I have owned 2 tamron 24-70 VC in the past so I have a little more pull toward the new Tamron VC. Tamron quality control for me has been impressive, picture quality has been impressive and price also so for me the Tamron is the best deal you can get period forget about the money. Don't know to much about the Sigma but It looks good as well. This is all good for DSLR owners so go Tamron and Sigma!
If I get one, definitely going with the Tamron. Looks like a stellar lens. BTW, I so agree with you - I don't know why people aren't really looking into those Tamron primes!! I own the 45mm, it's one heck of a lens! Paired up with my 6D, it makes for a perfect all-day setup. Amazing build, weather sealed, IQ is fantastic, f/1.8 aperture gives you beautiful bokeh, and the VC is AMAZING!!! It's an awesome lens.
There's a bokeh crazyness trend nowadays imho, some people hear 1.4 and it's all they want. So sigma is dominating there. They are great lenses but I much prefer the built quality, size, IQ VC and overall concept of the Tamrons.
You helped me decide, CSTV. Going with the Tamron G2. So, I'll be selling my first gen Tamron; My very first SLR lens. Thanks for the great moments, my dear. May your next owner take you to new and exciting places
as a video shooter I would pick the sigma, simply because the focus ring goes in the same direction as most cinema lenses, while the tamron goes in the opposite
+Smaakjeks K........I owned the tamron 17-50mm (parfocal) and honestly didn't find needing the parfocal use that much. the sigma 17-50mm for example only changes slightly when zooming in and out (and is easy to refocus, although has bad breathing), and you can always just stop the lens down and compensate with iso (atleast you can on the a7sii with it's insane iso). learning the wrong focus direction can really stuff up your manual focusing later on. other than the focus ring I think the tamron is better, but for video work both manual focus and autofocus on the sigma is better
I have four Sigma Art primes and they're incredible. In each case, I very carefully considered the Canon alternatives but opted for the Sigmas. I also wanted a nice 24-70 f/2.8 'walkaround' lens and discounted the Canon straight away simply because it's a lot more expensive and has no stabilisation. There aren't too many of these comparisons out yet, but from what I can tell, the Tamron does tend to come out on top. Mine arrived yesterday and I have to agree with the conclusions in this video - the image quality is fantastic. I've only used it once so far but, needless to say, it is absolutely pin sharp including very good corner sharpness. I'll be doing a full review of it on my channel once I've spent a little bit more time with it.
Mikael Schatz I am pretty much done with adaptive lens and switching to all native lineup for my A7Rii. Adapter works good but still not great! It will be nice to see companies like Tamron and Sigma start making e mount lens!
The D850 can automatically fine tune lenses too. So unless there are problems at various focal lengths there wouldn't be much need for either USB solution.
Great hands on review! I've got the Sigma and it's rather hard to believe its OS outperforms Tamron's VC. I personally feel a little bit let down by Sigma's overall performance especially it's wearing the Art series badge but for the money I couldn't ask for more. As a Nikon shooter I don't think the Nikon counterpart lens is worth the price difference.
Sigma's OS on their 24-105 is incredible so it isn't necessarily an incorrect observation. With the Dustin Abbott review, my guess is that each lens might actually be superior at different shutter speeds. - but on net they are similar. I did have a bad Tamron 45 VC stabilizer and when switched for a new unit it was excellent. On weight, weather sealing and extreme corner sharpness, the Tamron seems to be the slight winner - on micro contrast, the Sigma seems better.
Paul O'Neil I totally agree with you. I've been very happy with all my Sigma Art and Sports series lenses, and never found Tamron lenses attractive enough to give anyone of them a go.
I have the original Tamron 24-70 and it's a brilliant lens for the money. Much cheaper than the G2 and very similar performance (apart from the quality of bokeh) which is not an issue for me). The build quality of the 1st gen lens is absolutely fine too.
That happiness will end with Canon 5d Mark IV. Tamron 24-70 f2.8 (007 or G1) is good with 5D Mark III, but Mark IV can't correctly focus with Tamron 007 (G1) version. Maybe up to 55mm Zoom, then you'll have a problem with constabtly missing focus. This is known issue for that version. Tamron tap in console won't work with older version like G1, so no updates for this thing. Same goes for Older version of Tamron 70-200, f/2.8 (G1). Great lenses, but if you get them you stuck with them and no further, than 5d Mark III.
You resisted the temptation to take the same picture with both lenses under the same lighting conditions. You had two identical bodies, so why make it too easy, right?
I'm sure they did to make their own determinations. We can't possibly see every photo taken during a video review without it getting boring and clunky.
Yeah we shot quite a few identical frames and then I was like F this I'm tired of shooting the same photo twice so I tried instead to spend some time with each lens. Then my backpack got stolen and I didn't care what lens I was using. Still had fun though! Chris @TCSTV
Can't wait for my 35 to arrive! Been a Tammy fan since I bought my 90mm Di VC USD a couple years ago after I bought my first full frame. They've really stepped up their game and so I'm sticking with them. I now have their 90mm and the excellent 15-30. Now waiting for the 35 which the seller won't be sending til next Tuesday since this week is pretty much their version of Thanksgiving.
Too bad for Sigma they've lost to Tamron. If they have instead complemented the 24-35mm f/2.0 with a new 35-70mm f/2.0 I would have chosen the 35-70mm f/2.0 over the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 in a heartbeat.
Yay, a review I was hoping for! I'd get the Tamron just because the zoom's the way I'm used to with my Nikon lenses, but I also enjoy the two Tamrons I own. Happy both lenses are so good.
These both look like great lenses overall, I keep wondering about the Tokina 24-70 f/2.8. Granted, it's not stabilized or weather sealed, but by all indications it is much sharper at f/2.8 than either of these, especially out to the corners. Thoughts on that one?
Thanks for the great video! I just picked up the Nikon D850, would you favor the sigma 24 to 70, versus the 24 to 105 for a better walk around, every day lens? Thanks so much for your time
When you have to pixel-peep your image to find defaults, you know that's an excellent lens lol. They're both outstanding. In my situation, I chose sigma because my local photography store doesn't sell any of Tamron's. In conclusion, your tests in low light is an excellent way to verify a lens performance. Very good review, sir!
I use both Tamron and Sigma lenses and I’m more than happy with both companies. My 24-70 is the previous model of the Tamron and I find it an excellent lens, so good I have no intention of up dating it.
For me, the Tamron has that little bit of magic about it. Granted I'm not a technical shooter, so I don't know which one is actually better but I feel more love for the Tamron than the Sigma from the shots we saw :-)
+Prashanth "Correcting for aberrations = more glass = flatter image." I've seen no example of a blinded test where people can tell the difference between a "flat" image and a "deep" image. Feel free to provide a case of that happening :-)
I tried 2 sigma 50mm f1.4 art lenses and both had inconsistent focus issues, ie. On tripod, focusing on the same object single shot drive, using a remote, I would get one shot that's front focusing one shots thats rear focusing and another one really sharp all in random orders. Of course it's more pronounced the wider the aperture. Did you experience af issue with the sigma zoom?
At 9:25 in the video, we are shown a highrise in the distance with the cameras at 70mm @ F11, 1/8th, 2000 ISO. Looking at the two pictures, the one taken with the Sigma is clearer than the other one. If I'm looking at the two lenses for clarity, I would choose the Sigma over the Tamron based upon this picture.
For what's worth which ain't much, I have the Tamron on order from you guys. If people research these 2, they will find them so close that it is a difficult choice. It becomes a matter of where the +++ are something you need. What rarely gets mentioned in any of these reviews is that Tamron has the best (at the moment) customer service reputation out there. That to me given all things being almost equal, is the tipping point. Nobody seems to think that customer service is important, especially some manufacturers. I suppose in a culture where $3000 cameras and $2000 lenses are considered disposable that might be fair. Tamron found a niche and they are killing in it. Poor customer service has kept me away from stuff, and company's.
In these videos Canada always looks so wholesome and Little House On The Pararie'ish,but also quite boring.Have no idea if it is or not.Think Chris and the team do a great job.But yeah compared to London,you can just tell people in Canada look educated.
I visited Calgary a few weeks back (I live in Ann Arbor Michigan) and thought it was a lovely city. One that I could actually see myself living in one day. It really is as nice as this video made it seem. I though it also had plenty of stuff going on (I'm more outdoorsy than city though, so that's just me).
How do you think that the Tamron lens will perform for a inside picture of a hockey player in an inside rink with all those differents light possibility?
I've noticed a lot of people using the Sigma 18-35 on FF, even on camera's like RED; however it is only usable above 27mm so wouldn't it be a better choice to get the Sigma 24-70 ? The reason I ask is because I am using the a6500 but want to go FF when the A7Riii comes out and want to invest in a new lens.
i would make sure prior to testing their sharpness they are focus tested on a focus target/finely tuned if need be, as from my experince new lenses can be slightly out.
I was blessed with a good copy of the original G1 Tamron lens. The biggest down side was AF accuracy out of the box. AFMA allowed me to fix these issues, I know many photographers who couldn't. I hope that they have fix the AF issues with the G2 like the new 85 mm VC. I was surprised how accurate the 85mm was from Tamron. Let's hope it has the same accuracy.
i would very much interested in seeing review of the SONY Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM II and the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2, mainly because the ssm11 is the only 24-70mmf2.8 made for the sony "A" mount these days....... REPLY
i have the tamron and i have to say its an amazing lens. sharp, fast and feels solid. the only thing left to find out about i feel like would be the durability
Great video and comparison. I like both lenses but u shall purchase the Tamron 24-70 I also want the Tamron 85mm lens. Also how on earth are you managing to get great low light with the Panasonic GH5
You always make top reviews and awesome quality in all footage. Top notch, also sound is a blast. Love that. Regarding the 24-70 which is crucial for all pros there are some things I may disagree about. Fact is that VC/VR best is tested on live footage and of course stills. Sigma can not even get close there. Nor Canon, Nikon. On D850 its hard to say but Tamron give Nikon a real fight. Being sharper on many widths starting from f 2,8. Nikon better on some. NO direct comparision but on Canon 5dsr and Canon newest 24-70 almost the same results. They tend to be sharper at different focal lengths. We need to do severe pixelpeep to see it. Real time world. What we called 3rd party is today game changer due to price. I use the Tamron. Its a blast.
Thanks for the review, sold my Canon 24-70mm and looking to replace it - w/o going to the mk2. Was considering the Sigma due to having shot with the 35mm ART and was blown away. The Tamron boasts new tech, but haven't had much experience with them overall. Now the question is: do I save the coin and get the Sigma or go all-in for the Canon mk2 version.
Dang, I know this comment is over 4 years old, but if you see this, what lens did you end up getting?? I have a Canon RP and considering the Tamron if not the Canon EF v2
@@cjinreallife after lots of testing, I changed course and ended up going back to the trusty workhorse Canon 24-105mm mk2 lol... go figure. I'm now all-in with mirrorless (R5 and R3) and also all-in on RF glass now. You can't go wrong with either lens option really, but if you're already mirrorless... go for the new RF glass if you can.
Corner sharpness will not matter when using this lens, or any full frame lens, on a crop sensor camera like a Nikon D500 where the sensor uses the center of the lens and leaves out the corner areas. You get a new equivalent focal range of 36-105mm (on a Nikon APS-c 1.5 crop) but you will be using the absolute sharpest area of the glass (the center) and therefor should be pretty sharp edge to edge. This is why I only use FX (full frame) lenses on my DX (crop sensor) cameras like my D500, better image quality edge to edge.
nice short review. if you were to buy a 24-70 and the choice is between nikon ed without vr and tamron with g2, what would you go for, the prices are almost similar. please reply. Herbert from Kenya
can you sort out my problem of mine. I am confused of buying the lens in company's.Sigma AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for canon 80d and Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for canon 80d which one would you suggest.And whats the difference?
If only there was a way to objectively use reliability statistics as well. Just like you can find out which car is more or less reliable. It surely must be factored in. So you buy a lens for 40% less than a Canon/Nikon but then spend weeks & dollars getting it calibrated/repaired/replaced. What's that worth?
Hello. I had a question for you. Some people are complaining about the focusing of the tamron g2 . Specifically some are complaining that the middle focus point does not focus in the middle. The focus gets shifted a little bit. Are you aware of any such problem? Or did you face any while using your tamron g2 lens ? Waiting eagerly for your reply. Because your response will help me to decide whether I should go for this lens or not.
+DoomedRace999 Like most fast zooms, we recommend performing a focus micro-adjust with this lens if you are finding that focus is consistently out with a single point. We had no issues with the Tamron, Focus was consistent right out of the box.
Someone I am not getting almost any stabilization in my Sigma Art 24-70 in a Z7... I think fstoppers also found the stabilization in the sigma being very weak.
We purchased the Tamron a couple months back and we're doing video exclusively. The VC, while good, does give these really jarring jitters when filming in 60 fps. I've seen other reviews where others have experienced the same thing. Can anyone comment on that?
Hi, i'm planing to use the Sigma 24-70art on a Sony A7SII via mc-11 with a monopod for video shooting. It would be safe? do you guys think the lens mount will suffer? Adding a lens suport on the monopod would be messy. Please guys advise me a little on this. There is any type of tripod mount for the mc -11 or even the lens? Thank u,
I'm loving the Tamron 24-70 G2 with my D850 ✌️
What about the Tamron G1 is the upgrading worth it?
Don’t buy the G1, you will be disappointed! G2 is very much better in image quality.
James Wuertele How do u know?
Tamron g2 and d850. Dream setup right there. Good for you man. Congrats
Same here, first lens i picked up with mine. 2nd lens was the Tamron 70-200 G2.
@2:35 As a proud Pentaxian, I appreciate Chris incorporating some Pentax into the review :-D
Thanks for the videos, guys.
You read my mine as I was looking for Tamron review. Thanks TCSTV
I have owned 2 tamron 24-70 VC in the past so I have a little more pull toward the new Tamron VC. Tamron quality control for me has been impressive, picture quality has been impressive and price also so for me the Tamron is the best deal you can get period forget about the money. Don't know to much about the Sigma but It looks good as well. This is all good for DSLR owners so go Tamron and Sigma!
If I get one, definitely going with the Tamron. Looks like a stellar lens.
BTW, I so agree with you - I don't know why people aren't really looking into those Tamron primes!! I own the 45mm, it's one heck of a lens! Paired up with my 6D, it makes for a perfect all-day setup. Amazing build, weather sealed, IQ is fantastic, f/1.8 aperture gives you beautiful bokeh, and the VC is AMAZING!!! It's an awesome lens.
James Larsen I agree. I have the 45mm and it's freaking awesome!
There's a bokeh crazyness trend nowadays imho, some people hear 1.4 and it's all they want. So sigma is dominating there. They are great lenses but I much prefer the built quality, size, IQ VC and overall concept of the Tamrons.
You helped me decide, CSTV. Going with the Tamron G2. So, I'll be selling my first gen Tamron; My very first SLR lens.
Thanks for the great moments, my dear. May your next owner take you to new and exciting places
Thank you for another excellent video! I have been waiting for your review of these two lenses and happy to see that there it is.
Hi
Comparison between 24-70 2.8 old tamron and new G2 verion would be great
Oh my goodness, how I've been waiting for a proper look at these two.
This episode should be dedicated to the memory of Chris' backpack.
Thank you Piotr. Roots was nice enough to sympathize with my plight and sent me another one!
Chris @ TCSTV
Heads up: The Tamron G2 is parfocal. That's a huge improvement over the G1 lens for video work. I wonder if the Sigma Art is parfocal or varifocal.
Notification squad! Who's with me?
5 pm
Here I am!
Nope
Show offs.
what's ur settings? haha
I just order the Tamron!!! for the Nikon D850... both on back order. Looking forward to receiving them both.
so happy to see this video uploaded, great timing
Great hands on, lucky to get that Sigma, hard to get on our end. For the value and besides a little hunting issues, that Tamron is pretty good
yes
I really enjoy your channel. The information is clear & very well delivered. Keep up the great work!
Finally a review about this two new lenses! Both amazing, but I am going to buy the Tamron. It really impressed me!
Really ? It seems that Sigma is better in corners at 24 f 2,8 . But otherwise, I'm Ok with you.
Would have loved to hear about and see some stabilized video footage shot with these lenses.
as a video shooter I would pick the sigma, simply because the focus ring goes in the same direction as most cinema lenses, while the tamron goes in the opposite
+legend
The Tamron is parfocal, though. I'm not sure if the Sigma is.
+Smaakjeks K........I owned the tamron 17-50mm (parfocal) and honestly didn't find needing the parfocal use that much. the sigma 17-50mm for example only changes slightly when zooming in and out (and is easy to refocus, although has bad breathing), and you can always just stop the lens down and compensate with iso (atleast you can on the a7sii with it's insane iso). learning the wrong focus direction can really stuff up your manual focusing later on. other than the focus ring I think the tamron is better, but for video work both manual focus and autofocus on the sigma is better
+legend
No, you must use the lens I say, and have my conviction. Those are the rules of the internet.
+Smaakjeks K.........very well, my apologies. I hope you can forgive me for my mistake.............I shall pledge myself to tamron as you say :)
I'm really confused about which one to buy. Sigma or Tamron. Could help? it's because?
I have four Sigma Art primes and they're incredible. In each case, I very carefully considered the Canon alternatives but opted for the Sigmas. I also wanted a nice 24-70 f/2.8 'walkaround' lens and discounted the Canon straight away simply because it's a lot more expensive and has no stabilisation. There aren't too many of these comparisons out yet, but from what I can tell, the Tamron does tend to come out on top. Mine arrived yesterday and I have to agree with the conclusions in this video - the image quality is fantastic. I've only used it once so far but, needless to say, it is absolutely pin sharp including very good corner sharpness. I'll be doing a full review of it on my channel once I've spent a little bit more time with it.
I hope they will start coming out with E mount version.
Works good with Sigma mc-11.
Mikael Schatz I am pretty much done with adaptive lens and switching to all native lineup for my A7Rii. Adapter works good but still not great! It will be nice to see companies like Tamron and Sigma start making e mount lens!
ericthestone Sigma will release e mounts soon!
The Tamron is great...
Amazing review and your 4K video quality! Love the fact that you mentioned shooting with the GH5!
Were these both AF Fine Tuned? And if so, did you use the usb dock for the Sigma?
Good question
The tamron has a tap in console so it would only be fair to have the Tamron fine tuned as well...
The D850 can automatically fine tune lenses too. So unless there are problems at various focal lengths there wouldn't be much need for either USB solution.
....and how is that a camera can automatically fine tune lenses?
This says D500, but same process. Came in with the D5 & D500....
nps.nikonimaging.com/technical_solutions/d500_tips/af/auto_af_fine-tuning/
Great hands on review! I've got the Sigma and it's rather hard to believe its OS outperforms Tamron's VC. I personally feel a little bit let down by Sigma's overall performance especially it's wearing the Art series badge but for the money I couldn't ask for more. As a Nikon shooter I don't think the Nikon counterpart lens is worth the price difference.
Sigma's OS on their 24-105 is incredible so it isn't necessarily an incorrect observation. With the Dustin Abbott review, my guess is that each lens might actually be superior at different shutter speeds. - but on net they are similar. I did have a bad Tamron 45 VC stabilizer and when switched for a new unit it was excellent. On weight, weather sealing and extreme corner sharpness, the Tamron seems to be the slight winner - on micro contrast, the Sigma seems better.
Sigma fART. Sigma sucks Always has always will
Paul O'Neil I totally agree with you. I've been very happy with all my Sigma Art and Sports series lenses, and never found Tamron lenses attractive enough to give anyone of them a go.
Namn L No I'm happy with all my Sigma lenses even pairing them with my Nikon D850.
+Namn
Is someone a fan of Angry Photographer? Have you ever actually tried an Art lens?
Excellent video 😮!
I have the original Tamron 24-70 and it's a brilliant lens for the money. Much cheaper than the G2 and very similar performance (apart from the quality of bokeh) which is not an issue for me). The build quality of the 1st gen lens is absolutely fine too.
Just bought the G1, glad to hear this.
That happiness will end with Canon 5d Mark IV. Tamron 24-70 f2.8 (007 or G1) is good with 5D Mark III, but Mark IV can't correctly focus with Tamron 007 (G1) version. Maybe up to 55mm Zoom, then you'll have a problem with constabtly missing focus. This is known issue for that version. Tamron tap in console won't work with older version like G1, so no updates for this thing. Same goes for Older version of Tamron 70-200, f/2.8 (G1). Great lenses, but if you get them you stuck with them and no further, than 5d Mark III.
Just watched this and appreciated your wry humor (yes, US Spelling). This is a great comparative video and very helpful.
thank god clients wont say hey look onion rings on the bokeh hahahaha
At this point, I'm only watching these excellent reviews to hear Chris's, "or some sh*t like that".
You resisted the temptation to take the same picture with both lenses under the same lighting conditions. You had two identical bodies, so why make it too easy, right?
He did, when testing bokeh, how close it can focus, CA and also a few other times.
I'm sure they did to make their own determinations. We can't possibly see every photo taken during a video review without it getting boring and clunky.
He probably did but, to make the video interesting, they didn't show duplicate images other than when necessary.
Yeah we shot quite a few identical frames and then I was like F this I'm tired of shooting the same photo twice so I tried instead to spend some time with each lens. Then my backpack got stolen and I didn't care what lens I was using. Still had fun though!
Chris @TCSTV
The lens review of The Camera Store are very rare and I wish they were more frequent.
Can't wait for my 35 to arrive! Been a Tammy fan since I bought my 90mm Di VC USD a couple years ago after I bought my first full frame. They've really stepped up their game and so I'm sticking with them. I now have their 90mm and the excellent 15-30. Now waiting for the 35 which the seller won't be sending til next Tuesday since this week is pretty much their version of Thanksgiving.
Too bad for Sigma they've lost to Tamron. If they have instead complemented the 24-35mm f/2.0 with a new 35-70mm f/2.0 I would have chosen the 35-70mm f/2.0 over the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 in a heartbeat.
I agree but it would most likely be a 35-50/2 which isn't that useful.
for video shooters the focus direction on the sigma works better
But those onion rings...
Excellent and very informative video, great job guys.
I've been struggling on which one to get. Both seem very viable, but I may end up getting the Tamron lens. Thank you very much for this helpful video!
Yay, a review I was hoping for! I'd get the Tamron just because the zoom's the way I'm used to with my Nikon lenses, but I also enjoy the two Tamrons I own. Happy both lenses are so good.
These both look like great lenses overall, I keep wondering about the Tokina 24-70 f/2.8. Granted, it's not stabilized or weather sealed, but by all indications it is much sharper at f/2.8 than either of these, especially out to the corners. Thoughts on that one?
Thanks for the great video! I just picked up the Nikon D850, would you favor the sigma 24 to 70, versus the 24 to 105 for a better walk around, every day lens? Thanks so much for your time
is there any way fixing distortion from tamron shot at 24mm with 5d mark 3 ? there is no profile lens in lightroom
When you have to pixel-peep your image to find defaults, you know that's an excellent lens lol. They're both outstanding. In my situation, I chose sigma because my local photography store doesn't sell any of Tamron's. In conclusion, your tests in low light is an excellent way to verify a lens performance. Very good review, sir!
I use both Tamron and Sigma lenses and I’m more than happy with both companies. My 24-70 is the previous model of the Tamron and I find it an excellent lens, so good I have no intention of up dating it.
When are you guys coming back to TCSTV??
Chris & Jordan are joining us for a TCSTV livestream tonight. Check it out: th-cam.com/video/wNryq574gTA/w-d-xo.html
For me, the Tamron has that little bit of magic about it. Granted I'm not a technical shooter, so I don't know which one is actually better but I feel more love for the Tamron than the Sigma from the shots we saw :-)
+Prashanth
"Correcting for aberrations = more glass = flatter image."
I've seen no example of a blinded test where people can tell the difference between a "flat" image and a "deep" image. Feel free to provide a case of that happening :-)
why did tamron stop making this 24-70mm f2.8 g2 lens for the Sony E mount?????
I tried 2 sigma 50mm f1.4 art lenses and both had inconsistent focus issues, ie. On tripod, focusing on the same object single shot drive, using a remote, I would get one shot that's front focusing one shots thats rear focusing and another one really sharp all in random orders. Of course it's more pronounced the wider the aperture. Did you experience af issue with the sigma zoom?
Oooo that GH5 walking shot. Also always love it when Chris lets loose and lets a few f***s fly away.
You seem to handle your lenses without their caps right in the middle of nature...Is this safe?
At 9:25 in the video, we are shown a highrise in the distance with the cameras at 70mm @ F11, 1/8th, 2000 ISO. Looking at the two pictures, the one taken with the Sigma is clearer than the other one. If I'm looking at the two lenses for clarity, I would choose the Sigma over the Tamron based upon this picture.
These ain't lab conditions. I would highly recommend not to choose any glas just by comparing a few or in this case ONE shot/s.
getting the Tamron , can;t wait to place the order tonight
For what's worth which ain't much, I have the Tamron on order from you guys.
If people research these 2, they will find them so close that it is a difficult choice. It becomes a matter of where the +++ are something you need.
What rarely gets mentioned in any of these reviews is that Tamron has the best (at the moment) customer service reputation out there. That to me given all things being almost equal, is the tipping point. Nobody seems to think that customer service is important, especially some manufacturers. I suppose in a culture where $3000 cameras and $2000 lenses are considered disposable that might be fair. Tamron found a niche and they are killing in it.
Poor customer service has kept me away from stuff, and company's.
In these videos Canada always looks so wholesome and Little House On The Pararie'ish,but also quite boring.Have no idea if it is or not.Think Chris and the team do a great job.But yeah compared to London,you can just tell people in Canada look educated.
I visited Calgary a few weeks back (I live in Ann Arbor Michigan) and thought it was a lovely city. One that I could actually see myself living in one day. It really is as nice as this video made it seem. I though it also had plenty of stuff going on (I'm more outdoorsy than city though, so that's just me).
Where is East Village??
How do you think that the Tamron lens will perform for a inside picture of a hockey player in an inside rink with all those differents light possibility?
is this lens available on E mount?
Does Tamron lenses still focus the opposite direction like where turning right is to infinity, and turning left is to close?
can I attach a tamron lens to a Sony a7111
When they gonna do this for e-mount?
Which one do you think it could perform better for wedding photography, specially low light conditions?
Super helpful video. Thanks!
I've noticed a lot of people using the Sigma 18-35 on FF, even on camera's like RED; however it is only usable above 27mm so wouldn't it be a better choice to get the Sigma 24-70 ? The reason I ask is because I am using the a6500 but want to go FF when the A7Riii comes out and want to invest in a new lens.
Can you do a review on the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 art lens?
i would make sure prior to testing their sharpness they are focus tested on a focus target/finely tuned if need be, as from my experince new lenses can be slightly out.
great to see a youtube channel with that many subs from Calgary! keep it up, will visit the store soon
I was blessed with a good copy of the original G1 Tamron lens. The biggest down side was AF accuracy out of the box. AFMA allowed me to fix these issues, I know many photographers who couldn't. I hope that they have fix the AF issues with the G2 like the new 85 mm VC. I was surprised how accurate the 85mm was from Tamron. Let's hope it has the same accuracy.
i would very much interested in seeing review of the SONY Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM II and the tamron 24-70mm f2.8 G2, mainly because the ssm11 is the only 24-70mmf2.8 made for the sony "A" mount these days.......
REPLY
i have the tamron and i have to say its an amazing lens. sharp, fast and feels solid.
the only thing left to find out about i feel like would be the durability
With an aluminum alloy body I don’t think so
Great video and comparison. I like both lenses but u shall purchase the Tamron 24-70 I also want the Tamron 85mm lens.
Also how on earth are you managing to get great low light with the Panasonic GH5
Does the Tamron have more of a focus breathing problem than Sigma (that is, when at close focus and set at 70mm, what are the defacto focal lengths?).
Awesome! This will help me a lot!
You always make top reviews and awesome quality in all footage. Top notch, also sound is a blast. Love that. Regarding the 24-70 which is crucial for all pros there are some things I may disagree about. Fact is that VC/VR best is tested on live footage and of course stills. Sigma can not even get close there. Nor Canon, Nikon. On D850 its hard to say but Tamron give Nikon a real fight. Being sharper on many widths starting from f 2,8. Nikon better on some. NO direct comparision but on Canon 5dsr and Canon newest 24-70 almost the same results. They tend to be sharper at different focal lengths. We need to do severe pixelpeep to see it. Real time world. What we called 3rd party is today game changer due to price. I use the Tamron. Its a blast.
Hey there... can you just enlighten me about the ISO 2000 at 3:23 pls. why would you use that much of iso to capture that pic.
Was probably a typo, not 2000 but 200.
Thanks for the review, sold my Canon 24-70mm and looking to replace it - w/o going to the mk2. Was considering the Sigma due to having shot with the 35mm ART and was blown away. The Tamron boasts new tech, but haven't had much experience with them overall. Now the question is: do I save the coin and get the Sigma or go all-in for the Canon mk2 version.
Dang, I know this comment is over 4 years old, but if you see this, what lens did you end up getting?? I have a Canon RP and considering the Tamron if not the Canon EF v2
@@cjinreallife after lots of testing, I changed course and ended up going back to the trusty workhorse Canon 24-105mm mk2 lol... go figure. I'm now all-in with mirrorless (R5 and R3) and also all-in on RF glass now. You can't go wrong with either lens option really, but if you're already mirrorless... go for the new RF glass if you can.
Corner sharpness will not matter when using this lens, or any full frame lens, on a crop sensor camera like a Nikon D500 where the sensor uses the center of the lens and leaves out the corner areas. You get a new equivalent focal range of 36-105mm (on a Nikon APS-c 1.5 crop) but you will be using the absolute sharpest area of the glass (the center) and therefor should be pretty sharp edge to edge. This is why I only use FX (full frame) lenses on my DX (crop sensor) cameras like my D500, better image quality edge to edge.
nice short review. if you were to buy a 24-70 and the choice is between nikon ed without vr and tamron with g2, what would you go for, the prices are almost similar. please reply. Herbert from Kenya
Thank you Sir. Appreciated. Tamron G2 it is.
Really good reviews!
Good reviews Chris.
2:54 Lovechild of the Who-mobile and a Cyber-mat (1970-1975)
I had the first version of the Tamron, and my biggest gripe about it was that the VR mechanism was very noisy. Better now?
much better
4:43 to 5:37 Pretty awesome walking shot 👌🏼
can you sort out my problem of mine. I am confused of buying the lens in company's.Sigma AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for canon 80d and Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for canon 80d which one would you suggest.And whats the difference?
Jordan, where's the video review on these lenses too? =>
Is it possible to use the tamron on my crop sensored camera? A nikon d5600
Have any D850 grips shipped to customers yet? How about saving some of those D850s for TCS waitlist.......
If only there was a way to objectively use reliability statistics as well. Just like you can find out which car is more or less reliable. It surely must be factored in. So you buy a lens for 40% less than a Canon/Nikon but then spend weeks & dollars getting it calibrated/repaired/replaced.
What's that worth?
Can I use len for sonya7iii?
How does the G2 compare to the original Tamron 24-70mm?
Hello. I had a question for you. Some people are complaining about the focusing of the tamron g2 . Specifically some are complaining that the middle focus point does not focus in the middle. The focus gets shifted a little bit.
Are you aware of any such problem? Or did you face any while using your tamron g2 lens ?
Waiting eagerly for your reply. Because your response will help me to decide whether I should go for this lens or not.
+DoomedRace999 Like most fast zooms, we recommend performing a focus micro-adjust with this lens if you are finding that focus is consistently out with a single point.
We had no issues with the Tamron, Focus was consistent right out of the box.
Can I get either in a full frame for my Sony a7 I'm here in Calgary
Not in native E-Mount unfortunately. I recommend getting a Canon mount and using a Sigma or Metabones adapter.
Jordan @ TCSTV
Someone I am not getting almost any stabilization in my Sigma Art 24-70 in a Z7... I think fstoppers also found the stabilization in the sigma being very weak.
TCS, can you produce a Canon body follow-up please?
Great video! May I ask did you find some focusing accuracy issues with the Tamron? I saw some reviews about it, but not sure. Thanks!
Hey, nice review! What's the bag you are carrying though? Is it a camera bag?
We purchased the Tamron a couple months back and we're doing video exclusively. The VC, while good, does give these really jarring jitters when filming in 60 fps. I've seen other reviews where others have experienced the same thing. Can anyone comment on that?
Which one runs better on an adaptor on a sony camera?
Is anyone going to point out the Pentax strap on the Nikon?
Heyy hii..
I heard that sigma and tamron lenses gives little soft focus(little less sharpness) after 2 3 years is that true??
Nice review!
Hi, i'm planing to use the Sigma 24-70art on a Sony A7SII via mc-11 with a monopod for video shooting. It would be safe? do you guys think the lens mount will suffer? Adding a lens suport on the monopod would be messy. Please guys advise me a little on this. There is any type of tripod mount for the mc -11 or even the lens?
Thank u,
Which 24-70 for landscape?
14-24 better
It doesn't matter which one you choose; It's a matter of preference.