Many thanks dear brother for this excellent exposure of dispensationalism. I pray that our brothers and sisters who are caught up in this may search the scriptures and be amazed by the Lord's dealing with His people through the covenants, in particular the covenant of grace.
Outstanding! I feel so encouraged that we have men and congregations such as this, our prize fighters for Christ in this age. We must never forget that because we loved our Messiah and sought to obey Him alone we were slaughtered. The armies of Anti-christ came and put our ancestors to the sword and we know by the Scriptures they will do it again.
“And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” - Matthew 19:17 (KJV) and Jesus said more after this the requirement was keep His commandments and to be perfected this: same chapter:Matthew 19 (KJV) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ²⁰ The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? ²¹ Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
Finally I get it , GROWING UP IN THIS DISPENSATIONAL WEB OF JESUIT CONFUSION , NOTHING MADE SENSE. ( BUT JESUS MAKES A WAY.....EYES TO SEE & EARS TO HEAR.....GREAT TEACHING GOD BLESS......KINGVISION OUT
Not even jesuits. They're just bagmen controlled by the people who wanted to stone Jesus. All this subversion serves who? Then gaining an earthly throne though deceiving everyone into supporting their lies
The church, and the whole world, needs more scholarly teaching like this on the history of these Jesuit false doctrines. I have not found better on TH-cam. Thank you, and keep it up. I am including this video in several of my featured playlists and look forward to more.
I don't call logical fallacies like guilt by association scholarly work. Jesuits are trinitarian. So are Reformed Baptists. Therefore Reformed Baptists have their roots in the Jesuit movement. I hope you can see how scholarly my conclusions are. Lol
Well done Mark, showing Dispensationalism as another gospel is much needed in our day. Our Lord and Saviour was victorious in His mission, dying on the cross was not an afterthought because He failed in His initial mission.
This Yeshua crap is a denial of the Greek New Testament. ANTICHRIST Jews use Yeshu as a curse against Jesus. Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. Matthew 1:25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. The angel Gabriel told Mary to name him Jesus, not Yeshu which is a curse Jews say may his name be blotted out from under heaven. Esp since the new testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew. Luke 1: 26 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, 27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. 28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. 29 And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be. 30 And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. 31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. 32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: 33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
I came across this pastor a few months ago and praise God for him. I was keeping him and his church in my prayers but forgot about him so Im glad I found him again on youtube. Its so great to see the truth on how unbiblical and inaccurate dispensationalism is and how covenant theology is the truth.
Very well documented and accurate historical account given in a a time of great confusion about these doctrines Thank you for the information I will share it with others
I have read all three volumes of Manuel Lacunza's (a.k.a. Ben Ezra) "The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty" as translated by Edward Irving. He did not teach a rapture in two stages. The two stage rapture and dispensationalism was primarily propagated by John Nelson Darby.
Edward Irving taught a one stage second coming up until 1828 after he'd been heavily influenced by the Scottish charismatic Margaret McDonald. If it weren't for Darby the doctrine of a secret rapture coupled with hyperdispensationalism would have stayed within the confines of the Irvingites.I've been studying the lives of Edward Irving,Joseph Smith and Vernon Wayne Howell aka David Koresh and I've found that the similarities are uncanny to say the least.
In John 3 Jesus explained to Nicodemus "YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN." That fulfills God's promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3. Paul expands on this in Galatians 3 and 4.
Our 𐤌𐤔𐤉𐤇 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏 Mashiach Yahushua, Who came in His Father’s Name, and never changes, told Abraham to walk before Him and be perfect. He likewise said to His when walking in the flesh to ‘be perfect, as your Father in the Shamiym is perfect. He does not make mistakes, nor does He ask of us what we cannot do. Psalm 19 informs us how to be perfect. ‘Who discerns mistakes? Declare me innocent from those that are secret, and kept me back from presumptuous one, do not let them rule over me, then I shall be perfect and innocent of great transgression. Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be pleasing before You, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 Yahuah, my Rock and my Redeemer. May Alohim shine on all those who love the Truth.
Not at all; “That if you confess with your mouth 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏 Yahuah Yahushua and believe in your heart that Alohim has raised Him from the dead, you shall be Delivered. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and one confesses with the mouth, and so is Delivered, because the Scripture says, “Whoever puts his trust in Him shall not be put to shame.” Because there is no distinction between Yahudi and Greek, for the same Master of all is rich to all those calling upon Him. For “everyone who calls on the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 Yahuah יהוה shall be saved.”” Romiyim (Romans) 10:9-13 We should seek the Truth and cling to Him in Love.
Our confession goes back to 1677 (not exactly new). It is a second edition of a confession which dates back to 1644 (to people who called themselves Baptists, not anabaptists which was a different group who often were not even Christian). So the Jesuits who promoted 'free will' during the reformation, with their counter-reformation, now want everyone Calvinist or reformed?
Are you acknowledging the confession of whom? Catholic Baptist KJO Baptist I am confessing I have a lot to learn and am extending to others grace. I understand it is the job of a pastor to teach the platform that he is given. If you are going through a transformation of faith it changes dramatically and for me quite rapidly. Not getting off the elevator on your doctrinal statement. What floor is that ? The seventh floor? Why not continue heading upwards? Lol 😅
Prophecy is history written in advance. They go together. Knowledge of papist history is necessary to understand the origin of dispensationalism. Knowing the history of this false doctrine helps show how false it is. Let the man speak.
can you explain: Rom 11:12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness? When will the Jews attain their fullness?
@Ray Hernandez : Romans 11:25 King James Version (KJV) 25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
@Ray Hernandez : but what does the verse say, it says that God will go back to dealing with Israel as a Nation after the fullness of the Gentiles be come in, Dispensational it makes sense.
@@markcoetzer7576 pentecost was shavuot. The spirit was given on Jewish holy days ...all of them. The passover, is when Christ died....the belief continues, not periods of times...therefore God in His nature changes. God does not Change. His way never changes. Isaac on the mountain was the prophesy of Christ...the whole faith is One faith, One God. Why trinity? To allow years later for dispensation.
@@flamingrobin5957 God is eternal and forever. All scripture is required for reproof and doctrine. Dispensation - some scripture. Jesus=God same Religion same belief Jesus is the lamb before he is the lamb after.
If the dispensation of Grace was hidden in God from the beginning of the world, HOW can the plan still be the same, I quote: Eph 3:4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Eph 3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; Eph 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: Eph 3:7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. Eph 3:8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; Eph 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
what was HIDDEN - grace or the grafting in of the gentiles in book of acts when THE KILL AND EAT, the veil fell? see your quote and reread Eph 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the SAME HEIRS, and partakers of HIS PROMISE in Christ by the gospel: Question: what did GOD promise in the old testament and second question: FELLOW HEIRS, are they together both Gentile and JEW? THE SAME PROMISE? Is GRACE that promise that is hid? what was the promise from the old testament then?
@@johnp3081 hi John, excellent rebuttal and helpful for me. I've believed in dispensationalism and pre-trib rapture for 35 years. I feel like I'm reading the Bible for the first time
@@johnp3081 I think the Gentiles here are referring to the prophecies in Hosea 1 and is Ezekiel 37 of the two sticks Judah and Israel. This is speaking about the New Covenant and the Gentiles in Romans 11 and who Paul is referring to I believe are the lost 10 tribes that were scattered and living as Gentiles in the world.
@@mr.e1220 my Brother the gospel is for ONE GOD ...please read Romans on the olive tree and Grafting. ISRAEL IN the new testament is all of us and please note the Apostles were "Christians" yet all Jews except one. It is with trinity concepts inforced by pagan system that we are indoctrinated into false teachers. Look up "one" search in new testament and get a contextual understanding. Then come back with a response. Please I urge you. See also all the commandments that Jesus made about Himself......this will lead you to a further Truth. My Brother He is the Way, The Truth THe Life ....HALLELUYAH!
Paul is not referring to some hidden church age of grace that is wedged in between the 69th and 70th week. The mystery has nothing to do with the church itself man! May the Lord open your eyes! It is everything to do about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the One, whose blood was shed for all, and not just the Jews. To think the mystery is about the church...talk about arrogance, to think the mystery had anything to do with us lost souls....it had to do with Jesus and His provision and death on the cross, for us lost gentile souls. We are the beneficiaries of the mystery....we the church, are NOT the mystery. Also, the word dispensation in that chapter does not equal the contrived false doctrine of dispensationalism. It would also be appropriate to say "stewardship." Paul was called to preach to the gentiles, and that is the mystery, that was hid from all saints in the past, that Jesus would die for the entire world, not just a single nation of people descended from Abraham, but all people who believe in Jesus by faith--they are considered that spiritual seed of Abraham. Not all Israel is Israel Paul said. For a Jew is only a Jew who has inward circumcision of the heart. The gentile grafted into the tree with the Jews is the mystery which Paul was given to preach, that we all might have the opportunity to accept our salvation, reconciling mankind back to our Father in heaven.
please respond to my query on your hermeneutics video in this series. I am not a dispensationalist... but want your reply for this women that pushes it
Truth Warrior i asked him to reply to a dispensationalists post and he never did. Long time ago. I copy and pasted it in another video he did. I agree with him on this issue as well. It's a doctrine of demons and has seriously hurt true Christianity.
dispensation teaching is vary much true. the King James Bible has it written/mentioned 4 times. the modern bibles (ALL) which are by the roman catholic whore of Revelation 17 and 18 take dispensation out
@@joeiiiful O, so by rightly dividing the word of truth, (knowing what is clearly for and not for me) i am then terribly misinformed and confused? i'd challenge you to explain it in the way that would have the King James Bible not contradict itself, but if you try to do it non dispensationlly, you'll fail 100% of the time
If the origin is critical to our understanding then we will henceforth reject the legitimacy of the Church as a chief apostle, Peter, denied his Lord three times, and the man Whose Name is the name of the Church and of the religion was crucified as a shameful criminal.
Salvation today is only on the basis of the death, blood, and resurrection of God manifest in the flesh for your sins. This is the only gospel that saves today. There is more than one gospel in the Bible. If you understand the gospel of Christ, you can identify what is not ( Deut. 6:25; Matt. 3:2; John 3:16; Acts 2:38). There is only one gospel by which sinners are saved in this day of grace, the gospel of the grace of God, which is called in Ephesians 1:13, ‘the gospel of your salvation.’ No one has ever been saved except on the grounds of the shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Manuel De Lacunza, S.J. (July 19, 1731 - c. June 18, 1801) was a Jesuit priest who used the pseudonym Juan Josafat Ben-Ezra in his main work on the interpretation of the prophecies of the Bible, which was entitled The Coming of the Messiah in Majesty and Glory. Read this and understand where Darby got his ideas. Edward Irving is the one who translated his writings into English, he also believed in a pre-trib rapture around the same time as Darby. He was another heretic who started the catholic apostolic church where the ecstatic tongue speaking came from, way before the pentecostal movement.
I get a real kick out of people who are against dispensationalism when the word dispensation is found in the scriptures. Rightly dividing the word of God is important to know who it is taking to and who it applies to. Here is just one example David in the psalms prayed for the Lord to not take his Holy Spirit from him. Nobody that has been born again should ever pray that prayer because we are sealed by the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption. Now I am not saying not to ask for the fullness of the Holy Spirit but simply that we are his and he will never leave us or forsake us because when he purchases us with his own blood that is when the Holy spirit takes residence in the believer. No one in the Old Testament was born again. This also isn’t to say that everyone who believes in dispensationalism is always rightly dividing the word of truth. The Kingdom of heaven is not the same as the Kingdom of God. One is physical and one is spiritual. The bible says the kingdom of God dwelleth in you. It’s not Christs Physical Kingdom that dwells in us but his spiritual kingdom through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. We are not baptized unto John’s baptism. Our baptism is not to make our way strait because the kingdom of heaven is at hand. You read in the book of Mathew if thy right hand offends thee cut it off or if thy right eye offends thee pluck it out it is better to have one hand than two to be cast into hell fire. Now if you think this applies to you then tell me where are all the one-eyed Christians or one-handed ones? don’t spiritualize this brother he is talking about swift judgment when he sets up his earthly kingdom. Need more proof? If thou say unto thy brother Raca thou shall be in danger of the council. WHAT COUNCIL? DONT, YOU DARE SPIRITUALISE THIS TO FIT YOUR OWN NARATIVE! But if thou say to thy brother thou fool, thou shall be in danger of hell fire. Swift judgement carried out by the Lord Jesus when he set up rulers and councils to carry out his judgments when he sits on his throne in Jerusalem. This may apply to us in principal but when it is that specific it doesn’t apply to us doctrinally at all. It is talking about a different time period a different dispensation. If you find it in the bible it didn't start with any man.
Your argument doesn't hold water unfortunately. Kent Hovind Gave testimony how he believe in the pre rapture for over 40 yrs until he was doing 10 yrs in prison he had to unlearn dispensationalism due to its heretic doctrines.
[crickets]… The biggest problem I have with "anti" videos is that they spend far too much time slinging mud and never enough time declaring themselves. It is far too easy to criticize the dead and paint with a brush far too wide. This guy cherry picks the worst of "dispensationalists" to make a case that needs not be made. Virtually every Dispensationalist that I know would AGREE with much of what he says. For example, God never had a 'Plan B'. I do not know, personally, one who believes that. This guy speaks of Adam Pre-Fall, Post Fall, Crucifixion, Church Age, Millennium and Covenants. Well, that's most of what Larkin put on charts. At least Larkin was honest enough to put 4 different views on Chart 1 of Dispensational Truth and labels them all "Ages". Do I believe everything Larkin wrote? Nope. And, in fact, this guy in the video is grossly wrong when he describes the Dispensationalist view that the Millennium is a test that is passed (27:50). No Dispensationalist I personally know believes that because of Revelation 20:7-10. If the Millennium is a test, man blows that one too. Big time.
He's right,ALL of the protestant reformers followed HISTORICISM,(the method of prophetic interpretation followed by the prophets,Jesus & his disciples, & the reformers)...the reason futurism & praeterism was developed was because after the council of trent,the church wanted to STOP the reformers from preaching that ROME IS ANTI-CHRIST,so they commissioned the Jesuits w/the task of developing new forms of prophetic interpretation that would muddy the waters & mute the testimony of the reformers,so after futurism was developed by the Jesuit ribera & praeterism was developed by the Jesuit alcazar,a program of gradual infiltration was begun into the protestant churches & within a short time the futurist doctrine spread throughout the denominations like wildfire,HISTORICISM was the form used for almost 5 millennia & was endorsed by CHRIST & was proved to be consistent & reliable, dispensationalist prophecy was introduced into the protestant churches around 200 yrs ago & was intended to BLIND the churches as to the REAL identity of rome...its history & the Jesuits intent in it's introduction into the churches renders these interpretations HIGHLY SUSPECT & unreliable...
@@bigbruno56 Hegelian dialectic, all apart ie;Jesuitism , n. The arts, principles, and practices of the Jesuits. Cunning, deceit; hypocrisy; prevarication (to speak falsely); deceptive practices to effect a purpose. Shushing face sounds like the perfect definition of the false prophet, the Jesuit General The false prophet Superior General and the antichrist beast Pope are the two horns of the earth beast, the two leaders, as horns in prophecy point to a leader. They feign to be Christian (like a lamb) buy they serve Satan (the dragon). They control the city-state corporation of the District of Columbia, to use as their war-machine, to attack countries who have not bowed down to the authority of the Superior General, and who don’t have a Jesuit-Rothschild central bank.
@DavidRodriguez-er4rq You didn't read your bible. 1 Corinthians 9:17 “For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.” Ephesians 3:2 “If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:” Colossians 1:25 “Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;”
This is an honest question....And I am a dispensationalist ...but I am open to hear and consider opposing views...my question...was God's promises to Israel true promises or were they just based on condition. And did the church attain Israel's promises at rejection of Christ...I repeat this is an honest question....thank you for your video .
Dear friend, thank you for the question. I believe the answer is not in how true the promises were. They undoubtedly are, since God made them. The real issue is, to whom were the promises actually made. The Apostle Paul addresses this very point in Romans chapter 9. Consider what he says: Rom 9:6-8 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. So the promises were and are true. The recipients is the issue. Only the true spiritual israel receive them and all the blessings of them. I hope this is of some help.
@@MinisterRedPill there are some who believe in what is commonly caricatured as “replacement theology”. Historic Reformed confessions and believers do still hold to a future return of the Jews to the land, and their future re-ingrafting into the People of God (through conversion to Christ). Paul says the Jewish people stumbled, but did not fall. Their eyes are vailed, but only for a season. When the fullness of the Gentiles comes into the church, then Israel also shall be converted and re-join the church (the same body that she had in large part abandoned when she abandoned Christ). You have to understand that the Bible shows that there has always been one Church, from Adam until the end of the word. Israel was brought in early, as those to whom Messiah would come, but they did not receive Christ and so he “gave the kingdom to another” (ie, the Gentiles). When Israel returns to Christ, then gentile and Jew together shall be one people, with one King to rule over them.
Jesus did come proclaiming that the Kingdom was at hand. His Kingdom was not originating from this world but it was invading. He was and is King and Lord. Read HOW GOD BECAME KING by NT Wright. Jesus' Kingdom starts within and reigns in each heart and mind. It has been and will continue to fill the whole earth. It is both and. Jesus is Lord. He has been ruling and reigning until He makes all His enemies under His feet. Isaiah wrote that of the growth of His Kingdom there shall be no end. I believe it, first in me, then in others, and ultimately to fill the whole earth.
What does it mean to keep us FROM the hour of wrath. You are not appointed for wrath. What is happening in the Middle East currently To me, it seems that a ceasefire is needed. It also seems those people will come back to attack Israel in the future Who will be rewarded and over who will those people rule that will be rewarded. Another question. If you don't come up to Jerusalem yearly, you will not get rain. I did my own. Research. We are too interested in what preachers say. We dont read and study the bible for ourselves
Amen David Fleming...the devil may have some power but a very short leash!! Jesus said..Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth..
De Lacunza teach that the Antichrist will come from the Dan Tribe, not from «the apostate roman Church». I think this preacher didn't read De Lacunza directly.
And you will not find any evidence in Irving writings that he teach pretribulational rapture in the sense that Darby and other understand the matter. Irving was postribulational. The preacher limited his reaching to secundary sources. And that was the problem in all this lecture.
The Lord Jesus Chrisrt says in Revelation chapter 3 that the church is not going going through the great tribulation. Put that in your pipe and smoke it 😅
Like any critical thinking/reading just read it in CONTEXT! And pray! I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. End of discussion. Your theology ends when you breathe your last. Christ and Him crucified is the way, means, and message this world needs today. All these theologians and all this disputation profits nothing. Duh! Do you have a personal relationship with Jesus? Have you witnessed his salvation gospel to anyone? If you haven’t, be quiet! You have some of your own soul searching to do then. This - to everyone!
@@keithwhitlock726 would you answer my question? would you at least link me a site (an official catholic website) that preaches/defends the catching up? that is all i ask. because according to scriptures, (the King James Bible) dispensational teaching is vary much true
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 The Rapture and futurist doctrine had it's origin from the Jesuit Ribera during the Reformation. The key reason is to deflect focus on the scriptural doctrine of the Roman Catholic system as antichrist. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Ribera
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 Jesuits operate outside official Roman Catholic official doctrine. The speaker does a good job documenting his presentation.
Eph 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: Col 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; ...and Paul uses the word dispensation in two other books also. If I understand correctly, Paul wasn’t a jesuit and he preceded Darby.
... The word dispensation just means to "give out" and/or "give until gone" think ofna soap DISPENSER. or a Pez Dispenser. The word has NOTHING to do with periods of time lol and yes Paul used them 4 times but somehow that equals 7 dispensations? 🤔 there are LOTS of words in the Bible, it doesnt mean you need to create an entire goofy theology based on them. The word Nazarene is in the Bible. The word Presbytery. The word Pentecoste. That doesnt mean Im a Nazarite, a Presbyterian, or a Pentecostal 🤷🏻
@@mjy63086 Lol you defined the word dispensation correctly which obviously has everything to do with periods of time or "dispensations" lol. If we're all under one dispensation why don't you observe the sabbath? The feasts? Why don't you follow all the 600+ Laws of the Torah and slaughter animals for forgiveness of sins if we're still under the same dispensation? What changed to allow you to not have to do those things anymore? A different dispensation perhaps?
@@urielseptim9860dispensationalism also adheres to the false teaching of a ridiculous 2000 + year gap of Daniel 9:27. Unbeknownst to Dispensationalists, their beliefs of the Bible will *_never_* be fulfilled because the Bible will be stuck in a continuous false loop of time waiting for the antichrist.
I’m sorry I cannot hold my tongue (fingers); this man’s testimony is beyond erroneous! Sir, if Jesus Christ’s kingdom is “Spiritual” then please explain how He would reign for 1000 THOUSAND YEARS as per Revelation 20:6?! So would you dare to say that this “Spiritual” kingdom is temporal?! Please explain.
Jack Spalden 1000 years will be in heaven, during this period the Earth is laid desolate without inhabitants, that's why the Bible talked about Satan being bound for 1000 years, at the end of 1000 years the new Jerusalem come down
Jack Spalden; Many churches today affirm, in their “what we believe” statements, that Jesus will return to rule Earth for a millennium. Yet only one passage in the entire Bible refers to Jesus and a thousand years: Revelation 20;1-6. I think it dangerous for any church to base a core doctrine on a single scripture passage. It NEVER mentions that the reign is on earth. It says “they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years”. One thousand years is figurative to simply represent a very long period of time, especially since we already know that Christ’s Kingdom has no end Daniel 7;14 . If this were literal, it would contradict such passages: Isa 9;7, and Luke 1;31-33, as well as many others. Scripture does not speak of "the thousand year reign of Christ." Revelation 20:4 says, "...and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God,...and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years." It's not Christ that reigns 1000 years, but those who were killed for God's sake that reign with Christ 1000 years. For example, if I say that John Doe reigns with the President for one year, does that mean the President reigns only one year? No, it does not. The President could reign for 4 years, but the point is that John reigned with the President for one year. The President isn't the subject, it is speaking about how long John reigns with him. Likewise, Revelation 20:4 is not about how long Jesus will reign, but how long others will reign with Jesus. There's a big difference. The whole argument for an earthly millennium is so God can fulfill his promises to Israel, his earthly people. One of the central core doctrines of Zionism is an earthly kingdom. When Yeshua/Jesus came the first time, they were of a carnal mindset and kept inquiring on when the kingdom would be, however, an actual literal 1,000 earthly reign is not supported biblically, as Jesus stated His Kingdom is spiritual, and not of this world. When He came, they were expecting an earthly king and kingdom, this did not happen and Jesus told the House of Judah(Israel) that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to a nation bringing forth the fruit of it(Mat 21;38-43). They were not interested in a spiritual kingdom, and so they sought to take His birthright. (Also think: Esau and Jacob, Isaac and Ishmael, Cain and Abel).
Verse 20: 4 says thrones and in Revelation most cases where thrones are in heaven. 1000 year earthly rule is only in the minds of Darbyists and those who believe the con man Scofield
THATS HOW THEY OPERATE THEY WILL SAY ANY THING REQUIRED TO COVER UP, THEY KILL , THEY START WARS , AND NOW THEY GOT THEIR SCIENTIST TO KILL PEOPLE WITH THIS VIRUS , THIS PREACHER SOUNDS LIKE HE IS CATHOLIC , CALVINIST
Covenant 292 times in the Authorized version, Dispensation 4 times and those only in the NT. Enough said. The volume of scripture supports Covenant. Resurrection 41 times in the Authorized version plus many other references such as "I will raise him" speaking of the resurrection, Rapture 0 times in the authorized......let that sink in for a moment before you comment. While not a Calvinist I'm also not a Dispensationalist either. There are many that do not fit the boxes.
everyone opposing dispensationalism uses propanganda, strawman arguments, and sanctimony. while dispensationalists use scripture and a proper hermanuetic to extrapalates the revelations of Mysteries given to Paul the apostle unto the gentiles
This is a very general and superficial statement. I have found the exact opposit to be true. Nobody was able to show one single verse from scripture to prove the pretrib rapture to me... since 1998. I am still waiting...Darby split the evangelical church and the bretheren movement. Georg Mueller did not follow him but his Bible. I am determend to to the same...
Why would Jesuits need to invent dispensationalism when the current denominational churches have bibles from the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus as their source of doctrine. These align more with Catholic teaching than anything concerning dispensationalism.
"most of our time will not be spent in the scriptures" why? because if you read the King James Bible, you'll see that dispensation is a bible word, and that there are 7 dispensations. God dispensed grace differently to mankind when world wide events change. examples include (and by lines i mean the change from one dispensation to another) before the fall of man and after the fall of man. this is dispensation line one after the flood and God's everlasting covenant with Abraham and his seed. this is dispensation line two the change from the law and the prophets to the preaching of the kingdom of heaven to the Jews (God himself being their king according to the book of Psalms and prophets) after the Jews rejected that and killed him for it, that brings in the 5th dispensation (the one we're in now, grace through faith in the blood of Jesus Christ, which is from second half of Acts to Philemon. this is the 4th dispensation line and the catching up of the body of Christ is ganna end the grace through faith and lead into dispensation 6 where there will be signs and God's wrath on an unbelieving, Christ rejecting world (which the body of Christ will have no part in), this is dispensation line 5 dispensation line 6 is the ending of the wrath of God poured out on earth and the 2nd bodily return of Jesus Christ on the face of the earth and from their, the kingdom of heaven that was preaching in dispensation 4 and promised in dispensation 2 and 3 will be brought in. then after the thousand years of ruling and reigning is expired, then Satan will be released from the bottomless pit to deceive one last time then God will cast devour him with fire from heaven to land him in the lake of fire where the other two members of the trinity are then after that, into eternity. they that are in the lake of fire will have no other choice then to make it their home because that's where they are kept forever. the body of Christ will be with God, and physical Jews (seed of Abraham) as well as all the prophets and apostles will be with us. they that say there is no dispensations in the bible is either a liar or ignorant
the word 'dispensation' may be there but the context dictates the meaning... most of which are not eschatological in nature. see scholar Dr Michael Hieser on the fallacies of KJV only. even Erasmus conceded there were numerous known mistakes in his work
@@bigfigism you must have went to a bible collage, in other words be that foolish, simple to think that i will listen to a hypocrite, a liar who hates God and his book for things concerning scripture. might as well go to a murdering rapist for good morals Ephesians 3 has all one needs to know what dispensation means. brother Paul was talking about that which was hidden from the beginning but now made manifest, we see types and foreshadowings of the 5th dispensation (which we are in right now) with the first shed blood of a lamb that God killed after Adam and Eve fell, Abraham said that God would provide HIMSELF a lamb, Moses had the blood of a lab put on the door (Jesus is the door), on the left, right, and top (like a cross). dispensations are there, there is distinction, heresies and lies from false brethren and false prophets when they take a scripture and put it somewhere where it doesn't belong
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 you guys believe philosophy, you keep quoting what this person said and theology. theology failed. We can see it here - every tongue with a different opinion. LET YAHSHUA BE YOUR TEACHER and him only. read all the read letters and analyze them
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 Rom 8:7-8 the sinful mind is HOSTILE to God. It does NOT SUBMIT to God's law, nor can it do so. 8 Those controlled by the sinful nature CANNOT please God. DO YOU KNOW HIM? 1 John 3:22-24 22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we KEEP his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. JESUS IS GOD - same commandments REV 1:8
The catching where the body of Christ the Apostle Paul says even back then when Paul was around that there are those who said that the resurrection has passed already and overthrow the faith of some this is the rapture he's talking about. Again the issue I see here is this guy is a pagan who believes in Pagan theology outside of the Apostle Paul again these Catholics who follow alexandrian manuscripts and deny Jesus Christ sacrifice on the cross or going to constantly act like they believe in scripture but they're scripture is perverted
Sadly, the attack on classical dispensationalism is largely and attack on that which no longer exists. I am a premillennialist who agrees with the reformed that salvation has always been by faith alone in Christ alone (Gen. 15:6; Hab. 2:4; John 8:56; Rom. 4:3). I believe that regeneration precedes faith (John 6:44; Titus 3:5). I believe that both Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ are the "one new man" (Eph. 2:15) and that only believers in Christ (whether Jew or Gentile) will inherit Christ's Kingdom. I don't believe there is a distinction between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. I don't believe the gospels are for one group, while the epistles are for another group. I do believe, however, in good exegesis. Anyone who doesn't acknowledge the future restoration of Israel is distorting the Apostle Paul's teaching in Romans 11:25-28. Paul clearly states that "all Israel" will be saved in Romans 11:26. The term "all Israel" cannot refer to the church as Calvin claimed since they are called "enemies of the gospel" two verses later (Rom. 11:28). How can the church be enemies of the gospel? Paul also states that Israel had a "partial hardening" in Romans 11:25. This partial hardening also proves "all Israel" in verse 26 must be national ethnic Israel. Is someone willing to claim that the church had a partial hardening? Is someone willing to claim elect Jews had a partial hardening? Those who don't believe in a future restoration of Israel are attacking the promises of God and are unable to do solid exegesis. For example, partial preterists claim the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24 was fulfilled in 70 A.D. The Parousia of Christ is mentioned 4 times in this text (Matt. 24:3, 27, 37, 39). The apostle Paul teaches that the Parousia is the event in which believers are given their resurrected bodies (1 Cor. 15:22-23; 1 Thess. 4:15-18). So, either you're a partial preterist and you have to claim there will be two "Parousias" separated by thousands of years (brilliant!), or you have to be a full preterist and claim the resurrection already happened in 70 A.D. and commit the same heresy as Hymenaeus and Philetus (2 Tim. 2:17-18) (even more brilliant!). Can some partial preterist on this site explain how the 16 usages of Parousia for Christ's coming can refer to two comings separated by thousands of years? Can you explain why the Parousia Paul mentions in 1 Cor. 15:23 is different than the Parousia mentioned in the Olivet Discourse? Can some full preterist explain to me why the nations are not going up to Jerusalem to worship Christ as promised in Zechariah 14:16-17?
@@rdaleyj1 I'm talking about the exegesis of Romans 11:26 (not Gal. 6:16). There is no way that "all Israel" in Romans 11:26 is the church because they are called "enemies of the gospel" two verses later (11:28) and "partially hardened" one verse earlier (11:25). Explain to me how the church can be partially hardened and enemies of the gospel? By the way, there is no contradiction in believing that gentile believers in Christ will inherit the promises given to national, ethnic Israel (Rom. 11:17). If we maintain that there is only one way of salvation (faith in Christ) for both Jew and Gentile. and that the kingdom is coming to Israel, where's the contradiction?
@@ESCHATOLOGYERIC no I totally agree with you that the Jews who cannot believe in Jesus cannot be saved before judgment day, and that because so many of them have already went on to eternity without coming to Christ, and that those who are the called consisting of both Jewish and Gentile believers will be those who are saved from the second death. Whosoever activate l actually comes to Christ between now and the end have been called and drawn to him first, and they will be saved. The only way that All Israel will be saved makes any sense to me is the "All Israel" who are the called, AKA the Israel of God.
@@ESCHATOLOGYERIC there's one other way that I believe All Israel shall be saved that makes sense, but I'm not going down that road with you becuz most people cannot see it.
@@rdaleyj1 Jesus (the Messiah) is the living covenant. Matthew 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament [new covenant], which is shed for many for the remission of sins. There were righteous [righteous Jews] who were following the covenant long before the Messiah was born. Thus the Messiah says (John 4:22) “... we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.” The Messiah is including himself by saying we; “we know what we worship” Per the scriptures Jesus did not come to call righteous Jews to repentance... Matthew 9:13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for *I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.* Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, *I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.* The righteous that were already following the covenant did not need (and do not need) to be called to repentance. There are still righteous Jews that follow the covenant. They just don't know that the covenant (the word of God) was made flesh, yet they may even follow him even better than you or I. The Messiah came to call the sinner. There were righteous Jews following him long before he was born and continue to even today. Example: Luke 1:5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth. Luke 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
So what you're telling me is you're not going to go to the scripture you're going to go to your own man-made belief systems outside of scripture to try to disprove dispensationalism which is based in scripture. No I don't see anything Shawty going on here. On top of that look up a book called dispensationalism before Darby and also study your Bible and rightly divide it. Because dispensationalism is biblical Paul says we need to rightly divide but that also means there are those who wrongly divide. So there is good dispensationalist there are bad dispensation was trying to lump us all together is pretty bad
I was raised with Rapture Dispensationalism & believed it fervently for 40 years until 2016. I am willing to provide some helpful links & book titles for your own research, if you’re interested.
@@anng4665 wait so you're telling me you don't believe in dispensational theology after 2016 or cuz the way you phrase that. If you have books on dispensational theology or education on more dispensationalist teachings I'm all ears.
@@inthedark334 I was so heavily indoctrinated in it, it’s sad & embarrassing for me now. I don’t have time this evening to provide a bunch of links or book titles, but I will leave just 2 for now. They are sermon series links which were heavily instrumental in severing the false doctrines from my previously cherished beliefs. The first series is 8 sermons. I sat up all night listening to all 8 hours of it. I just couldn’t believe how many verses were cited that I didn’t remember ever reading or hearing in sermons. The next series is only 3 sermons about the Rapture. I believe it is crucial to listen to the 1st, longer series first because it goes into detail about the errors of Dispensational doctrine. The Rapture sermon series is only 3 sermons (about 3 hours). I will be interested in reading your comments after you have listened to both series.
@@inthedark334 The 8 sermon series by James C Gallagher is what gave me my breakthrough. I was no longer a Dispensationalist after hearing it. I begged my 80-something-yr-old Southern Baptist parents to listen to it in 2016 after I did. They listened & haven’t believed in Rapture Dispensationalism since. So it’s never too late to denounce false doctrine, not even in one’s 80’s. The series called The Israel of God parts 1-8. Scroll down past the first 5 or so sermons in this list and you will see Israel of God part 1. www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerWithinSource=&subsetCat=&subsetItem=&mediatype=&includekeywords=&exactverse=&keyword=Rev._James_C._Gallagher&keyworddesc=Rev.+James+C.+Gallagher&currsection=&AudioOnly=false&SpeakerOnly=true&keywordwithin=Israel+of+God&x=11&y=9
@@inthedark334 Listen to this after you’ve listened to the Israel of God series. This is the 3 sermon series by James C Gallagher called There Is No Such Thing As A Secret Rapture. www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerWithinSource=&subsetCat=&subsetItem=&mediatype=&includekeywords=&exactverse=&keyword=Rev._James_C._Gallagher&keyworddesc=Rev.+James+C.+Gallagher&currsection=&AudioOnly=false&SpeakerOnly=true&keywordwithin=There+Is+No+Such+Thing+As+A+Secret+Rapture&x=5&y=11
There are seven different definitions in the Bible for the one word Israel. Two are given in Romans 9:6-8. Find another illuded to in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Fake Israel.
Study to show yourself approved unto Gid rightly dividing the word of truth not to be ashamed of and shun profane babblings of whoom are Alexander and hymaneys who have erred and said the crucifixion is in the past but God knows who are his that is 2n Timothy 2:15 talking about Alexander and hymaneys who said the crucifixion is false like Muslims just after telling to divide the word of truth nit to be ashamed of shun babbling NHS strange things happening bible says divide the Word of Truth
You know nothing about dispensationalism to have made such a bold statement such as that. It is quite the opposite actually. You see; we believe that it was not UNTIL the blood of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was poured out that anyone could attain salvation. The saints went to paradise, not the third heaven, and it was not UNTIL Jesus led captivity captive when He descended that they were completely "saved" AFTER the only satisfactory atonement for sin was made! The greatest blunder by those who say things like you say is the fact that your view of salvation for old Testament Saints is actually attacking the very significance of what He did for us at Calvary! I so wish that my brothers and sisters in Christ would stop listening to men, swallow their pride and maybe actually listen to some of us "heretical" dispensationalists once in a while! God bless you and yours as we await His return!
Jesus has fulfilled the OT on the Cross once and for all, which fact can be proved by his last word on it "Tetelestai (I have fulfilled)". Since His second coming for judging the Old World in 70 AD, Jesus has established the New World conclusively and decisively, where Satan has no power and authority over the world "de jure" (1Cor. 15:20-28). Therefore, Christians should pray and act for their taking over the world for Jesus on the basis of the fact of His legal conquest.
You are missing it, big time. Yeshua Hamashi was the sacrifice for sin. Keeping the Sabboth is one of God's commandments that you will keep out of love because of what God did for you, not trying to gain points.
@@firestarter105G not as a Christian. That's a Jewish covenant. Have you read the New Testament. Notice in Acts the disciples keep meeting on the first day of the week.. Sunday. Sure they visit synagogues on Shabbat to engage with the Jews to tell them about the new covenant. This is like Christianity 101 Jesus Christ is likened to the Sun, he rose on a Sunday. You're getting ahead of time, come the great tribulation,ie the time of Jacobs Trouble , the Sunday law things will be relevant then. Not now. The application for the Christian is..6 days shall they labour and do all thy work: It's stops at the colon for us. Study to show thyself approved a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,rightly dividing the word of truth. 2Timothy 2:15 the Holy Bible. You guys aren't rightly dividing. Which Bible are you using friend?
What is this guy talking about?!? This isn’t dispensationalism all! Sir, quick question(s), do you believe that 1. To be born-again means you are saved from faith-alone and 2. Once saved always saved? Why or why not, in brief. -thanks
Please can you quote those exact words for me from the bible " faith alone" - the exact text that has that phrase that everyone says....PLEASE QUOTE THAT EXACT TEXT!!
PART I: Hi John P. Certainly, I would be glad to share this with you but before I divulge, I must confess that neither you or I will find the exact phrase “faith-alone” in this verbatim form and quite honestly why would it? It is logical to assume that to those who seek, find, opposed to those who do not seek, would not find. With that being said, there is plenty of evidence for FAITH-ALONE doctrine! What do you do with all of these verses that make it CLEAR that NO WORK is involved for one’s Salvation which indicates a purely through faith-alone message? The Bible, if it is this divide masterpiece, CANNOT contradict itself and if you find that it might seem like it does, there is usually an explanation that one has simply not sought out after, to contextually understand (eg. “nit-pickers”); it is that pure and simple! As a disclaimer, I’ve been saved now (after following the wrong doctrine for the majority of my life) for about 2-3 years now. Though, within this timespan, I have learned far more than all the years I’ve been alive prior; combined and multiplied, to the point where I do not think there is a specific number to give you. I had always “thought” that I “might” be saved, but had NO assurances at all! (Sounds a lot like the pagan religions, in which WORK is a MANDATE (eg. “in order to reach enlightenment” etc.) and one has to become familiar, accepting and be content with the “uncertainty”. -Sounds like one big RISK! But let’s get right down to business: Romans 10:3-4 says, “For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their ‘own righteousness’, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. FOR CHRIST IS THE END OF THE LAW FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS TO EVERY ONE THAT BELIEVETH.” Philippians 3:9, “And be found in him, NOT having mine own righteousness, WHICH IS OF THE LAW, BUT THAT WHICH IS THROUGH THE FAITH OF CHRIST, THE RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH IS OF GOD BY FAITH.” (FAITH = RIGHTEOUSNESS) The Lord Himself said that the only “WORK” necessary or allowed to be saved is to BELIEVE on the Lord Jesus Christ: John 6:28-29, “Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, THIS IS THE WORK OF GOD, THAT YE BELIEVE ON HIM WHOM HE HATH SENT.” In Matthew 7:23, it is very important to read that verse CAREFULLY, when it says, “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that WORK iniquity”. -the key word here is “work”. The previous verse saying, “Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many WONDERFUL WORKS? They equated their salvation with faith + WORKS and simply not believing alone! (Example Catholics, Seven-Day Adventists etc.). You only have to read Matthew 25:41 to understand what Jesus Christ means when He says “depart from me”. (Everlasting fire). Romans 11:6 “And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. BUT IF IT BE OF WORKS, THEN IS IT NO MORE GRACE: OTHERWISE WORK IS NO MORE WORK”. Galatians 2:21 “I do not frustrate the GRACE of God: FOR IF RIGHTEOUSNESS COME BY THE LAW, THEN CHRIST IS DEAD IN VAIN”. Ephesians 2:8 “For by GRACE are ye SAVED THROUGH FAITH; and that NOT OF YOURSELVES: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD: NOT OF WORKS, lest any man should boast”[!] Romans 4:5 “But to him that WORKETH NOT, BUT BELIEVETH ON HIM THAT JUSTIFIETH THE UNGODLY, HIS FAITH IS COUNTED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS.” (NO WORK--BELIEF ON CHRIST JUSTIFIED THE UNGODLY---FAITH = RIGHTEOUSNESS; NOT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ONE’S “OWN” RIGHTEOUSNESS AS ROMANS IN 10:3-4; PHILIPPIANS 3:9) Hence, we are deemed righteous by Jesus Christ by Faith. There is no hierarchy of sin or what “we” as a society may deem as worse than the other (see: “mortal vs venial sins”; a Catholic heresy). A lie is a sin, a murder is a sin, a fornication is a sin, a theft is a sin. God cannot look upon sin PERIOD, doesn’t matter what type; which might suggest that sin in general cannot be in his presence in heaven. (Isaiah 59:2; Habakkuk 1:13)-WE ARE ALL WORTHY OF HELLFIRE if it were not for the Grace of God! “FOR NO ONE DOETH GOOD, NO NOT ONE!”(Romans 3:12; Psalms 14:3, 53:3) “THERE IS NONE GOOD BUT ONE, THAT IS, GOD.” (Mark 10:18) Repenting and believing go hand-in-hand; it is to “change one’s mind” of what is and what is not sin (the Lord even “repented” in Exodus 32:14!) Homosexuals for example, believe they are not sinning but the LAW IS THE KNOWLEDGE OF SIN. (Romans 3:20) -though for the born-again, we are no longer under the schoolmaster (Romans 11:6)! When born-again (to those who BELIEVE that Christ is who saves; nothing else), we receive the Spirit of Christ, which we cannot lose, hence Christ would have to destroy himself as we have now become part of Him! 1 Corinthians 3:13-17 “Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: BUT HE HIMSELF SHALL BE SAVED. Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are”. Romans 8:10 “And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness”.
PART II: Once saved always saved continued: John 10:27-30 “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: AND I GIVE UNTO THEM ETERNAL LIFE; AND THEY SHALL NEVER PERISH, NEITHER SHALL ANY MAN PLUCK THEM OUT OF MY HAND. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and NO MAN IS ABLE TO PLUCK THEM OUT OF MY FATHER’S HAND. I and my Father ARE ONE”. Christ the advocator: “...IF GOD BE FOR US, WHO CAN BE AGAINST US? He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things? Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also MAKETH INTERCESSION FOR US. WHO SHALL SEPARATE US FROM THE LOVE OF CHRIST? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. FOR I AM PERSUADED, THAT NEITHER DEATH, NOR LIFE, NOR ANGELS, NOR PRINCIPALITIES, NOR POWERS, NOR THINGS PRESENT, NOR THINGS TO COME, NOR HEIGHT, NOR DEPTH, NOR ANY OTHER CREATURE, SHALL BE ABLE TO SEPARATE US FROM THE LOVE OF GOD, WHICH IS IN CHRIST JESUS OUR LORD. (Romans 8:31-39) In Corinthians, an unspeakable sin was committed, yet salvation was still secured! 1 Cor 5:1-5 “It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his FATHER’S WIFE. And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you. For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, TO DELIVER SUCH AN ONE UNTO SATAN FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FLESH, THAT THE SPIRIT MAY BE SAVED IN THE DAY OF THE LORD JESUS”. Not only where the faithful (who believed) still saved but this verse adds an insight into those who believe people who preach grace grace grace and there is no consequence for being a “Carnal Christian”. There is! In that verse, in this world, one can LEGALLY be turned over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh! What else happens? What goes around surely comes around; you “REAP WHAT YOU SOW”. Galatians 6:7-8: “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also REAP. For he that SOWETH to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting”. The very next page opens up the first chapter of Ephesians, in which verses 10-23 speaks of the inheritance by saying: “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an INHERITANCE, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who WORKETH ALL THINGS AFTER THE COUNSEL OF HIS OWN WILL: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. IN WHOM YE ALSO TRUSTED, AFTER THAT YE HEARD THE WORD OF TRUTH, THE GOSPEL OF YOUR SALVATION: IN WHOM ALSO AFTER THAT YE BELIEVED, YE WERE SEALED WITH THAT HOLY SPIRIT OF PROMISE, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory. WHEREFORE I ALSO, AFTER I HEARD OF YOUR FAITH IN THE LORD JESUS, and love unto all the saints, Cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers; That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him: The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward WHO BELIEVE, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.” Still think license to sin? NOPE, God CHASTENS AND SCOURGES the Sons He receives: Hebrews 12:6-8: “For whom the Lord loveth he CHASTENETH, and SCOURGETH every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons”.
PART III: Still believe we have a license to sin? NOPE, we’ll get sick! 1 Corinthians 11:29-31: “For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged”. The JUDGEMENT SEAT OF CHRIST (for the SAINTS [US!]); NOT THE GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGMENT (only for unbelievers and the damned of old) 2 Corinthians 5:10-11: For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, WHETHER IT BE GOOD OR BAD. Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences”. Also the famous verse 1 Corinthians 6:9; was NOT talking to those who were saved yet!! Where it says: “Know ye not that the UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind...” etc. Again according to Romans 4:5, WE ARE DEEMED RIGHTEOUS, 1 Corinthians 6:9 cannot be talking about the born-again! “Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins”. (James 5:20) -thus why soul-winning is important too; a multitude of sins are HIDDEN from God, why? -because that person is now deemed righteous through Christ. We are covered with the robe of righteousness! (Isaiah 61:10) We still sin which is why we STILL need to ask God for forgiveness! Matthew 6:14-15: “For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses”. Hence, why we still need to ask for forgiveness. A Perfect Bible CANNOT contradict itself, otherwise it is not perfect and God cannot be trusted. We cannot view certain parts as more authoritative over others. Does James contradict Paul in terms of faith + works? -or was James speaking about the JEWS? as Paul went to preach to the Gentiles? We also need to RIGHTLY divide Scripture to the right people as per 2 Timothy 2:15. Why? -because then you are going to presume that every detail will apply to you when this is not the case. I believe in the Pre-Tribulation rapture where the Saints will be caught up in the air to meet with the Lord, hence the significance of the Judgment Seat of Christ. Those who do not make this rapture will be left on earth and they must do something very important which doesn’t just take faith to do...what is it? THEY NEED TO RESIST THE MARK OF THE BEAST! -A WORK! So does James 2:17 (“Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.”) contradict the writings of Paul? NO. Contextually, you must observe the AUDIENCE James is speaking to, NOT the Church but to the JEWS; the same Jews who will have to endure the Tribulation (since they won’t be raptured with the Church) and turn to Christ during this period and must do an extra step for Salvation, resisting the Anti-Christ and his devices. How do we know James is talking to the Jews? In the same chapter in James 2 verse 10 (a few verses before) reads, “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” (And then a few verse after) Verse 21: “Was not ABRAHAM our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?” JAMES IS NOT SPEAKING TO THE CHURCH! ABRAHAM IS NOT THE FATHER OF THE GENTILES! That would be ADAM whom in turn, fathered the WHOLE WORLD. Hence, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through FAITH”[!] (Galatians 3:13-14) So essentially if you broke one law, you are guilty of all and are under a CURSE! (Deuteronomy 27:26; Galatians 3:10) Thankfully, we are NOT under the curse of the law, Christ Jesus became that curse for us! AMEN. “Do we then make void the law through faith? GOD FORBID: YEA, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW”! (Romans 3:31) WE ARE TO BE AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST (2 Corinthians 5:20), as He instructed us to carry out what many Christendom call, “THE GREAT COMMISSION” (which is performed by “witnessing”-Acts 1:8, “preaching”-Mark 16:15, “baptizing”, and “teaching”-Matt 28:20), which is not merely a “calling” of a certain few individuals (another Catholic heresy); we all ought to adhere to this calling as instructed by Christ. Though, the problem remains that many Christians either still remain Spiritually immature and are still babes (1 Corinthians 3:1; 1 Peter 2:2) or to the so-called Christian who follows a wrong doctrine who has declared themselves to be part of the Church but who are actually not saved at all. However, the more one familiarizes themselves with Scripture, the more maturing that person can undergo and of course with the aid of the Holy Spirit, can become born-again if that person wasn’t already. Just to note, by Baptism I do not mean the “infant water baptism” (an infant is too immature to understand repentance and believing on Christ) or that it is “water baptism in of itself, that saves a person”, for such a conversion to be born-again comes by BELIEVING, as being baptized by immersion in water is merely a SIGN of this change depicting the death, burial and resurrection as was Christ (Colossians 2:12; 2 Corinthians 5:17; Romans 6:4), for all those to witness; the former common beliefs are all Catholic heresies. The Bible says in Corinthians 2:11, “I marvel that [you all] are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto ANOTHER GOSPEL: Which [there] is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:6-9) “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.“ (Matthew 24:24) The disagreement between Peter and Paul wasn’t anything to be taken lightly. Paul’s argument was that these works of the Jews shouldn’t apply to the Gentiles BECAUSE we are not saved by works but of Faith. Faith in Jesus Christ is what makes us righteous, by Him who gives us the clean fine white linen upon us before God, not the filthy rags from our good deeds. (Isaiah 64:6)
PART IV: Now when it comes to meat and holydays (“holidays”): “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ”. (Colossians 2:16) When it comes to God’s laws, He gave them to man, knowing that nobody but God Himself could fulfill them! (In the Old Testament, a burnt offering was needed each year for the atonement of sin-Leviticus 16:34). Thus, an admitted sinner and debtor of the law is revealed in EVERYONE. We are all guilty and should all be punishable by death if it was not for believing on Christ who fulfilled every last one of these laws! Why couldn’t He eat unclean meat? I think the answer is obvious, it would defile the body and He needed to be incorruptible for a perfect sacrifice, but FOR US, also temples of God and believers in Christ, it defileth no more! It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, it is what comes out! (Matthew 15:17-18) Again, we are made righteous through faith on Christ Jesus and are thus CLEAN to be in the presence of the God almighty; though for man to do it alone (with the laws), they could not fulfill on their own. Again, if you break one, you break them all. God doesn’t even THINK an evil thought! If we love God, we ought to follow his commandments indeed, but not for our Salvation, Christ did that work for us so that we might live. AGAIN, we are to RIGHTLY divide Scripture to the right people as per 2 Timothy 2:15. John 3:16, mentions NO work but BELIEVING and in a nutshell that is how we are saved when it says, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH IN HIM SHOULD NOT PERISH, BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE.” It goes on to say in verses 17 and 18 that: “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that BELIEVETH ON HIM IS NOT CONDEMNED: BUT HE THAT BELIEVETH NOT IS CONDEMNED ALREADY, BECAUSE HE HATH NOT BELIEVED IN THE NAME OF THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON.” Jesus Christ came to save SINNERS, NOT the self-righteous. Believe on the finished work that Jesus Christ DID FOR US. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the TRUTH IS NOT IN US. (1 John 1:8) Jesus Christ said that we merely have to look upon a woman to have committed adultery [in our hearts]! (Matthew 5:28). NO ONE CAN MAKE IT TO HEAVEN ON THEIR OWN MERIT, HOWEVER THOUGH MERIT IS WHAT CAN REWARD YOU! Hence, Faith = Salvation; having been Saved already with the addition of Works = Rewards. Thus, how one is saved should NEVER be confused with how one is to obtain rewards! There are three different outcomes: (1) One can do works but NOT believe (faith) and henceforth NOT be saved. (The majority of the world may fit into this category which is the same as the one who does no works and does not believe; one may seem morally better than the other but both will die without Christ and He says that there is no excuse for not believing in Him! -Romans 1:20) (2) One can have FAITH (BELIEVE) on the Lord Jesus Christ and “BE SAVED” but choose NOT to become Ambassadors of Christ by preaching the Gospel. = LESS REWARDS (3) LASTLY, ONE COULD BELIEVE (FAITH) AND BE SAVED THROUGH FAITH AND PERFORM WORKS TO BECOME REWARDED ACCORDINGLY. -That is JUST; this is FAIR. One shouldn’t receive the same amount of rewards when somebody else is working harder to spread the Good News; this is COMMUNISM. If salvation did come by Faith and Works, then how would these rewards be distributed; what would determine this distribution? Evenly?? Again, this is communism. So in a nutshell, to those who are born-again and continue to live a life that is ungodly? REWARDS AFTER SALVATION MAY BE IN JEOPARDY! 2 John 1:8 says: “Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, BUT THAT WE RECEIVE A FULL REWARD”. Again, 1 Corinthians 3:13-16: “Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?” Catholics argue Purgatory with this verse, it is not! This humbly states that if all a man’s work for God was burned, that person would still be saved; then it follows by saying God dwelleth in us. If we need to be purged for our sins anyway, then that doctrine is calling God a liar about being made justified through Christ and this purging God would have to endure as well since he now dwells in us! Senseless! "LET NO MAN BEGUILE YOU OF YOUR REWARD in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind"[!!] (Corinthians 2:18) Every believer should want to be like Jesus. However, most believers DON'T but that does not mean they are not saved! Peter cursed the name of Jesus. Noah got drunk. Samson went with a prostitute. David commit murder and adultery. Jonah ran from God. Peter denied Jesus. John the Baptist sent his disciples to ask Jesus if he were actually the Christ. WE ARE ALL SINNING IN OUR MINDS PROBABLY RIGHT NOW! BREAK ONE LAW, YOU ARE GUILTY OF ALL! WE CANNOT NIT-PICK THE BIBLE ACCORDING TO OUR LIKING. WE MUST UNDERSTAND WHO IS BEING SPOKEN TO IN EACH CONTEXT, WHETHER TO THE JEWS, SAVED AND THE UNSAVED! ONCE WE ARE BORN, WE CANNOT BECOME UNBORN! CAN WE CRAWL BACK UP INTO OUR MOTHERS’ WOMB? NOPE! COULD WE LOSE FELLOWSHIP WITH HER AND NOT GET OUR WEEKLY ALLOWANCE? YEAP! IT IS THE SAME WITH GOD AND FALLING FROM GRACE AND FELLOWSHIP! THIS IS CALLED BEING A CARNAL(-CHRISTIAN). We OUGHT to want to do right and establish the law among others by upholding it, but by no means is it what saves you. What we aren’t to do is promote sin! I apologize that this wasn’t a clear-cut, few-worded answer you were seeking John P. We are CURRENTLY (time-period-wise) in the DISPENSATION OF GRACE. Ephesians 3:2-12 says: “If ye have heard of the DISPENSATION OF THE GRACE OF God which is given me to you-ward: HOW THAT BY REVELATION HE MADE KNOWN UNTO ME THE MYSTERY[...] Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; THAT THE GENTILES BE FELLOWHEIRS, AND OF THE SAME BODY, and PARTAKERS OF HIS PROMISE IN CHRIST BY THE GOSPEL: Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: In whom WE HAVE BOLDNESS AND ACCESS WITH CONFIDENCE BY THE FAITH OF HIM.” Hope this helps and would be happy to answer any further questions or concerned :) P.S. As a final disclaimer, I am under a strict guideline not to preach to you anything false as I could face a GREATER CONDEMNATION by the Lord. I am compelled to be as accurate as I can possibly be as James 3:1 states that, “[...] be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.” Thus, I also encourage you to double-check everything I have mentioned and to possibly reread this a couple of times over as in reality there was no short explanation to render you. If it were, many people would have their Salvation secured and would be working towards their rewards. (Remember Lucifer, now Satan, was bejeweled with every stone before he fell-Ezekiel 28:13. It is surely doubtful that he would want anyone to gain what he lost, let alone being saved!) Also, might I suggest that you only use the KJV (it’s an even LONGER explanation on why) as it is the best translation available to us. Even though the other versions may be easier to read, it has countless omissions, key word changes etc. that give rise to false doctrines and heresy. (Some of these reasons are listed here : www.jesusisprecious.org/bible/modern_bible_omissions.htm) I would just learn to change words like “thou”, “ye”, endings like “-eth” etc. to everyday words English words instead to make it easier. I have implemented some of these changes for you in the above verses I have given you and these changes are in brackets [ ]. We have the right to reprove, correct etc. but ONLY under sound doctrine. 2 Timothy 3:16 “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”.
Not watching the video right now, but dispensationalism is Biblical. Sorry if that offends someone. While it does trace back through some of the people I'm sure this guy mentions, It can also be traced back to early a.d. Very early. At the end of the day, what truly matters in understanding salvation by Grace through Faith alone. There are many dispensations in the Bible. The clearest and most defined is how God dealt with Mankind before Christ and how he deals with Mankind after Christ. To claim there is not a distinction is simply denial. I don't really jump onto the prochecy train as it has no bearing on salvation. It's fun to see different points of view and ideas though.
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE JESUITS didn't teach dispensationalism. what a lie. the catholic church believed it was literally the kingdom of God on earth and the pope is vicariously Jesus on earth. they are also historically been anti semitic. Dispensationalism teaches God's future faithfulness to the nation of Israel. IF ANYTHING JESUITS WOULD BE TEACHING AMILLENIALISM or PRETERISM
@@sandygiacobbe7346 people read the bible and interpret it. Theological coined camps by an individual mean nothing, it's either biblical and you are interpreting it accurately and with revelation or not. No dispensationalist who reads it from the Bible is following a man
@@flamingrobin5957 It is tragic that many professed “Christians” fail to recognize the occult nature of the hidden hand of the Jesuits thru Freemasonry All thru futurism dispensationalism once you understand this you’ll see all the deceptions of the Roman Vatican Jesuit control today
Freemasons influenced the church, they influenced all religions on the face of this earth even the one I follow and you follow. The bibles words are masonic influenced. King James was a mason. I use that bible never the less. I still believe the Almighty, keeps his Commandments because i love, but realize that man hates God and I ,me must follow my God..so He in I and I in him.
@@johnp3081 That why you will never see a Geneva Bible in a freemason lodge! if understand and learn how the Jesuits of the Roman Catholic Church manipulated Bible prophecy to create an end-times Antichrist, in order to deflect blame away from them as the Antichrist system.The Geneva Bible clearly witnesses that Christ fulfilled the 70th week of Daniel and that He sent the Roman army to desolate the Jews, so it has nothing to do with an end-times Antichrist. Luther, Henry, Wesley, Edwards, Moody, and many many great reformers believed in a historical application of The Revelation.It was John Darby who propagated Dispensationalism, then later Scofield who marketed this teaching.The apostle's teachings completely and would utterly reject it. This is why the Geneva Bible annoyed King James who was a Catholic easily shown in history . The Geneva Bible had marginal notes that simply didn’t conform to that point of view of Kingship /British Israelism is the Gnostic counterpart. Those marginal notes had been, to a great extent placed in the Geneva Bible by the leaders of the Reformation RESEARCH THE OCCULT AND THE KING JAMES BIBLE ...KING JAMES VI/I, FREEMASONIC MONARCH Francis Bacon and the Inspiration of the 1611 King James Bible Masonic, Rosicrucian, Kabbalistic or Occult themes in relation to the Bible will necessarily have to touch on the person of King James who ... If not then you are finally getting the message and should now focus your attention on the wonderful Geneva Bible 1560/99 instead of KJV Here are the study notes from the Geneva Bible: Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two x weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but y not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof [shall be] with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. (x) In this week of the seventy, will Christ come and preach and suffer death. (y) He will seem to have no beauty, nor to be of any estimation; ( Isaiah 53:2 ). Daniel 9:27 And he a shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to b cease, c and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. (a) By the preaching of the Gospel he affirmed his promise, first to the Jews, and after to the Gentiles. (b) Christ accomplished this by his death and resurrection. (c) Meaning that Jerusalem and the sanctuary would be utterly destroyed because of their rebellion against the Father, and their idolatry: or as some read, that the plague will be so great, that they will all be astonished at them. The Geneva Bible clearly witnesses that Messiah fulfilled the 70th week of Daniel and that He sent the Roman army to desolate the Jews, so it has nothing to do with an end-times Antichrist. But the King James Bible did not include these study notes, so they were unavailable to future generations, which allowed the Jesuits deception to creep into the church of John Darby who propagated Dispensationalism, then later Scofield who marketed this teaching Beware of Eschatological False Prophets, Armageddon Script "Psyop's.
Please stop twisting scripture. How can it be secret when it says that Jesus 2nd coming will include 1. Shout 2. Voice of an archangel 3. The trumpet of God and 4. The dead rising up to meet Jesus in the air BEFORE the living go up. Secret? The Bible says NOT secret.
True, dispensationalism is false. But so is Reformed Theology. I say this as one who was dispensational for 11 years, and staunchly Reformed for 30. Eastern Orthodox now, thank God. It’s a journey. Keep seeking.
It’s funny to watch reformed believers critiquing disoensstinalism when clavinism is nothing more than Augustinian manichean Gnosticism It’s not dispensational theology that is another gospel, dispensational theology isn’t the gospel but only a means of understanding scripture and how God works through time Calvinism is a different and christless gospel Sorry chumps It’s just true
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLBjiHvkKtE/mqdefault.jpg)
Many thanks dear brother for this excellent exposure of dispensationalism. I pray that our brothers and sisters who are caught up in this may search the scriptures and be amazed by the Lord's dealing with His people through the covenants, in particular the covenant of grace.
Oh thank you Pastor Mark!! Such helpful teaching. Looking forward to the next.
th-cam.com/video/xxzeGIY6imQ/w-d-xo.html
Outstanding! I feel so encouraged that we have men and congregations such as this, our prize fighters for Christ in this age. We must never forget that because we loved our Messiah and sought to obey Him alone we were slaughtered. The armies of Anti-christ came and put our ancestors to the sword and we know by the Scriptures they will do it again.
“And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.”
- Matthew 19:17 (KJV) and Jesus said more after this the requirement was keep His commandments and to be perfected this: same chapter:Matthew 19 (KJV)
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
²⁰ The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?
²¹ Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
The man is outstanding in his use of logical fallacies like guilt by association.
@@steveluibrand7174can you explain?
th-cam.com/video/xxzeGIY6imQ/w-d-xo.html
Good preaching brother❤
Finally I get it , GROWING UP IN THIS DISPENSATIONAL WEB OF JESUIT CONFUSION , NOTHING MADE SENSE. ( BUT JESUS MAKES A WAY.....EYES TO SEE & EARS TO HEAR.....GREAT TEACHING GOD BLESS......KINGVISION OUT
Not even jesuits. They're just bagmen controlled by the people who wanted to stone Jesus. All this subversion serves who? Then gaining an earthly throne though deceiving everyone into supporting their lies
I could listen to this guy all day!
Who doesn't like a Irish accent ?
This is most excellent, thank you!
The church, and the whole world, needs more scholarly teaching like this on the history of these Jesuit false doctrines. I have not found better on TH-cam. Thank you, and keep it up. I am including this video in several of my featured playlists and look forward to more.
The Sharper Sword you can check Walter j.veith has a whole lot of information on Jesuits history, and their counter Reformation
th-cam.com/video/su0UEfT_LVs/w-d-xo.html
I don't call logical fallacies like guilt by association scholarly work. Jesuits are trinitarian. So are Reformed Baptists. Therefore Reformed Baptists have their roots in the Jesuit movement. I hope you can see how scholarly my conclusions are. Lol
@@steveluibrand7174 Jesuits are not trinitarian but quadritarian. Since they added a fourth to their godhead.
Is the 4th jesuit god the pope, or satan?
Well done Mark, showing Dispensationalism as another gospel is much needed in our day.
Our Lord and Saviour was victorious in His mission, dying on the cross was not an afterthought because He failed in His initial mission.
I am so glad God wasn’t actually mad at Adam for disobeying, he wanted him to!
@BrockJamesStory
I’m not Calvinist, but this is a straw man about what our Calvinist brothers and sisters actually believe.
th-cam.com/video/xxzeGIY6imQ/w-d-xo.html
Amen and Thank you from Germany.🥰
Amen! Yeshua Hamashiach our ultimate high priest.
Bless you for this teaching!
th-cam.com/video/Y12dR20sIEA/w-d-xo.html
This Yeshua crap is a denial of the Greek New Testament. ANTICHRIST Jews use Yeshu as a curse against Jesus.
Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
Matthew 1:25 And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.
The angel Gabriel told Mary to name him Jesus, not Yeshu which is a curse Jews say may his name be blotted out from under heaven. Esp since the new testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew.
Luke 1: 26 And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth,
27 To a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary.
28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.
29 And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be.
30 And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God.
31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.
32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
@@ChaplainBobWalkerBTh
Yikes
Amen and amen - thank you brother.
I came across this pastor a few months ago and praise God for him. I was keeping him and his church in my prayers but forgot about him so Im glad I found him again on youtube. Its so great to see the truth on how unbiblical and inaccurate dispensationalism is and how covenant theology is the truth.
th-cam.com/video/su0UEfT_LVs/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/xxzeGIY6imQ/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/Y12dR20sIEA/w-d-xo.html
nothing more to say, truth is truth.
Very well documented and accurate historical account given in a a time of great confusion about these doctrines
Thank you for the information I will share it with others
I have read all three volumes of Manuel Lacunza's (a.k.a. Ben Ezra) "The Coming of the Messiah in Glory and Majesty" as translated by Edward Irving. He did not teach a rapture in two stages. The two stage rapture and dispensationalism was primarily propagated by John Nelson Darby.
Edward Irving taught a one stage second coming up until 1828 after he'd been heavily influenced by the Scottish charismatic Margaret McDonald. If it weren't for Darby the doctrine of a secret rapture coupled with hyperdispensationalism would have stayed within the confines of the Irvingites.I've been studying the lives of Edward Irving,Joseph Smith and Vernon Wayne Howell aka David Koresh and I've found that the similarities are uncanny to say the least.
The pretibulation raptue is a counter reformation false teaching, spawned from the pen of the Jesuit monk, Francoisco Ribera.
Lacunza did speak of false pre trib rapture in 1812
Morelike later said of him in 1812, for lacunza died in 1801
David Nikao Wilcoxson is excellent too. Has anyone heard of him?
Yes- I’ve learned a lot from his videos and websites!
Yes i have but i'd forgotten about him. Thanks for the reminder.
Is it true that Darby was a high ranking Freemason?
That wouldn't surprise me
In John 3 Jesus explained to Nicodemus "YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN." That fulfills God's promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:3. Paul expands on this in Galatians 3 and 4.
?????
th-cam.com/video/xxzeGIY6imQ/w-d-xo.html
Wish I could come visit. Some of my ancestors were from Dublin.
Our 𐤌𐤔𐤉𐤇 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏 Mashiach Yahushua, Who came in His Father’s Name, and never changes, told Abraham to walk before Him and be perfect. He likewise said to His when walking in the flesh to ‘be perfect, as your Father in the Shamiym is perfect.
He does not make mistakes, nor does He ask of us what we cannot do.
Psalm 19 informs us how to be perfect. ‘Who discerns mistakes?
Declare me innocent from those that are secret, and kept me back from presumptuous one, do not let them rule over me, then I shall be perfect and innocent of great transgression. Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be pleasing before You, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 Yahuah, my Rock and my Redeemer.
May Alohim shine on all those who love the Truth.
Not at all; “That if you confess with your mouth 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤔𐤅𐤏 Yahuah Yahushua and believe in your heart that Alohim has raised Him from the dead, you shall be Delivered. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and one confesses with the mouth, and so is Delivered, because the Scripture says, “Whoever puts his trust in Him shall not be put to shame.” Because there is no distinction between Yahudi and Greek, for the same Master of all is rich to all those calling upon Him. For “everyone who calls on the Name of 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 Yahuah יהוה shall be saved.””
Romiyim (Romans) 10:9-13
We should seek the Truth and cling to Him in Love.
Awesome! thanks :)
Brilliant! thank you!
What do you say about preterisum?
Our confession goes back to 1677 (not exactly new). It is a second edition of a confession which dates back to 1644 (to people who called themselves Baptists, not anabaptists which was a different group who often were not even Christian). So the Jesuits who promoted 'free will' during the reformation, with their counter-reformation, now want everyone Calvinist or reformed?
Are you acknowledging the confession of whom? Catholic Baptist
KJO Baptist
I am confessing I have a lot to learn and am extending to others grace. I understand it is the job of a pastor to teach the platform that he is given. If you are going through a transformation of faith it changes dramatically and for me quite rapidly. Not getting off the elevator on your doctrinal statement. What floor is that ? The seventh floor? Why not continue heading upwards? Lol 😅
This is a good and faithful teacher. Good job.
God bless in Jesus name.
“Most of our time will not be in the Scriptures[...]we will be looking more at history this evening” -You are joking right?
Prophecy is history written in advance. They go together. Knowledge of papist history is necessary to understand the origin of dispensationalism.
Knowing the history of this false doctrine helps show how false it is.
Let the man speak.
God bless you. Jeff.
TRUTH!
Good video but how was Isaac Watts a dispensationalist if he died in 1748? I guess there is more to this story.
Very good. Exelent...
can you explain: Rom 11:12 Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness? When will the Jews attain their fullness?
@Ray Hernandez : why do you say never?
@Ray Hernandez : Romans 11:25 King James Version (KJV)
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
@Ray Hernandez : but what does the verse say, it says that God will go back to dealing with Israel as a Nation after the fullness of the Gentiles be come in, Dispensational it makes sense.
@Ray Hernandez I hardly even know Darby or Schofield, I just read the scripture. The book of Acts shows me a very clear transition of events.
@@markcoetzer7576 pentecost was shavuot. The spirit was given on Jewish holy days ...all of them. The passover, is when Christ died....the belief continues, not periods of times...therefore God in His nature changes. God does not Change. His way never changes. Isaac on the mountain was the prophesy of Christ...the whole faith is One faith, One God. Why trinity? To allow years later for dispensation.
Thanks fer the warning David:/
The church was born on Pentecost Jesus Chrisrt said he would build his church future
Do a search for the video, “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to find out how it started.
no don't....its a lie like this video. dispensationalism comes for careful study of scripture
@@flamingrobin5957 God is eternal and forever. All scripture is required for reproof and doctrine. Dispensation - some scripture. Jesus=God same Religion same belief Jesus is the lamb before he is the lamb after.
If the dispensation of Grace was hidden in God from the beginning of the world, HOW can the plan still be the same, I quote:
Eph 3:4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)
Eph 3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;
Eph 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
Eph 3:7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power.
Eph 3:8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ;
Eph 3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
what was HIDDEN - grace or the grafting in of the gentiles in book of acts when THE KILL AND EAT, the veil fell? see your quote and reread Eph 3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the SAME HEIRS, and partakers of HIS PROMISE in Christ by the gospel: Question: what did GOD promise in the old testament and second question: FELLOW HEIRS, are they together both Gentile and JEW? THE SAME PROMISE? Is GRACE that promise that is hid? what was the promise from the old testament then?
@@johnp3081 hi John, excellent rebuttal and helpful for me. I've believed in dispensationalism and pre-trib rapture for 35 years. I feel like I'm reading the Bible for the first time
@@johnp3081 I think the Gentiles here are referring to the prophecies in Hosea 1 and is Ezekiel 37 of the two sticks Judah and Israel. This is speaking about the New Covenant and the Gentiles in Romans 11 and who Paul is referring to I believe are the lost 10 tribes that were scattered and living as Gentiles in the world.
@@mr.e1220 my Brother the gospel is for ONE GOD ...please read Romans on the olive tree and Grafting. ISRAEL IN the new testament is all of us and please note the Apostles were "Christians" yet all Jews except one. It is with trinity concepts inforced by pagan system that we are indoctrinated into false teachers. Look up "one" search in new testament and get a contextual understanding. Then come back with a response. Please I urge you. See also all the commandments that Jesus made about Himself......this will lead you to a further Truth. My Brother He is the Way, The Truth THe Life ....HALLELUYAH!
Paul is not referring to some hidden church age of grace that is wedged in between the 69th and 70th week. The mystery has nothing to do with the church itself man! May the Lord open your eyes! It is everything to do about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the One, whose blood was shed for all, and not just the Jews. To think the mystery is about the church...talk about arrogance, to think the mystery had anything to do with us lost souls....it had to do with Jesus and His provision and death on the cross, for us lost gentile souls. We are the beneficiaries of the mystery....we the church, are NOT the mystery. Also, the word dispensation in that chapter does not equal the contrived false doctrine of dispensationalism. It would also be appropriate to say "stewardship." Paul was called to preach to the gentiles, and that is the mystery, that was hid from all saints in the past, that Jesus would die for the entire world, not just a single nation of people descended from Abraham, but all people who believe in Jesus by faith--they are considered that spiritual seed of Abraham. Not all Israel is Israel Paul said. For a Jew is only a Jew who has inward circumcision of the heart. The gentile grafted into the tree with the Jews is the mystery which Paul was given to preach, that we all might have the opportunity to accept our salvation, reconciling mankind back to our Father in heaven.
Thanks for the truth.
Amen!!
The mill kingdom ends in apostasy!
The true church goes at the rapture, the rest go into Babylon the great and are destroyed with her.
please respond to my query on your hermeneutics video in this series. I am not a dispensationalist... but want your reply for this women that pushes it
Truth Warrior i asked him to reply to a dispensationalists post and he never did. Long time ago. I copy and pasted it in another video he did. I agree with him on this issue as well. It's a doctrine of demons and has seriously hurt true Christianity.
dispensation teaching is vary much true. the King James Bible has it written/mentioned 4 times.
the modern bibles (ALL) which are by the roman catholic whore of Revelation 17 and 18 take dispensation
out
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 You are misinformed and terribly confused.
@@joeiiiful O, so by rightly dividing the word of truth, (knowing what is clearly for and not for me)
i am then terribly misinformed and confused?
i'd challenge you to explain it in the way that would have the
King James Bible not contradict itself, but if you try to do it
non dispensationlly, you'll fail 100% of the time
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 what does the word dispensation mean. First establish this and then read the four times its mentioned.
If the origin is critical to our understanding then we will henceforth reject the legitimacy of the Church as a chief apostle, Peter, denied his Lord three times, and the man Whose Name is the name of the Church and of the religion was crucified as a shameful criminal.
Salvation today is only on the basis of the death, blood, and resurrection of God manifest in the flesh for your sins. This is the only gospel that saves today. There is more than one gospel in the Bible.
If you understand the gospel of Christ, you can identify what is not ( Deut. 6:25;
Matt. 3:2; John 3:16; Acts 2:38).
There is only one gospel by which sinners are saved in this day of grace, the gospel of the grace of God, which is called in Ephesians 1:13, ‘the gospel of your salvation.’ No one has ever been saved except on the grounds of the shed blood of the Lord Jesus Christ.
John the Baptist said he was a friend of the bride groom .not the bride .the church is the bride of Christ 😅😅
Manuel De Lacunza, S.J. (July 19, 1731 - c. June 18, 1801) was a Jesuit priest who used the pseudonym Juan Josafat Ben-Ezra in his main work on the interpretation of the prophecies of the Bible, which was entitled The Coming of the Messiah in Majesty and Glory. Read this and understand where Darby got his ideas.
Edward Irving is the one who translated his writings into English, he also believed in a pre-trib rapture around the same time as Darby. He was another heretic who started the catholic apostolic church where the ecstatic tongue speaking came from, way before the pentecostal movement.
I get a real kick out of people who are against dispensationalism when the word dispensation is found in the scriptures. Rightly dividing the word of God is important to know who it is taking to and who it applies to. Here is just one example David in the psalms prayed for the Lord to not take his Holy Spirit from him. Nobody that has been born again should ever pray that prayer because we are sealed by the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption. Now I am not saying not to ask for the fullness of the Holy Spirit but simply that we are his and he will never leave us or forsake us because when he purchases us with his own blood that is when the Holy spirit takes residence in the believer. No one in the Old Testament was born again. This also isn’t to say that everyone who believes in dispensationalism is always rightly dividing the word of truth. The Kingdom of heaven is not the same as the Kingdom of God. One is physical and one is spiritual. The bible says the kingdom of God dwelleth in you. It’s not Christs Physical Kingdom that dwells in us but his spiritual kingdom through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. We are not baptized unto John’s baptism. Our baptism is not to make our way strait because the kingdom of heaven is at hand. You read in the book of Mathew if thy right hand offends thee cut it off or if thy right eye offends thee pluck it out it is better to have one hand than two to be cast into hell fire. Now if you think this applies to you then tell me where are all the one-eyed Christians or one-handed ones? don’t spiritualize this brother he is talking about swift judgment when he sets up his earthly kingdom. Need more proof? If thou say unto thy brother Raca thou shall be in danger of the council. WHAT COUNCIL? DONT, YOU DARE SPIRITUALISE THIS TO FIT YOUR OWN NARATIVE! But if thou say to thy brother thou fool, thou shall be in danger of hell fire. Swift judgement carried out by the Lord Jesus when he set up rulers and councils to carry out his judgments when he sits on his throne in Jerusalem. This may apply to us in principal but when it is that specific it doesn’t apply to us doctrinally at all. It is talking about a different time period a different dispensation. If you find it in the bible it didn't start with any man.
Your argument doesn't hold water unfortunately. Kent Hovind Gave testimony how he believe in the pre rapture for over 40 yrs until he was doing 10 yrs in prison he had to unlearn dispensationalism due to its heretic doctrines.
Amen!
What do you believe in when it comes to eschatology. Are you a futurist, preterist or other?
[crickets]… The biggest problem I have with "anti" videos is that they spend far too much time slinging mud and never enough time declaring themselves. It is far too easy to criticize the dead and paint with a brush far too wide. This guy cherry picks the worst of "dispensationalists" to make a case that needs not be made. Virtually every Dispensationalist that I know would AGREE with much of what he says. For example, God never had a 'Plan B'. I do not know, personally, one who believes that. This guy speaks of Adam Pre-Fall, Post Fall, Crucifixion, Church Age, Millennium and Covenants. Well, that's most of what Larkin put on charts. At least Larkin was honest enough to put 4 different views on Chart 1 of Dispensational Truth and labels them all "Ages". Do I believe everything Larkin wrote? Nope. And, in fact, this guy in the video is grossly wrong when he describes the Dispensationalist view that the Millennium is a test that is passed (27:50). No Dispensationalist I personally know believes that because of Revelation 20:7-10. If the Millennium is a test, man blows that one too. Big time.
@@mcgeorgerl the whole bible is the true, the law was not done away but changed due to a change in the high priest. All the commandments still stand.
He's amillemial
@@m.d.d4250 I guess thats everything one needs to know about that clown
@@mutulica10 amils go to hell in ur religion?
He's right,ALL of the protestant reformers followed HISTORICISM,(the method of prophetic interpretation followed by the prophets,Jesus & his disciples, & the reformers)...the reason futurism & praeterism was developed was because after the council of trent,the church wanted to STOP the reformers from preaching that ROME IS ANTI-CHRIST,so they commissioned the Jesuits w/the task of developing new forms of prophetic interpretation that would muddy the waters & mute the testimony of the reformers,so after futurism was developed by the Jesuit ribera & praeterism was developed by the Jesuit alcazar,a program of gradual infiltration was begun into the protestant churches & within a short time the futurist doctrine spread throughout the denominations like wildfire,HISTORICISM was the form used for almost 5 millennia & was endorsed by CHRIST & was proved to be consistent & reliable, dispensationalist prophecy was introduced into the protestant churches around 200 yrs ago & was intended to BLIND the churches as to the REAL identity of rome...its history & the Jesuits intent in it's introduction into the churches renders these interpretations HIGHLY SUSPECT & unreliable...
well said
This is spot on, Jesuits are the popes army that do their dirty work.
@@YaH_Gives_Wisdom ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!..
I think that a Jesuit will be the false prophet mentioned in John's Revelation, a Jesuit Pope maybe?.
@@bigbruno56 Hegelian dialectic, all apart ie;Jesuitism , n. The arts, principles, and practices of the Jesuits. Cunning, deceit; hypocrisy; prevarication (to speak falsely); deceptive practices to effect a purpose. Shushing face sounds like the perfect definition of the false prophet, the Jesuit General The false prophet Superior General and the antichrist beast Pope are the two horns of the earth beast, the two leaders, as horns in prophecy point to a leader. They feign to be Christian (like a lamb) buy they serve Satan (the dragon).
They control the city-state corporation of the District of Columbia, to use as their war-machine, to attack countries who have not bowed down to the authority of the Superior General, and who don’t have a Jesuit-Rothschild central bank.
so what does this mean then
This is false. Read the book Dispensationalism Before Darby by Dr. William C. Watson.
Dispensationalism was never part of the church. Look at the Orthodox church. They have no such doctrine
@DavidRodriguez-er4rq You didn't read your bible.
1 Corinthians 9:17
“For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.”
Ephesians 3:2
“If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:”
Colossians 1:25
“Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;”
Great book- also- ancient dispensational truth and discovering Dispensationalism.
This is an honest question....And I am a dispensationalist ...but I am open to hear and consider opposing views...my question...was God's promises to Israel true promises or were they just based on condition. And did the church attain Israel's promises at rejection of Christ...I repeat this is an honest question....thank you for your video .
Dear friend, thank you for the question. I believe the answer is not in how true the promises were. They undoubtedly are, since God made them. The real issue is, to whom were the promises actually made. The Apostle Paul addresses this very point in Romans chapter 9. Consider what he says:
Rom 9:6-8 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
So the promises were and are true. The recipients is the issue. Only the true spiritual israel receive them and all the blessings of them.
I hope this is of some help.
Jesus Christ instituted the new covenant with 12 Jewish men. Once you understand the significance of this you'll see who the true Israel is today.
@@ArannReformedBaptistChurch so replacement theology
@@MinisterRedPill there are some who believe in what is commonly caricatured as “replacement theology”.
Historic Reformed confessions and believers do still hold to a future return of the Jews to the land, and their future re-ingrafting into the People of God (through conversion to Christ).
Paul says the Jewish people stumbled, but did not fall. Their eyes are vailed, but only for a season. When the fullness of the Gentiles comes into the church, then Israel also shall be converted and re-join the church (the same body that she had in large part abandoned when she abandoned Christ).
You have to understand that the Bible shows that there has always been one Church, from Adam until the end of the word.
Israel was brought in early, as those to whom Messiah would come, but they did not receive Christ and so he “gave the kingdom to another” (ie, the Gentiles).
When Israel returns to Christ, then gentile and Jew together shall be one people, with one King to rule over them.
@@Lawofkings nice mental play on words
Jesus did come proclaiming that the Kingdom was at hand. His Kingdom was not originating from this world but it was invading. He was and is King and Lord. Read HOW GOD BECAME KING by NT Wright. Jesus' Kingdom starts within and reigns in each heart and mind. It has been and will continue to fill the whole earth. It is both and. Jesus is Lord. He has been ruling and reigning until He makes all His enemies under His feet. Isaiah wrote that of the growth of His Kingdom there shall be no end. I believe it, first in me, then in others, and ultimately to fill the whole earth.
What does it mean to keep us FROM the hour of wrath. You are not appointed for wrath.
What is happening in the Middle East currently
To me, it seems that a ceasefire is needed.
It also seems those people will come back to attack Israel in the future
Who will be rewarded and over who will those people rule that will be rewarded.
Another question. If you don't come up to Jerusalem yearly, you will not get rain. I did my own. Research. We are too interested in what preachers say. We dont read and study the bible for ourselves
Amen David Fleming...the devil may have some power but a very short leash!! Jesus said..Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth..
Why did Jacob and Joseph want their bones buried in Canaan if they didn't have a hope for a earthly kingdom?😅
Now, let's hear about the Jesuit origins of anti-dispensationalism!
Dispensationalism is a modern and materialistic theology.. God bless you brother..
De Lacunza teach that the Antichrist will come from the Dan Tribe, not from «the apostate roman Church». I think this preacher didn't read De Lacunza directly.
And you will not find any evidence in Irving writings that he teach pretribulational rapture in the sense that Darby and other understand the matter. Irving was postribulational. The preacher limited his reaching to secundary sources. And that was the problem in all this lecture.
The Lord Jesus Chrisrt says in Revelation chapter 3 that the church is not going going through the great tribulation. Put that in your pipe and smoke it 😅
Where exactly in chapter three is this stated?
Like any critical thinking/reading just read it in CONTEXT! And pray! I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified. End of discussion. Your theology ends when you breathe your last. Christ and Him crucified is the way, means, and message this world needs today. All these theologians and all this disputation profits nothing. Duh! Do you have a personal relationship with Jesus? Have you witnessed his salvation gospel to anyone? If you haven’t, be quiet! You have some of your own soul searching to do then. This - to everyone!
Every believer is a theologian, the question is if their theology is correct. The point you just made is a theological one, and it is incorrect .
M. D.D Chuckle. Ok. Rather than appear pompous, which we all just know you aren’t, as in Geometry...please...prove it.
Amen!!
And the Jesuits are still the rapture's best promoters.
prove it. when has the roman catholic church ever taught the catching up before the time of Jacob's trouble?
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 Jesuit Lacunza pretending to be rabbi Ben Ezra.
@@keithwhitlock726 would you answer my question? would you at least link me a site (an official catholic website) that preaches/defends the catching up? that is all i ask.
because according to scriptures, (the King James Bible) dispensational teaching is vary much true
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 The Rapture and futurist doctrine had it's origin from the Jesuit Ribera during the Reformation. The key reason is to deflect focus on the scriptural doctrine of the Roman Catholic system as antichrist.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Ribera
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 Jesuits operate outside official Roman Catholic official doctrine. The speaker does a good job documenting his presentation.
Eph 1:10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
Col 1:25 Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;
...and Paul uses the word dispensation in two other books also. If I understand correctly, Paul wasn’t a jesuit and he preceded Darby.
... The word dispensation just means to "give out" and/or "give until gone" think ofna soap DISPENSER. or a Pez Dispenser. The word has NOTHING to do with periods of time lol and yes Paul used them 4 times but somehow that equals 7 dispensations? 🤔 there are LOTS of words in the Bible, it doesnt mean you need to create an entire goofy theology based on them. The word Nazarene is in the Bible. The word Presbytery. The word Pentecoste. That doesnt mean Im a Nazarite, a Presbyterian, or a Pentecostal 🤷🏻
@Billy Rader Too bad, there are at LEAST 2 ways of how righteousness was given out by God. (Romans 10:5)
@@mjy63086 Lol you defined the word dispensation correctly which obviously has everything to do with periods of time or "dispensations" lol. If we're all under one dispensation why don't you observe the sabbath? The feasts? Why don't you follow all the 600+ Laws of the Torah and slaughter animals for forgiveness of sins if we're still under the same dispensation? What changed to allow you to not have to do those things anymore? A different dispensation perhaps?
@@urielseptim9860dispensationalism also adheres to the false teaching of a ridiculous 2000 + year gap of Daniel 9:27. Unbeknownst to Dispensationalists, their beliefs of the Bible will *_never_* be fulfilled because the Bible will be stuck in a continuous false loop of time waiting for the antichrist.
I’m sorry I cannot hold my tongue (fingers); this man’s testimony is beyond erroneous! Sir, if Jesus Christ’s kingdom is “Spiritual” then please explain how He would reign for 1000 THOUSAND YEARS as per Revelation 20:6?! So would you dare to say that this “Spiritual” kingdom is temporal?! Please explain.
Have you read the Bible for yourself?? A physical kingdom...lol. Just like the Jews who killed Christ thought.
Jack Spalden 1000 years will be in heaven, during this period the Earth is laid desolate without inhabitants, that's why the Bible talked about Satan being bound for 1000 years,
at the end of 1000 years the new Jerusalem come down
Jack Spalden; Many churches today affirm, in their “what we believe” statements, that Jesus will return to rule Earth for a millennium. Yet only one passage in the entire Bible refers to Jesus and a thousand years: Revelation 20;1-6. I think it dangerous for any church to base a core doctrine on a single scripture passage.
It NEVER mentions that the reign is on earth. It says “they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years”. One thousand years is figurative to simply represent a very long period of time, especially since we already know that Christ’s Kingdom has no end Daniel 7;14 . If this were literal, it would contradict such passages: Isa 9;7, and Luke 1;31-33, as well as many others.
Scripture does not speak of "the thousand year reign of Christ." Revelation 20:4 says, "...and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God,...and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years." It's not Christ that reigns 1000 years, but those who were killed for God's sake that reign with Christ 1000 years.
For example, if I say that John Doe reigns with the President for one year, does that mean the President reigns only one year? No, it does not. The President could reign for 4 years, but the point is that John reigned with the President for one year. The President isn't the subject, it is speaking about how long John reigns with him. Likewise, Revelation 20:4 is not about how long Jesus will reign, but how long others will reign with Jesus. There's a big difference.
The whole argument for an earthly millennium is so God can fulfill his promises to Israel, his earthly people.
One of the central core doctrines of Zionism is an earthly kingdom. When Yeshua/Jesus came the first time, they were of a carnal mindset and kept inquiring on when the kingdom would be, however, an actual literal 1,000 earthly reign is not supported biblically, as Jesus stated His Kingdom is spiritual, and not of this world.
When He came, they were expecting an earthly king and kingdom, this did not happen and Jesus told the House of Judah(Israel) that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to a nation bringing forth the fruit of it(Mat 21;38-43). They were not interested in a spiritual kingdom, and so they sought to take His birthright. (Also think: Esau and Jacob, Isaac and Ishmael, Cain and Abel).
Verse 20: 4 says thrones and in Revelation most cases where thrones are in heaven. 1000 year earthly rule is only in the minds of Darbyists and those who believe the con man Scofield
@@ravinroyer excellent, they were probably masons.
This guy proves one thing: context and clavinism never ever go together
What's clavinism? Never heard of that.
@@christalone71
John Calvin, Calvinism look it up, I am sure you have by now?
But he wrote clavinism... Of course I've heard of Calvinism.
@@christalone71 probably a typo then
Clavinists, people who ascribe to the theological wisdom of Cliff Clavin from Cheers.😂
THATS HOW THEY OPERATE THEY WILL SAY ANY THING REQUIRED TO COVER UP, THEY KILL , THEY START WARS , AND NOW THEY GOT THEIR SCIENTIST TO KILL PEOPLE WITH THIS VIRUS , THIS PREACHER SOUNDS LIKE HE IS CATHOLIC , CALVINIST
Sucks that there were multiple baptism but you claim like Paul that there is 1.
Such a wicked doctrine
Thank you for brining this
ZIONISM too. The gibberish babblers promoted this too
Thanks for Isaac watts😅
Covenant 292 times in the Authorized version, Dispensation 4 times and those only in the NT. Enough said. The volume of scripture supports Covenant. Resurrection 41 times in the Authorized version plus many other references such as "I will raise him" speaking of the resurrection, Rapture 0 times in the authorized......let that sink in for a moment before you comment. While not a Calvinist I'm also not a Dispensationalist either. There are many that do not fit the boxes.
Helicopter. No mention in either Testament. Therefore... never use that word.
The word Bible isnt in the bible. It must not exist?!
@@mcgeorgerl Nobody is making a Christian theology out of helicopter.
@@truthisfreedom8039 Try "word of the Lord".
@@aktrapper6126 Theology. 0 uses in the OT or NT of the AV.
He is making a great case for the primacy of the Catholic Church.
Interesting x
everyone opposing dispensationalism uses propanganda, strawman arguments, and sanctimony. while dispensationalists use scripture and a proper hermanuetic to extrapalates the revelations of Mysteries given to Paul the apostle unto the gentiles
This is a very general and superficial statement. I have found the exact opposit to be true. Nobody was able to show one single verse from scripture to prove the pretrib rapture to me... since 1998. I am still waiting...Darby split the evangelical church and the bretheren movement. Georg Mueller did not follow him but his Bible. I am determend to to the same...
MYSTERIES thats all they quote. Mystery babylon is more like IT. MAN MADE JESUIT DOCTRINES - dispensations
Sola scriptura
Amen.
They are lying or ignorant.
You only have to find one pre trib rapture teaching before Darby (and there are many), to disprove this nonsense.
This is Truth
I pray not for the world. But only the ones who the Father gives to the Son of God john 17😅
Why would Jesuits need to invent dispensationalism when the current denominational churches have bibles from the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus as their source of doctrine. These align more with Catholic teaching than anything concerning dispensationalism.
"most of our time will not be spent in the scriptures"
why?
because if you read the King James Bible, you'll see
that dispensation is a bible word, and that there are 7
dispensations. God dispensed grace differently to mankind
when world wide events change.
examples include
(and by lines i mean the change from one dispensation to another)
before the fall of man and after the fall of man.
this is dispensation line one
after the flood and God's everlasting covenant with Abraham and his seed.
this is dispensation line two
the change from the law and the prophets to the
preaching of the kingdom of heaven to the Jews (God himself being
their king according to the book of Psalms and prophets)
after the Jews rejected that and killed him for it,
that brings in the 5th dispensation (the one we're in now,
grace through faith in the blood of Jesus Christ, which is from second
half of Acts to Philemon. this is the 4th dispensation line
and the catching up of the body of Christ
is ganna end the grace through faith and lead
into dispensation 6 where there will be signs
and God's wrath on an unbelieving, Christ rejecting world
(which the body of Christ will have no part in), this is dispensation
line 5
dispensation line 6 is the ending of the wrath of God poured out
on earth and the 2nd bodily return of Jesus Christ on the face of the earth
and from their, the kingdom of heaven that was preaching in dispensation
4 and promised in dispensation 2 and 3 will be brought in. then after
the thousand years of ruling and reigning is expired, then Satan will
be released from the bottomless pit to deceive one last time then
God will cast devour him with fire from heaven to land him in
the lake of fire where the other two members of the trinity are
then after that, into eternity. they that are in the lake of fire
will have no other choice then to make it their home because
that's where they are kept forever. the body of Christ will be with God,
and physical Jews (seed of Abraham) as well as all the prophets and
apostles will be with us.
they that say there is no dispensations in the bible is either a liar or ignorant
the word 'dispensation' may be there but the context dictates the meaning... most of which are not eschatological in nature. see scholar Dr Michael Hieser on the fallacies of KJV only.
even Erasmus conceded there were numerous known mistakes in his work
@@bigfigism you must have went to a bible collage, in other words be that foolish, simple to think that i will listen to a hypocrite, a liar who hates God and his book for things concerning scripture.
might as well go to a murdering rapist for good morals
Ephesians 3 has all one needs to know what dispensation means. brother Paul was talking about that which was hidden from the beginning but now made manifest,
we see types and foreshadowings of the 5th dispensation (which we are in right now) with the first shed blood of a lamb that God killed after Adam and Eve fell, Abraham said that God would provide HIMSELF a lamb, Moses had the blood of a lab put on the door (Jesus is the door), on the left, right, and top (like a cross).
dispensations are there, there is distinction, heresies and lies from false brethren and false prophets when they take a scripture and put it somewhere where it doesn't belong
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 you guys believe philosophy, you keep quoting what this person said and theology. theology failed. We can see it here - every tongue with a different opinion. LET YAHSHUA BE YOUR TEACHER and him only. read all the read letters and analyze them
Not one bible text to place exactly the divisions. Man's Philosophy. All because he rejects the Almighty.
@@xceptamanbbornagainnokingd5836 Rom 8:7-8
the sinful mind is HOSTILE to God. It does NOT SUBMIT to God's law, nor can it do so. 8 Those controlled by the sinful nature CANNOT please God.
DO YOU KNOW HIM?
1 John 3:22-24
22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we KEEP his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
JESUS IS GOD - same commandments REV 1:8
The catching where the body of Christ the Apostle Paul says even back then when Paul was around that there are those who said that the resurrection has passed already and overthrow the faith of some this is the rapture he's talking about. Again the issue I see here is this guy is a pagan who believes in Pagan theology outside of the Apostle Paul again these Catholics who follow alexandrian manuscripts and deny Jesus Christ sacrifice on the cross or going to constantly act like they believe in scripture but they're scripture is perverted
Dispensationalism has nothing to do with the RC church whatsoever. This is a lie.
Sadly, the attack on classical dispensationalism is largely and attack on that which no longer exists. I am a premillennialist who agrees with the reformed that salvation has always been by faith alone in Christ alone (Gen. 15:6; Hab. 2:4; John 8:56; Rom. 4:3). I believe that regeneration precedes faith (John 6:44; Titus 3:5). I believe that both Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ are the "one new man" (Eph. 2:15) and that only believers in Christ (whether Jew or Gentile) will inherit Christ's Kingdom.
I don't believe there is a distinction between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God. I don't believe the gospels are for one group, while the epistles are for another group. I do believe, however, in good exegesis. Anyone who doesn't acknowledge the future restoration of Israel is distorting the Apostle Paul's teaching in Romans 11:25-28. Paul clearly states that "all Israel" will be saved in Romans 11:26. The term "all Israel" cannot refer to the church as Calvin claimed since they are called "enemies of the gospel" two verses later (Rom. 11:28). How can the church be enemies of the gospel? Paul also states that Israel had a "partial hardening" in Romans 11:25. This partial hardening also proves "all Israel" in verse 26 must be national ethnic Israel. Is someone willing to claim that the church had a partial hardening? Is someone willing to claim elect Jews had a partial hardening?
Those who don't believe in a future restoration of Israel are attacking the promises of God and are unable to do solid exegesis. For example, partial preterists claim the Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24 was fulfilled in 70 A.D. The Parousia of Christ is mentioned 4 times in this text (Matt. 24:3, 27, 37, 39). The apostle Paul teaches that the Parousia is the event in which believers are given their resurrected bodies (1 Cor. 15:22-23; 1 Thess. 4:15-18). So, either you're a partial preterist and you have to claim there will be two "Parousias" separated by thousands of years (brilliant!), or you have to be a full preterist and claim the resurrection already happened in 70 A.D. and commit the same heresy as Hymenaeus and Philetus (2 Tim. 2:17-18) (even more brilliant!). Can some partial preterist on this site explain how the 16 usages of Parousia for Christ's coming can refer to two comings separated by thousands of years? Can you explain why the Parousia Paul mentions in 1 Cor. 15:23 is different than the Parousia mentioned in the Olivet Discourse? Can some full preterist explain to me why the nations are not going up to Jerusalem to worship Christ as promised in Zechariah 14:16-17?
Umm the Israel of God is the ecclesia (the church)
@@rdaleyj1 I'm talking about the exegesis of Romans 11:26 (not Gal. 6:16). There is no way that "all Israel" in Romans 11:26 is the church because they are called "enemies of the gospel" two verses later (11:28) and "partially hardened" one verse earlier (11:25). Explain to me how the church can be partially hardened and enemies of the gospel?
By the way, there is no contradiction in believing that gentile believers in Christ will inherit the promises given to national, ethnic Israel (Rom. 11:17). If we maintain that there is only one way of salvation (faith in Christ) for both Jew and Gentile. and that the kingdom is coming to Israel, where's the contradiction?
@@ESCHATOLOGYERIC no I totally agree with you that the Jews who cannot believe in Jesus cannot be saved before judgment day, and that because so many of them have already went on to eternity without coming to Christ, and that those who are the called consisting of both Jewish and Gentile believers will be those who are saved from the second death. Whosoever activate l actually comes to Christ between now and the end have been called and drawn to him first, and they will be saved.
The only way that All Israel will be saved makes any sense to me is the "All Israel" who are the called, AKA the Israel of God.
@@ESCHATOLOGYERIC there's one other way that I believe All Israel shall be saved that makes sense, but I'm not going down that road with you becuz most people cannot see it.
@@rdaleyj1 Jesus (the Messiah) is the living covenant.
Matthew 26:28 For this is my blood of the new testament [new covenant], which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
There were righteous [righteous Jews] who were following the covenant long before the Messiah was born.
Thus the Messiah says (John 4:22) “... we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.”
The Messiah is including himself by saying we; “we know what we worship”
Per the scriptures Jesus did not come to call righteous Jews to repentance...
Matthew 9:13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for *I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.*
Matthew 15:24 But he answered and said, *I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.*
The righteous that were already following the covenant did not need (and do not need) to be called to repentance.
There are still righteous Jews that follow the covenant.
They just don't know that the covenant (the word of God) was made flesh, yet they may even follow him even better than you or I.
The Messiah came to call the sinner.
There were righteous Jews following him long before he was born and continue to even today.
Example:
Luke 1:5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.
Luke 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
So what you're telling me is you're not going to go to the scripture you're going to go to your own man-made belief systems outside of scripture to try to disprove dispensationalism which is based in scripture. No I don't see anything Shawty going on here. On top of that look up a book called dispensationalism before Darby and also study your Bible and rightly divide it. Because dispensationalism is biblical Paul says we need to rightly divide but that also means there are those who wrongly divide. So there is good dispensationalist there are bad dispensation was trying to lump us all together is pretty bad
I was raised with Rapture Dispensationalism & believed it fervently for 40 years until 2016. I am willing to provide some helpful links & book titles for your own research, if you’re interested.
@@anng4665 wait so you're telling me you don't believe in dispensational theology after 2016 or cuz the way you phrase that. If you have books on dispensational theology or education on more dispensationalist teachings I'm all ears.
@@inthedark334 I was so heavily indoctrinated in it, it’s sad & embarrassing for me now. I don’t have time this evening to provide a bunch of links or book titles, but I will leave just 2 for now. They are sermon series links which were heavily instrumental in severing the false doctrines from my previously cherished beliefs. The first series is 8 sermons. I sat up all night listening to all 8 hours of it. I just couldn’t believe how many verses were cited that I didn’t remember ever reading or hearing in sermons. The next series is only 3 sermons about the Rapture. I believe it is crucial to listen to the 1st, longer series first because it goes into detail about the errors of Dispensational doctrine. The Rapture sermon series is only 3 sermons (about 3 hours). I will be interested in reading your comments after you have listened to both series.
@@inthedark334 The 8 sermon series by James C Gallagher is what gave me my breakthrough. I was no longer a Dispensationalist after hearing it. I begged my 80-something-yr-old Southern Baptist parents to listen to it in 2016 after I did. They listened & haven’t believed in Rapture Dispensationalism since. So it’s never too late to denounce false doctrine, not even in one’s 80’s. The series called The Israel of God parts 1-8. Scroll down past the first 5 or so sermons in this list and you will see Israel of God part 1.
www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerWithinSource=&subsetCat=&subsetItem=&mediatype=&includekeywords=&exactverse=&keyword=Rev._James_C._Gallagher&keyworddesc=Rev.+James+C.+Gallagher&currsection=&AudioOnly=false&SpeakerOnly=true&keywordwithin=Israel+of+God&x=11&y=9
@@inthedark334 Listen to this after you’ve listened to the Israel of God series. This is the 3 sermon series by James C Gallagher called There Is No Such Thing As A Secret Rapture.
www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerWithinSource=&subsetCat=&subsetItem=&mediatype=&includekeywords=&exactverse=&keyword=Rev._James_C._Gallagher&keyworddesc=Rev.+James+C.+Gallagher&currsection=&AudioOnly=false&SpeakerOnly=true&keywordwithin=There+Is+No+Such+Thing+As+A+Secret+Rapture&x=5&y=11
There are seven different definitions in the Bible for the one word Israel. Two are given in Romans 9:6-8. Find another illuded to in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Fake Israel.
God has never allowed the righteous to perish with the wicked
Wow. This guy apparently doesn't read his bible. And IF he does, he's twisting the scripture profusely. This guy is sick.
@BbyBokChoy Oh brother.
Study to show yourself approved unto Gid rightly dividing the word of truth not to be ashamed of and shun profane babblings of whoom are Alexander and hymaneys who have erred and said the crucifixion is in the past but God knows who are his that is 2n Timothy 2:15 talking about Alexander and hymaneys who said the crucifixion is false like Muslims just after telling to divide the word of truth nit to be ashamed of shun babbling NHS strange things happening bible says divide the Word of Truth
amen
"most of our time will not be spent on scriptures this evening". You know why? Because scriptures defend dispensationalism.
Strong delusion
Dispensationalism holds that Jesus failed on the cross.
Pretty much all you need to understand of this heresy.
You know nothing about dispensationalism to have made such a bold statement such as that.
It is quite the opposite actually. You see; we believe that it was not UNTIL the blood of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ was poured out that anyone could attain salvation.
The saints went to paradise, not the third heaven, and it was not UNTIL Jesus led captivity captive when He descended that they were completely "saved" AFTER the only satisfactory atonement for sin was made!
The greatest blunder by those who say things like you say is the fact that your view of salvation for old Testament Saints is actually attacking the very significance of what He did for us at Calvary! I so wish that my brothers and sisters in Christ would stop listening to men, swallow their pride and maybe actually listen to some of us "heretical" dispensationalists once in a while! God bless you and yours as we await His return!
@@flman9684
Thank you for responding.
Can you tell me the meaning of Mat 10:23
churchianity is afraid of mid-Acts dispensational grace believers because they’d have to explain why they’ve been lying for 2000 years...
Jesus has fulfilled the OT on the Cross once and for all, which fact can be proved by his last word on it "Tetelestai (I have fulfilled)". Since His second coming for judging the Old World in 70 AD, Jesus has established the New World conclusively and decisively, where Satan has no power and authority over the world "de jure" (1Cor. 15:20-28). Therefore, Christians should pray and act for their taking over the world for Jesus on the basis of the fact of His legal conquest.
Your misrepresenting dispensationalism
It’s always one plan, God does not need to change the plan he knows everything
I don't think you know who's really behind it. Hint: not jesuits, but a shorter word with he same starting.
@@VndNvwYvvSvv I agree Jesus was a dispensationalist
If dispensationalism isn't true, why is this guy not sacrificing calves and bulls and keeping the Sabbath?
You are missing it, big time. Yeshua Hamashi was the sacrifice for sin. Keeping the Sabboth is one of God's commandments that you will keep out of love because of what God did for you, not trying to gain points.
@@firestarter105G not as a Christian. That's a Jewish covenant. Have you read the New Testament. Notice in Acts the disciples keep meeting on the first day of the week.. Sunday. Sure they visit synagogues on Shabbat to engage with the Jews to tell them about the new covenant.
This is like Christianity 101
Jesus Christ is likened to the Sun, he rose on a Sunday.
You're getting ahead of time, come the great tribulation,ie the time of Jacobs Trouble , the Sunday law things will be relevant then.
Not now.
The application for the Christian is..6 days shall they labour and do all thy work:
It's stops at the colon for us.
Study to show thyself approved a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,rightly dividing the word of truth.
2Timothy 2:15 the Holy Bible.
You guys aren't rightly dividing.
Which Bible are you using friend?
@@firestarter105G So that was a different dispensation.
only JOSEPH SMITH is more evil than this mess.........
What is this guy talking about?!? This isn’t dispensationalism all! Sir, quick question(s), do you believe that 1. To be born-again means you are saved from faith-alone and 2. Once saved always saved? Why or why not, in brief. -thanks
Please can you quote those exact words for me from the bible " faith alone" - the exact text that has that phrase that everyone says....PLEASE QUOTE THAT EXACT TEXT!!
PART I:
Hi John P. Certainly, I would be glad to share this with you but before I divulge, I must confess that neither you or I will find the exact phrase “faith-alone” in this verbatim form and quite honestly why would it? It is logical to assume that to those who seek, find, opposed to those who do not seek, would not find.
With that being said, there is plenty of evidence for FAITH-ALONE doctrine! What do you do with all of these verses that make it CLEAR that NO WORK is involved for one’s Salvation which indicates a purely through faith-alone message? The Bible, if it is this divide masterpiece, CANNOT contradict itself and if you find that it might seem like it does, there is usually an explanation that one has simply not sought out after, to contextually understand (eg. “nit-pickers”); it is that pure and simple!
As a disclaimer, I’ve been saved now (after following the wrong doctrine for the majority of my life) for about 2-3 years now. Though, within this timespan, I have learned far more than all the years I’ve been alive prior; combined and multiplied, to the point where I do not think there is a specific number to give you. I had always “thought” that I “might” be saved, but had NO assurances at all! (Sounds a lot like the pagan religions, in which WORK is a MANDATE (eg. “in order to reach enlightenment” etc.) and one has to become familiar, accepting and be content with the “uncertainty”. -Sounds like one big RISK!
But let’s get right down to business:
Romans 10:3-4 says, “For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their ‘own righteousness’, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. FOR CHRIST IS THE END OF THE LAW FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS TO EVERY ONE THAT BELIEVETH.”
Philippians 3:9, “And be found in him, NOT having mine own righteousness, WHICH IS OF THE LAW, BUT THAT WHICH IS THROUGH THE FAITH OF CHRIST, THE RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH IS OF GOD BY FAITH.” (FAITH = RIGHTEOUSNESS)
The Lord Himself said that the only “WORK” necessary or allowed to be saved is to BELIEVE on the Lord Jesus Christ:
John 6:28-29, “Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, THIS IS THE WORK OF GOD, THAT YE BELIEVE ON HIM WHOM HE HATH SENT.”
In Matthew 7:23, it is very important to read that verse CAREFULLY, when it says,
“And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that WORK iniquity”. -the key word here is “work”.
The previous verse saying, “Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many WONDERFUL WORKS?
They equated their salvation with faith + WORKS and simply not believing alone! (Example Catholics, Seven-Day Adventists etc.).
You only have to read Matthew 25:41 to understand what Jesus Christ means when He says “depart from me”. (Everlasting fire).
Romans 11:6
“And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. BUT IF IT BE OF WORKS, THEN IS IT NO MORE GRACE: OTHERWISE WORK IS NO MORE WORK”.
Galatians 2:21
“I do not frustrate the GRACE of God: FOR IF RIGHTEOUSNESS COME BY THE LAW, THEN CHRIST IS DEAD IN VAIN”.
Ephesians 2:8
“For by GRACE are ye SAVED THROUGH FAITH; and that NOT OF YOURSELVES: IT IS THE GIFT OF GOD: NOT OF WORKS, lest any man should boast”[!]
Romans 4:5
“But to him that WORKETH NOT, BUT BELIEVETH ON HIM THAT JUSTIFIETH THE UNGODLY, HIS FAITH IS COUNTED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS.”
(NO WORK--BELIEF ON CHRIST JUSTIFIED THE UNGODLY---FAITH = RIGHTEOUSNESS; NOT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ONE’S “OWN” RIGHTEOUSNESS AS ROMANS IN 10:3-4; PHILIPPIANS 3:9)
Hence, we are deemed righteous by Jesus Christ by Faith. There is no hierarchy of sin or what “we” as a society may deem as worse than the other (see: “mortal vs venial sins”; a Catholic heresy).
A lie is a sin, a murder is a sin, a fornication is a sin, a theft is a sin. God cannot look upon sin PERIOD, doesn’t matter what type; which might suggest that sin in general cannot be in his presence in heaven. (Isaiah 59:2; Habakkuk 1:13)-WE ARE ALL WORTHY OF HELLFIRE if it were not for the Grace of God! “FOR NO ONE DOETH GOOD, NO NOT ONE!”(Romans 3:12; Psalms 14:3, 53:3) “THERE IS NONE GOOD BUT ONE, THAT IS, GOD.” (Mark 10:18)
Repenting and believing go hand-in-hand; it is to “change one’s mind” of what is and what is not sin (the Lord even “repented” in Exodus 32:14!) Homosexuals for example, believe they are not sinning but the LAW IS THE KNOWLEDGE OF SIN. (Romans 3:20) -though for the born-again, we are no longer under the schoolmaster (Romans 11:6)!
When born-again (to those who BELIEVE that Christ is who saves; nothing else), we receive the Spirit of Christ, which we cannot lose, hence Christ would have to destroy himself as we have now become part of Him!
1 Corinthians 3:13-17
“Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: BUT HE HIMSELF SHALL BE SAVED. Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are”.
Romans 8:10
“And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness”.
PART II:
Once saved always saved continued:
John 10:27-30
“My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: AND I GIVE UNTO THEM ETERNAL LIFE; AND THEY SHALL NEVER PERISH, NEITHER SHALL ANY MAN PLUCK THEM OUT OF MY HAND. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and NO MAN IS ABLE TO PLUCK THEM OUT OF MY FATHER’S HAND. I and my Father ARE ONE”.
Christ the advocator:
“...IF GOD BE FOR US, WHO CAN BE AGAINST US? He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things? Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also MAKETH INTERCESSION FOR US. WHO SHALL SEPARATE US FROM THE LOVE OF CHRIST? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. FOR I AM PERSUADED, THAT NEITHER DEATH, NOR LIFE, NOR ANGELS, NOR PRINCIPALITIES, NOR POWERS, NOR THINGS PRESENT, NOR THINGS TO COME, NOR HEIGHT, NOR DEPTH, NOR ANY OTHER CREATURE, SHALL BE ABLE TO SEPARATE US FROM THE LOVE OF GOD, WHICH IS IN CHRIST JESUS OUR LORD. (Romans 8:31-39)
In Corinthians, an unspeakable sin was committed, yet salvation was still secured!
1 Cor 5:1-5
“It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his FATHER’S WIFE. And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you. For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, TO DELIVER SUCH AN ONE UNTO SATAN FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FLESH, THAT THE SPIRIT MAY BE SAVED IN THE DAY OF THE LORD JESUS”.
Not only where the faithful (who believed) still saved but this verse adds an insight into those who believe people who preach grace grace grace and there is no consequence for being a “Carnal Christian”. There is! In that verse, in this world, one can LEGALLY be turned over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh!
What else happens? What goes around surely comes around; you “REAP WHAT YOU SOW”.
Galatians 6:7-8:
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also REAP. For he that SOWETH to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting”.
The very next page opens up the first chapter of Ephesians, in which verses 10-23 speaks of the inheritance by saying:
“That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him: In whom also we have obtained an INHERITANCE, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who WORKETH ALL THINGS AFTER THE COUNSEL OF HIS OWN WILL: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. IN WHOM YE ALSO TRUSTED, AFTER THAT YE HEARD THE WORD OF TRUTH, THE GOSPEL OF YOUR SALVATION: IN WHOM ALSO AFTER THAT YE BELIEVED, YE WERE SEALED WITH THAT HOLY SPIRIT OF PROMISE, Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory. WHEREFORE I ALSO, AFTER I HEARD OF YOUR FAITH IN THE LORD JESUS, and love unto all the saints, Cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers; That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him: The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward WHO BELIEVE, according to the working of his mighty power, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.”
Still think license to sin? NOPE, God CHASTENS AND SCOURGES the Sons He receives:
Hebrews 12:6-8:
“For whom the Lord loveth he CHASTENETH, and SCOURGETH every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons”.
PART III:
Still believe we have a license to sin? NOPE, we’ll get sick!
1 Corinthians 11:29-31:
“For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged”.
The JUDGEMENT SEAT OF CHRIST (for the SAINTS [US!]); NOT THE GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGMENT (only for unbelievers and the damned of old)
2 Corinthians 5:10-11:
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, WHETHER IT BE GOOD OR BAD.
Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences”.
Also the famous verse 1 Corinthians 6:9; was NOT talking to those who were saved yet!! Where it says:
“Know ye not that the UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind...” etc.
Again according to Romans 4:5, WE ARE DEEMED RIGHTEOUS, 1 Corinthians 6:9 cannot be talking about the born-again!
“Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins”. (James 5:20) -thus why soul-winning is important too; a multitude of sins are HIDDEN from God, why? -because that person is now deemed righteous through Christ.
We are covered with the robe of righteousness! (Isaiah 61:10) We still sin which is why we STILL need to ask God for forgiveness!
Matthew 6:14-15:
“For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses”.
Hence, why we still need to ask for forgiveness.
A Perfect Bible CANNOT contradict itself, otherwise it is not perfect and God cannot be trusted. We cannot view certain parts as more authoritative over others. Does James contradict Paul in terms of faith + works? -or was James speaking about the JEWS? as Paul went to preach to the Gentiles? We also need to RIGHTLY divide Scripture to the right people as per 2 Timothy 2:15. Why? -because then you are going to presume that every detail will apply to you when this is not the case. I believe in the Pre-Tribulation rapture where the Saints will be caught up in the air to meet with the Lord, hence the significance of the Judgment Seat of Christ. Those who do not make this rapture will be left on earth and they must do something very important which doesn’t just take faith to do...what is it? THEY NEED TO RESIST THE MARK OF THE BEAST! -A WORK!
So does James 2:17 (“Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.”) contradict the writings of Paul? NO.
Contextually, you must observe the AUDIENCE James is speaking to, NOT the Church but to the JEWS; the same Jews who will have to endure the Tribulation (since they won’t be raptured with the Church) and turn to Christ during this period and must do an extra step for Salvation, resisting the Anti-Christ and his devices.
How do we know James is talking to the Jews? In the same chapter in James 2 verse 10 (a few verses before) reads, “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” (And then a few verse after) Verse 21: “Was not ABRAHAM our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?” JAMES IS NOT SPEAKING TO THE CHURCH! ABRAHAM IS NOT THE FATHER OF THE GENTILES! That would be ADAM whom in turn, fathered the WHOLE WORLD.
Hence, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through FAITH”[!] (Galatians 3:13-14)
So essentially if you broke one law, you are guilty of all and are under a CURSE! (Deuteronomy 27:26; Galatians 3:10)
Thankfully, we are NOT under the curse of the law, Christ Jesus became that curse for us! AMEN.
“Do we then make void the law through faith? GOD FORBID: YEA, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW”! (Romans 3:31)
WE ARE TO BE AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST (2 Corinthians 5:20), as He instructed us to carry out what many Christendom call, “THE GREAT COMMISSION” (which is performed by “witnessing”-Acts 1:8, “preaching”-Mark 16:15, “baptizing”, and “teaching”-Matt 28:20), which is not merely a “calling” of a certain few individuals (another Catholic heresy); we all ought to adhere to this calling as instructed by Christ. Though, the problem remains that many Christians either still remain Spiritually immature and are still babes (1 Corinthians 3:1; 1 Peter 2:2) or to the so-called Christian who follows a wrong doctrine who has declared themselves to be part of the Church but who are actually not saved at all. However, the more one familiarizes themselves with Scripture, the more maturing that person can undergo and of course with the aid of the Holy Spirit, can become born-again if that person wasn’t already.
Just to note, by Baptism I do not mean the “infant water baptism” (an infant is too immature to understand repentance and believing on Christ) or that it is “water baptism in of itself, that saves a person”, for such a conversion to be born-again comes by BELIEVING, as being baptized by immersion in water is merely a SIGN of this change depicting the death, burial and resurrection as was Christ (Colossians 2:12; 2 Corinthians 5:17; Romans 6:4), for all those to witness; the former common beliefs are all Catholic heresies.
The Bible says in Corinthians 2:11,
“I marvel that [you all] are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto ANOTHER GOSPEL: Which [there] is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:6-9)
“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.“ (Matthew 24:24)
The disagreement between Peter and Paul wasn’t anything to be taken lightly. Paul’s argument was that these works of the Jews shouldn’t apply to the Gentiles BECAUSE we are not saved by works but of Faith. Faith in Jesus Christ is what makes us righteous, by Him who gives us the clean fine white linen upon us before God, not the filthy rags from our good deeds. (Isaiah 64:6)
PART IV:
Now when it comes to meat and holydays (“holidays”):
“Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ”. (Colossians 2:16)
When it comes to God’s laws, He gave them to man, knowing that nobody but God Himself could fulfill them! (In the Old Testament, a burnt offering was needed each year for the atonement of sin-Leviticus 16:34). Thus, an admitted sinner and debtor of the law is revealed in EVERYONE. We are all guilty and should all be punishable by death if it was not for believing on Christ who fulfilled every last one of these laws!
Why couldn’t He eat unclean meat? I think the answer is obvious, it would defile the body and He needed to be incorruptible for a perfect sacrifice, but FOR US, also temples of God and believers in Christ, it defileth no more! It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, it is what comes out! (Matthew 15:17-18) Again, we are made righteous through faith on Christ Jesus and are thus CLEAN to be in the presence of the God almighty; though for man to do it alone (with the laws), they could not fulfill on their own. Again, if you break one, you break them all. God doesn’t even THINK an evil thought!
If we love God, we ought to follow his commandments indeed, but not for our Salvation, Christ did that work for us so that we might live.
AGAIN, we are to RIGHTLY divide Scripture to the right people as per 2 Timothy 2:15.
John 3:16, mentions NO work but BELIEVING and in a nutshell that is how we are saved when it says, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVETH IN HIM SHOULD NOT PERISH, BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE.”
It goes on to say in verses 17 and 18 that:
“For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that BELIEVETH ON HIM IS NOT CONDEMNED: BUT HE THAT BELIEVETH NOT IS CONDEMNED ALREADY, BECAUSE HE HATH NOT BELIEVED IN THE NAME OF THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON.”
Jesus Christ came to save SINNERS, NOT the self-righteous. Believe on the finished work that Jesus Christ DID FOR US.
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the TRUTH IS NOT IN US. (1 John 1:8)
Jesus Christ said that we merely have to look upon a woman to have committed adultery [in our hearts]! (Matthew 5:28). NO ONE CAN MAKE IT TO HEAVEN ON THEIR OWN MERIT, HOWEVER THOUGH MERIT IS WHAT CAN REWARD YOU!
Hence, Faith = Salvation; having been Saved already with the addition of Works = Rewards. Thus, how one is saved should NEVER be confused with how one is to obtain rewards!
There are three different outcomes:
(1) One can do works but NOT believe (faith) and henceforth NOT be saved. (The majority of the world may fit into this category which is the same as the one who does no works and does not believe; one may seem morally better than the other but both will die without Christ and He says that there is no excuse for not believing in Him! -Romans 1:20)
(2) One can have FAITH (BELIEVE) on the Lord Jesus Christ and “BE SAVED” but choose NOT to become Ambassadors of Christ by preaching the Gospel. = LESS REWARDS
(3) LASTLY, ONE COULD BELIEVE (FAITH) AND BE SAVED THROUGH FAITH AND PERFORM WORKS TO BECOME REWARDED ACCORDINGLY. -That is JUST; this is FAIR. One shouldn’t receive the same amount of rewards when somebody else is working harder to spread the Good News; this is COMMUNISM.
If salvation did come by Faith and Works, then how would these rewards be distributed; what would determine this distribution? Evenly?? Again, this is communism.
So in a nutshell, to those who are born-again and continue to live a life that is ungodly? REWARDS AFTER SALVATION MAY BE IN JEOPARDY!
2 John 1:8 says: “Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, BUT THAT WE RECEIVE A FULL REWARD”.
Again, 1 Corinthians 3:13-16: “Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?”
Catholics argue Purgatory with this verse, it is not! This humbly states that if all a man’s work for God was burned, that person would still be saved; then it follows by saying God dwelleth in us. If we need to be purged for our sins anyway, then that doctrine is calling God a liar about being made justified through Christ and this purging God would have to endure as well since he now dwells in us! Senseless!
"LET NO MAN BEGUILE YOU OF YOUR REWARD in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind"[!!] (Corinthians 2:18)
Every believer should want to be like Jesus. However, most believers DON'T but that does not mean they are not saved!
Peter cursed the name of Jesus. Noah got drunk. Samson went with a prostitute. David commit murder and adultery. Jonah ran from God. Peter denied Jesus. John the Baptist sent his disciples to ask Jesus if he were actually the Christ. WE ARE ALL SINNING IN OUR MINDS PROBABLY RIGHT NOW! BREAK ONE LAW, YOU ARE GUILTY OF ALL!
WE CANNOT NIT-PICK THE BIBLE ACCORDING TO OUR LIKING. WE MUST UNDERSTAND WHO IS BEING SPOKEN TO IN EACH CONTEXT, WHETHER TO THE JEWS, SAVED AND THE UNSAVED!
ONCE WE ARE BORN, WE CANNOT BECOME UNBORN! CAN WE CRAWL BACK UP INTO OUR MOTHERS’ WOMB? NOPE! COULD WE LOSE FELLOWSHIP WITH HER AND NOT GET OUR WEEKLY ALLOWANCE? YEAP! IT IS THE SAME WITH GOD AND FALLING FROM GRACE AND FELLOWSHIP! THIS IS CALLED BEING A CARNAL(-CHRISTIAN).
We OUGHT to want to do right and establish the law among others by upholding it, but by no means is it what saves you. What we aren’t to do is promote sin!
I apologize that this wasn’t a clear-cut, few-worded answer you were seeking John P. We are CURRENTLY (time-period-wise) in the DISPENSATION OF GRACE. Ephesians 3:2-12 says:
“If ye have heard of the DISPENSATION OF THE GRACE OF God which is given me to you-ward: HOW THAT BY REVELATION HE MADE KNOWN UNTO ME THE MYSTERY[...] Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; THAT THE GENTILES BE FELLOWHEIRS, AND OF THE SAME BODY, and PARTAKERS OF HIS PROMISE IN CHRIST BY THE GOSPEL: Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: In whom WE HAVE BOLDNESS AND ACCESS WITH CONFIDENCE BY THE FAITH OF HIM.”
Hope this helps and would be happy to answer any further questions or concerned :)
P.S. As a final disclaimer, I am under a strict guideline not to preach to you anything false as I could face a GREATER CONDEMNATION by the Lord. I am compelled to be as accurate as I can possibly be as James 3:1 states that, “[...] be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation.”
Thus, I also encourage you to double-check everything I have mentioned and to possibly reread this a couple of times over as in reality there was no short explanation to render you. If it were, many people would have their Salvation secured and would be working towards their rewards. (Remember Lucifer, now Satan, was bejeweled with every stone before he fell-Ezekiel 28:13. It is surely doubtful that he would want anyone to gain what he lost, let alone being saved!) Also, might I suggest that you only use the KJV (it’s an even LONGER explanation on why) as it is the best translation available to us. Even though the other versions may be easier to read, it has countless omissions, key word changes etc. that give rise to false doctrines and heresy. (Some of these reasons are listed here : www.jesusisprecious.org/bible/modern_bible_omissions.htm)
I would just learn to change words like “thou”, “ye”, endings like “-eth” etc. to everyday words English words instead to make it easier. I have implemented some of these changes for you in the above verses I have given you and these changes are in brackets [ ]. We have the right to reprove, correct etc. but ONLY under sound doctrine.
2 Timothy 3:16
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness”.
Not watching the video right now, but dispensationalism is Biblical. Sorry if that offends someone. While it does trace back through some of the people I'm sure this guy mentions, It can also be traced back to early a.d. Very early. At the end of the day, what truly matters in understanding salvation by Grace through Faith alone. There are many dispensations in the Bible. The clearest and most defined is how God dealt with Mankind before Christ and how he deals with Mankind after Christ. To claim there is not a distinction is simply denial. I don't really jump onto the prochecy train as it has no bearing on salvation. It's fun to see different points of view and ideas though.
Wrong again. No support to rightly divide. The scriptures say rightly divide...how do you know you rightly dividing it?
THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE JESUITS didn't teach dispensationalism. what a lie. the catholic church believed it was literally the kingdom of God on earth and the pope is vicariously Jesus on earth. they are also historically been anti semitic. Dispensationalism teaches God's future faithfulness to the nation of Israel. IF ANYTHING JESUITS WOULD BE TEACHING AMILLENIALISM or PRETERISM
Direct from Wikipedia. No source is denying Jesuit Ribera started Futurism en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurism_(Christianity)
@@sandygiacobbe7346 people read the bible and interpret it. Theological coined camps by an individual mean nothing, it's either biblical and you are interpreting it accurately and with revelation or not. No dispensationalist who reads it from the Bible is following a man
@@flamingrobin5957 It is tragic that many professed “Christians” fail to recognize the occult nature of the hidden hand of the Jesuits thru Freemasonry All thru futurism dispensationalism once you understand this you’ll see all the deceptions of the Roman Vatican Jesuit control today
Freemasons influenced the church, they influenced all religions on the face of this earth even the one I follow and you follow. The bibles words are masonic influenced. King James was a mason. I use that bible never the less. I still believe the Almighty, keeps his Commandments because i love, but realize that man hates God and I ,me must follow my God..so He in I and I in him.
@@johnp3081 That why you will never see a Geneva Bible in a freemason lodge! if understand and learn how the Jesuits of the Roman Catholic Church manipulated Bible prophecy to create an end-times Antichrist, in order to deflect blame away from them as the Antichrist system.The Geneva Bible clearly witnesses that Christ fulfilled the 70th week of Daniel and that He sent the Roman army to desolate the Jews, so it has nothing to do with an end-times Antichrist. Luther, Henry, Wesley, Edwards, Moody, and many many great reformers believed in a historical application of The Revelation.It
was John Darby who propagated Dispensationalism, then later Scofield who marketed this teaching.The apostle's teachings completely and would utterly reject it. This is why the Geneva Bible annoyed King James who was a Catholic easily shown in history . The Geneva Bible had marginal notes that simply didn’t conform to that point of view of Kingship /British Israelism is the Gnostic counterpart. Those marginal notes had been, to a great extent placed in the Geneva Bible by the leaders of the Reformation RESEARCH THE OCCULT AND THE KING JAMES BIBLE ...KING JAMES VI/I, FREEMASONIC MONARCH Francis Bacon and the Inspiration of the 1611 King James Bible Masonic, Rosicrucian, Kabbalistic or Occult themes in relation to the Bible will necessarily have to touch on the person of King James who ... If not then you are finally getting the message and should now focus your attention on the wonderful Geneva Bible 1560/99 instead of KJV Here are the study notes from the Geneva Bible:
Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two x weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but y not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof [shall be] with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
(x) In this week of the seventy, will Christ come and preach and suffer death.
(y) He will seem to have no beauty, nor to be of any estimation; ( Isaiah 53:2 ).
Daniel 9:27 And he a shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to b cease, c and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
(a) By the preaching of the Gospel he affirmed his promise, first to the Jews, and after to the Gentiles.
(b) Christ accomplished this by his death and resurrection.
(c) Meaning that Jerusalem and the sanctuary would be utterly destroyed because of their rebellion against the Father, and their idolatry: or as some read, that the plague will be so great, that they will all be astonished at them.
The Geneva Bible clearly witnesses that Messiah fulfilled the 70th week of Daniel and that He sent the Roman army to desolate the Jews, so it has nothing to do with an end-times Antichrist.
But the King James Bible did not include these study notes, so they were unavailable to future generations, which allowed the Jesuits deception to creep into the church of John Darby who propagated Dispensationalism, then later Scofield who marketed this teaching Beware of Eschatological False Prophets, Armageddon Script "Psyop's.
Criticized by Calvinists and Amillennialiats. Lol
Thanks for dispensationalism. 1 thessalonians 4 secret rapture 😅😅
Please stop twisting scripture. How can it be secret when it says that Jesus 2nd coming will include 1. Shout 2. Voice of an archangel 3. The trumpet of God and 4. The dead rising up to meet Jesus in the air BEFORE the living go up. Secret? The Bible says NOT secret.
True, dispensationalism is false. But so is Reformed Theology. I say this as one who was dispensational for 11 years, and staunchly Reformed for 30. Eastern Orthodox now, thank God. It’s a journey. Keep seeking.
No human manmade male priesthood and laity in The Kingdom of JESUS CHRIST!
It’s funny to watch reformed believers critiquing disoensstinalism when clavinism is nothing more than Augustinian manichean Gnosticism
It’s not dispensational theology that is another gospel, dispensational theology isn’t the gospel but only a means of understanding scripture and how God works through time
Calvinism is a different and christless gospel
Sorry chumps
It’s just true
Ouchie :-)
How God dealt with Adam and EVE same way he deals with all
The blind leading the blind 😊