fr right now is "third party and camping: the game" and there's barely any incentive to w key due to the fact that you will get punished by the awful ranked system
maybe not siphon but they drop minis like reloaded or something... siphon is literally a mythic level ability as evident by c5s2 hades medallion. Sure its helpful but I dont see the pros complaining about it.
your videos got me a really close crown win a few nights ago (1 hp left) to keep it short i remembered i could rotate to high ground through storm in a top 3 situation instead of being really loud and obvious climbing up a hill and it put me in position to win the final 1v1 at the end of the fight so thanks for making content and teaching people the strats of the pros
Really liked the video Reisshub! I would also really enjoy if you talked about the cheating problem rn in zero build, its getting really chaotic, every tournament theres over 200-300 teams clearly cheating, ruining everyones tournament and stealing earnings from everyone whos really trying to get something out of this game. Keep up the good work!
they need too hire reisshub too do fncs because then we would have risks being taken in the format and if a format is hated or doesnt work we would know that risks would be taken too improve it and we would be testing the formats until we get an amazing format from all the feedback.
@pleshy5646 no, just not the entire team going on vacation during fncs. they literally have the entire year planned out in the first month with small changes throughout
15 teams skip semis. Semis day 1: Top 15 from upper and top 1 from lower. Semis day 2: Top 15 from upper and top 1 from lower. Semis day 3: 3 reboot rounds.
I want more prizes per match/round. Most wins, most damage... Could add some old Fortnite type fun with things like longest knock/elim, pickaxe elim, things like that would make me more engaged as a viewer.
I actually really like auto quals because it makes the set lobbies actually worthwhile, but I disagree that semis are bad/boring, we've seen big teams missing grands even with semis and the quality of the games is definitely not bad, however, I think the semis format we had in like ch3 was pretty solid, we had consistent teams and winning teams qualing in the same session
My idea for semis: no break from quals. Instead, 10 games the first weekend, 20 games every other weekend. Whoever gets the victory royale goes to grands (basically reboot rounds). Placement in quals would matter because since only 50 duos can play at a time, only the top 50 of those remaining get to play. Therefore, if a team places 99th they only get to play the last two games (they only have 2 opportunities to win), while if it places 56th they start playing after 6 games (they get 44 opportunities to win). This system gets rid of the big break and incentivises everyone to try hard in the first rounds
ive thought about this and yes i agree with the solos in s1 but i think the qual slots from that season should be for the most consistent teams throughout ALL of s2 and s3 it could be fun to see the storylines with this and make duos take this into consideration if they should split after a good s2 but not making globals
Chapter 2 trio heats system was the best, 4 heat lobbies, all heats are same skill, you put #1, #5, #9, #13 and so on into Heat one, #2, #6, #10, #14 into heat two, and so on. So all heats are balanced, and prize pool in heats would be good aswell
One round open qualifiers, one game: top 50 teams (50 winners with the most kills basically) make it to grand finals. Grands is a two-day format, 30 games on the first day (run back to back over the whole day from 7am-10pm), 2 games on the second day (first game at 7am, second game at 10pm) with 10x point multiplier. Elims are worth 0 points in grands and placement is completely linear (2 points every placement, 20 points in day two, from 50th-49th is the same points as from 2nd-1st). All prize money is split evenly between top 3 in grands (33% each), with $0 going to 4th, and all LAN qualifying slots are based on the open round, so top ten from opens qual to LAN and the grands is just for money. All regions will have equal prize pools, so 3rd on OCE will get the same money as 1st on EU.
I would love for their to be a dual FNCS Invitational. One for Solos were 16 players from each region qualify for the Globals and and duos to be kept the same. A solo FNCS to start off a season would be great, Increased players for a new season majority may not have a duo to play with so they will get involved in the Solo FNCS and, i just think it will create a large pull towards comp. (may make sense or not idk, put it into how you think it would work)
+ Prizepool does not need to be massive for the Regional online FNCS with majority of the Prizing going towards the Global Lan, - Even/ Close to even amount of players representing each region to make it more of a "Global" invitational lan. This solo FNCS idea i honestly recon would be great as the game has lacked a normal solos format since chapter 3 i believe. victory cup lans would not work tbh... lol.
The match point thing sounds really exciting to watch, but I can imagine it being frustrating for players. Imagine being Peterbot and Pollo last season, having won every duo cc and everyone convinced they're winning FNCS, only to get 2nd because another (also very good of course but not in 1st place) team won a game before they did. Besides, in last season with a 600 points threshold the finals would've ended after only the 1st game of day 2.
The only issue with that is if you have 20 people qual from qualifiers to grands they will miss out on set lobby practice in semis and may not be able to hold down their drop spot for grands
I feel like the only issue with a match point system would be the way epic hosts the tournaments. It would probably be hard to code unlimited games until a team hits X points and wins. If they weren’t able to code it they would have to use a system where the tournament window is open for ever and have someone manually stop games from being qued which means it would only work for NA and EU. Apex uses a custom match system similar to that of valorant or other fps titles, Fortnite just doesn’t have the in game infrastructure to make match point work currently
Match point would be difficult to do tho since there's 50 duos. Theoretically (and it wouldn't be that unlikely) we could see 20+ games played in grands because none of the teams at the threshold are winning. So, if match point was to be implemented, they should also have a game cap.
11:55 « the break is there to potentially get rid of the cheaters » … Avivv still playing grands. Epic been slacking.. Anyway, Reiss lots of good ideas, however the match point format for grand got me skeptical. Let’s say a team reach 600points and win a game on game 9/12. What would happen then? Does the tournament stops? If not, a lot of player are missing catchup opportunities. And if it goes on, What’s the real incentive for pros to keep pushing at 100%, knowing they are fighting but for second place? Probably Not so much motivation left, and that would lead to a boring end of broadcast. Feel free to clarify would love your thoughts. The idea for qualifier is super cool though!
Heats format was best, seedings based on series points over 3-4 qualifiers - but agree match point format in grands would be a spectacle. We need to see a live series point leaderboard during the qualifiers so people know where they stand. In heats/semis/grands we need eliminator style rules, whereby after 3 games the last place team every game gets eliminated.
FNCS should include a match point format. For example, FNCS would run as it normally would, however a week or so after grand finals, a match point format style finals would take place, with the whole idea of those finals being series points for globals. These points would add up to make the top amount of players who make it to grands. In a more detailed way, it would go like this; 2/3 weeks of qualifiers top 20 of series points leaderboard make it to grands top 250 teams behind in series points leaderboard make it to heats 5 heats with top 10 in each to make a winners brackets, and top 30 to make a losers bracket losers brackets plays first, 2 rounds with the top 50 moving to finals of losers brackets, and top 5 of those qual to winners brackets winners brackets acts like reboot round, with each winner being replaced by the highest placed team in losers bracket 5 match winners go to grands, as well as top 25 from winners bracket finals plays out with 2 days, no multipliers, and 6 games each day then based on a points format, teams starts with bonus points for match point finals match point finals would work as 250 points being match point, once a team reaches those points, they win the finals, and the finals end as that match finishes all match point finals teams would receive series points based on their placements each major would include this, and the teams by the end of the 3rd major with the most series points from match point finals, make it to globals This makes it so teams have to try in each part of each FNCS that runs throughout the year
I have an idea on a format "major 1" solos, no lan. major 2 and 3 duos lan -Qulifiers- 3 qulaifiers 4/5 rounds, round 1 diamond or elite open, round 2 top 5k, round 3 top 1k, round 4/5 top 300-51 and top 50. 2 rounds at same time like in lower and upper in qulaifers or at separate times for broadcast. prize pool in the upper version (half the money of the duo cash cup format but starts at top 10) series point leaderboard 1-50 qual uppers 51-250 qual lowers -Semis- 2 rounds of uppers and 2 rounds of lowers -Uppers day 1- 5 game winners go to grands + top 5 consistency (top 6-10) rest top 40 go to uppers day 2. -Lowers day 1- top 10 go to uppers day 2 top 11-30 got to lowers day 2 uppers and lowers day 2 are the same -Grands- 12 games 2 days (maybe a 1,25 multiplyer but the 1,5 is stillgrate) I think this format would be good it makes so casuall comp players (like me) can make fncs later rounds and maybe earn money but it is still hard to get to grand if your not a tier 1 or 2 pro. Will also hopefully make upper better then lowers. I also don't want to take any credd for all these ideas i have pick things i think are good.
Beyond game quality, I would appreciate if the rewards were more compelling beyond an emote, I’m not saying every stream can offer a free glider or pickaxe but stuff like loading screens, backblings, etc would go a long way I think.
im not an apex fan at all, played it a decent bit but never watched. I was glued to the EWC finals why? because match point format it went to game 13 with i believe 12 teams on match point before someone finally won. The tension it brought to each game was brilliant as the casters are basically handed free storylines as teams on match point that regularly engage on their rotates can be highlighted, along with the excitement it brings to the endgame which is obvious if one of these teams are still alive.
Good changes but matchpoint only makes it better for viewers teams in like 20 who need lan qual (if its last major) are just forced to grief the high teams and even if there is not any lan just the money that some teams would miss out on
rename cash cups as fncs qualifiers, make finalists go straight to semis, fill rest of semis with players placing lower on cash cup leaderboards maybe by adding quarter finals with tons of players like 5k round 1 so there is something to play and so people have less reason to throw in cash cup if they had bad games and all they can get is top 2000, bc top 2000 gives them series points for quarters or something
Ok. First, prizes throughout qualifying weeks. Lets say if you come 5th you get $500, 4th $1k, 3rd, $2k, 2nd, $4k and 1st, $5k. That's $12.5k per week. 2 weeks is good, but I think if you come top 3 in a week, no matter what you get to grands. That's 6 qual spots for grands immediately(rolling down spots ofc). Then, for semi finals, have 25 spots coming from uppers, 18 spots from lowers and 1 spot from reboot. Loot pool is completely separate from this btw. Then grands, add $25k to the prize pool, split between top 5.
@@fortnite-lore-yt easy for you to say, they want to make money not lose money and thats the amount they are willing to spend and we xant chamge that. and what we need to do is make a solution woth the same amount of money epic is willing to invest in fncs
@@RPGco. fair enough, but their competetive does bring in a lot of money, an extra 100k isnt that much compared to things like disney supporting them, sponsers etc
So u want it to be like the agls if they would do that it should have a contender league and a premade team one like faze or optic where they pick roasters
The format has been a mess for a while. Far too difficult to follow confidently so the earlier matches become boring to watch because it’s basically a case of teams who do well doesn’t guarantee anything, and it’s all a wait for the final rounds but even that’s not easy to follow and keep up with. The World Cup qualifiers were so much easier to follow which made watching any player a lot more interesting as you could see what they needed to do to keep up.
only 50 team qualify so it would make the semis a bit boring the rn semis 3 day format is quie fun but rather than 20 teams auto qual top 5 would make it even more fun
I don't care about semi finals or finals bc i dont play them. my fncs is over after 2 cups. while some players can play 14. also why just top 2000. if more people qualify more poeple will play the cup. why only top 250 getting serious pts? I mean it would be nice to get some even if you placed 5000th just so it wasn't completely pointless to play fncs.
I dont play battle royales but I have watched a few. I don't think match point would be good for fortnite. It works in apex because there are 20 teams but in fortnite a matchpoint with 50 teams is far too hard. Part of what makes apex a good watch is the fact that theres less teams meaning its more likely a matchpoint team gets deep in endgame.
They have to add siphon again at least in the og chapter 2 season it just makes clutches more insane and interesting to watch
it would make ranked and tourneys more fun bc its just third party sim
Yeah
fr right now is "third party and camping: the game" and there's barely any incentive to w key due to the fact that you will get punished by the awful ranked system
maybe not siphon but they drop minis like reloaded or something... siphon is literally a mythic level ability as evident by c5s2 hades medallion. Sure its helpful but I dont see the pros complaining about it.
I always thought the reason they took out siphon was because they wanted to have a siphon medallion, so hopefully it comes back
your videos got me a really close crown win a few nights ago (1 hp left)
to keep it short i remembered i could rotate to high ground through storm in a top 3 situation instead of being really loud and obvious climbing up a hill and it put me in position to win the final 1v1 at the end of the fight so thanks for making content and teaching people the strats of the pros
Bro just wants a reebot round
would be fire tho
Really liked the video Reisshub! I would also really enjoy if you talked about the cheating problem rn in zero build, its getting really chaotic, every tournament theres over 200-300 teams clearly cheating, ruining everyones tournament and stealing earnings from everyone whos really trying to get something out of this game. Keep up the good work!
I think there will be a huge wave of bans
got killed by obvious cheaters 4/10 games in an emote cup, probably more cheaters in cash cups or with less obvious cheats as well. (yeah i'm on oce)
they need too hire reisshub too do fncs because then we would have risks being taken in the format and if a format is hated or doesnt work we would know that risks would be taken too improve it and we would be testing the formats until we get an amazing format from all the feedback.
longest run-on sentence i've ever seen😭
*to 3×
"Write a sentence using 100 words"
@@Striker1870 bro who cares about grammar, especially in a yt comment section yttdtggvgv4hyfbui42bcou4b49vb4yivy :)
His opinion will make fncs worse
00:29 the break was just bad timing with epic's summer vacation its only supposed to be two weeks
still the break is butty
@@atreus_nr alright then epic employes should never get to go on vacation
@pleshy5646 no, just not the entire team going on vacation during fncs. they literally have the entire year planned out in the first month with small changes throughout
@@PleshYy it makes no sense that everyone in epic would go on break at the same time
@@PleshYythe even being at 2 weeks aucks
Muzz in the background has better aim assist on KBM than most console kids.
having good aim isnt actually that hard
People only say kids on console have decent aim bc aim assist but that’s cap
???? Are you stupid
@@CJFootballEdits-15 frfr
in fact, most console kids have ass aim and are bad at the game
15 teams skip semis.
Semis day 1: Top 15 from upper and top 1 from lower.
Semis day 2: Top 15 from upper and top 1 from lower.
Semis day 3: 3 reboot rounds.
I want more prizes per match/round. Most wins, most damage... Could add some old Fortnite type fun with things like longest knock/elim, pickaxe elim, things like that would make me more engaged as a viewer.
W vid
reishub I love your videos i've been watching since you had 150k subs
Also, SIPHON
Epic are just a bit dumb sometimes
yes i understood last season because of hades medallion but this season would make sense
@@koolkatzalt og season and chapter 6 😆 👁👄👁
I actually really like auto quals because it makes the set lobbies actually worthwhile, but I disagree that semis are bad/boring, we've seen big teams missing grands even with semis and the quality of the games is definitely not bad, however, I think the semis format we had in like ch3 was pretty solid, we had consistent teams and winning teams qualing in the same session
My idea for semis: no break from quals. Instead, 10 games the first weekend, 20 games every other weekend. Whoever gets the victory royale goes to grands (basically reboot rounds). Placement in quals would matter because since only 50 duos can play at a time, only the top 50 of those remaining get to play. Therefore, if a team places 99th they only get to play the last two games (they only have 2 opportunities to win), while if it places 56th they start playing after 6 games (they get 44 opportunities to win). This system gets rid of the big break and incentivises everyone to try hard in the first rounds
Sounds good. I’d also love to see a solo season every year.
I agree with adding a match point into grands because it definitely makes a game more exciting with all the chaos and everything
LETSSSS GOOOO A NEW VIIDDDDDD
🎉🎉
Lets hope chapter 6 brings some big fncs changes
Damn bro you look great! Congrats.
Cool
This man needs to work for Epic Games
I think we need rewards for watching it it would bring viewership up and yea more qualifiers
ive thought about this and yes i agree with the solos in s1 but i think the qual slots from that season should be for the most consistent teams throughout ALL of s2 and s3 it could be fun to see the storylines with this and make duos take this into consideration if they should split after a good s2 but not making globals
FNCS is in a mess recently I agree and this seasons felt quicker
Chapter 2 trio heats system was the best, 4 heat lobbies, all heats are same skill, you put #1, #5, #9, #13 and so on into Heat one, #2, #6, #10, #14 into heat two, and so on. So all heats are balanced, and prize pool in heats would be good aswell
Agreeeeeeee with all of this. The lack of hype epic fails to capture regularly is so disappointing…
One round open qualifiers, one game: top 50 teams (50 winners with the most kills basically) make it to grand finals. Grands is a two-day format, 30 games on the first day (run back to back over the whole day from 7am-10pm), 2 games on the second day (first game at 7am, second game at 10pm) with 10x point multiplier. Elims are worth 0 points in grands and placement is completely linear (2 points every placement, 20 points in day two, from 50th-49th is the same points as from 2nd-1st). All prize money is split evenly between top 3 in grands (33% each), with $0 going to 4th, and all LAN qualifying slots are based on the open round, so top ten from opens qual to LAN and the grands is just for money. All regions will have equal prize pools, so 3rd on OCE will get the same money as 1st on EU.
I would love for their to be a dual FNCS Invitational. One for Solos were 16 players from each region qualify for the Globals and and duos to be kept the same.
A solo FNCS to start off a season would be great, Increased players for a new season majority may not have a duo to play with so they will get involved in the Solo FNCS and, i just think it will create a large pull towards comp.
(may make sense or not idk, put it into how you think it would work)
+ Prizepool does not need to be massive for the Regional online FNCS with majority of the Prizing going towards the Global Lan,
- Even/ Close to even amount of players representing each region to make it more of a "Global" invitational lan.
This solo FNCS idea i honestly recon would be great as the game has lacked a normal solos format since chapter 3 i believe. victory cup lans would not work tbh... lol.
I agree love the reboot round and AND BACK SIPHON
W
bro watching this guy while its dark and eating is just different
Finally ressubb uploaded 🎉❤
NEW REISSHUB VID WOOO
The match point thing sounds really exciting to watch, but I can imagine it being frustrating for players. Imagine being Peterbot and Pollo last season, having won every duo cc and everyone convinced they're winning FNCS, only to get 2nd because another (also very good of course but not in 1st place) team won a game before they did. Besides, in last season with a 600 points threshold the finals would've ended after only the 1st game of day 2.
full solo season would be so good
Are u gonna show how vico and flickzy won fncs and other regions
I Wanna see that too
Yo!!
Bro just put aussi reisshub and the head office for fn then we would be chilling.
Perfect idea : i should win fncs
As long as I'm your duo
YES KING🎉 ALL OVER PLEASE. I WANT THE REİS EVERYWHERE
The only issue with that is if you have 20 people qual from qualifiers to grands they will miss out on set lobby practice in semis and may not be able to hold down their drop spot for grands
i love your videos
I feel like the only issue with a match point system would be the way epic hosts the tournaments. It would probably be hard to code unlimited games until a team hits X points and wins. If they weren’t able to code it they would have to use a system where the tournament window is open for ever and have someone manually stop games from being qued which means it would only work for NA and EU. Apex uses a custom match system similar to that of valorant or other fps titles, Fortnite just doesn’t have the in game infrastructure to make match point work currently
They already have a system that if u win u go straight through and u can't q anymore, it wouldn't be that hard and they could just do it manually
First
epic neeeds to hire this guy
Match point would be difficult to do tho since there's 50 duos. Theoretically (and it wouldn't be that unlikely) we could see 20+ games played in grands because none of the teams at the threshold are winning. So, if match point was to be implemented, they should also have a game cap.
Here before they steal your ideas next szn
❤❤
11:55 « the break is there to potentially get rid of the cheaters » … Avivv still playing grands. Epic been slacking..
Anyway, Reiss lots of good ideas, however the match point format for grand got me skeptical. Let’s say a team reach 600points and win a game on game 9/12. What would happen then? Does the tournament stops? If not, a lot of player are missing catchup opportunities. And if it goes on, What’s the real incentive for pros to keep pushing at 100%, knowing they are fighting but for second place? Probably Not so much motivation left, and that would lead to a boring end of broadcast.
Feel free to clarify would love your thoughts.
The idea for qualifier is super cool though!
Heats format was best, seedings based on series points over 3-4 qualifiers - but agree match point format in grands would be a spectacle. We need to see a live series point leaderboard during the qualifiers so people know where they stand.
In heats/semis/grands we need eliminator style rules, whereby after 3 games the last place team every game gets eliminated.
4:32 Bro Gave up 😭
Kisses is crazy
FNCS should include a match point format. For example, FNCS would run as it normally would, however a week or so after grand finals, a match point format style finals would take place, with the whole idea of those finals being series points for globals. These points would add up to make the top amount of players who make it to grands.
In a more detailed way, it would go like this;
2/3 weeks of qualifiers
top 20 of series points leaderboard make it to grands
top 250 teams behind in series points leaderboard make it to heats
5 heats with top 10 in each to make a winners brackets, and top 30 to make a losers bracket
losers brackets plays first, 2 rounds with the top 50 moving to finals of losers brackets, and top 5 of those qual to winners brackets
winners brackets acts like reboot round, with each winner being replaced by the highest placed team in losers bracket
5 match winners go to grands, as well as top 25 from winners bracket
finals plays out with 2 days, no multipliers, and 6 games each day
then based on a points format, teams starts with bonus points for match point finals
match point finals would work as 250 points being match point, once a team reaches those points, they win the finals, and the finals end as that match finishes
all match point finals teams would receive series points based on their placements
each major would include this, and the teams by the end of the 3rd major with the most series points from match point finals, make it to globals
This makes it so teams have to try in each part of each FNCS that runs throughout the year
I have an idea on a format
"major 1" solos, no lan. major 2 and 3 duos lan
-Qulifiers-
3 qulaifiers 4/5 rounds, round 1 diamond or elite open, round 2 top 5k, round 3 top 1k, round 4/5 top 300-51 and top 50. 2 rounds at same time like in lower and upper in qulaifers or at separate times for broadcast.
prize pool in the upper version (half the money of the duo cash cup format but starts at top 10)
series point leaderboard 1-50 qual uppers 51-250 qual lowers
-Semis-
2 rounds of uppers and 2 rounds of lowers
-Uppers day 1- 5 game winners go to grands + top 5 consistency (top 6-10) rest top 40 go to uppers day 2. -Lowers day 1- top 10 go to uppers day 2 top 11-30 got to lowers day 2
uppers and lowers day 2 are the same
-Grands-
12 games 2 days (maybe a 1,25 multiplyer but the 1,5 is stillgrate)
I think this format would be good it makes so casuall comp players (like me) can make fncs later rounds and maybe earn money but it is still hard to get to grand if your not a tier 1 or 2 pro. Will also hopefully make upper better then lowers.
I also don't want to take any credd for all these ideas i have pick things i think are good.
I agree with everything except for reboot rounds instead of the game winner it should be the team with most points that qualifies so kills matter more
Dealing with cheaters should be their first priority. It’s getting ridiculous, there’s cheaters in every tournament, even grands
Saying EU is better then NA is a pretty crazy thing to say after the most recent grands
Beyond game quality, I would appreciate if the rewards were more compelling beyond an emote, I’m not saying every stream can offer a free glider or pickaxe but stuff like loading screens, backblings, etc would go a long way I think.
im not an apex fan at all, played it a decent bit but never watched. I was glued to the EWC finals why? because match point format it went to game 13 with i believe 12 teams on match point before someone finally won. The tension it brought to each game was brilliant as the casters are basically handed free storylines as teams on match point that regularly engage on their rotates can be highlighted, along with the excitement it brings to the endgame which is obvious if one of these teams are still alive.
hire this guy
Good video but MATCH POINT not work in fortnite because people if someone on MATCH POINT the team will griefing the team
They need to change lower bracket in fncs semis
Quick question: the reboot round would consist of top 20-50 uppers and top 10-30 lowers teams right?
We got Reisshub fixing Fncs before GTA 6 💀
thats his job…???
@@isykllit’s a joke
@@SulakshanaCheppali-f5e It’s not funny and it’s probably a 8 year old who really thinks that. Also, Reisshub fixing FNCS isn’t even crazy…
Stop trolling bud. He does stuff like this all the time.
Good changes but matchpoint only makes it better for viewers teams in like 20 who need lan qual (if its last major) are just forced to grief the high teams and even if there is not any lan just the money that some teams would miss out on
good idea
Yh it will be Nice but auto qual would be a problem cause You will be 90% conned in grands
I think they should do solos fincs too.
yo i js noticed muzz and i have the same build binds lol
rename cash cups as fncs qualifiers, make finalists go straight to semis, fill rest of semis with players placing lower on cash cup leaderboards maybe by adding quarter finals with tons of players like 5k round 1 so there is something to play and so people have less reason to throw in cash cup if they had bad games and all they can get is top 2000, bc top 2000 gives them series points for quarters or something
i love the idea but in qual for prize money for only top 3 means that they people who know that they cant come top 3 will just grief everyone
i want quallifier 1 and 2 to be lower so like top 500 so pros to have a harder time quallifing which would be more fun tocwatch
they should make a 50vs50 fncs
fncs atp is just a pr farm for 99% of people you dont make money until grands and qualing heats isnt as big of a flex anymore
20 game Reboot Round how sick wouldnt that be?
Petition for epic to have solo victory cups on Friday’s next season
👇
I think they should add more tournaments like the Nick eh 30 cup that gets us like emotes or skins or wtv
Here
Ok. First, prizes throughout qualifying weeks. Lets say if you come 5th you get $500, 4th $1k, 3rd, $2k, 2nd, $4k and 1st, $5k. That's $12.5k per week. 2 weeks is good, but I think if you come top 3 in a week, no matter what you get to grands. That's 6 qual spots for grands immediately(rolling down spots ofc). Then, for semi finals, have 25 spots coming from uppers, 18 spots from lowers and 1 spot from reboot. Loot pool is completely separate from this btw. Then grands, add $25k to the prize pool, split between top 5.
Bro you are supposed to make a solution with the same amount of money just bringing more money out of thin air to fncs is not realistic
@@RPGco. oh no it's not like they are a multi billion $ company it is SOO expensive
@@fortnite-lore-yt easy for you to say, they want to make money not lose money and thats the amount they are willing to spend and we xant chamge that. and what we need to do is make a solution woth the same amount of money epic is willing to invest in fncs
@@RPGco. fair enough, but their competetive does bring in a lot of money, an extra 100k isnt that much compared to things like disney supporting them, sponsers etc
Why only 50k?
The movement is so glitchy with this new update
4:42 what was bud doing ☠
bring trios back for a year bring heats back bring siphon back bring reboot round back (I love the qualifier changes btw)
Also, don't change a major gameplay mechanic one day before finals
Bring back solo fncs from c2s3 with top 400 series pts making it to heats (do a console fncs as well)
Let’s another vid finally
So u want it to be like the agls if they would do that it should have a contender league and a premade team one like faze or optic where they pick roasters
Siphon
15 teams qual in open qualifiers
20 in upper bracket
10 in lower bracket
5 reboot rounds with the top 50 teams that haven’t qualified
Hear me out, Remove zone But top 20 everyone’s location is revealed and surge starts every game at 75 people💀
this isn't a good look dawg
wouldnt the reboot round only have 41 teams?
Real
The format has been a mess for a while. Far too difficult to follow confidently so the earlier matches become boring to watch because it’s basically a case of teams who do well doesn’t guarantee anything, and it’s all a wait for the final rounds but even that’s not easy to follow and keep up with. The World Cup qualifiers were so much easier to follow which made watching any player a lot more interesting as you could see what they needed to do to keep up.
Ye
only 50 team qualify so it would make the semis a bit boring the rn semis 3 day format is quie fun but rather than 20 teams auto qual top 5 would make it even more fun
My little pony ah skin
fncs needs siphon back, 4-5 qualifiers again, and not have something like nitro thats like impossible to counter
fix fncs: change the developers
I don't care about semi finals or finals bc i dont play them. my fncs is over after 2 cups. while some players can play 14. also why just top 2000. if more people qualify more poeple will play the cup. why only top 250 getting serious pts? I mean it would be nice to get some even if you placed 5000th just so it wasn't completely pointless to play fncs.
I dont play battle royales but I have watched a few. I don't think match point would be good for fortnite. It works in apex because there are 20 teams but in fortnite a matchpoint with 50 teams is far too hard. Part of what makes apex a good watch is the fact that theres less teams meaning its more likely a matchpoint team gets deep in endgame.
Fir
WEEK 3 SHOULD BE A MUILTERPLYER