So the BASE game has 3 statues and the EARLY ACCESS DLC adds 27 ? Bro they should just make an awesome game, like valheim which has no DLC, if they want to fund their game...
It is an awesome game, there's actually a huge variety of buildable cosmetics already in the base game. The dlcs are totally unnecessary and simply an opportunity to support the future development and make an already awesome game even better
After the loss of Battlerite which was one of my favorite games of the time, I do think I support them making cosmetic DLCs early. Anything to keep the development running that doesn't actually affect gameplay I am entirely supportive of.
I'm hyped for the game, but I think advertising DLCs despite the game not even being available in early access is beyond clumsy. Let the players try out the game in early access and decide whether it's good or not before pushing more paid content.
@@gabrevanasa exactly, I thinks it’s great that games are able to monetise their projects with non pay to win items. It could be the difference between no future content and years of great content if the players support the game by choice
@@Brusea42 yes and that's exactly my problem with this. If the games needs you to throw a total of 60 bucks at it this early in order to survive and maintain development, that leaves a bad taste already. And I say this as someone who is really hyped for the game.
I am not sure how I feel about DLC being pushed already, especially with how expensive they are. I just hope we will still have a large variety of cosmetics to earn in game as that is what I enjoy working towards.
complaining about cosmetics and the price of it is pretty sad, you are not forced to buy it and it in no way benefits your playthrough in anyway shape or form, to me it sounds like you want something for free or extremely cheap.
@@degeneratex2 Raven is not wrong.This game is not even out yet and we are already fed this shit. People like you are just conditioned to this kind of shit and accept no matter how hard you get screwed over. Btw this game is not free and from what I understand not even an MMO...
@@nedthedog4574 Further monetize a game implies the game is finished product. By doing this they are showing that we are receiving less for our 20 dollar free testing pricetag. Look at valheim as a comparison. You don't add dlc to a EA game yet alone housing decor and things clearly could of and should of been a part of the game. Early access is usually bad enough. This feels like Early Access by EA. These DLCs are a disgrace. Clearly content cut from the base game and put behind a pay wall to try and monetize the hype and following V-rising has. What happened to killing a boss and unlocking a new transform look? Crafting the statues or stuff like that in the base game. Don't milk your audience in EA before you even launch
Any game that release any dlc before the game is out is usually a sign that the devs have no confidence in their game. Even if it’s cosmetic they could have waited a month before announcing it if they had any confidence in their game selling.
8:06 Yo if they wanted to go with a PoE style development cycle and have season servers with races and release packs every three months with a bunch of new features; i'd be fuckin' game o,O
It will always take away cool stuff from the game, othervise there is no incentive for people to buy it. It's just to fool people, some people are fine with it but it's never a good thing for the player.
The gameplay is looking fun but damn how low the gaming industry has sunk that they're announcing *paid DLC* for an *early access* game and this is seen as an acceptable business model.
Yepp agree with you. It's because people are so thirsty for a new cool game to come out that scratches their itches, they are throwing all lessons learned from the past out if the window. The hype is already real. I do hope the game will be what everyone wants. But that still needs to be proven first.
But.....its optional visual content that has no actual impact on gameplay....wtf do you care about dlc that adds customization options...you don't have to buy it....the game is 19.99 its a reasonable price for the genre...everything else is just a way to further support the devs if you so desire. Such an odd take complaining about optional content.
@@iceytheice Also nothing against Stunlock but it's not like Blizzard is making this game. Stunlock is big but they aren't triple A big at least not when you compare them to the really big fish of the gaming world so this DLC is a great way to garner extra funds from fans willing to chip in extra for some unique content. If the optional DLC leads to an even better game/more features then who cares?
@@iceytheice Because its a disgusting practice that wouldn't (and shouldn't) be accepted anywhere else. Imagine if someone was making you a sandwich you ordered, and they put it in front of you and then they want to charge you extra for the sauce you ordered with your food. Would you say "it has no impact on the overall enjoyment of the sandwich, you don't have to buy the sauce"? Imagine if you ordered a yellow car but they gave you a grey one, saying the yellow paint costs extra. Would you say "bro why do you care, its just paint and its a reasonable price. It helps the mechanics"? Nobody in their right mind would say in these situations its ok to remove a part of the product that is created alongside it, and then charge extra for that part that comes with the product. The same should be true with videogames. This isn't an unreasonable thing to complain about.
Meh... EA game with DLC's... feel they should have waited with stuff like this. Will we have a gazillion DLCs and Skinpack once the game go full releases? Cut skins and stuff like that in a grindy game... i really hope they have tons of content right away. If not this is just bad.
So... 30$ for gargoyle statues because the rest of the stuff in the pack is garbage is still 10$ more than base game. Not going to be buying that. The 10$ pack I might like though.
Supporting a game is fine, but this is a red flag. Day 1 Cosmetic DLC isn’t the end of the world, I know I “don’t have to buy it”, but it sends a message about where their head is at for the future. Grandma skin is cringe and break the great vibe they’ve had going. Can’t wait to be 1 year into the game and have someone run past me on a rainbow sparkle “le funny” mount
There exclusive things if they were 1 dollar it’d only be exclusive for people that started playing since why wouldn’t u pay for that stuff for 1 dollar
SO, like in every other game in existence, if you don't want to look lame as hell you have to come out them pockets. Like, come on dawg. The game isn't even out and they are charging us for extra fucking content. These accessories, clothes, and castle furnishings are things that were made for the game and segmented out just for us to pay more for it. I'd rather they just charge more for the game than charge 30 fucking more dollars to get full character fucking customization. Was going to buy this day one early access. Now I'll wait and see. Plenty of other games out that I can easily forget about this greedy bastards.
DLC's beeing revealed even before the game is released, what a lame time to be a gamer. Bring back the old days with games actually beeing finished before getting released.
I disagree with it being a lame time being a gamer since they are cool games out there and EA has made the industry more varied. But damn does this lowers my expectations already. I was totally hyped for the game and will definitely give it a try, but this leaves a foul taste in my mouth. Not a good sign imho.
Can you put out lists of games you recomend in one place. I like your taist and need recomendations on games already out that are not too old. Maybe every few months you could do this.
To be honest this is ridiculous. Dlcs in early access game which is generally a paid beta also very risky, because as much as I love to game to be developer further, I think this should be available after release. Money not always mean faster and better development, look at Valheim. If the will be good, that base 20 dollar is price is enough to finish the game.
Learning about these DLC even BEFORE EA IS OUT, I am like: My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined. This is a red flag. No matter how hyped you guys are, be careful and make sure this is the game you're hoping for. Don't go all-in blindly and complain later on. You've been warned.
@@DNAOrbb yes it is. It's a flag as red as it gets. Other games do this with a soundtrack maybe. But from what I am reading the base game has 3 of these Gargoyle statues while you have 27 in one of the DLC. It makes me doubt that this game will survive EA at all due to a lack of funds. I hope I am wrong though. I'd love this game to be a huge success. I was hyped a lot.
HAHA....your day is ruined? Brother if this ruins your day you might need to reprioritize things...its optional visual dlc to support the team...no one is putting a gun to your head to buy it...go and just buy the game and have fun.
To be fair it never took off, que times got pretty brutal near the end, and the battle royale while fun was a shell of battle rite. I don't hate on them for making a business move that made sense
SO another game that did go this shit route. I was hoping this would be good one time payment and you get the game but NOooooo. call it what you will but this is not DLC this is just to me something they should of had in the game from start. they are not dumb ofc they want more money, problem is that I just hate the moral behind it. O you don't have to buy this its extra etc etc etc, but the thing is THIS COULD of been in the game but they for all we know took it out to sell as a DLC just to make more money, and what you think about the future they will make more skins and more cool stuff that will be most likly way way way cooler then what we got from the game purchas and we got to fork up more money for stuff we could have got bundled in the game. I guess I will have to wait for a big sale pack where every DLC is included for the price of a normal game, Like most games nowdays greedy bastards.
A $30 dollar and $10 dlc, both grossly overpriced, for almost no content. And the mods in the official discord pushing it as a "way to support the devs" as if Stunlock Studios is a charity. You're a damned business, so treat your customers with some damned respect, and don't try to rip them off under the guise of charity. Frankly, there are much better "causes" I would like to support than a simple video game, so if I were to just throw money at something, it wouldn't be this game. For this game, I'm willing to purchase the base game, and various DLC's for a reasonable price, where the value of the goods is worth the price, because that's how a business should be run, and that's how consumers should interact with such businesses.
so every single conan dlc is no content, 10$ overpriced? but you'll buy a 20$ fast food meal, it's cosmetics that you don't have to buy, if cosmetics are no content you're implying that you'd want content that boosts people with better gear etc
I don't understand why are people so mad about this. In every online game there are special cosmetics that you can get by paying extra and this is for extra support for devs and good cosmetics. Its nothing new you don't have to pay for it
It's probably because the game is in EA. Which is pretty much pay us to test the game generally. And the cosmetics like housing decorations and designs were removed from the base game and put behind a pay wall. During Early Access they already taking away not adding more.
@@Butcherza01 Complacency is the reason this keeps getting worse. Expect and accept shit and you'll keep getting it thrown at you. It's not even out in early access yet. Valheim was 20 bucks also. A good comparison. They didn't make "curved walls and monster heads" a DLC option.
@@Blankeyslab Then don’t buy it, that simple. It’s seriously as simple as that. Let people like what they want and do with their money as they please. It hasn’t even released and you’re already bad mouthing their approach. Quit acting like a tool
@@ferminharris3826 quit simping for a game not even released and being upset at someone's opinion on the internet. I spent plenty in battlerite. This is just clearly taking advantage. Plenty of ways they could of gotten the "extra support" without clearly taking advantage. You keep accepting shit you'll continue to get it. Complacency. Look it up and educate yourself on how to correctly be a passive aggressive tool like you tried to be in your post.
I'm in shock that you approve the grandma form in this game. It's so immersionbreaking and horrible. It actually made me NOT buy this game, it ruins it so much for me. Has the opposite effect for showing love for the game. And it's a shame that a "optional" DLC pack should stop people from wanting to play this, it's so sad. Like a bad april fools joke, that isn't a joke. I hate Stunlock Studios now for their choices here. And I'm scared for what other stuff they will put in this game when they broke it before release.. Really a nice job there.. Way to go.. But I guess it doesn't really matter anymore.
I wonder what the longevity of this isometric game will be like, now that we have Lost Ark out here. With Immortal and Diablo 4 on the rise, what're we getting here to keep us engaged with the community?
Pvp. Apparently full loot. Classless system. Base building. Open world arpg. More excited about this then Lost Ark by a long shot. Lost Ark is MMO. This is a modern arpg with elements which will give it an end game, something most Arpgs struggle with.
I really hope the game is good. we have so few good vampire games though i would have preferred a 3d first person vampire survival game this hopefully will be good enough to keep my attention.
I think it’s pathetic they put out dlc garbage that should already be in the main game that’s still in “early access” how an out just raise the base price of your game instead of gouging for cosmetics to fund the game smh.
everyone is saying that this is cut content, implying that the dlc's should have gear, but then everyone would cry that people are getting a boost due to pay to win, everyone wants to cry about something, even when 1. you don't have to buy it and 2. the people who do are in no way ahead in terms of gear, lvl etc, stop complaining, look at conan, 90% of that games dlc is way higher priced COSMETICS
The hell are you talking about? What's it being cosmetic have to do with it being cut content? The point is a game should just offer cool items to build without you having to buy them piece-mail.
@@Dead_Heir the game itself is already very cheap, the dlc's are also very cheap, the point is if you don't like it, it's not like people who do give that little bit extra aren't going to be ahead in any way shape or form, if the game was the cost with all the dlc's straight away no one would care, but they have a cheaper game with optional dlc purchase and that annoys people
I think its awesome cuz your actually getting your monies worth. Most founder packs are shit. I do think its abit much that you have to pay for the game and this if you want one. It should be $30 for the cheap one with the game which it is but the expensive one should be $40 with the game included. Still I dont even fully know what the game is about but im so pumped for it for some reason!
wheres the battle pass, im glad u can make an attractive female.. rare in western games these days.. i wish i can just buy only the mask one.. and shapeshift
So the BASE game has 3 statues and the EARLY ACCESS DLC adds 27 ? Bro they should just make an awesome game, like valheim which has no DLC, if they want to fund their game...
1 million purchases says otherwise 😇
It is an awesome game, there's actually a huge variety of buildable cosmetics already in the base game. The dlcs are totally unnecessary and simply an opportunity to support the future development and make an already awesome game even better
That first price is crazy
After the loss of Battlerite which was one of my favorite games of the time, I do think I support them making cosmetic DLCs early. Anything to keep the development running that doesn't actually affect gameplay I am entirely supportive of.
They didn't need it for the game. The base game has over 100k people playing. The DLC came out the same time the game came out.
I'm hyped for the game, but I think advertising DLCs despite the game not even being available in early access is beyond clumsy.
Let the players try out the game in early access and decide whether it's good or not before pushing more paid content.
No one cares
You can literally do what you just suggested. Try the game and if you liked and want to support it further buy the DLC after...
@@gabrevanasa exactly, I thinks it’s great that games are able to monetise their projects with non pay to win items. It could be the difference between no future content and years of great content if the players support the game by choice
@@Brusea42 yeas, but not at EA launch, that's simply bad taste. But whatever. Plenty are going to buy it anyway.
@@Brusea42 yes and that's exactly my problem with this.
If the games needs you to throw a total of 60 bucks at it this early in order to survive and maintain development, that leaves a bad taste already.
And I say this as someone who is really hyped for the game.
I am not sure how I feel about DLC being pushed already, especially with how expensive they are. I just hope we will still have a large variety of cosmetics to earn in game as that is what I enjoy working towards.
Early access cosmetic dlc is quite strange. At least they are not just blue
complaining about cosmetics and the price of it is pretty sad, you are not forced to buy it and it in no way benefits your playthrough in anyway shape or form, to me it sounds like you want something for free or extremely cheap.
@@degeneratex2 Raven is not wrong.This game is not even out yet and we are already fed this shit. People like you are just conditioned to this kind of shit and accept no matter how hard you get screwed over. Btw this game is not free and from what I understand not even an MMO...
would you rather have dlc characters like sfv has ? cosmetics are the best way to further monetize games without messing up balance
@@nedthedog4574 Further monetize a game implies the game is finished product. By doing this they are showing that we are receiving less for our 20 dollar free testing pricetag. Look at valheim as a comparison. You don't add dlc to a EA game yet alone housing decor and things clearly could of and should of been a part of the game. Early access is usually bad enough. This feels like Early Access by EA. These DLCs are a disgrace. Clearly content cut from the base game and put behind a pay wall to try and monetize the hype and following V-rising has. What happened to killing a boss and unlocking a new transform look? Crafting the statues or stuff like that in the base game. Don't milk your audience in EA before you even launch
Battlerite's DLC and such was totally fine. I really want V Rising to succeed. Game seems to be legitimately great.
Hard to argue against a game being $19.99 too
I've seen so many hyped games fail....
I am hyped myself, but if this game holds up to it's promises we'll see that starting May 17th.
You mean cut content? I just went from wanting this to a pass....well that's nice I guess just saved me money.
Wish more people where like you. Maybe crap like this would stop happening.
Same, was looking forward to this but they just couldn't resist and so I shall.
This made me want to buy the game more xD
@@barncagkanyldrm4618 Same im gonna buy the dlc cause I'm a building fanatic but what I like is its not forced upon anyone thankfully
Skins are cut content now?
So, the game is 20 bucks then another 30 for the founders?
Any game that release any dlc before the game is out is usually a sign that the devs have no confidence in their game. Even if it’s cosmetic they could have waited a month before announcing it if they had any confidence in their game selling.
Yes I agree. This really leaves a bad taste in my mouth even though I am hyped for the game and want to try it out.
8:06 Yo if they wanted to go with a PoE style development cycle and have season servers with races and release packs every three months with a bunch of new features; i'd be fuckin' game o,O
so are all dlcs only cosmetics and have no further content that makes u stronger more equip etc?
i go not issue with cosmetic DLC packs as long as it dosent take away from obtaining cool look items ingame
It will always take away cool stuff from the game, othervise there is no incentive for people to buy it. It's just to fool people, some people are fine with it but it's never a good thing for the player.
The gameplay is looking fun but damn how low the gaming industry has sunk that they're announcing *paid DLC* for an *early access* game and this is seen as an acceptable business model.
Yepp agree with you. It's because people are so thirsty for a new cool game to come out that scratches their itches, they are throwing all lessons learned from the past out if the window. The hype is already real. I do hope the game will be what everyone wants. But that still needs to be proven first.
Especially when the game is cheaper than cosmetic dlc lmao
But.....its optional visual content that has no actual impact on gameplay....wtf do you care about dlc that adds customization options...you don't have to buy it....the game is 19.99 its a reasonable price for the genre...everything else is just a way to further support the devs if you so desire. Such an odd take complaining about optional content.
@@iceytheice Also nothing against Stunlock but it's not like Blizzard is making this game. Stunlock is big but they aren't triple A big at least not when you compare them to the really big fish of the gaming world so this DLC is a great way to garner extra funds from fans willing to chip in extra for some unique content. If the optional DLC leads to an even better game/more features then who cares?
@@iceytheice Because its a disgusting practice that wouldn't (and shouldn't) be accepted anywhere else.
Imagine if someone was making you a sandwich you ordered, and they put it in front of you and then they want to charge you extra for the sauce you ordered with your food.
Would you say "it has no impact on the overall enjoyment of the sandwich, you don't have to buy the sauce"?
Imagine if you ordered a yellow car but they gave you a grey one, saying the yellow paint costs extra.
Would you say "bro why do you care, its just paint and its a reasonable price. It helps the mechanics"?
Nobody in their right mind would say in these situations its ok to remove a part of the product that is created alongside it, and then charge extra for that part that comes with the product.
The same should be true with videogames. This isn't an unreasonable thing to complain about.
How will the DLC's work with the servers? If you have it, will it carry onto whatever server you're on, or does the server have to have them unlocked?
Should be account based. That would make more sense.
This game will lack players, and indeed dlc before EA tells u this game isnt for the long run.
how to unlock the skins and building
Thanks for covering this. Looking forward to the game and how DLC is being handled.
How do you purchase this? nothing on Steam or on thier website. It's like they dont want you to purchase it.... Anyone know?
It will become available for purchase on May 17th on Steam
@@Vulkan_Gaming Thanks Vulkan!
Meh... EA game with DLC's... feel they should have waited with stuff like this. Will we have a gazillion DLCs and Skinpack once the game go full releases?
Cut skins and stuff like that in a grindy game... i really hope they have tons of content right away. If not this is just bad.
will this games PvP be optional?
Yep, there is a 4 hour + VOD from Lirik on twitch about it as well
@@Spriktor That’s a relief
why the fuck would an unfinished game need dlc?
It’s cosmetics, what’s the problem?
@@swaggitypigfig8413 its cut content. it is made to be sold extra to you instead of having it in the game the first place.
Why did they say "Vampire Swagger" Tho ....:(
Thanks for the info Vulkan.
So... 30$ for gargoyle statues because the rest of the stuff in the pack is garbage is still 10$ more than base game. Not going to be buying that. The 10$ pack I might like though.
And the cycle repeats....
I’ll wait for release then read the reviews in steam before buying
It be crazy if I can carry my Royal White Froglizard mount from battlerite over.
Supporting a game is fine, but this is a red flag. Day 1 Cosmetic DLC isn’t the end of the world, I know I “don’t have to buy it”, but it sends a message about where their head is at for the future. Grandma skin is cringe and break the great vibe they’ve had going.
Can’t wait to be 1 year into the game and have someone run past me on a rainbow sparkle “le funny” mount
$40 Cosmetics in a $20 EA?
Normally I'm all for cosmetic MTX pay models like PoE, but this much in an EA game feels a little soon.
There exclusive things if they were 1 dollar it’d only be exclusive for people that started playing since why wouldn’t u pay for that stuff for 1 dollar
Don´t know wether I should be hyped or not because I don´t really know how endgame will be like...
They need to add raids for end game to maybe enchant ability’s further or enchant items if that’s not already in the game
Going for the conan exiles way of making money huh?
SO, like in every other game in existence, if you don't want to look lame as hell you have to come out them pockets. Like, come on dawg. The game isn't even out and they are charging us for extra fucking content. These accessories, clothes, and castle furnishings are things that were made for the game and segmented out just for us to pay more for it.
I'd rather they just charge more for the game than charge 30 fucking more dollars to get full character fucking customization. Was going to buy this day one early access. Now I'll wait and see. Plenty of other games out that I can easily forget about this greedy bastards.
the cosmetics that are already in the game look cool, don't worry
Same, was looking forward to this but they just couldn't resist and so I shall.
stop making a fuss about cosmetics its the best way to further monetize an ongoing multiplayer game and guarantee future content
Wtf a early access drop a dlc, wtffff.finish your game first.
DLC's beeing revealed even before the game is released, what a lame time to be a gamer. Bring back the old days with games actually beeing finished before getting released.
I disagree with it being a lame time being a gamer since they are cool games out there and EA has made the industry more varied.
But damn does this lowers my expectations already. I was totally hyped for the game and will definitely give it a try, but this leaves a foul taste in my mouth. Not a good sign imho.
Can you put out lists of games you recomend in one place. I like your taist and need recomendations on games already out that are not too old. Maybe every few months you could do this.
Thanks for the infor mate, Im so excited for this game. I finally get to make my own Selene.
40$ is kinda stupid ngl, but relic DLC is amazing thing.
To be honest this is ridiculous. Dlcs in early access game which is generally a paid beta also very risky, because as much as I love to game to be developer further, I think this should be available after release. Money not always mean faster and better development, look at Valheim. If the will be good, that base 20 dollar is price is enough to finish the game.
Really not a fan of releasing dlc while in early access....
Gives me the impression the items you earn ingame will look mediocre in comparison
Not a fan of ea DLC either, but from what I've seen the in-game armour looks better that the DLC imo.
this game is literally everything i have been looking for lol really looking forward to it
I'm so freaking hyped !
Really looking forward to V Rising: University Life
Learning about these DLC even BEFORE EA IS OUT, I am like:
My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
This is a red flag. No matter how hyped you guys are, be careful and make sure this is the game you're hoping for. Don't go all-in blindly and complain later on.
You've been warned.
It's a support pack. A lot of games do this. Successful games even. It's not as big of a deal as you are blowing it up to be.
@@DNAOrbb yes it is. It's a flag as red as it gets. Other games do this with a soundtrack maybe. But from what I am reading the base game has 3 of these Gargoyle statues while you have 27 in one of the DLC.
It makes me doubt that this game will survive EA at all due to a lack of funds.
I hope I am wrong though. I'd love this game to be a huge success. I was hyped a lot.
HAHA....your day is ruined? Brother if this ruins your day you might need to reprioritize things...its optional visual dlc to support the team...no one is putting a gun to your head to buy it...go and just buy the game and have fun.
Just remember how dirty they did battlerite.
To be fair it never took off, que times got pretty brutal near the end, and the battle royale while fun was a shell of battle rite. I don't hate on them for making a business move that made sense
Do you remember when gabe himself wanted to make mods PAID ? that was pretty scummy wasnt it ? bet you still using steam tho
But expensive but if there's enough content in the base game I'll be happy to spend on it all!
SO another game that did go this shit route. I was hoping this would be good one time payment and you get the game but NOooooo. call it what you will but this is not DLC this is just to me something they should of had in the game from start. they are not dumb ofc they want more money, problem is that I just hate the moral behind it. O you don't have to buy this its extra etc etc etc, but the thing is THIS COULD of been in the game but they for all we know took it out to sell as a DLC just to make more money, and what you think about the future they will make more skins and more cool stuff that will be most likly way way way cooler then what we got from the game purchas and we got to fork up more money for stuff we could have got bundled in the game. I guess I will have to wait for a big sale pack where every DLC is included for the price of a normal game, Like most games nowdays greedy bastards.
Everspace im checking out this game now
Everspace 2 is really good
I really really hope this game is not p2w it looks so perfect to be true
how if its cosmetic only and they will not have a battle pass or anything like that
ngl, if they added additional content apart from cosmetics in EA that look so bad..
If I could then I would buy only gargul
Only thing that makes me sad in all of this are people who defend this.
A $30 dollar and $10 dlc, both grossly overpriced, for almost no content. And the mods in the official discord pushing it as a "way to support the devs" as if Stunlock Studios is a charity. You're a damned business, so treat your customers with some damned respect, and don't try to rip them off under the guise of charity. Frankly, there are much better "causes" I would like to support than a simple video game, so if I were to just throw money at something, it wouldn't be this game. For this game, I'm willing to purchase the base game, and various DLC's for a reasonable price, where the value of the goods is worth the price, because that's how a business should be run, and that's how consumers should interact with such businesses.
so every single conan dlc is no content, 10$ overpriced? but you'll buy a 20$ fast food meal, it's cosmetics that you don't have to buy, if cosmetics are no content you're implying that you'd want content that boosts people with better gear etc
When I see DLC before the actual game isnt even released yet I just ignore the shit out it.
I don't understand why are people so mad about this. In every online game there are special cosmetics that you can get by paying extra and this is for extra support for devs and good cosmetics. Its nothing new you don't have to pay for it
It's probably because the game is in EA. Which is pretty much pay us to test the game generally. And the cosmetics like housing decorations and designs were removed from the base game and put behind a pay wall. During Early Access they already taking away not adding more.
@@Butcherza01 Complacency is the reason this keeps getting worse. Expect and accept shit and you'll keep getting it thrown at you. It's not even out in early access yet. Valheim was 20 bucks also. A good comparison. They didn't make "curved walls and monster heads" a DLC option.
@@Blankeyslab Then don’t buy it, that simple. It’s seriously as simple as that. Let people like what they want and do with their money as they please. It hasn’t even released and you’re already bad mouthing their approach. Quit acting like a tool
@@ferminharris3826 quit simping for a game not even released and being upset at someone's opinion on the internet. I spent plenty in battlerite. This is just clearly taking advantage. Plenty of ways they could of gotten the "extra support" without clearly taking advantage. You keep accepting shit you'll continue to get it. Complacency. Look it up and educate yourself on how to correctly be a passive aggressive tool like you tried to be in your post.
@@Blankeyslab valheim, this is V Rising.
My teachers clan got 10 of The game beta keys
That price is way to high! Greed is what I see. And its a early access and a risk as it is! All I now see is Valheim syndrome!
I'm in shock that you approve the grandma form in this game. It's so immersionbreaking and horrible. It actually made me NOT buy this game, it ruins it so much for me. Has the opposite effect for showing love for the game. And it's a shame that a "optional" DLC pack should stop people from wanting to play this, it's so sad. Like a bad april fools joke, that isn't a joke. I hate Stunlock Studios now for their choices here. And I'm scared for what other stuff they will put in this game when they broke it before release.. Really a nice job there.. Way to go.. But I guess it doesn't really matter anymore.
I wonder what the longevity of this isometric game will be like, now that we have Lost Ark out here. With Immortal and Diablo 4 on the rise, what're we getting here to keep us engaged with the community?
Pvp. Apparently full loot. Classless system. Base building. Open world arpg. More excited about this then Lost Ark by a long shot. Lost Ark is MMO. This is a modern arpg with elements which will give it an end game, something most Arpgs struggle with.
think its fine. there is no must have, and as a supporter pack im good with it :)
I really hope the game is good. we have so few good vampire games though i would have preferred a 3d first person vampire survival game this hopefully will be good enough to keep my attention.
Cosmetics? For me it should be best game play not looks nice.
DLC for a game that isnt even out yet? Game looks mid af
60$ down the drain I guess
Game is 20 bucks tho
@@Spriktor yeah but I gotta buy the other stuff to
Ew. Another early access cheap game with dlc... PASS.
I think it’s pathetic they put out dlc garbage that should already be in the main game that’s still in “early access” how an out just raise the base price of your game instead of gouging for cosmetics to fund the game smh.
I’ll buy all the cosmetics just to support the devs. I truly have faith in this game based off of what I’ve seen.
everyone is saying that this is cut content, implying that the dlc's should have gear, but then everyone would cry that people are getting a boost due to pay to win, everyone wants to cry about something, even when 1. you don't have to buy it and 2. the people who do are in no way ahead in terms of gear, lvl etc, stop complaining, look at conan, 90% of that games dlc is way higher priced COSMETICS
The hell are you talking about? What's it being cosmetic have to do with it being cut content? The point is a game should just offer cool items to build without you having to buy them piece-mail.
@@Dead_Heir the game itself is already very cheap, the dlc's are also very cheap, the point is if you don't like it, it's not like people who do give that little bit extra aren't going to be ahead in any way shape or form, if the game was the cost with all the dlc's straight away no one would care, but they have a cheaper game with optional dlc purchase and that annoys people
I think its awesome cuz your actually getting your monies worth. Most founder packs are shit. I do think its abit much that you have to pay for the game and this if you want one. It should be $30 for the cheap one with the game which it is but the expensive one should be $40 with the game included. Still I dont even fully know what the game is about but im so pumped for it for some reason!
wheres the battle pass, im glad u can make an attractive female.. rare in western games these days.. i wish i can just buy only the mask one.. and shapeshift