2nd Timothy 4:3-4, "For the time will come when they will not tolerate sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance with their own desires, and they will turn their ears away from the truth and will turn aside to myths."
The simple truth is...Prov. 6:5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
@@John14-06 I agree. So even if I understand the basis for rejecting evolution, I accept evolution is true because I don’t lean on my own understanding.
@@lesalenart507 Evolution is not a faith. Faith is defined as "BELIEF without evidence", and there is plenty of evidence for Evolution. All you have to do is look. Even in my lifetime I have seen humans evolve - getting fatter and lasier due to evolution in transport, infrastructure and food production. Evolution in technology has seen children evolve from outgoing outdoor physical explorers to indoor introverted mental implorers. Animal species have been discovered and become extinct and the population explosion has seen interbreeding of races producing offspring very different to just a few generation back. Reptiles have been observed evolving differently after being placed in a different environment to where they and their parents were born due to adapting to different circumstances, and all in just a few generations. The only thing I can think of that has not evolved - is religious belief, but religious extremism has evolved in a very short time. If the bible was true - then why did it have to be amended? why were some of the old testament passages hushed up? - Maybee religion has evolved a very small amount! Finaly - "Irreducible complexity" does NOT mean anything. If it does - please explain!
@@lesalenart507 Two sentences and both are false. Firstly, evolution is observable, testable (measurable), repeatble and falsifiable. The scientific method itself is not faith-based. Science is based on empirical evidence, observation, and testing of hypotheses. It relies on the scientific method to update and refine knowledge based on new evidence. Religion, in contrast, often relies on faith in divine revelation, scripture, or spiritual experiences that cannot be empirically verified. Religious beliefs are typically held even without or despite contrary evidence. Secondly, irreducible complexity (IC) is proven wrong. Its based on the mistaken assumption that evolution relies on improvement of existing functions, totally ignoring how complex adaptations originate from changes in function, and disregarding published research. Evolutionary biologists already published rebuttals and showing how systems actually can evolve. Look up Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial.
I believe one must ask themselves how mighty is the God they believe in. This is a stumbling block for many, I think. One must wrap their mind around the fact that they cannot wrap their minds around God.
@@reeb9016 I believe when you truly start to understand what it would mean for a being to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, it is utterly impossible with the state of the world. You then realize that if this triple-O being did exist, all of our problems are its fault.
@msquiggle3590 Negative. He is all those, we are not. We choose to not do good. We choose to not look to Him as our guide. That leads to the problems we have today. So take accountability for your actions and stop placing blame elsewhere.
@@reeb9016 God has the power to do anything. God knew the outcome of his system before he set it into place, yet still did it anyway knowing the consequences. He could have done literally anything else, yet decided not to.
I believe in the literal 6-day creation & that’s why we have a week! Not hard to understand! With God everything is possible! My Lord Jesus delivered me from porn/lust oppression! I’m now free from that disgusting addiction! It’s supernatural deliverance only God can do! Thank you Jesus! You need the Holy Spirit to help you understand His Word & also fight demonic oppressions in your life!
@@friisteching3433 nope that's just names for days. The 7 days in a week were only numbers until pagans named them. The only named day of the week is called the Sabbath It was the day added to the 6 days of creation for man to rest after his 6 day work week.
@@friisteching3433 The reason there is a seven day week is told in Wikipedia as based on a Judeo-Christian week, as opposed to other time frames of other cultures. Emperor Constantine established the 7 day week. That's what the article says.
2:15 the first question we need to ask is where the idea of an old earth came from. The earliest example of the idea of millions of years is The Epochs of Nature, 1778. From there, geologists combined this and Darwin to make up the geologic column, assigning names and dates to layers where certain animal forms SHOULD be found. That fairy tale is then used to date rock layers based on the most appropriate fossil found in the layer (ignoring any other animal forms found in that layer; mammals have always been found alongside dinosars and other animal forms).
"the first question we need to ask is where the idea of an old earth came from." That would likely be from Hutton who based on his observations of rock formations including inconformities concluded that those could not have formed in a few thousands of years. So his theory had nothing to do with evolution.
They didn’t have radiometric dating in 1778 but we do now and that confirms the age of the earth. Yeah, I know creationists try to deny the accuracy of radiometric dating but that’s only when they try to do it.
@@davidgardner863 Not quite. It has been pointed out very clearly the three main assumptions involved in all radiometric or radioisotope dating methods. No matter what any opponent claims, these three assumptions remain as being always needed to make the methods appear to work. It doesn’t matter whether for a particular rock unit there appears to be agreement between the different dating methods. All of the methods are based on those fundamental assumptions. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. These three basic assumptions are: 1. All the daughter atoms had to be derived by radioactive decay from the parent atoms since the rock unit formed. 2. There were no additions or subtractions of parent or daughter atoms since the rock unit formed. 3. The rate of decay had to remain constant since the rock unit formed. None of these three assumptions can be proven because there were no scientists there when the rock units formed, nor in the vast majority of time since, to make sure that the daughter atoms we measure today (1) have only come from radioactive decay of parent atoms, (2) have not been contaminated, and (3) the parent atoms had a constant decay rate through all the millions of years. Even worse is that these three assumptions are fatally flawed since they cannot be verified. And now because of the RATE (Radioisotopes and Age of the Earth) project, results from numerous lines of investigations have shown that the radioactive decay rates have not been constant. Radiometric dating has been shown to not work on rocks of known age. Yet most secular scientists and other old-earth supporters assume that radiometric dating does work on rocks of unknown age. This is quite an obvious inconsistency. Dr. William Stansfield, in the Science of Evolution states, "It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years. There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological "clock"." You can not scientifically "date" something, it is a guessing game. By tweaking the assumptions (guesses) you have to make you can come up with any range of dates you want.
@ , The RATE project was conducted by creationist organizations, ( no surprise there) and of course they found flaws in radiometric dating because that’s what they wanted to find. It seems that every time science disproves creationism, they claim assumptions. I suppose you think the speed of light is an assumption too.
@ , The RATE program was carried out by creationists (no surprise there) who found flaws in radiometric dating because they wanted to find flaws. I couldn’t find this Dr. Stansfield on Google but I’ll bet he’s a creationist what is this “Science of Evolution”? A video? A magazine article?
When you close your eyes to sleep you dream, when you close your eyes to science and education you open yourself to waking dream of indoctrination in a make believe ideology, if you are happy with that then enjoy your life but don't try tell the educated in society that your fantasy is real, it only makes it look worse for you.
The main reason we should trust God is that He is worthy of our trust. Unlike men, He never lies and never fails to fulfill His promises. “God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?” (Numbers 23:19; Psalm 89:34). Unlike men, He has the power to bring to pass what He plans and purposes to do. Isaiah 14:24 tells us, “The LORD Almighty has sworn, ‘Surely, as I have planned, so it will be, and as I have purposed, so it will stand.’” Furthermore, His plans are perfect, holy, and righteous, and He works all things together for good for those who love Him and are called according to His holy purpose (Romans 8:28). If we endeavor to know God through His Word, we will see that He is worthy of our trust, and our trust in Him will grow daily. To know Him is to trust Him.
@@Christobanistan Jesus said that those who deny Him before man...He will deny before our Heavenly Father. Ultimately you make the decision where you will spend eternity...in a very real place of torment called hell or having accepted Jesus the Christ, eternal life with the Father.
This is a really great video! One of my greatest frustrations as a (retired now) Biology teacher was only being able to barely mention, but not teach the Biblical account and the evidence for young earth creation. Or to point out explicitly the manifold problems with Darwinistic evolution; of which there are a lot. What was encouraging however, was that my students mostly argued for creation and the Biblical account. 🙏✝️👑✝️🙏
_One of my greatest frustrations as a (retired now) Biology teacher was only being able to barely mention, but not teach the Biblical account and the evidence for young earth creation_ Good, at least it means superstitious bronze age nonsense is being kept out of the classroom. The same way we keep astrology, geocentrism, flat earth out of schools, for the same reason. _Or to point out explicitly the manifold problems with Darwinistic evolution; of which there are a lot_ Such as? Should be interesting, coming from a "biology teacher".
@@richardgregory3684 How much 'teaching' does the Bible account need? It's a fairly short story that any child can be led to understand in an afternoon.
There are preachers out there teaching that the word, yom, can actually denote millions of years between each day in Genesis. My brother fell for it. I asked him how plants could live millions of years without the sunlight. Because plants were created before the sun and moon. He said God could make that happen. I said yes He could, but He already told us how He did it and why would you listen to a preacher who try’s his best to fool you into believing that it happened a different way than God said it happened? He got mad at me. We all need to pray that God exposes these fake preachers for their hard work in changing the meaning of God’s word and fooling the people they are charged to protect.
@@paulanelson1629 These statement are only effective to those who share the same false worldly bias, they are meaningless as they describe no actions that actually happened, "he said there is light" in place for "I don't know where light comes from" is an outdated view of life, because were finding where these things come from that before humanity assigned to Devine action. Well, guess what humans have found in that ambiguous cloud of divine action? Answers, as in factual statements and theories that Christians REFUSE to accept because it doesn't align with what an old book tells them. Look at the origins of the bible in archeology and history, it's laughable. Especially considering there's tens of thousands of denominations, all in which have fought full on wars about who's reading it right. In that sense, if they truly believe in hell, how can anyone be sure they aren't going to burn in hell. But I can assure you won't, because it's not a real place. It's a mysterious enigma that you're supposed to attach everything bad to, as to keep you a good little Christian so you can give your money to the church.
There's a sense in which you're right that we need to pray for God to expose false teachers, but there's also a sense in which God already did expose them. He gave us the capacity for reason and a church against which the gates of Hell will not prevail, and one of the things God gave that church was a deposit of faith along with explicit warnings for us to apply that reasoning towards new teachings as per Galatians 1:8. If we choose to ignore those warnings then that's not God's fault.
You need to watch this channel’s MANY videos about the fossil evidence. You may or may not end up agreeing with them, but they do explain their view on it.
@@Swede-js9jq As a physicist - I am suppose to listen to bare-faced denial of the demonstrable truth? They push their lies - I reference the U238-Pb208 decay chain. Anybody interested in the truth can Google. The thing about liars is that the do not even hint at the evidence they offer - in case you can crosscheck it.
Old earth Christians tend to have a less than omnipotent view of God. The others believe that the interpretation of origins by secular scientists must align with God's power, or else the creation doesn't witness to them, but this leads to a universe that points more or less to God over time based on scientific achievement. Anything that deviates from a more literal view of scripture leads to more subjective views.
Being what do you mean create a human being in nine months that’s a fully natural process that says nowhere in the Bible that he like forms them in the womb
@@Gimmickvr Psalm 139:13-16 [13] For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. [14] I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well. [15] My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. [16] Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them.
Thank you for calling out the inconsistent and compromised teachers that undermine the foundations of the gospel and cause confusion. They need to repent. James 3:1 My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.
Nothing about the teaching of science or evolution or the Big Bang Theory is inconsistent, unless it is taught by a YEC who doesn't understand the theory or purposefully misrepresents the theories.
@@Gwaithmirthen believe science…. Fruit flies mutated more than any creature on earth ever was or could be always produce nothing but fruit flies… E. coli produce only E. coli. Peas produce…. You guessed it…. Peas…. Nothing else has ever been observed except exactly what the Bible tells you…. Kind reproduces after Kind….
@@Gwaithmir Nonsense. Vast amounts of the bible have been proven. There are some ancient kings mentioned in the Bible which people like you thought were fairy tales until archeological evidence confirmed their existence. Archeology continues to support the bible. Nothing uncovered through archeology has ever disproven anything in the Bible which is also amazing.
I could not accept the Seven Days of Creation for years. As a Christian. One day, I carefully thought it through through and with the majesty and omnipotence of God. If God is God, He could have created the Universe in seven trillions of years, seven billion years, . . . catch the drift?, . . . GOD chose seven days. GOD is GOD! He, not "she", HE can do as He pleases. So much more of the Bible opened up with the knowledge and understanding of the Seven days of Creation. Days. Not seconds, minutes, hours, centuries, millenia or eons. Days. Amen.
I turned down seminary decades ago. I'm now a retired firefighter. I'm beginning to think I'm going to more firefighters in Heaven than theologians. Sad.
I just checked r c sproul’s written view on genesis 1-11 or on creation. Although Sproul said at one point he leaned towards the framework hypothesis, that later he excepted the literal 6 day, biblical explanation for creation. I thought so because I had watched a few of r c’s teaching on creation and he matched with the biblical interpretation. Just to set the record straight. Thanks for your wonderful lecture on this subject.
@claireusilton4066 the creation myth is just that, a myth. That's what stoneaged desert dwellers came up with. It's hilarious and sad that grown men believe this nonsense.
This is facts as Christians we should stand on the Bible it doesn't matter if we are laughed at the lord will prove us right if not We are hypocrites as explained in this video death cannot come before Adam and eve My brothers stay strong God preaches devolution man preaches evolution The contrasts is insane
@@konsama1315 Is it blindly jesus existed his deciples existed the country of Judah existed most of kings is confirmed There was a time were scientist believed David and the kingdom of Judah was a lie a mere myth but we're proven Things only detailed in the new Testament like the pool of Salome everyone mentioned in acts things like politicians were real people I don't believe it's why would any culture make a myth about a God castrates the figuratively about there sins calling them stifnecked and so on Not only that the Bible aren't like other religions who did not care about other religions the Bible in its first chapters Genesis God tells Abraham that he will make him a great nation and through them his seed the entire world will be blessed There an enthesis of the world itself which you expect from a God who created all things There's also just prophecy Moses in Deuteronomy states if you abandon the lord he will bring a nation greater than though and kick you out of your homes and land Then you have Zechariah who says Israel the jews will be split across the nations around the world and God will bring them back to their own land We're there enemies will try to seige them How can a book be so accurate
@@Abidingingrace-p6z _ it doesn't. You've just been seriously misinformed. Sorry_ So zebras are striped because their ancestors mated by striped trees? lol Are bats birds? Which of the following is correct: "I have seen God face to face,” - Genesis 32:30 “No man hath seen God at any time”- John 1:18 How about "thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. ” - Exodus 21:23-25 “ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also" - Matthew 5:39 _What is incredible about the Bible is not its divine authorship; it’s that such a concoction of contradictory nonsense could be believed by anyone to have been written by an omniscient god. To do so, one would first have to not read the book, which is the practice of most Christians_
Thank you AIG this is very insightful and encouraging! Your videos are really helpful for myself but also as tools when i talk to others. I will be studying geology in college this year and my teacher is an evolutionist who believes in billions of years. I want to stand up for truth, for God and the gospel in the face of all of this, I want to stand for truth even in the face of persecution or whatever else this implies. I appreciate if anyone can pray for me regarding this things. Thank you !
If you look at the geologic evidence with an honest open mind it will take you about a day to realize the Earth is way older than 6000 years and that a global Noah's Flood never happened. Best of luck in your studies. Hopefully you can find the courage to be intellectually honest.
We see old and New Testament prophecy plain as day man, it just the coincidental ones either. We are seeing the last wars around Israel form. Time to pick people, will you trust God at his word the Bible, or will you trust wicked men who reject and rebel against God. As for me and my house we will serve the Lord!
What about the Old Testament prophecy that Nebuchadnezzar would destroy Egypt so thoroughly that no man would ever set foot in Egypt again. Oops... that didn't happen.
@@earthisasphere then that means that the new Babylon will! The kings also refer to the kingdom, actually that did happen if you understood history of Egypt. The Egypt we know today is nothing like it used to be. Egypt was the world power during that time period and Babylon wrecked it, along with God when he plagued it.
@@rofishy2 _The Egypt we know today is nothing like it used to be_ But it is not and never has been desolated, nor were her cities destoryed, nor has there been any time when no one has set foot in Egpyt - all false claims in the bible
If someone teaches something contrary to the Bible, but they say mostly good things, they are just a top-tier deciever. Discernment isn't about knowing right from wrong, but distinguishing between right from almost right. Mark and avoid them, as we were told to do
@@stevenbatke2475 Obviously, but I wanted David to reply explaining why the Bible "actually" doesn't justify slavery, so I could call him a "top-tier deceiver."
@@Christobanistan Under very specific conditions, slavery is permitted. Been a while since I read the part that talked about the laws of slavery, but it was something along the lines of "all slaves purchased require a license made at the time of purchase, which includes the date. Slaves may only be purchased from certain groups, and you may not own a slave that formerly belonged to your own group (just a guess, but buying and immediately freeing a slave that belongs to your group is probably ok). permanently injuring a slave with so much as a small scar (including branding or emasculation) allows the slave to show the injury to a judge and sue for freedom. Slaves may be owned for a maximum of 7 years (hence why you need a dated receipt to own a slave), at which point the slave can either go free or pierce their ear and become a permanent member of your household." again, that's just off the top of my head. It seems like chattel slavery was forbidden, but slaves are allowed to be owned for a limited amount of time as long as they are treated humanely. There's also a lot of parts in the Bible where people referred to as "masters" are strongly encouraged to treat their "servants" with grace, humanity, and dignity. I'm no expert on ancient Hebrew culture, so this could mean a literal master/slave relationship, an employer/employee relationship, or both.
We can learn to trust God as we see how He has proven Himself to be trustworthy in our lives and the lives of others. In 1 Kings 8:56 we read, “Praise be to the LORD, who has given rest to his people Israel just as he promised. Not one word has failed of all the good promises he gave through his servant Moses.” The record of God’s promises is there in His Word for all to see, as is the record of their fulfillment. Historical documents verify those events and speak of God’s faithfulness to His people. Every Christian can give personal testimony to God’s trustworthiness as we see His work in our lives, fulfilling His promises to save our souls and use us for His purposes (Ephesians 2:8-10) and comfort us with the peace that passes all understanding as we run the race He has planned out for us (Philippians 4:6-7; Hebrews 12:1). The more we experience His grace, faithfulness, and goodness, the more we trust Him (Psalm 100:5; Isaiah 25:1).
It seems almost no one commenting has listened to this entire wonderful talk because they don't address any of his points. I find that quite disheartening. of course I'm speaking primarily of skeptics but it seems to be true of the Christians that want to believe in Darwinian evolution instead of Jesus's words
Jesus' words is one thing. But this TH-cam channel's words are another. I know that whomever tries to convince people of ignoring reality and blindly following dogmatic words they themselves do not understand is either an idiot or a false prophet. Not sure which of the two this guy is yet.
@@darkfoxxbunyip Darwin was the first person to publish a theory not a comprehensive explanation as first small step to understanding the process of evolution, and the ongoing variety of life in our world. This exploration continues with many millions of people of all faiths contributing to new information. Evolution and Creativty do not prove or disprove the existence of God or Jesus they are simply alternative viewpoints of the way our universe came into existence. Debunking the evidence of others damages this video. Kind regards Tim
@@earthisasphere. Really, where do we see one species becoming another. There are adaption to surroundings but never evolving if you understand the meaning of the word
@@TrishWragg Species don't become another in short time spans. In fact, they don't ever do so from one mother/father to their children. It's only by comparing distant relatives back in time that you find new species.
@@earthisasphere you see adaptation within the Kind daily…. But you’ve never once observed the fairy tale of fish becoming anything but fish. Finches become anything but finches. Fruit flies become anything but fruit flies. Peas become anything but peas. E. coli become anything but E. coli. If you want to claim evolution is true because fish evolve into fish…. That’s fine…. Adaptation within the Kind is all you’ve ever observed. Common descent evolution in the other hand is a fairy tale for children…
As a Christian with a BS in Environmental Science, and a Minor in Geology it's so sad how biased historical geology and evolution is. So many assumptions, and I saw so much biblical evidence that was ignored. I almost failed my historical geology final paper because I had a hard time staying motivated to learn about names of eras that didn't happen.
_So many assumptions_ Such as? _so much biblical evidence that was ignored_ Examples? _ I almost failed my historical geology final paper because_ ....you were willing to put a bunch of iron age myths about magic wizards before actual evidence based science
@@richardgregory3684 I’m not going to list everything mentioned in the video but a good example is assuming that because animals have passed on desirable traits making further generations a little different means everything came from the same ancestor instead of multiple ancestors. Also why resort to insults? If you want someone to believe your argument generally bringing evidence and kindness is a better way to do so.
Hmmmm, many programs supported by reputable scientists Vs The admittedly religiously biased program that is disputed by the vast majority of scientists You can't be serious...
2 Timothy 2:15 study to show yourselves approved unto God, a workman who need not be ashamed rightly dividing the word of truth Very cool video sir, I am grateful to find this channel I came across this one and another called expedition Bible which is also very cool and covers more into geological places around the same time
@@jameswilspn1907 that hypocrisy right there, so convince me, an Atheist that the bible is the truth on how the world was created... good luck on that because you have no actual scientific evidence to back up any of it, in fact science can demonstrate the bible is wrong and if the bible is gods word then it is you that needs to question your indoctrination into a religious ideology.
@@billcook4768 frog prince where animals change into humans. and the Yaghan people of Tierra del Fuego, the Mapuche, and the Guaraní all have one type of animal changing into another.
How long did the Perfect World last ? According to the Elucidarium of Honorius Augustodunensis, a text summing up the knowledge elaborated from the Bible (XII century), Adam and Eve's life in Paradise lasted 7 hours, no more, as Eve' temptation was almost immediately after her creation from Adam's rib (fortunately, Adam previously could name all the animals). Do you agree with this time line, or would you suggest an updated one ?
@@KenJackson_US the Truth, to begin with. And a theological answer about Adam and Eve experience as new born in the Perfect World would be appreciated, as everything derives from it. Have you one ?
@@deguilhemcorinne418 How does anything derive from whether Eve lived a day or a century before sinning? How does either choice change one point of meaning of the Scriptures?
@@KenJackson_US Living during one century in the Perfect World would make you more experienced and conscious about your environment and relationship with God than living one day or a few days after being created, when your free will is not yet educated. Eve does indicates that she feels a lack of knowledge and of intelligence: was she inexperimented after a short existence, or did she felt dissatisfaction after living in a Perfect World for a century (she had her third son when around 130 year old, after loosing Abel we do not know at which age) ?
Evolutionists as you call them NEVER use that silly chart to describe human evolution....they know a lot more about it.....especially more than you di!
Amen brother. I love your ability to make this so clear. I struggled during high school and college. Nice to know all this information in my later years at least.
Why are some Christians so bent out of shape trying to convince themselves that the bible is literally true. Jesus's core message was love God with all your heart, repent (acknowledge what you do that separates you from God and resolve to improve by daily spiritual practices such as meditation, prayer, studying the bible and other spiritual guidance sources and practicing a lifestyle of selfless service to humanity. If you do this, whatever your religion or belief system is, divine love will flow through you and you won't have to worry about getting into heaven because you will already be there.
I wish you would consider renaming this video. I would like to share it with some friends without them being put in a defensive position before they watch it. Maybe something like "A Case for Creation" or even "Evolutionary Timeline vs Literal Creation Timeline". Just not "This Video OBLITERATES what you believe."
@@monty_reneepearison3053 Don't bother. I'm good. I was raised YEC. Luckily, after 25+ years in the cult I decided to learn actual science and history. Best decision I ever made.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
@@mrscience1409 why didn't you say the rest of the verse you only guoted a little not all why would you do that for just to try to make your point.Psalm 14:1 King James Version 14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. Read full chapter
@@mrscience1409 You're only trying to make it suit you and it don't work that away You should quote it all how can you use a verse that you don't even believe in.
@@mirandarogers3595 No, I am busting your chops. I know exactly what I was doing, and I know it was dishonest. It is blowback from the fact that theists like to present quotes out of context, so I give them a dose of their own medicine.
I believe in God and that Jesus died for my sins. Thank you for this discussion. I went to college for biology and got my degree in rangeland sciences. In this endeavor I had to struggle though many classes taught from an athiest perspective. One thing I still have a difficulty reconciling with is the concept of carbon dating. While I know it is based on a set of assumptions plugged into an equation to guess the dates. The only thing I have been able to respond with is "the equation is wrong because the assumptions are incorrect" but that rarely gets a positive response... what do I do about that.
Youcould start by accepting that carbon dating is accurate, but that would likely mean having to face up to the bible being a collection of fairty tales.
@@remainhumble6432 "This is for Christians to think properly about the evolutionary timeline and the Bible." And yet he provides no evidence for his claims. You can go back to your indoctrination, which has clearly been decades in the making.
@@UNIRockLIVE Perhaps you have a different working definition of “obliterate”. That’s totally fine. I just found this video to be most underwhelming (for me).
I’m a believer who accepts the overwhelming evidence for evolution by natural processes over millions of years. The scriptures were written by man from their understanding of their time. The truth of scripture is not diminished by appreciating this. Arguing for a 6-day creation in the face of the evidence is foolish and turning Christian’s away from faith in high numbers.
I agree. The Book of Genesis is not a textbook of science. It was state of the art in its day, but now God also speaks to us in the language of mathematics and physics - and the mind-boggling magnitude of His creation that science reveals is actually a confirmation of His glory.
Can you defend your faith in _"the overwhelming evidence for evolution by natural processes over millions of years",_ Tom? I am chagrined to admit that I used to believe as you do now. But after reading Darwin's Black Box, I launched into a study of molecular biology and am fascinated to realize there's a layer of authoritative spin on top of science that distorts the underlying facts. But the FACTS documented in molecular biology leave no room for the notion that all life evolved from a microbe. Anyway, I would love to hear what _"overwhelming evidence"_ you think science presents for microbe-to-man evolution.
The scriptures directly claim a very specific lineage of men, and gives their exact ages. It has nothing whatsoever to do with any "understanding of their time." What does such a vague phrase even mean??
@@Mario_Sky_521 I’m a follower of Jesus and have been for nearly all my life (I’m 69 now). That makes me a believer, or are you creating a new definition of what a believer is? Evolutionary science is not the word of man, but clear and painstakingly documented evidence which has compiled and supported by other science such as geology. The Bible takes creation myth stories that were existent in the Middle East region and inserts the Hebrew God - it wasn’t original but adopted. It’s possible to love God and His son Jesus and fully accept evolutionary science as the means God used to create the universe. It is no less miraculous and awe-inspiring to understand.
@@Christobanistan No, he literally doesn’t. That’s what a miracle is. He made wine out of grapes that never existed. He can make limestone whenever he likes. That’s why he’s God and we aren’t.
If you ask all these “Christians” who believe the evolutionary theory, and pry a little, they probably believe that you can lose your salvation or you have to work your way to salvation by acting perfectly.
Sadly there are more false and deceived "Christians" than they're are saved. 2 Timothy 4 3-4 "3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."
You can lose your salvation. Or more accurately, walk away from it through sin or apostasy. And I don't believe in evolution. OSAS is a doctrine of demons leading many to hell.
Will YEC's ever learn what a scientific theory is? Will they ever realize that gravity is also "only" a theory? Will they ever realize that a theory is the highest level an idea can reach in science? Will they ever realize a law is on the exact same level as a scientific theory?
@earthisasphere but its not observable and combined with the fact its illogical you come to the conclusion that its really ridiculous and preposterous to think everything from nothing, randomly and without cause. I challenge you tho, since you made the claim about it being observable, i would like for you to provide any evidence that supports such a claim
@@dano8613 First of all, it isn't illogical. You made that claim. Support it with evidence. Secondly, evolution doesn't deal with the origin of life, only the changes that occur once life began. Thirdly, with every birth comes around, on average, 30 mutations. That is evolution. Speciation is evolution. Every time a gene, chromosome or genome duplicates, that is evolution (that provides new information as YEC"s claim MUST happen). Once that has happened, if there is also a mutation to either the original or duplicated gene, chromosome, or genome, that is EVEN more new information, and again, evolution.
@earthisasphere but what you're describing isn't Darwins evolution. When the evolution is brought up as a talking point, it's almost certainly single cell to fish to monkeys to man. You know this, but you are avoiding it. Also, mutations aren't the same as new information. All the information is already in the DNA, and nothing new is added. Orgin of life is part of the evolutionary conversation. Illogical was my claim, and the evidence to support that claim can be found but not limited to No transition fossils Millions of years aren't possible based on the evidence we have, and on the contrary, we have evidence that supports three opposite. Entropy Can't be duplicated It hasn't been observed I can continue, but you'll reject it all anyway.
The documentary Journey of Man a Genetic Odyssey could be the history of the human race from the Tower of Babel onward. People did not obey God's command to fill the Earth before Noah's Flood 60 thousand years ago. It's a very enlightenening documentary. The book Navigating Genesis is a hard but worthwhile read.
You can fit the billion upon billion by accepting GOD made man already as a full grown adult.. So therefor HE could have made the world aged to be billion of years old. And not violate the 6 days of creation.
@@CosplayZine OK what doesn't make to much sense?? You have made the standard non committed response that has no meaning hoping to start a negative response.
@@jamesbarrett3889 Once again.. Please explain what part doesn't not make sense. Since you are willing attack a simple explanation of millions of years by GOD making instantly the earth appearing to be millions upon millions of years old.. In the same way he made Adam instantly a full grown adult male appearing about 25 to 30 years old. This way ps I haven't said that he didn't create the world in 6 literal days. Just gave an idea to confuse an atheist. This way christian's don't have to use there stupid god of the gap theory..
Why does it matter? We don’t need to know the age of the Earth to get into heaven or to consider ourselves a Christian. It doesn’t matter to me if the world was made in seven days literally or figuratively. Jesus still died on a cross and his bloodpaid for our sin. That’s how I view it.
Demonstrating clearly that the earth is young instills the fear of the Lord in the unbeliever, and dramatically increases faith in the believer. People want to know where they came from; the Bible has the answer, the REAL answer! 💖✝️🙌
It matters because the Bible is the word of God. It does have a little to do with salvation, though. Jesus treats the OT as literal and true and tells us to do the same. So, if Jesus said it's 6 literal days, then you disagreeing is calling Jesus wrong / a liar.
in fact it does matter! The Bible says that sin came into the world through men, and then death BECAUSE OF SIN. If we had evolved through evolution in millions of years, then death would have been there millions of years before the first humans existed, so also millions of years before the first sin was even possible. The story of evolution over millions of years corrupts the entire gospel - and that indeed is the only purpose it’s made for!
*Why does it matter?* It matters to YEcs because they've predicated their movement on biblical inerrancy, with literal interpretations. It's what they believe, so they treat anyone who disagrees, even fellow Christians, as dirty unbelievers.
There's no way a loving and holy God would call "Very good" a monitor lizard devouring a terrified little calf like that, impossible. Impossible, how? Cos of God's perfect nature, what He makes is perfect, perfect by who's standards? His standards, His standards are defined by His nature, what's His nature? Perfection. Moreover, the fear that calf is experiencing that's about to be eaten isn't of God. Why not? In God there is no fear, but perfect love, "Perfect love casts out fear." 1 John. Plain and simple. Just take the Genesis text for what God say's. Thanks brother, brilliant video. God bless you. Reverend Alexander B. Eley BA Honours Degree Theology. Wales, UK.
Genesis says that all animals ate plants for their food, meat only became a thing after the fall. The eating of plants did not count as death insofar as biblical standards are concerned. No, I do not believe the original creation included predation and the horribly bloody death organisms suffer today as a result of man’s sin.
Nowhere in the Bible says the earth is 6000 years old. The 6000 number came from counting the ages of the people in the Bible plus the days of creation. Only God knows the true age of the universe.
And the God Who knows the age of the universe revealed this IN HIS WORD, so we could know it. This is how divine revelation works. Our job in this is to stow our *hubris* and accept who He's revealed Himself to be.
I have a theory: Vegetation was created before the sun and the moon. You're broccoli! David, the Morning Star, rides the donkey. The bride of David rides the foal of the donkey. Blessed is the kingdom of our Father David that is to come! (Mar 11:10 NABO) David, their king, whom I will raise up for them. (Jer 30:9 NAB) Then comes the end, when he hands over the kingdom to his God and Father (1Co 15:24 NABO) Christ rides a horse - of many colors, or aspects, or perspectives. White - The wine press I have trodden alone (Isa 63:3 NABO) Red - Do not think that I have come to bring peace (Mat 10:34 NABO) Black - I came into this world for judgment (Joh 9:39 NABO) Pale Green - Its rider was named Death - Christ rising up from the Abyss (Rm 10:7) - all of Hades is at his heel (Rev 6:8 NJB) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ You will not always have me (Mat 26:11 NABO) (Homeward bound) I am with you always, until the end of the age. (Mat 28:20 NAB) (Began as the first Adam) My kingdom does not belong to this world. (Joh 18:36 NABO) (Third party mediator) Where I am going you cannot come. (Joh 8:21 NABO) (Left Behind) Then I took my staff "Refuge" and snapped it asunder, breaking off the covenant which I had made with all peoples (Noahic covenant) (Zec 11:10 NABO) Then I snapped asunder my other staff, "Heritage" (Deu 32:8) breaking off my brotherhood with (between?) Judah and Israel. (Zec 11:14 NABO) the one who ascended far above all the heavens (Eph 4:10 NABO) (a galaxy far away) never to return to corruption (Act 13:34 NABO) (Wait, what?)
@@VisshanVisYou can - take the time to look around you at the marvel of design, by the master designer, the Lord Jesus Christ. The evide6for Creation is all around you
@@centyniv7257 without God guidance Which god??? in the 250,000 years ( Give or take a few thousands of years) since modern humans have evolved they have made up and invented around 18,000 different gods deities and religions.
Wait a second. The guy ask, showing a komodo dragon attacking a goat; "What kind of a God make a world like that"? I would say: God made that. Who else made the creation of death and destruction we now live in? Adam and Eve didn't do it. They didn't have the power to change God's creation. They sinned and God expelled them and then God changed his perfect creation to the reality we now live in.
God created a PERFECT earth, a PERFECT universe. Sin is the thing that brought the ruin and evil. Free will was given, and a horrifically WRONG choice was made because of the deceit of the evil one. Mans free will has caused the ugliness and evil, resulting in the whole creation groaning, longing for its redemption. 💙🕊️💙
@@MichelleYvonne59 Mans sinning did 'cause' theft, murder, fraud, vandalism, etc. but did not change herbivores to carnivores, cause earthquakes, floods or other natural disasters were there were none before. Only God could make that change and he did.
@Species1732 Actually, God cursed the ground for man's sake, which inevitably brought about such facets of our earthly existence. God also mentioned that the world was filled with violence when He decided to flood it. It said that it grieved Him. That isn't something God would intend but rather a consequence or byproduct of the curse according to the sin Adam and Eve committed. The growth and spread of this corruption would be proportional to the sin of mankind though God has kept the earth by grace.
Satan is squarely to blame for all the horrific earthly pollution & distortions that have occurred & are occuring as a result of sin, which he is the father of. Look at the original creation from God's hand, all good, that's His plan. All of Earth's mess, lie's at satan's feet. Choose ye whom ye will serve, there's only two master's. Good = God, all evil is of satan! You can believe anything you choose, but it doesn't make it so. This world's time is EXTREMELY short, all will be revealed @ judgment, soon! This is God's universe He set's the JUST rule's, period. He will be vindicated judgement day! Regardless of distorted satanic brainwashing!
@@johnwills8056 Sure, Satan is to blame for the temptation, deception, delusion, misguidance, etc. but man is to blame for their sin and therefor for all the *man made* suffering, destruction, pollution, etc. But you are now saying that Satan also changed God's creation? In that case Satan would have the same power as God (note: the Bible does not mention this anywhere) Satan did not redesign the snakes to crawl on their belly, redesigned the ground so it is hard for man to work on, redesign woman to have increased pain of birth, redesigned some plants to bear thorns, redesigned every living thing so they do no longer live forever, etc. God did all that after the Fall. It's in the Bible. it is only logical to assume that God also redesigned some animals to be carnivores, redesigned parasites, insects, bugs, viruses and bacteria to 'prey' on other animals or humans and introduced natural disasters; things that did not exist before the Fall. To attribute that to Satan would make him equal to God.
God created in six days. The Bible says, let all men be Liars, but let God be true The age of the earth can be millions of years old, but life as we know it is only around six thousand years old
@@TheMickeymental Really? I hear things like god created the universe in 6 days, but what does he mean by "day"? And there may have been gaps between the days. And the first day begins on the third day, and other incoherent nonsense.
@@kpkpm3604Yom in Hebrew almost always refers to a 24 hour period. So think about it and listen to the video properly. If you are actually interested that is.
@@luish1498 that's the kind of thing that people say when they don't understand what God actually is (which is nothing to be ashamed of, even most religious people have virtually no understanding of God). It might sound like a pretty decent one-liner from your perspective, though haha
And observable. Young Earth Creationists require evolution to be true for their flood story to be real, but they just can't accept the actual timeline for earth for some reason.
God is outside of time, so to Him a thousand years is as a day and a day is as one thousand. Equating evolutionary theory with those who believe in an old earth is quite disconcerting. We believe in the wonderful creative power of our Great God and Savior. In the scheme of things, this is minor issue Lets not divide over it.
Sir, if you say six days is not really six days, then what other Words of the Bible are wrong (in your view) ? This is the issue. Either the Bible is the Truth or it is not. To question, try to understand, is absolutely needed. However, to say 'it was good' included death, is hubris
God cannot be outside of time. Time is a measurement of change. If god had any ability to think of anything, the clock would start. If he was actually outside of time, there would be no time that he decided to create. This claim is simply a coping mechanism to explain what Christians cannot explain.
The age of the earth isnt an opinion. The age has been measured scientifically as has the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years. If your religion cant accept science, you need to re-think your religion.
New research proposes a model that determines the universe's age to be 26.7 billion years, which accounts for the James Webb Space Telescope's "impossible early galaxy" observations. The telescope captured this Pillars of Creation image last year. (CREDIT: NASA/ESA)
@@jpacrylicstudio145 one example is the fact that we see light from many billion light years away. Light travels one light year per year, therefore if light from billions of light years away has reached us, then the universe seems to have existed long enough for it to make that journey. That is just one very very basic evidence pointing towards more that 6000 years. Another is the fact that there are trees that are literally older than 6000 years old. This leaves two main options. 1. Those trees started growing before there was a universe or.. 2. The universe is more than 6000 years old.
@@galenstevenson918 "New research proposes a model that determines the universe's age to be 26.7 billion years, which accounts for the James Webb Space Telescope's "impossible early galaxy" observations. The telescope captured this Pillars of Creation image last year. (CREDIT: NASA/ESA)" There is one study on that and only a few scientists are pushing the idea. This is nowhere near consensus.
@@jpacrylicstudio145 You want a course on astrophysics on a message board? Of course you do. We can measure the rate of the expansion of the universe and extrapolate back, Hubble's constant, redshift, etc. And we know Earth is over 4 BYO, so the universe has to be older than that.
I'm thinking it's god day not an 24 hour earth day! So a day is considered to be one full rotation of the earth then could gods day be considered one full rotation of the universe?
You've just done a brilliant job with proving how useless the God that you believe in is. Firstly he made a fundamentally flawed creation, which had a devious talk ing serpent in it. Secondly he somehow managed to not see Adam and being tempted by a serpent which he had also made and punished All of their descendants for doing something wrong when they hadn't yet learned the difference between right and wrong. Maybe to look as if it was billions of years old, it made the universe to look as if it is billions of years old and then got a book written that says it's only thousands of years old. God is absolutely useless and I can't work out why you would ever think that he was in anyway perfect. It's bizarre.
Their religion requires you put your intelligence and reason in a box, lock it, and throw it into a river. The sad thing is that geninely intelligent people have spent thousands of years trying to rationalise all of this, when they could have just said "It makes no sense because it's made up"
@@davidsteer1941 I'm just saying. The creator of something can allow it whatever freedoms He pleases. The serpent, as we come to find out, was Satan who WAS an angel. Angels having free will within their role and the ability to shape shift were probably perks of the job. Sin was introduced to humanity because of temptation. The "flaw" that you see in God's creation actually PROVES that our will really is free and always has been. You realize that without opposites we wouldn't be able to appreciate positives? So we know our will is free because of the "imperfections" (as you call them) of Gods creations. The question is, who are YOU to define perfection? Are you the creator of anything you see with the two eyes God gave you? Who are you to define good?
Educated men are supposed to be able to receive criticisms and expect challenges, simple based on their scholastics. SMH Father God, please help these poorly educated men to see the Truth, the Way, and the Life. In Your Son's most Blessed and Holy name Jesus Christ I pray. Amen Walk with Jesus Christ Stay Dangerous
Why...Why does everyone conclude that Adam was made on the 6th day? In the six days of creation, EVERYTHING was spoken into existence. And it also says, that he created them male and female, as if he 'spoke' Adam into existence, had a chat, brought some critters to name, and then put him to sleep, so he could extract a rib, form Havah, and yet, scripture does not support this. Notice, it was AFTER the Sabbath, and God created (as if by working with his own two hands) a garden. He then formed Adam, from the clay... Does that sound like he 'spoke' Adam into existence?!? He formed Adam out of the clay, and then 'breathed life' into his nostrils. None of that, is congruent with being 'spoken into existence'. But, what about Day 6? You might ask. Those were indeed humans, and they were called 'mankind'.. Think about that for a moment, animals and humans are to only mate with their own 'kind'. These were a different type of people. They did not walk with God in the garden, but were what you might consider a bit more primitive when compared to Adam and Havah. The 'watchers' (a class of angels) were with mankind, and taught them about God's laws, and ways. Before long, they had learned to speak a common tongue, to cultivate, to prepare and store food, and they had a society. But, they did not know of the Garden. It is from this same group of mankind, that the watchers, who rebelled against God, and lost their first estate and mated with the 'daughters of men'. These fallen angels, corrupted mankind as much as they could. Teaching them sorcery, witchcraft, and other types of forbidden knowledge. Here's how we know... Knowing that Kayan slew his brother, he was confronted by God. God punished him to be a vagabond and a wanderer. But Kayan says, 'My punishment is too great, for if they find me THEY will kill me'. And God agrees. Who is this 'THEY' they he fears will kill him? His own mother and father?!? Or could it be the corrupted 'mankind' who has already been known for violence and warfare? But, God agrees, and places a mark, and a curse to anyone who would kill Kayan. So apparently, God is also aware that 'THEY' will kill Kayan. Then, Kayan goes east, and settles in the land of Nod. He takes a wife, and she gives him a son... Hold your horses, where did this 'wife' come from, and who had already named the land BEFORE he got there? I've had some say, that Kayan had sex with his mother, and that SHE gave him a son. Not only is that against God's law, but SHE was not cursed to be a vagabond and a wanderer, until Kayan wanted to pop out a kid. And if you think that is a stretch, ask yourself this, who was his son Enoch's wife? Did he call mom, and have her 'stop by' for a visit, so that Kayan could have grandkids? NONE of this makes any sense, if you contend that Adam and Havah, were created on Day 6. Genesis is very specific about how Adam was formed out of the earth, and Havah was formed from the rib of Adam. You NEED those 'mankind' people that were created on day 6, for any part of Genesis to make sense. Who did Seth marry? You can't keep having all of these men going back to Havah to pop out some babies. Your only other choice, is to make up a story where Adam and Havah, had many unmentioned daughters, just for the purpose of incestual propagation. And that's simply not how God works.
If death existed before the FALL then death would be good. And if it is good then God would not have to overcome death and later throw it into the eternal fire.
Ah, AiG rejecting the operational, repeatable science of 1. radiometry; 2. Cosmic Background Radiation; 3. almost all galaxies moving away from each other.
AIG also rejects virtually all of geology, and biology, and genetics, and paleontology. In fact there are few sciences which AIG doesn't reject either all or in part.
@@TheMickeymental Rejecting large amounts of science simply because it contradicts your religious beliefs isn't just not justifiable, it's also not intellectually honest.
@@andrewshear2927 "Look evolution happens," you said. Basically, the *theory* of evolution says that human beings were not created by God, but sprang from the primordial soup. Is that what you believe?
@@sciencerules2825 I believe in the Bible. If that makes me unscientific, uneducated, unenlightened in your eyes, that's your opinion. *To be accepted by an unbelieving world is not the goal of one who believes in Jesus Christ/ Yeshua Ha'Mashiach.*
Nothing in the Bible says there was no death before the "fall"
หลายเดือนก่อน +3
1. God's declaration of creation as "very good": "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day." 2. Provision of plant-based food for all creatures: "And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." 3. The warning of death as a consequence of disobedience: "But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." 4. The curse of death after the fall: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and to dust shalt thou return." Expulsion from the Garden and loss of access to the tree of life: "Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life."
My wife can't understand why I spend my valuable time protesting cringe-fringe apologist YT channels. The short answer is to protect young, unformed minds which deserve quality, fact-based science education in our schools. If YEC kept in its lane as religious 'ministry', then yeah, who cares, but channels like AIG are more ambitious. They want Trump, obviously, which is sickening enough, but they also want to be a political stalking horse for undermining public science education with their brand of pseudoscientific snake oil. The threat is real, especially in my beleaguered home state, where we're contending with this: "Senate Bill 280 was signed into law by West Virginia's governor Jim Justice on March 22, 2024, according to the Associated Press (March 22, 2024). 'The National Center for Science Education said in a statement that the legislation is 'threatening the integrity of science education in the state's public schools.' "The new law provides that '[n]o public school board, school superintendent, or school principal may prohibit a public school classroom teacher from discussing or answering questions from students about scientific theories of how the universe and/or life came to exist.' The bill's lead sponsor, Amy Grady (R-District 4), declared that it would protect the teaching of "intelligent design," according to West Virginia Watch (January 23, 2024), although a federal court found "intelligent design" not to qualify as a scientific theory in Kitzmiller v. Dover in 2005. "The Associated Press reported that 'Aubrey Sparks, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia, said the organization would be watching the law's implementation closely. If the wording of the legislation is ambiguous to her, she said, it's going to be ambiguous for teachers, students and parents, too.'"
Have you ever considered you are wrong about the evidence for a young Earth. If so you are sending children to hell you say doesn't exist...that should be a concern.
I do not see it as "battle", I see it as a debate like many other about interpretation of the Bible today. I think it is said that some are very aggressive in this conversation.
@@Christobanistan I meant a religious debate. But science is a debate, too. Consider for instance the conflict between quantum mechanics and relativity theory.
@@Christobanistan wow, even the young earth creationists understand science better and would not say a silly thing like 'science is not a debate'. You have scientifically proven you are scientifically misunderstanding science.
@@darkfoxxbunyip It's NOT a debate, not in the sense you seem to think. Science is much more a very specific process of falsifying your own hypothesis wrong ideas are removed. When people talk of "scientific debate," they are not talking about going back and forth until a winner is declared, they're talking about the scientific process. As a Creationist, you're used to persuasion, not any kind of search for truth.
Genesis is not a textbook of science. And "Doctor" Mortenson's word salad merely serves to confuse people. And that is his intent. But even William Lane Craig, the great apologist of Christianity, accepts the scientific view, which by the way does not at all preclude God as the Creator of All.
Thank you for your presentation.........agree with your assertions and that the earth is 6k years old. We don't need to please evolutionists contentions. No transitional forms(missing links) evolving into higher more complex beings. Second law of thermodynamics shows progression from complex to random only.
_No transitional forms_ All living or once living things are or were transitional. Including you. _Second law of thermodynamics shows progression from complex to random only_ If only life on earth had some massive external energy source it could utilise....we could call it "the sun" maybe.
Everything this guy says depends on what the Bible says, including God. Why should we believe the Bible is true about God? Because the Bible says so. Anyone see the circular logic fallacy here?
But Jesus said (at the time) that God, His Father ,has worked all the way up to that time (2,000 years ago), AND that He was also working. So, the Sabbath of rest, for God, had not yet come up to that time. Paul reminds us that, it was written long ago, people would not ENTER into His rest, and that there still remains a rest for the people of God to enter into. So that REST (Sabbath) hasn't come yet. What also remains to come, is 1,000 years of peace (no war). Sounds similar to THE Sabbath 'day'. 🤔
This was kinda disappointing. I thought you gonna have some good arguments against evolution, but all i got was, "god said so." If that was true, wouldn't we find evidence of it? If scientists are biased atheist, then take a christian scientist and make him prove otherwise.
Well, there actually are some good arguments against evolution! First, let me make something clear that should already be clear. Purportedly, evolution required sequences. However, evolutionistic persuasion demands that evolutionists disregard sequences that WERE ABSOLUTELY NEEDED BEFORE evolution could even start. It is like counting from the number 1 to the number 10. You can't skip the sequences . Comparatively, something cosmological HAD TO have happened BEFORE EVOLUTION could even have had a place to start. So the earth ___via the universe ___provided such a place. The problem is: The universe and the earth were SUPPOSEDLY created through the Big Bang. The Big Bang occurred from The Singularity. All time, space, matter and energy is said to have been what constituted the Singularity. Time is NOT a material. Space IS NOT a material. Energy ISN'T material. Yet, we are suppose to believe that these three things were combined with a matter, which IS material? If a person is not biased,it should be obvious that such a thing as The Singularity is actually desperation at denying a god... relatedly , the supernatural. The funny thing is ___however____The Singularity IS supernatural! There is certainly nothing NATURAL about all time, space, matter and energy being combined. In connection, if ALL space was a part of The Singularity _____there would have been NO SPACE within which The Big Bang could have occurred. If ALL TIME was a part of The Singularity ____ there was NEVER A TIME when the Big Bang could have occurred! But let us consider another point which is central to sequences. After the Big Bang, the famous primordial soup CONVENIENTLY appeared upon the surface of the earth. That "SOUP" was where life started, it is claimed. Well it Had to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING within The Singularity already. Or it somehow WILLED ITSELF INTO EXISTENCE. Clearly that is not science! But let us go further into the essential sequences NEEDED in order for evolution to be true. Our single celled ancestors formed in that soup, reportedly. There is a lot that goes into the formation of a single cell. But one major problem is this. Amino acids have to form proteins. Proteins are a necessity for cell formation. But the so-called primordial soup would have NOT ever let amino acids form proteins in the first place. Why? Water causes depolymerization. But protein formation REQUIRES polymerization. So in truth, the evolutionistic, single -celled ancestors could have never happened. Ohhhhh, but the problem deepens! You see, there are six absolutely indispensable essentials for life.1.Phosphorous 2. Carbon. 3. Nitrogen 4. Sulfur. 5. Hydrogen. 6. Oxygen. These will also have to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING or CAUSED THEMSELVES to come into existence. So it comes down to: 1. Proponents who cling to evolutionistic dogma, REQUIRE the supernatural despite how they ridicule it! 2. Creationists REQUIRE the supernatural also. The difference is _____ creationists' supernaturality HAS a mind!!!
@@GregoryHolden-k5c No, AIG contracts require all their employees to disavow anything not explicitly stated in the Bible. You can't be an honest content creator or scientists after you sign that. Nothing is disregarded, you just make a baseless claim like the speaker does, and provide zero evidence for your claim. There is more evidence supporting evolution than any other scientific idea. Deal with it.
@@GregoryHolden-k5c ?there was NEVER A TIME when the Big Bang could have occurred" Really, evidence? Because the data says it occurred 13.7 BYA. "Well it Had to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING within The Singularity already. Or it somehow WILLED ITSELF INTO EXISTENCE." - So, you also don't understand abiogenesis or evolution. And, abiogenesis is not a prerequisite for evolution. Still waiting for evidence for any of your claims after your tirade..
Save your time, dude. No one is ever gonna have any good arguments against evolution. If all the world's religions can't come up with a single one after 2 centuries, no one ever is.
2nd Timothy 4:3-4, "For the time will come when they will not tolerate sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance with their own desires, and they will turn their ears away from the truth and will turn aside to myths."
So some people will disagree with your interpretation, and they are automatically heretics!
@@tahuyachris Romans 1:19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them.
Amen
Amen 🙏
Amen.
The simple truth is...Prov. 6:5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
@@John14-06 I agree. So even if I understand the basis for rejecting evolution, I accept evolution is true because I don’t lean on my own understanding.
Evolution is a faith. Irreducible complexity squashes it .
@@lesalenart507 Evolution is not a faith. Faith is defined as "BELIEF without evidence", and there is plenty of evidence for Evolution. All you have to do is look. Even in my lifetime I have seen humans evolve - getting fatter and lasier due to evolution in transport, infrastructure and food production. Evolution in technology has seen children evolve from outgoing outdoor physical explorers to indoor introverted mental implorers. Animal species have been discovered and become extinct and the population explosion has seen interbreeding of races producing offspring very different to just a few generation back. Reptiles have been observed evolving differently after being placed in a different environment to where they and their parents were born due to adapting to different circumstances, and all in just a few generations. The only thing I can think of that has not evolved - is religious belief, but religious extremism has evolved in a very short time. If the bible was true - then why did it have to be amended? why were some of the old testament passages hushed up? - Maybee religion has evolved a very small amount!
Finaly - "Irreducible complexity" does NOT mean anything. If it does - please explain!
@@rizdekd3912 but you lean on man’s opinion. Man’s wisdom is foolishness do God. So you are leaning on your own understanding
@@lesalenart507 Two sentences and both are false. Firstly, evolution is observable, testable (measurable), repeatble and falsifiable. The scientific method itself is not faith-based. Science is based on empirical evidence, observation, and testing of hypotheses. It relies on the scientific method to update and refine knowledge based on new evidence. Religion, in contrast, often relies on faith in divine revelation, scripture, or spiritual experiences that cannot be empirically verified. Religious beliefs are typically held even without or despite contrary evidence. Secondly, irreducible complexity (IC) is proven wrong. Its based on the mistaken assumption that evolution relies on improvement of existing functions, totally ignoring how complex adaptations originate from changes in function, and disregarding published research. Evolutionary biologists already published rebuttals and showing how systems actually can evolve. Look up Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial.
Many great points, and I especially like the point that Jesus believed Genesis was fact! Well done, God bless you.
That's rite. Jesus never says scripture was incorrect.
But there is no evidence that Jesus was real.
@@georg7120 There is plenty evidence that the man Jesus was real and a History figure.
@@JAMMAJ-cq2bl Not really. Most of the so called historical evidence has been debunked many times.
@@georg7120
There is zero evidence that you're real..
I love this. Thank you for applying logic and common sense through wisdom and understanding. Praise God!
I believe one must ask themselves how mighty is the God they believe in. This is a stumbling block for many, I think. One must wrap their mind around the fact that they cannot wrap their minds around God.
@@reeb9016 I believe when you truly start to understand what it would mean for a being to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, it is utterly impossible with the state of the world. You then realize that if this triple-O being did exist, all of our problems are its fault.
@msquiggle3590 Negative. He is all those, we are not. We choose to not do good. We choose to not look to Him as our guide. That leads to the problems we have today. So take accountability for your actions and stop placing blame elsewhere.
@@reeb9016 God has the power to do anything. God knew the outcome of his system before he set it into place, yet still did it anyway knowing the consequences. He could have done literally anything else, yet decided not to.
@@reeb9016 How exactly are natural disasters or childhood cancer or genetic deformities humanity's fault?
@@msquiggle3590 So you'd rather be a robot unable to make choices? Strange.
I believe in the literal 6-day creation & that’s why we have a week! Not hard to understand! With God everything is possible! My Lord Jesus delivered me from porn/lust oppression! I’m now free from that disgusting addiction! It’s supernatural deliverance only God can do! Thank you Jesus! You need the Holy Spirit to help you understand His Word & also fight demonic oppressions in your life!
The reason why you have a week is by the nordic gods. Thursday comes from Thor, Friday comes from Freya... Etc
@@friisteching3433That's the names of the days.
@@friisteching3433 nope that's just names for days. The 7 days in a week were only numbers until pagans named them. The only named day of the week is called the Sabbath It was the day added to the 6 days of creation for man to rest after his 6 day work week.
@@friisteching3433
I thought the days of the week came from the planets eg Moon-day Saturn day Sun day etc…. From the Latin
@@friisteching3433
The reason there is a seven day week is told in Wikipedia as based on a Judeo-Christian week, as opposed to other time frames of other cultures. Emperor Constantine established the 7 day week. That's what the article says.
2:15 the first question we need to ask is where the idea of an old earth came from. The earliest example of the idea of millions of years is The Epochs of Nature, 1778. From there, geologists combined this and Darwin to make up the geologic column, assigning names and dates to layers where certain animal forms SHOULD be found. That fairy tale is then used to date rock layers based on the most appropriate fossil found in the layer (ignoring any other animal forms found in that layer; mammals have always been found alongside dinosars and other animal forms).
"the first question we need to ask is where the idea of an old earth came from."
That would likely be from Hutton who based on his observations of rock formations including inconformities concluded that those could not have formed in a few thousands of years. So his theory had nothing to do with evolution.
They didn’t have radiometric dating in 1778 but we do now and that confirms the age of the earth. Yeah, I know creationists try to deny the accuracy of radiometric dating but that’s only when they try to do it.
@@davidgardner863 Not quite. It has been pointed out very clearly the three main assumptions involved in all radiometric or radioisotope dating methods. No matter what any opponent claims, these three assumptions remain as being always needed to make the methods appear to work. It doesn’t matter whether for a particular rock unit there appears to be agreement between the different dating methods. All of the methods are based on those fundamental assumptions. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
These three basic assumptions are:
1. All the daughter atoms had to be derived by radioactive decay from the parent atoms since the rock unit formed.
2. There were no additions or subtractions of parent or daughter atoms since the rock unit formed.
3. The rate of decay had to remain constant since the rock unit formed.
None of these three assumptions can be proven because there were no scientists there when the rock units formed, nor in the vast majority of time since, to make sure that the daughter atoms we measure today (1) have only come from radioactive decay of parent atoms, (2) have not been contaminated, and (3) the parent atoms had a constant decay rate through all the millions of years.
Even worse is that these three assumptions are fatally flawed since they cannot be verified. And now because of the RATE (Radioisotopes and Age of the Earth) project, results from numerous lines of investigations have shown that the radioactive decay rates have not been constant. Radiometric dating has been shown to not work on rocks of known age. Yet most secular scientists and other old-earth supporters assume that radiometric dating does work on rocks of unknown age. This is quite an obvious inconsistency. Dr. William Stansfield, in the Science of Evolution states, "It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years. There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological "clock"." You can not scientifically "date" something, it is a guessing game. By tweaking the assumptions (guesses) you have to make you can come up with any range of dates you want.
@ , The RATE project was conducted by creationist organizations, ( no surprise there) and of course they found flaws in radiometric dating because that’s what they wanted to find. It seems that every time science disproves creationism, they claim assumptions. I suppose you think the speed of light is an assumption too.
@ , The RATE program was carried out by creationists (no surprise there) who found flaws in radiometric dating because they wanted to find flaws. I couldn’t find this Dr. Stansfield on Google but I’ll bet he’s a creationist what is this “Science of Evolution”? A video? A magazine article?
We either believe the word of God or we don't. I will go with Goð and his word. It's about faith in him and his word.
May God bless everyone 🙏 ❤
Its the word of men, that claims it to be from God.
When you close your eyes to sleep you dream, when you close your eyes to science and education you open yourself to waking dream of indoctrination in a make believe ideology, if you are happy with that then enjoy your life but don't try tell the educated in society that your fantasy is real, it only makes it look worse for you.
✝️👑🙏🤍🕊️
The main reason we should trust God is that He is worthy of our trust. Unlike men, He never lies and never fails to fulfill His promises. “God is not a man, that he should lie, nor a son of man, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?” (Numbers 23:19; Psalm 89:34). Unlike men, He has the power to bring to pass what He plans and purposes to do. Isaiah 14:24 tells us, “The LORD Almighty has sworn, ‘Surely, as I have planned, so it will be, and as I have purposed, so it will stand.’” Furthermore, His plans are perfect, holy, and righteous, and He works all things together for good for those who love Him and are called according to His holy purpose (Romans 8:28). If we endeavor to know God through His Word, we will see that He is worthy of our trust, and our trust in Him will grow daily. To know Him is to trust Him.
Considering he also doesn't exist, it's pretty easy not to lie. Just the humans who invented him and lied about his existence.
@@Christobanistanu sound slow 😂
@@Cdr1ck nuh uhh, u do 🤭
@@Christobanistan Jesus said that those who deny Him before man...He will deny before our Heavenly Father. Ultimately you make the decision where you will spend eternity...in a very real place of torment called hell or having accepted Jesus the Christ, eternal life with the Father.
@@Christobanistan funny that God has revealed himself to us. Perhaps you should ask yourself the question why he hasn't revealed himself to you.
This is a really great video!
One of my greatest frustrations as a (retired now) Biology teacher was only being able to barely mention, but not teach the Biblical account and the evidence for young earth creation. Or to point out explicitly the manifold problems with Darwinistic evolution; of which there are a lot. What was encouraging however, was that my students mostly argued for creation and the Biblical account. 🙏✝️👑✝️🙏
_One of my greatest frustrations as a (retired now) Biology teacher was only being able to barely mention, but not teach the Biblical account and the evidence for young earth creation_
Good, at least it means superstitious bronze age nonsense is being kept out of the classroom. The same way we keep astrology, geocentrism, flat earth out of schools, for the same reason.
_Or to point out explicitly the manifold problems with Darwinistic evolution; of which there are a lot_
Such as? Should be interesting, coming from a "biology teacher".
Nothing to say? What a surprise.
@@richardgregory3684 How much 'teaching' does the Bible account need? It's a fairly short story that any child can be led to understand in an afternoon.
There are preachers out there teaching that the word, yom, can actually denote millions of years between each day in Genesis. My brother fell for it. I asked him how plants could live millions of years without the sunlight. Because plants were created before the sun and moon. He said God could make that happen. I said yes He could, but He already told us how He did it and why would you listen to a preacher who try’s his best to fool you into believing that it happened a different way than God said it happened? He got mad at me. We all need to pray that God exposes these fake preachers for their hard work in changing the meaning of God’s word and fooling the people they are charged to protect.
In the beginning HE said let there be light, and there was light.
Those preachers are apostate and are a stumbling block undermining what the scriptures clearly state.
@@paulanelson1629 These statement are only effective to those who share the same false worldly bias, they are meaningless as they describe no actions that actually happened, "he said there is light" in place for "I don't know where light comes from" is an outdated view of life, because were finding where these things come from that before humanity assigned to Devine action. Well, guess what humans have found in that ambiguous cloud of divine action? Answers, as in factual statements and theories that Christians REFUSE to accept because it doesn't align with what an old book tells them. Look at the origins of the bible in archeology and history, it's laughable. Especially considering there's tens of thousands of denominations, all in which have fought full on wars about who's reading it right. In that sense, if they truly believe in hell, how can anyone be sure they aren't going to burn in hell. But I can assure you won't, because it's not a real place. It's a mysterious enigma that you're supposed to attach everything bad to, as to keep you a good little Christian so you can give your money to the church.
There's a sense in which you're right that we need to pray for God to expose false teachers, but there's also a sense in which God already did expose them. He gave us the capacity for reason and a church against which the gates of Hell will not prevail, and one of the things God gave that church was a deposit of faith along with explicit warnings for us to apply that reasoning towards new teachings as per Galatians 1:8. If we choose to ignore those warnings then that's not God's fault.
Excellent presentation! This will help me greatly when talking with old earth creationists and unbelievers! Thank you so much!🙏🏻
FOLLOW AND TRUST IN OUR SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST READ HIS WORD AND FOLLOW IT❤ LIVE BY IT❤
Be a follower? LOL
Amen 🙏
And don't forget to give him lots of money. He's all-wise and all-powerful, but he always needs money.
Nah, I follow science.
Start with The Word.
But it cannot obliterate the fossil evidence - which is all around us.
You need to watch this channel’s MANY videos about the fossil evidence. You may or may not end up agreeing with them, but they do explain their view on it.
@@Swede-js9jq As a physicist - I am suppose to listen to bare-faced denial of the demonstrable truth? They push their lies - I reference the U238-Pb208 decay chain. Anybody interested in the truth can Google. The thing about liars is that the do not even hint at the evidence they offer - in case you can crosscheck it.
Very good presentation. Thank you very much AiG and Terry Mortenson!
God can create a human beiing in 9 month's 😀 and millions of them from day 1. Nothing is impossible to God
Old earth Christians tend to have a less than omnipotent view of God. The others believe that the interpretation of origins by secular scientists must align with God's power, or else the creation doesn't witness to them, but this leads to a universe that points more or less to God over time based on scientific achievement.
Anything that deviates from a more literal view of scripture leads to more subjective views.
Being what do you mean create a human being in nine months that’s a fully natural process that says nowhere in the Bible that he like forms them in the womb
@@Gimmickvr Psalm 139:13-16
[13] For you formed my inward parts;
you knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
[14] I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are your works;
my soul knows it very well.
[15] My frame was not hidden from you,
when I was being made in secret,
intricately woven in the depths of the earth.
[16] Your eyes saw my unformed substance;
in your book were written, every one of them,
the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there was none of them.
@@Gimmickvr o, and who make them grow? Who formed them in the mother womb? It is all by God. Who else? Read your bible there it is all be told.
@@mknalgas1758 no it’s a completely natural process how about you read the Bible
Thank you for calling out the inconsistent and compromised teachers that undermine the foundations of the gospel and cause confusion. They need to repent. James 3:1 My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.
Nothing about the teaching of science or evolution or the Big Bang Theory is inconsistent, unless it is taught by a YEC who doesn't understand the theory or purposefully misrepresents the theories.
Theory of Evolution has nothing to do...Genesis : 1:27 says it all✨✝️
Quotes from the Bible are nothing more than unproven CLAIMS.
@@Gwaithmirthen believe science…. Fruit flies mutated more than any creature on earth ever was or could be always produce nothing but fruit flies… E. coli produce only E. coli. Peas produce…. You guessed it…. Peas….
Nothing else has ever been observed except exactly what the Bible tells you…. Kind reproduces after Kind….
@@Gwaithmirfalse narrative, your opinion and you are mere human.
@@TrishWragg You are human too. Prove that the Bible is true. Until you do, my statement is valid.
@@Gwaithmir
Nonsense. Vast amounts of the bible have been proven.
There are some ancient kings mentioned in the Bible which people like you thought were fairy tales until archeological evidence confirmed their existence.
Archeology continues to support the bible.
Nothing uncovered through archeology has ever disproven anything in the Bible which is also amazing.
See the problem with people is they try to limit something limitless. We compare Gods knowledge to our knowledge...
I could not accept the Seven Days of Creation for years. As a Christian. One day, I carefully thought it through through and with the majesty and omnipotence of God. If God is God, He could have created the Universe in seven trillions of years, seven billion years, . . . catch the drift?, . . . GOD chose seven days. GOD is GOD! He, not "she", HE can do as He pleases. So much more of the Bible opened up with the knowledge and understanding of the Seven days of Creation. Days. Not seconds, minutes, hours, centuries, millenia or eons. Days. Amen.
😂🤣😂🤣😂
The real question is…WHY DID HE TAKE SO LONG?
(He wanted to “define” the day / the week / and so on….)
@@jamesyarnall6728 and then named them after Pagan gods 😂🤣😂
@@jamesyarnall6728 Because He is God. Ask Him.
@@truthgiver8286 aah yes, a manuscript written 4 thousand years ago had days named after pagan gods.
I turned down seminary decades ago. I'm now a retired firefighter. I'm beginning to think I'm going to more firefighters in Heaven than theologians. Sad.
I just checked r c sproul’s written view on genesis 1-11 or on creation. Although Sproul said at one point he leaned towards the framework hypothesis, that later he excepted the literal 6 day, biblical explanation for creation. I thought so because I had watched a few of r c’s teaching on creation and he matched with the biblical interpretation. Just to set the record straight. Thanks for your wonderful lecture on this subject.
@claireusilton4066 the creation myth is just that, a myth. That's what stoneaged desert dwellers came up with. It's hilarious and sad that grown men believe this nonsense.
@@quijybojanklebits8750 It's hilarious and sad that any adult could believe that everything came from nothing.
WE MYST PREACH THE (WHOLE) WORD OF GOD TO ALL PEOPLE NO MATTER WHAT THE COST❤
Gods word vs mans word. I'll take Gods word. Period.
Who was the Bible written by?
@@earthisasphere - It was written by man's hand but divinely inspired and authored by God.
@@justaYTuser1 can you demonstrate that this "divinely inspiration" can even happen?
@@justaYTuser1 amen 🙏
@@friisteching3433 Christians demonstrate the Holy Spirit in our lives, by the grace of God. Yes, we demonstrate the truthfulness of God's word.
This is facts as Christians we should stand on the Bible it doesn't matter if we are laughed at the lord will prove us right if not
We are hypocrites as explained in this video death cannot come before Adam and eve
My brothers stay strong God preaches devolution man preaches evolution
The contrasts is insane
Maybe you should question your book and not follow it blindly
@@konsama1315 Is it blindly jesus existed his deciples existed the country of Judah existed most of kings is confirmed
There was a time were scientist believed David and the kingdom of Judah was a lie a mere myth but we're proven
Things only detailed in the new Testament like the pool of Salome everyone mentioned in acts things like politicians were real people
I don't believe it's why would any culture make a myth about a God castrates the figuratively about there sins calling them stifnecked and so on
Not only that the Bible aren't like other religions who did not care about other religions the Bible in its first chapters Genesis God tells Abraham that he will make him a great nation and through them his seed the entire world will be blessed
There an enthesis of the world itself which you expect from a God who created all things
There's also just prophecy Moses in Deuteronomy states if you abandon the lord he will bring a nation greater than though and kick you out of your homes and land
Then you have Zechariah who says Israel the jews will be split across the nations around the world and God will bring them back to their own land
We're there enemies will try to seige them
How can a book be so accurate
Amen 🙏✝️ I trust in God and his word
How do you know it;s god's word? And why does it contain so many errors, contradictins and self-contradictions?
@@richardgregory3684 it doesn't. You've just been seriously misinformed. Sorry.
@@Abidingingrace-p6z *it doesn't.* How do you get solid colored cattle to produce striped offspring by having them mate in front of striped trees?
@@Abidingingrace-p6z _ it doesn't. You've just been seriously misinformed. Sorry_
So zebras are striped because their ancestors mated by striped trees? lol
Are bats birds?
Which of the following is correct:
"I have seen God face to face,” - Genesis 32:30
“No man hath seen God at any time”- John 1:18
How about
"thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. ” - Exodus 21:23-25
“ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also" - Matthew 5:39
_What is incredible about the Bible is not its divine authorship; it’s that such a concoction of contradictory nonsense could be believed by anyone to have been written by an omniscient god. To do so, one would first have to not read the book, which is the practice of most Christians_
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 Jacob’s Odd “Breeding Program” of Genesis 30~AIG
Thank you AIG this is very insightful and encouraging! Your videos are really helpful for myself but also as tools when i talk to others. I will be studying geology in college this year and my teacher is an evolutionist who believes in billions of years. I want to stand up for truth, for God and the gospel in the face of all of this, I want to stand for truth even in the face of persecution or whatever else this implies. I appreciate if anyone can pray for me regarding this things. Thank you !
If you look at the geologic evidence with an honest open mind it will take you about a day to realize the Earth is way older than 6000 years and that a global Noah's Flood never happened. Best of luck in your studies. Hopefully you can find the courage to be intellectually honest.
We see old and New Testament prophecy plain as day man, it just the coincidental ones either. We are seeing the last wars around Israel form. Time to pick people, will you trust God at his word the Bible, or will you trust wicked men who reject and rebel against God. As for me and my house we will serve the Lord!
What about the Old Testament prophecy that Nebuchadnezzar would destroy Egypt so thoroughly that no man would ever set foot in Egypt again. Oops... that didn't happen.
@@earthisasphere then that means that the new Babylon will! The kings also refer to the kingdom, actually that did happen if you understood history of Egypt. The Egypt we know today is nothing like it used to be. Egypt was the world power during that time period and Babylon wrecked it, along with God when he plagued it.
Amen!!! We have it on a cross right by our front door even.
@@rofishy2 _The Egypt we know today is nothing like it used to be_
But it is not and never has been desolated, nor were her cities destoryed, nor has there been any time when no one has set foot in Egpyt - all false claims in the bible
Then go get you some slaves then! It's OK!!
Excellent - thankyou.
Thank you
If someone teaches something contrary to the Bible, but they say mostly good things, they are just a top-tier deciever. Discernment isn't about knowing right from wrong, but distinguishing between right from almost right. Mark and avoid them, as we were told to do
So is slavery OK?
@@Christobanistanit is, according to the bible. Debt, chattel, and concubinage slavery are all just peachy keen ;)
@@stevenbatke2475 Obviously, but I wanted David to reply explaining why the Bible "actually" doesn't justify slavery, so I could call him a "top-tier deceiver."
@@Christobanistan Under very specific conditions, slavery is permitted. Been a while since I read the part that talked about the laws of slavery, but it was something along the lines of "all slaves purchased require a license made at the time of purchase, which includes the date. Slaves may only be purchased from certain groups, and you may not own a slave that formerly belonged to your own group (just a guess, but buying and immediately freeing a slave that belongs to your group is probably ok). permanently injuring a slave with so much as a small scar (including branding or emasculation) allows the slave to show the injury to a judge and sue for freedom. Slaves may be owned for a maximum of 7 years (hence why you need a dated receipt to own a slave), at which point the slave can either go free or pierce their ear and become a permanent member of your household."
again, that's just off the top of my head. It seems like chattel slavery was forbidden, but slaves are allowed to be owned for a limited amount of time as long as they are treated humanely. There's also a lot of parts in the Bible where people referred to as "masters" are strongly encouraged to treat their "servants" with grace, humanity, and dignity. I'm no expert on ancient Hebrew culture, so this could mean a literal master/slave relationship, an employer/employee relationship, or both.
@@Ben_of_Milam_Music So where do I buy my slaves?
Great!
We can learn to trust God as we see how He has proven Himself to be trustworthy in our lives and the lives of others. In 1 Kings 8:56 we read, “Praise be to the LORD, who has given rest to his people Israel just as he promised. Not one word has failed of all the good promises he gave through his servant Moses.” The record of God’s promises is there in His Word for all to see, as is the record of their fulfillment. Historical documents verify those events and speak of God’s faithfulness to His people. Every Christian can give personal testimony to God’s trustworthiness as we see His work in our lives, fulfilling His promises to save our souls and use us for His purposes (Ephesians 2:8-10) and comfort us with the peace that passes all understanding as we run the race He has planned out for us (Philippians 4:6-7; Hebrews 12:1). The more we experience His grace, faithfulness, and goodness, the more we trust Him (Psalm 100:5; Isaiah 25:1).
It seems almost no one commenting has listened to this entire wonderful talk because they don't address any of his points. I find that quite disheartening. of course I'm speaking primarily of skeptics but it seems to be true of the Christians that want to believe in Darwinian evolution instead of Jesus's words
Yeah, how dare people accept objective reality over Jesus's words!
/S
Jesus' words is one thing. But this TH-cam channel's words are another. I know that whomever tries to convince people of ignoring reality and blindly following dogmatic words they themselves do not understand is either an idiot or a false prophet.
Not sure which of the two this guy is yet.
@@darkfoxxbunyip Darwin was the first person to publish a theory not a comprehensive explanation as first small step to understanding the process of evolution, and the ongoing variety of life in our world. This exploration continues with many millions of people of all faiths contributing to new information. Evolution and Creativty do not prove or disprove the existence of God or Jesus they are simply alternative viewpoints of the way our universe came into existence. Debunking the evidence of others damages this video. Kind regards Tim
@friisteching3433 the more your science learns about this "objective reality " you will realize they have no idea what's really going on.
@@darkfoxxbunyip you think we live on a spinning ball flying through a vacuum? 😅
Not taking a stand on the age of the Earth simply means some of us don't take a stand on the age of the Earth and are open to listen and learn
Evolution needs ‘time’ for mutations…. & mutations are never advantageous. Evolution & Creation are not compatible.
Actually they are. We see evolution daily. Personal incredulity doesn't change that.
@@earthisasphere. Really, where do we see one species becoming another. There are adaption to surroundings but never evolving if you understand the meaning of the word
@TrishWragg - do you mean human giving birth to a frog? That is *not* evolution! You redefined evolution to hide the lies of creationism
@@TrishWragg Species don't become another in short time spans. In fact, they don't ever do so from one mother/father to their children. It's only by comparing distant relatives back in time that you find new species.
@@earthisasphere you see adaptation within the Kind daily…. But you’ve never once observed the fairy tale of fish becoming anything but fish. Finches become anything but finches. Fruit flies become anything but fruit flies. Peas become anything but peas. E. coli become anything but E. coli.
If you want to claim evolution is true because fish evolve into fish…. That’s fine…. Adaptation within the Kind is all you’ve ever observed. Common descent evolution in the other hand is a fairy tale for children…
Thank you for presenting this sound and sensible video. (Although, i am shocked that you would place Andy Stanley in a list of "great theologians.!)
As a Christian with a BS in Environmental Science, and a Minor in Geology it's so sad how biased historical geology and evolution is. So many assumptions, and I saw so much biblical evidence that was ignored. I almost failed my historical geology final paper because I had a hard time staying motivated to learn about names of eras that didn't happen.
_So many assumptions_
Such as?
_so much biblical evidence that was ignored_
Examples?
_ I almost failed my historical geology final paper because_
....you were willing to put a bunch of iron age myths about magic wizards before actual evidence based science
@@richardgregory3684 I’m not going to list everything mentioned in the video but a good example is assuming that because animals have passed on desirable traits making further generations a little different means everything came from the same ancestor instead of multiple ancestors. Also why resort to insults? If you want someone to believe your argument generally bringing evidence and kindness is a better way to do so.
#lyingForJesus
@GAJake - "So many assumptions"? I only see creationists making wrong assumption
If you believe in the nothing died before the "fall" idea there could be no limestone at creation
I believe in the 6000 years of creation but still I am troubled by the light/time travel age of the earth, I don’t know how to reconcile the two.
Answers in Genesis seems to be the only program that makes any sense logical sense when it comes to science.
Hmmmm, many programs supported by reputable scientists
Vs
The admittedly religiously biased program that is disputed by the vast majority of scientists
You can't be serious...
Answers In Genesis consistently denies science.
@bwtv147 there are many different sciences so what are even yapp about?
@@bwtv147 answers in genesis routinely show that science proves creation. Science and the Bible go hand in hand
@@sethwait4985did you watch the video?
2 Timothy 2:15 study to show yourselves approved unto God, a workman who need not be ashamed rightly dividing the word of truth
Very cool video sir, I am grateful to find this channel I came across this one and another called expedition Bible which is also very cool and covers more into geological places around the same time
Has AiG ever convinced one atheist scientist of a six day creation based on the evidence?
There is no scientific evidence for that, so the answer would be 'no'.
Doesn't matter if a scientist is atheist or religious.
@@Mark-h2sYou really don’t know very much do you?
@@jameswilspn1907 that hypocrisy right there, so convince me, an Atheist that the bible is the truth on how the world was created... good luck on that because you have no actual scientific evidence to back up any of it, in fact science can demonstrate the bible is wrong and if the bible is gods word then it is you that needs to question your indoctrination into a religious ideology.
Only Biologists, Geologists and Astronomists are relevant. Those working for AiG pretend to believe six day creation
The question I have is how long were Adam and Eve in the garden before they fell from grace
the theory is not even original. darwin plagiarized it from brothers grimm and other stories from ancient cultures that he met on his travels.
@@katamas832 source - theory and brothers grimm and letters.
Evidence please?
@@billcook4768 frog prince where animals change into humans.
and the Yaghan people of Tierra del Fuego, the Mapuche, and the Guaraní all have one type of animal changing into another.
@@HS-zk5nnWhich letters?
@@katamas832 the ones he wrote about his travels about meeting them
How long did the Perfect World last ? According to the Elucidarium of Honorius Augustodunensis, a text summing up the knowledge elaborated from the Bible (XII century), Adam and Eve's life in Paradise lasted 7 hours, no more, as Eve' temptation was almost immediately after her creation from Adam's rib (fortunately, Adam previously could name all the animals).
Do you agree with this time line, or would you suggest an updated one ?
I don't think there's enough information given to know. But is there any point of theology that depends on the answer?
@@KenJackson_US the Truth, to begin with. And a theological answer about Adam and Eve experience as new born in the Perfect World would be appreciated, as everything derives from it. Have you one ?
@@deguilhemcorinne418 How does anything derive from whether Eve lived a day or a century before sinning? How does either choice change one point of meaning of the Scriptures?
@@KenJackson_US Living during one century in the Perfect World would make you more experienced and conscious about your environment and relationship with God than living one day or a few days after being created, when your free will is not yet educated. Eve does indicates that she feels a lack of knowledge and of intelligence: was she inexperimented after a short existence, or did she felt dissatisfaction after living in a Perfect World for a century (she had her third son when around 130 year old, after loosing Abel we do not know at which age) ?
@@deguilhemcorinne418 Weak argument. You haven't said why you think it's important.
Faith through ignorance is just ignorance.
When did God create water? Which day?
Evolutionists as you call them NEVER use that silly chart to describe human evolution....they know a lot more about it.....especially more than you di!
Amen brother. I love your ability to make this so clear. I struggled during high school and college. Nice to know all this information in my later years at least.
Let’s be real, you didn’t stay in college long
_I struggled during high school and college_
Surprise!
It is thought the earth was always there but ‘void’.
Not by Hebrew scholars...LOL
Why are some Christians so bent out of shape trying to convince themselves that the bible is literally true. Jesus's core message was love God with all your heart, repent (acknowledge what you do that separates you from God and resolve to improve by daily spiritual practices such as meditation, prayer, studying the bible and other spiritual guidance sources and practicing a lifestyle of selfless service to humanity. If you do this, whatever your religion or belief system is, divine love will flow through you and you won't have to worry about getting into heaven because you will already be there.
I wish you would consider renaming this video. I would like to share it with some friends without them being put in a defensive position before they watch it. Maybe something like "A Case for Creation" or even "Evolutionary Timeline vs Literal Creation Timeline". Just not "This Video OBLITERATES what you believe."
Yes, really good point.
AIG has a precedent to uphold. The must present their first lie in the title of the video. It wouldn't be AIG otherwise.
@@earthisasphere I'm praying for you.
@@monty_reneepearison3053 Don't bother. I'm good. I was raised YEC. Luckily, after 25+ years in the cult I decided to learn actual science and history. Best decision I ever made.
1 John 2:19 @@earthisasphere
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Psalms 14:1 "there is no god"
@@mrscience1409 why didn't you say the rest of the verse you only guoted a little not all why would you do that for just to try to make your point.Psalm 14:1
King James Version
14 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Read full chapter
@@mirandarogers3595 if theists can quote mine, why can’t I?
@@mrscience1409 You're only trying to make it suit you and it don't work that away You should quote it all how can you use a verse that you don't even believe in.
@@mirandarogers3595 No, I am busting your chops. I know exactly what I was doing, and I know it was dishonest. It is blowback from the fact that theists like to present quotes out of context, so I give them a dose of their own medicine.
I wouldn't quote Keller or Grudem. Both are wrong about many things.
I believe in God and that Jesus died for my sins. Thank you for this discussion. I went to college for biology and got my degree in rangeland sciences. In this endeavor I had to struggle though many classes taught from an athiest perspective. One thing I still have a difficulty reconciling with is the concept of carbon dating. While I know it is based on a set of assumptions plugged into an equation to guess the dates. The only thing I have been able to respond with is "the equation is wrong because the assumptions are incorrect" but that rarely gets a positive response... what do I do about that.
Youcould start by accepting that carbon dating is accurate, but that would likely mean having to face up to the bible being a collection of fairty tales.
You can believe in God and evolution
54 minutes in and I’m still waiting for the obliteration.
@@remainhumble6432 "This is for Christians to think properly about the evolutionary timeline and the Bible." And yet he provides no evidence for his claims. You can go back to your indoctrination, which has clearly been decades in the making.
It easily did and im near the 20 or 30 minute mark. If you really believed that you would type why.
@@UNIRockLIVE Perhaps you have a different working definition of “obliterate”. That’s totally fine. I just found this video to be most underwhelming (for me).
I like where you didn't mention the seventh day. The day God said to remember in Exodus 20:8-10 or maybe you just forgot.
I’m a believer who accepts the overwhelming evidence for evolution by natural processes over millions of years. The scriptures were written by man from their understanding of their time. The truth of scripture is not diminished by appreciating this. Arguing for a 6-day creation in the face of the evidence is foolish and turning Christian’s away from faith in high numbers.
@@Mario_Sky_521 You not being able to read and comprehend is a problem. He never said he believed things can make themselves, as you state...
I agree. The Book of Genesis is not a textbook of science. It was state of the art in its day, but now God also speaks to us in the language of mathematics and physics - and the mind-boggling magnitude of His creation that science reveals is actually a confirmation of His glory.
Can you defend your faith in _"the overwhelming evidence for evolution by natural processes over millions of years",_ Tom? I am chagrined to admit that I used to believe as you do now. But after reading Darwin's Black Box, I launched into a study of molecular biology and am fascinated to realize there's a layer of authoritative spin on top of science that distorts the underlying facts. But the FACTS documented in molecular biology leave no room for the notion that all life evolved from a microbe.
Anyway, I would love to hear what _"overwhelming evidence"_ you think science presents for microbe-to-man evolution.
The scriptures directly claim a very specific lineage of men, and gives their exact ages. It has nothing whatsoever to do with any "understanding of their time." What does such a vague phrase even mean??
@@Mario_Sky_521 I’m a follower of Jesus and have been for nearly all my life (I’m 69 now). That makes me a believer, or are you creating a new definition of what a believer is? Evolutionary science is not the word of man, but clear and painstakingly documented evidence which has compiled and supported by other science such as geology. The Bible takes creation myth stories that were existent in the Middle East region and inserts the Hebrew God - it wasn’t original but adopted. It’s possible to love God and His son Jesus and fully accept evolutionary science as the means God used to create the universe. It is no less miraculous and awe-inspiring to understand.
I appreciated everything in the video except the video you showed of the lizard eating the goat. That was unnecessary.
If there were no deth before the fall there would not have been any limestone at creation. What was the Earth made of?
But god put that there to FOOL US!!! Don't you know everything is a test to see how far we can dig in our heels?
@@klouis1886 asteroids and stuff
Are you trying to tell God how he did it didn’t make creation? Lol?
@@Thecelestial1 No, but if you're going to claim He did it within the physical laws of the universe, then you gotta obey those laws.
@@Christobanistan No, he literally doesn’t. That’s what a miracle is. He made wine out of grapes that never existed. He can make limestone whenever he likes. That’s why he’s God and we aren’t.
Thankyou
Outstanding study
If you ask all these “Christians” who believe the evolutionary theory, and pry a little, they probably believe that you can lose your salvation or you have to work your way to salvation by acting perfectly.
Not really. your accusation is a bit libelous. There are many young earth believers that make those claims.
Sadly there are more false and deceived "Christians" than they're are saved. 2 Timothy 4 3-4
"3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."
You can lose your salvation. Or more accurately, walk away from it through sin or apostasy. And I don't believe in evolution. OSAS is a doctrine of demons leading many to hell.
Will YEC's ever learn what a scientific theory is? Will they ever realize that gravity is also "only" a theory? Will they ever realize that a theory is the highest level an idea can reach in science? Will they ever realize a law is on the exact same level as a scientific theory?
So they were wrong about this law/thepry of evolution😂😂
@@thomasprell4193 Yes, evolution is an observable fact. of course they were wrong about it.
@earthisasphere but its not observable and combined with the fact its illogical you come to the conclusion that its really ridiculous and preposterous to think everything from nothing, randomly and without cause.
I challenge you tho, since you made the claim about it being observable, i would like for you to provide any evidence that supports such a claim
@@dano8613 First of all, it isn't illogical. You made that claim. Support it with evidence. Secondly, evolution doesn't deal with the origin of life, only the changes that occur once life began. Thirdly, with every birth comes around, on average, 30 mutations. That is evolution. Speciation is evolution. Every time a gene, chromosome or genome duplicates, that is evolution (that provides new information as YEC"s claim MUST happen). Once that has happened, if there is also a mutation to either the original or duplicated gene, chromosome, or genome, that is EVEN more new information, and again, evolution.
@earthisasphere but what you're describing isn't Darwins evolution. When the evolution is brought up as a talking point, it's almost certainly single cell to fish to monkeys to man. You know this, but you are avoiding it.
Also, mutations aren't the same as new information. All the information is already in the DNA, and nothing new is added.
Orgin of life is part of the evolutionary conversation.
Illogical was my claim, and the evidence to support that claim can be found but not limited to
No transition fossils
Millions of years aren't possible based on the evidence we have, and on the contrary, we have evidence that supports three opposite.
Entropy
Can't be duplicated
It hasn't been observed
I can continue, but you'll reject it all anyway.
The documentary Journey of Man a Genetic Odyssey could be the history of the human race from the Tower of Babel onward. People did not obey God's command to fill the Earth before Noah's Flood 60 thousand years ago. It's a very enlightenening documentary. The book Navigating Genesis is a hard but worthwhile read.
You can fit the billion upon billion by accepting GOD made man already as a full grown adult.. So therefor HE could have made the world aged to be billion of years old. And not violate the 6 days of creation.
Doesn't make too much sense
@@CosplayZine OK what doesn't make to much sense?? You have made the standard non committed response that has no meaning hoping to start a negative response.
What you just said makes absolutely no sense.
What does Adam's age have to do with anything?
@@jamesbarrett3889 Once again.. Please explain what part doesn't not make sense. Since you are willing attack a simple explanation of millions of years by GOD making instantly the earth appearing to be millions upon millions of years old.. In the same way he made Adam instantly a full grown adult male appearing about 25 to 30 years old. This way
ps I haven't said that he didn't create the world in 6 literal days. Just gave an idea to confuse an atheist. This way christian's don't have to use there stupid god of the gap theory..
If there was no death before the FALL, then there could be no limestone at creation.
What was the Earth made of?
ALL the limestone was laid down during the flood...2 to 3 miles thick limestone. Didn't you know? s/
Why does it matter? We don’t need to know the age of the Earth to get into heaven or to consider ourselves a Christian. It doesn’t matter to me if the world was made in seven days literally or figuratively. Jesus still died on a cross and his bloodpaid for our sin. That’s how I view it.
Demonstrating clearly that the earth is young instills the fear of the Lord in the unbeliever, and dramatically increases faith in the believer.
People want to know where they came from; the Bible has the answer, the REAL answer!
💖✝️🙌
It matters because the Bible is the word of God.
It does have a little to do with salvation, though. Jesus treats the OT as literal and true and tells us to do the same. So, if Jesus said it's 6 literal days, then you disagreeing is calling Jesus wrong / a liar.
in fact it does matter! The Bible says that sin came into the world through men, and then death BECAUSE OF SIN. If we had evolved through evolution in millions of years, then death would have been there millions of years before the first humans existed, so also millions of years before the first sin was even possible. The story of evolution over millions of years corrupts the entire gospel - and that indeed is the only purpose it’s made for!
*Why does it matter?*
It matters to YEcs because they've predicated their movement on biblical inerrancy, with literal interpretations. It's what they believe, so they treat anyone who disagrees, even fellow Christians, as dirty unbelievers.
Because why not. He said a thousand years is a day and a day is a thousand years. That means to me the earth is only 6 thousand years old.
There's no way a loving and holy God would call "Very good" a monitor lizard devouring a terrified little calf like that, impossible.
Impossible, how? Cos of God's perfect nature, what He makes is perfect, perfect by who's standards?
His standards, His standards are defined by His nature, what's His nature? Perfection.
Moreover, the fear that calf is experiencing that's about to be eaten isn't of God.
Why not?
In God there is no fear, but perfect love,
"Perfect love casts out fear."
1 John.
Plain and simple.
Just take the Genesis text for what God say's.
Thanks brother, brilliant video.
God bless you.
Reverend Alexander B. Eley
BA Honours Degree Theology.
Wales, UK.
Brilliant. Tell granddad I said "high five!" when you get to Heaven! :D
Genesis says that all animals ate plants for their food, meat only became a thing after the fall. The eating of plants did not count as death insofar as biblical standards are concerned. No, I do not believe the original creation included predation and the horribly bloody death organisms suffer today as a result of man’s sin.
@@Cerdinok Exactly.
Nowhere in the Bible says the earth is 6000 years old. The 6000 number came from counting the ages of the people in the Bible plus the days of creation. Only God knows the true age of the universe.
Yes, the famous Bishop Ussher did this calculation in the early 1700's.
That's not much of a criticism. Do you accept the old earth lie just because of that?
And the God Who knows the age of the universe revealed this IN HIS WORD, so we could know it. This is how divine revelation works. Our job in this is to stow our *hubris* and accept who He's revealed Himself to be.
And humans. Because he have the scientific method.
@KenJackson_US no like I said, only God knows the age of the universe.
I have a theory: Vegetation was created before the sun and the moon. You're broccoli!
David, the Morning Star, rides the donkey. The bride of David rides the foal of the donkey.
Blessed is the kingdom of our Father David that is to come! (Mar 11:10 NABO)
David, their king, whom I will raise up for them. (Jer 30:9 NAB)
Then comes the end, when he hands over the kingdom to his God and Father (1Co 15:24 NABO)
Christ rides a horse - of many colors, or aspects, or perspectives.
White - The wine press I have trodden alone (Isa 63:3 NABO)
Red - Do not think that I have come to bring peace (Mat 10:34 NABO)
Black - I came into this world for judgment (Joh 9:39 NABO)
Pale Green - Its rider was named Death - Christ rising up from the Abyss (Rm 10:7) - all of Hades is at his heel (Rev 6:8 NJB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You will not always have me (Mat 26:11 NABO) (Homeward bound)
I am with you always, until the end of the age. (Mat 28:20 NAB) (Began as the first Adam)
My kingdom does not belong to this world. (Joh 18:36 NABO) (Third party mediator)
Where I am going you cannot come. (Joh 8:21 NABO) (Left Behind)
Then I took my staff "Refuge" and snapped it asunder, breaking off the covenant which I had made with all peoples (Noahic covenant) (Zec 11:10 NABO)
Then I snapped asunder my other staff, "Heritage" (Deu 32:8) breaking off my brotherhood with (between?) Judah and Israel. (Zec 11:14 NABO)
the one who ascended far above all the heavens (Eph 4:10 NABO) (a galaxy far away)
never to return to corruption (Act 13:34 NABO) (Wait, what?)
Evolution is the great lie that misdirects many humans from giving thanks for the miracle of creation.
You couldn't prove that a god ever created anything if your life depended on it.
@@VisshanVisYou can - take the time to look around you at the marvel of design, by the master designer, the Lord Jesus Christ. The evide6for Creation is all around you
@@WendyButt-h4c LOL, you couldn't prove that a god ever created anything if your life depended on it.
@@VisshanVis without God guidance chaos everywhere no civilization etc..
@@centyniv7257 without God guidance
Which god??? in the 250,000 years ( Give or take a few thousands of years) since modern humans have evolved they have made up and invented around 18,000 different gods deities and religions.
Sad, Grudem also believes in the apostolic gifts are still in existence today too.
Wait a second. The guy ask, showing a komodo dragon attacking a goat; "What kind of a God make a world like that"?
I would say: God made that. Who else made the creation of death and destruction we now live in? Adam and Eve didn't do it. They didn't have the power to change God's creation. They sinned and God expelled them and then God changed his perfect creation to the reality we now live in.
God created a PERFECT earth, a PERFECT universe. Sin is the thing that brought the ruin and evil. Free will was given, and a horrifically WRONG choice was made because of the deceit of the evil one. Mans free will has caused the ugliness and evil, resulting in the whole creation groaning, longing for its redemption. 💙🕊️💙
@@MichelleYvonne59 Mans sinning did 'cause' theft, murder, fraud, vandalism, etc. but did not change herbivores to carnivores, cause earthquakes, floods or other natural disasters were there were none before. Only God could make that change and he did.
@Species1732 Actually, God cursed the ground for man's sake, which inevitably brought about such facets of our earthly existence. God also mentioned that the world was filled with violence when He decided to flood it. It said that it grieved Him. That isn't something God would intend but rather a consequence or byproduct of the curse according to the sin Adam and Eve committed. The growth and spread of this corruption would be proportional to the sin of mankind though God has kept the earth by grace.
Satan is squarely to blame for all the horrific earthly pollution & distortions that have occurred & are occuring as a result of sin, which he is the father of. Look at the original creation from God's hand, all good, that's His plan. All of Earth's mess, lie's at satan's feet. Choose ye whom ye will serve, there's only two master's. Good = God, all evil is of satan! You can believe anything you choose, but it doesn't make it so. This world's time is EXTREMELY short, all will be revealed @ judgment, soon! This is God's universe He set's the JUST rule's, period. He will be vindicated judgement day! Regardless of distorted satanic brainwashing!
@@johnwills8056 Sure, Satan is to blame for the temptation, deception, delusion, misguidance, etc. but man is to blame for their sin and therefor for all the *man made* suffering, destruction, pollution, etc. But you are now saying that Satan also changed God's creation? In that case Satan would have the same power as God (note: the Bible does not mention this anywhere)
Satan did not redesign the snakes to crawl on their belly, redesigned the ground so it is hard for man to work on, redesign woman to have increased pain of birth, redesigned some plants to bear thorns, redesigned every living thing so they do no longer live forever, etc. God did all that after the Fall. It's in the Bible. it is only logical to assume that God also redesigned some animals to be carnivores, redesigned parasites, insects, bugs, viruses and bacteria to 'prey' on other animals or humans and introduced natural disasters; things that did not exist before the Fall. To attribute that to Satan would make him equal to God.
God created in six days. The Bible says, let all men be Liars, but let God be true
The age of the earth can be millions of years old, but life as we know it is only around six thousand years old
What is this man talking about?
@kpkm3604 The lie and stupidity of Darwinian-evolution and its iterations.
@@TheMickeymental Really? I hear things like god created the universe in 6 days, but what does he mean by "day"? And there may have been gaps between the days. And the first day begins on the third day, and other incoherent nonsense.
@@kpkpm3604 You are not correct god did not create the universe.
@@kpkpm3604Yom in Hebrew almost always refers to a 24 hour period. So think about it and listen to the video properly. If you are actually interested that is.
He is trying to confuse people with his word salad and his "Dr." credentials.
I don't believe in rival gods and end times that never arrive.
A 76 year old skeptic.
It's okay if you don't believe in God. He still believes in you.
@@Ben_of_Milam_Music It's okay if you don't believe in Zeus. He still believes in you.
@@luish1498 that's the kind of thing that people say when they don't understand what God actually is (which is nothing to be ashamed of, even most religious people have virtually no understanding of God).
It might sound like a pretty decent one-liner from your perspective, though haha
@@Ben_of_Milam_Music Zeus is the almighty god !! REPENT !!!!! ACEPT ZEUS AS YOUR SAVIOR!!!
@@luish1498 I genuinely just feel sorry for you.
Evolution is real and obvious!
Micro or macro?? Macro evolution is a lie
And observable. Young Earth Creationists require evolution to be true for their flood story to be real, but they just can't accept the actual timeline for earth for some reason.
@@stefanblumhoff2744 Evidence?
Evolution is impossible.
@@dorothyhinkel185 Evolution is impossible.
And yet here you are after millions of years of evolution along with everything else that lives today.
So there are no human remains before 6K years ago?
The 6,000 years is a "mason" teaching, it's 10,000 years on Earth or 1000 years in Heaven.
Enoch (PROPHET)
If you believe that the universe was created in six literal days, you must also believe that the earth is flat, because the Bible indicates this too.
God is outside of time, so to Him a thousand years is as a day and a day is as one thousand. Equating evolutionary theory with those who believe in an old earth is quite disconcerting. We believe in the wonderful creative power of our Great God and Savior. In the scheme of things, this is minor issue
Lets not divide over it.
Sir, if you say six days is not really six days, then what other Words of the Bible are wrong (in your view) ? This is the issue. Either the Bible is the Truth or it is not. To question, try to understand, is absolutely needed. However, to say 'it was good' included death, is hubris
God cannot be outside of time. Time is a measurement of change. If god had any ability to think of anything, the clock would start. If he was actually outside of time, there would be no time that he decided to create. This claim is simply a coping mechanism to explain what Christians cannot explain.
The age of the earth isnt an opinion.
The age has been measured scientifically as has the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years.
If your religion cant accept science, you need to re-think your religion.
New research proposes a model that determines the universe's age to be 26.7 billion years, which accounts for the James Webb Space Telescope's "impossible early galaxy" observations. The telescope captured this Pillars of Creation image last year. (CREDIT: NASA/ESA)
Where is this "scientific evidence?" It doesn't exist. Once you realize that, then perhaps you can believe the truth of the scripture.
@@jpacrylicstudio145 one example is the fact that we see light from many billion light years away.
Light travels one light year per year, therefore if light from billions of light years away has reached us, then the universe seems to have existed long enough for it to make that journey. That is just one very very basic evidence pointing towards more that 6000 years.
Another is the fact that there are trees that are literally older than 6000 years old. This leaves two main options.
1. Those trees started growing before there was a universe or..
2. The universe is more than 6000 years old.
@@galenstevenson918 "New research proposes a model that determines the universe's age to be 26.7 billion years, which accounts for the James Webb Space Telescope's "impossible early galaxy" observations. The telescope captured this Pillars of Creation image last year. (CREDIT: NASA/ESA)"
There is one study on that and only a few scientists are pushing the idea. This is nowhere near consensus.
@@jpacrylicstudio145 You want a course on astrophysics on a message board? Of course you do. We can measure the rate of the expansion of the universe and extrapolate back, Hubble's constant, redshift, etc. And we know Earth is over 4 BYO, so the universe has to be older than that.
I'm thinking it's god day not an 24 hour earth day! So a day is considered to be one full rotation of the earth then could gods day be considered one full rotation of the universe?
You've just done a brilliant job with proving how useless the God that you believe in is.
Firstly he made a fundamentally flawed creation, which had a devious talk ing serpent in it. Secondly he somehow managed to not see Adam and being tempted by a serpent which he had also made and punished All of their descendants for doing something wrong when they hadn't yet learned the difference between right and wrong.
Maybe to look as if it was billions of years old, it made the universe to look as if it is billions of years old and then got a book written that says it's only thousands of years old. God is absolutely useless and I can't work out why you would ever think that he was in anyway perfect. It's bizarre.
Their religion requires you put your intelligence and reason in a box, lock it, and throw it into a river. The sad thing is that geninely intelligent people have spent thousands of years trying to rationalise all of this, when they could have just said "It makes no sense because it's made up"
What's wrong with a talking serpent? You're a talking serpent.
@@Joy-c8h 😂😂😂 I'm a talking ape that's for sure!
@@davidsteer1941 I'm just saying. The creator of something can allow it whatever freedoms He pleases. The serpent, as we come to find out, was Satan who WAS an angel. Angels having free will within their role and the ability to shape shift were probably perks of the job. Sin was introduced to humanity because of temptation. The "flaw" that you see in God's creation actually PROVES that our will really is free and always has been. You realize that without opposites we wouldn't be able to appreciate positives? So we know our will is free because of the "imperfections" (as you call them) of Gods creations. The question is, who are YOU to define perfection? Are you the creator of anything you see with the two eyes God gave you? Who are you to define good?
Educated men are supposed to be able to receive criticisms and expect challenges, simple based on their scholastics. SMH
Father God, please help these poorly educated men to see the Truth, the Way, and the Life. In Your Son's most Blessed and Holy name Jesus Christ I pray. Amen
Walk with Jesus Christ
Stay Dangerous
Somple answer: NO
I agree. He didn't create....
@christopheespic yes only god can create
@@EasternOrthodoxChristianity you're free to think so!
@@christopheespic tell me who creates from nothing besides God?
Perhaps it's not so somple...😂
Why...Why does everyone conclude that Adam was made on the 6th day? In the six days of creation, EVERYTHING was spoken into existence. And it also says, that he created them male and female, as if he 'spoke' Adam into existence, had a chat, brought some critters to name, and then put him to sleep, so he could extract a rib, form Havah, and yet, scripture does not support this.
Notice, it was AFTER the Sabbath, and God created (as if by working with his own two hands) a garden. He then formed Adam, from the clay... Does that sound like he 'spoke' Adam into existence?!? He formed Adam out of the clay, and then 'breathed life' into his nostrils. None of that, is congruent with being 'spoken into existence'.
But, what about Day 6? You might ask. Those were indeed humans, and they were called 'mankind'.. Think about that for a moment, animals and humans are to only mate with their own 'kind'. These were a different type of people. They did not walk with God in the garden, but were what you might consider a bit more primitive when compared to Adam and Havah. The 'watchers' (a class of angels) were with mankind, and taught them about God's laws, and ways. Before long, they had learned to speak a common tongue, to cultivate, to prepare and store food, and they had a society. But, they did not know of the Garden.
It is from this same group of mankind, that the watchers, who rebelled against God, and lost their first estate and mated with the 'daughters of men'. These fallen angels, corrupted mankind as much as they could. Teaching them sorcery, witchcraft, and other types of forbidden knowledge.
Here's how we know... Knowing that Kayan slew his brother, he was confronted by God. God punished him to be a vagabond and a wanderer. But Kayan says, 'My punishment is too great, for if they find me THEY will kill me'. And God agrees. Who is this 'THEY' they he fears will kill him? His own mother and father?!? Or could it be the corrupted 'mankind' who has already been known for violence and warfare? But, God agrees, and places a mark, and a curse to anyone who would kill Kayan. So apparently, God is also aware that 'THEY' will kill Kayan.
Then, Kayan goes east, and settles in the land of Nod. He takes a wife, and she gives him a son... Hold your horses, where did this 'wife' come from, and who had already named the land BEFORE he got there? I've had some say, that Kayan had sex with his mother, and that SHE gave him a son. Not only is that against God's law, but SHE was not cursed to be a vagabond and a wanderer, until Kayan wanted to pop out a kid. And if you think that is a stretch, ask yourself this, who was his son Enoch's wife? Did he call mom, and have her 'stop by' for a visit, so that Kayan could have grandkids? NONE of this makes any sense, if you contend that Adam and Havah, were created on Day 6.
Genesis is very specific about how Adam was formed out of the earth, and Havah was formed from the rib of Adam. You NEED those 'mankind' people that were created on day 6, for any part of Genesis to make sense. Who did Seth marry? You can't keep having all of these men going back to Havah to pop out some babies. Your only other choice, is to make up a story where Adam and Havah, had many unmentioned daughters, just for the purpose of incestual propagation. And that's simply not how God works.
He ignores the fact that the bible describes two different creations.
No lol, same creation the perfect and corrupted versions.
@@Thecelestial1 Different creations, no doubt about that.
There is not one thing in the Bible that says nothing died before the FALL
If death existed before the FALL then death would be good. And if it is good then God would not have to overcome death and later throw it into the eternal fire.
Ah, AiG rejecting the operational, repeatable science of
1. radiometry;
2. Cosmic Background Radiation;
3. almost all galaxies moving away from each other.
@mark8099 You have conflated biological evolution with cosmological evolution.
Not at all. AiG rejects both.
AIG also rejects virtually all of geology, and biology, and genetics, and paleontology. In fact there are few sciences which AIG doesn't reject either all or in part.
@@sciencerules2825 Justifiable.
@@TheMickeymental Rejecting large amounts of science simply because it contradicts your religious beliefs isn't just not justifiable, it's also not intellectually honest.
I cant buy into this idea. Why would tyrannosaurus rex have a mouth full of razor sharp teeth. Those teeth arent needed for eating vegetation.
Look evolution happens, and we have a pretty good idea of the age of the Earth that is just the way it is.
@@andrewshear2927
"Look evolution happens," you said.
Basically, the *theory* of evolution says that human beings were not created by God, but sprang from the primordial soup.
Is that what you believe?
Just the way it is eh? Not so. We see evolution happening yes, adaptation and devolution.
@@eigenvalue5775 _Is that what you believe?_ You left out about 4 billion years' of life's history on Earth.
@@sciencerules2825
I believe in the Bible. If that makes me unscientific, uneducated, unenlightened in your eyes, that's your opinion.
*To be accepted by an unbelieving world is not the goal of one who believes in Jesus Christ/ Yeshua Ha'Mashiach.*
@@eigenvalue5775 _If that makes me unscientific, uneducated, unenlightened_ *WILLFULLY* unscientific, uneducated, and unenlightened.
Nothing in the Bible says there was no death before the "fall"
1. God's declaration of creation as "very good":
"And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
2. Provision of plant-based food for all creatures:
"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so."
3. The warning of death as a consequence of disobedience:
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."
4. The curse of death after the fall:
"In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and to dust shalt thou return."
Expulsion from the Garden and loss of access to the tree of life:
"Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life."
Nothing in there about death
So it wasn't great, just very good
My wife can't understand why I spend my valuable time protesting cringe-fringe apologist YT channels. The short answer is to protect young, unformed minds which deserve quality, fact-based science education in our schools.
If YEC kept in its lane as religious 'ministry', then yeah, who cares, but channels like AIG are more ambitious. They want Trump, obviously, which is sickening enough, but they also want to be a political stalking horse for undermining public science education with their brand of pseudoscientific snake oil. The threat is real, especially in my beleaguered home state, where we're contending with this:
"Senate Bill 280 was signed into law by West Virginia's governor Jim Justice on March 22, 2024, according to the Associated Press (March 22, 2024). 'The National Center for Science Education said in a statement that the legislation is 'threatening the integrity of science education in the state's public schools.'
"The new law provides that '[n]o public school board, school superintendent, or school principal may prohibit a public school classroom teacher from discussing or answering questions from students about scientific theories of how the universe and/or life came to exist.' The bill's lead sponsor, Amy Grady (R-District 4), declared that it would protect the teaching of "intelligent design," according to West Virginia Watch (January 23, 2024), although a federal court found "intelligent design" not to qualify as a scientific theory in Kitzmiller v. Dover in 2005.
"The Associated Press reported that 'Aubrey Sparks, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia, said the organization would be watching the law's implementation closely. If the wording of the legislation is ambiguous to her, she said, it's going to be ambiguous for teachers, students and parents, too.'"
Trump 2024!
@@Holycow723 Trump for prison 2024!
Have you ever considered you are wrong about the evidence for a young Earth. If so you are sending children to hell you say doesn't exist...that should be a concern.
@@Holycow723 Can you be elected President while you are in prison?
@@earthisasphere Actually in the U.S. you can.
I do not see it as "battle", I see it as a debate like many other about interpretation of the Bible today. I think it is said that some are very aggressive in this conversation.
Science is not a debate. Evidence is evidence.
@@Christobanistan I meant a religious debate. But science is a debate, too. Consider for instance the conflict between quantum mechanics and relativity theory.
@@Christobanistan wow, even the young earth creationists understand science better and would not say a silly thing like 'science is not a debate'.
You have scientifically proven you are scientifically misunderstanding science.
@@darkfoxxbunyip It's NOT a debate, not in the sense you seem to think. Science is much more a very specific process of falsifying your own hypothesis wrong ideas are removed.
When people talk of "scientific debate," they are not talking about going back and forth until a winner is declared, they're talking about the scientific process.
As a Creationist, you're used to persuasion, not any kind of search for truth.
@@acd1235 That conflict is resolved via the scientific method. That's what's meant by "scientific debate."
Genesis is not a textbook of science. And "Doctor" Mortenson's word salad merely serves to confuse people. And that is his intent. But even William Lane Craig, the great apologist of Christianity, accepts the scientific view, which by the way does not at all preclude God as the Creator of All.
Thank you for your presentation.........agree with your assertions and that the earth is 6k years old. We don't need to please evolutionists contentions. No transitional forms(missing links) evolving into higher more complex beings. Second law of thermodynamics shows progression from complex to random only.
In a closed system. You left out the "in a closed system" part of the second law of thermodynamics
_No transitional forms_
All living or once living things are or were transitional. Including you.
_Second law of thermodynamics shows progression from complex to random only_
If only life on earth had some massive external energy source it could utilise....we could call it "the sun" maybe.
You have a poor understanding of biology and physics
Everything this guy says depends on what the Bible says, including God. Why should we believe the Bible is true about God? Because the Bible says so. Anyone see the circular logic fallacy here?
It goes further than that.
A good starting place is Jesus
But Jesus said (at the time) that God, His Father ,has worked all the way up to that time (2,000 years ago), AND that He was also working. So, the Sabbath of rest, for God, had not yet come up to that time. Paul reminds us that, it was written long ago, people would not ENTER into His rest, and that there still remains a rest for the people of God to enter into. So that REST (Sabbath) hasn't come yet.
What also remains to come, is 1,000 years of peace (no war). Sounds similar to THE Sabbath 'day'. 🤔
This was kinda disappointing. I thought you gonna have some good arguments against evolution, but all i got was, "god said so." If that was true, wouldn't we find evidence of it? If scientists are biased atheist, then take a christian scientist and make him prove otherwise.
Well, there actually are some good arguments against evolution! First, let me make something clear that should already be clear. Purportedly, evolution required sequences. However, evolutionistic persuasion demands that evolutionists disregard sequences that WERE ABSOLUTELY NEEDED BEFORE evolution could even start. It is like counting from the number 1 to the number 10. You can't skip the sequences . Comparatively, something cosmological HAD TO have happened BEFORE EVOLUTION could even have had a place to start. So the earth ___via the universe ___provided such a place. The problem is: The universe and the earth were SUPPOSEDLY created through the Big Bang. The Big Bang occurred from The Singularity. All time, space, matter and energy is said to have been what constituted the Singularity. Time is NOT a material. Space IS NOT a material. Energy ISN'T material. Yet, we are suppose to believe that these three things were combined with a matter, which IS material? If a person is not biased,it should be obvious that such a thing as The Singularity is actually desperation at denying a god... relatedly , the supernatural. The funny thing is ___however____The Singularity IS supernatural! There is certainly nothing NATURAL about all time, space, matter and energy being combined. In connection, if ALL space was a part of The Singularity _____there would have been NO SPACE within which The Big Bang could have occurred. If ALL TIME was a part of The Singularity ____ there was NEVER A TIME when the Big Bang could have occurred! But let us consider another point which is central to sequences. After the Big Bang, the famous primordial soup CONVENIENTLY appeared upon the surface of the earth. That "SOUP" was where life started, it is claimed. Well it Had to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING within The Singularity already. Or it somehow WILLED ITSELF INTO EXISTENCE. Clearly that is not science! But let us go further into the essential sequences NEEDED in order for evolution to be true. Our single celled ancestors formed in that soup, reportedly. There is a lot that goes into the formation of a single cell. But one major problem is this. Amino acids have to form proteins. Proteins are a necessity for cell formation. But the so-called primordial soup would have NOT ever let amino acids form proteins in the first place. Why? Water causes depolymerization. But protein formation REQUIRES polymerization. So in truth, the evolutionistic, single -celled ancestors could have never happened. Ohhhhh, but the problem deepens! You see, there are six absolutely indispensable essentials for life.1.Phosphorous 2. Carbon. 3. Nitrogen 4. Sulfur. 5. Hydrogen. 6. Oxygen. These will also have to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING or CAUSED THEMSELVES to come into existence. So it comes down to: 1. Proponents who cling to evolutionistic dogma, REQUIRE the supernatural despite how they ridicule it! 2. Creationists REQUIRE the supernatural also. The difference is _____ creationists' supernaturality HAS a mind!!!
@@GregoryHolden-k5c No, AIG contracts require all their employees to disavow anything not explicitly stated in the Bible. You can't be an honest content creator or scientists after you sign that. Nothing is disregarded, you just make a baseless claim like the speaker does, and provide zero evidence for your claim. There is more evidence supporting evolution than any other scientific idea. Deal with it.
@@GregoryHolden-k5c ?there was NEVER A TIME when the Big Bang could have occurred" Really, evidence? Because the data says it occurred 13.7 BYA.
"Well it Had to have been ETERNALLY EXISTING within The Singularity already. Or it somehow WILLED ITSELF INTO EXISTENCE." - So, you also don't understand abiogenesis or evolution.
And, abiogenesis is not a prerequisite for evolution.
Still waiting for evidence for any of your claims after your tirade..
Save your time, dude. No one is ever gonna have any good arguments against evolution. If all the world's religions can't come up with a single one after 2 centuries, no one ever is.
@@Christobanistan What ever works for you _____ you are welcome to it!