Thank you for not having overwhelming music playing while this valuable information is being presented. Thank you, too, for your body of work, Tim and for having these two Doctors in the video to present their information. Perhaps when you stand before the throne, Yahusha might say, "Well done." Only He and His Father, the Almighty Creator know. Praise Yahuah!
As a layman's layman, even I could see the EL YWH on one of the pics of the lead tablet. Any other letters weren't so clear at least to me, but EL YWH is clearly seen. And from my perspective, those two words are the earth shattering part.
The name of God (Jehovah or some use Jahweh) is used in the Bible about 7000 times. And now it is found on this artifact from around 1400 BC. Great stuff.
Yer a Smart Man; gonna go places! 👍👏✊😎 I love that the only part of this Inscription revealed till now is the Biblical Name of God, although the vast majority of people who profess reverence for the Bible go out of their way to avoid it 🤔😆🤷♂️
@@Bimfirestarter yeah, weird isn't it. We all have a name, so does God. So why try to hide that or avoid using that name. Sure, we are not 100 percent sure what the correct pronunciation is, but we use the name Jesus all the time and I am sure that was not how his name was pronounced. So, it makes perfect sense to me to use Gods name despite not knowing the exact pronunciation. He knows who we mean:-)
@@YahwehsRestorationMinistry Scholar John Hinton, Ph.D wrote: Y to J Issue The final issue that must be addressed concerns the conversion of Y to J. This is such an utterly silly and ignorant criticism that I find it embarrassing that there are actually Christians that present it as an argument. I already dealt with the issue in my article on the name of Jesus, but I will restate some of it here with some additional historical linguistic information provided by Dr. Riplinger. Y becomes a J in every name in English, French, and Spanish. In English the J is pronounced like J in Japan, while in French it is pronounced like S in pleasure, in Spanish it is pronounced like an H, in German it is pronounced like Y. This is a phonological and orthographical issue, not a theological one. There is no theological issue at stake in how one language interprets a certain phoneme. In every case of a name in Hebrew that begins with a yod (Y) it is pronounced with the appropriate phoneme for that language. This came about through phonological and orthographical changes in the developments of those languages. Even Hebrew itself went through huge phonological and orthographical changes in its long history. God's name is not a magic word to be chanted for power as the name cult seems to suggest for both the names of God and Jesus. My name comes from a Hebrew word meaning given by God, which begins with a Y in Hebrew. It is Jean (zhan) in French, Juan (hwan) in Spanish, Giovanni in Italian, Hans in German, Yani in modern Greek, Ivan (eevan) in Russian, Yahya or Hanna (with a heavy H) in Arabic, and other variations exist in other languages. They all translate as John and I have no trouble adapting to any of them within the respective cultures and there is no reason for me to be insulted by any of these names. On the other hand, being addressed by a made up name based on a pagan deity would insult me. If these name cultists find the J so objectionable, why don't they refer to Elijah as Elaiyah, Jeramiah as Yeramaiyah, Jacob as Yakov, Jonathan as Yanatan, Jerusalem as Yerushaleem, and so forth. For that matter why don't they use the Hebrew pronunciation for all of the names in the Bible, such as Dahveed, Moshe (Moses), Shmu'el (Samuel), Sha'ul (Saul), Shlomo (Solomon), and so forth, if they consider the issue to be so important. Since those who call God by a name that is not even Hebrew at all, and since they do so without a scrap of evidence to override the very solid evidence to the contrary, why do they have any constraints at all about inventing whimsical pointings for other names in the Bible? Why not call David Dahwid, Duwad, Diwad, or Deewud. Or how about Da'ud as Arabic pronounces it? Since Yahwe sounds like an Arabic word (except for the long A) this should go over well. Better yet, why not Dood. After all, as I have already pointed out, the vav is read as a long U when there is a dot in the middle of it. The modern translations that want to relate to the modern youth could spell him Dude. Think of the great "Christian" rock lyrics that could come from that. While we are at it why not call Moses Mose instead of Moshe so it fits the atheist scholars view that his name is related to an Egyptian pharaoh with a similar name. Moshe could also be Masih (Arabic for Messiah), Shlomo could be Sulemaw, and Shmu'el could be Smiwal? For those who still who are still confused about the phonological issue of sound changes between and within languages, the following historical-linguistic summary from the World Book Encyclopedia concerning the Y to J conversion as it relates to English should be helpful. "The sound of the Hebrew letter jod came into English as the letter 'I,' used as a consonant and having the soft 'g' sound, like today's 'j.' In the past the letter 'I' was used as both a vowel (i) sound and as the consonant 'j' sound. The OED says that the sound of 'j,' though originally printed as 'I,' was pronounced as a soft 'g' (Oxford English Dictionary, Unabridged, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, s.v. J). The 'JE' sound in JEHOVAH was spelled 'IE' and pronounced as 'JE.' To distinguish the consonant sound (soft 'g') of the letter 'I' from the vowel sound of 'I,' many scribes in the 1200s began putting a tail on the soft 'g' 'I',' making it look like our modern 'J.' The Spanish, in the 1500s, were the first to more consistently try to distinguish the consonant I (soft 'g') sound as the shape of a 'J.' At that same time English printers used 'J' and 'I' fonts interchangeably (as documented elsewhere in this book). During the 1600s, most languages began consistently using the extended 'I' form, now called a 'J,' to represent the 'j' (soft 'g') sound." [quoted in Riplinger, p. 418]
@@thambone30 You make such a great argument - very logical. However, I feel obliged to say that while we can split hairs on diction and it is interesting to research - (I have very recently decided to learn Hebrew) - the important thing is to call on Him. Use whatever pronunciation suits you - but do call on Him. I have wondered during my prayers whether I was pronouncing His name correctly. I found it distracting. Then I remembered this verse in Exodus: ~ Exodus 3:15 "Moreover God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER, and this is My memorial to all generations.’ "The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob" is how I address Him. He must've know that we would get lost in the weeds and made calling upon Him as simple as simple gets. ("DUDE" - way too funny - I'll stay away from that.)
Now that the peer reviewed paper has been released we are finding that there are many problems with their dating which is what they are really after. The first problem though is the journal they published in. Its not a journal on archeology or epigraphy. Second the epigraphy was really bad. I fear this is going to be mocked in the scholarly world. They tried to force an early date into the artifact because they need that to be true.
@@danzelhill People that say Yahuah try to mix Jah and Yeshua. And they can't speak a single word of Hebrew! But in Hebrew the name of Jesus has always been Yeshua (Yehoshuah long form). Since ever! Because there has always been person with the name Yeshua until now. And for the name of God in manuscripts has always been Yehovah and the short form Yah. I know ancient Hebrew because I'm learning it.
The names of God on the led tablet and the time period may be spot on since it was at this time that Moses asked what should he tell people His name is; God replied “I AM WHO I AM” (El, [the God]) . God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel: YHWH, [the God ]of your ancestors,[ the God ]of Abraham, [the God ]of Isaac, and [the God ]of Jacob-has sent me to you. This is my eternal name, my name to remember for all generations. Exodus 3: 14-15
The debate of man will rage. If we take God at His Word, it always comes up valid. This is just another case of revealing the Truth that is declared by His people in the past, as well as the present.
It wasn't put in the fire, which would have melted it. Rather, the curse was put at the base of the alter, where the atonement would be poured over it to cover it. See: Exodus 29:12 & Hebrews 9:22.
At 7:41, you have a generic EL. Perhaps a more specific reflection of the truth would be the one at Wadi el Hol. In the negative space between the Aleph and the Lamed at the bottom of that inscription, you find a goat of Aries. Which is a very specific period of time. The passage of the vernal equinox between 4515 BC and about 4395 BC. It's when Fire marked the Rig Veda and God said Let there be Light.
If you read the Hebrew names in the scriptures, how many have yahu as an ending on their names; Eliyahu, Yirmeyahu, Malekiyahu, etc. Yehovah is the Hebrew appellation and Jehovah is the English version.
For people who didn't watch the video, the "name of God" from the Mount Ebal tablet is יהו (yahu), which is a name found in some biblical names. ישעיהו (Yeshayahu; Isaiah) ירמיהו (Yirm'yahu; Jeremiah) חזקיהו (Chiz'qiyahu; Hezekiah) etc. It is not to be confused with the tetragrammaton.
Very weird how there's never any mention of the year in Jewish tradition for the Exodus of 1313 BCE, or - taking the approx. 165 year discrepancy into account - 165 years prior, in 1478 BCE, in support of the general theme of early Exodus date mentioned these films, and mentioned here as well
No, no no, God cannot let us know God real name. Mozes asked the name of God. God answered I AM that I Am. Jacob asked God face to face, what is your name. God answered why do you ask of my name. So Jehovah or Yaweh is accepted by God. There are times that God appear as dove or angels. We cannot see God the same as we cannot know God name. That is why God answered Mozes. I AM that I AM
Strickland has lost his credibility by simply doubling down on his questionable find. I would love for it to be true, but if you look at current evidence it is definitely not a curse tablet.
This is just my own personal opinion. As I understand it, Yahweh translates to I Am Who I Am. This is not a name. God does not have a name as we think of them. He is simply God. I Am Who I Am is as close to a description of what God is as our limited minds can try to comprehend. God is totally complete within Himself. A name is not necessary. We need names to differentiate ourselves from one another. God does not.
You're close on the interpretation. He says "I Am" in reference to himself, especially when He explains His Name. We are instructed to call Him Yahweh, which means "He Is".
Numerous times in the Bible, Yahweh says "I am Yahweh; that is my name" or "I am Yahweh" or "By my name Yahweh" etc, which is simply telling us that God has a name and wants his servants to know him by that name. Imagine if Moses or any other of the prophets and people of faith who were spoken such words by Yahweh responded to Him by saying "A name is not necessary." Do you really think that would've been taken as anything other than an insult to the Most High? Or, look at it this way. Is there any verse in the entire Bible that says "God doesn't need a name"? God gave Himself a name. In Exodus 9 Yahweh tells Moses to tell Pharaoh: "For this reason I have kept you in existence, for the sake of showing you my power, and to have my name declared in all the Earth." Jesus prays to Yahweh with the words: "Father, glorify your name." Yahweh responds: "I have both glorified it and will glorify it again." In the Torah, Yahweh tells the Israelites that the names of false gods should not even be mentioned among them. Throughout the Bible, Satan (literally has•satan in Hebrew, meaning 'the opposer') is never named. Not once. He's called Devil, Tempter, but no name is given. These terms aren't proper names. Conversely, the name Yahweh is mentioned nearly 7000 times alone in the Tanakh. Let's ya know how Yahweh feels about the name He chose for himself, telling Moses "This is my name forever, and this is how I am to be remembered from generation to generation." As for 'I am that I am'. This doesn't at all translate 'Yahweh'. It's a common mistranslation of what Yahweh tells Moses in Hebrew " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'ehyeh", which more accurately translates as "I shall become what I shall become". 'Ehyeh is a common form of the verb ha•yah, 'he came to be'. When Ruth tells Naomi "I shall become as one of your people" she uses the same word 'ehyeh. When Jonathan tells David that one day David would be king and "I will become second only to you", Jonathan says the word 'ehyeh. So the word so commonly mistranslated as "I am" and misunderstood as some divine name is, in fact, neither. Shortly before Yahweh tells Moses the famously misrendered phrase 'I am that I am' in Hebrew, He assures Moses "I shall be with you" a few verses before. The term 'ehyeh is what the words "I shall be" are there translated from. So if your Bible says "I am that I am", it's a bit misleading. 'Ehyeh, however, is related to the name Yahweh. Yahweh means "He Causes To Become". It's in the incomplete sense of the verb, denoting continued action. You say of "I Am Who I Am" that "This is not a name." Technically, true, because Yahweh says shortly thereafter that His name is "Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...this is my name forever." He doesn't say that of " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'Ehyeh". If He had, then yes, that would be His name, regardless of the translation. Jacob means 'He supplants/seizes the heel'. Isaac means 'He laughs'. Joseph means 'He adds' or possibly 'Yahweh adds'. Yahweh means 'He Causes to Become'. Each name begins with a Y, in such causes denoting the incomplete form of a verb. It's not up to us to determine what constitutes a proper name by God's or ancient Semitic standards, know what I mean? Hope this helps. 🙂
Numerous times in the Bible, Yahweh says "I am Yahweh; that is my name" or "I am Yahweh" or "By my name Yahweh" etc, which is simply telling us that God has a name and wants his servants to know him by that name. Imagine if Moses or any other of the prophets and people of faith who were spoken such words by Yahweh responded to Him by saying "A name is not necessary." Do you really think that would've been taken as anything other than an insult to the Most High? Or, look at it this way. Is there any verse in the entire Bible that says "God doesn't need a name"? God gave Himself a name. In Exodus 9 Yahweh tells Moses to tell Pharaoh: "For this reason I have kept you in existence, for the sake of showing you my power, and to have my name declared in all the Earth." Jesus prays to Yahweh with the words: "Father, glorify your name." Yahweh responds: "I have both glorified it and will glorify it again." In the Torah, Yahweh tells the Israelites that the names of false gods should not even be mentioned among them. Throughout the Bible, Satan (literally has•satan in Hebrew, meaning 'the opposer') is never named. Not once. He's called Devil, Tempter, but no name is given. These terms aren't proper names. Conversely, the name Yahweh is mentioned nearly 7000 times alone in the Tanakh. Let's ya know how Yahweh feels about the name He chose for himself, telling Moses "This is my name forever, and this is jow I am to be remembered from generation to generation." As for 'I am that I am'. This doesn't at all translate 'Yahweh'. It's a common translation of what Yahweh tells Moses in Hebrew " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'ehyeh", which more accurately translates as "I shall become what I shall become". 'Ehyeh is a common form of the verb ha•yah, 'he came to be'. When Ruth tells Naomi "I shall become as one of your people" she uses the same word 'ehyeh. When Jonathan tells David that one day David would be king and "I will become second only to you", Jonathan says the word 'ehyeh. So the word so commonly mistranslated as "I am" and misunderstood as some divine name is, in fact, neither. Shortly before Yahweh tells Moses the famously misrendered phrase 'I am that I am' in Hebrew, He assures Moses "I shall be with you" a few verses before. The term 'ehyeh is what the words "I shall be" are translated from. So if your Bible says "I am that I am", it's a bit misleading. 'Ehyeh, however, is related to the name Yahweh. Yahweh means "He Causes To Become". It's in the incomplete sense of the verb, denoting continued action. You say of "I Am Who I Am" that "This is not a name." Technically, true, because Yahweh says shortly thereafter that His name is "Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...this is my name forever." He doesn't say that of " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'Ehyeh". If He had, then yes, that would be His name, regardless of the translation. Jacob means 'He supplants/seizes the heel'. Isaac means 'He laughs'. Joseph means 'He adds' or possibly 'Yahweh adds'. Yahweh means 'He Causes to Become'. Each name begins with a Y, in such causes denoting the incomplete form of a verb. It's not up to us to determine what constitutes a proper name by God's or ancient Semitic standards, know what I mean? Hope this helps. 🙂
III AAA OOO is an Mithraic chant from where the buddists got their Ohm rite for meditation purposes. Gregorian singing is also derived from this. Christ and meditation is inseparable. Daily chores to keep the Third Temple clean and neat.
In the DSS 4Q120 we see three of the four parts of the Tetragrammaton (Yaw) going back to before the 1st Century, written in Greek with the vowels preserved. This matches the Mt Ebol tablet.
@@YahwehsRestorationMinistry In both cases we're talking about abbreviations but those Greek spelligs indicate how the first two syllables of the Divine Name sounded ie YAHO, keeping in mind that Greek has no H. The more ancient Egyptian spelling YHW'W indicates a final syllable with a long A vowel like the A in 'bAr'; I believe this suggests YAHOWAH is the full ancient Biblical pronunciation.
Lead ... Only 3 letters ....not 4 ..🤔 Can ..say , 4 would be for GOD'S NAME 👉 YEHOVAH 👍 ........ By scholars research, nowhere in Hebrew Scriptures does it have .. Yahweh... NOT EVEN IN ANY HEBREW WRITINGS NOT IN HOLY SCRIPTURES. 🎤
@@Emcee_Squared That theory is completely without merit, despite its popularity. Some guy decided 'Oh, look! God in the Bible has a name - Yehowah - but also has all these titles like Lord, Almighty, God, etc...this MUST mean there's different authors t work, each one preferring a different word!' It's utter garbage! The name Elijah means 'My God is Jehovah'. The name Adonijah means 'My Lord is Jehovah'. The Israelites - like every other culture in the region - were perfectly capable of expressing their reverence for their God in varying ways. The Documentary Hypothesis idea falls apart when applying the same standard to the theological writings of other Levantine peoples in ancient times. It's the fallacy of applying/expecting a modern literary standard to an ancient foreign text. So, If different authors are evident by different Divine titles or name, and the original sources by implication should each use one, How does a 3300-year-old Hebrew inscription have two such terms ie Yahowah and 'El? There goes yer Documentary Hypothesis. There's been any evidence for these supposed different texts with only one name each, either.
it's not just that god has different names, its also different writing style, syntax, vocabulary which is consistently found with each of those names. The guy who uses elohim writes in a certain, distinct way. The guy who uses YHWH writes in a different distinct, unique way. Anyway the documentary hypothesis has evolved and the only thing that is agreed upon by various scholars is that there is a priestly source and a non-priestly source.@@Bimfirestarter
Why do you think shedding innocent blood is going to forgive your sin? Do you shed the blood of your sacrifice before you (Leviticus 26) repent, or do you think your supposed to kill every innocent person that reproves you because of your iniquity? Because shedding the blood of a man is not going to get you forgiveness, it will only cause your blood to be shed (Genesis 9. 6).
Ryan Joseph Laughlin Blood is needed to atone for sin (Hebrews 9:22, Leviticus 17:11, 1 Samuel 3:13-14). But Israel’s Levitical Priesthood had too many transgressions for the system to continue to atone (Malachi 2:1-10, Ezekiel 44:7, 1 Kings 12:31-33, 2 Chronicles 29). Therefore a New Covenant that provides atonement (Ezekiel 16:59-63) was given after the Old Covenant at large was broken (Deuteronomy 31:16 -> Jeremiah 11:10, Isaiah 24:5). The Levitical Priesthood was supplanted by the Melchizidekian Priesthood for now (Psalm 110:4 -> Hebrews 6:20). This is the long period of time Israel was prophesied to be without the Levitical priesthood (Hosea 3:4). Jesus now provides atonement for transgressors by interceding for them on their behalf (Isaiah 53:12 -> Hebrews 7:25).
Please read Isaiah 53. “He was pierced for our transgression… all of us have gone astray, each of us turned to his own way and the LORD laid upon him the iniquity of us all… for he poured out his life unto death and made intercession for the transgressors.”
@@at716JA Isaiah was in Babylon, Jesus was not. Jesus is a Greek. It says he "was", which means what he said was not a prophecy. They were probably talking about Uriah the Hittite, who King David killed, who was the light of YHWH. Hey-Zeus is the Abominable branch, Hey-Zeus is Mithridatism/Mithraism, Hey-Zeus defiles, defilement is Chrestian salvation!! The Beast (Antiochus III/Mithridates), & The Dragon (The 15 Ptolemys'), came with the whore of Babylon (Cleopatra); then they false flagged their system that they created. They put the mark of Jezebel on everyone, Alexandra the Great's Swine (Sus) Sacrifice.
@@NAYR-JAUAI Biblical predictive prophecy is not always written in the future tense. See Daniel 7 and "the coming of one like a son of man". Or any of the visions in Daniel in which the vision is seen as having already taken place, just like Joseph's dream interpretation for Pharoah in Genesis. The Servant in Isaiah 53 dies for the transgression of Isaiah's people. Not Babylonians. Jesus was not Greek. He was a descendant of Abraham and David - see Matthew 1.
So many scholars have now seen the peer review article. Scholars opinions are rather negative. There's really nothing there. Isn't it time for a retraction?. This was sensationalism. You can't. In all honesty say that you see something.
The name is long e(as in meet),short e(as in met), broad a(as in ball). Ee-eh-ah. Not Yahwe or Yahu. Ee-eh-ah just as he spoke it to Moses at Mount Sinai. Ee-eh-ah ashir ee-eh-ah with the r vocalized at the back of the throat insteaad of rhe tip of the tonge. Say it quickly and the "ir" in ashir becomes a long "u". This will be my name for all generations. The full name of Eeshu (Jesus) sounds phonetically identical - Eashuea. Yahwe was a Canaanite stoem God, brother to Ba'al Dagon.
Modern Hebrew has that R at the back of the throat, kind of like French, but Ancient Hebrew isn't like that. The spellings we find in Aramaic in the 500s BCE, Egyptian in the 1000s BCE, Greek Dead Sea Scrolls, all indicate that YAHO was how they pronounced it back then. When you have it spelled IAO in Greek and YHH/YHW in Aramaic, it becomes clear what's meant by these abbreviations, and it leads to Yahowah. There is no such Canaanite deity named Yahwe, brother to Baal-Dagon. -If I am mistaken, I welcome pointing me to such an inscription, as I am somewhat able to read late Bronze Age/Iron Age Canaanite inscriptions.
SHALOM: I AM SORRY TO TELL YOU THAT : WHAT YOU CLAIM TO BE THE NAME OF ‘ELOHYM’.IS WRITTEN ON THE ANCIENT STONE.. IT IS >> NOT TRUE.. BECAUSE THOSE “LETERS “, ARE NOT THE YOD, HEY VAV HEY OR : י ה ו ה .. IN THE “ PALO HEBREW.. , Phoenician . 🥶🤦🏻♀️.. THE ONLY NAME IS :” YESHÚA ( HA’MASHIACH). SHABAT SHALOM.
Leviticus 17:11 One of my favorite verses! What a revelation! His blood on the alter is the true atonement! Read my paper "Foundation of Blood". Read the verse till it comes to light. Amazing!
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Teaser] | 05-12-24](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P5Uto6e453w/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for not having overwhelming music playing while this valuable information is being presented. Thank you, too, for your body of work, Tim and for having these two Doctors in the video to present their information. Perhaps when you stand before the throne, Yahusha might say, "Well done." Only He and His Father, the Almighty Creator know.
Praise Yahuah!
Praise to the Almighty God, Yehovah/Jehovah.
YiHWe is my name and my memorial onto all generations!!! YHWℍ
Glory to God!
Praise GOD!
As a layman's layman, even I could see the EL YWH on one of the pics of the lead tablet. Any other letters weren't so clear at least to me, but EL YWH is clearly seen. And from my perspective, those two words are the earth shattering part.
The name of God (Jehovah or some use Jahweh) is used in the Bible about 7000 times. And now it is found on this artifact from around 1400 BC. Great stuff.
Yer a Smart Man; gonna go places! 👍👏✊😎
I love that the only part of this Inscription revealed till now is the Biblical Name of God, although the vast majority of people who profess reverence for the Bible go out of their way to avoid it 🤔😆🤷♂️
No J in Hebrew it's Y "yod"
@@Bimfirestarter yeah, weird isn't it. We all have a name, so does God. So why try to hide that or avoid using that name. Sure, we are not 100 percent sure what the correct pronunciation is, but we use the name Jesus all the time and I am sure that was not how his name was pronounced. So, it makes perfect sense to me to use Gods name despite not knowing the exact pronunciation. He knows who we mean:-)
@@YahwehsRestorationMinistry
Scholar John Hinton, Ph.D wrote:
Y to J Issue
The final issue that must be addressed concerns the conversion of Y to J. This is such an utterly silly and ignorant criticism that I find it embarrassing that there are actually Christians that present it as an argument. I already dealt with the issue in my article on the name of Jesus, but I will restate some of it here with some additional historical linguistic information provided by Dr. Riplinger. Y becomes a J in every name in English, French, and Spanish. In English the J is pronounced like J in Japan, while in French it is pronounced like S in pleasure, in Spanish it is pronounced like an H, in German it is pronounced like Y. This is a phonological and orthographical issue, not a theological one. There is no theological issue at stake in how one language interprets a certain phoneme. In every case of a name in Hebrew that begins with a yod (Y) it is pronounced with the appropriate phoneme for that language. This came about through phonological and orthographical changes in the developments of those languages. Even Hebrew itself went through huge phonological and orthographical changes in its long history. God's name is not a magic word to be chanted for power as the name cult seems to suggest for both the names of God and Jesus. My name comes from a Hebrew word meaning given by God, which begins with a Y in Hebrew. It is Jean (zhan) in French, Juan (hwan) in Spanish, Giovanni in Italian, Hans in German, Yani in modern Greek, Ivan (eevan) in Russian, Yahya or Hanna (with a heavy H) in Arabic, and other variations exist in other languages. They all translate as John and I have no trouble adapting to any of them within the respective cultures and there is no reason for me to be insulted by any of these names. On the other hand, being addressed by a made up name based on a pagan deity would insult me.
If these name cultists find the J so objectionable, why don't they refer to Elijah as Elaiyah, Jeramiah as Yeramaiyah, Jacob as Yakov, Jonathan as Yanatan, Jerusalem as Yerushaleem, and so forth. For that matter why don't they use the Hebrew pronunciation for all of the names in the Bible, such as Dahveed, Moshe (Moses), Shmu'el (Samuel), Sha'ul (Saul), Shlomo (Solomon), and so forth, if they consider the issue to be so important. Since those who call God by a name that is not even Hebrew at all, and since they do so without a scrap of evidence to override the very solid evidence to the contrary, why do they have any constraints at all about inventing whimsical pointings for other names in the Bible? Why not call David Dahwid, Duwad, Diwad, or Deewud. Or how about Da'ud as Arabic pronounces it? Since Yahwe sounds like an Arabic word (except for the long A) this should go over well. Better yet, why not Dood. After all, as I have already pointed out, the vav is read as a long U when there is a dot in the middle of it. The modern translations that want to relate to the modern youth could spell him Dude. Think of the great "Christian" rock lyrics that could come from that. While we are at it why not call Moses Mose instead of Moshe so it fits the atheist scholars view that his name is related to an Egyptian pharaoh with a similar name. Moshe could also be Masih (Arabic for Messiah), Shlomo could be Sulemaw, and Shmu'el could be Smiwal?
For those who still who are still confused about the phonological issue of sound changes between and within languages, the following historical-linguistic summary from the World Book Encyclopedia concerning the Y to J conversion as it relates to English should be helpful.
"The sound of the Hebrew letter jod came into English as the letter 'I,' used as a consonant and having the soft 'g' sound, like today's 'j.' In the past the letter 'I' was used as both a vowel (i) sound and as the consonant 'j' sound. The OED says that the sound of 'j,' though originally printed as 'I,' was pronounced as a soft 'g' (Oxford English Dictionary, Unabridged, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, s.v. J). The 'JE' sound in JEHOVAH was spelled 'IE' and pronounced as 'JE.' To distinguish the consonant sound (soft 'g') of the letter 'I' from the vowel sound of 'I,' many scribes in the 1200s began putting a tail on the soft 'g' 'I',' making it look like our modern 'J.' The Spanish, in the 1500s, were the first to more consistently try to distinguish the consonant I (soft 'g') sound as the shape of a 'J.' At that same time English printers used 'J' and 'I' fonts interchangeably (as documented elsewhere in this book). During the 1600s, most languages began consistently using the extended 'I' form, now called a 'J,' to represent the 'j' (soft 'g') sound." [quoted in Riplinger, p. 418]
@@thambone30 You make such a great argument - very logical. However, I feel obliged to say that while we can split hairs on diction and it is interesting to research - (I have very recently decided to learn Hebrew) - the important thing is to call on Him. Use whatever pronunciation suits you - but do call on Him. I have wondered during my prayers whether I was pronouncing His name correctly. I found it distracting. Then I remembered this verse in Exodus:
~ Exodus 3:15 "Moreover God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER, and this is My memorial to all generations.’
"The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob" is how I address Him. He must've know that we would get lost in the weeds and made calling upon Him as simple as simple gets. ("DUDE" - way too funny - I'll stay away from that.)
YAHOOAH!!! Glory be His name
Now that the peer reviewed paper has been released we are finding that there are many problems with their dating which is what they are really after. The first problem though is the journal they published in. Its not a journal on archeology or epigraphy. Second the epigraphy was really bad. I fear this is going to be mocked in the scholarly world.
They tried to force an early date into the artifact because they need that to be true.
Incredible! Thank you!
Amen thankyou All God bless you in work of thee high'est
👍Thanks. Yes, everything fits historically with the accuracy of the Biblical Book of Joshua👍
All praise to YAHUAH!!
You can't get the word "yahu-ah" from the Hebrew "יהוה".
@@wreiad I agree. What do you think how it's pronounced?
@@danzelhill Yehovah. Nehemiah Gordon explains it
@@davidemmanuelgarcia I agree. There is no evidence for Yahweh at all and hardly arguments for Yahuah, Yahavah etc.
@@danzelhill People that say Yahuah try to mix Jah and Yeshua. And they can't speak a single word of Hebrew!
But in Hebrew the name of Jesus has always been Yeshua (Yehoshuah long form). Since ever! Because there has always been person with the name Yeshua until now.
And for the name of God in manuscripts has always been Yehovah and the short form Yah.
I know ancient Hebrew because I'm learning it.
The names of God on the led tablet and the time period may be spot on since it was at this time that Moses asked what should he tell people His name is; God replied “I AM WHO I AM” (El, [the God]) . God also said to Moses, “Say this to the people of Israel: YHWH, [the God ]of your ancestors,[ the God ]of Abraham, [the God ]of Isaac, and [the God ]of Jacob-has sent me to you. This is my eternal name, my name to remember for all generations.
Exodus 3: 14-15
A lead curse tablet isn't a rare thing,the defixio is the name for the technique, but that it is to yhw is the difference
The debate of man will rage. If we take God at His Word, it always comes up valid. This is just another case of revealing the Truth that is declared by His people in the past, as well as the present.
Scriptures say that women who profess Godliness are not to adorn themselves outwardly with gold, pearls, costly apparel and the braiding of hairs.
❤❤❤✅🙏Bible is a life our lives in this holy book who we are ...is in the bible ❤❤❤ kept us living till now
So what is the holdup of the peer review? Is it trying to redate Zertal's archeology from a tiny tablet?
Wait...that voice I keep hearing on videos isn't a computer, but is this guy in the middle?
How did a lead tablet get into a sacrificial site without having any damage to it. Or, maybe it did and no one said. Who put it there?
It wasn't put in the fire, which would have melted it. Rather, the curse was put at the base of the alter, where the atonement would be poured over it to cover it. See: Exodus 29:12 & Hebrews 9:22.
Thank you! Archeology has confirmed the Bible.
At 7:41, you have a generic EL. Perhaps a more specific reflection of the truth would be the one at Wadi el Hol. In the negative space between the Aleph and the Lamed at the bottom of that inscription, you find a goat of Aries. Which is a very specific period of time. The passage of the vernal equinox between 4515 BC and about 4395 BC. It's when Fire marked the Rig Veda and God said Let there be Light.
This is great!
If you read the Hebrew names in the scriptures, how many have yahu as an ending on their names; Eliyahu, Yirmeyahu, Malekiyahu, etc. Yehovah is the Hebrew appellation and Jehovah is the English version.
PSALMS 83: 18.. ❣️📖💎🙏❣️
are we sure it’s aleph lamed and not aleph tav? the beginning and the end
The letters presented in this video were AL YHU. There was no J or E. I don't know what that guy is taking about.
For people who didn't watch the video, the "name of God" from the Mount Ebal tablet is יהו (yahu), which is a name found in some biblical names.
ישעיהו (Yeshayahu; Isaiah)
ירמיהו (Yirm'yahu; Jeremiah)
חזקיהו (Chiz'qiyahu; Hezekiah)
etc.
It is not to be confused with the tetragrammaton.
Very weird how there's never any mention of the year in Jewish tradition for the Exodus of 1313 BCE, or - taking the approx. 165 year discrepancy into account - 165 years prior, in 1478 BCE, in support of the general theme of early Exodus date mentioned these films, and mentioned here as well
They have changed their dates as much as I change my socks.
I don't trust anything from antichrist.
Amen
thanks for sharing this scientific confirmation of the Name: Yahuwah
There are scores of ancient Hebrew artifacts with the Name of God
No, no no, God cannot let us know God real name. Mozes asked the name of God. God answered I AM that I Am. Jacob asked God face to face, what is your name. God answered why do you ask of my name. So Jehovah or Yaweh is accepted by God. There are times that God appear as dove or angels. We cannot see God the same as we cannot know God name. That is why God answered Mozes. I AM that I AM
Strickland has lost his credibility by simply doubling down on his questionable find. I would love for it to be true, but if you look at current evidence it is definitely not a curse tablet.
This is just my own personal opinion. As I understand it, Yahweh translates to I Am Who I Am. This is not a name. God does not have a name as we think of them. He is simply God. I Am Who I Am is as close to a description of what God is as our limited minds can try to comprehend. God is totally complete within Himself. A name is not necessary. We need names to differentiate ourselves from one another. God does not.
You're close on the interpretation. He says "I Am" in reference to himself, especially when He explains His Name. We are instructed to call Him Yahweh, which means "He Is".
Numerous times in the Bible, Yahweh says "I am Yahweh; that is my name" or "I am Yahweh" or "By my name Yahweh" etc, which is simply telling us that God has a name and wants his servants to know him by that name. Imagine if Moses or any other of the prophets and people of faith who were spoken such words by Yahweh responded to Him by saying "A name is not necessary."
Do you really think that would've been taken as anything other than an insult to the Most High?
Or, look at it this way.
Is there any verse in the entire Bible that says "God doesn't need a name"?
God gave Himself a name.
In Exodus 9 Yahweh tells Moses to tell Pharaoh:
"For this reason I have kept you in existence, for the sake of showing you my power, and to have my name declared in all the Earth."
Jesus prays to Yahweh with the words: "Father, glorify your name."
Yahweh responds:
"I have both glorified it and will glorify it again."
In the Torah, Yahweh tells the Israelites that the names of false gods should not even be mentioned among them.
Throughout the Bible, Satan (literally has•satan in Hebrew, meaning 'the opposer') is never named. Not once. He's called Devil, Tempter, but no name is given. These terms aren't proper names. Conversely, the name Yahweh is mentioned nearly 7000 times alone in the Tanakh.
Let's ya know how Yahweh feels about the name He chose for himself, telling Moses "This is my name forever, and this is how I am to be remembered from generation to generation."
As for 'I am that I am'. This doesn't at all translate 'Yahweh'.
It's a common mistranslation of what Yahweh tells Moses in Hebrew " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'ehyeh", which more accurately translates as "I shall become what I shall become".
'Ehyeh is a common form of the verb ha•yah, 'he came to be'.
When Ruth tells Naomi "I shall become as one of your people" she uses the same word 'ehyeh. When Jonathan tells David that one day David would be king and "I will become second only to you", Jonathan says the word 'ehyeh. So the word so commonly mistranslated as "I am" and misunderstood as some divine name is, in fact, neither.
Shortly before Yahweh tells Moses the famously misrendered phrase 'I am that I am' in Hebrew, He assures Moses "I shall be with you" a few verses before. The term 'ehyeh is what the words "I shall be" are there translated from. So if your Bible says "I am that I am", it's a bit misleading.
'Ehyeh, however, is related to the name Yahweh.
Yahweh means "He Causes To Become". It's in the incomplete sense of the verb, denoting continued action.
You say of "I Am Who I Am" that "This is not a name." Technically, true, because Yahweh says shortly thereafter that His name is "Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...this is my name forever."
He doesn't say that of " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'Ehyeh".
If He had, then yes, that would be His name, regardless of the translation.
Jacob means 'He supplants/seizes the heel'. Isaac means 'He laughs'. Joseph means 'He adds' or possibly 'Yahweh adds'.
Yahweh means 'He Causes to Become'.
Each name begins with a Y, in such causes denoting the incomplete form of a verb.
It's not up to us to determine what constitutes a proper name by God's or ancient Semitic standards, know what I mean?
Hope this helps. 🙂
Numerous times in the Bible, Yahweh says "I am Yahweh; that is my name" or "I am Yahweh" or "By my name Yahweh" etc, which is simply telling us that God has a name and wants his servants to know him by that name. Imagine if Moses or any other of the prophets and people of faith who were spoken such words by Yahweh responded to Him by saying "A name is not necessary."
Do you really think that would've been taken as anything other than an insult to the Most High?
Or, look at it this way.
Is there any verse in the entire Bible that says "God doesn't need a name"?
God gave Himself a name.
In Exodus 9 Yahweh tells Moses to tell Pharaoh:
"For this reason I have kept you in existence, for the sake of showing you my power, and to have my name declared in all the Earth."
Jesus prays to Yahweh with the words: "Father, glorify your name."
Yahweh responds:
"I have both glorified it and will glorify it again."
In the Torah, Yahweh tells the Israelites that the names of false gods should not even be mentioned among them.
Throughout the Bible, Satan (literally has•satan in Hebrew, meaning 'the opposer') is never named. Not once. He's called Devil, Tempter, but no name is given. These terms aren't proper names. Conversely, the name Yahweh is mentioned nearly 7000 times alone in the Tanakh.
Let's ya know how Yahweh feels about the name He chose for himself, telling Moses "This is my name forever, and this is jow I am to be remembered from generation to generation."
As for 'I am that I am'. This doesn't at all translate 'Yahweh'.
It's a common translation of what Yahweh tells Moses in Hebrew " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'ehyeh", which more accurately translates as "I shall become what I shall become".
'Ehyeh is a common form of the verb ha•yah, 'he came to be'.
When Ruth tells Naomi "I shall become as one of your people" she uses the same word 'ehyeh. When Jonathan tells David that one day David would be king and "I will become second only to you", Jonathan says the word 'ehyeh. So the word so commonly mistranslated as "I am" and misunderstood as some divine name is, in fact, neither.
Shortly before Yahweh tells Moses the famously misrendered phrase 'I am that I am' in Hebrew, He assures Moses "I shall be with you" a few verses before. The term 'ehyeh is what the words "I shall be" are translated from. So if your Bible says "I am that I am", it's a bit misleading.
'Ehyeh, however, is related to the name Yahweh.
Yahweh means "He Causes To Become". It's in the incomplete sense of the verb, denoting continued action.
You say of "I Am Who I Am" that "This is not a name." Technically, true, because Yahweh says shortly thereafter that His name is "Yahweh, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob...this is my name forever."
He doesn't say that of " 'Ehyeh 'asher 'Ehyeh".
If He had, then yes, that would be His name, regardless of the translation.
Jacob means 'He supplants/seizes the heel'. Isaac means 'He laughs'. Joseph means 'He adds' or possibly 'Yahweh adds'.
Yahweh means 'He Causes to Become'.
Each name begins with a Y, in such causes denoting the incomplete form of a verb.
It's not up to us to determine what constitutes a proper name by God's or ancient Semitic standards, know what I mean?
Hope this helps. 🙂
Yahu, name or function?
Abbreviation! YHW appears in in other ancient Israelite texts like the Elephantine Papyri of the 500 BCE in Egyptian
III AAA OOO is an Mithraic chant from where the buddists got their Ohm rite for meditation purposes. Gregorian singing is also derived from this. Christ and meditation is inseparable. Daily chores to keep the Third Temple clean and neat.
In the DSS 4Q120 we see three of the four parts of the Tetragrammaton (Yaw) going back to before the 1st Century, written in Greek with the vowels preserved. This matches the Mt Ebol tablet.
YHW on Phrygian grave coffins in Bithynia early on too, with Christian styel greetings.
@@YahwehsRestorationMinistry In both cases we're talking about abbreviations but those Greek spelligs indicate how the first two syllables of the Divine Name sounded ie YAHO, keeping in mind that Greek has no H. The more ancient Egyptian spelling YHW'W indicates a final syllable with a long A vowel like the A in 'bAr'; I believe this suggests YAHOWAH is the full ancient Biblical pronunciation.
يهوه عدة أسماء
فاطم حنين عالي حسن زين
اكثر
Lead ... Only 3 letters ....not 4 ..🤔 Can ..say , 4 would be for GOD'S NAME 👉 YEHOVAH 👍 ........ By scholars research, nowhere in Hebrew Scriptures does it have .. Yahweh... NOT EVEN IN ANY HEBREW WRITINGS NOT IN HOLY SCRIPTURES. 🎤
Bruh el is the hebrew word for god, yhvh is the name of god. The e source refers to elohim, the plural version of el.
Plural of 'Eloah, specifically, but yeah. This find refutes the whole idea that there even were different such Sources.
@@lemonextreme3934 how does it do that?
@@Emcee_Squared That theory is completely without merit, despite its popularity. Some guy decided 'Oh, look! God in the Bible has a name - Yehowah - but also has all these titles like Lord, Almighty, God, etc...this MUST mean there's different authors t work, each one preferring a different word!' It's utter garbage! The name Elijah means 'My God is Jehovah'. The name Adonijah means 'My Lord is Jehovah'. The Israelites - like every other culture in the region - were perfectly capable of expressing their reverence for their God in varying ways. The Documentary Hypothesis idea falls apart when applying the same standard to the theological writings of other Levantine peoples in ancient times. It's the fallacy of applying/expecting a modern literary standard to an ancient foreign text.
So, If different authors are evident by different Divine titles or name, and the original sources by implication should each use one, How does a 3300-year-old Hebrew inscription have two such terms ie Yahowah and 'El? There goes yer Documentary Hypothesis. There's been any evidence for these supposed different texts with only one name each, either.
it's not just that god has different names, its also different writing style, syntax, vocabulary which is consistently found with each of those names. The guy who uses elohim writes in a certain, distinct way. The guy who uses YHWH writes in a different distinct, unique way. Anyway the documentary hypothesis has evolved and the only thing that is agreed upon by various scholars is that there is a priestly source and a non-priestly source.@@Bimfirestarter
first comment 4th viewer
🤣✊🫵
Why do you think shedding innocent blood is going to forgive your sin? Do you shed the blood of your sacrifice before you (Leviticus 26) repent, or do you think your supposed to kill every innocent person that reproves you because of your iniquity? Because shedding the blood of a man is not going to get you forgiveness, it will only cause your blood to be shed (Genesis 9. 6).
Ryan Joseph Laughlin
Blood is needed to atone for sin (Hebrews 9:22, Leviticus 17:11, 1 Samuel 3:13-14). But Israel’s Levitical Priesthood had too many transgressions for the system to continue to atone (Malachi 2:1-10, Ezekiel 44:7, 1 Kings 12:31-33, 2 Chronicles 29).
Therefore a New Covenant that provides atonement (Ezekiel 16:59-63) was given after the Old Covenant at large was broken (Deuteronomy 31:16 -> Jeremiah 11:10, Isaiah 24:5).
The Levitical Priesthood was supplanted by the Melchizidekian Priesthood for now (Psalm 110:4 -> Hebrews 6:20). This is the long period of time Israel was prophesied to be without the Levitical priesthood (Hosea 3:4). Jesus now provides atonement for transgressors by interceding for them on their behalf (Isaiah 53:12 -> Hebrews 7:25).
Please read Isaiah 53. “He was pierced for our transgression… all of us have gone astray, each of us turned to his own way and the LORD laid upon him the iniquity of us all… for he poured out his life unto death and made intercession for the transgressors.”
@@at716JA Isaiah was in Babylon, Jesus was not. Jesus is a Greek. It says he "was", which means what he said was not a prophecy. They were probably talking about Uriah the Hittite, who King David killed, who was the light of YHWH. Hey-Zeus is the Abominable branch, Hey-Zeus is Mithridatism/Mithraism, Hey-Zeus defiles, defilement is Chrestian salvation!!
The Beast (Antiochus III/Mithridates), & The Dragon (The 15 Ptolemys'), came with the whore of Babylon (Cleopatra); then they false flagged their system that they created. They put the mark of Jezebel on everyone, Alexandra the Great's Swine (Sus) Sacrifice.
@@NAYR-JAUAI Biblical predictive prophecy is not always written in the future tense. See Daniel 7 and "the coming of one like a son of man". Or any of the visions in Daniel in which the vision is seen as having already taken place, just like Joseph's dream interpretation for Pharoah in Genesis. The Servant in Isaiah 53 dies for the transgression of Isaiah's people. Not Babylonians. Jesus was not Greek. He was a descendant of Abraham and David - see Matthew 1.
No it’s not!!! It’s been proven to be fake! Please don’t lose your credibility by endorsing every possible artifact!
So many scholars have now seen the peer review article.
Scholars opinions are rather negative. There's really nothing there. Isn't it time for a retraction?. This was sensationalism. You can't. In all honesty say that you see something.
The name is long e(as in meet),short e(as in met), broad a(as in ball). Ee-eh-ah. Not Yahwe or Yahu. Ee-eh-ah just as he spoke it to Moses at Mount Sinai. Ee-eh-ah ashir ee-eh-ah with the r vocalized at the back of the throat insteaad of rhe tip of the tonge. Say it quickly and the "ir" in ashir becomes a long "u". This will be my name for all generations. The full name of Eeshu (Jesus) sounds phonetically identical - Eashuea. Yahwe was a Canaanite stoem God, brother to Ba'al Dagon.
Modern Hebrew has that R at the back of the throat, kind of like French, but Ancient Hebrew isn't like that. The spellings we find in Aramaic in the 500s BCE, Egyptian in the 1000s BCE, Greek Dead Sea Scrolls, all indicate that YAHO was how they pronounced it back then. When you have it spelled IAO in Greek and YHH/YHW in Aramaic, it becomes clear what's meant by these abbreviations, and it leads to Yahowah. There is no such Canaanite deity named Yahwe, brother to Baal-Dagon. -If I am mistaken, I welcome pointing me to such an inscription, as I am somewhat able to read late Bronze Age/Iron Age Canaanite inscriptions.
SHALOM: I AM SORRY TO TELL YOU THAT : WHAT YOU CLAIM TO BE THE NAME OF ‘ELOHYM’.IS WRITTEN ON THE ANCIENT STONE.. IT IS >> NOT TRUE.. BECAUSE THOSE “LETERS “, ARE NOT THE YOD, HEY VAV HEY OR : י ה ו ה .. IN THE “ PALO HEBREW.. , Phoenician . 🥶🤦🏻♀️.. THE ONLY NAME IS :” YESHÚA ( HA’MASHIACH). SHABAT SHALOM.
Leviticus 17:11 One of my favorite verses! What a revelation! His blood on the alter is the true atonement! Read my paper "Foundation of Blood". Read the verse till it comes to light. Amazing!
Why do you say the name is Yahu and then change it to Yaweh?