The Varlamov Dangit should also be a Dangit on Mayfield, as it was his stick that knocked the puck out. Good chance, but not a guarantee, that Varlamov holds onto the puck if his own teammate doesn't knock it out like that.
I hate the offsides challenge. It's really bad, because so often it just goes after plays that were CENTIMETERS offside. It's meant to protect against the egregious.
@@Kieva_Storm My personal opinion on this goal is that they had plenty of time to get ready after the offside that this goal should count just on the time from the offside to the goal. What is going to happen now. Anything that is 30 sec before a goal can bring back a goal now. This was 29 seconds after the offside should have happened. What is next???
hey hold on guys, it's 'the Steve', he'll start with the leafs losing streak and the lose to those bottom feeder teams like yotes, ducks, sharks, give the man some respect!
Varlamov def Danged It but cant believe you didnt even mention/notice the fact that Mayfield fully dislodges it from his own goalies glove to the point that i think they're both equally liable...also fair play to Trocheck for a killer finish under pressure
As a beer league goalie, dang its remind me that as amazing as nhl goalies are that they too get scored on in dumb ways sometimes (just way less often than us beer leaguers). Makes me feel slightly better about myself for a second especially knowing when I do it only like 25-30 people see it versus thousands or millions of people. Can’t imagine that pressure
Yep, but imagine all the times you'd want "offsides" in a game called. Like penalties, when some fans ignore it unless its on them, THEN its a problem lol
I was reflecting. Dahlin is swedish, Kotkaniemi is finnish. In both these countries hockey fights are not as big part of the game as in NHL. Yes, they do punch each other, aims to bring respect to the opponents and so on. But one rule is. If you drop the gloves, you are done. Game penalty. Sometimes even suspension. I know that when Canadians come and play in sweden, that rule has been tough for some of them to remember. Because for some players it is so natural to just drop the gloves and start fighting. This is not an intended discussion of what is right or wrong. I see benefits with both system. Just a thought of why they didn't drop the gloves.
The "offside review" controversy reminded me of game 5 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals. Colorado won in overtime, on a spectacular goal which was reminiscent of team Canada's gold-metal winning overtime goal in the Olympics just a few months earlier. With that win, the Avalanche took a 3-2 series lead as the teams headed back to Colorado for game 6. But some Detroit fans rewinded the tape and noticed that the winning play had been offside. There was enough discussion that Wings coach Scotty Bowman finally addressed it publicly, with the same attitude that you remember. Yes, it was offside, but it was incredibly close. You had to freeze the video on just the right frame to see it. Since the linesmen have to make these calls in real time, and usually get it right, the Red Wings were not going to get upset over this call. They lost game 5, and now their only focus was on game 6. Bowman's speech settled it, and I recall no further commentary on "the offside goal", which would also turn out to be the LAST goal Colorado would score in that series. Detroit won games 6 and 7 by a combined score of 9-0, and went on to beat Carolina to win the Stanley Cup.
I don’t know whether Saros’ .333 save percentage with 2 saves on 6 shots (and subsequent replacement) belongs in dang its for the Preds or hat picks for the kraken, but I think it deserves to be mentioned! That was the same game that Brandon Tanev got an empty net goal after falling on his face, haha
I saw the Wedgewood turnover behind the net live and thought to myself "this is the second week in a row we're gonna be in dang-its because Wedgewood can't stay in his freaking net"
Here's an idea for coaches review on goal, after any team score, the ref goes straight to the coach and give them 10 seconds to make a decision to challenge or not. This way if things are obviously offside/highstick/goalie interference, then they get caught and any tiny misses gets ignore.
I'd say more like 20 seconds to let a coach get captain and/or player input but yeah it needs to be like baseball where you're more or less asking for the review quickly or you don't get it.
@@kevinreilly51 Agreed. Players and ref aren't frame perfect people, we shouldn't always expect a call back because we have the tech for frame perfect decision.
I wonder if on any zone entry, the head coach has either his video coach or an associate coach take a look to see if it was offside in case they get scored on.
@@VeggieTart They already do. It was Minnesota's head video coach Jonas Plumb who immediately called down to Evason and told him it was offsides and to make the challenge after Zegras scored.
I was watching that ducks v wild game as a wild fan and I wasn’t even that upset over getting scored on like that. Obviously I was happy for the sake of my team it got called back, but oof
I have to agree with you, the whole offside review process is a little excessive, and most of the time its the bench that's looking at it because they have their tablets and as you said, they delay, timeout, delay and it just getting nitpicky. When I was growing up and started really paying attention to the rules I too thought about the dump in, my first question was why isn't it icing, the player didn't touch the center line, and like you said, that happens every single game, several times...
Felt sorry for Keumper on that one as a goalie, that's one of the situations where you know you stopped it at some point, the horn hasn't gone off yet so you know you have it somewhere and you just hope the ref blows the whistle before you have to move again.
It's just sh*t happens. This probably is the first game that I would say Kuemper had a bad night, even though the team in front of him didn't help either.
More goalies experience a lapse of concentration when playing the puck because they are distracted by the thought of that action maybe becoming a Dang-it. Steve is feeding them a 'self fulfilling prophecy' .....
I like how undercover agent Kulikov made it to two of these clips and in both he was the catalyst of the dang-it. First being offside and then calling for the puck from Gibson and then just throwing it in a completely random direction.
He also had the very nice butt assist on Kaprizov's first goal, and took the penalty that served as the catalyst for Kaprizov's 2nd goal of the night on the ensuing powerplay. All in all, masterful work by undercover agent Kulikov!
Most problems with offside reviews (and most reviews in all sports that use replay) could be solved simply by doing them at full speed rather than super slow-mo. The intent--everywhere it has been implemented--is to stop egregious errors (Duchene) not nit-pick the game to death. I don't know why every league has failed to realize this.
I swear... I understand the "get the call right" mentality, I really do, but when I'm actively cheering for my favorite team to NOT score because it would probably be called back thanks to a completely inconsequential zone entry a full minute prior then you know that something has gone seriously, terribly wrong.
Me, a Caps fan: "This season is so disappointing, I wonder how all of our team's former goaltenders are doing?" Steve, doing his weekly Dang-Its: "Anyway let's get back to talking about goalies screwing up..."
This is about the offside call on Trevor Zegras Michigan goal: Why is an opposing time allowed to call back a goal after such a long time? Would they still have call offside if Zegras hadn't scored? I think the answer to that is: No. So why if they see that it was an offside do not immediately call it? I think the solution to this is that there should be a time limit to an offside call. For example: An Opposing team should has 60 seconds to call offside and if they don't, any goal should count.
They should just reinstate the old rule. If the offside was too small to be noticed by human eye, it doesn't really give a clear advantage to the attacking team.
I was actually yelling your phrase about goaltenders at the Hershey Bears v. Wilkes-Barre Penguins game on Saturday last week 😂🤣😂🤣 people around me were getting a kick out of it lol
As a former High School goalie, beer/fun league goalie, I have made my fair share of Dang it's, I have even done the slide of shame, but the one thing I never ever did was play puck at the side boards. I wasn't the fastest skater, I know the side boards are a NO NO zone.
Honestly, I'm done with people thinking the Michigan isn't something 20% of junior players can do. Zegras is awesome, but not because of the Michigan or anything. It's cool and I'm all for more of it, but it's not some incredibly skilled play, it just looks really cool. There are 12 year olds that can pull it off.
The Varlamov/Mayfield dang-it is an even bigger dang-it because the Isles got a lucky breath of life at the beginning of that power play with a Rangers goal called off because the puck didn’t fully cross the goal line, only to then ruin it by giving up that goal at the end of the power play…
I think a reasonable amendment to the Offside Review rule that could work would be that a goal can only be overturned if the offsides happened within 10 seconds of the goal. Any longer than that, the defending team definitely has enough time to establish a defensive front and the offside is rendered moot by that point. Another variation could be if the attacking team has or gains clear possession of the puck behind the goal line. I just think something like letting a play go on for 90 seconds resulting in a goal only to get called back for a MINISCULE offside call is utter nonsense.
Even something like number of players who touch the puck between entry and goal would work. When you're in the zone for 30 seconds, does it really matter if the entry was clean?
These are great ideas. I would even go with 8 seconds. For your 2nd proposal we should also include the defending team gaining possession (the attacking team can still retrieve the puck afterwards and score).
@@arensaraydarian4648 ah yes, he also mentally took control of Cizikas just like Professor X and forced him to kick out his right foot. Of course knowing he had full mental control over this, Markstrom, while returning to his net took full advantage and put all his weight on his left leg in order to more thoroughly brace for and receive the force from the telepathically achieved, aforementioned, slewfoot action. 100% #Xmenconfirmed #Nothingtoseehereexceptsuperpowersandsomeguysshittydeductionskills
I thought the bigger Dangit in the Knights Leafs game was Nylander almost perfectly deflecting the puck to Reilly Smith for the tying shorthanded goal late in the 3rd.
I say this as a lifelong sufferer of the Canucks: that Miller play is in the running for Dang-It of the year if not the all time Dang-It All Star Ring of Honour
JT Miller this year seems to want to be the best player on the opposing team this year. He has done this so many times this year that it is almost not surprising anymore.
I'm sure the 1st thing Claude Giroux heard from a coach back in Mites was, "Put it on net. You never know what can happen." And as a guy who "has worn a full set of goalie equipment" (albeit crappy gear - I still felt every shot), I probably hold the distinction of scoring the game winning goal. We were playing our archrivals, and I was at the bottom of the circle to the left of my goal, playing a long dump-in. I waited until my wide-open right wing got back to the blue line and curled. I fired the puck up to him. It would have been the perfect lead pass to send him in alone. Unfortunately,... Just as I fired the puck, my left defenseman, retreating toward me, cut toward the slot and not to his right. My pass hit him in the left shin guard, and we all got a front-row view of the puck as it came off his shin and straight into my own goal. Yeah. 30 years ago, and it's still fresh in my mind. Hey, back then, we were all Hextall. Of course, I was Hextall before he was. I learned from watching Giacomin and Sawchuk. But, like when Bernie Parent stood in front of me, looked up and said, "I could have used you playing defense in front of me!", I told him, "I was a better goalie than I was defenseman, but obviously, I wasn't a very good goalie." Final Word: 15:45, I could almost hear Skinner yelling, "Last Man! Last Man!"
As an active goalie myself, I agree with you 100% the Gibson Dangit cant be pinned on him. The D clearly called for the puck, then in a brain dead move (they're professionals, in the N.H.L. - they have learned by this stage to slow their brains down and look before reacting) banked it off the end boards at such a horrible angle that it went in front of the net. DUUUUUDE. It is called a wrap around. You should try it. The D totally looked like a beer leaguer in that clip. (Goalie rant over)
Lmao that’s the most confusing part of being a goalie, the lack of awareness of the puck after you trap it on your chest/stomach or one of those good ol squeeze between the arms where you have no idea if it’s tucked in your arm or behind the goal line ☠️☠️ so much more confusion but pointing that out I feel the pain lmao
post for this week. Cale Maker's goal at about 5:30 left in the first period. Aves/Canes game 11/12. Don't know if is necessarily a hat pick or a dangit for Raanta. Just a unique scoring method!
I remember the NY Rangers Tikanen having a goal called back for offsides in the 94 playoffs. He took a slapshot from the blue line, scored and they called him offsides even though he wasn't. I thought that they were going to lose because of it but wound up winning
@@HeapOfBones Esa Tikkanen used to play on the Oilers way back when Gretzky and Messier played and won the Cup. He was a NY Ranger in 94 when the Rangers won the cup
Does anyone know which episode (I think hat picks) was when it featured the 2 commentators commentating while the refs were fixing the goalie net. (I think Grubauer when playing for Aves?. Peter McNab who was one of them and recently passed away.
Vancouver had a three-goal lead over Nashville and still ended up losing in the shootout? How many multi-goal leads have they blown this year? Kuemper had two dang-its in that game against Pittsburgh. Both of them tricklers between his legs. The fact that an NHL team is playing in a 5,000-seat arena and can’t even sell that out is a dang-it in itself. That last dang-it reminds me of how in the Caps game against Edmonton, the PA guy didn’t even have time to announce the Oilers penalty before Ovechkin slammed it home five seconds in.
can we all agree to let Matt Duchene have one 20ft offsides goal every season in order to allow goals like zegras' not to get called back for basically no real reason?
Anaheim's entire defense has been one colossal dang-it this year. Edit: they're on pace to give up something like 380 goals. That hasn't been done since the early 90s. Yikes.
Rick Middleton scored the BEST GOAL LINE GOAL EVER, he was hooked on a partial breakaway and lost the puck to his skates which he kicked back up to his stick and tucked it in the SHORT SIDE with a 1% chance of scoring as he was on a horrible angle to do so and SCORED! UNBELIEVABLE IN MY OPINION!
Don't like coach challenge on offsides either. Now when a goal is scored you have to wait to see if it's going to be challenged. If a blatantly offside goal is scored, maybe NHL head office can ask for a review, but not coaches, I'd be OK with that.
As a fan of the Wild since their inception, I think Zegras' goal should have counted. Goals like that give the league what they really want, which is exposure. An inch offside is a small price to pay for that goal to be on every highlight package worldwide.
100% on point about offside ... the intention behind the offside rule is so that a team doesn't get advantage, and being a hair offside is not really an advantage ... I'm all about using tech to make the game cleaner and more accurate, but maybe if the human eye doesn't catch the offside than it doesn't really matter ... also on an unrelated note, I wish they change the rule about icing, like if it's obvious call it, but if the guys are racing for it, and it can go either way, then don't call it and stop that glorious hockey action please
Completely agree with your take on the offside rule. I would even argue that in some cases (e.g. when there's a goal 1 min after the zone entry) the "offside review" is basically pure cheating.
wouldn't fighting with gloves make more sense than without them anyway? like in, I dunno, boxing? so how is that a dang it? cause... tradition? but what do I know
You have no idea how much I want the play by play to say, well we’ll see that on dang it’s” or “in honour of Steve we say, IF YOU’RE A GOALTENDER, TEND THE GOAL!”
Zegras goal was beautiful but whats the point of having rules if they arent going to be enforced? Just because it was pretty doesnt mean it should be allowed
okay the Gibson 'dang it' at 11:00 is NOT on him...at ALL, it wasnt a terrible decision to play the puck, he got it to his teammate...who then shot it into the side of his own net immediately leading to the goal...1000% NOT a 'tend the goal' situation EDIT: by the end of the clip you werent blaming Gibson at all so i retract my statment lol
The Varlamov Dangit should also be a Dangit on Mayfield, as it was his stick that knocked the puck out. Good chance, but not a guarantee, that Varlamov holds onto the puck if his own teammate doesn't knock it out like that.
Yep
I noticed that too and was about to comment about that.
I came to the comments to say this exactly.
I agree. NOT a Varlamov dangit. no goalie is gonna hold onto it if their glove is slashed like that
Steve is the worst
“The son of Hickory and Dickory” made me spit my beer Steve, well played!!
Hickory Dickory son of a Dock.
- Agatha Christie
I’m glad it made someone else spit everywhere, cause I sure did lol
Thats a hat pick
Came to say the same!
Good thing I already finished my juice, thank God
I was at that Ducks game last night and I feel beyond robbed of witnessing my first lacrosse goal... utter depression
Then tell the ducks to not be offsides when they score it kek
@@jasonb5987 Yes, it's horrible to apply the rules.
Leafs SUCK
I hate the offsides challenge. It's really bad, because so often it just goes after plays that were CENTIMETERS offside. It's meant to protect against the egregious.
@@Kieva_Storm My personal opinion on this goal is that they had plenty of time to get ready after the offside that this goal should count just on the time from the offside to the goal. What is going to happen now. Anything that is 30 sec before a goal can bring back a goal now. This was 29 seconds after the offside should have happened. What is next???
I was expecting this week's Dangits to be 22 hours in length, that way Steve could feature the entirety of the StL Blues last 8 games.
Lets double that runtime and include the last 7 Flames games too.
Let’s not forget the Penguins
It’s hard to include the Blues when the piss poor Canucks exist
Honestly the entire Canuck's season thus far have been a massive dang it. (Aside from Kevin Bieska night, that was nice).
hey hold on guys, it's 'the Steve', he'll start with the leafs losing streak and the lose to those bottom feeder teams like yotes, ducks, sharks, give the man some respect!
the goalie slide of shame had me absolutely rolling. excellent episode steve, a true gold mine of dang it’s this week.
Varlamov def Danged It but cant believe you didnt even mention/notice the fact that Mayfield fully dislodges it from his own goalies glove to the point that i think they're both equally liable...also fair play to Trocheck for a killer finish under pressure
To be fair to Varlamov, he absolutely has it. His own d man knocks the puck out of his glove. Dangit on Mayfield
As a beer league goalie, dang its remind me that as amazing as nhl goalies are that they too get scored on in dumb ways sometimes (just way less often than us beer leaguers). Makes me feel slightly better about myself for a second especially knowing when I do it only like 25-30 people see it versus thousands or millions of people. Can’t imagine that pressure
Dude. I feel this 100%!
I get rattled if I let a bad one in with just friends watching, lol I'm with you I can't imagine doing it on national TV
I f*****n love Zegras! Dude just got robbed of an amazing goal and there he is with a smirk on his face 🤣 How can you not like this kid?
should have been a penalty for carrying the puck.
Yep, but imagine all the times you'd want "offsides" in a game called. Like penalties, when some fans ignore it unless its on them, THEN its a problem lol
Poor Trevor Zegras thats twice now that fans weren’t able to appreciate his lacrosse goal
He just kinda chuckled and skated off. Dude just was like “whatever. Stuff happens”
As a Wild fan, can't say I'm too sad about it. Lol
Regarding Kotkaniemi, I would like to point out that Dahlin didn't drop his gloves either!
Yeah but Dahlin getting injured actual matters, where as an injured Bustaniemi is just cap relief.
@@robrick9361 I see we have another bitter Habs fan
@@nicksojka7457 Absolutely, I'm still bitter the Habs DIDN'T TAKE TKACHUK!
I was reflecting.
Dahlin is swedish, Kotkaniemi is finnish.
In both these countries hockey fights are not as big part of the game as in NHL.
Yes, they do punch each other, aims to bring respect to the opponents and so on.
But one rule is. If you drop the gloves, you are done. Game penalty. Sometimes even suspension.
I know that when Canadians come and play in sweden, that rule has been tough for some of them to remember. Because for some players it is so natural to just drop the gloves and start fighting.
This is not an intended discussion of what is right or wrong. I see benefits with both system. Just a thought of why they didn't drop the gloves.
The "offside review" controversy reminded me of game 5 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals. Colorado won in overtime, on a spectacular goal which was reminiscent of team Canada's gold-metal winning overtime goal in the Olympics just a few months earlier. With that win, the Avalanche took a 3-2 series lead as the teams headed back to Colorado for game 6. But some Detroit fans rewinded the tape and noticed that the winning play had been offside.
There was enough discussion that Wings coach Scotty Bowman finally addressed it publicly, with the same attitude that you remember. Yes, it was offside, but it was incredibly close. You had to freeze the video on just the right frame to see it. Since the linesmen have to make these calls in real time, and usually get it right, the Red Wings were not going to get upset over this call. They lost game 5, and now their only focus was on game 6.
Bowman's speech settled it, and I recall no further commentary on "the offside goal", which would also turn out to be the LAST goal Colorado would score in that series. Detroit won games 6 and 7 by a combined score of 9-0, and went on to beat Carolina to win the Stanley Cup.
I don’t know whether Saros’ .333 save percentage with 2 saves on 6 shots (and subsequent replacement) belongs in dang its for the Preds or hat picks for the kraken, but I think it deserves to be mentioned! That was the same game that Brandon Tanev got an empty net goal after falling on his face, haha
was hoping to see this mentioned, that 33% save
I saw the Wedgewood turnover behind the net live and thought to myself "this is the second week in a row we're gonna be in dang-its because Wedgewood can't stay in his freaking net"
I definitely saw that one unfolding and thought it was a bad, bad decision. Those times you hate being right...
Here's an idea for coaches review on goal, after any team score, the ref goes straight to the coach and give them 10 seconds to make a decision to challenge or not.
This way if things are obviously offside/highstick/goalie interference, then they get caught and any tiny misses gets ignore.
I'd say more like 20 seconds to let a coach get captain and/or player input but yeah it needs to be like baseball where you're more or less asking for the review quickly or you don't get it.
@@kevinreilly51 Agreed. Players and ref aren't frame perfect people, we shouldn't always expect a call back because we have the tech for frame perfect decision.
I wonder if on any zone entry, the head coach has either his video coach or an associate coach take a look to see if it was offside in case they get scored on.
@@VeggieTart They already do. It was Minnesota's head video coach Jonas Plumb who immediately called down to Evason and told him it was offsides and to make the challenge after Zegras scored.
I was watching that ducks v wild game as a wild fan and I wasn’t even that upset over getting scored on like that. Obviously I was happy for the sake of my team it got called back, but oof
I have to agree with you, the whole offside review process is a little excessive, and most of the time its the bench that's looking at it because they have their tablets and as you said, they delay, timeout, delay and it just getting nitpicky. When I was growing up and started really paying attention to the rules I too thought about the dump in, my first question was why isn't it icing, the player didn't touch the center line, and like you said, that happens every single game, several times...
Felt sorry for Keumper on that one as a goalie, that's one of the situations where you know you stopped it at some point, the horn hasn't gone off yet so you know you have it somewhere and you just hope the ref blows the whistle before you have to move again.
It's just sh*t happens. This probably is the first game that I would say Kuemper had a bad night, even though the team in front of him didn't help either.
@@jkliao6486 It disgusted me how the Pens were down three defensemen and STILL managed to skate circles around the Caps. It was a really bad game.
@@VeggieTart Reminds me of the 2-0 game 7 in 2017. Starting the game strong and after several near misses, just lost the momentum altogether.
It's crazy after so many "Dang-its" videos that goaltenders still don't know how to tend a goal.. 😂
More goalies experience a lapse of concentration when playing the puck because they are distracted by the thought of that action maybe becoming a Dang-it.
Steve is feeding them a 'self fulfilling prophecy' .....
I like how undercover agent Kulikov made it to two of these clips and in both he was the catalyst of the dang-it. First being offside and then calling for the puck from Gibson and then just throwing it in a completely random direction.
He also had the very nice butt assist on Kaprizov's first goal, and took the penalty that served as the catalyst for Kaprizov's 2nd goal of the night on the ensuing powerplay.
All in all, masterful work by undercover agent Kulikov!
I'm surprised they didn't add the blatant missed trip by the Islanders that led immediately to the GWG against the Rangers
I'm surprised too. That the Rangers weren't featured there for "not playing to the whistle" like Varly got featured for.
Most problems with offside reviews (and most reviews in all sports that use replay) could be solved simply by doing them at full speed rather than super slow-mo. The intent--everywhere it has been implemented--is to stop egregious errors (Duchene) not nit-pick the game to death. I don't know why every league has failed to realize this.
I swear... I understand the "get the call right" mentality, I really do, but when I'm actively cheering for my favorite team to NOT score because it would probably be called back thanks to a completely inconsequential zone entry a full minute prior then you know that something has gone seriously, terribly wrong.
EXACTLY! I hate it when you from your LIVNG ROOM COUCH can see the zone entry is offsides but the refs can't!
Yes- it’s complete bullshit. I hate that rule especially when they’re in the damn zone, in possession of the puck for 30s-1min plus. Garbage.
I saw that Giroux goal on Thompson live while working and said, out, "That's going to wind up on Steve's Dang Its"
Me, a Caps fan: "This season is so disappointing, I wonder how all of our team's former goaltenders are doing?"
Steve, doing his weekly Dang-Its: "Anyway let's get back to talking about goalies screwing up..."
im glad to see Strome's take away goal vs the Oilers on one of Hat Picks or Dang Its, because it was deserved.
Should have included the play before Dach's second goal, with Cole Caufield hitting Tyler Myers
Montreals goal horn, absolutely BRUTAL!
This is about the offside call on Trevor Zegras Michigan goal: Why is an opposing time allowed to call back a goal after such a long time? Would they still have call offside if Zegras hadn't scored? I think the answer to that is: No. So why if they see that it was an offside do not immediately call it? I think the solution to this is that there should be a time limit to an offside call. For example: An Opposing team should has 60 seconds to call offside and if they don't, any goal should count.
They should just reinstate the old rule. If the offside was too small to be noticed by human eye, it doesn't really give a clear advantage to the attacking team.
I was actually yelling your phrase about goaltenders at the Hershey Bears v. Wilkes-Barre Penguins game on Saturday last week 😂🤣😂🤣 people around me were getting a kick out of it lol
As a former High School goalie, beer/fun league goalie, I have made my fair share of Dang it's, I have even done the slide of shame, but the one thing I never ever did was play puck at the side boards. I wasn't the fastest skater, I know the side boards are a NO NO zone.
Steve has returned to his SMOOTH OPERATOR and hilarious presentation!
Since Vejmelka dang-it he plays like a madman, insanely good. Maye he got the proper motivation after this :D
Honestly, I'm done with people thinking the Michigan isn't something 20% of junior players can do. Zegras is awesome, but not because of the Michigan or anything. It's cool and I'm all for more of it, but it's not some incredibly skilled play, it just looks really cool. There are 12 year olds that can pull it off.
The Varlamov/Mayfield dang-it is an even bigger dang-it because the Isles got a lucky breath of life at the beginning of that power play with a Rangers goal called off because the puck didn’t fully cross the goal line, only to then ruin it by giving up that goal at the end of the power play…
Is the Michigan just how Zegras was taught how to score by default?
I think a reasonable amendment to the Offside Review rule that could work would be that a goal can only be overturned if the offsides happened within 10 seconds of the goal. Any longer than that, the defending team definitely has enough time to establish a defensive front and the offside is rendered moot by that point.
Another variation could be if the attacking team has or gains clear possession of the puck behind the goal line.
I just think something like letting a play go on for 90 seconds resulting in a goal only to get called back for a MINISCULE offside call is utter nonsense.
Even something like number of players who touch the puck between entry and goal would work. When you're in the zone for 30 seconds, does it really matter if the entry was clean?
These are great ideas. I would even go with 8 seconds.
For your 2nd proposal we should also include the defending team gaining possession (the attacking team can still retrieve the puck afterwards and score).
He's SO right about offside reviews!!! The previous rule was way better.
props to you for holding out as long as you did with Demko because I dropped him in fantasy after Week 2 or 3 lol
Markstrom being run over with no call better be here
Why would it? Markstrom backed into Cizikas.
@@arensaraydarian4648 ah yes, he also mentally took control of Cizikas just like Professor X and forced him to kick out his right foot. Of course knowing he had full mental control over this, Markstrom, while returning to his net took full advantage and put all his weight on his left leg in order to more thoroughly brace for and receive the force from the telepathically achieved, aforementioned, slewfoot action. 100% #Xmenconfirmed #Nothingtoseehereexceptsuperpowersandsomeguysshittydeductionskills
Run over? Really?
@@arensaraydarian4648 you gotta be joking lol, cizikas has a history of running goalies
@@akaashraghunath8677 I mean, it’s obvious it was on purpose.
I mean to ask on an earlier video, but where is Producer Drew?
THE HIGHLIGHT OF MY WEEK LETS GO GREAT JOB AS ALWAYS STEVE
“The Slide of Shame!!” Love it!
I thought the bigger Dangit in the Knights Leafs game was Nylander almost perfectly deflecting the puck to Reilly Smith for the tying shorthanded goal late in the 3rd.
I say this as a lifelong sufferer of the Canucks: that Miller play is in the running for Dang-It of the year if not the all time Dang-It All Star Ring of Honour
JT Miller plays Offence for both teams
Steve, you should keep a running count of "if you're a goaltender, tend the goal!" dang-its and display whenever another one comes up.
Rangers reverse retro jerseys are 🔥
yessss!! ducks have still made it into all dang-it / hat-pick videos so far (in some way)!! let's keep it gooooooing!!
Chara iced the puck half his career but since his stick on the follow through can reach the red line from the blue line it looked close enough.
There was a moment in tonight's Flyers / Blue Jackets game that had me laughing and saying "That HAS to be on next week's Dang-Its!"
Only 1 moment? (I say that as a Flyers fan.)
JT Miller this year seems to want to be the best player on the opposing team this year. He has done this so many times this year that it is almost not surprising anymore.
As a Canuck fan I love him or hate him depending on what side of the red line he's on.
JT Miller has two modes:
Racking up points and getting into the top ten players for points
Traffic cone
Like most start: If you're a goaltender, TEND THE GOAL!
You're*
@@snakeeyes9246 thanks for the correction
15:17 underrated joke, very much appreciated
There should be a statute of limitations on offside reviews. After a certain amount of time I'm play it should be irrelevant.
I'm sure the 1st thing Claude Giroux heard from a coach back in Mites was, "Put it on net. You never know what can happen."
And as a guy who "has worn a full set of goalie equipment" (albeit crappy gear - I still felt every shot), I probably hold the distinction of scoring the game winning goal. We were playing our archrivals, and I was at the bottom of the circle to the left of my goal, playing a long dump-in. I waited until my wide-open right wing got back to the blue line and curled. I fired the puck up to him. It would have been the perfect lead pass to send him in alone. Unfortunately,... Just as I fired the puck, my left defenseman, retreating toward me, cut toward the slot and not to his right. My pass hit him in the left shin guard, and we all got a front-row view of the puck as it came off his shin and straight into my own goal. Yeah. 30 years ago, and it's still fresh in my mind. Hey, back then, we were all Hextall. Of course, I was Hextall before he was. I learned from watching Giacomin and Sawchuk. But, like when Bernie Parent stood in front of me, looked up and said, "I could have used you playing defense in front of me!", I told him, "I was a better goalie than I was defenseman, but obviously, I wasn't a very good goalie."
Final Word: 15:45, I could almost hear Skinner yelling, "Last Man! Last Man!"
As an active goalie myself, I agree with you 100% the Gibson Dangit cant be pinned on him. The D clearly called for the puck, then in a brain dead move (they're professionals, in the N.H.L. - they have learned by this stage to slow their brains down and look before reacting) banked it off the end boards at such a horrible angle that it went in front of the net. DUUUUUDE. It is called a wrap around. You should try it. The D totally looked like a beer leaguer in that clip. (Goalie rant over)
I was at the habs/canucks game! That miller goal was really a dang it 😂As a Canadiens fan, love to see it!
If they're gonna keep the offsides challenge it should only be if the goal was scored on the initial rush.
"If you're a goal tender tend the goal" is my go to now when a goalie leaves the net hahahah 😆
Lmao that’s the most confusing part of being a goalie, the lack of awareness of the puck after you trap it on your chest/stomach or one of those good ol squeeze between the arms where you have no idea if it’s tucked in your arm or behind the goal line ☠️☠️ so much more confusion but pointing that out I feel the pain lmao
post for this week. Cale Maker's goal at about 5:30 left in the first period. Aves/Canes game 11/12. Don't know if is necessarily a hat pick or a dangit for Raanta. Just a unique scoring method!
*me remembering the OTHER scott wedgewood moment* oh no.
I remember the NY Rangers Tikanen having a goal called back for offsides in the 94 playoffs. He took a slapshot from the blue line, scored and they called him offsides even though he wasn't. I thought that they were going to lose because of it but wound up winning
who is this Tikanen? never heard of him
@@HeapOfBones Esa Tikkanen used to play on the Oilers way back when Gretzky and Messier played and won the Cup. He was a NY Ranger in 94 when the Rangers won the cup
@@adriankalitka3762 oh Tikkanen, I know him. it was Tikanen that was new to me, thanks for the clarification
@@HeapOfBones I forgot a K
Zegras got robbed, but not by a goalie!
Kulikov was clearly offsides before the goal. Good catch by the Wild
Does anyone know which episode (I think hat picks) was when it featured the 2 commentators commentating while the refs were fixing the goalie net. (I think Grubauer when playing for Aves?. Peter McNab who was one of them and recently passed away.
'TEND THE DAMN GOAL!!!!
Honorable mention for Dang-Its: Columbus's Power Play Percentage (6%).
Vancouver had a three-goal lead over Nashville and still ended up losing in the shootout? How many multi-goal leads have they blown this year?
Kuemper had two dang-its in that game against Pittsburgh. Both of them tricklers between his legs.
The fact that an NHL team is playing in a 5,000-seat arena and can’t even sell that out is a dang-it in itself.
That last dang-it reminds me of how in the Caps game against Edmonton, the PA guy didn’t even have time to announce the Oilers penalty before Ovechkin slammed it home five seconds in.
As a Stars fan it took me nearly a week to watch this set of dang-its. That jets game was just painful
Possibly the greatest Goal never made!🙌🏻👏🏻
Dangit! Zegras' goal was defy a hat pick... fluid af!!! I agree, the Planck length need not apply to determine offsides🤣
Uploaded this the exact night that Jack Campbell shot it right to Jesper Fast. Impeccable timing.
The Trevor zegras goal was amazing sad to see it be called offside
Zegres' goal should not be in this video. It was legitimately offside, regardless if you liked the goal or not.
Always good to see the Sens on the good end of back-to-back dang-its.
can we all agree to let Matt Duchene have one 20ft offsides goal every season in order to allow goals like zegras' not to get called back for basically no real reason?
Oops for Vegas 1:52, “Hey” 8:06, Slow emotion at 0.25x 9:53, and “Oh No” 12:40 & 14:03
So are we just ignoring Kelly Sutherland's little trip incident? Cost a team an entire game, no big deal.
Also at this point it’s gotta be an unspoken strategy to get the goalie to come out and play the puck hoping some shenanigans take place 😂😂👏
Damn Arizona really downsized their arena just to still not be able to sell it out
Can't wait to see the overall attendance figures for the coyotes and sun devils this season. Should be a fun comparison!
Anaheim's entire defense has been one colossal dang-it this year.
Edit: they're on pace to give up something like 380 goals. That hasn't been done since the early 90s. Yikes.
I can't stand when someone says "they're on pace for x" a month into the season. They're not on pace for anything. It's the first fkn month
Poor gibby and stolie
@@deusvult6920 exactly. Just like those pretending mcdavid has won the rocket because he has a stupidly high shooting percentage a month in.
I watched good Hockey tonight. Windsor Spitfires Vs Peterborough Petes. What a game folks, it was a tilt that needs analysys
"If you're a goaltender...TEND THE GOAL!" Can you tell my team that? I'm sick of them bitching that I don't play the puck out of the crease enough.
Rick Middleton scored the BEST GOAL LINE GOAL EVER, he was hooked on a partial breakaway and lost the puck to his skates which he kicked back up to his stick and tucked it in the SHORT SIDE with a 1% chance of scoring as he was on a horrible angle to do so and SCORED! UNBELIEVABLE IN MY OPINION!
Don't like coach challenge on offsides either. Now when a goal is scored you have to wait to see if it's going to be challenged.
If a blatantly offside goal is scored, maybe NHL head office can ask for a review, but not coaches, I'd be OK with that.
With that Gibson play also notice how much time we took to get back in his cage
As a fan of the Wild since their inception, I think Zegras' goal should have counted. Goals like that give the league what they really want, which is exposure. An inch offside is a small price to pay for that goal to be on every highlight package worldwide.
Gotta mention Saros letting in 4 goals on 6 shots in the next one!
100% on point about offside ... the intention behind the offside rule is so that a team doesn't get advantage, and being a hair offside is not really an advantage ... I'm all about using tech to make the game cleaner and more accurate, but maybe if the human eye doesn't catch the offside than it doesn't really matter ... also on an unrelated note, I wish they change the rule about icing, like if it's obvious call it, but if the guys are racing for it, and it can go either way, then don't call it and stop that glorious hockey action please
Completely agree with your take on the offside rule. I would even argue that in some cases (e.g. when there's a goal 1 min after the zone entry) the "offside review" is basically pure cheating.
wouldn't fighting with gloves make more sense than without them anyway? like in, I dunno, boxing? so how is that a dang it? cause... tradition? but what do I know
exactly my thought. Makes more sense to leave them on. But it's "tradition" as you said...
Can't wait for next week's Dang-Its being the Jack Campbell Show
You can’t blame Thompson for that, it was just an awkward bounce, but then again it was from center ice, it was just a bad bounce
Nothing about the Miller signing? That's a dang-it
But a hat pick to Bergeron, Marchand and Foligno.
the blues season so far should be on here
You have no idea how much I want the play by play to say, well we’ll see that on dang it’s” or “in honour of Steve we say, IF YOU’RE A GOALTENDER, TEND THE GOAL!”
I think a play by play commentator said that.. I’m not 100% sure
Zegras goal was beautiful but whats the point of having rules if they arent going to be enforced? Just because it was pretty doesnt mean it should be allowed
You’re fun at parties, eh?
*(im jk - just seemed like a prime opportunity to use that one)
okay the Gibson 'dang it' at 11:00 is NOT on him...at ALL, it wasnt a terrible decision to play the puck, he got it to his teammate...who then shot it into the side of his own net immediately leading to the goal...1000% NOT a 'tend the goal' situation
EDIT: by the end of the clip you werent blaming Gibson at all so i retract my statment lol
THE SON OF HICKORY AND DICKORY!!!! LMAO!! That may be the funniest thing I've ever heard you say!! Well done Steve-O!
Where was tkchuck (however the crap you spell his name) stabbing quick in the eye. That’s messed up AND a dang it
Honestly one of the strongest episodes yet