Yes, you’re right, it is a mistake, and thanks for pointing it out. It is, however, a minor mistake because the rest of the arguments still follow: 150 minus 158 (not 500) yields a negative number, which is what matters for the conclusion we aim to arrive at in that example.
![(M5E11) [Microeconomics] Risk Aversion and Concavity](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aEII9Fkvk48/mqdefault.jpg)
![(M5E11) [Microeconomics] Risk Aversion and Concavity](/img/tr.png)
![(M5E9) [Microeconomics] First Order Stochastic Dominance: Definition](/img/n.gif)
I would heart this video a million times if I could. You are fantastic at getting straight to the point.
Fantastic lecture, helped me a lot to figure out my assignments, thank you
It's a pleasure to learn from you Selcuk hocam. Thank you.
Very good explanation, thanks so much!
Amazing explanation! really helpful. Thank you very much sir
thank you
Wrong the squareroot of 25000 is not 500 its 158.113
Yes, you’re right, it is a mistake, and thanks for pointing it out. It is, however, a minor mistake because the rest of the arguments still follow: 150 minus 158 (not 500) yields a negative number, which is what matters for the conclusion we aim to arrive at in that example.
Sir please upload more videos@@selcukozyurt
I am disappointed by this video I think you can make Explanation much better than this. Thank you anyway