I want to congratulate Peach for actually comprehending and demonstrating this product properly. I too really dislike dry in your face direct guitar signals and the natural room ambiences and space along with imperfect amp speakers is what makes the perfect tone for recording situations. Loved this!
For what this costs, there's a lot of things that disappoint: - No XLR out for running direct to a mixing board. - No headphones out. It would make total sense to have one on this thing. - No remote control of any kind. Most will probably default to that A/B + Delay mode because it's the most sensible one. - No 3rd party IR support for convenience. Even if it has a lot of cabs, it has e.g quite few options for higher gain players. - No EVM 12L option either even though there's one on the Dream afaik. - Heavy reliance on the mobile app for the effects. You can't seem to e.g tap a tempo in for the delay so you better have each rig setup perfectly beforehand. UA, why do you make good sounding gear yet adamantly refuse to add features that could take them to the top?
Exactly... AND I don't want to NEED a fuckin' computer or smartphone 'cuz in a few years this thing won't be supported any longer. I just want a self-complete GOOD sounding device!
I started with the Golden and Starlight....then I got the Dream 65....not sure if Ruby or Ox Stomp or the Max is next.....damn these pedals are addictive! Sold my Kemper to finance this new adventure and no regrets.....back to turning knobs, love it.
Golden is good. I don't personally enjoy the starlight. Skip the max, its just the plug with no presets. Preorder the Ox Stomp (or better yet wait for prices to come down by $100's within a year) for now instead of the Ruby. Honestly with the Spring in the Dream and the Plate in the OX you may not even need the golden anymore depending on how you use it. The Ruby is very good but its not gonna be much different or helpful if you already have the Dream.
I'm an old school amp guy, and I love the Ruby and Starlight for practice and recording. Ruby does drive sounds way better than Dream imo. Use the Blue or Silver speakers, volume at 10, cut at 0, crank the treble booster, and you're in Brian May territory. Set the other channel as a pedal platform with Green speakers. That's a lot of tonal options right there. I'm thinking about getting the Lion, but I'm not convinced that they've reproduced the low end thump for chords and riffing that I'm listening for. I can't tell if it's the demonstrators or the pedal itself. Might have to hear that one in person. That said, I saw a guy play the Dream through an Ox Stomp, and I was very impressed. Dream's onboard speakers sounded good, but Ox Stomp took it up a notch or two. Not sure if I need an Ox Stomp, but I think I want one.
as much as I`d love a product to tick every box, this product is genius from a marketing stand point. UA doesn´t want it to do everything... UA wants it to be a phenomenal add on to almost every other product under the sun. perfect pairing. or at least, almost perfect pairing. if you don´t use it together with a UAD product, fine, use it with something else. it will always be a win win situation for Universal Audio. Brilliant!!!!!
I think this is awesome. It is for players who do not want a bunch of amps and mics and play direct from their board. They do not need an attenuator, and they do not need an XLR out. At the end of the chain you put your JDI XLR or whatever. This is something you can put on your board and have realistic studio sounds coming from your pedalboard line signal, mono, dual, mono, or stereo. I think it is great. I wanted an Ox but did not want a bunch of amps… and wanted the dynamix UA (non-IR technology). Already have Dream and Ruby which have this Ox technology in it. But for a direct in, pedalboard only scenario, this is something for the toolbox. This is for people who are not satisfied with IRs and want studio realism. If IRs make someone happy, great. But if someone wants a more realistic studio experience without amps, this is way more than a cab simulator pedal or IR offering. The Ox technology offers realistic super loud dynamics at TV volume. This is for people who want more than an IR tone - they want the full realistic dynamics of playing in a studio with real mics etc. I think this is great, and I do not think that this compares equally to IRs. UA is in a class by itself with this dynamic response technology. I absolutely love all of it. It gives me the opportunity to study configurations which behave more realistically than IRs (which are merely a snapshot of a sound) which I simply otherwise would not have access too. Big UA fan here. Just because a shoe doesn’t fit a specific use case does not diminish what it is. There is simply only one company with Ox technology… and you get it in the old Ox, this, Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow. If you have one of the latter three you probably might not need this in the chain as it would be redundant. But I need one anyway. I will make a board for it lol!
I am still learning this gear and so I was under the impression that since Ox technology is already in the Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow that an Ox pedal would possibly be redundant of you are using those pedals for their sounds. So maybe I do not understand how the Ox expands on these pedals. I figured that the Ox would be something for either a clean or dirty pedal or preamp pedal to go into. But hey, I qualified my level of knowledge (And you can throw a bunch of pedals at me with a board and a power supply and I can put together and dial it in - but sometimes I cannot explain in technical depth other than pedal order how I make it sound good). So I am going to look into this. If it is true that the Ox will add versatility as opposed to redundancy to the Ruby and Dream (and Woodrow which I do not have), then I want one. I the kind of person who can make it happen with the right parts. So I like what you are saying. I hope that I can see it fit together in my mind and ultimately hear it. At the end of the day it is still one signal at a time coming out the end. I am getting ready to solder, so I am going to figure this out first. Anything you or anyone wants to say about this is appreciated. I am going to keep reading and watching demos and am going to buy one of these, maybe two ultimately.
I am going to find out in a way that I can understand how the Ox technology in the big three pedals are not redundant with the Ox. That I fail to understand.
I think what I am trying to say is that I can see how Ox pedal could expand the tonal pallete for the other three pedals but not necessarily improve what is already there if you are happy with that tone. (except it adds effects and 1176 compression and maybe some more stuff - but I am talking about the Amp/Cab sound you get out of the Main three pedals wo the Ox). Anyways, looking forward to getting one.
Man I just got the ox stomp and IRX Friedman pedal .. bloody hell I may ditch my real amps for playing live. The OX stomp is a beast! UAD I love it but please make a desktop application for this please. Include usb c output for connectivity stability. Bluetooth is a great idea however it’s a big buggy. On my iPhone it if step away and my phone goes on standby, i have to reconnect the application and sync the pedal. Not a big deal if you save your favorite RIGS in advance. This makes a perfect studio peice and the Friedman IRX … we’ll no need to express that since it shares a similar sound as that power head being used in this video
Fantastic demo guys! Thanks again. I already have 2 Stomps and 1 MAX. May need to grab me a Dream very soon. Why not?? Life is short! Cheers & regards from Stratford, ON., Canada.
I did see this a little while ago as they applied for the trademark at the same time as the delverb. I was hoping that this was going to have an attenuator on it so I could swap this out for my two notes cab m and load box but looks like it’s basically just the same but more expensive and less speaker options
i have dream65 and is pain connecting with app, dificult to find the small bt bottom to pair with app, so without pc/mac app even if is the best pedal dosen't work for me!
Yes. If i remember correctly when i had my TM i believe you can turn the speaker sim off on the line out. I think TM only has xlr so you would need an xlr to 1/4" cable.
Why use the MAX? The Ox Stomp has built-in compression, EQ, Reverb and Delay. It's essentially a multi-effects unit creating more room on your board for vibe, fuzz, drive and/or other modulations.
Look for connection issues before you purchase this unbelievably awesome pedal. Alot of talk about how good it is, but none of these sellers tell you about how terrible and almost impossible to get it to pair to your phone. A complete waste of money.
So how are you guys listening to this? You have a two rock head and then you have this ox stomp so the stomp is taking care of the cab part of it but how are you listening to it in the room and how are we listening to it right now? I understand you could plug it into powered speakers for the computer but could you also plug this into a FRFR?
Can you run two amps at once into the Ox Pedal? For a guitarist that might have two amps with two separate load boxes/attenuators, can you run them both into the Ox pedal as a stereo setup?
Yes but if you want to use stereo pedals like the Strymon pedals and want stereo effects then you’ll need 2. I have the dream and ruby and I want stereo effects so I have 2 of these as well LOL … I know, a bit over kill but man, the ox stomp is amazing, I wish I they build this technology into the dream and ruby :/
@@joshuafernandes4935 It’s a long video mate, I just skipped to the sound examples. And instead of being snarky you could have kindly directed me to the part where he mentioned that, but you just wanted to leave a bitter comment instead of being helpful eh?
@@sejuyz hey according to your own logic what are you gaining from commenting but refusing the watch the video ? Also same logic if you don’t want to watch the video don’t comment on it !
I'm a caveman. As far as I can gather, this is not an active load attenuator. You can't use this to play a valve amp quietly in the house? So why's it called Ox? Confused
Hi There! That is correct, the OX Stomp is designed for instrument and line level only. It cannot take speaker loads or power attenuate. It does however feature all of the processing side of the original OX box and a few extra brand new features that are certainly worth checking out!
It only provides the microphone and speaker cab emulations. You can't plug an actual guitar amp into it unless you also have some kind of reactive load. It's a partial solution.
ปีที่แล้ว +4
Yeah so this is actually an alternative to an IR Loader pedal such as the Two Note Cab M but with proprietary UA technology to simulate speakers.
No headphone out? No XLR direct out. No licensing for “Friedman cabs" "Mesa" cabs etc. Seems to be still Behind two notes. Great format if you are using an amp in a box pedalboard and you don’t need DI out or practice with Headphones 🤔
I have a few of UAs pedals and this one surely disappointed me so I had to send it back as it did not enhance any of my other pedals, multi effects or gear to anything extra.
Very pricey for something that doesn't even allow you to load your own IRs. For nearly £400 it should also be able to take a speaker load IMO. Cheaper modelling units do everything this does and a LOT more besides.
These aren't static irs, they are dynamic speaker models that change response as the input changes like a real speaker does. If you want an ir loader buy one, that's not what this is. These sound much more real
@@narichey1981 they do sound good, I have to admit. But better than IR loaders that arguably offer way more flexibility? I dunno. The room sound is great.
@@dver4624 I have the ruby and dream which use these style of cabs from the ox, and they are better than any static ir. I've run the ua pedals through my helix, just the amp cab off, and put that through both the helix cabs and 3rd party irs. The UA cabs are just more realistic, which is not surprising because they are covering more of a speakers true behavior as levels change
I would get this and a Lion if only... They could give us a desktop app for editing! For crying out loud, every company's got that nowadays, even the cheapest gear has one. Sure, if you could do everything on the pedal itself I could live with it, but there's a lot of stuff that can only be done with the app.... It's not excactly the most advanced feature to wish for? Come on UA, why!?
How does this work with something like the Synergy amps stuff? I’m using the cab m+ with the power amp simulator on to help fill out the sound, but I like the speaker simulator in my ox much better.
seems like itd be great for the people who never got the OG OX and use other attenuators with Line outs that you can now use this pedal for OX features without spending over grand for the og ox.
The majority of guitar players don't even have amps anymore. This product is about getting the incredibly excellent ua cab Sims from ox in a pedal that can serve as the cab for modelers or amp in a box pedals, or offload the cab SIM from something like a helix to free up dsp and get a superior sound. Lots of uses for this, for people that have no need of an attenuator. If you need an attenuator, the ox exists.
@@narichey1981cab sims take up such little dsp from amp sims like helix and cortex. It’s all reverbs and delays. And unless you have 0 clue what you’re doing the cortex is essentially impossible to overload dsp wise. This product is beyond useless. I mean to each their own
Universal Audio is slowly becoming the 'Apple' of the Audio Industry. Costs a fortune and solves nothing. If you have to use so many adjectives to sell your product then maybe make a better product? And for this price, you could get the Captor from Two Notes and the cab loader from TC Electronics, way better combo than this.
Because most of the professional users are switching gear via MIDI. No one wants to switch anything via a phone during a concert/song, MIDI is the way to go.
For less than £50 more you can get a Two Notes Captor X… You get load box, attenuator, XLR outputs, headphone outputs and access to to the Wall of Sound plug-in software/IR’s… If this product was incredibly affordable (I.e
I want to congratulate Peach for actually comprehending and demonstrating this product properly. I too really dislike dry in your face direct guitar signals and the natural room ambiences and space along with imperfect amp speakers is what makes the perfect tone for recording situations. Loved this!
For what this costs, there's a lot of things that disappoint:
- No XLR out for running direct to a mixing board.
- No headphones out. It would make total sense to have one on this thing.
- No remote control of any kind. Most will probably default to that A/B + Delay mode because it's the most sensible one.
- No 3rd party IR support for convenience. Even if it has a lot of cabs, it has e.g quite few options for higher gain players.
- No EVM 12L option either even though there's one on the Dream afaik.
- Heavy reliance on the mobile app for the effects. You can't seem to e.g tap a tempo in for the delay so you better have each rig setup perfectly beforehand.
UA, why do you make good sounding gear yet adamantly refuse to add features that could take them to the top?
UA seems to be Apple of music gear
First two points are CRUCIAL. Hard pass for me
@@jamesemerson4102 Thats a compliment considering they’re objectively kings of the smartphone market lol
@@josearjona3728 If this is like the Dream pedal, you can use a TRS-Dual mono cable to then plug in your headphones and hear the pedal in stereo.
Exactly... AND I don't want to NEED a fuckin' computer or smartphone 'cuz in a few years this thing won't be supported any longer. I just want a self-complete GOOD sounding device!
I started with the Golden and Starlight....then I got the Dream 65....not sure if Ruby or Ox Stomp or the Max is next.....damn these pedals are addictive! Sold my Kemper to finance this new adventure and no regrets.....back to turning knobs, love it.
Golden is good. I don't personally enjoy the starlight. Skip the max, its just the plug with no presets. Preorder the Ox Stomp (or better yet wait for prices to come down by $100's within a year) for now instead of the Ruby. Honestly with the Spring in the Dream and the Plate in the OX you may not even need the golden anymore depending on how you use it. The Ruby is very good but its not gonna be much different or helpful if you already have the Dream.
I'm an old school amp guy, and I love the Ruby and Starlight for practice and recording.
Ruby does drive sounds way better than Dream imo. Use the Blue or Silver speakers, volume at 10, cut at 0, crank the treble booster, and you're in Brian May territory. Set the other channel as a pedal platform with Green speakers. That's a lot of tonal options right there.
I'm thinking about getting the Lion, but I'm not convinced that they've reproduced the low end thump for chords and riffing that I'm listening for. I can't tell if it's the demonstrators or the pedal itself. Might have to hear that one in person.
That said, I saw a guy play the Dream through an Ox Stomp, and I was very impressed. Dream's onboard speakers sounded good, but Ox Stomp took it up a notch or two. Not sure if I need an Ox Stomp, but I think I want one.
as much as I`d love a product to tick every box, this product is genius from a marketing stand point. UA doesn´t want it to do everything... UA wants it to be a phenomenal add on to almost every other product under the sun. perfect pairing. or at least, almost perfect pairing. if you don´t use it together with a UAD product, fine, use it with something else. it will always be a win win situation for Universal Audio. Brilliant!!!!!
No one's gonna mention the gorgeous playing by plaid shirt man? Lush - especially the jazzy stuff 👍 43:30
I think this is awesome. It is for players who do not want a bunch of amps and mics and play direct from their board. They do not need an attenuator, and they do not need an XLR out. At the end of the chain you put your JDI XLR or whatever. This is something you can put on your board and have realistic studio sounds coming from your pedalboard line signal, mono, dual, mono, or stereo. I think it is great. I wanted an Ox but did not want a bunch of amps… and wanted the dynamix UA (non-IR technology). Already have Dream and Ruby which have this Ox technology in it. But for a direct in, pedalboard only scenario, this is something for the toolbox. This is for people who are not satisfied with IRs and want studio realism. If IRs make someone happy, great. But if someone wants a more realistic studio experience without amps, this is way more than a cab simulator pedal or IR offering. The Ox technology offers realistic super loud dynamics at TV volume. This is for people who want more than an IR tone - they want the full realistic dynamics of playing in a studio with real mics etc. I think this is great, and I do not think that this compares equally to IRs. UA is in a class by itself with this dynamic response technology. I absolutely love all of it. It gives me the opportunity to study configurations which behave more realistically than IRs (which are merely a snapshot of a sound) which I simply otherwise would not have access too. Big UA fan here. Just because a shoe doesn’t fit a specific use case does not diminish what it is. There is simply only one company with Ox technology… and you get it in the old Ox, this, Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow. If you have one of the latter three you probably might not need this in the chain as it would be redundant. But I need one anyway. I will make a board for it lol!
I believe it’s also in the 55’ Fender which is the plug of the Woodrow afaik
No dude. The ruby, Dream and Woodrow don’t cover all the cabs in this thing. This is like and expansion pack for the ruby, Dream and Woodrow.
I am still learning this gear and so I was under the impression that since Ox technology is already in the Ruby, Dream, and Woodrow that an Ox pedal would possibly be redundant of you are using those pedals for their sounds. So maybe I do not understand how the Ox expands on these pedals. I figured that the Ox would be something for either a clean or dirty pedal or preamp pedal to go into. But hey, I qualified my level of knowledge (And you can throw a bunch of pedals at me with a board and a power supply and I can put together and dial it in - but sometimes I cannot explain in technical depth other than pedal order how I make it sound good).
So I am going to look into this. If it is true that the Ox will add versatility as opposed to redundancy to the Ruby and Dream (and Woodrow which I do not have), then I want one. I the kind of person who can make it happen with the right parts. So I like what you are saying. I hope that I can see it fit together in my mind and ultimately hear it. At the end of the day it is still one signal at a time coming out the end. I am getting ready to solder, so I am going to figure this out first. Anything you or anyone wants to say about this is appreciated. I am going to keep reading and watching demos and am going to buy one of these, maybe two ultimately.
I am going to find out in a way that I can understand how the Ox technology in the big three pedals are not redundant with the Ox. That I fail to understand.
I think what I am trying to say is that I can see how Ox pedal could expand the tonal pallete for the other three pedals but not necessarily improve what is already there if you are happy with that tone. (except it adds effects and 1176 compression and maybe some more stuff - but I am talking about the Amp/Cab sound you get out of the Main three pedals wo the Ox). Anyways, looking forward to getting one.
Man I just got the ox stomp and IRX Friedman pedal .. bloody hell I may ditch my real amps for playing live. The OX stomp is a beast! UAD I love it but please make a desktop application for this please. Include usb c output for connectivity stability. Bluetooth is a great idea however it’s a big buggy. On my iPhone it if step away and my phone goes on standby, i have to reconnect the application and sync the pedal. Not a big deal if you save your favorite RIGS in advance. This makes a perfect studio peice and the Friedman IRX … we’ll no need to express that since it shares a similar sound as that power head being used in this video
Yeah desktop app, UA please.
Glad to see UA expanding on the OX. Now what we need is a plug-in version of the OX with the original editor!!🙏🏻
Fantastic demo guys! Thanks again. I already have 2 Stomps and 1 MAX. May need to grab me a Dream very soon. Why not?? Life is short! Cheers & regards from Stratford, ON., Canada.
I did see this a little while ago as they applied for the trademark at the same time as the delverb. I was hoping that this was going to have an attenuator on it so I could swap this out for my two notes cab m and load box but looks like it’s basically just the same but more expensive and less speaker options
The EV12 Setting on the Dream 65 is already perfect. No need for all the other options which just keep you from playing guitar. Just my 2 cents... ;)
My thoughts exactly !
@universalaudio please add the the EV12 speakers to the OX Stomp !
i have dream65 and is pain connecting with app, dificult to find the small bt bottom to pair with app, so without pc/mac app even if is the best pedal dosen't work for me!
I think it's brilliant.
Sound better than real cabinet because more quiet good for recording
Could you plug a Fender Tone Master Deluxe from Direct out to this and use different IR:s?
Yes. If i remember correctly when i had my TM i believe you can turn the speaker sim off on the line out. I think TM only has xlr so you would need an xlr to 1/4" cable.
Why use the MAX? The Ox Stomp has built-in compression, EQ, Reverb and Delay. It's essentially a multi-effects unit creating more room on your board for vibe, fuzz, drive and/or other modulations.
so if i want to use it with my Boss IR-200 i have to disable the cab simulation on it, do i have understand it right?
yes.
Look for connection issues before you purchase this unbelievably awesome pedal. Alot of talk about how good it is, but none of these sellers tell you about how terrible and almost impossible to get it to pair to your phone. A complete waste of money.
So how are you guys listening to this? You have a two rock head and then you have this ox stomp so the stomp is taking care of the cab part of it but how are you listening to it in the room and how are we listening to it right now? I understand you could plug it into powered speakers for the computer but could you also plug this into a FRFR?
Can I use only the delay/reverb/compressor without the speaker sim??
did I miss it or you didn't even dial in the speaker drive knob in a 47 mins demo?
Can you run two amps at once into the Ox Pedal? For a guitarist that might have two amps with two separate load boxes/attenuators, can you run them both into the Ox pedal as a stereo setup?
It has a stereo input so I imagine so
Yes but if you want to use stereo pedals like the Strymon pedals and want stereo effects then you’ll need 2. I have the dream and ruby and I want stereo effects so I have 2 of these as well LOL … I know, a bit over kill but man, the ox stomp is amazing, I wish I they build this technology into the dream and ruby :/
@@nickrocker123 if they ever add this tech and MIDI capability into a revamped Dream/Ruby/Woodrow 2.0 pedal, I would go broke lol
I feel like if I have the dream, the woodrow or the ruby, then I shouldn't have to need that pedal. Or they did half their job at UA.
That's right. This is for ppl who have amp Sims but want to upgrade the cab section
This is so you can expand the sound of your dream, ruby and Woodrow as well.
I thought so too but in the UA demo video of this pedal the dream 65 goes into this pedal .
This looks nice. I don’t like getting lost in endless software menu’s.
That looks and sounds utterly awesome
How did you connect the Two Rock to the OX Stomp? Did you use a reactive load, and if so, which one? I really like the sound you got with that!
If you take time to actually watch the video you would not be asking this as he tells you in the video.
@@joshuafernandes4935 It’s a long video mate, I just skipped to the sound examples. And instead of being snarky you could have kindly directed me to the part where he mentioned that, but you just wanted to leave a bitter comment instead of being helpful eh?
@@dans5529 there is nothing snarky or bitter about telling you to watch the video. Watch the video ( hint: it’s in the beginning of the video)
@@joshuafernandes4935 what are you gaining from doing that? Be helpful or simply don´t reply.
@@sejuyz hey according to your own logic what are you gaining from commenting but refusing the watch the video ? Also same logic if you don’t want to watch the video don’t comment on it !
I'm a caveman. As far as I can gather, this is not an active load attenuator. You can't use this to play a valve amp quietly in the house? So why's it called Ox? Confused
Same. I went from super excited to let down.
Hi There! That is correct, the OX Stomp is designed for instrument and line level only. It cannot take speaker loads or power attenuate. It does however feature all of the processing side of the original OX box and a few extra brand new features that are certainly worth checking out!
It only provides the microphone and speaker cab emulations. You can't plug an actual guitar amp into it unless you also have some kind of reactive load. It's a partial solution.
Yeah so this is actually an alternative to an IR Loader pedal such as the Two Note Cab M but with proprietary UA technology to simulate speakers.
No headphone out? No XLR direct out. No licensing for “Friedman cabs" "Mesa" cabs etc. Seems to be still Behind two notes. Great format if you are using an amp in a box pedalboard and you don’t need DI out or practice with Headphones 🤔
If it’s anything like Bolgren’s technology it will sound very good.
I have a few of UAs pedals and this one surely disappointed me so I had to send it back as it did not enhance any of my other pedals, multi effects or gear to anything extra.
Very pricey for something that doesn't even allow you to load your own IRs. For nearly £400 it should also be able to take a speaker load IMO. Cheaper modelling units do everything this does and a LOT more besides.
doesn't use IRs, and its also a dynamic process
IRs?! This modeling is an evolutionary leap better sounding.
These aren't static irs, they are dynamic speaker models that change response as the input changes like a real speaker does. If you want an ir loader buy one, that's not what this is. These sound much more real
@@narichey1981 they do sound good, I have to admit. But better than IR loaders that arguably offer way more flexibility? I dunno. The room sound is great.
@@dver4624 I have the ruby and dream which use these style of cabs from the ox, and they are better than any static ir. I've run the ua pedals through my helix, just the amp cab off, and put that through both the helix cabs and 3rd party irs. The UA cabs are just more realistic, which is not surprising because they are covering more of a speakers true behavior as levels change
I would get this and a Lion if only... They could give us a desktop app for editing! For crying out loud, every company's got that nowadays, even the cheapest gear has one. Sure, if you could do everything on the pedal itself I could live with it, but there's a lot of stuff that can only be done with the app....
It's not excactly the most advanced feature to wish for? Come on UA, why!?
Hope it have power amp sim, or will have someday
It would have been nice 🙂
Wow
What load box were you guys using?
How does this work with something like the Synergy amps stuff? I’m using the cab m+ with the power amp simulator on to help fill out the sound, but I like the speaker simulator in my ox much better.
I am guessing that is a match made in heaven honestly, no load box needed.
Are they gonna make their own USB-C midi interface for these pedals at some point?
Ya i have been thinking exactly same thing
Already discovered the App doesn't work on my Iphone 6, so it's a hard pass from me.
And it ‘ll be the same in the future, after 3 years you’ll have to buy another phone or another stomp 😅 upgrade will be for money
With all due respect, not much will work on the 6 because it doesn’t support the latest version of iOS. So this shouldn’t be surprising.
😂
That is an Apple problem, they have already reached end-of-support for iPhone 8.
😂
Is everyone at Peach Guitars an absurdly good guitar player?!
Need an updated app with proper editing capability badly!
No reactive load/attenuator makes this an absolute fail sorry
seems like itd be great for the people who never got the OG OX and use other attenuators with Line outs that you can now use this pedal for OX features without spending over grand for the og ox.
The majority of guitar players don't even have amps anymore. This product is about getting the incredibly excellent ua cab Sims from ox in a pedal that can serve as the cab for modelers or amp in a box pedals, or offload the cab SIM from something like a helix to free up dsp and get a superior sound. Lots of uses for this, for people that have no need of an attenuator. If you need an attenuator, the ox exists.
@@narichey1981cab sims take up such little dsp from amp sims like helix and cortex. It’s all reverbs and delays. And unless you have 0 clue what you’re doing the cortex is essentially impossible to overload dsp wise. This product is beyond useless. I mean to each their own
Universal Audio is slowly becoming the 'Apple' of the Audio Industry.
Costs a fortune and solves nothing.
If you have to use so many adjectives to sell your product then maybe make a better product?
And for this price, you could get the Captor from Two Notes and the cab loader from TC Electronics, way better combo than this.
Why include midi when you can just use a phone app via Bluetooth! Big brain stuff from UA.
Because most of the professional users are switching gear via MIDI. No one wants to switch anything via a phone during a concert/song, MIDI is the way to go.
@@nikkinik2161 /whoosh
For less than £50 more you can get a Two Notes Captor X… You get load box, attenuator, XLR outputs, headphone outputs and access to to the Wall of Sound plug-in software/IR’s…
If this product was incredibly affordable (I.e
Yes, but you don´t have dynamic IR´s i the box. With Two Notes you could use the Celestion version of Dynamic IR´s though, but not in the pedal.
Great sounding device with such versatility, yet no possibility of MIDI control. Unbelievable. Deal breaker.
Pointless, 2 notes done this years ago much cheaper.
2 notes has IRs not dynamic.
Another UA Fail product for guitarist. Please put a real guitar player in charge of this things.
Perfect example of something that sounds good but is essentially useless and serves no purpose 😂
I think this was designed to mainly be used with a AMP PEDAL so why am I listening to it being played thru a regular Amp? I’m not bye bye