I've made it halfway through the video so far. Until now I didn't realize how much of a government surveillance program RID was intended to be. I wish I could go back and edit my comments on the proposed rule. A real big thank you to the people who spotted these issues and have been working on this case all along!
Thank you for shining the light on the many legal issues you have identified with the RID legislation. I think the majority of folks would view idea that the FAA should have control over the airspace above an individual's backyard below the tree line to be a major overeach of government control and recording those flights a breech of privacy. Appreciate you fighting the go!of fight.
It will be interesting to see the stats over the years if it is any safer with ADSB. I totally understand your position. When the Government starts charging by the mile for flight taxes, you let us know how you feel. My county already monitors all of the aircraft in our area with tracking software. Back to safety, what is safer, looking inside or outside the cockpit?
As a person using RC since the 70s, this level of surveillance and regulation is extreme overreach. At the very least I think under 750 grams and under the height of surrounding trees or buildings (where planes would never be) should not require any registration nor surveillance at all. My other belief is that registration and surveillance should be restricted to commercial use and has no place for recreational users. What they have now is preemptive enforcement. Rather than regulation and surveillance for all users, they should just make laws on what is specifically of concern. Things like not in other peoples yards, not over public gatherings, not in aircraft airspace, not above certain heights. You make a law and pursue those who violate that law, not regulate and surveil every user everywhere. What they're doing is downright authoritarian.
And 95% of people won't stay below buildings and treetops. I mean...we have police that watch for speeders and pretty much every car on the road still speeds. You think they'll follow the law if nobody's watching? 🤣🤣🤣🤣It'll never happen unless they're less than 8 or 9 years old.
@@J.C... Your thinking is the reason the FAA gets away with extreme overreach. Heavy regulation and registration is NOT ok for something far lighter than a football.
I have a strong feeling in the next 5 years or so there will be a big fight over UAVs and the first amendment. Protests and stuff that you would want to record out of brick throwing range, but the cops being very upset even though you have the right to film them anywhere. Surely the freedom of the press would include filming from above.
Any U.S. Government official, who violates the U.S. Constitution, should be removed from office permanently, and restricted from serving in any other government capacity.
Yea !!!! finally some REAL folks calling out the FAA who have ZERO authority over unmanned micro aircraft. they " made up " a weight limit. They MADE UP regulations to affect drone pilots and now Daddy Do Gooder Democrats want to entertain this nonsense I'm gonna lose my mind If I see any more vids of people acting like its LAW im gonna puke 🤮
Thanks for all the work you guys do! I just bought a drone and found out about all the government overreach! The abuse of power needs to stop, I donated $50 for the good cause! Keep up the good work! Also, does anyone know if we are required to register our drones or its not mandatory?
If I understand these ridiculous laws correctly, any drone being used commercially (to make money) MUST be registered with the FAA. Also, and this is where I get confused, but as I understand any drone weighing 250 grams or more even if being used for recreation, must be registered with the FAA. I'm confused because if I as a 12 year old kid walk in a store and purchase a drone, go to the park directly from the store, how am I to liable to the FAA for not following regulations that I am un-aware of? For years remote control hobbyist flew RC aircraft without having to register with the FAA. All of a sudden there's a tremendous danger in the skies with drones! I haven't heard of one instance in the 6 years I've been flying, that a drone has collided with a plane or caused a near accident with the exception of Aug 25, 2021 - According to a recent report, a student pilot and a flight instructor landed safely after a mid-air collision with a police-operated drone. I'm sure a google search would reveal examples. I just did a quick check and there is 1 case in which a drone collided with a plane (in the US) causing minor damage.
@@ruffrideralec Thank you for the response and you are correct. If it weighs over 250 grams it would have to be registered which I think its obserd since almost all good quality drone weigh over 250 grams. Definitely government overreach and a business to collect money. I did speak to a police officer friend though and they mentioned that police are a bit hazy on these new laws and their priority is more on serious crimes. So I guess it's better to be on the safe side though and register it just in case but I agree, it's ridiculous.
Rupprecht is saying that you have a reasonable expectation of privacy at a public ball field. That argument will fail. The Supreme Court has already ruled that there is NO expectation of privacy in a public place. Not sure that I would want him representing me in court.
Glad to see someone else knows there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public space or if viewable from public space (including airspace). As far as communication privacy is concerned, the message and content have a reasonable expectation of privacy; BUT the metadata doesn’t. The signals broadcast don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Many thanks for this great info. New to this 'hobby', and this compliance is scheduled for this September. What is the current state of this suit and rule?
Awesome work here RDQ. This whole idea is a massive overreach by the government. Stock up on parts and build your own. I just don't see anyone with common sense complying.
Incredibly important and pertinent information. Completely key everyone hears this and understands it at least in part. Thank you guy's all so much for this and for what you're doing for all of us. GOD bless America🇺🇲⚖️.
FAA needs to be sued for ADSB tracking in full size aircraft as well. It’s the same thing involving tracking with easy access to owner of aircraft identification.
The primary use of ADSB is for Air Traffic Control to see General Aviation aircraft along with altitude and speed to better control aircraft that they may not be able to see. Also some GA aircraft are getting advanced ADSB equipment to detect close aircraft and avoid being on a collision course with another plane. Also ADSB is used as a tool for search and rescue, as well as aircraft crash investigation. So you suggest shutting off ADSB and let the aircraft have a mid air collision just so there is more privacy. I don't think that has much traction, and it doesn't make sense.
What if you only had to transmit outside of Class G airspace? E.g. generally above either 700 or 1200 AGL? That way you can remain private in non-busy airspace.
One of my big concerns with the FAA is the issue of fines. In order to operate legally, we have to register with the FAA. I feel that violators of the FAA laws (when they become constitutionally created) should result in, first the temporary or permanent revocation of the registration which gives us the right to operate. Only if someone insist on operating without a valid registration should those huge fines enter consideration. No one should have to fly legally while having those ridiculous fines hanging over one's head. In my opinion, those fines are intended to dampen our interest in this hobby. NOTE: I was not able to view this video because of other commitments, so this issue may well be already on your minds.
@@papapsadventures6119 What's the matter? Can't produce any? Please supply verifiable proof that "this administration" is responsible for government overreach. And by the way, the Supreme Court has ruled decades ago that mandatory vaccinations are legal, that's why nobody gets into public school unless they are vaccinated against measles and polio.
@@vangazmicvoyage5077 so you think the government has the rite to make a medical decision for you? That vaccine isn't safe by any stretch of the imagination. My bet is if the measles and polio vaccinations still let you get those diseases, they wouldn't be mandatory.
@@papapsadventures6119 It's spelled "right" not "rite." The government can't literally hold you down and jab you with a needle but they do have the authority to deny you and your child entry to a public school building without it. The government also has the right to deny you access to any public building or public accommodation without a mask or a vaccine during a public health emergency. The Supreme Court has upheld that some of our freedoms may be temporarily suspended during a public emergency such as rioting, civil insurrection, or pandemic. And you couldn't be more wrong about the vaccine's effectiveness. You must be a magahat who bought into the big lies, probably taking your advice from OAN or Sucker Carlson. Smarten up, get educated by science not Trump. Stop being such a whiny little b*tch complaining about tyranny. You have no idea what actual tyranny is and its your refusal to stop spreading the disease that is killing people. How many children did you kill today? Polio is a disease that cripples and kills mostly children. Polio has been nearly eradicated from this planet because of MANDATED VACCINATIONS! Get it? Stop being so selfish and self centered, think about the right to life of everyone else. You are endangering lives and that is a violation of THEIR rights. Get it?
Drones we need your phantom flying in the park to remote id. We also need your registration number on it. 300 pound guy with a parachute flying over the interstate with a propeller strapped on your back? Nah your good
since 1990, here's my 2 cents worth. I've been in and out of general aviation since 1989 when I got my private pilot cert. I have around 660hrs in SEL acft. I am an IFR rated pilot and I was a CFI having taught about a dozen pilots. I currently hold a Part 107 cert for the occasional drone job. I'd like to believe the FAA will be successful in the drone remote ID business. However, I think they will fail in rather spectacular fashion. 1st off, has anyone tried lately to contact a FSDO office lately? I have, and had very little luck getting anyone to return my inquiries. This is still due to working from home for Covid IN 2023! JEEZ! GET BACK IN THE OFFICE! 2nd point is the shear number of drones being sold. There will be so many new remote ID drones that the FAA will be overwhelmed! If the FAA thinks they have a problem, now just wait until Sep 16th. Then they'll learn what real problems are!
The unfortunate reality here is that the plaintiffs are conflating individual protections guaranteed by the constitution and the systematic integration of an aircraft in the nation's airspace. The constitution doesn't protect aircraft operating in the nation's airspace. Aircraft are required to stay in radio contact with ATC and commercial aircraft of 10 passengers or more are required to have traffic collision avoidance systems that broadcast their position to other receivers. Supporting both systems is radar. The drone reporting system is the only way to ID these drones and this is based on a limitation of the drone technology based on the drone's physical size. If the drone was larger, the FAA could simply require the same onboard systems that conventional aircraft would be required to have on board and broadcast from.
Yeah it makes zero sense and is not needed for line of sight since you can move out of the way of a aircraft when flying drones and RC planes. However if you want to fly a drone outside of your line of sight then it should be required to broadcast to things nearby that it's there so nothing hits it.
The FAA is not a constitutionally recognized agency, holding no lawmaking authority, illegal to write or enact laws. 'Rules' are not law, and can not be enforced as a law. R.I.D can be ignored, the airspace is under the rule of the people, the FAA can not possess anything, and holds no ownership by their own actions. Nobody granted by legislation, or any electoral process to the FAA, the agency simply decided to take control on their own.
Sounds like they're using the GPS location, storing data. And whatnot as almost a route around. Getting warrants to collect information in such. Because you are forced to have your GPS Data. Give them to them. You can't opt out of it by saying no I don't want my GPS location transfer to anybody. I don't want that information stored for any. Of time. But nope, that's what it's all. 4 is just another means to find a way to prosecute people. To make money, cause that's what it's all about. Money, remember all the businesses wanna do drone delivery. And that's part of why they're gonna do this. And then eventually once they get that in place. They're just gonna start giving you specific areas. And that's the only place you'll be allowed to fly. Because then everywhere else will be drone delivery air space, which will be owned by large corporations. In the FAA roll out it. Because corporations will give them lots and lots and lots and lots of money does like I said it's all about money.
The first thing I thought of when I saw that ridiculous remote ID idea was that it's an infringement on our first amendment rights to freedom of press; in the same way that restricting public photography is the same type of infringement. AND it's an invasion of privacy too, with regard to its effect on the fourth amendment.
Is the new FAA Remote ID rule for all remote controlled aircraft or are drones being singled out? There are many types of UAV’s out there, every remotely controlled airborne vehicle should have to be equipped with a remote ID beacon not just drones. Why are drones the scapegoat in this new ruling?
Can you tell me if a video taken in another country and posted here (US server) what the FCC can do or say to you, as far as requirement for a 107 license? Thanks.
@@MrEWWWW Thank u for the response. That now brings another interesting question. How do they really know if a video that is monetize by UT is actually shot in this country? Not the obvious landscapes of course but u know what I mean. Thanks again
@@dorapadakis2957 simple they don't really unless you provided information when you posted the video or could track it down through other means. I doubt anyone will mess with on this. Worst case country of where you shot said video does something but why if your not in that country. Same with the US if you did something wrong in another country that's your problem.
A drone is fully or partially automatous, an RC quad copter is not a drone. Stop calling RC a drone. FAA already says an RC can not be operated outside the vision of the operator. Drones can/do operate outside the vision of the operator. Like military drones operating in middle east and controlled from California. This ID law is to stop people from delivering drugs inside prisons and spying anonymously for example. Now with ID law, the RC when found doing something illegal can be captured and queried to see who is responsible and where the device has been, and who owns it. Operating in public is not the same as operating on private property. Laws are always behind technology. The government and LEO want all control and they push the laws that give them more control. Unless you build it yourself, the new ones probably have the tracking and ID built in. Your car, your cell phone and everything with a network connection is already spying and reporting on you. I would not be surprised if the remote ID can also be used to shut the device down or even take over control and retrieve the device. After one youtuber mounted a pistol on a quad copter and showed it target shooting, the FBI confiscated the device and the FAA reclassified all RC aircraft as civilian aircraft, and it is illegal to weaponize a civilian aircraft. Then the FBI charged the owner under this law that was not in effect when he built it. You have only the rights the government wants you to have and they are revoked without warning, often on the spot.
Agreed Is that navigable airspace or is it preparation for remote commercial bots that deliver stuff to our homes? Would realtime milliwatt non recorded generic ISM beacons be acceptable without any ID? I hear the low airspace being a risk often concerning Amateur Radio Antennas over towers at 50 to 200 feet above ground! My common answer is if an aircraft hits it it was already crashing and outside human control except within 1000 meters of active airports!
I just don't like the idea of being out in a remote, or suburban area with 10k worth of drone equipment, and having some thugs scan my drone, and see instantly where I am, and losing my equipment. Only to have a cop show up 20 minutes later, and give me nothing but a case number for insurance. We have way to many folks whom believe the drones can and are invading their privacy, or spying on them in particular. I can't count the times I have encountered conspiracy Karens while doing roof estimates, and real estate shoots. This will just make it harder for us.
What about an onboard power-cutting limiter. At 399' feet above launch height you get an alarm. at 400' the power to the motor is shut off until the model returns to a lower altitude?
First, personal flyers in certain things. We don't need this c*** It doesn't matter what you do even with the remote. ID you're still gonna have people that are gonna fly. Whether they're not supposed to, it doesn't matter on top of the fact that you have some of these GPS control, so what if the system inside fails, and it just goes in flies and one direction, and it doesn't stop until it runs out of battery and crashes and yours you. Can't do anything with your remote. So that's another problem with Ramon ideas. Then you're gonna charge that man with the crime. When the machine itself had a failure and was doing whatever it chose to do. And you had no control because there was a malfunction. Can you go to make a man a criminal out of a machine having a malfunction?
Correct. Every right comes with a responsibility, every freedom comes with an obligation. There are limits to free speech: you can't yell fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten anyone or conspire to commit a crime.
Bob, You got it. No liberties or rights are universal or absolute. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public space or if viewable from public space.
Jay, You are the man to lead this fight,1 suggestion....Slow Down ,you talk so fast ,youll lose alot of your arguement because They cant listen that fast.Hope this helpful.KICK THEIR ASS
Is this legislation as passed by Congress or an FAA Regulation and does the FAA have Congressional approval to promulgate Regulations? You guys need to pay more attention to the Second Amendment community as some of the legal flailing of Joe Biden’s ATF are relevant!
according to the current FAA rule on remote ID it will broadcast from takeoff until landing. So if you take off inside your house or garage and just hover testing things or adjusting your settings your drone will be broadcasting in an area that the courts have ruled people DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. They would need a warrant.
Does the FAA have the authority from congress to change regulations? This is similar to the ATF and EPA overstepping their authority and making up new rules or modifying rules that would result in converting law abiding citizens to criminals.
It’s not going to matter because every town every park now wants you to get a permit and carry 1,000,000 ins I don’t even Cary that for my car and home put together
I think the FAA should be sued for regulating non-navigable airspace - the spaces under trees, and the spaces in the trees. No full scale can fly there - the FAA should not be telling us what to do under the trees. But they ban spotterless FPV under trees. And they ban BVLOS under trees. They have no right - to tell us what we can, and cannot do, under the trees.
I have no issue with remote ID but i do take issue withnit being made available to the public. It should be limited to the FAA and local law enforcement with a warrant.
The ID is like a vehicle license plate and can only be linked to an individual by law enforcement for cause. Bad drone actors made this ID system necessary .
why the drone have to take the same test as pilot . i think we need a class show us stuff and weather and maps charts. like a safe test for drone. and we go out and fly a drone. we have to pass flight test and paper test to.. then we get are 107 license.. bigger planes need more on there test because they are carry people
The best protest if this is in affect Everyone take your transmitters and receivers turn them on and drive around big airports be the best electric protest in history Nothing the government can do it will frustrate them and your not flying a drone your driving your car MAKE IT HAPPEN !!
What The FAA should do. Instead of making everyone of us . Use the remote id. Should go after those who illegally fly where there is no flying, like over government buildings, police activities , or over people private property and make them registered like a sex offender.and leave everyone else alone
But then who would control the 0 to 80 ft airspace if u let city’s states or your neighbors the drone industry for hobbies are dead 💀 I’ve never met anyone who said ya fly over my house! Or ny state has so much restrictions on where u can take off!
Yeah but the fpv an Ariel photography is what caused all this. Need to leave the line of sight guys out of it! Iam flying for fun no fpv or cam. You that's flying miles out with GPS an fpv your the ones who need remote I.d that's your problem sorry but its the truth.
Props to the responsible ADULTS in this comment section and waa waa to all the childish anti government trolls. These cry babies want no regulation yet cry when something happens to them. I live the child attorney taking this guys money on this ludacris lawsuit. Trust me I work with attorneys and that attorney knows he is full of crap and is laughing all the way to the bank. Drones need to regulated because there are irresponsible operators out there who care nothing about others safety. Hilarious video from a paralegal's stand point. Lol
Give a mouse a cookie, and he will want a glass of milk. Anti government is irrelevant. When you give one right over another is when you shall be concerned with. Hegelian Dialectic. Please be eduMaKated
I applaud this challenge to the FAA's overreach. 🔥🔥🔥
I've made it halfway through the video so far. Until now I didn't realize how much of a government surveillance program RID was intended to be. I wish I could go back and edit my comments on the proposed rule.
A real big thank you to the people who spotted these issues and have been working on this case all along!
This isn’t surveillance, nor an invasion or violation of privacy.
@@montithered4741yes it is
Just chipped in and donated $50. Thank you so much!
Thank you for shining the light on the many legal issues you have identified with the RID legislation. I think the majority of folks would view idea that the FAA should have control over the airspace above an individual's backyard below the tree line to be a major overeach of government control and recording those flights a breech of privacy. Appreciate you fighting the go!of fight.
It will be interesting to see the stats over the years if it is any safer with ADSB. I totally understand your position. When the Government starts charging by the mile for flight taxes, you let us know how you feel. My county already monitors all of the aircraft in our area with tracking software. Back to safety, what is safer, looking inside or outside the cockpit?
It's sad to see the over reach today compared too when I was younger many years ago
As a person using RC since the 70s, this level of surveillance and regulation is extreme overreach. At the very least I think under 750 grams and under the height of surrounding trees or buildings (where planes would never be) should not require any registration nor surveillance at all. My other belief is that registration and surveillance should be restricted to commercial use and has no place for recreational users. What they have now is preemptive enforcement.
Rather than regulation and surveillance for all users, they should just make laws on what is specifically of concern. Things like not in other peoples yards, not over public gatherings, not in aircraft airspace, not above certain heights. You make a law and pursue those who violate that law, not regulate and surveil every user everywhere. What they're doing is downright authoritarian.
And 95% of people won't stay below buildings and treetops. I mean...we have police that watch for speeders and pretty much every car on the road still speeds. You think they'll follow the law if nobody's watching? 🤣🤣🤣🤣It'll never happen unless they're less than 8 or 9 years old.
@@J.C... Your thinking is the reason the FAA gets away with extreme overreach. Heavy regulation and registration is NOT ok for something far lighter than a football.
Yes 250 g is ridiculous, should have been at least 500 g.
Finally someone who can go on longer rants than Paul! Need a edited down version of this video
I have a strong feeling in the next 5 years or so there will be a big fight over UAVs and the first amendment. Protests and stuff that you would want to record out of brick throwing range, but the cops being very upset even though you have the right to film them anywhere. Surely the freedom of the press would include filming from above.
Any U.S. Government official, who violates the U.S. Constitution, should be removed from office permanently, and restricted from serving in any other government capacity.
Yea !!!!
finally some REAL folks calling out the FAA who have ZERO authority over unmanned micro aircraft.
they " made up " a weight limit. They MADE UP regulations to affect drone pilots and now Daddy Do Gooder Democrats want to entertain this nonsense
I'm gonna lose my mind If I see any more vids of people acting like its LAW im gonna puke 🤮
That's alot of people 😕
That’s tRump and half the GOP, sounds like a good start.
@canadiangemstones7636 The deep state is mainly on the Democrat side. Need to remove the blinders if you speak truth.
Don't register it don't put the module on it. Cheaper to loose it then get fined...
Absolutely
Thank you guys for challenging the injustice and sketchy shenanigans.
Thanks for all the work you guys do! I just bought a drone and found out about all the government overreach! The abuse of power needs to stop, I donated $50 for the good cause! Keep up the good work! Also, does anyone know if we are required to register our drones or its not mandatory?
If I understand these ridiculous laws correctly, any drone being used commercially (to make money) MUST be registered with the FAA. Also, and this is where I get confused, but as I understand any drone weighing 250 grams or more even if being used for recreation, must be registered with the FAA. I'm confused because if I as a 12 year old kid walk in a store and purchase a drone, go to the park directly from the store, how am I to liable to the FAA for not following regulations that I am un-aware of? For years remote control hobbyist flew RC aircraft without having to register with the FAA. All of a sudden there's a tremendous danger in the skies with drones! I haven't heard of one instance in the 6 years I've been flying, that a drone has collided with a plane or caused a near accident with the exception of Aug 25, 2021 - According to a recent report, a student pilot and a flight instructor landed safely after a mid-air collision with a police-operated drone. I'm sure a google search would reveal examples. I just did a quick check and there is 1 case in which a drone collided with a plane (in the US) causing minor damage.
@@ruffrideralec Thank you for the response and you are correct. If it weighs over 250 grams it would have to be registered which I think its obserd since almost all good quality drone weigh over 250 grams. Definitely government overreach and a business to collect money. I did speak to a police officer friend though and they mentioned that police are a bit hazy on these new laws and their priority is more on serious crimes. So I guess it's better to be on the safe side though and register it just in case but I agree, it's ridiculous.
@@prolegacy9501 none of mine are registered. .so there's that. ..
@@ruffrideralecignorance of the law isint a defense sadly.
There are a lot of parallels here to what the ATF is doing with guns and accessories with respect to overreach.
What's the case name? Had it been decided yet?
Rupprecht is saying that you have a reasonable expectation of privacy at a public ball field. That argument will fail. The Supreme Court has already ruled that there is NO expectation of privacy in a public place. Not sure that I would want him representing me in court.
Glad to see someone else knows there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public space or if viewable from public space (including airspace).
As far as communication privacy is concerned, the message and content have a reasonable expectation of privacy; BUT the metadata doesn’t. The signals broadcast don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Additionally, it is improper to require an ID from a citizen who is not suspected of a crime.
Many thanks for this great info. New to this 'hobby', and this compliance is scheduled for this September. What is the current state of this suit and rule?
Awesome work here RDQ. This whole idea is a massive overreach by the government. Stock up on parts and build your own. I just don't see anyone with common sense complying.
Incredibly important and pertinent information. Completely key everyone hears this and understands it at least in part. Thank you guy's all so much for this and for what you're doing for all of us. GOD bless America🇺🇲⚖️.
FAA needs to be sued for ADSB tracking in full size aircraft as well. It’s the same thing involving tracking with easy access to owner of aircraft identification.
The primary use of ADSB is for Air Traffic Control to see General Aviation aircraft along with altitude and speed to better control aircraft that they may not be able to see.
Also some GA aircraft are getting advanced ADSB equipment to detect close aircraft and avoid being on a collision course with another plane.
Also ADSB is used as a tool for search and rescue, as well as aircraft crash investigation.
So you suggest shutting off ADSB and let the aircraft have a mid air collision just so there is more privacy.
I don't think that has much traction, and it doesn't make sense.
How can we put a stop to this as of now
If we would have stepped up when it was first proposed we could of done something about it
What if you only had to transmit outside of Class G airspace? E.g. generally above either 700 or 1200 AGL? That way you can remain private in non-busy airspace.
We Vastly outnumber them time to stand up for our 4th ammendment rights
I'm glad this popped up.
Bravo, I think pushback is in order.
Thank you Jon and Tyler!! We owe you guys!
Thank you so much for sharing your amazing experiences with drones ❤
Makes one wonder... what is the *real* reason they want to know where every drone is at any given moment...? What don't they want us to see???
Thank you guys for challenging the FAA clustermuck. I don't think RI will roll out in FAA's favor. Not to mention overreach to the max.
Full sized manned aircraft have been this way for 35 year
Stumbled on this today. Does anyone have an update on lawsuit?
I'm all for the right way. So good luck.
The FAA is unaccountable. I’ve had bad experiences with them.
One of my big concerns with the FAA is the issue of fines. In order to operate legally, we have to register with the FAA. I feel that violators of the FAA laws (when they become constitutionally created) should result in, first the temporary or permanent revocation of the registration which gives us the right to operate. Only if someone insist on operating without a valid registration should those huge fines enter consideration. No one should have to fly legally while having those ridiculous fines hanging over one's head. In my opinion, those fines are intended to dampen our interest in this hobby.
NOTE: I was not able to view this video because of other commitments, so this issue may well be already on your minds.
If it needs a license or registration it's not a right it's a privilege. As for the fines what Mortal man can afford to pay them just ignore them.
@@basspig Ignoring fines have consequences.
Well what's going to happen is they will require ADS-B to track all model aircraft instead of people.
Do you know what the status is on this case ?
Keep up the good work. You have my full support.
Keep up the good fight fellas!! Government overreach is only growing...our current administration is proof of that
Identify your so-called "proof."
@@vangazmicvoyage5077 you are kidding right?
@@papapsadventures6119 What's the matter? Can't produce any? Please supply verifiable proof that "this administration" is responsible for government overreach. And by the way, the Supreme Court has ruled decades ago that mandatory vaccinations are legal, that's why nobody gets into public school unless they are vaccinated against measles and polio.
@@vangazmicvoyage5077 so you think the government has the rite to make a medical decision for you? That vaccine isn't safe by any stretch of the imagination. My bet is if the measles and polio vaccinations still let you get those diseases, they wouldn't be mandatory.
@@papapsadventures6119 It's spelled "right" not "rite." The government can't literally hold you down and jab you with a needle but they do have the authority to deny you and your child entry to a public school building without it.
The government also has the right to deny you access to any public building or public accommodation without a mask or a vaccine during a public health emergency.
The Supreme Court has upheld that some of our freedoms may be temporarily suspended during a public emergency such as rioting, civil insurrection, or pandemic.
And you couldn't be more wrong about the vaccine's effectiveness. You must be a magahat who bought into the big lies, probably taking your advice from OAN or Sucker Carlson.
Smarten up, get educated by science not Trump. Stop being such a whiny little b*tch complaining about tyranny. You have no idea what actual tyranny is and its your refusal to stop spreading the disease that is killing people. How many children did you kill today?
Polio is a disease that cripples and kills mostly children. Polio has been nearly eradicated from this planet because of MANDATED VACCINATIONS! Get it?
Stop being so selfish and self centered, think about the right to life of everyone else. You are endangering lives and that is a violation of THEIR rights. Get it?
Enough is enough!
The FAA should stop harassing Hobbyist in the the drone field…
How about doing their job regarding Boeing and their passenger jet? 😮
Drones we need your phantom flying in the park to remote id. We also need your registration number on it.
300 pound guy with a parachute flying over the interstate with a propeller strapped on your back? Nah your good
since 1990, here's my 2 cents worth. I've been in and out of general aviation since 1989 when I got my private pilot cert. I have around 660hrs in SEL acft. I am an IFR rated pilot and I was a CFI having taught about a dozen pilots. I currently hold a Part 107 cert for the occasional drone job.
I'd like to believe the FAA will be successful in the drone remote ID business. However, I think they will fail in rather spectacular fashion. 1st off, has anyone tried lately to contact a FSDO office lately? I have, and had very little luck getting anyone to return my inquiries. This is still due to working from home for Covid IN 2023! JEEZ! GET BACK IN THE OFFICE! 2nd point is the shear number of drones being sold. There will be so many new remote ID drones that the FAA will be overwhelmed! If the FAA thinks they have a problem, now just wait until Sep 16th. Then they'll learn what real problems are!
The unfortunate reality here is that the plaintiffs are conflating individual protections guaranteed by the constitution and the systematic integration of an aircraft in the nation's airspace. The constitution doesn't protect aircraft operating in the nation's airspace. Aircraft are required to stay in radio contact with ATC and commercial aircraft of 10 passengers or more are required to have traffic collision avoidance systems that broadcast their position to other receivers. Supporting both systems is radar. The drone reporting system is the only way to ID these drones and this is based on a limitation of the drone technology based on the drone's physical size. If the drone was larger, the FAA could simply require the same onboard systems that conventional aircraft would be required to have on board and broadcast from.
ADS-B is also being included on drones.
Yeah it makes zero sense and is not needed for line of sight since you can move out of the way of a aircraft when flying drones and RC planes. However if you want to fly a drone outside of your line of sight then it should be required to broadcast to things nearby that it's there so nothing hits it.
The FAA is not a constitutionally recognized agency, holding no lawmaking authority, illegal to write or enact laws.
'Rules' are not law, and can not be enforced as a law.
R.I.D can be ignored, the airspace is under the rule of the people, the FAA can not possess anything, and holds no ownership by their own actions.
Nobody granted by legislation, or any electoral process to the FAA, the agency simply decided to take control on their own.
FAA IS NOT OUR MASTER!
JUST BECAUSE IT IS 'FEDERAL', DOES NOT MEAN THEY AUTOMATICALLY BECOME VALID, OR HOLD ANY LAWFUL POWERS, THEY DO NOT!
I'm seeing rainge issues having RemoteID neer my RC receiver. Anyone else seeing this?
Sounds like they're using the GPS location, storing data. And whatnot as almost a route around. Getting warrants to collect information in such. Because you are forced to have your GPS Data. Give them to them. You can't opt out of it by saying no I don't want my GPS location transfer to anybody. I don't want that information stored for any. Of time. But nope, that's what it's all. 4 is just another means to find a way to prosecute people. To make money, cause that's what it's all about. Money, remember all the businesses wanna do drone delivery. And that's part of why they're gonna do this. And then eventually once they get that in place. They're just gonna start giving you specific areas. And that's the only place you'll be allowed to fly. Because then everywhere else will be drone delivery air space, which will be owned by large corporations. In the FAA roll out it. Because corporations will give them lots and lots and lots and lots of money does like I said it's all about money.
The first thing I thought of when I saw that ridiculous remote ID idea was that it's an infringement on our first amendment rights to freedom of press; in the same way that restricting public photography is the same type of infringement. AND it's an invasion of privacy too, with regard to its effect on the fourth amendment.
I can see the police having a drone to look for a person that's running from them
What are the odds of winning this case?
Is the new FAA Remote ID rule for all remote controlled aircraft or are drones being singled out? There are many types of UAV’s out there, every remotely controlled airborne vehicle should have to be equipped with a remote ID beacon not just drones. Why are drones the scapegoat in this new ruling?
because that's a good plan for their revenue.
never about safety.
anything to keep their pockets full.
The rule covers all RC aircraft.
Can you tell me if a video taken in another country and posted here (US server) what the FCC can do or say to you, as far as requirement for a 107 license? Thanks.
Nothing it wasn’t in their airspace, they have nothing to stand on.
@@MrEWWWW
Thank u for the response. That now brings another interesting question.
How do they really know if a video that is monetize by UT is actually shot in this country? Not the obvious landscapes of course but u know what I mean.
Thanks again
@@dorapadakis2957 simple they don't really unless you provided information when you posted the video or could track it down through other means. I doubt anyone will mess with on this. Worst case country of where you shot said video does something but why if your not in that country. Same with the US if you did something wrong in another country that's your problem.
A drone is fully or partially automatous, an RC quad copter is not a drone. Stop calling RC a drone.
FAA already says an RC can not be operated outside the vision of the operator.
Drones can/do operate outside the vision of the operator. Like military drones operating in middle east and controlled from California.
This ID law is to stop people from delivering drugs inside prisons and spying anonymously for example.
Now with ID law, the RC when found doing something illegal can be captured and queried to see who is responsible and where the device has been, and who owns it.
Operating in public is not the same as operating on private property.
Laws are always behind technology. The government and LEO want all control and they push the laws that give them more control.
Unless you build it yourself, the new ones probably have the tracking and ID built in.
Your car, your cell phone and everything with a network connection is already spying and reporting on you.
I would not be surprised if the remote ID can also be used to shut the device down or even take over control and retrieve the device.
After one youtuber mounted a pistol on a quad copter and showed it target shooting, the FBI confiscated the device and the FAA reclassified all RC aircraft as civilian aircraft, and it is illegal to weaponize a civilian aircraft.
Then the FBI charged the owner under this law that was not in effect when he built it.
You have only the rights the government wants you to have and they are revoked without warning, often on the spot.
Well said, thank you and GOD bless America.
Agreed Is that navigable airspace or is it preparation for remote commercial bots that deliver stuff to our homes? Would realtime milliwatt non recorded generic ISM beacons be acceptable without any ID?
I hear the low airspace being a risk often concerning Amateur Radio Antennas over towers at 50 to 200 feet above ground! My common answer is if an aircraft hits it it was already crashing and outside human control except within 1000 meters of active airports!
How about it's a law that being arbitrarily adopted without legislative oversight.
FAA IS UNELECTED...NO LAWMAKING POWERS.
NOT GRANTED LAW ENFORCEMENT POWERS...
FAA CAN NOT PLAY COP.
FAA RULES ARE NOT LAW...WHO CARES!
Thank you
I’m a student pilot as well as a drone pilot. isn’t ADSB similar to remote id?
Any update on this ?
I just don't like the idea of being out in a remote, or suburban area with 10k worth of drone equipment, and having some thugs scan my drone, and see instantly where I am, and losing my equipment. Only to have a cop show up 20 minutes later, and give me nothing but a case number for insurance. We have way to many folks whom believe the drones can and are invading their privacy, or spying on them in particular. I can't count the times I have encountered conspiracy Karens while doing roof estimates, and real estate shoots. This will just make it harder for us.
What about an onboard power-cutting limiter. At 399' feet above launch height you get an alarm. at 400' the power to the motor is shut off until the model returns to a lower altitude?
This is good news for citizens
First, personal flyers in certain things. We don't need this c*** It doesn't matter what you do even with the remote. ID you're still gonna have people that are gonna fly. Whether they're not supposed to, it doesn't matter on top of the fact that you have some of these GPS control, so what if the system inside fails, and it just goes in flies and one direction, and it doesn't stop until it runs out of battery and crashes and yours you. Can't do anything with your remote. So that's another problem with Ramon ideas. Then you're gonna charge that man with the crime. When the machine itself had a failure and was doing whatever it chose to do. And you had no control because there was a malfunction. Can you go to make a man a criminal out of a machine having a malfunction?
Well according to the supreme Court in 1905 and one of their decisions a personal liberties is not absolute
Correct. Every right comes with a responsibility, every freedom comes with an obligation. There are limits to free speech: you can't yell fire in a crowded theater, you can't threaten anyone or conspire to commit a crime.
Bob,
You got it. No liberties or rights are universal or absolute. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public space or if viewable from public space.
Do we have an update since March 26, 2024?
I felt that yawn at 35:30
What is the latest on this?
Comment for the algorithm, fight for no remote ID on hobby aircraft under 1kg
January 2024 update: The FAA did it anyway.
Jay, You are the man to lead this fight,1 suggestion....Slow Down ,you talk so fast ,youll lose alot of your arguement because They cant listen that fast.Hope this helpful.KICK THEIR ASS
Is this legislation as passed by Congress or an FAA Regulation and does the FAA have Congressional approval to promulgate Regulations? You guys need to pay more attention to the Second Amendment community as some of the legal flailing of Joe Biden’s ATF are relevant!
Sub 250 grams? DJI Mini3 Pro has Rid that was activated automatically.
Do people not realize there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in public space or if viewable from public space (including airspace)?
according to the current FAA rule on remote ID it will broadcast from takeoff until landing. So if you take off inside your house or garage and just hover testing things or adjusting your settings your drone will be broadcasting in an area that the courts have ruled people DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. They would need a warrant.
Does the FAA have the authority from congress to change regulations? This is similar to the ATF and EPA overstepping their authority and making up new rules or modifying rules that would result in converting law abiding citizens to criminals.
It’s not going to matter because every town every park now wants you to get a permit and carry 1,000,000 ins I don’t even Cary that for my car and home put together
I think the FAA should be sued for regulating non-navigable airspace - the spaces under trees, and the spaces in the trees. No full scale can fly there - the FAA should not be telling us what to do under the trees. But they ban spotterless FPV under trees. And they ban BVLOS under trees. They have no right - to tell us what we can, and cannot do, under the trees.
The government, Congress, DOT, FAA are empowered by the US Constitution to regulate pretty much everything thanks to activist SCOTUS judges.
Why doesn't the FAA micro chip the drone pilots instead. It's cheaper. Lol
Probably not cuz most of them use Google. I hear all these people complaining but I don't see anyone throwing their cell phone into the trash.
sounds like a plan.
😂😂
I have no issue with remote ID but i do take issue withnit being made available to the public. It should be limited to the FAA and local law enforcement with a warrant.
The ID is like a vehicle license plate and can only be linked to an individual by law enforcement for cause. Bad drone actors made this ID system necessary .
why the drone have to take the same test as pilot . i think we need a class show us stuff and weather and maps charts. like a safe test for drone. and we go out and fly a drone. we have to pass flight test and paper test to.. then we get are 107 license.. bigger planes need more on there test because they are carry people
Anybody trying to control a dam drone or rc plane is out of there mind. Crabby old folks
The best protest if this is in affect
Everyone take your transmitters and receivers turn them on and drive around big airports be the best electric protest in history
Nothing the government can do it will frustrate them and your not flying a drone your driving your car
MAKE IT HAPPEN !!
What The FAA should do. Instead of making everyone of us . Use the remote id. Should go after those who illegally fly where there is no flying, like over government buildings, police activities , or over people private property and make them registered like a sex offender.and leave everyone else alone
How hard is it for the pilot to fly ?faa now has too learn to fly had they try,,,,,,,,
Any guess who submitted the 👎 ? 😂
Hegelian Dialectic. Shall I say more.....
nice
But then who would control the 0 to 80 ft airspace if u let city’s states or your neighbors the drone industry for hobbies are dead 💀 I’ve never met anyone who said ya fly over my house! Or ny state has so much restrictions on where u can take off!
Retro rule making..... after the fact.
Cheers...I bailed...Sold everything I Owned RC...Good Luck!
Best of luck enforcing it. Lmao nobody’s going to comply.
all this over an overpriced toy?
algorithm
Chinese controlling iFAA
Yeah but the fpv an Ariel photography is what caused all this. Need to leave the line of sight guys out of it! Iam flying for fun no fpv or cam. You that's flying miles out with GPS an fpv your the ones who need remote I.d that's your problem sorry but its the truth.
Props to the responsible ADULTS in this comment section and waa waa to all the childish anti government trolls.
These cry babies want no regulation yet cry when something happens to them.
I live the child attorney taking this guys money on this ludacris lawsuit.
Trust me I work with attorneys and that attorney knows he is full of crap and is laughing all the way to the bank.
Drones need to regulated because there are irresponsible operators out there who care nothing about others safety.
Hilarious video from a paralegal's stand point.
Lol
Give a mouse a cookie, and he will want a glass of milk. Anti government is irrelevant. When you give one right over another is when you shall be concerned with. Hegelian Dialectic. Please be eduMaKated
RDQ lost! And the Constitution does not include your rights to fly !!
Nazism?