J-10C is an air superiority fighter, whereas Rafale is a multi-role fighter. So for air-to-air combat, J-10C probably has an edge, given its faster speed, higher ceiling, larger AESA radar and above all the PL-15 missile. Pakistan has also proven that it has some of the best fighter pilots in the world. Pakistan bought J-10C for exactly the purpose of air superiority and it's an excellent choice.
j10c is claimed to have 1000 tr modules radar, larger than the rafale.. but the point is rafale has more powerful engines which gives it enough power to operate its radar at its best potential... also bigger radar doesnt certainly means better, rafale's radar has superior range which will give it an advantage to see j10 first..... rafale's electronic warfare suite is world class and far better than j10..... also the meteor missile of rafale is considered to be the best in the world with largest no escape zone..these are the edges that rafale have in beyond visual range combat..... even if you talk about dogfight, rafale is more agile and manueverable... its instantaneous turn rate and sustained turn rate are far better than any chinese and pakistani fighter..... if you name a fighter as air superiority, that doesnt mean it is certainly better than any fighter..... no doubt j10 is a very decent fighter and it is better than tejas... but it is not comparable to rafale... Rafale outclass any non stealth platform of this globe excluding eurofighter which is on par with it..
@🌪️LazY🔱 as I said no unstealthy jet excluding eurofighter is comparable to Rafale... Talking about PLA, I believe j-20 is on par with Rafale... But more number of J-20s in service and much more will be produced, that gives china edge over india
India feels proud coz rafale was made in France But keep in mind Pakistan actually won the game by purchasing j10c as Pakistan will get early repair than India And the cost of j10c is less And both of these jets are almost similar
@@tinkudas8320 1.4 billion people and you are bragging about an economy less than 3 trillion, that is so sad lmao. most of your people live in dirty slums. L kid
Asians have tradition of seeing modest as a virtue when they say their aircraft is 5 it probably is 6 or 7 (so they can be safe); 🔴 when a westerner says his aircraft is 5 it is probably 3 or 4 (add on to the percent of boost) 🤣 *FACT*
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@sumanthshetty9444 Oh really，but what is the Indian proud for，S ukhoi is Russian jet，Any one can get it if they pay，but Indian pay much more，because no capability for indigenous.
what about the Teja bhai????? Engine took from America, Radar took from Israel, Airframe from France, Ejection seat from Britain, Body Paint made in INDIA. Then after 35 years "Teja Bhai" ready for just Test flight.👏😂
@@kavithashiva3992 Over 60% of Indian 🇮🇳 Tejas Aircrafts Grounded. Tejas aircraft suffering basic design flaws that have not been dealt with by its manufacturer HAL despite working on numerous Tejas prototypes for more than 35 years, consistently suffering the issue of 60% of Tejas aircraft being grounded at all times. Indian Airforce frontline Tejas fighters that have so far been inducted by the Indian Air Force are facing critical issues, such as shortfalls in meeting the engine thrust and other parameters such as weight of the aircraft, fuel capacity due to which 60% of Tejas continually stand grounded.
@@kavithashiva3992 It came from the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) programme, which began in the 1980s and According to this calculation, 40 years have passed but still Teja Bhai ready for just Test flight.🤣
congratulations,Pakistan!you now had the most powerful 4.5gen fighters in the world now. j-10c's radar was better than the rafel's, even the missles are better. in the real fight, j10c will detact and attack earlier than the enemys
@@Avinashsingh-vc8yl deshbhakt and andhbhakt me difference hai bhai. Brahmos supersonic hai use detect nahi kar sakte. Lekin j10c ka radar jyada acha hai rafale se. Pehle detect karke missile fire kar dega
@@ENTERTAINMENT-dk3lz Go and find someone having iphone in your area and see on backside you'll see made in China. But I doubt if anyone has iphone in the whole slum you live in. 🤭
Compared to the Rafael it looks like the J10C is close competitor. It is considerably lighter, faster and therefore potentially more nimble. It is also 70% cheaper but it cannot operate from warships. The technical differences are minor. The pilots skill can make all the difference.
What most of you are not understanding here is the fact that Pakistan has less diameter to cover when it comes to combat with India in any form. The Land radius of Pakistan is way smaller than India hence less to defend. Therefore, any aircraft like J-10, JF17 or F-16 give Pakistan an edge on India as it can move inside within 2 mins of flight hence any air to air combat or air to ground combat will be on Indian ground irrespective of the outcome. Therefore, in any combat India has to suffer collateral damage. On other side, India has to move aircraft from one side of the country to other i.e. India has only 2 airbases in disputed Kashmir and 4 bases on International border. Given the time, tactile effectiveness and medium size range, Pakistan benefits overall. That is irrespective of any technical capabilities Rafael or any other airfcraft India has at the moment. Pakistan has been co-producing with China, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia and Azerbaijan since 90s. Whereas India is solely buying from Russia. United States has declined all technology transfer to India until TATA buys rights to produce F16s in India, which hasn't happened as it costs £2billion of initial commitment. So irrespective of overall technical comparison, Pakistan is far better when it comes to tactics, self reliance, suitability, range and area to cover in comparison with India. I HOPE THIS MAKES SENSE TO HATE & TROLL BRIGADE....
Pakistani pilots are trained on manual techniques as well besides technology, because technology can fail at any time but manual techniques remain constant
You are right,,, but still it was a drill or mock fight… World has seen reality on 27 feb 2019 where Indians Air Force radar were jammed and they lost 2 jets …
Lol 🤣 Here lots of people believe that the author is insulting Rafale, but she already does her best to unfairly compare the last version Rafale with the earlier J10A. Actually the new J10C has a AESA radar with 1200 T/R modules, more powerful than Rafale's 836 modules RBE2 radar (sorry, Rafale has smaller nose than J10). The PL15 is considered as the best BVRAAM (by experts, not here of cause😜), by it's world first dual pulsed solid propellant rocket engine, it has a range beyond 200km (export version PL15E reduce to 145km), much more than the Meteor missil with ramjet engine. The Meteor missil still uses old Pulse-doppler mechanical radar, while PL15 already changed with a more advanced AESA guidance head. Rafale's main advantage is its huge munitions and external fuel capacity. Literally, they're two different kind of fighters, J10 is a pure air dominance fighter, and Rafale is more like a multi-purpose fighter. Because in China, ground attack is J16's job(like F15E in US), but for France, Rafale has to do all. In short, J10C has more advantage in air combat, and Rafale is more powerful in air to ground attack.
@@QabilAGhor Yes. In the beyond vision range air combat era, the first-look, first-shot, first-kill capability is decisive. For modern fighters, missil>radar>engine. J10C's larger AESA radar can ensure first-look. PL15's longer range permits it's first-shot. And this missil's AESA guidance head ensure first-kill. Actually, in dog fight, J10's new PL10 short range AA missil is also better than Rafale's old MICA.
@@QabilAGhor I don't know. But I guess China will sell PL15E first. When US Airforce declared that they would use dual pulsed solid propellant rocket technology on its AIM120D missil, their chinese competitors under big pressure begun to work very hard developing its own. But ironically, when PL15 entered in service, AIM120D was found using traditional engine (So it is with the hipersonic weapons)🤣. And now it's turn to US feel nervous. So I don't believe that China will export PL15 before US own this technology. But PL15E also has 145km range, still larger than Meteor. Pakistan imports J10CE just to contend against India's Rafale, so China should ensure its advantage, at least in air combat.
@@QabilAGhor Pl 15 is dual pulse Meteor is solid fuel ducted ramjet with no escape zone of around 80 km and actual range is classified And which expert had said that PL15 is best BVRAAM
@@capricorn839 both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
Indians say: "I can buy a western plane, can you buy one?" The Chinese replied, "I can't buy it, they don't sell it, we developed and manufactured J10C and J20 by ourselves, don't you have LAC? Why buy a French plane?" The Indian replied, The LAC is so poor that it is only a small amount of equipment to save the pride of its people.
@SSR Abhi non done was also over confident like you. But after beaten by Pakistani boys he came back into reality 🤣🤣🤣🤣.. After that Indian Air force shot down its own helicopter. What a day was 27 fab. Indians apna he heli shot down krdia .. itna nikamme ho tm log hahahahah
I am not sure how you obtain all the data, in the case of J10, its performance varied significantly the latest variant J10C is almost a new plane, so the data is questionable, for example the J10A is a lot heavier than J10C because the latest variant used a lot of composite material to make the plane lighter
The variants themselves differ from eachother and if China ever learns how to do quality control they might end up with a decent fighter with a reliable engine and actually useful avionics. A French Rafale can take out a whole squadron of these by themselves. The export models require about two aircraft if they are equipped with the Meteor and three or four if they have the shorter range MBDA missiles. The only thing made in China that has lasted is the Wuhan virus.
@@jacksonteller1337 Now can you tell me how Rafael is any match for J10C much less it can take a whole squadron.... Such a silly post. Fact is Rafael is no match for the J10C if ever they both engage. Comparing the two prices and their performances... only fools will pick the Rafael. That is why today India is in panic mode because the Rafael is outranged by the J10C PL15 ... J10C with its AESA radar can compete with the rafael AESA radar and is more agile than the heavy Rafael. J10C fire the PL15 and go home while the Rafael will be jumping like monkeys in the air avoiding the Mach4 PL15 ....
The only thing that determines a fighter jet is the engine and radar based on electronic technology. A few decades ago, China's fighter jets may have been very backward, but today, China's engine technology has made some progress, and there may be some gaps between Europe and the United States, but it is completely possible. Satisfy the needs of medium fighter jets and, most importantly, China's electronic technology today is perhaps far ahead of France's.
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@teaisfantastic3730 25mn is just a token amount because a beggar nation doesn't have any money to pay their masters. What you jokers keep forgetting is that pay in kind by doing the slave jobs for China all the time 🤣. What China is giving is called bakshish in Hindi, but everyone knows about the quality of China made products which is just a joke. You people keep living in dreams by comparing the joke of a fighter plane with Rafael, when beggars don't have money to buy good products only dreams keep them happy, nothing unusual about it!! 🤣🤣🤣
@@amamam2424 China's missile technology is not bad, the most important thing is the radar and electronic technology on the aircraft. China's electronic technology has already surpassed that of France. Even American fighter jets use some Chinese-made electronic components.
Not really !! You can’t compare Lamborghini to Audi A3 ! Lamborghini is ,clearly 5 times more expensive FOR A REASON! I mean come on don’t be stupid ! Rafale is far superior !
Any country’s Air Force could equipped itself with more J10s in terms of costs & maintenances whether in peace times or at war. The costs of the Rafael in both situations would be enormously high for most countries. At war, an Air Force just cannot maintain the rate of losing its Rafael jets, even for a short war because the replacement costs would not be financially viable for a modest economy of most developing countries. The destructive capacity of both fighter jets are technically known but it would also have to come down to the basics of economics when owning & operating these military jets.
The war is won not only by fighter jets, but by the complex machinery of various branches of the military. In the air, the Rafal is superior to the Chinese by 90% in all parameters except ultimate speed.
@@robertstimac2428yeah but you forgot to mention that you can buy 4 j10s in price of 1 rafale. So what if you place 4 j10c infront of 1 rafale in fight??
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@teaisfantastic3730 china’s radar system is trash couldn’t even detect brahmos which flew 100km deep in pak. It shows how incapable china’s military equipment is. Rafale gonna outperform j10c in every aspect read the stats.
@ Tea Is Fantastic Did Pakistan pay? Add the huge interest cost China would levie before you arrive at the final purchase price. As far money goes, the price doesn't matter in such cases. The technology does. China can't make RC Planes and Helicopters that can last beyond a couple of months. Expecting their jets to last and come handy during a real war is too much expectation.
You forget that quantity also matters. I can buy 4 J10c while you can only buy 1 Rafale. Can you beat 4 j10c trying to kill you at the same time? Do you even have enough missiles to destroy 4 j10? I don't think so. Cost and quantities also matter. China produces j10 locally and can sell or loan Pakistan their own if needed in actual war. Can India even replace any lost Rafale? Can they even afford to? Maybe France won't even sell replacement if China outs pressure on France not to. That is Indias big weakness. It has no real allies and no domestic mass production capability for advanced weaponry. Even Pakistan can build jf17.
Pakistan has always been known to have excellent pilots or better pilots than India. Pakistan Air Force provides far more flying time to its pilots than India. A known fact. Having cheaper planes who ALMOST stack up to almost four times more expensive but slightly better aircraft is a better deal for Pakistan. Having an experienced pilot with better air to air and air to ground missiles is what would determine who will come out on top in a dogfight. Losing three pilots to one Rafale is definitely more disastrous for Pakistan than India. India now has far deeper pockets than Pakistan so even if India loses 30 Rafales compares to over a 100 Pakistani pilots for an even fight, is disadvantageous for Pakistan. In a war, money saved doesn't win battles/wars but well trained/experienced men remaining who can to continue to fight, will win the battle/war. Pilots are finite, planes can be infinite if you have deep pockets. Israel has survived its wars because US handed whatever Israel lost and more. The pilots had to be provided by Israel though.
@@sohailakhan your premise just a premise. In the personal ability, Pakistan pilot has more skill than the India pilot. In the past years, Pakistan pilots can beat Indian pilots with worse aircraft. It is no reason that Pakistan will lose. J10CE will made Pakistan win most dogfight.Not only will Pakistan's air force lose less, but the Indian Air Force will continue to lose blood, dragging down its already shriveled wallet
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha for war a man behind machine matter more than machine and pakistan prove that in every war that it has best man behind the machine latest example is 2019 hahahahahah and see my ID name hahahaha
I think the PL-15 missile is a greater factor than the differences between the planes themselves. The ramjet gives the Meteor greater range, but being a jet that needs to take in air makes its turning rate limited compare to a rocket. While PL-15 has a double pulse rocket system that can maneuver very quickly when getting close to the target.
The meteor has a second burst mode when it's close to the target where it dumps all of its fuel for maximum velocity and turning rate. It's one of the reasons its kill range is so big.
What demonstrated intercepts have been performed with the PL-15? The only missile in the world that holds the current long distance intercept record is the AIM-120D3. No Meteor or PL-15 has demonstrated comparable capabilities. We just don’t hear a lot about them because neither Europe nor China does regular live-fire testing of these weapons. PL-15E is listed by China as having 145km max range at the Zhuhai Air Show, whereas Meteor is 200km. PL-15E is longer than RVV-AE for sure though. China and India both have complained about the relatively short max range and performance of the RVV-AE missiles, and started programs to develop their own once they saw how bad the Russian export models of the R-77 are. Right now, the pecking order of missiles based on advertised max ranges is: AIM-120D Meteor R-77M AIM-120C7 PL-15 AIM-120C5 MICA Astra Mk.1 R-77-1 RVV-AE PL-12 Quality of electronics, guidance, ECCM, and propulsion pecking order: US MBDA Who knows on the others. The Russian missiles have been a huge disappointment to export nations. In Ukraine, Western electronics have been found in Russian missiles for their guidance systems, so they lack the ability to make their own transistors and other critical components. China said their electronics are superior to the Russian guidance systems on RVV-AE. China has been using Israeli missile technology under license for their IR-guided HOBS missiles since the 1980s, so they have learned how to copy some of that technology for decades.
J10C is lot lighter than J10A, it's completely different plane, on the other hand J10C with ASEA radar and capability of firing PL15 missile will help it alot against Rafale and Rafale in that case has no edge over J10C also Rafale's combat capability depends on its fuel tanks it can carry which makes it more vulnerable as it will make it have more weight and less agility and BVR can hit it with more precision.
Wtf Rafale cost 125 million??? J10 costs only 35 million. Ummm I don't even think Rafale is that much better than the J10. With 125 million, I would buy 3 x J10. Then have 20 million left over to build more modern public toilets for the Indian population.
98% Indian households have toilet facilities according to latest reports ( Article - Over 9.5 crore toilets built across India since the launch of Swachh Bharat Mission Over 5.5 lakh villages declared ODF SBM provides access of toilets to 93.1% of households 30 states/UTs are 100% covered with IHHL ODF results in reducing deaths due to diarrhea and malaria) And over 58% Pakistanis are toiletless said by their own Media and PM (Article - The dirty truth: 41 million Pakistanis without toiletsRecently, a Unicef warning announced that an alarming 41 million people in Pakistan lack access to adequate toilets; forcing them to defecate in public. Pakistan is in fact the third largest country, behind India and Indonesia, where people are forced to defecate in the open.) 🐷🇵🇰👙🇵🇰🐖👙🇵🇰 and yeah Grapes are sour.. You beggars can't even afford a Tyre of Rafale😹😹
When u look at the price range… you will come to know that j10 is worth buying compared to Rafael which is 4 times more price then j10 c with minor differences
@@subhankarkeshi It's sure that Rafael has a higher probility to take a long time and more effoerts to maintenance due to twin engines, and India has no enough possible to take off Rafael to combat with J10CP as Rafael is so expensive that Inidia cannot loss one Rafael jet.
@@LeoYengo that's one of the dumbest replies that rafale is expensive so we can't use it in combat 😂... if so then every Pakistani high value military assest is useless as pakistan can't afford to loose it😂
@@nomzee6520 That pilot(your father) destroyed your F16 with age old mig 21 This shows the capability of our Pilots And you kids were serving your father tea Papa agye papa agye 🤣🤣
@@devilJATT5911 Indian pilots are amazing, what do you mean? They only crash about 5 times a week, sometimes lose count of where they are and end up in enemy territory, sometimes get jammed and shot down in enemy terrirtory. Don''t worry bro, they have been trained by God himself, look at their skills.
Indian Rafal does not carry Meteor missiles, France refused to sell Meteor guided missiles to India as well as Egypt, so Indian Rafal will have to settle for MICA missiles with a maximum range of 80 kilometers, the same as Egyptian Rafal, so it is twice less from the range of Chinese air-to-air missiles PL 15 carried by all newer Chinese aircraft as well as the J 10C
Brate sad naletoh na tvoj komentar I bas razmisljam, u cemu je poenta davati toliki novac (mnogo je skuplji nego sto je ovde navedeno Ili je to cena "golog" Rafala) ako nemas na prvom mestu Meteor,pa onda I Skalp I Hummer rakete v-z. Nama to izgleda da ne daju uz avion kao sto nisu dali ni Egipcanima. Nosivost je skoro 4 tone veca Ali to je sve. Bolje nam je imati 24-36 ovih aviona nego 12 Rafala. Gledam kako S/300 sa raketama kojima je istekao resurs u Ukrajini Samo obaraju SU/34,35,30,24,25. Helikotere K/52... Stari sistem S/300 pa je pretlja za najbolje avione na svetu,zasto bi mislilo da je ovaj nesto specijalno,kada do pre 10ak god nisu ugradjivali ni Aesa radar. Negde procitah skoro da ce upravo to strari polovljaci bez Aesa radara da zavrse kod Hrvata. Ako SE to Desi ,a Velika je verovatnoca,ja mislim da ce vlada da padne odmah nakon prvog isporucenog aviona
@@zorajevremovic4608 To je čista Laž i izmišljotinja da Ukre sa S 300 obaraju Ruske avione, istina je da ih Rusi uništavaju bez ikakvog problema i svi Ukrajinski S 300 su već uništeni, a za helikoptere nema potrebe za S 300 jer heliko lete nisko, Francuzi su počeli da uvode Meteor rakete tek pre godinu dve tako da nisu ni mogli da ih prodaju Indiji i Egiptu, takođe i Aesa radari na rafalima su novina i po mojim procenama počeli su se uvoditi pre 5-10 godina, Meteor rakete su izuzetno skupe, dalje što se tiče nosivosti Rafala to je zahvaljujući delta krilima koja su dosta veća od klasične varijante krila kao na mig 29 / 35, F 15, F16 itd... mada Rafal ima slabe motore i nemože de premaši 2 maha, njegova brzina je 1,8 mah a mig 29 /35 je 2,2 maha, F 15 je 2,5 maha a F16 je 2,1 maha
Gde si ti video da obaraju tolike avione šta lupaš! A Rafal nosi 9.5t al sa 3 rezervoara goriva od 1.5t to je 4.5t gore dole a od naoružanja mica cica meteor su teški od 85kg do 125kg pa ajd nek su i 200kg. 14 podvesnih sa GBU mba po 250kg i zavisi ako kače na jedan pilin 3 GBU pa nema sile da nosi 1.5t to su manje bombice zato ih ima a to kad računaš je 4000tone naoružanja 2 do 3 skalpa i puna kapa. Dajte nebudite Deca pa naš Mig.29 kad bi mu zakačio njegove rakete raspao bi se. A da negovorim o Mig.35 šta tegli SU.30 34 24 35 8tona al baš uboitog a ne gorivo je u njima. Bio sam gledao pa znaš kolike su to grdosije od aviona pa rakete a Rafal mali ko PL15 nad njima i čuj nosi 9.5t a oni 8 plus 13.000l goriva u sebi malo idi vidi težine raketa bombi pa izračunaj. Da nosi 14 mica to je 1.5t a ajd ima teži bombi ok al zavisi šta nosi oni ga prikažu kako je nakićen ko jelka a samo od zapadnih daju karakteristike dobre a Rusi Kina ništa.. Čuj ruše sa S.300 nekažem al si ga preterao pa nisu ni oni ludi da ginu tek tako a jesu dobili po nosu za KA.52 mislili da je svemoćan sad ne sa Mi.8 ih deru a kamoli KA.52 itd.
Intentional lies?PL 15/21 is superior than meteor and J10 also has larger radar ,all that at 1/5th price ,so no wonder chinese manufacturing wins. Rafale has smaller radar ,slower and less nimble and lesser ranged missile but at 5x more price.
exatly both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha for war a man behind machine matter more than machine and pakistan prove that in every war that it has best man behind the machine latest example is 2019 hahahahahah and see my ID name hahahaha
@@direwolf7491 do you mean tea is fantastic with proof 😂😂😂. 2022 now. No need to bore with scriped Bollywood old movies are even then ur hungry army kept running to their papa America crying every time after a banging 😍😍😍😍
Radar Rafale: 838 T/R modules J10: 1231 T/R modules Short range missile J10: PL10 +/- 90° off-boresight Rafale: Magic II 27.5° off-boresight Long range missile J10: PL-15 300km Rafale: Meteor 200km Anti-ship missiles J10: YJ-83J 250km range Rafale: AM39 70km range TWR J10: 1.11 Rafale: 0.988 Engine MTBF J10: WS10 1500 hours Rafale: M88 1000 hours **Engine fuel consumption J10: WS10 0.695kg/N/h Rafale: 0.898 kg/N/h **Fuel capacity J10: 3860kg internal for single engine Rafale: 4700kg internal for 2 engines [** what this means is that the internal fuel stores of Rafale will deplete very quickly due to Rafale having higher fuel consumption and two engines, reducing both the combat range and loitering hours. This can only be mitigated by carrying external drop tanks (which is often seen on Rafales around the world), and that not only severely restricts the maneuverability of the aircraft but also drastically increases its RCS]
Pakistan has always been known to have excellent pilots or better pilots than India. Pakistan Air Force provides far more flying time to its pilots than India. A known fact. Having cheaper planes who ALMOST stack up to almost four times more expensive but slightly better aircraft is a better deal for Pakistan. Having an experienced pilot with better air to air and air to ground missiles is what would determine who will come out on top in a dogfight. Losing three pilots to one Rafale is definitely more disastrous for Pakistan than India. India now has far deeper pockets than Pakistan so even if India loses 30 Rafales compares to over a 100 Pakistani pilots for an even fight, is disadvantageous for Pakistan. In a war, money saved doesn't win battles/wars but well trained/experienced men remaining who can to continue to fight, will win the battle/war. Pilots are finite, planes can be infinite if you have deep pockets. Israel has survived its wars because US handed whatever Israel lost and more. The pilots had to be provided by Israel though.
In the battle field technology is secondary. USA lost in Afghanistan, Iraq, has never been able to peg Iran back. Ain Al Asad exposed US military might.
The methods matter, if western countries would fight their war like Russia or Syria do, they would win but the country would be destroyed and their inhabitant decimated, but that's not our values despite what everyone might (with good reasons) think
No, the Afghan Army lost Afghanistan. The US helped them for 20 years, that’s a career in the military. If they can’t figure it out by then, perhaps the problem them. As I recall the US took Afghanistan and gave it to the Afghan people.
@@antoinedubocq2052 "...but that's not our values despite what everyone might (with good reasons) think"? Then what the hell are you talking about? If everyone has a good idea about how brutally or savagely US, France, England, and Russia participate in a war then has there ever been a different way of fighting? US used cluster bombs, Vaccuum bombs, Nuclear Bombs, etc. and you're saying that US can be even more brutal? Why do you thing Iran is trying to have a nuclear capability. US would have bombed Iran back to stone age if it was afraid that Iran already has 4 nuclear war heads that were purchased from Soviet Union when it was collapsing 30 years ago. Just like US knew Iraq had NOTHING but small arms, which is why US invaded, landed, and pretended to look for WMD. Who would do that if the country had dangerous weapons? Your side are a bunch of liars.
The combination of j10 c f16 and jag 17 block 3 is dangerous for any one in the compition of this combination india have rafale su 30 and miraj in which rafale is good the other two failed and can’t fight with jf17 block 3 and f16
in egypt our Rafale beat the su 35 in training and it was f3, we order 30 f4 Rafale,like uae they order 80 and indonesia gonna buy it too, the Rafale proved it self, thx for your amazing video
@@umaydniassuh6511 russia built some of them but they couldnt complete the batch number bec of sanctions (parts not available) so the deal is on hold. Other countries also cancelled su-35 purchases bec of this
Rafale marine f4 and f18 block3 are competting for indian navy order for aircraft carrier meanwhile russia helped us in making that indegnious aircraftcarrier
Egypt should have started its own fighter jet program by now. You are making France richer.. The massive amount of money for Rafale was enough to start Egypt's own fighter program.
Don't forget, In Chinese Air Force J-10 has the same niche as that of F-16 in the USAF, the superior jet fighter is J-20, Rafale would not be able to compete J-20 at all .
and J15 J16 J16D。 Even J10c cant beat the J16 and J16D. The latters also more expensive than J10c. J20 is designed as the leader of Drones, plays the different role from J10 and J16
All Indian News outlets are lying. The Pakistani J10CE planes have 139.5 KN of thrust because they have the Chinese WS10B Thrust Vectoring Engine NOT the weaker Russian Saturn Engine.. This extra thrust also makes the Radar more effective and brings the J10CE much closer to the Rafale's performance. The higher altitude ceiling of the J10CE compared to the Rafale means that the PL15 missiles will have much more kinetic energy and range. The low altitude celing of the Rafale means that the Meteor Missiles will have greatly reduced range and kinetic energy. A Eurofigher Typhoon and launch a meteor missile from 55,000 feet and it's the real Meteor, not the export version India has. The Indian meteor export version launched from a Rafael's low altitude celing only has 60% of the range.
Three things: no, J10C does NOT have thrust vectoring. It was just a single prototype of a j10B demonstrated, all pictures of operational j10c shows the plane with a normal nozzle. Second pakistani will NOT have the PL15, but PL15E, export version, downgraded as well. Third the maximum range of a missile means nothing, it's the no escape zone (NEZ) of the missile that matters, and the meteor beats absolutly all his concurrents in this domain.
@@loganlee2028 The Export version of the Meteor has a much lower range and no escape zone. The NON export version of the Meteor launched from a Eurofigher Typhoon traveling at mach 2.25 at 65,000 feet altitude is where the Meteor's max range and no escape zone stats come from. The EXPORT version of the Meteor launched from a Rafale at mach 1.8 at 50,000 feet probably only has a max range of between 120 and 140 km, than that's only against slow moving awacs and refuelers. The range of the export version of the meteor launched from a rafale is only as good as the AIM 120C5 at best.
You don't know that, and the meteor is a much more nimble missile designed to engage 5th gen aircraft. But the missile need first to be locked on target by the launcher plane with it's radar. And Say whatever you want, the spectra AESA radar on rafale is surely more powerful and accurate than anything the chinese can get.
@@loganlee2028 The Aesa Radar in the J10C becomes supercharged and much more effective by getting the WS10 B or WS10C, or WS10G engines with 139.5 kn to 155 kn of thrust instead of the Saturn Engine with just 125 kn of thrust. . These new engines also mean that the J10C has a much better thrust to weight ratio than the Rafale,, much better Climb rate, turning rate, etc. The J10C traveling at mach 2.2 at 59,000 feet has a big advantage over a Rafale traveling at mach 1.8 at 50,000 feet. If India had Eurofigher Typhoons, it would be bad news for China and Pakistan. Luckily for China and Pakistan, India has the much slower Rafale with a terrible thrust to weight ratio, very low service celing, and very low top speed.
@@salamander5318 Never Heard a source about 155 Kn of thrust with the WS-10. Official sources speaks of 132KN. And the maximum air speed means nothing, especially on a small plane like J10, wich is small and a low fuel capacity, if it wants to hit Mach 2, it must be ready to find a tanker really fast. As for AESA "supercharged" i don't know where you Heard such a term, it does NOT exist. And the rafale Can supercruise, unlike all chineses planes.
i believe that if a pilot knows how to push the limits of an air.craft he will decide the fate and not the machine...besides rafale is an extremely overpriced jet compared to what is offered in J10 C package.. Pl15 missile and meteor are the best weapons on board in both jets and yet chinese missile has better range..so whats the fun of buying rafale when u get same climb rate same kn thurst...i mean is it wise to spend extra 90+ million dollars for one aditional fuel tank... seems only corrupt countries has rafale because thats how political parties loot common tax payers..
@@Abdul_puncturewala India can only bully smaller neighbouring countries with the backing of Western countries. Complete silence when China 🇨🇳 kick their bottom.
Pound for pound, the J-10C is a much more cost effective fighter aircraft, compared to the Rafiel. Besides, experience has shown that French aircraft seldom perform as advertised, and are priced well above their worth, and countries often only buy these French aircraft, when others are not available, due to political or other reasons.
Gareeb desh saste maal se khush. Mig 21 hi kaafi hain tumhare j-10 ke liye. Yaad hain na kaise f-16 crash chupana padh gaya that tea is fantastic karke 😂
I learned from China's military community In an exercise on January 7, J 10C and J20 conducted simulated combat, and two J20 fought with multiple j10cs. The following is the dialogue translation:
This bureau is actually a drill, but J20 does not participate in the golden helmet and Eagle cup. However, both pilots are ace champions. The opponent aircraft should be j10c, so j10c is really strong and in the hands of ACE elites. It even has a competition with J20, and not only low altitude, high-altitude supersonic can also escape medium-distance attacks for many times. Moreover, the RCS of j10c itself is less than 1.0, which is almost second only to the stealth ability of S57. J20 found that j10c is very close. Therefore, there is no time for supersonic raiding, and it is impossible to cut into the inescapable distance. Finally, the two fell into a fight, but J20 won, indicating that the fighting ability of the heavy fourth generation air superiority aircraft is not poor. Even if they fight, they still won the j10c, the champion of the third and a half generation mobility ranking. The pilots of both sides are basically trumps, which is enough to show that the performance gap between the two aircraft itself is very small. The confrontation between j10c and J20 has been controversial in China, because J20 is difficult to win almost every time, and it does have local war losses when j10c has quantitative advantages. The other three and a half generations are difficult to compete with j10c after 2019. At least 11b and 16 have never won 10C. So in the end, only j10c and J20 can fight on the final stage
At present, J20 can support eodas short-range perception + auxiliary fire control. This technical category is a complete rolling part. For three and a half generations, only EOTS integrates IRST without eodas. It's not easy to win. It's a narrow victory many times. So without EOTS and eodas, I don't think F22 can get the same level record instead of J20. What's more, the F22 is worse than the J20 in terms of fighting ammunition and medium distance, and its low-speed mobility is not as good as the J20. It may not be possible to beat 10C as narrowly as J20. Similarly, it is almost impossible for F35 to win j10c in combat, because it can't get into the escape distance without supersonic raid ability, so it is directly dragged into the combat Bureau by 10C. Fighting 35 really can't win, and it has lost its stealth advantage at all. However, for medium range strike, 10C is almost less than 40km and can not escape. 35 without supersonic raid, it is impossible to cut in, and it will be warned by infrared
J10c is a pure air combat aircraft. He is the king at high altitude and low altitude. He can score 4-6 even for the fourth generation aircraft. Of course, j10c is 4. He has completely sacrificed his multi-purpose capability, so he can't count on the ground and the sea, and his voyage is not good. Not far. However, as long as you fail to destroy him in the first medium range attack, once you enter the fighting distance, you can hardly get rid of him. You have a great chance of being killed, and it is difficult to escape his close pursuit
In fact, the j10b has upgraded the DSI inlet, and the resistance and stealth capability have been greatly improved. After j10c, the avionics system was further optimized, and the radar was upgraded to a higher model. Moreover, pl15 was replaced by pl12. The combat effectiveness has been greatly improved. After changing the ws10c engine, the maximum thrust is 14.6 tons. The empty weight of j10c is very low. So his push weight ratio is actually very strong. The biggest problem with this plane is that it is basically not good at ground and sea
The RCS of j10c is the lowest in three and a half generations, so that j16 radar finds that its distance is very close, so it is difficult to lock it in advance. As a result, he can detect incoming missiles through IRST infrared every time and conduct medium-range maneuver avoidance. As a result, it is almost difficult for supersonic aircraft to attack him without escape. If there is no early warning aircraft, no aircraft can do it
The biggest advantage that Pakistan have over India is that when it comes to Aircraft maintenance or repair parts, they're easily accessible to get since the J10's are manufactured in China, their next door neighbour and iron brother. This also helps to facilitate any subsequent enhancements that the PAF wishes to make in the future. For India, if the Rafale needed any parts or repairs .....good luck to them trying to get them delivered all the way from France and then trying to have them installed only to find that the wrong parts were delivered.
Well the biggest advantage that India have over pakistan is its enormous defence budget moreover it doesn’t need to beg to the neighbour door country. What pakistan should worry about is it’s economy which is sinking like a submarine. Pakistan already on leash to its solid iron brother china 😂. On top of it stop comparing yourself to India we will have our 5 gen AMCA running by 2026 and you guys have hard time manufacturing a needle. Needless to say as time will come either we will develop indigenous aircraft or sign a deal to manufacture it in India. But won’t beg like you guys do. All the best for Future beging endeavours.
The J10 is comparable to the rafale but costs only a quarter of the purchase price of the rafale. The max speed of J10 is higher by 100 m/sec. Pakistan has made a good choice of purchasing the J10 as it can buy four J10 and India has only one rafale. The significant lower cost and comparable performance of the Chinese home grown J10 makes the J10 very competitive in the market of military aircraft.
@@mitchjames9350 well the J10 is indeed more Superior than the rafale or any other western jet fighters of its class. Not comparable to western old junks. LOL.
No one in the right mind will sell Pakistan anything more than scrap, because they know that china is the actual entity buying equipment for Pakistan to access it and copy it. Then give Pakistan a dozen or two 😅
Rafale is so good that the French Air Force mainly rely on Mirage 2000. According to 2018 data, the French Air Force has 115 Mirage 2000 and only 95 Rafale and E-3 Sentry for electronic warfare.
From 1:58 the radar comparison is baseless as Rafale has a first generation AESA radar made up of 838 GaAs T/R modules, whereas J-10C has the second generation AESA radar made up of over 1000 GaN T/R modules. Rafale simply can't stand a chance when facing J-10C in WVR fights.
No Rafael will be 4x better. ORIGINAL J-10 can simply overwhelm in numbers and suffer less losses due to greater numbers. And this is an upgraded J-10C which is greatly upgraded.
Why are u all arsowls and what a waste of mans resources in countries who cant feed their people. Its shows you what a pos these people really are.What a wasted pos.are leaders are. What a deuterated pos u are for caring about these waste of resources and the stupidity that surrounds me.
@@shafayrajput7837 well, world record of biggest surrender is held by Pakistani army when they surrendered 93000 soldiers against india so pakistan has better experience. Ask bajwa if legs are still shaking or not 😂
@@direwolf7491 well france's daddy US is scared of pl15's according to IISS. the ramjet air drag is significant factor compared to dual pulse fox 3 pl15's plus missile warning recievers will detect meteor earlier due to same reason...
During air to air following factors are imp: 1. Speed 2. Range 3. Angle 4. Altitude 5. Whether ac flying inward,side wise etc 6. All above factors decides the first shoot chances Lastly, pilot is the key factor and how good he knows the enemy ac capability All this data is good but other factors are the deciding factors
Both are good aircrafts. J-10 AESA radar has about 1300 TR modules which is 500 more then Rafale's. J-10 radar has better anti-jaming capability & resolution. Many analysts call PL-15 as world's best AAM. Rafale has advantages in payload and Air to ground capabilities. Overall both jets can be given nearly same score, both are 4.5 generation in medium weight category.
Rafael's electronic countermeasures and electronic counter counter measures with SPECTRA , unmatched maneuverability, with meteor (dual pulse rocket motor missile with 150km, unlike dual pulse rocket motor pl15 with 145km range), plus rafale is a twin engine aircraft, has more power to give to its radar's tr modules, read any reliable source , meteor is the best bvr missile currently,
@@pankajshishodia4004 only one correction bro there is 2 types of pl-15 missile one is pl-15e n other is pl-15 both missiles have different ranges pl-15 have double range than pl-15e
@@pankajshishodia4004 if you add thrust of both Rafael’s engines, you will find that it is similar to the thrust produced by the single engine of the J-10. We will never know how much power is produced for each plane’s radar. As for Meteor and PL-15, we do not know the exact range, but we can compare the propulsion system they used. Meteor chose an air breathing engine, which allows it to control the burn rate of its fuel to slowly cruise to its target and speed up when approaching target. PL-15 chose a dual pulse rocket that can burn the first stage, then choose when to burn the second stage to maximize range and speed near target. The advantage of Meteor is that it can burn its fuel much more precisely to obtain the best range and terminal velocity. Downside is that it is air breathing, so the inlets on missile creates extra drag for the plane carrying it, also it cannot be lobbed high up into the air for long range shot, like normal missile, since the air is too thin for Meteor’s engine. Final point, Meteor accelerates very slowly at first due to its engine design, so conventional rocket based missile can hit Mach 3-4 in 3 seconds, while it make take 10-20s for Meteor to hit Mach3-4, making it ill suited to close range attack. PL-15 carries most of the advantage and disadvantage of a conventional missile, with the added benefit of having a second rocket stage that can be ignited mid flight.
Just let you know, J-10 is not J-10C, you can see them as two different fighters. Think wisely don't realise it after Indian AF lose a fight in the future.
The Chinese fighter with very reasonable capabilities and its price is equal to one fifth of the price of the Rafale, and with advanced electronic additions, it can frighten the enemy
Lets try and compare a J-10C with Rafale as this is a comparison with the old J-10. The differences are not much. Certainly two J-10cs are much more capable than one Rafale and they’d still cost half the price
4x cost... For a medium sized, rich country, 48 (or 45 or even 42) J-10C would be better than 12 Rafale. You can't afford 40 Rafale. And remember how France reacted in the Falklands War.
My friends, the Rafale plane in the video is an Egyptian plane, not an Indian one. To correct this, I also read the comments of some Chinese and some electronic flies who say that the J 10 is better than the French Rafale, and this is wrong. Do not forget that all the countries of the European Union met to manufacture this plane, and France completed the project after it left. It is the one that manufactured the Rafale, which carries long-range weapons and missiles. It is distinguished from the J 10 in many things. Such as anti-ship attacks, tactical strikes, nuclear conflicts, air superiority, and reconnaissance, depending on the needs of the mission. It can also carry missiles and rocket launchers such as the Mica ir and Yam missiles, which are dedicated to air superiority. The EG Koz missile is for ground attacks, the aan39 exoset sea missile is anti-warship, and the longer-range missile has visual vision, unlike the J10.
Firstly, all Rafales in the world are from France, not India. No matter where they are exported, they are all Rafales from France. Secondly, what is the basis for saying that Rafale is more advanced than J10C? Just because it was jointly developed by multiple European countries? Don't forget, the A400M transport plane was also jointly developed by multiple European countries, but that doesn't mean it will be more advanced than China's Y20 heavy transport plane. Different countries have different demands for equipment, which often leads to unclear positioning of products. On the contrary, equipment developed by a single country is more effective.
J10c cost 35 million an Rafale cost 125 million? Lol. Almost 4 times the price. Just comparing the two jets 1v1 shows how rip off Rafale is. In reality it will be 4 j10 vs 1 Rafale. Rafale has no chance.
There is no restrictions on day dreaming. Do you think we have only J10 C ! No F16s block 52s ! Air battle always a combination these days, AWACS, ground radar , EW aircraft and fighter jets only use BVRs missiles from a long distance. There are rare chances hunted fighter could see who killed him. Learn something then comment.
Are u sure that mig21 has 1200 T/R modules AESA radar plus 200km range BYR AA missil, and JMHCS helmet plus Multi-element imaging infrared homing short range AA missil? As I know, the last version Rafale that u admire so much unfortunately has not.
J10 is much better than Rafael and is much lighter, meaning it's swift just like the bird named the swallow, it's very agile, and can do as much damage just like the Rafael can...
Hopefully it'll never happen but if Pakistan ever gets into a war, they'll be very please how the J-10CE will perform against other fighter jets, particularly those below 5th generation. Below is a copied and pasted article from a military website. I can't post the link because my comment gets censored. But I did create a J-10C playlist with the link in it. IMO, the jet's a beast, truly the best non 5th generation superiority/multipurpose fighter jet currently in the world. ------------------------------------------------ If the Rafale is against the J-10C, the two are basically equivalent in fighting ability, but in the mid-range attack, the J-10C has a clear advantage. If the J-10C launches the "fight and run" volley tactics outside the line of sight , Gust will fall into the embarrassing situation of "can't catch up, can't escape". In terms of long-range air-to-air missile confrontation, although the European "Meteor" missile has an advantage over PL-15E in range (Meteor has a range of 160 kilometers and PL-15E is 145 kilometers), it is also embarrassing because of the aircraft of the Rafale. The caliber of the head radar is only 400 mm, so although the performance of the RDS radar is good, the effective detection range is not more than 150 kilometers, which is smaller than the range of the "Meteor" missile. It needs another discount to detect the J-10C with a certain stealth effect. Therefore, the range advantage of the "Meteor" missile is limited by the RDS radar and cannot be used at all.
Next compare eurofighter engines that last 8000 hours vs su 35 engines that last 1500 hours ... you do the math 1 eurofighter in terms of engines can last the same as 5x the su 35 in engines Without using weapons.... yeah
I don't doubt Rafale, I doubt the Indian air force， I don't know who is the first fighter to shoot down Rafale. but It must be the Indian air force that destroyed the first Rafale.
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points but but but 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@reepakkumarrout6733 well france's daddy US is scared of pl15's according to IISS. the ramjet air drag is significant factor compared to dual pulse fox 3 pl15's plus missile warning recievers will detect meteor earlier due to same reason...
At the cost of four at Place of one and more or less the same capability J10c is better. Above all the man flying it matters. worth a billion of dollars.
range doesnt make the whole story when it comes to air to air missile, the greater thye distance the harder it is to hit the target, in this case meteor is most effective below 150 km
@@tluangasailo3663 yup! Your's is the only sensible comment I found. PL 15 is not as agile as Nato standard missiles to hit a highly agile target like a fighter jet. The are best for not so agile planes like AWACS , fuel tankers etc.
We admit that rafale is a very capable fighter, but india have to field most of the rafales against china,, india won't have huge numbers for rafale against us plus nobody knows the true capabilities of j10c plus pl15,,,, pl15 can be a big surprise
@@saadafzal8094 Pakistan 3bar bayaan badla.. India kept on saying the same thing.. Humko to naam v malum hai un pilots ki jo 2 apke gire hain aur jo Pakistan ki awam ne lynch kiya hain.. Par aap log to admit nahi karoge ke woh aapke pilots the as u did in kargil war.. Pakistan is all about disowning it's soldiers.. What a fucking shit country man
@@shikhabhattacharjee5538 mate your favourite american intelligence said that pakistan f16 count is same so you wont trust it then...also tell me where is the f16 remains show it to us like we showed you your mig21...... Wont talk much but india disowning kalboshan yadev and then owning it shows clearly who is shit😘
Aayaj Sidqi in pakistani parliament Maine khud dekha ki Baajwa ke sar pe pasina tha taange kaap rahi thi dar ke maare ek piolet se pakistani Army chief ki taange kaap rahi thi was also fantastic 🇵🇰💩🇵🇰💩🇵🇰🤣
Barking dogs seldom bite Example India starts barking about every equipment even before any deal is done .... They used to bark about su 30 before feb 19 and after that they wanted rafale .... now Rafael is here barking is louder than all times before .... Still they will disappointed ....
Yup absolutely right ✅ ALLHUMDILLAHA Pakistan air force is already far more experienced well Trained compared to IAF its all about Pilot and yes IAF got bulk of ultra idiots like Abhinandan and many more 🙄. So its Rafeal or MIG's doesn't make any difference 🤔
@@nomzee6520 exactly indians should bark about Bangladesh, kargil, Siachen, kashmir and how they made 93000 pakistanis surrender which is still a world record 😂
Asians have tradition of seeing modest as a virtue when they say their aircraft is 5 it probably is 6 or 7 (so they can be safe); 🔴 when a westerner says his aircraft is 5 it is probably 3 or 4 (add on to the percent of boost) 🤣 *FACT*
J-10C is an air superiority fighter, whereas Rafale is a multi-role fighter. So for air-to-air combat, J-10C probably has an edge, given its faster speed, higher ceiling, larger AESA radar and above all the PL-15 missile. Pakistan has also proven that it has some of the best fighter pilots in the world.
Pakistan bought J-10C for exactly the purpose of air superiority and it's an excellent choice.
Both are multirole fighters.😅
@Zyzz Brah 🔱 Yup
j10c is claimed to have 1000 tr modules radar, larger than the rafale.. but the point is rafale has more powerful engines which gives it enough power to operate its radar at its best potential... also bigger radar doesnt certainly means better, rafale's radar has superior range which will give it an advantage to see j10 first..... rafale's electronic warfare suite is world class and far better than j10..... also the meteor missile of rafale is considered to be the best in the world with largest no escape zone..these are the edges that rafale have in beyond visual range combat..... even if you talk about dogfight, rafale is more agile and manueverable... its instantaneous turn rate and sustained turn rate are far better than any chinese and pakistani fighter..... if you name a fighter as air superiority, that doesnt mean it is certainly better than any fighter..... no doubt j10 is a very decent fighter and it is better than tejas... but it is not comparable to rafale... Rafale outclass any non stealth platform of this globe excluding eurofighter which is on par with it..
@@harshdeshwal2670 Exactly. Even if you claim that J10C has a powerful engine, it has equally higher drag and it is 3000kg heavier than the Gripen.
@🌪️LazY🔱 as I said no unstealthy jet excluding eurofighter is comparable to Rafale... Talking about PLA, I believe j-20 is on par with Rafale... But more number of J-20s in service and much more will be produced, that gives china edge over india
You forgot to mention J10C's radar has over 1000 T/R module. Actually, it's the J10C the first to detect its opponent when they flight head-on.
yeah, and its radar will be jammed as soon as the rafale pilot knows its seen. just like against su35s
@@sigma_frenchie4075 We'll see 😏
@@mujahid313. you won't, because your made in china J-10 will be on fire before it realizes
@@sigma_frenchie4075 lol Chinese jf17 shot su30mki
@@unknownerror1149 yeah and the rafale shot down a f22 in a movk dogfight, doesn't prove anything
India feels proud coz rafale was made in France
But keep in mind Pakistan actually won the game by purchasing j10c as Pakistan will get early repair than India
And the cost of j10c is less
And both of these jets are almost similar
Bhikharistan 🤣 purchase j10c..its chanise coloney..kuch girwi rakha hoga uske badle mila hoga..🤣🤣🤣 khane ko paishe nahi..bikh par chalne wala desh gyan pel raha.
@@ENTERTAINMENT-dk3lz You have more beggars in Endia, than Pakistan has people😂
@@gazzy2012ga Abe ghadhe whatsapp University chhor...Google kar...tere to pm imranwa ki fati pari mulk ka bera gerk hoga hi 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@gazzy2012ga Pakistan begs China , is almost bankrupt while India has the 5th biggest economy in the world
@@tinkudas8320 1.4 billion people and you are bragging about an economy less than 3 trillion, that is so sad lmao. most of your people live in dirty slums. L kid
A Truly 4.5 gen fighter with AESA radar and advanced PL-15.Good luck PAF,love from 🇨🇳
Asians have tradition of seeing modest as a virtue when they say their aircraft is 5 it probably is 6 or 7 (so they can be safe); 🔴 when a westerner says his aircraft is 5 it is probably 3 or 4 (add on to the percent of boost) 🤣 *FACT*
Lucky Pigshang Airforce has China to support in fighter jets and not just with nuclear weapons, terror funding, human & drug trafficking
😘😘
Very bad dreaming habit you have
Love and respect for our great friend China🇨🇳 from Pakistan 🇵🇰
what Indian can proud is only scammed by Frence for triple price.
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
Don't forget the Rafale will get India specific enhancements so i don't know how it's a scam
u thought raffle is our only Ace?
We also have Sukhoi 😌
@@sumanthshetty9444 lmao these people be living inside their daydream
@@sumanthshetty9444 Oh really，but what is the Indian proud for，S ukhoi is Russian jet，Any one can get it if they pay，but Indian pay much more，because no capability for indigenous.
what about the Teja bhai?????
Engine took from America,
Radar took from Israel,
Airframe from France,
Ejection seat from Britain,
Body Paint made in INDIA.
Then after 35 years "Teja Bhai" ready for just Test flight.👏😂
Atleast our aircraft bis made in india pakistan' aircraft is a combined project
@@kavithashiva3992
Over 60% of Indian 🇮🇳 Tejas Aircrafts Grounded.
Tejas aircraft suffering basic design flaws that have not been dealt with by its manufacturer HAL despite working on numerous Tejas prototypes for more than 35 years, consistently suffering the issue of 60% of Tejas aircraft being grounded at all times.
Indian Airforce frontline Tejas fighters that have so far been inducted by the Indian Air Force are facing critical issues, such as shortfalls in meeting the engine thrust and other parameters such as weight of the aircraft, fuel capacity due to which 60% of Tejas continually stand grounded.
@@kavithashiva3992
It came from the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) programme, which began in the 1980s and According to this calculation, 40 years have passed but still Teja Bhai ready for just Test flight.🤣
@@Pakistan-Lover96 huh bro there is new second varient of Tejas and it's operational r living in th 19s
@@Pakistan-Lover96 if it's suffering than why did it come second place in Singapore airshow Pakistan's aircraft was not even selected
congratulations,Pakistan!you now had the most powerful 4.5gen fighters in the world now.
j-10c's radar was better than the rafel's, even the missles are better. in the real fight, j10c will detact and attack earlier than the enemys
@@Avinashsingh-vc8yl deshbhakt and andhbhakt me difference hai bhai. Brahmos supersonic hai use detect nahi kar sakte. Lekin j10c ka radar jyada acha hai rafale se. Pehle detect karke missile fire kar dega
@@ENTERTAINMENT-dk3lz Apple mobiles are made in China
@@minamulhaq dats why I said come out from whatsapp University 🤣
@@ENTERTAINMENT-dk3lz Go and find someone having iphone in your area and see on backside you'll see made in China. But I doubt if anyone has iphone in the whole slum you live in. 🤭
@@minamulhaq bhikharistan ko duniya bhikhari hi lgta hai...pm katora lekar ghum raha tumra.aur aawam bus bakchodi 🤣
Compared to the Rafael it looks like the J10C is close competitor. It is considerably lighter, faster and therefore potentially more nimble. It is also 70% cheaper but it cannot operate from warships. The technical differences are minor. The pilots skill can make all the difference.
True 👍 ✔
The pilot skills matter the MOST 👍👍👍🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
☕️ fantastic
@@nadeemmustafa6450 Yes, Exactly
Just Like Wng Cdr. Abhinandan Had ❤️
@@adminjoey1654 you must be drunk!
Otherwise you wouldn't have commented that
What most of you are not understanding here is the fact that Pakistan has less diameter to cover when it comes to combat with India in any form. The Land radius of Pakistan is way smaller than India hence less to defend. Therefore, any aircraft like J-10, JF17 or F-16 give Pakistan an edge on India as it can move inside within 2 mins of flight hence any air to air combat or air to ground combat will be on Indian ground irrespective of the outcome. Therefore, in any combat India has to suffer collateral damage. On other side, India has to move aircraft from one side of the country to other i.e. India has only 2 airbases in disputed Kashmir and 4 bases on International border. Given the time, tactile effectiveness and medium size range, Pakistan benefits overall. That is irrespective of any technical capabilities Rafael or any other airfcraft India has at the moment.
Pakistan has been co-producing with China, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia and Azerbaijan since 90s. Whereas India is solely buying from Russia. United States has declined all technology transfer to India until TATA buys rights to produce F16s in India, which hasn't happened as it costs £2billion of initial commitment.
So irrespective of overall technical comparison, Pakistan is far better when it comes to tactics, self reliance, suitability, range and area to cover in comparison with India. I HOPE THIS MAKES SENSE TO HATE & TROLL BRIGADE....
Pakistan pilots are well trained. I remembered in a drill last year, Pak jf17 beat Rafael. That's impressive.
@@MMA-gb6to It happened plenty of times that Pakistani pilots have beaten other nations. I agree million percent
Pakistani pilots are trained on manual techniques as well besides technology, because technology can fail at any time but manual techniques remain constant
You are right,,, but still it was a drill or mock fight…
World has seen reality on 27 feb 2019 where Indians Air Force radar were jammed and they lost 2 jets …
Forcefully false fed war propaganda by Pakistan...
Lol 🤣 Here lots of people believe that the author is insulting Rafale, but she already does her best to unfairly compare the last version Rafale with the earlier J10A. Actually the new J10C has a AESA radar with 1200 T/R modules, more powerful than Rafale's 836 modules RBE2 radar (sorry, Rafale has smaller nose than J10). The PL15 is considered as the best BVRAAM (by experts, not here of cause😜), by it's world first dual pulsed solid propellant rocket engine, it has a range beyond 200km (export version PL15E reduce to 145km), much more than the Meteor missil with ramjet engine. The Meteor missil still uses old Pulse-doppler mechanical radar, while PL15 already changed with a more advanced AESA guidance head. Rafale's main advantage is its huge munitions and external fuel capacity. Literally, they're two different kind of fighters, J10 is a pure air dominance fighter, and Rafale is more like a multi-purpose fighter. Because in China, ground attack is J16's job(like F15E in US), but for France, Rafale has to do all. In short, J10C has more advantage in air combat, and Rafale is more powerful in air to ground attack.
You explained it very well. I think PL-15 will make all the difference.
@@QabilAGhor Yes. In the beyond vision range air combat era, the first-look, first-shot, first-kill capability is decisive. For modern fighters, missil>radar>engine. J10C's larger AESA radar can ensure first-look. PL15's longer range permits it's first-shot. And this missil's AESA guidance head ensure first-kill. Actually, in dog fight, J10's new PL10 short range AA missil is also better than Rafale's old MICA.
@@santiagoh6228 Can you tell me if China will sell PL-15 or PL-15E. to Pakistan?
@@QabilAGhor I don't know. But I guess China will sell PL15E first. When US Airforce declared that they would use dual pulsed solid propellant rocket technology on its AIM120D missil, their chinese competitors under big pressure begun to work very hard developing its own. But ironically, when PL15 entered in service, AIM120D was found using traditional engine (So it is with the hipersonic weapons)🤣. And now it's turn to US feel nervous. So I don't believe that China will export PL15 before US own this technology. But PL15E also has 145km range, still larger than Meteor. Pakistan imports J10CE just to contend against India's Rafale, so China should ensure its advantage, at least in air combat.
@@QabilAGhor Pl 15 is dual pulse
Meteor is solid fuel ducted ramjet with no escape zone of around 80 km and actual range is classified
And which expert had said that PL15 is best BVRAAM
china j10 is not the old j10 is the brand new version j10c
the engine is upgraded as well to ws10b and increased the fuel capacity and better radar
Can it fight and win or not ? Version is not important
@@capricorn839 空战性能持平或占优，对地攻击能力不如阵风。能不能赢还得看体系能力，飞行员能力
@@capricorn839 both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
Rafale is already tested but chinese has no test done so better to go for rafale
@@Thanos-u5f *Just like French Steam Catapult system that has to be bought from the United States 🤣 no hope for EMAL like in 003 or Gerald Ford*
Indians say: "I can buy a western plane, can you buy one?" The Chinese replied, "I can't buy it, they don't sell it, we developed and manufactured J10C and J20 by ourselves, don't you have LAC? Why buy a French plane?" The Indian replied, The LAC is so poor that it is only a small amount of equipment to save the pride of its people.
@SSR Abhi non done was also over confident like you. But after beaten by Pakistani boys he came back into reality 🤣🤣🤣🤣.. After that Indian Air force shot down its own helicopter. What a day was 27 fab. Indians apna he heli shot down krdia .. itna nikamme ho tm log hahahahah
@SSR Indian can't fight a war man to man. They have to be 10 time larger than their enemy to go for a war.
@@shehroziqbal4587 Abhi non done, lol hahahahah
@SSR I know right? Pakistani fantastic tea is to die for. Literally!
biggest difference: Rafale is best proud of France, but J10 is nobody in Chinese air force...
I am not sure how you obtain all the data, in the case of J10, its performance varied significantly the latest variant J10C is almost a new plane, so the data is questionable, for example the J10A is a lot heavier than J10C because the latest variant used a lot of composite material to make the plane lighter
The variants themselves differ from eachother and if China ever learns how to do quality control they might end up with a decent fighter with a reliable engine and actually useful avionics. A French Rafale can take out a whole squadron of these by themselves. The export models require about two aircraft if they are equipped with the Meteor and three or four if they have the shorter range MBDA missiles. The only thing made in China that has lasted is the Wuhan virus.
@@jacksonteller1337 Now can you tell me how Rafael is any match for J10C much less it can take a whole squadron....
Such a silly post. Fact is Rafael is no match for the J10C if ever they both engage.
Comparing the two prices and their performances... only fools will pick the Rafael. That is why today India is in panic mode because the Rafael is outranged by the J10C PL15 ...
J10C with its AESA radar can compete with the rafael AESA radar and is more agile than the heavy Rafael.
J10C fire the PL15 and go home while the Rafael will be jumping like monkeys in the air avoiding the Mach4 PL15 ....
@@jacksonteller1337 Holy-Moly well said Wally , I would like to add one more achievement that lasts is making Pakistan his slave.
@@jacksonteller1337 can you be more logical. Sour loser.
@@lenthokchom does your butt hurt because of the truth ignorant troll
This question has already been answered. The J-10 scored 9-0 against Rafale and Typhoon in Qatar exercise
😂😂 ahaha sure mate
@@M.Đ-z4u check it. It’s not my words you’re hearing
@@M.Đ-z4u只是台风，那个对抗没有阵风，你同时也要考虑到巴基斯坦飞行员和中东飞行员的素质差异。海合空军会连胡塞武装都对付不了
Pakistani always boasts their capabilities underestimating the opponent. That's why they always lose.
The only thing that determines a fighter jet is the engine and radar based on electronic technology. A few decades ago, China's fighter jets may have been very backward, but today, China's engine technology has made some progress, and there may be some gaps between Europe and the United States, but it is completely possible. Satisfy the needs of medium fighter jets and, most importantly, China's electronic technology today is perhaps far ahead of France's.
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@teaisfantastic3730 Ever heard of Meteor? Turn rate? And J-10s radar and electronic capability is better? Wtf😂
@@teaisfantastic3730 25mn is just a token amount because a beggar nation doesn't have any money to pay their masters. What you jokers keep forgetting is that pay in kind by doing the slave jobs for China all the time 🤣. What China is giving is called bakshish in Hindi, but everyone knows about the quality of China made products which is just a joke. You people keep living in dreams by comparing the joke of a fighter plane with Rafael, when beggars don't have money to buy good products only dreams keep them happy, nothing unusual about it!! 🤣🤣🤣
@@amamam2424 There is no shortage of Indian arms-buying jokes😂
@@amamam2424 China's missile technology is not bad, the most important thing is the radar and electronic technology on the aircraft. China's electronic technology has already surpassed that of France. Even American fighter jets use some Chinese-made electronic components.
It is the guy that hold the joystick which matters more
Pc master race here boii..
@@ArynNain007 mig 21 kay baad rafale kyo kharida..J20 aur jf17 say larnay kay liye 😹 THE TEA WAS FANTASTIC! ☕️🫖
Good point
Not really !! You can’t compare Lamborghini to Audi A3 ! Lamborghini is ,clearly 5 times more expensive FOR A REASON! I mean come on don’t be stupid ! Rafale is far superior !
For the price it will be 4 guys holding j10 joystick vs 1 guy holding raffle joystick. No comparison 4 vs 1 no matter how good you are.
Any country’s Air Force could equipped itself with more J10s in terms of costs & maintenances whether in peace times or at war. The costs of the Rafael in both situations would be enormously high for most countries. At war, an Air Force just cannot maintain the rate of losing its Rafael jets, even for a short war because the replacement costs would not be financially viable for a modest economy of most developing countries. The destructive capacity of both fighter jets are technically known but it would also have to come down to the basics of economics when owning & operating these military jets.
The war is won not only by fighter jets, but by the complex machinery of various branches of the military. In the air, the Rafal is superior to the Chinese by 90% in all parameters except ultimate speed.
@@robertstimac2428yeah but you forgot to mention that you can buy 4 j10s in price of 1 rafale. So what if you place 4 j10c infront of 1 rafale in fight??
@@Maxi0345 Look at the ratio of victories of the Russian MiG29 in the conflict with the F-16 and it will be clear to you immediately....
A drowning economy as the likes of Pakistan should worry about costs and prices, India dont
@@banujjalgogoi9253 Are Indians very wealthy? Let's take a look at your hunger index
You forgot to mention J10C's radar has over 1000
The radar detective a
range of J10c is definitely longer than rafale.
🇵🇰🇨🇳❤️
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
@@teaisfantastic3730 china’s radar system is trash couldn’t even detect brahmos which flew 100km deep in pak. It shows how incapable china’s military equipment is. Rafale gonna outperform j10c in every aspect read the stats.
@ Tea Is Fantastic
Did Pakistan pay? Add the huge interest cost China would levie before you arrive at the final purchase price. As far money goes, the price doesn't matter in such cases. The technology does. China can't make RC Planes and Helicopters that can last beyond a couple of months. Expecting their jets to last and come handy during a real war is too much expectation.
@@walkietalkie3653 *Just like their Steam Catapult system that has to be bought from the United States 🤣 no hope for EMAL like in 003 or Gerald Ford*
Egypt already owned Rafale as in the video, recently owned the J10 0:14
ان شاء الله❤
Pilot will win. Both aircrafts are good. Depends who has the best weapons. Weapons and pilots are the winner
You forget that quantity also matters. I can buy 4 J10c while you can only buy 1 Rafale. Can you beat 4 j10c trying to kill you at the same time? Do you even have enough missiles to destroy 4 j10?
I don't think so. Cost and quantities also matter. China produces j10 locally and can sell or loan Pakistan their own if needed in actual war. Can India even replace any lost Rafale? Can they even afford to? Maybe France won't even sell replacement if China outs pressure on France not to. That is Indias big weakness. It has no real allies and no domestic mass production capability for advanced weaponry. Even Pakistan can build jf17.
Pakistan has always been known to have excellent pilots or better pilots than India. Pakistan Air Force provides far more flying time to its pilots than India. A known fact. Having cheaper planes who ALMOST stack up to almost four times more expensive but slightly better aircraft is a better deal for Pakistan. Having an experienced pilot with better air to air and air to ground missiles is what would determine who will come out on top in a dogfight. Losing three pilots to one Rafale is definitely more disastrous for Pakistan than India. India now has far deeper pockets than Pakistan so even if India loses 30 Rafales compares to over a 100 Pakistani pilots for an even fight, is disadvantageous for Pakistan. In a war, money saved doesn't win battles/wars but well trained/experienced men remaining who can to continue to fight, will win the battle/war. Pilots are finite, planes can be infinite if you have deep pockets. Israel has survived its wars because US handed whatever Israel lost and more. The pilots had to be provided by Israel though.
@@sohailakhan your premise just a premise. In the personal ability, Pakistan pilot has more skill than the India pilot. In the past years, Pakistan pilots can beat Indian pilots with worse aircraft. It is no reason that Pakistan will lose. J10CE will made Pakistan win most dogfight.Not only will Pakistan's air force lose less, but the Indian Air Force will continue to lose blood, dragging down its already shriveled wallet
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
for war a man behind machine matter more than machine and pakistan prove that in every war that it has best man behind the machine latest example is 2019 hahahahahah and see my ID name hahahaha
So J-10. It can carry Pl-15. So only looking at weapons the debate would be pretty much over
I think the PL-15 missile is a greater factor than the differences between the planes themselves.
The ramjet gives the Meteor greater range, but being a jet that needs to take in air makes its turning rate limited compare to a rocket. While PL-15 has a double pulse rocket system that can maneuver very quickly when getting close to the target.
Exactly what I just posted. PL-15 is an absolute game changer, its range is crazy far.
The meteor has a second burst mode when it's close to the target where it dumps all of its fuel for maximum velocity and turning rate. It's one of the reasons its kill range is so big.
PL15 is overhyped missile. It can't hit agile targets with sufficient accuracy.
What demonstrated intercepts have been performed with the PL-15? The only missile in the world that holds the current long distance intercept record is the AIM-120D3. No Meteor or PL-15 has demonstrated comparable capabilities. We just don’t hear a lot about them because neither Europe nor China does regular live-fire testing of these weapons. PL-15E is listed by China as having 145km max range at the Zhuhai Air Show, whereas Meteor is 200km.
PL-15E is longer than RVV-AE for sure though. China and India both have complained about the relatively short max range and performance of the RVV-AE missiles, and started programs to develop their own once they saw how bad the Russian export models of the R-77 are.
Right now, the pecking order of missiles based on advertised max ranges is:
AIM-120D
Meteor
R-77M
AIM-120C7
PL-15
AIM-120C5
MICA
Astra Mk.1
R-77-1
RVV-AE
PL-12
Quality of electronics, guidance, ECCM, and propulsion pecking order:
US
MBDA
Who knows on the others. The Russian missiles have been a huge disappointment to export nations. In Ukraine, Western electronics have been found in Russian missiles for their guidance systems, so they lack the ability to make their own transistors and other critical components. China said their electronics are superior to the Russian guidance systems on RVV-AE. China has been using Israeli missile technology under license for their IR-guided HOBS missiles since the 1980s, so they have learned how to copy some of that technology for decades.
The PL17 is ready for actual combat
J10C is lot lighter than J10A, it's completely different plane, on the other hand J10C with ASEA radar and capability of firing PL15 missile will help it alot against Rafale and Rafale in that case has no edge over J10C also Rafale's combat capability depends on its fuel tanks it can carry which makes it more vulnerable as it will make it have more weight and less agility and BVR can hit it with more precision.
You are right
That's just BS😅😅😅
It also need a lighter or matchstick to kickstart its engine!! Have not chines told you about it
@@direwolf7491
If you wanna call it BS then you gotta explain why which is where you failed, indicating that you are the actual BS'er here.
@@KatariaGujjar Because for one PL15 is shit compared to the Meteor and J10C is shit compared to the Rafale.
J10C is simply way better than Rafale in air superiority
China ka maal kaha chalta h bakrichod
🤣🤣🤣🤣 loan me itna hi milega🤣🤣 suar ki aulad
What? You people don't even know what you guys are saying. Lol
@@direwolf7491 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Keep dreaming dude
Wtf Rafale cost 125 million??? J10 costs only 35 million. Ummm I don't even think Rafale is that much better than the J10. With 125 million, I would buy 3 x J10. Then have 20 million left over to build more modern public toilets for the Indian population.
98% Indian households have toilet facilities according to latest reports
( Article - Over 9.5 crore toilets built across India since the launch of Swachh Bharat Mission
Over 5.5 lakh villages declared ODF SBM provides access of toilets to 93.1% of households 30 states/UTs are 100% covered with IHHL ODF results in reducing deaths due to diarrhea and malaria)
And over 58% Pakistanis are toiletless said by their own Media and PM (Article - The dirty truth: 41 million Pakistanis without toiletsRecently, a Unicef warning announced that an alarming 41 million people in Pakistan lack access to adequate toilets; forcing them to defecate in public. Pakistan is in fact the third largest country, behind India and Indonesia, where people are forced to defecate in the open.)
🐷🇵🇰👙🇵🇰🐖👙🇵🇰 and yeah Grapes are sour.. You beggars can't even afford a Tyre of Rafale😹😹
@@tu.sh.3535 what Indians consider as toilet facilities is disgusting. Nothing more than a hole in the ground.
@@tu.sh.3535 yes but they still shit outdoors for fun. Thats their tradition
Iphone and Xiaomi. Know your place gareeb 😂
@@karanvarma5789 this isnt iphone vs xiaomi its xiaomi vs jio. Nobody cares about indian phone xiaomi is used world wide😂😂😂
Higher speed lighter weight best radar less price all makes j10c a great fighter jet than rafale.
Rafale spectra enter the chat
When u look at the price range… you will come to know that j10 is worth buying compared to Rafael which is 4 times more price then j10 c with minor differences
You will see the difference in maintanence, availability and future upgradation... that's why PAF tried to even get 2nd hand f16 rather than j10.
@@subhankarkeshi It's sure that Rafael has a higher probility to take a long time and more effoerts to maintenance due to twin engines, and India has no enough possible to take off Rafael to combat with J10CP as Rafael is so expensive that Inidia cannot loss one Rafael jet.
@@LeoYengo that's one of the dumbest replies that rafale is expensive so we can't use it in combat 😂... if so then every Pakistani high value military assest is useless as pakistan can't afford to loose it😂
No pilot will want to sit and fly on a J10 "flying coffin"
@@capricorn839 you bring down Rafael fighter jet against j10c and see which one is flying coffin .. you will get the biggest surprise of your life
3 J10s in 105 million can easily destroy 1 Rafale of 125 millions lol.
Because IAF got variety of Pilot's like idiot Abhinandans 😁😁
@@nomzee6520 That pilot(your father) destroyed your F16 with age old mig 21
This shows the capability of our Pilots
And you kids were serving your father tea
Papa agye papa agye 🤣🤣
@@nomzee6520 mig21 shot f16 lmao
@@devilJATT5911 Indian pilots are amazing, what do you mean? They only crash about 5 times a week, sometimes lose count of where they are and end up in enemy territory, sometimes get jammed and shot down in enemy terrirtory. Don''t worry bro, they have been trained by God himself, look at their skills.
Mdrsachaap paxtani logics😹😹 no doubt why they lost all wars to india along with world record 93000 surrender😹😹🇵🇰👙🐖
Indian Rafal does not carry Meteor missiles, France refused to sell Meteor guided missiles to India as well as Egypt, so Indian Rafal will have to settle for MICA missiles with a maximum range of 80 kilometers, the same as Egyptian Rafal, so it is twice less from the range of Chinese air-to-air missiles PL 15 carried by all newer Chinese aircraft as well as the J 10C
Brate sad naletoh na tvoj komentar I bas razmisljam, u cemu je poenta davati toliki novac (mnogo je skuplji nego sto je ovde navedeno Ili je to cena "golog" Rafala) ako nemas na prvom mestu Meteor,pa onda I Skalp I Hummer rakete v-z. Nama to izgleda da ne daju uz avion kao sto nisu dali ni Egipcanima. Nosivost je skoro 4 tone veca Ali to je sve. Bolje nam je imati 24-36 ovih aviona nego 12 Rafala. Gledam kako S/300 sa raketama kojima je istekao resurs u Ukrajini Samo obaraju SU/34,35,30,24,25. Helikotere K/52... Stari sistem S/300 pa je pretlja za najbolje avione na svetu,zasto bi mislilo da je ovaj nesto specijalno,kada do pre 10ak god nisu ugradjivali ni Aesa radar. Negde procitah skoro da ce upravo to strari polovljaci bez Aesa radara da zavrse kod Hrvata. Ako SE to Desi ,a Velika je verovatnoca,ja mislim da ce vlada da padne odmah nakon prvog isporucenog aviona
@@zorajevremovic4608 To je čista Laž i izmišljotinja da Ukre sa S 300 obaraju Ruske avione, istina je da ih Rusi uništavaju bez ikakvog problema i svi Ukrajinski S 300 su već uništeni, a za helikoptere nema potrebe za S 300 jer heliko lete nisko, Francuzi su počeli da uvode Meteor rakete tek pre godinu dve tako da nisu ni mogli da ih prodaju Indiji i Egiptu, takođe i Aesa radari na rafalima su novina i po mojim procenama počeli su se uvoditi pre 5-10 godina, Meteor rakete su izuzetno skupe, dalje što se tiče nosivosti Rafala to je zahvaljujući delta krilima koja su dosta veća od klasične varijante krila kao na mig 29 / 35, F 15, F16 itd... mada Rafal ima slabe motore i nemože de premaši 2 maha, njegova brzina je 1,8 mah a mig 29 /35 je 2,2 maha, F 15 je 2,5 maha a F16 je 2,1 maha
加上预警机的帮助，印度飞行员能在飞行中毫不知觉地被干掉
@@Oriental-perspectivealso Chinese and Pak aircrafts 😂
Gde si ti video da obaraju tolike avione šta lupaš! A Rafal nosi 9.5t al sa 3 rezervoara goriva od 1.5t to je 4.5t gore dole a od naoružanja mica cica meteor su teški od 85kg do 125kg pa ajd nek su i 200kg. 14 podvesnih sa GBU mba po 250kg i zavisi ako kače na jedan pilin 3 GBU pa nema sile da nosi 1.5t to su manje bombice zato ih ima a to kad računaš je 4000tone naoružanja 2 do 3 skalpa i puna kapa. Dajte nebudite Deca pa naš Mig.29 kad bi mu zakačio njegove rakete raspao bi se. A da negovorim o Mig.35 šta tegli SU.30 34 24 35 8tona al baš uboitog a ne gorivo je u njima. Bio sam gledao pa znaš kolike su to grdosije od aviona pa rakete a Rafal mali ko PL15 nad njima i čuj nosi 9.5t a oni 8 plus 13.000l goriva u sebi malo idi vidi težine raketa bombi pa izračunaj. Da nosi 14 mica to je 1.5t a ajd ima teži bombi ok al zavisi šta nosi oni ga prikažu kako je nakićen ko jelka a samo od zapadnih daju karakteristike dobre a Rusi Kina ništa.. Čuj ruše sa S.300 nekažem al si ga preterao pa nisu ni oni ludi da ginu tek tako a jesu dobili po nosu za KA.52 mislili da je svemoćan sad ne sa Mi.8 ih deru a kamoli KA.52 itd.
Intentional lies?PL 15/21 is superior than meteor and J10 also has larger radar ,all that at 1/5th price ,so no wonder chinese manufacturing wins. Rafale has smaller radar ,slower and less nimble and lesser ranged missile but at 5x more price.
exatly
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but the biggest difference is cost 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
for war a man behind machine matter more than machine and pakistan prove that in every war that it has best man behind the machine latest example is 2019 hahahahahah and see my ID name hahahaha
No j10c cost maybe that price. But it may higher for sale. Maybe sold in 90million
Pl-15 has a range of 145 km meteor is 200km and is ramjet. Absolutely delusional 😂
Speed together with talented pilot can make much difference. I would say yes J10 is winner with so much less cost. China❤️🏆❤️
What?😅😅😅😅
😂😂😂😂I think you are drunki
Abinandan can answer the best 😍😍😍😍😍. Rest r google masters 😂😂
@@mohammedrasul7639 Another nasheele😅😅
@@direwolf7491 do you mean tea is fantastic with proof 😂😂😂. 2022 now. No need to bore with scriped Bollywood old movies are even then ur hungry army kept running to their papa America crying every time after a banging 😍😍😍😍
Overall speed and cost comparison, J-10C is the better option compares with Rafale
Radar
Rafale: 838 T/R modules
J10: 1231 T/R modules
Short range missile
J10: PL10 +/- 90° off-boresight
Rafale: Magic II 27.5° off-boresight
Long range missile
J10: PL-15 300km
Rafale: Meteor 200km
Anti-ship missiles
J10: YJ-83J 250km range
Rafale: AM39 70km range
TWR
J10: 1.11
Rafale: 0.988
Engine MTBF
J10: WS10 1500 hours
Rafale: M88 1000 hours
**Engine fuel consumption
J10: WS10 0.695kg/N/h
Rafale: 0.898 kg/N/h
**Fuel capacity
J10: 3860kg internal for single engine
Rafale: 4700kg internal for 2 engines
[** what this means is that the internal fuel stores of Rafale will deplete very quickly due to Rafale having higher fuel consumption and two engines, reducing both the combat range and loitering hours. This can only be mitigated by carrying external drop tanks (which is often seen on Rafales around the world), and that not only severely restricts the maneuverability of the aircraft but also drastically increases its RCS]
Both air crafts come with good specifications but then pilot skills will be the decider, also the much less price of j10 makes it more fruitful
J10C is no match for the Rafale.
كل دولة تتسلح بما يتناسب مع الاعداء المحتملين ومسافة الطيران وماتحملة من صواريخ
Pakistan has always been known to have excellent pilots or better pilots than India. Pakistan Air Force provides far more flying time to its pilots than India. A known fact. Having cheaper planes who ALMOST stack up to almost four times more expensive but slightly better aircraft is a better deal for Pakistan. Having an experienced pilot with better air to air and air to ground missiles is what would determine who will come out on top in a dogfight. Losing three pilots to one Rafale is definitely more disastrous for Pakistan than India. India now has far deeper pockets than Pakistan so even if India loses 30 Rafales compares to over a 100 Pakistani pilots for an even fight, is disadvantageous for Pakistan. In a war, money saved doesn't win battles/wars but well trained/experienced men remaining who can to continue to fight, will win the battle/war. Pilots are finite, planes can be infinite if you have deep pockets. Israel has survived its wars because US handed whatever Israel lost and more. The pilots had to be provided by Israel though.
What your pilots did in 1965 & 1971 everyone knows even after getting trained form American forces.
We know how good Pakistan airforce is 🤣 They are trained in madarasa
O achaaa Sohail bhai ??
The new Manjan Now You sale now After JF Thunder flop show
@@aries9532 Better that than Mandir trained just ask Abhinandan =D
Pakistan is procuring J-10CE which is the most advance J-10. Both J-10CE & Rafael are 4.5 Generation Aircrafts.
At which cost?
In the battle field technology is secondary. USA lost in Afghanistan, Iraq, has never been able to peg Iran back. Ain Al Asad exposed US military might.
yes bravery and skills matter
And US found and killed Osama bin Laden inside Pakistan with higher technology.
The methods matter, if western countries would fight their war like Russia or Syria do, they would win but the country would be destroyed and their inhabitant decimated, but that's not our values despite what everyone might (with good reasons) think
No, the Afghan Army lost Afghanistan. The US helped them for 20 years, that’s a career in the military. If they can’t figure it out by then, perhaps the problem them. As I recall the US took Afghanistan and gave it to the Afghan people.
@@antoinedubocq2052 "...but that's not our values despite what everyone might (with good reasons) think"? Then what the hell are you talking about? If everyone has a good idea about how brutally or savagely US, France, England, and Russia participate in a war then has there ever been a different way of fighting? US used cluster bombs, Vaccuum bombs, Nuclear Bombs, etc. and you're saying that US can be even more brutal? Why do you thing Iran is trying to have a nuclear capability. US would have bombed Iran back to stone age if it was afraid that Iran already has 4 nuclear war heads that were purchased from Soviet Union when it was collapsing 30 years ago. Just like US knew Iraq had NOTHING but small arms, which is why US invaded, landed, and pretended to look for WMD. Who would do that if the country had dangerous weapons? Your side are a bunch of liars.
The combination of j10 c f16 and jag 17 block 3 is dangerous for any one in the compition of this combination india have rafale su 30 and miraj in which rafale is good the other two failed and can’t fight with jf17 block 3 and f16
J10C is far better ❤
in egypt our Rafale beat the su 35 in training and it was f3, we order 30 f4 Rafale,like uae they order 80 and indonesia gonna buy it too, the Rafale proved it self, thx for your amazing video
You don't have su35s after American pressure egypt cancelled the order
@@umaydniassuh6511 russia built some of them but they couldnt complete the batch number bec of sanctions (parts not available) so the deal is on hold. Other countries also cancelled su-35 purchases bec of this
Rafale marine f4 and f18 block3 are competting for indian navy order for aircraft carrier meanwhile russia helped us in making that indegnious aircraftcarrier
Egypt should have started its own fighter jet program by now. You are making France richer.. The massive amount of money for Rafale was enough to start Egypt's own fighter program.
3 J10s in 105 million can easily destroy 1 Rafale of 125 millions lol.
Don't forget, In Chinese Air Force J-10 has the same niche as that of F-16 in the USAF, the superior jet fighter is J-20, Rafale would not be able to compete J-20 at all .
and J15 J16 J16D。 Even J10c cant beat the J16 and J16D. The latters also more expensive than J10c. J20 is designed as the leader of Drones, plays the different role from J10 and J16
Rafale shot down an f22 in red flag. J-20 will be easily taken out considering how bad the Pl-15 is compared to the meteor
A Rafale F4, can take on the J-20.
All Indian News outlets are lying.
The Pakistani J10CE planes have 139.5 KN of thrust because they have the Chinese WS10B Thrust Vectoring Engine NOT the weaker Russian Saturn Engine.. This extra thrust also makes the Radar more effective and brings the J10CE much closer to the Rafale's performance. The higher altitude ceiling of the J10CE compared to the Rafale means that the PL15 missiles will have much more kinetic energy and range. The low altitude celing of the Rafale means that the Meteor Missiles will have greatly reduced range and kinetic energy.
A Eurofigher Typhoon and launch a meteor missile from 55,000 feet and it's the real Meteor, not the export version India has. The Indian meteor export version launched from a Rafael's low altitude celing only has 60% of the range.
Three things: no, J10C does NOT have thrust vectoring. It was just a single prototype of a j10B demonstrated, all pictures of operational j10c shows the plane with a normal nozzle. Second pakistani will NOT have the PL15, but PL15E, export version, downgraded as well. Third the maximum range of a missile means nothing, it's the no escape zone (NEZ) of the missile that matters, and the meteor beats absolutly all his concurrents in this domain.
@@loganlee2028 The Export version of the Meteor has a much lower range and no escape zone.
The NON export version of the Meteor launched from a Eurofigher Typhoon traveling at mach 2.25 at 65,000 feet altitude is where the Meteor's max range and no escape zone stats come from.
The EXPORT version of the Meteor launched from a Rafale at mach 1.8 at 50,000 feet probably only has a max range of between 120 and 140 km, than that's only against slow moving awacs and refuelers.
The range of the export version of the meteor launched from a rafale is only as good as the AIM 120C5 at best.
You don't know that, and the meteor is a much more nimble missile designed to engage 5th gen aircraft. But the missile need first to be locked on target by the launcher plane with it's radar. And Say whatever you want, the spectra AESA radar on rafale is surely more powerful and accurate than anything the chinese can get.
@@loganlee2028 The Aesa Radar in the J10C becomes supercharged and much more effective by getting the WS10 B or WS10C, or WS10G engines with 139.5 kn to 155 kn of thrust instead of the Saturn Engine with just 125 kn of thrust. .
These new engines also mean that the J10C has a much better thrust to weight ratio than the Rafale,, much better Climb rate, turning rate, etc.
The J10C traveling at mach 2.2 at 59,000 feet has a big advantage over a Rafale traveling at mach 1.8 at 50,000 feet. If India had Eurofigher Typhoons, it would be bad news for China and Pakistan.
Luckily for China and Pakistan, India has the much slower Rafale with a terrible thrust to weight ratio, very low service celing, and very low top speed.
@@salamander5318 Never Heard a source about 155 Kn of thrust with the WS-10. Official sources speaks of 132KN. And the maximum air speed means nothing, especially on a small plane like J10, wich is small and a low fuel capacity, if it wants to hit Mach 2, it must be ready to find a tanker really fast. As for AESA "supercharged" i don't know where you Heard such a term, it does NOT exist. And the rafale Can supercruise, unlike all chineses planes.
i believe that if a pilot knows how to push the limits of an air.craft he will decide the fate and not the machine...besides rafale is an extremely overpriced jet compared to what is offered in J10 C package.. Pl15 missile and meteor are the best weapons on board in both jets and yet chinese missile has better range..so whats the fun of buying rafale when u get same climb rate same kn thurst...i mean is it wise to spend extra 90+ million dollars for one aditional fuel tank... seems only corrupt countries has rafale because thats how political parties loot common tax payers..
It means Pakistan has 0 corruption.
exactly
90 million dollar for additional fuel tank hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Self Satisfaction is good . Carry on.jinke uparndo surgical strike ho chuki ho woh defend krenge waah
@@teaisfantastic3730 HOW IS UR ABBA NIAZI?
@@Abdul_puncturewala India can only bully smaller neighbouring countries with the backing of Western countries. Complete silence when China 🇨🇳 kick their bottom.
it seems, French scammed India for pricing.. .Lol"
Everyone knows chinese stuffs r cheaper obviously for one reason "lower quality"
@@abhishekranjan5314 the iphone u use is also manufactured in china
Stupid
@Farman Baloch Xiaomi vs iPhone. Gareeb desh ho gareeb cheez se khush raho 😂😂😂
India still has not paid for it!
Pound for pound, the J-10C is a much more cost effective fighter aircraft, compared to the Rafiel. Besides, experience has shown that French aircraft seldom perform as advertised, and are priced well above their worth, and countries often only buy these French aircraft, when others are not available, due to political or other reasons.
Gareeb desh saste maal se khush. Mig 21 hi kaafi hain tumhare j-10 ke liye. Yaad hain na kaise f-16 crash chupana padh gaya that tea is fantastic karke 😂
@@karanvarma5789 Are bhai konsa f 16 crash woh to america nay bhi keh dia tha ke koi crash nahi hua. Lun army he tum logon ki lun hi rahe gi😂😂😂😂
I learned from China's military community
In an exercise on January 7, J 10C and J20 conducted simulated combat, and two J20 fought with multiple j10cs.
The following is the dialogue translation:
This bureau is actually a drill, but J20 does not participate in the golden helmet and Eagle cup.
However, both pilots are ace champions. The opponent aircraft should be j10c, so j10c is really strong and in the hands of ACE elites. It even has a competition with J20, and not only low altitude, high-altitude supersonic can also escape medium-distance attacks for many times. Moreover, the RCS of j10c itself is less than 1.0, which is almost second only to the stealth ability of S57. J20 found that j10c is very close. Therefore, there is no time for supersonic raiding, and it is impossible to cut into the inescapable distance. Finally, the two fell into a fight, but J20 won, indicating that the fighting ability of the heavy fourth generation air superiority aircraft is not poor. Even if they fight, they still won the j10c, the champion of the third and a half generation mobility ranking.
The pilots of both sides are basically trumps, which is enough to show that the performance gap between the two aircraft itself is very small.
The confrontation between j10c and J20 has been controversial in China, because J20 is difficult to win almost every time, and it does have local war losses when j10c has quantitative advantages.
The other three and a half generations are difficult to compete with j10c after 2019. At least 11b and 16 have never won 10C.
So in the end, only j10c and J20 can fight on the final stage
At present, J20 can support eodas short-range perception + auxiliary fire control. This technical category is a complete rolling part. For three and a half generations, only EOTS integrates IRST without eodas.
It's not easy to win. It's a narrow victory many times. So without EOTS and eodas, I don't think F22 can get the same level record instead of J20. What's more, the F22 is worse than the J20 in terms of fighting ammunition and medium distance, and its low-speed mobility is not as good as the J20. It may not be possible to beat 10C as narrowly as J20.
Similarly, it is almost impossible for F35 to win j10c in combat, because it can't get into the escape distance without supersonic raid ability, so it is directly dragged into the combat Bureau by 10C. Fighting 35 really can't win, and it has lost its stealth advantage at all. However, for medium range strike, 10C is almost less than 40km and can not escape. 35 without supersonic raid, it is impossible to cut in, and it will be warned by infrared
J10c is a pure air combat aircraft. He is the king at high altitude and low altitude. He can score 4-6 even for the fourth generation aircraft. Of course, j10c is 4. He has completely sacrificed his multi-purpose capability, so he can't count on the ground and the sea, and his voyage is not good. Not far. However, as long as you fail to destroy him in the first medium range attack, once you enter the fighting distance, you can hardly get rid of him. You have a great chance of being killed, and it is difficult to escape his close pursuit
In fact, the j10b has upgraded the DSI inlet, and the resistance and stealth capability have been greatly improved. After j10c, the avionics system was further optimized, and the radar was upgraded to a higher model. Moreover, pl15 was replaced by pl12. The combat effectiveness has been greatly improved. After changing the ws10c engine, the maximum thrust is 14.6 tons. The empty weight of j10c is very low. So his push weight ratio is actually very strong. The biggest problem with this plane is that it is basically not good at ground and sea
The RCS of j10c is the lowest in three and a half generations, so that j16 radar finds that its distance is very close, so it is difficult to lock it in advance. As a result, he can detect incoming missiles through IRST infrared every time and conduct medium-range maneuver avoidance. As a result, it is almost difficult for supersonic aircraft to attack him without escape. If there is no early warning aircraft, no aircraft can do it
The biggest advantage that Pakistan have over India is that when it comes to Aircraft maintenance or repair parts, they're easily accessible to get since the J10's are manufactured in China, their next door neighbour and iron brother. This also helps to facilitate any subsequent enhancements that the PAF wishes to make in the future. For India, if the Rafale needed any parts or repairs .....good luck to them trying to get them delivered all the way from France and then trying to have them installed only to find that the wrong parts were delivered.
Well the biggest advantage that India have over pakistan is its enormous defence budget moreover it doesn’t need to beg to the neighbour door country. What pakistan should worry about is it’s economy which is sinking like a submarine. Pakistan already on leash to its solid iron brother china 😂. On top of it stop comparing yourself to India we will have our 5 gen AMCA running by 2026 and you guys have hard time manufacturing a needle. Needless to say as time will come either we will develop indigenous aircraft or sign a deal to manufacture it in India. But won’t beg like you guys do. All the best for Future beging endeavours.
@@308anmoldogra6 lool indians don't need weapons...they just need their mouth can shoot out a whole c0w over the moon and land on Mars looool
@@308anmoldogra6 Dudę Amca is only on paper not even a prototype exists what you talk about 2026 lmao
Ok thanks for the info
The J10 is comparable to the rafale but costs only a quarter of the purchase price of the rafale. The max speed of J10 is higher by 100 m/sec. Pakistan has made a good choice of purchasing the J10 as it can buy four J10 and India has only one rafale. The significant lower cost and comparable performance of the Chinese home grown J10 makes the J10 very competitive in the market of military aircraft.
The two countries have not the same military budget. Vs 4 J10, India can easily buy more than 4 Rafale.
They are not comparable at all.
Nothing comparable lol.
@@mitchjames9350 well the J10 is indeed more Superior than the rafale or any other western jet fighters of its class. Not comparable to western old junks. LOL.
No one in the right mind will sell Pakistan anything more than scrap, because they know that china is the actual entity buying equipment for Pakistan to access it and copy it. Then give Pakistan a dozen or two 😅
رفال مصريه ❤️🇪🇬 وقريبا الطائره الصينيه إن شاء الله
Wow! In the price of one Rafael, four J10-C can be purchased. And the speed of Chinese one is more.
But j-10 will get shot down by mig 21 just like f-16 😂
J10 is much better by time its improving more and more.
LOL funny joke...
Yesss..100000thhh gen tayyara J10 is better than alien ship as well😹😹
Rafale is so good that the French Air Force mainly rely on Mirage 2000.
According to 2018 data, the French Air Force has 115 Mirage 2000 and only 95 Rafale and E-3 Sentry for electronic warfare.
Rather have more j10 since it's one third the price and have more or less similar capabilities.
From 1:58 the radar comparison is baseless as Rafale has a first generation AESA radar made up of 838 GaAs T/R modules, whereas J-10C has the second generation AESA radar made up of over 1000 GaN T/R modules.
Rafale simply can't stand a chance when facing J-10C in WVR fights.
No Rafael will be 4x better. ORIGINAL J-10 can simply overwhelm in numbers and suffer less losses due to greater numbers. And this is an upgraded J-10C which is greatly upgraded.
Depends upon the pilot tooo
All can be shot down in dog fights. Making high G turns will cause the aircraft to brake up
@@itshamzatalat nothing to do with pilot bro in bvr
Why are u all arsowls and what a waste of mans resources in countries who cant feed their people. Its shows you what a pos these people really are.What a wasted pos.are leaders are. What a deuterated pos u are for caring about these waste of resources and the stupidity that surrounds me.
It looks like J10C will offer some Fantastic Tea.🤣😄👍
And I hope pakistan army will surrender as usual. They hold biggest surrender world record obviously 😇
@@abhishekranjan5314 I wouldn't worry about surrendering ask our boy abi about it
@@shafayrajput7837 well, world record of biggest surrender is held by Pakistani army when they surrendered 93000 soldiers against india so pakistan has better experience. Ask bajwa if legs are still shaking or not 😂
@@abhishekranjan5314 u wer not born to enjoy that moment but yes u watched nandu live on TV kaisay mara or tea is fantastic shurp shurp 🤣
@@muslimking3869 93k surrender and u lost every war u goat effer 😂😂😂😂 mulla
Chinese military technology is moving forward at alarming rate, from copying technology now they are advancing technology.
What else do people expect china to do, when the whole world is sanction china in technology.
the capabilities of both aircraft's will be tested in the Anatolian eagle exercises.
The capabilities of Rafale has been tested it's the J10 you have to worry about.
@@direwolf7491 well france's daddy US is scared of pl15's according to IISS. the ramjet air drag is significant factor compared to dual pulse fox 3 pl15's plus missile warning recievers will detect meteor earlier due to same reason...
During air to air following factors are imp:
1. Speed
2. Range
3. Angle
4. Altitude
5. Whether ac flying inward,side wise etc
6. All above factors decides the first shoot chances
Lastly, pilot is the key factor and how good he knows the enemy ac capability
All this data is good but other factors are the deciding factors
i would buy 3x j10 and still i will have enough pocket money left many other reason why j10 is better
this is not halwa puri its a fighter jet.
Both are good aircrafts. J-10 AESA radar has about 1300 TR modules which is 500 more then Rafale's. J-10 radar has better anti-jaming capability & resolution. Many analysts call PL-15 as world's best AAM. Rafale has advantages in payload and Air to ground capabilities. Overall both jets can be given nearly same score, both are 4.5 generation in medium weight category.
Rafael's electronic countermeasures and electronic counter counter measures with SPECTRA , unmatched maneuverability, with meteor (dual pulse rocket motor missile with 150km, unlike dual pulse rocket motor pl15 with 145km range), plus rafale is a twin engine aircraft, has more power to give to its radar's tr modules, read any reliable source , meteor is the best bvr missile currently,
The only aircraft which can match rafale in all aspects is eurofighter typhoon(except 5th gen fighters).
@@pankajshishodia4004 are u just ignoring Russia's su-35?
@@pankajshishodia4004 only one correction bro there is 2 types of pl-15 missile one is pl-15e n other is pl-15 both missiles have different ranges pl-15 have double range than pl-15e
@@pankajshishodia4004 if you add thrust of both Rafael’s engines, you will find that it is similar to the thrust produced by the single engine of the J-10. We will never know how much power is produced for each plane’s radar. As for Meteor and PL-15, we do not know the exact range, but we can compare the propulsion system they used.
Meteor chose an air breathing engine, which allows it to control the burn rate of its fuel to slowly cruise to its target and speed up when approaching target. PL-15 chose a dual pulse rocket that can burn the first stage, then choose when to burn the second stage to maximize range and speed near target.
The advantage of Meteor is that it can burn its fuel much more precisely to obtain the best range and terminal velocity. Downside is that it is air breathing, so the inlets on missile creates extra drag for the plane carrying it, also it cannot be lobbed high up into the air for long range shot, like normal missile, since the air is too thin for Meteor’s engine. Final point, Meteor accelerates very slowly at first due to its engine design, so conventional rocket based missile can hit Mach 3-4 in 3 seconds, while it make take 10-20s for Meteor to hit Mach3-4, making it ill suited to close range attack.
PL-15 carries most of the advantage and disadvantage of a conventional missile, with the added benefit of having a second rocket stage that can be ignited mid flight.
J10C has trust vectoring control.
Just let you know, J-10 is not J-10C, you can see them as two different fighters. Think wisely don't realise it after Indian AF lose a fight in the future.
I thought these two fighters are really close to each other untill I saw the price....
One is a Hermes, the other is Prada price. Both works as it is. 😂
I know why she compare this . Because india have Rafale and pak go to by j 10 😂😂
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 True
hehe true
And fun fact is it's a PAKISTANI channel 😝😝
The Chinese fighter with very reasonable capabilities and its price is equal to one fifth of the price of the Rafale, and with advanced electronic additions, it can frighten the enemy
@@DZ-Warrior1still you believe j 10 can fight against Rafale😂😂😂
Lets try and compare a J-10C with Rafale as this is a comparison with the old J-10. The differences are not much. Certainly two J-10cs are much more capable than one Rafale and they’d still cost half the price
Bhai Pakistan ki aukaat nhi hai 2 J10 leney ki. 😂
totally wrong propaganda video J10C is much better fighter then Rafale
4x cost... For a medium sized, rich country, 48 (or 45 or even 42) J-10C would be better than 12 Rafale. You can't afford 40 Rafale.
And remember how France reacted in the Falklands War.
My friends, the Rafale plane in the video is an Egyptian plane, not an Indian one. To correct this, I also read the comments of some Chinese and some electronic flies who say that the J 10 is better than the French Rafale, and this is wrong. Do not forget that all the countries of the European Union met to manufacture this plane, and France completed the project after it left. It is the one that manufactured the Rafale, which carries long-range weapons and missiles. It is distinguished from the J 10 in many things. Such as anti-ship attacks, tactical strikes, nuclear conflicts, air superiority, and reconnaissance, depending on the needs of the mission. It can also carry missiles and rocket launchers such as the Mica ir and Yam missiles, which are dedicated to air superiority. The EG Koz missile is for ground attacks, the aan39 exoset sea missile is anti-warship, and the longer-range missile has visual vision, unlike the J10.
Firstly, all Rafales in the world are from France, not India. No matter where they are exported, they are all Rafales from France. Secondly, what is the basis for saying that Rafale is more advanced than J10C? Just because it was jointly developed by multiple European countries? Don't forget, the A400M transport plane was also jointly developed by multiple European countries, but that doesn't mean it will be more advanced than China's Y20 heavy transport plane. Different countries have different demands for equipment, which often leads to unclear positioning of products. On the contrary, equipment developed by a single country is more effective.
If J 10 is better than Rafael then pakistan more richer than USA
can u just understand what u saying
like pakistan has got J10 from China
see the news
2. can you tell me the defence bujet of us militry and pakistan
J10c🇵🇰❤️🇨🇳✌️🔥🚀🌏
can't wait to see the j10 take the rafale down
tea will be even more fantastic... like it has always been.
The truth is that one is made in China and the other is not made in India. Compare the aerospace industry of two countries makes more sense.
Rafale is far better than chinese made....
The J10 is pretty impressive for its pice.
J10c cost 35 million an Rafale cost 125 million? Lol. Almost 4 times the price.
Just comparing the two jets 1v1 shows how rip off Rafale is. In reality it will be 4 j10 vs 1 Rafale. Rafale has no chance.
Rafael needs good pilots with big eggs
@@trkayani4949 yeah pilot and his decision making matters
@@trkayani4949 You'll need 20 J10cs to take out 1 Rafale. The Rafale give tough competition to even F35.
You guys are deluded😅😅😅
There is no restrictions on day dreaming. Do you think we have only J10 C ! No F16s block 52s ! Air battle always a combination these days, AWACS, ground radar , EW aircraft and fighter jets only use BVRs missiles from a long distance. There are rare chances hunted fighter could see who killed him. Learn something then comment.
@@direwolf7491 F35 is beaten by F16 in dog fight during US Air Force exercises.
J10 VS MIG 21 😂😂😌, That would be nice Comparation video.. 😂😂.
but still mig 21 will be better
Yes who will be better in killing its own pilots during peace time
@@rakshapuranik2372 sahi kaha , mig 21 se F 16 gera deya tho J 10 c ki kaya औकात hai
@@himanshudwivedi4926 kitnay F-16 giraye?
Are u sure that mig21 has 1200 T/R modules AESA radar plus 200km range BYR AA missil, and JMHCS helmet plus Multi-element imaging infrared homing short range AA missil? As I know, the last version Rafale that u admire so much unfortunately has not.
The outcome can only be find out by the real combat by J10C vs Rafale.
Pakistani pilots are best when it comes to dogfight we'll shot down Rafael inshAllah Pak China friendship❤😀❤🇵🇰❤🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
This question has already been answered. The J-10 scored 9-0 against Rafale and Typhoon in Qatar exercise
Pakistani pilots will win🏅
It's very simple, Pakistani Top Gun Pilot with J10 will out gun Rafael anytime! No match financially or technically!
Sleep well.. Dont dreem toomuch
@@forthepeople6738 29 February remember plz😂😂😂😂😂
@@ranashahzad8608 u also remember 93000 soldier surrender 😁😁😁😁😁😁
Bhutni ke pehle spelling to sikhle bhikhari Rafale hota h
Don’t you remember 78,000 Indian soldiers on kargil,,, bill Clinton help you out…🌶😂
J10 is much better than Rafael and is much lighter, meaning it's swift just like the bird named the swallow, it's very agile, and can do as much damage just like the Rafael can...
🐂💩💩
Hopefully it'll never happen but if Pakistan ever gets into a war, they'll be very please how the J-10CE will perform against other fighter jets, particularly those below 5th generation. Below is a copied and pasted article from a military website. I can't post the link because my comment gets censored. But I did create a J-10C playlist with the link in it. IMO, the jet's a beast, truly the best non 5th generation superiority/multipurpose fighter jet currently in the world.
------------------------------------------------
If the Rafale is against the J-10C, the two are basically equivalent in fighting ability, but in the mid-range attack, the J-10C has a clear advantage. If the J-10C launches the "fight and run" volley tactics outside the line of sight , Gust will fall into the embarrassing situation of "can't catch up, can't escape".
In terms of long-range air-to-air missile confrontation, although the European "Meteor" missile has an advantage over PL-15E in range (Meteor has a range of 160 kilometers and PL-15E is 145 kilometers), it is also embarrassing because of the aircraft of the Rafale. The caliber of the head radar is only 400 mm, so although the performance of the RDS radar is good, the effective detection range is not more than 150 kilometers, which is smaller than the range of the "Meteor" missile. It needs another discount to detect the J-10C with a certain stealth effect. Therefore, the range advantage of the "Meteor" missile is limited by the RDS radar and cannot be used at all.
Both are nice jets but depends upon the operators (pilots)who will use it with all the capabilities
All things considered, J10C is better.
Rafale have ain't no competition
Next compare eurofighter engines that last 8000 hours vs su 35 engines that last 1500 hours ... you do the math 1 eurofighter in terms of engines can last the same as 5x the su 35 in engines Without using weapons.... yeah
I don't doubt Rafale, I doubt the Indian air force， I don't know who is the first fighter to shoot down Rafale. but It must be the Indian air force that destroyed the first Rafale.
IAF must be happy and worry at same time after this comparison video.i think cost vice 3.5 j10c jets against 1 Raf.
On paper J10 is equal to Rafael but in reality it won't even see the Rafael coming.
J10c is not equal to rafale. It might be similar and it is the quater of the price of rafale
J10 is surely better on all aspects and cost effective and attractive over the Rafale hands down.
both are similar in some aspect j10 is better e-g radar, pl15 missiles, speed, weight, super single engine, and most modern electronic warfare capabilities etc
and in some aspect rafale is better e-g additional fuel tank, range, wing span, hard points
but but but 35 million dollar and 125 million dollar 4 j10C = 1 rafale (not in combat only in cost) hahahahah
so the conclusions is that india gives extra 90 millions dollars for additional fuel tanks hahahahahahahahahahaha
Which is battle proven can u include that😂😂
@@reepakkumarrout6733 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Rather your account title is better "Tea is fantastic" 🤩😛😅👈😁👍
@@reepakkumarrout6733 well france's daddy US is scared of pl15's according to IISS. the ramjet air drag is significant factor compared to dual pulse fox 3 pl15's plus missile warning recievers will detect meteor earlier due to same reason...
At the cost of four at Place of one and more or less the same capability J10c is better. Above all the man flying it matters. worth a billion of dollars.
PL15 missile is a Chinese missile ranging 300 km BVR .. highest range in the world by a wide margin
range doesnt make the whole story when it comes to air to air missile, the greater thye distance the harder it is to hit the target, in this case meteor is most effective below 150 km
@@tluangasailo3663 yup!
Your's is the only sensible comment I found.
PL 15 is not as agile as Nato standard missiles to hit a highly agile target like a fighter jet. The are best for not so agile planes like AWACS , fuel tankers etc.
We admit that rafale is a very capable fighter, but india have to field most of the rafales against china,, india won't have huge numbers for rafale against us plus nobody knows the true capabilities of j10c plus pl15,,,, pl15 can be a big surprise
It won’t be long before we find out which is actually better, India-Pakistan conflict will give us result.
It's not the gun but the man behind the gun that matters.... Operation swift retort is the best example ❤️❤️
Operation swift lies fed to ppl of Pakistan by the government u mean..
@@shikhabhattacharjee5538 ur government is still searching for the pakistani f16 that was shot😂
@@saadafzal8094 brahmos entered 120 km n u cudnt shoot it down, save ur asses next time 😂
@@saadafzal8094 Pakistan 3bar bayaan badla.. India kept on saying the same thing.. Humko to naam v malum hai un pilots ki jo 2 apke gire hain aur jo Pakistan ki awam ne lynch kiya hain.. Par aap log to admit nahi karoge ke woh aapke pilots the as u did in kargil war.. Pakistan is all about disowning it's soldiers.. What a fucking shit country man
@@shikhabhattacharjee5538 mate your favourite american intelligence said that pakistan f16 count is same so you wont trust it then...also tell me where is the f16 remains show it to us like we showed you your mig21...... Wont talk much but india disowning kalboshan yadev and then owning it shows clearly who is shit😘
Pakistan will be prepare more kind of tea in the future for “dear india air force”😂🤣
In which cost 1 mig21 = J10c
Aayaj Sidqi in pakistani parliament Maine khud dekha ki Baajwa ke sar pe pasina tha taange kaap rahi thi dar ke maare ek piolet se pakistani Army chief ki taange kaap rahi thi was also fantastic 🇵🇰💩🇵🇰💩🇵🇰🤣
Pakistanis will be making tea for Chinese in future. 🤣🤣🤣. And J 10 C will be taken care by our S 400's 🤣🤣🤣
@@tejasindianairforce3215the tea was fantastic 🤣😂jf17 shoot down Endia su30mki and mig21。maybe Endia can fight back in Bollywood movies🤣🤣🤣
@@sonushetty2569 sonal we need belly dance from you
Come on Arunachal border and entertain us
Barking dogs seldom bite
Example
India starts barking about every equipment even before any deal is done .... They used to bark about su 30 before feb 19 and after that they wanted rafale .... now Rafael is here barking is louder than all times before .... Still they will disappointed ....
Yup absolutely right ✅
ALLHUMDILLAHA Pakistan air force is already far more experienced well Trained compared to IAF its all about Pilot and yes IAF got bulk of ultra idiots like Abhinandan and many more 🙄. So its Rafeal or MIG's doesn't make any difference 🤔
@@nomzee6520 yah, it does not matter, we need to update the surrender agreement for Niazi
In 14th February F16 was shot and Pakistan is still barking
@@nomzee6520 exactly indians should bark about Bangladesh, kargil, Siachen, kashmir and how they made 93000 pakistanis surrender which is still a world record 😂
Would be funny when your j-10 gets shot down by a mig 21 again
In real war, a rafale pilot has no chance to find J10C, coz it will have been shot down, for its shortsighted radar.
lollllll satste nashe na kiya kro imran ki trah
Asians have tradition of seeing modest as a virtue when they say their aircraft is 5 it probably is 6 or 7 (so they can be safe); 🔴 when a westerner says his aircraft is 5 it is probably 3 or 4 (add on to the percent of boost) 🤣 *FACT*
True bro