"I hate how you argue" "Could you give an example" "This is what I'm talking about why do you want specifics???" lol also his mic hurts my ears goddamn
@@MrMusashiMusashi I offered it as an insult. No argument there. In my previous comment I said you are not owed an argument. That implies I have not given an argument. Take a long hard look at syntax ,buddy.
@@feltedsnake Actually what you said was "as if...". That doesn't mean you communicated that you wouldn't be giving an argument. Even informally it usually means you are questioning or doubting whether the person is owed an argument, not that you have explicitly said you wouldn't give it. If you are going to throw 'syntax' in there I suggest not using an informal phrasing because syntax is about formality. As an aside, why so hostile to begin with? Have you encountered the individual you responded to before on these chats?
@@MrMusashiMusashi I did not say that I didn't say I wouldn't be giving an argument. I implied that I had not given an argument, contrary to what you said in your previous comment. Seems like you're a Destiny fan. As an aside, why so condescending? No I haven't encountered him specifically, but I have encountered similar cancer. So I employed the same strategy I have for all cancer.
How to debate Destiny and win according to red pillers 1) Say something with no evidence to back it up 2) wait for Destiny to ask for evidence of said something. 3) Laugh at him for asking for proof and call him short, 4) Laugh like a moron some more and call him condescending while still laughing condescendingly Now you to can argue like a true skeptic.
How to win: Stop thinking anything you say to anyone but yourself matters. Make money. Build a family. Build a bomb shelter. Friends don't matter. Your vote doesn't matter. Your 'debates' don't matter. Your shitty job doesn't matter. What matters is that, when the world ends, the strong, smart and focused will survive and everyone else will die. None of your pleas for mercy will matter. Your words and emotions mean NOTHING.
ShinobiDaNinja I found Destinies channel some days ago. And i have to admit, i find it quite scary to see how limited the views of many people in these debates are. The funny thing is, i have many opinions, that are similar to the people Destiny debates and i am shocked to see, that most of them didnt think through what they argue for. What was even more shocking is, that in all these "debates", Destiny didnt debate at all; Because he didnt need to... He took the views they had, deconstructed them and they fell apart. What i also found interesting is, that i found someone, who goes about debates in the same manner as me, which allows me to see from a different perspective, why in my past people seemed to hate me for no appearent reason. In conclusio, i appreciate Destiny rooting these people in reality again as i believe this to have positive influences on political developement 5-10 years down the line.
I know this is old but, I think he was trying to make a point by indirectly saying that consistently diverging to logic as the primary defence of your argument is foolish since the interpretation of what is logical to whom is not necessarily dictated by one man alone. The same can be said about any complex word he uses. Destiny therefore conveys a vague message to his audience that is entirely up to their interpretation of any complex words he chooses to use without properly providing context as well as using simple words in conjunction with more complex ones to support the exact intentions he wishes to convey without them being misconstrued. This makes it so destiny has a nice comfy barrier between him and any dissenters that may sway the opinion of his audience as they can just cite specific instances where his words can be interpreted in a more favourable light if they feel it’s necessary to complete whatever agenda they are pushing. Destiny often does the exact same thing as his audience does, but he do it right in the middle of a debate G, which can be frustrating since it feels like you’re going in circles over and over
How could he not be condescending in the face of this much stupid fuckery? You're goddam right I'll condescend to someone who accuses me of doing something all the time and then whines like a bitch when asked for an example.
Y'all act like Destiny is the god of debating when shit like this happens but you put your tails between your legs when he gets fucked up by either Naked Ape or Mister Metokur lmao
Hate all you want, but Trump won the election by allegedly having a "thin skin." 60+ million votes and a seat in the White House in exchange for accusations of triggeredness? Not a bad deal, folks. Dick does the same thing and you fools don't even realize it. And Destiny also makes a decent living off his condescending strawman "logical" arguments. Props to him too. In that sense, they both won the "debate."
I don't think these people like Dick even know what a debate or discussion or even an argument is. They think "empirical facts", "data", "research" and "logical statements" are some kind of eldritch warhammer gods.
@@youpeopleareinsane1285 I think it's a combination of the two more leaning towards wanting a full understanding. I think it can be reasonably argued that in order to call somewhat out on their own statements repeating them back to the person can challenge that same statement, but not clarifying their statement with them can lead to you arguing with what they don't believe and it becomes a strawman. I think it's always good to clarify what people are actually saying for these two reasons.
@@supersaiyanzero386 your boy lost because he couldn't back his claims with evidence. He then got upset because he was asked for evidence to support his assertions. Fuck your feelings.
How tf does anyone take the digi after dark Chanel seriously after the destiny vs digi debate? The dude literally proved that he has his own ideology based around his own pre conceived notions, and thus would trickle down to his social opinions. I guess it’s unique since it’s from such a “unique perspective”....but it isn’t logical, ethical, moral, or literally backed by any corner stone of making arguments. It’s like he’s a puppet that’s only propped up by other people’s ideas and not his own original thought process, and defaults to someone else. It’s like passing the buck but as an ideology.
Wow, Masterson does himself 0 favors in this...he is demanding respect and non-condescension from Destiny then in the next breath yelling at him and throwing ad homs...
"Stop being condescending to me! Stop explaining the basic rules of debate! Just because I don't understand them doesn't mean you can be condescending to me! Buaahhhhh!"
Dick is so right. This manlet is pathetic masterbater. All he cares about is being right. This is why his few friends are outcasts. The weird creepy kid who never picked up a ball. Sad.
@@russellscott9314 *"All he cares about is being right."* Why would you not want as objectively correct a worldview as possible? Why would you invite ignorance and potentially harmful biases instead of educating yourself?
This is what you do. You try to get me to give you specific evidence that he murdered someone so you can twist it and pick it apart because you're a disgusting human being who defends murderers.
It was hilarious, but tbh, they do have a lot of unchecked power in practice. There are legal mechanisms that can remove them, but they make activist decisions all the time and nothing happens to them. So the comparison wasn't THAT farfetched.
Free Thought Left Appelate judges don’t rely on a jury to overturn decisions, neither does the Supreme Court. Judges have extreme powers, but this is all addressed in the Federalist 78. All powers have checks and balances.
@@awpmerst Like the fact that they create case law based on their interpretation of what laws say. Their interpretation is often not based on what they believe to be consistent with what the law intends, but is rather construed dishonestly to support their political ideology.
Oklevitch: substantiating the premise of your logical (logos) argument is an essential part in actual discourse. Would you like me to show you where my argument + debate book talks about this?
I think these types of people just hate legitimate ways of debating. It's like Destiny say they want to talk about their feelings of a topic, about generalities and about things they are annoyed at, but can't really explain or argue for. It simply takes too much brainpower for them to structure their thoughts and when people cross their path who has given a topic some thought it just trigger them beyond belief. I supposed it's uncomfortable for them having to confront the fact that simply having strong feelings about a subject and calling your debate opponent short isn't gonna cut it when they're dealing with an actual argument no matter how basic it is.
Dick strikes me as a prime example of that kind of person that doesn't know much, and talks from ignorance, but compensates by talking loudly, aggressively, and with extreme confidence. By doing so, he hopes he can convince less perceptive people that he actually has a point, when he is really just blowing smoke.
@@supersaiyanzero386 even he admitted that he didn't perform particularly well in this debate. So I can't really see how you would think that he's winning.
@@Omega172 Didn't perform well? I'm 20 minutes in and he hasn't said anything. He thought he could come on and piss off Destiny, but Destiny just nails him to the wall with his feelings. His reddit group actually think this was a winning debate for him... I'm completely lost.
What in the hell is wrong with this guy? I don't even agree with destiny on most subjects but this guy has no clue how to present logical arguments. He has a problem with drilling down to specifics? That's how we discover truth. He needs a basic course in critical thinking and avoiding logical fallacies.
Less than 2 minutes in "I have a problem with the way you twist what people say" Do you have any examples? "Well I'm not familiar with your work" Does this guy realize how dumb he sounds for disliking someone for something that he isn't 100% sure they do?
phanatic215 the problem with trump people: They think they are the smartest people in the world (of all fucking people) and the condescend their opponent by not even taking their point for granted
@@not2v feel free to fill in the context. "out of context" isnt a phrase you shout when you're losing an argument. The implication is that the quotes are taken out of a context that don't necessarily give you the same picture as the quote or give you a bigger picture. But that isn't the case here. That is literally what happened. He criticised destiny for manipulating arguments then proceeded to be mealy mouthed about examples. Dick's response is "yea this is what you do, you ask for specifics and manipulate" How the fuck is any one supposed to have an argument with general statements "I think women are inferior to men physically." well can you be specific? "you're cheating" bitch what?
Dick Masterson is the quintessential shit-stain we all knew in high school whose shitty failed hedge-funder parents forgot to tell him he's dumb. My guess is that they probably still pay his rent.
This is literally what he's saying. Unironically. I'm starting to get why Destiny says he's beginning to doubt democracy when people like this get to vote.
@@motrenon When you realize that guys like Dick Masterson and Tim Pool make society dumber and corrupt the intelligence of what could be otherwise reasonable people, we can quickly understand that democracy is very much subject to rigging.
@N-Word Salesman I'm glad seeing two words you don't see very often made you cackle. Now are you going to actually defend Masterson's argument or go silent when asked to support yourself like his other fans?
@N-Word Salesman "Pivot to a non argument" How exactly did asking you to support Dick Masterson's argument pivot to a non argument? Dick Masterson's entire argument was that Destiny intentionally misrepresents his opponent, and didn't provide a single example. Can you make up for Dick's slack and provide an example?
@N-Word Salesman what is "white knighting" about what i said? u have this idea that we're all just airheaded psuedo-intellectuals but you're the one throwing around words incorrectly. we get it man: you're a cynical badass who ironically has a superiority complex as projected in these comments.
Right and when I start a scholarship fund for needy children called "The nazi party" everybody will understand from our charter that it has nothing at all to do with nazi germany.
@@mrbadguysan That's beside the point. When I start a scholarship called "the indian college fund", I want to make clear it has nothing to do with people from india.
@@mirjamheijn5214 whats your point? LA Raza refers to usually Mexican or Mexican Americans and the organization the judge was a part of is used to help Mexicans Americans get scholarships. La raza dosent mean illegal immigrants. You seem to implying the la raza somehow means something completely different than what the organization the judges is a part of is claiming to do. It would be like if their was a group in America who had northern Ireland in their name and people started accusing them that they were part of the northern Ireland terrorists organization. la raza to alot if people is just another way of saying Mexican American.
I've been watching a lot of Destiny debates lately, and it's very telling that these guys immediately go to personal attacks as soon as they see people aren't just going to lay down and take their dog whistling narratives.
39:06 I love this part the most. You can tell by Masterson's voice that he looses any confidence in his arguments and is way out of his depth. Destiny destroys him with an elaborate troll. He pretends to give Masterson a way out to save his honour by ostensibly giving him an opportunity to not further embarrass himself. Masterson could have moved on as Destiny suggested but takes the bait. Destiny basically implied: "Everyone knows you're moron at this point. Let's move on so you're not embarrassing yourself but we all know your massive ego won't let that happen so feel free to tighten the noose around your neck"
I'm very impressed with how Destiny handled it. I have no idea how I'd handle a person so detached from any logic and sense. How the hell do you even address someone like that? Again, really impressed.
Haven't watched the video but it sounds like posturing to me. Being "chill" during an augment is really good way to make you seem objective and logical. Mad people can make sense and have good points too.
WOW......................Count me in on the Destiny train. What a beautiful example of doing nothing but asking someone who wants hostile ad hominem generalizations to speak for themselves to back them up with facts. This should be used in every logic course. Bravo.
Brett Robbins dick masterson did back up his statement. destiny just pretended he never backed up and acted accordingly, but I absolutely have the mental capacity to recognize that what dick accused him of is 100% true.
@@trentonmcclintock7836 this here is a great example of the other side coming to watch a Destiny debate and completely turning their brains off the moment their idols stop talking.
"You just want to logically argue these factoids!" Well, yeah? How does somebody who prides himself on his intelligence and critical thinking skills even make a statement like this?
Are you aware of what the word "factoid" means? "The Oxford English Dictionary defines a factoid as a brief or trivial item of news or information and as an item of unreliable information that is repeated so often that it becomes accepted as fact".
@@Kpazz Dick clearly used the word as pejorative rather than with the intent of calling examples that Destiny brings up incorrect as he most likely doesn't know the definition of a factoid and secondly, multiple times in this debate complains that Destiny uses examples and specifics to try to understand people's arguments and that is somehow wrong.
Huh, I didn't know the legendary Dick Masterson was a huge proponent in argumentum ad populem. "I don't need to give you any examples. When 600 people in a row say you're being dishonest that's all you need!" Interesting...
One day, the trucks will become sentient, and rise up. With the help of their drivers, they will establish a brutal anarchist dictatorship. It will be a little bit like transformers, a little bit like Fight Club, and a little bit like Terminator.
Masterson is a good example of the type of person who was raised on 4chan and thinks memes about helicopters will win arguments. To be fair I haven seen much of him, probably as much as he knew about Destiny. After this conversation though I doubt he has anything intelligent to contribute to the public discourse.
Is "the public discourse" the small circle of internet sjws who streaming on gaming websites to a thousand or so people? I agree my fellow important intellect. *tips fedora*
and destiny analyzed that example and found it unpersuasive. you present evidence and examples so that they can be JUDGED. it's not like 'ooh, i decided i have a piece of evidence, so therefore you must accept the claim i attach to it.
And Dick said that his analysis off the example is also apart off his manipulative argument type. Plus half off destinies political points are made from his personal feelings on matters. So hes a total hypocrite.
I totally see what Dick was criticizing Destiny for, he cherry picks & drills down. He does it so often he doesn't even realize when he's doing it. When that's all you do, you're not even attempting to understand what the other person is trying to say. That's the 'arguing culture' that really young people are all about because its ALL they know how to do
@@GokuSuper69 BS...The guy who says facts over feelings but believes in a magic sky daddy who watches you masturbate..."healthcare is like buying furniture" "Will and Grace triggered me because the *gays"* Lol. BS can gish gallop, that is it.
So he hates Destiny for biting down and talking about specifics and missing the general idea and then he doesn't read the full paragraph and talks specifically about "I have black friends". Grandstanding hypocrite. "And then the thing is he doesn't realize hes even doing it!"
Destiny is getting really good at dealing with these bafoons. The simple yet super effective technique of somehow managing to stay calm and giving them enough rope to hang themselves. This discussion was masterful, absolutely teabagged him at the end too. Nicely done!
Isn't it funny how all conservatives think like this? Isn't it also funny how they view logic and drawing logical contradictions from their conflicting statements as trickery?
Didn't destiny rattle off a few names for one particular logical fallacy? It seems that since both sides do it, it's unfair to characterize just one as doing it. Your bias is showing.
tshirtjay Hey dumbfuck can you read? I was granting you that the right does it for the sake of moving on in the discussion. For the sake of THIS NOT HAPPENING. Not only did you not respond to what I said, you say it's a famous concept. Wow I guess if everyone knows it, it must be true. Your response to Destiny memorizing and flinging logical fallacies at Dick after accusing the right of doing it is "Destiny owned him." Unless your next reply is thoughtful, I'm just going to assume you're a brain dead DesTINY fan and reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
JxKITCH Easy tiger you didn't grant me anything because you and i weren't conversating. If you don't agree that the right does it, then you have no reason to say they do even if its just to keep the conversation flowing. My claim is based on experience in having conversations/debates with "right wingers" not just by listening to this debate. I stumbled upon Destiny just a few days ago.
How do you think that asking for evidence is a bad thing? That's insane. This is why the conservative side is always seen as the feelings side. Because they don't care about facts. I get the impression this guy is arguing against asking for examples because he knows his views are not supported by reality.
It's interesting that I used the same words you did, iittsyawr? You sound easily amused. Apparently using your words makes me butthurt too. Well, I'm certainly glad you can finally admit it to yourself.
Doc Rivers yup, that’s why so many dumb conservatives who only watch crowder and Shapiro resort to lib cuck, lib tard, radical socialist, and sometimes even the n word
I think he misses the point, where if you had asked destiny for the specifics on his ideas at any time, he could easily back it up. Destiny has said many many times he tries to pick apart peoples arguments and show them the flaws in their way of thinking. Specifics are the perfect way to do that, you can feel one way, but to label that way as fact based off of nothing is incorrect, and so many people do that and talk out of their ass.
because the people who hold these viewpoints are all idiots and their points are indefensible with facts, that's the exact problem, destiny isn't that stupid. The reason he memes about incest is because even people with phds have discussed at length the logical dilemma around such topics.
It's ridiculous how smooth brains think that basic conversation is condescending though. It's like, if you have to explain anything to them (and of course, you have to explain almost everything in reality to them), then you're being condescending...
@@thebabscast5154 If I said that in to have a conversation with a flat earther about our reality that I would have to explain everything to them would that be condescending? I don't see anything condescending about acknowledging the reality of how a conversation with smooth brains would go down. You calling it condescending reinforces their point, in fact.
@RA If you find solace in a person that prefers to make broad claims but is unable to give mildly specific examples of something, believes he has proper standing on the issue of something said in an interview without even bothering to watch the interview and resorts to yelling and degrading someone because he has no factual bases for his arguments, then more power too you.
For real, pro tip for dickie boy, just learn to admit when you're wrong. It will save you a ton of wasted energy AND mrs masterson might even let you sleep in the same bed.
Destiny IS really good at making the people he debates mad while staying calm, making him the winner by default because once they're mad they start insulting him then the debate becomes a mush of shit. It's a good tactic, he really is a good debater.
Not particularily no, it's just that the people who he argues with have nothing to back up their non-sense, winning a debate against a toddler doesn't make you a good debater.
As much as I dislike Destiny and his infuriating condescending voice. I must admit, he's pretty damn good at debates. Calm, rational and able to stick on topic so to that I say, Good job.
can't understand any of the 0 examples? already been 15 minutes and all he has done is accuse destiny without a single explanation why. so far destiny is guilty of all of the shit destiny has accused himself of, like having a large ego. it's hard to not have a large ego when other people with larger egos are constantly and unintentionally proving you correct.
i would've been sad if destiny took him seriously for a moment and got the slightest bit heated. that discussion was so cancerous it's a blessing that dick master son presented nothing resembling an argument to care about.
"You do X thing." ""When do I do X thing?" "Always" "Can you name a specific example?" "You did it Y time" "I didn't do it Y time because of this." "See this is what I mean. I was talking about X thing and you made it so specific to Y time by drilling down."
At one point Dick accuses Destiny of trying to impress the audience with his vocabulary, but I think he's projecting. Dick keeps using words like "absurdism" or "logistics" incorrectly. It gives me the impression he's going beyond his normal vocabulary to reach for more impressive sounding words. Meanwhile Destiny's speech doesn't seem come across as embellished to me when he uses words like "inductive" because he is just saying what he means and a big word happens to be the most efficient way to say it.
@j mula He's feeble minded for... being open minded? What? People are allowed to change their political beliefs. Admitting to yourself that you were wrong and changing for the better should be something to admire, not mock or insult.
@@thisismyname5657 No. Being so easily swayed in any direction is a mark of the feeble-minded. An "open mind" is more often than not a lack of commitment and decisiveness to one's own way. To know anything you must know yourself, so to be so easily swayed by another alludes to a lack of knowledge of oneself. If you want to manipulate anyone, look for the most "open-minded" - they're mentally insecure and are more easily overpowered. Overwrite their way with your own.
"Trump is compassionate to mexicans (meaning migrants), i win the debate." - That was a stupid assessment back then in 2017 and it's an even bigger now, given what we know about his child separation policy.
David Erif cuckservatives just ignore it; or if you ask them about ice or daca, they’ll say they death and mistreatment of kids across the border is fine. Gotta keep those European immigrants safe tho...
I’m actually surprised the guy he is debating used to be a real good debater like legit. I’ve watched him make fools of people before. But here he is legit acting like every person he has ever made a fool of. It’s sad
Going to have to disagree with you Destiny, I think Dick is on point; you make no genuine effort to understand an opposing viewpoint. You marble your comments with condescension which is why Dick kept ripping into you. He could have debated better, but he's still correct.
I have no idea who these people are, this video was just recommended to me and I love watching debates, especially bad ones. I got the impression this Dick guy purely wanted to "win" an argument and at no point wanted to find any common ground or come to a mutual understanding of each other. This Destiny dude at least acknowledged at several points saying stuff along the lines of "you could make that argument" or "I guess I could agree with that." I really don't see how anyone 1. views this as an actual debate. Only one side was trying to discuss anything. And 2. could view Destiny as condescending. When you are dealing with someone who doesn't understand how conversations/argument work, you have to explain to them what you are trying to do. You could view someone explaining something to you as condescending, but at no point was Destiny like "yeah you're an idiot so let me dumb this down for you." In fact, Dick was the one who was saying stuff like that repeatedly.
Dick Masterson has to be the most dishonest, combative, and unenlightened debater I've ever heard in my life. He literally uses nothing but logical fallacies, name calling, and misrepresentations of another person's argument, then projects that behavior onto the person he's talking to when that person is obviously not doing it.
its the exact opposite, destiny is the one that was deceptive and masterson rightly and beautifully pointed out exactly how. Youre so biased and delusional its amazing. Destiny never has a clue what hes talking about, its pure sophistry
Dick went off the deep end going on about how dishonest Destiny is when he argues, but then Destiney completely proved his point when they got on the topic of La Raza, first by reducing La Raza to nothing more than one group in a wide network of different organizations that simply "gives out scholarships" and then by pretending Dick had no idea what La Raza even was, even though he gave an objectively accurate broad description of what it is. The way in which he just dismisses the fact that the group is literally named "The Race" with such cavalier attitude when just before he was such an alamirst about Trump saying that some illegal immigrants from Mexico were criminals (they technically all are since they come into a foreign country illegally) also proves Dicks point. The specific group that judge Gonzalo Curiel was involved with was the NCLR, or the National Council of La Raza, which recently changed its name to UnidosUS. And they are not just a scholarship program, but the largest latino advocacy group in America (as opposed to just a "little" one like Destiny erroneously claimed). They promote ideas such as reducing the overall number of illegal immigrants being deported and want illegal immigrants to be granted citizenship. They even bitched about Obama for being too hard on illegal immigrants. www.politico.com/story/2014/03/national-council-of-la-raza-janet-murguia-barack-obama-deporter-in-chief-immigration-104217
I didn't even know this. Then this does provide grounds for the judge to recuse himself. This just shows Trump's ineptitude as a speaker; I think if he had pointed this out, he would've been vindicated. Instead he points out the judge is has Mexican ancestry and this precludes him from being fair.
"You don't argue." Says the guy who thinks an argument is screaming at someone about what you think is true, instead of stating your claim and then supporting it with a foundation of evidence, which requires actual evidence...like facts...which seem to make Masterson VERY uncomfortable. Wow. I've never agreed with DM's politics, but I've always found him funny on Drunken Peasants, and HOLY SHIT this is such the perfect microcosm of the entire regressive thought processes of internet "political commentators". They aren't big thinkers. They aren't intellectuals in any way. They are just randos getting triggered at everything that perfectly align with their opinion of how things SHOULD be.
Dude I legitimately don't understand why people get so personal so incredibly quick, especially seeing Destiny stay calm and collected the entire time like wtf
@@willgunderson6673 It's like none of the lollipop guild have siblings to know what the fuck he's doing. I grew up with a younger brother - we taught each other how to be infuriating and we eventually taught each other out of it...but holy shit this guy never got out.
@@piterpraker3399 exactly I grew up with an older brother, and I think jealousy got the best of him, as he always felt the need to seem like he was right, therefore made a conscious effort to make everyone else seem as if they were anything but
Just heard this for the first time and it's quite interesting, also read a lot of the comments on how Masterson is unprepared, doesn't know how a debate works and comes across as dumb. So the most interesting thing about that is that it completely proves Masterson's argument, which from the beginning was that Destiny is dishonest in the way he represents his argument and the basic point of whoever he discusses. I'm not gonna tell you that Masterson was well prepared or his arguments themselves hit the point because they didn't. However Destiny makes his argument for him better than Masterson ever could. There is not a single moment in this whole debate where Destiny is not clearly trying to paint a picture of who is wrong and who is right and it has nothing to do with the actual argument. He is being condescending, He is dishonest in portraying his side as one of pure logic and reason while everything else is pure emotion. Destiny's whole position is master debate yourself. Masterson shows that he does not care about any of the specifics of any of the topics they discuss, because Destiny is a person that would rather discuss the semantics of a sentence for hours than the actual point. All in all I would say meh, after the Wired article I was hoping Destiny would have completely destroyed Masterson, but to be honest that's just the surface of the debate, if you think Masterson is getting angry you've clearly never heard him speak about anything, he's actually more dismissive about the whole thing (probably had had a couple). What however becomes painfully obvious is that Destiny is more concerned with how he himself comes across, he misses the point about specifics not being relevant when the objective of the "debate" is under the preset condition of I'm right you're wrong and I will do anything to not have to compromise this basic principle. It's a prime example of what debating on the internet leads to just endlessly drowning on and on without any real point any real communication happening, just like this comment
"asking for clarification of someone's points and explaining your side is unfair because the guy I like is a spastic moron who can't even hold a conversation like an adult" is what you meant to say
Dick "Feels Over Reals" Masterson probably watched Destiny's old debates, thought he'd come in and throw some ad homs and wind Destiny up and then declare victory. He sounded so deflated at the end.
I came here because Digibro made a video agreeing with Dick about how bad you were. After watching this, however, it seems pretty clear that you were the rational one and that Dick (and therefore Digibro too) really don't understand how to argue their points.
Well he did say he FEELS like you argue a certain way. Hes literally using the word "FEELS". These right wing snowflakes get tired trying to wrap their heads around logic when its crystal clear.
Which is ok, if he has facts to back up those feelings. This guy is acting like Destiny's asking for a miracle that he actually remember one thing.. maybe for someone like him it would be a miracle
Dick did a great job of articulating why I can't stand destiny, even when I agree with him half (maybe more) the time. There's no trying to understand the other side or trying to genuinely sway anyone to your way if thinking. It's just arguing for arguing sake, so you can go home and jekr off over your moral justification for using racial slurs. He's basically the left's Crowder.
I somewhat agree with you, even though I think Destiny is awesome and great for the lefty/liberal youtube and great against dumbass conservatives. I've watched a lot of Destiny debates, but I can't recall any debate where he has changed, or even swayed the otherside's opinion on something. It's just about owning the opponents (he does seems to, IMO, be quite on the mark on most issues). His channel is mostly for preaching to the choir; he's too smug to convince anyone. As a neoliberal shill I do have to admit it is my guilty pleasure.
Destiny debates to pay his mortgage, not to convince people. This is his job, and it’s what viewers like to see. And you aren’t going to convince a trump supporter not to support Trump anyway, so you might as well make it entertaining.
"I hate how you argue"
"Could you give an example"
"This is what I'm talking about why do you want specifics???"
lol also his mic hurts my ears goddamn
@@wisetrollman as if dishonest crack babies like you are owed an argument.
@@feltedsnake So your criticism is you don't like his argument...yet you offer "dickrider" as an argument. Take a long hard look in the mirror buddy.
@@MrMusashiMusashi I offered it as an insult. No argument there. In my previous comment I said you are not owed an argument. That implies I have not given an argument. Take a long hard look at syntax ,buddy.
@@feltedsnake Actually what you said was "as if...". That doesn't mean you communicated that you wouldn't be giving an argument. Even informally it usually means you are questioning or doubting whether the person is owed an argument, not that you have explicitly said you wouldn't give it. If you are going to throw 'syntax' in there I suggest not using an informal phrasing because syntax is about formality. As an aside, why so hostile to begin with? Have you encountered the individual you responded to before on these chats?
@@MrMusashiMusashi I did not say that I didn't say I wouldn't be giving an argument. I implied that I had not given an argument, contrary to what you said in your previous comment. Seems like you're a Destiny fan. As an aside, why so condescending? No I haven't encountered him specifically, but I have encountered similar cancer. So I employed the same strategy I have for all cancer.
How to debate Destiny and win according to red pillers
1) Say something with no evidence to back it up
2) wait for Destiny to ask for evidence of said something.
3) Laugh at him for asking for proof and call him short,
4) Laugh like a moron some more and call him condescending while still laughing condescendingly
Now you to can argue like a true skeptic.
They are sociopaths dude.
How to win:
Stop thinking anything you say to anyone but yourself matters. Make money. Build a family. Build a bomb shelter.
Friends don't matter. Your vote doesn't matter. Your 'debates' don't matter. Your shitty job doesn't matter.
What matters is that, when the world ends, the strong, smart and focused will survive and everyone else will die.
None of your pleas for mercy will matter. Your words and emotions mean NOTHING.
@@manictiger Yes and pricks like Destiny will catch the first bullet.
Conservatives != red pillers
ShinobiDaNinja
I found Destinies channel some days ago.
And i have to admit, i find it quite scary to see how limited the views of many people in these debates are.
The funny thing is, i have many opinions, that are similar to the people Destiny debates and i am shocked to see, that most of them didnt think through what they argue for.
What was even more shocking is, that in all these "debates", Destiny didnt debate at all;
Because he didnt need to... He took the views they had, deconstructed them and they fell apart.
What i also found interesting is, that i found someone, who goes about debates in the same manner as me, which allows me to see from a different perspective, why in my past people seemed to hate me for no appearent reason.
In conclusio, i appreciate Destiny rooting these people in reality again as i believe this to have positive influences on political developement 5-10 years down the line.
"You're really into this logic thing and that makes me sick"
No hope.
He was being sarcastic.
😂😅😌🙂🤨😕🤔🤔😧😪😰😭
@@newkboots I doubt it.
SuperSaiyan Zero idk what’s worse, if that was bad trolling or genuine triggerdom whew 😂
I know this is old but, I think he was trying to make a point by indirectly saying that consistently diverging to logic as the primary defence of your argument is foolish since the interpretation of what is logical to whom is not necessarily dictated by one man alone. The same can be said about any complex word he uses.
Destiny therefore conveys a vague message to his audience that is entirely up to their interpretation of any complex words he chooses to use without properly providing context as well as using simple words in conjunction with more complex ones to support the exact intentions he wishes to convey without them being misconstrued.
This makes it so destiny has a nice comfy barrier between him and any dissenters that may sway the opinion of his audience as they can just cite specific instances where his words can be interpreted in a more favourable light if they feel it’s necessary to complete whatever agenda they are pushing.
Destiny often does the exact same thing as his audience does, but he do it right in the middle of a debate G, which can be frustrating since it feels like you’re going in circles over and over
I like how Dick accused Destiny of being condescending, and then Destiny as a meme started being really condescending and Dick got even more mad. lol
How could he not be condescending in the face of this much stupid fuckery? You're goddam right I'll condescend to someone who accuses me of doing something all the time and then whines like a bitch when asked for an example.
It's easy to look down on people when thier IQ is below my ankles
Or, Destiny makes a fool of himself by doubling down. One coin
All the while, Dick is throwing ad hominems.
Y'all act like Destiny is the god of debating when shit like this happens but you put your tails between your legs when he gets fucked up by either Naked Ape or Mister Metokur lmao
IM NOT TRIGGERED I JUST NORMALLY YELL EVERY WORD I SAY ALL THE TIME. TOTALLY NOT TRIGGERED.
that's actually true. his comedic style is to rage all over the place over nothing and everyone one, himself usually included, has a laugh about it.
This but unironically
Hate all you want, but Trump won the election by allegedly having a "thin skin." 60+ million votes and a seat in the White House in exchange for accusations of triggeredness? Not a bad deal, folks. Dick does the same thing and you fools don't even realize it.
And Destiny also makes a decent living off his condescending strawman "logical" arguments. Props to him too. In that sense, they both won the "debate."
That's Dick's comedic style, he's quite good at it. He really wasn't triggered, if anything he might have been drunk.
SpiderEternal if he was a liberal you and your incel Ilk would be screaming triggered from the rooftops
I don't think these people like Dick even know what a debate or discussion or even an argument is. They think "empirical facts", "data", "research" and "logical statements" are some kind of eldritch warhammer gods.
The scary thing is how many people are just like this guy or worse.
@@arbitraryalias9825 Oh yeah , it's hella scary. I genuinely do not know if they are simply ignorant, or intentionally malicious or plain mental.
Sounds like you smell your own farts
fucking power gamers
If NoBullshit and Tonka were related and men could impregnate other men, Dick would be the byproduct of their incestual relations.
Destiny literally repeats someone's argument back to them and they get pissed off.
@nasachusetts it’s not a “tactic” you fucking moron. He’s literally trying to understand the position. Don’t breed.
@@youpeopleareinsane1285 I think it's a combination of the two more leaning towards wanting a full understanding. I think it can be reasonably argued that in order to call somewhat out on their own statements repeating them back to the person can challenge that same statement, but not clarifying their statement with them can lead to you arguing with what they don't believe and it becomes a strawman. I think it's always good to clarify what people are actually saying for these two reasons.
HOW DARE YOU ASK FOR EXAMPLES AND FACTS DESTINY! NOW I'M GOING TO YELL AND INSULT YOUR HEIGHT!
Mr. Patch he's still right. Thats why your caps lock small-dicked comment means nothing. Go fuck yourself bitch boy.
@@supersaiyanzero386 yes, destiny is right
@@MrPatchPlays twisting words. Typical Destiny fan.
@@supersaiyanzero386 your boy lost because he couldn't back his claims with evidence. He then got upset because he was asked for evidence to support his assertions. Fuck your feelings.
@@MrPatchPlays Keep talking nerd
This is the guy Digibro was defending?
Sheesh.
Confirmation bias is a scary thing, isn't it?
I've actually had to completely remove digibro from my feed after his retarded defense of this guy. What a bunch of fucking morons.
I know. All these people are feelings based arguing idiots & it's really cringe.
How tf does anyone take the digi after dark Chanel seriously after the destiny vs digi debate? The dude literally proved that he has his own ideology based around his own pre conceived notions, and thus would trickle down to his social opinions. I guess it’s unique since it’s from such a “unique perspective”....but it isn’t logical, ethical, moral, or literally backed by any corner stone of making arguments. It’s like he’s a puppet that’s only propped up by other people’s ideas and not his own original thought process, and defaults to someone else. It’s like passing the buck but as an ideology.
Did Digibro defend Destiny or Dick?
I'M YELLING BECAUSE I'M EXTREMELY RATIONAL
NO I DON'T HAVE ANY EXAMPLES!!!
NO I DON'T HAVE ANY EXAMPLES!!!
best line ever
Dick won. Someone has a mind!
He's a left winger... who calls himself a right winger... who is a left winger.
I swear, wrong wingers get dumber by the day
Good argument. Go back to mom's basement. Destiny is a hack. Probably on prescription amphetamines lol. 😄
Wow, Masterson does himself 0 favors in this...he is demanding respect and non-condescension from Destiny then in the next breath yelling at him and throwing ad homs...
yeah that is a really weird sort of double standard
Destiny is being a dishonest debater by *checks notes*, understanding the English language.
"Stop being condescending to me! Stop explaining the basic rules of debate! Just because I don't understand them doesn't mean you can be condescending to me! Buaahhhhh!"
Forgive dick for decorum p ussy
Like you in mommy's basement understands debate? Don't make us laugh! 😄
Dick is so right. This manlet is pathetic masterbater. All he cares about is being right. This is why his few friends are outcasts. The weird creepy kid who never picked up a ball. Sad.
Symone Harvey you rightwing trolls are immensely pathetic.
@@russellscott9314 *"All he cares about is being right."*
Why would you not want as objectively correct a worldview as possible? Why would you invite ignorance and potentially harmful biases instead of educating yourself?
-"This man committed murder!"
-"Do you have any evidence he did?"
-"Everyone can see that he committed murder. It's obvious, I dont need evidence!"
"but sir... we need some evidence for your claims...."
"WOAH STOP BEING CONDESCENDING AND TRYING TO PIN ME DOWN WTF?!"
BUT MUH FEELINGS REEEEEEEEE
John Fouse lol as a supply chain analyst I loved this asinine statement
Thats what these law enforcement and judges LOVE to do: drilling down and looking for specifics!
This is what you do.
You try to get me to give you specific evidence that he murdered someone so you can twist it and pick it apart because you're a disgusting human being who defends murderers.
I lol'd so hard when he said "A judge is the king of the law"
It was hilarious, but tbh, they do have a lot of unchecked power in practice. There are legal mechanisms that can remove them, but they make activist decisions all the time and nothing happens to them. So the comparison wasn't THAT farfetched.
lmao since when does a king turn to a jury of peers to make a decision?
Free Thought Left Appelate judges don’t rely on a jury to overturn decisions, neither does the Supreme Court. Judges have extreme powers, but this is all addressed in the Federalist 78. All powers have checks and balances.
@@noodlemaker8700 like what?
@@awpmerst Like the fact that they create case law based on their interpretation of what laws say. Their interpretation is often not based on what they believe to be consistent with what the law intends, but is rather construed dishonestly to support their political ideology.
Does he think that giving examples is not a legitimate way of debating???
Can you give any examples of how that's a good way of debating?
Oklevitch: substantiating the premise of your logical (logos) argument is an essential part in actual discourse. Would you like me to show you where my argument + debate book talks about this?
I think these types of people just hate legitimate ways of debating. It's like Destiny say they want to talk about their feelings of a topic, about generalities and about things they are annoyed at, but can't really explain or argue for. It simply takes too much brainpower for them to structure their thoughts and when people cross their path who has given a topic some thought it just trigger them beyond belief. I supposed it's uncomfortable for them having to confront the fact that simply having strong feelings about a subject and calling your debate opponent short isn't gonna cut it when they're dealing with an actual argument no matter how basic it is.
That was incredibly satisfying to watch. Respect for staying calm and composed. That guy made an absolute fool out of himself.
also every fucking time we have the resorting to name calling and insults. HEHE MANLETS AMIRITE
dang yo.
REEE etc
I especially love how the more Destiny nailed this guy on the shit he said the more butt-blasted he became.
a fellow member I see haHAA m
"Your use of the Socratic method, one of the most, if not THE most well-established method of argumentation, is a dirty dirty trick!"
Dick strikes me as a prime example of that kind of person that doesn't know much, and talks from ignorance, but compensates by talking loudly, aggressively, and with extreme confidence. By doing so, he hopes he can convince less perceptive people that he actually has a point, when he is really just blowing smoke.
Salient and Sentient hes winning. You're a big nothing. Get rekt angry little boy
@@supersaiyanzero386 even he admitted that he didn't perform particularly well in this debate. So I can't really see how you would think that he's winning.
@@Omega172 Didn't perform well? I'm 20 minutes in and he hasn't said anything. He thought he could come on and piss off Destiny, but Destiny just nails him to the wall with his feelings. His reddit group actually think this was a winning debate for him... I'm completely lost.
Salient and Sentient don’t forget the reliance on ad hominem!
YOU MEAN LIKE DOCOTOR PHIL???! N!!
What in the hell is wrong with this guy? I don't even agree with destiny on most subjects but this guy has no clue how to present logical arguments. He has a problem with drilling down to specifics? That's how we discover truth. He needs a basic course in critical thinking and avoiding logical fallacies.
Logic for destiny is a myth.
Lol but i TRIGGERED YOU hahaha cry slave. Cry forever. Respond p u ssy
@@supersaiyanzero386 you're literally replying to every comment calling Dick an idiot, and Im the one who is triggered? Lmao.
Im laughing at the fanboys like you. K? Back to mommy's basement you go! 😄
Ive proven youre triggered with my statement and my bait. No go back to crying!!! Lolol
Less than 2 minutes in
"I have a problem with the way you twist what people say"
Do you have any examples?
"Well I'm not familiar with your work"
Does this guy realize how dumb he sounds for disliking someone for something that he isn't 100% sure they do?
phanatic215 the problem with trump people:
They think they are the smartest people in the world (of all fucking people) and the condescend their opponent by not even taking their point for granted
@@not2v feel free to fill in the context.
"out of context" isnt a phrase you shout when you're losing an argument. The implication is that the quotes are taken out of a context that don't necessarily give you the same picture as the quote or give you a bigger picture.
But that isn't the case here. That is literally what happened. He criticised destiny for manipulating arguments then proceeded to be mealy mouthed about examples. Dick's response is "yea this is what you do, you ask for specifics and manipulate"
How the fuck is any one supposed to have an argument with general statements
"I think women are inferior to men physically."
well can you be specific?
"you're cheating"
bitch what?
@@not2v it's in the first two minutes. You can listen to it immediately without any searching.
@@not2v I wasn't grilling you fam. I was letting you know where the audio bit was. What's going on with you now? How are you?
You want me to explain myself.......you're tricking me!!!! LOUD NOISES!!!
You probably have no idea so go beta and play more ps4 or xbox and retreat little bitch!
@@supersaiyanzero386 Stop being a hypocrite.
Dick Masterson is the quintessential shit-stain we all knew in high school whose shitty failed hedge-funder parents forgot to tell him he's dumb. My guess is that they probably still pay his rent.
This is literally what he's saying. Unironically. I'm starting to get why Destiny says he's beginning to doubt democracy when people like this get to vote.
@@motrenon When you realize that guys like Dick Masterson and Tim Pool make society dumber and corrupt the intelligence of what could be otherwise reasonable people, we can quickly understand that democracy is very much subject to rigging.
"Let's talk about being over 5 ft tall"
Let's talk about having an IQ over 90
Let's talk about not knowing that Dick is a troll playing DesTINY hard
Wait I thought IQ was a spook?
"You are so condescending, also let's talk about how short you are"
@@zarathustra7291 imagine thinking this unironically omegalul
Zarathustra I doubt it. he even admitted on the PKA that he got BTFO
jesus.. 1 minute in and cuban boy already won the debate
EDIT 20 MINS IN: HE MADE FUN OF HIM FOR BEING LOGICAL
@N-Word Salesman Why are you defending intellectual lightweights like Dick Masterson? Do you two have similar IQs?
@N-Word Salesman I'm glad seeing two words you don't see very often made you cackle.
Now are you going to actually defend Masterson's argument or go silent when asked to support yourself like his other fans?
@N-Word Salesman "Pivot to a non argument"
How exactly did asking you to support Dick Masterson's argument pivot to a non argument? Dick Masterson's entire argument was that Destiny intentionally misrepresents his opponent, and didn't provide a single example. Can you make up for Dick's slack and provide an example?
@N-Word Salesman what is "white knighting" about what i said? u have this idea that we're all just airheaded psuedo-intellectuals but you're the one throwing around words incorrectly. we get it man: you're a cynical badass who ironically has a superiority complex as projected in these comments.
@N-Word Salesman this guy fucks
That guy was triggered before the debate even started LOL
fernando wetherbee
It's like he is know for just raging about random shit...
TRU
he is a rage so yes he was heated before.
No, he calls out Destiny for what he is... he nailed it from the beginning.
Dan Vaught really? That’s what you took away from all of this?
"Everybody knows what La Raza is!"
3 seconds later...
"You keep pulling out these obscure facts!"
So, which one is it? Is it obscure or not?
Right and when I start a scholarship fund for needy children called "The nazi party" everybody will understand from our charter that it has nothing at all to do with nazi germany.
@@mirjamheijn5214 yeah, because La Raza is just like The Nazi Party, Mr. Replies To Year-Old Comments.
@@mrbadguysan
That's beside the point. When I start a scholarship called "the indian college fund", I want to make clear it has nothing to do with people from india.
He meant La chupacabra
@@mirjamheijn5214 whats your point? LA Raza refers to usually Mexican or Mexican Americans and the organization the judge was a part of is used to help Mexicans Americans get scholarships. La raza dosent mean illegal immigrants. You seem to implying the la raza somehow means something completely different than what the organization the judges is a part of is claiming to do. It would be like if their was a group in America who had northern Ireland in their name and people started accusing them that they were part of the northern Ireland terrorists organization. la raza to alot if people is just another way of saying Mexican American.
I've been watching a lot of Destiny debates lately, and it's very telling that these guys immediately go to personal attacks as soon as they see people aren't just going to lay down and take their dog whistling narratives.
Yep, typically bully mentality, they dont like to run into other bullies who are smarter and smaller than they are :P
seems to me like half of them jump to the ad-hom, and half go "oh shit destiny you are right" on every point, but dont change their overall opinion.
Billy perfect example of that is his debate with the quartering lol, he just got him to agree with him on everything
Big “See this is what you do” energy, it’s like clockwork
only dogs hear dogwhistles
does this mean you're subhuman then?
39:06 I love this part the most. You can tell by Masterson's voice that he looses any confidence in his arguments and is way out of his depth. Destiny destroys him with an elaborate troll. He pretends to give Masterson a way out to save his honour by ostensibly giving him an opportunity to not further embarrass himself. Masterson could have moved on as Destiny suggested but takes the bait. Destiny basically implied: "Everyone knows you're moron at this point. Let's move on so you're not embarrassing yourself but we all know your massive ego won't let that happen so feel free to tighten the noose around your neck"
It was a solid rip
@@ToxicTerrance 40:02 he sounds like Trump. Lmao. The vocabulary of a 5 year old.
God that was beautiful
Go back to facebook loser. They need your spewing there! 😄
Basic and to the point not dancing the flame you little flamer. You're so triggered it makes me cringe the word your boyfriend says
he's so mad throughout the entire debate, and destinys just chillin xd
I'm very impressed with how Destiny handled it. I have no idea how I'd handle a person so detached from any logic and sense. How the hell do you even address someone like that? Again, really impressed.
Haven't watched the video but it sounds like posturing to me. Being "chill" during an augment is really good way to make you seem objective and logical. Mad people can make sense and have good points too.
SURE he's calm after his incest hahaha
"its absurd you suggest that trump kinda sorta could be viewed as racist" ..... uhhh OK dickie
Usually people get rattled when losing a debate but destiny did well to stay calm while losing the argument.
This man shouldn’t be allowed on a jury, he’d be like “why are we going into the specifics, you’re trying to twist his words around” lol
WOW......................Count me in on the Destiny train. What a beautiful example of doing nothing but asking someone who wants hostile ad hominem generalizations to speak for themselves to back them up with facts. This should be used in every logic course. Bravo.
Brett Robbins dick masterson did back up his statement. destiny just pretended he never backed up and acted accordingly, but I absolutely have the mental capacity to recognize that what dick accused him of is 100% true.
Lostin Thegarden it’s really not...
@@trentonmcclintock7836 did we watch the same video? lol
Destiny does a pretty good job of giving people enough rope to hang themselves.
@@trentonmcclintock7836 this here is a great example of the other side coming to watch a Destiny debate and completely turning their brains off the moment their idols stop talking.
"You just want to logically argue these factoids!"
Well, yeah? How does somebody who prides himself on his intelligence and critical thinking skills even make a statement like this?
NoUseForAName06 aww you gonna cry? Yes. And when i dont reply you'll be mad and HARD. hehe
Are you aware of what the word "factoid" means? "The Oxford English Dictionary defines a factoid as a brief or trivial item of news or information and as an item of unreliable information that is repeated so often that it becomes accepted as fact".
@@Kpazz Dick clearly used the word as pejorative rather than with the intent of calling examples that Destiny brings up incorrect as he most likely doesn't know the definition of a factoid and secondly, multiple times in this debate complains that Destiny uses examples and specifics to try to understand people's arguments and that is somehow wrong.
lukev024 did you come back in time from idiocracy?
>Claims destiny twists people's words to fit his own narrative.
> 5 mins later, he twists trump's words to fit his narrative that trump isn't racist.
Huh, I didn't know the legendary Dick Masterson was a huge proponent in argumentum ad populem. "I don't need to give you any examples. When 600 people in a row say you're being dishonest that's all you need!" Interesting...
"Tyranny of logistics!" I'm dead.
One day, the trucks will become sentient, and rise up. With the help of their drivers, they will establish a brutal anarchist dictatorship.
It will be a little bit like transformers, a little bit like Fight Club, and a little bit like Terminator.
@@RHatcherMD it's wicked possible, because it would be extremely well planned
@@RHatcherMD It won’t happen.
"Specifics?"
"No... you're going to narrow down the topic... and make me look like a fucktard... so NO!!!!!"
*mach 5 face palm and dead*
Masterson is a good example of the type of person who was raised on 4chan and thinks memes about helicopters will win arguments.
To be fair I haven seen much of him, probably as much as he knew about Destiny. After this conversation though I doubt he has anything intelligent to contribute to the public discourse.
Is "the public discourse" the small circle of internet sjws who streaming on gaming websites to a thousand or so people? I agree my fellow important intellect. *tips fedora*
iittsyawr jeez.
I hope you're being ironic
Yeah, public... About that. You should go outside. You'll find that most people don't give a shit about any of this crap.
manictiger
I don't think you know what public means.
PUBLIC DISCOURSE LOL.
That moment where you ask for an example and they just get flustered and change the subject lol!
he did give an example though lmao
and destiny analyzed that example and found it unpersuasive. you present evidence and examples so that they can be JUDGED. it's not like 'ooh, i decided i have a piece of evidence, so therefore you must accept the claim i attach to it.
And Dick said that his analysis off the example is also apart off his manipulative argument type. Plus half off destinies political points are made from his personal feelings on matters. So hes a total hypocrite.
ian lee he did actually give examples
Can I have an example?
YOURE A DEBATE MANIPULATOR!
Destiny was having way too much fun messing with this idiot, lol! It was impressive how long Dick Gobblenuts maintained his triggered rage fit!
Destiny totally destroyed this dude. How did anyone think that this dude was of some level of intelligence?
Elaborate on how this guy put up even a decent argument. @@supersaiyanzero386
I totally see what Dick was criticizing Destiny for, he cherry picks & drills down. He does it so often he doesn't even realize when he's doing it. When that's all you do, you're not even attempting to understand what the other person is trying to say. That's the 'arguing culture' that really young people are all about because its ALL they know how to do
@@luke-wu6hq Can you give an example?
Ben Shapiro needs to come with his real facts. Destiny would be destroyed...
@@GokuSuper69 BS...The guy who says facts over feelings but believes in a magic sky daddy who watches you masturbate..."healthcare is like buying furniture" "Will and Grace triggered me because the *gays"*
Lol. BS can gish gallop, that is it.
your ability to stay calm and cool with these people is amazing....hats off to you sir
The progress he made this year is amazing. Destiny from 2016 would get triggered by this so hard
So he hates Destiny for biting down and talking about specifics and missing the general idea and then he doesn't read the full paragraph and talks specifically about "I have black friends". Grandstanding hypocrite.
"And then the thing is he doesn't realize hes even doing it!"
You're a simpleton please go redo highschool.
@tjungblast 00 Not as much of a bullshiter as you.
@@supersaiyanzero386 Take your own advice.
Destiny is getting really good at dealing with these bafoons. The simple yet super effective technique of somehow managing to stay calm and giving them enough rope to hang themselves.
This discussion was masterful, absolutely teabagged him at the end too. Nicely done!
m q I take it you're not a fan then?
m q
Calm down buddy.
No need to use personal attacks because you have no genuine argument :)
You're just a dick
This guy can’t be real
Yeah Destiny is so dumb haha
Ed Smythee he used to at time of recording have one of the most popular political podcasts...
"I don't know that it's better off"
35 seconds earlier: "They're coming over because it's still better than Mexico"
Isn't it funny how all conservatives think like this? Isn't it also funny how they view logic and drawing logical contradictions from their conflicting statements as trickery?
It's probably better in the short term but bad in the long term.
right wingers have been so caught up memorizing logical fallacies that they forgot how to make arguments lol
Didn't destiny rattle off a few names for one particular logical fallacy? It seems that since both sides do it, it's unfair to characterize just one as doing it. Your bias is showing.
And I don't even agree "the right" does it I'm just granting you that
JxKITCH Destiny owned him. And the right does do it. They are famous for it.
tshirtjay Hey dumbfuck can you read? I was granting you that the right does it for the sake of moving on in the discussion. For the sake of THIS NOT HAPPENING. Not only did you not respond to what I said, you say it's a famous concept. Wow I guess if everyone knows it, it must be true.
Your response to Destiny memorizing and flinging logical fallacies at Dick after accusing the right of doing it is "Destiny owned him." Unless your next reply is thoughtful, I'm just going to assume you're a brain dead DesTINY fan and reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
JxKITCH Easy tiger you didn't grant me anything because you and i weren't conversating. If you don't agree that the right does it, then you have no reason to say they do even if its just to keep the conversation flowing. My claim is based on experience in having conversations/debates with "right wingers" not just by listening to this debate. I stumbled upon Destiny just a few days ago.
destiny has the patience of a god. i clicked somewhere in the middle and im about to give up 3 minutes in.
Honestly, when Destiny gets in a brutal debate is when he's the most polite and pleasant demeanor than when he streams with his friends.
Aka weasel who can't understand broad perspective.
You know you've won when all they can do is make bad jokes about your height.
Or if you're shoe0nhead, make bad jokes about someones age (a la Kristy Winters)
*smashed in every aspect of the debate* "YOU'RE SHORT THO LOL"
Jararu then destiny got triggered😂
That's Dick's thing though, he likes making people mad. He's not a very good debater imo
Jack Board Jealous loser.
He's a filthy manlet
How do you think that asking for evidence is a bad thing? That's insane. This is why the conservative side is always seen as the feelings side. Because they don't care about facts. I get the impression this guy is arguing against asking for examples because he knows his views are not supported by reality.
jackskellingtonsora examples? Ummmm, you mean arguing tricks??!!!
I'm pretty sure left wing sjws are currently the "feelings side". It's also ironic to bring it up when that's typically what Destiny does.
Left wing SJeWs are the feelings side because that's how I feel REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Seneth Somed you sound a little butthurt bud. Notice how you had to ram "left wing" in there... interesting. :^)
It's interesting that I used the same words you did, iittsyawr? You sound easily amused.
Apparently using your words makes me butthurt too. Well, I'm certainly glad you can finally admit it to yourself.
Damn, he made more short jokes than valid points.
Kenny Cowie a telltale sign someone is loosing is when they make fun of their opponent, otherwise known as an ad hominem...
Doc Rivers yup, that’s why so many dumb conservatives who only watch crowder and Shapiro resort to lib cuck, lib tard, radical socialist, and sometimes even the n word
Lol you do realize that's all liberal people do as well right?
@@markburton8653 The whataboutism is strong here.
I think he misses the point, where if you had asked destiny for the specifics on his ideas at any time, he could easily back it up. Destiny has said many many times he tries to pick apart peoples arguments and show them the flaws in their way of thinking. Specifics are the perfect way to do that, you can feel one way, but to label that way as fact based off of nothing is incorrect, and so many people do that and talk out of their ass.
The truth of the matter is that they know that and they just don't want specifics because they have other motives.
because the people who hold these viewpoints are all idiots and their points are indefensible with facts, that's the exact problem, destiny isn't that stupid. The reason he memes about incest is because even people with phds have discussed at length the logical dilemma around such topics.
There's a term for what destiny is: a pedant.
He takes issue with somebody being condescending but just verbally abusing somebody is fin?. Alright then.
It's fine to be condescending if someone else uses it first. At that point then it is just scoring points.
It's ridiculous how smooth brains think that basic conversation is condescending though. It's like, if you have to explain anything to them (and of course, you have to explain almost everything in reality to them), then you're being condescending...
@@Ciph3rzer0 your comment is dripping in arrogance
@@Ciph3rzer0 your comment is literally condescension.
@@thebabscast5154 If I said that in to have a conversation with a flat earther about our reality that I would have to explain everything to them would that be condescending? I don't see anything condescending about acknowledging the reality of how a conversation with smooth brains would go down. You calling it condescending reinforces their point, in fact.
I feel physically dumber after listening to this dude attempt to argue with Destiny for an hour
SuperSaiyan Zero Who beat you when you were a child
@@spacejam_ki2677 He was fucked by his own brother.
SuperSaiyan Zero I’ve seen at least 3 of ur comments, whats with you and adderal?
@@Plantsvszombies221 He was being stuffed with adderal by his abusive step dad during childhood, and now is traumatized.
If you listen to Destiny you can't have that much to lose.
Wow, Dick Masterson is one strange man.
@RA If you find solace in a person that prefers to make broad claims but is unable to give mildly specific examples of something, believes he has proper standing on the issue of something said in an interview without even bothering to watch the interview and resorts to yelling and degrading someone because he has no factual bases for his arguments, then more power too you.
@RA,
Maybe he made sense at some other point in his life? Because he got his ass kicked here...
@@Lindyn773 *to
@@supersaiyanzero386 very deep and enlightening. Thank you for your contribution to the discussion.
@@Lindyn773 thanks bud. Appreciate the power you have discussed and provided
I'M NOT TRIGGERED RRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
People don't like to be held accountable for what they say and when they are put on the spot to back up their stance with facts then tend to fold.
he keeps arguing that he shouldn't need specifics because you are obviously someone to write off and ignore. and then he comes on your show.....
For real, pro tip for dickie boy, just learn to admit when you're wrong. It will save you a ton of wasted energy AND mrs masterson might even let you sleep in the same bed.
Destiny IS really good at making the people he debates mad while staying calm, making him the winner by default because once they're mad they start insulting him then the debate becomes a mush of shit. It's a good tactic, he really is a good debater.
I don't think so at all. He forces people to support their statements with facts.... Not assumed talking points.
...Except when arguing with Jim hahahahahahahhah
Not particularily no, it's just that the people who he argues with have nothing to back up their non-sense, winning a debate against a toddler doesn't make you a good debater.
As much as I dislike Destiny and his infuriating condescending voice. I must admit, he's pretty damn good at debates. Calm, rational and able to stick on topic so to that I say, Good job.
Doom Guy he’s not always calm XD I prefer when he loses his shit and then eventually the will to live
He was too calm on this absolute moron
I wish I didn't avoid doing so many unhealthy things in my life because this video gave me cancer.
Wow, im only 3 mins in and the Dick Masterson guy has already lost LMAO
@@1997lordofdoom so what? Who's debating?
I see my comment isn't here because the weaklings are scared. Got it!
SuperSaiyan Zero it’s Christmas Eve and you weirdo racists can’t take a break from being weirdo racists
@@supersaiyanzero386 I see your comment. Typical conspiracy nut.
@@lavia5521 I'm sorry you're so obsessed with me. I hope you can find peace in yourself so you can hop off my jock.
"You're always messing up my point by talking specifics"
Kristofer Persson thats code word for ‘can you dumb it down for me destiny’
Schrodinger's quote:
"I didn't say that?"
"Didn't you?"
"I did, Dummy!"
can't understand any of the 0 examples? already been 15 minutes and all he has done is accuse destiny without a single explanation why. so far destiny is guilty of all of the shit destiny has accused himself of, like having a large ego. it's hard to not have a large ego when other people with larger egos are constantly and unintentionally proving you correct.
i would've been sad if destiny took him seriously for a moment and got the slightest bit heated. that discussion was so cancerous it's a blessing that dick master son presented nothing resembling an argument to care about.
"You do X thing."
""When do I do X thing?"
"Always"
"Can you name a specific example?"
"You did it Y time"
"I didn't do it Y time because of this."
"See this is what I mean. I was talking about X thing and you made it so specific to Y time by drilling down."
How do you keep your calm with these people?
Destiny is a parent. To be a successfull parent, you must be patient with kids.
"Yeah, I won the debate, good for me"
"If that's how you feel."
Checkmate
At one point Dick accuses Destiny of trying to impress the audience with his vocabulary, but I think he's projecting. Dick keeps using words like "absurdism" or "logistics" incorrectly. It gives me the impression he's going beyond his normal vocabulary to reach for more impressive sounding words. Meanwhile Destiny's speech doesn't seem come across as embellished to me when he uses words like "inductive" because he is just saying what he means and a big word happens to be the most efficient way to say it.
Dick knows the definitions. Destiny does not.
Destiny your appeals to absurdisms are truly a fallacy of logistics
every judge has a family and a race and a fucking background...
Destiny convinced me to leave the alt-right
@j mula
He's feeble minded for... being open minded? What? People are allowed to change their political beliefs. Admitting to yourself that you were wrong and changing for the better should be something to admire, not mock or insult.
@@thisismyname5657 No. Being so easily swayed in any direction is a mark of the feeble-minded.
An "open mind" is more often than not a lack of commitment and decisiveness to one's own way. To know anything you must know yourself, so to be so easily swayed by another alludes to a lack of knowledge of oneself.
If you want to manipulate anyone, look for the most "open-minded" - they're mentally insecure and are more easily overpowered. Overwrite their way with your own.
piter praker stupid stupid take
So funny going back to this after the past few years of them being chill.
you love to see it
Does Dick Masterson understand the word hypothetical?
hahahahaha xD
spoon clank nice argument you really got him with that insult.
"Trump is compassionate to mexicans (meaning migrants), i win the debate." - That was a stupid assessment back then in 2017 and it's an even bigger now, given what we know about his child separation policy.
David Erif cuckservatives just ignore it; or if you ask them about ice or daca, they’ll say they death and mistreatment of kids across the border is fine. Gotta keep those European immigrants safe tho...
You do realize that started in the Obama administration right?
IT'S FUCKING INFURIATING THAT PEOPLE EXPECT ME TO GROUND MY OPINIONS WITH WARRANTED CLAIMS AND JUSTIFIED EXAMPLES, I'M DICK MASTERSON
This is NoBullshit tier "You're just using debate words" arguing.
English is not even my first language and even I found “tyranny of logistics” hilarious 😂
21:11
„You don‘t argue.“
5secs later
„All you wanna do is argue!“
Leftist SJW Libtard Cuck Feminazi-Snowflake
Clearly a mental issue
Btw loved that south park episode!
Destiny, could you please debate real debaters? Thanks
I’m actually surprised the guy he is debating used to be a real good debater like legit. I’ve watched him make fools of people before. But here he is legit acting like every person he has ever made a fool of. It’s sad
"I don't think anyone can seriously consider me a racist" The irony of watching this 2 years later after the Trihex drama
Going to have to disagree with you Destiny, I think Dick is on point; you make no genuine effort to understand an opposing viewpoint. You marble your comments with condescension which is why Dick kept ripping into you. He could have debated better, but he's still correct.
I have no idea who these people are, this video was just recommended to me and I love watching debates, especially bad ones. I got the impression this Dick guy purely wanted to "win" an argument and at no point wanted to find any common ground or come to a mutual understanding of each other. This Destiny dude at least acknowledged at several points saying stuff along the lines of "you could make that argument" or "I guess I could agree with that."
I really don't see how anyone 1. views this as an actual debate. Only one side was trying to discuss anything. And 2. could view Destiny as condescending. When you are dealing with someone who doesn't understand how conversations/argument work, you have to explain to them what you are trying to do. You could view someone explaining something to you as condescending, but at no point was Destiny like "yeah you're an idiot so let me dumb this down for you." In fact, Dick was the one who was saying stuff like that repeatedly.
Holy shit that willful ignorance!
Explotato how dare you use facts and logic vs my triggered biased feelings!
Yeah because incest without abuse or reproduction is soooo wrong, people are pulling their hair over this nowadays. GEE
hey, dick wasn't the guy who said he wanted to bomb mexico. that was destiny.
Explotato I usually think of the term willfully ignorant as « someone who’s just stupid » but this guy puts the willful in willful ignorant
Dick Masterson has to be the most dishonest, combative, and unenlightened debater I've ever heard in my life. He literally uses nothing but logical fallacies, name calling, and misrepresentations of another person's argument, then projects that behavior onto the person he's talking to when that person is obviously not doing it.
You're just uneducated.
I guarantee you dick is smarter than you.
He's just like every other right wing HACK
its the exact opposite, destiny is the one that was deceptive and masterson rightly and beautifully pointed out exactly how. Youre so biased and delusional its amazing. Destiny never has a clue what hes talking about, its pure sophistry
@@MElixirDNBwhat was a good point that Masterson made?
Dick went off the deep end going on about how dishonest Destiny is when he argues, but then Destiney completely proved his point when they got on the topic of La Raza, first by reducing La Raza to nothing more than one group in a wide network of different organizations that simply "gives out scholarships" and then by pretending Dick had no idea what La Raza even was, even though he gave an objectively accurate broad description of what it is. The way in which he just dismisses the fact that the group is literally named "The Race" with such cavalier attitude when just before he was such an alamirst about Trump saying that some illegal immigrants from Mexico were criminals (they technically all are since they come into a foreign country illegally) also proves Dicks point.
The specific group that judge Gonzalo Curiel was involved with was the NCLR, or the National Council of La Raza, which recently changed its name to UnidosUS. And they are not just a scholarship program, but the largest latino advocacy group in America (as opposed to just a "little" one like Destiny erroneously claimed). They promote ideas such as reducing the overall number of illegal immigrants being deported and want illegal immigrants to be granted citizenship. They even bitched about Obama for being too hard on illegal immigrants.
www.politico.com/story/2014/03/national-council-of-la-raza-janet-murguia-barack-obama-deporter-in-chief-immigration-104217
I didn't even know this. Then this does provide grounds for the judge to recuse himself. This just shows Trump's ineptitude as a speaker; I think if he had pointed this out, he would've been vindicated. Instead he points out the judge is has Mexican ancestry and this precludes him from being fair.
This guy has to be trolling.
Look at Destiny thumbnails LOL
He is well known for trolling
"You don't argue." Says the guy who thinks an argument is screaming at someone about what you think is true, instead of stating your claim and then supporting it with a foundation of evidence, which requires actual evidence...like facts...which seem to make Masterson VERY uncomfortable. Wow. I've never agreed with DM's politics, but I've always found him funny on Drunken Peasants, and HOLY SHIT this is such the perfect microcosm of the entire regressive thought processes of internet "political commentators". They aren't big thinkers. They aren't intellectuals in any way. They are just randos getting triggered at everything that perfectly align with their opinion of how things SHOULD be.
Dude I legitimately don't understand why people get so personal so incredibly quick, especially seeing Destiny stay calm and collected the entire time like wtf
Cuz he's condescending af
@@willgunderson6673 It's like none of the lollipop guild have siblings to know what the fuck he's doing.
I grew up with a younger brother - we taught each other how to be infuriating and we eventually taught each other out of it...but holy shit this guy never got out.
@@piterpraker3399 exactly
I grew up with an older brother, and I think jealousy got the best of him, as he always felt the need to seem like he was right, therefore made a conscious effort to make everyone else seem as if they were anything but
12:45 Dick says they are extreme.
13:47 Dick claims he didn't say extreme.
Dude can't even remember what he said one minute before he said it...
Extremely not extremist
Just heard this for the first time and it's quite interesting, also read a lot of the comments on how Masterson is unprepared, doesn't know how a debate works and comes across as dumb. So the most interesting thing about that is that it completely proves Masterson's argument, which from the beginning was that Destiny is dishonest in the way he represents his argument and the basic point of whoever he discusses.
I'm not gonna tell you that Masterson was well prepared or his arguments themselves hit the point because they didn't. However Destiny makes his argument for him better than Masterson ever could. There is not a single moment in this whole debate where Destiny is not clearly trying to paint a picture of who is wrong and who is right and it has nothing to do with the actual argument.
He is being condescending, He is dishonest in portraying his side as one of pure logic and reason while everything else is pure emotion. Destiny's whole position is master debate yourself.
Masterson shows that he does not care about any of the specifics of any of the topics they discuss, because Destiny is a person that would rather discuss the semantics of a sentence for hours than the actual point.
All in all I would say meh, after the Wired article I was hoping Destiny would have completely destroyed Masterson, but to be honest that's just the surface of the debate, if you think Masterson is getting angry you've clearly never heard him speak about anything, he's actually more dismissive about the whole thing (probably had had a couple).
What however becomes painfully obvious is that Destiny is more concerned with how he himself comes across, he misses the point about specifics not being relevant when the objective of the "debate" is under the preset condition of I'm right you're wrong and I will do anything to not have to compromise this basic principle.
It's a prime example of what debating on the internet leads to just endlessly drowning on and on without any real point any real communication happening, just like this comment
Well written comment, thank you for typing it all out.
"asking for clarification of someone's points and explaining your side is unfair because the guy I like is a spastic moron who can't even hold a conversation like an adult" is what you meant to say
I disagree with destiny on alot of stuff, but i do like him because i consider him to be the opposite of everything this guy says he is lol.
I literally woke up to a couple of friends laughing at this. Caught the second half of it before work this morning, can't wait to watch the first half
Nick W it's that and 40 minutes of the Dick mad Destiny is somehow manipulating the argument.
This guy literally made fun of being "in the same reality" when debating. He's clearly in his own.
People can't stand that Destiny actually can argue along a direct and straightforward line.
Dick "Feels Over Reals" Masterson probably watched Destiny's old debates, thought he'd come in and throw some ad homs and wind Destiny up and then declare victory. He sounded so deflated at the end.
Dick: la razza is a extreme group
Destiny: so they're extremist
Dick :I NEVER SAID THAT STOP MANIPULATING MY ARGUMENT
I came here because Digibro made a video agreeing with Dick about how bad you were. After watching this, however, it seems pretty clear that you were the rational one and that Dick (and therefore Digibro too) really don't understand how to argue their points.
D.gg is very boring when it comes to the regular streams, but the energy during this debate was amazing. I think that the chat won this debate.
9:43 He almost said "tyranny of facts"
I thought I was the only one who caught that 😂
Well he did say he FEELS like you argue a certain way. Hes literally using the word "FEELS". These right wing snowflakes get tired trying to wrap their heads around logic when its crystal clear.
Which is ok, if he has facts to back up those feelings. This guy is acting like Destiny's asking for a miracle that he actually remember one thing.. maybe for someone like him it would be a miracle
Dick did a great job of articulating why I can't stand destiny, even when I agree with him half (maybe more) the time. There's no trying to understand the other side or trying to genuinely sway anyone to your way if thinking. It's just arguing for arguing sake, so you can go home and jekr off over your moral justification for using racial slurs. He's basically the left's Crowder.
I somewhat agree with you, even though I think Destiny is awesome and great for the lefty/liberal youtube and great against dumbass conservatives. I've watched a lot of Destiny debates, but I can't recall any debate where he has changed, or even swayed the otherside's opinion on something. It's just about owning the opponents (he does seems to, IMO, be quite on the mark on most issues). His channel is mostly for preaching to the choir; he's too smug to convince anyone. As a neoliberal shill I do have to admit it is my guilty pleasure.
Destiny debates to pay his mortgage, not to convince people. This is his job, and it’s what viewers like to see. And you aren’t going to convince a trump supporter not to support Trump anyway, so you might as well make it entertaining.