Generative sequencers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @precarious333music
    @precarious333music 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great rundown. This will surely help anyone looking to add one to their rig. The different philosophies behind each really lend themselves to different users and different uses.

  • @stefanhansen5882
    @stefanhansen5882 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a wonderful demonstration! Thanks!

  • @mattbx
    @mattbx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very nice rundown! thanks a lot

  • @electricarchaic
    @electricarchaic 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful, I want to get more into this generative sequencing for recording and some day live performing (when I have enough modules to really do a show). I just got Afeter Later steps yesterday and had no idea how to make it worth it’s salt. Gonna give it a more educated go tonight :)

  • @bongo10110
    @bongo10110 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you tie notes with any of these? thx

    • @JohnSchussler
      @JohnSchussler  18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Tuesday doesn't have slide, but Bloom has slew which can be the same. Not sure about the others.

  • @jdanielcramer
    @jdanielcramer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lurvly 😻 love these comparisons you do! In my Krell patches I always use some sort generative module or sub-patch to provide the pitch CVs, in the original Krell, Barton used a clocked random source like S&H with LFO or noise. Check out my latest video in which I created a poly-Krell by sampling the CV output of a keyboard playing fast arpeggios (lets me change notes/scales on the fly) what’s that last blue module you demo? I love the way it gives you probability of each pitch, great job👍

    • @JohnSchussler
      @JohnSchussler  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The last one is the Omsonic "Stochastic Inspiration Generator." In limited production, but I hear they may be coming out with another batch soon.

  • @TerekkiTerekki
    @TerekkiTerekki 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mutate on Bloom ‘is’ destructive - branch/path are non destructive

  • @stephanmobius1380
    @stephanmobius1380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you feed a non-regular clock into Tuesday??? The Tick and Beat LEDs look unsteady. Why did the melodies then play so steady? Or is this some sort of moiree pattern with the video framerate?

    • @JohnSchussler
      @JohnSchussler  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Weird, I hadn't noticed that. It's a regular/even clock. I don't actually know why they're doing that....

    • @JohnSchussler
      @JohnSchussler  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Huh. Just looked at the LED flash pattern on my Chloe vid (th-cam.com/video/3qJTVPSFYn8/w-d-xo.html), and it's doing the same thing. Must be a camera shutter issue.

    • @stephanmobius1380
      @stephanmobius1380 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JohnSchussler Good to know. Thanks for clearing this up. Very interesting module that Chloe!

  • @meerkatzThe23
    @meerkatzThe23 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    marbles doesn't fit in here?

    • @JohnSchussler
      @JohnSchussler  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pachinko is a shrunken version of Marbles.

  • @snörre23
    @snörre23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    to be honest after listening to the whole thing again i still prefer a plain sample and hold, maybe feed it sth else than only white noise and attenuate or offset it and use some kind of random gate for triggering. I dont even care about quantization.

  • @a.zarrouk5347
    @a.zarrouk5347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the problem with the majority of those sequencers is the lack of reset that makes them unuseful (try to stop and replay the sequence and you will have another melody :) ) or maybe am i missing something?

    • @joshk2181
      @joshk2181 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the stochastic and marbles clone both allow the segments to be looped with the sig letting you scrub thru past notes, and marbles letting a certain % of new notes into the seq :)

    • @snörre23
      @snörre23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      For me the randomness and unpredictability is their appeal.