Columbus resident here, you hit it right on the head! Our gun laws are pretty good in Ohio. We have permitless carry now too, which is awesome. It has actually dropped mugging and robbery rates in some areas in Ohio. Criminals just don't know whether somebody is packing or not!
Always found the silencer restrictions completely pointless, especially since in most states and towns you are required by law to have a functioning muffler on your vehicle for noise reasons and if you don't you can get pulled over and you won't pass your vehicle inspections but their states that say you have to have a muffler on your car but if you want to put one on your firearm so you don't annoy your neighbors You're not allowed to and if you make one it's 10 years in prison.
Imagine if the government put a 9% tax on cars "to help victims of drunk driving". There would be rioting in the streets. (Also, like this 9% tax on guns, we all know what that money would really be going to: right back to the state.)
Not a single one of these dumb laws do anything to actually hold criminals accountable for their actions. These laws have nothing to do with addressing violent crime and everything to do with civilian disarmament.
True, but if COVID has taught us anything, our "democracy" is exceptionally good at using fear and ignorance in order to enact draconian policies in the name of "safety." That indicates a strong need to focus on cultural shifts away from safetyism and into an acceptance that bad things happen and one ought to be prepared to face them rather than have the government "remove" them. While dealing with the legislative problems _is_ a worthwhile fight, it's not the only one, and probably not the most important one in the bargain.
Is it that they think that firing pins can’t be replaced or can’t be purchased elsewhere and replaced? Even better. Someone goes to a firing range and picks up 10 different shell casings of all the same caliber and leaves them all at the scene of a crime… Now what?
If 3 shots are recorded and there’s 11 different firing pin indents on casings it is pretty easy to find out which of those casings are actually from the shooting. The rifling is also unique to models and calibers, so if there’s rifling on the projectiles they’ll find out what make and model it was shot from and look at the casings to see which ones they were fired from
@@Mihail2204 So where did I say “3 shots,” where did I say recorded, and what prevents someone from policing up two of the shots? Next while the rifling matters on the bullet, it comes from a replaceable barrel. Why are we wasting our time/money with micro stamping? Because we don’t always get the bullet, and barrels can be replaced obviously…
@@EverettVinzant you edited the comment, but so what the barrel can be swapped, the rifling and casing will still have the same marks as the make and model, take a glock as an example, they leave a very distinct firing pin dent and other marks on the casing, the rifling is always the same on the barrels aswell unless you buy a very niche barrel which can be easily traced back to the person who bought it(I’ve seen it happen)
@@Mihail2204 Wrong, you can swap the hex barrel of a Glock with one that is rifled. So now your make/model theory is blown isn’t it? I’ve spoken with Federal agents (as a Glock armorer) that have said your example is when they get lucky. It’s trivial to get a “niche” barrel and not have it recorded. Please, keep trying. And it’s trivial to make sure you get used brass from someone with the same make and model as your firearm… I can’t go to a firing range without seeing someone shoot a 9mm Glock…
In Sweden, anyone can buy a silencer as long as you have a weapon that fits it. 22 long with a silencer is perfectly fine and they are actually really quiet.
Also Virginia's law only applies to certain cities when open carrying and has provisions for ccp holders, hunters and recreational shooters or any other lawful activity as is stated in § 18.2-287.4. Carrying loaded firearms in public areas prohibited; penalty.
Making it a duty to avoid violence until it is the only option seems like a good idea. Seems like a Christian should agree with that. Odd that so many of you "Christians" think violence shouldn't be a last resort, but the first choice.
@@garywboisseau Years and years of Catholic school would beg to differ. You have every right to defend yourself. I carry. I have lots of firearms. But I also know it's a last resort. You "Christians" seem almost eager to use your weapons. It's sick.
Ive got another dumb law for you. You can legally carry in national parks, ou have follow the laws of the state the park is in. But it’s against the law to fire a gun for any reason in the park. If a grizzly is charging you and you are forced to shoot it, you’ve committed a federal crime.
That doesn’t sound right at all, certainly you’re allowed to defend yourself if you’re allowed to carry. *looks it up “Unless authorized, the use or discharge of a firearm within a park area is prohibited.” “Visitors should not consider firearms as protection from wildlife.” Wtf
Thanks for all that you do for 2A.. Crazy that we the law abiding citizens are pretty much being punished. This isn’t fair however criminals get away with a slap on the wrist. Thanks for this video
And at the same time a new tax on guns and ammo is coming up in CO, that same legislature is looking to impose mandatory liability insurance, too. Guess they figure that if they can't ban everything, they'll at least make it prohibitively expensive. Gotta love how it's all motivated by "safety" and yet just ends up making everyone _more_ vulnerable, not less.
NY resident here. I don't believe we have to have micro stamping, but I could be wrong. The "SAFE" Act counts a detachable mag as a feature and it can't have any other (for rifles). With a pinned mag you can have collapsible stocks, etc. Technically half the state still has a 7-round limit, but all police agencies outside of NYC don't enforce it.
@@none-of-your-business404 sure, I'll pack up my family of 7, leave two decent to pretty good jobs so I can have all the "fun" toys. I don't tell you how to live your life, please don't tell me how to live mine.
@none-of-your-business404 yeah ok like everyone can do that and also we need freedom fighters in other states as well that are willing to try to help change the system for all of us. Just think case law real quick, let me ask you where do you think New York pistol and rifle association v. Bruen came out of?
@@ethan.amosberg835 From your perspective, wouldn't it be wiser to have more gun knowledgeable people in a very progressive state? I might agree with democrats on the majority of issues and solutions, but I do disagree with the fallacies presented with certain types of gun regulation. As a NYS resident as well there are many perks to living in this state that outsiders don't understand nor see. It's a rust belt state with a high quality of living, growth in some regions, and public schools a decade or 3 ahead of some southern states. States like TN that are using 90's tech, corporal punishment (never gets used for it's true intentions and abused more often then not), limited clubs, and few sports options. I pick the former over the latter as I've lived in both.
NJ hostage here. I have a bunch of both BB and airsoft stuff. Didnt need a license to get the BB gun, and most of the airsoft has the tip removed. From those of talked to, most NJ cops thinj the shit is nonsense, so they dont enforce it.
Interesting tidbits. 40 years ago, Colorado had no waiting period, and the only restriction was you had to be a Colorado resident for 30 days to purchase. Home invasions were unheard of. Times have changed. Here in Indiana, we can carry open or concealed. Easy peasy. When I travel back to my home state known as the Peoples Republic of Illinois, I cannot carry without an unconstitutional and draconian FOID card. But it gets worse. My backup is a Byrna SD less lethal. CO2 powered, .68 caliber. Pepper balls or kinetic rounds. And yes, they are effective in a bad situation. Ordinarily, I'd carry that as an alternative for visits to Illinois. BUT... Illinois has stopped that not only by restricting pepper balls, but also has a law banning anything that "looks like" a firearm. The point being: When you travel, carefully investigate the state and local laws in areas when traveling away from home. Don't get caught by surprise.
Why would someone intentionally pickup your rounds just to leave them at a crime scene?! That makes no sense. If I committed a crime using a firearm I would just pick up my rounds and leave. Why go through the trouble of getting someone else’s rounds like wtf. That’s stupid.
Yea, they’ll just check in on the person you tried to incriminate, they’ll have an alibi, then they’ll ask what range they go to and look at the video to see if someone picks up their brass and find the criminal
Thank you for not using vulgar language. Seems other gun pro people can't go 4 words without. What's bad it doesn't add a thing to the content of the message they want to get across.
Just wanted to chime in Rhode islands Magazine ban is 10 Rounds or less you may want to correct this just to mitigate confusion. Section 11-47.1-3 RI Gen-laws
NYS has an altered version of castle doctrine, its duty to retreat. Meaning even if you are in your own home and a violent actor is intruding, you cannot respond with lethal force if you have an opportunity to flee safely. Even if they are shooting, the only case you can respond with lethal force as a civilian is if you have no opportunities to flee safely. I might be a democrat but I don't agree with the gun laws. If your in such a situation it's easier for an attorney to romanticize easy opportunities to flee, then it is for the person in that situation. Policy and technicalities are nice on the surface to preserve life, but practicality is very different and a law like this can get someone innocent killed.
Has any American Politician, directly or indirectly stated an intent, desire or plan to take away the right to own a weapon Examples / direct quotes please
Having a license to sell firearms and firearm accessories makes sense, but a lot of the other gun laws are nothing more than bureaucratic bullshit to get people in trouble over nothing. Stand Your Ground laws make sense, but Duty To Retreat laws only lead to a higher unalive count. Banning shooting ranges in an area where it may be too dangerous for the shooters to be there makes sense, but that's the ONLY time it makes sense. The only difference between a suppressor and a muffler is the application, with mufflers being on vehicles and suppressors being on firearms. A BB gun is a great training tool, but they should require the muzzle or any other barrel tip to be painted orange like with an airsoft gun to make it obvious it's not a gun that takes bullets. Pellet guns should also have an orange muzzle or barrel tip for the same reason. Castle doctrines are just as great as Stand Your Ground laws, and go hand in hand with those. The Assault Weapons Ban only managed to piss people off, and magazine restrictions only serve to make people buy more magazines to carry the same number of rounds they always have.
Tax funds being used for what they say they are for. LMAO Tell me more about this fuel tax for roads and how good the streets and bridges are because of it.
Only thing I disagree with is not being held responsible if you’re gun is stolen out of your car…I carry a gun on me everywhere it’s legal and shouldn’t being a responsible firearm owner mean making sure the gun is safe at all times? If you have a actual safe or something like that and it’s stolen that’s one thing but if you have a Glock in the glovebox or a ar laying on the back seat and you have a ton of gun manufacturing stickers or something like that you should know you are advertising HEY I HAVE WEAPONS IN THE VEHICLE! The idiot who broke into the car should also be charged as well but can’t be surprised if your gun is stolen. We shouldn’t have to live in fear of our property being broke into but sadly it’s a reality and we gotta plan accordingly
the problem is some states are increasing penalties for the gun owner while doing nothing about the actual criminals stealing them. Here in Colorado, the only gun bll that didn't go anywhere this year...is one that would have made it a felony to steal any gun. My understanding is that currently it's only a felony if the value of the gun is over a certain amount.
Start by not putting gun logos all over your car and house and vote for those who want to put the criminals in jail rather than you for defending yourself or your loved ones.
So, the law abiding citizen should be penalized for the criminal? Riiiiiight. Makes perfect sense. If you’re carrying your gun EVERYWHERE, then you’re probably committing some felonies.
So you are a responsible conceal carry owner and as soon as you exit your vehicle someone hits you in the head from behind with a blunt object, takes your firearm. You should go to jail?
@@pcpolice7937 If you can't tell the difference between being assaulted, then having your things stolen off your body, and leaving a gun in an easily accessible car, you don't have enough brains to be carrying...
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
Columbus resident here, you hit it right on the head! Our gun laws are pretty good in Ohio. We have permitless carry now too, which is awesome. It has actually dropped mugging and robbery rates in some areas in Ohio. Criminals just don't know whether somebody is packing or not!
Always found the silencer restrictions completely pointless, especially since in most states and towns you are required by law to have a functioning muffler on your vehicle for noise reasons and if you don't you can get pulled over and you won't pass your vehicle inspections but their states that say you have to have a muffler on your car but if you want to put one on your firearm so you don't annoy your neighbors You're not allowed to and if you make one it's 10 years in prison.
Cali guy here. The micro stamping provision has been struck down here in California!
Imagine if the government put a 9% tax on cars "to help victims of drunk driving". There would be rioting in the streets.
(Also, like this 9% tax on guns, we all know what that money would really be going to: right back to the state.)
Not a single one of these dumb laws do anything to actually hold criminals accountable for their actions.
These laws have nothing to do with addressing violent crime and everything to do with civilian disarmament.
True, but if COVID has taught us anything, our "democracy" is exceptionally good at using fear and ignorance in order to enact draconian policies in the name of "safety." That indicates a strong need to focus on cultural shifts away from safetyism and into an acceptance that bad things happen and one ought to be prepared to face them rather than have the government "remove" them. While dealing with the legislative problems _is_ a worthwhile fight, it's not the only one, and probably not the most important one in the bargain.
Is it that they think that firing pins can’t be replaced or can’t be purchased elsewhere and replaced? Even better. Someone goes to a firing range and picks up 10 different shell casings of all the same caliber and leaves them all at the scene of a crime… Now what?
If 3 shots are recorded and there’s 11 different firing pin indents on casings it is pretty easy to find out which of those casings are actually from the shooting. The rifling is also unique to models and calibers, so if there’s rifling on the projectiles they’ll find out what make and model it was shot from and look at the casings to see which ones they were fired from
@@Mihail2204 So where did I say “3 shots,” where did I say recorded, and what prevents someone from policing up two of the shots?
Next while the rifling matters on the bullet, it comes from a replaceable barrel. Why are we wasting our time/money with micro stamping? Because we don’t always get the bullet, and barrels can be replaced obviously…
@@EverettVinzant you edited the comment, but so what the barrel can be swapped, the rifling and casing will still have the same marks as the make and model, take a glock as an example, they leave a very distinct firing pin dent and other marks on the casing, the rifling is always the same on the barrels aswell unless you buy a very niche barrel which can be easily traced back to the person who bought it(I’ve seen it happen)
@@Mihail2204 Wrong, you can swap the hex barrel of a Glock with one that is rifled. So now your make/model theory is blown isn’t it? I’ve spoken with Federal agents (as a Glock armorer) that have said your example is when they get lucky. It’s trivial to get a “niche” barrel and not have it recorded.
Please, keep trying. And it’s trivial to make sure you get used brass from someone with the same make and model as your firearm…
I can’t go to a firing range without seeing someone shoot a 9mm Glock…
In Sweden, anyone can buy a silencer as long as you have a weapon that fits it. 22 long with a silencer is perfectly fine and they are actually really quiet.
Do you need to show your license to buy one?
The Supreme Court needs step up stop this silliness. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!! Pretty simple until the politicians get involved.
Why is stand your ground law on this list? It's not stupid, it is the corner stone of how many self defense cases are presented to a jury.
Also Virginia's law only applies to certain cities when open carrying and has provisions for ccp holders, hunters and recreational shooters or any other lawful activity as is stated in § 18.2-287.4. Carrying loaded firearms in public areas prohibited; penalty.
It's a shame that gun owners can't sue the government for discrimination
The people that make these laws have watched too many Hollywood movies.
They have armed security and live in gated communities or secure compounds.
Stand Your Ground Laws Are Good Gun Laws; It's Duty To Retreat Laws That Are Dangerous.
Sounds like the entire country of Australia.
Making it a duty to avoid violence until it is the only option seems like a good idea. Seems like a Christian should agree with that. Odd that so many of you "Christians" think violence shouldn't be a last resort, but the first choice.
@@TheBeeFactory You evidently haven't read a Bible or the studied the actual words spoken by God Almighty.
@@garywboisseau Years and years of Catholic school would beg to differ.
You have every right to defend yourself. I carry. I have lots of firearms. But I also know it's a last resort.
You "Christians" seem almost eager to use your weapons. It's sick.
@@garywboisseau Bloodlust is not Christian. Eagerness to use violence is not Christian.
As a hitman, I already pick up used brass at ranges as well as hair clippings at the barbershop and pet salon.
Microstamping, meh 😉
12:50 - R.I.P. to my ear drums.. damn!
Ive got another dumb law for you. You can legally carry in national parks, ou have follow the laws of the state the park is in. But it’s against the law to fire a gun for any reason in the park. If a grizzly is charging you and you are forced to shoot it, you’ve committed a federal crime.
That doesn’t sound right at all, certainly you’re allowed to defend yourself if you’re allowed to carry.
*looks it up
“Unless authorized, the use or discharge of a firearm within a park area is prohibited.”
“Visitors should not consider firearms as protection from wildlife.”
Wtf
Thanks for the video. So refreshing to hear sensible dialogue.
Thanks for your content and what you do for the 2A community, Heg. 🇺🇸
Thanks for all that you do for 2A.. Crazy that we the law abiding citizens are pretty much being punished. This isn’t fair however criminals get away with a slap on the wrist. Thanks for this video
And at the same time a new tax on guns and ammo is coming up in CO, that same legislature is looking to impose mandatory liability insurance, too. Guess they figure that if they can't ban everything, they'll at least make it prohibitively expensive. Gotta love how it's all motivated by "safety" and yet just ends up making everyone _more_ vulnerable, not less.
NY resident here. I don't believe we have to have micro stamping, but I could be wrong. The "SAFE" Act counts a detachable mag as a feature and it can't have any other (for rifles). With a pinned mag you can have collapsible stocks, etc. Technically half the state still has a 7-round limit, but all police agencies outside of NYC don't enforce it.
Sell everything and move to a state that respects your rights
@@none-of-your-business404 sure, I'll pack up my family of 7, leave two decent to pretty good jobs so I can have all the "fun" toys. I don't tell you how to live your life, please don't tell me how to live mine.
@none-of-your-business404 yeah ok like everyone can do that and also we need freedom fighters in other states as well that are willing to try to help change the system for all of us. Just think case law real quick, let me ask you where do you think New York pistol and rifle association v. Bruen came out of?
@@ethan.amosberg835 Exactly so what does any of that have to do with your rights being violated
@@ethan.amosberg835 From your perspective, wouldn't it be wiser to have more gun knowledgeable people in a very progressive state? I might agree with democrats on the majority of issues and solutions, but I do disagree with the fallacies presented with certain types of gun regulation.
As a NYS resident as well there are many perks to living in this state that outsiders don't understand nor see. It's a rust belt state with a high quality of living, growth in some regions, and public schools a decade or 3 ahead of some southern states. States like TN that are using 90's tech, corporal punishment (never gets used for it's true intentions and abused more often then not), limited clubs, and few sports options. I pick the former over the latter as I've lived in both.
NJ hostage here. I have a bunch of both BB and airsoft stuff. Didnt need a license to get the BB gun, and most of the airsoft has the tip removed. From those of talked to, most NJ cops thinj the shit is nonsense, so they dont enforce it.
we shouldn’t give an inch because they will always take a mile.
Shall not be infringed. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Has been since 1934 😂
I couldn’t help but laugh when you mentioned the scitzo in co😂 I am almost 100% sure that you’re talking about Daniel Larson😂
3:16
Daniel Larson mentioned lol
Interesting tidbits. 40 years ago, Colorado had no waiting period, and the only restriction was you had to be a Colorado resident for 30 days to purchase. Home invasions were unheard of. Times have changed.
Here in Indiana, we can carry open or concealed. Easy peasy. When I travel back to my home state known as the Peoples Republic of Illinois, I cannot carry without an unconstitutional and draconian FOID card. But it gets worse.
My backup is a Byrna SD less lethal. CO2 powered, .68 caliber. Pepper balls or kinetic rounds. And yes, they are effective in a bad situation. Ordinarily, I'd carry that as an alternative for visits to Illinois. BUT... Illinois has stopped that not only by restricting pepper balls, but also has a law banning anything that "looks like" a firearm.
The point being: When you travel, carefully investigate the state and local laws in areas when traveling away from home. Don't get caught by surprise.
Glad you mentioned the NJ airgun laws, idiocy personified. I could do more damage with a paintball marker.
Aren’t those considered airguns?
Last I heard Cali got rid of the microstamp thing cause it just wasn't feasible.
Why would someone intentionally pickup your rounds just to leave them at a crime scene?! That makes no sense. If I committed a crime using a firearm I would just pick up my rounds and leave. Why go through the trouble of getting someone else’s rounds like wtf. That’s stupid.
Yeah and leave extra evidence lol
Yea, they’ll just check in on the person you tried to incriminate, they’ll have an alibi, then they’ll ask what range they go to and look at the video to see if someone picks up their brass and find the criminal
Casual Daniel Larson cameo lol
Talk about "Land of the free"
I think gun safety should be taught in school.
Thank you for not using vulgar language. Seems other gun pro people can't go 4 words without. What's bad it doesn't add a thing to the content of the message they want to get across.
The federal short barrel and suppressor laws have to be some of the dumbest gun laws on the books. Especially because pistols exist.
Just wanted to chime in Rhode islands Magazine ban is 10 Rounds or less you may want to correct this just to mitigate confusion. Section 11-47.1-3 RI Gen-laws
This is not against European laws.
NYS has an altered version of castle doctrine, its duty to retreat. Meaning even if you are in your own home and a violent actor is intruding, you cannot respond with lethal force if you have an opportunity to flee safely. Even if they are shooting, the only case you can respond with lethal force as a civilian is if you have no opportunities to flee safely.
I might be a democrat but I don't agree with the gun laws. If your in such a situation it's easier for an attorney to romanticize easy opportunities to flee, then it is for the person in that situation. Policy and technicalities are nice on the surface to preserve life, but practicality is very different and a law like this can get someone innocent killed.
Has any American Politician, directly or indirectly stated an intent, desire or plan to take away the right to own a weapon
Examples / direct quotes please
Did you watch the video?
Short barrel laws make no sense, because pistols exist
i don't get the spent casing argument… would the ballistics match the gun though? wouldn't it be obvious that the gun wasn't involved?
Scare law abiding citizens into not even wanting to own a gun is what I think is gonna happen.
Well, I guess Airsoft is dead in New Jersey
Great content brother guns and horror movie love it GOD bless you
BB guns the same in IL! It is just a little different. It's by FPS... and 18 no matter what!
Everything in NJ just assume IL is the same law!
Having a license to sell firearms and firearm accessories makes sense, but a lot of the other gun laws are nothing more than bureaucratic bullshit to get people in trouble over nothing. Stand Your Ground laws make sense, but Duty To Retreat laws only lead to a higher unalive count. Banning shooting ranges in an area where it may be too dangerous for the shooters to be there makes sense, but that's the ONLY time it makes sense. The only difference between a suppressor and a muffler is the application, with mufflers being on vehicles and suppressors being on firearms. A BB gun is a great training tool, but they should require the muzzle or any other barrel tip to be painted orange like with an airsoft gun to make it obvious it's not a gun that takes bullets. Pellet guns should also have an orange muzzle or barrel tip for the same reason. Castle doctrines are just as great as Stand Your Ground laws, and go hand in hand with those. The Assault Weapons Ban only managed to piss people off, and magazine restrictions only serve to make people buy more magazines to carry the same number of rounds they always have.
TH-cam keeps erasing my comment on short barrels
What brand is that PPK airsoft gun? I have one of the Arcturus PPK20 PE’s and it rips.
Rhode Island is 10 rnd limit not 15
3:07 is it Daniel Larson?
Land of “the free”
Dumbest thing about all of this is that guns are legal😂😂
What do you mean?
@@ethan.amosberg835 they should be illegal
May I ask why they should be illegal in your opinion?
@@ethan.amosberg835 they cause millions of deaths and are not needed by civilians
California, Colorado, New Jersey, Illinois. Those are the only states mentioned. Think about that. Glad we live in the Carolinas!
Tax funds being used for what they say they are for. LMAO Tell me more about this fuel tax for roads and how good the streets and bridges are because of it.
You should try illinois! 🤮🤮🤮
Illinois gun laws sucks
Illinois gun laws are for pacifist extremist
Illinois gun laws sucks
Gecko alert 12:25
You know there's a thin line between being a real gear reviewer with opinions and just being a click baiter/ complainer...
Only thing I disagree with is not being held responsible if you’re gun is stolen out of your car…I carry a gun on me everywhere it’s legal and shouldn’t being a responsible firearm owner mean making sure the gun is safe at all times? If you have a actual safe or something like that and it’s stolen that’s one thing but if you have a Glock in the glovebox or a ar laying on the back seat and you have a ton of gun manufacturing stickers or something like that you should know you are advertising HEY I HAVE WEAPONS IN THE VEHICLE! The idiot who broke into the car should also be charged as well but can’t be surprised if your gun is stolen. We shouldn’t have to live in fear of our property being broke into but sadly it’s a reality and we gotta plan accordingly
the problem is some states are increasing penalties for the gun owner while doing nothing about the actual criminals stealing them. Here in Colorado, the only gun bll that didn't go anywhere this year...is one that would have made it a felony to steal any gun. My understanding is that currently it's only a felony if the value of the gun is over a certain amount.
Start by not putting gun logos all over your car and house and vote for those who want to put the criminals in jail rather than you for defending yourself or your loved ones.
So, the law abiding citizen should be penalized for the criminal? Riiiiiight. Makes perfect sense. If you’re carrying your gun EVERYWHERE, then you’re probably committing some felonies.
So you are a responsible conceal carry owner and as soon as you exit your vehicle someone hits you in the head from behind with a blunt object, takes your firearm. You should go to jail?
@@pcpolice7937 If you can't tell the difference between being assaulted, then having your things stolen off your body, and leaving a gun in an easily accessible car, you don't have enough brains to be carrying...
👍👍👍
Why are you complaining about stand your ground laws