Foucault/Deleuze: what happened?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.พ. 2024
- In this video, we explore the deep bond between Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault, delving into its philosophical and personal significance. Specifically, we examine how Foucault's doubt regarding the prominence of power has catalysed a pivotal development in Deleuze's later thought.
My (not very active) Twitter/X: / deleuzephilo
Support:
Patreon: / deleuzephilosophy
Ko-fi: ko-fi.com/deleuzephilosophy
![Difference and Repetition [part 1] The Interstellar Conversation](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f6ujTzYb-9k/mqdefault.jpg)
![Difference and Repetition [part 1] The Interstellar Conversation](/img/tr.png)
Both were human treasures ❤
Very true
Hardly. Foucault was a confirmed paedophile. Look it up
Michel Foucault has been credibly alleged to be a child rapist and is on record supporting legislation enabling pedophilia. We are lucky to have foucault’s theories, but as a human, he was not a treasure.
I am just reading the fold and the last chapter of foucault recently and see this video. The way deleuze revisits foucault and this whole idea of the inside vs. the outside and the folds are just astonishing and genius. I have felt an urgency that the american academic circle, which has been adversely or even toxicly influenced by early foucault, should revitalize late deleuze.
True, making subjectivation the "differential" of power and knowledge is quite genius, especially with such rigour. But I don't know if young Foucault was toxic, so much as provocative and still in search. We can only dream of what he may have said about these intensive relations between visibilities and utterances. Perhaps he was the object of hasty interpretations that had a scientific or scientistic form, rather than a properly metaphysical one. Deleuze and Guattari develop this opposition at length in "What is philosophy?", incidentally--it could be related. You're totally right that late Deleuze needs to be revitalised.
Oh great, I did not read what is philosophy yet, that may be my next step. You are totally correct about the interpretation stuff, and i believe my biased understanding toward foucault is largely due to the bad impressions of english-speaking sociologists, who are always trying to make foucault realistic, scientific and appropriable, which did not always seem justifiable. I am a first year anthropology undergraduate, the reason i choose this as my major is that anthropology is totally philosophy-based (i mean modern anthropology) and qualitative. The prevailing quantitative methodologies and the scientific tendencies in social sciences are largely overrated. Virtually every subject except continental philosophy and anthropology, are already dominated by numbers.@@deleuzephilosophy
Fantastic video, as always. I love every single video you’ve done. Very inspiring as well. Keep it up.
Thanks a ton Kyle, will do!
Your channel and content is always the best. Thanks for sharing your researches and putting all this information together!
Hey Jonas, long time no see! Thanks mate, it's my pleasure. I appreciate your watching this content!
Well-made and informative video! Congratulations. Currently reading Difference and Repetition and Discipline and Punish and fascinated by the unities and differences.
Thanks a lot, glad you liked it! These two must be quite interesting to read in tandem, it could provide some insight as to what Deleuze felt when reading Foucault (or reversely)
great video, thank you! both Deleuze and Foucault are amazing thinkers.
Totally agree, they are indeed!
one of the best videos i have seen. anyway, regarding the quotes in it, can you provide me the full bibliography? loved it.
Thank you, appreciate it! So the quote by Dosse are from his 2010 [2007] book called "Intersecting lives" (Columbia University Press, I think it's the only edition). The quotes by Michel Foucault are from "The will to knowledge" (1978 [1976]) by Random House (First American Edition), the other quotes are from the standard editions of "Desert Islands" and "Two Regimes of Madness" by Deleuze. Hope this helps!
@@deleuzephilosophy Terrific! i'll look forward to reading what I haven't already, and make sure to share the video with everybody I know. Keep up the great work!
@@francescocerasuolo4064 That'd be fantastic, thanks a lot!
This was great. Thank you
Glad you enjoyed it!
Incredible video!! Thank you so much
Thank you, really glad you liked it!
Incredible video, thank you
You're welcome, thanks for watching!
Great video!
Thanks a lot mate, glad you liked it!
briliant images like easter eggs - the 2 thinkers from theoreticalpuppets and the bacon work
thanks for all the great uploads and this gem especially
Thank you for watching, appreciate the kind word!
@deleuzephilosophy
I've watched the entire difference and repetition series, loved it, view changed
was in a bad place, will watch again
thanks for this amazing channel
@@gilsimhon9251 You're welcome, thanks for all the watching mate!
I keep noticing on job applications when asked if someone wants to go to college... the three choices being yes, maybe, and never. It is an odd/suspected programmed choice. Good advice includes "never say never". I have noticed once I started "thinking before I speak" and began to avoid use of the word "never" that people who say it often end up returning to the thing they mean to avoid. What I came to understand is that it (the word never) blinds someone to the thing to which it refers in its use. Mark 11:24 in the Bible helps in a similar way... instead of quitting, just cut down.
It seems to me that the work of and with Pierre Bourdieu at college de france could have influenced Michel Foucault in his "impasse" about knowledge and power.
That's just a personal view and sentiment that I couldn't prove but it seems logical to me
Maybe ive never actually read foucault without a little deleuze in my ear. I thought the concrete development of subjectivation was allready just foucualt - especially considering his writing on the constitution of gay communities in california
tho of course he want talking about folding
amo a este gil delulu
2:44 lol
Queer Theory owes them a lot and that’s a problem
These guys pushed human progress back centuries and no one noticed…
care to elaborate?
Deleuze probably found out about Foucault's predilection for young boys.
There is no evidence of that.
@@user-ub2jp7tg6k did he not sign a petition to change the age of consent to 12?