How To Machine 5 Axis Parts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 70

  • @JohnBlaze505
    @JohnBlaze505 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I like the way this is programmed for a beginner to understand, very simple order of operations. Just because you have a 5 axis doesnt mean you need to have simultaneous movement for everything.

    • @urban625
      @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      3 + 2 is way more practical, I agree.

  • @Sara-TOC
    @Sara-TOC 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent tutorial, Jessie! I'm looking forward to seeing more like this!

  • @urban625
    @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love this channel! I use the HAAS UMC750, VF4 and TM1 so your videos relate incredibly.
    Whats the step over on the vortex roughing paths? Cant beleive the cutter isnt gumming using only air.

  • @-PlayMaker-
    @-PlayMaker- 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is my favorite video by far. More please

  • @poriq
    @poriq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can use long shaft with hole on it for dial indicator, we called it L-shape leg with dial indicator
    3:25
    It’s faster and without replace

  • @orimilegov4046
    @orimilegov4046 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Probing on this Part seems just so ridicilous to me. I work on GF and Hermle five axis mill's with a heidenhain control and renishaw probes. If we touch off second OP's we do it with the A-axis to -90° so that we can avoid the "Hat". It's really easy to program and also suitable for production.

  • @sobocinski123
    @sobocinski123 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Need to look into barrel milling cutters...that will increase your step over and lessen your scallops

  • @markdavis304
    @markdavis304 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great tutorial to start getting into 5 axis, Jessie👏

  • @matthaushetzenauer2591
    @matthaushetzenauer2591 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    These are amazing please keep them coming!

  • @mobilePCreviews
    @mobilePCreviews 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    it's really cool how similar this is to setting up my dnm500. I'm sure there's alot more that goes into it, but I feel like I could jump on a 5 axis and not completely suck at it.

    • @lukewebster1816
      @lukewebster1816 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only additional thing to watch out for is making sure your spindle clears the table when the table rotates. Using the probe to automatically set C0 is way easier than indicating everything

  • @brianropel
    @brianropel 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You should tell Barry about that semi finish thing. I’m pretty sure they didn’t teach him about semi finishing at Walmart in his greeter seminar

    • @barrysetzer
      @barrysetzer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ohhhhhh i see we got JOKES

  • @earendall
    @earendall 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Step 1, Have a 5 axis machine :D

  • @shaniegust1225
    @shaniegust1225 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    YES! The iconic TITAN-200 💥! My favorite part.

  • @xmartins2638
    @xmartins2638 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I use Renishaw probe, if I need to add an offset I do it in the ''advanced'' tab there is a place for offset there. So it You can automatically add the half of your part there, without doing it manually in the offset tab.

  • @nathanthomas8184
    @nathanthomas8184 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Attention to detail, Great display Jessie & BOOM to Titans 800K subs

  • @Steelcrafted
    @Steelcrafted 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you go into detail about the relationship between the X Y and Z work offsets you are telling the machine, and the dynamic work offsets that are allowing the simultaneous 5 axis movements? Is that all in the mastercam post processor? We have a 5 axis mazak at work, but don't have a 5 axis post processor for mastercam. So I can only do 3+2 and I have set each WO individually, and do manual B and C axis inputs. Help me understand the DWO process. Thanks!

    • @vgl217
      @vgl217 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Typically, the machine tracks that single work coordinate no matter how your part rotates. The axes always stay oriented in line with your spindle. The machine coordinates in your program for full 5 axis moves are in reference to this single point and are no different than 3 axis coordinates, except they include a B&C along with XYZ. This gets super complicated to do by hand and yes, you will definitely need a 5 axis post from your mcam reseller to take advantage of this.
      If you're doing 3+2 with your current post, try programming all planes off a single point. We had to do something like this with our old post. Your WCS should remain where your initial pickup is, then make your toolplane where you normally would and orient it properly, then take your toolplane and translate it to the same point in space as your WCS. You should no longer have to pick up more than one WO in the machine, unless your post cannot handle B & C rotations properly. Be sure to set all Tplanes to the same number as your WCS. Better 5 axis posts don't need this because they can handle a datum shift, so they don't care where you put your planes, as long as Z is correct.

  • @wst2663
    @wst2663 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've had this question for a while. When doing the roughing on this part, the 201, and other parts like it, why would you want to rotate C0, C180, and then go back to the other sides? Wouldn't it be better and more efficient to just rotate C0, C90, C180, C270 since you are going to cut all the sides anyways?

  • @14rs2
    @14rs2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Now do a ball in a box on a 5 axis!!

  • @dariennappi1401
    @dariennappi1401 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A video on tilted work planes and probing macros would be cool.

  • @Andrey222ful
    @Andrey222ful 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would rough machine the head/top first on both sides, then go rough the bottom portion. It almost started to chatter in the video.

    • @urban625
      @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely...makes no sense to clear the undercut before the top lol

  • @moritzanselm2803
    @moritzanselm2803 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i like the long videos

  • @rustysena2638
    @rustysena2638 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can hear some chatter when cutting the "head" area. I'm wondering if it would be smarter to cut around the head area first and the work towards the base to reduce chatter. That "neck" thing seems like a weak point. Maybe it doesn't really matter or maybe I'm just wrong?

    • @user-jg6bd7se8u
      @user-jg6bd7se8u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He says no coolant for filming purposes. Maybe that would help? Agreed the neck is a "choke" point. 😂

    • @rustysena2638
      @rustysena2638 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CHOKE!! Haha good one!@@user-jg6bd7se8u

  • @danielcedillo9037
    @danielcedillo9037 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you recommen me the vices for this machine...? will be so much appreciate

  • @turtlebeef
    @turtlebeef 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the confusion i have about 5 axis is the correlation between work coordinateZ0 and center of rotation of the 5th axis and how it works. If your part is sitting further closer from center of rotation, wouldn't your absolute positions be totally different when at different angles?

  • @angelasmith1405
    @angelasmith1405 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My talented boy ❤

  • @tj9382
    @tj9382 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant

  • @BedroomMachinist
    @BedroomMachinist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seems a little backwards to remove all the supporting material before removing all the material at the end of the part.

  • @navneetpatil3017
    @navneetpatil3017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please explain which commands use in programming

  • @brysonpayne9259
    @brysonpayne9259 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How long until the new Mastercam fundimentals series comes out. Im trying to follow the Titan building blocks series, but they are a few years old, and there have been some changes. Also, does anyone know why when i got to make my edge selection to program my finishing pass, I can't select the edges? Everything is set like it's supposed to be, but I literally just can't select it. Thanks in advance

  • @flikflak24
    @flikflak24 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine if someone made mcd inserts for that facemill ohh what a finish that would be

  • @MDABDULKADER-id2hz
    @MDABDULKADER-id2hz 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My need a job. I am a lathe operator. I like titan c n c

  • @philgross2385
    @philgross2385 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how do I get one of your shirts?

  • @liaml5530
    @liaml5530 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why not just use a G10 for the Centre of your vices only ever need to pick up on z0

  • @ivan61726
    @ivan61726 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anybody know has DWO and TCPC that machine?

  • @Kaleana89
    @Kaleana89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just don't understand why you probe x-axis with 123block and don't use single point probe with part at rotated b-axis like you probe y-axis
    I work at 3 Axis mill and i'm just curious, there is probing limitations with probing like this?

    • @bf4chode2
      @bf4chode2 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As a lathe guy and apprentice who has ran a few operations successfully on a 3 axis mill in my apprenticeship, I’m taking a shot in the dark here but maybe it’s because to get to your b axis you have to rotate along your a and c axis? Maybe since there are more moving parts to this type of touch off, it’s just more for piece of mind to touch off on a 123 block. I do reserve the right to be wrong, especially on this lol.

    • @orimilegov4046
      @orimilegov4046 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The probing in this video is ridicilous to me...
      In our shop, we probe at A -90° all the time for second OP's like this. (Hermle and GF mills) We have the cimco cycle probing addon in Mastercam and Heidenhain controls. But it works just fine without cimco probing.
      You could also set the C-Axis rotation automatically at A -90° so you dont need an indicator. Then X and Y (also A-90°). Either X at C0° with two points, then Y single point (Compensate for part dimension) or X at C0° two points and Y at C90° with two points.
      Probing in this way is very reliable and also suitable for general jobshop work (300+ Parts)

  • @andan2293
    @andan2293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    5 Axis Parts? Or Parts on a 5 axis machine?

    • @markdavis304
      @markdavis304 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      there's a little 5 axis movement towards the end. This part/ video is just a stepping stone to learning more complex 5 axis. Titan has a completely free 5 axis academy that progresses in difficulty for each part

    • @the1pigeon
      @the1pigeon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both? That's just a shorter way of saying it

    • @farhanaali6674
      @farhanaali6674 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Parts that require 5-axis machining

    • @globalrezzanate9399
      @globalrezzanate9399 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mainly 3 axis Z level roughing and positional work really. Nice, pretty easily programmed and works...just not the most efficient method. Depending on your machine though, this, may be the most rigid method to rough your part. Some machines, especially older machines, are more productive with the rotary axis clamped. Pretty modern machines, with the hyper-cycloidal rotary drives, (or whatever they call them😂) ate claimed to be as rigid when cutting as when clamped.

  • @CAMER_21
    @CAMER_21 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    should i send you difficult part for video ...
    so we can make

  • @anoosh-g4o
    @anoosh-g4o 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍👍👍

  • @dr.prof.mr.bigevil8532
    @dr.prof.mr.bigevil8532 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Strategicaly not the best option with that ruffing-order. I wouldve ruffed out the ball form both sides and after that the pyramide.

  • @CNC-Guru
    @CNC-Guru 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To me this is not for the 5axis machine... This could be done on 4.5 Axis or even 4 axis itself :)

  • @allanalasro
    @allanalasro หลายเดือนก่อน

    no one is trying to take your job don't confuse people mate!

  • @slyblood85
    @slyblood85 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where's the 5axis Syil machine?

  • @Profabdesigns
    @Profabdesigns 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man, what kind of time wasting program is this nonsense? At start tool walks backwards then starts another cut line? I would have run a Hog mill and got that material outta there. Then either a bull nose or a ball mill. One last thing, where did you learn the bad habit of clicking the torque wrench 2-3 times. Every course and on the AMSE tests specifically call out to never click more than 1 x and always unload the tension in a torque wrench. I have been a CNC Machinist 42+ yrs, and DON’T know everything. I do not claim to be an ‘expert’ but I am very good at what I do. And I can run about all types of conventional equipment too.

  • @dylanreese4576
    @dylanreese4576 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why don't yall just program off center of rotation?

    • @user-lj4xq4hm3k
      @user-lj4xq4hm3k 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because centering vises aren't perfect. So when you flip the part for op 2 it may not be perfectly aligned with your wcs anymore. TCPC allows you to just measure the offset and update accordingly.

    • @dylanreese4576
      @dylanreese4576 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-lj4xq4hm3k my only fear with that is now the part isn’t exactly where the programmer thinks it is so and machine verification to ensure crashes don’t happen might not be accurate now.

    • @urban625
      @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dylanreese4576I would expand the dimensions of the vice or just create planes to mimic vice location. Just make sure the Z pickup is bang on and should be good.

    • @urban625
      @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dylanreese4576one of the reasons why I prefer FCS lol

    • @dylanreese4576
      @dylanreese4576 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@urban625 we have precision plates with pin holes so the vises located in the machine exactly where the programmer expects them to be. This is also way faster as the operator doesn’t have to indicate the vise at all.

  • @thomascee
    @thomascee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How badly do you wear your tooling by not using coolant for our viewing sake? Thank you, but ouch for your beautiful machine!

    • @urban625
      @urban625 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looks like they blast air...no way these rough paths would make it through that far without gumming up.

  • @MoonSystem1111
    @MoonSystem1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Try to make one of this in a lathe....this is made in a Traub Tns30/42 from 199.....something.....

  • @MoonSystem1111
    @MoonSystem1111 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ...and whitout any cad/cam software...of course....otherwise you will not be a real man/woman..