Thank you for another great video. It was both great learning for the intended purpose as well as getting over the "terrifying fear of failure" when winding toroids.
Thanks for the excellent video! I do a lot of breadboarding, and I am intrigued by the stick-on solder pads. Where did you get those, or did you make them? Again, thanks for the video.
Thanks very much Ted. There are several sources for the pads online. Just Google "manhattan pcb pads" and you'll find some. QRPme, Kanga and eBay all gave me some options. 73, Nick
Thanks for watching. Yes, all my simulations are based on ideal components. Practical reality is something different though! That's what makes it interesting. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing If you short the secondary of the transformer and measure the inductance on the primary that will give you the leakage inductor. You could add that in series with the primary and leave the k=1.0. KN6MDB 73
Hi Nick, great video as always. I have watched your video and read Hans Summers' document. I have mocked up a circuit in LT Spice but when I look at the trace V004, all I get is a flat line. As far as I can see, other than component values, my schematic is the same as yours in LT spice. Any suggestions or advice? I am new to homebrew and LT spice (sigh).. Thanks again!
Hi Ryan, without looking at what you've done it is hard to comment. What I would suggest though is try an LTSpice simulation with my values for my frequency range. It might help to narrow down where the issue is. All the best to you. 73, Nick
Thanks. If you look at my final comparison between the LTSpice simulation and my sweep on the Spectrum Analyser then you can actually see for yourself. It is a sweep from 15 - 30 MHz: each horizontal division is 1.5 MHz and each vertical division is 10dB. You'll find it at 32:15 in the video. Basically 20m is nearly 40dB down, 17m about 20dB down and 10m about 30dB down. Hope this helps. 73, Nick
Hi Michal! Yes, it's a tried and trusted design. You can use different designs and possibly get steeper skirts though. Check out Bill Meara's experiments on the Soldersmoke Blog and the Soldersmoke TH-cam site. I tend to stick with these simple double tuned circuits though.
Hi there! I bought some of these: www.ebay.co.uk/itm/296288883417?itmmeta=01J3V1V45QPBEM188ZA7RXJV3W&hash=item44fc3192d9:g:VZ0AAOSw1CRbU0lr&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAABINUd9x5oq35f6vhbuaBQ9bjEghcaXGpY8u%2BNhd4APrNqAVaXVfCXE9R8zVxpHf0%2FX4O1eI1F3lcsedz4f3YkJeumRfGLkJ00M5nbx4N6QBnQbr9Nll8oIKH9lNUuEIm2RSxSKGfLNDlmHL7rW3brBk%2BEgwg68bfClUJ0dAtReakUKfeE1HW5j8jaavbF0ylgCMt9FIctQFm6A%2BCKsPqI%2Fzcdil5Obh0hp1f85tD3XkxdGfPkqSwOARz7yN0KPZ%2FCrHYAhViH%2FpeTpo5gCF5DkLrmurXLxbtnwEAG5CPYvuPowx3bWENj211MltkXgfU9pxs7THxDkS7Gacr9WSCPyDKNbI6OWH6zeiSveDVRGVKdfPoudSEqkFOwNcZaQ7QjUg%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR_TC7OGeZA&edge=1
Hi there! I think you mean toroids rather than ferrites - as these are not ferrites they are iron dust cores. But I know what you mean! To be honest the insertion loss is so low with these kind of filters (mine are typically less than 1 dB) that for HF frequencies it is probably not worth worrying about. Once you get higher in frequency then I agree - the inductors get smaller, the losses get bigger and air-core is a much better option. Thanks very much for watching and commenting. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing yes. I was using ferrites in a generic sense to cover any metal.powder. but do you really think a dB of loss is low? It adds directly to noise figure in a receiver and sucks power from a transmitter.
I take your point but to be honest when you are building from scratch manhattan-style you will inevitably introduce losses all over the place. The only real question is how much loss are you prepared to live with? Your mileage may vary, as they say. Thanks again. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing You're right. But my recent history has been 30GHz transceivers for space use. In that situation, even 2mm of pcb track from the antenna probe to the first HEMT FET introduced unacceptable loss. The probe need retuning to be a noise match to the FET with direct connection. Mileages do indeed vary.
Was just wondering how much power your bandpass filter is capable of handling? The design looks like it would be perfect for Field Day filters here in the US. 73 AE3D.
Hi Keith, the one in the video will be good up to about 20 watts or so. It depends on the toroid type you are using. If you look inside a commercial rig rated at 100W output then you won't usually see huge toroids - probably T50-6 for the higher HF bands. Having said that for my Shelf-17 rig which puts out 80+W on 17m I used T68-6 just to be safe! Your mileage may vary as they say. 73, Nick
Thanks very much. You can certainly use your NanoVNA but you just have to remember that it is expecting to 'see' an impedance of 50Ω. Personally I'd wind 11 turns primary (1.5KΩ end) and 2 turns secondary (50Ω end) on an FT37-43 and then measure the impedance (smith chart & SWR). This should be fine on RX or TX - assuming the next stage has a 50Ω impedance of course. Hope this helps. 73, Nick
My primary is 50ohm (antenna), the secondary is 1500 Ohm (input of NE602). I am using a similar pass band with with Toko coils. Are you saying that the S11 port of the nanoVNa needs to see 50 ohms? If so, I will place the primary on that port and the 1500 ohm side on the S21 port? will that work?@@M0NTVHomebrewing
Hi, sorry but I'm not really sure what you are trying to measure. Both ports of the NanoVNA expect to see 50Ω. In my last comment I described an impedance matching transformer to connect your NE602 (Z=1500Ω) to something else (e.g. band pass filter, antenna etc) with Z=50Ω. You can tell how well you have matched this by doing an S11 measurement on the 50Ω end of your transformer. You'll be reading (Smith chart and SWR) how much signal is going through and how much is being reflected back because of impedance mismatch. 73, Nick
Correct - although theoretically there is such a thing as a "lossless" transformer in reality you'll never build one. The practical reality of building a transformer means there will be some losses. These losses needn't be huge though. As long as you build them as carefully as you can you should be fine. Happy toroid-winding! 73, Nick
I’ve been a fool! I’ve gone and passed up constantly on those adjustable capacitors. The big big ceramic and metal ones?! I want to sink my head into the sand like an ostrich now when I see how much those baby’s fetch on eBay…. Hey?!? Your schematic there? It looks like the sort of circuit that goes between mains and transformer inside those ‘power conditioners’!?! ‘Common mode rejection’ - ahhhh I’m beginning to learn a few things here!! Edit: I absolutely love your ‘through hole components’ surface mounted to your copper clad board - very smart way to go while you’ll be presenting your board on camera. It looks great!
Hi there! I don't attempt to measure the Q of my inductors in band pass filters. I've found that all that is really necessary is to build them as carefully as possible. Being able to measure them is useful (I use a Peak Atlas LCR45 meter) but even then you'll need to tweak them by adding or subtracting turns or by separating or compressing them. Once you've got them exactly where you want them and the filter is complete then it is good to fix them with glue, wax or whatever so nothing moves around. In terms of buying the toroid cores then I usually use a few trusted sources e.g. Club Sales at the GQRP Club or www.sotabeams.co.uk Hope this helps. Thanks for watching. 73, Nick
Hi there! The best advice I can give you is to refer to Hans Summers' instructions (which I have linked to in the description of this video). If you're feeling adventurous and want to design your own then I find a filter design simulator very useful. One of my favourites is markimicrowave.com/technical-resources/tools/lc-filter-design-tool/ Hope this helps. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing Thanks alot for your answer! I tried to recalculate and I realized that if we use both Cap (23pf and 30pf) we would get nearly 21Mhz. My question is now that could I get FM signal with this SSB receiver?
You might be able to listen to some FM signals using the slope detection method (google it!) but if you are serious about FM demodulation then really that requires something of a redesign. FM is a fascinating thing but it is a whole different form of modulation and so requires a different approach. 73, Nick
I'm planning on getting my ham license and I'm already into ee as a hobby. The only piece of gear I don't have for all this is an sa. I'm planning to buy a siglent. Is the plus model worth the extra money for the mod I read about on the eevblog website. Also what are the names of those good variable caps you have? Great content my friend. I'm new to rf but it seems like the logical path to follow and a great hobby.
Hi there! Thanks for watching. I've not done to mod to the Siglent so I can't say about this but it is a tremendous piece of equipment. That said, you can also get a long way with a Tiny SA these days. The variable trimmer caps are like these: www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284572247234?hash=item4241d3e4c2:g:JMwAAOSw4hRhvG2z&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA8A8n5ZoK6A0Nd%2FkE4Z6RL71zssBh0Gf%2FIW5utLhXQZ15HLlCtZV6CbQCNQoPhp%2FnjGtdFZrwaqfmY3KqtbAuCt%2FJ0clywg8ACMGgiNpyKDOt201FLOrqjmtFbCa40XD6znc4gVIoT7GOUdpVuU0jli3evXFyhVyOkf%2Ft74T1eRHAlkSlIxn2xM7q0BIMMn5w4CsENH8veQBkpUDyptHH7D%2BUecx%2Bk0gozs3Y2HXajwvZHvcD06fqXPI2w2y7jHZMii4RXq0QBz06V7s8qi6U9KiT9WsLhrt6WXV2zDlh9fho0V%2FVtsFS55iIgxUsA9o9uw%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR4LN5o-bYw All the best as you go forward into Ham Radio - it's a great hobby! 73, Nick M0NTV
wondering now about perhaps shaping curves into the strings of an electric guitar to add an adjustment layer. kind of like an eq with strings and pegs 😂
Hi Mikele, band pass filters are always a trade off between 2 properties: (1) the bandwidth of your filter and (2) the insertion loss of your filter. The narrower you make the bandwidth the more insertion loss you're likely to get. It also works the other way of course: a wider bandwidth = lower insertion loss. So it is always something of a compromise. Having said this I've build many of these for 80m and had no more than 1 dB IL. Using good quality trimmer caps helps - as does careful construction of your inductors. I made another (earlier) video on this which might be of interest: th-cam.com/video/dZnvpxVd7dc/w-d-xo.html (NB. Make sure you read the description about the error in the onscreen schematic!). Hope this helps and all the best to you. Keep going! 73, Nick
George was such a great inspiration to so many people - myself included. I'm sorry I never got a chance to meet him myself. I do still study his designs though and his enthusiasm was infectious. Thanks for watching. 73, Nick
You make & Tune Excellent filters.....The Actual sweep run to Model is 'bout as Close as it gets !! .....Just for Educational & Practically purposes, Maybe you could Make an Identical Filter using hand wound #14 or 16 wire gauge Air Core inductors (Instead of Toroidal core) & show the sweep run loss Differences if any.....I almost Always have a usable piece of Enameled magnet wire around the shop & almost Never have the Correct Size & ferrite Mix type thats needed & probably Most of us beginners get initially Better results & feel more Confident winding Simple cylindrical Coils.....
Thanks Tom. Depending on the frequency you wouldn't be able to practically use an air-core coil. You could for VHF but for HF they would have to be pretty big in order to get the required inductance. Best idea is to stock up on type 6 yellow iron dust toroids (T37-6, T50-6). This will tackle 30m and above. I'd probably then use type 2 red (T37-2, T50-2) for 160, 80, 60 & 40m. Air-core coils are useful in filters where you need very small amounts of inductance though. 73, Nick
Great as always mate, the enthusiasm is infectious!
Cheers Al! Many congrats on the morse too!!! 73 my friend, Nick
Excellent video. You showed how to calibrate the BPF and what each capacitor and side of the BPF does. Thank you for putting this together. 73, KC9REN
Thanks very much. Glad it was of some help. 73, Nick
It was very good to see how well the modelling and design matched the practical result. Thanks for making the video,. 🙂
Thanks Ace , you’re welcome 👍
That insertion loss is amazing i hope i manage to build a few different filters with comparable results but thats the fun in building them
Thanks Tim. All the very best with your own filter building. 73, Nick
Superb video, thanks for posting - off to warm up the iron 👍
Thanks so much Josh! Have a good weekend. 73 Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing and you! 73
Thank you for another great video. It was both great learning for the intended purpose as well as getting over the "terrifying fear of failure" when winding toroids.
Thanks Buck. Glad it was useful. 73, Nick
Way to Nick, you have succeeded in building the perfect BPF!! I can only hope to do so well..
Thanks Ed. Some are better than others but this one worked out pretty well. 73 Nick
Thank you!!!!
The algo brought me here, trying to make a High-Q filter for APRS, but I'm not confident that I won't be able to do it.
Thanks!
73
Thanks very much. You are welcome James! 73, Nick
Excellent video. Keep them coming!
Thanks very much Jim. 73 Nick
Thanks for the excellent video! I do a lot of breadboarding, and I am intrigued by the stick-on solder pads. Where did you get those, or did you make them? Again, thanks for the video.
Thanks very much Ted. There are several sources for the pads online. Just Google "manhattan pcb pads" and you'll find some. QRPme, Kanga and eBay all gave me some options. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing Thank you so much! I had never heard of these before.
@@M0NTVHomebrewing - Thank you. I found some and they are on order.
No worries Ted. Glad you tracked some down! 73, Nick
Nice video. Note in your simulation you have the K value=1 which means you have know leakage inductance in your simulation.
Thanks for watching. Yes, all my simulations are based on ideal components. Practical reality is something different though! That's what makes it interesting. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing If you short the secondary of the transformer and measure the inductance on the primary that will give you the leakage inductor. You could add that in series with the primary and leave the k=1.0. KN6MDB 73
Hi Nick, great video as always. I have watched your video and read Hans Summers' document. I have mocked up a circuit in LT Spice but when I look at the trace V004, all I get is a flat line. As far as I can see, other than component values, my schematic is the same as yours in LT spice. Any suggestions or advice? I am new to homebrew and LT spice (sigh).. Thanks again!
Hi Ryan, without looking at what you've done it is hard to comment. What I would suggest though is try an LTSpice simulation with my values for my frequency range. It might help to narrow down where the issue is. All the best to you. 73, Nick
Really like it! Can you share what is the attenuation of surrounding bands for 21MHz filter? I mean dB down for 14, 18MHz and 24/28MHz?
Thanks. If you look at my final comparison between the LTSpice simulation and my sweep on the Spectrum Analyser then you can actually see for yourself. It is a sweep from 15 - 30 MHz: each horizontal division is 1.5 MHz and each vertical division is 10dB. You'll find it at 32:15 in the video. Basically 20m is nearly 40dB down, 17m about 20dB down and 10m about 30dB down. Hope this helps. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing Hi, that's exactly what I need. I plan to build a set of filters for 40/20/15 meters and this design looks pretty efficient.
Hi Michal! Yes, it's a tried and trusted design. You can use different designs and possibly get steeper skirts though. Check out Bill Meara's experiments on the Soldersmoke Blog and the Soldersmoke TH-cam site. I tend to stick with these simple double tuned circuits though.
Nice work. Would like to try my hands on something like that, what is the model number of those trimmer capacitors and where did you buy them from?
Hi there! I bought some of these: www.ebay.co.uk/itm/296288883417?itmmeta=01J3V1V45QPBEM188ZA7RXJV3W&hash=item44fc3192d9:g:VZ0AAOSw1CRbU0lr&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAABINUd9x5oq35f6vhbuaBQ9bjEghcaXGpY8u%2BNhd4APrNqAVaXVfCXE9R8zVxpHf0%2FX4O1eI1F3lcsedz4f3YkJeumRfGLkJ00M5nbx4N6QBnQbr9Nll8oIKH9lNUuEIm2RSxSKGfLNDlmHL7rW3brBk%2BEgwg68bfClUJ0dAtReakUKfeE1HW5j8jaavbF0ylgCMt9FIctQFm6A%2BCKsPqI%2Fzcdil5Obh0hp1f85tD3XkxdGfPkqSwOARz7yN0KPZ%2FCrHYAhViH%2FpeTpo5gCF5DkLrmurXLxbtnwEAG5CPYvuPowx3bWENj211MltkXgfU9pxs7THxDkS7Gacr9WSCPyDKNbI6OWH6zeiSveDVRGVKdfPoudSEqkFOwNcZaQ7QjUg%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR_TC7OGeZA&edge=1
Thank you so much for that link, I will definitely check it out. 73 Fer now, VA3TSU
If you can make your inductors with an air core, do so. Most of the insertion loss in these filters is in the ferrites.
Hi there! I think you mean toroids rather than ferrites - as these are not ferrites they are iron dust cores. But I know what you mean! To be honest the insertion loss is so low with these kind of filters (mine are typically less than 1 dB) that for HF frequencies it is probably not worth worrying about. Once you get higher in frequency then I agree - the inductors get smaller, the losses get bigger and air-core is a much better option. Thanks very much for watching and commenting. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing yes. I was using ferrites in a generic sense to cover any metal.powder. but do you really think a dB of loss is low? It adds directly to noise figure in a receiver and sucks power from a transmitter.
I take your point but to be honest when you are building from scratch manhattan-style you will inevitably introduce losses all over the place. The only real question is how much loss are you prepared to live with? Your mileage may vary, as they say. Thanks again. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing You're right. But my recent history has been 30GHz transceivers for space use. In that situation, even 2mm of pcb track from the antenna probe to the first HEMT FET introduced unacceptable loss. The probe need retuning to be a noise match to the FET with direct connection. Mileages do indeed vary.
Was just wondering how much power your bandpass filter is capable of handling? The design looks like it would be perfect for Field Day filters here in the US. 73 AE3D.
Hi Keith, the one in the video will be good up to about 20 watts or so. It depends on the toroid type you are using. If you look inside a commercial rig rated at 100W output then you won't usually see huge toroids - probably T50-6 for the higher HF bands. Having said that for my Shelf-17 rig which puts out 80+W on 17m I used T68-6 just to be safe! Your mileage may vary as they say. 73, Nick
Nice job! Extremely low loss. Can you use the NanoVNa if your output impedance is 1.5K, so 50:1.5K ( I have a NE602 after the bandpass)?
Thanks very much. You can certainly use your NanoVNA but you just have to remember that it is expecting to 'see' an impedance of 50Ω. Personally I'd wind 11 turns primary (1.5KΩ end) and 2 turns secondary (50Ω end) on an FT37-43 and then measure the impedance (smith chart & SWR). This should be fine on RX or TX - assuming the next stage has a 50Ω impedance of course. Hope this helps. 73, Nick
My primary is 50ohm (antenna), the secondary is 1500 Ohm (input of NE602). I am using a similar pass band with with Toko coils. Are you saying that the S11 port of the nanoVNa needs to see 50 ohms? If so, I will place the primary on that port and the 1500 ohm side on the S21 port? will that work?@@M0NTVHomebrewing
Hi, sorry but I'm not really sure what you are trying to measure. Both ports of the NanoVNA expect to see 50Ω. In my last comment I described an impedance matching transformer to connect your NE602 (Z=1500Ω) to something else (e.g. band pass filter, antenna etc) with Z=50Ω. You can tell how well you have matched this by doing an S11 measurement on the 50Ω end of your transformer. You'll be reading (Smith chart and SWR) how much signal is going through and how much is being reflected back because of impedance mismatch. 73, Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing sounds good. I will have some extra losses with the “adapter” transformer. Correct?
Correct - although theoretically there is such a thing as a "lossless" transformer in reality you'll never build one. The practical reality of building a transformer means there will be some losses. These losses needn't be huge though. As long as you build them as carefully as you can you should be fine. Happy toroid-winding! 73, Nick
Very good video.
Thanks very much. 73, Nick
I’ve been a fool! I’ve gone and passed up constantly on those adjustable capacitors. The big big ceramic and metal ones?! I want to sink my head into the sand like an ostrich now when I see how much those baby’s fetch on eBay…. Hey?!? Your schematic there? It looks like the sort of circuit that goes between mains and transformer inside those ‘power conditioners’!?! ‘Common mode rejection’ - ahhhh I’m beginning to learn a few things here!!
Edit: I absolutely love your ‘through hole components’ surface mounted to your copper clad board - very smart way to go while you’ll be presenting your board on camera. It looks great!
Thanks very much. 73, Nick
Hello, how you assess Q of inductors on 21 mhz? And where to buy realible t37-6 iron?
Hi there! I don't attempt to measure the Q of my inductors in band pass filters. I've found that all that is really necessary is to build them as carefully as possible. Being able to measure them is useful (I use a Peak Atlas LCR45 meter) but even then you'll need to tweak them by adding or subtracting turns or by separating or compressing them. Once you've got them exactly where you want them and the filter is complete then it is good to fix them with glue, wax or whatever so nothing moves around. In terms of buying the toroid cores then I usually use a few trusted sources e.g. Club Sales at the GQRP Club or www.sotabeams.co.uk
Hope this helps. Thanks for watching. 73, Nick
Hallo Nick, tolles Filter.Wo gibt es diese quadratischen uggly style kupferpads zu kaufen? 73, walter
Hallo! Wenn Sie "Manhattan PCB Pads" googeln, sollten Sie ein paar Treffer erhalten, z. www.ebay.co.uk/itm/143826734716. Hoffe das hilft. 73 Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing Hallo Nick, super danke für ihre info.......ich seh mal nach. Hab auch einen Nano Vna , macht viel freude.
73, walter
Keine Sorge. Gern geschehen. 73 Nick
very cool
Cheers! 73, Nick
Thankyou
You are welcome! 73, Nick
Sorry, could you explain me how to calculate the L and C for designing center frequency ò a BPF ? Thanks
I mean that if I use the formula: F = 1/(2*pi*sqrt(L*C)). So I don't get 21Mhz as your!
Hi there! The best advice I can give you is to refer to Hans Summers' instructions (which I have linked to in the description of this video). If you're feeling adventurous and want to design your own then I find a filter design simulator very useful. One of my favourites is markimicrowave.com/technical-resources/tools/lc-filter-design-tool/
Hope this helps.
73,
Nick
@@M0NTVHomebrewing Thanks alot for your answer! I tried to recalculate and I realized that if we use both Cap (23pf and 30pf) we would get nearly 21Mhz. My question is now that could I get FM signal with this SSB receiver?
You might be able to listen to some FM signals using the slope detection method (google it!) but if you are serious about FM demodulation then really that requires something of a redesign. FM is a fascinating thing but it is a whole different form of modulation and so requires a different approach. 73, Nick
I'm planning on getting my ham license and I'm already into ee as a hobby. The only piece of gear I don't have for all this is an sa. I'm planning to buy a siglent. Is the plus model worth the extra money for the mod I read about on the eevblog website.
Also what are the names of those good variable caps you have?
Great content my friend. I'm new to rf but it seems like the logical path to follow and a great hobby.
Hi there! Thanks for watching. I've not done to mod to the Siglent so I can't say about this but it is a tremendous piece of equipment. That said, you can also get a long way with a Tiny SA these days.
The variable trimmer caps are like these: www.ebay.co.uk/itm/284572247234?hash=item4241d3e4c2:g:JMwAAOSw4hRhvG2z&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA8A8n5ZoK6A0Nd%2FkE4Z6RL71zssBh0Gf%2FIW5utLhXQZ15HLlCtZV6CbQCNQoPhp%2FnjGtdFZrwaqfmY3KqtbAuCt%2FJ0clywg8ACMGgiNpyKDOt201FLOrqjmtFbCa40XD6znc4gVIoT7GOUdpVuU0jli3evXFyhVyOkf%2Ft74T1eRHAlkSlIxn2xM7q0BIMMn5w4CsENH8veQBkpUDyptHH7D%2BUecx%2Bk0gozs3Y2HXajwvZHvcD06fqXPI2w2y7jHZMii4RXq0QBz06V7s8qi6U9KiT9WsLhrt6WXV2zDlh9fho0V%2FVtsFS55iIgxUsA9o9uw%3D%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR4LN5o-bYw
All the best as you go forward into Ham Radio - it's a great hobby! 73, Nick M0NTV
I don't have a pile of money, but if NanoVNA's were $150 I would still buy one. They simply do so much so well.
You're absolutely right John. I was a bit of an 'early adopter' and so mine is an old one but it still works so well. Thanks for watching. 73 Nick
Nanovna ir only 40
Tnx
You are welcome. 73, Nick
wondering now about perhaps shaping curves into the strings of an electric guitar to add an adjustment layer. kind of like an eq with strings and pegs 😂
hello...i try lot of thing with this filter 80m band but insertion loss is about 2,5 -3db aprox....73 de 9a3xz Mikele
Hi Mikele, band pass filters are always a trade off between 2 properties: (1) the bandwidth of your filter and (2) the insertion loss of your filter. The narrower you make the bandwidth the more insertion loss you're likely to get. It also works the other way of course: a wider bandwidth = lower insertion loss. So it is always something of a compromise. Having said this I've build many of these for 80m and had no more than 1 dB IL. Using good quality trimmer caps helps - as does careful construction of your inductors. I made another (earlier) video on this which might be of interest: th-cam.com/video/dZnvpxVd7dc/w-d-xo.html (NB. Make sure you read the description about the error in the onscreen schematic!). Hope this helps and all the best to you. Keep going! 73, Nick
many thanks@@M0NTVHomebrewing
Is Nick the Vic the second coming of George Dobbs?? 🤣🤣. Great vid!
George was such a great inspiration to so many people - myself included. I'm sorry I never got a chance to meet him myself. I do still study his designs though and his enthusiasm was infectious. Thanks for watching. 73, Nick
That's why tuning screw drivers are plastic.
You make & Tune Excellent filters.....The Actual sweep run to Model is 'bout as Close as it gets !! .....Just for Educational & Practically purposes, Maybe you could Make an Identical Filter using hand wound #14 or 16 wire gauge Air Core inductors (Instead of Toroidal core) & show the sweep run loss Differences if any.....I almost Always have a usable piece of Enameled magnet wire around the shop & almost Never have the Correct Size & ferrite Mix type thats needed & probably Most of us beginners get initially Better results & feel more Confident winding Simple cylindrical Coils.....
Thanks Tom. Depending on the frequency you wouldn't be able to practically use an air-core coil. You could for VHF but for HF they would have to be pretty big in order to get the required inductance. Best idea is to stock up on type 6 yellow iron dust toroids (T37-6, T50-6). This will tackle 30m and above. I'd probably then use type 2 red (T37-2, T50-2) for 160, 80, 60 & 40m. Air-core coils are useful in filters where you need very small amounts of inductance though. 73, Nick