Its all about using open IPC cams on ruby, an open IPC can running ruby and a radxa running ruby for your ground smashes it, ruby is packed with features and a fairly major update coming in next few days :)
@CurryKitten jump on the ruby thread on Regroups, many of us are active on there daily including petru who created ruby, I thing you will be very surprised at just how developed ruby is and just keeps getting updates :) Pretty much all pi hardware is supported for ground or air side, radxa 3E/3W for ground with 3C support coming and OpenIPC cams also supported. 4k res supported as well as H265 if using a radxa for ground and OpenIPC for air, the new 794mw RTL8812EU 5.8ghz module is also supported on radxa and OpenIPC The menu based GUI also rocks :D
I agree. Especially now you can use the inav osd like walksnail etc. I cant see why you’d look at openHD these days. I mean that quite genuinely. Would love to see the advantages and disadvantages of each.
@@gosurc1860 Just done my first test of a Runcam WiFi link today, I will still use the larger IMX415 SSC338Q cams for anything they suit but the small size of the runcam really suits a car or a small quad :)
Wow this is crazy but this JUST happened to me tonight on inav 7.1. I had a plane completely ready to fly, was configuring my OSD (last thing I ever do on a new plane). Saved and rebooted, and that went fine. Next time I plugged it into a battery about 10 mins later, FC was all messed up. I ended up flashing new firmware to even be able to connect via usb.
The frame rate feels a little jerky in comparison, but there are better devices to run it on than a regular Pi. I only did a short bit of flying on a quad using OpenHD before I stuffed it into the ground - but I can't recall the latency feeling too bad.. but OpenIPC seemed to feel very good
If you look back a few videos ago, you would have seen that I made the quad, but had to abort the build as picture I was getting was all screwed up. Not entirely sure why - but it was.
Still impressed with your patience and technical ability ....Well done indeed.
Thanks :)
Awesome flying, Wayne! Really nice imagine indeed! 😃
I hope this system gets better and better!
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Thanks MC! :)
That certainly was a endeavor to conquer electron gods . Very well put together. 😊
thanks, good progress
Cheers :)
3:57 is that our belrick? I love the missery no skipping forward for me,
Its all about using open IPC cams on ruby, an open IPC can running ruby and a radxa running ruby for your ground smashes it, ruby is packed with features and a fairly major update coming in next few days :)
I still have a plan to look at Ruby, but there's a bunch of stuff in the queue first
@CurryKitten jump on the ruby thread on Regroups, many of us are active on there daily including petru who created ruby, I thing you will be very surprised at just how developed ruby is and just keeps getting updates :)
Pretty much all pi hardware is supported for ground or air side, radxa 3E/3W for ground with 3C support coming and OpenIPC cams also supported.
4k res supported as well as H265 if using a radxa for ground and OpenIPC for air, the new 794mw RTL8812EU 5.8ghz module is also supported on radxa and OpenIPC
The menu based GUI also rocks :D
I agree. Especially now you can use the inav osd like walksnail etc. I cant see why you’d look at openHD these days. I mean that quite genuinely. Would love to see the advantages and disadvantages of each.
@@gosurc1860 Just done my first test of a Runcam WiFi link today, I will still use the larger IMX415 SSC338Q cams for anything they suit but the small size of the runcam really suits a car or a small quad :)
Wow this is crazy but this JUST happened to me tonight on inav 7.1. I had a plane completely ready to fly, was configuring my OSD (last thing I ever do on a new plane). Saved and rebooted, and that went fine. Next time I plugged it into a battery about 10 mins later, FC was all messed up. I ended up flashing new firmware to even be able to connect via usb.
Amazing video
how much is the latency compared to openipc ?
The frame rate feels a little jerky in comparison, but there are better devices to run it on than a regular Pi. I only did a short bit of flying on a quad using OpenHD before I stuffed it into the ground - but I can't recall the latency feeling too bad.. but OpenIPC seemed to feel very good
Please please make the video about the iflight chimera with open hd
If you look back a few videos ago, you would have seen that I made the quad, but had to abort the build as picture I was getting was all screwed up. Not entirely sure why - but it was.