Pentagon not denying report on discrediting of Chinese vaccines | ANC How many Filipinos died from Covid-19 and what percentage of them were unvaccinated because of the action of the Pentagon. This is how much they care about the people of Asia
If the Philippines are damaging the corals. . Let's bring it to the court. . If that accusision are true Why China are afraid to bring that issue to court. .????😂😂😂😂
_"__0:13__ During the period of colonialism countries were not yet born. So when they were born, they thought it very unfair that almost all the South China Sea should have been claimed by China. So I think this is at the heart of it. Much of what the Philippines is now doing is the result of domestic politics. President Duterte reached some kind of an understanding with China, including the beached LST on Ren'ai Jiao (Second Thomas Shoal), __0:40__ but under _*_President Maros they felt that that was unfair and they want to repair that ship which is breaking down and that's approximate cause of the current tension._*_ "_ *- Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
@@AhmetTekin101 I have proved many times that you failed to read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling. back to you, 'You shouldn't say nonsense things like this while knowing nothing about them.' what a anti-China warmonger.
@@LivingLonger Was that why you ran away? Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling? You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
*The international law* is very clear on the South China Sea: - parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭, - the rest of it is the international water, - no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
Not true. The so-called Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has no authority nor powers to adjudicate territorial matters & it is an administrative body & not a judicial one. It is also not affiliated to the UN nor ICJ & altho it tries to masquerade as if it does by renting office space in the Peace Palace, Netherlands (Hague). The PRC ignored this hearing which was just a kangaroo court brought about by some US interests (much like the Uyghur genocide tribunal chaired by Geoffery Nice in London). This self-appointed body sitting in judgment comprised 4 europeans & 1 african - no guesses who paid them. Furthermore, historical records held in France & UK all recognise that China's claims have merit, which also predate the creation of the Phillies. Look it up rather than being swept along by US/CIA propaganda. Repeat after me: the PCA is NOT UN affiliated & its remit is over commercial disputes [not matters of territorial sovereignty]. Likewise UNCLOS on issues of use of resources & maritime rights. Ruling states 'neither advances or detracts from either party's claims. UK, France, Germany have openly stated that they take NO POSITION on territorial sovereignty. Also setting aside claims by Malaysia & Vietnam).
The PD 1596 is an assertion of sovereignty and jurisdiction over the Spratlys but i was issued only in 1978. Way too late. The Philippines has no legal claim to the Spratlys.
@@liarliar3412 That ruling is an important one. You'll see. Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam will see you in the next arbitration. 😁 Does not matter if you show up or not. 😄
If you are so concern with protecting 'lives', maybe you should ask the US and Israel to stop the genocide of the Palestinians in GAZA. Pls do that first before you talk about marine life, ok?
@@adamiskandar5107 red herring fallacy, if you're talking about "genocide of the Palestinians in GAZA", then we talk about "HAMAS, Mao Zedong, Taiwan, and Tibet" then? This is between China and ASEAN, it's about the coral reefs that destroyed because of the dredging of seabed for artificial islands in international sea that is tradition fishing ground of multiple nations adjacent to it, worst if it is within other country's exclusive economic zone.
The UNCLOS came into force in November 16, 1994. It's not a retroactive law and thus it has no jurisdiction over anything that has occurred earlier than this date.
Have you?@@AhmetTekin101 Manila should have asked for a refund of the $30m it spent on the non-legally binding PCA ruling. Declarations made by China under article 298, UNCLOS : The Government of the People’s Republic of China does not accept any of the procedures provided for in Section 2 of Part XV of the Convention with respect to all the categories of disputes referred to in paragraph 1 (a) (b) and (c) of Article 298 of the Convention.
PCA never rule against China, this is a greatly misunderstood fact. what philippine ask was if the 9 dash line constitute an EEZ, the court simply said no. China has never claim the 9 dash line as it EEZ so it kinda a strawman ruling. Philippine has never directly challenge the soverighty of those island like Malaysia did with Singapore's lighthouse, because Philippines knows there isn't much of a case for Philippines to win, while Singapore has actual control of the island we claim, Philippine has never control the island it is claiming. so it is far harder to challenge soverighty than it is to play with techicality.
The Philippines 'claim to dominion and sovereignty over North Borneo (Sabah, Malaysia)' in International Court Of Justice (ICJ) a success or failure? _"The Court therefore decided to hold public sittings to hear the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, before ruling on whether to grant the Application for permission to intervene. Following those sittings, the Court, on 23 October 2001, delivered a Judgment by which it rejected the Application by the Philippines for permission to intervene."_ *- Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), International Court Of Justice, 2001*
8 Jul, 2024 , A recent Philippine submission to the United Nations over claims to seabed territory has sparked vigorous protests from Malaysia, reviving a long-standing territorial dispute over Sabah in northern Borneo. The historically complex dispute, which can be traced back to colonial-era agreements, has significant political and economic implications for both nations given the region’s considerable oil and gas resources. Malaysia submitted a diplomatic note to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Saturday rejecting a filing from the Philippines to the UN. Manila had registered its entitlement to an extended continental shelf in the Western Palawan region of the South China Sea, defining the seabed areas over which it has sovereign and exclusive rights to exploit for natural resources. Malaysia said it “categorically” rejected the Philippines’ filing on the basis that the extended continental margin in the submission “was projected from the baselines of the Malaysian state of Sabah”. “This clearly disregards Malaysia’s indisputable sovereignty over the state of Sabah,” the diplomatic note said. Malaysia’s protest came just as the country’s foreign minister, Mohamad Hasan, paid a courtesy call on President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr in Malacanang Palace and met his Philippine counterpart, Enrique Manalo, on Monday.
granting that there is a miniscule coral damages caused by that ships, how does it fare to the thousands of acres of corals destroyed during the construction of man made islands by China?. Hipocricy at its finest!!
Why don't tell the truth ? U$ have NO obligation to defend the dispute maritime areas. Document 578 of American Foreign Policy Basic Documents 1977-1980 is a 1979 letter to then-Philippine Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlos Romulo, in which Vance further clarified the U.S. legal interpretation of the MDT. He declared that armed attack under the MDT refers to external armed aggression against any part of Philippine metropolitan territory as defined by the 1898 Treaty of Paris between Spain and the U.S. and the 1900 Treaty of Washington between Great Britain and the U.S. (amended in 1930), as well as island territories in the Pacific that are under Philippine jurisdiction. Moreover, “armed attack on any Philippine armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the Pacific would not have to occur within the Philippine metropolitan territory or island territory under its jurisdiction in the Pacific in order to come within the definition of Pacific Area in Article V.” Thus, armed attack on said forces or vessels taking place in undisputed maritime areas in the South China Sea would fall within the scope of the MDT.
Do you even know what the 1900 Treaty of Washington is? You've been spreading misinformation everywhere by nitpicking information and ignoring other context/facts. That treaty literally solidifies that the Spratly Islands is part of the Philippine territory, using that as an argument will only embarrass yourself because even the CCP doesn't want to hear it. US is not obligated to defend Philippines *IF* it seeks to expand its territories; however, PH is merely protecting the Islands/shoals it already owns. This is why US have reiterated that the treaty remains, "ironclad", since it's quite clear that the CCP is the aggressor in this scenario. But I know just like every CCP drones that are using VPN in international platforms, you will once again ignore facts and hope you can confuse everyone and drown the truth with new misinformation and baseless arguments every year.
Sierra madre needs Marcs jnr mounted he front of the bow to stop the rust destroying the marine ecology in the Phillipines, he is so silly. petty & LAUGHABLE ! Marcos jnr is bonkers ! LOL!
@@GTX311 Philippines is a product of colonialism. Many of its island were once independent and free. Philippines should be disbanded, broken up, and its islands free to self determination.
Stop making jokes already, Jocker. Haven't they done enough damaged to the environment by building artificial islands with a total area of close to 3,000 acres on seven coral reefs that occupies in the Spratly Islands ?
Did the Philippines consult ASEAN when took China to UNCLOS? _"..__0:51__ When the Philippines took China to UNCLOS, it never consulted ASEAN. So, ASEAN felt no obligation to support the Philippines and over the Second Thomas Shoal or Ren'ai Jiao (Huangyan Island or Scarborough Shoal). __1:01__ ASEAN shows great discomfort because they really don't want escalation and conflict in their own backyard."_ - *Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
@@AhmetTekin101 consult which country during the period of colonialism? what an anti-China warmonger. _"__0:13__ During the period of colonialism countries were not yet born. So when they were born, they thought it very unfair that almost all the South China Sea should have been claimed by China. So I think this is at the heart of it. Much of what the Philippines is now doing is the result of domestic politics. President Duterte reached some kind of an understanding with China, including the beached LST on Ren'ai Jiao (Second Thomas Shoal), __0:40__ but under _*_President Maros they felt that that was unfair and they want to repair that ship which is breaking down and that's approximate cause of the current tension._*_ "_ *- Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
@Augustus8383 Maybe you should keep yourself updated. China is no longer afraid of the US. They are ready for war with the US if it wishes so but would not initiate war. They are for peace.
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
Pentagon not denying report on discrediting of Chinese vaccines | ANC
How many Filipinos died from Covid-19 and what percentage of them were unvaccinated because of the action of the Pentagon. This is how much they care about the people of Asia
Instead of complaining, you should prove that Chinese vaccines are really effective.
If the Philippines are damaging the corals. . Let's bring it to the court. . If that accusision are true Why China are afraid to bring that issue to court. .????😂😂😂😂
China has been very restrained in dealing with the Pinoys. Just sayin..
@sss agree 👍
If it was the US, millions would have been dead! Study the history of US colonialization of the Philippines.
Yeah, better restrain. Or you're going to start a war. 😁
just bring a case against the philippines in the international court of justice
Damaged corals?? A bit rich coming from a country that went on a maniacal binge building artificial islands over the last ten years??
_"__0:13__ During the period of colonialism countries were not yet born. So when they were born, they thought it very unfair that almost all the South China Sea should have been claimed by China. So I think this is at the heart of it. Much of what the Philippines is now doing is the result of domestic politics. President Duterte reached some kind of an understanding with China, including the beached LST on Ren'ai Jiao (Second Thomas Shoal), __0:40__ but under _*_President Maros they felt that that was unfair and they want to repair that ship which is breaking down and that's approximate cause of the current tension._*_ "_ *- Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
@@LivingLonger Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling?
You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
@@AhmetTekin101 I have proved many times that you failed to read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling. back to you, 'You shouldn't say nonsense things like this while knowing nothing about them.' what a anti-China warmonger.
@@LivingLonger Was that why you ran away?
Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling?
You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
@@LivingLonger " *FORMER* Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo ".
How did the warship ended up on the shoal in the first place. Was it an accident or was it a deliberate act?
It was Philippine response to China occupation in Mischief Reef well within Philippines EEZ as prescribed by UNCLOS.
*The international law* is very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
Not true.
The so-called Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has no authority nor powers to adjudicate territorial matters & it is an administrative body & not a judicial one. It is also not affiliated to the UN nor ICJ & altho it tries to masquerade as if it does by renting office space in the Peace Palace, Netherlands (Hague).
The PRC ignored this hearing which was just a kangaroo court brought about by some US interests (much like the Uyghur genocide tribunal chaired by Geoffery Nice in London).
This self-appointed body sitting in judgment comprised 4 europeans & 1 african - no guesses who paid them.
Furthermore, historical records held in France & UK all recognise that China's claims have merit, which also predate the creation of the Phillies. Look it up rather than being swept along by US/CIA propaganda.
Repeat after me: the PCA is NOT UN affiliated & its remit is over commercial disputes [not matters of territorial sovereignty]. Likewise UNCLOS on issues of use of resources & maritime rights. Ruling states 'neither advances or detracts from either party's claims. UK, France, Germany have openly stated that they take NO POSITION on territorial sovereignty. Also setting aside claims by Malaysia & Vietnam).
Bot.
@@spidermann1256hahaha who told you your god xi Jin pong
@@NormanCamino-th7ud Pls argue with facts.
@@adamiskandar5107 2016 ruling
The PD 1596 is an assertion of sovereignty and jurisdiction over the Spratlys but i was issued only in 1978. Way too late.
The Philippines has no legal claim to the Spratlys.
You should have gone to the arbitration. 😉 Not attending showed that you're full of BS.
@@GTX311 What arbitration ? Not ICJ, not valid.
@@liarliar3412 That ruling is an important one. You'll see. Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam will see you in the next arbitration. 😁 Does not matter if you show up or not. 😄
@@liarliar3412 arbitration on territorial disputes. China is a signatory of UNCLOS so China is nothing but A con and a liar.
Question how many hectares of corals and marine life that was damage during reclamation for the building of artificial island?.
If you are so concern with protecting 'lives', maybe you should ask the US and Israel to stop the genocide of the Palestinians in GAZA. Pls do that first before you talk about marine life, ok?
Pls read and understand the topic, the subject, comment, and the question...
@@adamiskandar5107question do you know mosad Hassan Yousef...
@@adamiskandar5107 red herring fallacy, if you're talking about "genocide of the Palestinians in GAZA", then we talk about "HAMAS, Mao Zedong, Taiwan, and Tibet" then? This is between China and ASEAN, it's about the coral reefs that destroyed because of the dredging of seabed for artificial islands in international sea that is tradition fishing ground of multiple nations adjacent to it, worst if it is within other country's exclusive economic zone.
The UNCLOS came into force in November 16, 1994. It's not a retroactive law and thus it has no jurisdiction over anything that has occurred earlier than this date.
@@johntwohy8337 Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling?
You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
@@AhmetTekin101 If BBM is advised by his master to continue to challenge Beijing, it's not your business or my business.
@@johntwohy8337 Again, Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling?
You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
Have you?@@AhmetTekin101
Manila should have asked for a refund of the $30m it spent on the non-legally binding PCA ruling.
Declarations made by China under article 298, UNCLOS : The Government of the People’s Republic of China does not accept any of the procedures provided for in Section 2 of Part XV of the Convention with respect to all the categories of disputes referred to in paragraph 1 (a) (b) and (c) of Article 298 of the Convention.
@@johntwohy8337 I have read both. Have you?
PCA never rule against China, this is a greatly misunderstood fact. what philippine ask was if the 9 dash line constitute an EEZ, the court simply said no. China has never claim the 9 dash line as it EEZ so it kinda a strawman ruling. Philippine has never directly challenge the soverighty of those island like Malaysia did with Singapore's lighthouse, because Philippines knows there isn't much of a case for Philippines to win, while Singapore has actual control of the island we claim, Philippine has never control the island it is claiming. so it is far harder to challenge soverighty than it is to play with techicality.
@@lagrangewei Why didn't you show up at the arbitration? 😁
why malaysia pay as rent of sabbah?
This Philippines is out of hand, beside the sea, they are trying to claim malayisa Borneo
The Philippines 'claim to dominion and sovereignty over North Borneo (Sabah, Malaysia)' in International Court Of Justice (ICJ) a success or failure? _"The Court therefore decided to hold public sittings to hear the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, before ruling on whether to grant the Application for permission to intervene. Following those sittings, the Court, on 23 October 2001, delivered a Judgment by which it rejected the Application by the Philippines for permission to intervene."_ *- Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia/Malaysia), International Court Of Justice, 2001*
8 Jul, 2024 , A recent Philippine submission to the United Nations over claims to seabed territory has sparked vigorous protests from Malaysia, reviving a long-standing territorial dispute over Sabah in northern Borneo.
The historically complex dispute, which can be traced back to colonial-era agreements, has significant political and economic implications for both nations given the region’s considerable oil and gas resources.
Malaysia submitted a diplomatic note to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres on Saturday rejecting a filing from the Philippines to the UN.
Manila had registered its entitlement to an extended continental shelf in the Western Palawan region of the South China Sea, defining the seabed areas over which it has sovereign and exclusive rights to exploit for natural resources.
Malaysia said it “categorically” rejected the Philippines’ filing on the basis that the extended continental margin in the submission “was projected from the baselines of the Malaysian state of Sabah”.
“This clearly disregards Malaysia’s indisputable sovereignty over the state of Sabah,” the diplomatic note said.
Malaysia’s protest came just as the country’s foreign minister, Mohamad Hasan, paid a courtesy call on President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr in Malacanang Palace and met his Philippine counterpart, Enrique Manalo, on Monday.
@jon... ph are pirates. They rob everything they can lay their hands on.
Blabla crynese bot now come with the sabah issue,which has nothing to do with this topic!
China reclamtion didnt destroy corals and reefs😂😂😂😂 not to mention nuclear waste dump by China 5000x than fukushima for d last 35yrs.😂😂😂
granting that there is a miniscule coral damages caused by that ships, how does it fare to the thousands of acres of corals destroyed during the construction of man made islands by China?. Hipocricy at its finest!!
True 😅
Why don't tell the truth ?
U$ have NO obligation to defend the dispute maritime areas.
Document 578 of American Foreign Policy Basic Documents 1977-1980 is a 1979 letter to then-Philippine Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlos Romulo, in which Vance further clarified the U.S. legal interpretation of the MDT. He declared that armed attack under the MDT refers to external armed aggression against any part of Philippine metropolitan territory as defined by the 1898 Treaty of Paris between Spain and the U.S. and the 1900 Treaty of Washington between Great Britain and the U.S. (amended in 1930), as well as island territories in the Pacific that are under Philippine jurisdiction. Moreover, “armed attack on any Philippine armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the Pacific would not have to occur within the Philippine metropolitan territory or island territory under its jurisdiction in the Pacific in order to come within the definition of Pacific Area in Article V.” Thus, armed attack on said forces or vessels taking place in undisputed maritime areas in the South China Sea would fall within the scope of the MDT.
😂 China bot spreading lies😂
I will guess that you got this information from Trustable Numba #1 News Site Called "Global Times"
@@Julian0l0ll00 Read Document 578
Then file a case😅
Do you even know what the 1900 Treaty of Washington is? You've been spreading misinformation everywhere by nitpicking information and ignoring other context/facts. That treaty literally solidifies that the Spratly Islands is part of the Philippine territory, using that as an argument will only embarrass yourself because even the CCP doesn't want to hear it. US is not obligated to defend Philippines *IF* it seeks to expand its territories; however, PH is merely protecting the Islands/shoals it already owns. This is why US have reiterated that the treaty remains, "ironclad", since it's quite clear that the CCP is the aggressor in this scenario.
But I know just like every CCP drones that are using VPN in international platforms, you will once again ignore facts and hope you can confuse everyone and drown the truth with new misinformation and baseless arguments every year.
Sierra madre needs Marcs jnr mounted he front of the bow to stop the rust destroying the marine ecology in the Phillipines, he is so silly. petty & LAUGHABLE ! Marcos jnr is bonkers ! LOL!
Philippines as a nation claimed over 7000+ islands, now it wants Chinese island.
Boohoo! The Philippines is not going to give up any of its islands to a bully. 😅
@@GTX311 China claimed it in 1947, unclos didn't exist abd Philippines as 1 year old. Its not your island.
@@tonyatgoogle6076 Philippines will see China at the next arbitration! 😁
@@GTX311 Philippines is a product of colonialism. Many of its island were once independent and free. Philippines should be disbanded, broken up, and its islands free to self determination.
Who s to blame???😂😂😂😂
Does the IISS get funding from NATO countries?
Does the IISS get funding from NATO governments?
Xi should come to Manila to beg for leniency and forgiveness.
Manila will forgive Xi and be lenient on him if he feast himself on pagpag😂😂😂
Here you go 1 pesso for your effort #pimao
Hiii..🇮🇳🙏
😂😂😂God bless CHINA
Stop making jokes already, Jocker. Haven't they done enough damaged to the environment by building artificial islands with a total area of close to 3,000 acres on seven coral reefs that occupies in the Spratly Islands ?
China don't have the right to lecture asean nation lol those islands are a thousand miles away from them
Chinese claims in the SCS are illegal. The international court has ruled.
China owns nothing in the SCS.
Did the Philippines consult ASEAN when took China to UNCLOS? _"..__0:51__ When the Philippines took China to UNCLOS, it never consulted ASEAN. So, ASEAN felt no obligation to support the Philippines and over the Second Thomas Shoal or Ren'ai Jiao (Huangyan Island or Scarborough Shoal). __1:01__ ASEAN shows great discomfort because they really don't want escalation and conflict in their own backyard."_ - *Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
@@LivingLonger Did China consult with any country when it claimed almost the SCS?
@@AhmetTekin101 consult which country during the period of colonialism? what an anti-China warmonger. _"__0:13__ During the period of colonialism countries were not yet born. So when they were born, they thought it very unfair that almost all the South China Sea should have been claimed by China. So I think this is at the heart of it. Much of what the Philippines is now doing is the result of domestic politics. President Duterte reached some kind of an understanding with China, including the beached LST on Ren'ai Jiao (Second Thomas Shoal), __0:40__ but under _*_President Maros they felt that that was unfair and they want to repair that ship which is breaking down and that's approximate cause of the current tension._*_ "_ *- Former Singaporean foreign minister George Yeo highlights the Philippines' role in igniting current tensions by attempting to repair a stranded ship.*
😂😂😂CIA PROPAGANDA
Chinese is trembling after the Philippines God Father the US warned the Chinese 😂😂
🤣 you must be kidding.
@Augustus8383 Maybe you should keep yourself updated. China is no longer afraid of the US. They are ready for war with the US if it wishes so but would not initiate war. They are for peace.
Philippines should seek Support from United Nations To stop this
Pls do. The US/West are no longer in full control of the UN now, because of their supreme hypocrisy.