Some commenters seem to think Trudeau is ground-zero for our current problems. He is not my choice for PM, but there were other political antecedents that have brought us to where we are now, and not always Liberal. Resorting to easy labels like Laurentian elites and woke only discourages real debate. Canada needs a new government, but not one that runs on caustic labels or broken promises.
Isn't this the kind of politics that we wish for? It is refreshing to hear the CFP's vision and goals. Will the party fly? This is a nuanced political strategy outside of modern emotive tribalism, you're asking people to be thoughtful and informed. It's a political gamble well worth it
5:57 online things are polarized, but Canadian are NOT polarized! What we see online is being manipulated by forces outside of Canada. It doesn’t actually reflect real Canadian, and certainly not Canadian voters.
Maybe, hmmm! I hope and I pray that Canadian will not be deceive by the NEW PARTY, I wish them to focus to the Conservative Mr Polievre, Lets try Mr. Pierre Poilievre then that's the time to look for new one.
canadians are polarized. Ask nurses and anyone else in healthcare, and then ask anyone who was in the freedom convoy, or any random gen xer that dropped out of highschool. Then you will find polar political opposites.
@@connyn.padilla5354No thanks. PP is a populist, and very divisive. He has zero legit policies, no evidence based ideas, loves to promote hate and misinforation. The Conservatives should have chosen Jean Charest to lead them.
the party is too small. they should consider merging with the actual canadian centrist party. That's what we need to stop votes from ending up on either of the political extremes
@@user-zr1ry6rn8l lol actually Conservatives ceiling was a minority government in that election. Trudeau would likely stay on as Opposition Leader like his father waiting for Poilievre's government to collapse because his denial of climate change makes him have enemies in every other Opposition party sitting in the house. If Poilievre with a minority Government tries to follow through by axing the carbon tax without offering a credible alternative plan the Liberals, Bloc, NDP and Greens won't hesitate to disrupt everything else he does and defeat him in any confidence motion or Budget bill. Joe Clark's inability to pass his first Budget in a Minority mandate made him the shortest tenured elected PM in Canadian history and made Pierre Trudeau put his retirement plans aside and win another majority mandate.
Because it isn't a party yet. It's a proposal. Geez, give them time! It's like asking why the roof isn't shingled when they're still digging the foundation.
That's what they want to do, of course... but only the Conservatives and Liberals have the power to do that. And guess what? They won't because it would destroy their shared monopoly of ruling Canada.
@@user-xj9vf4xb9p Yep. I still remember. After all, what reason does he have to do it? It would certainly be the moral thing to do. But giving Canadians more options to vote for would make his party lose seats and would end the Conservative-Liberal monopoly.
While Mr. Cardy's message does mostly hit the nail on the head I fear that it is the incorrect way to go about things. I don't think a new political party is the right option. Though we will see how this plays out. Right now, to me, this seems like a dubious move, similar to Mr. Bernier's party though Mr. Cardy's (in my eyes) has much more legitimacy.
The root issue we have is that we are using a FPTP system of elections. A party with 25% of the votes can control 100% of the power. That is wrong. FPTP also tends towards a two party system over time, as we can see in the US. If we had a more proportional system then I don't think we would be seeing such fringe comments take centre stage as often because politicians would know that they would need a much larger chunk of votes in order to keep their seat.
If I remember correctly, Bernier's party cam across more populist, demagogic than centrist. Maybe a little outlandish too. He would not have appealed much to moderate/centrist Conservatives or Liberals. In fact, I think he was maybe more in line with today's Conservatives. But I could be wrong. And I don't think his timing was right. The Conservative had not made their right turn yet and Trudeau still had some "Trudeaumania 2.0" going for him. Now Trudeau is very low in the poll, possibly more than his party. Poilievre is comings very strong with the right fringe, but I am not sure he is so popular with "Harper-like", moderate, conservatives, especially the "law and order" ones who may not have appreciate his support for the brown-shirts in Ottawa's streets. And a new center party may well bring out the votes of those that are "sick and tired" of both the Conservatives and the Liberal/NDP and don't normally vote anymore. We will see!
@@Arkhanno Well I will be voting for this party. Thing to note Bernier got 4% of the vote last election so next election he will be on the debates advocating for Canadians who believe his ideology. What leader in next years debates will be advocating for my kind of politics I bare minimum want someone to do that I hope this party can get 4% support by next election so we have somebody advocating for that.
The reporter said "you dont score a lot of goals from the centre ice". Its a nice quote but applies to hockey and not politics. In Canadian politics, and maybe other systems, the "sweet centre" is what gets you to power. Why? Because the average Canadian is not polarized ,as are some fringe groups, and always seeks the most balanced party to vote for. The Centre is what Stephen Harper re-focused when he realized that the Reform Party vision does not ring a bell with the rest of Canada because it was too on the right which immediately narrows your focus. Neither the left, right or centre can claim they know everything and are the sole legitimate solution. But the Centre is the best positioned of them all to balance social policy and market interests and thus have a more holistic approach to politics. Usually the left is just social policy and tax the rich, while the right is no social policy and reduce and no tax for the rich (I'm simplifying for the sake of my example!) I wish all Canadians less or no polarization, more "reasonables" and acceptance as is the Canadian way!!
How are the Liberals moving left? The NDP had stayed put on the left and the Liberals have looked no closer to them than they have historically when you look at the policies they actually push. (Trudeau likes nice words, but doesn’t back it up with action and actual reform.)
This guy is nuts, we have more than enough immigrants if to many now, and they have nowhere to live now, the problem with immigrants now is we have over 1 million now we don't need more right now.
Actually we do genius. Canada suffers from an aging population and declining birth rates. I think by 2030 we will have a ratio of one retired person over 65 to one working Canadian. That means Old Age Security, Private Pension plans, and multiple Provincial Healthcare systems will not be sustainable. Harper’s solution to this impending problem was to raise the retirement age to 67 by 2023 which would be the present. Trudeau said no there is another way Canada can raise more tax revenue and the # of taxpayers by increasing immigration and increasing child benefits to incentivize Canadians both native and new to have more children who will be the taxpayers of tomorrow. 😂
@@Sam19509 Thanks for trying to bring reason to the immigration debate. We do need them for all the reasons you mentioned. But it is also true that we also need to shelter them. It does not take a genius to know that Canada's climate is generally not appropriate for sleeping in a car or under a bridge, like in the South. So the person has a legitimate, reasonable point in that respect. Do you think you will win him over by insulting his intelligence with that sarcastic "Actually we do genius"? Or just make him even more radicalized in his anti-immigration beliefs? Insulting him may be satisfying to your ego, but it is counter-productive in convincing people of your reasonable opinion.
Yes these guys can split Poilievre’s vote. It is not a coincidence they announce they exist after weeks of multiple news reports that Poilievre is ahead of Trudeau in the polls by double digits.😂
Necular energy sounds great until nobody wants these reactors in their backyards. Worst case scenario is these necular reactors will wipe out humanity and nobody will be left to report green gas emission.
Canadian voters definitely need more options to choose from but, under our current voting system, we shouldn't split the votes away from Poilievre to Trudeau. The most important thing is to get Trudeau out but, yes, we need electoral reform (proportional representation) and more parties to choose from.
@@yepyep2921the PC were centrist. When they merged with the reform party to form the CPC they shifted right. They have continued to shift right over the last 20 years and now they are as right if not more right than the Reform Party. In giant chasm, between the LPC and the CPC.
@@carlyar5281Wrong - this is one time Elon Musk was correct - the liberal parties in many Western and European countries moved to an extreme left while conservatives stayed exactly where they were. Then specifically in Canada the Conservative party was overtaken by left leaning leaders until the PPC was established to cater to a minority but growing right leaning electorate. In fear of losing votes the Conservatives started to lean further again to the right and have reestablished their standard position they had before. But now many conservative locations are looking to move their locations further to the right due to what they have seen happen to liberal locations.
well, they also have to have an effect outside of ontario too. otherwise it will just be an ontario-centric party and won't mean much for the rest of the country
@@firefox39693 Thanks. I like the idea of a center party, but that is a yellow flag. Then of course, the Conservative endorsed Poilievre who is at the very least very tolerant of the far right and the Liberal endorsed Trudeau who's only credential was his father. So in the current political landscape it may not be so bad. :-(
Are they talking centre of Left/Right, or talking centre between Liberals (centre-right) and Conservatives (far-right)? Because those are two very different positions.
Well, one person's center-left is someone else center-right. And a party can be on the left on one issue and on the right on another. I guess we will have to see their program and policies. I am not even sure the left-right classification is still that relevant. I think the "ideological" vs. "realist" vs. "demagogic" characterization might be more relevant. At least "democratic" hasn't become a criteria yet in Canada!
hi indian bot. go search online...majority of quebecers dont want independence. please tell your supervisor you need more training and education before posting online
@@justinleon3509 I like it. Hurt at the right place !!! Your name is also Justin. Same IQ like Canada PM !! Also look at the poor election system in your country. One need to pay to buy the nomination. We support Quebec liberation!!! What is Canada manufacturing - Nothing. Just a pet of US. Cheers from Indian Bot 😄 🤣
@@VK-ds2dw You know very little about economics if you equate UBI to short term social support. I suggest you pick up a book on macroeconomics and read it before you embarrass yourself further.
There already is a Centrist Party it's the Liberal Party their whole thing is not to rock the boat and do as little as possible sometimes they do more Liberal things, Sometimes Conservative. Personally this Canadian Future Party sounds like the Red Tory Branch of the Progressive Conservative Party.
Trudeau took the Liberals way to left and into NDP land to be considered "of centre". With respect to the Tories, of which I am a card carrying member but as a lonely and insignificant Red Tory, they went too right for my taste and are copying the Right Wing Republicans which is the real tragedy. You are 100% correct that this new part is a Red Tory Party, but I personally will join it as I identify with it.
@@yepyep2921 i mean between buying a pipeline, subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, being unwilling to crackdown on bad behavior from companies, doing nothing for Indigenous People and cracking down on their protests, clawing back CERB money from the poor, Not Standing up for Human Rights in Quebec, Supporting Saudi Arabia and Israel, generally maintaining the status quo, Conservative and Childcare, Senate Reform, Weed Legalization, CERB Payments, Mortgage Relief, Believing in Climate Change and Modern Medicine, Vocal Support to Sexual and Ethnic Minorities, the Housing Acceleration Fund, Gun Reform, Carbon Tax, generally maintaining the status quo, Liberal. I say that's pretty Centrist if they were Liberal they wouldn't do the conservative things and if they were conservative they wouldn't do the Liberal things so their Centrist. Besides i would prefer they didn't do the conservative things and i don't like the Liberal things because they don't go far enough nothing is solved it's just less bad.
I want compensation for damages done by the pandemic and by trudeau, and I want UBI. I'd love to work but there's no jobs in Canada. It's probably too little too late because I'm working on my Portuguese visa. I also want my student and government debt forgiven. But like I said I'm leaving the country.
From the guy that said they want to be fiscally conservative but socially liberal and stay out of our bedrooms, I bet there’s a few more people leaning socially conservative this time because the liberals are in our wallets AND bedrooms. Use mark hollands speech on pleasure as an example.
@@KyleRuggles lol context CBC kinda dictates what stories are allowed to be discussed on their channels if they find it too "taboo" they just turn off the comment section all together.
Legalization of cannabis, Negotiated CUSMA, joined the Paris agreement, invested in alternative energy sources, managed pandemic, promotes reconciliation and raised awareness by creating Truth and reconciliation day, promoted female politicians, child care support, banned 1,500 guns. Has kept more campaign promises for any PM since 1985. I never even voted for him but I can separate facts from make-believe so my opinion has been somewhat unique these days. @@troytighe1214
Charlene, why? Give us specific reasons. Trudeau was so supportive of First Nations that he went surfing in Tofino on Reconciliation Day. He also fired the Native woman Attorney General when she refused his illegal demands.
1. He was trying not to get divorced in Tofino and he prioritized his family. He talked that day about how reconciliation starts with your family. This issue requires communities and individuals to reconcile. 2. Not firing someone because they are first nations is called racism and it is illegal. Besides that her name is Jody Wilson-Raybould and she resigned. @@Jon.Morimoto
@@nuxkamina You could teach a masterclass in mendacious spin. You made up the family drama anecdote, and it doesn't help your case given what has occurred since. You pretend that there were legitimate reasons for Jody Wilson-Raybould to be removed from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General position, yet you cite no reasons. She did not resign as MOJ and AG, as Trudeau's cabinet order demoted her to Veterans. The next month, she resigned as Veterans Minister under pressure as she was forbidden from speaking truthfully while in Cabinet. Parliament of Canada Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion issued a report that concluded that Trudeau had contravened Section 9 of the federal Conflict of Interest Act by improperly pressuring Wilson-Raybould. That's truth based on evidence. Even SNC-Lavalin is ashamed of the lawbreaking, as the corporation later changed its name. I acknowledge that many Canadians support policies that the Liberal Party embraces but I ask them to consider better alternatives as their leader. While all currently proclaim loyalty to the Boss, there must be some person of moral quality, experience, and sincerity willing to improve Canada by reforming Liberalism.
Our species has not proven itself responsible enough for nuclear power. This is evidence-based, and it also includes future-forecasting based on all declining social-systems...Try a different response, as, the ongoing Anthropocene for your children does not need these extra worries placed onto them! Professor-Marty.
Nuclear power is safer than many alternatives? Even if there’s a meltdown… Canada has flood areas as large or larger than the Chernobyl exclusion zone for hydro power multiple times. With how rare meltdowns are, I’d say it wins vs hydro.
@@gror7849 Dear Madam/Sir, If you only write a bully statement, without showing signs that you understood my own point, the you prove yourself, not a thinking person, but only an anonymous cowardly bully. Sincerely, Martin.
Some commenters seem to think Trudeau is ground-zero for our current problems. He is not my choice for PM, but there were other political antecedents that have brought us to where we are now, and not always Liberal. Resorting to easy labels like Laurentian elites and woke only discourages real debate. Canada needs a new government, but not one that runs on caustic labels or broken promises.
I wholeheartedly agree with this statement and wish more people would realize it.
Go for it!
cause there is a gigantic group of us tired of the division? lets go! :D
Isn't this the kind of politics that we wish for? It is refreshing to hear the CFP's vision and goals. Will the party fly? This is a nuanced political strategy outside of modern emotive tribalism, you're asking people to be thoughtful and informed. It's a political gamble well worth it
Couldn’t agree more about nuclear.
If you value bodily autonomy this guy should be your last choice.
If we need to build houses, I'll build them. There's plenty of people without work right now. Why give those jobs away to immigrants?
Ugh. Underwhelming.
5:57 online things are polarized, but Canadian are NOT polarized!
What we see online is being manipulated by forces outside of Canada. It doesn’t actually reflect real Canadian, and certainly not Canadian voters.
Figures he'd say that tho. Dominic Cardy gets into so many Twitter slapfights its rotted his brain
Maybe, hmmm! I hope and I pray that Canadian will not be deceive by the NEW PARTY, I wish them to focus to the Conservative Mr Polievre, Lets try Mr. Pierre Poilievre then that's the time to look for new one.
canadians are polarized. Ask nurses and anyone else in healthcare, and then ask anyone who was in the freedom convoy, or any random gen xer that dropped out of highschool. Then you will find polar political opposites.
@@connyn.padilla5354No thanks. PP is a populist, and very divisive. He has zero legit policies, no evidence based ideas, loves to promote hate and misinforation. The Conservatives should have chosen Jean Charest to lead them.
the party is too small. they should consider merging with the actual canadian centrist party. That's what we need to stop votes from ending up on either of the political extremes
This party will be a bigger threat to the Conservatives than the PPC ever was.😂
All good for me.
@@user-zr1ry6rn8l lol actually Conservatives ceiling was a minority government in that election. Trudeau would likely stay on as Opposition Leader like his father waiting for Poilievre's government to collapse because his denial of climate change makes him have enemies in every other Opposition party sitting in the house. If Poilievre with a minority Government tries to follow through by axing the carbon tax without offering a credible alternative plan the Liberals, Bloc, NDP and Greens won't hesitate to disrupt everything else he does and defeat him in any confidence motion or Budget bill. Joe Clark's inability to pass his first Budget in a Minority mandate made him the shortest tenured elected PM in Canadian history and made Pierre Trudeau put his retirement plans aside and win another majority mandate.
CBC if you don't like people commenting on certain issues then get off youtube, you're trying to control youtube now, to push your views.
How? You were able to comment. You must be a Poilievre CBC journalist hater.
Given his outfit, a pitchfork and stout woman at his side would go far to complete the effect…🥲
Why is the Canadian Future Party not registered with Elections Canada as a Registered Political Party? (asking: September 21 of 2023)
Because it isn't a party yet. It's a proposal. Geez, give them time! It's like asking why the roof isn't shingled when they're still digging the foundation.
They are today, as of August 15, 2024. It took elections Canada 10 full months to grant them party status.
Means nothing unless you get rid of first past the post
That's what they want to do, of course... but only the Conservatives and Liberals have the power to do that. And guess what? They won't because it would destroy their shared monopoly of ruling Canada.
@@daniel_kryzTrudeau even promised electoral reform and broke that promise
@@user-xj9vf4xb9p Yep. I still remember. After all, what reason does he have to do it? It would certainly be the moral thing to do. But giving Canadians more options to vote for would make his party lose seats and would end the Conservative-Liberal monopoly.
要增加军费，这个是大钱，让加拿大参与战争？
One more eliminated welldone our comrade from FLQ
Home crisis is big issue
FINALLY a party to look out for the Laurentien Elite! THANK YOU!
😂😂😂
Excellent name
Pierre for PM!
Gross! we don't need a conspiracy theorist as our leader.
What is your policy to fix income disparity in Canada?
Moast likely too little too late
Online click baiting is exactly what western politics has devolved into.
The Rhino party re-names its self
While Mr. Cardy's message does mostly hit the nail on the head I fear that it is the incorrect way to go about things. I don't think a new political party is the right option. Though we will see how this plays out. Right now, to me, this seems like a dubious move, similar to Mr. Bernier's party though Mr. Cardy's (in my eyes) has much more legitimacy.
The root issue we have is that we are using a FPTP system of elections. A party with 25% of the votes can control 100% of the power. That is wrong. FPTP also tends towards a two party system over time, as we can see in the US. If we had a more proportional system then I don't think we would be seeing such fringe comments take centre stage as often because politicians would know that they would need a much larger chunk of votes in order to keep their seat.
If I remember correctly, Bernier's party cam across more populist, demagogic than centrist. Maybe a little outlandish too. He would not have appealed much to moderate/centrist Conservatives or Liberals. In fact, I think he was maybe more in line with today's Conservatives. But I could be wrong. And I don't think his timing was right. The Conservative had not made their right turn yet and Trudeau still had some "Trudeaumania 2.0" going for him. Now Trudeau is very low in the poll, possibly more than his party. Poilievre is comings very strong with the right fringe, but I am not sure he is so popular with "Harper-like", moderate, conservatives, especially the "law and order" ones who may not have appreciate his support for the brown-shirts in Ottawa's streets. And a new center party may well bring out the votes of those that are "sick and tired" of both the Conservatives and the Liberal/NDP and don't normally vote anymore. We will see!
@@Arkhanno Well I will be voting for this party. Thing to note Bernier got 4% of the vote last election so next election he will be on the debates advocating for Canadians who believe his ideology. What leader in next years debates will be advocating for my kind of politics I bare minimum want someone to do that I hope this party can get 4% support by next election so we have somebody advocating for that.
His policies do not resemble crazy Maxime Bernier's at all!
The reporter said "you dont score a lot of goals from the centre ice". Its a nice quote but applies to hockey and not politics.
In Canadian politics, and maybe other systems, the "sweet centre" is what gets you to power. Why? Because the average Canadian is not polarized ,as are some fringe groups, and always seeks the most balanced party to vote for. The Centre is what Stephen Harper re-focused when he realized that the Reform Party vision does not ring a bell with the rest of Canada because it was too on the right which immediately narrows your focus.
Neither the left, right or centre can claim they know everything and are the sole legitimate solution. But the Centre is the best positioned of them all to balance social policy and market interests and thus have a more holistic approach to politics. Usually the left is just social policy and tax the rich, while the right is no social policy and reduce and no tax for the rich (I'm simplifying for the sake of my example!)
I wish all Canadians less or no polarization, more "reasonables" and acceptance as is the Canadian way!!
I for one will be voting for this party
Totally agree. It's a slick line that's totally false.
How are the Liberals moving left? The NDP had stayed put on the left and the Liberals have looked no closer to them than they have historically when you look at the policies they actually push. (Trudeau likes nice words, but doesn’t back it up with action and actual reform.)
"Both sides" on everything as a policy . . .
This guy is nuts, we have more than enough immigrants if to many now, and they have nowhere to live now, the problem with immigrants now is we have over 1 million now we don't need more right now.
Actually we do genius. Canada suffers from an aging population and declining birth rates. I think by 2030 we will have a ratio of one retired person over 65 to one working Canadian. That means Old Age Security, Private Pension plans, and multiple Provincial Healthcare systems will not be sustainable. Harper’s solution to this impending problem was to raise the retirement age to 67 by 2023 which would be the present. Trudeau said no there is another way Canada can raise more tax revenue and the # of taxpayers by increasing immigration and increasing child benefits to incentivize Canadians both native and new to have more children who will be the taxpayers of tomorrow. 😂
@@Sam19509 Thanks for trying to bring reason to the immigration debate. We do need them for all the reasons you mentioned. But it is also true that we also need to shelter them. It does not take a genius to know that Canada's climate is generally not appropriate for sleeping in a car or under a bridge, like in the South. So the person has a legitimate, reasonable point in that respect. Do you think you will win him over by insulting his intelligence with that sarcastic "Actually we do genius"? Or just make him even more radicalized in his anti-immigration beliefs? Insulting him may be satisfying to your ego, but it is counter-productive in convincing people of your reasonable opinion.
Fawking finally
Yes these guys can split Poilievre’s vote. It is not a coincidence they announce they exist after weeks of multiple news reports that Poilievre is ahead of Trudeau in the polls by double digits.😂
Totally thinking the same thing!
I don't want them to split votes I want them to win. We need change in this country.
Necular energy sounds great until nobody wants these reactors in their backyards. Worst case scenario is these necular reactors will wipe out humanity and nobody will be left to report green gas emission.
I want to know you your thoughts on Canadian energy, oil & gas. Another politician from the east that will want to shutdown the west.
FINALLY!!! Someone based on facts! FFS why did it take this long? You NEED to win the next election for the sake of the country.
unemployment rate!!!!
5.5% and 10% of Canadians are useless so pretty much everyone that can be employed is.
?
Canadian voters definitely need more options to choose from but, under our current voting system, we shouldn't split the votes away from Poilievre to Trudeau. The most important thing is to get Trudeau out but, yes, we need electoral reform (proportional representation) and more parties to choose from.
Poilievre is not Prime Minister material. I hope he loses.
@@lanabulmer6360 Why not?
Go away!!!!
He's a Conservative, independent, same thing.
No. He has worked for both the Conservative and NDP parties.
@@lanabulmer6360
Exactly, lol
That means he's confused!
@lanabulmer6360
A CONservative who's CONstantly CONfused.
LMAO. The Liberals have moved sooooooooo far left that todays Conservatives are centrist moderates.
It’s laughable how wrong this take is.
@@vtabamoNo, it’s greatly accurate.
@@yepyep2921the PC were centrist. When they merged with the reform party to form the CPC they shifted right. They have continued to shift right over the last 20 years and now they are as right if not more right than the Reform Party.
In giant chasm, between the LPC and the CPC.
@@carlyar5281Wrong - this is one time Elon Musk was correct - the liberal parties in many Western and European countries moved to an extreme left while conservatives stayed exactly where they were. Then specifically in Canada the Conservative party was overtaken by left leaning leaders until the PPC was established to cater to a minority but growing right leaning electorate. In fear of losing votes the Conservatives started to lean further again to the right and have reestablished their standard position they had before. But now many conservative locations are looking to move their locations further to the right due to what they have seen happen to liberal locations.
@@carlyar5281 LMAO. Only a lefty could genuinely think todays Conservatives are far right.
They will do just as good as the PPC 😂 0
They got my vote!
They have to win in GTA and areas surrounding. Winning in remote countryside won't do much
well, they also have to have an effect outside of ontario too. otherwise it will just be an ontario-centric party and won't mean much for the rest of the country
#PriceFoodInCanada.
I struggle to take a Bernier supporter seriously.
Was he a Bernier supporter? Edit: Don't bother, I found my answer.
@@yl9154He specifically endorsed Maxime Bernier after ending his membership with the NDP.
@@firefox39693 Thanks. I like the idea of a center party, but that is a yellow flag. Then of course, the Conservative endorsed Poilievre who is at the very least very tolerant of the far right and the Liberal endorsed Trudeau who's only credential was his father. So in the current political landscape it may not be so bad. :-(
Focus on inflation, housing, carbon tax and high costs in everyday life. Don't need to allow more immigrants. That's why the housing crisis exists.
carbon tax just get redistributed to citizens. it's a good thing. The housing crisis is also much more complex than just "immigrants".
Are they talking centre of Left/Right, or talking centre between Liberals (centre-right) and Conservatives (far-right)? Because those are two very different positions.
Well, one person's center-left is someone else center-right. And a party can be on the left on one issue and on the right on another. I guess we will have to see their program and policies. I am not even sure the left-right classification is still that relevant. I think the "ideological" vs. "realist" vs. "demagogic" characterization might be more relevant. At least "democratic" hasn't become a criteria yet in Canada!
It will be interesting to see where support comes from, specifically money. His nebulous party is vulnerable to demagogic or foreign takeover.
they are dead-center
@@zephryus So you think they're further left than the NDP?
We have more than enough federal party's now, we don't need another one, are old federal party's just need to smarten up.
you should know that's not going to happen.
I support free Quebec !!!
hi indian bot. go search online...majority of quebecers dont want independence. please tell your supervisor you need more training and education before posting online
@@justinleon3509 I like it. Hurt at the right place !!! Your name is also Justin. Same IQ like Canada PM !! Also look at the poor election system in your country. One need to pay to buy the nomination. We support Quebec liberation!!! What is Canada manufacturing - Nothing. Just a pet of US. Cheers from Indian Bot 😄 🤣
Canadian Andrew Yang?
The guy who thought that giving people free money was a good idea (i.e. COVID payouts)? How's the inflation rate going thanks to stupidity like that?
@@VK-ds2dw You know very little about economics if you equate UBI to short term social support. I suggest you pick up a book on macroeconomics and read it before you embarrass yourself further.
If he is, I'm in. With a bit of UBI, maybe we can rid this country of its BS jobs and fix our productivity problem.
Finally someone I can vote for.
There already is a Centrist Party it's the Liberal Party their whole thing is not to rock the boat and do as little as possible sometimes they do more Liberal things, Sometimes Conservative. Personally this Canadian Future Party sounds like the Red Tory Branch of the Progressive Conservative Party.
Trudeau took the Liberals way to left and into NDP land to be considered "of centre". With respect to the Tories, of which I am a card carrying member but as a lonely and insignificant Red Tory, they went too right for my taste and are copying the Right Wing Republicans which is the real tragedy. You are 100% correct that this new part is a Red Tory Party, but I personally will join it as I identify with it.
Ha ha, Liberals centrist. Yeah, sure.
@@yepyep2921 i mean between buying a pipeline, subsidizing the fossil fuel industry, being unwilling to crackdown on bad behavior from companies, doing nothing for Indigenous People and cracking down on their protests, clawing back CERB money from the poor, Not Standing up for Human Rights in Quebec, Supporting Saudi Arabia and Israel, generally maintaining the status quo, Conservative and Childcare, Senate Reform, Weed Legalization, CERB Payments, Mortgage Relief, Believing in Climate Change and Modern Medicine, Vocal Support to Sexual and Ethnic Minorities, the Housing Acceleration Fund, Gun Reform, Carbon Tax, generally maintaining the status quo, Liberal. I say that's pretty Centrist if they were Liberal they wouldn't do the conservative things and if they were conservative they wouldn't do the Liberal things so their Centrist. Besides i would prefer they didn't do the conservative things and i don't like the Liberal things because they don't go far enough nothing is solved it's just less bad.
I want compensation for damages done by the pandemic and by trudeau, and I want UBI. I'd love to work but there's no jobs in Canada. It's probably too little too late because I'm working on my Portuguese visa. I also want my student and government debt forgiven. But like I said I'm leaving the country.
From the guy that said they want to be fiscally conservative but socially liberal and stay out of our bedrooms, I bet there’s a few more people leaning socially conservative this time because the liberals are in our wallets AND bedrooms. Use mark hollands speech on pleasure as an example.
As long as you keep splitting the Lib-Con vote into smaller and smaller chunks I'm happy. I fully support the NDP...
Lmfao ... yeah, Jagmeet is the answer 😂
@@VK-ds2dw a better answer than a conspiracy theorist
@@zephryus and who exactly is the conspiracy theorist?
yes yes and yes!
Why do you need another centrist parrty when there's already more than one.
When you pick and choose what stories are and aren't aloud to be discussed on your platform you loose all creditability.
Lol it’s called editing
What?
@@KyleRuggles lol context CBC kinda dictates what stories are allowed to be discussed on their channels if they find it too "taboo" they just turn off the comment section all together.
@@rhodalemay5182 what?
Letss gooo
Easier said than done. If it removes poilievre, I am all for it but I will continue to support PM Trudeau.
Why do you support trudeau?? What has he done that effects your life in a positive way.
Legalization of cannabis, Negotiated CUSMA, joined the Paris agreement, invested in alternative energy sources, managed pandemic, promotes reconciliation and raised awareness by creating Truth and reconciliation day, promoted female politicians, child care support, banned 1,500 guns. Has kept more campaign promises for any PM since 1985. I never even voted for him but I can separate facts from make-believe so my opinion has been somewhat unique these days. @@troytighe1214
Charlene, why? Give us specific reasons. Trudeau was so supportive of First Nations that he went surfing in Tofino on Reconciliation Day. He also fired the Native woman Attorney General when she refused his illegal demands.
1. He was trying not to get divorced in Tofino and he prioritized his family. He talked that day about how reconciliation starts with your family. This issue requires communities and individuals to reconcile. 2. Not firing someone because they are first nations is called racism and it is illegal. Besides that her name is Jody Wilson-Raybould and she resigned. @@Jon.Morimoto
@@nuxkamina You could teach a masterclass in mendacious spin.
You made up the family drama anecdote, and it doesn't help your case given what has occurred since.
You pretend that there were legitimate reasons for Jody Wilson-Raybould to be removed from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General position, yet you cite no reasons. She did not resign as MOJ and AG, as Trudeau's cabinet order demoted her to Veterans. The next month, she resigned as Veterans Minister under pressure as she was forbidden from speaking truthfully while in Cabinet.
Parliament of Canada Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion issued a report that concluded that Trudeau had contravened Section 9 of the federal Conflict of Interest Act by improperly pressuring Wilson-Raybould. That's truth based on evidence. Even SNC-Lavalin is ashamed of the lawbreaking, as the corporation later changed its name.
I acknowledge that many Canadians support policies that the Liberal Party embraces but I ask them to consider better alternatives as their leader. While all currently proclaim loyalty to the Boss, there must be some person of moral quality, experience, and sincerity willing to improve Canada by reforming Liberalism.
You will just help Trudeau. Foolish to the extreme
Our species has not proven itself responsible enough for nuclear power. This is evidence-based, and it also includes future-forecasting based on all declining social-systems...Try a different response, as, the ongoing Anthropocene for your children does not need these extra worries placed onto them!
Professor-Marty.
Its important to take your pills on time.
The Candu reactors in Canada are very safe. Not all reactors are built the same.
Nuclear power is extremely safe in this day and age. Please explain why you think it is not?
Nuclear power is safer than many alternatives? Even if there’s a meltdown… Canada has flood areas as large or larger than the Chernobyl exclusion zone for hydro power multiple times. With how rare meltdowns are, I’d say it wins vs hydro.
@@gror7849 Dear Madam/Sir, If you only write a bully statement, without showing signs that you understood my own point, the you prove yourself, not a thinking person, but only an anonymous cowardly bully. Sincerely, Martin.
Fk climt change.we gotta eat.need heat.Pollierve all the way.
get some help lol