The sunny hot day put Federer in trouble, and Berdych was also ruthless with nothing to lose. But as the afternoon progressed, the sun subsided and then Roger found his energy and game to complete the comeback.
@@user-cy6xl3vd3f Some people are irritated by hot weather and strong sunlight. It is not matter of whether it changes the surface characteristic or not.
@@varunshahvo-tv9854 Rafa is always injured according to his fans (which he was absolutely not here), and fed barely lost to him. Total points won : Fed= 174 Nadal =173 On a hard court slowed down to the ground, which favored Rafa's game rather than fed.
They've slowed down the hard courts in recent memory, and I think it's partially why Djokovic has had such success. He's all defense and the slow courts favor that
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy Although I completely agree that slower courts favor Djokovic but I wish people would stopping calling his or even Murray's style defensive. Even Federer himself said in an interview that he doesn't consider these two's style defensive, their shots do have more spin and less speed but are a still lot more penetrating than it appears on camera and their placement is immaculate.
No he wouldn't. What set the big 4 apart wasn't their aggression but their ability to defend and win the big points. Berdych, Tsonga, Cilic, Del Potro were all big hitters with high peaks and great results. They never maintained such ultra high levels over the course of a few weeks let a lone a full season. The last player with that type of style to be no1 was Marat Safin and he was smaller than all those guys and a better mover and his peak did not last either. Injuries pile up on big guys faster. Realistically Pete was big power player to be no1 ans he dominated the sport. But the game was very different and he relied on fast courts with little success. So no, Berdych would not have been no1 with this form. Novak, Rafa and probably murray who are better defenders would have stopped him. Just look at his h2h against them.
Really? Not from where I'm standing. You can't just win two straight sets in a Grand Slam match. Federer won three in a row afterwards, and was never under much threat either in those three.
![จบจนได้ ! | Black Myth: Wukong #007 [ตอนจบ?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DSqvWndF0sw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Roger Federer vs Marat Safin - Australian Open 2009 [HQ]](/img/n.gif)
In 2009, Delpo, Berdych, Davydenko, and Soderlin were playing really well.
And Roger got his French open, what an interesting year.
The sunny hot day put Federer in trouble, and Berdych was also ruthless with nothing to lose. But as the afternoon progressed, the sun subsided and then Roger found his energy and game to complete the comeback.
Exactly but Berdych by being absolute ruthless showed when he is on his god mode is absolutely invincible
Doesn't heat make the court faster? If so then it should help federer.
@@user-cy6xl3vd3f Some people are irritated by hot weather and strong sunlight. It is not matter of whether it changes the surface characteristic or not.
@@Luchon20082010I think your statement is contradicted by the fact that Federer came back from two sets down to win.
Berdych’s forehand is like a laser.
30:36 Never heard Roger grunt that loud before. Goes to show how well Berdych was playing.
I don't know how Federer won this game. Berdych was on fire ! OMG
Indeed, his best match ever by far: UNREAL SHOTS!!!
And people were really saying that Federer is the weak era champion...
29:34 is what you really came to see....
Why?
@@Luchon20082010 he means the following rally at break point, Federer has a pretty sick pop off
When Federer still had a killer forehand
Lol in this match his forehand was so weak compared to Berdych😳😳😳😳
@@Luchon20082010 and who won again?
@@benparsons4979 he didn't win because he had a superior forehand here
Lost to injured rafa
@@varunshahvo-tv9854 Rafa is always injured according to his fans (which he was absolutely not here), and fed barely lost to him. Total points won :
Fed= 174
Nadal =173
On a hard court slowed down to the ground, which favored Rafa's game rather than fed.
Berdych always look his opponent in the eyes and congratulate
Clay hardcourt, no surprise nadal won ao 2009
They've slowed down the hard courts in recent memory, and I think it's partially why Djokovic has had such success. He's all defense and the slow courts favor that
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazy Although I completely agree that slower courts favor Djokovic but I wish people would stopping calling his or even Murray's style defensive. Even Federer himself said in an interview that he doesn't consider these two's style defensive, their shots do have more spin and less speed but are a still lot more penetrating than it appears on camera and their placement is immaculate.
@@microsickful still they're not offensive in the sense that Federer is offensive
Nadal was unironically better on faster HC`s in this period if you look at his performances and W`s.
@@benparsons4979 oh yeah absolutely, but nobody is offensive like Federer is offensive lol.
So incredible!!
This Berdych would be number 1 right now
No he wouldn't. What set the big 4 apart wasn't their aggression but their ability to defend and win the big points. Berdych, Tsonga, Cilic, Del Potro were all big hitters with high peaks and great results. They never maintained such ultra high levels over the course of a few weeks let a lone a full season. The last player with that type of style to be no1 was Marat Safin and he was smaller than all those guys and a better mover and his peak did not last either. Injuries pile up on big guys faster. Realistically Pete was big power player to be no1 ans he dominated the sport. But the game was very different and he relied on fast courts with little success. So no, Berdych would not have been no1 with this form. Novak, Rafa and probably murray who are better defenders would have stopped him. Just look at his h2h against them.
Least delusional Fed clowns
This is one match which Berdych should have won
Berdych should have won this match.
Really? Not from where I'm standing. You can't just win two straight sets in a Grand Slam match. Federer won three in a row afterwards, and was never under much threat either in those three.
Hardcore implosion by Berdych. Fed hardly raised his level.
agree. never rated berdych. headcase
Berdy should’ve stayed with his 95 sq in frame
He did? He never changed?
Berdytch vs nadal Ao and this one he should have won both
Tomas好多刁鑽的回球，可惜竟沒拿過大滿貫冠軍
Biggest choker in tennis history
Waste of talent
varun does NOT like Tomas Berdych
😡😡😡😡
Nadal schooled him in the final
How is a 5 set match a schooling?
I wouldn't say 5 sets is "schooling" dude. You should choose your words more carefully.
You are on something dude
Least delusional Nole worshipper
He certainly did not. In fact, Federer outplayed Nadal for the entirety of the first four sets.
Almost another 40-15 moment from frauderer 💀
He's not "Frauderer", what a stupid nickname from a group of people who know nothing about tennis or the Great Swiss.
Vigin rat kid calling fraud one of the top sportman of all time
@@Ben6164they are just salty because no matter what djoker does, he will never be as popular or as adored as roger.