@Nissan370Z Glass ...soul red (crystal) metallic is Mazda's signature color and they charge extra for it; that's why 90% of their press fleet is this color. No one really talks about the other colors; for good reason -- boring! I could say some (similar) things about your 370Z, but I don't want to hurt your feelings...
@Nissan370Z Glass Now lets look at what Nissan makes in this range..oh right that god awful looking Pathfinder with its trash CVT...yeah the Cx9 is mile better than that shitbox lol
@@K03sport Most automakers have colors that cost extra and the soul red from Mazda is good looking on. They also have a good grey color and their white is just right as well.
I bought a 21 CX-9 Grand Touring last week for a couple reasons. 1. Cheaper than the equivalent highlander limited/platinum 2. I have two kids but don’t drive them daily. Just needed the space for their car seats and associated junk if I happen to have them instead of mom. 3. Looks good inside and out, and drives much smaller and lighter than it is. On the test drive I thought it was hilarious that it torque steered. Plucky thing. My wife calls it my soccer dad car and that’s exactly what it is.
I'm eyeing the exact same year and trim for the same reasons. Mid-20k seems like a steal for these. 80% of the time I'm by myself commuting, 15% I'm with my wife and kiddo, the other 5% would be for the "maybe we should pick up grandma and grandpa so they don't dive 40mph on the highway to meet us at Applebee's"
Everyone talks about how small the CX9 is but it's the best vehicle that I have ever owned. I am 6ft tall (over 200 pounds) and I have to adjust the seat forward, and the seats are very, very comfortable. I paid slightly under 35k for a Touring model with the premium package (lease trade in). I also got zero percent financing. I test drove everything and nothing came close to this price with all the features I got. Not to mention this is one of the safest vehicles you can buy in its class.
You would buy this because: you want an SUV, but fun to drive, that looks handsome, looks upscale, that’s reliable, and you don’t really need daily to haul 6 people, but have option to haul 6….My son has a 2021 CX-9 and is very happy with it.
Price is a bit much, but the interior does look extremely premium. I think as a used car value in a few years, with low mileage for around $30k or less, this will be an incredible bargain
thats why you work with the dealership and discounts below MSRP.... never get a car for MSRP most especially if its a mass produced car that isn't a limited production car.
@@KuyaArbee true. There is always room for negotiation. However, the signature model is $49k as mentioned in the video. Getting it for $30k or less is $19k+ off of msrp. I doubt any dealer will do that for a current year car with 0 miles (brand new) especially if the car is sub $100k, nonetheless sub $50k. Like I said, great suv, but more of a value when purchased used in a few years. Just like the telluride, pallasade, etc
The problem I have when comes to comparing prices with the Mazda6, CX-5, and CX-9 is the Signature trim. Typically, the trim directly below the Signature(Grand Touring or Grand Touring Reserve) Typically gives you 90-99% of the features of the Signature without the fancier materials and shaves $2,000-$3,000. For example, the Mazda6 Grand Touring Reserve is probably the secret strongest value in the mid-size sedan segment, but only the $36,000+ Signature gets attention.
Honestly I'll never understand why people buy Mazda. Like they are not BAD per se, but they are soooo expensive. Like just insanely expensive. And it's not even that great - generally speaking. I am not trying to hurt brand fans here, and the Miata doesn't count, that's a unique vehicle. But the rest, like these CX series, or a Mazda6 - I don't know why anyone would get them.
Had ours for three years and 25k miles with no issues. I bought it because it’s the smallest of the big three row suvs, since we knew it would be only kids or occasional adults in the back. The transmissions shifts great, tons of low end power, upmarket quality, and overall design sets it apart from the back. I’d highly recommend driving one and or some soccer mommy suv with a weezy v6.
@@Jacobk66 no it was not... it had Asin 6 Speed ATX , Fords very solid 3.7l V6 but build in Japan by and for Mazda , platform, steering, braking and handling were more like huge Mazda 6 rather than more boaty Ford .
I’ve driven the top trim CX-9 and top trim Telluride and both are great three row suvs but in my opinion the CX-9 is so much more enjoyable to drive. It doesn’t feel like a brick on wheels. Yes you sacrifice a little bit of space but I think these guys are over exaggerating a bit with that - the CX-9 is still an adequate sized 3-row SUV but it drives smaller then some of the other ones in its segment which is what I love about it. All depends on your preference
I've had mine for five weeks and love it. I wanted something that could haul stuff if required with room for the grandkids but handles like a regular sedan and this is it. I went with a demonstrator model with 1200 miles and paid $39700 after my 2010 Ford Fusion trade in. I just retired and with Mazda's reliability this may be my last new purchase.
"This carpet pulls up, the pile is really nice, and when you vacuum it you can put lines in it" - Mark (12" C@#K) Sanevski Hysterical video guys, keep it up!
The Geese are so good, that it's entertaining to watch the entirety of their videos even if you don't care about the vehicle at all. Well done, informative, and always good for a laugh. 15:00 LOL
I love the tribute to the retro Motorweek Reviews with Jack comically turning dials, flipping switches, and generally just man-handling the interior components of the car in a way that no one does.
We love our CX9. With only one kid it's perfect. Both adults are also not large, 5'7" and 5'2". If you are a larger person, this is not your car. The third row is only folded up once or twice a year. The driving Dynamics are great. This vehicle fits a niche.
Funny story, we test drove one this weekend. (1) The 2020 is the year to get (if you're shopping one), a lot of updates from 2019 (2) the Grand Touring is the package to get (3) the rear view camera resolution is the worst I have seen especially for a $40k vehicle (4) at this price range, the absence of a pano roof is a big negative (5) THE dadmobile to get for driving experience in this segment (6) really good deals right now due to overstock (7) low cargo space especially with 3 rows up With rumors of the next gen Mazda 6 expected to go RWD I can see the CX-9 going to a RWD platform
I also test drove this weekend along with Highlander Palisade Ascent and Pilot. CX9 is the best deal and handle great. But it really lack the interior width and refinement. The vibration coming from the floor and engine doesn't sound as nice as the V6 from Honda and Toyota. Also like video mention the engine have great power down low then it flatten out quickly. Great for the price but I would go for Pilot with strong v6 airy feeling interior and heavy discount. Palisade is the most smooth and comfort with best interior but dealer asking $2k markup is a hard NO.
I don’t think $47k is too much for the MSRP when every one of its competitors is atleast that much, but more importantly Mazda dealers are anxious to move them so there are some incredible deals on them. I’ve spent lots of time behind the wheel of late model CX9’s and the interior is outstanding with surprisingly plush materials, very soft leather, the steering/handling/agility is outstanding for such a big vehicle but I agree that the ride can be crashy over certain pavement and the chassis doesn’t feel as rigid as some competitors. Other plus points are that the engine is extremely smooth for a 4-cylinder, transmission isn’t decent, and particularly in Soul Red this is a pretty sharp looking large SUV.
the cx9's biggest problem for my family is the lack of interior space and the compromised 3rd row that being said this is by far the best looking entrant in this class Imo
The CX-9 sales are up for Mazda of the 2020 year. This reviewer should have mentioned that rather than make it a dinosaur that's dying off. It's a little older than the other Mazdas but it's still their flagship and it's still performing brilliant. Yes it's real wood(reviewer, do your homework). Do not rely on people such as this reviewer to make your buying decision. Rather take it from an owner or owners that's been driving the CX-9. I've had mine for over a year now. I can tell you it's been a pure joy of pleasure and reliability. It's been a very reliable automobile! Not all the competitors can say that. Please review Consumer reports and check-out Car and Driver's reviews(best 3 row in it's class for 2019). The reason the CX-9 design has not changed is because it's simply timeless. Mazda nailed it! Best looking and most reliable 3 row in it's class. Did I mention it gets 30 miles to the gallon on the highway. It has the best torque in its class, 320 pounds of it. It has very adequate space for hauling. Very few people pack their cars down like a U-Haul. It absorbs potholes extremely well. Not any shock waves going through my CX-9, lol. Yes, there are definitely some areas that need updating for the CX-9. But they are subtle ones. Don't buy the signature package, go for the best bang for your buck, the touring package. I paid 36 thousand for the premium package upgrade. That's a great bargain for this car. Also, Toyota has so much faith in Mazda that it bought 5% of it. The CX-9 is a great car and this design will be around to admire for years to come! It's pure Japanese excellents. Mazdas will become a premium brand. They showcase that when they built the CX-9!
Here we go again! No cargo space with the third row seats up. Well if you improve that .... It becomes a frickin VAN! Do you want practical, or something that doesn't look like a VAN?! Well, we all know the answer to that one.
Absolutely, my wife needs a bigger vehicle but doesn't want a van. So this is exactly what were looking for, a good looking SUV that mostly never uses 3rd row.
@@leventsl If you don't need/want a 3rd row the CX-5 is 20" shorter than the CX-9, has a curb weight over 550 lbs less, an identical engine and drive train, has only about 11 cubic feet less overall cargo space, a similar upscale top trim and costs thousands less. And that's why Mazda sold over 5.5 times as many CX-5's as CX-9's in (156,000 vs 28,000) in 2019.
These three row SUV's are for soccer moms who are in denial that they are lame soccer moms. If you have more than two screaming kids, you really do need a minivan.
Mazda should make minivans again like the Mazda MPV or Mazda5, give them the same attention to detail in interior design as the CX9, but with a much more usable cargo hold. That would be an absolute winner for Mazda, and would be an interesting option in the minivan segment.
The Mazda 5s used to sell like hotcakes here in Canada. In fact, most "quirky" car designs (hatchbacks, wagons, cars with manual trans', etc.) are sold here because 'murica only wants big clunky cars with soft suspensions and 16 speed automatics. Every time I travel in the states, I'm appalled at how many 90 lbs housewives drive around in Chevy Suburbans and Dodge Rams.
I'd LOVE to see a new Mazda5, it's would be so nice to have a van that's not full sized, but people here reeeaallyy hate them despite all the advantages they offer. It's gonna be painful to see them go and get replaced by crossovers 🙄
I drove an atlas, pilot, explorer and highlander. I will not drive a minivan, I was also coming from a 2012 expedition. I now own a 2020 CX-9. I picked it because I loved the drive over the rest of the seven passenger midsize suv. I also have 5 kids under 8 and like “fun” so the CX-9 was a great fit for me!
"...the CX-9 AWD system doesn't send power to the rear wheels quickly enough, which can result in torque steer if you need to accelerate away from a stop quickly." " In dry conditions, the system is designed to minimize the amount of torque it sends to the rear wheels, which means during full-throttle acceleration, the CX-9 and its 310 lb-ft of torque will chirp the front tires and then proceed to torque-steer, leaving the driver to wrestle with the steering wheel. Considering the AWD control module is monitoring both the accelerator position and steering angle, I feel like the moment the accelerator pedal is depressed fully, power should be moved to the rear to mitigate the effects of all of that torque on the front wheels." Motor Trend
Simple sticker tires on FWD version deal with all this great torque much better and make you accelerate much better when needed... Yes cars with V6 and 50lbs of torque less allow you to be careless how you put power down and maybe better for soccer moms or average American car buyer. Sticker tires that I have on my CX9 grip so much better than stock Falkens
@@WoZIMoo Horsepower sells not torque just because 95% of people do not now than Torque is a usable power rating not horsepower. So Mazda's 320 lbs tq will sell worse than Toyota's 300 hp.
I just bought one of these, a 2022 Signature with the parchment interior (under red). I absolutely love it. I traded an Alfa Stelvio for it because the Stelvio wasn't large enough for the family but I wanted something that didn't make me miss the Stelvio too much. I still miss the Stelvio (I'll get a Giulia eventually) but I'm completely happy with the CX-9 whereas I don't think there's another three-row SUV I would be able to tolerate. I have to sacrifice a little space for a dynamics? Gladly. I have no interest in driving a truck no matter how practical. I love Mazda for the same reason I've always loved Alfa; they prioritize the driving experience over the pedestrian stuff (I've always seen Mazda as the Japanese Alfa... my kind of company). P.s., I love Mazda's response re space. Exactly. The (relatively) limited space will keep my wife from turning a vacation trip into a gypsy caravan; I'm all for that.
I bought my new Mazda 3 2020, M-Hybrid, Skyactiv-G 122, MT, Selection, Design Package (in Germany: Matrix LED, iActiveSafe) after watching your review(s) about how Mazda changed the game in the middle-class, hatchback space. I booked my test-drive just after i saw your video about good/bad. Tested also the new Golf, the Focus and the i30 with automatic. I didn't want any SUV, Crossover-thing because from the moment i stepped into the Mazda 3 i felt something special. And ohhhh yeah, the car is special. Is now at 1400km and i love it more every single day that i'm driving. Cheers.
Their cars are uglier than homemade sin. That's why their sales are way down, most people just don't like the styling. It is objectively ugly. Big dumb looking grills flanked by the worst looking wheel arches ever conceived and don't even get me started on the rear end of the 3. That car is hideous all the way around. I guess for some people, the only taste they have is in their mouths.
Point is , this older product build for those few who appreciate driving with more feel than those looking for sofa on wheels like approach. Power is awesome and very usable with no need to rev the hell out of these V6 based cars. Good fuel economy , great torque to get you out of the corner if you even know what Im talking about here 😉 CX9 to me is more like large wagon than 3row CUV. Previous gen CX9 was this kind of "American" CUV approach , huge interior , tons of space , cushier ride, V6 with lot of torque and power .....and what ? It still did not sell better either ! So what is the point here? Mazda is Mazda and they will continue to build cars for these few who appreciate the driving over hauling and who can appreciate attention to detail , design and beauty. This greatly aging CX9 still looks so much cleaner and has amazing exterior proportions and look than any so called new designs . Telluride mentioned here and everywhere , that is a nice brand New vehicle designed for American market that is one of the best in that kind of the vehicle but it is so heavily overrated in review world , drives big and feels rather large . Drove Pallisade and Telluride and Pally felt little tighter to drive and had better control over Telly but still not even close on thither roads to this "old" CX9 . I have used sticker tires 255 width and it applies power very well with no need to rev the hell out of the engine when you need it to move . New one will come by 2022 looks like and I hope Mazda does not try to build another Telly here... I hope for RWD , inline 6 3.2l with turbo pushing 320hp and 350tq , maybe 4 qubic feet of cargo more gained mostly by removal of 3 rd row (avail as package) New 8 speed ATX for RWD layout , Mazdas attention to design detail and same amazing sound system from new 3 with woofers hidden in the A pillars , 3 way speaker sounding that good. Yes I'm European and in 5% of American car buyer and we buy cars too.
its likely going to be 3.0l as it would be based on the current 2.0l skyactiv-x (add 2 more cylinders). I don't see a turbo in the base trim/for a couple years, especially if theyre moving the cx-9 timeline up. Even if its naturally aspirated it would make 266hp and 248lbft at 3000rpm, a drop in torque for sure, but a gain in hp. I'd guess the Mazda6 would probably be redone first just cuz its been out since 2013 (although heavily updated), and the cx9 to be built on it, although the cx9 should be a higher priority as you want sales. Also I've noticed that it appears Mazda cares more about the European market than the North American one, which is quite interesting considering NA is currently the largest market they have.
@@HeavyMetalorRockfan9 3liter with out turbo with just 248lbs of torque for a large vehicle like CX9 will not be enough no matter how buttery smooth Mazda and Toyota can make this engine . Mazdas balanced design fits world markets expectations much better than American market where size and bloat are a key .
The problem with the CX-9 is the poor use of the space it has. It is one of the largest 3 row SUVs with FWD based architecture with the smallest usable space. It's almost as long as a Chevy Tahoe. The 3rd row is a JOKE for even small kids. Just too old given the rapid pace of upgrading going on in this segment.
People HAAATE minivans, so that option is out sadly 🤷. They're the most hated vehicle type on the planet by far, which breaks my heart because i love them so much.
Yes, but the point is that the CX-9 inefficiently uses space, despite having similar dimensions to its rivals. A lot of the space is lost due to the seriously long front hood, which is (I believe) required for SkyActiv-G tech to work (and why every Mazda model has a long hood... for longer exhaust travel). The complaints wouldn’t be warranted if the CX-9 was shorter than, say, a Highlander. But it’s not. In fact, it’s slightly longer than a Highlander, but with less interior volume. Does the Highlander fare that much better with the third row? No. It suffers from the same issues as the CX-9, albeit with slightly more space. It’s still not viable to fit adults in the third row for longer trips. You still need a minivan for that.
I have the 2019 and it's a great car. I don't use the 3rd row all the time and it's great to have it when you need it. I'm looking forward to the next gen CX9.
Couple of notes. The wood in the interior really is wood and not synthetic plastic made to look like wood! LOL! Also, for anyone seriously looking into the CX-9, the Grand Touring trim level is identical to the Signature sans the wood trim and premium leathers, but drops a few thousand off the price tag.
As an owner of a 2019 CX-9 GT, I can understand the negative opinions. I am one of those owners that value the driving dynamics with enough space, vs having a lot of space with decent driving dynamics. I just feel that when I'm in it, I'm driving 100% of the time. I only need all the extra space 10% of the time. However, for the American market, which thinks space is king, The CX-9 should be shrunken down to a large 2 row (aka CX-8 in Japan) and a new platform is needed for 3-row space efficiency.
I’ve owned a 2016 signature for 4 years and I don’t think it suffers structural rigidity. I was not on the market for a 3 row suv, I wanted something practical for a family of 4 (don’t need the 3rd row, it’s a bonus) without compromising on driving dynamics (my daily at the time was a bmw 128i manual and we lived in Colorado with frequent trips to the mountains. In fact I crossed shopped it against a jaguar Fpace but could not justify the $15k differences or similar equipment and the Mazda had better quality and materials. My next one may be a Genesis GV80, unless Mazda refreshes the CX9 with their rumored RWD platform
Problem with Mazda products is the American consumers are followers when it comes to automotive purchases. The Honda Pilot looks like a raised minivan yet if everyone has one I must have one!!! Mazda makes great products but unfortunately most consumers have tunnel vision
It's true that midsize SUV's don't offer expansive third row seats. But they're not all created equal, either. The CX-9 and the Highlander are the only vehicles that offer less third row legroom than the 30" of a Mustang's back seat. (29.7" and 27.7" respectively.) All others offer nearly 32" or more. I own a KIA Sorento, 189" long, 10" less than the Mazda with 31.7" of legroom in the third row. We don't use it often and I wouldn't put a couple of passengers back there for a long road trip. But for chauffeuring a gaggle of teenagers to an event or a short trip for six or seven passengers when two vehicles would otherwise be required, the third row is a great convenience. It remains stowed probably 90% of the time but when we need it, it's a huge convenience.
But what if you don't need that third row that often? I own a minivan that has similar small third row seats, in 15 years I've used it about 10 times. It is awesome. Its good to have in rare case of needing to drive more people, but 99% of time car is used as 4-5 people carrier with big cargo area. Seats taking a bit of cargo area was never an issue. Buying bigger SUV or bigger minivan means it will be longer, it will be heavier, more fuel consumption and it will cost much more. CX-9 is a good compromise.
This truly is one of your best videos. Top lines: "Don't you want to help the economy, don't you WANT to go shopping?" and "Its the best SUV ever, except for this, it doesn't really fit anything in the back". Then, that sound you made (lifted from one of your other videos) when you floored it.. I mean, I watched this video yesterday and then today I watched it again.
The most stylish, sporty, premium feeling and one of the highest, if not the highest reliability record in its class. Mazda enjoys big market shares in Canada, Australia and many other counties... Unfortunately, they are under appreciated in the US and I can't see why
The Highlander is overpriced. You can't find let alone get any discount on a Palisade or Telluride. The Pilot is aging even faster. The Explorer, eh, no style. CX9 is the best all around SUV in this class.
You remember when Curly left the Stooges and was replaced by Shemp? Still pretty good but not quite the same. Bring back Curly Turbowski. Pay him what he wants. He’s worth every penny.
Man i hope the 2023 cx-90 is like this but a larger trunk, tow up to 5k lbs, and swap gloss black for matte black, satin silver, brushed aluminum(something not glossy and reflective) I really appreciate my subarus, but i want something a little more refined but also reliable.
Yeah, CX9 is not build for 95% of the so called American people. It is a niche design and approach not a cookie cutter that is parked at every Wal-Mart around you.
I have cx9 and 3 kids. Yes, its a bit tight, but the driving dynamics compensate for everything. The interior quality of every knob and button, you don't find in any other competitor. Want size? Get a minivan.
CX9 is such an interesting story, it was designed for North America market, but failed in market there, it was never intended for Australia/NZ market, it has been the best seller for the segment for several years now. I own one, totally agree everything said here, but I feel this is much better product than last gen Toyota Highlander which is still on sale here in Aus/NZ. And CX9 suits crappy Australian roads perfectly. Look forward to next generation battle between CX9 and Highlander.
Todd Nguyen, I also have a CX9 but in Sig trim and mainly use it as family hauler but with only 2 kids so third row is stowed most of the time! For my commuter car I have a 6 which is also a nice driving sedan...both Mazda’s flagship models!
This is my first thumbs down to you. What ended up being a decent review started out so confusing. If long time viewers like me have a hard time clueing in on where sarcasm, funnies, and reality cross each other, what would a brand new viewer do? You guys deserve millions of subscribers, far more than those that other lesser reviewers have. But I think this is where it starts to break down. The first 5 minutes after your once slick intro really tripped me for not catching every twist in the funnies & sarcasm.
im practically autistic and yet I caught onto every moment where he was joking and where he wasn't. Dude, hes literally joking about teddy ruxpins, blowup dolls, and 12 inch cocks. Practically the entire drive segment was serious. If you can't tell hes serious there, you need to go outside and socialize more, and this is coming from an introverted person lol.
first of all, it is VERY affordable in the real marketplace, especially slightly used. second, if you are gonna bitch about the FWD feel, the only competitor i can think of that is RWD is the explorer. hopefully, at 47k, you are not putting any euro competition in against it. finally, the torque steer...isisn't that due to the low-end power, which non of the "better" competition of which you speak can even offer. non of the v6-lower mpgs engines offered by the competition are nearly as much fun in real, every day driving. yes, DITCH THE THIRD ROW. never understood why this wasn't an option.
all its competitors have a decent 3rd row, and regardless or not if you actually use it, it does remain a selling point in this class, though people who care about their 3rd row passengers *AND* want rear cargo space at the same time are best served with a van that being said if this was a 2 row only CUV and a little shorter and lighter this could have been a solid competitor to the Passport and Murano
There are approximately 20 mainstream midsize SUV's for sale in the US. The CX-9 is among the largest in term of length (199"). Only the Dodge Durango and the enormous Chevy Traverse are longer. But in terms of passenger and cargo space, it's at the bottom of the list and not by a little. Less total cargo space than a Honda CR-V (71.2 cubic ft vs 75.8 cf)! Less passenger space than a KIA Sorento, (134 cubic ft vs 153 cf), a vehicle that's almost a foot shorter than the Mazda. Of the various 3 row SUV's in the category only the CX-9 and Subaru Ascent do not offer a standard or optional V6 engine. The CX-9's turbo 4 isn't a bad motor, especially in a CX-5 or Mazda 6. But the CX-5 has a curb weight over 550 lbs less than the CX-9; the Mazda 6 is over 800 lbs lighter. And the Mazda's long-in-the-tooth 6 speed AT doesn't help especially given that rivals typically have 8 or more speeds in more recently developed transmissions. All of this goes to making the CX-9 the worst selling mainstream SUV in the market place.(20th out of 20) In fact, it ranked 28th out of ALL midsize SUV's, mainstream and luxury in 2019 with fewer that 27,000 units sold. The KIA Telluride widely available for only 9 months in 2019 and plagued by supply problems sold over 58,000. And if that weren't bad enough, a severe recession and over 40 million unemployed in 2020 will undoubtedly be far worse. Mazda's entire lineup (including SUV's and other vehicles) is in serious trouble. Only the CX-5 sold over 100K vehicles in 2019 and again 2020 looks worse. Mazda has built (and continues to build) some excellent vehicles but without a major turnaround it may well stop being the smallest independent mainstream brand on the market and become a division of Toyota. And that would be a shame.
I'm 6'1", 34" inseam, test drove a 2023 Carbon today, I've done tons of research on them, it feels so well engineered and drives so well compared to the other 3 rows I've driven in this segment, it's the vehicle I want, BUT the center console is so wide and tall, that my boney knee is constantly hitting it, there is no room to relax your right leg. So disappointing because I like everything else about it but I'm probably going to have to pass.
@@cdane63 Yeah, I took it for a 30 minute test drive, brought it to my house, tried everything I could. I guess my legs just need to bow out more than most to be comfortable.
This works for most people. Efficient, reliable, best to drive, great interior design and quality. Jack should stop making fun at the expense of this great vehicle.
Mike, I owned a 2017 Mazda CX9 Sig and I love driving it everyday, short trip and long trip. I enjoy driving it fully loaded specially on twisty/winding-uphill roads. Very fun vehicle to drive...The 2.5L turbo i4 is well capable. No issues at all. Yes, you’re right. It is efficient, reliable and best to drive. It is easy to maintain DIY. The only problem I had recently was the cv axle was leaking after I took it to the outside-auto shop for tire alignment.
Love Mazda; have owned several and will likely own more. When we recently went shopping for a new SUV, I suggested we test the Mazda CX9, Ford Explorer, Honda Pilot/Passport, Acura RDX, Toyota Highlander, and... Kia Telluride. My wife was surprised and balked at my last suggestion (I'm not a "snob" but I do a lot of research). So we tried them all out, and she's been loving her Kia Telluride EX for over 3 months now. Lots of tough competition out there, and as you showed in this review, the CX9 (for the price) is not quite competitive. They need to open up the insides some, make it a bit bigger and more roomy, and improve the visibility. Also, they need a 6 cylinder, at least as an option. It also wouldn't hurt if they would stop making all their cars/SUVs look the same. The only one with its own personality is the MX5 (one of several Mazdas we've owned). Thanks for the great follow-up review!
But it is $38k for entry level. Their entry level puts Ford and GMC to shame. It's an honest car. Drives well, good seats and above all good dynamics. It's not made for soccer families - instead, it appeals to older buyers who want comfort for four adults and plenty of luggage. It is an old style boulevardier - it cruises downtown looking sophisticated. I like it.
I rented one of these about 2 years ago. My wife and I loved this car. The thing that I dislike about it is that as a large man, I hate that my knee rubbed against the center console. I had to use a small pillow for comfort.
Loving this. You kept true to who you are, kept the humour, and still showcased the vehicle for what it is and what kind of life it fits into. It's fine to love and geek out over high end, ultra modern, performance machines, but these run of the mill dailys... they and the people who rely on them deserve recognition. You can make fun of them. You can joke about them. You can compare them to high end track weapons. Bag on them all you think you should, but in the end, it's not the Ferraris and Lambos, the Demons and C8 Corvettes that keep the country running. It's the regular cars. It's these, and those like it. Thanks. . Oh, and I still have a soft spot for the Mazda 6.
I don’t need a bigger vehicle. A lot single people and empty nesters are fine with the space. I want to know how it drives. How does it feel on a long drive. I like the 3rd row for being in a pinch but I would most always have the 3rd row folded down. I use to own a super crew F150 and rarely used all the room. For a large family with 3 more kids sure I would not get it. But if I had just kids which most American families do then it’s more than enough room. Do we forget that most us use to fine with Honda Accords and Camrys as “family” vehicles?
ATF! I saw the Hyundai and Kia rivals, they are BIGGER and ZERO space in the back when third row is up. CX-9 has MORE space in hatch when third row is up. Also has more hidden pockets in the hatch area.
Ya know, not everyone needs a big car, or lots of cargo room, or wants that. As for the third row, not everyone wants that either, you always have the option to keep the third row folded and reclaim a lot of cargo room, maybe someone will just use it in that config mainly, not everyone needs a third row.
Ride handling is big one I wish they would change. I've seen several CX-30 reviews mention similar things... when you hit any sort of rougher pavement or pot holes it doesn't not do well enough to absorb, isolate, and prevent it from transferring throughout the whole chassis/cabin. The 6 is supposedly getting a new RWD platform an I6 so hopefully so I'm guessing they'll wait to do a major refresh of the CX-9 until then.
I was considering looking at this suv to buy, but I changed my mind. That interior looks small especially for a 3rd row SUV. Most people in the US want more room especially for 47k.
Just drive it , it is best to drive amd look at from im and out from all of them and built and finished better than new holly cow of CUVs the Telluride. 2020 GT trim can be bought now for 35K usd and it is an amazing bargain ... while others will all pile on Kia with very little discount. This 2020 GT at 35K is a steal. Drive it first.
"North American Best in class seat lever design" motor trend 2020
#1
This line cracked me up!
GM wants to know your location
Wait, did they really say this?
@@EddieLRosado4L no lol just making fun of their dumb car rewards
He really leaned on the memes with this one. Did you drink too many mocha frappes before recording?
I like the vids extra spicy. 10/10.
RCR wasn't uploading a review today so someone had to make up for the loss
As soon as I heard the initial song I thought “oh boy, this is going to be good”
Ill post truth here. The last few videos I did burned a hole in my soul. Zero fun. So if there is no entertainment for me I won't keep doing this.
savagegeese Just don’t forget how well-appreciated your content is. You’ve got serious talent. That said, I completely understand.
almost hard to tell when he's being sarcastic or not at points lol
The banter is so brilliant because the delivery is so perfectly monotone that it's impossible to tell when it's a fact or a joke or both.
He likes Mazda trust me.....
Then u ain't watchin' enough, fam.
It's easy for a Brit because he has our sense of humour.
The CX-9 is still the best looking 3 row on the market in my eyes.
Nissan370Z Glass he said in his eyes which means it’s his opinion not yours
@@joskjj3625 Think some people will call the 370z a girl car because it doesn't have a v8, so there's that!
@Nissan370Z Glass ...soul red (crystal) metallic is Mazda's signature color and they charge extra for it; that's why 90% of their press fleet is this color. No one really talks about the other colors; for good reason -- boring! I could say some (similar) things about your 370Z, but I don't want to hurt your feelings...
@Nissan370Z Glass Now lets look at what Nissan makes in this range..oh right that god awful looking Pathfinder with its trash CVT...yeah the Cx9 is mile better than that shitbox lol
@@K03sport Most automakers have colors that cost extra and the soul red from Mazda is good looking on. They also have a good grey color and their white is just right as well.
I bought a 21 CX-9 Grand Touring last week for a couple reasons.
1. Cheaper than the equivalent highlander limited/platinum
2. I have two kids but don’t drive them daily. Just needed the space for their car seats and associated junk if I happen to have them instead of mom.
3. Looks good inside and out, and drives much smaller and lighter than it is. On the test drive I thought it was hilarious that it torque steered. Plucky thing.
My wife calls it my soccer dad car and that’s exactly what it is.
I'm eyeing the exact same year and trim for the same reasons. Mid-20k seems like a steal for these. 80% of the time I'm by myself commuting, 15% I'm with my wife and kiddo, the other 5% would be for the "maybe we should pick up grandma and grandpa so they don't dive 40mph on the highway to meet us at Applebee's"
“I appreciate the infotainment more when I don’t have to use it”
Goose 2020
Everyone talks about how small the CX9 is but it's the best vehicle that I have ever owned. I am 6ft tall (over 200 pounds) and I have to adjust the seat forward, and the seats are very, very comfortable. I paid slightly under 35k for a Touring model with the premium package (lease trade in). I also got zero percent financing. I test drove everything and nothing came close to this price with all the features I got. Not to mention this is one of the safest vehicles you can buy in its class.
You would buy this because: you want an SUV, but fun to drive, that looks handsome, looks upscale, that’s reliable, and you don’t really need daily to haul 6 people, but have option to haul 6….My son has a 2021 CX-9 and is very happy with it.
Price is a bit much, but the interior does look extremely premium. I think as a used car value in a few years, with low mileage for around $30k or less, this will be an incredible bargain
thats why you work with the dealership and discounts below MSRP.... never get a car for MSRP most especially if its a mass produced car that isn't a limited production car.
I'm liking the idea of it in the used market. Should be very reasonable in price.
@@KuyaArbee true. There is always room for negotiation. However, the signature model is $49k as mentioned in the video. Getting it for $30k or less is $19k+ off of msrp. I doubt any dealer will do that for a current year car with 0 miles (brand new) especially if the car is sub $100k, nonetheless sub $50k.
Like I said, great suv, but more of a value when purchased used in a few years. Just like the telluride, pallasade, etc
The problem I have when comes to comparing prices with the Mazda6, CX-5, and CX-9 is the Signature trim. Typically, the trim directly below the Signature(Grand Touring or Grand Touring Reserve) Typically gives you 90-99% of the features of the Signature without the fancier materials and shaves $2,000-$3,000. For example, the Mazda6 Grand Touring Reserve is probably the secret strongest value in the mid-size sedan segment, but only the $36,000+ Signature gets attention.
Honestly I'll never understand why people buy Mazda. Like they are not BAD per se, but they are soooo expensive. Like just insanely expensive. And it's not even that great - generally speaking. I am not trying to hurt brand fans here, and the Miata doesn't count, that's a unique vehicle. But the rest, like these CX series, or a Mazda6 - I don't know why anyone would get them.
"I like plasti-chrome on my f***ing underwear" this video is art no one can convince me otherwise
Lol, he just discovered Regular Car's channel, didn't he?
Had ours for three years and 25k miles with no issues. I bought it because it’s the smallest of the big three row suvs, since we knew it would be only kids or occasional adults in the back. The transmissions shifts great, tons of low end power, upmarket quality, and overall design sets it apart from the back. I’d highly recommend driving one and or some soccer mommy suv with a weezy v6.
How has the fuel economy been?
I think that is one of the first times I think I've seen you break character with the rear seat slider.
I look at the first Gen cx-9, and then I look at this. And I marvel. Mazda has done well with making their product stand out and evolve over time.
So have everyone else.
First gen was a 3 Row Ford Edge.
It may "stand out," but it doesn't sell.
@@Jacobk66 no it was not... it had Asin 6 Speed ATX , Fords very solid 3.7l V6 but build in Japan by and for Mazda , platform, steering, braking and handling were more like huge Mazda 6 rather than more boaty Ford .
@@stephenhendricks103 That's nice. Did I mention sales figures?
I pity anyone who sees this as their first SG video lmao
Yes is like a parody of a random car review
They're gonna be so confused lol
Ya gotta get loose occasionally.....
True
This is my first and I’m so confused 🤷♂️
I’ve driven the top trim CX-9 and top trim Telluride and both are great three row suvs but in my opinion the CX-9 is so much more enjoyable to drive. It doesn’t feel like a brick on wheels. Yes you sacrifice a little bit of space but I think these guys are over exaggerating a bit with that - the CX-9 is still an adequate sized 3-row SUV but it drives smaller then some of the other ones in its segment which is what I love about it. All depends on your preference
Forget the 3 row and cargo. Its a great hauler period. It drives like a sports sedan and is reliable as hell.
I miss the “i’m gonna get rid of this savagegeese, i’m gonna show you how to get rid of him on yelp etc etc..” part in the end of the video
I don't.
“What a waste of skin” was my fav
Those skits were the best
I'm rich why is this a problem!?
@@AnyBodyWannaPeanut Watch out we got a badass over here
I've had mine for five weeks and love it. I wanted something that could haul stuff if required with room for the grandkids but handles like a regular sedan and this is it. I went with a demonstrator model with 1200 miles and paid $39700 after my 2010 Ford Fusion trade in. I just retired and with Mazda's reliability this may be my last new purchase.
"This carpet pulls up, the pile is really nice, and when you vacuum it you can put lines in it" - Mark (12" C@#K) Sanevski
Hysterical video guys, keep it up!
The Geese are so good, that it's entertaining to watch the entirety of their videos even if you don't care about the vehicle at all. Well done, informative, and always good for a laugh. 15:00 LOL
I love the tribute to the retro Motorweek Reviews with Jack comically turning dials, flipping switches, and generally just man-handling the interior components of the car in a way that no one does.
I noticed that…LOL
We love our CX9. With only one kid it's perfect. Both adults are also not large, 5'7" and 5'2". If you are a larger person, this is not your car. The third row is only folded up once or twice a year. The driving Dynamics are great. This vehicle fits a niche.
I’m convinced that every shot in your videos is one take. How genuine.
15:22 Mr. Regular has entered the chat.
Mazda CX-9. The official car of "I need a family hauler but I don't really want one".
Lol. Yup.
Next thing you know, they'd be adding more toilet humor into the videos.
"Goose Poop"
Heh, that could catch on.
He was already here at 3:25
Mr. Goose toilet has more technology than the average car in regular car reviews (a fact that you didnt need)
Funny story, we test drove one this weekend. (1) The 2020 is the year to get (if you're shopping one), a lot of updates from 2019 (2) the Grand Touring is the package to get (3) the rear view camera resolution is the worst I have seen especially for a $40k vehicle (4) at this price range, the absence of a pano roof is a big negative (5) THE dadmobile to get for driving experience in this segment (6) really good deals right now due to overstock (7) low cargo space especially with 3 rows up
With rumors of the next gen Mazda 6 expected to go RWD I can see the CX-9 going to a RWD platform
I also test drove this weekend along with Highlander Palisade Ascent and Pilot. CX9 is the best deal and handle great. But it really lack the interior width and refinement. The vibration coming from the floor and engine doesn't sound as nice as the V6 from Honda and Toyota. Also like video mention the engine have great power down low then it flatten out quickly. Great for the price but I would go for Pilot with strong v6 airy feeling interior and heavy discount. Palisade is the most smooth and comfort with best interior but dealer asking $2k markup is a hard NO.
@druss999 lol
Everybody: "Make a bigger car for f*** sake."
Mazda: "No."
"... not on the outside, but on the inside please"
@@nischintr bruh that long ass hood 😂
Honda: good idea! (new CR-V has similar third row seats)
Half of Americans need to lose weight.
@@crazyone1067 lose
I don’t think $47k is too much for the MSRP when every one of its competitors is atleast that much, but more importantly Mazda dealers are anxious to move them so there are some incredible deals on them. I’ve spent lots of time behind the wheel of late model CX9’s and the interior is outstanding with surprisingly plush materials, very soft leather, the steering/handling/agility is outstanding for such a big vehicle but I agree that the ride can be crashy over certain pavement and the chassis doesn’t feel as rigid as some competitors. Other plus points are that the engine is extremely smooth for a 4-cylinder, transmission isn’t decent, and particularly in Soul Red this is a pretty sharp looking large SUV.
the cx9's biggest problem for my family is the lack of interior space and the compromised 3rd row
that being said this is by far the best looking entrant in this class Imo
Getting a 2020 CX9 Tomorrow!!!!!!!!!
The CX-9 sales are up for Mazda of the 2020 year. This reviewer should have mentioned that rather than make it a dinosaur that's dying off. It's a little older than the other Mazdas but it's still their flagship and it's still performing brilliant. Yes it's real wood(reviewer, do your homework). Do not rely on people such as this reviewer to make your buying decision. Rather take it from an owner or owners that's been driving the CX-9. I've had mine for over a year now. I can tell you it's been a pure joy of pleasure and reliability. It's been a very reliable automobile! Not all the competitors can say that.
Please review Consumer reports and check-out Car and Driver's reviews(best 3 row in it's class for 2019). The reason the CX-9 design has not changed is because it's simply timeless. Mazda nailed it! Best looking and
most reliable 3 row in it's class. Did I mention it gets 30 miles to the gallon on the highway. It has the best torque in its class, 320 pounds of it. It has very adequate space for hauling. Very few people pack their cars down like a U-Haul. It absorbs potholes extremely well. Not any shock waves going through my CX-9, lol.
Yes, there are definitely some areas that need updating for the CX-9. But they are subtle ones. Don't buy the signature package, go for the best bang for your buck, the touring package. I paid 36 thousand for the premium package upgrade. That's a great bargain for this car. Also, Toyota has so much faith in Mazda that it bought 5% of it. The CX-9 is a great car and this design will be around to admire for years to come! It's pure Japanese excellents. Mazdas will become a premium brand. They showcase that when they built the CX-9!
Forget about the car. . . Do you really have 12 inches? Asking for a friend.
Your friend could always ride a horse...more eco friendly
Lol same. I bet he does. 👁👄👁
his shoulders are as wide as a 16 year old girl's shoulders, I doubt even his legs are 12 inches
@@fullalbums5675 i guess that's why the call him tripod
Im dead. This comment is gold lol
Here we go again! No cargo space with the third row seats up. Well if you improve that .... It becomes a frickin VAN! Do you want practical, or something that doesn't look like a VAN?!
Well, we all know the answer to that one.
Absolutely, my wife needs a bigger vehicle but doesn't want a van. So this is exactly what were looking for, a good looking SUV that mostly never uses 3rd row.
@@leventsl If you don't need/want a 3rd row the CX-5 is 20" shorter than the CX-9, has a curb weight over 550 lbs less, an identical engine and drive train, has only about 11 cubic feet less overall cargo space, a similar upscale top trim and costs thousands less. And that's why Mazda sold over 5.5 times as many CX-5's as CX-9's in (156,000 vs 28,000) in 2019.
Agreed. If you need a 3rd row, you need a van. Get over it and stop deluding yourselves. You're not "sporty" because you drive an SUV.
These three row SUV's are for soccer moms who are in denial that they are lame soccer moms. If you have more than two screaming kids, you really do need a minivan.
33 upvotes? Bill Gates must be in the market for an SUV.
Mazda should make minivans again like the Mazda MPV or Mazda5, give them the same attention to detail in interior design as the CX9, but with a much more usable cargo hold. That would be an absolute winner for Mazda, and would be an interesting option in the minivan segment.
Minivans don't sell in US. But check the Mazda Biante for asian market only.
People do not buy minivans in the US. No matter the design or how much better for a family they may be.
Yup. But people don't buy minivans.
The Mazda 5s used to sell like hotcakes here in Canada. In fact, most "quirky" car designs (hatchbacks, wagons, cars with manual trans', etc.) are sold here because 'murica only wants big clunky cars with soft suspensions and 16 speed automatics. Every time I travel in the states, I'm appalled at how many 90 lbs housewives drive around in Chevy Suburbans and Dodge Rams.
I'd LOVE to see a new Mazda5, it's would be so nice to have a van that's not full sized, but people here reeeaallyy hate them despite all the advantages they offer. It's gonna be painful to see them go and get replaced by crossovers 🙄
In 2024, these are shaping up to be a nice value now that the CX-90 dropped
I drove an atlas, pilot, explorer and highlander. I will not drive a minivan, I was also coming from a 2012 expedition. I now own a 2020 CX-9. I picked it because I loved the drive over the rest of the seven passenger midsize suv. I also have 5 kids under 8 and like “fun” so the CX-9 was a great fit for me!
"...the CX-9 AWD system doesn't send power to the rear wheels quickly enough, which can result in torque steer if you need to accelerate away from a stop quickly."
" In dry conditions, the system is designed to minimize the amount of torque it sends to the rear wheels, which means during full-throttle acceleration, the CX-9 and its 310 lb-ft of torque will chirp the front tires and then proceed to torque-steer, leaving the driver to wrestle with the steering wheel. Considering the AWD control module is monitoring both the accelerator position and steering angle, I feel like the moment the accelerator pedal is depressed fully, power should be moved to the rear to mitigate the effects of all of that torque on the front wheels." Motor Trend
Meh, torque steer is fun. Who gives a shit.
Simple sticker tires on FWD version deal with all this great torque much better and make you accelerate much better when needed...
Yes cars with V6 and 50lbs of torque less allow you to be careless how you put power down and maybe better for soccer moms or average American car buyer.
Sticker tires that I have on my CX9 grip so much better than stock Falkens
Meanwhile, Toyota is selling 300 HP FWD TuRDs and people consider torque steer and wheel hop "sports sedan" features.
@@WoZIMoo Horsepower sells not torque just because 95% of people do not now than Torque is a usable power rating not horsepower.
So Mazda's 320 lbs tq will sell worse than Toyota's 300 hp.
Just bought my 6th Mazda coming from 2015 Mazda 6 . Bought a CX-9 GT for $35000 63 months 0% best Mazda I have owned by far.
0% for 63 months? Like lay away.
3:37
Sunglasses: I'm in danger
I just bought one of these, a 2022 Signature with the parchment interior (under red). I absolutely love it. I traded an Alfa Stelvio for it because the Stelvio wasn't large enough for the family but I wanted something that didn't make me miss the Stelvio too much. I still miss the Stelvio (I'll get a Giulia eventually) but I'm completely happy with the CX-9 whereas I don't think there's another three-row SUV I would be able to tolerate. I have to sacrifice a little space for a dynamics? Gladly. I have no interest in driving a truck no matter how practical. I love Mazda for the same reason I've always loved Alfa; they prioritize the driving experience over the pedestrian stuff (I've always seen Mazda as the Japanese Alfa... my kind of company). P.s., I love Mazda's response re space. Exactly. The (relatively) limited space will keep my wife from turning a vacation trip into a gypsy caravan; I'm all for that.
I bought my new Mazda 3 2020, M-Hybrid, Skyactiv-G 122, MT, Selection, Design Package (in Germany: Matrix LED, iActiveSafe) after watching your review(s) about how Mazda changed the game in the middle-class, hatchback space. I booked my test-drive just after i saw your video about good/bad. Tested also the new Golf, the Focus and the i30 with automatic. I didn't want any SUV, Crossover-thing because from the moment i stepped into the Mazda 3 i felt something special. And ohhhh yeah, the car is special. Is now at 1400km and i love it more every single day that i'm driving. Cheers.
Mazda makes a nice looking automobile in every class
They really do, it's crazy when I read comments saying the civic looks better than the 3.
Their cars are uglier than homemade sin. That's why their sales are way down, most people just don't like the styling. It is objectively ugly. Big dumb looking grills flanked by the worst looking wheel arches ever conceived and don't even get me started on the rear end of the 3. That car is hideous all the way around. I guess for some people, the only taste they have is in their mouths.
@@alansmilealot Yeah I bought a 2020 Mazda 3 hatch over the Civic equivalent due to the styling.
@@jasont.9559 Looks are subjective, dude, not objective. Grow up.
Jason T. Your very mad for whatever reason, lol. Mazda3 won car design of the year 2020, look it up LOL
But geese-man, Miata is already plenty big for my wife, kids, and girlfriend to ride along with me all the time.
His grilfriend is about the same age as his kids then
10:00 nice sweat stain on the headrest. The Takumis didn't see that coming
Never forget turbowski
But he's so forgettable. I had forgotten him until you made me remember him.
RIP Turbowski
Too late.
I watched the whole video. I still can't tell if it was 100% sarcasm, or if it was a real review...
Lots of sarcasm on this but final thoughts are 100% real.
Point is , this older product build for those few who appreciate driving with more feel than those looking for sofa on wheels like approach.
Power is awesome and very usable with no need to rev the hell out of these V6 based cars.
Good fuel economy , great torque to get you out of the corner if you even know what Im talking about here 😉
CX9 to me is more like large wagon than 3row CUV.
Previous gen CX9 was this kind of "American" CUV approach , huge interior , tons of space , cushier ride, V6 with lot of torque and power .....and what ? It still did not sell better either ! So what is the point here? Mazda is Mazda and they will continue to build cars for these few who appreciate the driving over hauling and who can appreciate attention to detail , design and beauty.
This greatly aging CX9 still looks so much cleaner and has amazing exterior proportions and look than any so called new designs .
Telluride mentioned here and everywhere , that is a nice brand New vehicle designed for American market that is one of the best in that kind of the vehicle but it is so heavily overrated in review world , drives big and feels rather large . Drove Pallisade and Telluride and Pally felt little tighter to drive and had better control over Telly but still not even close on thither roads to this "old" CX9 . I have used sticker tires 255 width and it applies power very well with no need to rev the hell out of the engine when you need it to move .
New one will come by 2022 looks like and I hope Mazda does not try to build another Telly here...
I hope for RWD , inline 6 3.2l with turbo pushing 320hp and 350tq , maybe 4 qubic feet of cargo more gained mostly by removal of 3 rd row (avail as package) New 8 speed ATX for RWD layout , Mazdas attention to design detail and same amazing sound system from new 3 with woofers hidden in the A pillars , 3 way speaker sounding that good.
Yes I'm European and in 5% of American car buyer and we buy cars too.
100% accurate description!
its likely going to be 3.0l as it would be based on the current 2.0l skyactiv-x (add 2 more cylinders). I don't see a turbo in the base trim/for a couple years, especially if theyre moving the cx-9 timeline up. Even if its naturally aspirated it would make 266hp and 248lbft at 3000rpm, a drop in torque for sure, but a gain in hp.
I'd guess the Mazda6 would probably be redone first just cuz its been out since 2013 (although heavily updated), and the cx9 to be built on it, although the cx9 should be a higher priority as you want sales.
Also I've noticed that it appears Mazda cares more about the European market than the North American one, which is quite interesting considering NA is currently the largest market they have.
@@HeavyMetalorRockfan9 3liter with out turbo with just 248lbs of torque for a large vehicle like CX9 will not be enough no matter how buttery smooth Mazda and Toyota can make this engine .
Mazdas balanced design fits world markets expectations much better than American market where size and bloat are a key .
This is the funniest review you have done. Had me in tears. Please more genuine comedy like this!!
These videos make my Monday morning enjoyable
I mean, if you need a third row AND lots of cargo space at the same time then wouldn't a minivan be a better choice?
The problem with the CX-9 is the poor use of the space it has. It is one of the largest 3 row SUVs with FWD based architecture with the smallest usable space. It's almost as long as a Chevy Tahoe. The 3rd row is a JOKE for even small kids. Just too old given the rapid pace of upgrading going on in this segment.
People HAAATE minivans, so that option is out sadly 🤷. They're the most hated vehicle type on the planet by far, which breaks my heart because i love them so much.
Yes, but the point is that the CX-9 inefficiently uses space, despite having similar dimensions to its rivals. A lot of the space is lost due to the seriously long front hood, which is (I believe) required for SkyActiv-G tech to work (and why every Mazda model has a long hood... for longer exhaust travel).
The complaints wouldn’t be warranted if the CX-9 was shorter than, say, a Highlander. But it’s not. In fact, it’s slightly longer than a Highlander, but with less interior volume.
Does the Highlander fare that much better with the third row? No. It suffers from the same issues as the CX-9, albeit with slightly more space. It’s still not viable to fit adults in the third row for longer trips. You still need a minivan for that.
@@darienmiller1032 in my country the same attitude has been common to wagons. And that makes me sad as well.
I have the 2019 and it's a great car. I don't use the 3rd row all the time and it's great to have it when you need it. I'm looking forward to the next gen CX9.
Couple of notes. The wood in the interior really is wood and not synthetic plastic made to look like wood! LOL! Also, for anyone seriously looking into the CX-9, the Grand Touring trim level is identical to the Signature sans the wood trim and premium leathers, but drops a few thousand off the price tag.
We want V8s and blow up dolls LOTS OF THEM make it happen doc
Peasant blockers.... that works 😆 happens to me every time
The people have spoken. Blow up dolls, mannequins, or GTFO.
As an owner of a 2019 CX-9 GT, I can understand the negative opinions. I am one of those owners that value the driving dynamics with enough space, vs having a lot of space with decent driving dynamics. I just feel that when I'm in it, I'm driving 100% of the time. I only need all the extra space 10% of the time.
However, for the American market, which thinks space is king, The CX-9 should be shrunken down to a large 2 row (aka CX-8 in Japan) and a new platform is needed for 3-row space efficiency.
You can. Put down 3rd row. Duh
I’ve owned a 2016 signature for 4 years and I don’t think it suffers structural rigidity. I was not on the market for a 3 row suv, I wanted something practical for a family of 4 (don’t need the 3rd row, it’s a bonus) without compromising on driving dynamics (my daily at the time was a bmw 128i manual and we lived in Colorado with frequent trips to the mountains. In fact I crossed shopped it against a jaguar Fpace but could not justify the $15k differences or similar equipment and the Mazda had better quality and materials. My next one may be a Genesis GV80, unless Mazda refreshes the CX9 with their rumored RWD platform
Problem with Mazda products is the American consumers are followers when it comes to automotive purchases. The Honda Pilot looks like a raised minivan yet if everyone has one I must have one!!! Mazda makes great products but unfortunately most consumers have tunnel vision
If you need three rows of seating, buy a full-size SUV or a minivan. These mid and below SUVs with dwarf-sized third rows are just silly.
It's true that midsize SUV's don't offer expansive third row seats. But they're not all created equal, either. The CX-9 and the Highlander are the only vehicles that offer less third row legroom than the 30" of a Mustang's back seat. (29.7" and 27.7" respectively.) All others offer nearly 32" or more. I own a KIA Sorento, 189" long, 10" less than the Mazda with 31.7" of legroom in the third row. We don't use it often and I wouldn't put a couple of passengers back there for a long road trip. But for chauffeuring a gaggle of teenagers to an event or a short trip for six or seven passengers when two vehicles would otherwise be required, the third row is a great convenience. It remains stowed probably 90% of the time but when we need it, it's a huge convenience.
But what if you don't need that third row that often? I own a minivan that has similar small third row seats, in 15 years I've used it about 10 times. It is awesome. Its good to have in rare case of needing to drive more people, but 99% of time car is used as 4-5 people carrier with big cargo area. Seats taking a bit of cargo area was never an issue. Buying bigger SUV or bigger minivan means it will be longer, it will be heavier, more fuel consumption and it will cost much more. CX-9 is a good compromise.
One of the funniest videos in a while, great job!
This truly is one of your best videos. Top lines: "Don't you want to help the economy, don't you WANT to go shopping?" and "Its the best SUV ever, except for this, it doesn't really fit anything in the back". Then, that sound you made (lifted from one of your other videos) when you floored it.. I mean, I watched this video yesterday and then today I watched it again.
The most stylish, sporty, premium feeling and one of the highest, if not the highest reliability record in its class. Mazda enjoys big market shares in Canada, Australia and many other counties... Unfortunately, they are under appreciated in the US and I can't see why
The new highlander is much better then this. Sorry.
"This carpet... pulls up" lmao
Really enjoying how Jack has fit in so well with these reviews! Keep up the awesome reviews and hoping you guys get to 1million subscribers quick!
The Highlander is overpriced. You can't find let alone get any discount on a Palisade or Telluride. The Pilot is aging even faster. The Explorer, eh, no style. CX9 is the best all around SUV in this class.
You remember when Curly left the Stooges and was replaced by Shemp? Still pretty good but not quite the same. Bring back Curly Turbowski. Pay him what he wants. He’s worth every penny.
Wow, totally disagree with this. CX 9 redone last year and looks really good compared to most SUVS I see out there. I guess everything is subjective
Man i hope the 2023 cx-90 is like this but a larger trunk, tow up to 5k lbs, and swap gloss black for matte black, satin silver, brushed aluminum(something not glossy and reflective)
I really appreciate my subarus, but i want something a little more refined but also reliable.
Best in class lever design
...that people do not buy.
Yeah, CX9 is not build for 95% of the so called American people.
It is a niche design and approach not a cookie cutter that is parked at every Wal-Mart around you.
k domster cookie cutter ? No it’s just not the best in class.
I have cx9 and 3 kids. Yes, its a bit tight, but the driving dynamics compensate for everything. The interior quality of every knob and button, you don't find in any other competitor. Want size? Get a minivan.
Probably haven't laughed this hard at one of your reviews in a while, loved every bit of banter and tom-foolery
I don't own a car, nor am I looking to ever buy one. But damn, I do love your videos.
Just gonna walk everywhere?
Liam Nissan he probably lives in Europe where they can walk everywhere and have decent public transportation
@@RestrictedHades Yep, managed to get about just fine with public transportation so far.
CX9 is such an interesting story, it was designed for North America market, but failed in market there, it was never intended for Australia/NZ market, it has been the best seller for the segment for several years now. I own one, totally agree everything said here, but I feel this is much better product than last gen Toyota Highlander which is still on sale here in Aus/NZ. And CX9 suits crappy Australian roads perfectly. Look forward to next generation battle between CX9 and Highlander.
2:52. I thought your friends would have gone Keto and eaten a breadless cod sandwich. Latte is so '90s.
Funny thing is that I bought the CX-9 as a family car for 2 kids. And exactly 365 days later, I bought a Miata RF for myself. Best of both worlds.
Todd Nguyen, I also have a CX9 but in Sig trim and mainly use it as family hauler but with only 2 kids so third row is stowed most of the time! For my commuter car I have a 6 which is also a nice driving sedan...both Mazda’s flagship models!
This is my first thumbs down to you. What ended up being a decent review started out so confusing. If long time viewers like me have a hard time clueing in on where sarcasm, funnies, and reality cross each other, what would a brand new viewer do? You guys deserve millions of subscribers, far more than those that other lesser reviewers have. But I think this is where it starts to break down. The first 5 minutes after your once slick intro really tripped me for not catching every twist in the funnies & sarcasm.
Ks So Well, I guess everyone should notice he ain‘t that serious when he mentioned his 12 inch schlong.
@@user-or9ey2ld6s Haha, no that is not what I think got confusing. I hope.
im practically autistic and yet I caught onto every moment where he was joking and where he wasn't. Dude, hes literally joking about teddy ruxpins, blowup dolls, and 12 inch cocks. Practically the entire drive segment was serious. If you can't tell hes serious there, you need to go outside and socialize more, and this is coming from an introverted person lol.
@@TheBanjoShowOfficial okay.
Thanks for all the great reviews. You guys are the best!
2:57 "It's got peasant blockers." lmao I am 100% stealing that term.
That an old one, lots of people say it. th-cam.com/video/1O6kttuSa1A/w-d-xo.html
I hadn’t heard it until this video. Peasant model cars sure (base). I was laughing my ass off after that and the rear seat adjustment.
first of all, it is VERY affordable in the real marketplace, especially slightly used.
second, if you are gonna bitch about the FWD feel, the only competitor i can think of that is RWD is the explorer. hopefully, at 47k, you are not putting any euro competition in against it.
finally, the torque steer...isisn't that due to the low-end power, which non of the "better" competition of which you speak can even offer.
non of the v6-lower mpgs engines offered by the competition are nearly as much fun in real, every day driving.
yes, DITCH THE THIRD ROW.
never understood why this wasn't an option.
all its competitors have a decent 3rd row, and regardless or not if you actually use it, it does remain a selling point in this class, though people who care about their 3rd row passengers *AND* want rear cargo space at the same time are best served with a van
that being said if this was a 2 row only CUV and a little shorter and lighter this could have been a solid competitor to the Passport and Murano
Bro, Mazda did that whole piano wood thing on the CX-9 and I can't believe you didn't realize that.
9:58 Yall remember Coming to America and the Soul Glow couch scene? LOL.
I was about to post the same thing! Glad i read through first lol
There are approximately 20 mainstream midsize SUV's for sale in the US. The CX-9 is among the largest in term of length (199"). Only the Dodge Durango and the enormous Chevy Traverse are longer. But in terms of passenger and cargo space, it's at the bottom of the list and not by a little. Less total cargo space than a Honda CR-V (71.2 cubic ft vs 75.8 cf)! Less passenger space than a KIA Sorento, (134 cubic ft vs 153 cf), a vehicle that's almost a foot shorter than the Mazda.
Of the various 3 row SUV's in the category only the CX-9 and Subaru Ascent do not offer a standard or optional V6 engine. The CX-9's turbo 4 isn't a bad motor, especially in a CX-5 or Mazda 6. But the CX-5 has a curb weight over 550 lbs less than the CX-9; the Mazda 6 is over 800 lbs lighter. And the Mazda's long-in-the-tooth 6 speed AT doesn't help especially given that rivals typically have 8 or more speeds in more recently developed transmissions.
All of this goes to making the CX-9 the worst selling mainstream SUV in the market place.(20th out of 20) In fact, it ranked 28th out of ALL midsize SUV's, mainstream and luxury in 2019 with fewer that 27,000 units sold. The KIA Telluride widely available for only 9 months in 2019 and plagued by supply problems sold over 58,000. And if that weren't bad enough, a severe recession and over 40 million unemployed in 2020 will undoubtedly be far worse.
Mazda's entire lineup (including SUV's and other vehicles) is in serious trouble. Only the CX-5 sold over 100K vehicles in 2019 and again 2020 looks worse. Mazda has built (and continues to build) some excellent vehicles but without a major turnaround it may well stop being the smallest independent mainstream brand on the market and become a division of Toyota. And that would be a shame.
So???
At least Mazda has a RWD/AWD sedan with an inline 6 Skyactiv-X engine with an 8 speed auto in the making. Hopefully that also translates to the CUVs.
I'm 6'1", 34" inseam, test drove a 2023 Carbon today, I've done tons of research on them, it feels so well engineered and drives so well compared to the other 3 rows I've driven in this segment, it's the vehicle I want, BUT the center console is so wide and tall, that my boney knee is constantly hitting it, there is no room to relax your right leg. So disappointing because I like everything else about it but I'm probably going to have to pass.
I'm 6'2" with a 32 inseam and never had leg comfort issues. You know you can adjust the steering wheel.
@@cdane63 Yeah, I took it for a 30 minute test drive, brought it to my house, tried everything I could. I guess my legs just need to bow out more than most to be comfortable.
Bro, you’re hilarious! And honestly I think the only Moto journalist that comes close to your editing, is FortNine!!
4:16 - Is this the new Mazda Sonata CX-9?
I lost it at the 12 inches comment😂😂😂. As always Mr. Goose, another great video.
This works for most people. Efficient, reliable, best to drive, great interior design and quality. Jack should stop making fun at the expense of this great vehicle.
Mike, I owned a 2017 Mazda CX9 Sig and I love driving it everyday, short trip and long trip. I enjoy driving it fully loaded specially on twisty/winding-uphill roads. Very fun vehicle to drive...The 2.5L turbo i4 is well capable. No issues at all. Yes, you’re right. It is efficient, reliable and best to drive. It is easy to maintain DIY. The only problem I had recently was the cv axle was leaking after I took it to the outside-auto shop for tire alignment.
Got the CX-9!!! Loving it!
Love Mazda; have owned several and will likely own more. When we recently went shopping for a new SUV, I suggested we test the Mazda CX9, Ford Explorer, Honda Pilot/Passport, Acura RDX, Toyota Highlander, and... Kia Telluride. My wife was surprised and balked at my last suggestion (I'm not a "snob" but I do a lot of research). So we tried them all out, and she's been loving her Kia Telluride EX for over 3 months now. Lots of tough competition out there, and as you showed in this review, the CX9 (for the price) is not quite competitive. They need to open up the insides some, make it a bit bigger and more roomy, and improve the visibility. Also, they need a 6 cylinder, at least as an option. It also wouldn't hurt if they would stop making all their cars/SUVs look the same. The only one with its own personality is the MX5 (one of several Mazdas we've owned). Thanks for the great follow-up review!
But it is $38k for entry level. Their entry level puts Ford and GMC to shame. It's an honest car. Drives well, good seats and above all good dynamics. It's not made for soccer families - instead, it appeals to older buyers who want comfort for four adults and plenty of luggage. It is an old style boulevardier - it cruises downtown looking sophisticated. I like it.
This guy is like if Doug DeMuro never escaped from the dark mental place he went into when he reviewed the Toyota Corolla hybrid.
I rented one of these about 2 years ago. My wife and I loved this car. The thing that I dislike about it is that as a large man, I hate that my knee rubbed against the center console. I had to use a small pillow for comfort.
Loving this.
You kept true to who you are, kept the humour, and still showcased the vehicle for what it is and what kind of life it fits into.
It's fine to love and geek out over high end, ultra modern, performance machines, but these run of the mill dailys... they and the people who rely on them deserve recognition.
You can make fun of them. You can joke about them. You can compare them to high end track weapons. Bag on them all you think you should, but in the end, it's not the Ferraris and Lambos, the Demons and C8 Corvettes that keep the country running. It's the regular cars. It's these, and those like it.
Thanks.
.
Oh, and I still have a soft spot for the Mazda 6.
I don’t need a bigger vehicle. A lot single people and empty nesters are fine with the space. I want to know how it drives. How does it feel on a long drive. I like the 3rd row for being in a pinch but I would most always have the 3rd row folded down. I use to own a super crew F150 and rarely used all the room. For a large family with 3 more kids sure I would not get it. But if I had just kids which most American families do then it’s more than enough room. Do we forget that most us use to fine with Honda Accords and Camrys as “family” vehicles?
ATF! I saw the Hyundai and Kia rivals, they are BIGGER and ZERO space in the back when third row is up. CX-9 has MORE space in hatch when third row is up. Also has more hidden pockets in the hatch area.
I had a car buddy get one of these fully loaded for under $40,000. He loves it.
Ya know, not everyone needs a big car, or lots of cargo room, or wants that. As for the third row, not everyone wants that either, you always have the option to keep the third row folded and reclaim a lot of cargo room, maybe someone will just use it in that config mainly, not everyone needs a third row.
Ride handling is big one I wish they would change. I've seen several CX-30 reviews mention similar things... when you hit any sort of rougher pavement or pot holes it doesn't not do well enough to absorb, isolate, and prevent it from transferring throughout the whole chassis/cabin. The 6 is supposedly getting a new RWD platform an I6 so hopefully so I'm guessing they'll wait to do a major refresh of the CX-9 until then.
I see the pandemic has had a certain effect to mental health.
Seriously though, glad to see more of the SG humor back into the videos.
I was considering looking at this suv to buy, but I changed my mind. That interior looks small especially for a 3rd row SUV. Most people in the US want more room especially for 47k.
Just drive it , it is best to drive amd look at from im and out from all of them and built and finished better than new holly cow of CUVs the Telluride. 2020 GT trim can be bought now for 35K usd and it is an amazing bargain ... while others will all pile on Kia with very little discount. This 2020 GT at 35K is a steal. Drive it first.
@@kdomster9141 Saving the $$$ doesn't make the CX-9 any larger. And that's why the CX-9 is the worst selling 3 row SUV in the marketplace.
still loving my 2016 GT. i love driving it every day. only complaint is lack of space in rear with both seats are up.
4:15 random Sonata clips
Thought I missed something. Had to rewind it a few times lol
oops?
The competitors never had and will never have the quality Mazda has no matter what they offer in terms of utilities.