Dishonored 2: PS4/Pro/Xbox One/PC Graphics Comparison + Analysis
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2016
- Dave stacks up three console versions of Dishonored 2 - plus the highly underwhelming PC build, which still can't hold 1080p60 on a Titan X Pascal, despite the arrival of a new patch.
Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: bit.ly/DFSubscribe - เกม
![[4K] Fallout 4: Xbox One X vs PS4 Pro Graphics Comparison + Frame-Rate Test](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jWutKSrog3c/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Live สด] การออกรางวัลสลากกินแบ่งรัฐบาล งวดวันที่ 1 มิถุนายน 2567](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3canzHC_d0k/mqdefault.jpg)
I love how all reviews praise any game and don't mention at all how badly it runs
paid by Bethesda, most game reviewers, even the PC ones are paid now by most developers.
Few people care about PC peasents I guess
Fervently PC Peasants? Please explain?
Fervently cant even spell "peasant" right. And dont try to invert the roles, consoles are peasants for real reasons, you are just a fucked up troll. What is up with Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and this game averaging 25 fps, on vanilla PS4 and Pro? That is so smooth.
I don't buy that, if that is true, some people would for sure get exposed for talking bribes.
So it's not just my computer, it performs like crap on all platforms.
MrJobocan I think it performs bad on all consoles
+Carlos Barillas i'm pretty shure ps4 pro can get 35-40 fps if is unlocked
+Zero Funk Sure*
MrJobocan nope
Playing it on ps4 pro and it's absolutely fine
Res at 1440p upscaled to 4k looks awesome and i get a stable 30fps 99% of the time
TheBlackShinobi implying 30fps is good kek
60fps> or nothing, peasant
Shitting out a game of this caliber in these conditions... Despicable, ruined potential
+Fernando Portal pc?
Fernando Portal Really? I call bullshit, if a Titan X Pascal can't even keep a good lock your not going to have the most ideal experience either. It maybe good enough for you, but what is good enough for you isn't the same for everyone. I have an RX 480 MSI Gaming X, and the game hardly stays locked at 60 on medium to high settings, but Its more like 45 to 60FPS.
14supersonic I have a gtx 980 and it runs at around 80 to 110 fps (very high). Turn off the Firewall for this game and it will do wonder. Betapatch aswell.
Smorfar
i call bullahit a firewall exception rule cant give such a boost especially because i own an 980ti and i cant maintain constant 60fps even with the beta patch.
u are probably adaptive resolution with framerate target
+DJBV If disabling the firewall really improves performance. it means that denuvo is at fault for PART of the issues, because it's the only thing that phones home. Also, even if it didn't phone home, denuvo adds aditional stress for the antivirus / firewall, because it has to scan your pc and the virtual machines (yea, in plural) denuvo creates and runs while you have the game open.
So... it won't be entirely crazy that it made a diference in performance when you disable your antivirus / firewall.
BUT that doesn't mean that it will be a good idea to turn your security off.
Also part of the problem is that ID Tech 5 is shit, specially the fact that it pulls too much data from the HDD instead of ram / Vram. And that causes more antivirus / firewall work. And if part of that data has to go through the virtual machines... you can see things adding up.
7:09 framerate approved by ubisoft
Even ubisoft would be ashamed lol
Purple Octogon
Hummm that sweet sweet 15 fps in AC Unity ... 😳
Peter Chaves
At least had vsync...
WH250398 V-Sync is terrible.
Stairwave
I prefer the screen not being in half.
everything about the tech side of this game is just a fucking shame, the devs should absolutely be ashamed to release a game like this, glitches, terrible performance, last gen graphics
Nothing last gen about the graphics.
At least you're telling it as it is, I was shocked that the game has no improvements on the Pro
the game on ultra looks great. you just don't like the art style they chose then dont play dishonored. its just that it runs horrible on pc
Kevboard Arts Minus the last gen graphics... you could check off the same deficiencies for a GOTY winner in Witcher 3.
You went a bit too far when you said last gen graphics. These textures and models are some of the best I've seen thus far in this current generation.
I'm a firm believer of frame rate over graphics
24 fps for the ultimate cinematic experience, fucking love it!
I really hope you’re not being serious
@@lordboyardee4088 of course he isn't is called sarcasm
I have to report that in 2019 the game is optimised at a good level. I have tested the 970/1070/1080 and they all run max settings 60fps at 1440p exept the 970 at 1080p
4k 60fps with consistent frame timing is not a problem on my system, which uses a 2080ti. All settings maxed, running from an ssd.
its still dogshite
@@sommer4570 no it's not,this game run way better and optimized well right now,i have predator triton 700,and it still had this micro stuttering issue,considering this is a laptop,not a desktop,but the game was very playable now,u should try the game if u haven't
Void is Id Tech 5 with some upgrades, Doom runs on Id Tech 6, not the same game engine
usually i dont complain about the graphics difference, but at 4:55, 3:42 it's really like night and day. The texture of the clothing looks like one found in a PS3/X360 launch title. Of course the PC renders the texture at a much lower resolution but seeing the graphical quality of the rest of the game (which still feels like the original) those low resolution textures. Not to speak of the poor performance in the game with a ~$1200 GPU...
Titan X can't hit 60 in 1080p lol
pc gamer excuses
I wonder how it would run with ps4pro res (1440p)
Knowing how pc is outdated and overpriced I assume below 20fps.
WolfSilver117 No, it IS just a shitty port.
Really wish Idtech was used/adjusted to handle the rest of Bethesda's projects the way frostbite and unreal 4 do. They're obviously wizards in there but the way this game and fallout 4 perform on high end pcs is a shame
this picture is worth nothing. I can show you my game running at 120 fps on a 980ti if i look in the right direction. At least show a video of the beginning cutscene of mission 2 and run around at the port. Patch 1.2 made some improvements but the game is still running much worse than it should.
Where are the GTX 1060 vs. RX 480 frame rate tests for latest games?
R.I.P Titan X Pascal - 04.08.2016 - 24.11.2016
You will be remembered as a card that couldn't handle ps3 early looking game in 1080/60 fps.
It's a shame that a such a brilliant game runs that badly. They will probably fix most of the issues, but still I feel bad for the people who preordered.
SteelSkin667 they get what they deserved for supporting this"preorders" "season pass" and ripped dlc practice,no need to feel bad to them.
nah, this shit cant be fixed. this game is rotten to the core, a few patches arent gonna help. didnt help mafia 3, AC unity or witcher 3 (console). all of them runs like shit to date. thank god for steam refunds.
@@erkki542 lol
"tangible"... 5fps, i mean when we are talking about 20fps, sure 5fps its 25% extra performance.
frame pacing with a 30 fps lock on PC would be of interest for me. Is there an insane setting to achieve this? What hardware does it take to run it at this frame rate? Would be great if you could cover these in a follow up video! BTW I love your work!! great job there!
Lower resolution, lower framerate on xbox one. Bethesda, what the fuck?
I blame bethesda for crap performance on everithing
Ioannis Stf Weren't you the one saying that you can't blame the PS4 Pro's hardware for its CPU bottlenecking when it ran games worse than the original PS4?
XO has lower resolution or lower framerate, but having both it's the developers fault
arthur staal I blame Bethesda for my erectile dysfunction.
Haha, sucked in fanboy
Sucks that today's Bethesda games have really shit optimisation.
Matthew N It sucks that bethesda is continuing to go down hill as a company.
It's not even a Bethesda game its an Arkane Studio's game
ThatNormalBunny Bethesda publishes these games. Fallout 4 is badly optimised, Doom runs pretty horrible on low-end hardware, and then there's this.
Matthew N - Fallout 4 is not badly optimized 30fps across the board on PS4 and Xbox One, 60fps on PC
Of course Doom is going to run terribly on low end hardware its requirements are high end requirements
Dishonored 2 is fixed on PC and i've played a bit of it on PS4 and the frame drops weren't that bad
Also no shit Bethesda publishes them but that is completely different from developing them. If your going to blame someone for Dishonored 2 you blame Arkane Studios
Bethesda has always been like this even when Skyrim came out I noticed a lot of glitches in the game so that is not new to bethesda .
Finally! Thanks for uploading this, been waiting all week
Audio issues with the video playback DigitalFoundry? Am I the only one experience this while watching the video? Volume keeps going high then low while watching this video.
I was thinking of buying this for my base PS4, as I really enjoyed dishonored 1.
Has the performance improved at all after 3 years?
Yeah, I played it a couple months ago on base ps4. It still had drops, but it was perfectly fine imo
ik i'm late but the frame rate at the first mission still total crap...
I just started playing and first I opened the game without the updates and omg I was pissed, shit FPS, clunky menu and even the graphics were looking weird, mainly the lighting. Well after it downloads and installed around 14GB of data it works like charm, stable framerate and the lighting was fixed.
I think it performs better now,back then i bought this game 3 years ago,when i have a pretty high end laptop which is Predator triton 700,it can't even play on stable FPS,lot of microstuttering issues,consider this is a laptop,not a desktop,so it won't run as well as desktop was,after then i deleted the game,i recently downloaded this game and i feel this game run way way moore stable and well-optimized,and i'm pretty sure that PS4 version have the same experience as PC was now,except the 30FPS lock on console,but it's worth to buy/play now compared to 3 years ago,enjoy your game dude 👌👌
@@proid1296 in PC version this game run well now,less micro stuttering issues compared to 3 years ago,well this game is poorly optimized,and FF XV did the same job too,but i think it's way more better now,and i'm sure PS4 had the same experience except the 30FPS lock
I laugh how Xbox fanboys go on about upscaling on the Pro yet most of the games on XO upscale to 1080p
Counterpoint Twofold gonna say something similiar when scorpio came out
RetroIsland well on console it's upscaling with high settings... on PC in the demanding games I do upscale with textures, effects etc at Ultra or above.
RetroIsland Exactly. Karma is a bitch.
And xfag keeps talking about their imaginary console. Come back here when it's actually fucking exist. Scorpio is a mere cheap talk so far. Just accept the fact that xbox is weak.
***** Ehh. PlayStation cum swallowers were saying the same thing when the Ps4 Neo was rumored. I remember the cum swallowers were talking about it beating a PC. 😂😂. I mean I own the Pro but yet when they announced it i was disappointed af including alot of PlayStation fans. It's still A great price for what you get. but for an upgrade it's nothing special. Xbox Scorpio isn't out yet but if they keep to what they said the hardware would be it would definitely 3x outperform the Pro. Even then the Scorpio is irrelevant to me since all exclusives are coming to my glorious PC.
will you guys do a PC/PS4/XO comparison with frame rate tests for the new Prey that's coming out?
There was a 4gb patch today on pc and the settings are different than before and it's running much better now.
For anyone on PS4 there is also a 10GB patch waiting for users
This game really showcases the difference in graphics quality between pc and console despite beeing run in the same resolution. I think the console manufacturers focus on the buzzword 4k with the upgraded consoles will continue the trend of compromised graphical quality but at 4k instead. I rather they give us the high quality graphics of pc with a 60 fps target than just upping the res at the cost of frames and quality.
Will you guys be doing an analysis of the Ezio Collection?
Nintendo 64 textures on ps4 pro.
Excellent.
The last of us has better textures on ps3, the problem is the developers, not the hardware, even Pc can't match 60fps -.-
bethesda is a idiot if we talk about optimization
they can`t do 1080, 60fps on skyrim, a game that use 512Mb of ram 5 years ago
While I do agree Bethesda Games Studios as a developer is generally bad at optimisation and polish note that this game is developed by Arkane Studios, it's only publshed by Bethesda Softworks in much the same way DOOM runs beautifully because its developed by id software even though its published by Bethesda ;)
Sam B yes i know, but is something like that :P
I know right
Great optimization, great job Ubisoft....
I hope they add some micro-transactions
@skaramandraX it's neither "greatly optimized", nor is it developed by "ubisoft". Has it ever occurred to you that the reference to "ubisoft" could be sarcastic?
***** Oh ok.. so your comment was "[In case you are being serious about the ubisoft part, let me let you know that] The game is not developed by Ubisoft"
You do realize this is a Bugthesda/Bethesda game right?
@@ryansmith-gu5yp wow
Why in the hell did the move from Unreal Engine to that dogshit id tech 5 engine?
BOSS ROSS No royalties paid.
blood. Otherwise the Unreal Engine 4 is perfect and better in every way.
because Bethesda has IDTECH as an in house engine now they own ID Games. So cheaper to use then pay for unreal license. Also makes shareholders and board members happy to see money saved. Even if product is shit.
id tech is fine. Doom runs like a dream even on low-end hardware. They made some very poor technical decisions on this game.
Niosus Id Tech 6 is great but Id Tech 5 is trash
Even if the port on PC is not doing well right now, it probably still looks 10 times better than the console ports.
2023, my first playthrough of Dishonored 2 (Steam), all in game settings maxed / Adaptive resolution disabled / 1080P 144Hz / 120fps cap / 13600k / 32GB / EVGA 3060 Ti , seeing occasional fps drops in Mission 2 but so far staying above 100fps, only problem is the game has frame pacing issues if its not maintaining either 60 or 120fps (according to the PCGaming Wiki for DS2) so the drops are more jarring because of this, think I can see why the Void engine was only used in a few games. It looks nice at least and I'm having fun, just got to mission 3 tonight.
was the gpu (Titan X-p) utilization at 100%? maybe those scenes were CPU limited ?
This is NOT based on the same engine as DOOM. This is based on ID Tech 5, which powered Rage and Wolfenstein (both of which had myriad performance problems). DOOM used the new ID Tech 6, which performs (and looks) much better.
People playing on PC with NVIDIA cards need to download the NVIDIA hotfix driver for this game. I have a 1070 and get 100+fps with an average of 90 with the 1.2 update and hotfix driver.
Hi, could you make a test for the released Killing Floor 2 for comparing to the early version?
So is that performance test on the consoles the PS4 Pro running @1440p or 1080p?
You can see just how big of a difference the change in engine can make. Idtech 5 is just terrible. Not a single game released with it has been spared of major issues. Rage was terrible on PC, Wolfenstein was terrible on PC, The Evil Within was terrible on PC.
The first Dishonored ran on Unreal 3 which is one of the best engines ever. Pretty much every game runs great on it, and the visual quality they managed to squeeze out of it was nothing short of jaw dropping.
Why they didn't go with Unreal 4 is beyond me.
I haven't played Dishonored 2 yet, but I played all of the games you listed at 60 FPS, on or very near launch day at much higher than normal maximum settings. Yes, even Evil Within. Nobody seems to realize the engine just needs a couple tweaks (usually standardized across any game using the engine, btw)
The REAL problem with the engine is the propensity for developers using it in their games to lock at 60 fps. THAT is fucking bullshit. The performance, on the other hand - UE3 could never dream to match the visuals at the low power requirements.
Bored Bastard Bullshit Really? Bioshock Infinite looks better than any Idtech 5 game and it runs well over 100 fps on a 970. Meanwhile Wolfenstein which looks like compete dogshit with horrible film grain effects and bad texture work is locked at 60 and can barely maintain that on the same card.
And even though Arkham Knight was a terrible PC port, it still is one of the best looking games ever made on a 10+ year old engine.
No the engine is not everything but Idtech 5 in particular is absolutely atrocious and has ruined every game that's chosen to use it for me.
This game is shit
Loved the first game. This game feels like a major step back. This game is just way too easy. You can cheese the AI so easily and the teleportation power up pretty much ruins any suspense and excitement of stealth in this game. If you turn the difficulty up to the hardest ... it completely breaks the AI and makes the game unfair. There is literally no balance in this shit show. The story is laughably bad. The setting is uninspired. There are too many influences going on that I couldn't get a proper feel for the setting. They just threw whatever they thought would work in the pot so they can say "ooooh....look at our cool setting." The level design feels cramped and significantly worse than the first game in most levels. The paths are now obvious so there is little thrill of discovery like in the first game and in Deus Ex Mankind Divided. The voice acting for the main characters feels forced and unnecessary, especially for corvo (sounds cheesy as fuck and ruins the mood). There are literally no memorable side characters like in the first one. Most importantly....you just don't feel like an assassin anymore. The stakes are significantly low compared to the first. In the first game, they nailed the end of days scenario very well and you felt like you were fighting to keep everything you love alive. In a city dying of plague, the signs of live stood out that much more. On the other hand, I could care less for Karnaca and its lore....blood flies were always there.....there are people walking around and life is happening....so the ominous feeling and the dread you felt while exploring Dunwall in the first game is gone. Most of all, I just don't give two shits about the story they want me to give two shits about. Lost your throne? Boo fuck hoo. The glitches were an icing on the cake. I just got a resounding "meh" feeling throughout my play through.
Also....the painterly art style that made me love Dishonored is mostly gone....and replaced with a generic post processing heavy visual style that I've seen before (..cough..Assassins Creed Unity...Syndicate).
Play the old Thief games and splinter cell games if you really want to experience proper stealth.
I knew there was something odd about the 1080p image on my pro, but i only thought it was a really bad supersampling implementation and not that it doesnt do jack shit.
The game also has lots of texture seam issues and other graphical anomalies on console that i wish youd touched on. Graphically its a bit of a mess at times tbh.
Great game though.
Was all the PC footage recorded with the latest 1.2 patch
It wasn't mentioned whether the PS4 pro was benchmarked in 1080p or 1440p mode, which makes the frame time results difficult to interpret. Ideally, it should be benchmarked in both modes!
I'm play on Xbox One X still fine
Wow... not solid 60 fps even at 1080p with the most powerful GPU in the world... that's embarassing 😓
The Game is soooo good!
but the performance make me sad :(
Was sick of all the ps4 pro videos that DF has been putting out lately. Nice to see a complete analysis of the consoles and pc
Why can't developers optimize their games, sometimes it's not the hardwares fault, mgs v is graphically amazing and runs 60 fps on consoles, infamous second son looks amazing even in 2016 and runs on fps of 30-40 even on a base ps4.
no its infamous for being very fickle about when it likes to run smoothly. Frame rate was never an issue unless you had a shitty pc. This is just dev lazyness.
Sponsored by FrameDrops™ technology
Do u guys test the old xbox one or the One S?
Is it possible they release a patch to fix those nasty frame rate drops? (Homefront did it, so there is hope i guess...).
No Darksiders warmastered edition ps4 frame rate test?
You only tested the ultra settings on PC. What about other settings ?! What setting console run ?! Medium settings ?! I really wish if you compare the budget PC with same settings as console to see if PC version is actually worse than console version which is struggling to get 30fps
I like to see fps comparison between GTX 1060/RX480 and PS4 pro with same settings and resolution
Nice Video but please verify your TX-Peformance.. My 1080 it runs at Full-HD with 85-100+ Fps no problem (Karnaca Harbour, Patch 1.2 Beta), even at 3440*1440 I have minimum 55 FPS. A Tx shouldnt almost never drop below 100 at Full-HD, even in Karnaca.
Still best game ever in my opinion.
Corey Yep. This game is a piece of art.
The gameplay, beautiful stylized graphics, the levels and the detailing in them are just off the charts.
What a stunner.
Hey , it is worth to get this game on OG PS4 ?
It crashed several times on my PS4 Pro in the later levels... :(
hes so stunned that there is almost no difference between ps4 and ps4 pro,
its not real 4k
I know you guy know lots more than me, but I don't think you mentioned anything about field of view custom options on pc. not that anyone would want to play it at 110°, but you can on pc. It is interesting to play around with. I have heard how narrow a field of view Destiny is and did not realize what people ment until playing this game, now I know why I'm always getting shotgunned in the head in PvP.
the patch fixed the framerates but it still has stuttering. the settings are irrelevant to that stuttering. just panning around will result in random inconsistent hitching.
Did the developers even try optimizing this game before releasing it on pc?
MrMagicaldog you mean across all platforms holy shit bethesda
Clear problems, this game is not optimised, if a Titan XP cannot run it at 1080p. Maybe if it was 4K i'd say fair enough, but 1080p, clearly something wrong.
yet again one more proof that you should always wait to buy games because they come out not done to be patched quite often stop day 1 or pre ordering then Developers will have no choice but to make sure their games work when they come out like they used to before they could be patched
not only that, waiting on pc can get you a fixed game with a huge discount.
Theprfesssor Wat do u expect from Bethsaysda
Visually on PS4 Pro on a 4K tv looks stunning in places but thats not why buy a game. it helps but gameplay is the main thing you should buy a game for. If I want just visuals I watch a damn movie.
Gotta love that cinematic 30fps.
The no review copies was a massive warning sign that something was up! Any publisher releasing a good game would surely want consumers to hear praise about the game before release!
Was it? Doom 2016 had no review copies and it was perfect
I think Bethesda anticipated this game and many others in the future being shit, so they started this policy with DOOM. So they can turn around and say "Remember how DOOM was good, and it had no review copies? Remember?"
Have they patched the game for the supersampling issue yet?
Can we get some videos comparing Xbox One S 4K upscaling with PS4 Pro gameplay with games like The Witcher 3?
DOOM showed us it is possible to optimize games perfectly and have dank graphics at the same time. Maybe they shouldn't have done that, now we know it can be done and we demand the same.
The Xbox one demo version of this game as of April 2017 STILL has the frame rate issues. I think I'm going to hold off for awhile (again) and buy it on sale for either PC or Xbox later when/if they fix this.
Once that downsampling bug is fixed, the Pro version is extremely solid. Nice!
So should I play this on PC or PS4 Pro?
Well i cant help but wonder what game version was used to test the pc version.
I play this gama maxed out 1440p on a 980ti. now i have fps dropping to 45ish every now and then but 90% of the time its above 55-60.
Indoors its above 80 fps usually. the 45 fps is no problem at all on my Gsync pannel. (i use the current Beta patch)
I am enjoying this game very very much the game play and story are really good.
if only people would just stop crying and play the darn game, they would see it is not as bad as it seems.
I wonder with the new ps4 pro system software i can do supersampling?
You'd think they would've used UE4 since they have experience with UE3. Performance wouldn't have been a issue either. Graphically what I've seen in the videos, their in house engine hasn't done anything for me.
Dishonered 1 was good in my book. Hated it when I rented the 360 version. Always felt like I was playing it wrong. But getting it on steam for 6$, I rathered enjoyed it actually. It felt better and native to keyboard/mouse. Something just, clicked. Specially with the performance issues I hear about, sounds like I"ll wait for 2 to go cheap as well.
Boogie Woogie You're the one insane clown posse song I like.
oh thank god I thought I was going crazy. my pc aint the newest thats certain, but it should run this way better than it does.. what a shame
So even if the Void Engine is based on ID Tech, it doesn't reach the crazy optimization that DOOM got on all platforms (after Vulkan API update on PC). That's disapointing, when it was said the engine was based on ID Tech, i was hoping for 1080p/60 like in DOOM
Mex RAGE It's based on ID Tech 5, not 6.
right now it's pretty good in ultra 1080p and a gtx 1070, some drops can happen but overall it's quite solid 60fps (this should run in 1440p like this on this card lol). a big shame that they fucked up the game so much since it has ridiculously good graphics and overall it's an awesome game.
Great job
Refuse to buy this, my most anticipated game of the year, until it actually works
Dan B smart move for PC gamers, but I'll be playing it on PS4 no doubt. For all the advantages of PC gaming, games are almost always optimized for consoles before PC.
Anant Singh Chandel I thought you were referring to its broken PC version. Honestly I play with a launch model PS4 on a 720p TV so frames, resolution, and textures aren't much of a concern for me.
This is out of date. New update brings a ton of fps on pc. I'm able to get 60 fps 1080p with a 970. Just make sure you update your driver too.
What the fuck is wrong with XBOX ONE
both run the game so bad
atif fan Xbox one has been way less than $400 for a year or so now lol
Damn, my console community really sucks...
please someone can tell me that this game is now fixed or not on base ps4 ?
FXAA provides a much sharper image?
What?
On what planet?
Dude i was thinking the same hahaha. FXAA is like Vaseline.
Yea, which most newer games are using SMAA and MSAA but to be honest i'm more of a no antialising type of guy, gives me a little more performance to work with and a more raw image.Majed Mohammed
Nathan Mitchell
Yup, in these situations you can use FXAA it takes only about 1-2 frames.
Majed Mohammed
I guess FXAA is like a little substitute if there are unwanted jaggies
Nathan Mitchell
👍👍👍
Why aren't the console people complaining about this performance too? 20fps and stutters and tearing during quick action fighting isn't acceptable.
I wonder about the guys at Digital Foundry, they've been doing these tests for some time now and having so many AAA releases suffer from sub par performance on PC, does it ever get to them? I get these videos are professionally created without any bias and they're doing a good job bringing issues to light. What really bothers me are the reviews which don't mention the technical issues this game is having on any platform.
I just wish somewhere someone major in the industry would finally speaks up about poor gaming optimisation, maybe Steam refunds are the way forward, I don't know but it's been going on for way too long.
Prediction; Watchdogs 2 will be a mess on PCs which surpass the recommended specifications.
Digital Foundry - Make sure you're using the latest NVidia drivers that Bethesda recommends. Runs great for me.
looking around city and 20 fps on xbox... how this is playable?
Going to wait for the Scorpio before playing this game.
the patch fixes the PC perf came out a day after this. (and new drivers)
Thank you DF!
Lmaooooo 1080p Titan can't run this at locked 60... wow. Patching time!
why does he say if you have a 1080p tv on the pro you get no benefits? Even though the game doesn't downsample unless you have a 4k tv and switch (definitely a bug) - isn't it still enabled so it gets the boost in framerate to hit the 30fps rather than dropping like the others?
If so then I would say the pro version is the way to go on the console side.
Blurry and Cinematic at the same time tsk tsk. I am dissapointed Bethesda. It's a shame because Dishonored 1 is amazing. This game improves on dishonored 1 in every way but takes a huge leap backward and falls flat. The bad performance is really ruining the experience for many including me. The PC version is sub par but it is still the best of the bunch. If your game is not getting locked 60 fps at 1080p on a Titan X GPU then you should reconsider releasing it in that state. Fuck you for disrespecting your customers Bethesda (again).
+BWX dude you are one of the best kind of person the kind that plays themselves so bad and don't even realize it like this is one of the best things iv ever had happen to me in a argument online its just to fucking good man love ya bro cya XD
p.s nice deleting the comment where you legit got so fucking played
I really wish these comparisons would end because somewhere down the line some ones gonna come along and say this is better looking on this one than that one and it's just always going to start off a unwanted commotion :-(
people should be warned, if the game runs good or not, this is one of the only reasons why such videos exist :D
what specs PC in this video?
What about the input lag?
Have you tried it in Xbox One S?
Thought that was Chun Li in the thumbnail
Damn the Xbox One version is such a blurry mess >:(
It seems like this game could do with a few patches for all platforms before playing.
Digital foundry logic "The ps foh suffers from low res texture pop and limited post processing, thus its on par w/the superior pc version"........😂😂😂😂
funny i did read so many times on neogaf dishonored 2 looks absolutly amazing on my 4k screen and ps4 pro . And now we know it looks same.
Finally this game is HORRIBLY optimized on Xbox One, like its blurry and never hits consistent 30 fps, so stuttering. I don't get it since while the Original remake on PS4/X1 wasn't anything special it mostly stuck to 30 fps and had a clean looking image and still looks and plays great. How did they fuck this up so bad?