Why Was Blue-Eyes White Dragon Tier 1? - Yu-Gi-Oh!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 168

  • @versutus2699
    @versutus2699 4 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    As Rata wisely put it, "[Blue eyes spirit dragon's] first effect was most likely suggested by someone whose entire family was massacred by pendulum monsters" XD

    • @gravekeepersven82
      @gravekeepersven82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      100% facts

    • @PleaseHitThis
      @PleaseHitThis 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel like a bafoon for thinking of the grey guy from Chowder.

    • @chendror872
      @chendror872 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can believe that

    • @Ramsey276one
      @Ramsey276one 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't remember that!
      XD

    • @glacierwolf2155
      @glacierwolf2155 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PleaseHitThis Schnitzel?

  • @LunaDachi
    @LunaDachi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    Don’t let Blue-Eyes winning worlds 2016 in a totally legitimate format with a Worlds banlist that definitely didn’t slaughter the other top decks distract from the fact that Word Chalice won a YCS

    • @doomkingraye7692
      @doomkingraye7692 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      World chalice is not consistent but its combo is really powerful...

    • @frankwest5388
      @frankwest5388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      sqvaddellamorte bs it’s kind of sad how World Chalice has become little more than Gameciel control

    • @notepic6357
      @notepic6357 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@doomkingraye7692 world of chalice doesn't do much now that ib and firewall are banned

    • @LunaDachi
      @LunaDachi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dominic Francis im not comparing them, I just don’t want people to forget that World Chalice won a YCS

    • @edymiguel4247
      @edymiguel4247 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LunaDachi agree with that. Nowaday, with Firewall, Brilliant fusion and soul charge banned... oh and add the addition of Dark Ruler No More and Nibiru, it just feels like its endgame doesnt do anything
      And that with the new Master Rules, U-link doesnt really mean much... yeah, what now?
      Unless an FTK is figured out or a 'you dont get to activate anything' combo, it will just die. And thats without counting opponents disruptions, like Ash, Nibiru, Impermanence, etc

  • @eliasjerhada
    @eliasjerhada 4 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    But you can't summon Blue-Eyes with no monsters left on the field and attack for game...

    • @GatorRay
      @GatorRay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I want them to make a card called "Magician's Link" which allows you to special summon a Dark Magician while you have no monsters on YOUR side of the field and let it attack directly. BUT have it blow up your backrow during the end phase IE say goodbye to that card you just summoned if Eternal Soul is on the field.

    • @justinlewis1248
      @justinlewis1248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Eli not unless you activate freakin Ancient Rules lol, or Rage with Eyes of Blue to summon 3 copies of Blue-Eyes (but honestly, both of those cards are kinda meh in a Blue-Eyes deck)

    • @ragingroadhog6073
      @ragingroadhog6073 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ancient rules does that but can be used on other normal monsters too.
      Rage with eyes of blue may be right up your alley if it wasn’t for the field destruction effect.
      Overall I say run ancient rules if your running a build dedicated to OG blue eyes. If not, there aren’t too many cards that can do that without some field cost.

    • @KudoShinichii1412
      @KudoShinichii1412 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      can this joke die please

    • @sebastiantschatordai
      @sebastiantschatordai 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justinlewis1248 Protector with Eyes of Blue > Ancient Rules

  • @JadaKaiser
    @JadaKaiser 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Anyone else put in a single Kaibaman just to look at his smug face and go "Yes, I am that. I am the Kaiba"?

  • @Stinkoman87
    @Stinkoman87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    It's tier 1 because Blue-Eyes is virtually invincible. It says so right on the card.

    • @Xeamless
      @Xeamless ปีที่แล้ว

      It can even defeat the ultimate wizard in terms of attack and defence

  • @number-qx1kw
    @number-qx1kw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    To promote the dark side of dimensions movie
    Also because kaiba owns konami

    • @GatorRay
      @GatorRay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you got it a bit backwards.

    • @BladeYGO
      @BladeYGO  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      👀

    • @AxisChurchDevotee
      @AxisChurchDevotee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Seems like it considering Red-Eyes keeps getting bad support and we all know what Kaiba thinks of Joey.

    • @dbomba
      @dbomba 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AxisChurchDevotee Dragun of Red Eyes would like to take a word

    • @chrishansen1842
      @chrishansen1842 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dbomba he's just trying to cover it up

  • @oceanman4413
    @oceanman4413 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Blue-Eyes can beat any 3rd rate duelist with a 4th rate deck

  • @KixMusaid
    @KixMusaid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Blue Eyes is the Charizard of Yugioh

    • @chendror872
      @chendror872 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kix Musaid pretty much

    • @heliosdiaz5855
      @heliosdiaz5855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      And Dark Magican is the Pikachu of Yugioh

    • @fishyweeb4820
      @fishyweeb4820 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And just like in Pokemon, it dies to rocks(like most decks do)

    • @louismasar6147
      @louismasar6147 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I want to dispute that but as hard as I’m trying to I can’t

    • @dimityrlefterov4877
      @dimityrlefterov4877 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Charizard is the BLUE EYES of Pokemon

  • @RedRanger0116
    @RedRanger0116 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I really wish that Blue-Eyes would get literal support instead of getting new versions of Ultimate Dragon.

    • @mathunit1
      @mathunit1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Those new versions would be OP if Blue-Eyes received an OP In-archetype fusion spell like Red-Eyes Fusion. :P

  • @Leant127
    @Leant127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    The flow of this video was really good

  • @bulborb8756
    @bulborb8756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    of course Blue-Eyes are getting more legacy support with a new monster called "Deep of Blue-Eyes" which has a pretty good effect even if it is another card that is landlocked to this archetype

    • @victortalons6873
      @victortalons6873 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'd prefer it staying in its own archetype than it being abused like magician's souls was used in cancer spyrals

    • @gunmetal10
      @gunmetal10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Deep of blue eyes is a one card combo, dragon shrine to dump blue eyes vanilla and an ancient egg. Ss deep of blue eyes thru egg, search chaos form, add chaos max.

  • @ashclaudius04
    @ashclaudius04 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When he said "poetic that pendulum monsters are countered by the oldest deck in the books, Blue-Eyes White Dragon" hit an unknown nostalgia in me.

  • @gracefulcharity8412
    @gracefulcharity8412 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    It was honestly a product of the environment. Alot of things needed to happen for it to become high tier deck which all happened lmao.

  • @maxigeiger4673
    @maxigeiger4673 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why was Blue eyes tier 1?
    Kaiba: ARE YOU QUESTIONING ME?!

  • @BigD321
    @BigD321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The time has come to stroke my blue eyes player ego

  • @dayonik
    @dayonik 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This deck at 2016 got me back into the game. As well as the Dark Magician support on The Dark Illusion, it was great (Is not needed to reprint them in every set but at the time I found it great) I still play them alongside with decks like Dinosaurs or Cyber Dragons.

  • @killerfox9674
    @killerfox9674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I don't know what your are talk about because Blue-eye white dragon is always tier 0 at locals.

  • @babysquirrel2746
    @babysquirrel2746 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the way blue eyes alternative is going, and I honestly hoped that future support cards in this archtype can be special summoned from hand by revealing another blue eyes monster

  • @miguelmata4557
    @miguelmata4557 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Short answer: Konami had a movie to promote...

  • @GeneralNickles
    @GeneralNickles 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Blue eyes may not have won any events, but it was certainly topping all of them.
    In fact, blue eyes was basically the only thing stopping Metalfoes from being straight up tier 0 at the time.
    I still say that blue eyes was a better deck than Metalfoes. More versatile. Higher power ceiling. And had access to some of the best xyz monsters in the game. Metalfoes just had a good match against them.(as good a match as a pendulum deck can have against blue eyes anyway.)

    • @BUNJIN40K
      @BUNJIN40K 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm not sure I can agree with that. "More versatile"
      You knew exactly what blue eyes would be doing turn 1, or pretty much any given turn, all the time. Summon alternative, summon a tuner, make a level 9. Which was usually just spirit. And if it didnt do that it was probably just bricking. The ceiling of those deck was *super* low outside of sacking soul charge.

    • @GeneralNickles
      @GeneralNickles 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BUNJIN40K clearly you never actually played blue eyes.
      you could easily make 2 rank 8s, and spirit, and usually still have a good hand for next turn.
      and i dont know how you can think a deck that has access to trade-in, cards of consonence, and melody of awakening dragon is bricky.
      it also made good use of where arf thou, and could actually search effect veiler with sage.
      this is another one of those cases where no one actually remembers what a deck was actually capable of after it hasnt been relevant for a while. like how everyone is always like "how were dragon rulers top tier? all they ever did was summon dracossak and pass. why are they even banned anymore? they dont do anything."
      thats not at all true. its mind boggling how often i hear people say shit like that. the rulers are banned for a reason, and blue eyes was top tier for a reason.
      sure, a lot of the time all you would do with blue eyes was summon spirit and pass, but thats because thats all you needed to do most of the time. spirit would slow your opponent down enough to let you OTK them the following turn, and sometimes you wouldnt even need to do that. if you went second with a good hand, you could usually clear your opponents board and OTK them right then and there.
      metalfoes had a good match against blue eyes because they were great at managing resources and could keep going long after blue eye ran out of steam, but that doesnt exactly make them the better deck. it just means they were good against OTK decks. blue eyes had access to way more powerful cards than metalfoes, and have an in-theme boss monster that basically shuts down pendulums almost entirely.

    • @BUNJIN40K
      @BUNJIN40K 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GeneralNickles I did. Thought it was terrible. But tell me, how are you making 2 rank 8s and spirit *without* soul charge? In conventional builds I'm almost positive you arent. Which is kind of my point. Also, on the note of dragon rulers, those are just much better, much more generic cards than most of blue eyes' stuff. *And* the world's finals of 2016 was literally 2 games of the deck losing to it's mirror because one of them bricked 2 games in a row. The scenario wasn't exactly uncommon either.

    • @GeneralNickles
      @GeneralNickles 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BUNJIN40K I didn't even play soul charge in my build. The fact that should charge locked you out of your battle phase made it pointless in a deck that lives and dies on its ability to kill the opponent quickly.
      And to make 2 rank 8s with spirit, literally all you needed was sage and an effect monster to target with it.
      Also, the world's finals was 2 people that were only playing blue-eyes because the world's ban list made everything else unplayable. They weren't heavily practiced in playing blue-eyes, and more than likely just netdecked builds that topped other events and modified them to fit the world's format. (Which is perfectly fine for high level players to do, but typically it only goes well when it's a deck they actually know how to play.) This resulted in subpar builds being piloted by subpar players.
      That whole fiasco was a result of the world's ban list. The consistency and power of blue eyes had nothing to do with it.
      And I really only mentioned dragon rulers because it's another example of people clearly forgetting how powerful a particular set of cards is. Much the same way you've clearly forgotten how powerful blue eyes was.

    • @BUNJIN40K
      @BUNJIN40K 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GeneralNickles I havent forgotten. I just genuinely believe the deck sucks, and always have. And I'm not seeing how you do all that off just sage and a monster to use his effect on.

  • @pootakhu
    @pootakhu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Still waiting for the "Why Dragon Ruler Tier 0" video :D?

    • @dumpsteronfire23
      @dumpsteronfire23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dragon rules never become tier 0 before

    • @BladeYGO
      @BladeYGO  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In due time my friend. Nah but actually I'll be doing one eventually, but there are only so many tier 0 decks I can cover, I want to build hype for each one!

    • @BladeYGO
      @BladeYGO  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dumpsteronfire23 They were actually, which when my dragon ruler video eventually cames out will explain when it was.

    • @pootakhu
      @pootakhu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dumpsteronfire23 How, most tournaments in 2013 ended in Dragon Rulers Mirror matches.

    • @dumpsteronfire23
      @dumpsteronfire23 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spellbook of judgment still there at the time sooo

  • @mikawa1314
    @mikawa1314 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Blue-Eyes Alternative can pop face-down monsters as well

  • @Bleachboy15
    @Bleachboy15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should make a vid explaining why performapals were, at one point, the closest deck to having a 100% win rate

  • @Nexus-445
    @Nexus-445 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wait... you messed up on Sage With Eyes of Blue effect you said “it can search out any level one light spellcaster” it isn’t just searching out Spellcasters, but overall any level 1 Light Tuner Monster, like the Stones which are helpful to the deck. :/

  • @drewbleborski7098
    @drewbleborski7098 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sage doesnt only search for level 1 light spellcaster tuners, it searches any level 1 light tuner

  • @juri101
    @juri101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "The deck's consistency cannot be matched with the consistency of the dragon's color"

  • @Nearnae
    @Nearnae 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I remember that Structure Deck: Rise of the True Dragon Lords (SR02) also included dragon support, like Return of the Dragon Lords. It came out right before the movie pack was released. I believe this card in particular helped the Blue-Eyes strategy, but I dont see it in your video

  • @masterofrites2749
    @masterofrites2749 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    short answer: because the banlist nuked monarchs. 👀

    • @majorBearsky
      @majorBearsky 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yoo what's the most important card to Nekroz?

    • @psvd7120
      @psvd7120 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mini ninja it’s brionac

    • @masterofrites2749
      @masterofrites2749 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mini Ninja
      definitely brionac.

  • @Nobody-xe9fc
    @Nobody-xe9fc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone remember Dan Green saying "Well...at least SOMEONE won with Blue-Eyes this weekend, right, Kaiba?"

  • @johnroy7708
    @johnroy7708 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If they're going to make more blue eyes support they should make dark blue eyes cards and make more a shiny Dragon support that's what they should do

    • @garygao6072
      @garygao6072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And or give us Red Eyes fusion but good for Blue Eyes cards, Poly is too inconsistent

  • @DesperateOak48
    @DesperateOak48 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My friend’s Blue-Eyes deck can semi-consistently get out Alternative Ultimate Dragon + Chaos MAX Dragon in one turn. And yes, their luck is just ridonculous, and yes again, it is scary

  • @onionlamento
    @onionlamento 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Now thats REALLY funny
    Day 68 of waiting for vendread support

  • @Ramsey276one
    @Ramsey276one 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tried making a Switch deck with Amarylease/Mischief of the Gnomes to Normal without Tributing... Then I didn't ewhst big monsters to put in it...
    Planets?
    Not Monarchs?
    BUT... Marauding Captain bringing in a 3K? Priceless (ACTUALLY a 2-3 card set-up, but STILL!)

  • @kenzofromtheyu-gi-squad2601
    @kenzofromtheyu-gi-squad2601 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another vid to add to my « why was » playlist!

  • @OtherL
    @OtherL 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I looove metal does just got back into the game and they caught my eye

    • @yugiohlegend
      @yugiohlegend 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Metalfoes? The pendulum deck? I’ve always loved that deck. If you need a good list, you can find some spicy builds on TH-cam on Trif Gamings channel ;)

  • @doublebasszealot1686
    @doublebasszealot1686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about blue eyes in speed duels? It was tier one there too.

  • @bearxbear
    @bearxbear 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm sad that there were so many metas I wasn't around to experience. Blue-Eyes ever being tier 1 in anything that wasn't within a short span of the Kaiba structure deck release just sounds so cool. I hope they can get some more legacy support cards like Bingo Machine, I'd love to see some cool Chaos Max based decks because that cards nutttyyyy.

  • @tumpalleonardosinurat2257
    @tumpalleonardosinurat2257 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The only way to support blue eyes and dark magician are continuous or field spell where lvl 7 higher normal monster gain 1000 atk and cannot be targeted by card effect and only be destroyed by battle

  • @mirroboylx
    @mirroboylx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow watching this now days before blue eyes was tier 1 in duel links

  • @thesonicslasher75
    @thesonicslasher75 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bladeygo I'm not sure if u caught this in your video or in editing but to hopefully help u not make the same mistake (albeit very small) in the future. Sage can search any level 1 Light tuner. Not just spellcaster type level 1 light tuners. I loved the vid but I did notice that mistake. Anyway keep up the great work man.

  • @minochanel
    @minochanel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still use my old blue eyes, it makes the job.

  • @MoonyInspired
    @MoonyInspired 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Blade, i think that the last Format (Orcust - Sky Striker - Thunder Dragon) would be a really good thing to do a video on.
    Because SKY STRIKER in the Full Power is equally (even in mechanics) broken as Zoodiac. Like, with the searchable...search ? (Engage) and the 1 card Boss (Kagari/Shizuku and Drident)
    This only means that orcust and thunder Dragon were so powerfull that stopped Strikers on being tier 0
    So, a "Why Sky Striker WASNT Tier 0?" Would be a really good vídeo. Luv your vídeos!
    (Day 1 trying to get this suggestion readed by Blade Senpai)

  • @firestylefireballjutsu2792
    @firestylefireballjutsu2792 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sage can search any level 1 light tuner it doesnt have to be spellcaster

  • @andrewscontent7524
    @andrewscontent7524 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer using white stone of ancient with 1 rating link monsters, because during end phases I get a blue eyes even if someone used infinite impermanence on it and I can add a blue eyed monster back to my hand

  • @WesleyParksTTV
    @WesleyParksTTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 1st card I ever owned from the Kaiba Starter deck 😍

  • @CRO-Palacinke-D.C
    @CRO-Palacinke-D.C 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nottrough the whole video yet, but would've been helpful to know about what time frame we talk about. i don't have a clue how long ago bewd was strong and how far power creep has gone therefore
    edit: he did mention a few dates, could be earlier in the vid, but it's fine i gueaa

  • @JustHiro848
    @JustHiro848 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Why heroic champion - Rhonda (forgot his name) is banned"

    • @BladeYGO
      @BladeYGO  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh that's a good one, I'll be sure to add it to my list.

    • @sto_ceppo9617
      @sto_ceppo9617 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it's broken

    • @Ramsey276one
      @Ramsey276one 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rhongomyniad...
      HELL of a name
      Hell of a strategy!

    • @LEC1857-6inFinalsGotReverseSwe
      @LEC1857-6inFinalsGotReverseSwe 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because of Number: 75

  • @Dwerynith
    @Dwerynith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    can you do a "Why was ulti-canahawk limited ?"

    • @BladeYGO
      @BladeYGO  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Honestly, I'm not sure if I'll do that one, the idea doesn't really excite me and I don't think the video itself will do that well. Maybe eventually, though!

  • @Bearlord771
    @Bearlord771 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you do why Dante never dies?

  • @blackg450
    @blackg450 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Blue Peeps Whitey Dragon!

  • @CyrusLeGrandProd
    @CyrusLeGrandProd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I genuinely don't think that the Blue-Eyes deck being tier 1 was a coincidence... Because by definition, top meta decks are those that are able to take over/counter all, or a majority of, other strategies. So It was good because it was meant to be good against the best decks at that time :)

  • @sherlock13holmes
    @sherlock13holmes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You make REALLY good videos, keep on keeping on!! 😁

  • @ActualGigachadEZ
    @ActualGigachadEZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Woah upload pog

  • @thefinalskarm1754
    @thefinalskarm1754 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Meanwhile in the Red-eyes corner!
    Oh you have an Erratum REDMD, that's lovely i wonder if Red-eyes cause-
    No.
    Will Red-eyes ever recover from it's identity crisis? Find out next time on Dragon Ball Z!.

  • @DaviRenania
    @DaviRenania 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very poetic ending

  • @Late20sSkateboarder
    @Late20sSkateboarder 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:48 wait it doesn’t say the card has to be face up... is that an unwritten rule??

    • @tooeasy1100
      @tooeasy1100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Baraldi No, it's not. Alternative totally can destroy face-down Monsters

  • @rotaugenandi
    @rotaugenandi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This time Was the most sad time for us Red eyes Player and every Red eyes Player was filled with rage at that time

    • @psvd7120
      @psvd7120 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro most people don’t care because red eyes is just ass

  • @sebastiantschatordai
    @sebastiantschatordai 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BLUE-EYES BEST DECK LETS GOOOOO!!!

  • @matthewplays7232
    @matthewplays7232 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah yes.
    Brick-Eyes Salt Dragon

  • @ashclaudius04
    @ashclaudius04 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    bgm names pls

  • @BitZMoment
    @BitZMoment 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    didn't blue eyes get 1st and 2nd at worlds?

  • @borreloaddragonxx7631
    @borreloaddragonxx7631 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @BladeYGO Please do a history of rokkets.

  • @duelmonsters7164
    @duelmonsters7164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love me some blue eyes 👀

  • @mathunit1
    @mathunit1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Blue Eyes was Tier 1 at the time?!?! The fuck?! XD

  • @Aceshot-uu7yx
    @Aceshot-uu7yx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could we get a pepe history video I know it could build powerfull boards and was hyper constenet but why did it become tier zero what else was around

  • @sweetpotatoffa94
    @sweetpotatoffa94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now do jerry beans man

  • @carrotcake6088
    @carrotcake6088 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should do a video on Infernity

  • @simas4609
    @simas4609 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im budget hard player but I'd pay for blue eyes if I played in 2016

  • @animevolution880
    @animevolution880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why? Because konami decided to add one card to an archetype that counters the entire meta in a deck that bricks more than frogs summoned in a frog ftk deck, just so we can have a worlds finals match where both players brick because it was a blue-eyes mirror

  • @hellotoday7435
    @hellotoday7435 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about yugi Kai a format. Blue eyes was a tier 1 deck there two.

  • @g-moneypartyrock6421
    @g-moneypartyrock6421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Day 3 of waiting for "Why was Hungry Burger Tier 0?"

  • @cameronlyon-hunter3655
    @cameronlyon-hunter3655 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Blue-eyes alternative White dragon can Target and destroy one monster your opponent controls the target does not have to be face up. READ!

  • @GatorRay
    @GatorRay 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll tell you what DIDN'T help it be Tier 1. Deep-Eyes White Dragon (Yes I DO in fact hate Martyn Kalendar because he won't shut up about it)

  • @AxisChurchDevotee
    @AxisChurchDevotee 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because Konami loves to favor blue eyes giving them great support while giving Red eyes crappy support.

  • @chargebladeygo6889
    @chargebladeygo6889 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have freinds would love the og anime and the majority play blue eyes instead of dark magician.

  • @rubenzafiro2523
    @rubenzafiro2523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    macro cosmos rabbit 2014 deck beat this

  • @moojza
    @moojza 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Didn't Blue eyes win world's one time

    • @tooeasy1100
      @tooeasy1100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Moojza 1st and 2nd Place on the WCS 2016

  • @leonshirogane5541
    @leonshirogane5541 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thou Bommer cant handle my pendulum deck
    (even thou I'm kinda old too) weakling :D
    learn new things is good, change is good

  • @I2obiNtube
    @I2obiNtube 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Devil's advocate here, every meta or tier 0 deck is just on top off the back of Konami banning the previous OP strategy. If that wasn't the case there'd be no need for the "traditional" format and stuff like yata, dmoc etc would all be allowed. Constant banning would be fine if it was to make the game more fair but it seems like Konami bans just to "change format". Which is pretty stupid way to cycle in and out sets. People with a monarch deck should be able to play a format that isn't traditional.
    Unpopular truth is that YGO is basically who does the most OP thing with the current best meta deck. For eg, you'll never know if Salamangreats now can stand up to Monarchs back then. In that sense Blue Eyes winning worlds is as valid as any other deck like Salamangreats winning it.

  • @Kefkaownsall
    @Kefkaownsall 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I mean it did win worlds so Kaiba can flaunt that over Yugi

  • @KudoShinichii1412
    @KudoShinichii1412 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish if this deck wasnt bricky

  • @aaronlivesay4652
    @aaronlivesay4652 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    *laughs in Maiden*

  • @gungnir382
    @gungnir382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Matze Up was here :D
    Grüss Dich Matze :'D

  • @williehawkinsii4845
    @williehawkinsii4845 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lime I've been saying blue eyes was just handed the 2016 world's. And if odd eyes magicians got dragon caller before 2016 they could have had a chance of winning

  • @melad3588
    @melad3588 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice.

  • @jestersol7100
    @jestersol7100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why Was Blue-Eyes White Dragon Tier 1? Easy, because Konami wanted.

  • @knowing1399
    @knowing1399 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dont know why you are putting this heavy emphasis on why Blue-Eyes was tier one. A lot of decks become tier one because they have great match ups vs the other strategies, it's not like this was the one time this has ever happened. Not, hating, I just find it super weird.

  • @bluehabs
    @bluehabs 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i hate this deck because this deck need 1 fucking card in felgrand SD which make D/D structure deck was declined and not became tier 1. seriously, D/D can win the world if they release it "accordingly"

  • @cardinal01
    @cardinal01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Real op from blue eyes is meiden

  • @VindeZwarts
    @VindeZwarts 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty sure blue eyes won worlds lol

    • @lloydbagby8355
      @lloydbagby8355 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yah it did the finals was a mirror match of blue eyes

  • @unknowniam121
    @unknowniam121 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The deck that losers use to win at something.

  • @DarkArmedDuelist
    @DarkArmedDuelist 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Blue eyes was tier 1 because Kaiba played them ;)

  • @psvd7120
    @psvd7120 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    And then blue eyes became trash