Ars Goetia (Black Letter Press edition) [Esoteric Book Review]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 49

  • @FoolishFishBooks
    @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If you'd like to support my work:
    - *Patreon*: www.patreon.com/foolishfish
    - *Book a Video Consultation with Foolish Fish*: foolishfish.simplybook.it/
    - *Buy my Book*: www.blackletter-press.com/category/denis-poisson-1
    - *PAYPAL One-off donation*: paypal.me/foolishfish
    - *Super Thanks *- click on the heart with a dollar symbol under the video to leave a tip!
    All Foolish Fish Patreons and Members get to watch Esoteric Saturday videos one week early without advertisements, get to chat on the FF Discord server, and get to watch my FF News videos a day early, among many other perks :)

  • @dispatersdance9691
    @dispatersdance9691 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Received my copy a couple weeks ago. It’s absolutely gorgeous

  • @sethcauthorne9258
    @sethcauthorne9258 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It sure packs a TON of info from several sources into its smallish size. And the multiple descriptions are organized in a very logical and user-friendly way. This is a beautiful version of this classic grimoire; very glad to have it! Thanks for the deeper dive, Denis!!

  • @callemdavies8992
    @callemdavies8992 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful! Looking forward to see the next volumes.

  • @howardhavardramberg333
    @howardhavardramberg333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    🔱⚜
    gorgeous book

  • @simont.b.2660
    @simont.b.2660 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quite a nice edition of the Ars Goetia! Thank you (as always) for the review video! Oh, and quite nice of you to tell viewers not to keep this in their bedrooms unless they really know what they're doing! 😄

  • @gorbalsboy
    @gorbalsboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That looks very nice indeed, has a more traditional book(as in vintage) feel about it

  • @CodyHill82
    @CodyHill82 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautifully made book! Yes, I snatched one up. 😂

  • @rishikesh1087
    @rishikesh1087 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great review as usual. This looks like a wonderful book. I'm curious that since it draws from so many sources does it include the "Headless Rite" as a preliminary to the conjurations, an invocation that I think is unique only to the Mathers/Crowley edition, assumed (I believe accurately) added by Crowley? Also, I think I know the answer but is this an edition that one would want to bring in to the circle for an operation or more of a beautiful and very informative reference guide to the Goetia that should be handled with care and may not be so practical for actual work? Thanks again!

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crowley's method for conjuration is not detailed here, only his introduction. Methods from several other sources are included.

    • @alexanderkaval7506
      @alexanderkaval7506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No it's pretty but a poor translation, go with joseph petersons translation.

  • @Sk8erMorris
    @Sk8erMorris 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Gorgeous book; I wish BLP's books wouldn't get scratched tho as some of mines do like for Agrippas 4 books. The covers are so easy to scratch with this publisher. Here I can see the scratches on your center piece and also on the spine of the book. As someone who started collecting (heavily inspired by your channel) books, it's nice to have them mint-condition.
    Hopefully they fix this for future prints and books, since we do pay for value. Also, less expensive books I own don't scratch like such.

    • @chigenerator
      @chigenerator 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for this comment.

  • @-Medici
    @-Medici 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ohhh i so need this. ❤

  • @fredavalbjorkstormnielsen7389
    @fredavalbjorkstormnielsen7389 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the warning 👍🫶

  • @SolomonsWorks
    @SolomonsWorks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was debating this one but the video you made pushed me over the edge. I really wanted to see how clear the sigils were along with the text. I do wish BLP made their books a tad larger but the content is undisputed.

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, the sigils are definitely clear, they've done a stellar job at cleaning them up!

  • @nordoflobsquipple3121
    @nordoflobsquipple3121 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Thank you. More than 72 and that's definitely worth paying the extra..

  • @clouds5866
    @clouds5866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They should do a GV book also.

  • @angelorosini4326
    @angelorosini4326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So does he give the corrected hierarchy instead of the blind version?

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm afraid I don't understand what you're asking.

    • @angelorosini4326
      @angelorosini4326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FoolishFishBooks the correct hierarchy wasn't givin instead a blind was placed. The three chiefs and correct 4 kings wasn't givin on purpose so the system wouldn't work proper. This is common knowledge JSK, Dr. Cummins, Julio Ody etc. All have written on this. The correct hierarchy and spirit catalog is found in The Book of Oberon.

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@angelorosini4326 Right! :)
      BLP have not set out to change the texts, or give their (or others') opinions on what the texts SHOULD have said, just to give us the unaltered original texts, which they've done to the delight of many, and it seems, the disapointment of at least one, I assume? Luckily we have Daniel Harms' recent edition of the Book of Oberon to cover the issue you mention. 🙏
      It's an interesting thread for anyone reading who should decide to pull on it, but of course it's also worth mentioning that just like Mathers' inaccurate Abramelin, the hierarchy listed in Ars Goetia has worked just fine for countless practitioners for centuries as is. This point notwithstanding, more accuracy is obviously preferable to less. Thank you for bringing it up!

    • @angelorosini4326
      @angelorosini4326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FoolishFishBooks thank you and Blact Letter Press for making these classics available!

  • @Cristoferurlaub
    @Cristoferurlaub 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man I wish I could pick this up now, but Im poor so Im waiting for the full set so I dont pay five times the shipping :(. Im so excited though. Beautiful book and Im sure the rest in the series will be just as good

  • @faridashaikh2865
    @faridashaikh2865 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I always thought it was weird that the demons have nobile titles such as prince and count.
    Does anyone know the reason behind this ?

  • @howardhavardramberg333
    @howardhavardramberg333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    72 👼+ 72 👹 = 144 entities collective albeit dual in aspect and nature

  • @NoOneAtAll-bz3zb
    @NoOneAtAll-bz3zb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    First! 💪

  • @Bishop1104
    @Bishop1104 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Goetic spirits are fallen angels, mostly djinn, and ancient humans that where powerful sorcerers and descended, or humans that where nephilim, or humans that where half djinn

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sorry, while I may or may not agree with you, you can't just make a sweeping statement like that without giving a source. "This is the truth because I say so" is one of the major problems with the world right now.

    • @Bishop1104
      @Bishop1104 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FoolishFishBooks no I didn’t mean it like that and I’m really sorry if you took it as me being brash. I know that everyone is untitled to there own opinion but my sources are Sufis and there materials, a lot of sorcerers, some magicians, and I have a large library myself filled with manuscripts and etc. Not as big as yours but a lot. I never claimed to be a known it all and never will and idk how you got that from my statement but I do apologize for rubbing you the wrong way

  • @M313-u8d
    @M313-u8d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    So this is the most critical edition of the goetia (used most of the manuscripts compared to other editions)

    • @alexanderkaval7506
      @alexanderkaval7506 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, I'm afraid not. it's pretty but not a good translation. Go for peterson if you want a good translation.(or pretty much any other)

  • @JoshuaPagan
    @JoshuaPagan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ll say it again. Absolutely gorgeous!

  • @ARsuffix
    @ARsuffix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why do you recommend not to keep this book where we sleep? Why not? What's the worst that could happen?

    • @gastonmarian7261
      @gastonmarian7261 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you don't have enough magical experience to understand the advice, you're better off just trusting the advice of someone who does have that experience
      If you're walking around one day, and a random thought crosses your mind, "I'm worthless", then your conscious awareness can catch the thought, recognize it as false and unhelpful, and dismiss it. As a gross exaggeration for demonstration purposes, if you put in headphones before bed that play "I'm worthless" on a loop all night, that will seep into your subconscious and be much more difficult to dismiss.
      Thoughts arise out of emotions. Emotions arise out of energy. This is one reason you meditate, training your awareness to watch where your thoughts and then emotions arise out of. If there exists a metaphysical force, an energy that radiates around the concepts of the ars goetia, then it can influence that deepest level of energy, which then bubbles up as emotions, and bubbles up again now not just a thought, but whole narratives that are unhelpful to your well being.
      It's like exposing yourself to radioactive material. Do you need to know exactly how the radiation will ionize your DNA in order to trust the physicist telling you not to eat the radium watch hands? No, of course not. If you care, study for a decade and become a physicist yourself so that you can understand how the stories we tell about physics (say, atoms with electrons in circular, concentric orbits) actually manifest in real life. If you don't know physics and choose to ignore the advice of trained physicists, you eat that radium at your own peril. The one thing you can't say is that you were never warned, because you have been

    • @RayoAtra
      @RayoAtra 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      heh, there is always one.

    • @KyleBaden
      @KyleBaden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well you know the movie the exorcist? Well the spirit that possessed little Ragen in that film is Paimon. He is just 1 of 72 demons whose sigils this book contains. So you might want to treat it with some respect to say the least.

  • @AnisaMavraganis
    @AnisaMavraganis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My mom bought one kislux and she loves it. It had been there for over 10 years when she went out with it.

  • @alexanderking9462
    @alexanderking9462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the review, mine is now officially lost by DHL so I guess I'm getting a refund instead.

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ah! Such a shame 🙇‍♂️ luckily BLP are very reliable with customer service.

    • @alexanderking9462
      @alexanderking9462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FoolishFishBooks so it turns out that DHL actually returned the parcel saying "incomplete address" as the reason. BLP sent me a photo of the parcel, which does, in fact, have my full address on it. lmao.

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alexanderking9462 wow. 🤦‍♂️ Well, again, confirmation that BLP have the kind of customer service I can recommend 😄🙏

  • @Dr.ZeeroFreeMagickSecretsShow
    @Dr.ZeeroFreeMagickSecretsShow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Want

  • @clouds5866
    @clouds5866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you name the 5 books of the goetia please.

    • @FoolishFishBooks
      @FoolishFishBooks  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I guess you mean the 5 books from the Lesser Key of Solomon.
      Ars Goetia, Ars Theurgia Goetia, Ars Paulina, Ars Almadel, Ars Notoria.

    • @g.septentrionis609
      @g.septentrionis609 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Without wishing to sound, … arsey, I suppose, none of the books of Lemegeton are really called 'ars' anything. I blame Wikipedia. In the title pages of all the nine or so extant manuscripts (complete or partial) the names of the books are simply Goetia, Theurgia Goetia, the Pauline Art, Almadel (Almadee in one instance, Ars Almadel Solomonis in another) and Artem Novem or the Notory Art (Ars Notoria in two instances). Internal titles refer only to the 'art Goetia', 'art Theurgia Goetia', 'Art Pauline', 'Art Almadel' ('Solomon's Almadel Art' in one case) and 'Notory Art' (Ars Notoria in one instance). In particular I think it is important to differentiate between the Lemegeton's Pauline Art and the earlier Latin Ars Paulina (a variation on the Ars Notoria and completely different to what's in the Lemegeton) and the Lemegeton's Almadel and the Latin Ars Almadel (substantially different to the seventeenth century English version) in order to avoid possible confusion netween the different texts.
      As for my (unsolicited) opinion of the BLP book, the presentation is lovely but after reading I found it a terrible waste of an opportunity to produce something fresh or innovative. Put another way I think the editor Arsed it up. [that's enough 'ars' puns: - ed.]