Yeah I’ve been a fan of him ever since the 2022, I really hated when he lost to Alcaraz in the U.S. Open semifinal he should’ve won that match. And now so many people are jumping on the Sinner bandwagon.
@@YT-ol7ss There was one test and then a followup for confirmation 8 days later. So don't try to pretend he continually fails drug tests. In fact, name one tournament where he won and failed a drug test. Any one at all. Let's hear it. You kiddies never answer that for some reason. Why is that?
if you've got no weapons in your game you've got no chance vs Sinner but even if you do have big weapons in your game it's still impossible to beat Sinner as he doesn't take no damage, the guy is a machine you simply can't hit through him plus he doesn't give opponents time to take over point as his hitting is that big the opponent's are rushed all time and can't do anything and also he barely gives opponents chances to break, he hardly faces break points and even when he does he saves them pretty much all time with either a unreturned serve as that's one of biggest in game now his serve has improved massively and he's got one of best or a one two combo big serve then usually the big forehand. At moment biggest challenge in tennis is to bear Sinner
Anyone who uses the word "doped" against Sinner could be sued for slander, it would be technically and legally possible, it was an accidental and involuntary contamination, of a substance used not ingested, injected or applied directly to his body but passed to him through contact with the hands of his physio. Who writes that Sinner is doped is essentially one of the following categories: either he is a hater of his, or a toxic fan of others, or a troll who only wants to provoke, or someone who speaks by hearsay without knowing the facts, the rules and the ITIA documents. The ruling of the independent tribunal, with the positive opinion of experts including WADA itself, says that "there is no fault or negligence on Sinner's part for the double positivity to Clostebol". Between the notification of the suspension in April and the ruling in August Sinner was able to play because he filed an urgent appeal bringing evidence of his innocence, an appeal that was accepted given the evidence in his favor, all those who complain of preferential treatment either did not file an appeal in time or did not have sufficient evidence to have it accepted and those who complain about the fact that it remained secret for months do not know the confidentiality rule that came into force when the suspension was revoked in April and is valid until the final sentence is filed in August. WADA for "political" reasons made an appeal to the CAS in which it does not deny the conclusions of the sentence regarding the contamination but only the possible negligence of Sinner in not having avoided it, in reality the WADA regulation has some gaps regarding liability of the people who collaborate with the athlete, the fundamental point that Sinner absolves is that the mistake was not made on Sinner's body but on that of the physio and only indirectly on him, and to avoid it he would have had to violate his privacy. The mistake, in any case not his, still cost him 400 ATP points and more than 300 thousand dollars, the prizes of Indian Wells. This does not mean that he was at fault, but it is provided for by the rules when there is a positive even if it is not your fault and is independent of any disqualifications. The facts that demonstrate his innocence: - A billionth of Clostebol is equivalent to the type of a teaspoon in an Olympic swimming pool, ridiculous to think that it is doping and not contamination, especially ridiculous think that it could have in any way improved his performance. - All tests before and after Indian Wells are negative, Sinner has done more than 20 in the last year, in addition to the biological passport that proves nothing strange. - Clostebol was used by East German weight lifters in the 80s, since then many other better substances have been used for doping - There have been several cases identical to Sinner's due to Trofodermin, those in which there was neither fault nor negligence had the same outcome as Sinner (for example Brazilian swimmer Gabriel Santos, Argentinian footballer Josè Palomino, tennis players Marco Bortolotti and Matilde Paoletti and many others), the difference is that not being famous and not having enemies they did not create a stir.
@@djsleekmanali6489 All the athletes named at the end of the first comment had one or more positive (failed) "dope tests" to clostebol, and were all completely acquitted (with or without appeal to the CAS), plus many positives and also to other substances that proved their innocence. Sinner has already been judged innocent 3 times without guilt or negligence, at the appeal to the CAS if he is not for the fourth time it will be a huge scandal. I remind you however that WADA has already judged him innocent, the appeal only concerns his alleged negligence.
@marcobaldi6980 true, alcaraz isn't that great on hardcourt while sinner is a beast on hardcourt his movement was flawless in the finals and alcaraz needs to be at his best to beat this sinner
Ruud's comparison absolutely makes sense, since he's only had to deal with 2020-and-later Novak, not the 2011 or 2015 versions, and also with the majority of their meetings being on clay.
I'd argue that Novak has been more aggressive since 2021 than earlier in his career when he was arguably at his best. I agree that Ruud probably didn't play the "best" version of the GOAT, but I think that Novak was more passive and consistent back then
Also it should be mentioned. Winning the ATP Cup without dropping a set. He is the first singles player to do it since the ATP took over in 1990. It has been done twice in doubles.
That's because the quality of the men's tour is so awful today, that we don't even have a single young player that can stand up to Jannik Sinner besides Carlos Alcaraz.
Prior to 2004 Federer was beatable. Since 2004 unbeatable. 20 years later... prior to 2024 Sinner was beatable. Since 2024 unbeatable. Hard to say if he'll have a 4 years run of dominance to equal Federer but he definitely has the potential to achieve it. We'll see.
Federer lost a lot of matches to Nadal in that time (2004-08.) I wouldn't say that Jannik Sinner is unbeatable. He wouldn't win if he had to face Agassi or Sampras in their prime. Let alone the Big 3.
@CHillTennisEntertainment pointless type of argument. Any top 50 today would destroy the greats of the 90s on today's surfaces and with today's equipment. Sports evolve and improve, modern champions are usually always technically better than the ones in the past. So either we imagine giving today's champions rackets from the 90s to play on those fast courts against Sampras and Agassi, or we imagine Sampras Agassi growing up today on modern surfaces with modern equipment and training science, nutrition etc. Pointless really, we will never know.
@@JulienGaudfroy You are putting far too much emphasis on the modern equipment. It doesn't make all of the difference in the world. Case in point, Pete Sampras was able to win the 2002 US Open with an early graphite racquet that was made in the 1980s. Roger Federer also played with this racquet for a while. How could they win with such outdated technology? It's simple. Because the technology, really doesn't make that big of a difference.
The only one who can face Sinner right now with hope of coming out on top is Alcaraz due to his instinctive and unpredictable playing, Alcaraz compared to Sinner should be able to find more consistency in results
Jim Courier remarked that players need to adjust their strategies to beat Jannik. However, I don’t think that’s the main challenge. Jannik’s calm, emotionless demeanour lets him stay focused and tackle problems effectively. He consistently finds new ways to pivot and adapt to various situations.
Carlos can barely hold on to number 2, he needs to get more consistent also lower ranked players are not as scared of Alcaraz , he needs to regain that edge that Sinner has, Sinner hasn’t lost to a player outside the top ten
@@milosc__7310 Shelton is a hype-job going backwards (his return stats are off the charts bad), Musetti don't think will ever be a consistent danger to the Top 3 /5. Fils and Draper possible but have to prove themselves. Mensik at just turned only 19 a couple of months ago has more scope to be better than all of them. Already had a better record vs Top 10 than any of those players in 2024 (4 wins, 3 losses).
@@broncoguy4862 prize money increased through the years, i won't take it as an important stat. Still one of the top 10 or top 15 seasons of a tennis player in history.
What!! without Alcaraz, that was an easy win.Great season means Rafa 2008, 2010 and the best comeback in the history of tennis in 2013. I reviewed records and Sinner’s 2024 season is in the Top 15.His results are good but not even close to Big 3, other players like Laver,Connors, Mac, Vilas Graff, Serena, or the maximum record in tennis of Navratilova 86/1 en 1983.
Is no one going to talk about how alcaraz won two majors. Plus a first time olympian semi finalists. Has all three court surface majors. Plus didnt fail not one but two drug tests.
Yes because obviously, he was doping in March, talked his team members into taking the rap, convinced the ITIA and an Independent Tribunal of his innocence, but then decided to carry on with the steroids in the face of a WADA appeal and amid regular testing on the tour. Makes about as much sense as your sentence 🙄
do you see? this is one or many examples of the mediocrity of the average man. Superficial information, little intelligence, desire to show off and great difficulties in expressing themselves with sensible sentences and detailed and precise arguments. Words thrown away without having the slightest idea of what is being written. This is the real problem with social media. Everyone, even illiterates, can express themselves, and on the chat the weight of their words is equal to those of a Nobel Prize winner or those of a cultured and well-informed man. Welcome to digital mediocrity.
as a sinner fan, I'm so proud of him for not only his achievements on the court, but also how well he has managed the things off the court 🦊
Yeah I’ve been a fan of him ever since the 2022, I really hated when he lost to Alcaraz in the U.S. Open semifinal he should’ve won that match. And now so many people are jumping on the Sinner bandwagon.
You mean how he handled the backlash for failing more than one drugs test?
@@YT-ol7ssLeggi le carte prima di parlare. Capra.
@@YT-ol7ss🤡😭
@@YT-ol7ss There was one test and then a followup for confirmation 8 days later. So don't try to pretend he continually fails drug tests. In fact, name one tournament where he won and failed a drug test. Any one at all. Let's hear it. You kiddies never answer that for some reason. Why is that?
if you've got no weapons in your game you've got no chance vs Sinner but even if you do have big weapons in your game it's still impossible to beat Sinner as he doesn't take no damage, the guy is a machine you simply can't hit through him plus he doesn't give opponents time to take over point as his hitting is that big the opponent's are rushed all time and can't do anything and also he barely gives opponents chances to break, he hardly faces break points and even when he does he saves them pretty much all time with either a unreturned serve as that's one of biggest in game now his serve has improved massively and he's got one of best or a one two combo big serve then usually the big forehand. At moment biggest challenge in tennis is to bear Sinner
D1 glazer
@@LaneZinke great counterpoint bozo
Anyone who uses the word "doped" against Sinner could be sued for slander, it would be technically and legally possible, it was an accidental and involuntary contamination, of a substance used not ingested, injected or applied directly to his body but passed to him through contact with the hands of his physio.
Who writes that Sinner is doped is essentially one of the following categories: either he is a hater of his, or a toxic fan of others, or a troll who only wants to provoke, or someone who speaks by hearsay without knowing the facts, the rules and the ITIA documents.
The ruling of the independent tribunal, with the positive opinion of experts including WADA itself, says that "there is no fault or negligence on Sinner's part for the double positivity to Clostebol".
Between the notification of the suspension in April and the ruling in August Sinner was able to play because he filed an urgent appeal bringing evidence of his innocence, an appeal that was accepted given the evidence in his favor, all those who complain of preferential treatment either did not file an appeal in time or did not have sufficient evidence to have it accepted and those who complain about the fact that it remained secret for months do not know the confidentiality rule that came into force when the suspension was revoked in April and is valid until the final sentence is filed in August.
WADA for "political" reasons made an appeal to the CAS in which it does not deny the conclusions of the sentence regarding the contamination but only the possible negligence of Sinner in not having avoided it, in reality the WADA regulation has some gaps regarding liability of the people who collaborate with the athlete, the fundamental point that Sinner absolves is that the mistake was not made on Sinner's body but on that of the physio and only indirectly on him, and to avoid it he would have had to violate his privacy.
The mistake, in any case not his, still cost him 400 ATP points and more than 300 thousand dollars, the prizes of Indian Wells.
This does not mean that he was at fault, but it is provided for by the rules when there is a positive even if it is not your fault and is independent of any disqualifications.
The facts that demonstrate his innocence:
- A billionth of Clostebol is equivalent to the type of a teaspoon in an Olympic swimming pool, ridiculous to think that it is doping and not contamination, especially ridiculous think that it could have in any way improved his performance.
- All tests before and after Indian Wells are negative, Sinner has done more than 20 in the last year, in addition to the biological passport that proves nothing strange.
- Clostebol was used by East German weight lifters in the 80s, since then many other better substances have been used for doping
- There have been several cases identical to Sinner's due to Trofodermin, those in which there was neither fault nor negligence had the same outcome as Sinner (for example Brazilian swimmer Gabriel Santos, Argentinian footballer Josè Palomino, tennis players Marco Bortolotti and Matilde Paoletti and many others), the difference is that not being famous and not having enemies they did not create a stir.
Will CAS pass verdict in favour of Sinner .
Are you quite sure?
A Failed dope test...... Is a failed dope test!!
@@djsleekmanali6489 All the athletes named at the end of the first comment had one or more positive (failed) "dope tests" to clostebol, and were all completely acquitted (with or without appeal to the CAS), plus many positives and also to other substances that proved their innocence.
Sinner has already been judged innocent 3 times without guilt or negligence, at the appeal to the CAS if he is not for the fourth time it will be a huge scandal.
I remind you however that WADA has already judged him innocent, the appeal only concerns his alleged negligence.
doped
Fritz in the final played a level of tennis that was even higher than what’ve seen by Zverev, but against Sinner it isn’t enough
Only carlos can beat him when he is in this form.
@@GEICO316but not in this courts in my opinion.
@marcobaldi6980 true, alcaraz isn't that great on hardcourt while sinner is a beast on hardcourt his movement was flawless in the finals and alcaraz needs to be at his best to beat this sinner
Ruud's comparison absolutely makes sense, since he's only had to deal with 2020-and-later Novak, not the 2011 or 2015 versions, and also with the majority of their meetings being on clay.
Djokovic never hit harder player
I'd argue that Novak has been more aggressive since 2021 than earlier in his career when he was arguably at his best. I agree that Ruud probably didn't play the "best" version of the GOAT, but I think that Novak was more passive and consistent back then
Also it should be mentioned. Winning the ATP Cup without dropping a set. He is the first singles player to do it since the ATP took over in 1990. It has been done twice in doubles.
He mentioned in the finale party, great video
without even a tiebreak
A clear reflection on the state of the game. We lack high quality young players, besides Sinner and Alcaraz.
Ivan Lendl
That's because the quality of the men's tour is so awful today, that we don't even have a single young player that can stand up to Jannik Sinner besides Carlos Alcaraz.
I just realized that there’s music in the background of the video😂anyways, I love this content man
Prior to 2004 Federer was beatable. Since 2004 unbeatable. 20 years later... prior to 2024 Sinner was beatable. Since 2024 unbeatable. Hard to say if he'll have a 4 years run of dominance to equal Federer but he definitely has the potential to achieve it. We'll see.
Federer lost a lot of matches to Nadal in that time (2004-08.) I wouldn't say that Jannik Sinner is unbeatable. He wouldn't win if he had to face Agassi or Sampras in their prime. Let alone the Big 3.
@@CHillTennisEntertainment You are kidding I hope. Sinner's career has yet to begin and for now he is just training
@CHillTennisEntertainment pointless type of argument. Any top 50 today would destroy the greats of the 90s on today's surfaces and with today's equipment. Sports evolve and improve, modern champions are usually always technically better than the ones in the past. So either we imagine giving today's champions rackets from the 90s to play on those fast courts against Sampras and Agassi, or we imagine Sampras Agassi growing up today on modern surfaces with modern equipment and training science, nutrition etc. Pointless really, we will never know.
@@JulienGaudfroy You are putting far too much emphasis on the modern equipment. It doesn't make all of the difference in the world. Case in point, Pete Sampras was able to win the 2002 US Open with an early graphite racquet that was made in the 1980s. Roger Federer also played with this racquet for a while. How could they win with such outdated technology? It's simple. Because the technology, really doesn't make that big of a difference.
And he is going for the Davis Cup again….
The only one who can face Sinner right now with hope of coming out on top is Alcaraz due to his instinctive and unpredictable playing, Alcaraz compared to Sinner should be able to find more consistency in results
Jim Courier remarked that players need to adjust their strategies to beat Jannik. However, I don’t think that’s the main challenge. Jannik’s calm, emotionless demeanour lets him stay focused and tackle problems effectively. He consistently finds new ways to pivot and adapt to various situations.
I didnt see him stealing the #1 spot from Alcaraz like this. Carlos better be working on his serve in the offseason!
But Alcaraz losed twice..😁 Alcaraz not consintence
Carlos can barely hold on to number 2, he needs to get more consistent also lower ranked players are not as scared of Alcaraz , he needs to regain that edge that Sinner has, Sinner hasn’t lost to a player outside the top ten
I look forward to how the other players will adjust their games in the off season to solve their collective "Sinner problem" :)
Ruud in the semi was the joke of the week. Alcaraz end up in the easy group and manage to not classify.
Socks to bed = only way to sleep😂😅😂😅
big sock making bots now???
Bro u get to play on my colleges courts ??
grande campeon jannik
Sinner is a terminator !!!
Sinner might become the best in history… he doesn’t have a 3 big to stop him… maybe Alcaraz
Ya denle la copa a Sinner 🦊
Hi!!! 🖐🏻
You look like a younger version of Patrick Mourataglou
Sinner will need to do it all over again from January 2025 AO.......i can't wait 🫸🏾🫷🏾...
he's a very effective player but that was the most boring ATP Finals in I don't know how long...
I think next 1/2 years there will be a generational rechsnge at atp finals with more exciting guys like Fils, Musetti, Shelton, Draper
@@milosc__7310 Shelton is a hype-job going backwards (his return stats are off the charts bad), Musetti don't think will ever be a consistent danger to the Top 3 /5. Fils and Draper possible but have to prove themselves. Mensik at just turned only 19 a couple of months ago has more scope to be better than all of them. Already had a better record vs Top 10 than any of those players in 2024 (4 wins, 3 losses).
@@huzcer i agree on Mensik, i think Fils will be great in 2025, Draper and Musetti still can raise a lot their level
Too much talk about big 2 era and forget that Carlos he s rank 3
Why haven’t you guys talked about coco gauff winning the wta finals yet ?
WTA is Aryna and Iga's territory
One of the best seasons in tennis history?
I don’t think this compares to the 2011 and 2015 Novak seasons or the 2004-2006 RF
It's probably in the top 15, probably not in the top 10 of all time. I'd say that it qualifies as one of the best of all time.
Sinner has pocketed almost $17 million in prize money in 2024...definitely one of the best if not THE best season for any player in history, period.
@@broncoguy4862 prize money increased through the years, i won't take it as an important stat. Still one of the top 10 or top 15 seasons of a tennis player in history.
What!! without Alcaraz, that was an easy win.Great season means Rafa 2008, 2010 and the best comeback in the history of tennis in 2013.
I reviewed records and Sinner’s 2024 season is in the Top 15.His results are good but not even close to Big 3, other players like Laver,Connors, Mac, Vilas Graff, Serena, or the maximum record in tennis of Navratilova 86/1 en 1983.
Dude, do you know the actual meaning of "one of the best"?
❤
Is no one going to talk about how alcaraz won two majors. Plus a first time olympian semi finalists. Has all three court surface majors. Plus didnt fail not one but two drug tests.
Next video Is for Carlos
2nd place is the first loser
@@matteoventura6344 and how many majors have you won
Not in this video , it is only about Sinner.
Drug tests? That’s all you have ? Keep,crying loser
Is he doping?
He is clean!
È contaminazione, ma tu con quel cervello da gallina cosa ne vuoi sapere.
are you idioting?
solo invidia.....Us che dominano ii mondo...ma non il tennis
He's right now the most tested player in the tour, with all the eyes on him. You really think that he's doping now?😅
Another positive for anabolic steroids???
You wish
Another frustrated one spreading falsehoods on YT?
If "has done it again" is doping sure
Your attempt at a zinger doesn’t make any grammatical sense. Try again 🦊
Yes because obviously, he was doping in March, talked his team members into taking the rap, convinced the ITIA and an Independent Tribunal of his innocence, but then decided to carry on with the steroids in the face of a WADA appeal and amid regular testing on the tour. Makes about as much sense as your sentence 🙄
cry more how sad
No it’s your mother
do you see? this is one or many examples of the mediocrity of the average man. Superficial information, little intelligence, desire to show off and great difficulties in expressing themselves with sensible sentences and detailed and precise arguments. Words thrown away without having the slightest idea of what is being written. This is the real problem with social media.
Everyone, even illiterates, can express themselves, and on the chat the weight of their words is equal to those of a Nobel Prize winner or those of a cultured and well-informed man. Welcome to digital mediocrity.
Didn’t Nole earn more than 23 M, in 2015?