shawn oldham Just be thankful that they showed us two minutes of him pouring, in case we were in any doubt that he was putting water into an obtuse-looking box.
***** i hope China will destroy USA and OPEC countries and bring them to its knee so that we can make water as new fuel. people in nepal and poor countries will be happy when water is used as fuel.
+norbolt Water fuel with net energy gains? In a lab, probably yes. Are those net gains commercially viable? Most likely not. Give it another 20 years of dedicated, funded R&D and it would be inevitable. Personally though I think solar energy is a way better route than water. We just need to develop practical and stable graphene-based cell storage and more efficient solar collection.
David Chapman simplest form - 2 nails, 2 wires, 1 battery. The nails in a jar of water, hole int he lid for a brake bleed nipple and some hose heading off to your carb. If you're clever with it you can wire it into the reg/rec of your vehicle and use the engines own stator/alternator to provide the 12v to the electrodes.... This system is called HHO and runs alongside your fuel. Check 'em out online - bloody simple to make.
norbolt perhaps I want to supply 12v to the electrodes via a battery which is charged from a solar panel? I'm a motor mechanic and have used an HHO generator on one of my 125cc motorcycles with great effect. Whilst I appreciate your opinion, the evidence I have gained over the last 3 years would show different. I would argue that on larger (car) engines the benefit gain was minimal and pointless.
I agree Harold, it's a simple vapor setup. The only reason the water was poured in the tank is to cover the exhaust outlet to keep it from igniting the flammable liquid in the tank. And there IS flammable liquid in the tank as the engine would not run without the vapors from it. Water is definitely not the fuel running the engine. Why do people lie?
***** There's no need for name calling. If your explanation is the case: Why is the exhaust plumbed into that tank? If it's only hydrogen and Oxygen running your engine and not some other flammable vapor, there's no need for exhaust in the tank. If you were making hydrogen under pressure in the tank, it would escape thru the open valve in the top of your tank. Really now. Do you know what happens when you introduce Hydrogen to hot exhaust gases/flame? BOOM. What you have "recreated" here is a GEET system, it's a type of vapor carb that has nothing to do with electrolysis or hydrogen production whatsoever. The exhaust gases are piped into the tank, water and some combustible liquid are added, the resulting flammable vapors are drawn from the exit tubes of the tank into the intake system of the engine, that with some valve regulated airflow feed the engine a combustible mixture to run on. With your alternate explanation, you may as well be trying to convince people it's a plasma reaction. It's a neat setup but nothing new.
goodday ! mr. paulson? or should i call you professor lazarus. i examine your project, and is amazed how you used a thermal heat conversion theory to put work to a cc moter bike engine. the use of a volume tank as a conservative reverse condense or condensor thermal chamber is high rank. but? only fault i can observe is vent ratio to add oxygen at a consistant rate to complete, the engine revolutions at a high rate when applied, if desired. i believe this complete the conversion reaction, and performance is it's Endeavour.....andy. p.s: good work, i can see our new fuel moving .
Honestly i think alcohol or ethanol was poured into that tank. My reasoning is 1. water doesn't break down grease and after the pour the bottom of his hand that got wet during filling of the tank had the grease cut away very easily and any mechanic knows grease isn't dissolved easily (Good cleaners are alcohol/ethanol, wd40, gasoline, any petroleum product etc), 2. Further evidence of it being an alcohol setup is the way the exhaust is ported through the tank like a heat exchanger as a crude setup such as this one would require heating up the alcohol to increase fumes in turn creating a higher combustion rate as without this process this setup wouldn't run at all or at least very poorly, 3. Even if it did run on just water it would require more than this I.E. a heater tank with a electro plated metal that separates the hydrogen molecules from H20 even the geetz engine addresses that issue, 4. Last but not least if it was water and this motor employees the same technology as the geetz engine it has to primed by a more combustible liquid or gas or Itd never start, after priming with crude oil/gasoline/ether etc it'd have to run long enough for the system to properly begin the chemical or molecular conversion of the hydrogen molecules, simply put its too crude to run on simply H20 alone... Take a big drink from the bottle, show the tank is empty with a stick that touches bottom of tank and didn't get wet, then disconnect supply lines from motor to ensure they aren't prefilled with gasoline etc, then take drink of water big enough to ensure its water, fill tank with it, then allow water to run from lines before connecting motor, after confirming water from the lines reconnect, then start the engine. It's very easy to fake this and like alot of the fakes they always show conveniently short videos, basically only long enough so that the fuel supply lines that are prefilled with gasoline can run the engine just long enough for the video to appear like your running on water. basically you get 30-60 seconds idle time on a motor this size 250cc or 600cc with lines approximately 2 ft in length full of gas, those are the only two plausible explanations...
hahaha some people were very funny commenting this video, read this clearly before commenting : THERE IS NO EVEN A TRACE OF ELECTROLYSIS DEMONSTRATION IN THIS VIDEO !!! Paulson does not even talk and write this is a video of small engine using electrolysis !!! So guys please keep your attitude don't comment if you don't know what you are looking and try to look like a scientist !
Maybe a bigger cylinder + lighter pistons... to increase the fuel's cubic inch "bang" per cylinder cycle. I know there are a few special light weight types of aluminium blocks out there that you could buy, & take a trip to the local machine shop with, & maybe give them a normal Piston to load into the computer, then cut out your super light weight version from your provided materials. Just a thought. I love seeing you guys do this stuff. :)
Hes holding it in one hand at the top of the bottle, its a 2 litre bottle by the looks of it, probably going to be hard to hold precisely, since hes holding camera in the other hand.
How?? Does it heat the water like a steam engine? Or does it use some kind of electricity to electrically seperate the atoms and make it create enough pressure to move the pistons??
Once he uses electrolysis to convert the liquid into a gas he is no longer fueling the engine with water, it is a hydrogen gas powered engine. Without an external power source to convert the water to a gas the engine won't run. This is as stupid as saying you are running your car on corn because you use methanol made from corn....
How did you get the timing to work using a completely different fuel and retain the stock ecu? That ecu isnt programmable and that fuel has to be a complrtely different octane rating than gasoline?? I mean even a pure ethanol or methanol engine cannot run on a gasoline tune..
water is composed of two things, hydrogen and oxygen, basically a litre of water will get you half a litre of hydrogen, but it comes from water so that's why its called water to fuel.
Cracking the water will burn and it will work. Pull the electrons out of the water. But as you can see it is a small amount that he uses. The rpm's are low
is gas production and consumption ratio is equal? I think O2 and H2 gas production is too much slow than fuel consumption by engine. so this technique will not work properly.
Hello my friend, are you installing your gadget in your country how much? here in the Philippines there are many water fuel installators, the famous one is the Dazo fuel water installators.
Water could be considered as a result of a combustion (some combustions), so how can it be used to produce work when it has no energy at all. In all water bottles you can see it has almost 0 joule of energy, we cannot use water to keep the warm of our body at a constant level. I'm not pretty sure if electrolysis would be the future. Is hydrogen really good for solar energy storage?
ipnorospo38 you sir, need to go back to school. mater = energy = mater = energy. A bomb is inert until you light it up. Does a bomb keep you warm if you hug it, no? Does it keep you warm if you light it up, most certainly.
well he is using a steam explosion inside the diesel powered motorcycle 350 cc engine and it is doing very well...bcoz the inside temperature vaporises the water mist sprayed inside very quickly into steam, but it is not visible bcoz the steam is negligible in amount.
So I don't get it, your using water, taking out hydrogen oxygen with electricity, then using the power once that reaction begins, to run a generator? Is that correct? So guess u could have hose tap into a river? Run it forever? Charging batteries or whatever? Just sending current thru water? Or added salts or something???
OK so can you explain this : If you take the energy to propel the car from the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen taken from the water (which basically means turning H and O back into water) that also means you have to spend energy to separate H and O atoms. Which consumes as much energy (if not more) than the opposite reaction produces. So even if your engine produced the electricity for the electrolysis you wouldn't have any energy left for the primary use of the engine: moving the car. A system cannot produce more energy than it consumes. Source : Any basic physics book.
Zeet If you read these book carefully you could know that opposite reaction produces the exact same amount of energy. So if you can burn all H2 back and can provide separation without losses on heating, magnetic fields and so on, the only inefficient thing here will be engine itself.
BestHolkin Except you CANNOT provide separation without losses. So you'll always have losses. Here the water is simply used as a way to convey energy, not as a source of energy.
It depend on what do you call the system. Of your system contains both separator and burner water is not a source of energy. So I see this video as a prof of concept using H2 in specific engine. Not a perpetuum mobile in any case.
BestHolkin Yeah I agree, his engine runs on Hydrogen, but his claim of making his engine run on water as fuel is false, as the real fuel (the energy source) is not the water itself.
if this is a form of the Geet then water is an additive not the main fuel. All the indications are that this is a geet that is hidden in the large fuel tank. I have made a geet and they run the same way as this. Its hard to find the sweet spot and it changes with the temperature of the system and the fuel is constantly changing the longer it runs. So what makes this better than the geet ?
How many kJ (kilojoules) per liter does Hydrogen have? Hydrogen has approximately 12 kJ (kilojoules) per liter 1 horsepower hour = 2,684.5195 kilojoules 2,684.5195 kilojoules / 60 minutes = 44.7 kilojoules per minute 44.7 kilojoules / 12 kilojoules = 3.7 liters per minute of Hydrogen needed to produce 1 horsepower? So too run a 20hp engine on HH0 would require 3.7liters per minute X 20Hp. = 74.5 liters per minute
ke4uyp And if you do some more checking you will find that a 75 liter per minute HHO generator is as big as a car and the batteries to run it have to be as big as two cars.
Great video! After looking how to fill a tank (sloppy) and some (vage) holes an engine starts to run (with some initial hickups), but it gives me no clue as to what is happening. Did I miss something?
Its not a fake, everyone say "fake' is a dub, the water is separated in oxygen and hydrogen , then burned in the motor. The battery is fondamental to separate water in a prices called electrolisis
he's running it either on propane or natural gas, thats why he has no carb on it. Plus you can hear it hiss the second time he starts it, just my opinion!
But that's like saying I use oil as fuel in my unleaded petrol engine. The 21% oxygen in air is used to reverse the reaction. If you used the pure oxygen coming off the electrolysis reaction you'd blow up your engine (that's just a guess).
Phyankord hey I just wanna tell you that hydrogen do not neet oxygen to burn. it can burn without oxygen ! thats why it is very unstable and fatal to store in a cylinder. You cannot use water as fuel until you separates oxygen and hydrogen.
gaurav chaudhary hydrogen needs a catalyst in order to react, lighting pure hydrogen up with a spark isent going to cause a reaction because there is nothing for it to react to. basics of combustion, you need 3 ingredients, you need 2 fuel aka hydrogen, 1 oxidizer aka oxygen, and somthing to initiate the reaction between the two aka heat.
That alternator is not even connected to power the crankshaft nor does the engine itself run (note that it should have been loud and vibrated as hell) so this is most likely not real.
He has calcium carbide in the tank. That is why he has to tighten the cover of the tube. If he connects a glass bottle of water to the engine, it wont work.
Using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, then burning the oxygen and hydrogen back to water, generating less energy (And power) than the energy spent in electricity (Energy is lost as heat).... Technically works, but it's useless to do the electrolysis, a waste of energy and weight. You better connect the battery directly to the engine. What you CAN do, is do the electrolysis earlier to load an "Hydrogen tank", then use the now full tank to power an engine, thus using the hydrogen as an energy transportator. This is better because hydrogen generates more power (Energy per second) when previously produced than electricity in an electrolysis, unlike doing it at the same time, where the whole process has the electrolysis as a bottleneck. It's still less energy than provided by the battery overall, but more power.
How can you expect people to take you seriously when you show no plans, or even evidence of hydrogen production..... same as all the others all talk, no evidence. Believe me I'd love you to prove me wrong but I know you won't.
This video may very well be fake but it has been done before. With an extremely powerful enough spark it will split the water atoms apart resulting in a sufficient explosion making the engine run. Although this is very difficult. Pure hydrogen would be a better solution.
you right, but i don't particularly know your field, coz for the humanities, if u want to tell me that every research written at masters or PHD level is new, then i need to know what was your research about at all levels,, however i was meaning most universities on rare occasions teach how to invent new things, so if u think in view that the best place to create a new idea is a university,i believe it is only a best place to expound on already existing facts. watch properly a TH-cam full report about that brazilian guy, en listen to response from the university professor frm US, u will get ma point may be.......... and your assumption sir was wrong......and am a pragmatist, every day i leave in world of creating new things....
Think I'll stick with the gas at the moment, as I have to get to work on time,maybe after another 25yrs development ,and I'll have a browse round the showroom !.
Are your eyes painted on or are you legally blind? The black spark plug lead is clearly attached to the spark plug on the cylinder head and the other end to a small coil....... Doh!
it appears that this is a GEET set up....if the single speed running could be smoothed out to run a generator non stop, it would be an effective way to produce electricity, limited only by the life of the generator head. Geet Engines supposedly make engines run cooler and with no harmful emmissions. engines run cleaner and last indefinitely longer than petrol engines. this would be an ideal generator to help power electric vehicles. If the batteries were not replinished by the time the vehicle reached it's destination the generator could continue to run until the batteries were completely recharged before being automaticly shut down.
Using this setup is less energy efficient than driving your car with the starter motor. He is using power from the grid to split water into hydrogen and oxygen than using that to power the motor. The only way this would make sense is using the hydrogen as a battery. By converting water into hydrogen gas you are essentially storing the electricity(well, storing the energy), although you will get far less energy out than what you put in, it would still be more energy dense than big battery banks. However, as some sort of "free energy" or other scheme its pretty silly.
Esteban Matus you mean fuel cells? Most car companies have fuel cell prototypes. Theyre not very viable right now because producing the hydrogen needed to fuel all of our cars would take enormous amounts of energy produced by burning fossil fuels. So it makes more sense just to power cars with the fossil fuels, instead of the diminished return you would get from making the hydrogen, unless we used nuclear power, it would generate more carbon than just using gasoline
I love it how back yard hackers can cobble up bits of rubbish in their back sheds and claim they can do what the auto and engine manufacturing industry with all their resources and facilities can't. Of course if one of these backyarders actually had anything remotely creditable they might be a bit more believable to people other than the dreamers and gullible.
Milin Pinero What you said is silly. All energy is free. Gasoline is free, just buy the mineral rights, drill the well, pump up the crude, refine it into gasoline and there you go - free fuel. Same with solar panels and wind power, just build and maintain the equipment you need to harvest the free energy and there you go. Water is free just like gasoline, though I do pay for my water as most people do, but you still have to get the water, buy the equipment to convert it to fuel and maintain that equipment. Anyone can do it, it is simply more expensive than other forms of energy so no one does. Nobody is winding up dead because FREE energy requires equipment, maintenance and distribution just like all sources of energy. And this technology is well known to everyone so there is no point to killing anyone.
Cmon dude,It ain't backyard hackery...It's just politics.The industry uses conventional fuel because of "demand" and "availability",oh and also the oil industry will die if everyone runs their car of HHO.That is all.
Ilen Vantev You are correct, the oil industry only exists because people want to buy gas, if they didn't, the oil industry would take their money and provide something else people want to buy. Believe me, the oil industry doesn't give one shit about the oil industry, they care about making money. The moment the oil industry stops making money they will be gone and they can't do one thing about it. They sure don't have to worry about HHO though as it is useless as a fuel substitute.
Space Cowboy I've always believed that planned obsolescence carries a great risk, someone that doesn't care about long term business survival can make something that lasts and nobody would want the old products that wear out anymore. Of course, once everybody that wants one, has one, you would go out of business. But, who cares? If this is your own business, and you don't have shareholders that you have to make richer forever, you can make your money, close-up shop and be okay. Your clock sound exactly like one of those products. I have clocks all over the house, some are plugged into the wall, most need batteries and I have to reset them when they lose power or the battery runs down - what a pain and expense. If you marketed a line of clocks that simply work for decades, who would want to buy any other kind of clock?
+Sanjaya Sampath Other way around buddy. 2 Hydrogens and 1 Oxygen. With electricity. Large voltage and low current, or high current, low voltage. Current car ignition coils produce approx 30,000v from a 12v battery. Very cool. This should do the job. ;)
Guys dont believe what u see exactly...even it may be ethil alchohol..and also how do we believe that the poured water must have been used to start or run the motor..there may be some hidden place to water and diesel separately ..this guy is not explaining anything thats why we have to think like it may be cheat...if its true i really appreciate this..anyway he could start but couldnt keep the engine running continuously..try better.
what a crock. apart from the fact that it isn't running on water. it is just what everybody would want, a hard to start engine that makes no power. yes sir i'll take 3
Back in the old days, we used a simple apparatus called a funnel. That minute of pouring liquid was pretty darn suspense building.
Well done! Great effort, at least you have made a start, it just needs more trial and error and progression and you'll get there.
Excellent.
All that technology and no funnel.
shawn oldham Just be thankful that they showed us two minutes of him pouring, in case we were in any doubt that he was putting water into an obtuse-looking box.
shawn oldham cause water is abundant. water for life and water for transportation. fuck america and OPEC for ruling the world on oil.
***** i hope China will destroy USA and OPEC countries and bring them to its knee so that we can make water as new fuel.
people in nepal and poor countries will be happy when water is used as fuel.
+norbolt Water fuel with net energy gains? In a lab, probably yes. Are those net gains commercially viable? Most likely not. Give it another 20 years of dedicated, funded R&D and it would be inevitable. Personally though I think solar energy is a way better route than water. We just need to develop practical and stable graphene-based cell storage and more efficient solar collection.
+norbolt Never mind peer reviewed scientific papers. Just explain where the energy comes from without resorting to magic and the occult...
I wish I could have seen the electrical components for the electrolysis process. Keep it up...it's the future.
David Chapman simplest form - 2 nails, 2 wires, 1 battery.
The nails in a jar of water, hole int he lid for a brake bleed nipple and some hose heading off to your carb.
If you're clever with it you can wire it into the reg/rec of your vehicle and use the engines own stator/alternator to provide the 12v to the electrodes....
This system is called HHO and runs alongside your fuel. Check 'em out online - bloody simple to make.
norbolt perhaps I want to supply 12v to the electrodes via a battery which is charged from a solar panel? I'm a motor mechanic and have used an HHO generator on one of my 125cc motorcycles with great effect. Whilst I appreciate your opinion, the evidence I have gained over the last 3 years would show different. I would argue that on larger (car) engines the benefit gain was minimal and pointless.
my motorcycle creates 14.6v AFTER going through the reg/rec. This system runs on 12v. Efficient :)
+TheAdventuresOfKalamooty you need to get those specs in Watts (Volts x Amps) and if it creates more energy in watts i'd be surprised
Basic high school physics say it is not the future and cannot ever be the future.
I agree Harold, it's a simple vapor setup. The only reason the water was poured in the tank is to cover the exhaust outlet to keep it from igniting the flammable liquid in the tank. And there IS flammable liquid in the tank as the engine would not run without the vapors from it. Water is definitely not the fuel running the engine. Why do people lie?
***** There's no need for name calling. If your explanation is the case: Why is the exhaust plumbed into that tank? If it's only hydrogen and Oxygen running your engine and not some other flammable vapor, there's no need for exhaust in the tank. If you were making hydrogen under pressure in the tank, it would escape thru the open valve in the top of your tank. Really now. Do you know what happens when you introduce Hydrogen to hot exhaust gases/flame? BOOM. What you have "recreated" here is a GEET system, it's a type of vapor carb that has nothing to do with electrolysis or hydrogen production whatsoever. The exhaust gases are piped into the tank, water and some combustible liquid are added, the resulting flammable vapors are drawn from the exit tubes of the tank into the intake system of the engine, that with some valve regulated airflow feed the engine a combustible mixture to run on. With your alternate explanation, you may as well be trying to convince people it's a plasma reaction. It's a neat setup but nothing new.
***** As I said Hanz...they walk among us...be watchful...sometimes they bite.
Not much BUT a GOOD START,,,hope you keep working on it,,,Congrats.
I'm thinking the sparks that close to the carb with hydrogen fuel is a safety hazard but way to go man. Let's en more.
Can I use sand instead of oil in my water engine?
ground up diamond dust works better
Yes, you can but first you have to check the sand quality......lol
Please do.
I use 20-30 grit in summer. Winter I use just cheap fitty grit. When I'm racing down the quarter etc 90 grit is great my engine never leaks
SURE ,,, YOU MAY USE STONE AS FUEL ...LOL
there is alcohol in the bottle, and I think he drank half of it. he couldn't even pour it in, unless he has Parkinson
nostradamus21es lol
roflmao
thats no bullshit good work mate more people need to be doin this shit water powered shit has been around for years its only a matter of time
goodday ! mr. paulson? or should i call you professor lazarus. i examine your project, and is amazed how you used a thermal heat conversion theory to put work to a cc moter bike engine. the use of a volume tank as a conservative reverse condense or condensor thermal chamber is high rank. but? only fault i can observe is vent ratio to add oxygen at a consistant rate to complete, the engine revolutions at a high rate when applied, if desired. i believe this complete the conversion reaction, and performance is it's Endeavour.....andy. p.s: good work, i can see our new fuel moving .
Y engine stopped when he open lid?
Honestly i think alcohol or ethanol was poured into that tank. My reasoning is 1. water doesn't break down grease and after the pour the bottom of his hand that got wet during filling of the tank had the grease cut away very easily and any mechanic knows grease isn't dissolved easily (Good cleaners are alcohol/ethanol, wd40, gasoline, any petroleum product etc), 2. Further evidence of it being an alcohol setup is the way the exhaust is ported through the tank like a heat exchanger as a crude setup such as this one would require heating up the alcohol to increase fumes in turn creating a higher combustion rate as without this process this setup wouldn't run at all or at least very poorly, 3. Even if it did run on just water it would require more than this I.E. a heater tank with a electro plated metal that separates the hydrogen molecules from H20 even the geetz engine addresses that issue, 4. Last but not least if it was water and this motor employees the same technology as the geetz engine it has to primed by a more combustible liquid or gas or Itd never start, after priming with crude oil/gasoline/ether etc it'd have to run long enough for the system to properly begin the chemical or molecular conversion of the hydrogen molecules, simply put its too crude to run on simply H20 alone... Take a big drink from the bottle, show the tank is empty with a stick that touches bottom of tank and didn't get wet, then disconnect supply lines from motor to ensure they aren't prefilled with gasoline etc, then take drink of water big enough to ensure its water, fill tank with it, then allow water to run from lines before connecting motor, after confirming water from the lines reconnect, then start the engine. It's very easy to fake this and like alot of the fakes they always show conveniently short videos, basically only long enough so that the fuel supply lines that are prefilled with gasoline can run the engine just long enough for the video to appear like your running on water. basically you get 30-60 seconds idle time on a motor this size 250cc or 600cc with lines approximately 2 ft in length full of gas, those are the only two plausible explanations...
hahaha some people were very funny commenting this video, read this clearly before commenting :
THERE IS NO EVEN A TRACE OF ELECTROLYSIS DEMONSTRATION IN THIS VIDEO !!!
Paulson does not even talk and write this is a video of small engine using electrolysis !!!
So guys please keep your attitude don't comment if you don't know what you are looking and try to look like a scientist !
Yea!
Im curious how he got the timing to work with a completely different fuel, using a factory non programble ecu?
Maybe a bigger cylinder + lighter pistons... to increase the fuel's cubic inch "bang" per cylinder cycle. I know there are a few special light weight types of aluminium blocks out there that you could buy, & take a trip to the local machine shop with, & maybe give them a normal Piston to load into the computer, then cut out your super light weight version from your provided materials. Just a thought. I love seeing you guys do this stuff. :)
This guy can't even pour water into a pipe
oh really tell me more ? oh i don't care
Yes you do, you replied. The first 50 seconds says it all.
oh really go on this took me closer to 10 out of my 24 hours bud
elijah perez
What? LOL WTF does that mean?
Hes holding it in one hand at the top of the bottle, its a 2 litre bottle by the looks of it, probably going to be hard to hold precisely, since hes holding camera in the other hand.
How?? Does it heat the water like a steam engine? Or does it use some kind of electricity to electrically seperate the atoms and make it create enough pressure to move the pistons??
how water got heated instantly? did u use chemical to separate water or used steam burner?
Please explaind what are you doing and how this works
It's not water in the bottle. It's probably alcohol
+cameron Hughes See the low revs of that engine?.... it´s probably not alcohol
+cameron Hughes He uses electrolysis to seperate the hydrogen molecules from the water, Then he runs it into a modified Internal combustion engine.
Once he uses electrolysis to convert the liquid into a gas he is no longer fueling the engine with water, it is a hydrogen gas powered engine. Without an external power source to convert the water to a gas the engine won't run.
This is as stupid as saying you are running your car on corn because you use methanol made from corn....
Yes I think so
How did you get the timing to work using a completely different fuel and retain the stock ecu? That ecu isnt programmable and that fuel has to be a complrtely different octane rating than gasoline?? I mean even a pure ethanol or methanol engine cannot run on a gasoline tune..
water is composed of two things, hydrogen and oxygen, basically a litre of water will get you half a litre of hydrogen, but it comes from water so that's why its called water to fuel.
tama gusto nila kc tubig nlng tlga.. shempre galing s tubig n para mka buo ng two element para mag produce ng gas....
why are there 2 inlets and 2 outlets on tank if it runs on straight water?
Cracking the water will burn and it will work. Pull the electrons out of the water. But as you can see it is a small amount that he uses. The rpm's are low
Put a hollow metal ball between carb and intake manifold atomizes and vaporizes gas doubles gas mileage and it works, please try this
its water&calcium carbonate mixture which produces gas which is used as fuel
One Question, what is the tank from the inside?
Thanks.
Nice keep up the good work. Next put this in a light weight dune buggy with a good muffler and drive across country.
It's like watching a serious stoned drunkard trying to remain standing and pee at the same time loll
is the electrolysis of water happening in the tank?
is gas production and consumption ratio is equal? I think O2 and H2 gas production is too much slow than fuel consumption by engine. so this technique will not work properly.
How are you supposed to get any usable work out of it when it can barely keep itself running?!
cool, so did you split the water into hydrogen or what, please explain
Hello my friend, are you installing your gadget in your country how much? here in the Philippines there are many water fuel installators, the famous one is the Dazo fuel water installators.
which powder mix in the bottle
Water could be considered as a result of a combustion (some combustions), so how can it be used to produce work when it has no energy at all. In all water bottles you can see it has almost 0 joule of energy, we cannot use water to keep the warm of our body at a constant level. I'm not pretty sure if electrolysis would be the future. Is hydrogen really good for solar energy storage?
ipnorospo38 you sir, need to go back to school. mater = energy = mater = energy. A bomb is inert until you light it up. Does a bomb keep you warm if you hug it, no? Does it keep you warm if you light it up, most certainly.
Thanh Tran No comment, really.
well he is using a steam explosion inside the diesel powered motorcycle 350 cc engine and it is doing very well...bcoz the inside temperature vaporises the water mist sprayed inside very quickly into steam, but it is not visible bcoz the steam is negligible in amount.
So I don't get it, your using water, taking out hydrogen oxygen with electricity, then using the power once that reaction begins, to run a generator? Is that correct? So guess u could have hose tap into a river? Run it forever? Charging batteries or whatever? Just sending current thru water? Or added salts or something???
OK so can you explain this :
If you take the energy to propel the car from the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen taken from the water (which basically means turning H and O back into water) that also means you have to spend energy to separate H and O atoms. Which consumes as much energy (if not more) than the opposite reaction produces. So even if your engine produced the electricity for the electrolysis you wouldn't have any energy left for the primary use of the engine: moving the car.
A system cannot produce more energy than it consumes.
Source : Any basic physics book.
Zeet If you read these book carefully you could know that opposite reaction produces the exact same amount of energy. So if you can burn all H2 back and can provide separation without losses on heating, magnetic fields and so on, the only inefficient thing here will be engine itself.
BestHolkin Except you CANNOT provide separation without losses. So you'll always have losses. Here the water is simply used as a way to convey energy, not as a source of energy.
It depend on what do you call the system. Of your system contains both separator and burner water is not a source of energy.
So I see this video as a prof of concept using H2 in specific engine. Not a perpetuum mobile in any case.
Sorry for mistypes.
BestHolkin Yeah I agree, his engine runs on Hydrogen, but his claim of making his engine run on water as fuel is false, as the real fuel (the energy source) is not the water itself.
pero como el AGUA hace combustion en el barril de los cilindros?? debe ser alcohol !!.. pero esa idea esta genial.. Amigo sigue adelante !! 👍👍
Why would it be only intended for generators?
you keep it up, your on to something!
if this is a form of the Geet then water is an additive not the main fuel. All the indications are that this is a geet that is hidden in the large fuel tank. I have made a geet and they run the same way as this. Its hard to find the sweet spot and it changes with the temperature of the system and the fuel is constantly changing the longer it runs. So what makes this better than the geet ?
Hello Paulson,
Do you furnish the complete plan with all details, so we could build one like that at our own home ? How to get it ? Thanks very much !
Oh, these comments.. People should really do some research before saying anything ;)
How many kJ (kilojoules) per liter does Hydrogen have? Hydrogen has approximately 12 kJ (kilojoules) per liter
1 horsepower hour = 2,684.5195 kilojoules
2,684.5195 kilojoules / 60 minutes = 44.7 kilojoules per minute
44.7 kilojoules / 12 kilojoules = 3.7 liters per minute of Hydrogen needed to produce 1 horsepower?
So too run a 20hp engine on HH0 would require
3.7liters per minute X 20Hp. = 74.5 liters per minute
ke4uyp
And if you do some more checking you will find that a 75 liter per minute HHO generator is as big as a car and the batteries to run it have to be as big as two cars.
so and how does this work then?
is that posible......kya aap bike m instal kar demo dikhayenge....
Great video! After looking how to fill a tank (sloppy) and some (vage) holes an engine starts to run (with some initial hickups), but it gives me no clue as to what is happening. Did I miss something?
Is there anywhere in Australia I can get someone to set this up for me in my Van?
SUPERB bro,but we can abel to mention mechanism
Its not a fake, everyone say "fake' is a dub, the water is separated in oxygen and hydrogen , then burned in the motor. The battery is fondamental to separate water in a prices called electrolisis
he's running it either on propane or natural gas, thats why he has no carb on it. Plus you can hear it hiss the second time he starts it, just my opinion!
Why do all these videos say they use water as fuel. Isn't it hydrogen?
yup I ask the same question
because water is hydrogen and oxygen. which means you have both the fuel and the oxygen necessary to produce combustion.
But that's like saying I use oil as fuel in my unleaded petrol engine.
The 21% oxygen in air is used to reverse the reaction. If you used the pure oxygen coming off the electrolysis reaction you'd blow up your engine (that's just a guess).
Phyankord hey I just wanna tell you that hydrogen do not neet oxygen to burn. it can burn without oxygen ! thats why it is very unstable and fatal to store in a cylinder. You cannot use water as fuel until you separates oxygen and hydrogen.
gaurav chaudhary
hydrogen needs a catalyst in order to react, lighting pure hydrogen up with a spark isent going to cause a reaction because there is nothing for it to react to.
basics of combustion, you need 3 ingredients, you need 2 fuel aka hydrogen, 1 oxidizer aka oxygen, and somthing to initiate the reaction between the two aka heat.
Calcium carbide reacts with water to produce acetylene gas. WHICH IS USED FOR COMBUSTION
CaC2(s)+2H2O(l)→C2H2(g)+Ca(OH)2(aq)
how many waterpower?
how long time it's working?
That alternator is not even connected to power the crankshaft nor does the engine itself run (note that it should have been loud and vibrated as hell) so this is most likely not real.
Paul, is this a variant of the GEET technology? I can see a similarity..
what you save on gas will be needed for a new starter motor.
uhhh...wasn't that the coil wire hanging in space?
Water fuelled vehicles. will be revolutionised transportation.
I cannot afford water for my bike, is there an alternative option?
He has calcium carbide in the tank. That is why he has to tighten the cover of the tube. If he connects a glass bottle of water to the engine, it wont work.
All that technology and not a syllable of explanation. Absolutely useless!
Using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, then burning the oxygen and hydrogen back to water, generating less energy (And power) than the energy spent in electricity (Energy is lost as heat).... Technically works, but it's useless to do the electrolysis, a waste of energy and weight. You better connect the battery directly to the engine. What you CAN do, is do the electrolysis earlier to load an "Hydrogen tank", then use the now full tank to power an engine, thus using the hydrogen as an energy transportator. This is better because hydrogen generates more power (Energy per second) when previously produced than electricity in an electrolysis, unlike doing it at the same time, where the whole process has the electrolysis as a bottleneck. It's still less energy than provided by the battery overall, but more power.
this is a modified geet thing. I can see the intake and exhaust going into the big as hell tank. I dont think this will ever run a gen. with a load
How can you expect people to take you seriously when you show no plans, or even evidence of hydrogen production..... same as all the others all talk, no evidence. Believe me I'd love you to prove me wrong but I know you won't.
+Justin Steer I take from granted that this gut isn´t an engineer or anything like that... his methods and knowledge are somehow... poor
No issue about the plan Nikolai Tesla never recognize by many until he passed away
who invented the first funnel i know it was a guy named spillard
You really don't need that big thing. All you need is two small jars and holes.
This video may very well be fake but it has been done before. With an extremely powerful enough spark it will split the water atoms apart resulting in a sufficient explosion making the engine run. Although this is very difficult. Pure hydrogen would be a better solution.
OK so the dude made a video ... true or not .... you all watched .... enjoy the moment ! ... It passed time regardless
1989 the Filipino inventor made car run by water. They tested so many times. But the government not interested to help the inventor.
it is true, Universities, teach only the known, and we spend a lot of time
learning da already existing facts
you right, but i don't particularly know your field, coz for the humanities, if u want to tell me that every research written at masters or PHD level is new, then i need to know what was your research about at all levels,, however i was meaning most universities on rare occasions teach how to invent new things, so if u think in view that the best place to create a new idea is a university,i believe it is only a best place to expound on already existing facts. watch properly a TH-cam full report about that brazilian guy, en listen to response from the university professor frm US, u will get ma point may be.......... and your assumption sir was wrong......and am a pragmatist, every day i leave in world of creating new things....
Think I'll stick with the gas at the moment, as I have to get to work on time,maybe after another 25yrs development ,and I'll have a browse round the showroom !.
No spark plug, dieseling?
Are your eyes painted on or are you legally blind? The black spark plug lead is clearly attached to the spark plug on the cylinder head and the other end to a small coil....... Doh!
Hello, is run only with water?
Spilled fuel everywhere. Never called the EPA hazmat team.
pentone process?
...low power even for generator..., what is geet sistem ?
it appears that this is a GEET set up....if the single speed running could be smoothed out to run a generator non stop, it would be an effective way to produce electricity, limited only by the life of the generator head. Geet Engines supposedly make engines run cooler and with no harmful emmissions. engines run cleaner and last indefinitely longer than petrol engines. this would be an ideal generator to help power electric vehicles. If the batteries were not replinished by the time the vehicle reached it's destination the generator could continue to run until the batteries were completely recharged before being automaticly shut down.
Add a hollow metal ball between carb and intake manifold atomizes and vaporizes gas doubles gas mileage
its geet...okej....nice...cleen water?
where can i. get the kit
The battery is used for the initial start
Maybe this is the reason Nestle stealing water around the world under the frase "water is not a human right"
can we have a video explaining how we can make this ourselves?
Using this setup is less energy efficient than driving your car with the starter motor. He is using power from the grid to split water into hydrogen and oxygen than using that to power the motor. The only way this would make sense is using the hydrogen as a battery. By converting water into hydrogen gas you are essentially storing the electricity(well, storing the energy), although you will get far less energy out than what you put in, it would still be more energy dense than big battery banks. However, as some sort of "free energy" or other scheme its pretty silly.
+Nate Elliott Wasn´t Honda working in something like that?... YEARS ago?
Esteban Matus you mean fuel cells? Most car companies have fuel cell prototypes. Theyre not very viable right now because producing the hydrogen needed to fuel all of our cars would take enormous amounts of energy produced by burning fossil fuels. So it makes more sense just to power cars with the fossil fuels, instead of the diminished return you would get from making the hydrogen, unless we used nuclear power, it would generate more carbon than just using gasoline
Well explained... thanks Nate Elliot
I love it how back yard hackers can cobble up bits of rubbish in their back sheds and claim they can do what the auto and engine manufacturing industry with all their resources and facilities can't.
Of course if one of these backyarders actually had anything remotely creditable they might be a bit more believable to people other than the dreamers and gullible.
Milin Pinero
What you said is silly.
All energy is free. Gasoline is free, just buy the mineral rights, drill the well, pump up the crude, refine it into gasoline and there you go - free fuel. Same with solar panels and wind power, just build and maintain the equipment you need to harvest the free energy and there you go. Water is free just like gasoline, though I do pay for my water as most people do, but you still have to get the water, buy the equipment to convert it to fuel and maintain that equipment. Anyone can do it, it is simply more expensive than other forms of energy so no one does.
Nobody is winding up dead because FREE energy requires equipment, maintenance and distribution just like all sources of energy. And this technology is well known to everyone so there is no point to killing anyone.
Cmon dude,It ain't backyard hackery...It's just politics.The industry uses conventional fuel because of "demand" and "availability",oh and also the oil industry will die if everyone runs their car of HHO.That is all.
The energy consumption for the electrolysis part makes this idea obsolete.
Ilen Vantev
You are correct, the oil industry only exists because people want to buy gas, if they didn't, the oil industry would take their money and provide something else people want to buy. Believe me, the oil industry doesn't give one shit about the oil industry, they care about making money. The moment the oil industry stops making money they will be gone and they can't do one thing about it.
They sure don't have to worry about HHO though as it is useless as a fuel substitute.
Space Cowboy
I've always believed that planned obsolescence carries a great risk, someone that doesn't care about long term business survival can make something that lasts and nobody would want the old products that wear out anymore. Of course, once everybody that wants one, has one, you would go out of business. But, who cares? If this is your own business, and you don't have shareholders that you have to make richer forever, you can make your money, close-up shop and be okay.
Your clock sound exactly like one of those products. I have clocks all over the house, some are plugged into the wall, most need batteries and I have to reset them when they lose power or the battery runs down - what a pain and expense. If you marketed a line of clocks that simply work for decades, who would want to buy any other kind of clock?
water should break into two oxygens & one hydrogen.And that H uses as the fuel.Isn't that right??
but how did you do that?
+Sanjaya Sampath Other way around buddy. 2 Hydrogens and 1 Oxygen.
With electricity. Large voltage and low current, or high current, low voltage. Current car ignition coils produce approx 30,000v from a 12v battery. Very cool. This should do the job. ;)
thanks.MY bad about the H2O
i saw this all televsion beyond tomorrow they show people who sucessful create with run the engine with all source in the world
Looks like Calcium carbide + water -> acetylene + some modifications in the engine.
how do you make it
Please change the video category from "science and technology" to "voodoo magic"!
Tank has two shells I think one has water another has fuel,Viewers observe the tank first we are not mad
Venkatesh Bandam ,yes it's an important guess, mixture that is obtained through the carborator is set in its tank .
have to share the project you feis so you can make one here in Brazil
Please explain the mechanism.
Guys dont believe what u see exactly...even it may be ethil alchohol..and also how do we believe that the poured water must have been used to start or run the motor..there may be some hidden place to water and diesel separately ..this guy is not explaining anything thats why we have to think like it may be cheat...if its true i really appreciate this..anyway he could start but couldnt keep the engine running continuously..try better.
yes i heard someone say you may be able to run them on petrol ;)
Awesome, The laws of thermodynamics was changed by humans. Now can some one show how to make the anti-gravity device?
what a crock. apart from the fact that it isn't running on water. it is just what everybody would want, a hard to start engine that makes no power. yes sir i'll take 3
can u explain me exactly how it work
+FieldMarshal can we use h2 gas or we have to use hydrogen in liquid form