Sailor found not guilty in fire that destroyed U.S.S. Bonhomme Richard

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @emeraldforcier14
    @emeraldforcier14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wonderful! Right from the beginning a lot of people felt the Navy would throw some poor enlisted person under the bus rather than address obvious management problems.

    • @rgloria40
      @rgloria40 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think the enlisted people are scott free. One problem is the stealing of other people identities to work jobs in the San Diego area which require a US accredited ENGINEERING DEGREE or STEM degree. They usually hire military family members (military clearance by association) or service member as (secondary job) who may or may not have complete engineering prep course work (2 years). The service member has to concentrate on firefighting and their in rate training and not just get another pay check from the Defense Industrial Complex. In fact, many people assigning contract don't have the initial engineering (or STEM) bachelor degree to assign contracts as well as the final master degree in STEM. They are also taught by proxy who don't have an STEM degree in the field. Navy shipyard is an engineering environment. Another is the problems is officer ranks not having the engineering degree; mostly LDO, mustang and CWO who may have learn the wrong way for most of their careers and get caught.

    • @emeraldforcier14
      @emeraldforcier14 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rgloria40 Well, after reading your reply, I have to stay with my original statement. There appears to be some serious management issues that need to be addressed. You brought a couple up.

    • @rgloria40
      @rgloria40 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@emeraldforcier14 Homesteading is another contributing fact. It has lead to the housing shortage and price of a home to buy in San Diego is just too high....that leads to fraud....income fraud or working at job your not qualified by degree.

  • @jayman1943
    @jayman1943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Comes to show how quick KHAKIS are to blame their junior Sailors so theu don't take the heat!!!!!! GOOD VERDICT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ssgus3682
    @ssgus3682 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was the USS Iowa all over again. The Navy needed a junio sailor to be the fall guy.

  • @worthlessgarbage4857
    @worthlessgarbage4857 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hope he sues

  • @navy4735
    @navy4735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sue the Navy. this is despicable how the Navy blamed him like this......sure "leadership" pathetic.

  • @kevincannell895
    @kevincannell895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good

  • @robertblake9892
    @robertblake9892 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Dropped out of SEAL training." ? The original version was he was dropped due to an injury.

  • @mudman6156
    @mudman6156 ปีที่แล้ว

    I highly suspected that he wasn’t guilty. I’ll never forget when some Admiral blamed another young sailor for the explosion in one of the gun turrets on board the USS IOWA. Totally disgraceful of that Admiral. The Navy was using gun powder bags from WWII. It’s amazing that it hadn’t happened sooner than it did. Those gun powder bags were extremely dangerous and shouldn’t have ever been allowed to be used. The Navy needed to have all new bags manufactured, as gun powder becomes more and more explosive as it ages for so long. They knew all along that there was an extremely high risk associated with using gun powder bags from WWII.

  • @mudman6156
    @mudman6156 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that there’s a high chance that this fire may have started from a lithium ion battery shoring out while being stored in some piece of electronic equipment that was placed in one of those huge storage containers they had placed on the lower vehicle storage deck. It wouldn’t have been the first fire that a lithium ion battery caused. I had a Samsung phone who’s entire back blew off because the battery swelled up to about a inch wide. I’m lucky it didn’t burn my house down. That phone would go from being nice and cool to burning my fingers even when the phone was turned completely off. It had a defective battery in it. AT&T actually tried to blame me for leaving the phone on the charger too long. Cellphones should be able to be left on a charger for months, as they shouldn’t charge even when plugged in unless they need to charge.

  • @edwardhickey-gg6rc
    @edwardhickey-gg6rc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And it still took a 2 year investigation to charge him. He was legal hold for this maybe brig