Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care. lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman. the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts. Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society. Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
You mean a non henpecked father. Makes little difference if a "man" is around if the other doesn't "let" him teach what he thinks or know to be male to his kids. This is one main reason they love"male role models" instead of fathers, bc women can tell teh "ale role model" what they want and don't want and since he is not the father he HAS TO obey. So from male tears to step fathers, to trainers, tehy prefer them since women can easily stop anything they don't like since teh man has no rights.
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
My niece referred to her father as a "sperm donor," which her mother found amusing. Unsurprisingly, neither one has been able to form a lasting relationship with a man.
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence? I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection. If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU. This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history. On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully. Let me ask you, what ended up happening? We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but TH-cam is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
As a 75 year old woman, I was often looked down upon for my CHOICE to have children AND raise them myself. No day care . I have watched the sad results of the far left feminists over my 54 years of marriage. I’m strong. Marriage isn’t easy and raising 6 great kids WAS work but all the efforts were worth it. Wake up women!
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies. I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it. If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
I did my family tree in the 1990s. I read genealogy articles by women and I collaborated with women. Some ladies felt that farm wives of the 1800s and earlier were forced to have children. What I noticed was that families with many children were far more prosperous than childless couples or small families. Children had farm chores to do which enriched the family. A family of 12 had an easier and more prosperous lifestyle than a childless couples. Daughters helped the mother manually clean the house while sons helped the father manually farm the land. I think that women wanted the softer and more productive life the big family gave the entire family and wanted to have the children to produce a large family. A man could barely earn a living on a farm without a wife. He could not maintain a home and work a field manually. Wives were in high demand. Almost everyone married. The children benefited by learning to farm and live off the land. I think that farm families of that era had good lives.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours. Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
Patriarchies also fail. Look at the mess the world is in, with the most male dominant countries being the most awful to live in. We should have men and women leading together, not matriarchies or patriarchies. There's a reason children have a father and mother - men and women's differences are meant to compliment each other. This woman sounds like a serious "pick me".
@@lordkekz4 Being ostracized and alienated from other women. When you go along with the woke, feminist, liberal agenda your "loved" and celebrated but when you break from the herd by using reason and commonse, you're quickly cancelled. (edited for spelling)
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male. Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired. Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business. EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
I have the highest degree of respect for people like you Erin, who read and open their minds to new perspectives. Thank you for sharing your brave perspective on feminism, Erin! Sending you my good wishes and love!
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that. There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
forgot to mention that historically female monarchs are more likely to wage wars than their male counterparts. The reason for that is that during most of human history kings and emperors were expected to lead their armies directly in the battlefield putting their own lives at risk, something queens didn't had to do because women were not allowed on the battlefield.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did. As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first. This is a role model. Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero. This is sad.
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer. Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't" If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point. So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point). Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are). Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at? Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
My main argument is I'd like to see a society where men are in charge of kids for once. I'm a single dad and I love it. Pouring myself into my kid is far more fulfilling than the corporate tech job I hold.
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
3:51 thank you so much for talking about this. I only recently noticed how common this rewriting of history has become. People really think half of humanity was slave status until 100 years ago
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity. The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. . most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward. .....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium. Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
@@TheGreatMaster-dr6yx Right. My wife doesn't call it cheating when she pays someone to clean the eavestroughs instead of expecting me to do it for free.
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions.. If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..) Greetings from switzerland!
1 Refuse to Take Responsibility for their Choices 2 Refuse to Be Held Accountable for their Actions 3 Gaslight Gaslight Gaslight while BLAMING anyone and everyone else around them 4 Throw someone else under the bus for their mistakes 5 NOT Learn from their Mistakes, instead insisting that they do it again
The problem is that blaming does not lead to find root causes for problems to address causes and prevent problems. Mental games do not lead to mental health. Real world does not care about beliefs or feelings. Making decisions while having feelings usually leads to bad decisions.
back in the day they were groomed to be feminine and lean into their nursing nature. now they're groomed to be paranoid feminist and told to be as ruthless as men. the problem is men will get checked if they crossed the line but women don't you can see it in fights between a man and a woman usually the man will try to push or restrain her but the women will hit him as hard as she can.
I learned a lot from this talk. It was well organized, well and appropriately referenced, and well presented. I subscribed and plan to watch other of her videos. One comment. If the US continues on its present path it won't survive much longer but will be replaced by something else. Change won't come from within given the present corruption of Government, media, and academe. The present collectivist cancel culture suppresses the dialogs needed to resolve conflicts and feedback needed to correct dysfunctional policies. The result is societal decay. That is the Thermodynamics. The Kinetics, which predicts the time frame of the decay, depends on the model used and is difficult to impossible to predict.
@@kc6810 Women never spoke way about men until the 1990s when Hollywood & the Marxist-controlled Media pumped out hundreds of shows/movies of Fathers being bumbling dopes and Wives/Mothers as "Superwomen". There is no way before then that women spoke that way of men, men who literally built civilization around the world.
@@kc6810 used to? they still today , in fact it's far worse. As the ego's and superiority complex of modern women get worse do to their feminist indoctrination and how relationships are carried out on TV. or the movies plus Disney, you can expect more nasty things to happen. I doubt women even said anything along the lines of men being children, if they did they kept it to themselves back in the day , at least post WW2 Keep i mind those privileges less women who had no advantage had the power over a government ruled by men to pass prohibition. Outlawing alcohol and making many peoples lives difficult ( most likely they wanted to keep their men at home so they can dominate them without other men around them to tell them what their wives were actually doing) and they created organized crime like the mafia that reeked hell on others up to modern times. Good job ladies! and the real kicker is they didn't have the vote back then.
Great essay! Only recommendation I would make is the application/use of visual aids, especially during the section when discussing the numerical skews between labor distribution. Other than that, excellent!
@@docbohemian1328they were given pigs and none of them had the balls to do what was necessary to survive. They couldn't seperate themselves from their feelings and "nurturing" nature. Those pigs ate better than all the women did.
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy. The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.* Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ... In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that. Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
Insert that one famous clip from the TV show Survivor, where the group of men are quickly able to gather food, build a fire and assemble structures to sleep in and protect from the weather. Were as the women just sit around and argue until some of them wander over to the male group.
The women couldn’t figure out how to obtain food and they “found” a piglet and instead of eating it, they adopted it and tried to name it. Meanwhile the men were hunting small alligators.
@@abcdefghij337 You're actually talking about a different show than @danieldosso2455 . There have been several man vs women survival shows, all with similar results.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
One thing about the current situation is that with women dominating the schools and so many fatherless homes, many younger college students have never been instructed or directed in a deep male voice with masculine delivery, and they find it threatening. Such students are liable to file unjustified grievances against their profs because it bothers them so much (this was also the opinion of one of my female department heads). Some single mothers bring their children to karate class largely so that their sons and daughters will experience male authority for a couple of hours a week.
Single parent homes really show who really matters. The crime rate of people who only grew up with a mother is several times higher than that one people who only had a father, which in turn is only marginally higher than those who had both a mother and a father.
In my childhood i go on taekwondo and my tutor was female what the male authority are you talking about? Even my sport teacher in school was female until i move to another one Male authority is killed by women purposely, they could stop it in 80-90s but they didn't now it's too late and we all will pay for this mistake by demographic and civilization collapses by the 2050 for sure
its crazy how the most highly traded items in earlier centuries were things like silk and perfumes, when women weren't supposed to have any say in things
My wife and I have a very handsome and eligible son. A few years ago a very attractive girl his age began to pursue him but he was not interested. She finally confronted him and asked him why he was not interested in her. He responded that their world views were not compatible (Matriarchy vs Patriarchy). She asked him to describe his worldview. He quickly shared with her a patriarchal view in which while men were leaders women were respected and motherhood was exalted. When he finished describing his worldview the young and VERY beautiful girl said the following: Even though she disagreed with every word and every concept she had to admit that while he was describing it she experienced a deep feeling of safety, security and contentment. She went away confused why a worldview that she had been taught was so evil could make her feel so safe and content. Erin, I listened to every word. You really did a great job on this. You really articulated wisdom well.
Thanks for sharing that, thumbs up. The roles God/Jesus created for mankind, He knows best for only He is the sole Creator omniscient one....if we actually obeyed Him, this present world would be far far less.......antichrist.
You seem to have a very detailed record of these conversations that you apparently weren't present for. Sounds almost like you made the whole thing up just to make a point.
Men organize people into societies. All large organizations are structured using masculine principles such as rigid hierarchies. Feminine organizations, like book clubs, don’t scale. No large organization can work if organized as desired by feminine principles.
@@erinbyrd5377This is a beautiful phrase. These conversations always seem to devolve into woman-bashing. People gotta remember that women are miracle workers at the proper scale. The endgame is species survival and women are totally required
large corporations create great inequalities for many reasons - corrupts politicians with oligopoly, transfer funds from poor to reach, etc... so your logic is BS
Very eloquent and poignant. I appreciate you doing the reading/research and presenting the topic in a very matter-of-fact type of way, unbiased and unburdened by political leanings. 10/10 video. Subscribed. P.S. : This is only the tip of the iceberg. There are so many underlying patterns that keep repeating themselves that are slowly eroding at progress and society as a whole. Never stop questioning the status-quo, but make an effort to understand just why it exists in the first place. That is the key to improvement.
I can’t actually see how a matriarchy could function for any length of time, particularly if a select few genetically prime studs were kept for mating purposes (a logical outcome where women are in charge) while the other 99% of the male population are used as worker drones. Without the possibility of sexual reproduction, those worker drones would either lose the incentive to continue to work and/or rise up and overthrow the system to improve their reproductive chances. And that’s a battle that’s only going to go one way. Female power by its very nature has always been soft power and that’s when it’s at its most effective when it’s used as persuasion to direct and influence masculine hard power. If this balance becomes too out of kilter and that feminine power accrues too much power to itself then it starts to become a form of hard power and will then meet resistance against the existing masculine hard power. I suspect that is when things start to get ugly. This isn’t to say that an overly rigid, tyrannical, hierarchical patriarchy is good for society either - those tend to turn into despotic autocracies that make their populations miserable and usually destitute. Humanity as a whole, is much better off when we can all contribute our own individual strengths. In the end, the most optimal outcome for everyone is a system that’s in balance.
"Humanity as a whole, is much better off when we can all contribute our own individual strengths.". I agree, meritocracies benefit society as a whole, and are an branch of patriarchy. "DEI", a branch of matriarchy as far as I can tell, is based off of feelings for who should hold any given position, not who is right for the job. Anyone being honest with themselves could tell you that merit is not only appropriate, but will lead to the best outcomes.
When someone says "there is no objective truth" you know to not listen to whatever bs they spew. It's just a different way of saying "my emotions are more important than facts"
@@jaysontadlock1871 It’s part of a quote from Friedrich Nietzsche, about how the real truth can’t be uncovered, no matter how much we try. We are not all knowing creatures, and we are imperfect. We can certainly try to pursue the truth as best we can, but because we can’t physically know what others truly think and what precisely happened during an event, those are interpretations of the truth, rather than the absolute truth. Try to keep an open mind to learn instead of insulting others.
I read JD Unwin's book also among others. Women are essentially emotionally unstable, narcissistic, permanent children by nature. In human history, every society where women gain critical control self-destructs shortly afterward. Every society of any size or location, every time, no exceptions. Women are fundamentally incapable of developing or sustaining a society. However, women will almost immediately destroy a society if allowed.
Erin, they'll throw you out of college for this kind of blasphemy. Of course, that probably means that you are correct and that is something that has to be suppressed and destroyed. Truth and facts are anathema to the narrative and must be eliminated. I consider you heroic for espousing facts and standing up to the power of "feminism".
Matriarchy would fail in a different way than patriarchy. The extremes of power is not the answer. Just like our bodies, nature, and relationships, true success is found in the balance of the extremes.
This was a courageous post. It caught my eye because of an essay I once wrote for a history Western Civilization in college. In the 80s It only covered “ancient” civilizations, but we were taught many of them were matriarchal in nature, and left behind amazing art and literature and so on, but just “disappeared”. I wondered what happened to them so went to the library and did some research- as it turned out, they didn’t really disappear- they were overrun by patriarchal civilizations by war. Interestingly enough, the conquering civilizations over several generations became more matriarchal over time, and the cycle repeated
It was not matriarchal civilizations that were conquering, lol, they were arising side by side as a warning to the patriarchal decadence that eventually led to conquer and dissolution, this is a realm of duality. Anytime a matriarchal society arises, it is as an option to save themselves from the patriarchy running amok. You dont know history. At the beginning of civilization this whole world was matriarchal, which means not run by women of course, becayse matriarchy does not mean it is run by women, it means it is based on the fraternity and its inter-connected system connected to nature. This is why everything what this lady has shared in this video is false from the start.
@@danielchettiar5670 Evidence is there if you bothered to research. What there is no evidence for is the ludicrous insanity that matriarchy were conquering other cultures, lol, that is literally in the principles of patriarchy, colonization. This lady is a master in brainwashing gullible people who have no knowledge of historical evidences.
Things I need men for: 1. Dealing with sewage and garbage 2. Extracting minerals, ores, and fossil fuels 3. Slaughtering livestock and cooking food 4. ASSISTING me with lifting the occasional heavy object (notice I said assist, not do) 5. Some pretty ones for eye candy 6. Regular (but not daily) D and some oxytocin cuddles 6. Gay men to hang out and go dancing with Things I DO NOT need men for: 1. Catching and saddling my horse 2. Math 3. English 4. Driving instructions 5. Directions to locations The rest of it can really go either way. I say this as a fairly centrist, monogamous, middle-aged, childless, woman in a STEM field. I wanted kids but I let fear keep me from having them. Fear I couldn’t meet their needs. These heavily biased statistics assume that women are incapable of figuring complicated systems out. This is not true. Humans tend to problem solve. We can learn to share and not subjugate each other. Oh wait, we’re all greedy humans, we are incapable of enacting such a system. I wish the f-big algorithm would stop trying to radicalize me. Things were better when nothing was aimed at pulling me to either side.
It seems to be very hard for women to form long lasting functional hierarchies. Men automatically self sort most of the time(usually based on a variety of factors like perceived competence and strength)into hierarchies of leadership. Males who don't submit to this are punished, usually physically (though if that isn't an option they can be dealt with in other ways). I don't see this sort of sorting in women. They seem to prefer fake friendships with everyone until they come into conflict at which point they fight each other through social shaming/turning methods. These sorting methods are usually subconscious, but seem to be at the base of many cross culture differences between men and women.
One very important category missing from why women need men: 1. Protection A> Females may not be able to call police or police may not arrive in time. B> Dogs can provide great protection, but there's few places which allow you to take guard dogs with you to every building and location. C> A good strong man when traveling or attending events will scare away potential threats... even when walking thru a parking lot late at night. D> A good strong man will bravely fight three men with knives so his woman can runaway and escape. E> Yes she can hire a rotating group of men for 24x7 protection, yet she will be spending quarter of a million each year for such protection.
It truly does require two to tango. Especially in a household, it's a *requirement* for the Mom and the Dad to both be present and giving their all every day, or otherwise it no longer stays a household and instead becomes a work camp.
for a quick answer to the why, just look at how women deal with conflict and how they are compare to men more emotional when it comes to make decisions.
Thanks for this eye-opening video. I'm a black man who is very concerned about the future of our country. I'm glad to see more women calling out the hypocrisy of feminism/the Matriarchy. This push to create a matriarchy was created by antiwhite oligarchs who seek to destroy Western civilization. Feminism, which is a subset of antiwhiteism, has white erased the norms and rules which make up Western Civilization. As you said, matriarchies cannot work without the participation of both men and women. In order to restore civility to Western civilization, the victimization of whites (Westernkind) must stop. A couple of books that you should check to further understand what I'm referring to is Go Free and Born Guilty. The author, Jason Kuhne goes into great detail explaining the current state of Western Civilization and how to reclaim it from further decline due to antiwhiteism.
Thank you sir, I've only seen a few dozen black men calling out antiwhiteism but it feels good to know we can recognize unfair treatment even when it's not occurring to us directly, we shouldn't artificially put down ANYONE, we need to forge the future the 20th century wanted which is color blind not color coded
No one is trying to establish a matriarchy, like you said a matriarchy would need the participation of both men and women, so does every other system. What is being sought is a more equal and just society where anyone can pursue their goals without societal hurdles like gender, race, religion etc. There is no antiwhiteism in an equal and just society
@@davianoinglesias5030 then pie society is not equal and just By every metric everything you said is false Nobody is striving for equality, they are striving for equity which is inherently unequal They are socially engineering a new culture where everything is flipped simply because we can, and white men are on the bottom of the social ladder They admit and cheer on such a fate so don't even lie to me with your cope and 2013 reddit tier naivety I can't really find anyone who truly behaves in a way that will bring about a truly free and color blinded equal future
@@davianoinglesias5030 It's all about white erasure. The society, which was created by Westernkind(the white race) creates a set of mores and values which make up Western Civilization. Those mores and values are being white erased by antiwhiteism. A more equal and just society is nothing more than another version of DEI. And DEI is antiwhiteism in its purest form.
@@davianoinglesias5030 An equal and just society is exactly what antiwhiteism represents. You're talking about a more equal and just society and that reminds me of DEI. Look where our society is right now because of DEI. We have people who are NOT qualified to do certain jobs, but because of DEI initiatives, white males are overlooked and not being hired in this antiwhite society. The trans agenda is being pushed so that men can compete in women's sports. In the end, the only way to restore our society to its former glory is to make antiwhiteism a thing of the past.
“Women only have rights because men have allowed it” Can’t remember who said it but it’s stuck with me ever since. Same with “If the government can take away your rights, they weren’t rights”
One woman absolutely tanked Bud Light so bad. 3 women made a complete joke of the Secret Service, probably the most respected, feared, well-funded and actually badass Agency [Cheetos Cheatle (USSD), that woman who cowered behind Trump on the stage, couldn't holster her gun, and the one who fiddled and put her sunglasses on lmao].
the woman who did actually did her job and tried to cover Trump wasn't even actually tall enough to do it. how about hiriing someone with the same height to begin with lol.
For whatever reasons, majority of women refuse to take responsibility for their actions. To succeed in anything in life, you must be willing to sacrifice and take responsibility for making hard decisions
@@debrawehrly6900 I think it's for 3 reasons: 1. Taking responsibility for your actions requires work to improve yourself 2. It means you're fallible and not perfect And 3. They think that if they were to admit they were wrong about something, they'll be treated the way women treat men when men are wrong, (i.e. that they'll be excessively bullied).
@@Harbringer12 I think it's just the path of least resistance for women. Society doesn't hold them to account, so neither do they themselves. They get babied, so they expect to be babied. And part of that being babied constantly is the rejection of any suggestion that they aren't babied, because that might actually require them to look at themselves and do some personal work. There's this on top of women being excessively over reactive about taking offence / reading intent in a persons tone, rather than listening to what they actually said.
That was interesting food for thought. I take exception with 2 things: 1) Andrew Tate is not a reputable source to quote from. It only leads to people discrediting your argument. And 2) I think your bonobo analogy is flawed. We may be close genetically but we're so different in many other ways. Overall I think I'm convinced of your argument and I strongly agree with your conclusion. Thank you for being brave and making this video!
Our current crumbling society is predicted by “Sex and Culture” (1934) by JD Unwin. It also directly mirrors the examples of the Bonobos you cite and the Mouse Utopia. “In all of human history there is not a single of a society raising its level of culture/civilization unless it has been strictly sexually monogamous. Nor is there an example of a society retaining its culture after it has relaxed its sexual restrictions.” Basically, we are proving his latter point.
@@R3GARnatorCalhoun did not include entertainment for the rats in his experiments. If you're aware of an experimenter who did, please cite them as I would be interested. I studied psychology and did not come across any well known studies that did.
Well.. thank you Erin for stating the facts and just putting it out there overall. It’s certainly easier for another lady to do so. It tends to come across as a bit off-putting when we men attempt to bring up a lot of the very things you’ve mentioned. Women need never to forget the very important role that they play in society, the role of an individual. My mother began her career in banking, eventually becoming head of its loan department, managing 13 other employees within that department. Years later she became VP of a title company, clearing six figures for the 6 yrs she spent at that position. Eventually, her and fellow employee resigned from that company and went into business together, starting their own title company where mom remained President and CEO for 14 yrs, never missing a day. Her and her business partner sold the company several years ago and now she is retired. Guess who I’d rather have my teenage daughter looking up to as opposed to the flamboyant, loud and aggressive feminist standing in a group in protest and yelling obscenities. What’s most ironic is that my mother’s success never stemmed from being a woman, it wasn’t because of what she was. It was because of what she did. The truth is.. men and women should be able to give each other the respect that they both ver well deserve. Because women can’t do it without men, and men can’t do it without women. We really do need each other. Good show Erin Byrd…. well done indeed.
I’ve been reading a book called ‘The Mech Touch.’ It’s a good book, super sci-fi orientated, it’s really good if anyone is interested. The book has these examples of future human culture and civilization splitting up on a constant basis. One of these civilizations is a matriarchy, and I swear the author made this book to be extremely detailed and he wrote it in a way that just seemed so believable. Women referred all men as ‘boys,’ they would stunt a man’s growth to prevent them from becoming taller than the women. They would call men brutes while also stealing things from other people. The Hexers as they’re called even ended up starting an entire war on a MASSIVE scale. Not only killing soldiers but also turning on a special device that made people EXTREMELY violent. Just imagine entire planets filled to the brim full of people. Now imagine they all start killing each other. Now imagine calling yourself the good guy after that. That you were in the right because men are the oppressors. I don’t know… Sure the book is fiction but there’s so much about that that makes me think the author has seen some sh!t and personally from my own experience… I can definitely see all that happening. Women are scary once they find out they have an ounce of power.
its the fact that they dont understand the RESPONSIBILITY of "power" that is scary, they would wield it in a harmful fashion because they dont innately understand it.
Which is why, even in relationships, you don't give women power over you. And the minute a man gives a woman power over him in the relationship, she will lose faith and walk away, even cheat on him before she monkeybranches to the next man.
Very interesting that she says feminists must protect feelings at all costs. Malcom Collins (eg in his interview with Chris Williamson) theorises that the core ideology of “woke” is that it seeks to remove in the moment emotional pain. Things like critical race theory are a derivative of this. Check him out if you are interested
Recommendations: 1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie *2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination* 3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS *4) 8. Materialism vs. Idealism: How Social Change Happens | What is Politics?* *5) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong* 6) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism 7) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book)
@@Divide_et_lmpera Don't worry, it's pretty balanced. Maybe SomeMoreNews is not so much, but I put it their video because it's good. Just see the one in bold letter to maximum serious research and the last one of Caroline Criado-Pérez.
@@davidlahozgil I checkde out number 7.1 and didnt even bother, sounds like some more women victim narrative (THE POOR LITTLE ANGELS, THEY NEED MORE POWER GIVEN TO THEM! POOWERR!!!!!1 POWERRR!!!)
Your synopsis of these modern social dilemmas was very refreshing, being so thoughtfully sourced and explained. Definitely gonna check out your other work :)
The only few "matriarchies" i've ever heard of, where women are effectively the kings and priests, the men still held the rolls for military. Meaning at any time they could wrestle power from the women. Thus the women only had power because the men were willing to defer it to them. They had the power of enforcing rules within society by force. So in theory those Matriarchies were still lead by men, or at least enforced.
True. So the conclusion is: Matriarchy doesn’t mean Patriarchy but with women in charge, but rather something like anarchy, I.e. no hierarchies, no armies, no power structures etc
@@mathematikgeschichteundmeh8335 It would probably look a lot like that for when you get a gaggle of women together they don't want any other woman to be above them in power and so want everything to become a group vote. Usually where you have to have 100% agreement. This of course leading to nothing getting done.
In the modern era, with all the female lieutenants, colonels, and generals out there, I guess the problem you cited could be easily solved in a modern matriarchal dictatorship. Also, there's lots of experienced female soldiers and female police officers to draw from so the military rank and file and much of the police force could also be %99 female too. The rest of us guys can work at Amazon or in construction or do Uber/Lyft to remain productive and not try and overthrow the matriarchy.
Nature is nature. If one tries to change it, being part of it, there will be a corresponding change somewhere else, and nothing would change in total. It is what it is
@@erinbyrd5377 You did a great job. It is heart warming to find a woman that is intelligent, compassionate, feminine ,more logical than most women and has great control over her emotions
The issue is benevolence versus malevolence, which applies to both male and female psyche archetypes. We hear all about "toxic masculinity" which is the negative side of masculinity, but no acknowledgement of positive masculinity (which is sorely missing in our society in general) and nothing about "toxic femininity", which is the tendency of evil women to be lying, manipulative, gas-lighting persons. Both gender polarities can be toxic or nurturing. What we need to be striving towards is benevolence in both polarities and balanced roles, while still recognizing (and nurturing) the differences between the two polarities - the strengths and differences between each.
I appreciate this video a lot. I stopped dating 5 years ago because it seemed all the women I interacted with were just trying to use me in one way or another. It made me value emotional connection over physical ones and see sexuality as an enslavement mechanism rather than something that should be a bonding mechanism. I may never date again but this video gives me hope that perhaps society can recover from what's happening now and maybe we can find a better balance than exists now.
What a wonderful video! Thank you for saying this. I was born in a Soviet country and now blessed to be a naturalized US citizen. Those that defend communism don't know the realities of it or have never left the boundaries of the US to see the rest of the world. In one very old Soviet film that was meant to be a love story - when you get to the very end - the woman declines the man's proposal for family and children so that she can go to the city and "build utopia communism." She even shames the man for thinking about his own happiness and future without sacrificing it all to become a worker drone for "global communism" that all propaganda of that day claimed they were building. Shockingly the US has been experiencing a similar social engineering - albeit the approach to trick women is different. It appeals to their neuroticism, fear, pride, ego and narcissism but with the same end goal - societal reset. It convinces women that they have greater freedom and life satisfaction from not having a family but by becoming worker drones for the "state" - as the "state" grows bigger and restricts more natural human freedoms. Thank you for all the hard work you put in to create this very informative video!
Thanks for this historical perspective and warnings. Someone said those that don't learn from history, repeat it. It seems to me western society has been heading at full speed towards similar outcomes for the last 50 years.
Every time I've seen only women working together, whether it's my time working in a department store that was 99% women, during group project work, or on TV with the apprentice and survival shows, it always falls apart almost right from the start. The fundamental problem seems to be a desire to avoid leadership, with the responsibilities of telling others what to do and risks that comes from the role, when some of those people being led inevitably get frustrated and talk bad about the leader or organise opposition to take them down. By pretending everyone is equal and there is no threat of punishment, nobody does the hard nasty work by choice. Taking offense is used as a weapon of offense and defence, which can spiral into huge drama sessions where every action and reaction are documented and regurgitated as reasoning for someone being a "bad" person. The desire to be the "good" woman to win in the eyes of the majority means never allying themselves with those who risk being called "bad" people, whilst men are far likelier to risk slander and defamation if it means standing by their principles. The loudest voices seem to intimidate other women into following them as they refuse to confront hostile forces, rather preferring to hide safely in the majority, instead of standing up for the proven smart successful voices. Eventually the disfunction becomes so bad, the silent majority either walks away for the group to collapse, or latches onto the few men or masculine women they have for guidance.
@@Fredericko-k7pPossible Counterbalances: * Strong Leadership: * Clear Roles and Expectations: Establishing clear roles, responsibilities, and expectations from the outset can help prevent power vacuums and conflicts. * Accountability: Implementing systems of accountability can ensure that everyone contributes fairly and takes ownership of their work. * Conflict Resolution: Providing training in effective conflict resolution can help teams navigate disagreements productively. * Open Communication: * Psychological Safety: Creating a psychologically safe environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their opinions and concerns is crucial. * Active Listening: Encouraging active listening and empathetic communication can prevent misunderstandings and build trust. * Feedback Mechanisms: Establishing regular feedback channels can help address issues proactively. * Diversity and Inclusion: * Diverse Perspectives: Encouraging diversity in terms of gender, background, and experience can bring different viewpoints to the table, leading to more robust decision-making. * Inclusive Practices: Implementing inclusive practices can ensure that everyone feels valued and respected. * Skill Development: * Leadership Training: Providing leadership training to all team members can empower individuals to take on leadership roles when needed. * Assertiveness Training: Helping team members develop assertiveness skills can enable them to express their needs and opinions effectively. * Structural Changes: * Mentorship Programs: Implementing mentorship programs can provide support and guidance to emerging leaders. * Reward Systems: Rewarding collaboration and teamwork over individual achievements can foster a more cooperative environment. It's important to note that these are general suggestions and may not be applicable to all situations. The effectiveness of these strategies depends on the specific context, group dynamics, and individual personalities involved.
Speakng from experience, I have seen how the family unit has fallen apart since the 1970s. My biological parents have put me through 4 marriages, which involve other people who do not have the children's best interests as a priority. My brother & I have been subjected to neglect, physical violence, educational instability, financial instability and severe alcohol addiction at the hand of our parents. My brother committed suicide (age 34) because of the experiences that we endured. Had our parents stayed together, it is highly unlikely that we would have had to endure the highly stressful situations that were put upon us. My mother committed adultery within the 1st 3 years of my life, which inevitably led to the break up our biological family unit.
So many women say "men need to teach men how to treat women." But they don't let their children have a male role model
Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
Facts
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care.
lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman.
the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts.
Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society.
Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
A lot of men in the West are missing that male role model. They simply stand less of a chance in this world.
You mean a non henpecked father. Makes little difference if a "man" is around if the other doesn't "let" him teach what he thinks or know to be male to his kids.
This is one main reason they love"male role models" instead of fathers, bc women can tell teh "ale role model" what they want and don't want and since he is not the father he HAS TO obey. So from male tears to step fathers, to trainers, tehy prefer them since women can easily stop anything they don't like since teh man has no rights.
Matriarchies put women into positions of power but not so much into positions of responsibility.
🙌 🏅
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
That is not Matriarchy - that is Gynocentrism!
An exception to this is the Philippines. It is very matriarchal (at the familial level), but first-born daughters bear most of the responsibility.
Name a female president
Whereas a tyrannical father says “Do it, your feelings be damned” a tyrannical mother requires you to like it as well” (edited)
@@kc6810 You dont need to live here. You can leave anytime.
@@kc6810 Women could change if they wanted to. And we should want to; what women, as a group, are doing is destroying everything.
@@kc6810because there are not only tyrannical parents in this world.
@@kc6810well, if you consider yourself to be a tyrannical mother to be - then don't, your unborn children would thank you for that mercy.
@@GlasbanGorm Don't say things like that.
My niece referred to her father as a "sperm donor," which her mother found amusing. Unsurprisingly, neither one has been able to form a lasting relationship with a man.
@@ach2lieber That's sad
Does she refer to her mother as "incubator" then? Equality and so on :)
Femcels are real.
Brainrot most likely taught by or allowed by mom
@@dissect123Great point.
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." - George Orwell.
Not true in this day and age, those rough men would rather do business with those that seek to do "us" harm...
Men are also the ones doing the harm though lol
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence?
I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection.
If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU.
This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history.
On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully.
Let me ask you, what ended up happening?
We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
Wow, you're totally right
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but TH-cam is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
Guess I need to do more research. Good job 👍
Love it
Stupid claims by stupid people being corrected
I would very much like you to give us that list for science.
I want the list too. I'm in education. This list can impact greatly.
Victoria was also not nice, Elisabeth 1, also not. And the "queen if seven heavens" (Maya) also...
As a 75 year old woman, I was often looked down upon for my CHOICE to have children AND raise them myself. No day care . I have watched the sad results of the far left feminists over my 54 years of marriage. I’m strong. Marriage isn’t easy and raising 6 great kids WAS work but all the efforts were worth it. Wake up women!
Let the feminist build their matriarchy while we are chilling in the woods with the bears.
Cool. I’m going to Thailand a bang pros
They make great gym bros
th-cam.com/video/GBY2xsu2Juk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Pi5Hb76QJRke-3Dn
@@hansgullickson4080lady boys
They’ll get other men to hunt you and put you to work.
Bearmaxxing 🐻 😎
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
Sadly the men of today cannot say NO to a woman.
Indeed, I see signs that men are starting to wake up.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
MGTOW is on it
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies.
I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
An average woman's caloric intake is 3600??? Yeah they DO need to cut that down to 890...
A world without men: Lights out, water off, sewer backing up. Chaos. Watch any apocalypse movie.
And empty store shelves because there aren't enough women trained to drive trucks and trains, or fix them. Most would be dead in less than a year.
👍
i start to imagine that
A world? More like a week.
Just watch beR grylls survival island the women practically started starving and would most likly died without the mens help
It’s so refreshing to hear a very intelligent woman talk about an arguably difficult subject for most women to discuss.
Where did you see an intelligent woman?
@@markherbert1978 LMAO... you sound like a Cuck... bet you're still a virgin...
@@markherbert1978 Definitely not your mom, because the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
@@Insomnolant1335Jesus man don't kill him
@@iantsai6082Nah let him cook
The great american 20th century philosopher Al Bundy got it right : "Don't try to understand women, women understand women and they hate each other."
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
Wtf are you talking about that guy ain’t no philosopher he sounds more like a serial killer.
You forgot to mention his 4 touchdowns in a single game for Polk High
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
Its like in that old joke:
Heaven is when germans are engineers and italians are cops
Hell is when germans are cops and italians are engineers
Never heard that before, any references by chance?
@@brainkill7034 Its an old joke that have multiple versions. Just google heaven is when germans are engineers joke
Gold
How is this relevant to the topic being discussed?
@@vanbeet5105 Relevant in the sense that a system works great in one way, but if the roles reverse, it would be horrible.
I think matriarchies fail for the same reason Bumble got rid of their "only women can message first" mechanic.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it.
If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
wait why did they get rid of it?
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
Women ruin things.
matriarchies fail because men use force to get what they want - there's no negotiating, hense wars, r*pes and murder.
I did my family tree in the 1990s. I read genealogy articles by women and I collaborated with women. Some ladies felt that farm wives of the 1800s and earlier were forced to have children. What I noticed was that families with many children were far more prosperous than childless couples or small families. Children had farm chores to do which enriched the family. A family of 12 had an easier and more prosperous lifestyle than a childless couples. Daughters helped the mother manually clean the house while sons helped the father manually farm the land. I think that women wanted the softer and more productive life the big family gave the entire family and wanted to have the children to produce a large family. A man could barely earn a living on a farm without a wife. He could not maintain a home and work a field manually. Wives were in high demand. Almost everyone married. The children benefited by learning to farm and live off the land. I think that farm families of that era had good lives.
There is no greater hell than people blaming each other for everything and nothing getting done.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours.
Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
Women...☕
So said Adam and Eve
Oh! Oh! That's what my mother and grandmother did for decades!
We are blaming the evil and trying to fix the crack head of the simps like who liked your comment.😅😅
"Kids don't need a bigger house they need values instilled in them" those words will stick with me.
Ironically, this is almost the same goal for communism. The values may differ.
Brave woman. My hat is off to you for not drinking the kool-aid and for being unafraid to speak the truth, even at personal cost.
💯
Patriarchies also fail. Look at the mess the world is in, with the most male dominant countries being the most awful to live in. We should have men and women leading together, not matriarchies or patriarchies. There's a reason children have a father and mother - men and women's differences are meant to compliment each other. This woman sounds like a serious "pick me".
What personal cost?
@@lordkekz4 Being ostracized and alienated from other women. When you go along with the woke, feminist, liberal agenda your "loved" and celebrated but when you break from the herd by using reason and commonse, you're quickly cancelled. (edited for spelling)
You're drinking the kool aid
"even at personal cost." she made tons of money doing this video
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male.
Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired.
Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business.
EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
@@jackspring7709 True. They have enough pattern recognition to understand bad thing is bad, but not enough cognitive ability to work out why.
@@Nevir202 True. Its an extraordinary example of cognitive dissonance.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
@@McGriddy51095 Yep, crabbing is a nightmare!
Because men and women are not the same. It's almost like we were designed for different roles. Shocker
IKR mine mind blown.
We are far more similar than we are different.
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
This sketch sums it up perfectly: th-cam.com/video/-rC-nDkae5k/w-d-xo.html
@@mrastronaut9078propaganda. we dont have anything in common with them
I have the highest degree of respect for people like you Erin, who read and open their minds to new perspectives. Thank you for sharing your brave perspective on feminism, Erin! Sending you my good wishes and love!
Nobody abuses power more than someone whose never had it.
And people are going to actually vote for Kamala Harris…….ha ha ha ha we may have a chance at. A matriarchal government soon.
@@rodterrell304 may as well start playing the violins now
@@rodterrell304I’m never voting for Kamala Harris. She’s a wicked and cruel person.
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
What? Those same women are the reason the world is the way it is right now.
@@chadcadsonvii5258 They were women who were young in the 40's .They were real women who loved being women . Not feminists.
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that.
There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
@@aaronadamson7463 humility is a sign of good character, also of self awareness and situation/reality awareness imo
forgot to mention that historically female monarchs are more likely to wage wars than their male counterparts. The reason for that is that during most of human history kings and emperors were expected to lead their armies directly in the battlefield putting their own lives at risk, something queens didn't had to do because women were not allowed on the battlefield.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did.
As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
"an historian" is how we know you are an historian.
Why do you hate women?
@@jeravincer Why do you murder puppies?
An exception you just made up means nothing.
Women don't understand "with great power comes great responsibility"
Women avoid accountability like the plague.
Neither do men, it seems. Think of atom bombs, poisons used on food, pollution of the planet. Yep. Men have royally fd everything up.
@@allynflinchbaugh4570 The fastest animal on Earth is a woman running from accountability.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first.
This is a role model.
Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero.
This is sad.
Everytime a woman chooses a tall, strong broad shoulder man, she s clearly saying "I want security and leadership from someone else but me"
or maybe thise characteristics in a man produve heakthier offspring?
@@debrawehrly6900 both id say. need healthy kids and the security and strength to protect them.
@@debrawehrly6900 best chances at healthy and surviving offspring will be found in diversification of genetic outcomes.
@@debrawehrly6900 Yes your right. It is a woman's hypergamous nature on full display. But the thing is those tall men make up a small fraction of the population with more than 80% of women fighting for those men. The thing is women shouldn't be concern with a man's height anymore. We live in a safer society where many men have never been punched in the mouth, and jobs for men in high salary jobs use a keyboard and his build isn't important towards productivity.
@@KuroKumo96You’re saying the same thing but with different words.
You can't run away fast enough from someone who uses terms like "my truth", "manifest", "partner." 🏃♂️➡️
hit the like button
w8, what's wrong with "partner"?
@@vesuvius1318because it's wife or husband. Partner completely demeans the relationship.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol
Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer.
Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 So you think hiring only craftsmen who are qualified is a "bias"?
So you imply that women cannot be qualified?
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't"
If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point.
So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point).
Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are).
Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at?
Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
My main argument is I'd like to see a society where men are in charge of kids for once. I'm a single dad and I love it. Pouring myself into my kid is far more fulfilling than the corporate tech job I hold.
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
@@danieldosso2455 Wow, you are absolutely correct
Schopenhauer said that all limitations make people happy.
You want women to stay in houses?
I don't think my marriage is fun.. more like work
@@bjung8858 It requires sacrifices, but that's what makes it so fulfilling.
"Everything's fine today, that is our illusion” - Voltaire
th-cam.com/video/h-U6g89YBRA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=t7OYUuxupEMbQxyq
Voltaire also said he would destroy the christian faith. He was a Jesuit. If you read the Jesuit oath you will know they are evil.
@@ianmonk6211Jesuit def aren’t evil lol. Conspiracy brain. But Voltaire was ass and not a Christian
@@ianmonk6211 and? i have had enough damage to my family caused by christianity why not cause some damage back
@@thecoolestofthe834s2 that would be the false Christianity the bible predicts will arise
3:51 thank you so much for talking about this. I only recently noticed how common this rewriting of history has become. People really think half of humanity was slave status until 100 years ago
Never met a happy feminist but have met happy housewives.
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity.
The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
Same with men who sleeps around think they are alpha, they see nothing but a used up needles
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. .
most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward.
.....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly
vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium.
Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
No one actually believes the phrase "Sex work is work". This example. A man who is an electrician tells his landlord he cant make rent this month. The landlord tells him to pay what ever he can and tells the man if you do some electrical work at another one of my properties Ill waive the rest of the rent this month. This is an acceptable deal. No one would have a problem with that. Now same example but with a woman making OF. She tells the landlord she won't make rent this month. The landlord says if you have s*x with me Ill waive the remainder of the rent this month. Feminists would lose their minds over the 2nd situation. This would be condemned as exploitative. How could it be if "Sex work is work"? Both traded work for shelter.
It is hypocrisy that is all the world is riff with it. Much like many will support gender rights or gender equality but at the same time say gender is just a social construct not meaning man or women and I have no idea how many genders they are claiming exist now but when they mention gender rights or gender equality they mean woman's rights these people speak out both sides of their mouth with forked tongues.
If sex work is work, then it's not cheating if I pay for it
@@TheGreatMaster-dr6yx Right. My wife doesn't call it cheating when she pays someone to clean the eavestroughs instead of expecting me to do it for free.
I will re-use this argument.
@@davidlacosteLmfao.
Good luck brother.
👍😎
Subbed. Profoundly brave. Keep making awesome, thought provoking content!
One of my jobs over the years was a hard labor job before I developed moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. No women ever worked back there in the plant even though they could apply and very likely be hired because the place had such a high turnover rate due to the jobs back there being so grueling, even a lot of men couldn't cut it. Women worked up front in the air-conditioned office, of course. So much for equality.
Saw it happen a handful of times at a construction job myself. They come in with the tough broad mentality, then get confronted with reality before long, and either quit or get put on easier work. There's always the rare exception but men are a lot more likely to be able to tolerate hard labor in general. It's almost as if people have fallen into these gender roles in the majority of societies because it works.
Bro, try the carnivore diet fr. Using ground meat its affordable and can do wonders for autoimmune conditions..
If the carnivore diet is too hardcore at first, keto can helb too (because of anti inflammatory effects..)
Greetings from switzerland!
@@darthmais1375 thanks for the info, I'll check it out. Arthritis is a bad deal.
Even when women work in manual labour they arent doing the same thing
It is said that modern fem - lnlsm is only possible under air conditioned facilities 😅
1 Refuse to Take Responsibility for their Choices
2 Refuse to Be Held Accountable for their Actions
3 Gaslight Gaslight Gaslight while BLAMING anyone and everyone else around them
4 Throw someone else under the bus for their mistakes
5 NOT Learn from their Mistakes, instead insisting that they do it again
The problem is that blaming does not lead to find root causes for problems to address causes and prevent problems.
Mental games do not lead to mental health.
Real world does not care about beliefs or feelings. Making decisions while having feelings usually leads to bad decisions.
Yes this is true
u just described kathleen kennedy to a T!
back in the day they were groomed to be feminine and lean into their nursing nature.
now they're groomed to be paranoid feminist and told to be as ruthless as men. the problem is men will get checked if they crossed the line but women don't you can see it in fights between a man and a woman usually the man will try to push or restrain her but the women will hit him as hard as she can.
Become "narcissists" full pattern... I (we) live in a narcissistic run world ...
I learned a lot from this talk. It was well organized, well and appropriately referenced, and well presented. I subscribed and plan to watch other of her videos. One comment. If the US continues on its present path it won't survive much longer but will be replaced by something else. Change won't come from within given the present corruption of Government, media, and academe. The present collectivist cancel culture suppresses the dialogs needed to resolve conflicts and feedback needed to correct dysfunctional policies.
The result is societal decay. That is the Thermodynamics. The Kinetics, which predicts the time frame of the decay, depends on the model used and is difficult to impossible to predict.
@@jobardu I very much agree
I love my daughter but I have never seen her happier than when she became a mother.
yes
You should also address the elephant in the room: Women in general, are psychologically speaking, Adult Children.
@@kc6810 Women never spoke way about men until the 1990s when Hollywood & the Marxist-controlled Media pumped out hundreds of shows/movies of Fathers being bumbling dopes and Wives/Mothers as "Superwomen".
There is no way before then that women spoke that way of men, men who literally built civilization around the world.
@@kc6810used to?
@kc6810 clearly you've never seen them react to accountability. The men who do it today? Raised by single moms.
@@kc6810 , with all those advantages came accountability. Women, on the other hand, refuse it.
@@kc6810 used to? they still today , in fact it's far worse. As the ego's and superiority complex of modern women get worse do to their feminist indoctrination and how relationships are carried out on TV. or the movies plus Disney, you can expect more nasty things to happen. I doubt women even said anything along the lines of men being children, if they did they kept it to themselves back in the day , at least post WW2
Keep i mind those privileges less women who had no advantage had the power over a government ruled by men to pass prohibition. Outlawing alcohol and making many peoples lives difficult ( most likely they wanted to keep their men at home so they can dominate them without other men around them to tell them what their wives were actually doing) and they created organized crime like the mafia that reeked hell on others up to modern times. Good job ladies! and the real kicker is they didn't have the vote back then.
Give this woman an upvote guys 👍 she needs to be seen by more people!
Great essay! Only recommendation I would make is the application/use of visual aids, especially during the section when discussing the numerical skews between labor distribution. Other than that, excellent!
@@Psychratic_JMB I appreciate the feedback 😊
Look at bear grylls survival island. How did the woman team progress?
Not so well
They had to be given food to survive, if memory serves.
The women were willing to whore themselves out near the end.
While the men built a camp in half of a week.
@@docbohemian1328they were given pigs and none of them had the balls to do what was necessary to survive. They couldn't seperate themselves from their feelings and "nurturing" nature. Those pigs ate better than all the women did.
@@thetjdman lol they started nurturing the pigs? That's your food! haha
A large spoonful of War & a pinch of Poverty is all it takes to take down a Matriarchy.
The Utopia will turn into a terrifying Dystopia pretty quickly.
Matriarchies fail because women believe that a hug can fix everything.
They also will require everyone to pee sitting down.
bears are good at hugging
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.*
Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ...
In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that.
Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
This is why in ancient times a common curse was 'May you be ruled by your women'.
word
if all the town/city's men were killed in a war or battle and left with no leaders and aimless?
🤣🤣🤣u men are delusional y’all are not leaders providers or protectors
curse for men
Ms. Byrd, you are a lady and a scholar. I've discovered in your channel a voice of reason, grace, and hope. Thank you.
Insert that one famous clip from the TV show Survivor, where the group of men are quickly able to gather food, build a fire and assemble structures to sleep in and protect from the weather. Were as the women just sit around and argue until some of them wander over to the male group.
damn i wanna watch that
@@Silverstreamable You don't. It's infuriating.
The game was rigged in favour of the women yet they still lost
The women couldn’t figure out how to obtain food and they “found” a piglet and instead of eating it, they adopted it and tried to name it. Meanwhile the men were hunting small alligators.
@@abcdefghij337 You're actually talking about a different show than @danieldosso2455 . There have been several man vs women survival shows, all with similar results.
Modern people in power have forgotten that with great power comes great responsibility.
They forgot me
Spiderman really is the best hero.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
Women living amongst women know how acid a matriarcal environment can be.
One thing about the current situation is that with women dominating the schools and so many fatherless homes, many younger college students have never been instructed or directed in a deep male voice with masculine delivery, and they find it threatening. Such students are liable to file unjustified grievances against their profs because it bothers them so much (this was also the opinion of one of my female department heads). Some single mothers bring their children to karate class largely so that their sons and daughters will experience male authority for a couple of hours a week.
Single parent homes really show who really matters.
The crime rate of people who only grew up with a mother is several times higher than that one people who only had a father, which in turn is only marginally higher than those who had both a mother and a father.
Boy Scouts used to partially fulfill that niche until the Chomos and pedos ruined it.
In my childhood i go on taekwondo and my tutor was female what the male authority are you talking about?
Even my sport teacher in school was female until i move to another one
Male authority is killed by women purposely, they could stop it in 80-90s but they didn't now it's too late and we all will pay for this mistake by demographic and civilization collapses by the 2050 for sure
I am overjoyed to see pro-family, pro-love, pro-cooperation content gaining some level of popularity
It's too late tho 🤔
@@robertmarley8852it’s never too late.
@@robertmarley8852
the bad times have to pass before the pendulum swings back to the good
@@robertmarley8852 Better late than never.
@@robertmarley8852 We'll get through this. Endeavor to persevere.
You are a very wise young woman!! Keep up the good work!! Very much needed in today's society!!
Easy to imagine what would happen to society if women had to dig ditches, do all the construction & repair jobs
its crazy how the most highly traded items in earlier centuries were things like silk and perfumes, when women weren't supposed to have any say in things
Well, nobody wants a bitch that dresses in rags and stinks.
The gaslight is literally 5,000 years old
@@theskyizblue2day431 Women have always spent men's money.
but... men wear perfumes and silk also centuries ago. like, today we have cologne. what is yout point lol
@@MistyEyesNow that is just blatantly wrong
My wife and I have a very handsome and eligible son. A few years ago a very attractive girl his age began to pursue him but he was not interested. She finally confronted him and asked him why he was not interested in her. He responded that their world views were not compatible (Matriarchy vs Patriarchy). She asked him to describe his worldview. He quickly shared with her a patriarchal view in which while men were leaders women were respected and motherhood was exalted. When he finished describing his worldview the young and VERY beautiful girl said the following: Even though she disagreed with every word and every concept she had to admit that while he was describing it she experienced a deep feeling of safety, security and contentment. She went away confused why a worldview that she had been taught was so evil could make her feel so safe and content. Erin, I listened to every word. You really did a great job on this. You really articulated wisdom well.
Thanks for sharing that, thumbs up. The roles God/Jesus created for mankind, He knows best for only He is the sole Creator omniscient one....if we actually obeyed Him, this present world would be far far less.......antichrist.
You seem to have a very detailed record of these conversations that you apparently weren't present for. Sounds almost like you made the whole thing up just to make a point.
@@TheSpoovyOR his son told him the story afterwards, y'know.
@@TheSpoovy Very detailed record? It was one sentence man... what on earth are you talking about?
Yeah that totally happened
Men organize people into societies. All large organizations are structured using masculine principles such as rigid hierarchies.
Feminine organizations, like book clubs, don’t scale. No large organization can work if organized as desired by feminine principles.
@@theevermind The sacred masculine is in large things, the sacred feminine is found in small things
@@erinbyrd5377This is a beautiful phrase.
These conversations always seem to devolve into woman-bashing. People gotta remember that women are miracle workers at the proper scale. The endgame is species survival and women are totally required
large corporations create great inequalities for many reasons - corrupts politicians with oligopoly, transfer funds from poor to reach, etc... so your logic is BS
Very eloquent and poignant. I appreciate you doing the reading/research and presenting the topic in a very matter-of-fact type of way, unbiased and unburdened by political leanings.
10/10 video. Subscribed.
P.S. : This is only the tip of the iceberg. There are so many underlying patterns that keep repeating themselves that are slowly eroding at progress and society as a whole. Never stop questioning the status-quo, but make an effort to understand just why it exists in the first place. That is the key to improvement.
I can’t actually see how a matriarchy could function for any length of time, particularly if a select few genetically prime studs were kept for mating purposes (a logical outcome where women are in charge) while the other 99% of the male population are used as worker drones. Without the possibility of sexual reproduction, those worker drones would either lose the incentive to continue to work and/or rise up and overthrow the system to improve their reproductive chances. And that’s a battle that’s only going to go one way.
Female power by its very nature has always been soft power and that’s when it’s at its most effective when it’s used as persuasion to direct and influence masculine hard power. If this balance becomes too out of kilter and that feminine power accrues too much power to itself then it starts to become a form of hard power and will then meet resistance against the existing masculine hard power. I suspect that is when things start to get ugly.
This isn’t to say that an overly rigid, tyrannical, hierarchical patriarchy is good for society either - those tend to turn into despotic autocracies that make their populations miserable and usually destitute. Humanity as a whole, is much better off when we can all contribute our own individual strengths. In the end, the most optimal outcome for everyone is a system that’s in balance.
That's why feminism needs the patriarchy to survive.
"Humanity as a whole, is much better off when we can all contribute our own individual strengths.". I agree, meritocracies benefit society as a whole, and are an branch of patriarchy. "DEI", a branch of matriarchy as far as I can tell, is based off of feelings for who should hold any given position, not who is right for the job. Anyone being honest with themselves could tell you that merit is not only appropriate, but will lead to the best outcomes.
When someone says "there is no objective truth" you know to not listen to whatever bs they spew.
It's just a different way of saying "my emotions are more important than facts"
Wait till you hear about metaphysics/ontology
There literally is no objective truth, “only interpretations”
Interpretations of what? Genius
@@jaysontadlock1871 It’s part of a quote from Friedrich Nietzsche, about how the real truth can’t be uncovered, no matter how much we try. We are not all knowing creatures, and we are imperfect. We can certainly try to pursue the truth as best we can, but because we can’t physically know what others truly think and what precisely happened during an event, those are interpretations of the truth, rather than the absolute truth. Try to keep an open mind to learn instead of insulting others.
"I think, therefore I am."
JD Unwin studied 86 societies going back 5,000 yrs, and every time women achieve equality the society ends - no exceptions!!
Thank you I started reading his works and I can see them coming true all around me.
I read JD Unwin's book also among others. Women are essentially emotionally unstable, narcissistic, permanent children by nature. In human history, every society where women gain critical control self-destructs shortly afterward. Every society of any size or location, every time, no exceptions. Women are fundamentally incapable of developing or sustaining a society. However, women will almost immediately destroy a society if allowed.
Men instinctively form hierarchies which are the cornerstone of society.
Erin, they'll throw you out of college for this kind of blasphemy. Of course, that probably means that you are correct and that is something that has to be suppressed and destroyed.
Truth and facts are anathema to the narrative and must be eliminated. I consider you heroic for espousing facts and standing up to the power of "feminism".
Matriarchy would fail in a different way than patriarchy. The extremes of power is not the answer. Just like our bodies, nature, and relationships, true success is found in the balance of the extremes.
This was a courageous post. It caught my eye because of an essay I once wrote for a history Western Civilization in college. In the 80s
It only covered “ancient” civilizations, but we were taught many of them were matriarchal in nature, and left behind amazing art and literature and so on, but just “disappeared”. I wondered what happened to them so went to the library and did some research- as it turned out, they didn’t really disappear- they were overrun by patriarchal civilizations by war.
Interestingly enough, the conquering civilizations over several generations became more matriarchal over time, and the cycle repeated
@@southpaw7426 Wow, you're right. It is a cycle
It was not matriarchal civilizations that were conquering, lol, they were arising side by side as a warning to the patriarchal decadence that eventually led to conquer and dissolution, this is a realm of duality. Anytime a matriarchal society arises, it is as an option to save themselves from the patriarchy running amok. You dont know history. At the beginning of civilization this whole world was matriarchal, which means not run by women of course, becayse matriarchy does not mean it is run by women, it means it is based on the fraternity and its inter-connected system connected to nature. This is why everything what this lady has shared in this video is false from the start.
As a Greek person, let me educate you. Μητέρα is the word for mother. Αρχή is power/authority. So peddle your literal falsehoods elsewhere.
@@Shalanayabunch of claims with absolutely no evidence, but feelings ig
@@danielchettiar5670 Evidence is there if you bothered to research. What there is no evidence for is the ludicrous insanity that matriarchy were conquering other cultures, lol, that is literally in the principles of patriarchy, colonization. This lady is a master in brainwashing gullible people who have no knowledge of historical evidences.
Things I need men for:
1. Dealing with sewage and garbage
2. Extracting minerals, ores, and fossil fuels
3. Slaughtering livestock and cooking food
4. ASSISTING me with lifting the occasional heavy object (notice I said assist, not do)
5. Some pretty ones for eye candy
6. Regular (but not daily) D and some oxytocin cuddles
6. Gay men to hang out and go dancing with
Things I DO NOT need men for:
1. Catching and saddling my horse
2. Math
3. English
4. Driving instructions
5. Directions to locations
The rest of it can really go either way. I say this as a fairly centrist, monogamous, middle-aged, childless, woman in a STEM field. I wanted kids but I let fear keep me from having them. Fear I couldn’t meet their needs.
These heavily biased statistics assume that women are incapable of figuring complicated systems out. This is not true. Humans tend to problem solve.
We can learn to share and not subjugate each other. Oh wait, we’re all greedy humans, we are incapable of enacting such a system.
I wish the f-big algorithm would stop trying to radicalize me. Things were better when nothing was aimed at pulling me to either side.
It seems to be very hard for women to form long lasting functional hierarchies. Men automatically self sort most of the time(usually based on a variety of factors like perceived competence and strength)into hierarchies of leadership. Males who don't submit to this are punished, usually physically (though if that isn't an option they can be dealt with in other ways). I don't see this sort of sorting in women. They seem to prefer fake friendships with everyone until they come into conflict at which point they fight each other through social shaming/turning methods.
These sorting methods are usually subconscious, but seem to be at the base of many cross culture differences between men and women.
One very important category missing from why women need men:
1. Protection
A> Females may not be able to call police or police may not arrive in time.
B> Dogs can provide great protection, but there's few places which allow you to take guard dogs with you to every building and location.
C> A good strong man when traveling or attending events will scare away potential threats... even when walking thru a parking lot late at night.
D> A good strong man will bravely fight three men with knives so his woman can runaway and escape.
E> Yes she can hire a rotating group of men for 24x7 protection, yet she will be spending quarter of a million each year for such protection.
Female CEO Pava LaPere... spent the last moments of her life realizing she had no man to protect her.
It truly does require two to tango. Especially in a household, it's a *requirement* for the Mom and the Dad to both be present and giving their all every day, or otherwise it no longer stays a household and instead becomes a work camp.
Fatherlessness leads to being undisciplined and motherlessness leads to emotionless children
What an excellent presentation. Thanks for this perspective. Hopefully we find balance and empowerment for everyone thru videos like this.
for a quick answer to the why, just look at how women deal with conflict and how they are compare to men more emotional when it comes to make decisions.
Thanks for this eye-opening video. I'm a black man who is very concerned about the future of our country. I'm glad to see more women calling out the hypocrisy of feminism/the Matriarchy. This push to create a matriarchy was created by antiwhite oligarchs who seek to destroy Western civilization. Feminism, which is a subset of antiwhiteism, has white erased the norms and rules which make up Western Civilization. As you said, matriarchies cannot work without the participation of both men and women. In order to restore civility to Western civilization, the victimization of whites (Westernkind) must stop. A couple of books that you should check to further understand what I'm referring to is Go Free and Born Guilty. The author, Jason Kuhne goes into great detail explaining the current state of Western Civilization and how to reclaim it from further decline due to antiwhiteism.
Thank you sir, I've only seen a few dozen black men calling out antiwhiteism but it feels good to know we can recognize unfair treatment even when it's not occurring to us directly, we shouldn't artificially put down ANYONE, we need to forge the future the 20th century wanted which is color blind not color coded
No one is trying to establish a matriarchy, like you said a matriarchy would need the participation of both men and women, so does every other system. What is being sought is a more equal and just society where anyone can pursue their goals without societal hurdles like gender, race, religion etc.
There is no antiwhiteism in an equal and just society
@@davianoinglesias5030 then pie society is not equal and just
By every metric everything you said is false
Nobody is striving for equality, they are striving for equity which is inherently unequal
They are socially engineering a new culture where everything is flipped simply because we can, and white men are on the bottom of the social ladder
They admit and cheer on such a fate so don't even lie to me with your cope and 2013 reddit tier naivety
I can't really find anyone who truly behaves in a way that will bring about a truly free and color blinded equal future
@@davianoinglesias5030 It's all about white erasure. The society, which was created by Westernkind(the white race) creates a set of mores and values which make up Western Civilization. Those mores and values are being white erased by antiwhiteism. A more equal and just society is nothing more than another version of DEI. And DEI is antiwhiteism in its purest form.
@@davianoinglesias5030 An equal and just society is exactly what antiwhiteism represents. You're talking about a more equal and just society and that reminds me of DEI. Look where our society is right now because of DEI. We have people who are NOT qualified to do certain jobs, but because of DEI initiatives, white males are overlooked and not being hired in this antiwhite society. The trans agenda is being pushed so that men can compete in women's sports. In the end, the only way to restore our society to its former glory is to make antiwhiteism a thing of the past.
“Women only have rights because men have allowed it”
Can’t remember who said it but it’s stuck with me ever since. Same with
“If the government can take away your rights, they weren’t rights”
One woman absolutely tanked Bud Light so bad.
3 women made a complete joke of the Secret Service, probably the most respected, feared, well-funded and actually badass Agency [Cheetos Cheatle (USSD), that woman who cowered behind Trump on the stage, couldn't holster her gun, and the one who fiddled and put her sunglasses on lmao].
One biological man pretending to be a woman tanked bud light.
That was a guy that tanked Bud Light
the woman who did actually did her job and tried to cover Trump wasn't even actually tall enough to do it. how about hiriing someone with the same height to begin with lol.
@@anthonyhulse1248I was about to point this out when I saw your response. 👍🏻
@@canobenitezI take it you're NOT referring to the one ducking behind him?
We like to imagine we are living like bonobos. In reality, we are living like chimps.
Anyone who has anything negative to say about this video is actually saying more about themselves.
We don't live in a patriarchy, we live in an egalitarian society. 150 years ago, you'd have an argument, but it's not 150 years ago.
For whatever reasons, majority of women refuse to take responsibility for their actions. To succeed in anything in life, you must be willing to sacrifice and take responsibility for making hard decisions
what makes you think that they don't?
@@debrawehrly6900 it’s not that I think they don’t. I know based on my observations in real time. And the women who do, they still struggle with it.
@@debrawehrly6900
I think it's for 3 reasons:
1. Taking responsibility for your actions requires work to improve yourself
2. It means you're fallible and not perfect
And 3. They think that if they were to admit they were wrong about something, they'll be treated the way women treat men when men are wrong, (i.e. that they'll be excessively bullied).
@@debrawehrly6900 , what makes you think that they do? That would be a site rarer than unicorn itself.
@@Harbringer12 I think it's just the path of least resistance for women. Society doesn't hold them to account, so neither do they themselves. They get babied, so they expect to be babied. And part of that being babied constantly is the rejection of any suggestion that they aren't babied, because that might actually require them to look at themselves and do some personal work. There's this on top of women being excessively over reactive about taking offence / reading intent in a persons tone, rather than listening to what they actually said.
Elephant herds are led by wise matriarch and the matriarch does really well for the survival of the herd, passing down wisdom
Men never stopped keeping up their end of the bargain, women nowadays seem to blame even their lack of sacrifice to us men for some reason.
That was interesting food for thought. I take exception with 2 things: 1) Andrew Tate is not a reputable source to quote from. It only leads to people discrediting your argument. And 2) I think your bonobo analogy is flawed. We may be close genetically but we're so different in many other ways. Overall I think I'm convinced of your argument and I strongly agree with your conclusion. Thank you for being brave and making this video!
Our current crumbling society is predicted by “Sex and Culture” (1934) by JD Unwin. It also directly mirrors the examples of the Bonobos you cite and the Mouse Utopia.
“In all of human history there is not a single of a society raising its level of culture/civilization unless it has been strictly sexually monogamous. Nor is there an example of a society retaining its culture after it has relaxed its sexual restrictions.”
Basically, we are proving his latter point.
Mouse Utopia problem was solved by giving the mice entertainment.
@@R3GARnatorCalhoun did not include entertainment for the rats in his experiments. If you're aware of an experimenter who did, please cite them as I would be interested. I studied psychology and did not come across any well known studies that did.
Well.. thank you Erin for stating the facts and just putting it out there overall. It’s certainly easier for another lady to do so. It tends to come across as a bit off-putting when we men attempt to bring up a lot of the very things you’ve mentioned. Women need never to forget the very important role that they play in society, the role of an individual. My mother began her career in banking, eventually becoming head of its loan department, managing 13 other employees within that department. Years later she became VP of a title company, clearing six figures for the 6 yrs she spent at that position. Eventually, her and fellow employee resigned from that company and went into business together, starting their own title company where mom remained President and CEO for 14 yrs, never missing a day. Her and her business partner sold the company several years ago and now she is retired.
Guess who I’d rather have my teenage daughter looking up to as opposed to the flamboyant, loud and aggressive feminist standing in a group in protest and yelling obscenities. What’s most ironic is that my mother’s success never stemmed from being a woman, it wasn’t because of what she was. It was because of what she did. The truth is.. men and women should be able to give each other the respect that they both ver well deserve. Because women can’t do it without men, and men can’t do it without women. We really do need each other.
Good show Erin Byrd…. well done indeed.
I’ve been reading a book called ‘The Mech Touch.’ It’s a good book, super sci-fi orientated, it’s really good if anyone is interested. The book has these examples of future human culture and civilization splitting up on a constant basis. One of these civilizations is a matriarchy, and I swear the author made this book to be extremely detailed and he wrote it in a way that just seemed so believable. Women referred all men as ‘boys,’ they would stunt a man’s growth to prevent them from becoming taller than the women. They would call men brutes while also stealing things from other people. The Hexers as they’re called even ended up starting an entire war on a MASSIVE scale. Not only killing soldiers but also turning on a special device that made people EXTREMELY violent. Just imagine entire planets filled to the brim full of people. Now imagine they all start killing each other. Now imagine calling yourself the good guy after that. That you were in the right because men are the oppressors. I don’t know… Sure the book is fiction but there’s so much about that that makes me think the author has seen some sh!t and personally from my own experience… I can definitely see all that happening. Women are scary once they find out they have an ounce of power.
its the fact that they dont understand the RESPONSIBILITY of "power" that is scary, they would wield it in a harmful fashion because they dont innately understand it.
Which is why, even in relationships, you don't give women power over you. And the minute a man gives a woman power over him in the relationship, she will lose faith and walk away, even cheat on him before she monkeybranches to the next man.
@@RobertMertensPhD yep, its hard-wired in to them to walk away from a man she no longer respects.
All hail Supreme Mother lol
@@nathanielestinopo994 the true feminist 😂
Very interesting that she says feminists must protect feelings at all costs.
Malcom Collins (eg in his interview with Chris Williamson) theorises that the core ideology of “woke” is that it seeks to remove in the moment emotional pain. Things like critical race theory are a derivative of this. Check him out if you are interested
@@bullethead1953 Oh yeah, I know who he is, I like him
Thank you so much for recommending my book, I’m so glad you enjoyed it 🙏🏻
Recommendations:
1) Patriarchy According to The Barbie Movie
*2) Jordan Peterson Doesn't Understand Gender Discrimination*
3) Are Men Okay? - SOME MORE NEWS
*4) 8. Materialism vs. Idealism: How Social Change Happens | What is Politics?*
*5) 7. The Origins of Male Dominance and Hierarchy; what David Graeber and Jordan Peterson get wrong*
6) 7.1 Material Conditions: How to Eliminate Sexism
7) Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado-Pérez (this is a book)
@@davidlahozgil Those all sound like leftist/feminist talking points.
Probably not very balanced list seeking objectivity.
@@Divide_et_lmpera Don't worry, it's pretty balanced. Maybe SomeMoreNews is not so much, but I put it their video because it's good. Just see the one in bold letter to maximum serious research and the last one of Caroline Criado-Pérez.
@@davidlahozgilgross
@@davidlahozgil I checkde out number 7.1 and didnt even bother, sounds like some more women victim narrative (THE POOR LITTLE ANGELS, THEY NEED MORE POWER GIVEN TO THEM! POOWERR!!!!!1 POWERRR!!!)
Your synopsis of these modern social dilemmas was very refreshing, being so thoughtfully sourced and explained. Definitely gonna check out your other work :)
The only few "matriarchies" i've ever heard of, where women are effectively the kings and priests, the men still held the rolls for military. Meaning at any time they could wrestle power from the women. Thus the women only had power because the men were willing to defer it to them. They had the power of enforcing rules within society by force. So in theory those Matriarchies were still lead by men, or at least enforced.
True. So the conclusion is: Matriarchy doesn’t mean Patriarchy but with women in charge, but rather something like anarchy, I.e. no hierarchies, no armies, no power structures etc
@@mathematikgeschichteundmeh8335 It would probably look a lot like that for when you get a gaggle of women together they don't want any other woman to be above them in power and so want everything to become a group vote. Usually where you have to have 100% agreement. This of course leading to nothing getting done.
@@AndrewTheFrank Matriarchy = Patriarchy + Blowing Smoke Up Women’s Arses
In the modern era, with all the female lieutenants, colonels, and generals out there, I guess the problem you cited could be easily solved in a modern matriarchal dictatorship. Also, there's lots of experienced female soldiers and female police officers to draw from so the military rank and file and much of the police force could also be %99 female too. The rest of us guys can work at Amazon or in construction or do Uber/Lyft to remain productive and not try and overthrow the matriarchy.
@@kenw.4539the number of of female military personnel is very small.
“A woman’s kryptonite is accountability, reason, and leadership.
…A man’s kryptonite is women.”
Let that marinate for a bit. 👀 😎
Matriarchies work, but there is always only be one woman running it.
yeah man, those damn uppity oh so sexy women....
Damn right,man's greatest weakness is women.
Nature is nature. If one tries to change it, being part of it, there will be a corresponding change somewhere else, and nothing would change in total. It is what it is
You make way too much sense. You’ve been banned.
😂
@@erinbyrd5377 You did a great job. It is heart warming to find a woman that is intelligent, compassionate, feminine ,more logical than most women and has great control over her emotions
@@wendigos_eat_people7177 Wow, seriously thank you for the kind words 🙏
And cute 😉
@@erinbyrd5377 Repeal the 19th!
The issue is benevolence versus malevolence, which applies to both male and female psyche archetypes. We hear all about "toxic masculinity" which is the negative side of masculinity, but no acknowledgement of positive masculinity (which is sorely missing in our society in general) and nothing about "toxic femininity", which is the tendency of evil women to be lying, manipulative, gas-lighting persons. Both gender polarities can be toxic or nurturing. What we need to be striving towards is benevolence in both polarities and balanced roles, while still recognizing (and nurturing) the differences between the two polarities - the strengths and differences between each.
I hope your parents are as proud of you as I would be.
Yea she knows how to read. Impressive
"It was never about equality. It was always about power."
-- Gloria Steinem
This is my belief. It doesn't matter the gender. We pursue our selfish desires.
so men are allowed to seek power, even more power than they hold now, but if women do that - that's terrible? wow, just WOW
I appreciate this video a lot. I stopped dating 5 years ago because it seemed all the women I interacted with were just trying to use me in one way or another. It made me value emotional connection over physical ones and see sexuality as an enslavement mechanism rather than something that should be a bonding mechanism. I may never date again but this video gives me hope that perhaps society can recover from what's happening now and maybe we can find a better balance than exists now.
What a wonderful video! Thank you for saying this. I was born in a Soviet country and now blessed to be a naturalized US citizen. Those that defend communism don't know the realities of it or have never left the boundaries of the US to see the rest of the world. In one very old Soviet film that was meant to be a love story - when you get to the very end - the woman declines the man's proposal for family and children so that she can go to the city and "build utopia communism." She even shames the man for thinking about his own happiness and future without sacrificing it all to become a worker drone for "global communism" that all propaganda of that day claimed they were building. Shockingly the US has been experiencing a similar social engineering - albeit the approach to trick women is different. It appeals to their neuroticism, fear, pride, ego and narcissism but with the same end goal - societal reset. It convinces women that they have greater freedom and life satisfaction from not having a family but by becoming worker drones for the "state" - as the "state" grows bigger and restricts more natural human freedoms. Thank you for all the hard work you put in to create this very informative video!
Thanks for this historical perspective and warnings. Someone said those that don't learn from history, repeat it. It seems to me western society has been heading at full speed towards similar outcomes for the last 50 years.
Every time I've seen only women working together, whether it's my time working in a department store that was 99% women, during group project work, or on TV with the apprentice and survival shows, it always falls apart almost right from the start. The fundamental problem seems to be a desire to avoid leadership, with the responsibilities of telling others what to do and risks that comes from the role, when some of those people being led inevitably get frustrated and talk bad about the leader or organise opposition to take them down. By pretending everyone is equal and there is no threat of punishment, nobody does the hard nasty work by choice. Taking offense is used as a weapon of offense and defence, which can spiral into huge drama sessions where every action and reaction are documented and regurgitated as reasoning for someone being a "bad" person. The desire to be the "good" woman to win in the eyes of the majority means never allying themselves with those who risk being called "bad" people, whilst men are far likelier to risk slander and defamation if it means standing by their principles. The loudest voices seem to intimidate other women into following them as they refuse to confront hostile forces, rather preferring to hide safely in the majority, instead of standing up for the proven smart successful voices. Eventually the disfunction becomes so bad, the silent majority either walks away for the group to collapse, or latches onto the few men or masculine women they have for guidance.
Well said.
How do you see an effective counterbalance to this operating?
@@Fredericko-k7pPossible Counterbalances:
* Strong Leadership:
* Clear Roles and Expectations: Establishing clear roles, responsibilities, and expectations from the outset can help prevent power vacuums and conflicts.
* Accountability: Implementing systems of accountability can ensure that everyone contributes fairly and takes ownership of their work.
* Conflict Resolution: Providing training in effective conflict resolution can help teams navigate disagreements productively.
* Open Communication:
* Psychological Safety: Creating a psychologically safe environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their opinions and concerns is crucial.
* Active Listening: Encouraging active listening and empathetic communication can prevent misunderstandings and build trust.
* Feedback Mechanisms: Establishing regular feedback channels can help address issues proactively.
* Diversity and Inclusion:
* Diverse Perspectives: Encouraging diversity in terms of gender, background, and experience can bring different viewpoints to the table, leading to more robust decision-making.
* Inclusive Practices: Implementing inclusive practices can ensure that everyone feels valued and respected.
* Skill Development:
* Leadership Training: Providing leadership training to all team members can empower individuals to take on leadership roles when needed.
* Assertiveness Training: Helping team members develop assertiveness skills can enable them to express their needs and opinions effectively.
* Structural Changes:
* Mentorship Programs: Implementing mentorship programs can provide support and guidance to emerging leaders.
* Reward Systems: Rewarding collaboration and teamwork over individual achievements can foster a more cooperative environment.
It's important to note that these are general suggestions and may not be applicable to all situations. The effectiveness of these strategies depends on the specific context, group dynamics, and individual personalities involved.
Speakng from experience, I have seen how the family unit has fallen apart since the 1970s. My biological parents have put me through 4 marriages, which involve other people who do not have the children's best interests as a priority. My brother & I have been subjected to neglect, physical violence, educational instability, financial instability and severe alcohol addiction at the hand of our parents. My brother committed suicide (age 34) because of the experiences that we endured. Had our parents stayed together, it is highly unlikely that we would have had to endure the highly stressful situations that were put upon us. My mother committed adultery within the 1st 3 years of my life, which inevitably led to the break up our biological family unit.