Subscribe to Newslaundry: pages.razorpay.com/pl_OtqOCKKxBviVQy/view Download the accessible Newslaundry app: www.newslaundry.com/download-app Join us on WhatsApp: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va61PEo0QeacOqU9vr2k
Shantidootz in minority want ALL 6 (read, all 6)things when they r in minority 1 - they want country to be secular democracy 2-they want their population to remain stable 3- they want to occupy top post like President and prime minister 4- they want to convert 5- they want waqf board 6- they want to occupy sacred places of majority community There r 0 peaceful MAJORITY NATIONS in the world where all 6 (read, all 6)conditions r fulfilled. So shantidoots don't give these things to minorities once they r majority but want them when they r in minority. They can't say they have nothing to do with other countries coz they raise voice for Palestine
Faye D Souza needs to understand that she can talk for such men without talking about the problems on the other side, just like how talking about feminism is important after a rape case and it should not invite talks about “men’s rights”. It is of paramount importance to talk about feminism and its role in preventing crimes against women when a tragedy happens (and even generally), but it is equally important to talk about how women misuse these laws with their lawyers. Moreover, talking about what such men are going through will touch on feminism because it essentially preaches equality. So, whataboutery never helps on either side.
@@hkhabar6726 actually in the cases related to violence against women, it's equally important to talk about men and address the problems that led to these crimes. And it applies to the other way around.
This ia a standard tactic by vile feminists to silence men's voices. You can see this on every time a feminist is called to discuss. Anytime an issue related to men is raised they start talking about women instead. Next time when Nirbhaya happens men should start talking about false rape cases instead of supporting women like we did.
Hey team NL it's a sensible episode and the title in the thumbnail explains it best but I don't understand why you would like to contradict your own stand by adding the picture of the person who took his life..is it ethical or feeds into the same trap of sensationalisation PPL will listen to hafta anyways adding a picture doesn't seem necessary or harmless (I am talking to the person who made the thumbnail)
WHY Supreme Kotha doesn't charge woman for filling False Cases? Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2024 (BNS) deals with the crime of falsely accusing someone of a crime with the intent to cause harm. The law aims to protect people from being maliciously involved in criminal proceedings by someone who knows the charges are false. The punishment for this crime can include: Imprisonment for up to five years A fine of up to two lakh rupees Both imprisonment and a fine If the false accusation is for a serious crime, such as one punishable by death, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment, the punishment can be more severe. The punishment can include imprisonment for up to ten years, in addition to a fine.
Because it would require more than a sucide note to eatablish the flasity of the cases filed. Legal procedure requires a caredul examinationnofnevidence and the preponderance kf evidence does not change because someone comitted suicide.
The comparison between the misuse of a familial / conjugal penal law and the misuse of PMLA (which focuses on economic offences) is simply lame. Good call-out, Anand.
Problem is that misuse is misuse. Question should be asked why laws in our countries are allowed to be misused. Our judicial and police system is so much broken that getting a justice is asking for moon.
@@Delhi_Guy men do crimes and less amount of cases is fake compared to crimes and 74% bulsshit is fake not real ncrb has less then 5% that will happen and it's really less.
First I have lot of respect for all of you . I love how NewsLaundry presents news . But in this topic somehow I feel you guys are either are almost afraid to say something which against a women centric law or you guys are not informed enough . The lawyer in the panel , somehow did not say the point which common people are thinking . 1: No one is saying to scrap the law ... 2: The law should be in today's age , gender neutral . In India a man cant be harassed . There are no specific sections 3: If it is proved beyond doubt , that this law was misused or any law , there should be a punishment ( jail time ) . 4: The most important aspect ,which is an open secret , a sitting judge asked for a bribe , which should be looked seriously . I wish you could have discussed this serious matter is more importance .
@arnab28824 in used to have respect for this channel, but the pathetic way they have handled an issue which doesn't have the potential to ruin 50% of the populations lives but all the women in the men's lives as well.... Imagine tomorrow a law was made where hindu can put very serious life destroying false case against others without any repercussions, then let's see the coverage in this pathetic channel... All men are asking is to have gender neutral laws and even that basic requirement is being mocked...
As a big sister, married to a good husband....I feel scared for good men in my life. Forget men getting justice against a women...they can't even speak bad about bad women. Matlab is so horrible. Alot of women have destroyed families because of unnecessary egos and misusing laws. Horrible are those lawyers who know the fact that it's all fake cases n how it will impact men. They lose jobs, respect and any good opportunities in life.
Har di 61 die beacuse of dowry murder tab toh nahi bolte itna kuch,every 25 minute 1 womenn suicide tab toh nahi bolta koi ,30% women are facing domestic violence tab toh kuch nahi bolta ,lekin ek admi ko kuch ho jaye toh sare women rights wah ,aur ispe kya pata ye fasne k liye suicide Kiya ho ji normal h men m ye pure pariwar ko marke suicide hadd common h.
Sorry, but putting all blame on the lawyers takes a lot of the blame off the women who file false cases. At the end of the day, going to the courts for justice is a not a trivial issue and the women who sign the final documents are mature adults and should be fully aware of what they are getting into.
For women, NL would have been making shows after shows in name of justice. Because its a man, they want all coverage to be stopped immediately. I would like to ask Abhinandan as to why her endorses the idea of arresting boyfriend immediately when a girl does this, but whenever a man takes his life, Abhinandan wants the system to ensure that the woman is sent out of country f0or her safety like in Rhea case. Why this discriminations and hate against men Abhinandan has? I think kam se kam women are being exposed of law abuse and how the who system enbdorsed by leftist, is only helping rich elitre women and genuine women always suffers, uska bhi coverage nahi dete tum log. It is good, Why NL wants to hprotect those who are abusing system and misusing laws?
It has not been established that the allegations were false, a suicide note is not enough for the court. Legally, it is a complicated matter which needs discussion and laws need to be evaluated
@@RevelingScribbler i hope u said that when the bf was arrested immediatedly after the suicide of the female pilot without any sucide note. typical feminazis
Can we avoid engaging in whataboutism in the Atul Subash case? Instead of comparing non-bailable laws, shouldn’t we focus on improving existing laws to reduce misuse? For example, we could introduce informal hearings to hold lawyers accountable for filing unnecessary cases, or perhaps create a counter-law that imposes appropriate penalties on women if their judicial actions cause undue stress that significantly impacts men’s daily lives.
The person who complaint about Anand being pro bjp clearly has no idea how well educated discussions work. If you want to be in an eco chamber of Modi bhakts or Rahul bhakts then there are other spaces on TH-cam like deshbhakt, Ajit Anjum or aaj tak or republic Bharat. But I come here to get views from all perspectives. It’s not that either Muslims or Hindus and bjp or congress are doodh ke Dhule and clearly one side is evil . Every thing is in shades of grey . I love it when there’s perspective of all sides in an argument. Other wise it’s just becomes a bhakti video of either side .
Finally, a sensible comment! It’s funny to see each side talk as if they are an angel! People who listen to both sides of the ideology can see the one sided media narrative both sides! 😅
I have been a follower of newslaundry and Faye for years now. Really disappointed at how they talked about Atul's case. I dont know why people think that talking about Men's rights means we are taking away Women's rights. Felt disgusted when Faye was slyly justifying why lawyers use these laws as Women dont have access!! Are you kidding me? No one is saying that these laws that protect Women be completely thrown out. People just want justice to be done without seeing just the gender. Really Nauseous to see my beloved Abhinandan and Faye talk like this. Wont be a subscriber to each of them now.
For the first time, I am seeing newslaundry folks being either so ignorant or so ill-informed about something they are discussing. You guys should have left this topic untouched.
Hello Team, I was quite disappointed by the discussion on the dowry case in this episode. Anand raised some critical points regarding the weaponization of this law and instigation by lawyers themselves. However, everyone else on the panel seemed to only provide their personal views without having done any research to talk to a judge or a senior lawyer with expertise in handling 498A cases. I kindly request you to invite Deepika Narayan Bharadwaj onto your panel who has been fighting for men accused with false cases and busting such rackets. It's a much wider problem that you made it out to be. It was disappointing that you chose to make a comparison with PMLA to trivialize this important issue.
you guys are shallow to listen to these guys and it is but a reflection of your prejudices and your bigoted stances that you come here to validate except maybe this time when you realize that these guys aren't in your corner.
@@jitkr1489 Please stop this name calling and toxicity. They provide detailed discussions of news matters. You don't have to listen to them if you don't want to.
I am just a lay person. about dowry law, When I was a kid, everyday there were multiple dowry death news in newspapers. But it's reduced now, how? due to law. One man committed suicide. There will be investigation. Everyone jumping into conclusion that he is victim,law is wrong. Feminism is culprit. Women are still vulnerable . This law is supposed to protect vulnerable women, in their in law's house. It's necessary. Nobody going to save a woman in their inlaw's house,if they have wrong intention. Everywhere now men showing their intolerant side due to this incident. Laws has been misused. People have been deprived of basic human rights in the name of law. No one ask to change law at that time. When come to women right? Every one comes out of their gentleman disguise.
I can bet that you have never set foot in a family court anywhere in this country. Or else you are a woman, and the legal system is already in your favour.
Thr anchors arguments are so immature.. what a stupid comparison...this is the reason why people can't take you seriously it's ridiculous take on such serious issues....
Very biased opinions by all of you have. Please atleast discuss about law don't do what aboutry. You guys criticise other media organisations when they do what aboutry on something bad happens to women or something like that. Now you guys are doing same. You haven't discussed anything about law how this law is one sided .....
Leaving apart personal religious faith, leaving apart party politics, joining, supporting, admiring or voting for someone is as good as holding up their political ideology. I hope people akin to SR would realise their contribution, as miniscule as they could be to the graves they dig for people from their own communities and other minorities. Democracy really needs to be redefined..
57:00 There is a very valid reason why the scripts are written in roman. The scripts, technically has to follow a specific font and size which takes into account the duration of the script. Technically, a scene written on one page is one minute long. That means a 140 page long script would be 140 minutes long movie. and we cannot change the font or size because it would then change the kerning and leading eventually changing the size of the script (number of pages or even the placement of a particular scene). Secondly, the cinema today is global, where there are people from all sort of background (non hindi speakers) working on it. Also, usually, it’s the same script for everyone (for ease of reference) so that everyone is on the same page, literally speaking.
I wanna say it's shameful for @abhinandan to have said that . Can you say same for Nirbhaya Story ? I used to be a liberal but the way liberals are going ahead I head hang in shame. No matter what woman does she is correct, no matter what minority do they are correct and no matter what a poor or under privileged Does they are correct. The moto is to stand with righteousness not with weak or strong.
I don't have to even watch this episode to know where NL will go with this issue. They are stereotypically one dimensional with no nuance. everytgihng is a fight for social justice. The world is black and wqhite for them and all of it is predefined in their heads. The audience should also know what they come here for.. I am sure these guys serve you that. There is no objectiveness in your judgements.. you just come here to validate your beliefs
Why don't you give the lawyer panelist to give his opinion on your issues. He hardly speaks. Let him give his opinion. You can talk less I think. Let your panelists speak
Nation is built on communities and the percentage of human living around with their mental health but lately in india their lacks method of governance and administration which frustrate humans and disturbs
Shantidootz in minority want ALL 6 (read, all 6)things when they r in minority 1 - they want country to be secular democracy 2-they want their population to remain stable 3- they want to occupy top post like President and prime minister 4- they want to convert 5- they want waqf board 6- they want to occupy sacred places of majority community There r 0 peaceful MAJORITY NATIONS in the world where all 6 (read, all 6)conditions r fulfilled. So shantidoots don't give these things to minorities once they r majority but want them when they r in minority. They can't say they have nothing to do with other countries coz they raise voice for Palestine
No no.....don't censor.....as it is we have too much censoring!! People must learn to take criticism confidently ....it should pose no problem if you are confident of what you say!!
Watch Out if some body bribed the Chinese Chess reigning World Champion for his move in 14th game after 6-1/2 - 6-1/2 tie) for a ridiculous move (beyond the caliber of 500 Chess point)
This channel brought Faye D’Souza 😂….to speak on the neutrality of law… I would say to news laundry…please one day be courageous enough to speak for men’s right…bcoz what I’ve felt it’s the most difficult task…where you risk your impression the most but still speak what is right…
I have probably never seen a more dishonest journalist than Faye (RW morons aside). It is a shame that these instagram journos with zero boots on the ground experience have become such leading voices. Look at the depth that Anand brings to the discussion and then look at Faye's views and the difference in scholarship is so vast that it is hilarious.
@mds33483 Most men can't understand a woman and usually avoid discussions on what their role in a marriage is and so many women, who may not be physically abused feel mentally inferior when their opinions are either ignored or just dismissed. It is this frustration of being treated as secondary for years that comes out in slapping what, to most people, would appear false cases. Mental discrimination in a marriage is difficult to prove because it is what the woman thinks but the man does not!
You guys are walking on egg-shells on this matter. Please consider the scale of how much this law has been mis-used. I disagree with Faye's characterisation of the dowry laws being mis-used 'some of the time'. . I would say if you really want to underestand it. One area of enquiry can be. When one says 'misuse' of the dowry law. what type of misuse? cases of out right lies? or selective cherry picking. Or genuine cases that couldn't meet the criterea to get a proper prosecution out of it? What is it? The guy didn't kill himself because of the lawyer. I am sure his wife pushed for it. So lets call a spade a spade. You guys are more worried about being seen in a particular light. Even after a guy killed himself over this.
Discussion on dowry harassment.problem os🥺🤔lack of proper education at home or at institution as everywhere you need to excel. Can u do a show on suicides in india by men vs. Women. Dividing the areas of suicides region wise and reasons
Manisha is saying shame people who misuse dowry laws. I want to ask her are dowry takers shamed publicly in our country? No marriage where I come from is taking place without dowry. And dowry has transformed into a status symbol instead of being seen as a crime that it is. Also shouldn't the institution of marriage itself be questioned that works perfectly well only till a women accepts to be treated as inferior the moment she tries to assert herself all hell breaks lose.
don't worry women are having full rights to put false cases without any repercussions and destroying men and men's families lives (which include the women in his family) Quite progressive or feminist isn't it..
For new marriages provision of alimony need to be removed. There should be a law for welfare of children born through live ins.Men are not getting women for marriage. Dowry anymore relevant?
Raman, are you in senses, when Rahul is speaking he is tutored, raising Adani corruption gundaraj is futile for you, then you want he should not do anything or ask you for everything.
Pain in Manish pandes voice, when sonia gandhi is caught peddling pro pakistan views. ..priceless. Why cant Cpngress say they do not support the views mentioned in that website and will file a case against the promoters of that site.
While demeaning men's rights and voice for TRP and comparing it with other unrelated laws is not only shameful but it shows insensitivity towards men and the kind of repeated videos on feminist issues only is pathetic. It's only Red Mike that took this issue in a positive light, no one is saying there is no crime against women but how can one downplay crime by women so easily a crime cant be used to justify another crime. This is what judiciary and feminists have been doing these days. Supporting draconian laws and judicial terrorism because there have been crime against women is same as BJP preaching validating their terror activities citing alleged crime by Muslim rulers centuries ago! Renaming immorality and crime with fancy English terms will never validate such acts.
Let's not question religious faiths now. Most of us don't know religious preachings and their iterations. Most of us were born into a religion. It's beyond our control. We don't have any right in criticising why someone follows some faith.
1:09:00 such a lier. Samay at this point in time is almost impossible to ignore. Khud youtube channel chalata hain and bol ase raha hain jaise kta naam hain uska. Abe joker abhinandan kisi aur k samne ye acting karna Luvdu. Metro se hun sab samjhta hain. Joker sala! 😂😂😂
The writer is a fool. Bringing some of the dark jokes of Samay here has no meaning. He did it for that audience in his show. Completely misplaced to send to NL. It is as misplaced as doing the topics discussed here on the stage of that latent show.
@@Mirage_1212 bcs he know Samay raina is a kashmiri pandit. Must have speculated that he is a right winger and in front of their audience they don't want to give him importance.also lets demean him a little bit bcs he doesn't fit into their scheme of things! Modi is one of the most powerful leaders in the world Nd one of the most, stable reliable and trusted leaders and moreover the indian public put him thrid time in the highest office and i have seen this joker Abhinandan whom i didn't even know a few months back, he talks about modi like he is discussing about some trash!! Sab Newlaundry walle sale jokers hain!! Kabhi mujhse debate kar k dekhain, they will start sweating in their pants.
Subscribe to Newslaundry: pages.razorpay.com/pl_OtqOCKKxBviVQy/view
Download the accessible Newslaundry app: www.newslaundry.com/download-app
Join us on WhatsApp: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va61PEo0QeacOqU9vr2k
BEETROOT >>>> ABHINANDHAN LAUNDRY ; ALL DAY!!
Shantidootz in minority want ALL 6 (read, all 6)things when they r in minority
1 - they want country to be secular democracy
2-they want their population to remain stable
3- they want to occupy top post like President and prime minister
4- they want to convert
5- they want waqf board
6- they want to occupy sacred places of majority community
There r 0 peaceful MAJORITY NATIONS in the world where all 6 (read, all 6)conditions r fulfilled. So shantidoots don't give these things to minorities once they r majority but want them when they r in minority. They can't say they have nothing to do with other countries coz they raise voice for Palestine
Faye D Souza needs to understand that she can talk for such men without talking about the problems on the other side, just like how talking about feminism is important after a rape case and it should not invite talks about “men’s rights”. It is of paramount importance to talk about feminism and its role in preventing crimes against women when a tragedy happens (and even generally), but it is equally important to talk about how women misuse these laws with their lawyers. Moreover, talking about what such men are going through will touch on feminism because it essentially preaches equality.
So, whataboutery never helps on either side.
@@hkhabar6726 yes, in this law men does not have anything that he can use to defend him self
@@hkhabar6726 actually in the cases related to violence against women, it's equally important to talk about men and address the problems that led to these crimes.
And it applies to the other way around.
This ia a standard tactic by vile feminists to silence men's voices. You can see this on every time a feminist is called to discuss. Anytime an issue related to men is raised they start talking about women instead. Next time when Nirbhaya happens men should start talking about false rape cases instead of supporting women like we did.
Hey team NL it's a sensible episode and the title in the thumbnail explains it best but I don't understand why you would like to contradict your own stand by adding the picture of the person who took his life..is it ethical or feeds into the same trap of sensationalisation PPL will listen to hafta anyways adding a picture doesn't seem necessary or harmless (I am talking to the person who made the thumbnail)
WHY Supreme Kotha doesn't charge woman for filling False Cases?
Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2024 (BNS) deals with the crime of falsely accusing someone of a crime with the intent to cause harm. The law aims to protect people from being maliciously involved in criminal proceedings by someone who knows the charges are false.
The punishment for this crime can include:
Imprisonment for up to five years
A fine of up to two lakh rupees
Both imprisonment and a fine
If the false accusation is for a serious crime, such as one punishable by death, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment, the punishment can be more severe. The punishment can include imprisonment for up to ten years, in addition to a fine.
shUTUP pus!
cANT BREATHE CLEAN AIR AND THATS WHAT YOU THINNK ABOUT!
Because it would require more than a sucide note to eatablish the flasity of the cases filed. Legal procedure requires a caredul examinationnofnevidence and the preponderance kf evidence does not change because someone comitted suicide.
The comparison between the misuse of a familial / conjugal penal law and the misuse of PMLA (which focuses on economic offences) is simply lame. Good call-out, Anand.
Problem is that misuse is misuse. Question should be asked why laws in our countries are allowed to be misused. Our judicial and police system is so much broken that getting a justice is asking for moon.
@@Delhi_Guy men do crimes and less amount of cases is fake compared to crimes and 74% bulsshit is fake not real ncrb has less then 5% that will happen and it's really less.
52:15 Manisha Said that "Few" People is misusing it. Any data please?
Not sure why they even felt the need to discuss this topic when there was clearly no homework done.
array bhai it's about issues that are ruining men's and their families lives... who care right.... lost respect for this channel...
55:35 Great call out Abhinandan. India has no rule of law because the laws are unenforceable.
Anand is very correct in his reading of the harrassment issue.....lawyers mint money by misleading victims
First I have lot of respect for all of you . I love how NewsLaundry presents news . But in this topic somehow I feel you guys are either are almost afraid to say something which against a women centric law or you guys are not informed enough . The lawyer in the panel , somehow did not say the point which common people are thinking .
1: No one is saying to scrap the law ...
2: The law should be in today's age , gender neutral . In India a man cant be harassed . There are no specific sections
3: If it is proved beyond doubt , that this law was misused or any law , there should be a punishment ( jail time ) .
4: The most important aspect ,which is an open secret , a sitting judge asked for a bribe , which should be looked seriously .
I wish you could have discussed this serious matter is more importance .
@arnab28824 in used to have respect for this channel, but the pathetic way they have handled an issue which doesn't have the potential to ruin 50% of the populations lives but all the women in the men's lives as well....
Imagine tomorrow a law was made where hindu can put very serious life destroying false case against others without any repercussions, then let's see the coverage in this pathetic channel... All men are asking is to have gender neutral laws and even that basic requirement is being mocked...
So you brought Faye dsouza to discuss on dowry laws it is like bringing giriraj Singh to discuss on hindutva.
@@freethinker. Both are extremely biased towards their ideology.
As a big sister, married to a good husband....I feel scared for good men in my life. Forget men getting justice against a women...they can't even speak bad about bad women. Matlab is so horrible. Alot of women have destroyed families because of unnecessary egos and misusing laws. Horrible are those lawyers who know the fact that it's all fake cases n how it will impact men. They lose jobs, respect and any good opportunities in life.
Har di 61 die beacuse of dowry murder tab toh nahi bolte itna kuch,every 25 minute 1 womenn suicide tab toh nahi bolta koi ,30% women are facing domestic violence tab toh kuch nahi bolta ,lekin ek admi ko kuch ho jaye toh sare women rights wah ,aur ispe kya pata ye fasne k liye suicide Kiya ho ji normal h men m ye pure pariwar ko marke suicide hadd common h.
Sad to see that they have zero sympathy for Atul !
Sorry, but putting all blame on the lawyers takes a lot of the blame off the women who file false cases. At the end of the day, going to the courts for justice is a not a trivial issue and the women who sign the final documents are mature adults and should be fully aware of what they are getting into.
For women, NL would have been making shows after shows in name of justice. Because its a man, they want all coverage to be stopped immediately. I would like to ask Abhinandan as to why her endorses the idea of arresting boyfriend immediately when a girl does this, but whenever a man takes his life, Abhinandan wants the system to ensure that the woman is sent out of country f0or her safety like in Rhea case. Why this discriminations and hate against men Abhinandan has? I think kam se kam women are being exposed of law abuse and how the who system enbdorsed by leftist, is only helping rich elitre women and genuine women always suffers, uska bhi coverage nahi dete tum log. It is good, Why NL wants to hprotect those who are abusing system and misusing laws?
male feminism is the biggest way to show the strength of your character and all these guys are in reality very shallow and so is the audience here
It has not been established that the allegations were false, a suicide note is not enough for the court. Legally, it is a complicated matter which needs discussion and laws need to be evaluated
@@RevelingScribbler i hope u said that when the bf was arrested immediatedly after the suicide of the female pilot without any sucide note. typical feminazis
I will cancel the subscription for the next 3 months to protest on low quality discussion on guy suicide .
Yes me too.
Can we avoid engaging in whataboutism in the Atul Subash case? Instead of comparing non-bailable laws, shouldn’t we focus on improving existing laws to reduce misuse? For example, we could introduce informal hearings to hold lawyers accountable for filing unnecessary cases, or perhaps create a counter-law that imposes appropriate penalties on women if their judicial actions cause undue stress that significantly impacts men’s daily lives.
Exacty what I pointed out.
The person who complaint about Anand being pro bjp clearly has no idea how well educated discussions work. If you want to be in an eco chamber of Modi bhakts or Rahul bhakts then there are other spaces on TH-cam like deshbhakt, Ajit Anjum or aaj tak or republic Bharat. But I come here to get views from all perspectives. It’s not that either Muslims or Hindus and bjp or congress are doodh ke Dhule and clearly one side is evil . Every thing is in shades of grey . I love it when there’s perspective of all sides in an argument. Other wise it’s just becomes a bhakti video of either side .
Finally, a sensible comment!
It’s funny to see each side talk as if they are an angel! People who listen to both sides of the ideology can see the one sided media narrative both sides! 😅
"we will discuss the suicide of the techie guy.". Respect much?
I have been a follower of newslaundry and Faye for years now. Really disappointed at how they talked about Atul's case. I dont know why people think that talking about Men's rights means we are taking away Women's rights.
Felt disgusted when Faye was slyly justifying why lawyers use these laws as Women dont have access!!
Are you kidding me?
No one is saying that these laws that protect Women be completely thrown out. People just want justice to be done without seeing just the gender.
Really Nauseous to see my beloved Abhinandan and Faye talk like this.
Wont be a subscriber to each of them now.
For the first time, I am seeing newslaundry folks being either so ignorant or so ill-informed about something they are discussing. You guys should have left this topic untouched.
Hello Team,
I was quite disappointed by the discussion on the dowry case in this episode. Anand raised some critical points regarding the weaponization of this law and instigation by lawyers themselves. However, everyone else on the panel seemed to only provide their personal views without having done any research to talk to a judge or a senior lawyer with expertise in handling 498A cases. I kindly request you to invite Deepika Narayan Bharadwaj onto your panel who has been fighting for men accused with false cases and busting such rackets. It's a much wider problem that you made it out to be. It was disappointing that you chose to make a comparison with PMLA to trivialize this important issue.
you guys are shallow to listen to these guys and it is but a reflection of your prejudices and your bigoted stances that you come here to validate except maybe this time when you realize that these guys aren't in your corner.
@@jitkr1489 Please stop this name calling and toxicity. They provide detailed discussions of news matters. You don't have to listen to them if you don't want to.
I am just a lay person. about dowry law,
When I was a kid, everyday there were multiple dowry death news in newspapers.
But it's reduced now, how? due to law.
One man committed suicide.
There will be investigation.
Everyone jumping into conclusion that he is victim,law is wrong.
Feminism is culprit.
Women are still vulnerable .
This law is supposed to protect vulnerable women, in their in law's house.
It's necessary.
Nobody going to save a woman in their inlaw's house,if they have wrong intention.
Everywhere now men showing their intolerant side due to this incident.
Laws has been misused.
People have been deprived of basic human rights in the name of law.
No one ask to change law at that time.
When come to women right?
Every one comes out of their gentleman disguise.
I can bet that you have never set foot in a family court anywhere in this country. Or else you are a woman, and the legal system is already in your favour.
Yes one man committed suicide is what you see but in 2022 over 4000 men did it it's not an isolated incident
Thr anchors arguments are so immature.. what a stupid comparison...this is the reason why people can't take you seriously it's ridiculous take on such serious issues....
Sorry , I just find your style and commentary just a waste of time, trifle pseudointellectual , wannabe stylized and quite a waste of time ! Sorry .
C'mon Sir, newslaundry has such "cool" journalists 🤷♂️🤟🤟😁
Please keep timestamps to skip anand
The problem is the court does not punish those who misuse the laws and weaponize it.
And what's the problem with making rape, DV laws gender neutral?
problem is they don't care if it's men who suffer, after all men are not humans right!!! absolute clowns... Toxic feminism at it's peak..
Does your channel have the facility to pay for individual programmes behind the payroll?
Please include the recommendations in the description
Very biased opinions by all of you have. Please atleast discuss about law don't do what aboutry. You guys criticise other media organisations when they do what aboutry on something bad happens to women or something like that. Now you guys are doing same. You haven't discussed anything about law how this law is one sided .....
they have exposed what a bunch of clowns they are.... how dare they pretend to be journalist, now they are not able to gather anyyy data...
sad video... bogus panel... may be the agenda was not clear.
I'm of the opinion that the GOI must set-up a Men's Commission as a counterpart to the Women's Commission.
Loved this ad, very thoughtful and refreshing to bring to our notice the young folks who chose to belive in good work.
Bad, Abhinandan!!
BJP has coined a new term Gandhi and Sorros = GANDOS 😂
Leaving apart personal religious faith, leaving apart party politics, joining, supporting, admiring or voting for someone is as good as holding up their political ideology. I hope people akin to SR would realise their contribution, as miniscule as they could be to the graves they dig for people from their own communities and other minorities. Democracy really needs to be redefined..
Its more than 100 minutes video, hence ,atleast 100 positive comments must be uploaded on this laundry channel..
57:00 There is a very valid reason why the scripts are written in roman.
The scripts, technically has to follow a specific font and size which takes into account the duration of the script. Technically, a scene written on one page is one minute long. That means a 140 page long script would be 140 minutes long movie. and we cannot change the font or size because it would then change the kerning and leading eventually changing the size of the script (number of pages or even the placement of a particular scene).
Secondly, the cinema today is global, where there are people from all sort of background (non hindi speakers) working on it.
Also, usually, it’s the same script for everyone (for ease of reference) so that everyone is on the same page, literally speaking.
ty Mr Kripal on the AQI recc waiting for the pollution campaign next week!
Why are not discussing alimony law
Nice to see Faye ❤️❤️❤️
I wanna say it's shameful for @abhinandan to have said that . Can you say same for Nirbhaya Story ? I used to be a liberal but the way liberals are going ahead I head hang in shame. No matter what woman does she is correct, no matter what minority do they are correct and no matter what a poor or under privileged Does they are correct. The moto is to stand with righteousness not with weak or strong.
I don't have to even watch this episode to know where NL will go with this issue. They are stereotypically one dimensional with no nuance. everytgihng is a fight for social justice. The world is black and wqhite for them and all of it is predefined in their heads. The audience should also know what they come here for.. I am sure these guys serve you that. There is no objectiveness in your judgements.. you just come here to validate your beliefs
Can you compare hapta with death.
Law need to be gender neutral
Absolutely......Dhankar was such a poor Governor too.....both speakers are tooooo partisan to deserve the posts......
Why don't you give the lawyer panelist to give his opinion on your issues. He hardly speaks. Let him give his opinion.
You can talk less I think. Let your panelists speak
Y is this outside pay wall?
Abhinandan....why you are giving all these free... philanthropic or marketing strategy 😮
Marketing strategy
Nation is built on communities and the percentage of human living around with their mental health but lately in india their lacks method of governance and administration which frustrate humans and disturbs
Does "Mumbai" sound low market, Bombay people?
🙏🙏🙏
Big fan of Faye D'Souza... Kindly make a video on Ex-Muslim Movement in India🙏
Somone has to start something and it will get to other laws too but watering down Atul's case wont help anyone.
the quality of discussion on misuse of dowry law is pathetic, its better to watch masala news at least they have entertainment value
actual crime :))))
PM invited them ....they invited as they got invite...
Shantidootz in minority want ALL 6 (read, all 6)things when they r in minority
1 - they want country to be secular democracy
2-they want their population to remain stable
3- they want to occupy top post like President and prime minister
4- they want to convert
5- they want waqf board
6- they want to occupy sacred places of majority community
There r 0 peaceful MAJORITY NATIONS in the world where all 6 (read, all 6)conditions r fulfilled. So shantidoots don't give these things to minorities once they r majority but want them when they r in minority. They can't say they have nothing to do with other countries coz they raise voice for Palestine
No no.....don't censor.....as it is we have too much censoring!! People must learn to take criticism confidently ....it should pose no problem if you are confident of what you say!!
I couldn't agree more on the dowry law misuse case. Couldn't have put this so well myself.
Congress can't fight soros issue Wow Maneesha Are you journalist or propagandist? Haven't you seen press conference of. Supriya?!
Watch Out if some body bribed the Chinese Chess reigning World Champion for his move in 14th game after 6-1/2 - 6-1/2 tie) for a ridiculous move (beyond the caliber of 500 Chess point)
War rukwa di paw paw 🐾
"we don't have the data"
Then get the data
This channel brought Faye D’Souza 😂….to speak on the neutrality of law…
I would say to news laundry…please one day be courageous enough to speak for men’s right…bcoz what I’ve felt it’s the most difficult task…where you risk your impression the most but still speak what is right…
Justice Shekhar Yadav roaster has been changed now he'll only listen appeals to Civil cases that too prior to 2010..
17:41
1:02:54 bro trying so hard to act smart ofc he know the name but trying hard to look cool
I have probably never seen a more dishonest journalist than Faye (RW morons aside). It is a shame that these instagram journos with zero boots on the ground experience have become such leading voices.
Look at the depth that Anand brings to the discussion and then look at Faye's views and the difference in scholarship is so vast that it is hilarious.
Why not educate the men in the matter and the women to insist on NOT taking dowry from parents??
educate people only misuse law by false dowry harassment and rape case.
let's also educate women to not put false cases and destroy people's lives...
@mds33483 Most men can't understand a woman and usually avoid discussions on what their role in a marriage is and so many women, who may not be physically abused feel mentally inferior when their opinions are either ignored or just dismissed. It is this frustration of being treated as secondary for years that comes out in slapping what, to most people, would appear false cases. Mental discrimination in a marriage is difficult to prove because it is what the woman thinks but the man does not!
NOT TAKING DOWRY IS NOT GOING TO HELP WHEN WOMEN ARE GONNA FILE FALSE CASES
Rahul soros bhai bhai 😂😂😂
You guys are walking on egg-shells on this matter. Please consider the scale of how much this law has been mis-used. I disagree with Faye's characterisation of the dowry laws being mis-used 'some of the time'. . I would say if you really want to underestand it. One area of enquiry can be. When one says 'misuse' of the dowry law. what type of misuse? cases of out right lies? or selective cherry picking. Or genuine cases that couldn't meet the criterea to get a proper prosecution out of it? What is it? The guy didn't kill himself because of the lawyer. I am sure his wife pushed for it. So lets call a spade a spade. You guys are more worried about being seen in a particular light. Even after a guy killed himself over this.
40k views 😝😝😝😝😝
Discussion on dowry harassment.problem os🥺🤔lack of proper education at home or at institution as everywhere you need to excel. Can u do a show on suicides in india by men vs. Women. Dividing the areas of suicides region wise and reasons
Manisha is saying shame people who misuse dowry laws. I want to ask her are dowry takers shamed publicly in our country? No marriage where I come from is taking place without dowry. And dowry has transformed into a status symbol instead of being seen as a crime that it is. Also shouldn't the institution of marriage itself be questioned that works perfectly well only till a women accepts to be treated as inferior the moment she tries to assert herself all hell breaks lose.
don't worry women are having full rights to put false cases without any repercussions and destroying men and men's families lives (which include the women in his family) Quite progressive or feminist isn't it..
@@RitvikSen nahi degi bhai...
assert by getting the in laws arrested, because she can? lol. are you dumb or just not well read! you think being assertive = "misusing laws"
Apart from the huge left/ anti BJP bias which is expected, this is a fine podcast.
Faye ❤❤❤
शेखू
उमर हो गई है reading glass ले क्या
For new marriages provision of alimony need to be removed. There should be a law for welfare of children born through live ins.Men are not getting women for marriage. Dowry anymore relevant?
Raman, are you in senses, when Rahul is speaking he is tutored, raising Adani corruption gundaraj is futile for you, then you want he should not do anything or ask you for everything.
Pain in Manish pandes voice, when sonia gandhi is caught peddling pro pakistan views. ..priceless. Why cant Cpngress say they do not support the views mentioned in that website and will file a case against the promoters of that site.
Dies this progressive host believe mrn could be abused or SAed by women. He need to first answer that.
While demeaning men's rights and voice for TRP and comparing it with other unrelated laws is not only shameful but it shows insensitivity towards men and the kind of repeated videos on feminist issues only is pathetic. It's only Red Mike that took this issue in a positive light, no one is saying there is no crime against women but how can one downplay crime by women so easily a crime cant be used to justify another crime. This is what judiciary and feminists have been doing these days. Supporting draconian laws and judicial terrorism because there have been crime against women is same as BJP preaching validating their terror activities citing alleged crime by Muslim rulers centuries ago! Renaming immorality and crime with fancy English terms will never validate such acts.
Follow Ex Muslim Sahil and Adam Seeker to know the Reality of Islam ❤❤
Let's not question religious faiths now. Most of us don't know religious preachings and their iterations. Most of us were born into a religion. It's beyond our control. We don't have any right in criticising why someone follows some faith.
Hindi me kar lo yaar.
Uska alag episode aata hai bhai .
india mein har koi hindi nai boltana
they have episodes in shudh hindi also
1:09:00 such a lier. Samay at this point in time is almost impossible to ignore. Khud youtube channel chalata hain and bol ase raha hain jaise kta naam hain uska. Abe joker abhinandan kisi aur k samne ye acting karna Luvdu. Metro se hun sab samjhta hain. Joker sala! 😂😂😂
The writer is a fool. Bringing some of the dark jokes of Samay here has no meaning. He did it for that audience in his show. Completely misplaced to send to NL. It is as misplaced as doing the topics discussed here on the stage of that latent show.
@@Mirage_1212 bcs he know Samay raina is a kashmiri pandit. Must have speculated that he is a right winger and in front of their audience they don't want to give him importance.also lets demean him a little bit bcs he doesn't fit into their scheme of things!
Modi is one of the most powerful leaders in the world Nd one of the most, stable reliable and trusted leaders and moreover the indian public put him thrid time in the highest office and i have seen this joker Abhinandan whom i didn't even know a few months back, he talks about modi like he is discussing about some trash!!
Sab Newlaundry walle sale jokers hain!!
Kabhi mujhse debate kar k dekhain, they will start sweating in their pants.
1:11:00 Any prime ministers and Presidents (Plural) Lol!!
English sikh le chomu thodi