ECE 100 05 DeMorgan's Theorem Example

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 87

  • @funmeister
    @funmeister 6 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Wow, of all the explanations for this, yours is the clearest, simplest, shortest, most concise. Bravo! Subscribed!

    • @loopnation5359
      @loopnation5359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no!he is not

    • @emanueliden6351
      @emanueliden6351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@loopnation5359 we uko down tu! kama kiatu yako

    • @loopnation5359
      @loopnation5359 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@emanueliden6351 english please sir

  • @troymd2009
    @troymd2009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you, clearest explanation that I have come across so far.

  • @Nicolasgtix
    @Nicolasgtix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I have been struggling for long a time trying to understand the explanations of my teacher... you made it all clear in 5 minutes. Thanks a lot. Subscribed!

  • @danielakoyleek3757
    @danielakoyleek3757 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Concise and precise.
    You just nailed it. Thanks

  • @MiMejorAmigoTablon
    @MiMejorAmigoTablon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video really helped me, other videos are 17 minutes long and I cannot understand completely.
    Thank you so much

  • @wonderbuddy3204
    @wonderbuddy3204 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    you explained it wayy better than my lecturers! TYSM!!!!

  • @jakeday5224
    @jakeday5224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i struggled so much with topic and i learned more from this 5 minute video than two years of studying computer science

  • @againstthemachine86
    @againstthemachine86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks, for the clear explanation...Also, this exact question came out in one of my assignments so thank you again for the free marks :-)

  • @kithminijoseph2646
    @kithminijoseph2646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel like I've been enlightened after your video thank you so much!!! :D

  • @Prof-BOF
    @Prof-BOF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    May God bless you for this🙏🏽 this is the best explanation ever

  • @eggxecution
    @eggxecution 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didn't know about this until now big thanks!

  • @universoinfinito7125
    @universoinfinito7125 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Muy bien, excelente explicacion,. Me agrado y lo entendi perfectamente.

  • @arnaldoferreira632
    @arnaldoferreira632 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this. It really helped me.

  • @vanithanegali5947
    @vanithanegali5947 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well explained. Thanks

  • @rachitajain4405
    @rachitajain4405 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for making it so simple

  • @leleuxfamily8364
    @leleuxfamily8364 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really like your videos, i am more relieved now after seeing these. I did have a question though could you post a reference to which videos to follow in sequence to what your teaching. I keep having to skip around to get basics before I can watch other videos so if you could tell me like a list of which ones to start and follow with I would greatly appreciate it. Either way though great job on the videos you teach this so much better than my professor and now I feel I have a chance to make a decent grade this semester.
    Best Wishes
    Donald

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your kind words. Here is a playlist of all my digital logic videos from beginning to end.
      th-cam.com/play/PLRZOuAYqms1Nf5cfrswAv7BFYuLeRN8pQ.html

  • @Mr97gilad
    @Mr97gilad ปีที่แล้ว

    Wowwww you are amazing 😮🎉 thank you so much 😊

  • @brendamudereri1683
    @brendamudereri1683 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank yuuuuuuuuuuuuuu for e video. everything is clear now

  • @jyotiaher3003
    @jyotiaher3003 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation......I like it plz.....make more such vedio on various problems related to De Morgan theorem...

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here is a link to the playlist of all my digital logic videos: th-cam.com/play/PLRZOuAYqms1Nf5cfrswAv7BFYuLeRN8pQ.html

  • @ObeyTehPro
    @ObeyTehPro ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you explain the equation after you said "This is our ultimate goal"? I didnt get the equation method. 4:08

  • @marthamwansa30
    @marthamwansa30 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Were did you get another b bar

  • @zahinhusain
    @zahinhusain 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankss this helps me alot

  • @thechrisricci
    @thechrisricci 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @ahmaddzulhakim4189
    @ahmaddzulhakim4189 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a question..if the " + " does't bounded with the longest bar..are we need to change it to multiplication or just leave + ?

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If I understand your question correctly, then you are right-if the plus sign is not enclosed under the bar, then it does not change to a multiplication sign.

  • @imoilman7079
    @imoilman7079 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you bro ❤

  • @banoubaid450
    @banoubaid450 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you

  • @abrahamabraham7650
    @abrahamabraham7650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you brother

  • @rafainfernal
    @rafainfernal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I dont know why so many down votes, this is crazy good

  • @moazelsawaf2000
    @moazelsawaf2000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir ❤

  • @computersciencetutor9678
    @computersciencetutor9678 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a legend!!! thank you ever so much!!!!!! But i have one question, on 4:20 , why did you OR it? Since you have and and OR,s in the bracket, how would you know?
    Thank you!

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      CST,
      Thank you for the positive feedback! It's just like distribution in algebra: (X+Y)(WZ)=XWZ+YWZ. The AND operation behaves like multiplication, and the OR operation behaves like addition.
      Hope that helps,
      Doug Tougaw

    • @computersciencetutor9678
      @computersciencetutor9678 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dougtougaw7681 Oh yes i see, well explained, Thank you!!!

  • @Nathouuuutheone
    @Nathouuuutheone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is really great! But since my algebra is a little far, I kinda got lost at the distribution part. I'm gonna have to relearn how to multiply parantheses together cause that totally took me by surprise.

    • @deandawiz
      @deandawiz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Im also confused can you explain how he multiplied the distribution part cuz I don't get it

    • @junh4807
      @junh4807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@deandawiz he took the whole A .B on the right parenthesis and multiplied to each A and B.C separately in the left parenthesis.

    • @coodlevlogs7770
      @coodlevlogs7770 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@junh4807 This helped so much thanks!

  • @panashepanaxe629
    @panashepanaxe629 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well explained 👏

  • @jirehreid8213
    @jirehreid8213 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could have explained the distribution part

  • @thoughtinfliction8693
    @thoughtinfliction8693 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why can't we just use double paranthesis and brackets??

  • @Devi--Devi
    @Devi--Devi 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What happened to C? HELP I DON'T UNDERSTAND

  • @nayeckmuhammadsafwaan3278
    @nayeckmuhammadsafwaan3278 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    best one

  • @hanifpetri
    @hanifpetri 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explain tq

  • @razvypld
    @razvypld 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ty bro, you saved my fk life i love you sm.

  • @Do-It_With_D
    @Do-It_With_D 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @HaloWolf102
    @HaloWolf102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am more confused now then I ever was. 5:00
    What rule did you use to come to this conclusion??

    • @HaloWolf102
      @HaloWolf102 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Found the answer. I made a circuit with ABC, and it included 3 AND gates. There was a NOT gate hooked up to B. Made a 3 input binary table, and the table did not produce a single '1'. So that is why B•C•A•B'=0

    • @adammustapha4150
      @adammustapha4150 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hmmm
      @@HaloWolf102

  • @pierregiuseppegilles9135
    @pierregiuseppegilles9135 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shouldn't A+(B•C) be (A+B)•(A+C)?

  • @chaoslegend1000
    @chaoslegend1000 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    10/10

  • @AichatouOmor
    @AichatouOmor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes

  • @jora1308
    @jora1308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    shloud noty it be : A .(not)B + A.C ?

    • @jora1308
      @jora1308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because B.(not)B = 1 ?

  • @nathaniell.1886
    @nathaniell.1886 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was following aong until you got rid of the C in the second equation.

  • @frostbitepokin9520
    @frostbitepokin9520 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is B.B(Bar).C.A also 0?

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, Boolean algebra follows the commutative property, which means that a sum or product is independent of the order of the variables being added and multiplied. This means that if there is a variable and its complement anywhere in the product, then it is equal to zero.

    • @frostbitepokin9520
      @frostbitepokin9520 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Doug Tougaw thanks! You have helped me in simplifying Boolean algebras. I hope I do well for my test tomorrow

  • @r3dx936
    @r3dx936 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ESE MAQUINA

  • @abduljabbar-eh9ko
    @abduljabbar-eh9ko 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow

  • @kintrix007
    @kintrix007 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't get what this DeMorgen's theorem is. Isn't this just basic boolean algebra?

  • @marthamwansa30
    @marthamwansa30 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    A(AUB) = A

  • @inventing...3717
    @inventing...3717 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:13 I'm lost

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are multiplying each of the terms in parentheses with the terms in the other parentheses. It's like FOIL: (a+b)(c+d)=ac+ad+bc+bd.

  • @OccupiedBot
    @OccupiedBot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not really understanding at 4:15....

  • @Akash-ph2ft
    @Akash-ph2ft 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    😀

  • @uninor1928
    @uninor1928 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    (A+(B)'+C+D)-(A+(B)'+(C)'-(D)')'=Y
    Please solve it

  • @mathieubourgoy8581
    @mathieubourgoy8581 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am from Belgium and my professor his explenations are not so clear as this video

  • @marthamwansa30
    @marthamwansa30 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cause there is only one

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      At 4:14, I distributed the AND operation across the parentheses. This is just like multiplying out (x+y)*z=x*z+y*z. It appears that another z was created, but in reality it was just distributing the z across the parentheses.

  • @user-lu2ln8js9j
    @user-lu2ln8js9j 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    「動画の音が良くない」、

  • @nealmaxwell303
    @nealmaxwell303 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep Change Flip on steroids

  • @merabaap9809
    @merabaap9809 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, i can solve this in 2steps ...
    Instead of going from outside bar to inside go through inside to outside...(consider | as a bar )
    I.e;
    ||A+(B+C)|+|A.|B|||=
    ||{A+(B.C)}{A.|B|}||=
    {A+(B.C)}{A.|B|}=
    A.|B|

    • @dougtougaw7681
      @dougtougaw7681  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's true that there are many ways to solve problems in Boolean algebra, and I included additional steps in order to try to make it easier to understand.

  • @furquannaser3549
    @furquannaser3549 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nasty equation 😂

  • @ejsafara456
    @ejsafara456 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    didnt help at all

  • @TacoDaddy-mr8ig
    @TacoDaddy-mr8ig 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a useless video

  • @ObeyTehPro
    @ObeyTehPro ปีที่แล้ว

    @Doug Tougaw

  • @danieldian8708
    @danieldian8708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't we solve it by factoring =>A+B'(1+B.C)which the value of parenthesis is equal to 1 and final result is A+B'

    • @danieldian8708
      @danieldian8708 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry i had mistake A.B'(1+B.C) =A.B'(1)=A.B'