SpaceX Nails Landing of Reusable Rocket on Land
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2021
- Jun.30 -- SpaceX launches 88 satellites, including three for Starlink, into orbit. Elon Musk says he wants to use the Starlink satellites to beam broadband internet everywhere in the world except the polar regions by August. After this latest launch, the Falcon 9 first stage rocket came back to Earth and landed at Cape Canaveral, instead of on a drone ship out in the ocean.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA GF D3 | Summer | มาร่วมเป็นพยาน กับวินาทีแชมป์!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JCYvEsFlwx8/mqdefault.jpg)
When I was a kid the old sci-fi ships used to land like this
Now it’s not sci fi
@@ziggity7851now it’s just sci lmao
so the first time I saw this, I was convinced someone was playing a video backwards, my brain just could not process its brilliance…I don’t know about anyone else, but deffo on my bucket list to watch this for real 🤔
@@Holcroft1969 ELON IS THE WORLDS SMARTET MAN..
Dude. This is HUGE. Future of humanity huge
Remember when things like this were a Global life changing experience to witness.. Now people would rather watch a 6 second clip and scroll on to the next pointless video like it was nothing. Makes you wonder if we even deserve to bother going out beyond the stars.
We do. We worked for it, and contrary to what the "Let's fix all the problems here first" freeloaders say, staying here indefinitely is a guarantee of extinction.
I don't think people truly understand how difficult this is. Seriously. How the hell does this cylinder stabilize enough for a pinpoint landing?
because the earth's surface is stationery and not spinning 1000mph, once Elons landing rockets get developed it'll be over for NASA
Fake
@@loislali275 Space X isn't fake. His reusable rocket program is very real.
Deception is real
It's so difficult is impossible
That Never Gets Old.
Just another day launching and landing rockets. Amazing job spacex team!
@Science Revolution Google it
Space x has done such a wonderful job landing these boosters over the years. These days its seems kind of normal.
It never gets old for me... I do not want to get complacent like people did after Apollo 11
seems normal but this is insane to watch.
Nothing normal about it, that's completely wild
That's the point..they wanna normalize and do it at big scale
After watching last night’s launch, I still get excited for the landing. I applauded at my screen when the booster touched down.
In hindsight, it's strange that it took us this long to design something reusable.
us? what you mean us? try again my dude, it is not us! More like Elon, you can't just tack us on every accomplishment, gotta give it to the man who literally willing to lose everything so you can see it happened! Not even the great USA did it, the flag of USA is there just for show off really!
Well in the past, the technology that we have can't possibly do this
@@unknownone3680 no Nasa didn't want to make landing rockets because it'll debunk their bs gravity and spinning earth - Nasa make 53million a day selling lies and CGI images
NASA rockets have always been reusable. Space x have just made them land fancy.
Because it’s very difficult to do it. My father worked during the Apollo project for NASA and all the smart people they couldn’t figure out. Elon did and nobody celebrated it. I think most people are jealous of him or something. It’s easy criticize but doing something like this it’s very difficult.
The amount of math required to program this is AMAZING
The amount of fakery required to program this is AMAZING.
@@eli8589fakery? 😂😂
@@zzuro. Yea, this guy (@eli8589) is a flat-earther I think. He's been all through these comments, calling this fake.
Interesting that you say fakery. This raises the question as to how the lunar lander was able to do this successfully back in 1969 on the moon without an atmosphere (think, although less gravitational pull, there is no terminal velocity to aid the descent).@@eli8589
Yeah amazing how smoothly it landed and how the landing arms dispursed just cm's from the ground 😂
American technology is something else extraordinary from the world, i still bealive it's the best country
Beautiful symmetry
Nailed the landing
Horrible edit - left out the best video of the landing taken from below. Look elsewhere, it's worth it!
Sheldon calculated this
Untucking real. Absolutely amazing. It’s so astonishing that it looks almost fake. I just can’t…great job people… great job
I think it looks fully fake.
Boggles the mind how a cylinder can stay stabilized on liftoff....let alone on touchdown.
That's right. It should boggles your mind because it's physically impossible. Every part of your being says bs but your stubbornness and ignorance say right on.
It's TV with jump cuts and cgi. Another fake religion
@@eli8589are you a flat-earther or something?
@@eli8589 Its 'impossible'...but yet there it is. Are you saying these landings are faked? If so, where is your proof?
@@eli8589 You're a flat-earther, aren't you?
My greatest salute for your dedication Mr. Elon Musk ...
I cant imagine a more grand illustration of the difference computers can make, connected to sensors reading altitude and controlling thrust and thrust vectoring, to gently place that thing in exactly the right spot, without tipping over! 🤣
The only way to land a cylindrical rocket vertically would have to involve a lot of different rockets located all over the place to maintain the correct trim. And it would have to hover and descend really slowly the last few yards. Forget vectoring. That might work for a plane to land on its wheels but never to back down and land on its tail. Those grid control surfaces would be no use at all backing down. Spacex is mass delusion and that makes Elon a fraud.
Unbelievable!
_Space may be the final frontier but it's made in a Hollywood basement_
If you think this technology will end at space travel you are severely naive
The lunar lander was able to do this successfully back in 1969, on the moon without an atmosphere (think, although less gravitational pull, there is no terminal velocity to aid the descent) and take off again.
Their CGI keeps getting better and better
Go to Florida go to the KSC find a scheduled launch and watch but you are probably a bot
@@beenchillin2yill197 bro its fake they have proved it
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102 when
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102you can literally go watch them land you peanut
@@exploringnaturalbeauty2102You can literally watch it with your own eyes...
Do some research before believing every conspiracy.
NASA has been trying this for years. SpaceX: "hold my beer "
CGI dept, "Hold my beer, again"
NASA wasn't trying that for years, from where did you got that idea?
this is unreal.
so cool
Unreal, yes. Cool, not at all.
It's as unreal as it gets.
Maybe one day they will actually do it for real?
I used to make these same videos with my friends in high school.
We never used a cheer and clap track in our videos though. Nice touch
Congrats Lonnie!
If you think you can land a light pole falling from the sky you will believe ANYTHING
is there any footage where they land one with one continuous camera?
Yes but when there is they "lose signal" right as its landing everytime.
@@Flipdodge392 lol. it's pantomime for the hypnotised masses.
@@Kunn1ngDruger The excited people along with the clapping is the best selling point lmao
Until I see it with my own eyes or someone I know does, I won't believe it's real.
@@Kunn1ngDruger Yes there are continuous videos from third parties everywhere, just look up SpaceX landing videos.
So, how many times do they expect to reuse these boosters? Do they plan to part them out to reuse the shells while replacing the engines at some point? I watched the Saturn launches and before them. My comparison, these launches seem routine and without the constant expectation at that the next one would blow up on the pad. I suspect thaat much of difference between then and now is the computers, the ones used to design and test the designs now before they get launched, and even more so, the large number of computers which control every aspect of the rocket's functions. The computing power in a Saturn rocket wouldn't have run an I-Pad.
Some boosters up to 30 times.
Yes, engines get swapped out quite regularly.
P.S. it wouldn't have run a simple calculator, let alone an iPad 😅
crazy visual
“Perfectly fucking vertical”
-Rick Sanchez
Cebok?
i mean, if that thing went to space from one spot, then came back from space and landed in the same spot...incredible
It would've been better if you included the tracking shot
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
Something not quite accurate about this Video...
You mean other than being fake?
Yeah, people didn’t cheer loud enough
ВО! Побольше бы такого контента) Не ленись чел, снимай видосы почаще)
Did SpaceX start to actually re-use them? Or are these new everytime?
They reuse the first stage and the fairings currently, I believe. The upper stage burns up on re-entry and is new each launch.
Woah.
Saves tremendously 👍🏾
Wonder if I can get my Estes rocket to do that. Hmmm
Brilliant.
I cried the first time I watched this
All the launches I used to watch, the rockets flew eastwards. Does this rocket actually have enough juice to return back to the pad and land?
This is a 2-stage rocket.
The first stage (booster) returns to earth, while the second stage continues into earth orbit.
Why did it land on Cape Canaveral now instead of the drone ship
The payload was light enough that it had enough fuel to boost back to the cape.
That's pretty cool!
Meanwhile aliens observing this: Wow they finally made those, it's been a thousand years since when our ancestors made that kind of tech.
Brasileiro: Foguete não tem ré.
Elon Musk: What did you say? 🤭
This is absolutely unbelievable. The science it takes to pull this off is next to impossible. Try sending a pencil to the moon and then making it land on a pin point needle perfectly with no damage. Unbelievable. We are very fortunate to be able to experience something like this in our life time. Elon musk is a pioneer
Fantastic!!
Surprised its from Bloomberg
Here after two years and making 300 launches and landings.
Is there no way to connect duck energy by coming back to earth like a turbine 😊 I love it
very cool ellon
I’m not gonna lie the first time I saw a video of one of these boosters landing itself like this I couldn’t believe it, thought it had to be fake. It’s amazing to see this progression of technology in my lifetime and I hope that what we are seeing is the beginning of a space age. The idea of possibly watching somebody set foot on Mars or the moon live is marvelous.
I felt the same way! The hairs on my arms were raised with joy/excitement/wonderment...I dunno exactly what it was...but I felt 12 years old again watching the space shuttle launches. Damn near cried. I love this!
I'm here because i though there's no way this is real .they have to be running the footage backwards. I am pleasantly surprised to find out I was wrong
All right little believer...
@@jenzuiderveen6247 you are pleasantly willing to deceive yourself.
@@eli8589 Listen if you think it's fake that's okay I get it but you don't have to belittle people for something
That is Awesome
FUNtaSTICK! FUNtaSTICK!
And the NPC people are like yeah!!! Whoohooo!
I don't beleave this is possible until i see it on my eyes
Well, then go to Cape Caneveral when they is the next landing. There were meanwhile nearly 300 landings. Why is it unbelievable for some people?
Sheldon has done it
We are truly in the future
im not sure if people have seen how dangerous this things are. When they first were designed them they were falling of the sky. Now they land on earth, but what surprises me is the velocity rate at which the are falling. To me if seems as fast as a missile. The rocket comes in to land at a velocity of 24 thousand miles per hour. This is relatively as fast as the International space station travel !!!! thats sooooo cool like CHarlie !!
The rocket ISN'T travelling at '24 thousand miles per hour' when it comes into land.
With that one remark, you completely destroyed any credibility you had in the discussion.
@@sailorman8668 what’s your educated guess at which the rocket is coming into orbit ? According to google the booster is flying at a fast velocity before the engines deploy. Please explain your reasoning
Smooth
As easy as taking candy from a baby
Nice parking
Why wouldn’t this work on the moon or mars as long as you change the programming to account for the difference in gravity? You may need some extendable legs like earlier versions in case you land on a slope.
It would. Ideally with different engines, as fewer, larger engines do better in vacuum. The hard part is getting the equipment to those locations in the first place.
Парни, а где можно посмотреть все шансы на эту игру? А то я не совсем пойду как оно считается
I heard the sonic booms over in Melbourne but too many clouds to see it.
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
I was at the bridge by the base my ears are still ringing
That's technology at it's finest, progress that borderlines on scary.
That's Hollywood,m baby!
Esto es más increíble que el plan economico de Milei. Pero el pueblo elige creer. Ellos son amigos. Salud a los crédulos
Soy el unico que se emociona llorando viendo esto?
No suprise ...
If they can nail it on a moving ship a stable earth platform is easy .....
◼️T•h•a•n•k•s f•o•r w•a•t•c•h•i•n•g T•o•d•a•y•s v•i•d•e•o f•o•r m•o•r•e i•n•f•o o•r g•u•i•d•a•n•c•e W•H•A•T•S•A•P•P +1•9•1•7•2•6•8•6•3•8•4🤜❤️◼️
They even landed 2 of these boosters simultanously on land a few years ago, for the Falcon Heavy test. So it’s not even a first, just another landing..
I thought earth was spinning 1000 miles per hour?
@@Datanditto Not when you are only one hundred metres above it ....
@@markjmaxwell9819 then why do people that shoot guns adjust for earth spin? You cant have it both ways.
The Polar Express, irl...
THANK YOU for your vision Elon Musk
I’m 13 and I want to build a rocket
Elon you are great motivation
SoaceX did this in 20 yrs where NASA could not in 60 yrs. Why? The power of private enterprise.
Lol Elon lass die Rakete Kopfüber landen, dann funktioniert es auch in der Realität. Wir teilen später 😂👍
Soooo... it must be Thurs.
It will be like a big battery 🔋 making electricity coming back to Earth 🌍 is there such a way 😁 I love it 💕
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Wheres the live moon cam? What? Can't do it? Wheres the moon cam elon. Total bs.
I can't believe people think this is real.
🤣😂🤣
Same bra lol
Well, dc-x was capable of landing as well, years ago 🤔
it was a couple of hop tests... sadly the program was cancelled, it never got to space.😔
Great just Great ❤
I’m starting to notice this more it’s like it hit some it never leaves the earth atmosphere. Firmament question mark?✝️like if it’s free falling around the planet and not actually leaving.
Guessing this is the technology that Spacex have developed to resupply colonists on the moon/Mars. You couldn’t take supplies down in an Apollo-style lander - it would be far too small. So these rockets will get developed until they can touch down on Mars then take off and be reused.
The idea of living on the Moon or Mars seems very glamorous, but I bet in reality it will be depressing as hell - dust everywhere clogging up your gear, small living spaces at least initially, the same few faces to chat to all the time. Getting excited about the monthly resupply rocket arriving. A huge journey in a small living space to get there and return. New technology will hopefully make existence a bit more bearable - VR headsets, e-books and music and other media etc. Bet the pioneers will dream of breathing real air though!
The way the rocket drops back down looks really fake tbh.
🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍
All of them all of the time???
✌🌐✌🌐✌🌐✌🌐✌🌐✌🌐✌🌐✌🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍🐍
Spirit Undefeated
Ggi but is a good CGI
Another troll kid
Back when Elon was a somewhat of a decent human, the good old days 👀
Oh no! Free speech! The television told me to believe Elon bad, Orange man bad, anyone that questions muh tv people? Bad
Come parcheggiare nello spazio 10 …
The rest is history
Elon fr just be doin shit 😂
A medium quality cgi. Please spend more money faking it.
You can go in person and see it with your own eyes
They have been landing them for 2 or 3 years for over 70 times or something. This channel brings it as if it’s a first 🙄
Meanwhile women in the Philippines are having 11 babies.
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷💯💯💙🎗️
Swwweeeet!!!😜😁
💚🤘🏿
I cannot believe how much of a fake this looks like
Man has never walked on the Moon. Fact.
Man has walked on the Moon. Fact.
There, fixed your ignorant mistake - you're welcome.
@@sailorman8668
Some day man might walk on the moon for real.
if you want you can start at the 7:40 - 10:21 mark. The footage shown is footage that is not shown on any of those Debunked shows. It shows the ASSNUTS faking an Earth photo sh0t being taken that you can clearly see that they are faking it.
www.youtube.Com/watch?v=Qd1yDpT-M8Y
Like she says in the video "If we been to the Moon, why fake any of it?"
Then there is that whole "Van Alan Belts" thing.
Until then I believe that man has never walked on the Moon.
@@sailorman8668 And it's strange that no other space program has ever relaunched to the Moon with humans, fact.
If you seen the lunar module on display at the space muesem , I have my doubt it ever touch the moon with people inside.
IIRC Japan is working on the 2nd lunar landing and they are taking ages in their space program to get that LM to the moon.
@@trikkerman1how do you know that van Allen belts exist kiddo... Oh wait did nasa tell you tjat, I thought yuy don't believe them?
Source?