emrald spelled wrong usa is a big country..Its okay for usa to emit large CO2 emmision..compare to area wise UK and Qatar emit too much CO2 and if UK or Qatar is like USA in area wise..they would be unrivaled in CO2 emmision
Kacchan Mark co2 per capita emissions shows that the usa are among the top polluting countries in the world again. Especially per capita emissions is bigger in the usa than in most of european countries(including uk) and than most of countries in the world
@@adampiotrmalejewski695 lol on your mentality... Bhutan 🇧🇹 only nation where no one is homeless.. Every Bhutanese has access to free health care all the times Bhutan tops in World's Happiness index
@@nimmacity8615 you mean some Chinese , Pakistanis, and pewdiepie extreme fan these are one side story But on the other side our allies are also increased more then our haters
Are people hating because of war crimes, dictatorships, genocides, terrorism? No. That means people don't like to see a country doing good because it's pure jealousy. This is what is happening with all these videos.
His point is why is USA stopping other countries when they themselves continue to emit gases from all their industries that sparked development while limiting other countries
Brought into the WTO and given most favored nation status and also given a third world development status. This gives them free reign to produce abusively, and pollute to their heart's content without a word from anybody to complain. So they have an unfair trade advantage and emissions status, comparatively.
@@troyb3659 It's very true. In the list of top 20 CO2 emitting nations, India has lowest per capita emissions, around 1.7 metric tonnes per capita. For instance, US has 15.6 and china has 7 metric tonnes per capita.
Actually plants grow faster and better now. Ifs called CO2 fertilization. I am not saying climate change is a good thing. Over all its horrible, but in this one issue, you are wrong. Most plants would benefit. Most of the history of earth, CO2 levels were much higher than now.
Me : HOORAY MY COUNTRY IS ON THE LIST!! Me : Oh no.. it's not on the list anymore 😥 (Me realized that this list is for CO2 emissions) Me : My country is THE BEST!!!
I'd love to see this as a 'one person from each country' version, since the big numbers for China and the USA look bad but you have to remember population numbers too
@@nicholasroyer9066 China produces almost everything in the world. They are the world's factory, especially in the US most products are made in China so it's like who's really responsible for these emissions?
Music: Young Rich Pixies (Sergey Ustyuzhin) - Epicness. Finally I found this music! I have searched for it so many times. And since yesterday I've used a bunch of music recognition programs, but dozens of recognitions turned out to be wrong. But after a lot of time, I finally found it!
4:15 After the Paris agreement, India's Co2 emissions start to decline, even though the base was already low. So India's growth story will remain clean.
@@adityashankar5723 not India, but this absolutely pollutes the ocean th-cam.com/video/WOmtFN1bfZ8/w-d-xo.html Also, India has one of the largest ship graveyards in the world.
But they started it all. :) It's easy to turn "eco" after your country is already developed thanks to the factories that polluted the air for so many years.
@@AndrewVasirov Yes I have to agree with you obviously it's not fair. But now that we know the impact of our development and what to avoid in order to protect our earth, we should consider new solutions (not easy to find obviously). Because it was not obvious what our development could cause in the former centuries. With our technology, we should be able to help developing countries in order to protect the planet. Btw : Sorry for the english, frenchies like me are not able to speak it
I had no difficulty understanding your comment, I find it more difficult if it is written by US teenagers actually. :) Your English is good. Yes, we should be able to help developing countries. But our governments are more interested in sanctioning, supporting coups, insurgents and exploiting said developing countries. Humans might be the only species in our ecosystem that thinks about its future generations, but few care about the future generations of different civilizations/people.
@@AndrewVasirov It's kind of an utopia but I think the only solution would be an internationalisation, living under one flag, the humans. There are several things that obstruct this vision such as cultures or religions but in the end, if we keep this personal behaviour, we are not going anywhere. If our generation is able to think this way, let's hope our children can be even more optimistic.
Its interesting to see that France despite being one of the most industrialized countries in the word, keeps dropping. Thats not only because it relies mostly in nuclear energy, but also because of the environmental politics in which they truly are (or should be) an example to the world.
France per Capita is significantly lower than Germany now. And it's because France kept the nuclear energy while Germany is turning it off. Let's all learn from France. New generation nuclear technology will be even greener, safer and better. Everyone should be thinking about it.
@@tronalddump5447 Wtf? it's like to say that a Person with Asian Face isn't brazilian, But yes, there is lots of this people in Brazil, A Country with One of the most diversity of population, Even in today's days with Globalization .
How would it? And how would you disputr those numbers. It's a reason why india and china don't have restrictions on fossile fuel and they don't innovate. They also don't care about the enviroment. Look at their population
You are reversing the problem, according to your logic, if i pollute with my house 1% less than my neighbourgs counting 5 people inside. i'm better than them.
@@Warzak77 no i'm saying that yoy can't take differance from the biggest polluters like china and india with their population polluting the big cities, when they don't try other modern solutions as the west have. The fact is that you can't deny the population booming and the higher demand for cheaper more enviromental damaging process. USA and China is examples of this, only that china gives less crap about all their 10000 factories.
@@Warzak77 ok china is communist, a big part of the population is poor, the industries makes a lot of money for poor work force, the more industries than most other countries per capita. The fact is that with a poor living standard same goes with india the poorer the quality of production and innovation like look at Norway who has the highest usage of tesla's, using hydropower as energy ect. The list would be the same.
@Shmatt S Well, it has changed its industry, importing its stuff from China. So I am not sure what to applaud here, as the emissions the UK causes are just shifted to anothers countries calculation. They haven't disappeared.
@@mlg_teletubby9391 Irrelevant, even though it's the 7th largest economy in the world... And is predicted to take over France in 2023. Considering it is tiny compared with other countries size wise it is beating, I consider that pretty impressive. Thanks for the input though.
@@Sebastian-lz8pu I'm just saying world wide empire recovering from a devastating world war is obviously going to have more emissions than an economically stunted island nation
@@0penminds well it is all western countries, not just UK, that have outsourced lot of their industry to China thanks to globalization. Doesn't help our globe if western countries just transfer co2 output to Asia. We need to change the consumptionism in our societies towards co2 free consumption
Very interesting to watch the acceleration/deceleration of output, over time. From 2003/4 the US output slowed to just over 5 tonnes and actually started a reduced output that brought them down, from just over 6 tonnes to its current output, from approx. 2000 forward. Seems like the stats are finally reflecting not only the population, but the degree of industrialization and other factors that add/subtract to a country's output.
And remember, China and India are not part of the Kyoto Protocol. Both countries will look into reducing CO2 in 2040. And China is bringing 831 new coal fired power plants online in '19-'20.
I think China maybe reducing at 2040 but not India because India will completely become an industrial based economy while China being based on service sector economy...
That's only because in the early 90s when the Soviet Union collapsed, Poland was also hit with new economic policies that basically decimated its economy with cheap foreign imports and shut down its domestic production.
Hubcio So did the emissions of Russia and Ukraine, but it was only because the factories were shutting down after our countries entered the capitalist economy.
Yet CANADA had been racing with Poland 1-1 pre SU. Now it is double (600k v 300k). It would be cool if Canada would export to the world actual good practices instead of mental gymnastics.
@@chrisbedwards yet the EU still makes us look like we're throwing that CO2 in the air like there's no tomorrow. Even if Germany produces more than twice than us
Meanwhile Canada (with same pop) is double lol (and yes, Poland with 300.000 vs Germany with 700.000 is rougly equivalent per capita since Poland is ~40m and Germany ~100m).
USA: haha we pollute the earth the most. China: hold my rice... **Earth has joined the chat.** **Natural disasters have joined the chat.** **Mankind has left the chat**
Do u know why USA water and environment is cleaner than china and India? Bc u dump ur trash to China for the past 3 decades, China helped the entire European countries to clean their wastes! And bc of ur greedies, China has to sacrifice the environment and get all those rare earth metals so American and make more bombs to home the others.
I was tracking Canada hard. Hoping we didn't get higher then 6. But when we add in how much oil we drill up and long commutes. We aren't innocent. We have lots of hydro based power. But not enough.
@@AttackTheGasStation1 nah thats fixable, the real problem is the amount of uranium amd plutonium left, the rejects are in a way a way samller problem than that
All countries have the right to development, and everyone has the right to live a rich life, which is equal. The comparison of carbon emissions per capita is the most fair and reasonable criterion.China's per capita carbon emissions are still very low. The per capita carbon emissions of the United States are very high, several times higher than China's.
@@l.m.1375 How many people died because of a nuclear disaster? Almost no one. How many died because of oil, constructing windmills or other green energy things? A lot more!
coco the first cars were alse too expensive and not efficient and now they are cheap and very efficient it's just matter of time. I live in Switzerland we have STILL problems with high radiation in mushrooms and in wild pigs that caused Chernobyl. Don't tell me what's better. If you want to live in a waste land then go ahead but not with me.
@@ishan849 It really isn't. 93% of all CO2 is absorbed by seas and oceans. In future, as they lose their ability to absorb CO2, the balance would likely tilt back, at which point we're screwed anyway.
Thanks to MODI'S commitment.. India's CO2 emission is in control. International solar alliance was joint venture by india and france. Both the country's head got UN'S CHAMPION OF THE EARTH award for that. 🇮🇳🇫🇷
@@mitranuckecheddy8466 I think you should first stop your country in carbon emissions rather than saying others to shut up. What are you doing? Nothing, you got no life at all.
@@mitranuckecheddy8466 wooosh In terms of *per capita* , we are *118 th* . Indians planted 66million plants in 12 hour breaking its own record of 50 million in 1 day. This is a world record.
@Paul de Sarasate They used to but the bottom has dropped out of the market for recyables. All that recycled plastic you've carefully been sorting is probably going to a land fill.
No it's not fair actually.. Some countries have massive minding industries that provide metals to the entire planet.. Their industry moves massive amounts of earth to access those ores and thus they produce more emissions per capita then countries that have no mining industry.. But the developed nations with no mining industry import all their minerals and metals.. Thus they are just as responsible as the ore mining nations in producing the CO2 ... But that does not show up in the statistics..
This is why if we prompt the USA AND Europe to go as much as HALVE their emissions, we can still only delay the consequences. And remember - more and more countries are starting to get into the category of "developing", characterised by huge growth of industry, the biggest source of emissions by far. Fixing the problem in developed countries is a drop in the bucket.
With the roll out of renewables and efficiency measures, pay attention to the UK, starting with 'The Climate Change Act 2008', and how fast its emissions dropped. Economic progress can be decoupled from carbon emissions, and with a fully green economy the potential economic benefits (let alone environmental and social) are mind blowing. The future winners and leaders are green.
I think fare comparison should be CO2 per capita (by population) than total CO2. Also China exports lot of goods so part of their CO2 emissions attribute to those countries who import those goods, for example USA. PS: I do want every country to cut down their CO2 emissions.
You may have missed it, but the per capita leaders were presented on the right side of the presentation. Almost exclusively underdeveloped countries where fuels aren't used efficiently.
@@noelgenoway9360 Hi! Good Day! Well in India we do need air conditioning and fans during summer which is very brutal. 45-degree centigrade is not very uncommon during our summers. Well, Asians are known to be extremely frugal when consuming resources. It would be an interesting comparison of how developing countries and well-developed countries individuals compare and what is the yearly per capita increase is. I am interested in how the graph starts to flatten or peak.
Because like many rich countries nowaday, they import everything from Asia/Africa. So they produce less Co2 but that gaz emissions is just in different country now. If China is that high, it's because it's the factory of the world, they produce to every country many different products
@@JeremieFlo - actually, the UK embarked on a de-carbon program in the 2000s - thats the reason. An china stuff is based on stolen ideas from the west , then made by cheap labour.
@@VCYT Stolen or not, China is the world's factory. They produce virtually everything in your store, hence the pollution. One country provides for the rest 200 countries, be grateful.
This much capita in China means it is so much in total as China have 1.3 billion people. Oh my God, is this country really care. Why USA leave Paris climate change agreement.
Per Capita CO2 emissions is still very low for China. Qatar and UAE are in fact the most polluting counties. Please make a video on per capita carbon dioxide emissions so that the viewers must not sustain the impression that China is the most CO2 emitting country in the world while in fact Qatar is destroying the planet awfully fast!!!!! Pls Wawamau
doesn't matter taking per capita doesn't make sense whether you have one person or 100 person polluting the same amount doesn't matter. you're still polluting
@@SADebre , actually the US has been decreasing quite a lot... I mean heck look at the end the US easily decreased the most out of everyone. From it's height of 5,785,437 in 2005 to it's final score in 2017 5,045,514.. the US basically dropped the equivelent of Germany's emissions in 2017 by then...
And here I was watching my country (The Netherlands) only going slightly up (peaking at 187k, only 3x higher than the original start) and then down, until it's no longer in the list.
And we in Germany import quite a few products from there. Many products have somewhat organic "plastic" packages instead of normal ones You guys also take part in a lot of social or climate related projects in the third world.
Actually, I've heard the reason why Europe's CO2 emission decreases is because the industries that pollute are relocated in third world countries like India or China, while industries in Europe are converted into stuff that don't pollute ^^' Which makes sense actually.
@Ameen ShindoliTo be fair, C02 emissions count is somewhat different from pollution levels. The Clear Air act passed in the US so many years ago has done wonders to reduce pollution and smog in their cities. There was also conservation projects to clean up rivers and water reservoirs, for example: A river in the US known as the Connecticut river used to be inhospitable, 40 years later it is much cleaner and now most of it is safe for swimming. India has less overall C02 emissions, yet since the country's industrialization is in full swing, there is yet to be a major conservation effort to curb such pollutants from being present in major population centers. Not all Americans are stupid, however a lot of them are. That is something I will admit. Something I have observed is the phenomenon of "Rational Ignorance." Remember to put double quotation marks on ""Rational."" This appears to be something prevalent in many Americans, which refuse to educate themselves not because they are unable but because they are unwilling. Many Americans I have been around are too focused on their personal lives and the weather to give a shit about anything but themselves and their social circle. They say that they are just one person and that even if they were educated it wouldn't matter. In actuality it does, especially when millions of people are having the exact same thought and are doing the exact same thing. I am ridiculed for having worldly views and being concerned about whats going on around me, which is frustrating. This does highlight something about American culture as a whole, as intellectual discussion is seen as a taboo and is shunned as not proper social etiquette. Thankfully, there are plenty of likeminded people in America who at the very least know Germany is in Central Europe, the UK is an island, and that China is not bordering Mexico (People actually believe this).
I would say that having almost 4 times more population than the States, China only emitted barely 2 times CO2 of the States, either something is wrong with the US or China is doing a relatively good job.
If you're truly worried about the environment, total output is the only thing that matters. It is lower per capita because far more than half of the Chinese people live in poverty and are lucky if they have a family bicycle or moped to get to work each day..
@@dancnkc After watching all these stats, you are wasting 4 mins of your life if you still believe in these stereotype thing. In fact, half of the Chinese families have their own private cars. China is america's largest creditor
Jaa... Hauptsache bei uns wird geknausert bis zum Gehtnichtmehr! Mehr Dieselfahrverbote! Mehr Atomaustiege! So wird die Welt gerettet! Jaa... Scheißegal, dass China und USA ein zigfaches jeglichen Einsparpotentials bei uns absichtlich um ein Vielfaches Jahr für Jahr hinzuauspusten! Deutschland muss Verantwortung übernehmen! Mehr Verbote! China macht alles richtig! Ist ja ein 3.Weltland, das noch unterstützt werden muss :) Scheiß Altparteien
I guess the USSR did not share its stats on carbon dioxide emissions which would explain why it's not there and why Russia pops up at #3 out of nowhere in 1992.
The chinese actually listen to her though, they've stopped importing trash and disposing them for other countries. unlike some politicians and celebrities....
Notice how the UK, Italy, France and Poland produce now much less CO2 than before. Those are serious countries! China, the US and others could learn a great deal from them
This could be more interesting if u counted EU as whole to see if those eco laws are actually helping, also it would be more comparable number to other 2
Is your country on the list?
India
Yes, Australia
WawamuStats USA
Brasil
Yep usa
The first WawamuStats video in which you want your country to be overtaken.
They did another video for imports. I'm assuming you don't think importing a lot of stuff is a good thing.
No, higher CO₂ emission means higher manufacturing output/added value of industrial output
military spendings.
Look at population video...
@Siddharth Kumar I disagree. Having an economy that is reliant on imports or exports makes it dependent on other countries.
Do the ranking of forest areas.
Yeah it should be.
up
Yes
I would prefer percentage of forest area
Suriname has highest percentage of forest area in world
You forgot Bosnia. we have also 2 factories.
Then u should be proud of
@@rupeshverma9536 Yes, he should be proud of his country being poor. Because having money is only for losers !
why so serious hes making a joke
Jokes fade away easy.
also have*
USA: all the other country's emit so much co2
all the other country's: whut
china: laughs nervously
why nervous?
emrald spelled wrong usa is a big country..Its okay for usa to emit large CO2 emmision..compare to area wise UK and Qatar emit too much CO2 and if UK or Qatar is like USA in area wise..they would be unrivaled in CO2 emmision
Kacchan Mark r/woosh
@@Anselization1 I think India's population is not that small.
Kacchan Mark co2 per capita emissions shows that the usa are among the top polluting countries in the world again. Especially per capita emissions is bigger in the usa than in most of european countries(including uk) and than most of countries in the world
*USA:* We are the largest CO2 producing country
*China: Hold my CO2*
not a proudest fap for any country :d
😂😂
just scrolling through comments expecting cringe comments like this
Per Capita emmisons are still higher for USA than China.
INDIA: *_HOLD MY TREES_*
Britain is now powered by hot air produced by it's lying, cheating politicians.
lol
It is powered by China and other countries from the top of this list.
If only we could, then we might just have energy too cheap to meter.
Does the fact that Brexit promoters are fools and liars explain why your punctuation in English is so bad?
mascara snake german ones are even worse...
EARTH has left the chat
Earth don't care, it will be here long after humans..
Maybe he meant "Earth as we know it has left the chat"
See how irksome it sounds?
Extrapolate on jokes and have fun :)
Nope!
Haha
No.. Earth kicked all country from group
*BHUTAN - ONLY CARBON NEGATIVE NATION IN THE WORLD*
SIKKIM_ ONLY CARBON NEGATIVE STATE IN INDIA
Size of Buthan fir to my pocket .... no industry no electricity lol you compare knife to revolver :D
2040 plans are radically starting in UK deadline 2050 for zero carbon
Be the first country to do zero carbon followed by France shortly after
@@adampiotrmalejewski695 and where is your Luxembourg Monaco Vatican city which are smaller than Bhutan??
@@adampiotrmalejewski695 lol on your mentality... Bhutan 🇧🇹 only nation where no one is homeless.. Every Bhutanese has access to free health care all the times Bhutan tops in World's Happiness index
Lol in most videos china and india become usian bolt after 2004.
@@nimmacity8615 you mean some Chinese , Pakistanis, and pewdiepie extreme fan these are one side story
But on the other side our allies are also increased more then our haters
@@nimmacity8615 and at the end India's CO2 emission starts decreasing without effecting GDP growth
@@nimmacity8615 😂😂 haters gonna hate we don't care
Are people hating because of war crimes, dictatorships, genocides, terrorism? No.
That means people don't like to see a country doing good because it's pure jealousy. This is what is happening with all these videos.
@@familiarr_Strangerr you're right. China and Pakistan is Jealous of India
We indians nearly 4 times of usa when we have started our devlopment usa is asking us to stop whereas we still are behind the usa for carbon emissions
HOW DARE YOU!
Siddharth Dansena oh bhai kyu bina bat ke America ki sath pange le rahe ho? Chup kar jao tum na Americans ke dil me hamare kilafe nafrate bur rahe ho.
The USA is not letting India to develop
His point is why is USA stopping other countries when they themselves continue to emit gases from all their industries that sparked development while limiting other countries
@@remokim5066 thanks
I was like holyshit wtf happened in china...than i looked at my cup "made in china" pant "made in china" phone"parts made i china". OK
everything is made in china
Brought into the WTO and given most favored nation status and also given a third world development status. This gives them free reign to produce abusively, and pollute to their heart's content without a word from anybody to complain. So they have an unfair trade advantage and emissions status, comparatively.
Destroy China and West and planet can be free and breath
funny when the emission per capita is still higher in US.
HOW DARE YOU!
Next time make video on how much trees are there in countries
@@yv3009 from this video we can see how much destruction we made to environment & earth
Y V Very wrong. Things changed HUGELY.
What will happen in just seeing it
@@yv3009 no it increased by 20% due to India and China I read somewhere
@@Bobby-ld6el but there are too many illegal tree cutting activities in india.
Bar chart: exists
China: *Aggressively accelerates*
@MarktheSpark yeah
Markthespark, Qatar is way worse than USA in emissions per capita. But it’s a small country, so it’s not doing much.
It should be noted that India's per capita CO2 emissions is one of the lowest.
uhh, not true
@@troyb3659 It's very true. In the list of top 20 CO2 emitting nations, India has lowest per capita emissions, around 1.7 metric tonnes per capita. For instance, US has 15.6 and china has 7 metric tonnes per capita.
what is it in 2017? or even 18?
@@troyb3659 Yes,this is the data of 2 years back. There should not be any drastic change in 2 years.
With a population of more than a billion, that's to be expected, lmao.
India's CO2 emission started to decrease in the end, there is still hope 😁
@田中加奈と Way better than living in your stupid commie country
@田中加奈と I also told you to shut up.....so shut up
Nice job India!!
Ankit Banerjee 傻逼印度人就是恶心 赶紧去去喝洗澡水好吧
Ankit Banerjee 傻逼印度人还以为自己说英文是一件光荣事 lol 跟你说话一股咖喱味 再见👋
We damages the environment too much
Now it's bounce back time for environment......
Before it's too late grow some plants🌴🌿🍀🌲🌱🌳
Actually plants grow faster and better now. Ifs called CO2 fertilization. I am not saying climate change is a good thing. Over all its horrible, but in this one issue, you are wrong. Most plants would benefit. Most of the history of earth, CO2 levels were much higher than now.
@@MobinMGreen I wish your teachers were good at environment subject
Yes, i care about the environment as well
I love popcorn🍿🍿🍿
Wanna some?
That's not enough we need to move towards clean energy
Does anyone else feel that the music in all of the videos is so satisfying?
Yessssssss
Ikr
Me : HOORAY MY COUNTRY IS ON THE LIST!!
Me : Oh no.. it's not on the list anymore 😥
(Me realized that this list is for CO2 emissions)
Me : My country is THE BEST!!!
Just out of curosity, what is you country?
@@Person868 Probablly Bhoutan
@@bal-duredt2190 probably not.. because my dear country is on the list again.. (sad mode)
I think it’s Australia
@@MCCCXI. hmm, I think AUS will be in top 10 for *_Weed Smoke Emission_*
I'd love to see this as a 'one person from each country' version, since the big numbers for China and the USA look bad but you have to remember population numbers too
US levels would be WAY bigger per capita. I wonder if China's emissions are a more potent form, or if they just have that much more industry and stuff
@@nicholasroyer9066 China produces almost everything in the world. They are the world's factory, especially in the US most products are made in China so it's like who's really responsible for these emissions?
@@WaveRider1989 The US was the world's factory in the 1960s. Using that same metric, historical US emissions should be far lower.
@@nicholasroyer9066 The US would outrank China in nearly everything if this channel used per capita rankings.
@@WaveRider1989 yeah, literally all the products i buy it says “made in china” even iphones say that
Music: Young Rich Pixies (Sergey Ustyuzhin) - Epicness.
Finally I found this music! I have searched for it so many times.
And since yesterday I've used a bunch of music recognition programs, but dozens of recognitions turned out to be wrong.
But after a lot of time, I finally found it!
thanks. found it after 5 years. lol
4:15 After the Paris agreement, India's Co2 emissions start to decline, even though the base was already low. So India's growth story will remain clean.
yeah, till someone does a study on ocean pollution...
@@nicholasroyer9066 India doesn't pollute ocean lmao, US does.
@@adityashankar5723 not India, but this absolutely pollutes the ocean
th-cam.com/video/WOmtFN1bfZ8/w-d-xo.html
Also, India has one of the largest ship graveyards in the world.
Unlike their rivers and streets.
@@adityashankar5723 What about the rivers or air? Or Mt Everest of plastic garbage?
Europe, always making all the efforts..
True ...
But they started it all. :)
It's easy to turn "eco" after your country is already developed thanks to the factories that polluted the air for so many years.
@@AndrewVasirov Yes I have to agree with you obviously it's not fair. But now that we know the impact of our development and what to avoid in order to protect our earth, we should consider new solutions (not easy to find obviously). Because it was not obvious what our development could cause in the former centuries.
With our technology, we should be able to help developing countries in order to protect the planet.
Btw : Sorry for the english, frenchies like me are not able to speak it
I had no difficulty understanding your comment, I find it more difficult if it is written by US teenagers actually. :) Your English is good.
Yes, we should be able to help developing countries. But our governments are more interested in sanctioning, supporting coups, insurgents and exploiting said developing countries. Humans might be the only species in our ecosystem that thinks about its future generations, but few care about the future generations of different civilizations/people.
@@AndrewVasirov It's kind of an utopia but I think the only solution would be an internationalisation, living under one flag, the humans. There are several things that obstruct this vision such as cultures or religions but in the end, if we keep this personal behaviour, we are not going anywhere. If our generation is able to think this way, let's hope our children can be even more optimistic.
Its interesting to see that France despite being one of the most industrialized countries in the word, keeps dropping.
Thats not only because it relies mostly in nuclear energy, but also because of the environmental politics in which they truly are (or should be) an example to the world.
Yeah dropping. Because they have moved all their polluted Citroen, Peugeot and Renault manufactury line into Asia.
The hole earth should follow France.
@@fabiolaiiludwigvonhoffenhe2264 whats your source ?
France per Capita is significantly lower than Germany now. And it's because France kept the nuclear energy while Germany is turning it off. Let's all learn from France. New generation nuclear technology will be even greener, safer and better. Everyone should be thinking about it.
I hope the new Prime Minister of Japan can restart the nuclear power plants.
OMG my first first comment and like in this amazing channel, congrats to tour job from brazilll
but you have a Chinese name
@@tronalddump5447 Wtf? it's like to say that a Person with Asian Face isn't brazilian, But yes, there is lots of this people in Brazil, A Country with One of the most diversity of population, Even in today's days with Globalization .
@@tronalddump5447 well...
Chinese are everywhere around the world not just in Brazil.
Not even suprise if chinese people are lived at antartica😀
@@kannakamui9427 São Paulo have chineses imigrants, but i am confuse to hahaha
hahahaha, Im not chinese, this name is from a league of legends player "xiaohu", I like his story and the game, so I put this in my acc
YEAH MY COUNTRY IS ON THE LIST!
*oh wait a min*
日本を称賛 my country is on the list, too. Bro, in Poland we have the same problem. Of course not so big, but exist.
lol
I envy your country, buddy. Carbon emission drops constantly in your country.
Can we agree that "Co2 per population" would have been more relevant ?
How would it? And how would you disputr those numbers. It's a reason why india and china don't have restrictions on fossile fuel and they don't innovate. They also don't care about the enviroment. Look at their population
You are reversing the problem, according to your logic, if i pollute with my house 1% less than my neighbourgs counting 5 people inside. i'm better than them.
@@Warzak77 no i'm saying that yoy can't take differance from the biggest polluters like china and india with their population polluting the big cities, when they don't try other modern solutions as the west have. The fact is that you can't deny the population booming and the higher demand for cheaper more enviromental damaging process. USA and China is examples of this, only that china gives less crap about all their 10000 factories.
@@Warzak77 ok china is communist, a big part of the population is poor, the industries makes a lot of money for poor work force, the more industries than most other countries per capita. The fact is that with a poor living standard same goes with india the poorer the quality of production and innovation like look at Norway who has the highest usage of tesla's, using hydropower as energy ect. The list would be the same.
lbhtdc zz_ lol biggest pollution in the world China but also biggest environmentalists in the world China
Applause to the UK for going from 2nd to 17th
And halved it's emissions despite a growing population? That can't be said for most countries
为英国倒退鼓掌
呱唧呱唧呱唧
我没说经济
@Boss Ross As the 5th largest economy, the UK seems to be doing pretty well.
@Boss Ross not really
@Shmatt S Well, it has changed its industry, importing its stuff from China. So I am not sure what to applaud here, as the emissions the UK causes are just shifted to anothers countries calculation. They haven't disappeared.
Shoutout to the UK. Went from 2nd to not even on the list.
Do you know how to read ?
@@radg0090 huh?
Went from being the world superpower to practically irrelevant as well
@@mlg_teletubby9391 Irrelevant, even though it's the 7th largest economy in the world... And is predicted to take over France in 2023. Considering it is tiny compared with other countries size wise it is beating, I consider that pretty impressive. Thanks for the input though.
@@Sebastian-lz8pu I'm just saying world wide empire recovering from a devastating world war is obviously going to have more emissions than an economically stunted island nation
Give a round of applause for India for having a huge population and having a decently low amount of emissions for its population.
the power of a indian
USA: Haha I’m the best at everything! Even bad things such as pollution
China: Hold my Noodles
Lol!!!
Ha! It’s funny because Chinese use chopsticks to pick up noodles!
Hold my noodles wtf hahaha
CO2 is not pollution
True... it’s trash, smog, and nuclear waste that’s pollution.
It's great that the Uk produced much less co2 than 1970
The UK and France should be admired on this list for going the other way unlike most other countries
They didn't do it to reduce CO2. They did it by shutting down industry and outsourcing.
It is because of outsourcing production to China and other countries.
@@ninaakari5181 It's called buying from others. No matter what the UK does, people will complain. Is it jealousy or just hate?
@@0penminds well it is all western countries, not just UK, that have outsourced lot of their industry to China thanks to globalization. Doesn't help our globe if western countries just transfer co2 output to Asia. We need to change the consumptionism in our societies towards co2 free consumption
Very interesting to watch the acceleration/deceleration of output, over time. From 2003/4 the US output slowed to just over 5 tonnes and actually started a reduced output that brought them down, from just over 6 tonnes to its current output, from approx. 2000 forward. Seems like the stats are finally reflecting not only the population, but the degree of industrialization and other factors that add/subtract to a country's output.
lmao, US simply outsourced its emissions overseas
I can be glad that my country is on the list because my country (the uk) actually made an effort to reduce co2 emissions.
The UK halved it's emissions since the 70s... meanwhile the US increased further.
At least they took some precautions and avoided getting to 6M
Part of that is the fact the UK stopped manufacturing goods and went more services.
@@washuotaku Yeah our main exports used to be coal and steel but both industries have been handed to China
Sebastian Garcia yeah, I hope that at some point we can go sub 5 mil and over time even go down to sub 4 mil.
They also killed their industries. Germans are doing pretty good with balance.
And remember, China and India are not part of the Kyoto Protocol. Both countries will look into reducing CO2 in 2040. And China is bringing 831 new coal fired power plants online in '19-'20.
And when you look into the CO2 emission per capita. China is one half of US.
@@allasar I am Maltese, so those numbers are both way higher than here.
@Advocatus Diaboli Bc it serves as the perfect comparison of how much you can fuck up.
@@johnperic6860 Did you watch the video?
I think China maybe reducing at 2040 but not India because India will completely become an industrial based economy while China being based on service sector economy...
Love from india😍😍
I SMELL T-SERIES
@@LsSwappedMiata 😂😂
Tushar Dey don't be hyper
@@urajoke2912 thats not even funny...
Say carbon di oxide from india😆🙏
China: I am speed
Gabriel Angelo It’s still the same
速不及汝父行房
@@zawarudotokiyotomare102 he edited and changed it..
Abi shek the comment was a month ago lmao ofcourse he/she would change it anytime soon
First video I watch on this channel where I'm glad my country (Bulgaria) isn't on the list. #FeelsGoodMan
France and Poland make great efforts To reduce their CO² emission ! Great Job ! 🇵🇱🇨🇵
EL 835 Italy too they strike down 1/4 of total emissions in only 10 years
EU policy... They have no choice.
If US and CN do nothing, it's just a waste of efforts, look at the graph ffs
@@FoxyKing93 they made that choice themselves though
If you do not meet EU standards, you will be penalized financially.
Is it not time to calculate per capita carbon emissions?
SUSCRIBE TO PEWDIEPIE
@@juanmanuel9892 no, I won't. First of all subscribe me then I you.
Amy Hsu it literally to the right of the bar graphs 😂
The westerners won't like that as it would make them look so bad.
USA said no.
Love how Polands emission started to decrease after Soviet Union collapsed :)
That's only because in the early 90s when the Soviet Union collapsed, Poland was also hit with new economic policies that basically decimated its economy with cheap foreign imports and shut down its domestic production.
Hubcio So did the emissions of Russia and Ukraine, but it was only because the factories were shutting down after our countries entered the capitalist economy.
Yet CANADA had been racing with Poland 1-1 pre SU. Now it is double (600k v 300k).
It would be cool if Canada would export to the world actual good practices instead of mental gymnastics.
@@chrisbedwards yet the EU still makes us look like we're throwing that CO2 in the air like there's no tomorrow. Even if Germany produces more than twice than us
@Panzer Faust haha. You're funny. Really, go play some games. If you wouldn't destroy our country, you wouldn't have to pay anything
North Americans be like:
_I will fart less, I promise._
Lol
Leave Canada out of this
*Asians
No no americans be like i will not Eat too many hamburgers and pizza
Farts are *methane* you morons not *Carbon dioxide*
European Union: OMG Poland you are producing so many CO2!!!
China: hehe
True
Poland, 20 place... It's funny how they bash Poland because of CO2 and at the same time Germany is sixth on the list. Hypocrisy...
@@FoxyKing93 Well Germany is only producing 3 times the CO2 while having like 5-6 times the GDP.
@@thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 in nominal gdp, in real gdp per capita its close to 1/2.
Meanwhile Canada (with same pop) is double lol
(and yes, Poland with 300.000 vs Germany with 700.000 is rougly equivalent per capita since Poland is ~40m and Germany ~100m).
USA: haha we pollute the earth the most.
China: hold my rice...
**Earth has joined the chat.**
**Natural disasters have joined the chat.**
**Mankind has left the chat**
On of the most underrated comment ever
US Does not pollute the most we may make a lot of CO2 But our waters and waste management is far better than most other countries like China and India
Do u know why USA water and environment is cleaner than china and India? Bc u dump ur trash to China for the past 3 decades, China helped the entire European countries to clean their wastes! And bc of ur greedies, China has to sacrifice the environment and get all those rare earth metals so American and make more bombs to home the others.
@@courier3567 hahaha, better than India I trust, better than China? Please come to look by yourself.
@@JerryFeng-tq6sy China is the top water polluter in the world with 8.8 million tons of plastic ending up in water.
2:00
Indonesia
Turkey
Indonesia
Turkey
Indonesia
Turkey
Indonesia
Lol
SUSCRIBE TO PEWDIEPIE
Hahahaha
Welcome to the Riceland where your weeds got intensely farted
@林
a
And people call India to change its system.
India is a shithole neverthelessw
@PopnLock Popin India is a country not a race, so it can't really be racist..
@PopnLock Popin YEAH THAT'S RACIST!
Given the state's of the ganges I think that demand still has merit.
@Vijay Patil atleast we don't pollute compared to European shithole countries....
Our waste per capita is way soo less than these European countries
Amazing animation! Really shows the trends.
Canada: I wanna have high emmisions but nobody will notice *becomes 6th*
I was tracking Canada hard. Hoping we didn't get higher then 6. But when we add in how much oil we drill up and long commutes. We aren't innocent. We have lots of hydro based power. But not enough.
We can see France and Poland did an effort for their CO2 emission
Let's say every European country
France : nuclear energy....
France still lives in the atomic era when it comes to power
AttackTheGasStation1 nuclear energy if treated is very clean and produce more than anything
@@AttackTheGasStation1 nah thats fixable, the real problem is the amount of uranium amd plutonium left, the rejects are in a way a way samller problem than that
All countries have the right to development, and everyone has the right to live a rich life, which is equal. The comparison of carbon emissions per capita is the most fair and reasonable criterion.China's per capita carbon emissions are still very low. The per capita carbon emissions of the United States are very high, several times higher than China's.
Its funny cos other countries started to decrease
Why would that solve climate change, No... So a country that can't control it's population it's ok to polute the world... WTF
@@philliangbeihai5388 This exactly, these comments have too many china bots
but their emissions to gdp ratio is very low meaning they are super inefficient
France did very well in comparison to other countries. That's because of their many nuclear power plants. Nuclear energy is the future.
coco until an accident happens.
@@shadowraven4221 Fusion is not efficient and thus too expensive.
@@l.m.1375 How many people died because of a nuclear disaster? Almost no one. How many died because of oil, constructing windmills or other green energy things? A lot more!
ShadowRaven nuclear fusion yes but have seen what fissuon can cause.
coco the first cars were alse too expensive and not efficient and now they are cheap and very efficient it's just matter of time. I live in Switzerland we have STILL problems with high radiation in mushrooms and in wild pigs that caused Chernobyl. Don't tell me what's better. If you want to live in a waste land then go ahead but not with me.
Next video: how much Forrest land have by countries
Most Co2 is consumed in the ocean by phytoplankton
Most of the CO2 is stored in trees.
@@ishan849 It really isn't. 93% of all CO2 is absorbed by seas and oceans. In future, as they lose their ability to absorb CO2, the balance would likely tilt back, at which point we're screwed anyway.
It won't be fair ... It should be based on % of forest .
It won't be fair ... It should be based on % of forest .
In Italy today we have same emission of 1972
sempre peggio va
Not developed
@@dasgibt2276 What are you saying? Italy is the second manufacturing nation in the EU after Germany.
Gazzab
3:13 - 4:22
Wow, China Really wants to be first so bad
Feera Zerno similar to T-Series
They do not want to, but do not forget the 1.4 billion people
@@Isaac-ny1qt with having 1.4 billion.. this is too less
Ankit Banerjee ik that I have a discord that focus on a sub gap
这时候就不看人均了?在这逼逼你🐴呢?
Thanks to MODI'S commitment.. India's CO2 emission is in control. International solar alliance was joint venture by india and france. Both the country's head got UN'S CHAMPION OF THE EARTH award for that. 🇮🇳🇫🇷
Wow awesome champion indeed to be the 3rd/4th biggest polluter of the world.
Shut up mate.
@@mitranuckecheddy8466
I think you should first stop your country in carbon emissions rather than saying others to shut up. What are you doing? Nothing, you got no life at all.
@@mitranuckecheddy8466 mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-05/india-breaks-record-planting-66-million-trees-in-12-hours/8677302
@@mitranuckecheddy8466 wooosh
In terms of *per capita* , we are *118 th* .
Indians planted 66million plants in 12 hour breaking its own record of 50 million in 1 day. This is a world record.
@@mitranuckecheddy8466
In per capita mauritas rank is *88th* . Keep dreaming
Thanks WawamuStats, very educational!
USA: Haha yes I'm destroying the earth faster than the rest of you!
Other Countries: That's not a good thing
China: Hold my Tiemmean Square
Fun fact: Most western countries send their garbage to China to have them burn/recycle(right) it.
@@Kr4zYm0f0 not anymore, china has stopt inmporting garbage from the US.
Bullshit because China is 1.4 billion while USA is 330 million so I guess it's bad comparison
@Paul de Sarasate They used to but the bottom has dropped out of the market for recyables. All that recycled plastic you've carefully been sorting is probably going to a land fill.
www.cnbc.com/2018/04/16/climate-change-china-bans-import-of-foreign-waste-to-stop-pollution.html
Please do a per capita one! That's more fair for comparison I think
I was thinking the same thing.
Doesn't it say "per capita" on the right side of the screen?
why fair? It's not a race. The point of the chart is to show how much we are fucking our planet not who is the worst at it
Kevin Han How many chromosomes are you missing?
No it's not fair actually.. Some countries have massive minding industries that provide metals to the entire planet.. Their industry moves massive amounts of earth to access those ores and thus they produce more emissions per capita then countries that have no mining industry.. But the developed nations with no mining industry import all their minerals and metals.. Thus they are just as responsible as the ore mining nations in producing the CO2 ... But that does not show up in the statistics..
How much procent of land area are covered by forests
Song name please
Please make "Co2 emissions per capita by country", ty!
In movies the US always save the planet against alien invasion, asteroids, deseases but in reality they are destroying Earth slowly
This is why if we prompt the USA AND Europe to go as much as HALVE their emissions, we can still only delay the consequences. And remember - more and more countries are starting to get into the category of "developing", characterised by huge growth of industry, the biggest source of emissions by far.
Fixing the problem in developed countries is a drop in the bucket.
With the roll out of renewables and efficiency measures, pay attention to the UK, starting with 'The Climate Change Act 2008', and how fast its emissions dropped.
Economic progress can be decoupled from carbon emissions, and with a fully green economy the potential economic benefits (let alone environmental and social) are mind blowing. The future winners and leaders are green.
I think you forgot one little recession there...
Kinda nice when you recognize various events based on the development, such as periods of economic depression from how the emissions abruptly dip.
can you make a video about the production of plastic by country?
I think fare comparison should be CO2 per capita (by population) than total CO2. Also China exports lot of goods so part of their CO2 emissions attribute to those countries who import those goods, for example USA.
PS: I do want every country to cut down their CO2 emissions.
You may have missed it, but the per capita leaders were presented on the right side of the presentation. Almost exclusively underdeveloped countries where fuels aren't used efficiently.
why a fair comment so less likes why those biased and provoke hatred have so many likes.
Reading through these comments and reading all the salty comments is some great reading material
Please do the same with Carbon Dioxide per capita, It will be more relevant!
No it would not. Northern countries need heat to heat homes!
@@noelgenoway9360 southern countries need air conditioners.
@@noelgenoway9360 Hi! Good Day! Well in India we do need air conditioning and fans during summer which is very brutal. 45-degree centigrade is not very uncommon during our summers. Well, Asians are known to be extremely frugal when consuming resources. It would be an interesting comparison of how developing countries and well-developed countries individuals compare and what is the yearly per capita increase is. I am interested in how the graph starts to flatten or peak.
And most polluted cities as well, it will be interesting
The Moral is that countries should reduce their co2 emissions.
Thanks for your video. Can you make a video about the CO2 by one person of each country?
It would be informative to have a cumulative CO2 production since the industrial revolution comparison.
Entertaining to see Poland and Italy fight for most of it
and... Canada.
Now canada is double.
And pop-wise Poland is ~40m Italy ~60m and Canada ~40m. Shame!
UK went from number 2 in 1960 to 17th today, BUT....we still get protestors !
Because like many rich countries nowaday, they import everything from Asia/Africa. So they produce less Co2 but that gaz emissions is just in different country now.
If China is that high, it's because it's the factory of the world, they produce to every country many different products
@@JeremieFlo - actually, the UK embarked on a de-carbon program in the 2000s - thats the reason. An china stuff is based on stolen ideas from the west , then made by cheap labour.
Like as just stated above :-)
@@VCYT Stolen or not, China is the world's factory. They produce virtually everything in your store, hence the pollution. One country provides for the rest 200 countries, be grateful.
@@YTofuable trouble is, most China stuff is crap. I know from experience. As do others.
Looking forward to Austria vs Czech Republic vs Hungary vs Switzerland :D Also if you see this could you add romania and slovkia as special guests?
Fair play to the uk cut co2 in half.
Hop fully the rest of the world follows what the U.K. did
Hopefully*
@@heemano2 they are following what UK did... First destroy the earth then clean it... But I don't see UK cleaning anyway...
What's the source of this music track? I don't see a link in the description or other credit. Wanted to look up because its awesome.
Same here , I even searched online can't find it
This much capita in China means it is so much in total as China have 1.3 billion people. Oh my God, is this country really care. Why USA leave Paris climate change agreement.
Per Capita CO2 emissions is still very low for China. Qatar and UAE are in fact the most polluting counties. Please make a video on per capita carbon dioxide emissions so that the viewers must not sustain the impression that China is the most CO2 emitting country in the world while in fact Qatar is destroying the planet awfully fast!!!!! Pls Wawamau
Qatar has only like 1 million, and UAE 9 million
doesn't matter taking per capita doesn't make sense
whether you have one person or 100 person polluting the same amount doesn't matter. you're still polluting
What is the name of the music?
Can't find online
It's shame list. Props to USA for trying to decrease CO2 emission in the end
Uh... Donald Trump is president. He ain't decreasing no emissions, dawg.
@@SADebre , actually the US has been decreasing quite a lot... I mean heck look at the end the US easily decreased the most out of everyone. From it's height of 5,785,437 in 2005 to it's final score in 2017 5,045,514.. the US basically dropped the equivelent of Germany's emissions in 2017 by then...
Honestly, more efficient in China cos it supports 1.4 billion lives compared to USA only 0.3 billion by contribute 1/2 of China does.
And here I was watching my country (The Netherlands) only going slightly up (peaking at 187k, only 3x higher than the original start) and then down, until it's no longer in the list.
And we in Germany import quite a few products from there. Many products have somewhat organic "plastic" packages instead of normal ones
You guys also take part in a lot of social or climate related projects in the third world.
France is the way to go, they kept decreasing their CO2 emission
530 000 in 1980
330 000 in 2019
Thanks to nuclear power
Actually, I've heard the reason why Europe's CO2 emission decreases is because the industries that pollute are relocated in third world countries like India or China, while industries in Europe are converted into stuff that don't pollute ^^'
Which makes sense actually.
Assholes are wiping out all the plant life.
France is a huge exporter of energy which is ironic really.
because those french assholes have a million nuclear plants. witch is a million times worse then anything else
That's a lot of co2 for 350 million people..
@Ameen ShindoliTo be fair, C02 emissions count is somewhat different from pollution levels. The Clear Air act passed in the US so many years ago has done wonders to reduce pollution and smog in their cities. There was also conservation projects to clean up rivers and water reservoirs, for example: A river in the US known as the Connecticut river used to be inhospitable, 40 years later it is much cleaner and now most of it is safe for swimming.
India has less overall C02 emissions, yet since the country's industrialization is in full swing, there is yet to be a major conservation effort to curb such pollutants from being present in major population centers.
Not all Americans are stupid, however a lot of them are. That is something I will admit.
Something I have observed is the phenomenon of "Rational Ignorance." Remember to put double quotation marks on ""Rational."" This appears to be something prevalent in many Americans, which refuse to educate themselves not because they are unable but because they are unwilling. Many Americans I have been around are too focused on their personal lives and the weather to give a shit about anything but themselves and their social circle. They say that they are just one person and that even if they were educated it wouldn't matter. In actuality it does, especially when millions of people are having the exact same thought and are doing the exact same thing.
I am ridiculed for having worldly views and being concerned about whats going on around me, which is frustrating. This does highlight something about American culture as a whole, as intellectual discussion is seen as a taboo and is shunned as not proper social etiquette. Thankfully, there are plenty of likeminded people in America who at the very least know Germany is in Central Europe, the UK is an island, and that China is not bordering Mexico (People actually believe this).
Excellent work! It looks like some countries are missing from the list - like the USSR, West Germany, etc.
I would say that having almost 4 times more population than the States, China only emitted barely 2 times CO2 of the States, either something is wrong with the US or China is doing a relatively good job.
If you're truly worried about the environment, total output is the only thing that matters. It is lower per capita because far more than half of the Chinese people live in poverty and are lucky if they have a family bicycle or moped to get to work each day..
@Aaryan Shrestha Indian waters are horribly polluted they got shit, dye and bodies in them
dancnkc half of China’s population is under poverty? Are you still living in 1991 before USSR collapsed?
China is also the factory for the whole world, you should also take that into account.
@@dancnkc After watching all these stats, you are wasting 4 mins of your life if you still believe in these stereotype thing. In fact, half of the Chinese families have their own private cars. China is america's largest creditor
Herzlichen Glückwunsch, du hast einen deutschen Kommentar gefunden!
Guten Tag Kammerad
Jaa... Hauptsache bei uns wird geknausert bis zum Gehtnichtmehr! Mehr Dieselfahrverbote! Mehr Atomaustiege! So wird die Welt gerettet! Jaa... Scheißegal, dass China und USA ein zigfaches jeglichen Einsparpotentials bei uns absichtlich um ein Vielfaches Jahr für Jahr hinzuauspusten! Deutschland muss Verantwortung übernehmen! Mehr Verbote! China macht alles richtig! Ist ja ein 3.Weltland, das noch unterstützt werden muss :) Scheiß Altparteien
2:25
Russia: sorry for being late, I stood in traffic
ВИЧ Опасен this deserves more likes
And that traffic is Soviet Union.
Respect to the UK for cutting back so much.
I guess the USSR did not share its stats on carbon dioxide emissions which would explain why it's not there and why Russia pops up at #3 out of nowhere in 1992.
The USSR is never in these top 20 IIRC.
No shit Sherlock. Or you just look at what the editor already said between 0:28 and 0:48
Not sure why, but the music was great in this video
Producing CO2 is not we must be proud of folks 😐
changu mangu Plants need CO2
@@mtutoriales humans need water , that doesn't mean humans should start living in the sea.
@@changumangu4660 unless technology allows underwater cities or whatever
@@mtutoriales dumbass there should be proportion balance its just causing Global warming
@@PrashantYadav-jj1mw Doesn't change the fact that they need it lol, he talked about producing not the quantity that is produced lol
The UK is doing so much better in recent years
@MarktheSpark The UK has been specialising in tertiary industry for several decades now.
@MarktheSpark I wasn't contradicting you. And industry is basically the production of goods
How about adding a list overall per capita and the percentage of renewable energy over the years
I guess Greta better start learning how to say "how dare you" in Mandarin.
HAHAHAHA 你竟然 ni jing rán
wtf we have 14 hundred million people which is 4 times larger than US
The chinese actually listen to her though, they've stopped importing trash and disposing them for other countries. unlike some politicians and celebrities....
你(you)好(how)大(big)的(of)胆子(dare) !
how big dare of you !
ni hao da de danzi !
Notice how the UK, Italy, France and Poland produce now much less CO2 than before. Those are serious countries! China, the US and others could learn a great deal from them
Is there an updated version of this?
This could be more interesting if u counted EU as whole to see if those eco laws are actually helping, also it would be more comparable number to other 2