Understanding Derrida, Deconstruction & Of Grammatology
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2017
- In this video, I take an introductory look at the philosophy of Jacques Derrida and Deconstruction. I look at the basic tenets of Derrida's thought, and his relationship with Ferdinand de Saussure and Jean-Jacques Rosseau in Of Grammatology.
Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Facebook: thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
Recommended Reading Order:
If you're completely new to Derrida, these graphic introductions are actually really helpful -
goo.gl/XKaJMJ
'Structure Sign and Play' in Writing and Difference -
goo.gl/szZ6JC
Différance - projectlamar.com/media/Derrida...
Of Grammatology -
goo.gl/e8SDv4
Credits:
Image of Derrida by Chinmoy Guha
(Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported - creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Edited by Lewis Waller
Music:
'Your Mother's Daughter' by Chris Zabriskie
Too Cool Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Concentration Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
![Rick Roderick on Derrida - The Ends of Man [full length]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LvAwoUvXNzU/mqdefault.jpg)
I wouldn't comment on a video if I wouldn't notice the distinct lack of comments, while being a big fan of the channel. I love what you do and your videos are really good at explaining philosophical concepts over a relaxing tune playing, helping me stay focused. I believe you touch just the right topics that other thoughtful youtube channels haven't tapped into yet.
Take it as a compliment: Then & Now is what The School of Life should be.
Thank you, that's really appreciated. Comments like this help me keep going. I certainly feel frustration at The School of Life's lack of a depth sometimes.
agreed
Not just lack of depth, even though that is painful to look at, it's also that sometimes he is straight up wrong. Also he claims to present an unbiased view but he is clearly shaping other concepts to fit his ideology. He also tries to make everything about enlightening self-help and shit.
Why did I open this can of worms?
Admittedly, I haven't watched much of the newer stuff he's done so I can't say this with much conviction, but I do applaud the idea of making philosophy more approachable and applicable to our everyday lives. But I agree completely that you can't claim to be unbiased while doing it. I try to be balanced when I approach a topic, but I do have a political bias which I would never try to hide. But I will try, when I want make an overtly political video, to express my political views in a way that acknowledges there are two sides to an argument. I try to be Hegelian about these things!
Anyway, I am still working out the modus operandi of this channel so all these comments are really welcome! Thanks again
I concur with Jean Kirstein, even as far as The School of Life is concerned. The video was very well done. Thank you.
This has to be the best introduction to Derrida I've ever seen. Amazing production quality, clear and concise explanations of the central concepts, and very helpful graphics. Your channel really deserves to become huge. I'm looking forward to watching your other videos.
Dude your profile pic
@@scriabinismydog2439 You didn't expect your dog to be watching Derrida videos, did you?
@@ILoveMagic15 absolutely not. He must've taken from the owner
What I liked best is the lower pace of speech that enabled me to grasp most of the aspects mentioned. This is such a wonderful summary! Thank you!
I took classes under a professor whose PhD advisor was Derrida (at Ecole Normal Superior, I believe). He says that on the day he had to defend his dissertation, Derrida instead decided to use the event as an opportunity to deconstruct his student/my professor. The professor still seemed traumatized by the experience when he recalled it to us. He has become an accomplished philosopher in his own right, as an expert on Heidegger, Dasein, etc. - taking his classes was one of the highlights of my college experience.
What Derrida did to his own student is a trend between professors in universities nowadays. I've seen it happening. Misconduct.
I really appreciate the amount of work put into this video. The graphics and film montages had really made the philosophical concepts accessible to viewers and understandable. Always wanted to get my head around Derrida. Thank you for giving me a foothold and I'm sure the same sentiment is felt by other viewers.
It sure is 🙂
You described what I paid a college professor thousands of dollars to teach me for free! This is fairy accurate and touches almost all main points. Videos like this are why i love TH-cam based education. Please do another one maybe for those who have read a few of Darrida's texts, maybe?
Thank you! I would like to do one the purloined letter at some point.
Please do. I sincerely dream of a world where open platforms like TH-cam will have greater and more accessible wisdom than Jstore. I would also recommend advanced lectures which ask audiences to do some readings first. I know that might reduce popularity, but i do not think one experimental attempt will not hurt.
PS: To gain better recognition and acceptance, i would recommend thoroughly citing ALL the information you present. It will make academics more comfortable spending their time behind your content and not feel like they are wasting any. One of the biggest complains i will hear from Professors about online education is how ill-cited they are. Just turn the comment section into a bibliography and provide links at the span of seconds you mention the information in the video.
To be fair if you scour the internet, you can find sources & writings on anything.
You didn't pay him. You paid the institution.
Yes it's like that
Really great work with this one. Honest, calm, well tought-out artwork, great quotes, deep enough. Quite superb actually. Thanks.
Thank you!
@@ThenNow You help a lot on the field of Enlightenment for other-fellow living beings.It's the greatest thing what You can do.
Thank You.
Best wishes.
Bless.
This video is, in a large part responsible for the "basic understanding" of Derrida's philosophical concepts, theories and the amazingly insightful, reality changing concept of Deconstruction, and has afforded me an opportunity to increase my conceptualizations of my reality, and or realities. Fantastic video! Thank You! Keep pushing forward!
Very clear and accessible. I liked the moderate to slow pace of it, being pretty slow myself. I am not in general a great fan of background music, but the music here was an exception. I found it relaxing and inobtrusive. More of these please!
what an amazing video! as someone new to derrida, this begins to explain the basic premise of his ideas. Thank you
This video is still one of the greatest gifts someone interested in the more modern thinkers may have. In a sense, you can can split your understanding of language before and after Derrida and this is the best introduction you can have.
Thank you, mate. Your work is incredible!
6:55
17:15
Damn so glad I found this video. Always a shock to see such high quality channels at such low subscriber numbers. Keep at this, man. You're doing some really incredible work and i think it's genuinely important to have this kind of content in the pantheon of ~content~
> "inspired by the writings of ONE MAN"
> shows a book written by two men
@jay Or are they pinions in the s t r u c t u r e s ? /music plays
@@qazaqstanmann Stalin is the one. Our glorious leader ❤️.
your visuals here really help here instead of distract like so many other videos I've seen on this site, wonderful work here
Thanks for these videos, very helpful for an English Major to grasp the concepts of Deconstruction and more. It's also nice to get the full history on these theories.
You're welcome :)
Thank you, I was getting clumsy with Derrida's theories this video gave me crisp points and it touches everywhere as well..
Videos like those should be considered as valid bibliography for thesis and academic research !!
After a week trying to understand Derida's philosphy for my thesis framework, I end up watching this and matching all my thoughts.
THANK YOU from Spain!
The music is nice, it's not distracting at all, and actually helps me focus on the words oddly. I'm curious why there is so much disdain?
Oh, god yes, thank you for this succinct introduction to Derrida - his work sounds like it is of... deep personal relevance to myself, and I look forward to circulating this video to others as well.
Currently writing a thesis on Derrida, and his theory- your video does a great job explaining Derrida’s philosophy, and I couldn’t agree more with your stance on archi-writing, as one who has already read grammatology- this video serves as a wonderful introductory step for those who are either curious about deconstruction, or literary criticism as a whole! Wonderful video. :)
Did you finish it?
I suggest to read his books , as difficult as it may be , and forget this simplification
Currently; writing a thesis on Derrida, his theory; however, serves as a foundation for this video, which demonstrates a metaphysical presence in the mind of the other for a desiring form of meaning that is obfuscated by grammar that diverges concepts into hyphenated forms of interpretation. Does it matter?
You make complex thought clear without becoming simplistic. Thank you.
very good. A lot of info was packed into this short video, which I listened to 3 times. Will share.
hello, i am an undergrad eng major, and derrida's a part of our intro to literary theory paper. this video was incredibly helpful, and thought provoking. the video clips that you chose to supplement the text with really brought me to newer ideas that will be immensely rewarding in my reading, of derrida and otherwise. i am so happy that your channel exists! best of luck with everything. hope you have a wonderful day.
footprintsofliterature.blogspot.com/2020/07/deconstruction-easy-handout-for.html?m=1
This was a phenomenal introduction. Clear, including the necessary context, and interesting.
You, sir, the real MVP!
If anyone wants to know more about what Derrida means by a sign / trace, definitely check out some Levinas!
I really appreciate what you're doing. Thank you for your efforts. Do not give up.
Thank you, it's appreciated!
Very informative, clearly presented, and well designed video. Thank you.
This is a great channel with well produced videos. Keep up the great work.
THANK YOU. WE'RE READING OF GRAMMATOLOGY FOR MY CLASS AND I COULDN'T MAKE HEADS OR TAILS OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING.
That's how everyone comes to Derrida, initially. Keep going, you'll get it.
Very helpful to grasp the main veins of the philosophy and the way of looking at it. Thank you!
Excellent video on Derrida! Many of the things my brother talked about to me during his Uni education came back in this video, bravo :D
Bro... this is such a great introduction to so many difficult concepts, but you make it very easy to understand. Great work.
love your voice! Can listen to you for hours really!! Keep up the good work
Wow, amazing job on both the explanation and the editing!
Masterpiece! More of these please.
Peace and love from Indonesia.
Explained this way better than my college prof, with such thoughtfulness too
never did this before, but here i have to make an exception, and congratelate the author of the videos in here and Now, for the outstanding pedagogical quality of his work and thank him for it:
Great content, refreshing take on Derrida. Inspired.
Thank you for your time and effort. Your summation has been proven helpful to those that struggle with Derrida and Deconstruction. Cheers.
Thank you for your videos! Especially thank you for your reading suggestion on "introducing Derrida, a graphic guide". It really clarified things well!!
Thank you again! :))
Very good video, thanks for this I’m reading a book about Giorgio Agamben and he is deeply connected to Derrida.
I love your videos.
just amazing work you do!
This is incredibly helpful. Thank you!
A simple observation: both speaking and writing have pros and cons. Conversations "theoretically" allow for a vigorous trade of back-and-forth that provides participants the opportunity to hone in on a particular point and make sure they are "on the same page". But I find that quite often there are all manner of breaks in conversation that occur, which end up derailing the flow of discussion and lead to very little actual "progress" in the process of communication.
Writing, on the other hand, while it doesn't allow for "receiver" interruptions for the sake of gaining clarity, for that very reason also provides a vehicle for presenting extended coherent material without interruption. Both are necessary, imo, as both together contribute to a fuller exchange of ideas.
Yes writing is tyranny.
great video and production, thanks for making this.
Great video and great site. Thank you for breaking down Deconstruction
That's a very clear introduction to a methodology of reading which should be the normal way of doing it, in order not to be deceived in politics, religion, etc... It's the real deal. Thanks.
THANK YOU. YOU JUST SAVED MY LIFE FOR MY THEORY FINAL EXAM.
Super helpful! Thank you for making such an informative video on Derrida
Dude, awesome video! Congratulations
I was doing homework--or avoiding it by tearing apart the kitchen and your videos seem to help with a deeper understanding of material I don't grok well. The kids being the helpful souls that they are, were moving their body parts as if they were indeed moving towards successful "of course we are working" motions, until your video came up. Auto-play being what it is.... Thanks for being something even an 8 year old who doesn't pay attention to much, enjoyed along with her 10 year old sister, though I spent the next hour or so on my own.
Interesting Video I struggled a lot going in this Derridian way of philosophy. This video is very helpful to understand his way of thinking.
Thank you for the upload :). This is a great exposition on Derrida and the importance of his work! The graphics add a great deal of clarity, and it’s a brilliant and concise way of explaining ideas that are notoriously abstract and hard to define.
This is by far the best explanation of Derrida I have come across and the only one that actually helps me understand his books. You have a real talent. Thank you so much for sharing this.
Agreed
Very interesting and clearly expressed!. Interesting how both philosophers relied on both SPEECH and WRITING ✍️ in order to relay their message, and as profound as it sounds, their worldview can easily lead to chaos.
Quite impressive and fundamental.would love to have more details.
The soothing music really made this video a joy to watch, thank you!
i have learned so much from your channel. thank you.
I am an Mphil in Comparative Literature and I approve your message!
It's really good explanation of deconstruction of Jacques Derrida using pictures and videos...
Good job. This helps me understand.
This is such a well made video
This is an amazing video. Brilliant, really. Thanks 🙏🏽
Beautifully described, you certainly have a poetic flow to your video and still manage to be concise
Thank you :)
Love your work!
I still have trouble understanding "differance" and "trace".
Wonderful, absolutely wonderful.
This video was rewarding. I'm thirsting for one of those books.
I love the distinctly postmodernist argument that while postmodernist writing is, "on the surface," forbiddingly and pretentiously abstruse, at a deep level it embodies nothing but a body of simple truisms of common sense (e.g. "power relies on rhetoric," "institutions use language") that everybody already knew anyway.
AMAZING VIDEO!
Great summary, thanks!
Great work, mate
great video, thank you learnt loads about stuff I thoiught I knew,
Interesting individual. I do not agree with his thinking but interesting how the human mind can reach different understanding of what value is on all world aspects
I have stumbled upon this channel looking for the person who inspired "Martin Heidegger" and more clarity pertaining to his landmark book {Being and Time (1927}. So far, this video tied up many loose ends and I will be following your future work.
Thanks so much... :)
This is an amazingly put together video, concise and with a perfect amount of context for the study of Derrida, thank you for the help!
Fantastic introduction
Brilliant video mate. New subscriber ✌🏻
thank you for explaining that, and for the reading list
Great Video! This channel always produces great content, takes lots of skills and hard work edit and make this stuff!
For the sake of learning, I'm going to try to form some propositions (in summary) from what I gathered about Derrida and my personal criticisms. (If anyone has anything to comment, please do so.)
It seems as though Derrida is noticing the distinction of the symbol/symbolized (I find this language easier to use that signifier and signified), and just taking language to its logical conclusion. That since propositional truths, such as all bachelors are unmarried, are true only given the conventional meanings of the words "bachelors" and "unmarried" (and of course all the other words), that truth can be manipulated. And deconstruction is merely the explication of the meanings of the words within the definition of the words, and the infinte regress that follows it. Obviously, there is no objective reference point for the meanings of words. This is self-evident. The reference point we use for words, is a conventional one, as a means to an end - to relay the meaning we are trying to communicate. Derrida and the postmodernists seem to think that the meaning, is entirely found in the reader of the words, not the writer of the words. This I just cannot accept. Because if it is the case, then why does Derrida think before using words? Or try to use the right words? You cannot escape making truth claims either, as the conclusion that we have no epistemological access to objective knowledge, is predicated on the premises that led to the conclusion... to be true.
Just my 2 cents, I always find it much easier to think, remember, and understand what I learn when I write or comment about it.
Great video!
Wonderful video and channel!
This video is in all aspects very well-made
This was a very insightful video. I've also seen your video on Habermas, who had disputes with Derrida before they reconciled later on (though not in philosophical terms, as far as I'm aware).
Could you do a video mediating the positions of communicative action and deconstruction? I think that topic is quite fascinating, though I've yet to read into the post-structuralist side of things.
Laclau's critique of Habermas is a good one. The standard poststructural argument against communicative action is that there is no 'rational' centre that we can build agreement around - power of various forms always distorts and dislocates the idea of a perfectly rational argument
Beautifully articulated
Beautifully told video-story.
I'm just starting to dive into philosophy, and I have to admit this was tough to grasp at times. Nontheless I thank you for such an amazing explanation, I'm definitely going to binge watch your channel. Keep spreading knowledge my man!
phenomenal job
Where do you get your stock black and white footage?
Amazing video. I thank you for it
10:13 - where is this footage from? It's beautiful...
Thank you so much!
Thank you for this very clear introduction in Derrida. The link about Différance doesn't work can you maybe update it?
Great introduction to Derrrida.
I'm hooked, I subscribed, and I want to know more!
This is quite good!
Can u do a video on Hannah Arendt?
THIS video is full of RICH CONTENT, amazing QUOTES
very good coverage.
Amazing video!