So let's say we take an average newspaper, 4800cm^2. When this is folded in half the area halves and becomes 2400cm^2. As you continue to fold the paper in half, the area keeps shrinking resulting in 45 folds making a piece of paper of size 0.0000000001cm^2, which is 140 times smaller than a carbon atom (which is inside a molecule of paper), therefore if folding paper more than 7 times was possible, 45 times would result in an atom being split meaning you couldn't get it to the moon.
But what if you cut the paper in half and put the first half on the other? Also you can take a bigger paper... I mean if you take a paper with an area equal to the surface of the earth, what Will happen?
And so I grabbed a piece of paper and started folding it and after 5 folds the paper was torn. Moral :- Never take Science so lightly even if it seems easy.
you don't really need to fold the paper, just cut it in half everytime and put one half on top of the other, that way you won't have that pesky problem of it being hard to fold
By the way, here is something called dimension compression. You start with a rectangle with dimensions 1x2. It has an area of 2 square units. However, if we were to move the line on top of the rectangle to the midpoint, the bottom line will double in length, assuming the area of the rectangle remains constant. Then, it will have dimensions of 0.5x4. If we keep dragging the top line as the space becomes infinitesimally small as the 2 lines converge on top of each other, we will get a line that extends infinitely; a dimension. We can do the same thing with a 3D cube, where we will compress the top square to the bottom one which increases it to extrude it into a flat 2D plane. Therefore, we can theorize we are living in a 4D tesseract where the top cube is compressing against the bottom cube, causing the universe to expand at negative velocities. When the top cube lies on top of the bottom cube, the Big Rip will happen as the bottom cube gets an infinite 3D volume. Therefore, if you want to extrude something into the 4th dimension, you must make them infinitely large in 3 dimensions, and then pull the top cube out of the bottom cube, which will shrink the tesseract back to finite dimensions. Therefore, if we divide by 0, we can create an infinitely large Rubik's cube and pull the cubes away to create the first 3x3x3x3 Rubik's tesseract.
Mars is actually 10~50x further from earth than moon at best moments (when distance between earth and mars is smallest) so u should fold it 3~6 times more
Shaurya Sharma well, if you can fold a paper that thick then maybe since getting up to 10 folds is barely doable. Mythbusters even got up to 11 and the used a large wide paper and used a steam roller just to flatten it. Also you have to make it stand up and it having a height of over 6 miles is hard if not impossible unless it had a lot of support.
I remember reading somewhere years ago - and it seemed as incredible as this one - that if you could fold a piece of paper 100 times it would actually be taller than the KNOWN UNIVERSE is wide. That is, it would be about 16.7 *BILLION* _lightyears_ tall. Doesn't seem feasible until you start actually doing the math. Another one similar to this is the one where you hire someone to work for you for 30 days, but you're going to pay them every day double what you gave them the day before, but you will start with only 1 penny. So, on day two you will give them 2 pennies (so now they have 3 pennies, etc). How much would they have at the end of the 30 days? Almost 11 million dollars!
The atoms wouldnt be enough to reach thay long. And..... The universe is expanding and...... we dont know how big The universe is so......its an impossible theory
@@RAXIIIIIIII Well of course the paper itself would be impossible because it would require more atoms than there are in the universe to construct it, but as an example of geometric progression it checks out.
I took a sheet of computer paper and stared at it for a while before going like, "Nope, this can NOT be as tall as the Empire State Building." Then I folded it 40 times The purpose of this comment is that I need help. If you see this comment, please tell NASA that I'm stuck on one of their satellites.
When you fold a 1meter length paper 40 times, the length/width would be reduced to 9e-13m. I believe this is smaller then the size of an atom. The paper tower would be so thin it couldn't hold together at the sub atomic level. So even as a hypothetical discussion, the concept doesn't hold water very well.
You forgot to take in account that when you fold 40 times, you actually only fold 20 times the width and 20 times the height. For example if a paper of one squared meter is folded once, either the width or the height is still 1m long. So when folded 40 times, the sides are still about 0.9 microns long...
Well... Its length will be enough to go to the Moon (in 45 folds). But how am I going to climb it? I need a solution NOW. I have to go to the Moon this weekend for my school project.
Point is, we don't know how big exactly that newspaper is. Don't tell me that the hands are a reference point. Why? They're just put there to make things understandable.
The area of paper is also exponentially decreacing...so assume that initial area is 1m^2 that is length is 1m and breath is 1m after folding 49 times ...(by doing mathematical calculation)...the length and breath become 42(nano meter)....so, it becomes invisible to human eyes...thickness is less then 3000 time to human hair...
fun fact: 25 folds and its height would be 0.25 miles it's width would be 0.0000002 ft this is called exponential decay 45 folds and it's width would be 0.000 000 000 000 28 width (diameter) of an atom's nucleuss 1x10^12 which is close to width of 45 folds 45 folds and we get ladders to the moon that are 3 nucleuses wide hold my beer
Grunt I did this in my 8th grade speech. If you fold a normal piece of paper 103 times, it’ll be thicker than the whole observable universe. And for the width, I would probably be smaller than a plank which is the smallest thing in the entire universe.
Boosters is Quicker, Stronger and highly durable, Can Protect Humans from Cosmic Debris, Can store Science and Research gadgets, Large and can fit a lot, Easier to do, Can help people explore new stuff in lesser time, Can carry Satellite s, Better than folding a paper
Me: “Mom I learned something new today! Mom: What is it? Me: I can get to the moon Mom: Its not that easy how are you going to do that? Me: *Holds bible*
This is very theoretical! It’s scientifically impossible, you would also need to start with a huge paper, it has to be super flexible, more flexible than silk
+Alex Raxach It would reach the distance to earth from the moon, but it's paper. Just imagine a bunch of people trying to climb a piece of paper. It would fall over, if the wind didn't blow it over.
+Alex Raxach We don't need to go to the moon, because we have earth. If we were on the moon, we would desire to reach to the earth because earth has oxygen, a lot of water/H2O,iron, magnesium, sulfur, nickel, calcium which make up the bulk composition and more elements, an Ozon layer, the ideal amount of gravity for us to be developed the way we are, a strong magnetic field to protect us from solar eruptions, is in the habitable zone and full of life in every corner. The moon has also many of those elements but has e.g. a much thinner atmosphere, much less water in form of ice and is inhabitable without astronautic devices. So, what is better for us, the moon or our earth? We need to face it that paper doesn't work the way it is imagined with folding.
Alex Raxach Well, i may appear that way to some, but for my own, i am alright. Btw, it doesn't have to be bad that something is wrong with me in an unlikely right society, don't it. Speaking about something wrong simply indicates that there is something right on the other side which is expected to be normal.
I'd like to see the same animation done with the size of the sheet of paper, assuming when you get to the moon, you have a stack that measures 8-1/2" x 11" x 250,000,000 miles. How big of a sheet do you need to start with?
What they forgot is that every time you fold a piece of paper in half it gets smaller while it gets thicker, the surface area of the paper doesn't change no matter how many times you fold it
all shitheads trying to say "its physically impossible " or this "video is misleading",this is trying to teach the concept of exponential growth , its an analogy which is perfect to me.peace.
Summary of most of the comments here: "I know it's mathematically correct, but it's not possible!" REALLY? It's just an idea that works in theory, just like ironman can invent a new element in 5 minutes for a movieplot or how dogs playing poker can work for a painting. Some people just don't understand the "if" in this video. Well at least we don't all suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect...
The illustrations is deceptive! The area of the surface of the paper gets smaller and smaller after each fold! So basically it gets as tiny as an atom after being folded for so many times. Which makes it a fun fact but literally impractical and undoable.
you guys are looking it the other way to figure what causes the impossibility. It's not about how hard to fold the paper, heck just forget folding and stack the paper instead, though it wouldn't still work since the bottom part of the stack can't handle the immense pressure that would already explode before you reach the moon Not to mention other factors like budget and weather effects which shouldn't be brought to this discussion
You guys forget that the paper stack would become incredibly thin....getting slimer and slimmer, so it would be about 0,0001 mm in diameter (less than a hair)
Tanmang42 not just that... all of the books in schools use our system of measurement. even things such as road signs and milk cartons would have to be switched to metric, and quite frankly no one wants to pay all of those taxes.
It would also have to be EXTREMELY stretchy paper because the top layer on the moon would be "next" to the bottom layer on the earth and it would be curving around all of the other layers, unless you want to assume the paper has zero thickness in which case it wouldn't get off the ground.
i first thought this was fake, but now that im learning about exponential growth and decay in khan academy, i think it is posible if you have the right sized paper
gredangeo Americans won't get the metric system.....just be glad the idea was simple otherwise he'd start using football fields as a unit of measurement
+TotalTempest American football ie a sport in which feet and ball have little to no contact at all! dude please dont get me started on "the world series" thingy hahaha!
+gredangeo As an American, metric is only practical for small things. Anything larger (like the distances you'll find on a road sign) is taught/displayed in Imperial so there's no real point using kilometers.
Vapor alien civilization : they said they would get here with only a paper,thats madness *super thin paper turns planet into juice because a fly touched the part on earth*
The only problem with this is that it's completely theoretical. A piece of paper can't fold that many times. The most that a standard sheet can get to is about 7 or 8 folds.
Nhan Vu That's because it's only 32 layers thick at 5 folds, if you fold it 6 times you'd have 64 layers, 7 times and you'd have 128 layers and so on. Each fold doubles the amount of layers.
Wouldn't the folded paper be extremly thin? I don't know how to explain it well, but wouldn't it be like a 'tower' that is insanely thin yet really tall? (just ignore me if it makes no sense, or is simply false. Never was good in science)
Instant Crush when u fold it, the thickness, if u measures the folded (lets say papers) hight it would have been doubled. Just like if you folded a blanket many times over, after each fold, you would find that it takes up more hight, while other dimensions may shrink
but what if it’s a super super thin and super large paper. in my mind it would fold at least 14 times without the paper being taller than a dog, right?
When I was in art class ,we were told we could do origami or draw. I was the only one who knew how to make a origami box ,so I grabbed 3 sheets of paper and made 2 ,but the third I cut in half, and made and smaller boxes and then I though to my self "what if I kept on folding the paper in half?" Then I did that. I got 6 boxes before I couldn't go smaller. I told my teacher "I made a box within a box within a box within a box within a box within a box".
I know this exercise is performed to get us to consider the power of doubling, but what none of these "fold a piece of paper" thought experiments confront is that the surface area (coplanar area perpendicular to the axis we are doubling) is getting half as big each time. Yeah, it would theoretically reach the moon, but it would be theoretically smaller (thinner) than a neutrino.
TheDerDumme You would have to start with a piece of paper 13.58 million sq miles. That is approximately 10% of the earth's surface. (139 million sq mi). That's be 3685.6 miles on a side. Not exactly 8x11 printer paper. Just make a piece of paper that goes from NY to Paris on the x axis. And NY to Bolivia / S.America on the other. Done and done.
To continue with this mathematical phenomenon, let's come up with an equation for this paper-folding technique. If we think of this as x = t * 2^n, with x being the length of the folded paper, t being the original thickness, and n being the number of times we fold the paper, we can find how large n would be at a certain thickness if we know how thick the paper originally was. According to the video, the thickness of this magical paper is 0.001 cm, or 0.00001 m, or 10^-5 m, so we can use this starting thickness again for this example. Finally, let's come up with a distance we can reach. Since they already used the distance between the earth and moon as an example, let's come up with something bigger, like the distance to the sun. That distance is 150 million km or 1.5 * 10^11 meters. Plugging it in, we get 1.5 * 10^11 = 10^-5 * 2^n, which must mean that 2^n is 1.5 * 10^16. We can find n by transforming the exponent into a log, and so we get the log function log2(1.5 * 10^16), which is equal to 53.736. Since we can't fold the fraction of a distance, we can round it up to get 54 folds. Let's go even further: Distance to Proxima Centauri (4 * 10^16 meters) = 71.760 (72) folds Length of Milky Way Galaxy (1.75 * 10^21 meters) = 87.177 (87) folds Diameter of Observable Universe (8.8 * 10^26 meters) = 106.117 (106) folds
What people don't think about is how incredibly small the paper would be folding it that many times. If you start out with a regular piece, and fold it 40 times there isn't now more paper so it would be a very small tower (~20x27~0.001=33,500x0.004x0.004). At the height of the Empire State Building, it would have sides only 4 times as long as the original length, making it an almost invisible tower.
+Mr. Sarvy it's because people that where educate with the metric system knows how to convert millimiter to meters easily but the ones that uses the imperial system don't know that.
BUT if I had 1 square meter of paper and I folded it in to half, then I have 0.5 square meters, then 0.25, 0.125... So it is smallest than atom in the end, right?
LegendOfMario is the year old kid here in the old house and I don’t know what to do with the kids and I just got to the point where I was going to go to the store and get them to me and I just got to the house and I have to go to the store and get my car and then I will be home in about a half hour and then I will be home by five so I can go get some food and then I’ll be home in a few minutes I love you so much and I love you too see you tomorrow love you mama love you bye bye Twitter is the way you want me to come over
I really hope you realize that cm is not the standard system america uses. Centimeters is a metric system measurement so is kilometers. So technically he isn't using American measurement.
If we fold this magical paper 107 times, it's length would be of 0.001 x 2^107 cm, or about 1.6225 x 10^29 cm, or 1.6225 x 10^27 meters (1,622,592,768,292,133,633,915,780,103 meters). That's almost twice as big as the observable universe (8.8 x 10^26 meters or 880,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 meters).
i knew origami would get me somewhere one day
lulz
i know right
but if u keep folding it even if it reaches the moon wont it be really thin?...like it will be tall and thin
No, with zillyhoo
Yeah...
Nasa : To the moon? That`ll cost 25 billion dollars. Adrian Paenza: No just fold paper 45x.
Nasa: But you can't fold paper more than 7 times. Adrian Paenza: Hold my Beer
Lol just folding the paper 45 times will cost 25 billion dollars
Going to the moon costs 750 million dollars
Same for the return trip😂
@@TheElvisnator we can 8 times
Teacher: how long is the distance between Earth and Moon..?
Me: 45 folds..
lol
Lol
LoL
loL
Lol
*Hey, Ferb, I know what we're gonna do today!*
UNDERRATED COMMENT
*we’re going to fold paper that goes all the way to the moon*
@@zasproductions9258 That was implied
Also, hello fellow Productions
Candace: *”Mom! Phineas & Ferb are going to the moon without their helmets on”*
LEGENDARY COMMENT
I like it how they added instructions on how to get back. We wouldn't want anyone getting stuck on the moon, would we?
Isvoor 😂😂😂😂😂😅
Isvoor 😅😅 How did you noticed this !!
Isvoor yea 🙌 and how do we fold that much paper it impossible tell the further
Let someone get lost though. 😈
🤣🤣🤣
I love how his animation kept the area constant while increasing height only
😂
Lol same here
well the reason u cant fold paper more than 7 times is bcs its get too small so thats probably why
0:59
Damn that paper *THICC*
Rishabh Vailaya and Hellbanisher rockz😂
Your name is a DIRECT refrence to fnaf sister location.
A girl I saw yesterday was *T. H. I. C. E. R*
@Justin Y. lol
@Justin Y. when and what time u disappear from me
If I write "I love you" in a paper and fold it 45 times, twice, would it be like saying "I love you to the moon and back?"
👁️👄👁️
nope 46 for it to have the "and back"
@@select9th845 Ahh you're right.
*Big brain over here*
*pro gamer move right there*
@@select9th845 I wanted to write that
NASA: ...Nope, we cant afford a rocket to space.
Me: *folds paper 45 times*
NASA: *ITS A MOON LADDER*
wow very funny 😒
@@justfish7086 “😒”
you cant even see the ladder anyways, it is as thin as an carbon atom
"Mom"
"Yes"
"Get the Bible"
"Why"
*"WE'RE GOING TO HEAVEN"*
*_"WHAT"_*
Underrated
Jajajaja
This.
Hahahahah
*_Haven't seen a genuinely good comment in a while, you made my day_* 😂
1:04 "...what would you imagine the thickness of the paper would be then?"
Me: "乇乂ㄒ尺卂 ㄒ卄丨匚匚"
Hehe
XD
*_EXTRA THICC_*
_EXTRA_ *THICC*
I thought u wrote chinese there lol
*Darn, Elon should see this. He would probably close down spacex and open a book store*
Not so funny
So you’re saying Jeff bozos was right to be in the book business al along
Brilliant person, you’re. Quite the thinker.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I got 56 Bibles
72 dictionarys
45 Harry Potter books
See y'all later I'm going to Mars!
😂😂
The real question is why do you have 56 Bibles
If each Bible, dictionary, and Harry Potter books are 1000 pages, and you folded them all 45 times, it will be 25.42 million light years wide
Ted-ed watchers are damn funny and super smart when it comes to commenting
😂😂
You’ve got 72 dictionaries and yet u call them dictionarys
"Mom, get the bible we're going to the moon!"
Nohlan Fisherman
Screw that, we're to Uranus
That One Guy what about Pluto or Planet X?
GalaxyOfNeon ._.
Probably doesn't go that far
60 times however
Well... I would never use the Bible to do that.
GalaxyOfNeon ._. What about son?
Somebody: "Love you to the moon and back"
Me: *YoU mEaN...*
Minh Hạnh Đào hahahahh
thào?
Breeeehhhhhhhh
Never mind
Love you 46 paper folds!
*Love... haven't heard that name in years*
3:34
Thanks dude I thought I would be stuck after reaching Moon
😂🤣
0 folds.
I can't bring myself to ruin such fine paper.
We're doing it, man.
We're making this happen.
CursedPugs #paperlivesmatter
CursedPugs #paperlivesmatter
so, you want to say that you are stupid?
CursedPugs idiot
So let's say we take an average newspaper, 4800cm^2. When this is folded in half the area halves and becomes 2400cm^2. As you continue to fold the paper in half, the area keeps shrinking resulting in 45 folds making a piece of paper of size 0.0000000001cm^2, which is 140 times smaller than a carbon atom (which is inside a molecule of paper), therefore if folding paper more than 7 times was possible, 45 times would result in an atom being split meaning you couldn't get it to the moon.
Right
thealexguy1 RElax he’s just saying if you had the world’s biggest
piece of bible paper you *could* get to the moon.
But what if you cut the paper in half and put the first half on the other? Also you can take a bigger paper... I mean if you take a paper with an area equal to the surface of the earth, what Will happen?
@@alsatan1032 that's an excellent question - the one about a paper being equal to the surface of the earth - i would love to hear an answer as well
@@alsatan1032 won't help much, since by exponential growth ( and shrinkage) only one more fold can ruin all the extra size you took initially.
And so I grabbed a piece of paper and started folding it and after 5 folds the paper was torn.
Moral :- Never take Science so lightly even if it seems easy.
indeed, leave folding paper to the aerospace engineers!
0cheeseburga yes :D
you don't really need to fold the paper, just cut it in half everytime and put one half on top of the other, that way you won't have that pesky problem of it being hard to fold
Sevanape This1s4you hmm :)
NullAndIce :D
By the way, here is something called dimension compression.
You start with a rectangle with dimensions 1x2. It has an area of 2 square units. However, if we were to move the line on top of the rectangle to the midpoint, the bottom line will double in length, assuming the area of the rectangle remains constant. Then, it will have dimensions of 0.5x4. If we keep dragging the top line as the space becomes infinitesimally small as the 2 lines converge on top of each other, we will get a line that extends infinitely; a dimension. We can do the same thing with a 3D cube, where we will compress the top square to the bottom one which increases it to extrude it into a flat 2D plane. Therefore, we can theorize we are living in a 4D tesseract where the top cube is compressing against the bottom cube, causing the universe to expand at negative velocities. When the top cube lies on top of the bottom cube, the Big Rip will happen as the bottom cube gets an infinite 3D volume. Therefore, if you want to extrude something into the 4th dimension, you must make them infinitely large in 3 dimensions, and then pull the top cube out of the bottom cube, which will shrink the tesseract back to finite dimensions. Therefore, if we divide by 0, we can create an infinitely large Rubik's cube and pull the cubes away to create the first 3x3x3x3 Rubik's tesseract.
Best comment I’ve read in a looong time
By folding it 45 times, we get to the moon, and by doubling it....
*me thinking* mars?
We get back to earth
*brain.exe has stopped working*
Mars is actually 10~50x further from earth than moon at best moments (when distance between earth and mars is smallest) so u should fold it 3~6 times more
Even further than pluto
If you fold it 50 times it should reach the sun
[GD] Kwee67 it wouldn't, it'll burn
Kuba Tutak if you fold a paper 103 times it will be larger than the observable universe, sooooo
Finally found a way to reach the moon back in just 50 cents, Now that's called saving
Shaurya Sharma good luck climbing that you might need to also make a homemade spacesuit
Shaurya Sharma well, if you can fold a paper that thick then maybe since getting up to 10 folds is barely doable. Mythbusters even got up to 11 and the used a large wide paper and used a steam roller just to flatten it. Also you have to make it stand up and it having a height of over 6 miles is hard if not impossible unless it had a lot of support.
by the time u get to around 8 folds, the height of the paper will prevent you from making another fold.
Why not fold dirt
Shaurya Sharma yea instead of spending 3.4 billion on a spaceship that ur only using once
1919: soon in the future we will have flying cars.
2019: nope but have papers though.
8995446: I shouldn't be here
There were papers at that time....
Why do you copy other people's comments?... You literally just changed the last part
There Are Flying Cars In 2019 Btw This Video Was Posted In 2012
Cars was not invented yet !!
I remember reading somewhere years ago - and it seemed as incredible as this one - that if you could fold a piece of paper 100 times it would actually be taller than the KNOWN UNIVERSE is wide. That is, it would be about 16.7 *BILLION* _lightyears_ tall. Doesn't seem feasible until you start actually doing the math.
Another one similar to this is the one where you hire someone to work for you for 30 days, but you're going to pay them every day double what you gave them the day before, but you will start with only 1 penny. So, on day two you will give them 2 pennies (so now they have 3 pennies, etc). How much would they have at the end of the 30 days? Almost 11 million dollars!
103 times i think was the exact number
The atoms wouldnt be enough to reach thay long. And..... The universe is expanding and...... we dont know how big The universe is so......its an impossible theory
@@RAXIIIIIIII Well of course the paper itself would be impossible because it would require more atoms than there are in the universe to construct it, but as an example of geometric progression it checks out.
I took a sheet of computer paper and stared at it for a while before going like, "Nope, this can NOT be as tall as the Empire State Building."
Then I folded it 40 times
The purpose of this comment is that I need help. If you see this comment, please tell NASA that I'm stuck on one of their satellites.
***** Come on, please, I'm running out of oxygen.
***** Thanks!
***** Don't worry, I'll try not to die.
No promises though.
Dead yet? :^(
JamaicanPerson Very soon I will be, because people like you aren't telling NASA that I need help. >:/
When you fold a 1meter length paper 40 times, the length/width would be reduced to 9e-13m. I believe this is smaller then the size of an atom. The paper tower would be so thin it couldn't hold together at the sub atomic level. So even as a hypothetical discussion, the concept doesn't hold water very well.
You forgot to take in account that when you fold 40 times, you actually only fold 20 times the width and 20 times the height. For example if a paper of one squared meter is folded once, either the width or the height is still 1m long. So when folded 40 times, the sides are still about 0.9 microns long...
Pablo M
Ah I see. Very good correction sir.
NERDSSSSSSSSS
+monckey100 True
+Balee Tong best, most accurate comeback ever
Dad: what are you doing?
Kid: my science project
Ok
Ok
Ok
These are the thoughts I get when I am bored and couldn't sleep at night
"Someone is getting to the top of the empire state building with a paper"
Wind: "I'm about to end this man's whole career. "
😹😹
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To be able to fold it that many times the paper would have to be so long that its weight is also a lot, so it wouldn't fall from wind
Well... Its length will be enough to go to the Moon (in 45 folds). But how am I going to climb it? I need a solution NOW. I have to go to the Moon this weekend for my school project.
Hide Behind you dont
Just use a paper the size of Asia!
Well a bible has a lot of pages, make some stairs!
Hide Behind Start with folding it 7 times , then talk lol
Sophia lol
Yeah you can go infinitely high, but its length and witdh DECREASE exponentially with each fold. Interesting video though.
He never mentioned the size of the paper.
OrangeBird he did, he says at the start that's it's the size of a page out of a newspaper
Point is, we don't know how big exactly that newspaper is. Don't tell me that the hands are a reference point. Why? They're just put there to make things understandable.
OwnageCubed Sorry
OwnageCubed yeah he knows, he just made it like that so it's not confusing
Ok, but why do i feel like swallowing my saliva just from hearing this guy talking?
w...t...f...
Wait, do you swallow your saliva everytime ( gulping), then you have aerophagia
I fold toilet paper all the time like that lol. Guess where it goes, that's right Uranus.
Underrated comment
Lmaooo
Lmaoooo
lol that was a good pun this need more likes
pretty good
120 folds and u go to edge of the universe
johnson SC go back to minecraft, kid.
lol what??
wtf?
you know he said the edge of the universe not of space.
why would it take infinity folds to get to the edge of the universe? 103 folds and the the piece of paper would be as thick as the universe.
What am I suppose to do with this information
lol the troll 91 go to the moon...
Idk but I watched the full video anyway
lol the troll 91
Get ur *ss to the moon...
*supposed, and idk it's pretty pointless
it's kind of intresting
"What would you imagine the thickness of the paper would be then?"
me: idk probably like 10 cm
also me after I've seen the 25th fold: BOI
2 to the 1 = 2
2 to the 2 = 4
2 to the 3 =8
2 to the 4 = 16
the answer if u fold the paper 45 times is, well
around 1 carbon atom
How much folds would it take to get to her heart? :'(
1 for me since I’m lonely ;-;
infity
Too many.
Xıҳ Ҡıngdơm 0
Oh maan :(((
The area of paper is also exponentially decreacing...so assume that initial area is 1m^2 that is length is 1m and breath is 1m after folding 49 times ...(by doing mathematical calculation)...the length and breath become 42(nano meter)....so, it becomes invisible to human eyes...thickness is less then 3000 time to human hair...
mdsabir shaik that's right .. area is inversely proportional to it's length.. this is exactly what I've been trying to say..
I realized that lol
at last someone gets it
Guess we just need 3 million news papers
mdsabir shaik :( IF YOU HAD A HUUUUUUUGE PAPER YOU COULD FOLD IT 45 TIMES IN WITHIN (mathematics calculation) 27 hours.
If you start the month with $1 and double it every day, you'd be a billionaire by the end of that month.
+Pritish Sai If your father give you a small loan of a million dollars you will be a Trump.
+Bohdan “oovlq” McClane lmao
21 days = 3 weeks
Wow I just checked and that's actually true
can you explain it?
Maybe if the paper was a million miles wide, we could get a visible folded bridge to the moon out of it.
fun fact:
25 folds and its height would be 0.25 miles
it's width would be 0.0000002 ft
this is called exponential decay
45 folds and it's width would be 0.000 000 000 000 28
width (diameter) of an atom's nucleuss 1x10^12 which is close to width of 45 folds
45 folds and we get ladders to the moon that are 3 nucleuses wide
hold my beer
Grunt
We need paper 45 light-years in size
Not nucleuses
It's nuclei
Nerd
Grunt I did this in my 8th grade speech. If you fold a normal piece of paper 103 times, it’ll be thicker than the whole observable universe. And for the width, I would probably be smaller than a plank which is the smallest thing in the entire universe.
Áki Ingason
Who me?
I've started to wonder why they built rockets !!
it is expensive,derr
Thrust. Quicker.
Boosters is Quicker, Stronger and highly durable, Can Protect Humans from Cosmic Debris, Can store Science and Research gadgets, Large and can fit a lot, Easier to do, Can help people explore new stuff in lesser time, Can carry Satellite s, Better than folding a paper
Just try to fold a paper 8 times and you will understand
because, elon musk
Me: “Mom I learned something new today!
Mom: What is it?
Me: I can get to the moon
Mom: Its not that easy how are you going to do that?
Me: *Holds bible*
Bruh if this was real you could travel
so much distance with a bible
Holds 56 bibles xD
@@pshekchik what about a single Mahabharata book with around 13,000 pages?
LMAO
*with the help of Jesus*
This is very theoretical! It’s scientifically impossible, you would also need to start with a huge paper, it has to be super flexible, more flexible than silk
And the moon is moving so it would actually be longer distance to travel
Obviously, It is just theoretical. What? You think people would actually do this
Over 9000+ folds you can get to Planet Vegeta, but sadly Frieza destroyed it after you fold 8999 folds
+KomunistangTUPA 8999 folds means you were only half way there.
I see what you did 😂
+KomunistangTUPA Two puns in one. I think i just died.
Actually, less than one half. You see, you must have OOOOOVER 9000!!!!!!!!!! folds.
You weeb
Jkjkjkjkjk issa joke... don’t kill me
As a canadian, Y U MURICANS NO SWITCH TO METRIC
Like in every other country!!!
(PS: I'm from Germany ;)
Just convert it.
I use the metric system
As a Lebanese I agree with you
It helps us walk on the moon better
Let's face it, we all know folding paper won't get us to the moon.
+Alex Raxach It would reach the distance to earth from the moon, but it's paper.
Just imagine a bunch of people trying to climb a piece of paper. It would fall over, if the wind didn't blow it over.
+I will get a username when I stop being lazy. That mental image cracked me up. Thank you.
+Alex Raxach We don't need to go to the moon, because we have earth. If we were on the moon, we would desire to reach to the earth because earth has oxygen, a lot of water/H2O,iron, magnesium, sulfur, nickel, calcium which make up the bulk composition and more elements, an Ozon layer, the ideal amount of gravity for us to be developed the way we are, a strong magnetic field to protect us from solar eruptions, is in the habitable zone and full of life in every corner. The moon has also many of those elements but has e.g. a much thinner atmosphere, much less water in form of ice and is inhabitable without astronautic devices.
So, what is better for us, the moon or our earth?
We need to face it that paper doesn't work the way it is imagined with folding.
+nadjim73 Dude, there's something seriously wrong with you :)
Alex Raxach Well, i may appear that way to some, but for my own, i am alright. Btw, it doesn't have to be bad that something is wrong with me in an unlikely right society, don't it.
Speaking about something wrong simply indicates that there is something right on the other side which is expected to be normal.
I'd like to see the same animation done with the size of the sheet of paper, assuming when you get to the moon, you have a stack that measures 8-1/2" x 11" x 250,000,000 miles. How big of a sheet do you need to start with?
Define how big you want it to be at the end and multiply it by 2^45
Have you ever tried to fold a piece of paper more than 8 times. It's impossible.
Rhino Alestorm mythbusters broke that myth got 11 folds into a huge piece of paper
Trevor Phillips oh really? Proved me wrong.
Rhino Alestorm th-cam.com/video/kRAEBbotuIE/w-d-xo.html
The highest number of folds is 13 by the way
There is no limit to how many folds you can do as long as you can apply the pressure needed
guys I went to mars by folding paper.
but I didn't count how many folds.
sai kk
sai probably 193 folds
50 folds or plus or minus is enough
sai I traveled the whole universe it 103
Saeed AlRomaithi it takes 103 to travel the whole universe
Instructions not clear, stuck in orion's belt
Instructions not clear, stuck in Andromeda.
Instuctions not clear, stuck in the universe
Instructions not clear, still stuck on this annoying planet with it's pesky earthlings.
Instructions not clear
Stuck near a nearby Universe
Instructions not clear, Reached Sagittarius A
Me and My friend: ok we need 4 pieces of newspaper, a big box of food, and water
Mom: Are you gonna make paper mache?
Me and My friend: .....no
What they forgot is that every time you fold a piece of paper in half it gets smaller while it gets thicker, the surface area of the paper doesn't change no matter how many times you fold it
I can only get to 44 folds
Woah your talented I'm stuck at 43
hahahaha✌
I can fold it 76 times 12 hours......
lol ur comment on October 5 2016 has 45 likes
Phillip Abreu '
me: *mouth open,,,hands on my forehead,,,AMAZED*
Dad: what are you watching?
me: I have no idea...
Hmm so I can go to the moon right now?
Reality: let me introduce myself
Angelo
all shitheads trying to say "its physically impossible " or this "video is misleading",this is trying to teach the concept of exponential growth , its an analogy which is perfect to me.peace.
Palash Pandey finally someone who actually uses their brain
Go back to kindergarden
Look at your profile picture, now look at your name.
Summary of most of the comments here:
"I know it's mathematically correct, but it's not possible!"
REALLY? It's just an idea that works in theory, just like ironman can invent a new element in 5 minutes for a movieplot or how dogs playing poker can work for a painting. Some people just don't understand the "if" in this video. Well at least we don't all suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect...
The illustrations is deceptive! The area of the surface of the paper gets smaller and smaller after each fold! So basically it gets as tiny as an atom after being folded for so many times. Which makes it a fun fact but literally impractical and undoable.
good job einstein, u want an award?
@@alexshadel3617 Y so rude?
Exactly what i was thinking about !
@Something Studios it won't matter much because paper is shrinking exponentially..
you guys are looking it the other way to figure what causes the impossibility. It's not about how hard to fold the paper, heck just forget folding and stack the paper instead, though it wouldn't still work since the bottom part of the stack can't handle the immense pressure that would already explode before you reach the moon
Not to mention other factors like budget and weather effects which shouldn't be brought to this discussion
His voice is just so relaxing 😌
You guys forget that the paper stack would become incredibly thin....getting slimer and slimmer, so it would be about 0,0001 mm in diameter (less than a hair)
Why dont we just get a giant piece of paper?
@@abdulrhmanmohamed1918 cost
It isn't a piece of dough, it does not get thinner in this scenario
@@dinonuggiesguy4847 they were joking, obviously they know that
@@levimckenna8344 k
First, I googled how many 250000 miles in kilometers.
+Adhi Pambudi We really need to switch to metric. Only problem is that people are against it since they grew up with it here in the states.
Tanmang42 nahh fam its much more complex than that
Adhi Pambudi HAHAHAH
I'm from Poland which is in Europe and I definitely agree that everyone needs to use metric.
Tanmang42 not just that... all of the books in schools use our system of measurement. even things such as road signs and milk cartons would have to be switched to metric, and quite frankly no one wants to pay all of those taxes.
Why on earth are we converting cm to feet and miles instead of meters and kilometers?
ikr
american system.
Well there are two kinds of countries, those who use the metric system, and those who have put a man on the moon.
SI vs old distance units
+Spurious That's your own but obviously wrong opinion.
Me - folding paper
Dad- what are u doing
Me -planing to go to moon
if u fold it 45 times u get a rly long piece of paper
+bobtheflyingdonkey rly long and skinny
+DEK Gaming Oh god.
What about 75 times?
romela casas even longer and skinnier
If you fold it 53 times you get to mars
It would also have to be EXTREMELY stretchy paper because the top layer on the moon would be "next" to the bottom layer on the earth and it would be curving around all of the other layers, unless you want to assume the paper has zero thickness in which case it wouldn't get off the ground.
it is exceptionally interesting how difficult it is for us to comprehend exponential growth
i first thought this was fake, but now that im learning about exponential growth and decay in khan academy, i think it is posible if you have the right sized paper
right size paper = galaxy size. even size of Sun isnt enough.
Why are you using miles for? You started off good in one unit, and fucked up.
gredangeo Americans won't get the metric system.....just be glad the idea was simple otherwise he'd start using football fields as a unit of measurement
+TheTatocba And that has an issue of it's own, as "football" field are actually "hand-egg" fields, much smaller than actual FOOTball fields :D
+TotalTempest American football ie a sport in which feet and ball have little to no contact at all! dude please dont get me started on "the world series" thingy hahaha!
+TotalTempest I'm from Australia.
+gredangeo As an American, metric is only practical for small things. Anything larger (like the distances you'll find on a road sign) is taught/displayed in Imperial so there's no real point using kilometers.
That's going to be one hell of a paper needle.
Eventually it'll be a one atom thick needle.
You came here because of that robot size comparison video, huh?
ClassicGameGuys hehehe. still looking for Miku
Vapor alien civilization : they said they would get here with only a paper,thats madness
*super thin paper turns planet into juice because a fly touched the part on earth*
The only problem with this is that it's completely theoretical. A piece of paper can't fold that many times. The most that a standard sheet can get to is about 7 or 8 folds.
th-cam.com/video/kRAEBbotuIE/w-d-xo.html
Dud its just sinple the smaller the paper the harder you can fold it so if you need a paper big enough to do 45 folds easily
Faris Akmal I
Record is 12. timeswww.google.com/amp/s/www.zmescience.com/science/math/folding-a4-paper-103-times-5345/amp/
Just use a paper the size of US
Everybody gansta till a giant folded paper hits on the head
*stretches arms over 1,000 km* Now i can fold the paper again lol.
Facts bro
of sh
of sh
@@manualreviewer5901 Shutter up
screw spaceships ill just start folding paper
So... the key to unlocking the universe is to build a "Paper Folding Drive"
"Initiating PFD captain"
LOL😂😂
we're reaching fold 9!
I can fold 10 times only
Um I folded a piece of paper 5 times and it's thickness is like half a centimeter
Nhan Vu That's because it's only 32 layers thick at 5 folds, if you fold it 6 times you'd have 64 layers, 7 times and you'd have 128 layers and so on. Each fold doubles the amount of layers.
This is something people don't seem to understand, especially in these harsh coronavirus times
It's crazy that the Covid-19 outbreak happened a year ago.
@@eesaisiot yeahh
Directions unclear, there’s no hole in my roof
you can make it in back yard
DNAX gaming what if he has no backyard
@@LewisVinyl IDK xD
Your poor, you don't even have a yard.
"And when it double it one more time, we can back to the moon"
Damn
Wouldn't the folded paper be extremly thin? I don't know how to explain it well, but wouldn't it be like a 'tower' that is insanely thin yet really tall? (just ignore me if it makes no sense, or is simply false. Never was good in science)
You're correct. Each fold decreases the surface area of the paper by half. This is all theoretical of course. It's obviously impossible.
EmperorGluteusMaximus im aware of that, thanks for replying
+Instant Crush Lol NOT TRUE FOLD YOUR HAND
+Instant Crush Lol NOT TRUE FOLD YOUR HAND
Instant Crush when u fold it, the thickness, if u measures the folded (lets say papers) hight it would have been doubled. Just like if you folded a blanket many times over, after each fold, you would find that it takes up more hight, while other dimensions may shrink
but what if it’s a super super thin and super large paper. in my mind it would fold at least 14 times without the paper being taller than a dog, right?
What kind of dog? Also, 103 times and you get to 93 billion light years, farther than the observable universe.
When I was in art class ,we were told we could do origami or draw. I was the only one who knew how to make a origami box ,so I grabbed 3 sheets of paper and made 2 ,but the third I cut in half, and made and smaller boxes and then I though to my self "what if I kept on folding the paper in half?" Then I did that. I got 6 boxes before I couldn't go smaller. I told my teacher "I made a box within a box within a box within a box within a box within a box".
Ivan Ivanov No one asked you that!
Zohaib Khan But its still an interesting story
BOX-CEPTION
I have a gum pack in a gum pack in a gum pack in a gum pack in a gum pack in a gum pack inside a gum pack inside a gum pack
The paper would get taller but also thinner with every food
"food"
noice okay
Lord Caden nice profile pic tho, fairytale on fleke
Lord Caden c
Yum yum, love myself some folded paper!
I know this exercise is performed to get us to consider the power of doubling, but what none of these "fold a piece of paper" thought experiments confront is that the surface area (coplanar area perpendicular to the axis we are doubling) is getting half as big each time. Yeah, it would theoretically reach the moon, but it would be theoretically smaller (thinner) than a neutrino.
You are correct, it surface area would be impossibly small on the flats and more than you started with on the folds. It is a thought experiment only.
What if the starting paper is big enough to reach 1m² after 45 folds?
TheDerDumme You would have to start with a piece of paper 13.58 million sq miles. That is approximately 10% of the earth's surface. (139 million sq mi). That's be 3685.6 miles on a side. Not exactly 8x11 printer paper. Just make a piece of paper that goes from NY to Paris on the x axis. And NY to Bolivia / S.America on the other. Done and done.
trombone7 challenge accepted.
trombone7 smart people like you make me hard
To continue with this mathematical phenomenon, let's come up with an equation for this paper-folding technique.
If we think of this as x = t * 2^n, with x being the length of the folded paper, t being the original thickness, and n being the number of times we fold the paper, we can find how large n would be at a certain thickness if we know how thick the paper originally was. According to the video, the thickness of this magical paper is 0.001 cm, or 0.00001 m, or 10^-5 m, so we can use this starting thickness again for this example.
Finally, let's come up with a distance we can reach. Since they already used the distance between the earth and moon as an example, let's come up with something bigger, like the distance to the sun. That distance is 150 million km or 1.5 * 10^11 meters. Plugging it in, we get 1.5 * 10^11 = 10^-5 * 2^n, which must mean that 2^n is 1.5 * 10^16.
We can find n by transforming the exponent into a log, and so we get the log function log2(1.5 * 10^16), which is equal to 53.736. Since we can't fold the fraction of a distance, we can round it up to get 54 folds.
Let's go even further:
Distance to Proxima Centauri (4 * 10^16 meters) = 71.760 (72) folds
Length of Milky Way Galaxy (1.75 * 10^21 meters) = 87.177 (87) folds
Diameter of Observable Universe (8.8 * 10^26 meters) = 106.117 (106) folds
Problem is, it wud b rly thin. It wud b like an atom wide
not even
wat do u mean
make sure your spelling is correct
(murk sure yur sperlerg irs curruct)
Paper can only be folded 7 times not more than that
7 X 11 in or 17.78 X 27.94 cm paper think about it less that a 0.001 cm or 0.00039370079 in
how many times can you fold a peice of pizza?
Skrubs _ 0.
I ate it.
Skrubs _ ask new york
2 to 0 folds what type is it
Skrubs _ thats up to my gut...
What people don't think about is how incredibly small the paper would be folding it that many times. If you start out with a regular piece, and fold it 40 times there isn't now more paper so it would be a very small tower (~20x27~0.001=33,500x0.004x0.004). At the height of the Empire State Building, it would have sides only 4 times as long as the original length, making it an almost invisible tower.
Nasa: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN
why you convert centimeters in feet and not in meters?
because america you fucking communist
pivotboy11 Pivot Animations i m not communist,i m fascist!
+Mr. Sarvy it's because people that where educate with the metric system knows how to convert millimiter to meters easily but the ones that uses the imperial system don't know that.
I hate it how people jump on others in the comments!
It's caz us Mericans don't got proper edication
Ted Ed: *lessons worth sharing*
Me: brain dead after this 4 minute vid
Came to comments to see if people would say "this is bullshit I can do it 25 times"
XD
Michael B I can do it 48 times!
This is better than reading something out of google
BUT if I had 1 square meter of paper and I folded it in to half, then I have 0.5 square meters, then 0.25, 0.125... So it is smallest than atom in the end, right?
+Tygr Asijsky genius
Guitah Amir I know... :D
+Tygr Asijsky helemese, kdo tady je =D
Tygr Asijsky
nič -.-
Dalibor Kovačič Jééééé to je hezkýýýý
1:31 THICCness
LegendOfMario how you FICCing CCHIT
Bible paper is one thicc bih
You have 69 likes
More like Ficky Ness
LegendOfMario is the year old kid here in the old house and I don’t know what to do with the kids and I just got to the point where I was going to go to the store and get them to me and I just got to the house and I have to go to the store and get my car and then I will be home in about a half hour and then I will be home by five so I can go get some food and then I’ll be home in a few minutes I love you so much and I love you too see you tomorrow love you mama love you bye bye Twitter is the way you want me to come over
can you use km also in your videos for non american subs? thx
Are you stupid?
No, I'm not stupid. I could ask you the same but I already know the answer.
I really hope you realize that cm is not the standard system america uses. Centimeters is a metric system measurement so is kilometers. So technically he isn't using American measurement.
Tae Bae why dont you convert
Explosions Fire n' More Because it would be very useful for americans to convert their whole metrical system to the same as the rest of the world lol
The narrator sounds like he's gonna make me an offer which I can't refuse.
Before I start folding my paper tower to get to the moon, I will first fold steel to forge a katana to cut the moon in half with.
how you cut the moon with a katana the katana with go about 1 to 3 cm more if you are lucky you find a spot have a lot of He2
David Kinkade Just shut up
and Radius is 1,079 mi its Density is 3.34 grams
If we fold this magical paper 107 times, it's length would be of 0.001 x 2^107 cm, or about 1.6225 x 10^29 cm, or 1.6225 x 10^27 meters (1,622,592,768,292,133,633,915,780,103 meters). That's almost twice as big as the observable universe (8.8 x 10^26 meters or 880,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 meters).
Lol thanks btw did u do that in ur head????
And u would have riped the paper long time befor the wut like 10th or so fold
Timothy Hagge
Hey, that's a magical paper.
And no, I used a calculator and some data from Wikipedia.
Dembara Lemoon
Well, it's going to be smaller in volume, but not in length. Oh well, you got the picture.
Dembara Lemoon Please, I know that's an impossible scenario, that's why I called "magic paper", get it?
If you fold a piece of paper 96 times, it will reach the length of the observable universe. Daaaaaaaaaaaaaang.
NƎcktie3223 how... Thin... Would its width... Flipping.... BE
Atoms thin? Would it still be called paper?
Adonay Flores I think so
challenge accepted
RadiantFireHD eks dee
That's how compound interest works.