Это что то совершенно непревзойденное! Это какая то новая музыка. Это абсолютно гениальное прочувствование… Самое недооцененное исполнение Метнера. Так увидеть, так понять, так передать. Непостижимо
Dove sono i gigli che oziavano vicino al pruno bianco? Nella voglia di abbandono sono scesi in antri profondi dove nella penombra l' acqua intesse delicate melodie. Fiori cantati nel buio della notte. Lava e fiamma tra merletti d'acqua
Very beautifully performed. I've also heard this performed by Alexander Malofeev, just as beautifully at this slower pace, but I can't seem to find it on yt now. If anyone sees it, please post the link. Thank you! Meanwhile, this is wonderfully played by Lugansky.
Hello, you can find video of Malofeev’s interpretation on the channel “Eve Wong” on her latest video! (it’s 43 minutes long) It’s part of a compilation of his playing. Hope this helps!
I heard Malofeev version first. I already disapproved Malofeev's interpretation before hearing Luganski. Luganski has the right interpretation right from the beginning and especially in the middle section.
hahaha, i meant to discover what this piece is, as it's often used as an excerpt by radio programs and TV documentary. Now i finally know it's Medtner. I can tell this will be very difficult to play without accent and refinement and then that middle section goes piano concerto for a few bars. It's one of these pieces many pianists can learn the notes but almost none will play satisfactorily from beginning to end like Luganski does.
Medtner is an undiscovered genius, the way some composers go through a long period of being left out after the death. this piece is extremely difficult to render musically from beginning to end, more so than Chopin, Scriabin, Schumann. It takes a pure soul to find the poetry and meaning of every passage in it, and this is the only artist that reveals the masterpiece. Other top world stage pianists fail magistraly at it , their technique and color won't help them without the finely tuned musical mind, which Lugansky is a rare genius to have. only Rachmnaninov would make this piece even more meaningful with his exquisite rubato (especially his de-rubato) and more phantasmagorical . Many so called legendary pianists are very limited musically (first 3 letters of their names only) : Hor, Pol, Arg, Kis, Lan. I believe no contemporary pianist can match this interpretation (some might be able to copy it, if they listen and train from it).
@@pghagen Lang Lang. I heard Malofeëv he is among the many musicians who don't understand this music. It's hard words but it's exactly the case. Not his technique but his musicality is not suited.
I love Nikolai's soulful playing and expression, it's such pleasure watching him, his gentle, humble demeanor
What a good interpretation
Два пианиста для меня лучшие в исполнении этого произведения это Николай Луганский и Александр Малофеев. Спасибо им большое!!!
Quelle beauté dans le jeu de Lugansky, assurément l'un des grands grands pianistes de notre époque.
Oui, sans aucun doute. Avec Boris Berezosky! quel duo... dans les Danses Symphoniques pour 2 pianos. Fascinant.
Another stunning performance by Lugansky.
Это что то совершенно непревзойденное! Это какая то новая музыка. Это абсолютно гениальное прочувствование…
Самое недооцененное исполнение Метнера. Так увидеть, так понять, так передать. Непостижимо
Понравился Луганский. Лучше чем другие, замечательная пьеса, весь 38 опус прекрасная мусыка..
The first cellist is a beautiful woman seeing her seriously moved by the beauty of this piece, is like a communion.
The best version really
Thank you ... !
Dove sono i gigli
che oziavano
vicino al pruno bianco?
Nella voglia di abbandono
sono scesi in antri profondi
dove nella penombra
l' acqua intesse delicate melodie.
Fiori cantati nel buio della notte.
Lava e fiamma
tra merletti d'acqua
Very beautifully performed. I've also heard this performed by Alexander Malofeev, just as beautifully at this slower pace, but I can't seem to find it on yt now. If anyone sees it, please post the link. Thank you! Meanwhile, this is wonderfully played by Lugansky.
th-cam.com/video/prLqqcLoWcU/w-d-xo.html
Hello, you can find video of Malofeev’s interpretation on the channel “Eve Wong” on her latest video! (it’s 43 minutes long) It’s part of a compilation of his playing. Hope this helps!
@@just_peachy7344 Thank you!
I heard Malofeev version first. I already disapproved Malofeev's interpretation before hearing Luganski. Luganski has the right interpretation right from the beginning and especially in the middle section.
I'm learning this piece right now 🤭💗
hahaha, i meant to discover what this piece is, as it's often used as an excerpt by radio programs and TV documentary. Now i finally know it's Medtner. I can tell this will be very difficult to play without accent and refinement and then that middle section goes piano concerto for a few bars. It's one of these pieces many pianists can learn the notes but almost none will play satisfactorily from beginning to end like Luganski does.
Like this comparatively slower pace than some I’ve heard. Thanks
Slower but actually the correct tempo. Others don't understand the music.
Medtner is an undiscovered genius, the way some composers go through a long period of being left out after the death. this piece is extremely difficult to render musically from beginning to end, more so than Chopin, Scriabin, Schumann. It takes a pure soul to find the poetry and meaning of every passage in it, and this is the only artist that reveals the masterpiece. Other top world stage pianists fail magistraly at it , their technique and color won't help them without the finely tuned musical mind, which Lugansky is a rare genius to have. only Rachmnaninov would make this piece even more meaningful with his exquisite rubato (especially his de-rubato) and more phantasmagorical . Many so called legendary pianists are very limited musically (first 3 letters of their names only) : Hor, Pol, Arg, Kis, Lan. I believe no contemporary pianist can match this interpretation (some might be able to copy it, if they listen and train from it).
who is "Lan" ? and what about Alexander Malofeëv?
@@pghagen Lang Lang.
I heard Malofeëv he is among the many musicians who don't understand this music. It's hard words but it's exactly the case. Not his technique but his musicality is not suited.
Как прекрасно Вы подметили про чистую душу!
Попытки Метнера спрятать музыкальную бессодержательность за объявляемой программностью бесполезны.