Question for you do you have any insights Mother Tara she is also absolutely wonderful and profoundly blissful thank you so much for explaining the difference between the two. Sadhu 😊😊❤❤🙏🙏
Yes, Mother Tara holds a special place in many Buddhist traditions, particularly in Tibetan Buddhism, where she is revered as a compassionate savior and protector. Tara is considered a bodhisattva of compassion and action, often referred to as the "Mother of Liberation." She represents the dynamic aspect of compassion, always ready to spring into action to help beings overcome obstacles and suffering. There are 21 manifestations of Tara, but the two most well-known are Green Tara and White Tara. Green Tara is associated with active compassion, swift protection, and overcoming physical, mental, and spiritual dangers. White Tara, on the other hand, is connected with healing, long life, and tranquility. Tara's profound blissfulness comes from her embodiment of wisdom and compassion, which are central to the path of enlightenment. Meditating on Tara can help cultivate these qualities within ourselves, as her energy is seen as swift, motherly, and boundlessly compassionate. For those who feel a close connection to Tara, her mantra, "Om Tare Tuttare Ture Soha," is often recited to invoke her blessings for protection, healing, and spiritual growth. The mantra itself is a powerful tool for removing obstacles, calming the mind, and drawing on her compassionate energy. Tara's presence is comforting and nurturing, guiding practitioners toward enlightenment with kindness and a deep sense of maternal care. Many find her teachings and meditations profoundly transformative, offering both immediate relief from suffering and long-term spiritual growth. Sadhu! 🙏😊
These are all means to attain enlightenment. Think of it this way: there is salad. Then there are types of salad. All are salads, all achieve the same goal. 🥗. Whether it’s Shakyamuni or Amitabha or Maitreya or any of the other Buddhas mentioned. They all are means to espouse dharma in many different ways to agree with as many people as possible. Purelands, dhyana/zen, mantras and Vajrayana, leavin everything and joining the Sangha etc? It’s all Buddhism viewed in different lenses. If you want it as is? Early Buddhism. But the three main schools all provide different interpretations of these. Mahayana is easier to envision.
Exactly! All these different approaches-whether it's Zen, Pure Land, Vajrayana, or Theravada-are like different "salads" leading toward the same nourishment: enlightenment. Each path offers teachings suited to different temperaments, cultures, and times. Some find resonance in the simple and direct practices of early Buddhism, while others are drawn to the devotional aspects of Pure Land or the mystical elements of Vajrayana. Ultimately, as you said, it’s all Buddhism. The core principles of the Dharma remain the same, but the methods and expressions vary to meet people where they are on their journey. The Buddha, in his great compassion, offered different means (upaya) to guide beings out of suffering, understanding that not everyone will follow the same path. This flexibility, while rooted in the same truth, makes Buddhism such a rich and diverse tradition. It’s less about "which path is right" and more about finding the one that speaks to us individually at any given time.
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu 🙏 Your statement touches upon a profound truth that lies at the heart of Buddhist philosophy. The concept of "Buddha" in its most essential form transcends the notion of individuality and multiplicity. In the highest sense, "Buddha" refers to the ultimate reality-the awakened state, beyond time, space, and personal identity. It is not confined to any particular historical figure, such as Siddhartha Gautama, nor is it limited to a multiplicity of beings. Instead, it is a state of enlightenment, wisdom, and compassion that is universally accessible, beyond all distinctions. This notion of the singular Buddha represents the inherent potential within all sentient beings to realize their true nature, to awaken fully, and to embody compassion and wisdom. Every being, in essence, has the potential to become Buddha, as the qualities of enlightenment are not separate from the mind of each sentient being. In Buddhist teachings, this can also be seen in the idea that Buddha-nature is present in all beings. It is not a singular entity that can be grasped or owned, but the fundamental nature of reality itself-unifying all things and beings in their potential for awakening. This concept aligns with the idea that there is only the Buddha, because in the ultimate reality, the distinctions we make between different Buddhas, or between the Buddha and others, dissolve. The essence of Buddha is inseparable from all things, all moments, and all experiences. By recognizing that there is only Buddha, we move beyond dualistic thinking and connect with the truth that all phenomena are manifestations of the one, the all-encompassing, enlightened reality. May you continue to reflect deeply on this teaching and experience its profound wisdom in your practice. 🙏💖
May you find wisdom in understanding the teachings of both Shakyamuni Buddha and Amitabha Buddha. As you reflect on their compassion and guidance, may you be inspired to cultivate inner peace, and may their wisdom lead you toward enlightenment and boundless compassion in your own life ♥
Thank you for your kind and thoughtful words. May the wisdom and compassion of both Shakyamuni Buddha and Amitabha Buddha continue to guide you on your journey toward inner peace and enlightenment. Your reflections are truly beautiful, and I wish you boundless joy and insight on this path. Sadhu! 🙏🌿❤️
@@MindPodcastEnglish1. there is no buddha name amitabha. 2. There is no such thing is pure land that amitabha bring people to by just speak name before dead. 3. When amitabha born? During buddhism divide to 18 sections in india, each seaction create their own imagination. What for? Just to able gain wealth and fame. 4. Did buddha gautama introduce amitabha buddha: No, fiction. Those greed people just make up story and pick one part of dharma During king who kill his father and claim the throne. Name Ajatashatru. His mother cry so hard and than open her eye and see buddha talk to her. Madame don't be sad, the earth is full of sorrow war and etc. If you wish to be better you need reborn in amitabha buddha realm. He is better than me etc... Pure land etc. Mother of Ajatashatru chant and go to amitabha land. 😢😮 fraud become real 😂🎉. Soon monk will have wife, it is buddha predicted due to greed and fame.
There was no such Buddha as Amitaba.. Amitaba came from Amitayus.. a Greek sun god.. when The Greeks came to India they worshipped a sun god by the name Amitayus.. and the rest, man kept the delusion going.. please do not pollute the good Dhamma taught by Buddha Gautama anymore than it already has..
Yes, you're correct! The historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, was born in Lumbini, which is located in present-day Nepal, not India. Lumbini is considered one of the most important pilgrimage sites for Buddhists around the world. However, during Buddha's lifetime, the geographical regions were quite different from today's national boundaries. His teachings spread widely, especially in what is now India, where he attained enlightenment and spent most of his life teaching. Some confusion arises because ancient India was a broader cultural region, and the Buddha’s life and teachings were primarily associated with the Indian subcontinent, particularly areas now part of northern India and Nepal. Thank you for pointing this out!
All Dharma doors in Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana traditions are said to have been taught by the Buddha, Sakyamuni himself. To look down on, belittle, or disapprove of any of these Dharma doors is to display ignorance and arrogance, as though one knows better than the enlightened masters of all lineages who have walked the path and verified these teachings. Those who claim that the Pure Land method, which relies on the power of Amitabha Buddha’s vow, contradicts the self-reliance methods taught by the Buddha, and is therefore false, are again demonstrating ignorance and ego. A true understanding of the Pure Land Dharma door reveals that it fully aligns with the Buddha’s teachings across all traditions, whether Theravada, Mahayana, or Vajrayana. One should not hastily criticize any Dharma door, especially with incorrect or incomplete understanding, as the karmic consequences can be severe. Many practitioners of the pureland dharma door from the past to present have attained the promised result of rebirth in pureland. Investigate deeply before fast to denounce it. It's OK to follow whatever dharma door resonate with oneself but don't foolishly defame other dharma doors.
Your reflection emphasizes the importance of respecting all Dharma doors, regardless of the tradition they originate from-Theravada, Mahayana, or Vajrayana. The Buddha's teachings are vast and multifaceted, designed to resonate with different temperaments, circumstances, and inclinations of beings across time and space. Criticizing or dismissing any particular practice, like the Pure Land method, without a deep and thorough understanding is indeed unwise. The core of the Pure Land practice, especially the reliance on Amitabha Buddha’s vow, does not contradict the Buddha's teachings. It offers a path for those whose conditions make it difficult to attain enlightenment through more self-reliant methods. Each path, whether self-power or other-power (like in Pure Land), ultimately aims at liberation from suffering. To dismiss a practice without understanding its depth is a reflection of the ego, which clouds true wisdom. Your call for careful investigation and avoiding hasty judgments is a wise reminder. Every Dharma door has its place, and each serves beings in ways that resonate with their karmic conditions and capacities. Respecting this diversity of teachings honors the compassion of the Buddha, who taught with great skillful means (upaya) to help all beings find the path to liberation. Sadhu 🙏
Thank you for pointing that out! 🙏 Yes, you're absolutely right-Lumbini, the birthplace of Siddhartha Gautama, is indeed in present-day Nepal. It’s an important and sacred site for Buddhists around the world. I appreciate your input and helping to keep the information accurate! 😊
There is no Buddha, there is only Me. Without Me...Buddha cannot come to existence in my mind, to seek His teachings and guidance. Buddha only exist when one see value in Buddha. One can see the Buddha when one become Bodhisattva. One can be Buddha when he recognizes that all reflections are one and the same as the one that appreciates. Whomever Buddha you choose to follow...They are all the same. Difference is the struggle you mind that is important that is not. Never is and never was.
Your reflections express a deep understanding of non-duality and the interdependence of self and the Buddha. In essence, you are touching upon the idea that the Buddha's teachings and realization arise within us through our own practice, perception, and awakening. The Buddha represents the awakened mind, and as you’ve mentioned, it is our recognition and realization that bring forth this understanding. Without the practitioner-the seeker-the teachings remain dormant. In many Buddhist traditions, this echoes the concept that "Buddha-nature" is inherent within all beings. It is the potential to realize the truth, and it is only through our own practice and insight that we awaken to this nature. Whether one follows Amitabha, Shakyamuni, or any other Buddha, the ultimate aim is the same: to transcend duality and recognize the oneness of all things, including the self and the Buddha. Your insight that all Buddhas are the same and that the struggle lies within the mind is profound. Indeed, the mind creates distinctions, attachments, and suffering, and the path is about realizing that these separations are illusory. The mind that sees Buddha is the same mind that creates and resolves these struggles. Thank you for sharing your deep reflections! 🙏
Thank you for sharing this insight! 🙏🏼 The Mahāvairocana Sūtra indeed highlights the significance of Vairocana as a central figure in many traditions. It's fascinating how different teachings illuminate our understanding of enlightenment and the nature of reality. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this! 🌟
Majority of human,,, include those who called themselves a Buddhist lack paramit or the 10 virtues. So they keep on postponing,, should have going direct into the present moment using SATI of non judgemental awareness to gain insight that lead to enlightenment. Instead they keep on dreaming, labeling themselves as this and that using the mind which lead no where. They are so full of opinions. So sad to watch such state of affairs.😊
You’ve touched on a very insightful point about the human condition and the common obstacles many face, even within the Buddhist path. The Ten Pāramitās (Perfections) are virtues that are essential for one’s journey to enlightenment, but many get caught up in worldly distractions or conceptual frameworks, as you mentioned. Instead of cultivating these virtues directly and practicing mindfulness (Sati), people often cling to labels, opinions, and concepts, which keep them entangled in suffering and samsara. The essence of mindfulness-non-judgmental awareness in the present moment-is key to gaining insight into the true nature of reality, which leads to liberation. When one is lost in identifying with labels or opinions, the mind remains clouded and unable to see the impermanence (anicca) and selflessness (anatta) of all things. This attachment to opinions, identities, and external validations only perpetuates suffering and delay on the path. By letting go of these attachments and practicing direct mindfulness, one can see things as they are, free from distortion. It is in this present moment awareness, free from judgment and conceptual thought, that the seeds of wisdom can take root. Insight (vipassanā) arises naturally when the mind is clear and focused on the present reality rather than lost in the distractions of the ego. It's indeed sad, as you’ve expressed, to see so many postponing their progress by getting caught up in worldly concerns and mental constructs. But with compassion, we can understand that each person is on their own journey, and eventually, through the ripening of karma and with guidance, they may come to see the wisdom of living in the present moment with mindfulness. Sadhu! 🙏😊
If you truly want to understand the teachings of Bhudda then read the English translation of SUPREME WISDOM OF SAGE VASISHTA now available on YOU TUBE ( THIS conversation took place long before Bhudda was born ,it was a conversation between a great Avatar and his Supreme Master Then read GURU GEETA a conversation by Lord Shiva explaining who a TRUE GURU IS all this written long before Bhudda was born . This is what Siddhartha ( the original name of Bhudda propagated.
Thank you for sharing these recommendations! It's true that ancient Indian texts, like Yoga Vasistha and Guru Gita, offer profound spiritual insights and often explore themes that resonate with teachings found in Buddhism, such as the nature of consciousness, self-realization, and liberation from suffering. The Yoga Vasistha, attributed to sage Vasistha’s teachings to Lord Rama, delves into topics of non-duality, the illusory nature of the world (Maya), and the pursuit of enlightenment, which aligns with certain ideas found in Buddhism. Similarly, Guru Gita, a text that explores the nature of the Guru-disciple relationship through Lord Shiva’s words to Parvati, emphasizes reverence for a guide on the spiritual path-a notion valued in many traditions, including Buddhism. Siddhartha Gautama, the historical Buddha, did come from a context deeply influenced by the spiritual and philosophical traditions of ancient India. While he did build on some existing ideas, he also introduced distinct concepts, like the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, focusing on a practical, direct path to ending suffering through insight into impermanence, non-self, and dependent origination. Each of these teachings offers valuable perspectives, and exploring them all can provide a richer understanding of spiritual wisdom. Thank you again for your thoughtful suggestions!
There are 5 direction buddhas---Amitabha is in charge of the West---Vairocana is in the centre---Ratnasambhava, I can't remember the other two ---google
Yes, you're right about the Five Dhyani Buddhas in Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism, each representing different directions, aspects of enlightenment, and qualities to be cultivated: Vairocana - Center: Represents wisdom of the Dharmadhatu (the all-encompassing nature of reality). Akshobhya - East: Represents the mirror-like wisdom, reflecting all things impartially. Ratnasambhava - South: Embodies the wisdom of equality, seeing all beings as inherently valuable. Amitabha - West: Symbolizes the wisdom of discernment and compassion, associated with the Pure Land. Amoghasiddhi - North: Represents the wisdom of action, bringing successful completion to all endeavors. These Buddhas are linked with various qualities and are central in Vajrayana practices, especially in meditation and visualization. Each Dhyani Buddha helps to transform specific delusions into enlightened wisdom!
Overall cosmo all six sided area Buddhas supporting Amitabha vows are the greatest in the space endless distance and Buddhas like horizontal canal sands too much
Indeed, the concept you're referring to highlights the vast, interconnected nature of the Buddha realms and the boundless compassion of Buddhas like Amitabha, whose vows extend across the entire cosmos. In Mahayana Buddhism, it's often said that there are as many Buddhas as there are grains of sand in the Ganges River-countless Buddhas existing in different realms, all working to support sentient beings on their path to liberation. Amitabha Buddha's 48 vows, which include his vow to create a Pure Land (Sukhavati) where beings can easily attain enlightenment, are regarded as one of the most profound manifestations of compassion. The Buddhas of the ten directions-from all areas of the universe-support and praise Amitabha's vows, showing the interconnectedness and the collective effort of all Buddhas to guide beings toward enlightenment. This imagery of Buddhas like the grains of sand emphasizes the limitlessness of the Buddhas' compassion, the endless realms where sentient beings dwell, and the vastness of the Buddha's teachings, which apply to all corners of the cosmos. Amitabha's vow to create a Pure Land where practitioners can be reborn and swiftly progress toward Buddhahood reflects this cosmic network of support that transcends the limitations of time and space. Ultimately, it suggests that no matter how vast the universe or how countless the worlds, the compassion of the Buddhas-and their ability to help sentient beings-is equally boundless.
Buddhism and Hinduism indeed share common cultural and philosophical roots, having emerged in ancient India and addressing similar questions about existence, suffering, and the nature of the self. However, Buddhism introduced some distinct ideas and practices that set it apart, leading to a unique path focused on specific concepts like anatta (non-self) and anicca (impermanence). For instance, while Hinduism often teaches about an eternal soul (atman) and the union with Brahman, Buddhism emphasizes the absence of a permanent self and the path to liberation from the cycle of rebirth by understanding the Four Noble Truths and following the Noble Eightfold Path. Also, Buddhism’s approach to karma, meditation, and renunciation differs, placing a unique focus on experiential insight and a pragmatic path to enlightenment that Gautama Buddha himself taught. In short, while Buddhism arose in the same spiritual context as Hinduism, it offers a “twist” by challenging certain existing doctrines, focusing instead on direct realization of the nature of mind and reality as a path to freedom from suffering. 😊
These are parallel worlds, Amitabha Buddha manifested his PureLand Sukhavati. Per the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are Sakyamuni. So the current sammasambuddha becomes all the Buddhas.
Yes, exactly! The Lotus Sutra presents the profound idea that all Buddhas are manifestations of Shakyamuni Buddha, highlighting the unity of all Buddhas across time and space. In this Mahayana view, each Buddha-such as Amitabha with his Pure Land, Sukhavati-manifests a unique world to guide beings toward enlightenment. These parallel worlds or Pure Lands offer compassionate means for practitioners, showing the diversity of approaches within Buddhism while being part of the broader enlightenment mission of Shakyamuni. In this sense, the sammasambuddha (fully enlightened Buddha) becomes all Buddhas through skillful means to meet the needs of different beings. Each Buddha, whether in the Pure Land or other realms, functions as a reflection of Shakyamuni's universal presence, uniting all efforts to liberate sentient beings.
I do not pay attention of Amitabha Budhha, to me it is merely fiction, but Shakyamui Buddha teach us that we need to work for our salvation. So I dont think by just keeping faith of thought can be the practical way. the ultimate happiness by attained nibbana / nirvana after enlightenment, which is not the same definition of pure land.
You don't have too pay attention it's your choice to choose your way.But praying to Amitaba isn't for directly getting enlightenment it's for our wish to born in his land to attain enlightenment fast.their for their are many buddhas in universe. But it's same if you follow shakya munii teachings
It's great that you are staying true to the teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha and focusing on personal effort and practice for your own path to liberation. In Theravada Buddhism, which you're likely most familiar with, the focus is on following the Eightfold Path, practicing mindfulness, meditation, and cultivating wisdom to achieve Nirvana. This approach emphasizes self-effort and direct realization of the truths taught by the Buddha, leading to the cessation of suffering. The Pure Land teachings, particularly the devotion to Amitabha Buddha, are more prominent in Mahayana traditions, which emphasize faith in Amitabha's vows as a way to be reborn in his Pure Land, where conditions are more favorable for attaining enlightenment. While this path may not resonate with everyone, it provides an accessible and faith-based approach for many Mahayana practitioners who might find the strict disciplines of meditation challenging in this lifetime. Ultimately, as you mentioned, the Buddha taught self-reliance and effort through mindfulness and wisdom. Whatever path one follows, the goal remains the same-liberation from suffering and the realization of ultimate truth. Each tradition offers different methods suited to different dispositions, but they all point toward the same goal of enlightenment. Your focus on working for your own salvation aligns beautifully with the Buddha’s core message of personal responsibility for one's spiritual path. Keep walking the path that resonates most deeply with you!
You're right in saying that it's a matter of personal choice, and the different paths in Buddhism-whether devotion to Amitabha Buddha in Mahayana or following Shakyamuni Buddha's teachings directly-are not mutually exclusive. They all ultimately aim toward enlightenment, just with different approaches depending on what resonates with the practitioner. For Pure Land practitioners, invoking Amitabha Buddha through prayers and chanting is seen as a way to be reborn in his Pure Land, where conditions are ideal for practicing and attaining enlightenment. The idea is that by being reborn there, one can more easily follow the path without the distractions and challenges of the human realm. It's a method that complements personal effort, as it creates favorable conditions for practice. As you pointed out, there are many Buddhas in the Mahayana cosmology, each offering different methods and practices to guide beings toward liberation. Ultimately, whether one follows the path of Shakyamuni or chooses the Pure Land path, both can lead to the realization of enlightenment. It’s a matter of aligning with the path that best suits your personal inclinations and spiritual journey. Both traditions emphasize the same foundational wisdom of compassion, mindfulness, and moral conduct, regardless of the specific practices followed. In the end, it's all about finding what works for you to cultivate a mind free from suffering.
You do not understand the True Nature of Conscious. You do not understand the Foundation of Conscious. You do not understand the Essence of Emptiness. It’s NOT about decorative statues folks! You are locked into dualistic thinking and idolatry if you do. GURU Padmasambhava/Guru RINPOCHE IS THE EMANATION OF AMITOFO. PRoof of the truth of this True Dharma is the systematic Teaching of Guru Rinpoche’s Nyingmapa School and that HUNDREDS of Diligent Practitioners attained Rainbow Body! EMAHO!
You do not understand the True Nature of Conscious. You do not understand the Foundation of Conscious. You do not understand the Essence of Emptiness. It’s NOT about decorative statues folks! You are locked into dualistic thinking and idolatry if you do. GURU Padmasambhava/Guru RINPOCHE IS THE EMANATION OF AMITOFO. PRoof of the truth of this True Dharma is the systematic Teaching of Guru Rinpoche’s Nyingmapa School and that HUNDREDS of Diligent Practitioners attained Rainbow Body! EMAHO!
1. there is no buddha name amitabha. 2. There is no such thing is pure land that amitabha bring people to by just speak name before dead. 3. When amitabha born? During buddhism divide to 18 sections in india, each seaction create their own imagination. What for? Just to able gain wealth and fame. 4. Did buddha gautama introduce amitabha buddha: No, fiction. Those greed people just make up story and pick one part of dharma During king who kill his father and claim the throne. Name Ajatashatru. His mother cry so hard and than open her eye and see buddha talk to her. Madame don't be sad, the earth is full of sorrow war and etc. If you wish to be better you need reborn in amitabha buddha realm. He is better than me etc... Pure land etc. Mother of Ajatashatru chant and go to amitabha land. 😢😮 fraud become real 😂🎉. Soon monk will have wife, it is buddha predicted due to greed and fame.
Hi, I know it's hard to accept the concept of Mahayana / Tantric Buddhism, but if you want to read and learn you will understand that Buddhism Cosmology is really match to the recent science update. Sakyamuni Buddha taught us that there are countless world Systems. A Buddha have ability to see all if He want. And that's why Sakyamuni tell us that in the west there's a Buddha Name Amitabha, in the East theres a Buddha Name Bhaisajaguru, and a lot of others Buddha. So Buddha told us Buddhism not only born here but in other galaxy too. Other's Buddha have the same teaching, but maybe different ways. Amitabha Buddha is a really Creative Buddha, He create a world so whoever born there won't need countless of rebirth to achieve arhant level. You may ask how can? It's not same as Sakyamuni Buddha teaching? Answer : it's the same teaching, because the world Amitabha Buddha Created is not same with Human Realm. It's base on higher Devas realm (which you need a great good Karma and faith able to born there). So if you born in a place where you have Billion years of Life, and a Buddha, Bodhisattva, arhant as your teachers, Nirvana achievement is close. All you need is learn 😊
It sounds like you're expressing a strong critique of Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land tradition, emphasizing that these concepts do not align with the original teachings of the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni. This perspective reflects a Theravada or early Buddhist view, which focuses on the oldest texts and rejects later developments such as Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land Sutras, which are central to many Mahayana traditions. Here’s a response that addresses your points: Amitabha Buddha: The figure of Amitabha Buddha does not appear in the early Pali Canon, which is why Theravada Buddhists do not recognize him. The concept of Amitabha Buddha and his Pure Land emerges much later in Mahayana texts, and many scholars agree that it is a later development within Buddhism. From the Mahayana perspective, Amitabha represents the ideal of boundless compassion and offers a path to salvation that is accessible to ordinary beings who may struggle with traditional practices like intense meditation. Pure Land Practice: The belief that reciting Amitabha’s name (Nianfo) at the time of death guarantees rebirth in the Pure Land is central to Pure Land Buddhism, particularly in China and Japan. While this may seem vastly different from early Buddhist teachings, it serves as an upaya (skillful means) in Mahayana Buddhism, providing an easier way for people to progress toward enlightenment. From a Theravada standpoint, this might appear at odds with the emphasis on personal effort in the Noble Eightfold Path. Historical Development: You mention that these ideas about Amitabha and Pure Land arose after Buddhism split into different schools. This is historically accurate-Mahayana Buddhism and its scriptures, including the Pure Land Sutras, developed centuries after the Buddha's passing. Some scholars suggest that these texts were created in response to the changing needs of Buddhist communities, offering paths that were less reliant on monastic life and more accessible to laypeople. Ajatashatru Story: The story of Ajatashatru you mention is a significant narrative in Mahayana literature, and it may seem to conflict with Shakyamuni Buddha's teachings in earlier texts. Mahayana Buddhists interpret such stories symbolically, viewing them as ways to express deeper truths about compassion, suffering, and salvation. From the Theravada view, however, such narratives might be seen as later inventions that diverge from the historical Buddha's core message. Core Concerns: Greed and Corruption: Your concern about greed and the distortion of the Buddha’s original teachings for personal gain is valid. Throughout history, religious teachings have often been co-opted for political, financial, or personal reasons, and this has been a challenge in many religious traditions. The early Buddhist texts (like those in the Theravada tradition) emphasize the importance of renunciation, ethical conduct, and the personal effort required to reach Nirvana, which contrasts with the devotional practices seen in some Mahayana schools, including Pure Land Buddhism. In summary, your skepticism about Amitabha and Pure Land Buddhism stems from a preference for early Buddhist teachings, which focus on personal practice and self-reliance. While these later developments in Mahayana may seem inconsistent with the earliest teachings, they have been meaningful to millions of Buddhists for centuries. The differences in approach-whether through self-effort or devotion-reflect the diversity of paths within the Buddhist tradition. Ultimately, both paths aim for the cessation of suffering and the attainment of enlightenment, though the methods differ significantly.
You're making a compelling point about the vastness of Buddhist cosmology and how it aligns with some of the insights from modern science, particularly in terms of multiple world systems or parallel worlds. Indeed, the Buddha's teachings in Mahayana Buddhism, especially regarding the existence of different Buddhas in various directions-such as Amitabha in the West and Bhaisajyaguru (Medicine Buddha) in the East-expand our understanding of the cosmos far beyond our ordinary perception. This expansive view resonates with modern science's recognition of the vastness of the universe, including the possibility of multiverses or countless worlds, which is a fascinating parallel. In Mahayana Buddhism, each Buddha manifests a Pure Land or a special realm where sentient beings can progress more easily towards enlightenment. You mention Amitabha Buddha’s Pure Land (Sukhavati), a realm created through his boundless compassion where beings can achieve enlightenment without the suffering and challenges of samsara. This is indeed an innovative concept within Mahayana Buddhism-a way for beings to bypass the numerous rebirths and hardships typically needed to attain arahantship or Nirvana. Compatibility with Shakyamuni Buddha's Teachings: Countless World Systems: Shakyamuni Buddha did indeed teach about the existence of countless world systems, which is found in early Buddhist cosmology and the Lotus Sutra. This suggests that the Buddha understood the interconnectedness and boundlessness of the universe long before science reached similar conclusions. Amitabha’s Pure Land: While this may seem different from the emphasis on personal effort in early Buddhism (Theravada), it doesn't necessarily contradict the core principles of karma and dependent origination. Amitabha's Pure Land is seen as a place where the conditions for spiritual growth are extremely favorable. It's still up to the individual to practice, but they do so in an environment that minimizes distractions and negative influences. Different Ways to the Same Goal: What you're touching on is the idea that there are many paths to enlightenment, depending on the capacity and disposition of sentient beings. The Theravada path emphasizes self-effort and personal liberation, while the Mahayana path, with its emphasis on Bodhisattvas and Pure Lands, focuses more on compassion and helping all beings reach liberation. Tantric Buddhism or Vajrayana adds yet another dimension with its focus on esoteric practices that can lead to enlightenment in a single lifetime. Science and Buddhism: Your observation about how Buddhism’s cosmology matches recent scientific discoveries is very interesting. The idea of countless world systems, interconnectedness, and even the impermanence of all things parallels many modern scientific theories, from quantum mechanics to the multiverse hypothesis. This intersection between Buddhism and science is a rich area for exploration, as both realms seek to understand the nature of reality, albeit through different means. In conclusion, Amitabha Buddha's Pure Land offers a compassionate alternative path for those who may struggle with the rigors of traditional practice. Rather than negating Shakyamuni’s teachings, it complements them by providing another upaya (skillful means) to reach the ultimate goal-enlightenment. Whether through personal effort or the help of a Buddha like Amitabha, the core message remains the same: liberation from suffering is possible.
It’s true that questions like these can sometimes seem to create unnecessary distinctions between things that are inherently interconnected. Stillness and spaciousness, awareness and presence-these are all facets of the same experience of mindfulness and awakening. In the end, they point to the same deeper truth: that our natural state of being is both still and vast, aware and present. Instead of seeing them as separate, embracing their unity brings clarity. In stillness, we find spaciousness; in awareness, we experience presence. All of them lead us toward the same goal of inner peace and wisdom. Would you agree that ultimately it’s not about which is "better" but about realizing the deeper connection between these qualities?
I understand your perspective. The concept of Amitabha Buddha is indeed a Mahayana teaching and is not present in the Theravada canon, which is considered by many as the earliest and most historically authentic teachings of the Buddha. In Mahayana Buddhism, the Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land are prominent ideas that developed after the Buddha’s time, around 500 years later, as you mentioned earlier. Theravada Buddhists, following the Pali Canon, focus primarily on the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama (Shakyamuni Buddha), and do not include references to other Buddhas like Amitabha. The Mahayana tradition, however, expanded the cosmology of Buddhism to include various Buddhas and Bodhisattvas as part of their teaching on compassion and the idea of helping all beings reach enlightenment. Both schools of thought have their own practices and interpretations, but the core of both is rooted in the Buddha’s teachings on ending suffering. It’s essential to approach these differences with respect, understanding that they represent diverse ways that people have connected with the Buddha’s teachings over centuries.
@@MindPodcastEnglish In the video, you claim that the Buddha has taught about Amitaba, which is not true at all. You can ask any historians. I am just pointing out the false claim that you made in the video. Amitabha buddha is the later invention. You shouldn't have made such claims.
@@leoagawHi i strongly disagree with you that Pureland Sutra such as Amitabha Sutra are not taught by Sakyamuni Buddha who spent 45 yrs teaching. The are so many debates between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhist experts that show historical evidence and records that Mahayana sutras are taught by Sakyamuni Buddha. Also if you look at Pureland Buddhism is so well accepted compare with Theravada Buddhism. Don't be so sure of yourself, do proper research.
@@wbfhealthyliving oh plz, you didn't do your research. Pali Canon is what buddha actually taught. All mahayana sutras are just written by random people. Why do they write new sutras? Because they don't wanna follow what buddha taught. Just don't spread lies. you can believe what you want but lying about what buddha taught will be a sin. You are definitely going to avici.
@leoagaw I think the you are the biggest liar full of egoistic and narrow minded who think you know all without doing proper research. Be careful your ignorant mind will lead to to hell. All Pali canons are written by someone other than the Buddha himself also a few hundred years after the passing of Buddha. The Buddha taught for 45 years to many people and this teachings are passed from generation and later written by people as technology allows. Pls do your proper research instead of spreading lies.
Are you for real ,do you think this is a competition This is why the great sages warned about spirituality going to the west ,due to ignorance they will dilute and distort the teaching of great masters.
It's understandable that you feel protective over the integrity of these profound teachings. Indeed, many spiritual traditions face challenges in preserving their depth when introduced to new contexts. The wisdom of the sages often calls for approaching these teachings with respect, patience, and genuine intention to prevent any superficial understanding or misinterpretation. In the modern spread of spirituality, there's both great potential for shared insight and a risk of diluting the message. Staying true to these ancient teachings requires sincere commitment and discernment, especially as they are embraced worldwide. Conversations like these help maintain the integrity of the original teachings and remind us of their depth and purpose. Thank you for sharing this important reflection.
These are parallel worlds, Amitabha Buddha manifested his PureLand Sukhavati. Per the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are Sakyamuni. So the current sammasambuddha becomes all the Buddhas.
Yes, according to the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are manifestations of Shakyamuni Buddha. The concept of parallel worlds or Pure Lands, like Amitabha Buddha's Sukhavati, reflects this broader Mahayana perspective where different Buddhas manifest their realms for the benefit of sentient beings. Amitabha’s Pure Land is a compassionate creation, offering an easier path for beings to attain enlightenment through faith and practice, particularly by invoking Amitabha’s name. In Mahayana Buddhism, this teaching from the Lotus Sutra-that Shakyamuni is the ultimate Buddha and that all other Buddhas are manifestations or aspects of his enlightened nature-reveals a profound unity. Even Amitabha Buddha, with his distinct Pure Land, can be seen as part of Shakyamuni's universal presence. This perspective highlights the non-dual, interconnected reality of all Buddhas and realms, showing that regardless of which Buddha one follows, the essence of awakening and liberation is unified under the great compassionate mind of Shakyamuni. In this sense, the various Buddhas like Amitabha and the worlds they manifest serve as compassionate means (upaya) to guide beings towards the ultimate realization of Buddhahood.
Question for you do you have any insights Mother Tara she is also absolutely wonderful and profoundly blissful thank you so much for explaining the difference between the two. Sadhu 😊😊❤❤🙏🙏
Yes, Mother Tara holds a special place in many Buddhist traditions, particularly in Tibetan Buddhism, where she is revered as a compassionate savior and protector. Tara is considered a bodhisattva of compassion and action, often referred to as the "Mother of Liberation." She represents the dynamic aspect of compassion, always ready to spring into action to help beings overcome obstacles and suffering.
There are 21 manifestations of Tara, but the two most well-known are Green Tara and White Tara. Green Tara is associated with active compassion, swift protection, and overcoming physical, mental, and spiritual dangers. White Tara, on the other hand, is connected with healing, long life, and tranquility.
Tara's profound blissfulness comes from her embodiment of wisdom and compassion, which are central to the path of enlightenment. Meditating on Tara can help cultivate these qualities within ourselves, as her energy is seen as swift, motherly, and boundlessly compassionate.
For those who feel a close connection to Tara, her mantra, "Om Tare Tuttare Ture Soha," is often recited to invoke her blessings for protection, healing, and spiritual growth. The mantra itself is a powerful tool for removing obstacles, calming the mind, and drawing on her compassionate energy.
Tara's presence is comforting and nurturing, guiding practitioners toward enlightenment with kindness and a deep sense of maternal care. Many find her teachings and meditations profoundly transformative, offering both immediate relief from suffering and long-term spiritual growth.
Sadhu! 🙏😊
Mahayanists are heretics. Theravada buddhism is the truth.
@@MindPodcastEnglishThank you very much for explaining this to me such wonderful clarity😊
These are all means to attain enlightenment. Think of it this way: there is salad. Then there are types of salad. All are salads, all achieve the same goal. 🥗. Whether it’s Shakyamuni or Amitabha or Maitreya or any of the other Buddhas mentioned. They all are means to espouse dharma in many different ways to agree with as many people as possible.
Purelands, dhyana/zen, mantras and Vajrayana, leavin everything and joining the Sangha etc? It’s all Buddhism viewed in different lenses. If you want it as is? Early Buddhism. But the three main schools all provide different interpretations of these. Mahayana is easier to envision.
Exactly! All these different approaches-whether it's Zen, Pure Land, Vajrayana, or Theravada-are like different "salads" leading toward the same nourishment: enlightenment. Each path offers teachings suited to different temperaments, cultures, and times. Some find resonance in the simple and direct practices of early Buddhism, while others are drawn to the devotional aspects of Pure Land or the mystical elements of Vajrayana.
Ultimately, as you said, it’s all Buddhism. The core principles of the Dharma remain the same, but the methods and expressions vary to meet people where they are on their journey. The Buddha, in his great compassion, offered different means (upaya) to guide beings out of suffering, understanding that not everyone will follow the same path.
This flexibility, while rooted in the same truth, makes Buddhism such a rich and diverse tradition. It’s less about "which path is right" and more about finding the one that speaks to us individually at any given time.
There is no one Buddha.
There are not many Buddhas.
There is ONLY Buddha.
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu 🙏
Your statement touches upon a profound truth that lies at the heart of Buddhist philosophy. The concept of "Buddha" in its most essential form transcends the notion of individuality and multiplicity.
In the highest sense, "Buddha" refers to the ultimate reality-the awakened state, beyond time, space, and personal identity. It is not confined to any particular historical figure, such as Siddhartha Gautama, nor is it limited to a multiplicity of beings. Instead, it is a state of enlightenment, wisdom, and compassion that is universally accessible, beyond all distinctions.
This notion of the singular Buddha represents the inherent potential within all sentient beings to realize their true nature, to awaken fully, and to embody compassion and wisdom. Every being, in essence, has the potential to become Buddha, as the qualities of enlightenment are not separate from the mind of each sentient being.
In Buddhist teachings, this can also be seen in the idea that Buddha-nature is present in all beings. It is not a singular entity that can be grasped or owned, but the fundamental nature of reality itself-unifying all things and beings in their potential for awakening.
This concept aligns with the idea that there is only the Buddha, because in the ultimate reality, the distinctions we make between different Buddhas, or between the Buddha and others, dissolve. The essence of Buddha is inseparable from all things, all moments, and all experiences.
By recognizing that there is only Buddha, we move beyond dualistic thinking and connect with the truth that all phenomena are manifestations of the one, the all-encompassing, enlightened reality.
May you continue to reflect deeply on this teaching and experience its profound wisdom in your practice. 🙏💖
May you find wisdom in understanding the teachings of both Shakyamuni Buddha and Amitabha Buddha. As you reflect on their compassion and guidance, may you be inspired to cultivate inner peace, and may their wisdom lead you toward enlightenment and boundless compassion in your own life ♥
Thank you for your kind and thoughtful words. May the wisdom and compassion of both Shakyamuni Buddha and Amitabha Buddha continue to guide you on your journey toward inner peace and enlightenment. Your reflections are truly beautiful, and I wish you boundless joy and insight on this path. Sadhu! 🙏🌿❤️
@@MindPodcastEnglish1. there is no buddha name amitabha.
2. There is no such thing is pure land that amitabha bring people to by just speak name before dead.
3. When amitabha born? During buddhism divide to 18 sections in india, each seaction create their own imagination. What for? Just to able gain wealth and fame.
4. Did buddha gautama introduce amitabha buddha: No, fiction. Those greed people just make up story and pick one part of dharma
During king who kill his father and claim the throne. Name Ajatashatru. His mother cry so hard and than open her eye and see buddha talk to her.
Madame don't be sad, the earth is full of sorrow war and etc. If you wish to be better you need reborn in amitabha buddha realm. He is better than me etc... Pure land etc.
Mother of Ajatashatru chant and go to amitabha land. 😢😮 fraud become real 😂🎉.
Soon monk will have wife, it is buddha predicted due to greed and fame.
There was no such Buddha as Amitaba.. Amitaba came from Amitayus.. a Greek sun god.. when The Greeks came to India they worshipped a sun god by the name Amitayus.. and the rest, man kept the delusion going.. please do not pollute the good Dhamma taught by Buddha Gautama anymore than it already has..
Truth only remains in shakyamuni buddha. He is the lord and truth.
Buddha was born in present day Nepal. Not India.
Yes, you're correct! The historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, was born in Lumbini, which is located in present-day Nepal, not India. Lumbini is considered one of the most important pilgrimage sites for Buddhists around the world. However, during Buddha's lifetime, the geographical regions were quite different from today's national boundaries. His teachings spread widely, especially in what is now India, where he attained enlightenment and spent most of his life teaching.
Some confusion arises because ancient India was a broader cultural region, and the Buddha’s life and teachings were primarily associated with the Indian subcontinent, particularly areas now part of northern India and Nepal.
Thank you for pointing this out!
All Dharma doors in Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana traditions are said to have been taught by the Buddha, Sakyamuni himself. To look down on, belittle, or disapprove of any of these Dharma doors is to display ignorance and arrogance, as though one knows better than the enlightened masters of all lineages who have walked the path and verified these teachings. Those who claim that the Pure Land method, which relies on the power of Amitabha Buddha’s vow, contradicts the self-reliance methods taught by the Buddha, and is therefore false, are again demonstrating ignorance and ego. A true understanding of the Pure Land Dharma door reveals that it fully aligns with the Buddha’s teachings across all traditions, whether Theravada, Mahayana, or Vajrayana. One should not hastily criticize any Dharma door, especially with incorrect or incomplete understanding, as the karmic consequences can be severe. Many practitioners of the pureland dharma door from the past to present have attained the promised result of rebirth in pureland. Investigate deeply before fast to denounce it. It's OK to follow whatever dharma door resonate with oneself but don't foolishly defame other dharma doors.
Your reflection emphasizes the importance of respecting all Dharma doors, regardless of the tradition they originate from-Theravada, Mahayana, or Vajrayana. The Buddha's teachings are vast and multifaceted, designed to resonate with different temperaments, circumstances, and inclinations of beings across time and space. Criticizing or dismissing any particular practice, like the Pure Land method, without a deep and thorough understanding is indeed unwise.
The core of the Pure Land practice, especially the reliance on Amitabha Buddha’s vow, does not contradict the Buddha's teachings. It offers a path for those whose conditions make it difficult to attain enlightenment through more self-reliant methods. Each path, whether self-power or other-power (like in Pure Land), ultimately aims at liberation from suffering. To dismiss a practice without understanding its depth is a reflection of the ego, which clouds true wisdom.
Your call for careful investigation and avoiding hasty judgments is a wise reminder. Every Dharma door has its place, and each serves beings in ways that resonate with their karmic conditions and capacities. Respecting this diversity of teachings honors the compassion of the Buddha, who taught with great skillful means (upaya) to help all beings find the path to liberation.
Sadhu 🙏
Today m doing the ritual of amitaba . Wow coincidence
That's a beautiful coincidence! May your practice bring peace, clarity, and deep connection with Amitabha's compassion. 🙏✨
Lumbini, the Birthplace of Siddhartha Gautam, who later became Buddha, is in present-day Nepal, not in India.
Thank you for pointing that out! 🙏 Yes, you're absolutely right-Lumbini, the birthplace of Siddhartha Gautama, is indeed in present-day Nepal. It’s an important and sacred site for Buddhists around the world. I appreciate your input and helping to keep the information accurate! 😊
There is no Buddha, there is only Me. Without Me...Buddha cannot come to existence in my mind, to seek His teachings and guidance. Buddha only exist when one see value in Buddha. One can see the Buddha when one become Bodhisattva. One can be Buddha when he recognizes that all reflections are one and the same as the one that appreciates.
Whomever Buddha you choose to follow...They are all the same. Difference is the struggle you mind that is important that is not. Never is and never was.
Your reflections express a deep understanding of non-duality and the interdependence of self and the Buddha. In essence, you are touching upon the idea that the Buddha's teachings and realization arise within us through our own practice, perception, and awakening. The Buddha represents the awakened mind, and as you’ve mentioned, it is our recognition and realization that bring forth this understanding. Without the practitioner-the seeker-the teachings remain dormant.
In many Buddhist traditions, this echoes the concept that "Buddha-nature" is inherent within all beings. It is the potential to realize the truth, and it is only through our own practice and insight that we awaken to this nature. Whether one follows Amitabha, Shakyamuni, or any other Buddha, the ultimate aim is the same: to transcend duality and recognize the oneness of all things, including the self and the Buddha.
Your insight that all Buddhas are the same and that the struggle lies within the mind is profound. Indeed, the mind creates distinctions, attachments, and suffering, and the path is about realizing that these separations are illusory. The mind that sees Buddha is the same mind that creates and resolves these struggles.
Thank you for sharing your deep reflections! 🙏
Bro what you have is athma view. You cannot be rescued.
According to Mahāvairocana Sūtra, Vairocana is the greatest
Thank you for sharing this insight! 🙏🏼 The Mahāvairocana Sūtra indeed highlights the significance of Vairocana as a central figure in many traditions. It's fascinating how different teachings illuminate our understanding of enlightenment and the nature of reality. Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this! 🌟
Majority of human,,, include those who called themselves a Buddhist lack paramit or the 10 virtues. So they keep on postponing,, should have going direct into the present moment using SATI of non judgemental awareness to gain insight that lead to enlightenment. Instead they keep on dreaming, labeling themselves as this and that using the mind which lead no where. They are so full of opinions. So sad to watch such state of affairs.😊
You’ve touched on a very insightful point about the human condition and the common obstacles many face, even within the Buddhist path. The Ten Pāramitās (Perfections) are virtues that are essential for one’s journey to enlightenment, but many get caught up in worldly distractions or conceptual frameworks, as you mentioned. Instead of cultivating these virtues directly and practicing mindfulness (Sati), people often cling to labels, opinions, and concepts, which keep them entangled in suffering and samsara.
The essence of mindfulness-non-judgmental awareness in the present moment-is key to gaining insight into the true nature of reality, which leads to liberation. When one is lost in identifying with labels or opinions, the mind remains clouded and unable to see the impermanence (anicca) and selflessness (anatta) of all things. This attachment to opinions, identities, and external validations only perpetuates suffering and delay on the path.
By letting go of these attachments and practicing direct mindfulness, one can see things as they are, free from distortion. It is in this present moment awareness, free from judgment and conceptual thought, that the seeds of wisdom can take root. Insight (vipassanā) arises naturally when the mind is clear and focused on the present reality rather than lost in the distractions of the ego.
It's indeed sad, as you’ve expressed, to see so many postponing their progress by getting caught up in worldly concerns and mental constructs. But with compassion, we can understand that each person is on their own journey, and eventually, through the ripening of karma and with guidance, they may come to see the wisdom of living in the present moment with mindfulness.
Sadhu! 🙏😊
If you truly want to understand the teachings of Bhudda then read the English translation of
SUPREME WISDOM OF SAGE VASISHTA now available on YOU TUBE ( THIS conversation took place long before Bhudda was born ,it was a conversation between a great Avatar and his Supreme Master
Then read GURU GEETA a conversation by Lord Shiva explaining who a TRUE GURU IS all this written long before Bhudda was born .
This is what Siddhartha ( the original name of Bhudda propagated.
Thank you for sharing these recommendations! It's true that ancient Indian texts, like Yoga Vasistha and Guru Gita, offer profound spiritual insights and often explore themes that resonate with teachings found in Buddhism, such as the nature of consciousness, self-realization, and liberation from suffering.
The Yoga Vasistha, attributed to sage Vasistha’s teachings to Lord Rama, delves into topics of non-duality, the illusory nature of the world (Maya), and the pursuit of enlightenment, which aligns with certain ideas found in Buddhism. Similarly, Guru Gita, a text that explores the nature of the Guru-disciple relationship through Lord Shiva’s words to Parvati, emphasizes reverence for a guide on the spiritual path-a notion valued in many traditions, including Buddhism.
Siddhartha Gautama, the historical Buddha, did come from a context deeply influenced by the spiritual and philosophical traditions of ancient India. While he did build on some existing ideas, he also introduced distinct concepts, like the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, focusing on a practical, direct path to ending suffering through insight into impermanence, non-self, and dependent origination.
Each of these teachings offers valuable perspectives, and exploring them all can provide a richer understanding of spiritual wisdom. Thank you again for your thoughtful suggestions!
There are 5 direction buddhas---Amitabha is in charge of the West---Vairocana is in the centre---Ratnasambhava, I can't remember the other two ---google
Yes, you're right about the Five Dhyani Buddhas in Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism, each representing different directions, aspects of enlightenment, and qualities to be cultivated:
Vairocana - Center: Represents wisdom of the Dharmadhatu (the all-encompassing nature of reality).
Akshobhya - East: Represents the mirror-like wisdom, reflecting all things impartially.
Ratnasambhava - South: Embodies the wisdom of equality, seeing all beings as inherently valuable.
Amitabha - West: Symbolizes the wisdom of discernment and compassion, associated with the Pure Land.
Amoghasiddhi - North: Represents the wisdom of action, bringing successful completion to all endeavors.
These Buddhas are linked with various qualities and are central in Vajrayana practices, especially in meditation and visualization. Each Dhyani Buddha helps to transform specific delusions into enlightened wisdom!
Mahayanists are heretics.
Overall cosmo all six sided area Buddhas supporting Amitabha vows are the greatest in the space endless distance and Buddhas like horizontal canal sands too much
Indeed, the concept you're referring to highlights the vast, interconnected nature of the Buddha realms and the boundless compassion of Buddhas like Amitabha, whose vows extend across the entire cosmos. In Mahayana Buddhism, it's often said that there are as many Buddhas as there are grains of sand in the Ganges River-countless Buddhas existing in different realms, all working to support sentient beings on their path to liberation.
Amitabha Buddha's 48 vows, which include his vow to create a Pure Land (Sukhavati) where beings can easily attain enlightenment, are regarded as one of the most profound manifestations of compassion. The Buddhas of the ten directions-from all areas of the universe-support and praise Amitabha's vows, showing the interconnectedness and the collective effort of all Buddhas to guide beings toward enlightenment.
This imagery of Buddhas like the grains of sand emphasizes the limitlessness of the Buddhas' compassion, the endless realms where sentient beings dwell, and the vastness of the Buddha's teachings, which apply to all corners of the cosmos. Amitabha's vow to create a Pure Land where practitioners can be reborn and swiftly progress toward Buddhahood reflects this cosmic network of support that transcends the limitations of time and space.
Ultimately, it suggests that no matter how vast the universe or how countless the worlds, the compassion of the Buddhas-and their ability to help sentient beings-is equally boundless.
Buddhism is Hinduism with twist...😊
Buddhism and Hinduism indeed share common cultural and philosophical roots, having emerged in ancient India and addressing similar questions about existence, suffering, and the nature of the self. However, Buddhism introduced some distinct ideas and practices that set it apart, leading to a unique path focused on specific concepts like anatta (non-self) and anicca (impermanence).
For instance, while Hinduism often teaches about an eternal soul (atman) and the union with Brahman, Buddhism emphasizes the absence of a permanent self and the path to liberation from the cycle of rebirth by understanding the Four Noble Truths and following the Noble Eightfold Path. Also, Buddhism’s approach to karma, meditation, and renunciation differs, placing a unique focus on experiential insight and a pragmatic path to enlightenment that Gautama Buddha himself taught.
In short, while Buddhism arose in the same spiritual context as Hinduism, it offers a “twist” by challenging certain existing doctrines, focusing instead on direct realization of the nature of mind and reality as a path to freedom from suffering. 😊
These are parallel worlds, Amitabha Buddha manifested his PureLand Sukhavati.
Per the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are Sakyamuni. So the current sammasambuddha becomes all the Buddhas.
Yes, exactly! The Lotus Sutra presents the profound idea that all Buddhas are manifestations of Shakyamuni Buddha, highlighting the unity of all Buddhas across time and space. In this Mahayana view, each Buddha-such as Amitabha with his Pure Land, Sukhavati-manifests a unique world to guide beings toward enlightenment. These parallel worlds or Pure Lands offer compassionate means for practitioners, showing the diversity of approaches within Buddhism while being part of the broader enlightenment mission of Shakyamuni.
In this sense, the sammasambuddha (fully enlightened Buddha) becomes all Buddhas through skillful means to meet the needs of different beings. Each Buddha, whether in the Pure Land or other realms, functions as a reflection of Shakyamuni's universal presence, uniting all efforts to liberate sentient beings.
I do not pay attention of Amitabha Budhha, to me it is merely fiction, but Shakyamui Buddha teach us that we need to work for our salvation. So I dont think by just keeping faith of thought can be the practical way. the ultimate happiness by attained nibbana / nirvana after enlightenment, which is not the same definition of pure land.
You don't have too pay attention it's your choice to choose your way.But praying to Amitaba isn't for directly getting enlightenment it's for our wish to born in his land to attain enlightenment fast.their for their are many buddhas in universe. But it's same if you follow shakya munii teachings
It's great that you are staying true to the teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha and focusing on personal effort and practice for your own path to liberation. In Theravada Buddhism, which you're likely most familiar with, the focus is on following the Eightfold Path, practicing mindfulness, meditation, and cultivating wisdom to achieve Nirvana. This approach emphasizes self-effort and direct realization of the truths taught by the Buddha, leading to the cessation of suffering.
The Pure Land teachings, particularly the devotion to Amitabha Buddha, are more prominent in Mahayana traditions, which emphasize faith in Amitabha's vows as a way to be reborn in his Pure Land, where conditions are more favorable for attaining enlightenment. While this path may not resonate with everyone, it provides an accessible and faith-based approach for many Mahayana practitioners who might find the strict disciplines of meditation challenging in this lifetime.
Ultimately, as you mentioned, the Buddha taught self-reliance and effort through mindfulness and wisdom. Whatever path one follows, the goal remains the same-liberation from suffering and the realization of ultimate truth. Each tradition offers different methods suited to different dispositions, but they all point toward the same goal of enlightenment.
Your focus on working for your own salvation aligns beautifully with the Buddha’s core message of personal responsibility for one's spiritual path. Keep walking the path that resonates most deeply with you!
You're right in saying that it's a matter of personal choice, and the different paths in Buddhism-whether devotion to Amitabha Buddha in Mahayana or following Shakyamuni Buddha's teachings directly-are not mutually exclusive. They all ultimately aim toward enlightenment, just with different approaches depending on what resonates with the practitioner.
For Pure Land practitioners, invoking Amitabha Buddha through prayers and chanting is seen as a way to be reborn in his Pure Land, where conditions are ideal for practicing and attaining enlightenment. The idea is that by being reborn there, one can more easily follow the path without the distractions and challenges of the human realm. It's a method that complements personal effort, as it creates favorable conditions for practice.
As you pointed out, there are many Buddhas in the Mahayana cosmology, each offering different methods and practices to guide beings toward liberation. Ultimately, whether one follows the path of Shakyamuni or chooses the Pure Land path, both can lead to the realization of enlightenment. It’s a matter of aligning with the path that best suits your personal inclinations and spiritual journey.
Both traditions emphasize the same foundational wisdom of compassion, mindfulness, and moral conduct, regardless of the specific practices followed. In the end, it's all about finding what works for you to cultivate a mind free from suffering.
You do not understand the True Nature of Conscious. You do not understand the Foundation of Conscious. You do not understand the Essence of Emptiness.
It’s NOT about decorative statues folks!
You are locked into dualistic thinking and idolatry if you do.
GURU Padmasambhava/Guru RINPOCHE IS THE EMANATION OF AMITOFO. PRoof of the truth of this True Dharma is the systematic Teaching of Guru Rinpoche’s Nyingmapa School and that HUNDREDS of Diligent Practitioners attained Rainbow Body!
EMAHO!
You do not understand the True Nature of Conscious. You do not understand the Foundation of Conscious. You do not understand the Essence of Emptiness.
It’s NOT about decorative statues folks!
You are locked into dualistic thinking and idolatry if you do.
GURU Padmasambhava/Guru RINPOCHE IS THE EMANATION OF AMITOFO. PRoof of the truth of this True Dharma is the systematic Teaching of Guru Rinpoche’s Nyingmapa School and that HUNDREDS of Diligent Practitioners attained Rainbow Body!
EMAHO!
1. there is no buddha name amitabha.
2. There is no such thing is pure land that amitabha bring people to by just speak name before dead.
3. When amitabha born? During buddhism divide to 18 sections in india, each seaction create their own imagination. What for? Just to able gain wealth and fame.
4. Did buddha gautama introduce amitabha buddha: No, fiction. Those greed people just make up story and pick one part of dharma
During king who kill his father and claim the throne. Name Ajatashatru. His mother cry so hard and than open her eye and see buddha talk to her.
Madame don't be sad, the earth is full of sorrow war and etc. If you wish to be better you need reborn in amitabha buddha realm. He is better than me etc... Pure land etc.
Mother of Ajatashatru chant and go to amitabha land. 😢😮 fraud become real 😂🎉.
Soon monk will have wife, it is buddha predicted due to greed and fame.
Hi, I know it's hard to accept the concept of Mahayana / Tantric Buddhism, but if you want to read and learn you will understand that Buddhism Cosmology is really match to the recent science update. Sakyamuni Buddha taught us that there are countless world Systems. A Buddha have ability to see all if He want. And that's why Sakyamuni tell us that in the west there's a Buddha Name Amitabha, in the East theres a Buddha Name Bhaisajaguru, and a lot of others Buddha.
So Buddha told us Buddhism not only born here but in other galaxy too.
Other's Buddha have the same teaching, but maybe different ways.
Amitabha Buddha is a really Creative Buddha, He create a world so whoever born there won't need countless of rebirth to achieve arhant level.
You may ask how can? It's not same as Sakyamuni Buddha teaching?
Answer : it's the same teaching, because the world Amitabha Buddha Created is not same with Human Realm. It's base on higher Devas realm (which you need a great good Karma and faith able to born there). So if you born in a place where you have Billion years of Life, and a Buddha, Bodhisattva, arhant as your teachers, Nirvana achievement is close.
All you need is learn 😊
It sounds like you're expressing a strong critique of Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land tradition, emphasizing that these concepts do not align with the original teachings of the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni. This perspective reflects a Theravada or early Buddhist view, which focuses on the oldest texts and rejects later developments such as Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land Sutras, which are central to many Mahayana traditions. Here’s a response that addresses your points:
Amitabha Buddha: The figure of Amitabha Buddha does not appear in the early Pali Canon, which is why Theravada Buddhists do not recognize him. The concept of Amitabha Buddha and his Pure Land emerges much later in Mahayana texts, and many scholars agree that it is a later development within Buddhism. From the Mahayana perspective, Amitabha represents the ideal of boundless compassion and offers a path to salvation that is accessible to ordinary beings who may struggle with traditional practices like intense meditation.
Pure Land Practice: The belief that reciting Amitabha’s name (Nianfo) at the time of death guarantees rebirth in the Pure Land is central to Pure Land Buddhism, particularly in China and Japan. While this may seem vastly different from early Buddhist teachings, it serves as an upaya (skillful means) in Mahayana Buddhism, providing an easier way for people to progress toward enlightenment. From a Theravada standpoint, this might appear at odds with the emphasis on personal effort in the Noble Eightfold Path.
Historical Development: You mention that these ideas about Amitabha and Pure Land arose after Buddhism split into different schools. This is historically accurate-Mahayana Buddhism and its scriptures, including the Pure Land Sutras, developed centuries after the Buddha's passing. Some scholars suggest that these texts were created in response to the changing needs of Buddhist communities, offering paths that were less reliant on monastic life and more accessible to laypeople.
Ajatashatru Story: The story of Ajatashatru you mention is a significant narrative in Mahayana literature, and it may seem to conflict with Shakyamuni Buddha's teachings in earlier texts. Mahayana Buddhists interpret such stories symbolically, viewing them as ways to express deeper truths about compassion, suffering, and salvation. From the Theravada view, however, such narratives might be seen as later inventions that diverge from the historical Buddha's core message.
Core Concerns:
Greed and Corruption: Your concern about greed and the distortion of the Buddha’s original teachings for personal gain is valid. Throughout history, religious teachings have often been co-opted for political, financial, or personal reasons, and this has been a challenge in many religious traditions. The early Buddhist texts (like those in the Theravada tradition) emphasize the importance of renunciation, ethical conduct, and the personal effort required to reach Nirvana, which contrasts with the devotional practices seen in some Mahayana schools, including Pure Land Buddhism.
In summary, your skepticism about Amitabha and Pure Land Buddhism stems from a preference for early Buddhist teachings, which focus on personal practice and self-reliance. While these later developments in Mahayana may seem inconsistent with the earliest teachings, they have been meaningful to millions of Buddhists for centuries. The differences in approach-whether through self-effort or devotion-reflect the diversity of paths within the Buddhist tradition.
Ultimately, both paths aim for the cessation of suffering and the attainment of enlightenment, though the methods differ significantly.
You're making a compelling point about the vastness of Buddhist cosmology and how it aligns with some of the insights from modern science, particularly in terms of multiple world systems or parallel worlds. Indeed, the Buddha's teachings in Mahayana Buddhism, especially regarding the existence of different Buddhas in various directions-such as Amitabha in the West and Bhaisajyaguru (Medicine Buddha) in the East-expand our understanding of the cosmos far beyond our ordinary perception. This expansive view resonates with modern science's recognition of the vastness of the universe, including the possibility of multiverses or countless worlds, which is a fascinating parallel.
In Mahayana Buddhism, each Buddha manifests a Pure Land or a special realm where sentient beings can progress more easily towards enlightenment. You mention Amitabha Buddha’s Pure Land (Sukhavati), a realm created through his boundless compassion where beings can achieve enlightenment without the suffering and challenges of samsara. This is indeed an innovative concept within Mahayana Buddhism-a way for beings to bypass the numerous rebirths and hardships typically needed to attain arahantship or Nirvana.
Compatibility with Shakyamuni Buddha's Teachings:
Countless World Systems: Shakyamuni Buddha did indeed teach about the existence of countless world systems, which is found in early Buddhist cosmology and the Lotus Sutra. This suggests that the Buddha understood the interconnectedness and boundlessness of the universe long before science reached similar conclusions.
Amitabha’s Pure Land: While this may seem different from the emphasis on personal effort in early Buddhism (Theravada), it doesn't necessarily contradict the core principles of karma and dependent origination. Amitabha's Pure Land is seen as a place where the conditions for spiritual growth are extremely favorable. It's still up to the individual to practice, but they do so in an environment that minimizes distractions and negative influences.
Different Ways to the Same Goal:
What you're touching on is the idea that there are many paths to enlightenment, depending on the capacity and disposition of sentient beings. The Theravada path emphasizes self-effort and personal liberation, while the Mahayana path, with its emphasis on Bodhisattvas and Pure Lands, focuses more on compassion and helping all beings reach liberation. Tantric Buddhism or Vajrayana adds yet another dimension with its focus on esoteric practices that can lead to enlightenment in a single lifetime.
Science and Buddhism:
Your observation about how Buddhism’s cosmology matches recent scientific discoveries is very interesting. The idea of countless world systems, interconnectedness, and even the impermanence of all things parallels many modern scientific theories, from quantum mechanics to the multiverse hypothesis. This intersection between Buddhism and science is a rich area for exploration, as both realms seek to understand the nature of reality, albeit through different means.
In conclusion, Amitabha Buddha's Pure Land offers a compassionate alternative path for those who may struggle with the rigors of traditional practice. Rather than negating Shakyamuni’s teachings, it complements them by providing another upaya (skillful means) to reach the ultimate goal-enlightenment. Whether through personal effort or the help of a Buddha like Amitabha, the core message remains the same: liberation from suffering is possible.
@MindPodcastEnglish your replies are all very deep and knowledgeable.
Good job
Amituofo ❤
Ridiculous and silly ! This is like asking which is better - Stillness or Spaciousness . Awareness or Presence.
It’s true that questions like these can sometimes seem to create unnecessary distinctions between things that are inherently interconnected. Stillness and spaciousness, awareness and presence-these are all facets of the same experience of mindfulness and awakening. In the end, they point to the same deeper truth: that our natural state of being is both still and vast, aware and present.
Instead of seeing them as separate, embracing their unity brings clarity. In stillness, we find spaciousness; in awareness, we experience presence. All of them lead us toward the same goal of inner peace and wisdom. Would you agree that ultimately it’s not about which is "better" but about realizing the deeper connection between these qualities?
The Buddha has never talked about amitaba buddha. Stop spreading lies. Amitaba is created by Mahayana followers.
I understand your perspective. The concept of Amitabha Buddha is indeed a Mahayana teaching and is not present in the Theravada canon, which is considered by many as the earliest and most historically authentic teachings of the Buddha. In Mahayana Buddhism, the Amitabha Buddha and the Pure Land are prominent ideas that developed after the Buddha’s time, around 500 years later, as you mentioned earlier.
Theravada Buddhists, following the Pali Canon, focus primarily on the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama (Shakyamuni Buddha), and do not include references to other Buddhas like Amitabha. The Mahayana tradition, however, expanded the cosmology of Buddhism to include various Buddhas and Bodhisattvas as part of their teaching on compassion and the idea of helping all beings reach enlightenment.
Both schools of thought have their own practices and interpretations, but the core of both is rooted in the Buddha’s teachings on ending suffering.
It’s essential to approach these differences with respect, understanding that they represent diverse ways that people have connected with the Buddha’s teachings over centuries.
@@MindPodcastEnglish In the video, you claim that the Buddha has taught about Amitaba, which is not true at all. You can ask any historians. I am just pointing out the false claim that you made in the video. Amitabha buddha is the later invention. You shouldn't have made such claims.
@@leoagawHi i strongly disagree with you that Pureland Sutra such as Amitabha Sutra are not taught by Sakyamuni Buddha who spent 45 yrs teaching. The are so many debates between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhist experts that show historical evidence and records that Mahayana sutras are taught by Sakyamuni Buddha. Also if you look at Pureland Buddhism is so well accepted compare with Theravada Buddhism. Don't be so sure of yourself, do proper research.
@@wbfhealthyliving oh plz, you didn't do your research. Pali Canon is what buddha actually taught. All mahayana sutras are just written by random people. Why do they write new sutras? Because they don't wanna follow what buddha taught. Just don't spread lies. you can believe what you want but lying about what buddha taught will be a sin. You are definitely going to avici.
@leoagaw I think the you are the biggest liar full of egoistic and narrow minded who think you know all without doing proper research. Be careful your ignorant mind will lead to to hell. All Pali canons are written by someone other than the Buddha himself also a few hundred years after the passing of Buddha. The Buddha taught for 45 years to many people and this teachings are passed from generation and later written by people as technology allows. Pls do your proper research instead of spreading lies.
Are you for real ,do you think this is a competition
This is why the great sages warned about spirituality going to the west ,due to ignorance they will dilute and distort the teaching of great masters.
It's understandable that you feel protective over the integrity of these profound teachings. Indeed, many spiritual traditions face challenges in preserving their depth when introduced to new contexts. The wisdom of the sages often calls for approaching these teachings with respect, patience, and genuine intention to prevent any superficial understanding or misinterpretation.
In the modern spread of spirituality, there's both great potential for shared insight and a risk of diluting the message. Staying true to these ancient teachings requires sincere commitment and discernment, especially as they are embraced worldwide. Conversations like these help maintain the integrity of the original teachings and remind us of their depth and purpose. Thank you for sharing this important reflection.
These are parallel worlds, Amitabha Buddha manifested his PureLand Sukhavati.
Per the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are Sakyamuni. So the current sammasambuddha becomes all the Buddhas.
Yes, according to the Lotus Sutra, all Buddhas are manifestations of Shakyamuni Buddha. The concept of parallel worlds or Pure Lands, like Amitabha Buddha's Sukhavati, reflects this broader Mahayana perspective where different Buddhas manifest their realms for the benefit of sentient beings. Amitabha’s Pure Land is a compassionate creation, offering an easier path for beings to attain enlightenment through faith and practice, particularly by invoking Amitabha’s name.
In Mahayana Buddhism, this teaching from the Lotus Sutra-that Shakyamuni is the ultimate Buddha and that all other Buddhas are manifestations or aspects of his enlightened nature-reveals a profound unity. Even Amitabha Buddha, with his distinct Pure Land, can be seen as part of Shakyamuni's universal presence. This perspective highlights the non-dual, interconnected reality of all Buddhas and realms, showing that regardless of which Buddha one follows, the essence of awakening and liberation is unified under the great compassionate mind of Shakyamuni.
In this sense, the various Buddhas like Amitabha and the worlds they manifest serve as compassionate means (upaya) to guide beings towards the ultimate realization of Buddhahood.
Mahayanists are heretics.