Physicists Proved the Universe Doesn't Exist

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.8K

  • @BLAZENYCBLACKOPS
    @BLAZENYCBLACKOPS ปีที่แล้ว +1133

    Why does every documentary get this wrong, the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second, not miles per hour.

    • @philyvo
      @philyvo ปีที่แล้ว +59

      17:05
      … beats me. The narrator even says it out loud…
      ‘fun fact’: stating 300.000 m/s - meters per SECOND - right underneath being the correct (rounded) metric number.

    • @Letsskatenaked
      @Letsskatenaked ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Well he said labarnith for labyrinth and says temperature as tempchure

    • @user-wm1xm5gm2k
      @user-wm1xm5gm2k ปีที่แล้ว +70

      You're all wrong. There is no speed of light, since light is not particles. Light is an illumination of the aether.

    • @ImCrz
      @ImCrz ปีที่แล้ว +117

      ​@@user-wm1xm5gm2k Photon is considered as a particle and moves at light speed.

    • @nrom5960
      @nrom5960 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      It even showed mps but he said mph

  • @bobbybob3865
    @bobbybob3865 ปีที่แล้ว +820

    If the universe isn't real, I'm going back to bed.

    • @Anthony-ru7sk
      @Anthony-ru7sk ปีที่แล้ว +25

      You were already asleep if you believed in this illusion 😂

    • @TheLosrodri
      @TheLosrodri ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Glad to hear I’m not the only one who watches this stuff going to sleep in bed lol

    • @Anthony-ru7sk
      @Anthony-ru7sk ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@TheLosrodri there’s 190k views and 500 comments. Literally everyone is watching this in bed 😂😂

    • @germanomora6345
      @germanomora6345 ปีที่แล้ว

      ❤IT'S REAL..NO ONE CAN DENAY THAT..NOW WE HAVE MORE KNOWLEDGE THAN EVER..THEY ALSO..BEEN TAKING ABOUT HAVE THERE IX A RELACION WITH GOD.😮😊❤😢😅

    • @daniellewaller6454
      @daniellewaller6454 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right ✅

  • @ImUnadjusted
    @ImUnadjusted ปีที่แล้ว +295

    Took physicists years to figure this out, most people just do lsd once and reach the same conclusion

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Most physicists don't do LSD.

    • @johnbyrnes7912
      @johnbyrnes7912 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@bobbybob3865they should ! 🌈🤡

    • @siroswaldfortitude5346
      @siroswaldfortitude5346 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've always thought they should do DMT@@bobbybob3865

    • @eddietamani
      @eddietamani ปีที่แล้ว +20

      ​@@bobbybob3865
      But LSD do physicists.... in😅

    • @algalgod159
      @algalgod159 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe not the same conclusin,but a similar one for sure

  • @stevenlidster1431
    @stevenlidster1431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    The universe might not exist but the shriek of pain echoing through the void when you step on a Lego in the dark is sempiternal.

    • @charlesmiller8107
      @charlesmiller8107 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Despite me being one of the rare people who do a lot of reading I still had to look this word up "sempiternal". Even Google spellcheck don't know what it means. The only thing I learned here was a single word found in the comment section. Because of you I don't feel that it was a complete waste of time. Thank you.

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@charlesmiller8107It's on the WordWeb app 😅

    • @MegaLaMoto
      @MegaLaMoto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@charlesmiller8107 Ditto

    • @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025
      @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@charlesmiller8107it means eternal or unchanging.

    • @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025
      @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sempiternal is a new one. Thank you friend.

  • @hammer8809
    @hammer8809 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    If the universe is an illusion why isn't my illusion of my bank account of a million dollars not real??

    • @NylonStrings83
      @NylonStrings83 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let me try to give my opinion. The body that you had when u were 7 months old or 7 years old Dosent exist today as it was back then it changed so everything around us will change as it is call maya temporary how can something that is temporary be real where is that small body Today it’s gone did it ever exist or does jt even matter ? The soul and consciousness never changes it is eternal beyond time and is constant read the Bhagwat gita for more detail

    • @TheAaronRodgersTao
      @TheAaronRodgersTao 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Can I have some?

    • @Luvtocomment069
      @Luvtocomment069 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

  • @IVANHOECHAPUT
    @IVANHOECHAPUT ปีที่แล้ว +164

    Since physicists have "proved the universe doesn't exist", does that mean that physicists also don't exist?

    • @JasonRule-1
      @JasonRule-1 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes.

    • @kateburns8126
      @kateburns8126 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Fantastic question! LOL
      THANKS!
      Needed that laugh this morning. 😂

    • @curtcoller3632
      @curtcoller3632 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      hope so.

    • @DanielEngsvang
      @DanielEngsvang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Seems so

    • @The_Real_Indiana_Joe
      @The_Real_Indiana_Joe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Then why do we still have to pay taxes?

  • @rogerhill138
    @rogerhill138 ปีที่แล้ว +216

    The fact that we exist does not lead to the question that "can the universe exist without us?" What we can say is that we experience the universe as humans. So although the universal laws may stay the same our experience of them will be unique. Other life forms will experience it differently, even here on earth. Objective reality means that our universe exists whether we are here or not.

    • @derekmiles9306
      @derekmiles9306 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Very well put

    • @bigpicture3
      @bigpicture3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      But that is the "assumption" made: that the universe is "objective". Assuming that it can exist without any consciousness to be "aware" of it, and maybe even that "creates" it. But that (objective) "assumption" cannot be made for sure. The double slit experiment is the most repeated experiment there ever was, and of all the various ways that it can be set up, the observed results have never changed. Entanglement, Superposition, and Retrocausality, has an inescapable conclusion, although they have tried to get around it with various mathematical gymnastics, that Space Time does not actually exist in the way that the "conscious mind" conceptualizes it. (that the "conscious mind" in some way creates that illusion) And according to Jung the "conceptualized self" often referred to as the ego, also does not exist. (it is an illusion, or a false self) That the "reality" of self and the Universe cannot be conceptualized at all. That the "real Self" and perceived / conceptualized reality of any kind emerges from the Jungian "individual unconscious" and the "collective unconscious." The part of, or the nature of, "consciousness" that we are not even "consciously aware" of.

    • @martinnewtonholmes
      @martinnewtonholmes ปีที่แล้ว +23

      My "version" of the Universe dies with me

    • @chrisstevens-xq2vb
      @chrisstevens-xq2vb ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We are the Universe.

    • @bigpicture3
      @bigpicture3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@chrisstevens-xq2vb But the mystery for the physicists is: What are the "processes" by which that happens, and that is before they even address the issue of: What are the "causes". And they think if they have enough confusing detail on the processes, that maybe the causes can be ignored. But since "consciousness" (whatever that might be) is required to understand the "processes", and itself might be the "primary cause". In other words there cannot be "experiences" without it, and maybe also there cannot be anything "to experience" without it, so that could cause a little bit of an "empirical" quandary.

  • @Mam-ur1
    @Mam-ur1 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Phew that's a relief. Let's agree that the only thing we know is that we don't know anything.

    • @ConDual020
      @ConDual020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And if we knew ' everything ',
      what would be of concern next.? 😊

    • @scottwalker9766
      @scottwalker9766 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, we only know one thing.

    • @scottwalker9766
      @scottwalker9766 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is the only thing we are allowed to know.

    • @scottwalker9766
      @scottwalker9766 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      How much do you think a cell knows? Only what it needs too to grow.

    • @ConDual020
      @ConDual020 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reality is that they we are educated just enough to believe what we have been taught and not educated enough to question what we have been taught. 😟

  • @gumshoe2273
    @gumshoe2273 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    I met a theoretical physicist the other day. I was surprised to learn they actually exist.

    • @LudyLoomy
      @LudyLoomy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Did you think it was just a made up job? 😂

    • @sargonofakad
      @sargonofakad ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yesterday upon the stair
      I met a man who wasn't there.
      He wasn't there again today.
      I just wish he'd go away.

    • @merabharataurbhimahan4270
      @merabharataurbhimahan4270 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i know that you are not there to write this while i don't exist..

    • @jaimesoldi6724
      @jaimesoldi6724 ปีที่แล้ว

      What we call 'reality' is a trick of our senses. We say that something exists, and is 'real' (for us) if we can see it, hear it, smell it, feel it or taste it. Things we can't detect with our senses, we say they don't exist. But this is not necessarily true. There may be, could be, should be, must be, a great number of 'things' out there that go undetectable to our senses 🙄🤔

    • @braddishner8597
      @braddishner8597 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I assumed they were theoretical as the name implies

  • @1FoxxFace1
    @1FoxxFace1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    If the universe doesn't exist - therefore my mother-in-law doesn't exist. Everything is fine.

    • @Jiji-ym6ss
      @Jiji-ym6ss 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

    • @rayarmijo4512
      @rayarmijo4512 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No its not 😂

  • @ChadLuciano
    @ChadLuciano ปีที่แล้ว +65

    17:16 The speed of light is 186 000 miles per second...not miles per hour...huge difference.

    • @queenofdestiny
      @queenofdestiny ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It was narrated by yee haw! :P

    • @rayraylalonde
      @rayraylalonde ปีที่แล้ว

      You cauth that too

    • @rayraylalonde
      @rayraylalonde ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 299,792,458 metres per second is correct.

    • @ChadLuciano
      @ChadLuciano ปีที่แล้ว

      it's been covered no worries@@rayraylalonde

    • @CharlesSelf-sq9ti
      @CharlesSelf-sq9ti ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I noticed the mistake too but I doubted myself and thought I was wrong.

  • @wayneasiam65
    @wayneasiam65 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    When we really don't have a clue of Anything, we can at least dream of everything.

    • @davidmartin2442
      @davidmartin2442 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wayne’s World, Wayne’s World…. SHWING 😂

  • @tourvideo1970
    @tourvideo1970 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    If something exists, you can say it doesn't exist. If something doesn't exist, you have nothing to say.

    • @kencastleberry5126
      @kencastleberry5126 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Is that a quote from something? Looks like something written by the same guy who came up with the gem "Whether you're rich or poor, our graves are the same size" People have plenty to say about things that don't exist all the time. It's called fantasy.

    • @Wiseman108
      @Wiseman108 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kencastleberry5126 Fantasy still exist as a thought, and as art in many cases. Also by saying that fantasy doesn't exist you are proving the point of original post.

    • @kencastleberry5126
      @kencastleberry5126 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Wiseman108 I didn't say fantasy doesn't exist I said fantasy concerns itself with things that don't exist. Keep up please.

    • @Wiseman108
      @Wiseman108 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kencastleberry5126 My point is that it does exist within the context of fantasy. Keep up please.

    • @MeganVictoriaKearns
      @MeganVictoriaKearns ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Wiseman108i understand your perspective.

  • @LuigiMordelAlaume
    @LuigiMordelAlaume ปีที่แล้ว +29

    So if a subatomic tree falls in the forest and no humans are around to see it, the answer is that it exists in a superposition of both upright and fallen unless it was entangled and it's partner was observed. Good job god, very elegant code you wrote for us.

    • @kittyc3525
      @kittyc3525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was reflecting on entanglement as well…

    • @smrodriguez-mr9ng
      @smrodriguez-mr9ng 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ha! You actually articulated this in a way that I can understand. This even cleared up Schroedingers cat. I don't feel like looking up the spelling of his name but I'm sure you know who he is. I couldn't fully grasp the concept. Not even through this program. I'm glad I decided to click on the comments
      Thank you

    • @StephenBingham-kp2ld
      @StephenBingham-kp2ld 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What is a subatomic tree!

    • @RyannLagattuta
      @RyannLagattuta 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@StephenBingham-kp2ldsame 😫

    • @muzikizfun
      @muzikizfun 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It should read: if subatomic particles meet in an atom smasher, will anyone hear the crash!

  • @texwade2169
    @texwade2169 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    During this presentation at 17:15 the speaker makes a mistake saying that light travels at 186,000 mph, It is 186,000 miles per second not miles per hour!

    • @19501960
      @19501960 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's enough for me not to watch this. Sounds like an AI bot presentation

  • @babyrazor6887
    @babyrazor6887 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    The universe perceived by a moth is quite different than ours yet it works perfectly well for the moth. the limitations of sensory perception determine
    ones reality. Thankfully this is true for the ability to "see" what the world "really" looks like would make us unable to function in it.

    • @chrisstevens-xq2vb
      @chrisstevens-xq2vb ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No, perception doesn’t determine reality. If I perceive you as a chicken nugget are you?

    • @kittyc3525
      @kittyc3525 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      👍

    • @crowley3015
      @crowley3015 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If there was no creature to perceive reality, then reality doesn't exist, because existence is one of our attributes.
      Perception is everything. You can't force "perception" so your argument is actually wrong, i think you mean "will" him into a chicken nugget, because you don't know English or the definition of perception xd. @@chrisstevens-xq2vb

    • @crowley3015
      @crowley3015 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean "Doesn't not" explains it all.@@chrisstevens-xq2vb

    • @HABLA_GUIRRRI
      @HABLA_GUIRRRI 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      don't insult moths they are my only friends

  • @minhnguyen-mk9om
    @minhnguyen-mk9om ปีที่แล้ว +20

    we care about the Universe but the Universe doesnt care about us, the Universe is still moving along with or without us.

    • @gravity00x
      @gravity00x ปีที่แล้ว

      no.

    • @nassirshahshah7216
      @nassirshahshah7216 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me and the universe are homies bro

    • @healthiswealth1452
      @healthiswealth1452 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We are part of the universe

    • @howmathematicianscreatemat9226
      @howmathematicianscreatemat9226 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We all have the same universal consciousness. If you don’t believe me, go deep inside yourself in a meditative state. If you do this many months, you will finally come to a state where you basically become clairvoyant, you are everyone and everyone is you.
      This is why badass Chinese poets said: „self recognition is the source of all valuable knowledge“

    • @CraftyLemons
      @CraftyLemons 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      What if the universe doesn't exist without a conscious observer?

  • @Dabergyt
    @Dabergyt ปีที่แล้ว +23

    When the narrator doesn't know the difference between casual and causal. 😂

    • @PugFaceMusic
      @PugFaceMusic 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He probably just pulls info from the web and other videos and regurgitates it for profit.

    • @ginnygin7141
      @ginnygin7141 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He did say labry nith instead of labyrinth in like the first minute so it was always gonna be that kinda time here

  • @dan98257
    @dan98257 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Casuality or causality? Which is it? 👍😜❤️🙏
    This is a great episode. Concise, comprehendible, comprehensible, and compelling. 👍

    • @kenmocabee2325
      @kenmocabee2325 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, that bugged me!

    • @jakubhladik5898
      @jakubhladik5898 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Causality. I guess they missed that slip up.

  • @Three-Chord-Trick
    @Three-Chord-Trick ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, p. 449 (2nd ed.):
    'If in employing the principles of understanding we do not merely
    apply our reason to objects of experience, but venture to extend these
    principles beyond the limits of experience, there arise pseudo-rational
    doctrines which can neither hope for confirmation in experience or fear
    refutation by it. Each of them is not only in itself free from contradiction,
    but finds conditions of its necessity in the very nature of reason - only
    that, unfortunately, the assertion of the opposite has, on its side, grounds
    that are just as valid and necessary.'

  • @jmk1727
    @jmk1727 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This being a little bit more recent and discussing the flaws in past theories, even reminding people at times that today's models are just that- models and NOT fact (no matter how many times the discovery channel replays their space/universe shows), I had high hopes for updated info that's not based on 1930's text books. Where's the electric force or how plasma and charged particles interact and affect every piece of the universe? Or how the electric force to attract or repel is 2.4 x 10⁴³ times greater than that of gravity.
    When every article and research paper about planets/stars/even our own solar system and the expected results starts out with "Scientists Are Stunned" or "They Never Expected These Results" means it's time to invest a little more into other areas. I enjoyed the pretty pictures and the soothing voice though.

    • @chrisstevens-xq2vb
      @chrisstevens-xq2vb ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gravity is an electric force. Electric forces manifest in different ways. Consider electromagnetism and electrostatic force. Both electric like gravity but vary greatly in strength

    • @AndreasDrakos-c6o
      @AndreasDrakos-c6o ปีที่แล้ว

      Gravity is an electric force. Κοιτα κυριε τι μαθαινει ο ανθρωπος. Thanks!

    • @aceventura5398
      @aceventura5398 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gravity is truely the greatest magic of all. It holds every drop of water in the oceans from leveling out while allowing it to go on hollidays moving freely about the planet.
      Wont let it fall but allows it to form waves and swells.
      Its the weakest force but most dominant of all. Amazin ! BRAVO !

    • @PeterSon-x2g
      @PeterSon-x2g 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0

    • @jmk1727
      @jmk1727 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're all playing with words trying to change what they were meaning. When they ever speak of gravity they never mention the planets and their "electromagnetic force" they in fact never mention the planets having an electric charge.
      Wish they did but thankfully a few scientists in the mainstream are finding the courage to change the conversation.

  • @E_Cleazy
    @E_Cleazy ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Nothing exists until a form of sensory reception can detect and conceptualize it.

  • @jimpemberton
    @jimpemberton ปีที่แล้ว +33

    There is a lot of good information here. Something that confounds us is our lack of ability to make predictions in multiple temporal frames of reference (TFORs). We can acknowledge time and distance dilation, but fail to apply it when answering the questions of why things behave the way they do in our TFOR. So we explain these behaviors such as to attempt to make predictions within our own TFOR without understanding causal interactions with other TFORs.
    If our experience depends on quantum behaviors, then it is a homogenized experience that depends on countless other quantum TFORs. I propose, for example, that distance is caused by quantum movement approaching the speed of light in one TFOR and translated as a persistent distance in other TFORs. Electromagnetic radiation, therefore, becomes merely a disjunction between different TFORs where the distance has collapsed in at least one of them. In each TFOR, the conservation of matter/energy must still be represented. And what happens in one TFOR influences all other local TFORs. I think this is where gravity comes from. It's not a force. It's a collapsing of distance that also affects the TFOR of passing photons which themselves are based on a different collapse. Superposition is caused by a distance that has already collapsed in one TFOR while that distance has not collapsed in other TFORs. So distant particles of the same originating source can affect each other without any noticeable attachment within the homogenized TFOR. It could be as simple as that.

    • @fairyprincess911
      @fairyprincess911 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds good to me 👍🏽

    • @DaManWilliams-ye9iq
      @DaManWilliams-ye9iq ปีที่แล้ว

      We will all be the same again not a shame

    • @RickSanchezpicklerick-jq5tq
      @RickSanchezpicklerick-jq5tq ปีที่แล้ว

      "Man, I don't know what the fok you just little kid, but you special man. You reached out, and you touched a brother heart."~ Tracy Morgan/Pumkin Escobar ~ Jay & Slilent Bob srike back. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😈

    • @robertwieczorek5838
      @robertwieczorek5838 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Have you heard the theory that the universe is actually someone's brain. And we exist inside that brain. Universe and brain seem very similar. Imagine using 100% brain power. Who's to say that can't be it.

    • @jimpemberton
      @jimpemberton ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertwieczorek5838 Yes. That's the Bultzmann Brain thought experiment. That's not physics. It's philosophy, particularly a metaphysical discussion. The problem with 'who's to say?' discussions is that you end up with any number of untestable hypotheses purporting to explain the same thing. The Bulzmann Brain just happened to get more famous than the rest as being kind of the first one to be widely discussed. It's no more likely than any other such supposition.

  • @marquezsmith8889
    @marquezsmith8889 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I saw the duration 1:10:13
    ... yes this will definitely put me to sleep, I usually just lay the phone down and fall asleep listening 😆

  • @danielash1704
    @danielash1704 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Aliens don't exist until they give you their selfie

  • @arcyhicks8335
    @arcyhicks8335 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    The problem with all of this is that the problem itself only exists if we as a real entity think of it as a problem. Nothing unreal exists. From the perspective of humanity as well as all other biological entities, there are only two states of reality, tangible and non-tangible. If one can think of it, it exists. It's real. It may not yet be in a tangible state, but that doesn't make it unreal. 10,000 yrs ago, there were a rare few who dreamed of soaring with the birds. Well, it took a while, but here we are.

    • @sharesgames9546
      @sharesgames9546 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "If one can think of it, it exists." Not to be rude, but did you read this somewhere? This is exactly the same conclusion I arrived at, decades ago, when I was thinking about another, unrelated subject. The colleagues around my desk were not impressed. The reasoning is also backwards, "you cannot think of something if it cannot exist", which how it started off my train of thought, way back then.

    • @watchthiscrap
      @watchthiscrap ปีที่แล้ว

      Try that on physical laws and mathematics. Dumb ideas. Keep trying though.

    • @jaredfleischer8966
      @jaredfleischer8966 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm still waiting for them to be able to get us cell phone to work in my basement before I believe they're running remote controls on other planets... And like when they launch the Vikings explorers the technology wasn't good enough to still be sending his pictures and if space is a vacuum you can't have thrust

  • @jackspence625
    @jackspence625 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    If the speed of light is 186,000 mph, then it seems that light would take about 500 hours to reach us from the sun. I was under the impression light takes about 8 minutes.

    • @redbirdauto1713
      @redbirdauto1713 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It's 186,000 miles per second.

    • @shawnn6541
      @shawnn6541 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does

    • @jackspence625
      @jackspence625 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the correction. I was being a little facetious.@@redbirdauto1713

    • @jackspence625
      @jackspence625 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. I guess it was a little too much dry humor.@@shawnn6541

    • @queenofdestiny
      @queenofdestiny ปีที่แล้ว

      🤠

  • @tedgriffiths5216
    @tedgriffiths5216 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "No matter where you go, there you are."....Buckaroo Banzai.

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've been studying this and I think Bucky is right.

  • @danstewart2770
    @danstewart2770 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    [41:02] Before you go on, please explain:
    1) Why an object's mass increases as its speed increases?
    2) How a particle can have no mass?

    • @69weed.420
      @69weed.420 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't know?? Wow 😂

  • @OhAncientOne
    @OhAncientOne ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The Universe observes itself.
    Whether we are here or not.

    • @Sharperthanu1
      @Sharperthanu1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where can I find proof of that?

    • @OhAncientOne
      @OhAncientOne 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sharperthanu1 You can't, it's a catch 22.
      If you are here, in this universe, the proof is impossible because someone is in the universe observing lol.
      So, if you can get outside the universe... 🤷‍♂️

    • @OhAncientOne
      @OhAncientOne 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sir Roger Penrose does not believe that the universe requires an observer.

    • @XaelX777
      @XaelX777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello are we having this conversation or not? What happens if we Really find out the universe doesn't exist? We all disappear simultaneous leaving only the number 42 written in our dust? 😆😅😅
      If there's no universe there's nowhere to live there's nothing and I can't be typing this. But ultimately I have a spoiler alert: the universe doesn't exist. Go figure 😆

    • @OhAncientOne
      @OhAncientOne 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@XaelX777 Yes, well, the universe does exist but, since the creation of Earth Mark II,
      42 is no longer the correct answer.
      We have to wait for the program to recalculate.
      I'll be at the restaurant in the meantime.
      🧙‍♂️😉😂

  • @tobberfutooagain2628
    @tobberfutooagain2628 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Time is not real, but I get older every day.
    Sheesh…

    • @sannytizer7772
      @sannytizer7772 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was 3 minutes late for work and got sacked, so time matters to some.

    • @rogerdiogo6893
      @rogerdiogo6893 ปีที่แล้ว

      At first i was skeptical when scientist told us the universe wasn't real, but now there's at least 2 of them, i'm even more skeptical...

    • @sannytizer7772
      @sannytizer7772 ปีที่แล้ว

      you mean less skeptical@@rogerdiogo6893

    • @tobberfutooagain2628
      @tobberfutooagain2628 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      God is such a sinister joker…..

    • @despicableone4495
      @despicableone4495 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that isnt due to the so-called passage of time though. It's due to the constant activity of the metabolic processes in your body causing deterioration the same way that friction and heat degrade a vehicle's engine

  • @melissadwiggins
    @melissadwiggins ปีที่แล้ว +12

    10:09 so if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, it does not make a sound. That's what I'm getting from this lol

    • @Anthony-gm3jp
      @Anthony-gm3jp ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A deaf dog still barks

    • @guiseppe36749
      @guiseppe36749 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      sound is just our brain's interpretation of shockwaves of air displacement. so when a tree falls, there will always be air displacement. it never makes 'sound' because 'sound' only exists in our mind. when someone's there to 'hear it', it just means someone interprets the air displacement of a tree falling and calls it 'the sound of a tree falling'

    • @thewinesmith
      @thewinesmith ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep gotta observe it. Before its observed its just like a probability that a bear shits in the woods.

    • @QuantumAnswer
      @QuantumAnswer ปีที่แล้ว

      No, that's not it and also all the answers you got are just... bad. Mainly the @guiseppe36749 who thinks they sound smart but basically said nothing. They said "sound is just our brain's interpretation of shockwaves of air displacement. so when a tree falls, there will always be air displacement. it never makes 'sound'"... WUT... thanks for nothing... Yeah "Sound" is word for Air displacement so they are equal therefore IT DOES MAKE SOUND.It's just nonsense equivocation on "sound" trying to differentiate between the fact and what "word" we use to describe that fact to be able to communicate about it between each other - unless you define "sound" as "observed sound wave" and then OFC yes, but at that moment it's definitional and nothing can make sound unless observed, obviously. Ergo they said literally nothing of any value. @thewinesmith is also wrong, it's not probability of making sound, when the tree fell down it did make a sound regardless If someone was there or not to observe it. The macro world is still predictable, this result of violation of bell's inequality has outcome for quantum world (there are different worlds with different rules). Just like for a bug the gravity is negligible, surfice tention is what matters = different rules.
      So hopefully we now understand that what violation of bell's inequality changes is "our understanding of quantum mechanics", it has little to no effect of our understanding of reality "in different frame" (table is still table, tree that fell without no one around still made waves (sound) that no one observed).
      The change that happen was, there were 2 theories of how quantum world works, it could have been deterministic "with hidden variables" or "non-deterministic", the violation of bell's inequality shows that it is non-deterministic and therefore they only way for us to describe quantum behaviour is using "probability" because results of measurement cannot be determined. That is to say, If you take 2 boxes and you put left shoe in 1st and right shoe in 2nd and you send this box to your friend once she opens the box "she knows what's in your box", now nothing changed about your box, what changed is her beeing able to determine an information about it. This does not apply for quantum entanglement for pre-detrmined quantum states - that's what bell inequality is about, it's a upper bound of quantum entaglement "parallel measurement" correlation instead of orthogonal (notice, parallel is important, for example if you messaure vertical motion on one side the horizontal motion on other side there is no correlation between meassurements, however If you meassure both vertically they are maximally correlated - and if your meassurements go into diagonals that's what we are talking about here). So if you meassure parallel you can tell how strongly they are correlated until the "upper bound" (=bell inequality). What many meassurements shown is that it can be violated and therefore is not "local" ergo not determined. And that's all it says, that quantum mechanics seems to be not determined and non-local. It has little to no implications on your normal life whatsoever and falling tree still makes the sound even If nobody "observes it" because such a statement equivocates on "observer" which in case of that tree are air particles reacting to particles of falling tree, ergo "observe" their movement - all this still happen regardless of our observation.
      I tried... but it's a bit complicated to put it in words like this, I suggest to find video that explains it with visual help :)

    • @martinnewtonholmes
      @martinnewtonholmes ปีที่แล้ว

      You are probably right@@thewinesmith

  • @robertmossberger3385
    @robertmossberger3385 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Oh, I see. I don't exist, you don't exist, we don't exist it doesn't exist and the computer running our programs doesn't exist. Got it.

    • @Daniel_P116
      @Daniel_P116 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would respond to that, but I don't exist so I can't.

    • @maxtek73
      @maxtek73 ปีที่แล้ว

      ok so I have put some thought in to this and have also talked to others, the ones that think this way about our existence have no skills and little experience in working with things. they can't see in their minds what people talk about. things like "it is becoming hard to steer the car" in your mind you would see a power steering fluid holder or if you are a mechanic you might see a power steering mechanism. this is how my mind works. work does not scare me but concerns I do have. I am always concerned with quality! on my stuff it is ok to tweak with stuff but when you are dealing with work you are dealing with people. so if life is a simulation then what if I chose to believe this theory then i can do a crappy job and as soon as i leave everything will fix itself, right? so I can basically sit there and do nothing because a simulation has default rules and everything is written in stone, yes? well I am having a non existing lunch.

    • @Daniel_P116
      @Daniel_P116 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maxtek73 Nothing would fix itself, according to that theory. But I don't really know what you're trying to say.

    • @juuu7801
      @juuu7801 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Daniel_P116idk either lol. All i know is that we humans do not know what anything is and scientists are making theories that isnt real. We Might get clearance when we die

  • @meditateforbliss9382
    @meditateforbliss9382 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is what Sage Sankaracharya stated in his philosophy more 1300 years ago. "Brahma Sathyam Jagath Mithya Jeevo Brahmaiwa na para"

  • @billmackie8226
    @billmackie8226 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the universe does Not exist, then nothing we think we know also doesn't exist; Ergo, the physicists who "proved" this theory, themselves, do not exist - which blows their entire theory

    • @philharmer198
      @philharmer198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Universe does exist . The Universe never hasn't existed . Space has never not existed .

    • @philharmer198
      @philharmer198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It does .
      The confusion between reality and mathematics , which is real ?
      Physical Reality .

  • @johnrieger2461
    @johnrieger2461 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    👍Fantastically Interesting.. I enjoy daydreaming about this subject, convinced we are part of something much Bigger🤔.
    Thanks!!

    • @PAULLONDEN
      @PAULLONDEN ปีที่แล้ว

      It's obvious we're part of something bigger...... which might be the universe ? Even a down syndrome patient could come to such a conclusion.

    • @shawnn6541
      @shawnn6541 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope

  • @mohammadsareh4732
    @mohammadsareh4732 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Physicists can replace falsehood with truth and vice versa for ordinary people.

    • @boogathon
      @boogathon ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try telling that to “climate change” believers...

  • @Nancy-px7hn
    @Nancy-px7hn ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We experience our world as real though. We feel pain, hunger,etc.

    • @69weed.420
      @69weed.420 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rt it ain't real at all though that's the thing. It's all about the Christ 👍🧙‍♂️ and in December, Christmas ☮️

    • @bandulaamarawardena6576
      @bandulaamarawardena6576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because 'WE' created our own selves from the time our brains developed while in mother's womb, and up to now, using the senses... a false world, a false universe, etc etc... As some commented: 'A DREAM FOR OURSELVES'...!!

  • @matthewschwartz8730
    @matthewschwartz8730 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wanted to share something that I read in a book about the nature of the way objects move through space-time. Early in the second part of this documentary The voice spoke of how we are already moving at the speed of light or something to that extent and gave almost no explanation. Everything moves through space-time with a maximum amount of"movement" split between moving through space and moving through time. From what I can understand everything moves through space-time in a way such that if you are moving faster meaning that you are moving through space more u then move less through time. For example if an object is not moving at all through space then all of its motion is through Time meaning that that object's clock is moving at maximum speed. On The other extreme if an object is moving at the speed of light meaning that its clock will be stationary.
    I do hope I explained this properly and I also hope that you can understand what I am trying to get at.

    • @JasonRule-1
      @JasonRule-1 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. And that would explain why photons do not experience time.

    • @danbreilin9169
      @danbreilin9169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's all relative. If we race our spaceships at light speed to Andromeda our dashboard clocks keep ticking, we keep growing older.
      I don't know some of this stuff is ridiculous. You can't stop time. The universe is not a holograph and the future is not preordained.

    • @JasonRule-1
      @JasonRule-1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danbreilin9169If we were traveling at the speed of light I suspect that even though the clocks keep ticking what would happen is that we would arrive at our destination instantly without any travel time at all in our own perception. No time would pass for the passengers on our ship. All the while time would have continued on in the outside world at its normal pace.

    • @danbreilin9169
      @danbreilin9169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JasonRule-1
      No, it takes 8 minutes for sunlight to reach earth. Imagine if you're a photon at the surface of the Sun and we communicate instantaneously and I tell you to leave right now head towards the earth, how long is it going to take you to get here? It's not instantaneous so time must elapse

    • @JasonRule-1
      @JasonRule-1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@danbreilin9169 It's not instantaneous for an external observer, as from the Earth. But it IS instantaneous for the photon. The photon experiences no elapsed time.

  • @markfromct2
    @markfromct2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    So. If I look at a table and leave the room the table no longer exists? I have a hard time getting my head around that sir. Please explain. What happens if I peek in the window?

    • @bandulaamarawardena6576
      @bandulaamarawardena6576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The bottom line is, ENERGY. Our senses perceive the energy in many ways. Colour is merely a wave-length of magnetism. All our senses are deceiving our brain..!! The table you looked at was energy.... Our brain is energy... Our thinking is energy... All an illusion, hence the hologram theory..!!

    • @Dani-zv4rw
      @Dani-zv4rw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What spoon Neo? There is no spoon.
      Only in your mind.

    • @adriancopping1253
      @adriancopping1253 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know, what a load of nonsense.

    • @kabukillmee.0125
      @kabukillmee.0125 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re still observing it

    • @kdub9812
      @kdub9812 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      if you see a table in a video game then you leave the area does the table exist? no because tables exist as rendered objects and when you leave that area of the game you are no longer rendering stuff that used to be there. howeve, something always remains without perception. the founders of QM called it consciousness, modern physicist prefer the term “information” regardless there exist a world outside of your perception but that world is not physical, “rendered” as the rendered world is something that only occurs in ones observation

  • @Vile_Entity_3545
    @Vile_Entity_3545 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    186,000 miles per second more like

    • @boogathon
      @boogathon ปีที่แล้ว

      …but only in a Hoover.

  • @mikeransom1168
    @mikeransom1168 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    At 41:40 the narrator says if I sit at home I am not moving, but if I go to the store I am moving. I was under the impression that we are all moving with our planet as it rotates and orbits our sun and simultaneously travels around the center of our galaxy while we travel with our galaxy as we head on our collision course toward the Andromeda galaxy. Doesn't that count as moving?

    • @sharesgames9546
      @sharesgames9546 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "movement" is a change of position relative to another object. If you move your little finger, it has moved relative to the other fingers, relative to your body, and relative to the bed you are sitting on. If you move two fingers are the same time and in the same fashion, both your fingers have moved relative to your arm, and relative to your body and to the bed you are sitting on. But both fingers have been completely stationary relative to each other, no movement at all.

    • @shawncarter7188
      @shawncarter7188 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of course it does. You don't need to initiate your own movement to be considered to move. Whether your muscles generate the motion or an outside force interacts with you, you'll be moving. I.e. if you get rear ended, you'll move

    • @sharesgames9546
      @sharesgames9546 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Movement" is relative, and is always defined "with respect to another object". In our universe there are objects moving in all possible directions, from large galaxies to small pebbles flying about space, and according to relativity all objects are linked together. Because no object can travel at the speed of light. Which means if an object travels at half the speed of light, there can be no other object in the whole universe that can travel at half the speed of light in the opposite direction.

    • @shawncarter7188
      @shawncarter7188 ปีที่แล้ว

      @sharesgames9546 right except for that last part. You're saying that only one object in the universe can travel at C÷2 at any given time. That's not accurate

    • @sharesgames9546
      @sharesgames9546 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@shawncarter7188 I said that if object A is moving at half speed of light with respect to another object B, there cannot be an object C that travels at half the speed of light in the opposite direction of A. This constraint links A, B and C together, regardless of distance, or size. As there are so many objects in the universe, this constraint would seem to imply that the maximum achievable speed is 1/2 the speed of light, because if you try and go any faster there will surely be some other object, no matter how far away, that travels faster than light with respect to you.

  • @theinspector7882
    @theinspector7882 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not a single thing is permanent, it's only change (time) we've always perceived.

  • @DWKThedogbreaths
    @DWKThedogbreaths 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Beautiful graphics and exceptional narration of complex ideas, without which, most of the information would be too giddy to comprehend.
    Your presentation is outstanding for this alone; the graphics are a bonus.

    • @RickHansbury
      @RickHansbury 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you mean too stoned to comprehend? 😂

  • @thekingofmojacar5333
    @thekingofmojacar5333 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Our life isn´t always so "real", but the cosmos exists (we are an insignificant part of it) and that´s 100% a reality and not just a hallucination, and I am absolutely sure about it!

    • @chrisstevens-xq2vb
      @chrisstevens-xq2vb ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Touché. Some people perceive governments as honest🥴

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 ปีที่แล้ว

      To bad you are wrong OP. See Donald Hoffman for a better explanation of the following statements but as it stands all forms of life perceive reality totally different. To believe Humans have the only true real reality is absurd. It is 100% a hallucination and psychology could have told you this over 100 years ago.

    • @thekingofmojacar5333
      @thekingofmojacar5333 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chrisstevens-xq2vb
      I perceive governments as an obligated tax payer (and wasting my money)...🤬

  • @malcolmlewis6014
    @malcolmlewis6014 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Anything goes these days where the human brain is starting to run amok with incredible ideas and imagination.

    • @kieran-299
      @kieran-299 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's about mocking the American standards of measurement, so since they usually use METRIC they mindlessly did the conversion so came up with 300 mi/sec

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      An interesting thing to me is that, with the current speed of communication worldwide, a good idea in New Zealand can be put to use two days later in the United States.

  • @Shadow_B4nned
    @Shadow_B4nned ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yea? no. The universe absolutely exists and does not need an observer. An observer's view of the universe is merely a perspective. It's a recreation of reality within one's mind. Time dilates around each observer so that everyone experiences the universe differently. But it's the same vibrating universe. Furthermore entangled particles don't magically stay entangled. They decohere very rapidly. You can't magically plop entangled particles on opposite sides of the universe.

    • @IBADSNU
      @IBADSNU ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Prove it.

    • @Shadow_B4nned
      @Shadow_B4nned ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IBADSNU Prove what exactly?

    • @Shadow_B4nned
      @Shadow_B4nned ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IBADSNU Would you like me to prove the earth is round? Or the moon exists even if you don't look at it? Are you asking about time dilation? Such as, no two watches are ever truly in sync. Are you asking about how decoherence works? What's your conundrum?

  • @hulamei3117
    @hulamei3117 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's OK we're still doing illusionary calls on our cell phone and eating invisible- visible burgers! 😅 Enjoy!

  • @orale_
    @orale_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    waiting for physicists to prove rent doesnt exist

  • @Raging.Geekazoid
    @Raging.Geekazoid ปีที่แล้ว +5

    7:00 The good news is that we can retain reality by giving up locality, which is just a glorified way of saying the speed of light as a universal speed limit. And we'll have to do that anyway if we're going to develop hyperdrives and explore the universe. 😋
    So the universe does exist in some form or another, but so far nobody knows what that really is. 🤔

  • @UrbanDefensiveTactics
    @UrbanDefensiveTactics ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Question: If a spirrow galaxy is located along the same plane relatively, according the blue-shift observation, the side of the galaxy that rotating towards our point of reference should appear blue and the side of the same galaxy moving away, should appear red, correct?

    • @Raging.Geekazoid
      @Raging.Geekazoid ปีที่แล้ว

      Correct.

    • @bruss4580
      @bruss4580 ปีที่แล้ว

      Id almost have no doubt the (most) galaxies moving toward ea other. Say andromeda and milky way…..the speed in which they are approaching is much higher than the speed of rotation. Sooo rotation vs light shift would be negligible to our perception. No?

    • @Raging.Geekazoid
      @Raging.Geekazoid ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bruss4580 "Expanding universe" means most galaxies are moving away from each other. That was Edwin Hubble's great discovery in 1929.
      Andromeda is approaching the Milky Way at about 110 kilometers per second, and its rotational velocity has a maximum of 225 kilometers per second (at a radius of 1300 light years from the center).

  • @hammer8809
    @hammer8809 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The double split experiment is flawed, it's not the human observation turning waves to particles, it is simply the electronic instrument used that does this.

    • @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025
      @tatesmobilewashandinstalla7025 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting theory.

    • @samuraisteve2775
      @samuraisteve2775 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nope, your understanding is flawed.
      Any observations, video, electronic monitoring, etc. It cannot be a person watching as we cannot see stuff that small, genius.

    • @hammer8809
      @hammer8809 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@samuraisteve2775 Oh dah, the humans observe using the instruments. Did you really think they just put them there for show? 🙄

  • @DuanTorruellas
    @DuanTorruellas ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I had ADS they said I have to learn to concentrate more hahahahahaha

  • @chrisevans1255
    @chrisevans1255 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If the universe doesn't exist then neither do physicists...so how can they prove anything? Don't let this non-existent comment upset you.

  • @michaelvonfriedrich3924
    @michaelvonfriedrich3924 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    In the absence of the fabric of space, can light transverse this void or does light require the fabric of space in order for it to travel?

    • @BaronoftheDead
      @BaronoftheDead ปีที่แล้ว

      Light needs something to be "absorbed" by in order to be seen. I believe the light would travel through the "Void" but would not be observed until it reaches something that it can reflect on.

    • @rd4908
      @rd4908 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BaronoftheDead There is no void. The fabric of space is everywhere in the universe

    • @BaronoftheDead
      @BaronoftheDead ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rd4908 That's why I put quotes around "Void." I wanted it to retain the context the OP meant.

    • @sannytizer7772
      @sannytizer7772 ปีที่แล้ว

      I you don't pay your leccy bill then there's no light

  • @VideoVidYT
    @VideoVidYT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Universe Is Real

  • @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm
    @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Finally! The documentary narrated by an actual human being. Which is so much nicer than computer generated voices. It made this documentary so enjoyable I will listen to the whole thing. And I'm only a minute into it and I've already enjoying it

    • @thegamingflyhd1397
      @thegamingflyhd1397 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only video I listened to every word (watching most of it) and jus realized it's almost over lmao literally the only video ever thats over 30-45 mins tops that i actually sat through the entire video which is crazy

    • @PlebianGorilla
      @PlebianGorilla ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s possible this is a computer generated voice. If you capture enough samples of someone, you can create something that fools us into thinking it’s real.

    • @kenpotter6745
      @kenpotter6745 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This was actually a computer generated voice made from a sampled voice and then the transcript was converted using text to speech. If listening to it carefully there are several points when the synthesized voice made GIANT errors in the correct pronunciation of certain words.
      This ‘screams’ of ‘text to speech’ synthesis as systems like this can occasionally make these kinds of errors AND ALSO will not catch common sense typos in the transcript like a human would catch because the human would easily catch the contextual error in the sentence the moment the wrong word was used.
      For example at 24 seconds into the video the synthesized voice says ‘laberNinth of time’ instead of the correct word ‘labyrinth’.
      Another example during the narration at the 28 minute and 20 second mark in this video, the narrating synthesized voice says the word “casualty” instead of the word “causality”. This renders the sentence meaningless as it doesn’t make sense with the incorrect word (“casualty”). No human would make that mistake and not catch the stupidity of the sentence they just said… This video was a narration from a very good text to speech engine with a unique Midwest American accented voice.

    • @craigfowler7098
      @craigfowler7098 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well if the universe is a hologram or simulation, your theory is wrong

  • @bigimskiweisenheimer8325
    @bigimskiweisenheimer8325 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When it all comes down to it, we still have to go to work and pay our bills. When we don't, then I'll consider it a major discovery.

  • @ralphpeirson8475
    @ralphpeirson8475 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jane Roberts channeled a number of books dictated by a being named SETH, who describes himself as a multidimensional personality no long in human form.
    On one of these books, Seth also says that the universe does not exist! Interesting!

    • @philharmer198
      @philharmer198 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To your last statement . Seth is wrong . The Universe does exist . It has space and physical things , And Life .

  • @ButchersSM
    @ButchersSM ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think that all possible outcomes are played out within reality, and time is the vehicle that consciousness uses to navigate through different outcomes within reality. Free will is only the conscious decision in which consciousness itself uses time to navigate within all outcomes that exist all at the same time. So we see time choice by choice, in a line, Every outcome that can exist already does. We just ride time through all the outcomes, and it looks like free will. which basically it is. Its just the physicality of existence already exists. Does that make any sense to you??

  • @jlg4398
    @jlg4398 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It is most certainly real as we define it.

    • @junes2k
      @junes2k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      he said elon musk is a scientist. anything goes, man. BTW I'm a firetruck.

    • @LloydSavage-ob3qy
      @LloydSavage-ob3qy ปีที่แล้ว

      Since Hawkin passed even he now knows the truth and will bow his knee like all others will giving glory to the Father of all creatures and things.

  • @dfreshMC
    @dfreshMC ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It all boils down to the age old axiom:
    "I think therefore I am"
    More profound and more aprapo than one might think it to be at 1st glance 12:18

    • @bandulaamarawardena6576
      @bandulaamarawardena6576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes.. Perfect.. I like to say that the universe is energy, our brains are energy.. and the thinking is energy... Our thinking deceives us to think that we exist.

  • @RajagopalRajagopal-s7u
    @RajagopalRajagopal-s7u 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The universe exist both physically and Concisely
    To our physical science
    material world exists
    To our spiritual science
    Consciousness exists

  • @RigaudMoise-c5u
    @RigaudMoise-c5u 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    IF UNIVERSE IS NOT REAL, THEN YOU ARE NOT LIVING.

    • @philharmer198
      @philharmer198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nor exist . The Universe exists , and space .

  • @NomadSupreme911
    @NomadSupreme911 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    If you are reading this you are the only sentiant being in the universe. Every other living being is an illusion projected into your mind.
    -The Universe

    • @XaelX777
      @XaelX777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks
      -Your Mom

    • @randallhackworth421
      @randallhackworth421 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@XaelX777😂

  • @rogerhill138
    @rogerhill138 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If time didn't exist at the big bang then we can't time how long it took.

    • @shawnn6541
      @shawnn6541 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope

    • @BaronoftheDead
      @BaronoftheDead ปีที่แล้ว

      We use mathematics to determine how fast things are moving away from the "epicenter" of the Universe. We measure everything around us and the direction they move. Once we have that number we use it to calculate how long it could have taken to travel that distance and create a timeline with this data. It's similar to "How far does a car travel moving at 60mph if it's moving at 60mph?"

    • @BaronoftheDead
      @BaronoftheDead ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hat_With_A_Hat_On It is a fun problem to look at lol. Trying to calculate objects paths through space based on their interactions with each other is kind of interesting. I'm not sure how useful it would be to apply to the "Big Bang"; I honestly haven't studied it much. (I'm not a mathematician lol) An object 20 light years away could have affected an object's path before being flung away on its journey and that's too much information needed.
      Our best approximation is good enough for me. The Universe is chaos haha We would have to be present during the Big Bang to truly know.

    • @naomidoner9803
      @naomidoner9803 ปีที่แล้ว

      The big bang is a theroy... widely accepted but not proven

    • @martinmurry3
      @martinmurry3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@BaronoftheDeadwhere is the "epicenter" of the universe?

  • @diliproy6455
    @diliproy6455 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    India’s Vedantic philosophy has known this theory since time began

    • @Bavarian-ko9il
      @Bavarian-ko9il ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed 200%
      Western thinkers still catching up 😅

    • @samboychip1
      @samboychip1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because it’s based on consciousness, the observer, not the observed, as the source of reality

  • @rbwinn3
    @rbwinn3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Here is where physicists went wrong. I figured this out in high school. Our physics teacher was explaining Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity to us. He said that Einstein had proven that a moving clock would be slower than a clock that was not moving. For the moving clock I imagined a clock in a flying airplane and for the clock that was not moving, a clock on the ground. It was obvious to me that if the pilot in the airplane had a slower clock than an observer on the ground had, then the pilot would get a faster speed for the airplane than the observer on the ground.
    x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
    y'=y
    z'=z
    t'=(t-vx/c^2)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
    inverse equations
    x = (x' - vt')/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
    y = y'
    z = z'
    t = (t' + vx'/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
    The problem with these equations is that v is the speed of the airplane and is the same speed as seen from either frame of reference. t' is definitely less time than t. So what these equations are showing is a mathematical description of a miracle, a supernatural event. We common people live in something called reality where if the pilot has a slower clock than the observer on the ground, he will get a faster speed for the airplane. If a person works the mathematics correctly, he will get the result we observe in reality, not what Einstein gets with his incorrect mathematics.

  • @pauly362
    @pauly362 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:25 "as far as we know" and "according to" are so refreshing to hear when relating to age of universe.
    Thank you!

  • @uuzd4s
    @uuzd4s ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The very fact that the best and brightest minds on the Planet can prove opposing theories exist about the origins and makeup of the Universe tells you everything you need to know . . . and that is that we DON'T Know. When you hear words or descriptions like, Singularity, Event Horizon, Dark Energy and Dark Matter, these are undifinable words meaning we Don't Know what they are. They're just made-up words to describe the unknown.
    We, Mankind, has Always gone w/ the most popular definitions of the Universe until something better comes along, That's the only constant here.
    Still, Well Presented and definitely stimulates any spare neurons floating around, of which I've only One. The other two keep me breathing and help my Lips move. 😉

  • @y5mgisi
    @y5mgisi ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I really like these thought provoking videos.

  • @mds1171
    @mds1171 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Dont understand how a clock can run slower because of gravity. Clocks arent meters, they're just machines set to run at a certain pace.

    • @boat1280
      @boat1280 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything is physics. Physical systems slowly breaking down
      Gravity affects time and these physics
      Because time is different in different gravity, the clocks will be off when returning to “normal time”
      The corrections the international space station makes are incredibly small, but they are made

  • @charlesmcmillion5118
    @charlesmcmillion5118 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that it's impossible not possible. Who the hell wrote this script?

  • @KithEsq
    @KithEsq ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Humans aren't the observer who makes the universe real. GOD is watching us!

    • @nassirshahshah7216
      @nassirshahshah7216 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yo god watching me game? Finally a friend

    • @KithEsq
      @KithEsq ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @nassirshahshah7216 You are the main character in a world of n.p.c's "player 1"

  • @Synthematix
    @Synthematix ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If the universe doesn’t exist then nothing exists

  • @yanan3681
    @yanan3681 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    No universes were harmed in the making of this video

  • @baje2089
    @baje2089 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the doc!
    You keep saying "casualty" when I think you mean "causality."

  • @joshb4230
    @joshb4230 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video! Also I love your voice and accent, very soothing!

  • @keithford460
    @keithford460 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Malfunctions such as the Mandela affect perhaps?... maybe these things that we are being told we misremember actually happened in a previously overwritten version of the current simulation. I have been places that I looked up and have never existed, but, I was there, uninfluenced by intoxication of any sort. I witnessed these events in these places that never were. Could that make me an artifact carried over from a former glitch repair? Many of us have shared "mismemories", could that mean that we are all artifacts of previous versions? Or perhaps there were many parallel "servers" on which simulations were being run that the runners of these simulations have decided to combine the servers, thus bringing the minutia of the different servers into conflict with each other. Thus BOTH events DID happen just as "misremembered" by the current versions of us. I Love the thought experiments that videos such as this open up!!!

  • @ycc9369
    @ycc9369 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If the universe is not real, so what? life goes on.

    • @naomidoner9803
      @naomidoner9803 ปีที่แล้ว

      In or out of the body... it goes on

  • @danstewart2770
    @danstewart2770 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    [29:11] Why say time is an _"emergent property"_ of the universe, instead of just a _"property"_ of the universe?

  • @shaneburroughs3717
    @shaneburroughs3717 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Casuality? I think the narrator was supposed to say causality. But it's odd that no one picked up on that all through the editing and screening process before this was released. If not the what is casuality and what does it have to do with this subject?

  • @Greenishprint
    @Greenishprint ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The universe doesn't exist? Says the Physicists, who also doesn't exist!😅 The irony

    • @a.od-reszki4674
      @a.od-reszki4674 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But they are still harmonic oscillators. Even when they don't exist.

  • @Jmoney-1603
    @Jmoney-1603 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm from Texas, you voice makes me like home.

    • @TheOttomann64
      @TheOttomann64 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I always imagine the narrator looking like a mix of Pixars Woody and John Wayne 😊

    • @johnnyringo9759
      @johnnyringo9759 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If this came from Texas, then it all makes sense!!!

  • @davidluck1678
    @davidluck1678 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    glad to know that I don't exist. Maybe this tooth will stop hurting.....

    • @tomgrinnell4536
      @tomgrinnell4536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check your hearing David

  • @beanondaddy3397
    @beanondaddy3397 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is everyone watching this from their bed to help them fall asleep?
    Give a comment below

  • @CinematicLaboratory
    @CinematicLaboratory 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As long as science agrees that division by zero is impossible, they will never figure out the Universe.

  • @denmorin
    @denmorin ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You lost me at 186000 mph

    • @bartb7450
      @bartb7450 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s a huge stupid mistake - can’t believe they didn’t catch it

  • @davidwestfall4336
    @davidwestfall4336 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Argue if you will, but I'm moving if an 18-wheeler is barreling down the highway towards me. "Reality"

  • @John-100
    @John-100 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's as real as it gets for you and me. Do you think you will escape once you know you live in something that's not real? You are stuck here regardless of the nature of the universe. Soon, oblivion will take your body and mind and return it to dust. Your spirit may escape to a place that you deserve or dont deserve. Live morally, and the spirit will live, don't, and the second death will result.

  • @jinotepe79
    @jinotepe79 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This video does not exist!!

    • @pg-ko6ph
      @pg-ko6ph 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂

  • @zayday6777
    @zayday6777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoyed watching this and wanted to correct one thing. One thing does move faster than light, space/time. Initial inflation was way faster than light by a very very wide margin. Thank you for the great video

  • @rahulsp8375
    @rahulsp8375 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No one can understand, measure & think about the universe, because it is infinite, no start & no end, beyond anyone's imagination.....

  • @darrex999
    @darrex999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Does the universe exist without us?"
    Like "Does a tree falling in a forest make a sound if nothing is around to detect that sound?"
    Well, yeah, it _does_ cause a percussive wave through the gas around it (the atmosphere); if 'sounds' means 'something perceived by a brain' then no, there's nothing to perceive that percussive wave as sound. But then again, if I left a blaring sound system playing music at high volume in the middle of the same forest, and then removed all brains from the vicinity again, that thing's gonna carry on pushing out 'those percussive waves' which some would call 'sound waves'. So it all depends on what we mean by 'sound'.
    The universe according to me and you is modelled within me and you: we're sensing it through our 5 senses, causing electric signals to travel into our brain, and being decoded into a perception called 'the universe': this is our lived experience, our consciousness of what's going on around and within us; our internally controlled hallucination; the phenomenology of our neurology. And your experience is yours, and mine is mine. So in that sense, there are two 'inner universes': mine, and yours. And the same for all the other 8bn living humans. And if we count all species, goodness knows how many 'inner universes' that would be.
    If our planet suddenly ceased to exist tomorrow including all life on it, I'm sure our galaxy and our nearest galaxy Andromeda would still go on doing their thing, as would the entire cosmos: it was doing its thing before we emerged to experience and perceive it; and it'll go on doing its thing long after we've ceased to exist to perceive and experience it.
    "It is", "we are", and that's that.

  • @Joe-fe2xl
    @Joe-fe2xl ปีที่แล้ว +2

    All I know for a fact is when your twenty years old, it takes forever to reach thirty years old. As if you'll never get there! But when you hit thirty, forty comes quicker then thirty took, and every ten years after that gets here quicker also!

    • @karmasutra4774
      @karmasutra4774 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait until 50!

    • @Joe-fe2xl
      @Joe-fe2xl ปีที่แล้ว

      @@karmasutra4774 I don't have to wait for 50. It's already came and is long gone!

  • @TheVRHandler
    @TheVRHandler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want to know how we figured this out… I understand it completely but how do we even make these discoveries and understand something. With almost no doubt of its authenticity

  • @123DLAWRENCE
    @123DLAWRENCE ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry I have to correct this as it was incorrectly stated a couple of times. Light travels at 186,000 miles per second, NOT per hour.

  • @dr.augustinecruze8360
    @dr.augustinecruze8360 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mystic. I enjoyed. Thanks. Go ahead

  • @MaxineMJahn
    @MaxineMJahn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3:55 PM 😅 it's always good to watch current views of scientists.

  • @mikerosy6924
    @mikerosy6924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If universe isn’t real, I need to get a Nigerian social scammer to be my assistant and make my life better