Least Reliable Cars That Won't Even Last 60,000 Miles || Avoid Buying!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ค. 2024
- Top 10 most unreliable car and SUV's you should never buy for 2024. These are the worst and most unreliable cars and SUV's that you should avoid buying. These are the worst cars and SUV's that won't last 60,000 miles due to bad engines. If you want to know what are the most unreliable cars and worst cars and worst SUVs to buy, watch this video.
SUBSCRIBE TO CHANNEL:
th-cam.com/channels/qy-.html...
Website: www.carhelpcanada.com/
Instagram: / shari_pryma. .
TikTok: @shariprymak
My Favorite Undercoating / Rust Protection:
www.krown.com/en/
ABOUT ME
With over a decade of experience as a professional car buyer and auto consultant, Shari Prymak has helped thousands of consumers with their car buying needs. Car Help Corner provides honest, objective, consumer advice with all aspects of car buying and car ownership. For more professional advice, check out Car Help Canada, become a member, and subscribe! - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
i'll just keep the 2009 corolla. 300,000 miles and it just works everytime.
Best car I've ever had same year Toyota 2009.
Just junked mine. Got to 165K miles and the headgasket gave up.
Those Corollas are indestructible if you do the basic maintenance on them.
1995 Mercedes E300, 310,000 miles on original engine and transmission (diesel)
My mother couldn't even 75k miles out of her Toyota Camry before it started nickeling and diming her to the point of total independability.
CVT transmissions, undersized turbo engines, cylinder deactivation, and overly complicated electronic issues, are all the Bubonic Plague of the auto industry... The industry that is racing to the bottom as fast as they can!!!
it is change for the sake of change not because any of these things are good
Thank the federal government CAFE requirements forcing car builders to make undersized turbo engines and CVTs to squeeze as many mpg out as possible to appease the climate control nazis.
@@dampergoldenrod4156It's certainly a motivation, but I have thought lately that ultimately it is government pressure, that is CAFE standards, they are pushed to achieve greater and greater mpg. That means smaller engines, turbo charging, and redesigned transmissions.
Reliability is inversely proportional to complexity!
Right?! What could possibly go wrong?
I own 2004 Buick LeSabre, 20 years old , 235.000 miles and still runs perfect. oil change/transmission fluid change and tires and general maintenance which is dirt cheap . now I'm fascinated how long it will go
3800 V6? 235,000 miles. It's just getting broken in good.
I wish I’d kept my parents LaSabre. 🥹
@@ButchNackley - Best motor ever.
You literally put 235 miles. We use a comma to separate digits, not a decimal. I suspect a BOT in the midst.
@@haroldbeauchamp3770 - Or a German. Or a typo. The comma and decimal/ period are beside each other.
I appreciate the honest straightforward opinions in your commentary.
Ultra small engines with Turbo and high tech transmission are bound to be a headache.
Yep thank the EPA and friends for all this BS. Fuel economy standards need to be thrown in the trash already, or at the very least rolled back to early 2000's levels. Nobody actually enjoys driving with a CVT, they were introduced due to fuel economy standards!
Scotty Kilmer didn't completely trash the newer Rogues yet, but He still doesn't like them!
I own a Nissan Juke that's a 2011 and has never had any serious problems (actually not even unserious ones..all we've done is maintain it according to schedule). I'm guessing it has about 150k miles on it. It's a 4 cylinder turbo that was bought used, and passed from one college student to another over the years. Occasionally, I have a chance to drive it, and nothing is wrong. If they still made them I'd buy a dozen to last the rest of my life.
If we got rid of the EPA and EEA, we would be making rock solid NA-engined cars and turbos would only be used for diesels or for performance instead of fuel economy. Like a 200 HP NA 2.5L i4 Nissan Rogue with 8-speed automatic transmission, a Honda Accord Type R with a 500 hp 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6, Altima SE-R with a 400 HP VR30DDTT, a Lexus UX F with an NA V6 that revs to 7500 rpms, and more. The Trailblazer, Cruze, and Encore would come with a 160 HP NA 2.0L inline 4 and the Sonic would come with a 120 HP 1.5L NA inline 3.
Too much heat and pressure and thin castings.
Still can't believe people buy Jeeps, their track record over the last 20 years is putrid!
Old, fat, bald men who are soldier-wannabes.
I agree, but they love the image that it projects for so many people, they think it makes them look butch, rugged, tough, etc. it just goes to show you how marketing can brainwash someone.
Its quality is not stable
You will find some of thier cars last long time
@@waheedali2429 But MOST certainly will not.
Yup. As that great American philosopher once said, "Stupid is as stupid does."
I learned my lesson. My last non-Toyota or -Honda company or personal car was 30 years ago.
It was a Ford Explorer. The service mgr. at the Ford dealer said his mechanics called them "Exploders." From what I see and hear, they haven't gotten any better.
“Exploders” wow. How amazingly clever. I guess there must be something wrong with the last 2 Explorers I’ve had or the hundreds of thousands that police and fire departments all over the country use because my ‘01 lasted 20 years and 230k before the transmission failed and my current ‘15 has literally had ZERO mechanical issues and sits at 170k today and rides a hell of a lot smoother and comfortable than your boring anti-Union, Nazi-friendly Japanese tin can which will rust out waaaay sooner than my Fords
Honda is starting to suck too.
Too much plastic and aluminum.
@@richardalvarado-ik9br
Perhaps. I’ve been pleased so far with my current Ridgeline, and I have nothing against plastic and aluminum used appropriately. At least they don’t rust.
The Ridgeline has had a number of minor recalls, though, and there is a major one coming involving the crank which may necessitate replacing the engine. It will be interesting to see how that goes.
I drove a lot of pickups in fleet service and the GM/GMC and Fords never were that good. I finally figured out they have a cult following is why. Selantis ruined dodge trucks, but back in the 80s, and 90s, Dodge really was the best in reliability and comfort for all day driving too. Corrosion protection was far better too.
Was it Found On Road Dead or did you have to Fix Or Repair Daily?
Best friend had the Chevy 1500 cylinder deactivation engine shutdown and replacement at 10K miles. He’s OCD, the vehicle had to be sold shortly thereafter, he was a big GM fan, now he’s tickled with his Honda civic. Doesn’t need a truck sold his boat
1. Nissan Rogue (@0:45)
2. Infiniti QX50 (@02:19)
3. Ford Bronco Sport (@03:00)
4. Chrysler Pacifica hybrid (@04:00)
5. Jeep Grand Cherokee 4XE/Jeep Wrangler 4XE (@04:50)
6. Chevrolet Silverado/GMC Sierra (@06:00)
7. Land Rover/Range Rover (@08:00)
8. Jaguar F-Pace (@08:50)
9. Volkswagen Taos (@09:50)
10. Hyundai/Kia with 2 liter 4 cylinder engine (@10:40)
Good job!
It is worth noting, that while this was the order presented and the associated times, he counted down from 10, down to the worst in the number 1 spot.
Thanks.
Prius CVT is solid
@@greymanBB Agreed. People who condemn a technology just because some companies implement it poorly are akin to watching a documentary on the V-2 and announcing that all rockets are evil.
Wow! A real human doing the narration and pictures that are relevant to the narrative.
Nicely done! Subscribed.
Thank you!
I was thinking exactly the same thing !
Most car problems are on the seat…….
This man does not have what it takes to become a politician.
how do your know it’s not AI generated?
2014 Kia Soul+ has had zero issues at 152k. Tires, 2 batteries and scheduled maintenance. Still looks nearly new inside and out. Best money I've spent on a commuter/travel car.
Except anyone can steal it by using an Apple USB cable.
I bought a VW Golf 4 (1.6 petrol) in 2002 as new and still have it. It's been more than 20 years and he's still driving great, and no rust spots.
I'm even afraid to trade it in for a new car.
Big bodies, little engines, it never ends well. Primarily designed for shopping mall usage. The Brits call them "Chelsea Tractors", it's not a term of endearment.
Automakers put these small displacement engines in cars because the Feds make these foolish CAFE mileage goals. The Secretary of DOT's only qualification is he was a homosexual Democrat.
I prefer ‘mum wagons’. Fit for the (1/2 mile) school run.
nah, it's not that. the problem is greed. these auto makers are cutting corners bigtime to maximize profits. problem is, once you lose your loyal customers, you lose them for life. they will never buy from you ever again and neither will their family members.
True Chelsea tractors mainly used for the school run, some trips as low as 500 yard's !😎
Gaz UK
@@jamesgarner2103 Nah, it’s not that. The problem is governments constantly placing greater and greater environmental requirements on vehicles, which makes them more expensive and also causes companies to try to find other ways to keep prices from going any higher than they already have gone. In the US, large states like California make it worse for everyone because manufacturers can’t afford to make separate models for them and everyone else, so whatever crazy requirements California put out, the rest get stuck with it.
Nice to see Jaguar and Kia being consistent at something...
@@JOSH-ge4oc Not only that, I heard they ceased production also.
My neighbor had a Jaguar. It was in the shop more often that it was on the road. He hated it and ended up getting rid of it.
@@bills5009 My wife's uncle had one for about 2 years before he realized it was never going to go more than a few weeks without something breaking and he sold it also... That was back a long time ago I was really hoping Jaguar had done better now but I guess not
Jaguar and Range/Land Rovers were originally Briths Leyland cars. Right from the beginning, they were known as "serious trouble" cars. British Layland sold them "for an apple and an egg" to Ford, just to get out of the warranty claims. Ford tried to fix them but eventually "gave them away" to an Indian Car Conglomerate - who had no better idea than to add 40 % to the sales price and launch a PR campaign presenting them the the ultra luxireous category of cars.
yes, they are consistent at breaking down
Thanks for both professional and objective reporting, thank you
Thank You Sir for your advice on these vehicles.
Driving habits have a huge impact on car longevity.
True, but some of these brands are historically unreliable.
Unless your driving habits are leaving the vehicle parked, none on this list should be owned.
But they do not save junk from being junk. Mechanic since the 1970s here.
With a vehicle that is fairly reliable to begin with, maintenance is the key to making them last longer. Oil changes should be done every 3000 miles. City driving is several times harder on a car than highway driving, though high speed highway driving is also very hard on a car. I drive my Mercury Grand Marquis at 65 mph on the highway, with it's V8 engine turning over at 1500 rpm. It's about to reach 400,000 miles. Both the engine and transmission are original and have never been worked on. Driving it at 80 mph will knock 100,000 miles off the life of the engine and transmission.
@@geraldscott4302 You are correct.
work at a major auction...every kia/hyundai we get has either been stolen, or a new engine...jags never sell, Nissan everyone the cvt is shot...
The problem people dont maintain the cvt trans in the nissan people just drive change oil and that all. If they change or service trans every 20 30k the trans will last
I visit the auctions a few times a week and try and buy Kia's as they are so reliable. Very rare to come across one with an engine swap. Though I do tend to keep away from the taxi's as they are pretty worn out. They sell really well to the public because of their great customer service, 7 year warranty and people know how reliable they are. Not often you can get a car with over 180,000 on the clock with a couple years factory warranty left. Just about everything else only has a 5 year warranty. I only buy cars newer than 5 years. My company car is a Kia Cerato with the 2.0 and never had a recall or an issue with it. Guess that's why they are popular with taxi drivers.
Girlfriend’s Kia Soul had the engine replaced THREE TIMES. That’s totally ridiculous. After 40-60k miles, Kia’s are a time bomb. I convinced her to go w/ a Honda Civic and we’ve had zero problems.
still bad design , that is why Nissan getting transmission from same manufacturer as Honda now . @@leonardovalladares4315
Manheim..?
My Nissan Rogue is about 13 years old.
It's running like new!
Never had any problems!
It's not a 3 cylinder. The newer ones are.
Thank you so much for the advice.
None of these vehicles are any surprise I can't believe people still buy these vehicles
I think a lot of people still just look at prices or take what looks cool while doing no research.
Brother, missed these staying with Lexus
Many people refuse to do any research before purchasing a vehicle. In a way I feel sorry for them.
Exactly. Ford, GM, and to a lesser degree Nissan, should always be avoided. Only a fool picks these brands.
@@billbaine1286 Is Lexus good and reliable?
I’m a retired Automotive Technician. I stick to my 1998 Nissan Maxima with manual transmission and my 1999 z71 Silverado that I use for hauling and wintertime.
yes those Maxima with the manual are good cars
Cool not to disparage your comment in any way - when you're right, you're right! But I'm curious what major components have gone into them over the years and what mileage?
@@robertmaybeth3434 the 1998 Nissan Maxima has around 157,000 miles and only major problems was alternator and drive axles. 1999 z71 Silverado has around 309,000 miles, original power and drive train. That one is has had alternator, radiator, water pump, heater core, window motor etc.. basically nickel and diming me right now. I just drive it to haul or pull stuff and winter time when I need 4wheel drive.
if they made a maxima with a manual under 40,000 i'd buy it
Old engine is 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
Great video, very matter of fact and to the point.
My wife has a 2018 Nissan X Trail (same as Nissan Rogue from the US) with a 1.6l 163 bhp 6 speed manual transmision and close to 170k km on board and so far 0 issues , it is a very good car.
Manual trany makes a big difference. Not so the CVT.
I agree with you 100%. I am first owner of 2014 Nissan Rogue (2.4 liter) with automatic transmission with 138 000 miles on it and so far I didn't have any problems except for oil change/transmission fluid change and general maintenance.
I have a 2013 Hyundai Elantra, bought new in December 2012 & still have that car. No major engine or transmission issues; car is directly built in South Korea. The major recalls I see are those models that are likely direct built in Alabama. So far its maintenance is up to date. I’m at 115K miles.
The company I work for had a new 2023 Nissan rogue when I joined with them. The vehicle had 3000 and some odd miles on it. The car began sputtering when driven, the check engine light was on steady, then it started blinking. It was finally taken in for service only to find out the engine was beyond repair.
Maybe if you had taken it in when the light CAME ON??
@@patverum9051 Doesn't matter, they're junk. I was driving my 230k mile Sequioa when one blew up in front of me in the fast lane on the highway, covered my whole truck in oil.
Why do you think We call
It the "money light"?
My office had one that we rented from enterprise. It went into limp mode with only 16000 miles on it. It's a pos.
lol hence the apropos name- Rogue car
The big problem with the Kia and Hyundai engine failure is lack of oil changes.We have several of these engines in our family. We all change oil every 5000 miles. A few have over 100,000 on them!
That's true of virtually all current engines, so when owners cheap-out & skip regular oil-changes & servicing, it ends up costing big bucks!
The owners I feel sorry for are the ones who have paid for a full-service, only to have been ripped off by a dodgy mechanic who didn't even touch their vehicle!
It is strange to hear of Kia and Hyundai problems. In South Africa they are fairly popular and I have never heard of premature engine failures or fires. Oil change intervals in this country is 15000km or 1 year although few people stick to one year if the 15000km is not up. The 1 year thing is considered relevant for warranty vehicles only by most.
That's at least two oil changes a year, even with full synthetic oil.
Yeah same here, I change the oil in my Mother's 2018 Sonata every 5000miles and it's fine, near 100k. It also gets 40 to 43mpg on the hwy around here, and around 36 to 37 on a long trip, where you are driving at 85mph most of the time.
Also Car and Driver and Motortrend flat out lied about those cars. They have tons of leg room in the back, even with the front seats all the way back and I'm over 6ft tall... They don't wallow in curves like the Auto rags all claimed. In fact, my mother's Sonata is one of the best handling sedans I've ever driven, and that includes a friends Acura.
No one mentions that Toyota in the last decade has had oil burners and head gasket blowers in their lineups too....
I no longer trust the auto media at all.
The media slams Subaru's 2.0ltr Crosstrek, 9 second, 0 - 60, as "slow" but they never test the base Corolla Cross, and similar vehicles, to report that they are even slower with 10 and even 11 second 0-60mph times, vs the 2.0 Crosstrek's 8,5 - 9 second 0 - 60 times....
The media is super slanted now.
Wife's Hyundai 2006 Sonata has 260k+ and just keeps a going.
She's faithful as to oil changes.
Thanks, very helpful
Seems to be repeat offenders often, I used to be a big Subaru guy, but not a fan of CVT. I have switched over to Mazda the last two CX5s and just got another new 2024 , wonderful cars ,reliable, never a problem with any of them, no CVT transmission , I will stick with my Mazda CX5 , Japanese build quality , also got 0% financing on a new one for 60 months offer in December , which was incredible,
cvt is a transmission
and they suck
Imagine this, let's face this, no car have a perfect track record of reliability, & to make matters worse if a car brakes, you should buy a new vehiicle & it's sad that cars are "through away cars" these days. Because they're adding more electronics, turbo chargers, & complicated transmissions that can cause a car to fail. Instead of "Car Help Corner", the channel should be called "Bike Help Corner" where they can talk about the best bicycles you should buy, the bikes you should avoid, how a bike can help, & tips to maintain your bike. If CR talks about unreliable cars then, we might move to a bike as a greener alternative & if we do not wanna get wet then, add a roof & sides to make bikes safer for everyday use. Plz reply
Did you buy the cx5 with the turbo engine?
My '22 Crosstrek Limited was built in Japan. Zero issues. Runs great.
Issue with Hyundai and kia is that they didnt do a good job of getting rid of machine shavings which lodge in the cranks oil way..eventually, the engine starves for oil
Yep. They cut corners and ignore responsibility. I think one of their higher ups was jailed for this.
Agree, but also with all new engines they should be run in gently, not like older engines and oil and filter changed at the 1,000 or 1-month first service check up, to remove debris from bedding in the engine.
Funny tho because majority of the ones with problems are built in US lmao
I drive mostly highway miles. Mechanic friend said that may flush most of those shavings out to the filter or pan.
@@timheersma4708 , yes, maybe the pressure will push out the shavings. Also change your oil sooner than 5k..good luck
I miss my 1972 VW bug.
My 72 would be completely rusted away by now, but I do miss my 71 & 73 bugs
It is sad what VW has become...
You can buy a blockout unit for $300 that plugs into the diagnostic port and it completely disables the Cyclinder Deactivation Technology on the GM trucks and suvs like the Tahoe, Yukon, Silvarado etc. I bought one and have had it in my 2015 Yukon Denali for 5 years and it works perfect. I lost 1-2 miles per gallon but gained rapid acceration and the engine running very smooth. If you try one just remember to unplug it before you take your vehicle into the dealer.
They only cost around $100. I bought one a year ago.
Cadillac tried (and failed miserably) with similar technology back in the 80s with thier “4-6-8” engine. Same principles-computer turns each cylinder on and off as needed. Total disaster. Cadillac ended up swapping the engines for the HT4100 (not much better with the soft cams). Auto makers will never learn.
Last year I bought one of the last 2022 GMC Canyon long beds before they were gone from the lots... specifically to get a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder without stop/start technology, or active fuel management (cylinder deactivation). And I wasn't a fan of the computer-generated gauges in the redesign. I'm a very cautious "late adopter" in marketing-speak. Some people might say the truck is a touch underpowered, but I don't tow, or go mud-bogging. I'm content to avoid the Turbo-4 of the redesign, and collect slightly better gas mileage from the outgoing model anyway.
@@Avo7bProject for every single piece of electronic junk they add, that’s something else to break. You mentioned virtual gauges. What the hell was wrong with the actual gauges?! So with the virtual gauges, if there’s an electrical issue, you have nothing to worry
why do you need to take it out before going to dealer?
Geez, thank you for the heads-up!
😢 I stopped buying American-made vehicles when a GM employee confessed that he was hired to engineer parts to only last 5 to 10 years. Also, Turbo chargers are only good for decreasing the engine's lifespan.
Honda - Toyota ….
Good cars …..
the Bonneville did it for me. No more GM cars.
I love my 2019 Toyota Highlander (not a hybrid/conventional transmission) except for the fact it has auto-shut off at stops. For the sake of very small gas savings I know this will only wear out my starter sooner.
I’ve been driving used Toyota’s for 25 years. I’d buy a 10 year old Toyota before I buy anything else new…..😉💪🏻💪🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for the insight, CHC! Posts like yours are a Godsend. Whenever I have followed those who have don research on automotive quality in both new and used, I've never been let down. It is very good of you to have this public voice for the rest of us who can't take the time for the needed research that you devote your time to.
Thanks for a factual and well researched report.
Ford should be embarrassed to have their badge on the new Bronco.
Mate , I stayed away from all them , almost got the 2023 Ford Dule cab. But I didn't I'm very happy with the little Aussie car or Dule cab I have. Great video mate 👍
Your vidios are spot on, thank you for your recommendations and knowlage of projected car troubles down the road. Consumers need people like you ,thanks again.
Thanks so much!
One of the few car videos where anyone is spot on everything
Toyota, honda and mazda and that is pretty much it for quality. Honda is slipping from what I am reading.
They all are. At this point it’s pick your poison and hope for the best. Some of these alleged unreliable cars people do own trouble free as well so…
@@terrencebenjamin7241 I am a bit of a laggard with cell phones and cars. 07 camry 148k. will be holding on to this until this auto insanity levels off. years. but if anything happened to it, Id buy a 15 to 17. Heck, I like the look of a 00 to 01. so am not worried about it. I did rent a corolla in sept. and thought it was great.
@@JOSH-ge4oc wow. didnt realize that. recalls are a mistake but they dont mean the engine and tranny are bad do they?
I own a Toyota Rav 4 Prime2021 and I have had two recalls. I still would buy it again. The recalls were computer reprograming and fire cover placed over wiring.
@@JOSH-ge4ocNot sure where u get ur numbers from but Honda had 2.5m recalls just in the US back in December of 2023 for fuel pumps. These Toyota and Honda recalls aren't really a big issue, they're mostly due to defective parts unlike the catastrophic recalls some companies do for engine failure.
Thank you very informative
Thanks...good info.
I bought a new 2007 Nissan Sentra with the cvt transmission. I went through three transmissions before 50,000 miles. Th e dealer told me they wouldn’t replace another transmission and it would cost me $5000 next time. I sold the car the next day.
I got a 2012 Nissan rogue a few years ago it’s been really problematic like the check engine light would turn on every few months, gas mileage is terrible and found out that it had the transmission replaced 3 times, luckily I’ll be getting a new car soon and done my research for a good reliable one
I have a 2015 Nissan Rogue and the CVT transmission went out at 65,000 miles!
Thanks for sharing. Not surprised to hear this!
shy what are u going with. 07 camry here.
@@TheCaptjamestkirk cvt's are a disaster
Thats horrible
Great stuff dude.
Thank you for all the info and the hard work that comes with it.
Toyota and Lexus CVTs are actually planetary gear set transmissions. They do not have the steel bands that stretch and break, as are typical in CVTs from other car manufacturers. I don’t know why they’re all designated as CVTs when, in fact, they’re different.
The planetary gear set is the eCVT only used on the hybrids. Some Toyota's do have a fairly conventional CVTs such as the Corolla and CH-R. But you're right, eCVT and CVT should absolutely be differentiated because they are totally different.
Shari, thank you for the clarification and explanation.
Exactly! Thank you for pointing out the differences! :)
the new Hondas (crv-hrv-fit/jazz etc) has the eCVT build in some years now without any problems.i own one😀😀😀
@@JOSH-ge4oc I bet you failed every economics and statistics exam you ever took. The size of the debt is irrelevant, its the ability to service it and the debt:equity ratio that is important. Anything over 2.0 is bad. Toyotas is 0.57. See my point? They are the biggest manufacturer by volume in the world and they only have Toyota and Lexus. You are talking absolute bollox. You have mixed up your a-hole with your brain and are thinking and writing out of the wrong one.
Thanks for your information.
Very helpful. Thanks.
I love my 2018 Nissan Rogue with its 4 cylinder engine. I received a notice from Nissan that the warranty on the CVT transmission was extended to 84 months. This could be a response to a class action lawsuit but at least they owned up to the CVT issues. I am keeping my Rogue.
Previous comment had"buy a Toyota,Lexus or Honda" and lease everything else..Good philosophy
Add Mazda, Acura, Subaru - #3, #4 and #6 in reliability, because you choose smartly your car when you get the most reliable (and preferably low Total Cost of Ownership) in that segment. Mazda is far better overall than Honda, please check CR and other statistics.
@@codincoman9019 I would only add Acura- Subaru is problematic over 100K
Sorry don’t agree with Honda anymore. Bought one and have been disappointed. Honda has several
class action lawsuits against them for BCMs failing and engine issues.
@@sosohoenot all the time.
@@seinundzeiten depends on the year and model really when it comes to Subarus. The Ascent is probably the most notorious, followed by some of the older Subarus classic head gasket issues.
Im at 123,000 miles on my 2017 Nissan Sentra and has been solid so far. I bought it new at 25 miles and in the 7 years I've had it has been pretty good. NO CVT issues either.
I have a 2017 with 164000 no issues I just change the oil and got net tires
That is very rare for a Nissan Sentra. Just ask all Sentra owners from 2013-2016
Nice to see 2 of them didn’t break, only the rest….
I've heard if you replace the trans fluid it will last as long as any other regular transmission. But, that's not part of Nissan's maintenance cycle.
@@stevequantie8064I agree. It’s just another manufacturer trying to mislead consumers by saying the oil lasts the lifetime of the transmission. But they never specify what the life of the transmission will be 😂
Mercedes Benz S Class and the BMW 7 series, Engine Oil Leaks Rod Bearing and Turbo Issues, these are $100,000 dollars cars that Engine Issues Starts Around 20k Miles Sad, these Vehicles are no better than a $1000 vehicle.
I'm currently looking at a relatively low mileage 1989 VW Caddy pick up. Build before a lot of the modern developments and computerisation it won't be as economical on diesel but has a lot less expensive technology to go wrong so should overall be a lot cheaper to run.
Thanks for the list of vehicles to avoid. I wouldn't consider them anyway. I know that the CAFE standard is forcing automakers to make complex engines, but small displacement, turbo-charged engines, cylinder deactivation, and other high-tech features have lead to unreliable engines. When Hyundai started making the Theta 2 engine they had nothing but problems with it. CBC Marketplace exposed this issue several years ago. It was enough for me to say no to Hyundai. I avoided parking next to Hyundai and Chevy Bolt as either one could spontaineosly combust.
If Nissan would abandon the CVT they might actually sell a few vehicles.
Surprisingly I see a lot of Nissans on the road, just as many as Toyotas, Hondas and Mazdas.
@@juanmateus8560 I suppose because they're cheaper.
@@juanmateus8560cause you can buy them dirt cheap used
@@genes.3285And bad credit, Nissan will apparently finance anyone with a heartbeat
In my 13th year driving my Altima with the original CVT and ZERO issues. I change the CVT fluid every 2 years. Drain and fill that's it plus changing the paper cartridge filter every 100,000 miles.
Excellent information and these vehicles are expensive. Many thanks.
Excellent Report.
Complexity might not necessarily mean unreliability , but it definitely DOES mean astronomical repair bills when (not if) something goes wrong. I got lucky with my Nissan with CVT, it went over 250K miles but it cost a small fortune to get anything fixed. Keep in mind that the only reason for this complexity is so the manufacturers can reach government-mandated mileage and emissions goals. What the customers want (e.g., reliability, reasonable cost, build quality) come in a distant third, if that much.
CVT in a belt what makes it more complex than a Ford 10 speed transmission. Many fewer parts
@@hugoglenn9741Nissan CVTs manufactured in the last few years are having major problems that the earlier ones (early 2000s) didn't have. I never had a problem with my transmission from 2002, but my car was built in Japan. Could be that I just got lucky...for once
I k ow the CVT on my Nissan is not serviceable. It’s an R&R job for almost anything. Minus $6000 out of my pocket of course
@@grazz7865 Yep. Modern cars should have a big sticker on the inside of the hood: "No user serviceable parts inside."
Didn't you ever wonder why a V8 car with a 2 bbl carburetor can get 30 MPG auto transmission and a 4 cylinder small car can only get 28mpg(or less)?? That is BIG OIL working hand in hand with the car companies saying you can make little cars BUT THEY HAVE TO CONSUME the same amount of fuel as the V8 engine. Everybody thinks there is an unlimited oil supply and air pollution is no problem so long as BIG OIL & BIG AUTO make their money. That is SAD. KIND OF WHY I am rooting for Tesla(but not really) I am hoping the garage mechanic /inventor comes up with something that burns CO2 & emits O2 gas.
next week were turning in our leased kia because we won the lemon law case. essentially we got a free car for three years.... wasnt bad when it was working.
The big issue is the TIME you spend (servicing your lemon car) that you will never get back.
I almost got to that point with my 2016 Toyota Tacoma because it had so many issues. Glad I traded it in because now that generation of Tacoma is having engine failures outside of the warranty period. All manufacturers seem to have given up on reliability and quality control.
@@codincoman9019 I'll take a free car for 3 years, even if I waste 2-3 hrs every month servicing it. Hell most tiktoker's time is worthless anyhow, so in those cases, even 10 hrs a month would still be worth it.
HAD FRIEND WENT FROM ROGUE TO A JEEP RENEGADE ... FROM BAD TO WORSE
. . . tks for a great and useful vid . . .
Just rented an Wrangler 4xe in Denver, CO. Went in looking forward to it and was eager to see how much better mileage would be over the one with the turbo 4cyl I rented last time. Came back 4 days later disappointed. I actually got worse mileage, around 22mpg and just didn't like the way it drove and all the hybrid buttons that do something were puzzling but a bit much for someone just wanting to relax on vacation, not pilot a spaceship in order to get the right combos of buttons for max mpgs.
Thanks Shari, your videos convinced me two years ago to get a Honda instead of a Huyundai
Great to hear!
Wise decision
Thanks a lot for being the watch dog. i got mt rav4 hybrid two days ago
My husband has had two silverados different years yet he had same problems on both. Always breaking down
I'm currently leasing an AWD Taos and the overall driving experience is horrible. Jerky acceleration, leaks coolant, electrical and operating system issues. I can not wait to get out of this thing.
My 2019 Pacifica is closing in on 75,000 miles and has been very reliable, though strictly a gas engine. Guess I got one built on a good day🙂
... and yet people still spend their hard-earned money on unreliable vehicles that will be worthless down the line. Go figure.
Cuz wifey wants it.....
Buying new is silly...
@@BohemianLifer if you got the money to burn, go for it. The problem is most of these people are financing (they can't actually afford to buy new).
I’ll do the “figure” for you.
Not everyone wants to buy a soulless Toyota with zero personality and pay MORE for it than it’s domestic counterpart just to watch the frame and wheels rust out within 10 years.
Just look at all those fugly RAV4 with their rusty wheels and soft frames.
What good is that boring 4 cylinder engine if the entire body of the car is rusted out and cracking up looong before the engine dies??
There’s more to buying a car than how long the engine lasts
IMO most people don't do their homework & rely on looks, ads, pricing.
Bought a KIA Sorrento in 2017. Just reached 99K miles and the motor is consuming oil like crazy. Thanks for this video. I now know this car isn't going to last much longer. KIA service is being very coy about this telling me that burning up to two liters of oil between oil changes is "normal." No warranty coverage for me.
5:18
And the hybrid battery pack is under the back seat which vents Lithium Ion fumes directly into the passenger compartment.
It makes for great fireworks!
Good job Cruzler 👌🏽
GM had issues with cylinder deactivation back in the 80s with the 8/6/4 engines. Many owners disabled that system.
Thank you so much for your very worthy advice.
My family bought four Nissan rogue starting with 2016 model. Not a single one of them had any issues. All I ever do for the car is an oil change at every 3,000 miles. We changed out batteries and brake pads… no issues what so ever. We did do transmission oil drain and refill at 60,000 mile intervals.
Thank you for your excellent narration and keep informing American people the TRUTHS.
Simply put in a couple of sentences buy a Toyota/Honda, and you will never have to worry about crappy car brands.
Newer Hondas are not as reliable as they used to be.
The Honda CRV now has a CVT transmission.
I would change that to TOYOTA only! As others have correctly pointed out, Honda has gone down the toilet tubes in the last 15 years or so! They used to be “bulletproof” just like Toyota, until GREED got the better of them! 🙄
I have a 14-year-old hybrid Lexus RX, and the only problems are the cost of the dealership's labour and the cost of parts. Still more reliable than a Range Rover, though, and uses far less gas. I said to a friend that I got 28mpg in town and he said he barely got that out of his Peugeot hatchback, though he does just go to church and the shops...
@@747-pilotshame, because their engineering design is solid. I like their hybrid system, should be very reliable, like their engines, and they have better habitability than Toyotas (Jazz, Civic, HR-V).
Thanks, I needed this video. I'm in the market and I've always been a Honda or Toyota or Lexus kinda girl. I will stick with one of those brands.
Depending on the segment you buy in, you might check Mazda, Subaru or Acura. Honda's reliability is below these overall, but depending on the segment, you can smartly go for the most reliable plus low Total Cost of Ownership car, no matter the brand (almost 100% probability of being Japanese).
I have an Elantra with a 1.6 litter. It’s been great so far and I hope I continue to not have any issues. 🤞🏽
We had a Chrysler Pacifica 2020 and the dealership had it for six months because of an engine failure. It had to be sent off to Houston and all they did was essentially replace the whole engine. Fortunately, that car was later totaled in a wreck, victim of a suicidal deer. It always had weird problems with the electronic systems. We now drive the 2022 Chrysler hybrid Pacifica I know you would ask why we would own one but we really do love the hybrid and a lot of the features it has. The vehicle drives great and is very practical. The plug in feature gets us over 50 mpg and we get the best parking spots. I think they really ironed out all the bugs by the 2022 edition.
I was wondering as you went down the list , what about my 2016 kia Sportage ? at 60000 miles consuming 1 qt / oil every 1000 miles. Junk.
In 2008, I purchased a Jeep Patriot 4X4 with the 2.4 litre engine and 5 speed manual. It has 90,000 miles (150,000 kms) and has been very reliable but the body is showing a bit of rust. I don't expect it to last forever but so far, it has been a really good vehicle and practical and fun to drive. No complaints here.
We purchased a Patriot in 2010 (front-wheel drive) automatic transmission and it's also been very reliable. Then they moved the production to Mexico, and reliability went downhill (it was produced in the US with the Compass at the time). We're slowly looking to change it and will probably go to Buick...
@@baddogsboyI researched before I purchased and the one consistent complaint was the CVT having issues. I have seen CVT problems with many brands and didn't want the automatic. I prefer the manual because it gives me more control and most car thieves can't drive a stick. HA!!
@@rickroberts9182 Now to be clear I only do City and Highway and zero off road - and I am overall gentle on acceleration/deceleration. That seems to be where people run into trouble with that CVT, and it ends up slipping/breaking.
@@baddogsboy I believe you are correct. The info I saw said that the drive would be lost and the engine would rev as the car slowed. Usually happened on the highway.
Hi, do you have any issues relating to the Nissan Navara 2.5 turbo diesel truck. Your input would be appreciated
I have a Kia Sorento 2.2 coming up to 100000 miles and touchwood it's been a dream. Only one issue a turbo actuator needed replacing other than that everything has been great.
Absolutely right, especially range rover, sold . Helpful video. Keep it up.
Please clarify what model year(s) are you warning is the issues. Readers are taking your POV on make and models to be universal. For myself, I’ve owned numerous Nissan models (Murano & Pathfinder) with CVT with the latest over 10 years old without any transmission concerns.
I'm 67, retired for 13 years. Purchased a new 2002 Nissan Quest SE (rear glass opens alone). I've taken trips across the country with it for months at a time. It's still a pleasure to drive (and a great surf vehicle too). I stopped looking at replacing it many years ago. I just keep in top shape.
Start stocking up on spares - I'm in the same boat with a 99 Matiz, but parts are starting to get thinned out.
good, useful information.
1997 Honda Accord DX original owner, great car 200K miles, 2009 Honda CRV 190k miles original owner great car. 2019 Honda Ridgeline 43 k miles original owner. Several minor recalls, starting to make me regret the purchase. Current recall is the fuel pump. Waiting for the part to come in.
A CRV with 190K? That thing is just broken in at 190. Years of happy motoring ahead for that one.
@@mothman-jz8ug I agree. I 100% stay on top of the maintenance.
@@mothman-jz8ug I have a 2007 Honda Civic with 35K. I pay more car
insurance per year then I do Gasoline.
The Toyota Camry and Honda Accord I owned were great cars, super reliable. Can't say the same for the Chevy Baretta. My current 2018 WRX has had a few issues but they have been minor ones, bought it new and I drive it pretty hard. Oil/filter changes every 3000 miles though.
2016 NIssan Rogue bought June of 2016. Drive about 6500 miles a year.
50,500 as of today. No jackrabbit starts or excessive use of passing gear
Changed CVT fluid August 2019 at 17,800 miles (was unaware of Nissan CVT issues till then}
Changed CVT fluid June 2022 at 39,000 miles
To date I can't feel any slippage whatsoever, engine still runs great and gas mileage is fantastic.
Definitely a good idea to keep the CVT fluid clean and changed often. The 2016 Rogue though has a very different engine compared to the new one though so unfortunately new Rogue owners won't benefit from your experience with the 2016.
@@marketingmajor8126 Indeed. I also have done a lot of preactive maintenance like having throttle body and MAF cleaned. Anything to keep the dreaded engine MIL from appearing.
I have the 2016 rogue. Change the transmission fluid every year -regardless of mileage. I did not wait for the 36,000 mile window which coincidentally is when the warranty expires!
It's probably the luck of the draw. My Murano is babied. No CVT issues after 180,000 and still drives like a dream except I've had to replace the stupid axles regularly. Bummer. Keeping my fingers crossed regarding the CVT. A lot of people don't change the trans fluid at proper intervals.
@@interstellarconundrum4774 what was going on with the axles? I believe I need a driveline. I’m getting a humming sound at exactly 65 and then goes away at 75. I checked the tires, wheel bearings and half shafts. Everything seems ok. I change the transfer case and differential fluids every year. I have to do some more research. I’m sure the issue will get worse before it gets better.
Very well done on this!
Why oh why can these manufacturers not make a totally good engine and vehicle that is not going to fail or catch fire. We are in the 21st Century, some people I know have reverted to older vehicles as keepers and have dropped the idea of a nice new shiny make on the drive.
My BMW 325 of 1994 vintage has 172k miles and costs so very little to run and I have heard of others with over 300k miles still going strong. How these makers now keep turning out duds is appalling!
very good information! >>subscribed :-)Innovation comes with risk, of course, but I think that many technical approaches you mentioned are a recipe for disaster.
The race to these 3-cylinder engines, is for fuel economy. It’s not economical if you have expensive drivetrain repairs after 100,000 km (60,000 mi). All these small and mediums-sized SUVs should have naturally aspirated 6-cylinders. The full-sized pickups should drop the cylinder deactivation.
I am sirprised abt the Range Rover. Surprised it only took the number 4 spot and not higher.
If more people could afford them it would be higher.
The Rovers are overpriced garbage as cars and more status symbols than anything.
yup! me too, the others must be proper shyte.
@@m.malina6797😢
Good information Which years and vehicles are great to get at least 300,000 miles and more.
Totally agree with this list
No surprise! Thanks for the periodic reminder. 👍👍👍
My car is Toyota Prius C and almost 10yrs old very very close to 100,000 miles and I have no problem. Great car..
❤️ Toyota HUV
I have the 3 cylinder eco-boost turbo in an Escape and it's awesome. No issues
I couldn't agree with you more fella 👍