Sign up for SKILLSHARE: skl.sh/screenprism19 Support ScreenPrism on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=7792695 Subscribe to keep up with our latest videos, and let us know what you want to see next!
Yep but Jack could've taught her to live and give her a lifetime of adventure and love , they could have shared that life. Many times people are in our lives that shape who we are and don't necessarily have to die,in my opinion this served as a dramatic effect and nothing more
This has made me realize Jack served a purpose that’s stereotypically given to female characters insofar as bolstering a male character and giving them a reason to go on. I never noticed that flip before, and it’s pretty brilliant for a late 90s romance set in a historical tragedy.
I read an article about this recently and they went even further and said that Leo fulfilled the stereotypically female role of being James Cameron’s new starlet. It was very interesting.
Wouldn't he have died anyway though?... Men from 3rd class weren't given a lifeboat or anything from what I saw in the movie. In Jack's case, at least he died saving a woman's life...
"Jack didn't have to die." Well, the Titanic didn't have to sink either, nor did those 1,500 people have to die. Life is full of unfortunate occurrences.
titanic wasn,t supposed to sink from an impact with an icebirg she was built to with stand all kinds of frontal impact limitng it at two or three compartment being flood at the most . what they never expected wa sto have a slide side impact that would buckle that hall on 5 compartment . If they had hit that icebirg head on the ship would have made it to New York anyway .thats why they modified the Britannic so that it could stay afloat even with 6 compartments flooded . what they didn,t expect in her case was to have some disobidient nuses opening the lower front deck,s portholes even if they were strictly told to keep them shut in times of war . Britannic didn,t sink becasue of the explosion it sank because once it stppepd sinking the ship tilted a bit and the opened portholes went underwater and from there she tilted enough to go on her side . from there she was doomed . when it comes to ships its the same as planes .its mostly human errors of judgement when murdock applied the brakes he caused the ship to lose its directional capabilities and when he finally managed to steer it he caused 5 compartments to buckle on impact while a head on collision would have greatly avoided the sinking .when thoose nurse opened those portholes even after being strongly told not to they casued the britannic to sink when she should have . now a days ships ahve automatic system that shuts every opening for water to come in . at the minute the switch is pulled to closed the water tight compartments all the portholes and hall doors completly shuts and lock and they only way to unlock them is with a security clearence
Homesty: when Jack died I... didn't really flinch, but the scene with that mother singing her kids to sleep knowing they were going to die... breaks me
Dude same! I didn't really even cry when Jack died, but I sobbed when those little kids were screaming and crying while the ship flooded. And dude that mom singing her kids to sleep, it also breaks me.
same here... i just don't understand the whole point of rose finding a will to live if the love of her life is dead. and the movie suggests that she devoted her life to him. i don't feel like she lived truly happily, she married another man and had kids because that's what jack wanted her to do.
You say Jack was handsome enough to inspire crushes on any preteen girls who watched the movie when it came out... Girl, I was 5 when it came out and I was determined to marry Jack Dawson when I grew up.
Same! I was also 5 years old when this movie came out. I was absolutelt crushed. My first crush and first heartbreak 😂 seriously though, there was no comforting me, I cried myself to sleep..
The motive of this movie was to show the "emotional impact" of the Titanic disaster. Jack represents all the 1500 people who died on that ship, while Rose represents the 700 survivors. James Cameron wanted the audience to feel how the real survivors felt when they lost their loved ones in the sinking. That's why the story is narrated by Rose in the movie. She tells everyone about her time on the ship and how she, a survivor, felt when she the lost the love of her life, just like the 700 real people whose feelings she represents in the movie.
Exactly... we wouldn't have felt the loss, had it been just random people that died. It had to be someone we loved and I personally feel like Rose had to live so that she can experience the life she's been missing her whole life.
I made a comment almost similar to this one & found yours now...! Jack represents all the men who sacrificed & rose represents all the women who lived ♥️💔
That is quite a perfect way of describing the movie. And it's completely true. How else are you going to connect the audience in learning an important event in history if they have no connection to any of the characters. Getting them to have some form of connection to a character is the perfect way for the audience to feel that type of loss the survivors felt.
Exactly. James Cameron created the characters of Rose and Jack, gave us as the audience 3 hours to develop an emotional attachment and sense of empathy towards both of them, and then killed off one of them, leaving the other to grieve, so that we could see how this tragedy impacted the actual survivors. The writers made Jack Dawson perfect so that his death would hit us as hard as it hit Rose.
A lot of people tend to forget that after rose gets on the door jack then tries to climb on as well and the door flips over knocking rose back in the water. He didn’t want to try again risking her to fall in again.
Kelsey Eilish it’s a film get over it😂 it’s wouldn’t have had the same impact on viewers if he survived. The titanic was a tragic event, this was also portrayed through jack
Kelsey Eilish I don’t need calming down haha, was literally just saying the movie wouldn’t have had the huge impact it did if jack survived. End of discussion thank u
That's symbolic of sacrifice. If you love someone, you will die for them. Also them being on a door is a symbol. Jack opened the door for rose and she walked through to freedom.
@@jaysmith3448 That would be a lovely metaphor and interpretation (as an English major, I honestly like it a lot), but it's not actually a door she's on
She hated her life and he was an escape but she treated him as such cause she showed no real logic, grit or backbone in defending him. Only when they had to fight to survive did she have enough backbone to protect him. She couldn't defend his honor and keep him out of harms way. But she lived her life and thats all that matters im sure.
And the video says that once his purpose is fuffiled in rose's life, he's gone. So this whole movie minus her narrating as an old woman is all about HER. What about his story? what about his life?
@@60wwediva she most likely didn't know his whole life story, and she's not giving her life story. She's explaining her story on the Titanic. She rescued him and freed him from chains and he did the same for her. She kept his honor and lived and died the way he wanted her too. Did you even watch the movie?
What I liked a lot was that she went and lived her life after to jack died. She didn’t spend the rest of her life mourning him, she went and lived. Just like he told her to
The entire movie is about a historical tragedy. Giving the movie a sad ending would make the viewers understand the real causes of the shipwreck. But keeping him alive would be as if the shipwreck wasn’t relevant to the plot at all.
The story is perfect the way it is. I loved at the end how Rose died in the same place where Jack died, as an old lady and warm in her bed too, like Jack said she would. Then we get a little visual of heaven, where Titanic becomes alive again and Jack and Rose reunite. It’s beautifully done.
skandarkeynes _ skandarians Ignoring the fact that she had another life with another man she promised her life’s too. But heaven is with Jack. I guess this is where death do us apart comes into play hahaha
Jack also in my opinion was more than Roses voice. He was the embodiment of all who died that night. Jacks will to live was sooo strong he fought with everything he had to survive which made his death all that bitter. Amd to me its a symbol of the struggle of those who did not survive. That we may never forget the unfortunate who fought hard to live but still lost their lives.
This is so true, the dad reality of the titanic is that some (Rose and the other first class passengers like Cal, her mother, etc) survived but many (Jack) died, it wouldn’t have been realistic for them to both live honestly
That line was cut a bit and the full line shows that not only did cal not learn any lessons but his shallow values about money were passed on to his kids, here is the unabridged line "He married of course and inherited his millions, but the crash of 29 hit his interests hard and he put a pistol in his mouth that year, his heirs fought over the remains of his estate like hyenas, or so I read.
Cal was such an asshole! This is what Rose's mom Was pimping her out to! Jack saved Rose's life multiple times in just three days. Saved her from jumping in the beginning, from hypothermia and drowning in the end and from pimp mom and asshole Cal! Incidentally Rose risked her life to save Jack so they could be together just a few more hours. The story was intense!
@@ryanr20091he should have just told him straight up…despite the fact her mother was pushing her hard to marry him, so that the family could have resources? How does that work How about Cal could have backed off, once he realised she wasn’t interested
No, Jack living wouldn't make the story morally wrong... it would make the event historically inaccurate. Besides the tragic love story tugging at the heartstrings the complete inexperience of the crew created a LOT of widows. Husbands, male lovers, fathers... men and boys died more so than women and girls. For both to live would be perfection but inaccurate. For both to die would actually have been accurate though there would be nobody to tell the story. To have Jack live and Rose die would be seen as selfish on Jack's part. For Rose to live would show the metaphor of the men sacrificing themselves to save the women they loved. Though I'm sure it did happen that men made it onto the boats, with the hopes that their wives and kids got onto another but that didn't happen would be true too.
Great video. You mention that Jack has the feeling of unreality about him, like he's a little too good to be true. There's a pretty good explanation for this... And it comes down to the fact that the elderly Rose is the one telling the story. It's entirely possible that she's the typical unreliable narrator - exaggerating the facts to make Jack even better or even moreso, she remembers things differently after a lifetime of recollection.. "He lives now, only in my memories" and memory, is fallable.
Yes absolutely correct. Not to mention she literally only knew him for a few days so they were still in their intial "honey-moon" phase of love where you dont notice the bad things about your partner.
Kind of like the 1997 Lolita movie, I first watched it and was shocked that I felt sorry for the guy ( I even cried at the end lol) and I really didn't like Lo, till I read that the story is told from his point of view and it made so much more sense.
Exaaactly... people forget it is not a real story.. it is a story told by Rose..her version of what happened.. her version of right and wrong, good and bad.
@@calmcalm6203 Romanticising means to take something (like an event) and make it look better than how it actually was, or look like something that you want to go through. Basically it means if Jack had survived, the movie would end up just looking like a romantic adventure film, which would be very distasteful to the families of those who died in the Titanic's sinking or had survived (but probably would've been very traumatised because of the sinking itself and losing loved ones)
James Cameron is one of the only few male directors out there who generally makes his female characters way more compelling than his male characters. I just get a sense he's so much more interested in their plight rather than guys. Even the two villains in Titanic. Rose's mother and her fiance. One is a one dimensional, over the top scumbag and the other is cruel but has a sympathetic backstory that drives why she is the way she is.
That doesn't make it good. If you are a top storyteller all your characters should be well developped. But I thought in the Abyss both the male and female lead husband and wife characters were equally strong.
Even though Jack and Rose is just a fictional character I still believe that their story will represent that there's anyone on that ship that could possibly be a Jack and Rose in real life to each other and promised that they will never let go even they are on the verge of dying and giving each other the power of will to live.
Ah, one of my favorite movies. As much as I would've loved for Rose and Jack to get the traditional/cliche "happily ever after," the movie wouldn't have held the same dramatic and iconic weight that it holds in pop culture: Every time I ask someone what they remember about this movie, the answer's always, "Jack dies" and it took me a while to accept that, in the narrative, he HAS to: As you said, he teaches her the will to live and not just to live, but to live through joy AND sorrow, which is why is she able to go on years later after he's gone, unlike in the beginning where she's going to jump: She doesn't feel helpless and through her journey with Jack, she discovers that she's far from it. If anything, I see this film as the living embodiment of the saying, "Sometimes we need others to see the thing inside that we can't see ourselves," because that's what Jack sees in Rose: Fire and life and passion and will. She just needed to see it too. (:
Indeed, as sad as the ending was, it made it all the more romantic that Jack sacrificed himself for Rose, so I can totally understand why they wrote it that way.
That was very mean what Miss mojo said the story has no more use for Jack like are you kidding me his death was the most horrible thing ever I know everybody else died on the boat but jack dying that was so sad
He DID try to get on the door and it immediately buckled! Am I the only one who remembers?! Also amazing video and I always look forward to your analysis.
yeah but then he wouldnt have met rose and he was the reason she survived because he gave her strength and when she saw him dead she ws willing to die to be with him but then she remembered the promise that she made him that she would survive and die an old old lady warm in her bed and she did and when they reunited the clock behind jack it read 2:20 am wich is the exact time the titanic compelety sank
I really enjoyed this breakdown and 100% agree with the thematic use of Jack as a character. Iv been meaning to rewatch this for ages and this really got me excited about it again and also helped me see it differently! Great job!
Me too. From the earliest moment this movie came out in late 97' it made you wondering why Jack had to die and if there was any way that the *decision* could have been made for him to survive. Going as far as imagining different story plots and endings of your own to make sense of it. I always had an idea nevertheless that James Cameron wanted the tragic story of Titanic to be told and not some happy ending Romeo & Julia kind of story. In that regard it made sense because Jack's death made the sinking of the Titanic so much worse. Bawling your eyes out etc. But with this *explanation* by Screenprism it all falls into place even more. You're totally looking different at it now. James Cameron was way ahead of its time, proving once again.
The thing about that is... like he had interactions with other characters in the movie, and People had interactions with him. He drew that picture, and it was proven that he drew it when it was all over the news. It’s not like the picture just came out of nowhere. That’s the only problem with it.
Had she not met jack (and not jumped off the stern, which Jack called her out that she wouldn't have), wouldn't she have not been in the floating door situation? I mean.. not criticizing the story at all because I love the movie... but realistically, this romance probably caused Jack's death, and the death of Lovejoy, and likely Fabrizio... because if they had not met she would have been on a lifeboat, and Cal and Lovejoy would have made the arrangement with First Officer Murdoch, and Jack, being survival-oriented, would have figured out a way for him and his friend to escape and survive the disaster... Furthermore, the two security guards in the mail-hold wouldn't have died at the time of impact because they wouldn't have been in there searching for those two when it flooded!
Rose: It's not up to you to save me, Jack. Jack: You're right. Only YOU can do that. THIS philosophy needs to be taught in every school on the planet. YOU are the maker of your destiny.
I think we all know deep down that Jack had to die. In a sense, he represented the ship's downfall as well as everyone else who passed away that night. It makes the movie so much more emotional, so much more tragic, that he died. Of course, that doesn't stop us from trying to evaluate why he couldn't have lived. For many of us, our hearts yearn to find a way he could've possibly lived - and that was the exactly intended emotion. Cameron wanted us to develop such an emotional attachment to his character that we would grieve strongly for him following his death. He just did such an incredible job with it, we're still crying for Jack to live, and we're still battling with our heavy emotions on the issue years later. But can we honestly say that Titanic would still draw the same extensive heartfelt, bittersweet emotions from its audiences; would Jack even be as captivating, knowing he would still be alive by the end of the film? I think the fact he is taken away from us makes the story so much more memorable; his death therefore makes him as well as the film so much more beautiful, more alluring, and more incandescent - and that's excluding the fact alone that he is played by Leonardo DiCaprio, who only adds to his undeniable charm ;) So that's why Jack ultimately had to die. The movie simply wouldn't be nearly as meaningful or even enjoyable, really, if he hadn't. As much as my heart aches that he died, and that I can't envision an entire life of Jack and Rose raising their adorable children together, it makes me flat-out adore the story even more. The emotional elements within Titanic are so much more than merely love alone. It has pain, desire, fear, doubt, hopelessness, hopefulness, anger, frustration, wistfulness, longing... which only strengthen the depth of love present in the movie. All these emotional elements combined is what truly makes for a successful, beloved, timeless, and memorable film
eh. find a way he could have possibly lived? he could have lived by sticking to logic and not putting himself in dangerous situations in the midst of rose's beef with her fiance. he could have put himself first at least 3 times. idk why everyone is acting like jack was doomed with no way out. love killed him purely and simply
I agree, that it's about the emotional impact and the narrative. But I also think it's about allowing the tragedy to...'breathe,' so to speak. As in... Giving you tragedy, with a backdrop of better things, so you can process the tragedy within the larger framework of a happier or different life. And your brush with Jack's symbolism as a character is really spot on. What's fascinating is that you get into meta commentary with the thought that Jack's downfall parallels the 'downfall of the ship,' so to speak. It's a topic that's been debated a lot, and a lot of conclusions have been drawn between a ship's maiden voyage - Rose feeling trapped on said ship and coming out stronger for it, and the ways the two stories can parallel reach other, inversely, or side by side (depending on how you look at the whole story.) But a majority of commentators agree that Rose and the Titanic's stories parallel each other in a lot of ways. Just as the modern consensus seems to agree (largely) that Rose losing her virginity is not only a metaphor but an allegory of a lot of other things (virginity as a change of a woman's state of being, Rose as a maiden and the Titanic as one are the same until the point of the iceberg when Rose's recent sexual experience gives her New wisdom, the idea that the Titanic never finished Her maiden voyage while Rose did as reasoning for her surviving, and so on) the majority of people agree that Jack's death is a tragedy, but one within a much larger framework, whether it's the metaphor of him being a third class passenger, or (in this argument) a plot device allowing Rose's own self realization, Jack's death rides on a lot of other factors, and virtually any objective way to look at the narrative agrees, Jack's dying was the right narrative choice for Cameron as the writer, and Titanic as a story.
can't we all realize if rose got on the dang safe boat, he easily could've lived by going on the door in the water, and gotten saved. yes for the storyline he had to die, but he didn't really HAVE to. rose wasted a lot of time, aswell. rose really is- well.... stubborn. she cant just get on a safe boat. that would have worked out well. IF SHE GOT ON THE BOAT.
rose is so unbelievebly strong! after jake died she didn't hesitate to live a full life like he told her to instead of feeling sad because she lost the love of her life. I think I would've stayed with jack in the water and died with him
I only just noticed when Jack tells Rose her fire will go out if she stays as she is, and also when she asks him to draw her, she's wearing a butterfly, a symbol of emergence and change, in her hair. Well done, Deborah Lynn Scott.
The Take: Jack's purpose is to make Rose find her will to live Me who has crippling depression: *I THINK I NEED A JACK IN MY LIFE BECAUSE. . . WHAT IS WILL TO LIVE???*
Appreciation.... To be able to spit as far as you can , to stretch out your arms at the helm of a boat, the air in your lungs, meeting fine people, art, food, dressing up, the ability to run around and be silly, the memories of happy past moments.... are just a few of the things worth living for......I hope I helped a little......Jack.❤
Because to have everyone always survive and live happily ever after in stories gives us heart candy, but it doesn't give us insight into our fellow man in terms of how life REALLY impacts us, and what it REALLY does to us emotionally, what we REALLY go through, and the scars and treasures and traumas and regrets and heartaches we REALLY have to cope with. Heart candy doesn't connect us in the way something like this does. And at the end of it, that connection is more what we're REALLY looking for when we tell stories.
I have been in the "Jack is imaginary" camp for quite some time, not because I think Rose lied about having some love affair on the Titanic. But because Jack is an amalgamation of everyone who lost their lives on the Titanic, perhaps that's why Jack seems so perfect. His not just a person, his a symbol for the oppressed and marginalized, ,for everyone who lost their lives too soon.
But the drawing was still there so how is does he not exist, he drew it and it wasn't found my rose but by other people who didn't even know he existed
rose isn't a strong female character at all if her story arc needed a man to freeze to death just to make her "live". if she was strong and resourceful, jack would have been alive.
You don't understand her character development, clearly. She's strong because she rejected everything that was deemed "respectable" and "successful" in the world she was raised in.
An Morein actually, most people are quick to ignore her character flaws for the sake of feminism in cinema. she's not even a good example for a strong feminist. everything was thrown at her feet. though her mother was horrible, she did try to find her a "good match". even when the boat was sinking, both jack and cal convinced her to go into one of the lifeboats, yet what did she do? she jumped into the water to be with jack. FFS, if she had only stayed in the darn lifeboat, jack could have had the door to himself and not have to die for her. it was even so pointless of her to go into the water, as she had no intention of actually saving jack, she just wanted to be near him. in the end, she made herself a damsel that needed to be saved by her man, who had to die in the process when she was already SAFE in the lifeboat to begin with. also, it's so unrealistic that, man or woman, the one who survives doesn't even live with the guilt of having the other die for them. she was fondly remembering how jack's ass froze in the friggin ocean. i fail to understand why everybody is calling rose a "strong" character. what exactly did she do that was so brave and heroic? saying no to her mom and cal? that's pathetic. meanwhile, the poor guy who literally dies in the story is a "mere prop" for her to realize that she should live. FFS...
Maggy Frog Yeah, duh. Characters are supposed to have flaws. You’re completely ignoring the inner conflict of Rose’s character and the time period the film is set in. It was expected for women to obey their husbands, and not only that, Rose had the obligation of basically selling herself to this man so her family (mother) could survive. She rejects everything that’s considered as success in her life to go with someone who is deemed the “scum” of society. Perhaps stop watching superhero movies. Your expectations for the development of these characters are ridiculous.
Great analysis! I have to shake my head at all the people who even now seem to think that Titanic is Jack's story, when Cameron showed with every image, allegory, and event in the script that it was Rose's journey, start to finish. Indeed, folks, sometimes the hero wears a dress.
I think the significance of that last scene where Rose reunites with Jack in a white dress means that Rose has passed on after giving the necklace to the sea. That scene always pulls at my heart strings. One of the most devastating things that I think you could live through is your significant other passing. I told my husband that even though I’m 13 years younger than him I’ve called Debs on dying first. LOL but seriously I can’t help but burst into tears every time I think of him passing before me..
That’s why people in the video were commenting about the life jackets. The idea is, if they’d stuffed one under the door, it would have added enough buoyancy to support both their weight
When you're in water that cold you go unconscious within 30 min. It's incredible they even thought to swim to the door in the first place, let alone trying to grab random life jackets off people to buoy the door up.
nah, it really was a plot hole issue. a door that size could have saved the both of them with a little bit of resourcefulness. no amount of romance or drama could convince me that it's a good idea to throw logic under the bus so that the hero dies trying to save the damsel in distress when they could have lived together and that still would have been romantic and dramatic all the same. as far as the character arcs go, i don't buy that rose would really let jack die like that. that moment could have been her ultimate character growth by being a bit more resourceful instead of idiotically saying, "i won't let go jack" and then lets the poor guy freeze and sink to the abyss. i also don't buy that she was utterly happy and absolutely fulfilled in her new life knowing she let her great love die for her. that's too much BS imho. james cameron could have at least made her have that one great regret in her life while still trying to live large. instead, it's like she remembers jack dying quite fondly. i just don't like how it ended. in real life, if your great love dies for you like that, freezing to death and you letting that person go to sink in the bottom of the ocean, that's gonna leave you with survivor's guilt for sure, not a "happy ending".
Here’s my take on it: At first I was very sad that Jack was dead and that he didn’t have to die. But I’ve realized it makes since that he did. Of course there were ways that he could survive. But it is for the best. The titanic was a tragedy and we all knew the boat was going to sink in the movie, but they couldn’t end the movie with it working out for Jack or Rose or for any of the other characters. And let’s face it, this movie wouldn’t be as good and emotional if he had survived. Directors and writers like to make people emotional, and I for sure cried after and that proves that it was a great movie. If the Jack and Rose part of this story was real, I know they would be living together forever after she dies. But the number one thing that bugged me is that Rose probably had multiple kids, most likely a boy, yet she didn’t name her son Jack I’m guessing!!!!
yea I get that last part too but she also took his last name which is a lot stronger than a child name to me that will go on from generation to generation
I don't know why but this video gave me more closure about my breakup than anything else. My boyfriend had Jack's character and what separated us wasn't death, but how frustrated he became with my actions in regard to not changing a bad situation I was in. I learned a lesson through my ex and I'm grateful for that :).
My problem was never about why Jack had to die but the fact that Rose threw the necklace in the sea. I know it was a symbolic move but what about all those people working to find it?
@@MADEbySOUL I think these are pretty strong words you're using. The crew of the ship was hired to retrieve the necklace, you make it sound like the had to walk on dead bodies and steal them. It was just their job and Rose made sure no-one would ever get it. And if she didn't want the crew to get it she could donate it and let be a symbol of love not only to her but also from her to others. But nooooooo
Great video and analysis. When people fixate on the door thing it's as if we're not conscious of the fact that it's a work of fiction and that detail serves the purposes of the story. Obviously, it's sad that he dies. But rewatching the film as an adult made it more apparent to me that as heroic as Jack Dawson was in the film, his purpose was primarily to serve Rose's character arc (so yes, definitely an example of the "Manic pixie dream boy"!). If he had lived, it would have been a happy ending... but I think Rose still got a happy ending.
@@torinmccabe it's a semi-accurate depiction of the time period (I've heard that the "women and children first" rule actually wasn't practiced in real life, though I'm not sure.) Unfortunately, women's life were treated as more valuable then men's at that point in time (in fact, that's similar to how it is even today, though to a much lesser degree). A byproduct of this was that women had very little agency and were quite literally second class citizens. Women are privileged in some ways just as men are privileged in others.
Once again phenomenal breakdown! 👏🏽bravo! Y’all hit it right on the mark, it was never about the door.....it was bout the growth of Rose Dawson👏🏽👏🏽 great job ladies as always!!! One of the greatest films of all time. Such a classic!
It is true that the movie Titanic, because it came out in 97', was able to perfectly serve the temporary embodiment of female *empowerment* at that time. Just around the turn of the Millennium. From what I have seen in my life so far, it is quite obvious that the work of James Cameron has touched the lives of many women around the world with this great movie.
JACK represents all the good men who sacrificed themselves & waived goodbye to their wives & children💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔 ROSE represents all the strong women who survived & rebuilt their life after the tragedy..♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
I find that you people are too grown to be this slow... Jack TRIED to get on the board... when he did, it became unstable and seemed to sink a bit therefore he opted to leave ROSE alone on it. BEGINNING MIDDLE AND END. WOW...
but notice it's always him making the attempts with rose? she could have thought of taking turns with him but she gave up constantly mentioning she was cold, body numb, weak etc. no excuse
@@60wwediva they wouldve both died of hypothermia if they took turns in the water, being exposed to the freezing air AND water. Jack wanted to protect Rose and in the end she lived because of it. She lived her whole life for him.
Yeah, can't be trusted an inch, that woman! Seriously though, wonderful nod to life's often cruel ironies that in order to not let go, she had to let go. VERY insightful.
10,000 subs no videos? UGH! For the love of god what did you expect from rose? To put his dead body on the life boat? She said she’ll never let go of the wonderful moments they had on the titanic and took his final words and did what she did in life until she died when the they reunited on the Titanic in heaven and lived happily ever after!
When I started to break down was when she told that one guy that her name was Rose Dawson, meaning that she put jacks last name as hers, I don’t know why but when she gave that guy her name with jacks last name I was sobbing
"He exists in order to empower Rose and give her the will to live ... and once that story purpose is fulfilled, he's gone." So... Jack is a manic pixie dream girl? edit: I now see that you make this point in the video. love it!
Jack was a symbol of all the brave men who could have through brute force forced their way into boats to save themselves, but instead sacrificed their lives for women. We sometimes just don't stop long enough to let our hearts melt over altruistic men....A modern day example w is all those young, handsome, strong men during the floods in Texas going back over and over again, for days, until exhaustion carrying out women, children the elderly and pets in their strong arms. They came from all over, they saved thousands of lives....Some men are so wonderful it brings me to tears....I cried watching those men in Texas and I cried remembering the men on the Titanic. God bless good men...The heart of God Himself must swell with pride at having made men like that.
This gave me so hard nostalgia....flashback to a time when movies were actually good and female lead was not just a romantic doll for male actor....!!!
@@sarojadreyer8630 Actually, at the beginning of the movie, he saved her from a suicide attempt ... so there wouldn't have been an old Rose without a Jack.
*Why Jack had to die* Because Titanic is a melodramatic romance, so the ending has to be bittersweet or sad to make the audience cry. Mind you, I'm not saying melodramatic in a negative way. The screenwriter knew what Titanic had to be for it to be popular, and he achieved that spectacularly.
+Marc If only someone had made a video about the topic which goes into detail about this. Farnsworth: Oh... A man can dream, though. A man can dream...
Jack and rose represented peoples of TITANIC.. Jack represented people who lost their life and rose represented people who lost their loved one on sinking of TITANIC
This is exactly why it's one of my favourite movies. It pains me when I see that people don't understand that it is more than a love story, and that the message behind it is about finding the will to live. It's one of the movies that does it the best, and it's unfortunate that it is hidden by the popularity of its romance.
the last scene... when the camera goes into the water and the ship appears as new... when she enters the room and every major actor is there happily, greeting her... when she meets jack at the end... oh god i ugly cried so much... oh man
@@maggyfrog It was shown in the movie that the door wouldnt hold both their weights. It works within the movie, and nobody in the audience will, in that 5 second part of the movie, be able to tell whether that doors buoyancy is enough or not lol. It's irrelevant to the story, it doesn't break the immersion, it's a minor detail.
Lars T. james cameron admitted to mythbusters that the door should have been smaller. that is the film maker himself admitting that the size of the door is indeed a problem.
@@maggyfrog Yes but it is still not a stretch to believe that it couldn't hold their weight, the movie indicated that it couldn't, and even if that's not 100% accurate, i think it works fine. And you also have to take into account that it's not unrealistic that Jack would simply fear it not being able to hold them up both. He tried once, then gave up immediately to not put Rose in any more danger. Any more seconds of her being exposed to the water and she could have easily died from shock/hypothermia. It doesn't take much more, and he knew that. So she let her rest on there alone
Lars T. see this response doesn't make sense anymore when you are aware of the thought processes of the film maker behind that particular scene. it's very simple, the film maker was made to realize that the scene indeed has a problem with the door, which he agrees with and says the door should have been smaller to make sure jack really dies because that's the story. the door is indeed a problem. there's no more doubt about that and yet people will still defend it for some strange reason. and about jack letting rose hog the door, that makes zero sense if you take into account jack's personality and will to survive as presented in the movie. he should have tried to look for other debris because not doing anything is suicide. that's more of a character plot hole imho. it's more likely that rose would be the one who gives up on surviving given her initial suicide attempt. also, even if jack dies in the process of finding other debris to save himself, what's important is that the character integrity is kept intact. instead they had to go for the melodrama and so jack simply held on to the edge of the door which is stupid. he could still die in the attempt to save himself when rose was already safe in her own door, the film maker should have made his character try to survive. think about this situation in real life. you know you will die if you stay in the water, so why would you stop trying to look for debris or help? it won't make jack less heroic or less in love with rose if he tries to save himself because he's already letting her hog the door. but of course that's not "romantic" therefore people will defend the idiotic scene.
Ah - I remember when I saw Titanic in theaters. December 1997. I was a sophomore in college and it was the fastest 3 hours of my life. When Jack died, I was in such shock, I couldn't cry. I was frozen stiff in my chair because it was the first time I saw a movie in which the director had the guts to kill one of the main characters. Years later, I bought a book about screenwriting before I wrote my first script and in 1 of the chapters, there were 1-line descriptions of famous movies. "Titanic is Romeo and Juliet on a ship liner." So - yes - Jack had to die. Looking back all these years, It makes sense Jack died - he held a third-class ticket.
Imma just say this... As a simple answer why he didn’t get in the door. They were freezing and scared... does anyone remember that part? No matter how smart and skillful you are, when you have several factors overwhelming you, your head is always anything but useful. Have you imagined how hard would’ve been for Jack to get on the door? His limbs were probably already numb, even Rose’s were and she was “safe” by not being in the water. By all of this factors, I bet they wouldn’t be able to manage a plan for Jack to get in either. The wouldn’t be able to think straight and their bodies would’ve been so numb and weak. Sometimes you got to remember that these were meant to be normal people...
Honestly. Some of these people are saying "they could have used life jackets to hold up the door!" or "they could swap places every five minutes!" They're freezing and exhausted and terrified, you fucks! Most people can't even function without their morning cup of coffee, much less the rest of the crap Jack and Rose went through that night.
Did you know that Jack was actually not dead when Rose let him go, it was proven that Jack was in Stage 3 of hypothermia, which means he was only unconscious...
Yes, this is also why he had to die. It would have been undecent if the main characters would have basically benefitef from the tragedy. Ang Rose has the character arc so she could not die.
+Sara Samaletdin I don't know if I agree with that last point. Characters with arcs die all the time, if anything it makes their arcs more compelling. MacBeth is the greatest example.
Briandon Stark this comment doesn't make any sense. just because it's a tragedy doesn't mean that the story itself should end illogically. edit: if your username is a reference to game of thrones / a song of ice and fire, you should know that character deaths ought to be free from any kind of plot hole to maximize the tragic effect.
If rose would’ve got on the first life boat instead of jumping back on the ship jack would’ve only had to worry about himself and would’ve probably been the one on the price of wood. Then with both would’ve survived
Stern Fan actually that was after. Wen she was getting lowered onto the life boat kal and jack looked down at her but she jumped back on the sinking ship. Get your facts right
What I think is if both Jack and Rose survived, the audience would have left the movie theatre being happy as the main characters were safe. But since Titanic was a disaster, a tragedy, the movie makers would have wanted the audience to feel the loss of a loved one. Probably that's why they make us grow so close to Jack.
I would disagree. For instance, there were numerous moments in the movie that had made me on edge with my emotions and feelings already, including the sight of Rose and Jack at the front of the ship and singing: _"come Josephine in my flying machine"_ ...saving Jack from his hand cuffs down at the Master-At-Arms and when Rose says goodbye to Jack and jumps right back on the ship to be with him: _"you jump, I jump"_ etc. The Bottom-line is, that the movie, the whole narrative and music was hitting you in the feels already everywhere where you were going. Even when Rose was ready to give up when she and Jack were in the water, both shaking and trying to instill hope and strength in this dire situation that they they were in. Add on top the loss of the majesty of the RMS Titanic and all the other innocent passengers who we had seen dying, including Fabrizio, Tommy Ryan, Helga and Cora and their respective families, in addition to Thomas Andrews, Captain Smith, Murdoch and Trudy, Rose's maid, I would have not left the theater happy at all. It would still have been a very emotional experience. The reason why Cameron made the audience grow so close to Jack, I think, was because there had to be this lead device for Rose to complete her transformation. And the only way was through some additional main character. Hence, Jack had to be a gentleman and someone who would treat Rose as an equal. But to do so, meant that he had to have many nice attributes and qualities, in addition to showing a willingness to survive and showing a sign of strength. And Jack's character fully did that, but a bit too much. Meaning, the issue would end up becoming about Jack and that he had almost reached the level of being immortal and a superhero etc. ... e.g. the way how he carried himself throughout the movie. Ranging from almost getting his hands chopped off to almost drowning behind a locked gate. Cameron purely did this from a "blockbuster" point of view and wanting a spectacle. Not on the basis of bearing relevance and resemblance to reality. There isn't a problem with that, but it does make it conflicting when you let him suddenly die, knowing he could have made it.
@@litlifes3278 The other passengers we did see ending up dying, like Fabrizio, Tommy and Thomas Andrews, were already representing the people who died. Whilst Rose got to represent one of a sole female heroine.
Sign up for SKILLSHARE: skl.sh/screenprism19
Support ScreenPrism on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=7792695
Subscribe to keep up with our latest videos, and let us know what you want to see next!
Yep but Jack could've taught her to live and give her a lifetime of adventure and love , they could have shared that life. Many times people are in our lives that shape who we are and don't necessarily have to die,in my opinion this served as a dramatic effect and nothing more
Great vids, but.... why do we need SkillShare if we have free tutorials about almost everything in You Tube?
ScreenPrism do one on Samantha from Sex and the city please!
No
NUTAN
Jack had to die because the writer write so..
This has made me realize Jack served a purpose that’s stereotypically given to female characters insofar as bolstering a male character and giving them a reason to go on. I never noticed that flip before, and it’s pretty brilliant for a late 90s romance set in a historical tragedy.
TheShamefulNarcissist I know I’m like in awe right now
a manic pixie dream boy!
oops..just got to the part in the video where they made this point
Nichola Marshall but you are right! When they first said that he came into her life to teach her a lesson that’s the first thing that I thought of!
I read an article about this recently and they went even further and said that Leo fulfilled the stereotypically female role of being James Cameron’s new starlet. It was very interesting.
That song by Celine wouldn’t have hit as hard if he survived
It is a funeral song,after all
True
Mate, it *wouldn't* have hit. Her heart wouldn't have *needed* to "go on" loving him (in the "You're dead but I still love you way) 😂😂. But I get you.
Yeh
Bahhhahhha of course
He died because of me and i lived because of him
-Rose
She said... What
SOO TRUE!!!
Dndjndbgghbgjyjnfdhfvjffhjfhfjfjfjfhffhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfh
Ade wat na❗‼️❗
Wouldn't he have died anyway though?... Men from 3rd class weren't given a lifeboat or anything from what I saw in the movie. In Jack's case, at least he died saving a woman's life...
"Jack didn't have to die."
Well, the Titanic didn't have to sink either, nor did those 1,500 people have to die.
Life is full of unfortunate occurrences.
I knowww!!
titanic wasn,t supposed to sink from an impact with an icebirg she was built to with stand all kinds of frontal impact limitng it at two or three compartment being flood at the most . what they never expected wa sto have a slide side impact that would buckle that hall on 5 compartment . If they had hit that icebirg head on the ship would have made it to New York anyway .thats why they modified the Britannic so that it could stay afloat even with 6 compartments flooded . what they didn,t expect in her case was to have some disobidient nuses opening the lower front deck,s portholes even if they were strictly told to keep them shut in times of war . Britannic didn,t sink becasue of the explosion it sank because once it stppepd sinking the ship tilted a bit and the opened portholes went underwater and from there she tilted enough to go on her side . from there she was doomed . when it comes to ships its the same as planes .its mostly human errors of judgement when murdock applied the brakes he caused the ship to lose its directional capabilities and when he finally managed to steer it he caused 5 compartments to buckle on impact while a head on collision would have greatly avoided the sinking .when thoose nurse opened those portholes even after being strongly told not to they casued the britannic to sink when she should have . now a days ships ahve automatic system that shuts every opening for water to come in . at the minute the switch is pulled to closed the water tight compartments all the portholes and hall doors completly shuts and lock and they only way to unlock them is with a security clearence
guy tremblay honestly, you took too long to write this
i was the 1.1k like on ur thing XD
Jack had to die. Titanic had to sink. 1,500 people did have to die. I’m sorry. You’re wrong.
Homesty: when Jack died I... didn't really flinch, but the scene with that mother singing her kids to sleep knowing they were going to die... breaks me
AD Queen me too.
absolutely
And the scene of the old couple
Dude same! I didn't really even cry when Jack died, but I sobbed when those little kids were screaming and crying while the ship flooded. And dude that mom singing her kids to sleep, it also breaks me.
@Lena Moore SAME
I can’t be the only one that literally bawled their eyes out when rose told the man her name was Rose Dawson...😭😭😭
same here... i just don't understand the whole point of rose finding a will to live if the love of her life is dead. and the movie suggests that she devoted her life to him. i don't feel like she lived truly happily, she married another man and had kids because that's what jack wanted her to do.
Smooth Criminal naw, you want a Leonardo DiCaprio in your life
cam i no I did 😭😭😭😭
No I did it to and Jack can't only be in her mind cuz he drawed her and the drawing was found
@@jabukakruska9423 Bc if she didnt have the will to live that would of been a slap in the face to the man she loved, the the man that saved her life.
You say Jack was handsome enough to inspire crushes on any preteen girls who watched the movie when it came out...
Girl, I was 5 when it came out and I was determined to marry Jack Dawson when I grew up.
😂😂😂😂
You are not the only preschool who fell in love with Jack
Same. Watching Titanic at the age was the first time I ever experienced 'those sort' of feelings
I was little older than, around 12 years old when I got a crush on Jack. Now I'm 18, with a crush on someone else.
Same! I was also 5 years old when this movie came out. I was absolutelt crushed. My first crush and first heartbreak 😂 seriously though, there was no comforting me, I cried myself to sleep..
Jack Dawson.
If any woman gets loved the way he loved Rose, you are truly blessed.
And vice versa if a man gets loved that way, he's a lucky man.
George Daugherty Rose didn’t love Jack. He was just an exciting fling from her boring life
Tora Chan Oooh that's trollish! :p
i do love a women like jack dawson loves rose, i truly do, hopefully someday she will know how much she means to me
her name is Fatima
TJae Speaks, THAT’S FACTS!
The motive of this movie was to show the "emotional impact" of the Titanic disaster. Jack represents all the 1500 people who died on that ship, while Rose represents the 700 survivors. James Cameron wanted the audience to feel how the real survivors felt when they lost their loved ones in the sinking. That's why the story is narrated by Rose in the movie. She tells everyone about her time on the ship and how she, a survivor, felt when she the lost the love of her life, just like the 700 real people whose feelings she represents in the movie.
Exactly... we wouldn't have felt the loss, had it been just random people that died. It had to be someone we loved and I personally feel like Rose had to live so that she can experience the life she's been missing her whole life.
I made a comment almost similar to this one & found yours now...! Jack represents all the men who sacrificed & rose represents all the women who lived ♥️💔
This sounds like an English essay. My English teacher would be proud 😳
That is quite a perfect way of describing the movie. And it's completely true. How else are you going to connect the audience in learning an important event in history if they have no connection to any of the characters. Getting them to have some form of connection to a character is the perfect way for the audience to feel that type of loss the survivors felt.
Exactly. James Cameron created the characters of Rose and Jack, gave us as the audience 3 hours to develop an emotional attachment and sense of empathy towards both of them, and then killed off one of them, leaving the other to grieve, so that we could see how this tragedy impacted the actual survivors. The writers made Jack Dawson perfect so that his death would hit us as hard as it hit Rose.
2 things I took away from this...
1. Rose is the Hero
2. Jack is the sexy life coach
..... that's fair
how is rose the hero😭
serena matti watch the video 😑
😂😂😂
If you look at Titanic that way, t's actually a sort of saltwater version of "The Legend of Bagger Vance."
😂😂😂😂😂😂
His drawing of her is physical evidence that he existed, tho.
But the pic got torn up
@@wmitch1983 no, it didn't
They literally recover it 84 years later, definitely not torn up
Maybe there is another Jack Dawson? And that Jack Dawson was just a con artist posing as the real Jack Dawson, very good
@Maria Blente He wrinkled the note, not the drawing.
Jack wanted to live
Rose wanted to die
Jack died for Rose
Rose lived for Jack
Wouh wouh wouh
omgguitgyu8ryhuiryh
I'd never wish a fate like that on anyone.. Damn this hits hard
Mhm good logic
Me like it
How table turn
A lot of people tend to forget that after rose gets on the door jack then tries to climb on as well and the door flips over knocking rose back in the water. He didn’t want to try again risking her to fall in again.
Kelsey Eilish it’s a film get over it😂 it’s wouldn’t have had the same impact on viewers if he survived. The titanic was a tragic event, this was also portrayed through jack
Kelsey Eilish I don’t need calming down haha, was literally just saying the movie wouldn’t have had the huge impact it did if jack survived. End of discussion thank u
That's symbolic of sacrifice. If you love someone, you will die for them. Also them being on a door is a symbol. Jack opened the door for rose and she walked through to freedom.
@@jaysmith3448 That would be a lovely metaphor and interpretation (as an English major, I honestly like it a lot), but it's not actually a door she's on
@@grenbaygrl1 What were they on then?
so the real iceberg...was depression.
Ahahaha
And the real treasure was the sexy life coach she did along the way.
The real iceberg was the friends we made along the way
I know this is probably just a joke but remember that the Titanic was a real ship that did sink cuz a iceberg
@@personontheinternett7218 it sank because of arrogance and an iceberg
I love how he says to rose “your going to die an old lady warm in your bed not here” and she actually does die an old lady in her bed 🥺
omg that was my last big cry of the movie
@@alex-lr9zd I didn't even cry in that movie lol
@@milfslayer6984 HOW I WAS BAWLING THE WHOLE TIME
@@alex-lr9zd I wasn't even sad actually
@@milfslayer6984 i don’t believe that you are a human
Jack was Rose’s escape from a life she hated. He helped her find her backbone.
Totally
She hated her life and he was an escape but she treated him as such cause she showed no real logic, grit or backbone in defending him. Only when they had to fight to survive did she have enough backbone to protect him. She couldn't defend his honor and keep him out of harms way. But she lived her life and thats all that matters im sure.
And the video says that once his purpose is fuffiled in rose's life, he's gone. So this whole movie minus her narrating as an old woman is all about HER. What about his story? what about his life?
@@60wwediva she most likely didn't know his whole life story, and she's not giving her life story. She's explaining her story on the Titanic. She rescued him and freed him from chains and he did the same for her. She kept his honor and lived and died the way he wanted her too. Did you even watch the movie?
Nailed It😮
What I liked a lot was that she went and lived her life after to jack died. She didn’t spend the rest of her life mourning him, she went and lived. Just like he told her to
Exactly!
Yup.. she didn’t mourn him, she honored him by honoring the promise she gave him
I never got it. But then again, my grandma lost my granddad when she was 26, and she never laid her eyes on another man since.
A lot of murderers do this.
I shed a tear when I saw the picture of her riding a horse like a man, like Jack told her they would do that together.
The entire movie is about a historical tragedy. Giving the movie a sad ending would make the viewers understand the real causes of the shipwreck. But keeping him alive would be as if the shipwreck wasn’t relevant to the plot at all.
No plotarmor in this masterpiece.
The story is perfect the way it is. I loved at the end how Rose died in the same place where Jack died, as an old lady and warm in her bed too, like Jack said she would. Then we get a little visual of heaven, where Titanic becomes alive again and Jack and Rose reunite. It’s beautifully done.
skandarkeynes _ skandarians Ignoring the fact that she had another life with another man she promised her life’s too. But heaven is with Jack. I guess this is where death do us apart comes into play hahaha
SHE DIED THERE omg u made me cry all over again😂
skandarkeynes _ skandarians I don’t understand why she dedicates herself to him. She must have fell in love again because we learn she has 2 children
Elernation People can have 2 children without being in love
Yes! So if you think about it, it’s a somewhat happy ending, because she gets to live eternity with Jack.
Jack also in my opinion was more than Roses voice. He was the embodiment of all who died that night. Jacks will to live was sooo strong he fought with everything he had to survive which made his death all that bitter. Amd to me its a symbol of the struggle of those who did not survive. That we may never forget the unfortunate who fought hard to live but still lost their lives.
I was thinking the same thing, to me Jack isn't just a character his an allegory.
This is so true, the dad reality of the titanic is that some (Rose and the other first class passengers like Cal, her mother, etc) survived but many (Jack) died, it wouldn’t have been realistic for them to both live honestly
Exactly. It would've almost felt disrespectful to those who actually died that night to give Jack and Rose a happily ever after ending.
It would've cheapened the tragic aspect of the whole story.
😮👏👏👏
Can we just appreciate rose's delivery of "he put a pistol in his mouth"? Savage
@@PennyMsElite ?
That line was cut a bit and the full line shows that not only did cal not learn any lessons but his shallow values about money were passed on to his kids, here is the unabridged line
"He married of course and inherited his millions, but the crash of 29 hit his interests hard and he put a pistol in his mouth that year, his heirs fought over the remains of his estate like hyenas, or so I read.
Cal was such an asshole! This is what Rose's mom Was pimping her out to! Jack saved Rose's life multiple times in just three days. Saved her from jumping in the beginning, from hypothermia and drowning in the end and from pimp mom and asshole Cal!
Incidentally Rose risked her life to save Jack so they could be together just a few more hours. The story was intense!
@@ryanr20091he should have just told him straight up…despite the fact her mother was pushing her hard to marry him, so that the family could have resources? How does that work
How about Cal could have backed off, once he realised she wasn’t interested
Jack had to die because a story about a historical tragedy having a happy, sweet ending is morally wrong.
honestly.very logical response.
rachie but even if he survived the ending wouldn’t be sweet because of all the other people that didn’t make
@@datboisus3981 But we wouldn't be focusing on anyone except Jack and Rose.
THIS!!!
No, Jack living wouldn't make the story morally wrong... it would make the event historically inaccurate. Besides the tragic love story tugging at the heartstrings the complete inexperience of the crew created a LOT of widows. Husbands, male lovers, fathers... men and boys died more so than women and girls. For both to live would be perfection but inaccurate. For both to die would actually have been accurate though there would be nobody to tell the story. To have Jack live and Rose die would be seen as selfish on Jack's part. For Rose to live would show the metaphor of the men sacrificing themselves to save the women they loved. Though I'm sure it did happen that men made it onto the boats, with the hopes that their wives and kids got onto another but that didn't happen would be true too.
No matter how many times I watch it, I always hope the ship won't hit the iceberg 😂😂😂😂😂🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
TemaOfficial if the titanic never sank, this story would've never existed
The lucky One321 but it’s not like we would miss it because you can’t miss something that doesn’t exist
Same and I’ve seen this movie dozens of times. I’m always like FUCK THEY HIT IT!! FUCK FUCK FUCK
TemaOfficial same
Imagine if one time it doesn't 😳
" if your ship is going down .. what does it matter what class you're going to die in"
That's such a profound statement about the eternity of death
“the story has no more use for him” god damn can you let me down easier next time
that escalated quickly 😂
Great video. You mention that Jack has the feeling of unreality about him, like he's a little too good to be true. There's a pretty good explanation for this... And it comes down to the fact that the elderly Rose is the one telling the story. It's entirely possible that she's the typical unreliable narrator - exaggerating the facts to make Jack even better or even moreso, she remembers things differently after a lifetime of recollection..
"He lives now, only in my memories" and memory, is fallable.
Again, yes! And again, a little-made point! :)
Yes absolutely correct. Not to mention she literally only knew him for a few days so they were still in their intial "honey-moon" phase of love where you dont notice the bad things about your partner.
Kind of like the 1997 Lolita movie, I first watched it and was shocked that I felt sorry for the guy ( I even cried at the end lol) and I really didn't like Lo, till I read that the story is told from his point of view and it made so much more sense.
Cynic.
Exaaactly... people forget it is not a real story.. it is a story told by Rose..her version of what happened.. her version of right and wrong, good and bad.
Jack and Rose having a happy ending by surviving the Titanic would've romanticized the tragedy.
THISSSSS IS THE REAL REASON. THISSSSS.
It’s already romantised
I don't get it..
@@calmcalm6203 Romanticising means to take something (like an event) and make it look better than how it actually was, or look like something that you want to go through.
Basically it means if Jack had survived, the movie would end up just looking like a romantic adventure film, which would be very distasteful to the families of those who died in the Titanic's sinking or had survived (but probably would've been very traumatised because of the sinking itself and losing loved ones)
The 2 animated Titanic movies did that. In fact one of them didn't have anyone die. Offensive!
So Leonardo DiCaprio really is an angel sent from above to save us all. I knew it.
Rebecca Nelson he only saves people until they turn 25
He’s a real life angel no cap
@@jasik.8611 but he saved samantha in sex and the city once.
Tejaswini Dewangan I’m talking about real life, but it’s just a joke😂
James Cameron is one of the only few male directors out there who generally makes his female characters way more compelling than his male characters. I just get a sense he's so much more interested in their plight rather than guys. Even the two villains in Titanic. Rose's mother and her fiance. One is a one dimensional, over the top scumbag and the other is cruel but has a sympathetic backstory that drives why she is the way she is.
Mostly, except for Terminator
Yes. He's a true feminist, in that he will dump Linda Hamilton for a younger model
You can fight for women's right and still treat some particullar woman like trash. Being a feminist is not an alpha and omega of morality.
That doesn't make it good. If you are a top storyteller all your characters should be well developped. But I thought in the Abyss both the male and female lead husband and wife characters were equally strong.
Good point
Even though Jack and Rose is just a fictional character I still believe that their story will represent that there's anyone on that ship that could possibly be a Jack and Rose in real life to each other and promised that they will never let go even they are on the verge of dying and giving each other the power of will to live.
I was thinking that
Ah, one of my favorite movies. As much as I would've loved for Rose and Jack to get the traditional/cliche "happily ever after," the movie wouldn't have held the same dramatic and iconic weight that it holds in pop culture: Every time I ask someone what they remember about this movie, the answer's always, "Jack dies" and it took me a while to accept that, in the narrative, he HAS to: As you said, he teaches her the will to live and not just to live, but to live through joy AND sorrow, which is why is she able to go on years later after he's gone, unlike in the beginning where she's going to jump: She doesn't feel helpless and through her journey with Jack, she discovers that she's far from it. If anything, I see this film as the living embodiment of the saying, "Sometimes we need others to see the thing inside that we can't see ourselves," because that's what Jack sees in Rose: Fire and life and passion and will. She just needed to see it too. (:
Well said
Wow.. what a remarkable thought
MY FAVOURITE MOVIE
Indeed, as sad as the ending was, it made it all the more romantic that Jack sacrificed himself for Rose, so I can totally understand why they wrote it that way.
That was very mean what Miss mojo said the story has no more use for Jack like are you kidding me his death was the most horrible thing ever I know everybody else died on the boat but jack dying that was so sad
“Committing to being alive , means committing to living as ones authentic self “ Story of my life ✨
Dying is easy, living is harder.
The truth.
"The point is that Jack has a subtle air of unreality to him"
Excellent!
He DID try to get on the door and it immediately buckled! Am I the only one who remembers?! Also amazing video and I always look forward to your analysis.
Exactly, even if they had both managed to get on, there was water literally flowing over the door and they both would have died thru hypothermia.
aakksshhaayy Right?? He clearly tried to get on and couldn’t without the door sinking.
Your all right, but the debate comes from should it have, would it have happened in real life.
They tried once LOL
omg righttttt? I have been saying this to everyone with the "door theory" for years, u literally see him trying in the scene lol
If he just didn’t win the poker game.
And he wouldn’t have saved her
Julimar Martinez he wouldn’t be dead himself though
UNO Sheem true!!😳😳 omg
yeah but then he wouldnt have met rose and he was the reason she survived because he gave her strength and when she saw him dead she ws willing to die to be with him but then she remembered the promise that she made him that she would survive and die an old old lady warm in her bed and she did and when they reunited the clock behind jack it read 2:20 am wich is the exact time the titanic compelety sank
@iyanna just the facts
"What's your name?"
"Rose...
Rose Skywalker."
Rise of Skywalker reference lol
@@thatoneturtle7737
more like Rose of Skywalker
Lol
Had me in the first 2/3rds, not gonna lie.
BAHAHAHAHA
Jack had to die to make us cry, well that rhymes
My friends and I are REALLY BIG fans of titanic and we always argue about why jack had to die. Next time, we argue about it, I’ll say this
Beautiful. Magnificent. Awesome U R Special ,he died be cause he was very cold what kinda question is that
It wasn't even remotely sad
I wasn't even sad
I really enjoyed this breakdown and 100% agree with the thematic use of Jack as a character. Iv been meaning to rewatch this for ages and this really got me excited about it again and also helped me see it differently! Great job!
Me too. From the earliest moment this movie came out in late 97' it made you wondering why Jack had to die and if there was any way that the *decision* could have been made for him to survive. Going as far as imagining different story plots and endings of your own to make sense of it. I always had an idea nevertheless that James Cameron wanted the tragic story of Titanic to be told and not some happy ending Romeo & Julia kind of story.
In that regard it made sense because Jack's death made the sinking of the Titanic so much worse. Bawling your eyes out etc. But with this *explanation* by Screenprism it all falls into place even more. You're totally looking different at it now. James Cameron was way ahead of its time, proving once again.
The thing about that is... like he had interactions with other characters in the movie, and People had interactions with him.
He drew that picture, and it was proven that he drew it when it was all over the news.
It’s not like the picture just came out of nowhere.
That’s the only problem with it.
Had she not met jack (and not jumped off the stern, which Jack called her out that she wouldn't have), wouldn't she have not been in the floating door situation? I mean.. not criticizing the story at all because I love the movie... but realistically, this romance probably caused Jack's death, and the death of Lovejoy, and likely Fabrizio... because if they had not met she would have been on a lifeboat, and Cal and Lovejoy would have made the arrangement with First Officer Murdoch, and Jack, being survival-oriented, would have figured out a way for him and his friend to escape and survive the disaster... Furthermore, the two security guards in the mail-hold wouldn't have died at the time of impact because they wouldn't have been in there searching for those two when it flooded!
Rose: It's not up to you to save me, Jack.
Jack: You're right. Only YOU can do that.
THIS philosophy needs to be taught in every school on the planet. YOU are the maker of your destiny.
"I want you to draw me like one of your French girls."
Epic meme
Q from trek
D VDV I CaNt rOlL iN pEiCe
First the emotional flute song, and now french girls-
“Draw me like one of your French. g h o r l s
-gru
...wearing this, wearing ONLY this.
I think we all know deep down that Jack had to die. In a sense, he represented the ship's downfall as well as everyone else who passed away that night. It makes the movie so much more emotional, so much more tragic, that he died. Of course, that doesn't stop us from trying to evaluate why he couldn't have lived. For many of us, our hearts yearn to find a way he could've possibly lived - and that was the exactly intended emotion. Cameron wanted us to develop such an emotional attachment to his character that we would grieve strongly for him following his death. He just did such an incredible job with it, we're still crying for Jack to live, and we're still battling with our heavy emotions on the issue years later.
But can we honestly say that Titanic would still draw the same extensive heartfelt, bittersweet emotions from its audiences; would Jack even be as captivating, knowing he would still be alive by the end of the film? I think the fact he is taken away from us makes the story so much more memorable; his death therefore makes him as well as the film so much more beautiful, more alluring, and more incandescent - and that's excluding the fact alone that he is played by Leonardo DiCaprio, who only adds to his undeniable charm ;)
So that's why Jack ultimately had to die. The movie simply wouldn't be nearly as meaningful or even enjoyable, really, if he hadn't. As much as my heart aches that he died, and that I can't envision an entire life of Jack and Rose raising their adorable children together, it makes me flat-out adore the story even more. The emotional elements within Titanic are so much more than merely love alone. It has pain, desire, fear, doubt, hopelessness, hopefulness, anger, frustration, wistfulness, longing... which only strengthen the depth of love present in the movie. All these emotional elements combined is what truly makes for a successful, beloved, timeless, and memorable film
eh. find a way he could have possibly lived? he could have lived by sticking to logic and not putting himself in dangerous situations in the midst of rose's beef with her fiance. he could have put himself first at least 3 times. idk why everyone is acting like jack was doomed with no way out. love killed him purely and simply
I agree, that it's about the emotional impact and the narrative. But I also think it's about allowing the tragedy to...'breathe,' so to speak. As in... Giving you tragedy, with a backdrop of better things, so you can process the tragedy within the larger framework of a happier or different life.
And your brush with Jack's symbolism as a character is really spot on. What's fascinating is that you get into meta commentary with the thought that Jack's downfall parallels the 'downfall of the ship,' so to speak. It's a topic that's been debated a lot, and a lot of conclusions have been drawn between a ship's maiden voyage - Rose feeling trapped on said ship and coming out stronger for it, and the ways the two stories can parallel reach other, inversely, or side by side (depending on how you look at the whole story.) But a majority of commentators agree that Rose and the Titanic's stories parallel each other in a lot of ways. Just as the modern consensus seems to agree (largely) that Rose losing her virginity is not only a metaphor but an allegory of a lot of other things (virginity as a change of a woman's state of being, Rose as a maiden and the Titanic as one are the same until the point of the iceberg when Rose's recent sexual experience gives her New wisdom, the idea that the Titanic never finished Her maiden voyage while Rose did as reasoning for her surviving, and so on) the majority of people agree that Jack's death is a tragedy, but one within a much larger framework, whether it's the metaphor of him being a third class passenger, or (in this argument) a plot device allowing Rose's own self realization, Jack's death rides on a lot of other factors, and virtually any objective way to look at the narrative agrees, Jack's dying was the right narrative choice for Cameron as the writer, and Titanic as a story.
DiCaprio should read this :p
You wrote a lot for a TH-cam comment
can't we all realize if rose got on the dang safe boat, he easily could've lived by going on the door in the water, and gotten saved. yes for the storyline he had to die, but he didn't really HAVE to. rose wasted a lot of time, aswell. rose really is- well.... stubborn. she cant just get on a safe boat. that would have worked out well. IF SHE GOT ON THE BOAT.
rose is so unbelievebly strong! after jake died she didn't hesitate to live a full life like he told her to instead of feeling sad because she lost the love of her life. I think I would've stayed with jack in the water and died with him
It was a little much for her to compare herself to slaves on the triangle trade.
Jack was stronger.
I only just noticed when Jack tells Rose her fire will go out if she stays as she is, and also when she asks him to draw her, she's wearing a butterfly, a symbol of emergence and change, in her hair. Well done, Deborah Lynn Scott.
Well put. Thank you soo much for enlightening me!
I like that we actually see her wear it as opposed to seeing one time early on and never again.
The door started off as a joke , but some people took it way to serious lol.
James Cameron hit the nail on the head when he said that he should have used a smaller piece of wreckage.
The Take: Jack's purpose is to make Rose find her will to live
Me who has crippling depression: *I THINK I NEED A JACK IN MY LIFE BECAUSE. . . WHAT IS WILL TO LIVE???*
a moment of silence
Appreciation.... To be able to spit as far as you can , to stretch out your arms at the helm of a boat, the air in your lungs, meeting fine people, art, food, dressing up, the ability to run around and be silly, the memories of happy past moments.... are just a few of the things worth living for......I hope I helped a little......Jack.❤
Iodine Cerium. Please read my post above this
😂😂😂 SAME!
@@asura--- 😂😂
because it's better to leave your audience sad and longing so they will keep discussing about the ending.
RetiredChild you got it!!!
Because to have everyone always survive and live happily ever after in stories gives us heart candy, but it doesn't give us insight into our fellow man in terms of how life REALLY impacts us, and what it REALLY does to us emotionally, what we REALLY go through, and the scars and treasures and traumas and regrets and heartaches we REALLY have to cope with. Heart candy doesn't connect us in the way something like this does. And at the end of it, that connection is more what we're REALLY looking for when we tell stories.
Exactly. Feel good happy endings simply aren't always reality, so the movie ends up cheesy and stupid if it ended this way.
I have been in the "Jack is imaginary" camp for quite some time, not because I think Rose lied about having some love affair on the Titanic. But because Jack is an amalgamation of everyone who lost their lives on the Titanic, perhaps that's why Jack seems so perfect. His not just a person, his a symbol for the oppressed and marginalized, ,for everyone who lost their lives too soon.
neosoontoretro :-O I’ve never heard this theory before!
Don’t believe that but good theory
But the drawing?
If that pic is really you, you're absolutely stunning. Why don't you have any vids or instagram? You could be a model.
But the drawing was still there so how is does he not exist, he drew it and it wasn't found my rose but by other people who didn't even know he existed
If they hadn’t made the movie “titanic” I wouldn’t have known who Leonardo DiCaprio is. Lmfao
Same
I knew who he was before Titanic I had seen What's Eating Gilbert Grape
Growing Pains?
Say what you want about James Cameron, but he does know how to write strong, female characters.
Well, look who he married: Gale Ann Herd, one of the greatest producers in history.
rose isn't a strong female character at all if her story arc needed a man to freeze to death just to make her "live".
if she was strong and resourceful, jack would have been alive.
You don't understand her character development, clearly. She's strong because she rejected everything that was deemed "respectable" and "successful" in the world she was raised in.
An Morein
actually, most people are quick to ignore her character flaws for the sake of feminism in cinema.
she's not even a good example for a strong feminist. everything was thrown at her feet. though her mother was horrible, she did try to find her a "good match". even when the boat was sinking, both jack and cal convinced her to go into one of the lifeboats, yet what did she do? she jumped into the water to be with jack. FFS, if she had only stayed in the darn lifeboat, jack could have had the door to himself and not have to die for her. it was even so pointless of her to go into the water, as she had no intention of actually saving jack, she just wanted to be near him. in the end, she made herself a damsel that needed to be saved by her man, who had to die in the process when she was already SAFE in the lifeboat to begin with.
also, it's so unrealistic that, man or woman, the one who survives doesn't even live with the guilt of having the other die for them. she was fondly remembering how jack's ass froze in the friggin ocean.
i fail to understand why everybody is calling rose a "strong" character. what exactly did she do that was so brave and heroic? saying no to her mom and cal? that's pathetic.
meanwhile, the poor guy who literally dies in the story is a "mere prop" for her to realize that she should live. FFS...
Maggy Frog Yeah, duh. Characters are supposed to have flaws. You’re completely ignoring the inner conflict of Rose’s character and the time period the film is set in. It was expected for women to obey their husbands, and not only that, Rose had the obligation of basically selling herself to this man so her family (mother) could survive. She rejects everything that’s considered as success in her life to go with someone who is deemed the “scum” of society. Perhaps stop watching superhero movies. Your expectations for the development of these characters are ridiculous.
Great analysis! I have to shake my head at all the people who even now seem to think that Titanic is Jack's story, when Cameron showed with every image, allegory, and event in the script that it was Rose's journey, start to finish. Indeed, folks, sometimes the hero wears a dress.
I think the significance of that last scene where Rose reunites with Jack in a white dress means that Rose has passed on after giving the necklace to the sea. That scene always pulls at my heart strings. One of the most devastating things that I think you could live through is your significant other passing. I told my husband that even though I’m 13 years younger than him I’ve called Debs on dying first. LOL but seriously I can’t help but burst into tears every time I think of him passing before me..
Also because it wasn’t a space issue, it was a weight issue. He tried to get on the door and it wouldn’t hold both of them.
That makes more sense. It's just hard to tell from the 2 sec clip of them both trying to get on.
It's not that hard! It's logic...
That’s why people in the video were commenting about the life jackets. The idea is, if they’d stuffed one under the door, it would have added enough buoyancy to support both their weight
When you're in water that cold you go unconscious within 30 min. It's incredible they even thought to swim to the door in the first place, let alone trying to grab random life jackets off people to buoy the door up.
nah, it really was a plot hole issue. a door that size could have saved the both of them with a little bit of resourcefulness.
no amount of romance or drama could convince me that it's a good idea to throw logic under the bus so that the hero dies trying to save the damsel in distress when they could have lived together and that still would have been romantic and dramatic all the same.
as far as the character arcs go, i don't buy that rose would really let jack die like that. that moment could have been her ultimate character growth by being a bit more resourceful instead of idiotically saying, "i won't let go jack" and then lets the poor guy freeze and sink to the abyss. i also don't buy that she was utterly happy and absolutely fulfilled in her new life knowing she let her great love die for her. that's too much BS imho.
james cameron could have at least made her have that one great regret in her life while still trying to live large. instead, it's like she remembers jack dying quite fondly. i just don't like how it ended. in real life, if your great love dies for you like that, freezing to death and you letting that person go to sink in the bottom of the ocean, that's gonna leave you with survivor's guilt for sure, not a "happy ending".
SAW THE TITLE AND LITERALLY SCREAMED😭😭😭
I fanboyed too:p
Same Loooool
@Bobo Boy 😂😂😂i said the same thing
lol
this makes me cry, jack would have been such an amazing supportive person. telling her to promise she would live
Basically if the art department just made it smaller we would not have the debacle
I came to the comments specifically to say this.
I mean, visually, it does look big enough for two people. They done effed up. Haha.
Yeah. Damn the art and props department! Haha
Yes. Damn that prop department making the door historically correct.
its still symbolic. titanic was big enough to fit enough lifeboats for everyone. its SUPPOSED to cause frustration
still classic after all these years!
Hi
Put it simply: Jack was a tool for storytelling. 🤔
LET ME DOWN EASIER AHHHHHHH
@@juliannasummerallstories399 😂
Yes
Here’s my take on it:
At first I was very sad that Jack was dead and that he didn’t have to die. But I’ve realized it makes since that he did. Of course there were ways that he could survive. But it is for the best. The titanic was a tragedy and we all knew the boat was going to sink in the movie, but they couldn’t end the movie with it working out for Jack or Rose or for any of the other characters. And let’s face it, this movie wouldn’t be as good and emotional if he had survived. Directors and writers like to make people emotional, and I for sure cried after and that proves that it was a great movie.
If the Jack and Rose part of this story was real, I know they would be living together forever after she dies.
But the number one thing that bugged me is that Rose probably had multiple kids, most likely a boy, yet she didn’t name her son Jack I’m guessing!!!!
yea I get that last part too but she also took his last name which is a lot stronger than a child name to me that will go on from generation to generation
at least they re-united. Best bit by far. But wouldnt it be weird she name her kid jack? Like she was practically dating him innit.
If you think he should've survived, then you don't know Jack.
*exits room after awkwardly stumbling on own feet
Hubert Cumberdale i don’t even know what this references but i laughed
This comment is too damn funny
Top comment
Lol
Finest pun I’ve see in a long time!
The movie without the credits and modern titanic clips runs a total of 2 hours 40 minutes, the amount of time it took for the titanic to sink.
Wow, that is crazy to think it took only 2 hours and 40 minutes to sink, so. Dry very sad.
I don't know why but this video gave me more closure about my breakup than anything else. My boyfriend had Jack's character and what separated us wasn't death, but how frustrated he became with my actions in regard to not changing a bad situation I was in. I learned a lesson through my ex and I'm grateful for that :).
My problem was never about why Jack had to die but the fact that Rose threw the necklace in the sea. I know it was a symbolic move but what about all those people working to find it?
sivula17 they found out they were exploiting the disaster rather than truly understanding the tragedy.
I need a video analysis on this subject!!!!!
+Sirama
Could have donated it to charity. How many people could have been saved?
@@MADEbySOUL I think these are pretty strong words you're using. The crew of the ship was hired to retrieve the necklace, you make it sound like the had to walk on dead bodies and steal them. It was just their job and Rose made sure no-one would ever get it. And if she didn't want the crew to get it she could donate it and let be a symbol of love not only to her but also from her to others. But nooooooo
You should watch the alternative ending, it's worse
The take: “Rose is the hero”
Me:how tf is she the hero?
The take: “and jack is just a sexy life coach”
Me:mkay I mean thats kinda fair😅
Are u gotta sweeping on ps4
Great video and analysis. When people fixate on the door thing it's as if we're not conscious of the fact that it's a work of fiction and that detail serves the purposes of the story. Obviously, it's sad that he dies. But rewatching the film as an adult made it more apparent to me that as heroic as Jack Dawson was in the film, his purpose was primarily to serve Rose's character arc (so yes, definitely an example of the "Manic pixie dream boy"!). If he had lived, it would have been a happy ending... but I think Rose still got a happy ending.
Torin McCabe Are you fucking kidding me? :v
@@torinmccabe wtf? The fact that he's a man has nothing to do with it 😂, anyone is heroic for sacrificing their life for another.
@@torinmccabe it's a semi-accurate depiction of the time period (I've heard that the "women and children first" rule actually wasn't practiced in real life, though I'm not sure.) Unfortunately, women's life were treated as more valuable then men's at that point in time (in fact, that's similar to how it is even today, though to a much lesser degree). A byproduct of this was that women had very little agency and were quite literally second class citizens. Women are privileged in some ways just as men are privileged in others.
Interesting how you complain about feminist, yet you're the one who brought feminism into this.
He's a better Manic Pixie Dream Boy than any girl.
I thought that the point of Jack dying at the end was to show that he was chivalrous, he gave his live to save Rose.
I think so too.
Agreed, and representative of hundreds of men on the ship.
This explanation made me appreciate the story, which I always thought was cliché.
This is maybe the very best analysis of a movie I've ever seen, well done!
Check out the deepfocuslens channel. She’s really insightful.
Once again phenomenal breakdown! 👏🏽bravo! Y’all hit it right on the mark, it was never about the door.....it was bout the growth of Rose Dawson👏🏽👏🏽 great job ladies as always!!! One of the greatest films of all time. Such a classic!
It is true that the movie Titanic, because it came out in 97', was able to perfectly serve the temporary embodiment of female *empowerment* at that time. Just around the turn of the Millennium. From what I have seen in my life so far, it is quite obvious that the work of James Cameron has touched the lives of many women around the world with this great movie.
"Those two had only each other."-Joey Tribbiani.
Love it!🤣
Jack will always live *points at chest* in here.
@Lieve Rekers BAHAHAHAH no in our hearts you made me laugh too hard😂
Lieve Rekers 😂😂😂😂😂
Now it's official: Jack would have fit on the damn door.
A Boe who’s Jake?
*jack
Ya I know jake 😂 jack*
A Boe i think it’s the weight
@@Flowerdustx I think it's just part of the story. Like a deeper meaning and not the physical aspect that he couldn't get on the door.
JACK represents all the good men who sacrificed themselves & waived goodbye to their wives & children💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
ROSE represents all the strong women who survived & rebuilt their life after the tragedy..♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
I find that you people are too grown to be this slow... Jack TRIED to get on the board... when he did, it became unstable and seemed to sink a bit therefore he opted to leave ROSE alone on it. BEGINNING MIDDLE AND END. WOW...
but notice it's always him making the attempts with rose? she could have thought of taking turns with him but she gave up constantly mentioning she was cold, body numb, weak etc. no excuse
@@60wwediva they wouldve both died of hypothermia if they took turns in the water, being exposed to the freezing air AND water. Jack wanted to protect Rose and in the end she lived because of it. She lived her whole life for him.
THANK YOU
I mean, the way he was trying to climb on was pretty stupid
If jack didn’t exist then who drew Rose naked? 👀🤦🏾♀️
Mozzarella • then maybe it wasn’t her 👀
she drew herself. lol
@@Mpelladaki88 it says jack dawson on the paper lol
Her mother
@@amr_12_ lol
People always ask me what I think happens when you die. I'm 99.9% sure I'll go to heaven, walk up some stairs and kiss Leonardo DiCaprio.
YES
Oh my gosh I’m dead🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Rose: *ill never let go*
Rose 2 seconds later: *lets go of jack letting him into the depths of the ocean*
Yeah, can't be trusted an inch, that woman! Seriously though, wonderful nod to life's often cruel ironies that in order to not let go, she had to let go. VERY insightful.
catherinespark huh
Rose means she will never let go of the promise she made to jack; to survive
Do you believe there is only one possible meaning of "I'll never let go?"
10,000 subs no videos? UGH! For the love of god what did you expect from rose? To put his dead body on the life boat? She said she’ll never let go of the wonderful moments they had on the titanic and took his final words and did what she did in life until she died when the they reunited on the Titanic in heaven and lived happily ever after!
“The story has no more use for him”-said the narrator
Me- OH HELL NO
ikr, 1) who doesnt want a sexy life coach all their life? 2) they later contradict themselves saying rose becomes dawson so she never loses him
When I started to break down was when she told that one guy that her name was Rose Dawson, meaning that she put jacks last name as hers, I don’t know why but when she gave that guy her name with jacks last name I was sobbing
"He exists in order to empower Rose and give her the will to live ... and once that story purpose is fulfilled, he's gone."
So... Jack is a manic pixie dream girl?
edit: I now see that you make this point in the video. love it!
Jack was a symbol of all the brave men who could have through brute force forced their way into boats to save themselves, but instead sacrificed their lives for women. We sometimes just don't stop long enough to let our hearts melt over altruistic men....A modern day example w is all those young, handsome, strong men during the floods in Texas going back over and over again, for days, until exhaustion carrying out women, children the elderly and pets in their strong arms. They came from all over, they saved thousands of lives....Some men are so wonderful it brings me to tears....I cried watching those men in Texas and I cried remembering the men on the Titanic. God bless good men...The heart of God Himself must swell with pride at having made men like that.
rose wanted to die
jack wanted to live
rose lived for jack
jack died for rose-
im not crying u r
titanic isn't about jack saving rose; it's about jack giving rose the power to save herself.
This gave me so hard nostalgia....flashback to a time when movies were actually good and female lead was not just a romantic doll for male actor....!!!
Think about it, if jack was not there
Rose would be dead.
Also funny thing, “Jack” was my celebrity crush when I was five.
She would have still been alive. She would have climbed on that boat with her mum and married
Caledon Hockley not knowing Jack was even alive.
@Arlie Satchitananda ૐ or not, when jack found her she was hesitant.. She probably wouldn't have really did it
@Arlie Satchitananda ૐ hahaha yeah, not so good
@@sarojadreyer8630 Actually, at the beginning of the movie, he saved her from a suicide attempt ... so there wouldn't have been an old Rose without a Jack.
I genuinely don't know if I enjoy a film analysis TH-cam channel more than yours! Great job as always!
*Why Jack had to die*
Because Titanic is a melodramatic romance, so the ending has to be bittersweet or sad to make the audience cry. Mind you, I'm not saying melodramatic in a negative way. The screenwriter knew what Titanic had to be for it to be popular, and he achieved that spectacularly.
+Marc
If only someone had made a video about the topic which goes into detail about this.
Farnsworth: Oh... A man can dream, though. A man can dream...
An early 20 century woman 's life is melodramatic. Sorry if this is not your life story to feel represented. Sometimes is not all about you.
Jack has to die because we can't have a happy ending about a movie based on a real life event where 1,500 people died.
they could have at least made jack's death realistic and logical. instead, it had to be death by plot hole.
Marc Shanahan Titanic is based on a real ship
Jack and rose represented peoples of TITANIC..
Jack represented people who lost their life and rose represented people who lost their loved one on sinking of TITANIC
But Leo was hot back in his young days
I think he looks better now.
L D exactly
Still is.
he still got it
We are talking about jack death and your here talking about leo face 😑😡
This is exactly why it's one of my favourite movies. It pains me when I see that people don't understand that it is more than a love story, and that the message behind it is about finding the will to live. It's one of the movies that does it the best, and it's unfortunate that it is hidden by the popularity of its romance.
the last scene... when the camera goes into the water and the ship appears as new... when she enters the room and every major actor is there happily, greeting her... when she meets jack at the end...
oh god i ugly cried so much... oh man
People really shouldn’t fixate on the science of a story because they’re going to miss the art
LOL the so-called "art" is shallow if basic science can ruin it. good art gets backed up by real life science all the time.
@@maggyfrog It was shown in the movie that the door wouldnt hold both their weights. It works within the movie, and nobody in the audience will, in that 5 second part of the movie, be able to tell whether that doors buoyancy is enough or not lol. It's irrelevant to the story, it doesn't break the immersion, it's a minor detail.
Lars T.
james cameron admitted to mythbusters that the door should have been smaller. that is the film maker himself admitting that the size of the door is indeed a problem.
@@maggyfrog Yes but it is still not a stretch to believe that it couldn't hold their weight, the movie indicated that it couldn't, and even if that's not 100% accurate, i think it works fine. And you also have to take into account that it's not unrealistic that Jack would simply fear it not being able to hold them up both. He tried once, then gave up immediately to not put Rose in any more danger. Any more seconds of her being exposed to the water and she could have easily died from shock/hypothermia. It doesn't take much more, and he knew that. So she let her rest on there alone
Lars T.
see this response doesn't make sense anymore when you are aware of the thought processes of the film maker behind that particular scene. it's very simple, the film maker was made to realize that the scene indeed has a problem with the door, which he agrees with and says the door should have been smaller to make sure jack really dies because that's the story. the door is indeed a problem. there's no more doubt about that and yet people will still defend it for some strange reason.
and about jack letting rose hog the door, that makes zero sense if you take into account jack's personality and will to survive as presented in the movie. he should have tried to look for other debris because not doing anything is suicide. that's more of a character plot hole imho. it's more likely that rose would be the one who gives up on surviving given her initial suicide attempt.
also, even if jack dies in the process of finding other debris to save himself, what's important is that the character integrity is kept intact. instead they had to go for the melodrama and so jack simply held on to the edge of the door which is stupid. he could still die in the attempt to save himself when rose was already safe in her own door, the film maker should have made his character try to survive. think about this situation in real life. you know you will die if you stay in the water, so why would you stop trying to look for debris or help? it won't make jack less heroic or less in love with rose if he tries to save himself because he's already letting her hog the door. but of course that's not "romantic" therefore people will defend the idiotic scene.
Please tell me that I’m not the only person who cried when watching titanic 😐
I even cried on this video alone 🤣🤣🤣
Girl... you ain’t special
Rihanna Vlogs I know I did so, did my Mom
We all did
Didn't we all cry? Lol
Ah - I remember when I saw Titanic in theaters. December 1997. I was a sophomore in college and it was the fastest 3 hours of my life. When Jack died, I was in such shock, I couldn't cry. I was frozen stiff in my chair because it was the first time I saw a movie in which the director had the guts to kill one of the main characters. Years later, I bought a book about screenwriting before I wrote my first script and in 1 of the chapters, there were 1-line descriptions of famous movies. "Titanic is Romeo and Juliet on a ship liner." So - yes - Jack had to die. Looking back all these years, It makes sense Jack died - he held a third-class ticket.
If you think about it, the titanic is just another movie that shows how to the rich survive off the sacrifices of the poor.
Pretty much how the disaster itself panned out.
That is not the story they're telling though. Not at all. There are poor people who were in the life boats and rich people who drowned.
It wasnt about rich or poor, it was about woman and children first
Imma just say this...
As a simple answer why he didn’t get in the door.
They were freezing and scared... does anyone remember that part?
No matter how smart and skillful you are, when you have several factors overwhelming you, your head is always anything but useful.
Have you imagined how hard would’ve been for Jack to get on the door? His limbs were probably already numb, even Rose’s were and she was “safe” by not being in the water.
By all of this factors, I bet they wouldn’t be able to manage a plan for Jack to get in either.
The wouldn’t be able to think straight and their bodies would’ve been so numb and weak.
Sometimes you got to remember that these were meant to be normal people...
Honestly. Some of these people are saying "they could have used life jackets to hold up the door!" or "they could swap places every five minutes!" They're freezing and exhausted and terrified, you fucks! Most people can't even function without their morning cup of coffee, much less the rest of the crap Jack and Rose went through that night.
Did you know that Jack was actually not dead when Rose let him go, it was proven that Jack was in Stage 3 of hypothermia, which means he was only unconscious...
i need a link or proof right now
He would die anyway. They waited for Carpathia for hours in the cold.
Hes literally dead it says he died in the script so no, he’s dead when she drops him
No, please. Don't give me hope.
@Henry Lewis How the hell was she supposed to pull him up? Just stop.
Titanic is a tragedy, it just makes sense.
Briandon Stark it’s a tragedy, but it’s also a hero’s arch... rose being the hero.
Yes, this is also why he had to die. It would have been undecent if the main characters would have basically benefitef from the tragedy. Ang Rose has the character arc so she could not die.
+Sara Samaletdin I don't know if I agree with that last point. Characters with arcs die all the time, if anything it makes their arcs more compelling. MacBeth is the greatest example.
Briandon Stark
this comment doesn't make any sense. just because it's a tragedy doesn't mean that the story itself should end illogically.
edit:
if your username is a reference to game of thrones / a song of ice and fire, you should know that character deaths ought to be free from any kind of plot hole to maximize the tragic effect.
@@MANJYOMETHUNDER111 Things Fall Apart is also a great example of tragedy befalling the main character. Plays perfectly into the themes and plot.
If rose would’ve got on the first life boat instead of jumping back on the ship jack would’ve only had to worry about himself and would’ve probably been the one on the price of wood. Then with both would’ve survived
Uh, no. Jack was handcuffed on a lower level of the boat and would have drowned.
And if the ship had listened to any of the five iceberg warnings, it wouldn’t have hit the damn thing in the first place.
Stern Fan actually that was after. Wen she was getting lowered onto the life boat kal and jack looked down at her but she jumped back on the sinking ship. Get your facts right
But it was jack who started the "you jump, i jump" scheme. Rose had to return the favour.
Actually someone had a key to the binoculars, nobody would have died.
{ not in the movie}
What I think is if both Jack and Rose survived, the audience would have left the movie theatre being happy as the main characters were safe. But since Titanic was a disaster, a tragedy, the movie makers would have wanted the audience to feel the loss of a loved one. Probably that's why they make us grow so close to Jack.
Jack represented the people who died and Rose represented the people who lived after the tragedy
I would disagree. For instance, there were numerous moments in the movie that had made me on edge with my emotions and feelings already, including the sight of Rose and Jack at the front of the ship and singing: _"come Josephine in my flying machine"_ ...saving Jack from his hand cuffs down at the Master-At-Arms and when Rose says goodbye to Jack and jumps right back on the ship to be with him: _"you jump, I jump"_ etc.
The Bottom-line is, that the movie, the whole narrative and music was hitting you in the feels already everywhere where you were going. Even when Rose was ready to give up when she and Jack were in the water, both shaking and trying to instill hope and strength in this dire situation that they they were in.
Add on top the loss of the majesty of the RMS Titanic and all the other innocent passengers who we had seen dying, including Fabrizio, Tommy Ryan, Helga and Cora and their respective families, in addition to Thomas Andrews, Captain Smith, Murdoch and Trudy, Rose's maid, I would have not left the theater happy at all. It would still have been a very emotional experience.
The reason why Cameron made the audience grow so close to Jack, I think, was because there had to be this lead device for Rose to complete her transformation. And the only way was through some additional main character. Hence, Jack had to be a gentleman and someone who would treat Rose as an equal. But to do so, meant that he had to have many nice attributes and qualities, in addition to showing a willingness to survive and showing a sign of strength. And Jack's character fully did that, but a bit too much.
Meaning, the issue would end up becoming about Jack and that he had almost reached the level of being immortal and a superhero etc. ... e.g. the way how he carried himself throughout the movie. Ranging from almost getting his hands chopped off to almost drowning behind a locked gate. Cameron purely did this from a "blockbuster" point of view and wanting a spectacle. Not on the basis of bearing relevance and resemblance to reality. There isn't a problem with that, but it does make it conflicting when you let him suddenly die, knowing he could have made it.
@@litlifes3278 The other passengers we did see ending up dying, like Fabrizio, Tommy and Thomas Andrews, were already representing the people who died. Whilst Rose got to represent one of a sole female heroine.