Hello, good afternoon, I am an ophthalmologist in Argentina and I would like to know if you could provide me with the bibliography of your Power Point to prepare a thesis on Microtropia. You presented a classification of Microtropia with and without identity that interested me. Without further ado, I send my regards.
Congrats for the presentation! A really nice one :) about i would just suggest to base the diagnosis even upon the clinical findings like visus with crowding (relevant to identify the microtropia with identity) and i would suggest the term secondary only for conditions which are caused by an ocular pathology and like consecutive in case of strabismus following the surgery (but i find the last one not really likely to happen "non a real possible entity".. it is more likely that there was already a microtropia before the surgery with latent component which decompensated and once solved comes again up)
Ms. Koklanis, thank you for this fantastic presentation! At 12:25 of the presentation you say that "no movement on CT and positive 4 PDT does not prove microteopia. We need to further do visioscopy to differentiate microtropia from monofixation". Wouldn't a patient with monofixation though have an absense of BV which would on its own stay as a proof for the diagnosis and differentiate it from microtropia? Thank you.
Hello, good afternoon, I am an ophthalmologist in Argentina and I would like to know if you could provide me with the bibliography of your Power Point to prepare a thesis on Microtropia. You presented a classification of Microtropia with and without identity that interested me. Without further ado, I send my regards.
Congrats for the presentation! A really nice one :) about i would just suggest to base the diagnosis even upon the clinical findings like visus with crowding (relevant to identify the microtropia with identity) and i would suggest the term secondary only for conditions which are caused by an ocular pathology and like consecutive in case of strabismus following the surgery (but i find the last one not really likely to happen "non a real possible entity".. it is more likely that there was already a microtropia before the surgery with latent component which decompensated and once solved comes again up)
Ms. Koklanis, thank you for this fantastic presentation! At 12:25 of the presentation you say that "no movement on CT and positive 4 PDT does not prove microteopia. We need to further do visioscopy to differentiate microtropia from monofixation". Wouldn't a patient with monofixation though have an absense of BV which would on its own stay as a proof for the diagnosis and differentiate it from microtropia? Thank you.
Wonderful explanation. Thank you so much.
Madam, may I know the references used for this presentation?
Mam what app do you use for recording these lectures?
I don't know which one is being used here but I assume a screen recorder. May I recommend the one I use: is called OBS Studio, it is completely free
Will you please tell me what's the full form for CIP?
Contralateral Image Point = CIP
@@conniekoklanis 🤗thanks