Law of Torts - Rylands vs. Fletcher

[@anamkhan-yq8yp]

the strict liability is based on the rule of rylands v fletcher

[@dishabaruachowdhury1022]

thanks for helping

[@yasheshahuja302]

bhtt badia vgood.very good narration -_-✌️✌️

[@yashthakar9441]

very good video , excellent narration

[@actionmoviesofficial6537]

Fuck.... Vedio

[@abdarazqalsheikh5970]

If the explanation was in English it was be a great

[@haidernaqvi92110]

bahut badiya sir....khush rhe aap...

[@praveenpandey1176]

Thank you

[@summayyamulla4910]

Tqqqqq

[@komalgupta4961]

it is very easy to learn
# fabulous

[@RamanSingh-bp7ze]

You are not explaining the whole case. Just reading it, that anyone can do. Please explain it fully, every line.

[@akankshasp4087]

The video was promptly descriptive but your explanations needs a bit of work. Thanks anyway

[@madhvisharma5401]

it's strict liability or absolute liability? which liability applicable on this case

[@kaushikdey9873]

Madhvi Sharma this is strict liability, absolute liability is applicable only in Indian law

[@Ayakomx]

This video says that Fletcher is a plaintiff. But isn't he a defendant?

[@jessicaatkinson9629]

this is crazy late but in case anyone reads this:
plaintiff is the one bringing the charges: that's fletcher as his mine was damaged
defendant is the one being accused: thats ryland whos reservoir escaped and caused the flood

[@richapanjwani1020]

Mc mehta vs union of india case is nt availabel

[@suparnabandyopadhyay3592]

How strict liability differs from strict liability?

[@kartikpandey8448]

are you high 🤣🤣🤣

[@MehediHasan-bp7ox]

Fletcher was the defender

[@aakritidaksh3568]

Why aren't you able to pronounce even the simple words like disused? And spelling mistakes like came into contact ?

[@snehal2344]

U r only reading it.. no use of watching the video..

[@GauravKumar-zn5he]

U are not even reading properly what's written 😑

[@Girlwithpain0401]

Aap thik se samjha nai pa rahe ho 😒😒

[@arpitasarkar5669]

Very bad