Concord Previews And First Impressions Round-Up - Luke Reacts
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
- 👉🏼 LINKS: linktr.ee/lukestephens 👈🏼
--
Luke Stephens is a Content-Creator and Streamer that co-streams on TH-cam and Twitch. This channel has Live Stream clips and highlights in addition to the streams themselves. Check out Luke's main channel & other content by going to: linktr.ee/lukestephens !!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#gaming #LukeStephens #ps5 #xbox - บันเทิง
![ไหล่อ่อน (Soft Shoulder) - Atom ชนกันต์ [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HUWl53msBQY/mqdefault.jpg)
1:43
I'm a high ranking Overwatch player and play the game quite a lot, so I can comment on why the devs are likely doing this.
Overwatch struggles with a very particular issue due to the ability to swap to any hero within your role at any time, and that's counter-swapping. This is an issue most prevalent on the tank role, but is pervasive throughout the game, in which you will frequently see situations in which players repeatedly swap heroes in order to counter a specific pick, generally the tank, on the enemy team. It's gotten to the point that players will sometimes even leave a fight to go back to spawn and swap heroes, because certain picks are just so objectively better against other picks that there's no point in playing it out.
This is obviously frustrating to a lot of players, as they often feel like their favorite hero is useless and unplayable because the enemy team will just always find a way to counter pick you if you're outperforming them.
It's worth noting that Overwatch is also currently investigating how to solve this issue, with one of their proposed solutions being pretty much exactly what Concord is doing here. It's likely the Concord devs have kept up with the Overwatch situation and are trying to get ahead of it.
Only thing i know about over watched ....they butchered tracer and removed her ass
Thanks! I was actually going to comment on this but I saw your comment.
They also are doing open queue which is what overwatch should have stuck with, I love role queue as it makes games more consistent but it's a queue time nightmare and has caused them to need to fix the game in so many other ways that it's gotten to the point they removed a tank and have made countless bad decisions, so while open queue has its flaws, it's just clearly the optimal way to go as long as you dont create characters like brig that specifically counter a whole strategy, rather than just a hero, If a single hero can stop the hardest to play strat (dive) without any effort, ofc its gonna ruin the game but instead of fixing that hero, they just ruined the game further sadly.
It's just now brigs world and were all suffering in it as they legitimately made holistic gameplay changes based off one hero and if you're in that situation you should probably look at the one hero not the entire game 😂
Yes this. Overwatch has become Counterwatch. It’s an ever growing annoyance. I am really intrigued how concord handles their system.
Great insight
The character selection lock in is likely to cut down on counter picking. It's a HUGE complaint in the competitive Overwatch scene. You kill someone, they switch to counter you. You die then you switch. Then again and again. It just gets tiresome and it's hard to keep the team cohesion going well.
Luke has no idea what he's complaining about he just likes to be negative for views
@noodles9345 counter switching is literally the gimmick of overwatch, though
@@THawkMedia not really
@@THawkMedia Its really not. Its just a bad mechanic.
@@THawkMediano people hate it
I will play the beta and decide for myself
thats a real smart human mentality , we're at times were ppl score a game 3/10 2 mounths before its release XD
The o ly smart thought in this moment section and video....u must be older than 25
Same here. I really don't know why everyone is bitching. Beta is around the corner, just try playing the game before you write it off.
@@aaronclay4665you must be younger than 20 then cause this game looks like shit lol
Because your beta
Not going to lie, I think the idea of limiting your hero pool per match is brilliant.
OverWatch could absolutely use this to reduce counterpicking as a strategy, and encourage players to actually invest effort in learning their heroes.
Too bad this is going to be exclusive to PlayStation, cuz I'd love to try it
It's on PC too.
Yup, tank counterwatch is horrible
Honestly, I'm sold on the possibility of Destiny crucible without the tedium of playing Destiny lol
Total Control in Halo Infinite is basically Control in Destiny Crucible without playing Destiny
@@Disconnis that might be helpful if PS ever gets Halo lol I'll keep that in mind
@@itsyorpal_bish😂😂bro doesn’t know the struggle for pvp players in Destiny especially PS
@@DisconnisThe movement and abilities in this game seem far more similar than Halo is to Destiny. Bro was confounded by the third person movement abilities, meanwhile I’m thinking that’s one of the best things about Destiny’s gameplay
it's weird to have people say "why bother with this when you have Overwatch"? when you can apply this to nearly every game genre imaginable. "why bother with WoW when we have FF14" or vice versa, why play Ara when Civ 7 is coming etc
and people can play more than one game at a time
While I can see your point, I think it is more that there is a huge influx of hero shooters are coming up suddenly. At the moment we have Overwatch 2, Team Fortress, Paladins, and Star Wars Hunters which just released. Then coming up we have Marvel Rivals, an upcoming Valve hero shooter, and Fragpunks. This isn't counting for all the other live service FPS we have and are getting.
Yes, we did have WoW, ESO, and FF14 but how many MMO's quickly died all trying to hop on the hot trends. It is nice to have options, but those games also should try to stand out from each other. I don't really know what Concord is doing differently other than being a highly polished game with some ongoing cinematics. Marvel Rivals has the cool destruction going for it while Fragpunks has an interesting card system (which seems similar to another game).
With Concord you have the extra barrier of having to pay $40 on top of needing PSN which is a monthly fee not available to every country. I worry more about the longevity of the game when it has other similar games to pull it away from with a bigger barrier to entry.
And for every Civilization like game we do get, we have about 20 similar FPS GaaS games. It isn't exactly comparable. Ara also seems to be doing something a bit different as well than Civ 7 to stand out.
that is how it is when you the game Seems to similar to something else. no one will buy a cod copy if they already have cod. you have to be different and be very clear HOW you are different with your messaging. so everyone thinking its another OW when they already HAVE OW is a big issue.
you want to make a game? be different that you arent comparable.
@@Drstrange3000 Maybe but I say let Concord do its things and see if people like it but acting like this game's a 3/10 when we're 2 months out from launch is a stretch. even if its a crowded genre, at least let the game prove itself
The Hero Shooter audience normally sticks to a handful of games.
And there is a graveyard of MMOs firvtgecsame reason. WOW and FF14 are exceptions to the rule.
Concord will be competing with Overwatch, Aprx Lrgends, Valorant, Marvel Rivals, Destiny, and Valves Upcoming Deadlock.
As well as other live services like Fortnite, Hell Divers, and PUBG.
Then there are extraction shooters, though those might have a different audience.
Overwatch is free, destiny PvP is free... Also on every platform. It will be an uphill battle for Concord. Trust me.
If it was f2p with $10 dlc people would still complain
it could be free with free dlc and people would still complain. all gamers want to do, particularly on the internet, is bitch and whine about everything because their lives are miserable.
@@sonnyankau9239 so true
I remember before helldivers 2 dropped and people were dismissing it saying that $40 is too much money (crazy that we're complaining about $40 when $70 is the standard). Then the game dropped, was great, and they didn't have to abuse microtransactions because of the $40 tag. Concord isn't my type of game but I think that's the plan here.
People are used to free to play.
I agree though that I prefer a $40 price to tamper the microtransactions, though Helldivers still has a lot of them.
@@bjf9304 I agree, people are used to free to play. I play a lot of free to play games and the microtransactions for some of those games are nuts. The first time I actually spent money on microtransactions was helldivers 2 for two reasons. 1, the game was so amazing that I wanted to support the devs. 2, I didn't feel like I was being ripped off by paying $15 for skins. $10 for actual weapons and stuff I use is good.
@professormilly2021 plus armor actually has different Perks
$40 for a pve co-op game and $40 for pvp game are two different things these days
@@singmysin I agree but if the system holds true you won't get a free PVP game up front with $40 skins or content updates later.
Why are they still trying to push these? It's like big corporations just hate money at this point.
Because if they do some how make a hit it makes more money than all those losses combined
@@TheStickz6 exactly
Its alot like the music industry.
Lol they clearly chasing trend but they are late
Chasing a trend is easy and relatively safe. The problem is, when the market is saturated with it,it ironically turns unsafe, because you have to compete with everyone else+the top dogs.
It's like selling,let's say, a pencil. If you just sell the most generic pencil,it gets lost in a sea of generic pencils. Meanwhile a colorful pencil with, idk, infinite eraser, that gets more attention even if it is riskier
Locking characters for swap is actually a smart move. It prevents from counter swapping which Overwatch is struggling with. If you don't remember at the end of Overwatch 1 there was a Hero Pool which Blizzard Banned some hero every week to prevent counter swapping and permanent metas and they did it completely random which was absurd. tbh it is a feature that Overwatch 2 can use.
I'm theorizing that they initially wanted to do a Destiny-like campaign with single- and cooperative play with a bigger focus on story, but eventually hard-pivoted into pure hero shooter. It explains why the characters feel rather bland as "heroes", but maybe could've worked as more grounded characters within a story. Could be the "vignettes" they're talking about are what's left of this more story focused vision.
yeah, I literally see no reason to buy this as FULL game when there is Destiny 2 WITH campaign and PvP modes.
I'll make my mind when I play the Beta. I love how gamers want to seem open minded but are so quick to down a game simply because a trailers looks like another game. And not even by the actual visuals or looks but by the game being the same genre.
Everyone saying Helldivers 2 is an exception to the rule however majority of people deep down knew it wasn't going to be hit until it did. Just feels like people just want to put this game down because they are afraid the success will set a bad precedent for Playstation to make more.
Bingo....
But helldivers was genuinly unique and felt really good to play, whereas here you have this game that just looks like a standard team shooter with some (imo) unappealing designs and nothing really going for it from what we've seen
Yeah it is prob receiving more hate than it should because of that, but at the same time it's understandable
Plus hd2 is a sequel to a game that a lot of people liked and didn't really expect to see a sequel of. The change from a top down shooter to third person on its own was big enough of a change to Garner some interest.
Concord just feels bland all around.
@@SpardasTechReviews Weak argument. You’re saying HD1 that sold 2 million copies warrants evidence HD2 would sell 12 million copies in weeks? There was barely any hype or hate when they revealed HD2. What I’m saying is our intial reactions doesn’t quantify any hint of success in a live service game because that’s how volatile live service is. In only takes a few thousand players to love the gameplay and spread it word of mouth until it snowballs into the millions ala HD2
People new that it would hit not this big but still. A lot were really hyped after first trailer. Plus it's the second part, so they already had a small, but a fanbase.
I don't think I've seen any negativity after announcement. Here on the other hand. I don't think I've seen anything actually positive. Maybe open beta will change the tides
I treat every live service game like a scam and how are they not? With +$20 skins and they always prioritize overpriced transactions before they even think of supporting the game and just drip feed the bare minimum
It's definitely been that way.
Warframe, lerhaps a good safe zone?
The only non scam live service games are the free ones. A good example would be xdefiant or Fortnite. They’re free, and still better than most of there competitors.
@@Zynet_Eseled warframe is one of the worst examples of live service games and the (relatively few) fans of it suffer from stockholm syndrome
@@clankfishyup
🙄 ppl have been going from 1st person to 3rd person for a decade in destiny. Its hardly “super disorienting”
Super weird thing to say
Yeah… Take notes from the dying PvP community in that game.
yeah, I guess Luke doesn't play destiny too much and he has said before he has motion sickness with some games so I guess that's a factor too while switching between 1st and 3rd person
@@saberzer094 luke is a baby honestly . The motion sickness thing is fine and legitimate, but a lot times he’s being baby
Once Luke has an opinion on something, he’s going to stick to it. Like he literally found the most negative article to read and talk about when everyone else who played the game said it was a fun game with cool mechanics
I hope modern audience gonna show up this time , and if not it is our fault hhh , but at least they not gonna destroy some other beloved franchise so win win .
It's not free to play, so the "modern audience" is already priced out.
god i hope not. I hope Sony loses big money with this game
@@Cryptic0013true.... the worst thing g to happen to gameing is " free to play"
Sad
@@aaronclay4665free to play is good. Look at a game like Fortnite. There’s thousands of modes, maps, and things to do. There’s basically infinite content because the community keeps making more. Not to mention the regular modes, which get massive updates every few months.
@@HahahMamamanfortnite isnt f2p anymore, it's a platform in if itself.
And what it's done is cool and all but not every game can di that even if they wanted too and only had the players best interests at heart because you need to be as big as fortnite to pull it off so I would rather fortnite not have been made and the gaming industry gets to remain healthy than fortnite succeeding at the expense of the entire gaming industry
I think the limited roster is to cope with the no-role limit. A team could do a 5 tank team but it'd be the same tank meaning one enemy with a good moveset against said tank could wipe the team easy. A neat idea but if they wanna pull people from Overwatch, every change away from Overwatch is gonna feel like an obstacle, not a new flavor.
It's not limited. It's literally 16 characters. That's a lot for base roster.
@@CrystalMang0 Limited as in during a set of matches one team could only pick from 8 possibly randomly chosen set of characters and the other team picks from the other 8 as opposed to getting the option of the full roster every game. Maybe that's not what they're doing but that's what I gathered from this video.
@@MusingsMusesit's probably to help with the staleness that overwatch metas can hit, if sojourn is op, shes played on both teams every match and than you nerf her and Cassidy is now on both teams, than you nerf him and widow is the hitscan pick, and it just cycles and while I think balance would solve this, overwatch cant balance but also this is now an incentive for them to balance these heros well, since if ones just objectively better, they arent gonna abandon their balance philosophies the second the going gets hard like ow and just tell you to bascially hard lock sojourn like the enemy every game if you wanna win.
Because the way ow has it just barely works although its boring and stale but if they have a sojourn in this game than the games unplayable and you cant leave it in that state the way overwatch can just leave sojourn op because both parties have access to it, this is actually how paladins fuctions in ranked and it's always forced them to balance their heros well, until they merged pc and console which completely screwed that games balance but until that change I always marveled at how well paladins balanced their game compared to their much more successful brother overwatch lol
If First Descendant is successful i’ll probably be playing that for the next 6 - 12 months at least.
@@massterwushu9699 saaaaame
This.... concord might be great. But first descendant looks the best.
But crying about 40 bucks for a game ...... gamers are fucked if they cry over 40 buck games, I just think it's a loud moronic minority
same
@@massterwushu9699 same
I think it will have moderate success.
This is one of those games everybody trashes, yet it will probably launch more optimized than 50% of other games at launch.
I hope its optimised mate its a basic pvp, not gta 6
@@MxrkJJok and?
Are you basing this on anything? Or are you just talking?
Unless they're going destructible environments and object physics, there's not really a huge amount (or need) to optimize.
Their focus should be more on game and server stability, and minimizing bugs. Having things not work when and how they're meant to will irritate players far more than fps dips.
@Thorn_416 Sony always produce non buggy optimized games for the most part....that's what it's based on. Much like you can count on blizzard to launch shit games or Bethesda to launch trash buggy shit. Sony launches quality games......from there studios.
This is not up for debate, u can not like the games but u can't question the quality
Concord is like Titanfall 1 in the sense that everyone wanted a single player mode
and then they got a good one in Titanfall 2 and no one bought it.
I don't
@@ryuhayabusa3540 booooo
@@vincevirtua I still believe the campaign in TF2 is overrated. Loved the multiplayer but the single player was so booooring.
@@vincevirtua didn’t titanfall 2 sell pretty decently? But yeah, sandwiching it between cod and battlefield… what are we doing bruh
I’m honestly pretty open minded about Concord and I’m looking forward to at least trying the beta. I’ll make up my own mind because so far from what I have seen it looks pretty fun 🤷🏻♂️
This game is like any throwaway multiplayer mode that you would've found in any generic FPS 15 years ago.
Final fantasy 14 is the biggest mmo on the market now....and you play mmos for long time, all becaude it runs counter to your " 40 bucks is too much" point dont mean its wrong, 10 million will be playing ff14 when the xpac launches today
Game Is for weebs and furries.
The gameplay looks okay. People probably wouldn't be so down on Concord had Sony led the reveal with gameplay rather than that CGI trailer.
I havent watched the video yet but am i right to assume he was down on the game and super pessimistic about it?
Bingo
As a player of these other shooting games. Im gonna give it a shot. If it's a blast, Ill stick to it. That's pretty much it.
Ok I have to write another comment. You can see how reloading could be annoying? What kind of take is that? I really need to stop watching your videos altogether.
Long reloads and small mags sounds annoying my guy
@@Bindlemindjust like all you whiners. Just hold on a couple of more days and we can all try the game out.
Lawbreakers was so good and people really missed out on that game. I still miss it so much.
not the biggest hero shooter fan, but one thing that overwatch had going for (at least at launch) was really good character designs. Just about every character in that game (at least at launch) was iconic, and helped elevate overwatch to the legendary status it used to have. Concord (even the name of the game is soulless) on the other hand has some of the most design by committee characters I have ever seen for a game, which you would think would be a priority for a game for this but apparently not (or they are delusional enough to think this is competitive with overwatch). I agree with Luke, game is DOA, in part because of the $40 price tag... In an industry with so many good free to play live service options (which people have become conditioned to), I don't think there will be much stomach for an upfront cost like this, especially becasue a game like this needs a decent playercount and relevance that comes from that. Classic case of a game trying to simulate the success of a prior title without understanding why it succeeded in the first place.
Tbh a lot of overwatch streamers are getting tired of overwatch and other players/content creators about to leave or have left like most of them are playing Eden ring but I think marvel rivals would probably take the overwatch players most of them
I actually forgot that concord existed until I saw the thumbnail. I think my brain wrote it off as another overwatch clone and threw it into the trash bin.
Okay?
Smart
My friend and I always tried out the new shooters when they come out but they never stick. We keep going back to valorant the longest break we had from it was when we played the finals
Veruca Salt was not the blueberry. She's the bad egg. Violet Beauregard was the blueberry because of the gum. 😂
"Hrrrmmm, well actually..."
I get that nerds tend to lack social skills, but it's honestly like some of ya'll aint even trying.
No one likes that person who is constantly correcting people even when they're joking around and aren't meant to be taken seriously.
So stop being that person.
I think they missed the mark on the style. Simple as that. I don't think it will take off with this design.
The design is typical 80s like Flash Gordon, the problem with todays gamer they hate just everything 😂 and ex devs from bungie work on this game so it means movement is addicted and feels great.
@@deathloop935Nope, it just looks meh. Get off the high horse.
@@deathloop935the game looks like shit lol
@@deathloop935You can’t talk to these new PS fans bro,all they want is 3rdperson over the shoulder cinematic games and act like they’re “real gamers” because they don’t play multiplayer
@@archersterling6726 nah he's right. it looks great, but gamers these days can't simply say "i don't like this and it's not for me." instead they desperately try to force their opinion on everyone and write any game that doesn't pique their interest off as dogshit & bad.
Weekly cutscenes are wild to think about. I think they're underestimating the long term viability. Destiny 2 has cutscenes throughout a season/episode but they're not weekly. Also they're basic inkblot cutscenes that are outsourced to cheaper illustration studios to do the work with voiceover done in house. If these guys think they're going to be making in depth fully animated/voiced cutscenes weekly they'll be bankrupt in a year. That's IF the game is any good at all.
They're like 60-90 seconds each, so around maybe 60-70 minutes of cut scenes over the course of a year. In comparison, Baldur's Gate 3 has more than 174 hours of (fully voiced) cinematics in the game. If this game fails, it won't be because of the costs of making cutscenes.
If forty bucks is hefty then don't game because this is an expensive hobby. Save your money for gas or bus fare
Man I was thinking the same thing! A $40 investment into a video game isn’t worth it? But then these same ppl will go and spend a bag on MTXs and cosmetics. Gamers can be so finicky sometimes and will complain about any and everything.
Eh, it's more like spending $40 just to get into a casino. Calling money spent on a competitive online multiplayer game with crates and skins an "investment" is really stretching the definition of that term beyond all recognition.
@@meek6119What? What you talking about? A videogame is not an "investment" wtf
That's not the issue ... the problem is that the competition is free to play with mtx this game is Pay to play with mtx
I really don’t understand the logic behind these live service games. They set them up with these long-term progression systems, where the player is able to invest time and money into accumulating tons of skins and upgrades and whatever else, and feel a sense of intrinsic value in that.
And then like two or three years down the line, they expect them to just drop all of that personal investment and start over form scratch with some new game that, lets be honest, is just the existing ideas recycled into a slightly different looking package?
And they are *surprised* when it doesn’t work, and the game shuts down from a lack of players?
I don't understand it either. I can't say that though or I will be called a hater. Having spent my time giving these games an honest try, they are exhausting and not worth it in the end. I'm tired of comments saying, "give it a try." I don't need to. I am currently playing Star Wars Hunters and don't see me playing long term. I'm ready for the Live service formula to change. I really don't like battle passes and I want more new content than just cosmetics.
Being a Destiny player for 5-6 years, I loved the gunplay of Destiny. However I have just gone off any multiplayer game nowadays because I wasn't finding them fun as Ive become more introverted. Only thing with a multiplayer mechanic Im playing routinely now is Gran Truismo 7, because the driving is so fun.
Gameplay is king; thats half of why Helldivers 2 is doing so well, the other half is how they're keeping that world alive.
So when you get zoom out during a dodge or dash its straight out of destny the exact thing happens i feel like concord was just made for crucible players at this point
I would rather a $40 game than have another microtransaction content barren free to play game.
Finally, Luke stop talking about starfield😂
10:43 - 11:57 this is annoying. bro is just hating on a game for no reason. Bro said “the sniper, okay so widowmaker” so if a character had a sniper they are widowmaker? With Lennox it said he has 2 handguns and because he watched the reveal trailer knows those guns happen to be revolvers says “oh this guy is like mccree” so no other character can use revolvers? Bro just read every character then picked the overwatch character they are most similar to then proceeded to say “I didn’t think they would just be 1 to 1 characters” after laughing about it.
Veruca Salt wasn’t the one who turned into a blueberry. That was Violet Beauregard
Bro said veruca blue berry ass cosmetics 😮💨 gotta get your facts right brother, violet turned into a blueberry 👀 getting a fact like that wrong could end your career
I'm not currently playing any live player PvP shooters, so this could take the place of went m when I played Overwatch
Locking characters, sounds actually great
why would it be good to lock out the full roster in a match - to avoid counter swapping, and cycling through counter swaps
Surprising this isn't free-to-play. I would expect some form of single-player/wave based mode, but it looks to be strictly PVP. Agree with your points about drawing in a player base, Concord will have to pry it's users away from someone else. Hard to imagine many people trying this as their 'first hero shooter'.
We have too much singleplayer games
hold up... its not even FTP?!
@@Thepvpguy128 What is that suppose to mean? If anything we don't have enough. Or heck we don't have enough offline single player and optional offline multiplayer modes incase the multiplayer doesn't pan out so we rely on bot matches.
@Deliveredmean42 "we don't have enough" do you guys ever pay attention? If you watched the Playstation and xbox showcases it was 98% of singleplayer and coop games. What you guys even complaining about?
@@Thepvpguy128 Not complaining here. Tho I did suggest some offline multiplayer mode if those games don't pan out. You know the problem when multiplayer games that had fun concepts or little nuggets of brilliance every once in a while? It be too bad if you can't play those in the future given the always online nature of live service games. I am just kind of worried more than complaining.
I did heard that the multiplayer games I am certain some people want to be revived by Sony aren't being made. Altho its probably for the best those remain gone given the current landscape. Unless the community revive them themselves on PC.
I think Sony had a chance to kill here. They could definitely have s great game in the works. This looks like the start of something new.
Every hero is basically OW 1-to-1? Yup, and every form of martial art is basically the same because they usually involve some form of hitting or kicking.
The game has my interest. I hate the FTP model. 40$ seems reasonable. I'll wait to see what their MTX are like, but if they keep on on a similar level to hell divers it won't bother me at all. I've gotten burnt out of OW, but none of these other FTP hero shooters fill the void for me. If this game is good, I'd be thrilled to leave OW behind for good.
I think they have a probably very competent team and the game might be fairly solid. The problem for most gamers seeing their promo material are not interested in more live service hero shooters unless they have an interesting twist (like fragpunks chews cheat cards instead of targeted or isolated abilities). Also hurts a lot to have such a long trailer without gameplay with a writing style that feels generic and overused.
They're going to have to fight uphill to gain any interest right now.
Bro who signed off on your haircut? 😭😂💀
I dont know, overwatch may have its problems but damn they made good character designs which I think is essencial for a game like this to have sucess. Even exoprimal has cooler designs than concord
This is a nice paid for article by PC Gamer. I wish there was a media source I could trust.
Sounds like the only media source u trust is the one that shares your " I hate Sony " agenda......
Do better kid
I know its too late now but this should launch as a F2P title. I hope I'm wrong but this has 'Lawbreakers' written all over it
it just looks so tumblr
I do think the price tag works. They don't want to have a battle pass and having a barrier for entry is promising to me that I'm not going to get banged over the head with them trying to sell me shit.
There is sliding i believe, but why would you wanna have a forward facing movement ability over an omnidirectional role that can go backwards to get you into safety? And its most likely like that so destiny players have something that familiar to them as well as it being how the devs work, you hire ex halo/destiny devs, youre gonna get halo/destiny gameplay as thats what theyre used too and its probably gonna feel good just like destiny does which is a perk for anyone who enjoyed halo or destiny which is alot of people.
Remember, they canceled Factions 2 for this.
You gotta keep in mind so many overwatch fans left overwatch
It looks more like the crucible with other classes. Just because it’s a fps with abilities doesn’t make it an Overwatch tanky mess. Looks more about gunplay I’ll give it a try
At some point, the MBAs have to figure out that chasing gaming trends is basically a pyramid scheme. Not that I'm complaining. By all means, let them cook. The AAA live service sector is a great landfill to toss all the smoothbrain investors and soulless clout-chasers into.
Every game genre is chasing trends after the first successful game. Look at souls games the only reason those are getting the type of scrutiny as this is because it’s a live service and gamers have a hard wire hate for those types of games no matter the number of successes.
The third person role is from Destiny.
After seeing the gameplay, its got my interest so will try the beta. It has very similar gameplay to destiny 2 which I like a lot, though pvp support is basically non-existent for the game. Maybe it might get the attention of the destiny playerbase
I think that’s clearly the intended audience. Dude is way off base trying to find the Overwatch clone in this. One of the characters literally has Warlock float and Icarus Dash 😂
While helldivers 2 is a live service it was a unique live service in an interesting universe. A lot of these live service are just doing generic hero shooters and we are tired of those
man , ppl already have prejudice to hate , no matter if the game is good or not , they're gonna hate it ( and they are not to blame after all its companies fault for making lot of shit live service games ) its like with ubisoft , whaatever the fuck they make , ppl gonna hate it , i see even ppl hating AC shadow and starwars outlaws been hated when they game isn't even released , and thats really hard to outcome , personally i never judge a game before trying it myself ( after all i can always pirate it or just refund it if i bought it )
@@alaa341g personally I think Star Wars outlaws looks pretty good
@@BigmanBrando yeah me too , but just goo see the dislikes on its videos if you have the chrome extension
@@BigmanBrandoyou are in the minority but if you think it looks good then im glad at least someone will buy that game lol
@@BibFortunasBarber never said I was gonna buy it. I’m 100% waiting until I watch a review. It may look good but it’s still Ubisoft 😂
When i first saw the trailer i was like this is a lame version of Destiny crucible, and people were calling me names, saying this is overwatch…. And now you confirmed i was right
It does look generic, but also pretty fun to me. Might try it.
If the game was free to play, I think it could actually do decently well. I just don't understand trying to jump into a 95% free to play market with a $40 price tag...
Also that third person rolling... thats normal in hero shooters. All of them do that.
R.i.p. lawbreakers. That game was incredible and just simply wasnt marketed correctly. It was way better than overwatch, but died because of an unshakeable perception, they created for themselves.
Ehh… I feel like most ppl are over negative about the game honestly. I’ve always stuck to final reviews of content creators/reviewers I share similar taste to. No one but Hell Divers fans were excited for Hell Divers 2. Every trailer for the game was met with reactions that it looked bland, generic, not fun and team killing sounded “dumb” and frustrating. I haven’t made up my mind, yet, about the game but the fact that it feels like HALO and Destiny has my attention.
These games are like lottery tickets. Low chances they’ll be successful, but if you hit on one, the game makes billions and all studios are chasing that long shot
I'm liking you don't get instakilled every 20 seconds. I'm getting too old for the deadliness of stuff like Battlefront 2, where life doesn't matter at all. Two shots you're dead.
11:40 You are making a weird forced critique on the "character comparisons" between DVA and 1-Off. DVA has Missile Birage, a secondary character specific playstyle where she is out of Mech, has a nuclear ultimate, can eat bullets temporarily has infinite ammunition and can fly.
1-Off is a big robot with a vacuum who can't fly. They are not 1:1
Like I main DVA so you're claim that she's 1:1 is very silly and disingenuous
the average Overwatch2 players aren’t playing OW religiously anymore. If there’s any time for a competitor or a new hero shooter for that certain player base the time is perfectly now. OW isn’t the boogie man of the 5v5 hero shooter that it was once known for anymore. Val and marvel rivals are proved that you have a chance to release a hero shooter without being automatically doomed.
At the same time, Marvel Rivals, another team based hero shooter, is getting hyped up and launching betas in roughly the same time frame, and that game will be:
Free to play.
An established IP that is popular for a lot of people.
Has an art style that, while some may not like, others will, and will give it a unique look. It won't be "generic realistic artstyle #48" that a lot of games make the mistake of looking like.
Has characters that all play differently and have shiny abilities and actions that look cool.
It's not a perfect comparison, and who knows if Marvel Rivals will be good either, but at least that one I want to try, compared to Concord.
O god!!!! Even Dreamcast guy took a dump on Concord.
The game's logo reminds me a lot of Konami's.
Lmao
Cassidy aka old McCree in ow, had a non disorienting fpv roll for a hell of a long time. Probably some engine limitations, but yeah, interesting
This game should have been free to play at least for a week in order to get people to try it themselves. The 40$ upfront cost is a big no no for this type of game.
Helldivers got lucky because it was memeworthy that happened naturally.
Concord on the other hand is more of a "modern audiences" type of game.
This game is either going to go free to play within a year from its launch, or it will die a silent death.
Imagine this blueberry peaking to a corner… her berry would stick out by 1 meter
Would give it a try if their characters weren't disgustingly ugly.
Honestly in overwatch 1 time it would kinda work for it to be 40$ but now when overwatch 2 and destiny are f2p i don't see this being realistic for that price
I’ll probably wait until the game is free or added to ps plus to try it.
I dont understand the story cutscenes they plane to release as time goes on.
If its to appeal to single player story driven gamers they arent going to buy a multiplayer hero shooter.
If its to give the regular multiplayer customers something extra to be exited about will they care i cant imagine i would just want more items or something.
Found the one negative concord video. lol. I’m glad this game is generating positive buzz. People want this to fail but if you have the right people behind the game and it’s good then it should be supported. This guy just wants to shit on it.
That PC gamer article is the little positive buzz I've seen. And access media previews tend to be positive in general.
Most people aren't talking about the game one way or the other.
I don't think he was completely shitting on it, but I understand some skepticism considering there's alot of hero shooters on the market. I think the game will find a niche but don't see it being super popular
Could it be for Destiny players who want a somewhat balanced PVP? As a D2 player I hear a lot of grumbling about Crucible, but since I'm a PVE player it's all Greek.
$40 is a pretty great price for how much they probably invested in the game
Its probably still gonna flop. I mean game requires PSN. So they are pretty much declining the money for the game from almost 200 countries. And in general its pretty nothing new in the gaming.
@@henrikaskavaliauskas6639 most multiplayer games require some sort of account fortnite requires epic ubisoft has it for xdefiant it's not outlandish
@@henrikaskavaliauskas6639 the fuck ? the game is playstaion , of course you need PSN ? like wtf are you talking , it like saying that you want to watch netflix but without the account , netflix also didn't exist back in the day in lot of country and sportify also , the entire playstation money came from PSN , they are even selling consoles at a loss
he snowflake it's been like that for a long time
It's gonna gonna fail. Helldivers 2 had a good run but now it's slowly losing ppl
Another DoA game
Over all i dont have a problem with the character desings, i think people are over reacting, but some of the characters do look a tad bit out of place compared to the regular sci fi Guardians design.
They're definitely trying to transition Destiny 2 players into the game
17:30 Hunt Showdown is doing quite well
It looks like Overwatch and D2’s Crucible
He likes that its 40 dollars because every other game is 70
Okay first of all i don't get the hate for that game before people trying it, second of all i rarely play multiplayer games the most game I've ever played in this genre is helldivers 2, I'd prefer paying for a game and have less microtransacrions then having it F2P and pay 100$+ a year to look good or win in the game
"will this game be enough to convince ow players to stay" at this point I don't think even ow is enough for ow players to stay. They are basically looking for an out,but that out is likely marvel rivals, not this
Will be back next year to say you were wrong about this game. And you dont know what u are talking about.
Cant wait to hear about all the diverse characters. The chubby one, the gay one, the trans one, the non-binary one, etc etc. it’s the same old stuff already. If I want Destiny pvp I’ll just play destiny pvp which is actually completely free.
What? 95% of games don't have diverse casts like that.
You're online way too much if that's your concern.
You also have bigger problems in your head and life if that is your biggest concern for a game
@@aliquidgaming1068 You have bigger problems in your head if you defend this soulless slop.
@@yarikistaken The concern will be that you think he is defending it.
@@Desmond-Dark 95% of games are Steam trash made by two guys on zero budget. Try refining the sample to AAA games that get significant media coverage, aka the ones anybody cares about, and that percentage flips.
Marvel rivals looks better,Valorant looks better, X Defiant looks better, The Finals looks better. How many of these are they gonna do?
I just can’t understand why people pay £40 for what is effectively small scale death match.
Shooters is not for me. But I always find it interesting to hear Luke always hate/ mock on everything and going out of his way to convince his "community" to feel the same