Sporadic Groups - Prof Richard Borcherds - The Archimedeans

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2020
  • Prof. Richard Borcherds received a Fields medal in 1998. He is most famous for proving Monstrous Moonshine, a conjecture of John Conway and Simon Norton relating the Monster group to modular forms. Professor Borcherds' work has also played an important role in Quantum Field Theory and other areas of physics.
    The longest published proof in mathematics, covering maybe around 20000 pages, is the classification of finite simple groups. It shows that every finite simple group is either contained in one of 18 infinite families, or is one of 26 exceptions called the sporadic groups, ranging in size from the Mathieu group M11 with 7920 elements to the Fischer-Griess monster group with 808,017,424,794,512,875,886,459,904,961,710,757,005,754,368,000,000,000 elements. This talk will describe some of these sporadic groups.
    No prerequisites are required, but it would be helpful to know what a group is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe: / @thearchimedeans7041
    Our website: archim.soc.srcf.net/
    Our Facebook page: / archimedeans
    Join our mailing list: lists.cam.ac.uk/mailman/listi...
    Join our Microsoft Teams: forms.gle/tGHnN7XhEUVCeRgr6
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @m.alperenyasar3118
    @m.alperenyasar3118 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I am not a mathematician nor a physicist but Prof. Richard Borcherds was so clear even I understood this topic. I'm really glad that I have found this video ^^

  • @j.mauricerojas3650
    @j.mauricerojas3650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What a beautifully clear talk! So nice to see a Fields medalist take the time to give such an accessible talk! Thank you!

  • @bman420_
    @bman420_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great questions from the audience

  • @henrikljungstrand2036
    @henrikljungstrand2036 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The techniques used for proving the classification of finite simple groups might be useful for proving similar results about Hopf algebras, and possibly some classes of loops that are well behaved enough like e.g. Left Bol loops (Moufang loops were surprisingly little more complicated than groups when it comes to simplicity).

  • @jimmypk1353
    @jimmypk1353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hit pay dirt today! Instantly subscribed!

  • @nicholaswilliams4507
    @nicholaswilliams4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Adam (blue shirt) had some great questions! Thanks, Adam, wherever you may be.

  • @fjfaase
    @fjfaase 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For John Conways water based 'computer' (actually more of a logic circuit), google for: This early computer was based on a urinal flush mechanism

  • @sasha-2574
    @sasha-2574 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    46:34 must be a floating point error or something why those are "almost integers" in some super computer

  • @richardboland1935
    @richardboland1935 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OK cool.
    So my next dnd adventure is going to feature radiolarians for sure.
    😛

  • @sasha-2574
    @sasha-2574 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    45:18 This is advanced mathematics

  • @adrianorizabal6122
    @adrianorizabal6122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3 little blue boys and a brown guy brought me here

    • @user09832
      @user09832 ปีที่แล้ว

      Strangely enough they look like the greek letter pi

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Elliptic curves are dual to modular forms.
    "Perpendicularity in hyperbolic space is measured in terms of duality" -- Professor Norman Wildberger.
    Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
    Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
    Fractals = self similarity, self equivalence = self duality!
    The Klein bottle contains two mobius loops when cut in half -- self intersection = duality.
    Energy is duality, duality is energy.
    Time duality -- the future is dual to the past.

    • @00000ghcbs
      @00000ghcbs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Name checks out

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@00000ghcbs Duality within duality = quadrality or meta, hyper- duality.
      Mind is dual to mass -- Descartes.
      Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant.
      Bosons (waves) are dual to Fermions (particles) -- matter or wave/particle quantum duality.
      Mind duality is dual to matter duality.
      There is a deeper or second level of duality at work.

    • @Kalumbatsch
      @Kalumbatsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@hyperduality2838 Excuse my adversariality, but I doubt the optimality of this inconsequential banality.

    • @hyperduality2838
      @hyperduality2838 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kalumbatsch The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics! All energy is dual in physics!
      Einstein is telling you that gravitational energy is dual.
      Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy.
      Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality.
      Once you understand duality you can create new laws of physics!
      Homotopic equivalence = duality!

    • @Kalumbatsch
      @Kalumbatsch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@hyperduality2838 But look at the veridical superficiality and potential impracticality of this conceptuality.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grouped conglomerations of prime-connection coordination in ONE-INFINITY Quantum-fields Mechanism of AM-FM QM-TIME Communication Completeness/Singularity positioning of logarithmic numberness condensation.
    I Agree, in absolute principle.

  • @rossevans11
    @rossevans11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It saddens me that some stupid prank channel can garner millions of subscribers showcasing banal idiocy, but high quality pedagogy, is largely ignored. We really can't claim that we don't have exactly the kind of society we deserve.