I don't speak Chinese but this seems also a summary. The same as you say in English. The final point is that the two points don't move, only connected by a torque along a plane. It seems to me that the question can be reduced to: 'What is this planar surface..?" The study of anatomy can tell us that this region is the region of the 'pectoral fascia' (let's call it PF) which is attached to the sternum at the center, attaches to the clavicle above and below is continuous with the shoulder, axilla and thorax. These parts all have sensation. We also know, from the cellular responses to acupuncture needle insertions that the skin can torque around particular points of stimulation at a microlevel. This is why mindfully torqueing the body in small parts makes sense, even if it seems unusual in the beginning. We have to imagine that for the skin (and the fascia especially) torque comes naturally when it is healthy and mindfully turned on (another way of saying 'chi is flowing'). The thorax (or thoracolumbar fascia...the trunk of the body) is, in turn, continuous with the nuchal facia on the back of the neck..! More details can be researched and the pathway retraced anatomically, confirming the taiji classics. Especially of interest, is the nuchal connection (back of the neck), the platysma connection (the whole front of the neck from just below the collarbones to the edge of the jaw), the tongue (first two thirds of the tongue), and the fact that the the PF at the deep layer connects with the clavicular periosteum. There are many more wonders of consonance between the classics and modern anatomy, many possibilities to explore and the wonders of taiji continue. But this also takes study, dedication, knowing where to look and a deep understanding of the classics and lots of practice. I, myself, am fascinated by the different focuses of different teachers. I have been trying to reconcile the differences for many years. Anatomy gives me some clues because, in fact, what one teacher thinks is important is actually connected to what another teacher thinks is important via anatomical links which produce essentially the same effect, assuming that there's a third thing they do in common (which they have kept secret to themselves). I think secrets are still necessary because of the ethics of the art. Taiji, in my opinion, is not just technique but a way of transmitting social and spiritual values. If this interpretation is correct, then the longer secrets are kept, the more people learn the values of patience, kindness, harmony, respect for those who have gone before and made great efforts over many decades, even carried the tradition of gratitude over many generations. We cannot reduce everything to an impersonal anatomical dissection, although general clues can be helpful. What do you think Master Chen..? The option of giving absolutely everything away to modern science does not make holistic sense to me because humanity if it becomes enlightened by scientific knowledge does not mean 'enlightened' or 'wise' in the Eastern spiritual sense. I may be wrong about this but as someone like you, who is trying to bridge the two worldviews, I am struggling to balance the ethics of knowledge when teaching: open learning vs. tacit instruction via autodidactic intuition. :)
老师教的好
陈老师讲的非常透彻
好東西
I don't speak Chinese but this seems also a summary. The same as you say in English. The final point is that the two points don't move, only connected by a torque along a plane. It seems to me that the question can be reduced to: 'What is this planar surface..?" The study of anatomy can tell us that this region is the region of the 'pectoral fascia' (let's call it PF) which is attached to the sternum at the center, attaches to the clavicle above and below is continuous with the shoulder, axilla and thorax. These parts all have sensation. We also know, from the cellular responses to acupuncture needle insertions that the skin can torque around particular points of stimulation at a microlevel. This is why mindfully torqueing the body in small parts makes sense, even if it seems unusual in the beginning. We have to imagine that for the skin (and the fascia especially) torque comes naturally when it is healthy and mindfully turned on (another way of saying 'chi is flowing'). The thorax (or thoracolumbar fascia...the trunk of the body) is, in turn, continuous with the nuchal facia on the back of the neck..! More details can be researched and the pathway retraced anatomically, confirming the taiji classics. Especially of interest, is the nuchal connection (back of the neck), the platysma connection (the whole front of the neck from just below the collarbones to the edge of the jaw), the tongue (first two thirds of the tongue), and the fact that the the PF at the deep layer connects with the clavicular periosteum. There are many more wonders of consonance between the classics and modern anatomy, many possibilities to explore and the wonders of taiji continue. But this also takes study, dedication, knowing where to look and a deep understanding of the classics and lots of practice. I, myself, am fascinated by the different focuses of different teachers. I have been trying to reconcile the differences for many years. Anatomy gives me some clues because, in fact, what one teacher thinks is important is actually connected to what another teacher thinks is important via anatomical links which produce essentially the same effect, assuming that there's a third thing they do in common (which they have kept secret to themselves). I think secrets are still necessary because of the ethics of the art. Taiji, in my opinion, is not just technique but a way of transmitting social and spiritual values. If this interpretation is correct, then the longer secrets are kept, the more people learn the values of patience, kindness, harmony, respect for those who have gone before and made great efforts over many decades, even carried the tradition of gratitude over many generations. We cannot reduce everything to an impersonal anatomical dissection, although general clues can be helpful. What do you think Master Chen..? The option of giving absolutely everything away to modern science does not make holistic sense to me because humanity if it becomes enlightened by scientific knowledge does not mean 'enlightened' or 'wise' in the Eastern spiritual sense. I may be wrong about this but as someone like you, who is trying to bridge the two worldviews, I am struggling to balance the ethics of knowledge when teaching: open learning vs. tacit instruction via autodidactic intuition. :)
清楚明白！
真的被你笑死 手縮得跟雞翅一樣 遇到泰拳 跆拳道 直接被踢死