EXCLUSIVE: Grammarly CEO: This Is Why ChatGPT Won't Kill My Business

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
  • Rahul Roy Chowdhury, the new CEO of Grammarly, joins "Forbes Talks" to discuss why he's taken the lead on the growing software company, how long Grammarly will suspend service in Russia, the risk of training ChatGPT to disrupt what he does, the need for legislation on AI, and more.
    Read the full story on Forbes:
    Subscribe to FORBES: th-cam.com/users/Forbes?s...
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes newsletters: newsletters.editorial.forbes.com
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com
    Forbes covers the intersection of entrepreneurship, wealth, technology, business and lifestyle with a focus on people and success.

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @mikezooper
    @mikezooper ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Grammarly is over! You can copy and paste a document and ask ChatGPT to rewrite it in any style. Ask it to rewrite in the style of Emily Bronte, or write it in a more persuasive tone. Or write this webpage with SEO in mind. It can do it all. I wish people would admit when they're doomed.

    • @user-ch3px1fd6o
      @user-ch3px1fd6o 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you. I despised Grammarly for spyware and ads before and now I will never need it...Chatgpt has made it redundant and useless

  • @Openspeedtest
    @Openspeedtest ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Grammarly is no longer the only grammar checker on the market. ChatGPT and Bard are two other popular options that are also doing a good job. Both ChatGPT and Bard are large language models (LLMs) that have been trained on a massive dataset of text and code. This allows them to generate text that is both grammatically correct and semantically meaningful.

  • @user-nd3vy8xv4f
    @user-nd3vy8xv4f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Goodbye, Grammarly! You were a pioneer in the pre-AI era, much like Kodak in the film camera age and Radioshack in radio manufacturing.

  • @josefinademialma
    @josefinademialma ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for making this video!

  • @RodrigueFouafou
    @RodrigueFouafou ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting!!

  • @andu896
    @andu896 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great answers from the CEO. ❤

  • @hk5454
    @hk5454 ปีที่แล้ว

    great answers from CEO, a company who stands up for their employees

  • @simple1278
    @simple1278 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RIP Grammarly

  • @warrenjeremyrourke
    @warrenjeremyrourke ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An exceptional interviewer, with the guest's openness serving him well in response.

  • @Sarahdigital4k
    @Sarahdigital4k ปีที่แล้ว

    🙂

  • @abhiseeker1579
    @abhiseeker1579 ปีที่แล้ว

    how about ai detection??

  • @AdamWeatherall
    @AdamWeatherall ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Shorting this stock 😂

  • @1anre
    @1anre ปีที่แล้ว

    The guy is really smart, Product guys moving into CEO roles are getting more of a boost due to chaps like this.

  • @keithnewton1780
    @keithnewton1780 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing study time so it’s spell check on steroids I said it 1st

  • @IronDogger
    @IronDogger ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I find it disheartening that this is the absolute best we can do as a species that claims to be superior. Rinsing and repeating catastrophic failures while expecting different results without recognizing the insanity of it all.
    Thousands of years humans have done the same thing; take from others, build walls, defend the stolen goods, have wars, rinse and repeat…
    There are plenty of resources for everyone to live a sustainable lifestyle.
    Rising inflation to try and maintain an outdated system, this is not sustainable.
    When the wealthiest have to look over their shoulders, maintain security, hide, cannot walk freely down the street, afraid that someone else is going to take it from them, how is any of this the absolute best we can do with all we have at our disposal? Continue the exact same process humans have done since we grunted in caves?
    History, data, intelligence, time and yet we have enough research to comprehend our trajectory is ridiculous and those who are at the helm have the ignorant monkey brain mentality who refuse to upgrade accordingly. Those in power are the worst of society that rose to the top because they could take more from others.
    How many times do we need to replay who can get the most money? That has been done for thousands of years! Nothing new, nothing unique, nothing that proves we are an intellectually and morally superior species. We can do what has always been done…rinse and repeat.
    Jacque Frescoe had legitimate solutions for society but humanity is too ignorant and hellbent on rinsing and repeating catastrophic failures while expecting different results without recognizing the insanity of it all.
    If the measures of success is how much you can take from others, how sustainable is that and what does that say about humans who use that antiquated system to measure worth? When you realize it’s absolutely worthless to live like this and not sustainable, then what?
    Who is really in charge and able to actually do something unique and flip this rinse and repeat cycle? No one?

    • @Aussie-Mocha
      @Aussie-Mocha ปีที่แล้ว

      Huh! You are right. When too many of the wrong people gain access to power, lots of bad decisions are inevitably made. 🤔

  • @richardmohr9218
    @richardmohr9218 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you get Grammarly to write it for you. then you did not write it. Learn the skill, you know, how to write. If your teacher, lecturer or boss discovers that you got a program to write the work that you were supposed to do yourself, then you will fail. You will be fired. Suppose you are doing a paper on glitter sauce....Who would? And Why? If you are doing a paper on renewable energy...what renewable energy are you referring to? Learn how to write! Grammarly is for losers only. Grammarly is for unintelligent, cheating. deceivers. who are so weak that they cannot be bothered to learn how to string a cohesive sentence together. Those who intend to be fakers and liars use this mental crutch

  • @hanshek9871
    @hanshek9871 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Traditional writing style cannot be achieved with AI what you want to write by each sentence. You will end up spending more time than giving instructions to AI. It's better to write and correct live, which is where Grammarly helps. Chatgpt is an AI tool for general but for writing, Grammarly has built-in features. Plus it will be used by writers as long as writers write by themselves. AI writing has different styles that can be easily caught, human writing is different

  • @ezragonzalez8936
    @ezragonzalez8936 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    bye bye Grammarly Chat GPT is orders of magnitude better!