Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care. lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman. the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts. Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society. Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
You mean a non henpecked father. Makes little difference if a "man" is around if the other doesn't "let" him teach what he thinks or know to be male to his kids. This is one main reason they love"male role models" instead of fathers, bc women can tell teh "ale role model" what they want and don't want and since he is not the father he HAS TO obey. So from male tears to step fathers, to trainers, tehy prefer them since women can easily stop anything they don't like since teh man has no rights.
My niece referred to her father as a "sperm donor," which her mother found amusing. Unsurprisingly, neither one has been able to form a lasting relationship with a man.
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim. Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined. You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know. You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for. You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control. Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc. Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen? Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival. And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes? Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
I live in a family with 16 grandkids are girls and three boys, when my grandparents died everyone of the girls were fighting over the farm and my aunt,s just decided to sell everything,none of the girls could work together, and they lost everything
@@PunmasterSTP I was never part of it ,my brother died before it happened, and my cousin was already rich because of his mom, but my mother did get her part, but now our whole family is devided, except me and one of my sisters, she wasn't sexist like the rest of them though, she was the only one raised with a man in her life,me and my dad, and us three get along great
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
Amen! A man and a woman in a marriage is Biblical. It is amazing how both men and women contribute to society in slightly different, yet equally important ways!
Its how victorious nations die, they can afford more, their men build more, but they don't want to be mean to their own kids so they skip the discipline.
@@dexstewart2450 - The Book covers LiFe before the existence of man & so if you become respectful & wise you may get to see your ancestors, if not, they will get to hear of you. Psalms 19: 7 - 10 Jude 14, 15; John 11: 21 - 27
That's basic female hierarchy. Women become high or low status based purely on how they look (it is really about how competent their body is at converting food into energy for their fetus, but we're on a strict 'need-to-know' basis, so to the naked eye, female hierarchies seem incredibly superficial). This substance over competence transfers over to race and sex, with minorities being privileged because they're not White (men) and therefore oppressed. Even the way feminists think about patriarchy plays into the feminine hierarchy. They think men obtained positions of power because of what they are, not realizing that patriarchy is really meritocracy.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but TH-cam is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
As a 75 year old woman, I was often looked down upon for my CHOICE to have children AND raise them myself. No day care . I have watched the sad results of the far left feminists over my 54 years of marriage. I’m strong. Marriage isn’t easy and raising 6 great kids WAS work but all the efforts were worth it. Wake up women!
Disagree. See extensive analysis of Candice Owens. Black men have become useful idiots of Marxists. However this may be changing as Trump connects with them. Interestingly, a thriving manufacturing economic sector has a massive impact upon them. No jobs means gangs.
What? Black women are the strongest women I know. They are the ones who usually keep it all together in the family. They function under opression and poverty alone and still keep the boat afloat. I'm not saying all, but a good chunk do.
@marciamartins1992 He's probably referring to what happened to black communities once the single motherhood epidemic, among other things, really took off. You may not know this, but in the middle of the 20th century black families almost always had 2 parents, and had decades worth of economic growth and improvement. They had been trending upwards for decades. LBJ then enacted very liberal policies that split up black families which is when single motherhood, crime, poverty and violence all began exponentially increasing in black communities. It was the beginning of the end for Black America, and the sad thing is a majority of them still feel beholden to liberal Democrats. Sorry for the info dump, just wanted to put some facts out there.
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful. Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists. She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister. Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence? I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection. If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU. This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history. On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully. Let me ask you, what ended up happening? We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
My story: I was born as very gifted boy. Mind-bogglingly gifted. My mother was touched by feminism. She believed in equality. Same with my teachers, almost all of them were women. I had four sisters. Because I was very successful in school even without learning almost all chores around the home were mine. Support went to my sisters just to help them to "catch me". Similarly in school. I attention and support went to students "in need" especially to girls. How it looked like from my perspective? I was neglected and overall treated worse as a human being. I felt punished like I was doing something wrong. Especially when I was succeeding in something. It went through all my life until 20th year of my life when I totally collapsed. I went straight from studying very difficult into the most simple job in construction. What happened then? All those feministic "softhearted" women came with triumph just to celebrate victory. Finally they won. What a fantastic victory it was. Withholding love, affection and support because someone is a man, especially gifted? Only women, stupid, poor and weak need love? What kind of perverted conditional love it is? I was raised from rock-bottom by three older guys. I've got from them food, shelter and finally some love and acceptance. Maybe for the first time in my life I was treated as normal human being. No single women helped me. For me its matriarchy in nutshell. Now I'm well off reasonably but I will never allow woman to have any power over me.
@@NewfolderD I am sorry those things happened to you. I think a lot of feminist women believe that men don't have feelings or if they do, they don't matter. They assume that it's easy for all men to be successful. Your family was misled by a toxic belief system. Mine was too, which resulted in me believing that I was a feminist for some time. It took wisdom and pain for me to see the truth, and to understand that men are so very important. The people who have hurt me the most in life, hands down, have all been women. I tried relentlessly to live out my philosophy by cooperating with them and building them up as people, only to be betrayed by friends who hated me because they thought their boyfriends liked me. It broke my heart.
Women today are all emotionally abusive en masse. Frankly, women are innately emotionally abusive because of the way the creat hierarchies based off reputation destruction rather than competence. Women aren't suited for hierarchies or leadership.
@@erinbyrd5377I think its more accurate to say that women are innately dredisposed to emotionally abusing men, and feminism enables rather than suppresses this instinct. It's really not being "misled" let's be honest. It's a dark jungian shadow part of female nature. All I'm seeing from this comment is that many women are just really really stupid, or that women intrinsically do not care for men in any real regard. I'd day it's probably a mixture of both. Womens neurotic self obsession (solipsism) makes it markedly easy for them to dehumanize men.
i hope you overcome these traumas and find your peace and balance as a man, and come out of it stronger. dont let these women, nor your experiences, define you. despise them, feel anger, pity, but dont hate them. remember Our Lady and what a woman can be.
My parents divorced when I was 4. They had joint custody but my mom actually wanted me to be with my dad during the week and her on weekend. This is because she knew he would do a better job taking care of me and he most definitely was by far the more responsible parent. It wasn't 100 percent stable with my dad cause he was a young mechanic that didn't make a whole lot but definitely more stable than the chaotic life my mom was living. When I was with her she usually had a dysfunctional boyfriend and a lot of times would just leave me with my uncle so she could go out to the bars. Sometimes she would even bring me along. She's not a horrible person. She loves me and I never went hungry when I was with her but she was never responsible. She prioritized men over her kids but she would never admit that. My dad worked a lot and at times it felt like he should be around more often but he was really working hard so he could take care of me and eventually my little brother too. He was still always there and taught me responsibility, accountability, respect, and discipline. He's always been there to help me and even gave me a job that i fell in love with and will be my career. My mom never did anything for her future. Every job she had she ended up quitting. No 401k. No Ira. 55 and she has nothing cause of the decisions she made in the past. Now I'm the only one that will help her. What I'm trying to say is fathers are seen as the not so necessary parent when in actuality they are absolutely necessary and are often times the better parent.
Statistically, not enough people will read your comment for its length, but that doesn’t make it any less poignant, accurate or exemplary. As a career auto worker and a single father (with an ex who dodges accountability constantly), I would love to meet your dad, shake his hand, and share a beer with him. 🍻 ❤️ Being a good man is an uphill climb in western society. Good on you for recognizing his sacrifice and his efforts. 💪 🙌
I was lucky. My parents divorced (amicably) when I was 10. Me and my older brother lived with our mother. Our mom worked herself to the bone while always making time for us as best she could. She was always calm and collected, and when shit went down she always kept her head. When me and my brother did stupid shit all she needed to do was give us The Eye or speak with That Tone and we'd get our shit in order. She was my role model growing up. I learned how to deal with life, how to knuckle down and work hard even if it sucked, and to keep a cool head when the shit hits the fan, not from lectures or lessons, but from seeing her living example. Her one glaring weakness, both when we were growing up and now, is handling money and budgeting. I learned from that too, but as a negative example of what not to do. My dad on the other hand . . . He wasn't a bad dad, but he basically wasn't a dad at all. He was kind of a non-entity, a ghost, present but not really having any impact, during the majority of my life, even before they divorced. It's only now in my thirties and his sixties that he's trying to be a dad. Too little too bloody late, but at least he's trying, if clumsily and poorly. Pretty sure that his difficulties being a dad stem from a combination of his experience with his own very strict, very old school dad and him almost certainly being autistic. (Source: I'm a late diagnosed autistic and knowing what to look for now it seems almost certain that dad's autistic too.)
@DefaultFlame being a poor parent is definitely not unique to either gender. I've known some kids growing up with some deadbeat ass dads but had strong mothers. From my experience, however, it does seem like the kids without fathers have the biggest issues with respect and discipline.
@@vcalv9354 Yeah, I think my dad just didn't know what to do and defaulted to letting mom raise us for the most part, even when they were together. I resent him just a little bit for not really trying harder when I was growing up, but I understand why. He had an unreasonably harsh dad growing up, who only provided an example of what not to do. Combine that with undiagnosed autism and mom's excellent parenting and I can see why he just kind of coasted, settling into the role of breadwinner and nothing else. Like I said before, he wasn't a bad dad, the issue is that he wasn't really much of a dad at all, he was just kind of there. Present, but not having much of an impact.
I have this saying " Men are generalized, women are the exception". A man is blamed for all of the mistakes, grudges, failures, hardships that a woman encounters involving or interacting with all men in her life. In short every man that's done said woman wrong that current man is the punching bag / representative of their failure. However when it comes to women a woman is not like The Other women, each woman is the exception to any situation no matter how generalized, common or similar the actions of women in that situation may act.
@user-xs3sj3em6u The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@Zoomie932Aristotle was using old greek boomer language for Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies. I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?" ...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls" ...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain: It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help. If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
I did my family tree in the 1990s. I read genealogy articles by women and I collaborated with women. Some ladies felt that farm wives of the 1800s and earlier were forced to have children. What I noticed was that families with many children were far more prosperous than childless couples or small families. Children had farm chores to do which enriched the family. A family of 12 had an easier and more prosperous lifestyle than a childless couples. Daughters helped the mother manually clean the house while sons helped the father manually farm the land. I think that women wanted the softer and more productive life the big family gave the entire family and wanted to have the children to produce a large family. A man could barely earn a living on a farm without a wife. He could not maintain a home and work a field manually. Wives were in high demand. Almost everyone married. The children benefited by learning to farm and live off the land. I think that farm families of that era had good lives.
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does! In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless. The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out). Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
Feminism has been used to shift our societies and economies from single income families to two income families. This has enabled exponential real estate inflation and industrial production & consumption.
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that. There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
I'm a survival instructor. I can live in the wilderness for years at a time with no gear. I can tell you, anyone who doesn't build or maintain the infrastructure of civilized society doesn't know or care how it got here.
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes. As a child youngest of 4, my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12, I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete and disciplined man. Meanwhile, my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess . I owe him my life. The saddest thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
As an older woman I believe Hollywood & woman's magazines took over by design the cultural formation roles formerly done by the tribe. When the economic crash happens women will need to go back to our reality based roles. BUT if we do not grasp the power of media in the hands of people who hate humanity & uses us like cattle we will slide back. I pray thus does not happen.
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side? Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields. It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand. You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know. The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life. I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!! "Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over." Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
I know this girl at work who is in her early twenties and someone that had a bad run in with ONE GUY who did her wrong, and now she absolutely hates seemingly all men and only socially interacts with other female workers but never men. Now mind you we’re in retail, and she not only has to work with, but also around men as well as women all day long. She’s also a Swifty, so you can only imagine how that plays out. I myself, a guy has been repeatedly rejected and also dealt very snarky nasty in manner by modern women of all ages both in and out of work. Does that give me the right to hate all women and pursue this “patriarchy”? No! And I feel that goes for these radical “feminist” man haters just as well. This was a very excellent well put video and truth be told this girl I know should be watching this instead. Might help open her eyes.
sounds like from your comment that people are focused on politics (patriarchy and feminism) when the real issue is that they are injured by sick relationships!
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women. I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
Patriarchies also fail. Look at the mess the world is in, with the most male dominant countries being the most awful to live in. We should have men and women leading together, not matriarchies or patriarchies. There's a reason children have a father and mother - men and women's differences are meant to compliment each other. This woman sounds like a serious "pick me".
@@lordkekz4 Being ostracized and alienated from other women. When you go along with the woke, feminist, liberal agenda your "loved" and celebrated but when you break from the herd by using reason and commonse, you're quickly cancelled. (edited for spelling)
This randomly reminded me of a time when I saw a woman on the internet angrily complaining about the word "housewife". I don't remember exactly what she said but I remember that her logic expressed as an argument was something like... 1. Housewife insinuates that the woman is married to her house[her house's wife]. 2. It is absurd and offensive to say that a woman is married to a house. 3. Therefore, the term "housewife" should not be used. In my mind, the logic continued to it's conclusion. 4. Wives are women who are married to men. 5. If housewife wrongly implies that women are married to houses, then manwife would be more accurate by implying that a wife is married to a man. So I asked her "Would you prefer to be called a manwife?". For some reason, I think she might have been offended
Even though it was clear that you read that from a sheet, it was engaging enough for me to listen to the end, thank you for working on that, and doing the research to make it interesting.
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible. We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do. This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it. Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it. If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
I've visited those matriarchal households where the man instructs guests to leave the toilet seat down as a courtesy. Lift the seat and every time you'll see dried old pee splatter accumulated on the underside. Gross! Be sure to look the woman of the household in the eye when you tell her you always leave the seat up if only to wipe the gross pee splatter and leave it obviously clean for the next person.
Firstly, this was a glorious essay. Your conclusions are the solution to many of the current issues. Secondly, I'm deeply disappointed we didn't get introduced to the flooferz in the background.
One feminised man I knew insisted that all reality is subjective. One day, he decided to ignore the fence with the sign 'danger' and 'do not enter' written on it. It took 6 men and an emergency chopper to rescue him from that cave. I could not stop laughing for hours. He doesn't talk to me any more.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours. Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
I'm one that had all the options available to men, and it paid off. Women call the shots in the realm of romance, how men react is in theirs. In my last breakup, she said the feeling just wasn't there anymore. I said ok, and reminded her how our friends had noticed her growth and newfound feminine strength. Indeed, she agreed, possibly now being twice the woman that I originally met. My reply? "Yes, my dear, but if you had listened and done to what I said, you might have been ten times the woman and be here still." Beauty is her currency; trust is her forfeiture. Measured reason is mine; trust is my reward.
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.* Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ... In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that. Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
Wow! Every single word and sentence inthis video is well thought out and you don't want to miss a syllable. I feel like watching it again and writing the key points down. Thank you
Thank you. Well researched and well said. Another good example often cited is that "survivor competition" they did once with men on one island and women on another. The women had troubles building shelter, trapping food, and avoiding danger. If memory serves, they needed to be rescued before the end of their scheduled time. By the end of the test, the men had created basic shelter and were hunting. And they had figured out how to get freshwater and how to safely dispose of their solid waste so that they wouldn't spread disease to each other.
@@erinbyrd5377 Another good example is the late Queen Elizabeth. While she made many charities and public service organisations, the negative effects Matriachy influence is especially insidious in England, even if it's invariably unintentional on her part. Ever since she rose to power, the Court system and Justice system in England slowly started to erode mens right's in court of law. Today, if a man got falsely accused of doing something to a women, generally speaking the Judge will always side with women even if he is innocent. Johnny Depp is a prime example of this where he lost the case in England despite the overwhelming evidence supporting his story. If they are falsely accused, men do not stand a chance. And a lot of women are starting to catch on to that fact and take advantage of that system. For example, I know a British youtuber who has a big channel and very popular got falsely accused by two women and lawyered up but his attorney likely told him there's no point litigating this and just give in to the demands which the two women wanted large sums of money knowing he was rich. He had no choice but to acquiesce to the extortion. Matriarchies do not work.
I remember that. The women told everyone they won’t need any help from the men. A week later they still couldn’t build a fire and were freezing cold. The girls told everyone they would beat the men in the competition, but when it got hard, they all went over the the men’s side of the island and flirted with the men to try and stand next to their fire and get warm.
There is a matriarchal tribe that I no longer remember the name of (I was exposed to it on one of those Discovery/History Channel types), it was either Polynesian, or South American in origin. In this tribe, they had achieved a literal sort of paradise, in which there was no conflict, and because of their isolation, the only menace to their life were large predators who often were simply spooked. Peace was paramount, and they practiced polygamy in a very open manner. Women took multiple husbands, men took multiple wives, and it all balanced out. The reason why this system worked is because something akin to communism was in place. Every man and every woman had a role in society, and they married/procreated to access each of their resources. Women want fish? They marry a fisherman. Women want carvings? They marry a woodcarver. etc, etc. And men themselves weighed the benefits of different wives, since some could farm, fish, or weave, etc. The reason why this place was a matriarchy is because women controlled and dispensed sex so as to ensure peace. They separated the conflicted men from each other, and used sex to pacify them. They basically practiced a sort of elevated society equivalent to Bonobos. Modern day feminists are mostly left-leaning and they have a communistic/non-nuclear belief on the view of "family", but they hold on to something that will never allow them to reach this "perfect utopia". They have to surrender the thing they value most: their sexual pride. Now, I don't know about you guys, but most feminists say they want the freedom to sleep with "anyone". But they don't mean "anyone". They want the freedom to have sex with the men they find most valuable, and they will look at unattractive and/or "economically humble" men, with disdain. And men without hope to form relationships are more susceptible to violence (this is true mostly in societies where "traditional polygamy" is practiced, as wealthy men can "afford" the largest amount of women, and the poorest class of men are left without hope to form a family; Boko Haram, a military group in Africa gets the brunt of its recruits from such men, as it promises them wives/slaves as they gain territory and raids). I respect other cultures and ways of life, and I applaud a society that can create peace. But hedonistic life without development is stagnation in my eyes.
There are also monogamist south American tribes that are matriarchal. The men share a large hut in the center of the village where women are not allowed to enter, the women have smaller huts around it with gardens and livestock. Men and women don't live together as husband and wife, men just visit their wife to mate when their wife's siblings are not around otherwise he will get teased away by them (especially her brothers), most of the time men are in the men's hut or with their mother or with one of his sisters when in the village.
Communism is about the distribution of the mean of production and social rights for the workers. I dont remember it requires you to sacrifice your personal relationship and family to be one. It was rather a dreamy Philosophy, but still not as extreme as your example.
Anyone can build a flourishing society with zero scarcity and high walls. Give one of those men 3 bottles of antibiotics and watch women fight over who's in the top 3 people who can save a loved one from death. Then watch men be frustrated by being ignored and cut off the fish supply. That society will implode in under a day. And what is described here is *not* communism, it's post scarcity. Communism is supposed to work with realistic input, like ambition, envy, greed and a mechanism of rewarding innovation.
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male. Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired. Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business. EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
when I came home from work one day, my ex-girlfriend told me she was jelous of me because all i do all day is "tip-tap on a keyboard". She was completely ignorant of the problem solving ability it takes to debug code and electronic systems. I think this is one of the main problems: women just dont respect men's careers or their ability to be technical problem solvers. According to them, they could do just as good a job. I find this incredibly unfair because I can appreciate how valuable caeers like teaching and nursing are, why can't women appreciate men's careers just the same?
Hold on bro before I let you fall into this rabbit hole, this was a one time thing, don't overgeneralize by saying that 'women can't appreciate men's careers' Love ya man, keep yo chin up
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
Most women will claim you're being a "pick me". The grim reality you mentioned of a majority of men being able to physically delete a majority of women with their bare hands is sobering.. I don't say that with glee or satisfaction. But framing it in that way makes me more sympathetic to women who genuinely believe the patriarchy is oppressing them. Great video. Food for thought.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did. As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
Ikr, I'm VERY attracted to intelligence, it is the most attractive trait a person can have, ofc that doesn't mean you have to be smart for me to like you, but still it's awesome Edit I should clarify what type of intelligence I'm talking about, I'm talking about the kind and considerate intelligence, not the "I'm right and you're retarded for not thinking the same way I am" type of intelligence, those people are a huge turn off
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions.. If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..) Greetings from switzerland!
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
I was forced to take a communications class in undergrad and selected Group Communications and one of the funny aspects of it was that it taught me a very valuable lesson on what turned out to be this very subject. Essentially the lesson was about the relative effectiveness between the primary two group oriented dynamics: Hierarchical Groups and Consensus Groups. The general benefits of a Consensus orientation are that you get everyone's consent to any major decision, ensuring maximum cooperation with decisions for the group. But the downside of this is that it takes a LOT of time to arrange, not only through setting up the necessary mechanism for coming to a determination (usually a vote) but also the constant squabbling and politicking that occurs in the interim between decision making events where people in the groups vie for advantage and convincing others to their preferences. The general benefit of a Hierarchical orientation is speed, full stop. Because the authority gets vested upward in fewer and fewer people, ultimately only one person at the top has to make a decision about what the group will do when a determination on group action is needed, then the rest will follow that determination. This has the disadvantage of course, of needing a capable individual at the top, which is never certain, but when you get one, you get a more cohesive group that can not only make decisions that benefit the group, but one which can do so very fast. This is the reason all groups that REQUIRE speed of decision making, such as militaries, police, and other first responder organizations (like firefighters or paramedics etc) inevitably end up being hierarchies. The necessity of speed is just too important to the function of the group for any other group formation to be functional to their role. Imagine if a vote had to be held for every military maneuver taken in a war or whether or not the police would even respond to a call within their remit - such an organizing principle would invalidate the purpose of the group entirely. Generally speaking, when the two types of group orientation face off against each other, the hierarchies outcompete the consensus groups most, if not all of the time. The biggest example being in business. Co-ops exist that try to compete in markets using a consensus group orientation, but unless that market is effectively fixed and doesn't have to respond to quickly shifting market trends a similar competing organization that uses a hierarchy will out-compete it 99% of the time and take market share. It can simply respond to trends faster in almost every instance. The holds to the Patirarchy/Matriarchy issue because men and women have distinct preferences along these lines. Women prefer consensus orientated groups and men prefer hierarchies. Use this knowledge however you will.
Also, another weakness of consensus orientation is that, regarding anything that requires cadence or 'smartness', it is very likely to be wrong. For example, a mob is very weak in decision making and can be easily manipulated. Consensus groups are also, not very scalable. hierarchy groups instead are very scalable. without hierarchy groups society would not exist.
I'm usually at the top of a small hierarchy and use that position to 1) Allow those with the expertise to get on with how a job should be done, and 2) Protect them from interference from further up the hierarchy, where the expertise for the asks is somewhat reduced
@@dexstewart2450 "Allow those with the expertise to get on with how a job should be done, and 2) Protect them from interference from further up" That was my role in the Navy (along with some technical expertise of my own).
@@thomasmaughan4798 That is allowed in a tyranny (in the classical sense) where the benefits of such a strategy is clear to the tyrant or his inner circle, and decisions are based on what makes the tyranny stronger. In a democracy, where politicking and Lowest Common Denominator Stupidity comes into play, it is a whole different game.
Holy sht this makes so much more sense now! I have grown up with a mom who've always used arguments which sound awfully similar to what you describe as standpoint theory, to 1. backpeddal out of corners when being wrong, 2. make herself immune to facts and logic that would otherwise paint her as a creature of lower cognitive ability, and 3. to manipulate and dethrone you from being right and deny you the victory. Now as an adult it has made me a pain to argue with, and i struggle with stopping myself from going full force on people who decide to start to argue with me
@erinbyrd5377 I have to admit, watching the video to it's end took me a few pauses because just hearing the words "there is no such thing as objective truth" aggrevates me on such a deep level, despite agreeing with you 😂😂
@@tkmfischerman2582 It's a typical trick and manipulation by all w who don't want to accept reality, including author of this video, no matter how seemingly "intelligent" or "smart" they are, they are not in fact, they don't know how to construct valid and sound arguments, they just use intertext and compilations, ideas and thoughts of others, because they don't have real comprehension and critical thinking ability, also they don't have powerful rhetoric, they only can read what's written by others. W hate reality, they think (it's oxymoron in it's own, because they don't really) that their feelings are more important than facts and that objective facts and truth does not matter. It's epistemology and metaphysics, formal logic, women hate those and reality. 2+2=4, but they will say it's 5. And so on.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again. Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere. The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females. It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem. We need to understand this in order to advance......
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer. Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't" If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point. So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point). Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are). Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at? Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy. The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
Ages ago I did a report in middle school about suffrage and the 19th, so I interviewed my grandmother, who was a young woman at the time. I remember thinking how insane she sounded as she recounted telling my grandfather to vote against pro-suffrage candidates. She didn't want it. I did not understand for a very very long time.
I think it was also a very clear indicator of how women still very much had power with voting. When people got married, that vote the man made was typically for the betterment of the family, they usually consulted their wives on the situation, and the outcome was more or less what both of them thought was right. Could it be completely vetoed by the man? yes, but that wasn't a substantial enough part of our society to really make women have no voice at all.
Most women did not want it. The feminists knew this and did all they could to fight against women's desire to be at home and have men take care of political and national affairs.
I saw this quote somewhere that perfectly encapsulated all of the divorces of people i have personally known. "Men give up their happiness for their families, Women give up their families for their happiness."
if men didn't give up their happiness may be, just MAY BE they wouldn't die young, they would not be the ones to murder all of their family, they wouldn't be the ones to beat up their wives and cheat on them. All those things are done by men mostly, not women. There's nothing wrong in wanting to be happy, but it seems like men don't mind being unhappy themselves and want women to be unhappy with them. How f*cked up is that? Your children will see unhappy parents and will create unhappy families for themselves. Nobody wins.
Men give up nothing for their families. Men would work with or without families. you hate women and lust after men cuz you are #GAY. Your misogyny is what provoked divorces, you hypocrite. You pretend men are all good and women are all bad. Just admit you lust after men. You saw a quote by a hateful misogynist that you re-post because you are a hateful misogynist. You hate women cuz you don't have a women. INCEL
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
@@TheGreatMaster-dr6yx Right. My wife doesn't call it cheating when she pays someone to clean the eavestroughs instead of expecting me to do it for free.
What a gem to come across this morning, happy to see a truly logical take on a lot of the issues we are and will continue to face for a few decades more.
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
Not a book recommendation, but season 2 of "The Island, with Bear Grylls" is applicable to this topic. There was an all male tribe and all female tribe, and the women did a fantastic job of showing why no matriarchy survived the test of time. In case you don't have that sort of time, the TL/DR is that the women were facing death from dehydration and had to be saved by out-of-game intervention. Their whole experience was bad choice after bad choice, like refusal to set a leader and adopting a couple of wild piglets as pets that they should have killed and eaten.
Not only that, but after the women spent an obscene amount of time trying to start a fire, when they finally got it going the narrator said something like “in only ten hours the women achieved what it took man hundreds of thousands of years to do”. 🤭
@@Mistmantle88 Yeah, the fawning, pro-woman bias was written all over the scripting - as is true of pretty much everything these days. However, even that couldn't cover up that the recorded material proved them wholly incapable of long-term survival without outside assistance. Given a few more days unassisted, most would've been dead.
This doesn't sound like the basis for a good study. Reality TV tends to screen for personality types that will create drama and get more views of the show. Not for people that will actually succeed at the tasks that are given. Also, it's misleading to take a small number of people and portray them as a reflection of a majority of people.
@Dave-um7mw true, but then we'd have to talk about things like "how many women are even willing to do a survival challenge?" "What personality types do we estimate would function better?" "Would any women participate at all w/o a female-appealing reward structure?" And so on. So that sword definitely cuts both ways.
@@spaceranger7683 agreed. I would imagine we (or at least the producers of reality TV shows) already have the answers to these questions do to how long reality TV has been out, especially the "what personality types do we estimate would function better" question.
Men organize people into societies. All large organizations are structured using masculine principles such as rigid hierarchies. Feminine organizations, like book clubs, don’t scale. No large organization can work if organized as desired by feminine principles.
@@erinbyrd5377This is a beautiful phrase. These conversations always seem to devolve into woman-bashing. People gotta remember that women are miracle workers at the proper scale. The endgame is species survival and women are totally required
large corporations create great inequalities for many reasons - corrupts politicians with oligopoly, transfer funds from poor to reach, etc... so your logic is BS
When women on TV say they don't need a man I always wonder how they would carry on the species without a man. Saying one sex doesn't need the other is the height of ignorance.
But pray reflect - If you enlist all women in your cause, And make them all abjure tyrannic Man, The obvious question then arises, ‘How Is this Posterity to be provided? W.S. Gilbert wrote a spoof of these newfangled 'feminists' in Princess Ida in 1884 with a punchline that still sticks on modern feminists. If you get rid of all the men, where do you get more children?
Many years ago, as an apprentice engineer, I witnessed the matriarchy in action. I worked in a factory that was staffed mainly by women who caused a strike, half of the women wanted a fan on and the other half wanted it off, so they went out on strike. Where there is matriarchy there is strife, which later in life I regularly witnessed as a DJ at a club, the fights were started 85% of the time by women, either they fought amongst them selves our would spur men on to fight for them, under the guise of some perceived insult. If a women would be in charge of the US, nuclear war would follow
@@stevehayward1854 If women were in charge, free speech would be permanently eliminated. IVF and surrogacy would be the norm. Men would lose the primary incentive of their lives and become non-productive. Meanwhile, women would establish a ruthless pecking order that would alienate any women who dared to think for themselves.
@@erinbyrd5377 "IVF and surrogacy would be the norm" Unlikely Women still chase after men, & still have children, usually from multiple fathers. Women will never really be in charge of society. What is going to happen is a economic & social collapse (currently underway), that will put women back as second class citizens. This is what happened in the Muslim world. If you look at old photos of women in Iran, Afghanistan & other Muslim countries from the 1979s, You see them wearing western style clothing. Now go look that the clothing they wear today. After a collapse it will be strong arm men that seize control and restore the society back to a pre feminist society. Resulting in Women will lose all their rights. Presuming there is no global nuclear war (80% of nuclear war), This will all playout likely over the next 25 to 30 years. Western society is likely to collapse in the 2030s because of debt, Collapsing Oil production (Peak Oil in 2018), and Demographics (Boomers retiring). Younger generations are becoming very angry because the cannot afford housing, food, energy & healthcare, meanwhile the Boomers largely control most of the wealth & assets. Very likely when the next financial crisis unfolds, sending unemployment higher, we see the return of the 2020 type riots, but probably much worse.
In 1978 I worked as an apprentice in a trade. I was taught by a retired man. He was a German toolmaker who had lived through the Nazi regime. I'd ask him about the war and sometimes he'd tell me stories. He said that one day the authorities came and grabbed him and his wife in the middle of the night . They were taken to a production complex that made Panzer tanks. They did everything from forging steel to building diesel engines to assembling tanks. It was heavy industry and he said the entire plant was staffed by women. There were no men. It was late in the war and all the men were conscripted to fight. When he walked through the plant the women just stood at their stations and stared at him. He said they were filthy and miserable looking. The plant had problems getting tanks built and they needed a experienced tradesman who understood industry, manufacturing standards and how to keep things running. When I asked what it was like managing a plant full of women, he bit his lower lip and shook his head. He would not speak of it.
Children of single mothers fare worse in every metric, while children of single fathers have almost the same results as children of two-parent families. Part of this difference might be genetic though, as the problematic children have problematic fathers...
@@Olivia-Whow is it harder single mothers have way more free leisurely time have all sorts of welfare and government assistance to the point being a single mom is ‘almost’ incentivized yeah ‘almost’ yeah it’s so much harder that’s totally why they get such a bad rap because it’s sooooooooo hard 😅😅😅😅
@@Olivia-W I am sure it is. Consider the people who become single parents: In a certain environment, it is almost a given to become a single mom for women. For men, no such environment exists. Single fathers are created by exceptional circumstances and a lot of times, they have a very good support network, because their environment generally does not contain a dysfunctional family background, generational unemployment and precarious living circumstances. Men who take on single fatherhood are generally capable and organized, otherwise they just wouldn't do it. For women, they are more often than not young, naive and emotionally bound by motherhood. Very different scenarios.
Every single feminist needs to watch the Bear Grylls show where the women were on their own island without men and nearly died from starvation and dehydration.
From the American Heritage Dictionary matriarchy noun A social system in which the mother is head of the family. A family, community, or society based on this system or governed by women. The collection of women in positions of power, especially in such a social system or community. A social system in which the mother is head of household, having authority over men and children. A system of government by females. A form of social organization in which a female is the family head and title is traced through the female line. This sounds a lot like a female figure head to me. Please elaborate on the difference between matriarchy and a female figure head.
@@Dave-um7mwHi Dave. Maybe an example would help discern a bit of the nuance. Queen Elizabeth I of England, whose father was Henry VIII, managed through constant political struggle, to rule a country almost exclusively governed and controlled by the noblemen of England. So one could reasonably contend that Elizabethan England had elements of matriarchy and elements of patriarchy. The set of definitions for the word ‘patriarchy’ includes mildly conflicting notions, as is true for many words, so one typically chooses the definition appropriate to the conversation. But of course, subtle disagreements often arise, as to the specific meanings of the words being used. Sometimes these disagreements go unrecognized, causing further misunderstandings. I think Elizabethan England is an example of a society demonstrating clear elements of matriarchy (domination by a queen for decades), while simultaneously demonstrating clear elements of patriarchy (constant political and economic pressure by a society almost exclusively controlled by men (excepting the monarch in this case)). [AI large language models use probabilities when modeling the characteristics of words, which naturally allows multiple meanings of words, at the cost of some rather abstract mathematical concepts. Humans typically solve the ‘multiple conflicting definitions’ problem by attempting to recognize the nuances and categorize the discussion by clarify the definitions currently in use for the specific conversation.]
@@Dave-um7mw Consider the meaning of "figurehead": _A person given a position of nominal leadership but having no actual authority._ Do you see the difference now?
So many women say "men need to teach men how to treat women." But they don't let their children have a male role model
Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
Facts
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care.
lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman.
the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts.
Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society.
Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
A lot of men in the West are missing that male role model. They simply stand less of a chance in this world.
You mean a non henpecked father. Makes little difference if a "man" is around if the other doesn't "let" him teach what he thinks or know to be male to his kids.
This is one main reason they love"male role models" instead of fathers, bc women can tell teh "ale role model" what they want and don't want and since he is not the father he HAS TO obey. So from male tears to step fathers, to trainers, tehy prefer them since women can easily stop anything they don't like since teh man has no rights.
My niece referred to her father as a "sperm donor," which her mother found amusing. Unsurprisingly, neither one has been able to form a lasting relationship with a man.
@@ach2lieber That's sad
Does she refer to her mother as "incubator" then? Equality and so on :)
Femcels are real.
Brainrot most likely taught by or allowed by mom
@@dissect123Great point.
Matriarchies put women into positions of power but not so much into positions of responsibility.
🙌 🏅
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
That is not Matriarchy - that is Gynocentrism!
An exception to this is the Philippines. It is very matriarchal (at the familial level), but first-born daughters bear most of the responsibility.
Name a female president
Sending this to my wife that constantly questions why our 3 daughter's barely listen to her, yet they do everything I tell them to without question.
someone's sleeping on the couch tonight.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
And the feminists hated thatcher because she was traditional in most of her values
@@theverystones2643😂
@@theverystones2643 So true, a most valuable lesson for radical feminists.
They should be happy. See, women suck as rulers just as badly as men! Equality!
I’ve been bullied by other women and consequently, a matriarchy sounds like hell on earth to me.
Same here
MORE heirachal than EVER BEFOOORRREEEE. 😂
In the same way that patriarchy hurts men? In the exact same way? 🤔
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim.
Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
Power without responsibility is an unmitigated disaster.
"Handouts without responsibility destroy human dignity" ~Former senator Bob Dole
Most men through it history did that
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
@@wegfarir1963 Whole history is full with male rulers who are never held responsible. Not only recent.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined.
You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know.
You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for.
You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control.
Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc.
Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen?
Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival.
And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes?
Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
I live in a family with 16 grandkids are girls and three boys, when my grandparents died everyone of the girls were fighting over the farm and my aunt,s just decided to sell everything,none of the girls could work together, and they lost everything
Oh dang. I hope the boys and the rest of the family were okay at least!
@@PunmasterSTP I was never part of it ,my brother died before it happened, and my cousin was already rich because of his mom, but my mother did get her part, but now our whole family is devided, except me and one of my sisters, she wasn't sexist like the rest of them though, she was the only one raised with a man in her life,me and my dad, and us three get along great
@@jimmyagnew2184 I'm glad that at least you three can get along 👍
@@PunmasterSTP man,me too, but me and her was the only ones that worked that farm our whole childhood, she was a tomboy though,
Typical
Matriarchies fail because future success requires sacrifice.
Facts, and they want someone else to sacrifice for matriarchy, mainly men and we're not falling for it.
Lol. Yeah. And other things… accountably… etc.
No matriarchies fail because, as was pointed out in the video, only men can be the enforcement arm.
And if you can just get what you want at any time by opening your legs for a man, why would you ever sacrifice?
@@hansgullickson4080
Literacy...
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
What ever made you feel men were expendable?
@@fronttowardenemy9994 that would be the social construct outside the home.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
@@lexzenis2544 then society is clearly not worthy of men’s sacrifices. Point noted.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
“Kids don’t need a bigger house. They need values instilled in them.” Convicting words 24:02
need big houses, large spaces, Nature and culture.
Amen! A man and a woman in a marriage is Biblical. It is amazing how both men and women contribute to society in slightly different, yet equally important ways!
Its how victorious nations die, they can afford more, their men build more, but they don't want to be mean to their own kids so they skip the discipline.
@@lukek1949 Marriage existed before that book of nonsense
@@dexstewart2450 - The Book covers LiFe before the existence of man & so
if you become respectful & wise you may get to see
your ancestors, if not, they will get to hear of you.
Psalms 19: 7 - 10
Jude 14, 15; John 11: 21 - 27
Not "feelings are more important than facts", but "some people's feelings are more valuable than others based on what group you were born into"
That's basic female hierarchy. Women become high or low status based purely on how they look (it is really about how competent their body is at converting food into energy for their fetus, but we're on a strict 'need-to-know' basis, so to the naked eye, female hierarchies seem incredibly superficial). This substance over competence transfers over to race and sex, with minorities being privileged because they're not White (men) and therefore oppressed. Even the way feminists think about patriarchy plays into the feminine hierarchy. They think men obtained positions of power because of what they are, not realizing that patriarchy is really meritocracy.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
Guess I need to do more research. Good job 👍
Love it
Stupid claims by stupid people being corrected
I would very much like you to give us that list for science.
I want the list too. I'm in education. This list can impact greatly.
Victoria was also not nice, Elisabeth 1, also not. And the "queen if seven heavens" (Maya) also...
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
Wow, you're totally right
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but TH-cam is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
As a 75 year old woman, I was often looked down upon for my CHOICE to have children AND raise them myself. No day care . I have watched the sad results of the far left feminists over my 54 years of marriage. I’m strong. Marriage isn’t easy and raising 6 great kids WAS work but all the efforts were worth it. Wake up women!
6 kids ?
@@goofygrandlouis6296not that weird, my grandma had 9, and my other grandma 7, family gatherings sure aré wild...
God bless you ma’am
God bless u, u are a real woman!
@@goofygrandlouis6296 what it's her body, she can choose to have as many kids as she want.
Black America is the most devastating example of the failures of matriarchy.
Disagree. See extensive analysis of Candice Owens. Black men have become useful idiots of Marxists. However this may be changing as Trump connects with them. Interestingly, a thriving manufacturing economic sector has a massive impact upon them. No jobs means gangs.
What? Black women are the strongest women I know. They are the ones who usually keep it all together in the family. They function under opression and poverty alone and still keep the boat afloat. I'm not saying all, but a good chunk do.
@@marciamartins1992 have you ever met a black woman?
And leftists
@marciamartins1992 He's probably referring to what happened to black communities once the single motherhood epidemic, among other things, really took off. You may not know this, but in the middle of the 20th century black families almost always had 2 parents, and had decades worth of economic growth and improvement. They had been trending upwards for decades. LBJ then enacted very liberal policies that split up black families which is when single motherhood, crime, poverty and violence all began exponentially increasing in black communities. It was the beginning of the end for Black America, and the sad thing is a majority of them still feel beholden to liberal Democrats. Sorry for the info dump, just wanted to put some facts out there.
Parents should not only teach men how to treat women, but just as importantly, teach young girls how to treat men. What a concept!
Amen
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@epicmercury333do you have some advice or insights about it that you can share with us?😅
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful.
Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists.
She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister.
Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
Whereas a tyrannical father says “Do it, your feelings be damned” a tyrannical mother requires you to like it as well” (edited)
@@kc6810 You dont need to live here. You can leave anytime.
@@kc6810 Women could change if they wanted to. And we should want to; what women, as a group, are doing is destroying everything.
@@kc6810because there are not only tyrannical parents in this world.
@@kc6810well, if you consider yourself to be a tyrannical mother to be - then don't, your unborn children would thank you for that mercy.
@@GlasbanGorm Don't say things like that.
Let the feminist build their matriarchy while we are chilling in the woods with the bears.
Cool. I’m going to Thailand a bang pros
They make great gym bros
th-cam.com/video/GBY2xsu2Juk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Pi5Hb76QJRke-3Dn
@@hansgullickson4080lady boys
They’ll get other men to hunt you and put you to work.
Bearmaxxing 🐻 😎
"Kids don't need a bigger house, they need values instilled in them." So true. Glad you made this video.
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." - George Orwell.
Not true in this day and age, those rough men would rather do business with those that seek to do "us" harm...
Men are also the ones doing the harm though lol
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence?
I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection.
If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU.
This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history.
On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully.
Let me ask you, what ended up happening?
We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
My story:
I was born as very gifted boy. Mind-bogglingly gifted.
My mother was touched by feminism. She believed in equality.
Same with my teachers, almost all of them were women.
I had four sisters. Because I was very successful in school even without learning almost all chores around the home were mine.
Support went to my sisters just to help them to "catch me".
Similarly in school.
I attention and support went to students "in need" especially to girls.
How it looked like from my perspective?
I was neglected and overall treated worse as a human being.
I felt punished like I was doing something wrong.
Especially when I was succeeding in something.
It went through all my life until 20th year of my life when I totally collapsed.
I went straight from studying very difficult into the most simple job in construction.
What happened then?
All those feministic "softhearted" women came with triumph just to celebrate victory.
Finally they won. What a fantastic victory it was.
Withholding love, affection and support because someone is a man, especially gifted?
Only women, stupid, poor and weak need love?
What kind of perverted conditional love it is?
I was raised from rock-bottom by three older guys.
I've got from them food, shelter and finally some love and acceptance. Maybe for the first time in my life I was treated as normal human being.
No single women helped me.
For me its matriarchy in nutshell.
Now I'm well off reasonably but I will never allow woman to have any power over me.
@@NewfolderD I am sorry those things happened to you. I think a lot of feminist women believe that men don't have feelings or if they do, they don't matter. They assume that it's easy for all men to be successful. Your family was misled by a toxic belief system. Mine was too, which resulted in me believing that I was a feminist for some time. It took wisdom and pain for me to see the truth, and to understand that men are so very important. The people who have hurt me the most in life, hands down, have all been women. I tried relentlessly to live out my philosophy by cooperating with them and building them up as people, only to be betrayed by friends who hated me because they thought their boyfriends liked me. It broke my heart.
Women today are all emotionally abusive en masse.
Frankly, women are innately emotionally abusive because of the way the creat hierarchies based off reputation destruction rather than competence.
Women aren't suited for hierarchies or leadership.
And yeah, the emotional abuse of men by women, is pretty bleak.
@@erinbyrd5377I think its more accurate to say that women are innately dredisposed to emotionally abusing men, and feminism enables rather than suppresses this instinct.
It's really not being "misled" let's be honest. It's a dark jungian shadow part of female nature.
All I'm seeing from this comment is that many women are just really really stupid, or that women intrinsically do not care for men in any real regard. I'd day it's probably a mixture of both.
Womens neurotic self obsession (solipsism) makes it markedly easy for them to dehumanize men.
i hope you overcome these traumas and find your peace and balance as a man, and come out of it stronger. dont let these women, nor your experiences, define you. despise them, feel anger, pity, but dont hate them. remember Our Lady and what a woman can be.
My parents divorced when I was 4. They had joint custody but my mom actually wanted me to be with my dad during the week and her on weekend. This is because she knew he would do a better job taking care of me and he most definitely was by far the more responsible parent. It wasn't 100 percent stable with my dad cause he was a young mechanic that didn't make a whole lot but definitely more stable than the chaotic life my mom was living. When I was with her she usually had a dysfunctional boyfriend and a lot of times would just leave me with my uncle so she could go out to the bars. Sometimes she would even bring me along. She's not a horrible person. She loves me and I never went hungry when I was with her but she was never responsible. She prioritized men over her kids but she would never admit that. My dad worked a lot and at times it felt like he should be around more often but he was really working hard so he could take care of me and eventually my little brother too. He was still always there and taught me responsibility, accountability, respect, and discipline. He's always been there to help me and even gave me a job that i fell in love with and will be my career. My mom never did anything for her future. Every job she had she ended up quitting. No 401k. No Ira. 55 and she has nothing cause of the decisions she made in the past. Now I'm the only one that will help her.
What I'm trying to say is fathers are seen as the not so necessary parent when in actuality they are absolutely necessary and are often times the better parent.
Statistically, not enough people will read your comment for its length, but that doesn’t make it any less poignant, accurate or exemplary.
As a career auto worker and a single father (with an ex who dodges accountability constantly), I would love to meet your dad, shake his hand, and share a beer with him. 🍻 ❤️
Being a good man is an uphill climb in western society. Good on you for recognizing his sacrifice and his efforts. 💪 🙌
@@TheTexican05 he's a dope mf. Can promise you it wouldn't just be one beer, though.🤣
I was lucky.
My parents divorced (amicably) when I was 10. Me and my older brother lived with our mother. Our mom worked herself to the bone while always making time for us as best she could.
She was always calm and collected, and when shit went down she always kept her head. When me and my brother did stupid shit all she needed to do was give us The Eye or speak with That Tone and we'd get our shit in order.
She was my role model growing up.
I learned how to deal with life, how to knuckle down and work hard even if it sucked, and to keep a cool head when the shit hits the fan, not from lectures or lessons, but from seeing her living example.
Her one glaring weakness, both when we were growing up and now, is handling money and budgeting. I learned from that too, but as a negative example of what not to do.
My dad on the other hand . . . He wasn't a bad dad, but he basically wasn't a dad at all. He was kind of a non-entity, a ghost, present but not really having any impact, during the majority of my life, even before they divorced. It's only now in my thirties and his sixties that he's trying to be a dad. Too little too bloody late, but at least he's trying, if clumsily and poorly.
Pretty sure that his difficulties being a dad stem from a combination of his experience with his own very strict, very old school dad and him almost certainly being autistic. (Source: I'm a late diagnosed autistic and knowing what to look for now it seems almost certain that dad's autistic too.)
@DefaultFlame being a poor parent is definitely not unique to either gender. I've known some kids growing up with some deadbeat ass dads but had strong mothers. From my experience, however, it does seem like the kids without fathers have the biggest issues with respect and discipline.
@@vcalv9354 Yeah, I think my dad just didn't know what to do and defaulted to letting mom raise us for the most part, even when they were together.
I resent him just a little bit for not really trying harder when I was growing up, but I understand why. He had an unreasonably harsh dad growing up, who only provided an example of what not to do. Combine that with undiagnosed autism and mom's excellent parenting and I can see why he just kind of coasted, settling into the role of breadwinner and nothing else.
Like I said before, he wasn't a bad dad, the issue is that he wasn't really much of a dad at all, he was just kind of there. Present, but not having much of an impact.
I have this saying " Men are generalized, women are the exception".
A man is blamed for all of the mistakes, grudges, failures, hardships that a woman encounters involving or interacting with all men in her life. In short every man that's done said woman wrong that current man is the punching bag / representative of their failure. However when it comes to women a woman is not like The Other women, each woman is the exception to any situation no matter how generalized, common or similar the actions of women in that situation may act.
"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny." - Aristotle
This is not a "new" phenomenon.
@user-xs3sj3em6u
The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@mmestari You're complete bullshit, numerous sources attribute that to Aristotle, altho it's possible that Plato said it as well.
@@Zoomie932Aristotle was using old greek boomer language for
Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
Which give way to collapse, more tyranny or a new republic.
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
Sadly the men of today cannot say NO to a woman.
Indeed, I see signs that men are starting to wake up.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
MGTOW is on it
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies.
I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?"
...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls"
...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
@@spacedinosaur8733 Totally
Something to go on the reading list and great cover art.
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain:
It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help.
If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
Piper was a great author, sad he left us so soon. He did it on his own terms, even if we don't understand them.
One of my favorite authors.
I did my family tree in the 1990s. I read genealogy articles by women and I collaborated with women. Some ladies felt that farm wives of the 1800s and earlier were forced to have children. What I noticed was that families with many children were far more prosperous than childless couples or small families. Children had farm chores to do which enriched the family. A family of 12 had an easier and more prosperous lifestyle than a childless couples. Daughters helped the mother manually clean the house while sons helped the father manually farm the land. I think that women wanted the softer and more productive life the big family gave the entire family and wanted to have the children to produce a large family. A man could barely earn a living on a farm without a wife. He could not maintain a home and work a field manually. Wives were in high demand. Almost everyone married. The children benefited by learning to farm and live off the land. I think that farm families of that era had good lives.
Feminism has transformed the economic relationship between men and women from being complementary to competitive.
@@LawrenceMclean 100 %
Also agree, heard it out of my wife’s mouth the one year she made more money than me out of the 11 years we were married.
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does!
In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless.
The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 Very well said-thank you.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out).
Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
It’s so refreshing to hear a very intelligent woman talk about an arguably difficult subject for most women to discuss.
Where did you see an intelligent woman?
@@markherbert1978 LMAO... you sound like a Cuck... bet you're still a virgin...
@@markherbert1978 Definitely not your mom, because the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
@@Insomnolant1335Jesus man don't kill him
@@iantsai6082Nah let him cook
Feminism has been used to shift our societies and economies from single income families to two income families. This has enabled exponential real estate inflation and industrial production & consumption.
Finally. Someone gets it. Well said.
And now wamon is inflated out of the possibility to be full time homemaker.
THIS!!!!
You're not wrong
And now a lot of women wonder why most men can’t pay all of the bills.
No sisterhood has emerged in all this time, just tiktoks.
Sisterhood😂
Exactly. Women tend to envy and hate each other when they aren't locked up in a convent and forced to serve God as nuns 24/7.
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
What? Those same women are the reason the world is the way it is right now.
@@chadcadsonvii5258 They were women who were young in the 40's .They were real women who loved being women . Not feminists.
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that.
There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
@@aaronadamson7463 humility is a sign of good character, also of self awareness and situation/reality awareness imo
Most women think the infrastructure that makes their lives so comfortable and easy just fell out of the sky.
VERY TRUE
I would say most people that aren't engineers or builders of some kind think that.
Most men do as well.
@@mikeg9bexactly. Finally someone smart. Most people in general take things for granted.
I'm a survival instructor. I can live in the wilderness for years at a time with no gear. I can tell you, anyone who doesn't build or maintain the infrastructure of civilized society doesn't know or care how it got here.
"Kids don't need a bigger house they need values instilled in them" those words will stick with me.
Ironically, this is almost the same goal for communism. The values may differ.
Every young woman needs to hear this message. I’ll send to my 16 year old daughter. Thanks
The great american 20th century philosopher Al Bundy got it right : "Don't try to understand women, women understand women and they hate each other."
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
Wtf are you talking about that guy ain’t no philosopher he sounds more like a serial killer.
You forgot to mention his 4 touchdowns in a single game for Polk High
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes.
As a child youngest of 4, my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12, I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete and disciplined man.
Meanwhile, my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess .
I owe him my life.
The saddest thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
Got her cake and wanted all to herself.
Respect to your father for overcoming the trauma of war to raise you. I wish peace to you both.
A woman will sacrifice her family for her own happiness
As an older woman I believe Hollywood & woman's magazines took over by design the cultural formation roles formerly done by the tribe. When the economic crash happens women will need to go back to our reality based roles. BUT if we do not grasp the power of media in the hands of people who hate humanity & uses us like cattle we will slide back. I pray thus does not happen.
@@AlphaChad-mi6pj A man will too sometimes.
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
Me too
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side?
Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields.
It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand.
You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know.
The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life.
I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!!
"Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over."
Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
I know this girl at work who is in her early twenties and someone that had a bad run in with ONE GUY who did her wrong, and now she absolutely hates seemingly all men and only socially interacts with other female workers but never men. Now mind you we’re in retail, and she not only has to work with, but also around men as well as women all day long. She’s also a Swifty, so you can only imagine how that plays out. I myself, a guy has been repeatedly rejected and also dealt very snarky nasty in manner by modern women of all ages both in and out of work. Does that give me the right to hate all women and pursue this “patriarchy”? No! And I feel that goes for these radical “feminist” man haters just as well. This was a very excellent well put video and truth be told this girl I know should be watching this instead. Might help open her eyes.
@@For_The_Republic92 Life is a battle when you believe everyone is against you. This girl sounds like she has no perspective.
sounds like from your comment that people are focused on politics (patriarchy and feminism) when the real issue is that they are injured by sick relationships!
If women were in charge, we'd still be living in grass huts - Camille Paglia
Well she’s wrong cuz what’d happen is an opposing force like China would quickly take over.
Yes, but we’d have nice cushions 😄
@@drstrangelove4998 😜
@@drstrangelove4998 So many that it would be impossible to sit on the couch...
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women.
I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
Brave woman. My hat is off to you for not drinking the kool-aid and for being unafraid to speak the truth, even at personal cost.
💯
Patriarchies also fail. Look at the mess the world is in, with the most male dominant countries being the most awful to live in. We should have men and women leading together, not matriarchies or patriarchies. There's a reason children have a father and mother - men and women's differences are meant to compliment each other. This woman sounds like a serious "pick me".
What personal cost?
@@lordkekz4 Being ostracized and alienated from other women. When you go along with the woke, feminist, liberal agenda your "loved" and celebrated but when you break from the herd by using reason and commonse, you're quickly cancelled. (edited for spelling)
You're drinking the kool aid
"even at personal cost." she made tons of money doing this video
This randomly reminded me of a time when I saw a woman on the internet angrily complaining about the word "housewife". I don't remember exactly what she said but I remember that her logic expressed as an argument was something like...
1. Housewife insinuates that the woman is married to her house[her house's wife].
2. It is absurd and offensive to say that a woman is married to a house.
3. Therefore, the term "housewife" should not be used.
In my mind, the logic continued to it's conclusion.
4. Wives are women who are married to men.
5. If housewife wrongly implies that women are married to houses, then manwife would be more accurate by implying that a wife is married to a man.
So I asked her "Would you prefer to be called a manwife?". For some reason, I think she might have been offended
that was the proper response though 😎
Of course, this could mean that the house wife was the wife that got to stay in the house, while the others slept elsewhere
What should stay at home husbands be called then? Womenhusband? 💀
@@Ash-dj5ph idiots. But if you go by the precedent, it would be househusband, because he's the cuc... man that's taking care of her home and children.
@@Ash-dj5ph They should be called based.
Even though it was clear that you read that from a sheet, it was engaging enough for me to listen to the end, thank you for working on that, and doing the research to make it interesting.
Matriarchy is already here and will continue to gain momentum so long as we have unlimited food and entertainment.
Actually, the ONLY reason that it continues is that men allow it to continue!
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible.
We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do.
This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it.
Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Women’s suffrage necessitates matriarchy.
Nope. The globalists won't allow it.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
I think matriarchies fail for the same reason Bumble got rid of their "only women can message first" mechanic.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it.
If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
wait why did they get rid of it?
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
Women ruin things.
matriarchies fail because men use force to get what they want - there's no negotiating, hense wars, r*pes and murder.
Who will climb down waist deep in human waste to clean out the sanitary products they insist the didn’t flush? 😂
😂😂😂
The male slaves
@AssortedGamer696 definitely not married.
I've visited those matriarchal households where the man instructs guests to leave the toilet seat down as a courtesy. Lift the seat and every time you'll see dried old pee splatter accumulated on the underside. Gross! Be sure to look the woman of the household in the eye when you tell her you always leave the seat up if only to wipe the gross pee splatter and leave it obviously clean for the next person.
@AssortedGamer696 It's a joke, smart man.
Stick to your games.
Firstly, this was a glorious essay. Your conclusions are the solution to many of the current issues. Secondly, I'm deeply disappointed we didn't get introduced to the flooferz in the background.
A world without men: Lights out, water off, sewer backing up. Chaos. Watch any apocalypse movie.
And empty store shelves because there aren't enough women trained to drive trucks and trains, or fix them. Most would be dead in less than a year.
👍
i start to imagine that
A world? More like a week.
Just watch beR grylls survival island the women practically started starving and would most likly died without the mens help
Either a bridge fell down, or it didn’t. Having your own truth won’t re-alive the people who lost their lives.
sad but what can only be done is to be responsible enough to never let something like that ever happen again !!
One feminised man I knew insisted that all reality is subjective. One day, he decided to ignore the fence with the sign 'danger' and 'do not enter' written on it. It took 6 men and an emergency chopper to rescue him from that cave. I could not stop laughing for hours. He doesn't talk to me any more.
There is no greater hell than people blaming each other for everything and nothing getting done.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours.
Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
Women...☕
So said Adam and Eve
Oh! Oh! That's what my mother and grandmother did for decades!
We are blaming the evil and trying to fix the crack head of the simps like who liked your comment.😅😅
I'm one that had all the options available to men, and it paid off. Women call the shots in the realm of romance, how men react is in theirs. In my last breakup, she said the feeling just wasn't there anymore. I said ok, and reminded her how our friends had noticed her growth and newfound feminine strength. Indeed, she agreed, possibly now being twice the woman that I originally met. My reply? "Yes, my dear, but if you had listened and done to what I said, you might have been ten times the woman and be here still." Beauty is her currency; trust is her forfeiture. Measured reason is mine; trust is my reward.
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.*
Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ...
In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that.
Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
Its like in that old joke:
Heaven is when germans are engineers and italians are cops
Hell is when germans are cops and italians are engineers
Never heard that before, any references by chance?
@@brainkill7034 Its an old joke that have multiple versions. Just google heaven is when germans are engineers joke
Gold
How is this relevant to the topic being discussed?
@@vanbeet5105 Relevant in the sense that a system works great in one way, but if the roles reverse, it would be horrible.
Give this woman an upvote guys 👍 she needs to be seen by more people!
Wow! Every single word and sentence inthis video is well thought out and you don't want to miss a syllable. I feel like watching it again and writing the key points down. Thank you
Your channel is one of the very rare times TH-cam recommended something GOOD instead of trying to feed me more propaganda.
I appreciate that a lot
Thank you. Well researched and well said. Another good example often cited is that "survivor competition" they did once with men on one island and women on another. The women had troubles building shelter, trapping food, and avoiding danger. If memory serves, they needed to be rescued before the end of their scheduled time. By the end of the test, the men had created basic shelter and were hunting. And they had figured out how to get freshwater and how to safely dispose of their solid waste so that they wouldn't spread disease to each other.
@@justaskin8523 One big difference is that men know how to cooperate with each other and women don't.
@@erinbyrd5377 Another good example is the late Queen Elizabeth. While she made many charities and public service organisations, the negative effects Matriachy influence is especially insidious in England, even if it's invariably unintentional on her part. Ever since she rose to power, the Court system and Justice system in England slowly started to erode mens right's in court of law. Today, if a man got falsely accused of doing something to a women, generally speaking the Judge will always side with women even if he is innocent. Johnny Depp is a prime example of this where he lost the case in England despite the overwhelming evidence supporting his story. If they are falsely accused, men do not stand a chance. And a lot of women are starting to catch on to that fact and take advantage of that system. For example, I know a British youtuber who has a big channel and very popular got falsely accused by two women and lawyered up but his attorney likely told him there's no point litigating this and just give in to the demands which the two women wanted large sums of money knowing he was rich. He had no choice but to acquiesce to the extortion. Matriarchies do not work.
I remember that. The women told everyone they won’t need any help from the men. A week later they still couldn’t build a fire and were freezing cold. The girls told everyone they would beat the men in the competition, but when it got hard, they all went over the the men’s side of the island and flirted with the men to try and stand next to their fire and get warm.
👍👍
@@luminatrixfanfiction Thumbs up. Thank you for sharing that.... more indisputable daughters of satan.
There is a matriarchal tribe that I no longer remember the name of (I was exposed to it on one of those Discovery/History Channel types), it was either Polynesian, or South American in origin.
In this tribe, they had achieved a literal sort of paradise, in which there was no conflict, and because of their isolation, the only menace to their life were large predators who often were simply spooked.
Peace was paramount, and they practiced polygamy in a very open manner. Women took multiple husbands, men took multiple wives, and it all balanced out.
The reason why this system worked is because something akin to communism was in place.
Every man and every woman had a role in society, and they married/procreated to access each of their resources.
Women want fish? They marry a fisherman.
Women want carvings? They marry a woodcarver. etc, etc.
And men themselves weighed the benefits of different wives, since some could farm, fish, or weave, etc.
The reason why this place was a matriarchy is because women controlled and dispensed sex so as to ensure peace.
They separated the conflicted men from each other, and used sex to pacify them.
They basically practiced a sort of elevated society equivalent to Bonobos.
Modern day feminists are mostly left-leaning and they have a communistic/non-nuclear belief on the view of "family", but they hold on to something that will never allow them to reach this "perfect utopia". They have to surrender the thing they value most: their sexual pride.
Now, I don't know about you guys, but most feminists say they want the freedom to sleep with "anyone". But they don't mean "anyone". They want the freedom to have sex with the men they find most valuable, and they will look at unattractive and/or "economically humble" men, with disdain. And men without hope to form relationships are more susceptible to violence (this is true mostly in societies where "traditional polygamy" is practiced, as wealthy men can "afford" the largest amount of women, and the poorest class of men are left without hope to form a family; Boko Haram, a military group in Africa gets the brunt of its recruits from such men, as it promises them wives/slaves as they gain territory and raids).
I respect other cultures and ways of life, and I applaud a society that can create peace.
But hedonistic life without development is stagnation in my eyes.
There are also monogamist south American tribes that are matriarchal. The men share a large hut in the center of the village where women are not allowed to enter, the women have smaller huts around it with gardens and livestock. Men and women don't live together as husband and wife, men just visit their wife to mate when their wife's siblings are not around otherwise he will get teased away by them (especially her brothers), most of the time men are in the men's hut or with their mother or with one of his sisters when in the village.
Communism is about the distribution of the mean of production and social rights for the workers. I dont remember it requires you to sacrifice your personal relationship and family to be one. It was rather a dreamy Philosophy, but still not as extreme as your example.
A) Thats not a Matriarchy, thats subversion
B) Bullshit. I dont believe any such tribe existed.
Geez, that looks so wrong lol
Anyone can build a flourishing society with zero scarcity and high walls.
Give one of those men 3 bottles of antibiotics and watch women fight over who's in the top 3 people who can save a loved one from death. Then watch men be frustrated by being ignored and cut off the fish supply.
That society will implode in under a day.
And what is described here is *not* communism, it's post scarcity. Communism is supposed to work with realistic input, like ambition, envy, greed and a mechanism of rewarding innovation.
I love my daughter but I have never seen her happier than when she became a mother.
yes
Women living amongst women know how acid a matriarcal environment can be.
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male.
Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired.
Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business.
EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
@@jackspring7709 True. They have enough pattern recognition to understand bad thing is bad, but not enough cognitive ability to work out why.
@@Nevir202 True. Its an extraordinary example of cognitive dissonance.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
@@McGriddy51095 Yep, crabbing is a nightmare!
when I came home from work one day, my ex-girlfriend told me she was jelous of me because all i do all day is "tip-tap on a keyboard". She was completely ignorant of the problem solving ability it takes to debug code and electronic systems. I think this is one of the main problems: women just dont respect men's careers or their ability to be technical problem solvers. According to them, they could do just as good a job. I find this incredibly unfair because I can appreciate how valuable caeers like teaching and nursing are, why can't women appreciate men's careers just the same?
Hold on bro before I let you fall into this rabbit hole, this was a one time thing, don't overgeneralize by saying that 'women can't appreciate men's careers'
Love ya man, keep yo chin up
Lmao. You don't know any male teachers or female developers?
"Everything's fine today, that is our illusion” - Voltaire
th-cam.com/video/h-U6g89YBRA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=t7OYUuxupEMbQxyq
Voltaire also said he would destroy the christian faith. He was a Jesuit. If you read the Jesuit oath you will know they are evil.
@@ianmonk6211Jesuit def aren’t evil lol. Conspiracy brain. But Voltaire was ass and not a Christian
@@ianmonk6211 and? i have had enough damage to my family caused by christianity why not cause some damage back
@@thecoolestofthe834s2 that would be the false Christianity the bible predicts will arise
Everytime a woman chooses a tall, strong broad shoulder man, she s clearly saying "I want security and leadership from someone else but me"
or maybe thise characteristics in a man produve heakthier offspring?
@@debrawehrly6900 both id say. need healthy kids and the security and strength to protect them.
@@debrawehrly6900 best chances at healthy and surviving offspring will be found in diversification of genetic outcomes.
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
@@KuroKumo96You’re saying the same thing but with different words.
Most men dont realize they're the guards of theyre own prison.
I must like my prison then. I felt free in it.
Meaning ?
It’s similar to why a huge elephant has a tiny little chain.
Jesus set me free from my invisible prison/captivity to sin almost two decades ago.....nothing compares to it, try it.
Their*
Most women will claim you're being a "pick me".
The grim reality you mentioned of a majority of men being able to physically delete a majority of women with their bare hands is sobering.. I don't say that with glee or satisfaction. But framing it in that way makes me more sympathetic to women who genuinely believe the patriarchy is oppressing them. Great video. Food for thought.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did.
As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
"an historian" is how we know you are an historian.
Why do you hate women?
@@jeravincer Why do you murder puppies?
An exception you just made up means nothing.
Amazing how women can get their minds right when they're up against the impending draft 😂🤣
bingo!
But...aren;t there women already in the military?
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much, cupcake?
DRAFT.
IMBECILE.
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much?
DRAFT.
Don't need a d to fly a drone. However, have you seen the stats on female gamers?
Hearing you talk common sense, is infinitely more attractive than every indecent only fans account combine.
Ikr, I'm VERY attracted to intelligence, it is the most attractive trait a person can have, ofc that doesn't mean you have to be smart for me to like you, but still it's awesome
Edit I should clarify what type of intelligence I'm talking about, I'm talking about the kind and considerate intelligence, not the "I'm right and you're retarded for not thinking the same way I am" type of intelligence, those people are a huge turn off
Facts
What are the common sense takes she discusses?
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAXS
@@vicentesanchezjr.3877 Joker: You wouldnt get it....
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
@@danieldosso2455 Wow, you are absolutely correct
Schopenhauer said that all limitations make people happy.
You want women to stay in houses?
I don't think my marriage is fun.. more like work
@@bjung8858 It requires sacrifices, but that's what makes it so fulfilling.
Modern people in power have forgotten that with great power comes great responsibility.
They forgot me
Spiderman really is the best hero.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
@@trequor Daredevil is best Marvel hero.
Sadly, usually with great power comes great irresponsibility.
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions..
If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..)
Greetings from switzerland!
@@darthmais1375 thanks for the info, I'll check it out. Arthritis is a bad deal.
Even when women work in manual labour they arent doing the same thing
It is said that modern fem - lnlsm is only possible under air conditioned facilities 😅
This woman is perfect. Highly intelligent and absolutely drop dead gorgeous. Great video!
To comment upon her looks is NOT part of a Feminist outlook. Sorry.
Nobody abuses power more than someone whose never had it.
And people are going to actually vote for Kamala Harris…….ha ha ha ha we may have a chance at. A matriarchal government soon.
@@rodterrell304 may as well start playing the violins now
@@rodterrell304I’m never voting for Kamala Harris. She’s a wicked and cruel person.
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
Men never stopped keeping up their end of the bargain, women nowadays seem to blame even their lack of sacrifice to us men for some reason.
I was forced to take a communications class in undergrad and selected Group Communications and one of the funny aspects of it was that it taught me a very valuable lesson on what turned out to be this very subject.
Essentially the lesson was about the relative effectiveness between the primary two group oriented dynamics: Hierarchical Groups and Consensus Groups.
The general benefits of a Consensus orientation are that you get everyone's consent to any major decision, ensuring maximum cooperation with decisions for the group. But the downside of this is that it takes a LOT of time to arrange, not only through setting up the necessary mechanism for coming to a determination (usually a vote) but also the constant squabbling and politicking that occurs in the interim between decision making events where people in the groups vie for advantage and convincing others to their preferences.
The general benefit of a Hierarchical orientation is speed, full stop. Because the authority gets vested upward in fewer and fewer people, ultimately only one person at the top has to make a decision about what the group will do when a determination on group action is needed, then the rest will follow that determination. This has the disadvantage of course, of needing a capable individual at the top, which is never certain, but when you get one, you get a more cohesive group that can not only make decisions that benefit the group, but one which can do so very fast.
This is the reason all groups that REQUIRE speed of decision making, such as militaries, police, and other first responder organizations (like firefighters or paramedics etc) inevitably end up being hierarchies. The necessity of speed is just too important to the function of the group for any other group formation to be functional to their role. Imagine if a vote had to be held for every military maneuver taken in a war or whether or not the police would even respond to a call within their remit - such an organizing principle would invalidate the purpose of the group entirely.
Generally speaking, when the two types of group orientation face off against each other, the hierarchies outcompete the consensus groups most, if not all of the time. The biggest example being in business. Co-ops exist that try to compete in markets using a consensus group orientation, but unless that market is effectively fixed and doesn't have to respond to quickly shifting market trends a similar competing organization that uses a hierarchy will out-compete it 99% of the time and take market share. It can simply respond to trends faster in almost every instance.
The holds to the Patirarchy/Matriarchy issue because men and women have distinct preferences along these lines. Women prefer consensus orientated groups and men prefer hierarchies. Use this knowledge however you will.
Spot on.
Also, another weakness of consensus orientation is that, regarding anything that requires cadence or 'smartness', it is very likely to be wrong. For example, a mob is very weak in decision making and can be easily manipulated.
Consensus groups are also, not very scalable.
hierarchy groups instead are very scalable.
without hierarchy groups society would not exist.
I'm usually at the top of a small hierarchy and use that position to 1) Allow those with the expertise to get on with how a job should be done, and 2) Protect them from interference from further up the hierarchy, where the expertise for the asks is somewhat reduced
@@dexstewart2450 "Allow those with the expertise to get on with how a job should be done, and 2) Protect them from interference from further up"
That was my role in the Navy (along with some technical expertise of my own).
@@thomasmaughan4798 That is allowed in a tyranny (in the classical sense) where the benefits of such a strategy is clear to the tyrant or his inner circle, and decisions are based on what makes the tyranny stronger. In a democracy, where politicking and Lowest Common Denominator Stupidity comes into play, it is a whole different game.
Holy sht this makes so much more sense now! I have grown up with a mom who've always used arguments which sound awfully similar to what you describe as standpoint theory, to 1. backpeddal out of corners when being wrong, 2. make herself immune to facts and logic that would otherwise paint her as a creature of lower cognitive ability, and 3. to manipulate and dethrone you from being right and deny you the victory.
Now as an adult it has made me a pain to argue with, and i struggle with stopping myself from going full force on people who decide to start to argue with me
@@tkmfischerman2582 A lot of people do this. It's totally crazy.
@erinbyrd5377 I have to admit, watching the video to it's end took me a few pauses because just hearing the words "there is no such thing as objective truth" aggrevates me on such a deep level, despite agreeing with you 😂😂
@@tkmfischerman2582 It's a typical trick and manipulation by all w who don't want to accept reality, including author of this video, no matter how seemingly "intelligent" or "smart" they are, they are not in fact, they don't know how to construct valid and sound arguments, they just use intertext and compilations, ideas and thoughts of others, because they don't have real comprehension and critical thinking ability, also they don't have powerful rhetoric, they only can read what's written by others. W hate reality, they think (it's oxymoron in it's own, because they don't really) that their feelings are more important than facts and that objective facts and truth does not matter. It's epistemology and metaphysics, formal logic, women hate those and reality. 2+2=4, but they will say it's 5. And so on.
Finally people are starting to understand we are currently living in a matriarchy.
And this is why society will come to an end, because of women and effeminate men incharge. May they ALL have Hell to pay.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again.
Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere.
The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females.
It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem.
We need to understand this in order to advance......
No, this is just the latest counterculture. Most people don't see things that way at all, not even along political lines.
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer.
Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 So you think hiring only craftsmen who are qualified is a "bias"?
So you imply that women cannot be qualified?
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't"
If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point.
So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point).
Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are).
Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at?
Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
I am overjoyed to see pro-family, pro-love, pro-cooperation content gaining some level of popularity
It's too late tho 🤔
@@robertmarley8852it’s never too late.
@@robertmarley8852
the bad times have to pass before the pendulum swings back to the good
@@robertmarley8852 Better late than never.
@@robertmarley8852 We'll get through this. Endeavor to persevere.
Three months ago you had 2k subs. Now you have 25k. You deserve it!!
Thank god for men who know how to be fathers and women who know how to be mothers otherwise we wouldn't be here.
This quotes a good one, hopefully you don't mind me magpieing it? Anyways, God bless!
@@cerebrummaximus3762 Glad u liked it !! Don't mind at all. :)
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy.
The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
Ages ago I did a report in middle school about suffrage and the 19th, so I interviewed my grandmother, who was a young woman at the time. I remember thinking how insane she sounded as she recounted telling my grandfather to vote against pro-suffrage candidates. She didn't want it. I did not understand for a very very long time.
amazing. grace goodwin was an author at the time and she recounts the same thing. suffrage was a disaster.
I think it was also a very clear indicator of how women still very much had power with voting. When people got married, that vote the man made was typically for the betterment of the family, they usually consulted their wives on the situation, and the outcome was more or less what both of them thought was right. Could it be completely vetoed by the man? yes, but that wasn't a substantial enough part of our society to really make women have no voice at all.
Most women did not want it. The feminists knew this and did all they could to fight against women's desire to be at home and have men take care of political and national affairs.
@outregis women had a lot of power! The vote was meant to represent the household unit and take into account all its members.
Great video. Thank you for trying to get the word out. Hopefully you can enlighten some people who will go on to make a positive change.
I saw this quote somewhere that perfectly encapsulated all of the divorces of people i have personally known.
"Men give up their happiness for their families,
Women give up their families for their happiness."
if men didn't give up their happiness may be, just MAY BE they wouldn't die young, they would not be the ones to murder all of their family, they wouldn't be the ones to beat up their wives and cheat on them. All those things are done by men mostly, not women. There's nothing wrong in wanting to be happy, but it seems like men don't mind being unhappy themselves and want women to be unhappy with them. How f*cked up is that? Your children will see unhappy parents and will create unhappy families for themselves. Nobody wins.
Men give up nothing for their families. Men would work with or without families. you hate women and lust after men cuz you are #GAY. Your misogyny is what provoked divorces, you hypocrite. You pretend men are all good and women are all bad. Just admit you lust after men. You saw a quote by a hateful misogynist that you re-post because you are a hateful misogynist. You hate women cuz you don't have a women. INCEL
well if she leaves the family she is so irrationally dependent on i will love it to be true. But it seems very rule has exceptions...
ugh.... this is so eerie because my cousin is in a divorce right now and this describes his situation exactly.
@@letBIGGIErest Your cousin was responsible and treated his wife lovingly? Not a chance!
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
If sex work is work, then it's not cheating if I pay for it
@@TheGreatMaster-dr6yx Right. My wife doesn't call it cheating when she pays someone to clean the eavestroughs instead of expecting me to do it for free.
I will re-use this argument.
@@davidlacosteLmfao.
Good luck brother.
👍😎
poverty always restores the natural state of things
this.
God save the earth from women.
Talk about your grave yard cheer leader. Are you bragging or complaining?
NOPE! It just reminds us why we modified human nature in the first place.
@@hoottasshell The way you used so few words to show that many malfunctions in your brain is downright impressive.
What a gem to come across this morning, happy to see a truly logical take on a lot of the issues we are and will continue to face for a few decades more.
Because men and women are not the same. It's almost like we were designed for different roles. Shocker
IKR mine mind blown.
We are far more similar than we are different.
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
This sketch sums it up perfectly: th-cam.com/video/-rC-nDkae5k/w-d-xo.html
@@mrastronaut9078propaganda. we dont have anything in common with them
Not a book recommendation, but season 2 of "The Island, with Bear Grylls" is applicable to this topic. There was an all male tribe and all female tribe, and the women did a fantastic job of showing why no matriarchy survived the test of time. In case you don't have that sort of time, the TL/DR is that the women were facing death from dehydration and had to be saved by out-of-game intervention. Their whole experience was bad choice after bad choice, like refusal to set a leader and adopting a couple of wild piglets as pets that they should have killed and eaten.
Not only that, but after the women spent an obscene amount of time trying to start a fire, when they finally got it going the narrator said something like “in only ten hours the women achieved what it took man hundreds of thousands of years to do”. 🤭
@@Mistmantle88 Yeah, the fawning, pro-woman bias was written all over the scripting - as is true of pretty much everything these days. However, even that couldn't cover up that the recorded material proved them wholly incapable of long-term survival without outside assistance. Given a few more days unassisted, most would've been dead.
This doesn't sound like the basis for a good study. Reality TV tends to screen for personality types that will create drama and get more views of the show. Not for people that will actually succeed at the tasks that are given. Also, it's misleading to take a small number of people and portray them as a reflection of a majority of people.
@Dave-um7mw true, but then we'd have to talk about things like "how many women are even willing to do a survival challenge?" "What personality types do we estimate would function better?" "Would any women participate at all w/o a female-appealing reward structure?" And so on. So that sword definitely cuts both ways.
@@spaceranger7683 agreed. I would imagine we (or at least the producers of reality TV shows) already have the answers to these questions do to how long reality TV has been out, especially the "what personality types do we estimate would function better" question.
Men organize people into societies. All large organizations are structured using masculine principles such as rigid hierarchies.
Feminine organizations, like book clubs, don’t scale. No large organization can work if organized as desired by feminine principles.
@@theevermind The sacred masculine is in large things, the sacred feminine is found in small things
@@erinbyrd5377This is a beautiful phrase.
These conversations always seem to devolve into woman-bashing. People gotta remember that women are miracle workers at the proper scale. The endgame is species survival and women are totally required
large corporations create great inequalities for many reasons - corrupts politicians with oligopoly, transfer funds from poor to reach, etc... so your logic is BS
Power without Accountability or Responsibility is a Major issue when discussing a Matriarchal Realership
When women on TV say they don't need a man I always wonder how they would carry on the species without a man. Saying one sex doesn't need the other is the height of ignorance.
Women by and large don’t care about the future
A lot of women who say that are also collecting cheques from at least one and likely several X's as their primary source of income.
But pray reflect -
If you enlist all women in your cause,
And make them all abjure tyrannic Man,
The obvious question then arises, ‘How
Is this Posterity to be provided?
W.S. Gilbert wrote a spoof of these newfangled 'feminists' in Princess Ida in 1884 with a punchline that still sticks on modern feminists. If you get rid of all the men, where do you get more children?
I’d say it’s more from the “height of arrogance”.
What's funny is they will say they will go to sperm bank to get pregnant but there would be none because they said they didn't need men. 😂
Many years ago, as an apprentice engineer, I witnessed the matriarchy in action.
I worked in a factory that was staffed mainly by women who caused a strike, half of the women wanted a fan on and the other half wanted it off, so they went out on strike.
Where there is matriarchy there is strife, which later in life I regularly witnessed as a DJ at a club, the fights were started 85% of the time by women, either they fought amongst them selves our would spur men on to fight for them, under the guise of some perceived insult.
If a women would be in charge of the US, nuclear war would follow
@@stevehayward1854 If women were in charge, free speech would be permanently eliminated. IVF and surrogacy would be the norm. Men would lose the primary incentive of their lives and become non-productive. Meanwhile, women would establish a ruthless pecking order that would alienate any women who dared to think for themselves.
@@erinbyrd5377 Exactly right
@@erinbyrd5377 "IVF and surrogacy would be the norm"
Unlikely Women still chase after men, & still have children, usually from multiple fathers. Women will never really be in charge of society. What is going to happen is a economic & social collapse (currently underway), that will put women back as second class citizens. This is what happened in the Muslim world. If you look at old photos of women in Iran, Afghanistan & other Muslim countries from the 1979s, You see them wearing western style clothing. Now go look that the clothing they wear today.
After a collapse it will be strong arm men that seize control and restore the society back to a pre feminist society. Resulting in Women will lose all their rights.
Presuming there is no global nuclear war (80% of nuclear war), This will all playout likely over the next 25 to 30 years. Western society is likely to collapse in the 2030s because of debt, Collapsing Oil production (Peak Oil in 2018), and Demographics (Boomers retiring). Younger generations are becoming very angry because the cannot afford housing, food, energy & healthcare, meanwhile the Boomers largely control most of the wealth & assets. Very likely when the next financial crisis unfolds, sending unemployment higher, we see the return of the 2020 type riots, but probably much worse.
In 1978 I worked as an apprentice in a trade. I was taught by a retired man. He was a German toolmaker who had lived through the Nazi regime. I'd ask him about the war and sometimes he'd tell me stories. He said that one day the authorities came and grabbed him and his wife in the middle of the night . They were taken to a production complex that made Panzer tanks. They did everything from forging steel to building diesel engines to assembling tanks. It was heavy industry and he said the entire plant was staffed by women. There were no men. It was late in the war and all the men were conscripted to fight. When he walked through the plant the women just stood at their stations and stared at him. He said they were filthy and miserable looking. The plant had problems getting tanks built and they needed a experienced tradesman who understood industry, manufacturing standards and how to keep things running. When I asked what it was like managing a plant full of women, he bit his lower lip and shook his head. He would not speak of it.
@@starledge Of all the horrors of WWII, the only unspeakable one was working with women.
More children wnd up in prison from single mother families than single fathers.
Children of single mothers fare worse in every metric, while children of single fathers have almost the same results as children of two-parent families.
Part of this difference might be genetic though, as the problematic children have problematic fathers...
@@akaemzett Or maybe it's harder to be a single mother?
@@Olivia-Whow is it harder single mothers have way more free leisurely time have all sorts of welfare and government assistance to the point being a single mom is ‘almost’ incentivized yeah ‘almost’ yeah it’s so much harder that’s totally why they get such a bad rap because it’s sooooooooo hard 😅😅😅😅
@@Olivia-W I am sure it is. Consider the people who become single parents: In a certain environment, it is almost a given to become a single mom for women. For men, no such environment exists. Single fathers are created by exceptional circumstances and a lot of times, they have a very good support network, because their environment generally does not contain a dysfunctional family background, generational unemployment and precarious living circumstances.
Men who take on single fatherhood are generally capable and organized, otherwise they just wouldn't do it. For women, they are more often than not young, naive and emotionally bound by motherhood. Very different scenarios.
That is probably true for certain communities.All of the mass shooters including Trump shooter had fathers .
13:02 "cut their average caloric intake from 3600 to 890"
Thank you for CITING being fat is a choice.
Every single feminist needs to watch the Bear Grylls show where the women were on their own island without men and nearly died from starvation and dehydration.
Reality doesn't care about idealistic movements or personal feelings. Too much wishful thinking gets you killed. That show was a great example of that
Boom!
They don’t care 😂
They mostly just sat around hoping things would get better magically.
Reality shows are generally not reality.
They confuse a female figure head with matriarchy. For example, you can have a queen but that does not make it a matriarchy.
That's a Woman Brain. Their Brain doesn't have that Power. 😂😂😂
She’s a queen only at the behest of men willing to kill on her behalf. Literally.
From the American Heritage Dictionary
matriarchy
noun
A social system in which the mother is head of the family.
A family, community, or society based on this system or governed by women.
The collection of women in positions of power, especially in such a social system or community.
A social system in which the mother is head of household, having authority over men and children.
A system of government by females.
A form of social organization in which a female is the family head and title is traced through the female line.
This sounds a lot like a female figure head to me. Please elaborate on the difference between matriarchy and a female figure head.
@@Dave-um7mwHi Dave. Maybe an example would help discern a bit of the nuance. Queen Elizabeth I of England, whose father was Henry VIII, managed through constant political struggle, to rule a country almost exclusively governed and controlled by the noblemen of England. So one could reasonably contend that Elizabethan England had elements of matriarchy and elements of patriarchy.
The set of definitions for the word ‘patriarchy’ includes mildly conflicting notions, as is true for many words, so one typically chooses the definition appropriate to the conversation. But of course, subtle disagreements often arise, as to the specific meanings of the words being used. Sometimes these disagreements go unrecognized, causing further misunderstandings. I think Elizabethan England is an example of a society demonstrating clear elements of matriarchy (domination by a queen for decades), while simultaneously demonstrating clear elements of patriarchy (constant political and economic pressure by a society almost exclusively controlled by men (excepting the monarch in this case)).
[AI large language models use probabilities when modeling the characteristics of words, which naturally allows multiple meanings of words, at the cost of some rather abstract mathematical concepts. Humans typically solve the ‘multiple conflicting definitions’ problem by attempting to recognize the nuances and categorize the discussion by clarify the definitions currently in use for the specific conversation.]
@@Dave-um7mw Consider the meaning of "figurehead": _A person given a position of nominal leadership but having no actual authority._
Do you see the difference now?