x∈ (AUB)'
X∉(AUB)
X∉A and X∉B
My question is, why the U in second line interprets for 'and' in the second line. As we know, union is interpreted for 'Or'.
Same is the question for the ∩ in the proof of
(A∩B)' where it is interpreted for 'Or'.
it is because , when an element does not belong to a set then the way the sign is expressed changes
for eg-
if x does not belong to AUB , THEN IT WILL BE EXPRESSED AS
x does not belong to A and B
@@aayuushmehta8133 you are just restating De-Morgan's Law in English rather than set theory notation... this makes the proof circular in nature
@@SrishDutta Thank you! I think the same, whats the deal with the guy going silent on the most important part of the proof.
The set for intersection of A and B includes the elements which are common in both A and B and x can be an element in either set without being a common element of both sets.
For union of A and B,all elements of both sets are included meaning that if x does not belong to this set then it does not belong to both sets A and B
@@azeezahmad8850 okay thanks for the union part explanation but what about the intersection part. that if Y doesn't belongs to(A int B) then how can we say that (Y doesn't belongs to A) *and* Y doesn't belongs to B)
you have a soothing voice and clear explanations. Thanks so much!
Best explanation of de Morgan's theorem on yt ❤️🙂
Yea wahi log hai ...jo ki aapna jaath dekh ke samajhte hai ki yahi #AMAZON_BASIN hai
You did so good. wish profs explained it like this!
Sir I am not able to understand that why in a union b complement yu have written and . And in a intersection b complement yu have written or
Wasn't in the class when written this proof now it seems i am ready for midterm test insha'allah .
THANK YOU ❤
@Violater since x doesn't belong to A intersection B
that means x can be element which can be in A OR in B
this statement can be written as
x is not a element of A, then it is in B OR
x is not a element of B, then it is in A
To represent this he wrote
x not belongs to A or x not belongs to B
Sir I'm understand everything but in last step how to came union and intersection . Please tell about it
@@sidrapervaiz3409 but *and* is used for *intersection* and *or* is used for *union* right?
Best explanation of de Morgan's law. Thank you so much.
Best teacher ever
Thankyou so much sir ,today is my maths exam and I will sure do well 😊😌❣️
Sir you have only proved the condition of a subset .The proof is incomplete.
We will do same for other half of give given question but in reverse order
Very good explanation. Only thing though is that when you use this proof, it only means that one set is included in the other, not necessarily meaning that the two sets are equal.
Really thanks for the video!
Well explained
Best explanation sir I love you yar you helped me
Sir,
Could please explain how are you writing "or" when it is intersection. It means "And".
Ok, which principal is applied to change "and" into "or" directly.
In the first part you are using 'and' instead of the union symbol and instead of the intersection symbol, however we should use 'or' instead of the intersection symbol. Am I missing something?
Fantastic work, Anil. Concise and easy to understand!
Why the union is written as and...?
How can you justify saying that x is is not an element of A or B in the intersection one? You said x is an element of the complement of A intersection B which means x is apart of a universal set that does not include any shared elements of A or B. However if A or B has elements that are not shared then those can still be in the universal set as the complement was of their intersection, not the entire sets A and B. And x is an element of that complement, so it could still be one of the elements in A or B. I say "or"; "and" in normal English.
Best explanation of DeMorgan's theorem .Very beneficial for me ...❤️
thnk u sir 🙇🏻♀🙇🏻♀🤧🤧
Thanks Here is a Playlist for you: th-cam.com/video/T897-tssTN8/w-d-xo.html
Simple and precise 🤝
Nice, i was confused with "And" "or" thing.
Thank you Sir you've made me understand 🤲🙏😊
I got everything but why {x: doesn't belong to (A Union B)}
Then how there's and in place of union sir
Thanks for the explanation sir
Thanks
Union of sets generally means 'or'. So in 1:27 why have you written 'and' instead of 'or' ?
Why and is written in between?
U means 'or' ?
Same to same explanation is given in R.D. Sharma's 11th class book.
If anyone wants to see the full proof of the De-Morgan's Law.
Very useful 🎓💯
Awesome. It's could be never forgot
sir step agye pehchye likh skty hai means k phly belong likh dye bad mei not belong likh dye ???is sy koi farkr parta h??
Thank you sir
In the first round, how does the the union just suddenly become and ? because i thought union means or and intersection means and as later discussed in the video
Yes, you're right. ‘or’ means union & ‘and’ means intersection... But when you're dealing with ‘not’, then you need to be careful with cases.
A union B has three parts - A intersection B and two difference of sets; mathematically it is represented as A∪B = (A-B)∪(A∩B)∪(B-A)
So if x does ‘not’ belong to A union B, there is a case where A doesn't belong to A intersection B...
Infact, you don't need to do these all, even with thinking logically, you'll realise that by your own like this: (A-B), (B-A) and (A∩B) are subsets of A∪B so If x doesn't belong to A∪B then simply x also doesn't belong to any of them since they're subsets of A∪B and now use that (A∩B) and write x doesn't belong to A “and” x doesn't belong to B.
Very beneficial For me...And Your way of teaching Is too Good Sir❤️
Better than others ❤
can some explain why x cannot belong to the union of a and b though ?
because x belongs to complement of a and b, so it is not belonged to the union. of a and b
Good
bhai proper steps k sath prove krna hota h sir , aapne bs baate ghuma kr conclusion la diya...aapne bs smjhaya h but proper steps se prove krna nhi sikhaya........exam mai agr aise prove kra to marks nhi milenge
Excellent proof
Thank you very much Mr Anil Kumar for the powerful explanation of de Morgan's laws of sets. I have really understood.
It is very easy to understand
Well xplained tenks ser😀😀
You have assisted me alot
Thank you sirr ❤
Thanks. PLAYLIST for you: th-cam.com/video/HjT6G4_lqg4/w-d-xo.html
thank you this helped
But if the x doesnt belong to the intersect of ab its should mean that it doesnt belong to both a and b or ( doesnt belong to one of them )!
Intersection in other words: It could belong to any one of them not both. Thanks
@@MathematicsTutor so what is union ,????? Belonging to both ?? Isnt union belonging to one of the sets or both?
@@faridsahraouiii It's because of that “not”
If x does “not” belong to the A intersection B, then there are two possibilities(cases):
1) x doesn't belong to both A and B (meaning x belongs to complement of A intersection B)
2) x doesn't belong to either A or B (meaning x belongs to complement A or x belongs to complement B)
If we use the 1st possibility (infact we already have done it), then we'll get complement of ‘A intersection B’ instead of complement A union complement B, which we have to prove.
thank you so much for the explanation
It's amazing and it's very easy to understand thanks 👍😊
Thank you very much for this explanation : ) greetings from Poland
@@samarsingh9480 and is there chutiya teachers like him there also😂😂
@@samarsingh9480 of course dude , everyone has to study maths , without Maths world can't exist
Thank you bro 😅
very crisp sir
thank u sir
APPRECIATED ♥️
Thanku sir....
Sir for the third step of the first proof why the word " and" not "or" ? Bcoz "and" means it belongs to both the sets which means it belongs to the intersection while here we want to show it belongs to the union so it should be X doesn't belong to A" or ".....B
Step 2: x does not belong to A or B.
Step 3: x is not in A and it is not in B also
We are not saying that it is not in the intersection of A and B
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks
Really appreciate work...u explained it too simple.... really i have no words👍🏻👍🏻sir
If you have any kind of problem in any subject so watch video
th-cam.com/video/CDyKTqiY-Qo/w-d-xo.html
This solution may be wrong or incomplete or anything, but never be the right one.
Thank you Sir. I understood very easily within fewer minutes. Take Love From Bangladesh ❤️🇧🇩
Best👍
Fabulous 😁
Thank you so much for solving in a simple way. 😊
Great ! Great !
Thank you !
~Anurag Mishra !
Sir you have to consider the case when x not belongs to A union B
Thank you ❤️
Why am I learning this in 9th...
Wow! That was so straight forward, thank youuu😭❤
i can understand the feeling when u get are not understanding any concept and you finally find a video that clears your doubts and satisfy u , best feeling ever .. XD
Sir what is the meaning of \ this mark like BUA\CUA=BUC\A
While the first section is ok, second section does not seem to make sense.... Or am I getting it wrong?
How is it that x NE of A -OR- x NE of B,
should it not be x NE of A -AND- x NE of B
so x could be element of A, then it is not an element of B, and x could be an element of B, but then it cannot be an element of A
However, the theorem could be still proved, as if x is NE of A, then it is assumed to be element of A Complement. Similarly, if x is NE of B, then it is element of B Complement. so x surely will be in A Comp Union B Comp
THANKYOU ❤️
Short and accurate.., lovely
Here is a Playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqq8Z-ZYVUnhA2tpugs_C8bo.html
Thanks
Tq
I think wrong in or & And, please check well
Perfectly awesome👍
thank you, sir, make a tutorial for other proof of other properties of sets, please
Thanks a lot sir its realy helpful🙏🏻🙏🏻
Thank you so much sir .....
Tq sir 😊
set equality proofs have to be proven in both directions right?
Why in first explanation we say and, in second or. What they stand for
Thank you
sir,
when u will remove "union" in part(i) then or will come na...
Check this video: th-cam.com/video/DELp4ecIwyE/w-d-xo.html
Hope that helps. Thanks
I have the same question... I drew a Venn diagram and tried to reason it out. If x does not belong to (AuB) that means it is not part of either set. Therefore it must be outside of the union of those two sets. Usually a union usually implies 'or' and not 'and'. This is confusing!
მადლობა
Thank you so much sir to help me to understand this concept
Thank you very much ..Hi From Papua New Guinea
The missing part is proving the tautologies ¬(A˅B)⇔¬A˄¬B and ¬(A˄B)⇔¬A˅¬B. But this is so simple I would leave it as an exercise to listener.
dude explained the shit in the best way anyone could, truly grateful
ikrr