telling him that he’s a nit to spell the word as “math” .
@@johnmanning5568 yes it's mathematics. math. it's not mathsematics. Just like most things british people argue about, word wise, math was first, then math's. All in a vain attempt to try to prove themselves smarter than American's.
@@Drianikaben unfortunately your English is atrocious. You cannot even spell the simple plural word “Americans”. Why put an apostrophe in the word? To pluralise an English word in the vast majority of cases then simply add a letter “s”. Thus, one American, two Americans. An apostrophe isn’t used to make a singular noun into a plural noun. Hopefully your maths is better than your English!
We all know British television comedy has been light-years ahead of us for decades. Also, Tom Allen is a quick-witted genius. But Sarah Millican is their national treasure.
ooh no, you can have Millican if you want
It's around year five you start to think "did I do something wrong?"
I see Susie Dent and smut in the same sentence and I click immediately
Having watched them get repeatedly shocked and watching their movements, they could use this technique on zombie actors. Works great! 😂
I have to admit as soon as I saw Fabio in Rachel's place I was kind if hoping to see Rachel in Fabio's outfit.
I quite like midlife crisis Jon. 😂❤
Wow that hair (wig) really looks good on Jon.
0:04 - anyone know what comic strip that is? Best outfit Susie's had in years really.
Fun fact: ripened cheese has les or no lactose depending on the length of the ripening time.
Here in the states we don't get this style of humor on tv due to our censors.
Granted this would be aired late nite but it's actually good humor. Better than foul mouthed comics who rely on cursing vs actual humor.
That lightning round is the funniest thing I remember seeing this year.
Rachel at 00:50 immediately holds ones attention haha
add 2:53
Hummina!!!
It just makes you stop breathing for a moment.
@@brianhaygood183 ... and worth every second!!!
Katherine's at 14:37
How does Susie Dent look EXACTLY the same in the flashback clip?
Moisturizer
Black magic.
and how much better does Laura look?
As a lexicographer, I imagine she knows all the secret words and incantations that makes her basically a witch.
@@jlaakso1706 I wonder if she floats.
Susie Dent .. As apart of the commonwealth I want to thank you for years of entertainment and fun.. From Canada with love thank you for .. give’r
The slang word give’r, or any number of other variant spellings, is used in Canada to mean to give it all you’ve got or to try as hard as possible at something.
New clips?! I couldn't click fast enough
27:40
75 - 3 = 72
100 / 25 = 4
72 x 4 = 288
288 + 1 = *289*
What the FUCK was that calculation to get 289? How the hell would she know to get it that way. Holy hell.
It's just an algebraic manipulation (specifically, the distributive property) that enables you to effectively use a number twice without actually using it twice.
Start with 3 * 100 = 300, and note that you'd like to reduce this by 11. Taking off 3 * 3 = 9 would help, and you can make another 3 with 75/25, but you've already used the first 3.
But the distributive property tells us that
100*3 - 3*3
is equal to
(100-3) * 3
Take a 3 off the 100 _before_ multiplying by 3, and you've effectively used the first 3 twice. So we're at
(100-3) * 75/25
That's 291. Now, can you make a 2 to take away to get to 289? Well, 50/25 = 2, but you've already used the 25.
Algebra to the rescue! What we want is
(100-3) * 75/25 - 50/25
That can be rearranged as
((100-3) * 75) / 25 - 50/25
and then, with the distributive property, that's equal to
((100-3) * 75 - 50) / 25
which is exactly what Rachel did. The reason she asked for a calculator to verify is because she hadn't done those steps in that order yet, so didn't yet know that the intermediate calculations would give a 7275 and 7225, and she wanted to make sure it was right.
TL;DR: Rachel effectively did
3 * 100 = 300
75 / 25 = 3
3 * 3 = 9
300 - 9 = 291
50 / 25 = 2
291 - 2 = 289
but just did a couple of algebraic manipulations to avoid actually using the 3 and the 25 twice.
Rachel Riley is the most attractive woman on this Planet. Fact.
If there were to be a race with several fortune-tellers, there would be no point in more than one (the known winner), running the race.
Great headphones.
Joes in the hole once was great.
The first 90 seconds puts american TV to shame.
Who was that doing th Don Rodolfo Martini Toyota? That was bizarre, but quite a ride.
I will answer myself that it is Ciarán Dowd
28:16 Super(b) Rachel! Dang
Which episode is the guy with the black jacket?
S26 e3, Ciarán Dowd as Don Rodolfo
@@jackmarshall1253 thank you
@@langerzzz5652it’s here on TH-cam if ya looking up full episodes 😊
Nails on a chalkboard does not bother me, but Kemah’s voice is so cringe inducing and horrible.
No, it really isn't.
A bit like you then, cringe inducing and horrible 🤔
It’s awful
That and her entire personality are so contrived. It's somehow worse than Kristen Schaal.
I don't mind her personality as much but her voice makes me want to die
🤣🤣🤣
John plays Barry Gibb???
A-a-ha
What happened to Laura?
weird island
Wow, Laura looked so lovely. What happened???
She had cancer in 2021. I'm guessing this was around that time.
Kathrine is 40? Gorgeous
24:19 absolutely killed me hahahaah
Seeing fabio with clothes on is...weird
Rosie Jones is the exact opposite of funny.
If you think there is no racism in UK then please tell me how Rachel Riley is still working there 💀💀
Cause she's not racist? And a massive amount of people are racist, and employed, lol.
Why do they keep seating awful unfunny comedians next to Susie? The cringe is unbearable.
Kemah should never be on this show ever again
Why is this edited so poorly?
That woman spitting it out was gross…..
3:12: Cockermouth...?
If all you’re looking for is verbal pornography and smut then yes! The Brit’s are funnier. My idea of funny is someone who can make you laugh without resorting filthy content.
ahhh yes, season 26, horrible horrible season
I really like those shows, but they are getting stale...
Whoa. Laura used to be hot
Pity there aren't any funny shows in N America.
WTF happened to Laura, FFS?
Please don't add fake audience reactions CH4.
Richard Ayowade ?? what a boar and no humour at all, be good to keep him off the show.
Just not the same without Sean lock
They should bring him back.
@@null6634 I'm pretty sure he'd have found that comment truly hilarious.
she used 25 twice
No she didn't?
Numbers were (in descending numerical order) 100, 75, 50, 25, 3, 1
Rachel's calculation was
100-3=97 [1̶0̶0̶ 3̶ 75 50 25 1]
97x75=7275 [1̶0̶0̶ 3̶ 7̶5̶ 50 25 1]
7275-50=7225 [1̶0̶0̶ 3̶ 7̶5̶ 5̶0̶ 25 1]
7275÷25=289 [1̶0̶0̶ 3̶ 7̶5̶ 5̶0̶ 2̶5̶ 1]
24:06 Oh wtf, all the others were dressed to the part!
She has the bowtie, as you'd hope, but...