If all things went well for India (realistically). 1 Partition happens properly & systematically, with full 100% population exchange. 2 Patel becomes 1st PM. 3 India sends Indian army & annex full Kashmir instead of going to UN & losing face. 4 India now has direct access to central Asia. 5 India does not support China's annexation of Tibet & Tibet remains a separate Nation. 6. India accepts UNSC permeant seat when offered by USA & USSR. 7. Mass industrialization & capitalist economy resembling China of our timeline. 8. New super power by 2000.
@@ReldrikGeoit is like in 1947 british left/kicked out from india. Since goa was very small it wasn't much effected since it have nothing to do with british raj and famine. It acted like a Portuguese embassy. Like how the part of france in south america part of french country, not a colony. Also india was busy stabilizing the mess created by british they don't wanna go to another war. During 1960 when UN asked them to give freedom to their lands outside Portugal, they said 'Na', which piss off india because they were in peace talk with portugal to give them back the goa. So India Warned them to leave or get ready for a war in 1961, since by that time Portugal was not as strong as India, so they said you can have the land but if people wanna join us we would allow them. Thats why people of Portuguese colonies in India born before 1961 and their 2 generation can get default citizenship of Portugal if they wanted
@@felidaebi6239they actually did have a war but it only lasted 2 days or something It started when Portuguese soldiers fired on a Indian vessel, killing one person India then sent it's air force, army and navy Portugal blew up bridges to slow advance and Salazar ordered his men to go for scorched earth policy but the governor general of Portuguese India surrendered and Goa became a part of India Portugal tried to send more vessels but Egypt didn't allow them to pass 👍
8:47 it is historically accurate Sikkim,Goa,Daman and diu(Green),Pondicherry(blue) where not part of the British Raj. Sikkim was annexed into India,Goa was a portugese colony,Pondicherry was french and daman and diu were dutch.
nepal also wanted to join india but india did not wanted since india had no money to fight china immediately after indipendance,back then china captured tibet and also wanted to capture nepal
@@Not_Deb ha,waise bhe nepal ke gdp india s he chalti h,jo log a jate h india me as labours btw or 2 nehru k blunder vallabh bhai ne solve kar dia.telengana and lakshwadweep
Nepal was never willing to join india neither we want..why should we?? we are older than india and nepal is nepal...our religion can be the same but not our mentality...nepal is nepal.....there is saying king offered that but who is king to offer he is just a king we made him king and most importantly nepal is not his father property to give whoever he wants...
Personally i wont consider it as what if everything went PERFECT with India coz its potraying that everything was fine with India before British. Westerners dont have any much detailed knowledge of India before Britishers. The peak of India was during Mauryan and Gupta Empire when there was peace in the sub-continent too. During the mughals and Islamic period, estimated shows that 80-280 million people were killed by the muslim invaders and it demoralised the people and created a divide between hindus and muslims and as usual hindus were given the choice to beheaded, give jizya( a tax given my non-muslim for their protection from the rulers) or become zimmi (servants) and mostly people become zimmi so that they can survive as any other non-muslim nation. Those horrors were even terrifying than the british empire. Then came the british who were cleaver and moreover used the demoraslised people to divide and rule them and used to whitewash the indians in the name of education agaist their own people which made people disliking their own culture, traditions and civilisation. Hindus are pretty much like jews surviving Islam and Christianity. That is why there are just 3 hindu majority nation India, Nepal and Mauritius and only 1 big country India and thats also Democracy due to the Hindus. Pakistan was made on Hindu muslim divide and tried to potray itself as it is democratic but this created a lot of the problems in present day Pakistan. I mean you cant make a nation in the name of Islam and then say it has democratic and secular values. I mean the problems created by Islam and Christianity due to the concept of conversion and conquering nations is insane. Cant imagine how much of culture, traditions and things might be destroyed. At the end Of 12th Century Invader Bakhityar Khilji Demolished the Nalanda which was the first early University where students from all across Korea, Sri Lanka, Tibet, China and ofc India came to get knowledge and killed the monks and burned it. It had so much texts and knowlegle that it burned continiously for 3 months and was the most important and valueable thing we lost. Disclaimer - This was just a general look throught an Indian perspective and doesnt meant to harm anyone's religious sentiments but humanity will always be above any religion anyday.
Its better we got partitioned. Just imagine the Chaos that would have caused by those muslims considering Indian politics favoured them at those times 😵.
31:06 No, Nepal's culture is more Indian. Nepal is also the most Hindu nation by percentage of population and one among 3 hindu majority nations other 2 being India and Mauritius. Also yes, Nepal and Bhutan were British Protectorates like Sikkim but were more independent so didn't continue the same with India. Sikkim continued and was a country till 1975 after which it had a referendum and was annexed to India. So Nepal and Bhutan could have joined.
Pondicherry is 1 of 4 districts geographically separated across Southern India, and the collective is called Puducherry. Pondicherry is the largest one and practical capital of Puducherry. The other 3 are Karaikal, Mahe and Yanam.
I am indian and I have a lot of nepali friends, coz they moved here. They is majority hindu population in nepal, so it would technically join india rather than tibet.
" _What If India Was Unified?!_ " . .................................................... Then we would had 400 million more head-aches. Try and figure out the sub-text of that statement.
28:00 See how people who wants united India is talking about "united south Asia" and avoiding calling it United India? That's where the problem starts.
26:53 India would absolutely partner with USA but I think India at that time was still trying to find it footing in the then present geopolitical landscape. Indians/Hindus are rather pro-West and pro-Israel except India would hate interference into internal affairs which USA is notorious for.
@@ReldrikGeo I'm just watching the video and after listening to the South Asia comment, I have an excellent reaction suggestion for you. Kraut's video India and Pakistan a continuing story, it is very insightful and although long at 48 minutes, you'll like it.
Nice reaction. Your analysis is better than the video you reacted to. To see the flip side, please react on "How The India Pakistan Partition Actually SAVED India"
I don't know anything about Soros so I can't speak on it. As far as US elections I still think Trump will win despite his felony charges he got recently. In fact this pushed his base to be even more in support of him.
@@ReldrikGeo What about the surge of illegal immigrants who are likely to vote for democrats. And why do you guys allow people to vote without having an ID of any sorts? I follow conservative twins on YT and I have learnt from various other videos that the democrats have opened the borders to foster illegal immigrants and gain votes. Is that true?
If India was unified it would have Economic Liberalization way Earlier like as soon as 1978 with China or even earlier and it would likely have a Per capita income of $10,000 taking the population of South Asia as of present it's 1.9 Billion that means somewhere around $19 Trillion or even more now all of that depends on when does Unified India gets off from it's Socialistic policies taken down under Jawaharlal Nehru and Adopts Liberalisation and Privatization also China was Build up upon US aid to counter Russia so India being there and Democracy USA would have preferred a stable Nation like India but bot China at all and we would definitely have the role of China to fill that means we can certainly Overpass even USA in GDP and the fact that India's population peak would hit by 2065 Makes India having 41 Years still to grow on 6-7 Percent GDP growth for straight 41 Years literally making it a Behemoth Giant with a GDP of $190 Trillion by 2065 and a Per capita income of $100,000 some may think it to be Unrealistic but that's the reality because Unified India would have it's Young population ageing only by 2065 upto the levels of China in 2024 and still it would be maintaing a GDP growth of 4-5 Percent.
India was divided because of the urgency of Britain to leave India , giving basically everyone a power that they could claim their own states and land ownership for themselves , Basically Britain thought that every major King or Political figure would be greedy enough to claim a separate state for themselves and Massive internal civil war would destroy Indian hope for freedom from Britishers and they would finally intervene to colonise India again but this time with the support of local prominent figures. Insidious plan right , and guess what that actually happened but not on a scale which Britishers contemplated or hoped . The conflict was widely spread mainly by Jinna founder of Pakistan because he was able to unify maximum Muslim population under his own dream , most sus thing was that Jinna actually died just after 1 year of creating Pakistan. So only Muslim majority states were separated initially Like East and West Pakistan , but Nizam of Hyderabad and King of Kashmir also got greedy and claimed separate States for themself in middle and Top of India's Map. Every Indian is proud and eternally thankful to Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel for Unifying India because of which we see Current map of India intact today. So because of Patel , Britisher's plan to possibly capture India again , scrapped . As per this video you reacted to seems to be a propaganda video ( maybe ) which does not meets with reality of Mega India Hypothesis. The creator of the video seems to be a victim of common disease which compels him to put India into his western templates , There is vast difference between West and East which he cannot understand and I do not blame him for that because from decades they have been taught only poor things about India intentionally (maybe). And you said rightly , Mega India would have ensured free Tibet and China would not have been dared to do things it tries today. Yes if I negate the expense of effort and resources which have been lost because of Pakistan and China's aggression to this date , I am confident that Mega India would emerged as most powerful ( maybe ) and but surely economically supreme Land today. But still it is not too bad as per the video shown , Yes there are massive challenges but they are slowing us down to reach our full potential , which are being countered very efficiently especially after Narendra Modi came to power.
I personally feel that the video had flaws at least Bhutan and Nepal could have been the part of India, I feel you could have done a better job in making an alternate history for India
Even if India is undivided, It still could have developed the nuclear weapons cause you can't just forget about our very much friendly neighbour China.
Most of the people in India feel sour in heart against the muslims for the creation pakistan. Even the lot of politics today rotate around pakistan problem instead of development. Which is legitimate but unexpected.
i understand nepal, sri lanka and some extent bhutan joining india but not myanmar for sure (almost entirety of our ethnics groups are more chinese) yall can have the rohingya tho
India initially considered becoming a nuclear state because of China, but news of Pakistan being assisted in becoming a nuclear power accelerated our nuclear goal.
Realistically Speaking .... A unified India at that time would not be so good due to following reasons A gigantic growing muslim population would overtake Hindu population and the country would either be riddled with civil wars or it will became an islamic state (only North) Unified India would have definitely sided with soviet union more actively because both country would share a socialist mindset resulting in Proxy wars or sanctions by the USA and west China would not be as aggressive because Unified India would be significant threat so ... India China would most probably be friends even after Tibet annexation (India would let it happen in the name India China good relations) which means a new kind of permanent cold war would perpetually exist between India Russia China and the west
18:32 china wouldn't have been a manufacturing superpower if only india had opened it's door for the foreign companies just a little early (which India couldn't do as India was recovering from it's 200 years long colonial rule & was struggling getting acceptance from the world as a new nation 😢)
This wasn't the reason though, the congress and Indian politicians at large were socialists back then, starting from Nehru. Government control led everything, we only opened our doors because the soviet way of economy had us mortgage gold to the IMF, that's when the LPG (liberalization, globalization and privatization) was introduced by Manmohan SIngh.
Hello Martin, I am writing this comment so that you can better understand how a unified India would form and what would it mean for the world in a manner certainly more comprehensive than that the narrator in this video explained in. To begin, a unified India would never be possible if the leadership that spearheaded the Indian independence movement in the 40s doesn't change. Who were these leaders? Gandhi and Nehru from Congress who advocated for a unified India and Muhammad Ali Jinnah of the Muslim League who advocated for a division based on Hindu-Muslim demographics. Though Gandhi was equally respected by all people in the subcontinent, Nehru was generally not favored as a potential prime minister of independent India by both the common Muslims and their leaders. For the muslims Congress, especially after the resignation of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose(I will address him as Netaji for future references) from the post of party president on 29th April 1939 due to rising tensions with Gandhi, was viewed as a party more inclined to the Hindu causes than theirs. In short, the muslims didn't trust the vision of India that Nehru, and by the 40s, even Gandhi envisioned. No amount of concession would satisfy the Muslim league as long as Nehru stays the leader. So for a unified India, we need one man to somehow emerge victorious as the leader, that being Netaji. Netaji's support surpassed that of Gandhi and unlike Nehru, the Muslim leaders had strong faith in Netaji as a leader. Jinnah himself had quoted multiple times that he would only concede to a unified India only if Netaji were to be the leader of that nation (you can google it up). So in this timeline, one way or the other Netaji emerges victorious in his military campaigns with the INA and the Japanese army in the north east(the only possible way Netaji wins is by breaking through British communication blockades and informing the masses about the INA and the fight to liberate India, inciting a country wide rebellion). If Netaji manages to incite a rebellion in 1945, the consequences it would have on the war is tremendous. I am going to go with the consequences that will be the best for India. 1) The British just leave India without much fight. This is more likely to happen than you think since the British military was spread thin and they simply do not have the resources to quell a large scale rebellion. 2) Netaji emerges as the leader of united India(modern day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, possibly Burma later on but unlikely). 3)The Japanese do not lose Burma immediately. 4) I am going to say India does not declare war on UK or the US, but does support the Japanese via logistics and resources, hopefully no nukes in Mumbai. 5) The Japanese still get nuked, there is no stopping that 6) The allies win, there is no stopping that either 7) The allies do not declare war on India as it too much of a fight 8) The allies definitely sanction India for at least until the 60s(Netaji not only comes to power due to the Japanese and by defeating the British but he also had direct connections with Hitler so there is plenty excuses for sanctions) 9)India develops close ties with the soviets to counter western sanctions 10) Free Tibet would probably exist 11) India would definitely be no.2 in GDP in 2024, closer to the US than China is today. 12) Post war Indo-Japanese and Indo-German relations would be really really interesting to say the least 13) India would certainly be a manufacturing and service economy and not an agricultural economy as it is today. 14) India is a permanent member in UN 15) India would get nukes even earlier
In 1962 indo-china war naheru maybe did good to not retaliate against China even when we have the stronger Air force Because maybe he get the insight that pak will attack india with siding china So he didn't turn the battle into full blown two front war
Nah , Nehru was simply incapable. He never considered the possibility of war with china neither felt that army should be strengthened...Nehru , Krishna Menon and General Kaul were solely the reason we lost the war.
@@intenjiku brother as well as I want bharat mata to expend his arms wideer and wider but untill all muslim of Pakistan and Bangladesh become dharmic it will be disaster for india
If all things went well for India (realistically).
1 Partition happens properly & systematically, with full 100% population exchange.
2 Patel becomes 1st PM.
3 India sends Indian army & annex full Kashmir instead of going to UN & losing face.
4 India now has direct access to central Asia.
5 India does not support China's annexation of Tibet & Tibet remains a separate Nation.
6. India accepts UNSC permeant seat when offered by USA & USSR.
7. Mass industrialization & capitalist economy resembling China of our timeline.
8. New super power by 2000.
Literally the wettest Indian dream
Wrong, the desire for India's Nuclear power was further and more importantly fueled by the 1962 Indo-China war.
Indeed altho id point out that these kinds of events dont exist in a vaccume.
You have actually good knowledge of general geopolitics
I don't know much about other areas but Goa was a Portuguese colony from 1510 to 1961 hence why it was a different colour
Interesting, I was unaware of how much later it was a Portuguese colony
@@ReldrikGeoit is like in 1947 british left/kicked out from india. Since goa was very small it wasn't much effected since it have nothing to do with british raj and famine. It acted like a Portuguese embassy. Like how the part of france in south america part of french country, not a colony.
Also india was busy stabilizing the mess created by british they don't wanna go to another war.
During 1960 when UN asked them to give freedom to their lands outside Portugal, they said 'Na', which piss off india because they were in peace talk with portugal to give them back the goa. So India Warned them to leave or get ready for a war in 1961, since by that time Portugal was not as strong as India, so they said you can have the land but if people wanna join us we would allow them. Thats why people of Portuguese colonies in India born before 1961 and their 2 generation can get default citizenship of Portugal if they wanted
Ever heard about the Goa inquisition by Xavier.@@felidaebi6239
@@felidaebi6239they actually did have a war but it only lasted 2 days or something
It started when Portuguese soldiers fired on a Indian vessel, killing one person
India then sent it's air force, army and navy
Portugal blew up bridges to slow advance and Salazar ordered his men to go for scorched earth policy but the governor general of Portuguese India surrendered and Goa became a part of India
Portugal tried to send more vessels but Egypt didn't allow them to pass 👍
@@ReldrikGeo broooooooooooo india is secular not hindu
8:47 it is historically accurate Sikkim,Goa,Daman and diu(Green),Pondicherry(blue) where not part of the British Raj. Sikkim was annexed into India,Goa was a portugese colony,Pondicherry was french and daman and diu were dutch.
nepal also wanted to join india but india did not wanted since india had no money to fight china immediately after indipendance,back then china captured tibet and also wanted to capture nepal
A huge arrogant blunder by the most lovable chacha Nehru
@@Not_Deb ha,waise bhe nepal ke gdp india s he chalti h,jo log a jate h india me as labours btw or 2 nehru k blunder vallabh bhai ne solve kar dia.telengana and lakshwadweep
Nepal was never willing to join india neither we want..why should we?? we are older than india and nepal is nepal...our religion can be the same but not our mentality...nepal is nepal.....there is saying king offered that but who is king to offer he is just a king we made him king and most importantly nepal is not his father property to give whoever he wants...
@@Xetrii.19 lol why you crying
Nehru blunders 😂😂😂😂
Personally i wont consider it as what if everything went PERFECT with India coz its potraying that everything was fine with India before British. Westerners dont have any much detailed knowledge of India before Britishers. The peak of India was during Mauryan and Gupta Empire when there was peace in the sub-continent too. During the mughals and Islamic period, estimated shows that 80-280 million people were killed by the muslim invaders and it demoralised the people and created a divide between hindus and muslims and as usual hindus were given the choice to beheaded, give jizya( a tax given my non-muslim for their protection from the rulers) or become zimmi (servants) and mostly people become zimmi so that they can survive as any other non-muslim nation. Those horrors were even terrifying than the british empire. Then came the british who were cleaver and moreover used the demoraslised people to divide and rule them and used to whitewash the indians in the name of education agaist their own people which made people disliking their own culture, traditions and civilisation. Hindus are pretty much like jews surviving Islam and Christianity. That is why there are just 3 hindu majority nation India, Nepal and Mauritius and only 1 big country India and thats also Democracy due to the Hindus. Pakistan was made on Hindu muslim divide and tried to potray itself as it is democratic but this created a lot of the problems in present day Pakistan. I mean you cant make a nation in the name of Islam and then say it has democratic and secular values. I mean the problems created by Islam and Christianity due to the concept of conversion and conquering nations is insane. Cant imagine how much of culture, traditions and things might be destroyed. At the end Of 12th Century Invader Bakhityar Khilji Demolished the Nalanda which was the first early University where students from all across Korea, Sri Lanka, Tibet, China and ofc India came to get knowledge and killed the monks and burned it. It had so much texts and knowlegle that it burned continiously for 3 months and was the most important and valueable thing we lost.
Disclaimer - This was just a general look throught an Indian perspective and doesnt meant to harm anyone's religious sentiments but humanity will always be above any religion anyday.
Yeah even I said near the end of the video that for a true what if you would need to go back much further to around the time of Chandragupta
Its better we got partitioned. Just imagine the Chaos that would have caused by those muslims considering Indian politics favoured them at those times 😵.
What's the point they r still doing it we lost our land and our people who stayed in their mother land after partion like sindh
@@deepaksahu6075 Just imagine the Muslim population then ,you will get the point.
The likes of Netaji and Patel would have straightened them out, the bigger misfortune was having Nehru and Gandhi at the helm of things.
@@MoviePlanetEdit Netaji died before independence as per record, Sardar Patel also passed away too soon after independence.
@@Steve09903 IKR, that's why I mentioned that having Gandhi and Nehru as the leaders of Independent India was a big misfortune.
Fun part of your videos is that u read comments .Continue doing it fun to watch😅
Never know what you will see in the comments, its just as fun as watching the video sometimes lol
Breaking news! All exit polls are predicting Landslide victory for PM modi... ❤️
Yes, even as an outsider I saw this as inevitable. It was clear he would win with a landslide victory
@@ReldrikGeo yes broo
31:06 No, Nepal's culture is more Indian. Nepal is also the most Hindu nation by percentage of population and one among 3 hindu majority nations other 2 being India and Mauritius.
Also yes, Nepal and Bhutan were British Protectorates like Sikkim but were more independent so didn't continue the same with India. Sikkim continued and was a country till 1975 after which it had a referendum and was annexed to India.
So Nepal and Bhutan could have joined.
Pondicherry is 1 of 4 districts geographically separated across Southern India, and the collective is called Puducherry. Pondicherry is the largest one and practical capital of Puducherry. The other 3 are Karaikal, Mahe and Yanam.
I am indian and I have a lot of nepali friends, coz they moved here. They is majority hindu population in nepal, so it would technically join india rather than tibet.
The guy clearly knows nothing about India or its local politics.. he has a very simplistic understanding of india
Which guy, PH or RG?
Unified India means Present day India + Pakistan + Bangladesh + Afganistan + Nepal + Bhutan + Srilanka + Myanmar
bro now you are indian enough for trying some indian food just order some and fall in love with it❤
" _What If India Was Unified?!_ " . .................................................... Then we would had 400 million more head-aches. Try and figure out the sub-text of that statement.
We need the territory without the 'headaches'.
Yeahh 😂😂😂😂😂
Same Headaches that are looting and beating the police in the name of kanwar practice?
28:00 See how people who wants united India is talking about "united south Asia" and avoiding calling it United India?
That's where the problem starts.
26:53 India would absolutely partner with USA but I think India at that time was still trying to find it footing in the then present geopolitical landscape. Indians/Hindus are rather pro-West and pro-Israel except India would hate interference into internal affairs which USA is notorious for.
3:44 That is 5/6rds of British colonies in Africa (look up Cape to Cairo)
Yeah, I knew they controlled a lot of the area in Africa but not to that extent
@@ReldrikGeo I'm just watching the video and after listening to the South Asia comment, I have an excellent reaction suggestion for you.
Kraut's video India and Pakistan a continuing story, it is very insightful and although long at 48 minutes, you'll like it.
Neheru the Man of Thousand Blunders
Literally 😑🙃
Nice reaction. Your analysis is better than the video you reacted to. To see the flip side, please react on "How The India Pakistan Partition Actually SAVED India"
8:50 pundicherry
Thank you
What? It’s either Puducherry or Pondicherry, definitely not Pundicherry😂
@@MoneyMitrovic333 He mixed both names 😂
@@MoneyMitrovic333 not from english medium
Pondacherry😊
Bro nice video ,,, Whats happening in US elections? And how Americans view Jorge Soros?
I don't know anything about Soros so I can't speak on it.
As far as US elections I still think Trump will win despite his felony charges he got recently. In fact this pushed his base to be even more in support of him.
@@ReldrikGeo as far as I still think 🤔 Modi/BJP will win in INDIA ❤😊(today date is 1st June. Or election results announced on the 4th June)
@@ReldrikGeo What about the surge of illegal immigrants who are likely to vote for democrats. And why do you guys allow people to vote without having an ID of any sorts? I follow conservative twins on YT and I have learnt from various other videos that the democrats have opened the borders to foster illegal immigrants and gain votes. Is that true?
Partition of India increased hindu muslim conflict instead of solving it.
even burma(Myanmar) was carved out from British India in 1931..
Yeah exactly
If India was unified it would have Economic Liberalization way Earlier like as soon as 1978 with China or even earlier and it would likely have a Per capita income of $10,000 taking the population of South Asia as of present it's 1.9 Billion that means somewhere around $19 Trillion or even more now all of that depends on when does Unified India gets off from it's Socialistic policies taken down under Jawaharlal Nehru and Adopts Liberalisation and Privatization also China was Build up upon US aid to counter Russia so India being there and Democracy USA would have preferred a stable Nation like India but bot China at all and we would definitely have the role of China to fill that means we can certainly Overpass even USA in GDP and the fact that India's population peak would hit by 2065 Makes India having 41 Years still to grow on 6-7 Percent GDP growth for straight 41 Years literally making it a Behemoth Giant with a GDP of $190 Trillion by 2065 and a Per capita income of $100,000 some may think it to be Unrealistic but that's the reality because Unified India would have it's Young population ageing only by 2065 upto the levels of China in 2024 and still it would be maintaing a GDP growth of 4-5 Percent.
India was divided because of the urgency of Britain to leave India , giving basically everyone a power that they could claim their own states and land ownership for themselves , Basically Britain thought that every major King or Political figure would be greedy enough to claim a separate state for themselves and Massive internal civil war would destroy Indian hope for freedom from Britishers and they would finally intervene to colonise India again but this time with the support of local prominent figures.
Insidious plan right , and guess what that actually happened but not on a scale which Britishers contemplated or hoped .
The conflict was widely spread mainly by Jinna founder of Pakistan because he was able to unify maximum Muslim population under his own dream , most sus thing was that Jinna actually died just after 1 year of creating Pakistan.
So only Muslim majority states were separated initially Like East and West Pakistan , but Nizam of Hyderabad and King of Kashmir also got greedy and claimed separate States for themself in middle and Top of India's Map.
Every Indian is proud and eternally thankful to Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel for Unifying India because of which we see Current map of India intact today. So because of Patel , Britisher's plan to possibly capture India again , scrapped .
As per this video you reacted to seems to be a propaganda video ( maybe ) which does not meets with reality of Mega India Hypothesis.
The creator of the video seems to be a victim of common disease which compels him to put India into his western templates ,
There is vast difference between West and East which he cannot understand and I do not blame him for that because from decades they have been taught only poor things about India intentionally (maybe).
And you said rightly , Mega India would have ensured free Tibet and China would not have been dared to do things it tries today. Yes if I negate the expense of effort and resources which have been lost because of Pakistan and China's aggression to this date , I am confident that Mega India would emerged as most powerful ( maybe ) and but surely economically supreme Land today.
But still it is not too bad as per the video shown , Yes there are massive challenges but they are slowing us down to reach our full potential , which are being countered very efficiently especially after Narendra Modi came to power.
Well, looks like I am the first this time. 🤣🤣
I watched this video just yesterday.
Oh really? TH-cam must be pushing it lol it randomly showed up for me too
I personally feel that the video had flaws at least Bhutan and Nepal could have been the part of India, I feel you could have done a better job in making an alternate history for India
he used a wrong map of present day india😐
17:26
finally good observation👍👍👍
Loved the video! Hope you react to more Possible History
We still have full control of Indian Ocean to project power
Even if India is undivided, It still could have developed the nuclear weapons cause you can't just forget about our very much friendly neighbour China.
Yup exactly
Attention ⚠️ : I definitely believe you are very familiar with this name/meme "German shepherd" 😂😂😊
Most of the people in India feel sour in heart against the muslims for the creation pakistan. Even the lot of politics today rotate around pakistan problem instead of development. Which is legitimate but unexpected.
i understand nepal, sri lanka and some extent bhutan joining india but not myanmar for sure (almost entirety of our ethnics groups are more chinese)
yall can have the rohingya tho
Nepal is Hindu Majority country not Buddhists. So it's association with India is more natural.
India initially considered becoming a nuclear state because of China, but news of Pakistan being assisted in becoming a nuclear power accelerated our nuclear goal.
6:18 AI image using zombie apocalypse to show exodus between 2 countries.
Realistically Speaking .... A unified India at that time would not be so good due to following reasons
A gigantic growing muslim population would overtake Hindu population and the country would either be riddled with civil wars or it will became an islamic state (only North)
Unified India would have definitely sided with soviet union more actively because both country would share a socialist mindset resulting in Proxy wars or sanctions by the USA and west
China would not be as aggressive because Unified India would be significant threat so ... India China would most probably be friends even after Tibet annexation (India would let it happen in the name India China good relations) which means a new kind of permanent cold war would perpetually exist between India Russia China and the west
Good analysis.
18:32
china wouldn't have been a manufacturing superpower if only india had opened it's door for the foreign companies just a little early (which India couldn't do as India was recovering from it's 200 years long colonial rule & was struggling getting acceptance from the world as a new nation 😢)
This wasn't the reason though, the congress and Indian politicians at large were socialists back then, starting from Nehru. Government control led everything, we only opened our doors because the soviet way of economy had us mortgage gold to the IMF, that's when the LPG (liberalization, globalization and privatization) was introduced by Manmohan SIngh.
Hello Martin, I am writing this comment so that you can better understand how a unified India would form and what would it mean for the world in a manner certainly more comprehensive than that the narrator in this video explained in.
To begin, a unified India would never be possible if the leadership that spearheaded the Indian independence movement in the 40s doesn't change. Who were these leaders?
Gandhi and Nehru from Congress who advocated for a unified India and Muhammad Ali Jinnah of the Muslim League who advocated for a division based on Hindu-Muslim demographics.
Though Gandhi was equally respected by all people in the subcontinent, Nehru was generally not favored as a potential prime minister of independent India by both the common Muslims and their leaders. For the muslims Congress, especially after the resignation of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose(I will address him as Netaji for future references) from the post of party president on 29th April 1939 due to rising tensions with Gandhi, was viewed as a party more inclined to the Hindu causes than theirs.
In short, the muslims didn't trust the vision of India that Nehru, and by the 40s, even Gandhi envisioned.
No amount of concession would satisfy the Muslim league as long as Nehru stays the leader.
So for a unified India, we need one man to somehow emerge victorious as the leader, that being Netaji.
Netaji's support surpassed that of Gandhi and unlike Nehru, the Muslim leaders had strong faith in Netaji as a leader. Jinnah himself had quoted multiple times that he would only concede to a unified India only if Netaji were to be the leader of that nation (you can google it up).
So in this timeline, one way or the other Netaji emerges victorious in his military campaigns with the INA and the Japanese army in the north east(the only possible way Netaji wins is by breaking through British communication blockades and informing the masses about the INA and the fight to liberate India, inciting a country wide rebellion).
If Netaji manages to incite a rebellion in 1945, the consequences it would have on the war is tremendous.
I am going to go with the consequences that will be the best for India.
1) The British just leave India without much fight. This is more likely to happen than you think since the British military was spread thin and they simply do not have the resources to quell a large scale rebellion.
2) Netaji emerges as the leader of united India(modern day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, possibly Burma later on but unlikely).
3)The Japanese do not lose Burma immediately.
4) I am going to say India does not declare war on UK or the US, but does support the Japanese via logistics and resources, hopefully no nukes in Mumbai.
5) The Japanese still get nuked, there is no stopping that
6) The allies win, there is no stopping that either
7) The allies do not declare war on India as it too much of a fight
8) The allies definitely sanction India for at least until the 60s(Netaji not only comes to power due to the Japanese and by defeating the British but he also had direct connections with Hitler so there is plenty excuses for sanctions)
9)India develops close ties with the soviets to counter western sanctions
10) Free Tibet would probably exist
11) India would definitely be no.2 in GDP in 2024, closer to the US than China is today.
12) Post war Indo-Japanese and Indo-German relations would be really really interesting to say the least
13) India would certainly be a manufacturing and service economy and not an agricultural economy as it is today.
14) India is a permanent member in UN
15) India would get nukes even earlier
Feel free to poke holes in my theory and ask questions whenever they arise
In 1962 indo-china war naheru maybe did good to not retaliate against China even when we have the stronger Air force
Because maybe he get the insight that pak will attack india with siding china
So he didn't turn the battle into full blown two front war
Nah , Nehru was simply incapable. He never considered the possibility of war with china neither felt that army should be strengthened...Nehru , Krishna Menon and General Kaul were solely the reason we lost the war.
Hey hey! we don't want to be Brutal 😂😂😂 for Akhand Bharat 🚩. It's past so let it be in past😂😂😂😂.
Nice video and commentary
I think it's Ukraine
Please react on why Marathi is unique
React on web series
Family man
6:10 movie
ah okay
th guy in this video is not accurate at all
You are absolute wrong there 22:01
Y?
15:29 well I always no that you are BJP propaganda channel softly saying whatt BJP wants akhand bharat 😂😂😂 just joking
Akhand Bharat is not a whim of a political party but the responsibility of all Indians to fulfill.
@@intenjiku brother as well as I want bharat mata to expend his arms wideer and wider but untill all muslim of Pakistan and Bangladesh become dharmic it will be disaster for india
India map is not correct please just check
I know, I even said so in the reaction
And am 2nd
Here's your medal 🥈😂
🥈