ความคิดเห็น •

  • @nobodyor2788
    @nobodyor2788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    dude explained the shit in the best way anyone could, truly grateful

    • @Justsiz
      @Justsiz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ikrr

  • @topobrotosaha3886
    @topobrotosaha3886 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    x∈ (AUB)'
    X∉(AUB)
    X∉A and X∉B
    My question is, why the U in second line interprets for 'and' in the second line. As we know, union is interpreted for 'Or'.
    Same is the question for the ∩ in the proof of
    (A∩B)' where it is interpreted for 'Or'.

    • @aayuushmehta8133
      @aayuushmehta8133 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      it is because , when an element does not belong to a set then the way the sign is expressed changes
      for eg-
      if x does not belong to AUB , THEN IT WILL BE EXPRESSED AS
      x does not belong to A and B

    • @SrishDutta
      @SrishDutta 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@aayuushmehta8133 you are just restating De-Morgan's Law in English rather than set theory notation... this makes the proof circular in nature

    • @Hersonrock12
      @Hersonrock12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SrishDutta Thank you! I think the same, whats the deal with the guy going silent on the most important part of the proof.

    • @azeezahmad8850
      @azeezahmad8850 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The set for intersection of A and B includes the elements which are common in both A and B and x can be an element in either set without being a common element of both sets.
      For union of A and B,all elements of both sets are included meaning that if x does not belong to this set then it does not belong to both sets A and B

    • @sainineelam2625
      @sainineelam2625 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@azeezahmad8850 okay thanks for the union part explanation but what about the intersection part. that if Y doesn't belongs to(A int B) then how can we say that (Y doesn't belongs to A) *and* Y doesn't belongs to B)

  • @nathanbruce1992
    @nathanbruce1992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    you have a soothing voice and clear explanations. Thanks so much!

  • @craftlanguage4683
    @craftlanguage4683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Best explanation of de Morgan's theorem on yt ❤️🙂

    • @ayushkeshri4k
      @ayushkeshri4k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Correct

    • @192gauravkumar4
      @192gauravkumar4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea wahi log hai ...jo ki aapna jaath dekh ke samajhte hai ki yahi #AMAZON_BASIN hai

    • @thairux
      @thairux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ♥️

    • @dearcontents
      @dearcontents 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did you see all videos of Morgan's law ?!😒🥴

    • @SomilSrivastava2406
      @SomilSrivastava2406 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dearcontents 😯😯😯

  • @kashishkohli9514
    @kashishkohli9514 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You did so good. wish profs explained it like this!

  • @seemakumari2983
    @seemakumari2983 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sir I am not able to understand that why in a union b complement yu have written and . And in a intersection b complement yu have written or

  • @abdulfathmohamoud2736
    @abdulfathmohamoud2736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Wasn't in the class when written this proof now it seems i am ready for midterm test insha'allah .
    THANK YOU ❤

    • @akshanshsharma4421
      @akshanshsharma4421 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Violater since x doesn't belong to A intersection B
      that means x can be element which can be in A OR in B
      this statement can be written as
      x is not a element of A, then it is in B OR
      x is not a element of B, then it is in A
      To represent this he wrote
      x not belongs to A or x not belongs to B

  • @chromebotlegend-_-7275
    @chromebotlegend-_-7275 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    CLEAR AND WITH PERFECTION THANKS

  • @jh8038ee
    @jh8038ee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks so much it was very helpful

  • @zhilubbae8707
    @zhilubbae8707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Best explanation of demorgans law ever

  • @v.s.n.lsahityarao9517
    @v.s.n.lsahityarao9517 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wonderful explanation and calming voice. Thank you sir😇

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. Related Playlist: th-cam.com/video/5YkjnZljKLA/w-d-xo.html

  • @himanshushukla8846
    @himanshushukla8846 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Sir I'm understand everything but in last step how to came union and intersection . Please tell about it

    • @sidrapervaiz3409
      @sidrapervaiz3409 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      due to and used for union, or used for intersection

    • @saathviksutarsaathvik_IIT25
      @saathviksutarsaathvik_IIT25 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sidrapervaiz3409 but *and* is used for *intersection* and *or* is used for *union* right?

  • @FarjanaKhan-hv4lb
    @FarjanaKhan-hv4lb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Best explanation of de Morgan's law. Thank you so much.

  • @prithvirajsrinivasan1077
    @prithvirajsrinivasan1077 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best teacher ever

  • @sanchitvashishtha7198
    @sanchitvashishtha7198 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thankyou so much sir ,today is my maths exam and I will sure do well 😊😌❣️

  • @amanmalik1254
    @amanmalik1254 5 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Sir you have only proved the condition of a subset .The proof is incomplete.

    • @rahulden6673
      @rahulden6673 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      u r right

    • @factmania0803
      @factmania0803 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@abhishekdiggal2433comment 4 yr ago 💀 and reply 4 month ago 🥬

    • @macsky07
      @macsky07 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We will do same for other half of give given question but in reverse order

    • @akramlabib7040
      @akramlabib7040 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes

  • @Nothathard
    @Nothathard 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very good explanation. Only thing though is that when you use this proof, it only means that one set is included in the other, not necessarily meaning that the two sets are equal.

  • @startart03
    @startart03 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really thanks for the video!

  • @PiusMutunga-i3l
    @PiusMutunga-i3l 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Well explained

  • @adityasharma5499
    @adityasharma5499 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best explanation sir I love you yar you helped me

  • @Beah_
    @Beah_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you so much. bless you

  • @dilnawajmufeed661
    @dilnawajmufeed661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir,
    Could please explain how are you writing "or" when it is intersection. It means "And".
    Ok, which principal is applied to change "and" into "or" directly.

    • @komaljamwal5614
      @komaljamwal5614 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same issue

    • @xadxtya
      @xadxtya 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A or B = Union
      A and B = Intersection

  • @Cat_Sterling
    @Cat_Sterling 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In the first part you are using 'and' instead of the union symbol and instead of the intersection symbol, however we should use 'or' instead of the intersection symbol. Am I missing something?

    • @ushpill
      @ushpill 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I have the same question

  • @jacobm7026
    @jacobm7026 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Fantastic work, Anil. Concise and easy to understand!

  • @goutamdey1307
    @goutamdey1307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why the union is written as and...?

  • @FriedFrenchFries
    @FriedFrenchFries 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    How can you justify saying that x is is not an element of A or B in the intersection one? You said x is an element of the complement of A intersection B which means x is apart of a universal set that does not include any shared elements of A or B. However if A or B has elements that are not shared then those can still be in the universal set as the complement was of their intersection, not the entire sets A and B. And x is an element of that complement, so it could still be one of the elements in A or B. I say "or"; "and" in normal English.

  • @himanisabikhi4567
    @himanisabikhi4567 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Best explanation of DeMorgan's theorem .Very beneficial for me ...❤️

  • @whoareyou5995
    @whoareyou5995 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    thnk u sir 🙇🏻‍♀🙇🏻‍♀🤧🤧

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks Here is a Playlist for you: th-cam.com/video/T897-tssTN8/w-d-xo.html

  • @michaelmoyo1388
    @michaelmoyo1388 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Best explanation ever

  • @nwagbochisom8980
    @nwagbochisom8980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simple and precise 🤝

  • @sidrapervaiz3409
    @sidrapervaiz3409 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice, i was confused with "And" "or" thing.

  • @adessysakala3999
    @adessysakala3999 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Sir you've made me understand 🤲🙏😊

  • @komaljamwal5614
    @komaljamwal5614 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I got everything but why {x: doesn't belong to (A Union B)}
    Then how there's and in place of union sir

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor ปีที่แล้ว

      Make a Venn Diagram. That will help to visualise. Thanks

  • @lekhaniaatmpujy4587
    @lekhaniaatmpujy4587 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the explanation sir

  • @dc_Playzz-
    @dc_Playzz- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @akshitdas4612
    @akshitdas4612 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Union of sets generally means 'or'. So in 1:27 why have you written 'and' instead of 'or' ?

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor ปีที่แล้ว

      True, Union is OR

    • @akshitdas4612
      @akshitdas4612 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MathematicsTutor sorry sir. I have understood.

  • @anikettambuskar7519
    @anikettambuskar7519 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the best explaining in this video sir ❤

  • @getupshahid5455
    @getupshahid5455 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why and is written in between?
    U means 'or' ?

  • @Mani_Umakant23
    @Mani_Umakant23 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Same to same explanation is given in R.D. Sharma's 11th class book.
    If anyone wants to see the full proof of the De-Morgan's Law.

  • @jesinsuresh5252
    @jesinsuresh5252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very useful 🎓💯

  • @kavikavi1534
    @kavikavi1534 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome. It's could be never forgot

  • @WaqqasLeghari
    @WaqqasLeghari 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir step agye pehchye likh skty hai means k phly belong likh dye bad mei not belong likh dye ???is sy koi farkr parta h??

  • @ugakshata9579
    @ugakshata9579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you sir

  • @ayamwenzdayz3551
    @ayamwenzdayz3551 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In the first round, how does the the union just suddenly become and ? because i thought union means or and intersection means and as later discussed in the video

    • @πΣυφ-μ2ξ
      @πΣυφ-μ2ξ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, you're right. ‘or’ means union & ‘and’ means intersection... But when you're dealing with ‘not’, then you need to be careful with cases.
      A union B has three parts - A intersection B and two difference of sets; mathematically it is represented as A∪B = (A-B)∪(A∩B)∪(B-A)
      So if x does ‘not’ belong to A union B, there is a case where A doesn't belong to A intersection B...
      Infact, you don't need to do these all, even with thinking logically, you'll realise that by your own like this: (A-B), (B-A) and (A∩B) are subsets of A∪B so If x doesn't belong to A∪B then simply x also doesn't belong to any of them since they're subsets of A∪B and now use that (A∩B) and write x doesn't belong to A “and” x doesn't belong to B.

  • @keshavarya5245
    @keshavarya5245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very beneficial For me...And Your way of teaching Is too Good Sir❤️

  • @thehiddencode5686
    @thehiddencode5686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A very clear explanation. Thanks!

    • @abhinavkashyap9565
      @abhinavkashyap9565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      First you go and upload coding videos on your channel

  • @Sparsh_goyal704
    @Sparsh_goyal704 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Better than others ❤

  • @lena-fb4sz
    @lena-fb4sz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    can some explain why x cannot belong to the union of a and b though ?

    • @Physchokillerwillkillu
      @Physchokillerwillkillu ปีที่แล้ว

      because x belongs to complement of a and b, so it is not belonged to the union. of a and b

  • @habibshahid1941
    @habibshahid1941 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good

  • @prateekbhardwaj9729
    @prateekbhardwaj9729 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    bhai proper steps k sath prove krna hota h sir , aapne bs baate ghuma kr conclusion la diya...aapne bs smjhaya h but proper steps se prove krna nhi sikhaya........exam mai agr aise prove kra to marks nhi milenge

  • @Nsut_Aim
    @Nsut_Aim 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent proof

  • @lanomusambazi8654
    @lanomusambazi8654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Thank you very much Mr Anil Kumar for the powerful explanation of de Morgan's laws of sets. I have really understood.

  • @mujahidulislamchoudhury5995
    @mujahidulislamchoudhury5995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is very easy to understand

  • @Trendycrunchyhere
    @Trendycrunchyhere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well xplained tenks ser😀😀

  • @misheckcaswell3326
    @misheckcaswell3326 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have assisted me alot

  • @Slytherin369
    @Slytherin369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you sirr ❤

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks. PLAYLIST for you: th-cam.com/video/HjT6G4_lqg4/w-d-xo.html

  • @keshavsoni6012
    @keshavsoni6012 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thank you this helped

  • @faridsahraouiii
    @faridsahraouiii 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    But if the x doesnt belong to the intersect of ab its should mean that it doesnt belong to both a and b or ( doesnt belong to one of them )!

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Intersection in other words: It could belong to any one of them not both. Thanks

    • @faridsahraouiii
      @faridsahraouiii 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MathematicsTutor so what is union ,????? Belonging to both ?? Isnt union belonging to one of the sets or both?

    • @πΣυφ-μ2ξ
      @πΣυφ-μ2ξ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@faridsahraouiii It's because of that “not”
      If x does “not” belong to the A intersection B, then there are two possibilities(cases):
      1) x doesn't belong to both A and B (meaning x belongs to complement of A intersection B)
      2) x doesn't belong to either A or B (meaning x belongs to complement A or x belongs to complement B)
      If we use the 1st possibility (infact we already have done it), then we'll get complement of ‘A intersection B’ instead of complement A union complement B, which we have to prove.

  • @RezeTsarBomba
    @RezeTsarBomba 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you so much for the explanation

  • @mshoaibakhtar9512
    @mshoaibakhtar9512 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's amazing and it's very easy to understand thanks 👍😊

  • @Shadoxsas
    @Shadoxsas 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thank you very much for this explanation : ) greetings from Poland

    • @samarsingh9480
      @samarsingh9480 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In Poland is their also maths

    • @shreyashvinchurkar2931
      @shreyashvinchurkar2931 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samarsingh9480 and is there chutiya teachers like him there also😂😂

    • @myyeschannel
      @myyeschannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samarsingh9480 of course dude , everyone has to study maths , without Maths world can't exist

  • @jatishrajwani2588
    @jatishrajwani2588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice explaination sir. I appreciate your clear voice.

  • @futbin2004
    @futbin2004 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you bro 😅

  • @10-den-see
    @10-den-see 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very crisp sir

  • @SATWICKSOUMYA
    @SATWICKSOUMYA 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    thank u sir

  • @AdvertisementOfproducts-ib6kd
    @AdvertisementOfproducts-ib6kd ปีที่แล้ว +2

    APPRECIATED ♥️

  • @Kiran_Atri
    @Kiran_Atri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanku sir....

  • @tracygourge6027
    @tracygourge6027 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir for the third step of the first proof why the word " and" not "or" ? Bcoz "and" means it belongs to both the sets which means it belongs to the intersection while here we want to show it belongs to the union so it should be X doesn't belong to A" or ".....B

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Step 2: x does not belong to A or B.
      Step 3: x is not in A and it is not in B also
      We are not saying that it is not in the intersection of A and B
      Hope that makes sense.
      Thanks

  • @priyanshutyagi5620
    @priyanshutyagi5620 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really appreciate work...u explained it too simple.... really i have no words👍🏻👍🏻sir

    • @sulimankhan6640
      @sulimankhan6640 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have any kind of problem in any subject so watch video
      th-cam.com/video/CDyKTqiY-Qo/w-d-xo.html

  • @vishwajeetkumar5847
    @vishwajeetkumar5847 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This solution may be wrong or incomplete or anything, but never be the right one.

  • @tafrimrmsajin4992
    @tafrimrmsajin4992 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Sir. I understood very easily within fewer minutes. Take Love From Bangladesh ❤️🇧🇩

  • @laxmitashanbhag2614
    @laxmitashanbhag2614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best👍

  • @Kakarot__DBZ
    @Kakarot__DBZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fabulous 😁

  • @python.hub.genius
    @python.hub.genius ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for solving in a simple way. 😊

  • @jhumamishra7407
    @jhumamishra7407 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great ! Great !
    Thank you !
    ~Anurag Mishra !

  • @debabratabhaumik4725
    @debabratabhaumik4725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir you have to consider the case when x not belongs to A union B

  • @MrAbd0001
    @MrAbd0001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you ❤️

  • @johnsaikya1196
    @johnsaikya1196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why am I learning this in 9th...

  • @khuziwe.sithole3079
    @khuziwe.sithole3079 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow! That was so straight forward, thank youuu😭❤

    • @raghavmittal8662
      @raghavmittal8662 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i can understand the feeling when u get are not understanding any concept and you finally find a video that clears your doubts and satisfy u , best feeling ever .. XD

  • @NidhiSingh-ms9yj
    @NidhiSingh-ms9yj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir what is the meaning of \ this mark like BUA\CUA=BUC\A

  • @sendanoop
    @sendanoop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    While the first section is ok, second section does not seem to make sense.... Or am I getting it wrong?
    How is it that x NE of A -OR- x NE of B,
    should it not be x NE of A -AND- x NE of B
    so x could be element of A, then it is not an element of B, and x could be an element of B, but then it cannot be an element of A
    However, the theorem could be still proved, as if x is NE of A, then it is assumed to be element of A Complement. Similarly, if x is NE of B, then it is element of B Complement. so x surely will be in A Comp Union B Comp

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This may relate: th-cam.com/video/T897-tssTN8/w-d-xo.html

  • @artandcraftwithtahira3666
    @artandcraftwithtahira3666 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THANKYOU ❤️

  • @jai8666
    @jai8666 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Short and accurate.., lovely

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Here is a Playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLJ-ma5dJyAqq8Z-ZYVUnhA2tpugs_C8bo.html
      Thanks

  • @namratahamal1234
    @namratahamal1234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tq

  • @shahinurrahmankazi8393
    @shahinurrahmankazi8393 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think wrong in or & And, please check well

  • @ANKITPATEL098
    @ANKITPATEL098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Perfectly awesome👍

  • @Philip_GitongaKE
    @Philip_GitongaKE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    thank you, sir, make a tutorial for other proof of other properties of sets, please

  • @simranrani3372
    @simranrani3372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot sir its realy helpful🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @swagatika2026
    @swagatika2026 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much sir .....

  • @RituKushawaha-h2t
    @RituKushawaha-h2t 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tq sir 😊

  • @china4749
    @china4749 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What pen is he using? Thanksss

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/ck-MU8Pmwzs/w-d-xo.html
      Thanks

  • @zhopezh
    @zhopezh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    set equality proofs have to be proven in both directions right?

  • @muzaff
    @muzaff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why in first explanation we say and, in second or. What they stand for

  • @creatormilo6095
    @creatormilo6095 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @codeminatiinterviewcode6459
    @codeminatiinterviewcode6459 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    sir,
    when u will remove "union" in part(i) then or will come na...

    • @MathematicsTutor
      @MathematicsTutor 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check this video: th-cam.com/video/DELp4ecIwyE/w-d-xo.html
      Hope that helps. Thanks

    • @hotpeppersweetieful
      @hotpeppersweetieful 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have the same question... I drew a Venn diagram and tried to reason it out. If x does not belong to (AuB) that means it is not part of either set. Therefore it must be outside of the union of those two sets. Usually a union usually implies 'or' and not 'and'. This is confusing!

    • @samsoft4968
      @samsoft4968 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      well its complement of union ...or thus becomes and
      @@hotpeppersweetieful

  • @SGoswami967
    @SGoswami967 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Union means 'or' right?

  • @sabby13
    @sabby13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    მადლობა

  • @saksham5087
    @saksham5087 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much sir to help me to understand this concept

  • @gabrielkasalman2736
    @gabrielkasalman2736 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much ..Hi From Papua New Guinea

  • @danwe6297
    @danwe6297 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The missing part is proving the tautologies ¬(A˅B)⇔¬A˄¬B and ¬(A˄B)⇔¬A˅¬B. But this is so simple I would leave it as an exercise to listener.