I love the original and watch it every year. Recently I wanted to re watch the 1994 version since I had only seen it once when I was a kid. The first instance of Susan explaining that she doesn't believe in Santa was very telling. In the original she just stated it as if it were a fact. In the new one, she had like a deep sorrow or regret for not believing in it. Your reviews were great. Very accurate. That beard is glorious.
Excellent analysis. Regarding the 1947 ending, though, I think we can assume that they purchased the house. Fred says to Doris "The sign says it's for sale. We can't let her (Susan) down." I like to think that Kris Kringle was responsible, but like you said, it was subtle and perhaps ambiguous. I never saw the 1994 version, but didn't Susan also specifically want a father and baby brother?
I used to love the original 1947 version. Then I saw the 1994 version, and it totally won my heart. I couldn't watch the 1947 version anymore. It seemed too 'old fashioned.'
im doing this for school can u help me ? the question is "Compare and contrast the 1947 Version with the 1994 version in a 5 paragraph essay. How are they the same? How are they different? Be Specific! Which one did you like better why?" can u help me make a 5 paragraph essay, I'm in highschool and this is really stressful, and i subbed and liked. thanks!
For specifics check out the original on disney+ and I was able to find the remake on hulu. The big differences I laid out in the video. Ex: the product placement, the portrayals of santa, and the vagueness of the original santa's powers vs the more affirmative remake. One big difference that I didn't want to spoil in the video is how the trials are presented, so keep an eye out for that. Best of luck!
![HIWWHEE | OHM [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OJJLtTLqLag/mqdefault.jpg)
I love the original and watch it every year. Recently I wanted to re watch the 1994 version since I had only seen it once when I was a kid. The first instance of Susan explaining that she doesn't believe in Santa was very telling. In the original she just stated it as if it were a fact. In the new one, she had like a deep sorrow or regret for not believing in it. Your reviews were great. Very accurate. That beard is glorious.
Excellent analysis. Regarding the 1947 ending, though, I think we can assume that they purchased the house. Fred says to Doris "The sign says it's for sale. We can't let her (Susan) down." I like to think that Kris Kringle was responsible, but like you said, it was subtle and perhaps ambiguous. I never saw the 1994 version, but didn't Susan also specifically want a father and baby brother?
I used to love the original 1947 version. Then I saw the 1994 version, and it totally won my heart. I couldn't watch the 1947 version anymore. It seemed too 'old fashioned.'
I grew up watching the 1994 version so I have a biased towards it
I definitely agree with the points you made. I like the original a lot better.
I just got the 1994 version off Netflix and I was wondering if I should send it back. I've never seen it
They are both on Disney Plus, watch the original first please lol than watch the 94 the next day or so
im doing this for school can u help me ? the question is "Compare and contrast the 1947 Version with the 1994 version in a 5 paragraph essay. How are they the same? How are they different? Be Specific! Which one did you like better why?" can u help me make a 5 paragraph essay, I'm in highschool and this is really stressful, and i subbed and liked. thanks!
For specifics check out the original on disney+ and I was able to find the remake on hulu. The big differences I laid out in the video. Ex: the product placement, the portrayals of santa, and the vagueness of the original santa's powers vs the more affirmative remake. One big difference that I didn't want to spoil in the video is how the trials are presented, so keep an eye out for that. Best of luck!
The 1994 version is a joke. Not worth the time. Stick with the best, which is the original.